All language subtitles for Thank.You.Dr.Fauci.English-WWW.MY-SUBS.CO

Subtitles created by RPMJ

www.caseway.ai is for people
who can’t afford a lawyer

First of all, thank you both for getting on the Zoom.

Yeah.

Yeah, sure.

These producers have asked us to investigate the origins of COVID, to go and hunt down

Dr. Anthony Fauci and ask him a bunch of tough questions.

Gotcha.

And if we get anything wrong, I'm going to be committing career suicide as a director

and I'll probably never work again.

Even if you get everything right, people are going to hate you for this documentary.

It doesn't scare me to enter this conversation if it's dangerous, I just, I do need your

help to get the research right, so that's really the job and it starts tonight because

I have to go to DC in a couple days.

I'm just going to jump right in.

Let's look at this clip, right, remember when Fauci went on Face the Nation that

time?

They're really criticizing science.

He's repeatedly said.

Because I represent science.

He is the science.

People who have been tracking this story believe that he does represent science,

everything wrong with science.

But the thing is that everything about the pandemic has been so shit-coded and

politicized from the very beginning.

Fauci does not love you, I guarantee it.

It's not popular opinion, this is not mainstream thought.

This is not broadcast by the mainstream news media.

Have you seen the COVID misinformation page?

It's crazy, man.

Why don't we go there right now.

Let's go through this page and figure out what has nothing to do with Anthony

Fauci.

We've got meteor origin that a meteor carried the pandemic.

Wow, man.

Like deep impact?

We've got drinking cow urine and applying cow dung to your body can cure COVID.

Nothing to do with Fauci, may be interesting to try.

I guess I'll try anything once.

Okay, man.

Now we're getting closer.

Washing groceries in Purell.

Oranges in the sink.

He didn't say to do it.

Don't forget to disinfect your trunk.

Yeah.

But he also didn't say not to do it.

People should not be walking around with masks.

Gotcha.

Yeah, that was one of my favorites.

And loosely related to Fauci, you've got 5G.

I'm a guinea pig.

You've got the whole plandemic scandal.

Mickey Willard.

Fauci and Bill Gates.

QAnon.

We've got whatever Fox News said about Fauci.

It's like a war shock test.

You think they show serial killers and kindergartners?

We will not comply.

Thank you.

And keep the faith.

Wow.

How do you not be cynical in this world, man?

OK, right here at the top, directly related to Fauci,

the consensus among virologists

is that the most likely origin is natural crossover from animals.

Right.

Feel sorry for bats, man.

They get a bad rap.

Coronavirus jumps from an animal to a human.

Maybe.

Probably in a wet market.

Maybe not.

Did it come from a lab?

Isn't that what we want to know?

Absolutely.

Yeah.

Totally consistent with the jump of a species from an animal to a human.

Right?

This is just nature.

I mean, the paper will be available.

I don't have the authors right now.

OK.

Wikipedia says the resurgence of the lab leak and other theories

was fueled in part by the publication of May 2021

of early emails with Fauci.

There were like thousands of emails, documents, grant proposals.

Who knows what else?

Honestly, I have no idea.

But I should tell you guys that right after the pandemic,

I got approached to direct a movie about Fauci.

Wow.

It was not about COVID.

It was about AIDS in Africa and how he saved a lot of lives.

And I have his contact.

So I'm thinking that I just start writing him an email.

Here are the movies I worked on.

I was supposed to do one about you,

but you did one for Nat Geo and for PBS and not mine.

And now I'm looking at this COVID thing

and there seems to be a lot of controversy.

You do not know what you are talking about.

All the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab.

And there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab,

including yourself.

So according to Rand Paul,

Anthony Fauci is Frankenstein from the 1931 movie.

It's a lie!

What we're alleging is the gain of function research was...

We got to ask him to explain the gain of function research.

Where you're looking at a deadly pathogen

and you're figuring out what could make it more deadly.

There was a tremendous controversy.

Biological warfare.

Is it bio warfare? Is it bio defense?

Whatever it is, it was dangerous.

Why were we doing it in the first place?

Did you help the U.S. government spy on China?

Are you responsible for killing millions of people?

Actually, a serious question.

Did you do it? Are you a sociopath?

Yeah, you probably shouldn't write any of that.

So what am I going to sign it like?

How about, thank you, Dr. Fauci.

Thank you, Dr. Fauci.

Thank you for your years of service.

Right. I'm sure he loves to hear that.

Thank you, Dr. Fauci.

Thank you, Dr. Fauci.

Thank you, Dr. Fauci.

All right. I sent it.

Nice.

I mean, I think there's about a 10% chance

that he's going to write me back, so let's see what happens.

You've reached out to Dr. Fauci.

This is not a hit piece.

This is not a hit piece.

But it's tricky. Like, everyone's going to have an opinion.

You won't get the disease, but you can carry the disease

and you can spread it, you dumb fuck.

You're a dumb fuck. You're not listening.

You're a dumb fuck. You're not listening.

You're a dumb fuck.

I don't think people understand

how stressful this job is.

This could potentially be

one of the biggest stories of our time.

And I hope that you never have to go through COVID

because it is evil.

20 million people may be dead.

There could be up to $25 trillion in damages.

And if this could have been prevented,

I mean, the whole world has a right to know.

Dr. Fauci, thank you for doing all you can

to keep America healthy.

I mean, look at all these celebrities.

You are America's scientist.

They worship this guy.

Anthony Fauci's work has saved literally millions of lives.

We are breaking down this concept of idolatry.

Yeah, I mean, it's dangerous when something as big as science

can be falsely represented by one man.

In the end, very few people have first-hand experience

working with him.

And almost none of those people will talk to you.

I was told I need to talk to Dr. Robert Redfield.

He was the director of the CDC at the time of the pandemic.

He's the highest-placed person who's been outspoken on Fauci.

The patient has had long COVID since 2020.

His whole career got turned upside down from the pandemic,

and now he's back practicing as a doctor

and specializes in long COVID.

...currently being treated with antihistamine.

My own view is that this virus was not of natural origin.

It was an act of scientific arrogance.

He's blamed in the early days for a lot of the problems with the pandemic,

but then there's other reports that say that he told Fauci

that this was most likely a lab leak,

and he was excluded from all these secret teleconferences

that were happening.

He's also a colleague of Fauci's for 40 years.

It's incredible.

And then in 2018, they get put in the same orbit again

when Redfield gets appointed to be the director of the CDC.

One of the reasons I accepted the CDC job

is that I have 12 grandchildren,

and I just have a very strong premonition

that our nation is going to have a terrible, terrible pandemic.

New Year's Eve, 2019.

I got a phone call from my team in China,

and I was informed that there was 27 cases

of an unspecified pneumonia.

From the beginning, my antennas were up.

I called my counterpart, George Gao,

who was the head of the CDC in China,

and he said, he came from the wet market,

and viruses go from animals to humans.

When you look at SARS,

it went from a bat to a civet cat to humans.

MERS came from a bat to a camel to humans.

It takes them a long time

to learn how to transmit effectively in a human species.

And this virus immediately understood

how to replicate effectively in humans.

It was clear from the information I was getting

that there were literally thousands of patients, if not more,

and getting some intelligence feedback

that this was a major issue.

Everyone, you know, without any critical analysis,

attributed this to the wet market,

and nobody went back and looked at people

that had nothing to do with the wet market.

And a couple days later,

George Gao called me back, and he said,

Bob, we have hundreds of cases,

and it has nothing to do with the wet market.

So we knew by the first couple days in January

that this wet market story, in my view, was a ruse.

I called the National Security Council,

and I told them that there was a situation in China,

and then I called Anthony Fauci.

And I told them, as a clinical virologist,

this virus is way too infectious in humans

right out of the gate.

I felt strongly that it had been educated in the laboratory.

And Redfield knew that the Wuhan Institute of Virology

was the most famous lab in the world

for researching coronaviruses.

So the idea that this virus came from a lab

is very reasonable.

We were talking about it,

and Tony argues that my premise is wrong,

that I believe it came from the lab,

and it was clear the aggressive support

for the wet market being the source.

I thought that Tony should embrace

scientific investigation,

but Tony only considered a single hypothesis.

It was spillover, spillover, spillover, spillover.

I was perplexed.

Redfield thought this virus could have been

the product of gain-of-function research,

which is genetically mutating viruses

to make them more infectious and deadly.

Fauci had been a champion of this type of research

for decades.

For gain-of-function research,

I mean, Tony is the poster boy.

He believed the best way to prepare for the next pandemic

is to predict it by creating it.

If we can create the pathogen

that can negatively impact humanity,

then we can prevent it.

But this is a big difference between Fauci and me,

because I disagree with that logic.

I think we should not be doing

this gain-of-function research.

We don't have the proper biocontainment in these labs,

and that could cause a laboratory leak or accident,

so it's very dangerous.

Of course, Tony argued this was science.

I've known and worked with Tony since 1981.

Tony believed that science is supreme,

and the more you do of science,

the higher up the mountain you go.

You know, Oppenheimer learned the hard way

that there's a downside to science, right?

He learned the hard way.

Tony doesn't see the downside to science,

and that is a big problem.

It's interesting because it has jumped species likely

from an animal source into the human.

If you go back, Tony's got a lot of airtime on tape.

Viruses emerge from animal reservoirs.

He was very aggressive in saying

that this had to be a natural spillover.

Probably in a wet market.

The White House Coronavirus Task Force

stood up somewhere I think in late January.

We did invite Fauci to be part of it.

Tony made it very clear

that it was spillover, spillover, spillover, spillover.

We obviously disagreed

on the potential of origin in those meetings,

and that's where the lines were drawn.

But then I saw the papers that were published

by the Wuhan lab.

NAID was acknowledged on the paper in 2014.

That was evidence Tony had funded the Wuhan laboratory.

And being an insider at the time,

I said to myself, I mean, what's going on here?

And I don't know the answer to that question.

Thank you, Dr. Redfield.

I would now like to invite Dr. Anthony Fauci.

I can start off by putting it into perspective

by telling you I often get asked,

we have an influence...

And when Tony spoke, I was just very shocked.

And how aggressive he was

to try to take the leadership position

on being the voice of the pandemic.

...the kinds of things we're doing here right now.

I was only the head of CDC,

which, by all accounts,

was the leading public health position in the United States.

Until I got iced out,

people argued that it was the White House.

I don't buy that.

I've just been going through all these different documents.

There's a lot of people

who have been covering this for years now.

What I understand about Dr. Richard Ebright

is that he is, in a sense,

probably the most vocal critic of Anthony Fauci.

Richard, is it true that people call you

Anthony Fauci's worst nightmare?

Yes.

From what I've read,

it seems like he hates Anthony Fauci,

and Anthony Fauci hates him.

It's not even just about COVID.

It's been happening for the last 20 years

between the two of them.

We have willful, deliberate misfeasance

that likely caused a pandemic,

killed 20 million,

and cost $25 trillion.

Against that context,

it is unsurprising

that individuals would prefer a lie.

Neil Harrison is a scientist at Columbia,

and he was tracking COVID since the beginning.

Scientists don't generally like

to criticize other scientists,

and we really don't like to use the F-word.

What's the F-word?

Fraud.

I said the F-word.

And he's now helping a congressional investigation

into the origins of COVID

and the potential of a cover-up.

Hi, this is Emily Kopp,

I'm a reporter with U.S. Right to Know in Washington.

So Emily Kopp is a health reporter,

and around 2021,

she shifted into covering the origins of COVID.

I felt like I had a moral obligation

to get answers.

She's been responsible for a lot of the

Freedom of Information documents,

and her main focus has been sort of piecing together

the behind-the-scenes communications

between Fauci and this group of scientists.

So I'm going to go see Charles Rixey.

What do I need to know about him?

Rixey is part of this group called DRASTIC,

which is this sort of decentralized,

investigative team comprised of scientists,

and web sleuths, and veterans.

That's me in the black shirt.

I was really sick when I got COVID,

and then a former Marine reached out to me and said,

you should look into the origin of the virus.

And from that date in 2020,

I shifted my attention full time

to figuring out what the origin of the virus was.

He believes COVID was engineered in a lab.

On January 11th,

the genome of SARS-CoV-2 was released by the Chinese.

This is the genetic sequence of the virus.

Molecular biologists can look at these letters,

and they can compare these sequences

to other similar viruses looking for differences,

and they immediately found a huge difference.

Some aspects of it looked unnatural.

That section right in the middle, PRRA,

that is something that they call a furrin cleavage site,

and that can have a lot to do

with how infectious the virus is in humans.

They could not find it in any similar viruses,

and that was really suspicious.

The furrin cleavage site stands out like a sore thumb.

So this furrin cleavage site is right on the spike protein,

and this is what makes the virus stick to human cells.

So if they were using gain of function

and they were modifying a virus in the lab,

this is exactly what they would use to make it more infectious.

Every informed person knew at that point

that lab engineering was a very real possibility,

and discussions began immediately.

So on January 27, there's another twist.

Dr. Fauci is contacted over email

by this scientist named Christian Anderson.

Christian Anderson is a virologist based in California

who sort of started out as this whistleblower

that the virus seemed unusual

and might have resulted from a lab accident.

Christian Anderson came to him

with a 2015 paper by Zhang Lishi.

Zhang Lishi, who works at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

And Anderson says it looks like a how-to manual

for creating SARS-CoV-2 in a lab.

This is the paper connected to a scientist at the Wuhan lab,

and if we scroll down here,

you can see in the funding section they cite 13 grants.

All of those grants are connected to the U.S.

and the NIH, National Institute of Health,

and nine of those grants were signed by Anthony Fauci

and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

I mean, Redfield saw the same connections weeks prior,

and now random scientists like Christian Anderson

are finding more of these connections on the Internet,

and they're directly emailing Fauci about it.

And they all agree this fur and cleavage site doesn't look natural.

On January 27, when Christian Anderson emailed him

about the fur and cleavage site,

Fauci says, if this is correct,

then you should probably contact the FBI,

because this could be suspicious.

It may be signs of engineering.

It may even be related to biological weapons research.

I would love to ask him about this email,

because I don't think it makes that much sense.

Why wouldn't he call the FBI?

I mean, this is a guy who's been in government for 40 years more.

Why would he not call the FBI?

And then, on January 31,

there's this paper from a group of scientists in India,

Pradhan et al.,

and it points out not just the fur and cleavage site,

but there are other areas of this spike protein

that don't look natural and could be from HIV.

Wow.

Which is totally fucked up.

Yeah. Yeah.

And that is frightening.

Wow.

In addition to the fur and cleavage site,

these three inserts were suspiciously similar

to spike protein of HIV.

At that point in time, Dr. Fauci began an email storm.

He emailed other members of the United States government,

as well as outside scientists,

urgently asking their opinions about laboratory origin.

And a lot of these panicked emails

seemed to be written to Sir Jeremy Farrar.

Farrar is an extremely powerful scientist from the UK,

and they seemed to be backchanneling

about how to handle this story.

Fauci and Jeremy Farrar consulted on how to address the optics,

inviting scientists to an emergency teleconference

to be held the next day on a Saturday.

You can look at the emails,

like not a single email is written to Bob Redfield that night

about any of this.

I considered both Jeremy Farrar and Fauci scientific colleagues.

We may not go out to dinner every night,

but we were scientific colleagues,

and I thought there was mutual respect.

Redfield was not part of this February 1st teleconference that took place.

It is unthinkable when there's a potential viral pandemic

that the director of the CDC would not be part of this initial conversation.

So this emergency teleconference happens right after on Saturday, February 1st,

and they have invited Christian Anderson,

who had emailed Fauci earlier with his concerns that this may be a lab leak.

Anderson looped in Robert Gehry,

a Tulane close colleague of Anderson,

and Andrew Rambeau at the University of Edinburgh,

and Eddie Holmes at the University of Sydney,

who has worked very closely with the China CDC.

So all these guys are on this slack.

They're saying stuff like the virus became loaded for human transmission,

exactly what you would expect from lab engineering.

McCall appears to have been the shouting match between Anderson and Holmes,

who had these suspicions about unusual aspects of the genome,

and the gain-of-function virologist who had spent years saying

that their work could not ignite a pandemic.

We also know through slacks that were exchanged during the call

that there was some sort of, quote-unquote, big ask.

But we don't know what the big ask was.

We don't know what was discussed on this call.

We only have these slacks.

But a big ask was made.

And you look at these slacks, whatever these dudes were asked to do,

Anderson thinks it's hard to pull off.

For our Collins and Fauci, altogether they oversee about $72 billion

in funding every year.

So if you're a scientist and perhaps one of these gentlemen

asks you to write something,

you have an enormous incentive to write something that they will like.

Anderson and Gary had a very large grant proposal

for a center of research on emerging infectious diseases in West Africa.

That grant proposal was on Fauci's desk.

In a very real sense, Christian Anderson and Robert Gary

had $8.9 million to comply.

On February 3rd, there's another teleconference

with Ralph Baric and Peter Daschick.

Both had received a lot of money from Fauci's agency,

and Daschick had been out in the media promoting this

and his nonprofit for years.

EcoHealth Alliance, what is it?

Well, we're a nonprofit, a typical charity

funded by federal government and other sources.

EcoHealth Alliance has an enormous budget

from many different U.S. agencies.

NIH, Department of Defense.

He does a ton of work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Go, go, go, go, go!

There were a lot of people in the scientific community

who felt like Peter Daschick may have known more than he alluded to.

I mean, I really wonder, did Anthony Fauci think that too?

The goal of this February 3rd meeting

was to combat misinformation

related to the origin of COVID-19.

That was the stated goal.

Immediately after this meeting, Pradhan et al.,

the first paper to publish the existence of the three inserts

suspiciously similar to the spike protein of HIV,

a paper that was published just 72 hours prior,

was withdrawn under intense pressure.

Gone. Taken off the Internet.

Wow.

After the teleconferences,

while the virus was spreading around the world

and beginning to kill a lot of people,

Death toll from the coronavirus now topping 34,000.

all these scientists that had come together

to speak with Fauci and Farrar and Collins,

they write a bunch of papers that claim

this couldn't have come from a lab

and must have come from nature.

So was that the big ask?

All the members of that teleconference

published 33 articles.

There was a paper that stated

that there was no evidence for laboratory engineering.

There's a section called figures and data,

and it's empty.

There's no data and there are no figures.

Day after day, week after week,

there was a different scientific paper.

It has the quality of a media campaign.

And then there's this one in The Lancet,

which is one of the most prestigious

scientific journals in the world.

The letter in The Lancet

is not even a scientific paper.

I call it a wedding announcement.

It's orchestrated by Jeremy Farrar.

It's basically an article saying

that anyone who thinks this virus

came from a lab is a conspirator.

And it's signed by over 20

very prominent scientists.

At the bottom of the letter

does we declare no competing interest.

But Peter Daschick is the guy

who writes the letter, so I have no idea

what The Lancet is thinking,

but that is a competing interest.

And then you have

the proximal origin paper.

It was written by those guys from Slack.

And it is arguably the biggest one.

The paper gets released

and went viral.

It immediately gets something like

3 million views.

But I consider proximal origin

very sloppy science.

This was propaganda.

This was not science.

Then there's this

press conference.

Investigation into whether the virus

escaped from this lab in Newhaun.

How active is that?

We're looking at it.

They talk about a certain kind of bat,

but that bat wasn't in that area.

If you can believe this, that's what they're down to now

is bats, but that bat is not in that area.

That bat wasn't so...

And then there's another reporter

who asks if this virus could come from a lab.

And he directs that question

to Anthony Fauci.

There was a study

recently that

we can make available to you where

a group of highly qualified

evolutionary virologists

And this is where it gets really weird

because now Fauci says that there's

this paper

about bats

as they evolve

and the mutations that it took

to get to the point where it is now.

And, uh,

he's referring to proximal origin,

the paper that was written by those guys

from Slack.

It is totally consistent

with a jump from an animal to a human.

So, I mean,

the paper will be available.

I don't have the authors right now,

but we can make that available too.

He said that he had just seen a paper

that he didn't know much about

or who the authors were.

I don't have the authors right now,

but we can make that available too.

I think it'd be good to just rewind this

for a second and listen to what he says here.

Listen to this.

Totally consistent with a jump

of a species from an animal to a human.

It's not so much what he says,

but what he didn't say.

So, I mean,

the paper will be available.

I don't have the authors right now.

He says he doesn't have the authors.

Is he saying that because he legitimately

is blanking on their names?

Let me have some water.

I know that Fauci is a very busy man.

And as he said,

he gets hundreds of emails a day.

But I find it incredibly hard

to believe

that he would not remember

the names of

people that he spoke to

on the eve of the pandemic.

Well, I don't have the authors right now.

It's not just, oh, that he can't remember

the names.

It sounds like just something that he read

just like that came across his computer

or that he just saw on the internet.

It feels really shady.

I certainly could understand the frustration of people,

but my main role

in the task force was to make

recommendations to protect the health

and the safety of the American people.

For me, it seems his entire management

was not about serving the sick

and dying.

It was about serving and protecting

the system

that was responsible

for the sick and dying.

And I would hope that people understand that

that's the reason why we're doing what we're doing

and hopefully we'll put an end to this.

So, Fauci

still hasn't gone back to me,

right, at this point, and so I wrote him again

and I write him, hello,

just bring this email back to the top of your inbox.

As new facts emerge,

I'm left with many questions.

I'm hoping to connect at your convenience.

Thank you,

Dr. Fauci.

And I get an email back from him tonight

and it says, Jenner,

thanks for this note. Your proposal sounds

interesting. However,

I am totally immersed in the rollout

of my memoir.

Wow. On call.

So, I got a copy

of the manuscript and the

audio file

for the book.

And Fauci reads the book.

Part one.

From Bensonhurst to Washington.

It's crazy.

Brooklyn boy. Yeah.

Anthony Stephen Fauci was born at

Brooklyn Hospital.

And so I've just been going through the book.

The ultimate game changer.

And I have it playing in my car.

It's like stepping into

an alternative universe.

They had what they referred to as

instinctively good

clinical judgment. You know, it's this curated

experience of Dr. Fauci

with his Brooklyn accent.

If you want me to like soft-shell

crabs, I like soft-shell crabs.

This is just nuts. And so I went

to the COVID chapter. And he is bouncing

around so much it's really hard to

follow. Part five. COVID.

I mean, he starts some point late in

January. In the Situation Room on January

29th, 2020.

In the first scenes and interaction

with Trump.

He barely mentions Bob Redfield

at all.

He definitely doesn't mention that they were arguing

about the origin of the virus.

And I can't find any mention of the

fern cleavage site.

He doesn't say anything about these panicked emails

and trying to get in touch with everybody for a secret

teleconference. No mention whatsoever

of how they didn't invite

Bob Redfield.

The upshot. I became

the de facto public face

of the country's battle with the disease.

It's hard to look at this and not

see a pattern. And the pattern

is this completely curated

version of history.

Calm the country's anxieties and provide

factual information. People should

not be walking around with masks.

A lot of this wasn't even factually true.

And the way he's describing this to the public

and in his book is exaggerated

at best.

That's as they evolve.

If not, it was legitimately

misinformation.

Totally consistent with a jump

of a species from an animal to a human.

How do you listen to anything this guy says

and think it's true?

If Fauci did have a hand in covering all this up

why would he do it in the first place?

What is he really protecting here?

All of this stuff with Fauci

I believe is set in place

to protect the interests

of the people who rule the people.

People so high up on the

ladder that we don't even

know who they are.

Yeah.

When you look at abuses of

government power, information

takes such a long time

to come out.

The Tuskegee experiment was a U.S. backed program.

For 40 years

the U.S. government injected

over 600 black men

with syphilis without telling

them.

Really interesting example that I found

in the middle of the pandemic.

Congress decided

to investigate the

origin of Lyme disease.

Wow.

Lyme disease.

1975 was the first outbreak of

Lyme disease. You have

the outbreak of a disease

that is an augmented

strain of Rocky Mountain fever

which up until

1975 only existed in

Colorado.

This illness is breaking out

on the completely other side of the country

in Lyme, Connecticut.

Lyme is just miles away

from this Plum Island

animal disease center

which apparently was a

hotspot for bioweapons research.

The researcher who was credited

with discovering Lyme disease was a

bioweapons specialist.

Ironically, Congress started an investigation

in the middle

of the COVID pandemic.

Decades later.

This is a lot bigger than COVID

and I think this whole bioweapons thing

is a multi-decade story and a crazy

one. Vice President

Dick Cheney became convinced

that the United States needs to pursue

a more aggressive program

of biodefense research.

We're in the middle of improving

our capability to do that.

Dick Cheney is part of the project

for a new American Century.

This was a manifesto about how

America was going to grow its empire

in the 21st century. They talked

about energy dominance, they talk

about military power, and they

say that all of this could be possible

if there was an attack on American

soil.

Everything that happens after 9-11

is directly connected to this

story.

9-11 created the war on terror

and the anthrax attack created the

war on bioterror. And Dick Cheney

used this to completely deregulate

biodefense and get it out of the

Pentagon.

He found one department and one official

who agreed. The official was

Dr. Fauci. This gave Anthony

Fauci billions of dollars to fund

the riskiest research in the world

with no oversight.

And this anthrax attack made Anthony

Fauci the most powerful man in science.

Fauci becomes the head of biodefense

because of a hoax committed by a

biodefense researcher who allegedly

commits suicide.

But this was never acknowledged

and he just got the billions anyway.

And the hoax and all these billions of dollars

go into this crazy genetic research

that's extremely dangerous.

Fauci gets dragged into all this

controversy around the genetic

reconstruction of the Spanish

flu. This is the one that caused

the 1918 pandemic.

People were like, what the fuck are you

doing? This virus killed hundreds

of millions of people around the world

and has been dormant for 100 years.

Why would we want to bring it back

to life? Whether that was your

intention or not, you've created a

bio weapon. There were U.S. policies

in place that were put in place

to protect the public from laboratory

generated pandemics.

And those policies were violated

repeatedly and flagrantly.

This issue has provoked a lot of anger

in everybody. Scientists

like Bryce Nichols and Justin Kinney

are part of a movement for biosafety

and are big critics of Fauci.

Fauci's legacy is tied

to this type of dangerous research

activity. Doctors would have a

responsibility to do no harm

but Anthony Fauci

was putting the life of everyone

on the planet at risk

without their consent.

Researchers took bird flu and

manipulated it to make it easier

to transmit between humans.

Fauci was drawn into a scandal with

a scientist named Ron Fouchier

who used gain of function to make bird

flu airborne in mammals.

This had never been done before.

We already did everything we can to

protect the virus from getting out of our

facilities and

I will leave it with that for now.

You have said to me

in a phone interview that

this was quote the doomsday

virus. There was an accident

that could have infected humans.

I think that what we need

to make sure is that we don't mix apples and oranges.

People have mixed opinions but

if it had leaked the virus

could have killed like 20

to 50 percent of the world's population.

People playing God

man. People with God

complexes.

But instead of being punished

for doing this work

and putting the entire world's

population at risk

by doing this work, they

were celebrated.

Fauci didn't

apologize. Fauci celebrated

it and he actually wrote an

op-ed in the Washington Post

saying that this was a flu risk

worth taking.

Yes, gain of function research

could trigger a pandemic but it is

so important for public health and national

security it would be a mistake

not to do it.

I personally think it's a miracle

that that hasn't already been used

as a bioterrorist event.

Mike?

Let me just follow up.

Any SARS, any number of

viruses, it would be a horrible tragedy if they

ever were to leak out. We could contain

them and it would not see a global pandemic.

Wait, what?

SARS could get out and cause a

pandemic and it wouldn't hurt the world?

It would be a horrible tragedy if they ever were to leak out.

But we could contain them and it would not see a global

pandemic. Wow.

Look at this shit. Look at Fauci.

Look at his face.

1977 H1N1 was an accidental

release. No doubt about it.

They knew this could happen, man, and they knew it had happened before.

It's all so crazy.

We don't want to see that happen

again with a virus like this. What we're trying to do

is come to the middle. How to do this research

safely, how to do it in a way that

we don't want to see.

He knew. He knew this could happen.

And it seems like it's happened a lot of times

before.

Epidemics of disease

and fear.

In 2014,

there was an Ebola

outbreak in West Africa.

In Kenema,

the outbreak is out of control.

But the facts didn't add up.

The strain of

Ebola that caused the outbreak

in 2014 had never been seen

in West Africa before.

It's found in Zaire,

which is 2,000 miles away.

In 2014, a journalist

named Sam Husseini had a lot

of questions about this outbreak.

He traced it back to a

boy in Miliandou,

little Emile.

But the

boy's father doesn't think that

he died of Ebola. The health care workers

don't think that he died of Ebola.

A lab

in Sierra Leone was suspected

of being

the potential source of this

outbreak of Ebola.

The head of Doctors Without Borders, when she got there,

she was like, I'm not setting foot in that lab.

They were so appalled by the

conditions.

And now, here's where the story takes a whole

other twist.

That lab had a lot of connections

to Christian Anderson

and Bob Gehry.

These scientists got money to do Ebola

research from Fauci and Collins

and from Jeremy Farrar.

And now they may be tied to a whole

other cover-up. When that outbreak

happened, you had people like

Peter Daza claim that

it came from bats.

There's been more and more evidence that bats

are the source of Ebola virus.

Somehow, bats

were the culprit that spread Ebola

Zaire across a 2,000

mile journey. And

there's a very disturbing

pattern here.

And that pattern of deception

became more obvious to people in the

medical community like Dr. Marty

Macari.

I had become skeptical of

Dr. Fauci during the

Ebola epidemic.

Dr. Fauci

transferred a

nurse in Dallas

with Ebola to the

NIH Clinical Center in

Washington, D.C. And then Dr.

Fauci puts on an astronaut

suit and walks in with a

photographer and gets a photo

opportunity. That's when

I took a step back and thought, yes,

Dr. Fauci is a nice guy.

But that whole Ebola incident

seemed like a circus.

After the Ebola

outbreak in 2014,

there was a ban on gain-of-function

research.

But many people think that that ban

was violated and that they did even

more gain-of-function research at

Wuhan. David Asher was

at the State Department during the pandemic

when he began investigating the origin.

He found all these crazy connections

between the NIH and the

Wuhan lab.

In 2015, the Wuhan Institute of

Rheology has launched a global recruitment plan

of principal investigators under the Outstanding

Foreign Talents Program, quote-unquote,

of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

And the NIH is actually helping

match scientists

to the Chinese program to recruit

our most sensitive

biologists. This was going to be China's

first BSL-4 laboratory,

which is the highest level of security.

Those are the ones where everybody has the

full suit and the respirator.

The Chinese had

partnered with the French to build this lab

and then kicked them out the day it was

finished.

Their view was

a sign that there was a biological

military-related

research program that had

adversarial ambitions.

And this could have been a reason

for the U.S. to start spying on the

Wuhan lab. Peter

Daschick was very deep into this

world of emerging infectious diseases

and potential biological weapons

or dual-use research.

A lot of people believe

that Peter Daschick may have been

using all of these research projects

to spy on the Wuhan lab.

We started to look into it, and what we found

was very alarming.

People inside Daschick's

nonprofit had witnessed

him talking about spying

on the Chinese.

Dr. Peter and Daschick and I are closing

up the office, and

as he locks the door, he turns to me and says, Andrew, do you mind if I

ask you a question? Sure, Peter, go ahead.

Well, Andrew, someone from the

CIA approached me, and they're

interested in the places we're

working, the people we're working with,

and the data we're collecting.

Do you think it's a good idea

that we work with them?

And I'm shocked.

I mean, I

couldn't believe that my boss, Dr. Peter Daschick,

is asking me whether or not we should

work with the CIA.

In hindsight, I suspect that he

had been working with the intelligence community

for a long time. How far

back? I don't know.

The research that Daschick was doing at Wuhan

was already incredibly dangerous.

This was singled out as the

research project on the

planet with the highest likelihood

of causing a pandemic.

Why on earth would the U.S. fund this

crazy research?

The answer for me is simple. We traded

the Chinese, the most advanced biotechnology

in the world, for access to their

laboratory so we could collect intelligence on it.

I decided that I had to get out of the

organization as fast as I could.

The situation was already dangerous,

and then in 2017, the

NIH lifts their ban to do even more

dangerous research. I don't think this

is going to be foolproof. Things are going to slip

through. It makes

your question the motives of some

of these people.

Assisting the design of the Wuhan Institute

of Virology was Dr.

Stefan Banzel. Banzel

is now the CEO of Moderna.

Stefan Banzel and the

NIH had a close relationship with this lab.

Moderna was researching a

coronavirus vaccine to launch their mRNA

platform, and they were using research

that was happening at Wuhan.

My colleagues in China did the work. You create

pseudoparticles, you insert

the spike proteins from those viruses,

sifted bind to human cells.

The U.S. was funding dangerous

research at the Wuhan lab that

may have been used to spy on the Chinese.

And there was also research happening

at Wuhan that was being used to develop

an mRNA vaccine years

before the pandemic ever happened.

Why do we not know anything

about this? But there's

another bombshell that is

even crazier. The pandemic

may have started three months before

it was ever reported.

Sometime in September,

something happened in the Wuhan lab.

There were workers falling sick

at the Wuhan Institute, and they

seem to be the first people in China that we knew of

that fall sick. This is in September

2019. We didn't hear

about it until December, and apparently

the U.S. knew about this.

I mean, they had intelligence that the military

took over the lab, that they were doing

drills at the airport. Look at these

satellite images. The traffic at

hospitals increased ten-fold.

And then the World Military Games

happens in October. Teams

from around the world compete in Wuhan,

some of them get sick, and countries

with the most teams at the event are the

first places to have massive

outbreaks. France, Italy,

Iran, the U.S.

This was the first super spreader.

And then in December, before the

pandemic was even reported, there's

an information sharing agreement

between Moderna, the NIH,

and Ralph Baric's lab

to share information about an

mRNA vaccine, which they claim

is a coincidence. And it was only

two days after the genetic sequence

was published by the Chinese that the NIH

and Moderna signed a landmark

vaccine deal, worth nearly 50

billion dollars. Moderna shares are creating

higher falls. And then Fauci and a group of

scientists, with critical conflicts of

interests directly connected to gain a function

to Wuhan, to spying

on China, and to other

potential leaks like Ebola,

secretly convene, and the scientists

in that meeting publish 33

science papers and letters

saying that there was, quote, no evidence of a lab

leak, that it was a conspiracy theory,

and that it came from this wet market.

It's interesting because it has jumped

species likely from an animal

source. It's beyond suspicious.

It's scientific malpractice on a global

scale. More cities and states

have started shutdowns. New

York, California, Illinois, and Connecticut.

America is completely unprepared

for a pandemic,

even though Fauci

claimed his sole purpose for doing

this dangerous research was to

prepare for a pandemic.

Dr. Anthony Fauci. And Fauci

jumps in front of the cameras to become

the spokesperson for a pandemic

he may have had a hand in creating.

I mean, he was doing media interviews

from 6 a.m. in the morning until 12 midnight.

People should not be walking around with

masks. But the problem is

all that messaging was wrong.

Whether schools should be closed or open.

The schools should be closed.

The right answer for many of the

big questions during the COVID pandemic

was, we don't know.

But instead, they made

it up. How could we ever

look at this story the same way again?

How could we ever look at this man

the same way again?

How could we ever see him as

a hero ever again?

There's a new social media challenge

and why did the American

media decide not to cover

any of this? Because it's the same thing to do.

This was the

same media that had driven the country

apart. And by the time we got to the pandemic

we were so fucked, all we had was

the news replaying clips of Sarah Silverman

singing to herself.

But not all people

on the left fell for this. And there were

journalists like Christian Parenti who could

see this more clearly.

If you've got the intelligence

services, you've got the scientific

establishment, you've got

the pharmaceutical companies,

you've got the political parties.

Like the gauntlet had been thrown down.

Both sides

in our political system, the Republicans

and the Democrats, had staked out

their positions.

Trump misreads it.

And then I see the disinfectant

who knocks it out

in a minute.

The Democrats are thinking, this time

we finally got him. He's misunderstanding this

virus. He takes no responsibility.

He still doesn't have a plan.

So they go all in on ratcheting

up fear. I feel like I'm going to have to

rewire myself.

All of a sudden Fauci became a hero to

everyone who hated Trump.

That face plant transformed him into a progressive

idol who soon had

bobblehead dolls and

votive candles and an audience

of people who imagined

he was all that stood between

them and Donald

Trump. He leaned into the

celebrity. That is why

he was shielded. He became a

patron saint of science just because it

was politically convenient. I want to say

thank you, Dr. Fauci,

for your perseverance in leading us

all through this pandemic.

Here's to you, Anthony Fauci.

I almost feel bad for these people. It's like

they got played. Thank you for your

invaluable public service.

Can I have your autograph? It just feels like

a Black Mirror episode.

Dr. Fauci, you are my hero.

It's insane.

I thank you for fighting a good fight.

Thank you for being kind.

Tony, we love you.

We honor you.

We thank God for you.

Dr. Fauci, I want to thank you for always

telling the truth, even

during the hardest moments.

Despite the fact there was all this evidence

that connected him to the birth of this pandemic

in the first place, people were thanking

him for his service. Thank you, Dr.

Fauci. This became

such a perverse, politically driven

story. Congratulations!

Frontline workers were thanking

him even though he may have put their lives at risk.

Congratulations on being named

the federal employee of the year.

Yeah, it's disgusting.

So it's disgusting. And so you

get this layering of

independent interests that come together

to just push hysteria

and fear and

support for censorship and support

for authoritarian control.

And a lot of these COVID policies

enraged the country and led us

to the brink of civil war.

Attacks on me, quite frankly, are

attacks on science.

Fauci just manipulated people

and said that they were anti-science

if they disagreed with him.

Specifically about the vaccine mandates.

Mandating vaccines.

I actually encourage it.

Big scenes of violence out here earlier today.

It was generally believed the reason the COVID

pandemic was continuing was the

unvaccinated and the unvaccinated

was a term for

conservative Republicans

often in rural areas who were

uneducated. Oh, you can't

shame them. You can't call them stupid.

You can't call them silly. Yes, they

are. But the reality

was the biggest group of unvaccinated

Americans by percentage

was African-Americans

because they distrusted

public health for good reasons.

You go back to the barbaric

experiments that our medical

establishment did to that community.

So when you see Nicki

Minaj, LaKeith,

Kanye, reluctant

to take the vaccination, they all made

to look crazy. A fan had shot this

video of Busta Rhymes.

All these little weird ass government

policies and mandates suck a dick.

He was criticized, but his

rage was justified.

I'm trying to take our civil liberties away.

Take Kyrie Irvin. All the damage

done for not taking the vaccination.

Fortunately for Kyrie Irvin, he's

a multimillionaire several times over.

But I know some teachers.

Or I know some firemen. I know a lot

of people that had to resign. Average

Americans were enraged, so it's not a

surprise to see Fauci on 60 Minutes

having to go for a walk with bodyguards.

Dr. Fauci now power walks,

flanked by federal agents.

Critically

minded journalists went along

with B.S.

and didn't question things

that they knew they should have questioned.

No one was questioning Fauci

or Peter Daschick. People just

fell for it. Even renowned

economist Jeffrey Sachs fell for Peter

Daschick. Sachs and Peter Daschick

were working on this commission for the

Lancet, which was the same journal that

published his conspiracy theory

letter. And it wasn't until Ebrite

sent Sachs all of these

research grants with Daschick,

Wuhan, Ralph Baric,

that Sachs finally confronted

Daschick. The next day

I contacted Daschick and I

said I'd like to see the whole thing. Daschick's

response to me was

I can't give that to you.

My lawyers say I

can't give that to you.

I said, Peter, what are you saying?

No, no, no, my lawyers say I can't

give that to you. There's a consistent

line of evidence and a consistent

line of obfuscation,

which is usually when guilty parties are

trying to engage in a cover-up.

And, you know, you don't

have to be Woodward and Bernstein to figure this shit out

in Washington. It looked to me like it had

a lot to do with Tony Fauci cutting big

checks and perhaps

elements of the intelligence community

encouraging individuals

not to be so forthcoming either.

We don't really know.

After this State Department report

comes out, the WHO

sends a group to Wuhan to investigate.

And what is absolutely crazy

is Peter Daschick

was leading the WHO

mission to Wuhan.

Apparently China refused to approve

most of the scientists that were presented,

but for some reason

they approved Peter Daschick.

Here is my former boss conducting

gain-of-function research

at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,

which could have been the place

where this disease originated,

now investigating

the origin of the disease. I couldn't believe it.

You look at these images of Daschick

at the Wuhan lab, it's all so

brazen, and it just makes you question

everything. I came to understand

that some conspiracy theories

are wrong.

Many are right, actually.

Did you find anything inside?

And after the Wuhan trip, there's the first

release of these emails through the

Freedom of Information Act.

But they're all redacted.

So why are they redacted

if Fauci and the NIH have nothing

to hide? You've had the distinct

honor and pleasure of having

many of your emails released to the public

over the last few days. And Fauci

goes on this media tour. They only

took about 10,000 emails from me.

Of course I remember. I remember all

10,000 of them. Give me a break.

And they did, with a lot of the outlets taking

his word for it. Those 3200 pages of emails

don't appear to contain anything particularly

explosive. It's preposterous,

Chuck. Totally preposterous.

We've struggled to understand why there's

controversy around it. Chuck Todd even says

there's really nothing here,

and yet he doesn't ask

him what was in all of the

redacted emails.

He could release all this stuff with no scrutiny

and it just goes to show how powerful he

was. He's been there for 50 years, so he's

like J. Edgar Hoover, and the only way

that you last 50 years is by

carrying order for the pharmaceutical

industry. Robert Kennedy Jr. had

written two whole books about Anthony

Fauci. And one of RFK's

biggest talking points was

the censorship. You couldn't find

information because people were being erased

off the internet. Adam

Angevsky had started this

organization called Open the Books.

He had done forensic accounting on

government, and he was a very well

respected columnist at Forbes.

That was until he started writing

bad stuff about Fauci.

So in 2021, we

noticed that Dr. Anthony Fauci

was the most highly compensated

federal employee. He was a

public servant making close to a half a million

dollars. His net worth went up by

five million dollars during the pandemic

years. 2019, it was seven million

dollars. By 2022,

his net worth was more than

12 million dollars. He's

also gotten a copy of Anthony Fauci's

calendar. We launched this

finding in my column

at Forbes. I receive a phone

call from my regular editor.

I was barred from writing about Anthony

Fauci any longer.

I filed a Freedom of Information Act request

with NIH for all the

email correspondence. And what we

found was the height of the pandemic

when Omnicron was sweeping the country,

these six powerful executives at NIH

and Dr. Fauci himself

throughout the night crafted

the pushback email to Forbes.

And so, rather than back my

reporting, they decided

to fold the column.

After eight years, 206 columns,

20 million page views, I had been

promoted to Senior Policy Contributor at

Forbes. They went silent on

me, and after 10 days, I

was terminated.

On the day I was terminated,

Forbes bent the knee

to Dr. Anthony Fauci,

and they penned a column that

Fauci's portrait will hang

in the Smithsonian Institute.

And of his many

critics, the one who he couldn't get

fired was Senator Rand

Paul.

And right after this hearing,

in May 2021, all these different

emails and documents, they kept

dropping in these Freedom of Information

cases. The weight of the evidence

was, this was a

lab release. And after all

these new emails drop, he goes back in front

of Rand Paul, who basically says,

you perjured yourself. Dr. Fauci,

knowing that it is a crime to lie to

Congress, do you wish to retract

your statement where you claimed that the NIH

never funded gain of function research

in Wuhan? Senator Paul,

I have never lied before

the Congress, and I do not

retract that statement.

Gain of function research was going

on in that lab, and NIH funded

it. You can't get away from it.

It meets your definition, and you are

obfuscating the truth. And you are

implying that what

we did was responsible for

the deaths of individuals.

I totally resent that. And it could have been.

And if anybody is lying here,

Senator, it is you.

And while Rand Paul is grilling him

during the summer of 2021,

a huge development

is about to happen.

In the summer of 2021,

Major Joseph Murphy reached out to me

and told me of the existence

of what we now know is

the Diffuse proposal.

Joseph Murphy is in a wing of

the DOD called DARPA.

He's found this

proposal called Diffuse.

Diffuse is written by Peter Daschick,

and this is a proposal to create

a virus that looks exactly

like the virus that caused the

pandemic one year

before the pandemic emerged.

Wow.

In Diffuse, scientists propose

collecting samples from

wild bat populations in

Yunnan province, China,

in order to engineer

new pathogens.

To look for the next SARS.

Then they're going to bring them back into the lab.

They're going to insert

the fern cleavage site,

literally. That's their intent, is to

insert it. Specifically,

to make the resulting virus more

dangerous to humans. They say they're going to

do a lot of work at Ralph Baric's lab,

but right on the masthead of the proposal

is the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The story is that it was submitted to DARPA,

which is part of the Defense Department.

And the story

is that the proposal was not funded

and that the work was never done.

Nine times out of ten,

when you submit a grant proposal,

you already have about

50% of the work done.

So it seems surprising

that nobody wanted to tell us about this.

Diffuse is so

explosive and reveals so many different things

that they had to have a natural origin.

And the public could never find out.

Because once you open Pandora's

Box, you can't close it again.

Diffuse was

the biggest break in the

story thus far over four years.

Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Murphy

risked potentially going to prison

for the rest of his life.

To leak the Diffuse proposal

to me.

And as a father

myself, I know

that he risked his freedom

and his

ability to be a father.

And he did it because it was the right thing to do.

And that's been an inspiration to me.

Because I believe that he has done more than

any single person

to shed truth

on the origin of this pandemic.

Hi, this is Emily Kopp.

I'm a reporter with U.S. Right to Know.

And after Diffuse, Emily goes on to do some

of the most comprehensive reporting

about all the behind the scenes

emails and Slack messages

and secret teleconferences.

A few other journalists were treating Diffuse

like it was a major breakthrough.

The Intercept covered the

story quite carefully.

And they particularly covered

the Diffuse proposal.

But I'm confused. Where's the New York

Times on this? Like where's the Washington

Post?

And when accomplished scientists

like Alina Chan picked up the reporting

and wrote a book like Viral, she

did an interview saying she was harassed.

People called me a race

traitor. And when the Great

Barrington Declaration questioned lockdowns,

scientists like Jay Bhattacharya were

alienated from the science community.

Fauci created an illusion of

consensus. Scientists

were being censored on social media.

And when Elon Musk was taking over Twitter,

he released the Twitter files, which confirmed

that Fauci and the Biden administration

were censoring users.

Fauci ended up getting sued by two

states for stuff related to this.

And

he does this deposition that's

laughable.

I don't recall. I don't

recall. I don't recall.

I might have. I don't recall.

He gives the same answer over and over again.

I don't recall.

I do not recall.

I don't really recall.

This entire system of power that

Fauci built over 50

years was crumbling

in his hands.

We have breaking news from the White House.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is

retiring. He is stepping

down in December after more than

five decades of public service.

Literally like a month

later, the Department of Energy

and the FBI both

released declassified reports

saying that the virus most likely was

engineered in a lab. He conveniently

ducks out. He retires to try and

avoid being held accountable.

In the beginning of 2023,

a House committee decides to investigate

this, but it's completely

politicized.

Democrats that sit on this committee,

they only hindered.

Which is kind of compromised from the start.

Republicans spent on advancing this

partisan narrative.

And so Redfield is like the opening

testimony. You have said before that

you were locked out of conversations

about the lab leak by Dr.

Fauci. Do you think they kept

you out of the conversations because you believe

COVID-19 may have come from a lab?

Yeah, I think I made it very

clear in January to all I was told

that the reason I wasn't

included, they were going to come out

with a single point of view that everyone

had to agree with. And

that it was clear that I

wasn't going to be capable of that.

Unfortunately, I have this bad trait

that I can't get rid of.

I'm honest.

And then the committee questioned people

that weren't so honest, like

Christian Anderson and Bob Gary.

Did either of you have any conversations

with Peter Daszak while drafting

Proximo Origin? We did not.

No one follows up with any

tough questions and asks them,

hey, that's interesting. We have it here

that you were on a conference call with

Peter Daszak and Ralph Barak

on February 3rd. Dr. Gary,

did you have any conversations with Dr. Daszak?

I did not. Anderson and Gary

perjured themselves before Congress.

Those are felonies.

You know, you watch this hearing and no one's

putting the pieces together. No one

is understanding what all these scientists

have in common. Think fundamental

biology research, which includes

gain-of-function research, is important.

It was so important

that people did everything they could to cover

it up.

New allegations

this morning from an unnamed CIA

whistleblower relating to the origins

of COVID-19.

All of a sudden, there's this whistleblower

from the CIA that comes forward.

A senior level officer

claiming the agency offered hush money

to analysts to cover up their

findings. There were reports that Fauci had been

in the CIA building, and it wasn't

just Moderna with a conflict of interest.

Apparently, Scott Gottlieb from

Pfizer was also in the CIA building.

What are Fauci and Pfizer doing in the

CIA building? And a couple months

later, Ralph Barak agrees to do a

closed-door testimony, and in the

middle of the testimony, he's asked

if he's a spy. There's a question

where you would source the IC,

and suddenly it goes off the record, and

I mean, Ralph Barak, he

basically admits that he was an intelligence

source. It's all blacked out, but

he's obviously talking to somebody.

Them being used as intelligence

sources, okay, given

the fact that they all work for the Chinese

and are compensated by the Chinese,

I find crazy. The weakest

link here is Peter Daschick.

Right after the diffuse proposal was

released, the

FOIA. DARPA turned us down for

whatever reasons DARPA had, and I want

to remind the committee that this proposal

was never funded and the work

was never done. But not a lot of people

are taking Peter Daschick's word for

it, and Rixie

had done a deeper analysis of the

diffuse proposal.

It wasn't until the diffuse proposal mentioned

DC sign that I realized

how important it was.

DC sign is about targeting

D cells. D cells

are immune system cells.

This proposal wanted to create a virus

that would confuse your immune system.

And it would allow

the virus to go undetected until

it infected your immune system.

So if they engineered it to have

a DC sign, what other viruses would

they find this feature in?

The conspiracies that we were talking about

in February 2020 were things like

there are HIV inserts

into the virus. Looking back, it seems

obvious. The conspiracies that we

were talking about were things like there are

HIV inserts into the virus.

The HIV virus does this to people.

So looking back,

these HIV inserts

that were part of the paper

written by these Indian scientists

on January 31st,

they make a lot of sense now.

There were four unique inserts

in total. And one of those inserts

contained the furan cleavage site.

And the other three

contained elements from

different HIV strains.

And those three inserts allow this virus

to utilize DC sign.

There is this insane probability

that all of these things would happen naturally.

So if you look at this paper

that these Indian scientists put out

in the timeline, it's January

31st when everybody panics,

right?

Christian Anderson even says that

he got a panic call from Fauci about

the HIV inserts.

And after all those teleconferences,

this paper written by Pradhan

et al, it was pulled down by February

3rd. The conspiracies

that we were talking about were things like

there are HIV inserts into the virus.

Diffuse

is connecting all of these pieces.

I mean, it makes sense why they would want to

cover it up. It's just very

damning. It's not a good

look.

Scientists

were concerned about testing a live

attenuated HIV vaccine.

You know, there's a lot of this vaccine

research that Fauci and other people

don't want us to know about.

Vaccines, if not properly and completely

inactivated,

could lead to a public health disaster.

Vaccine research trying to end

one pandemic could accidentally cause

another one. And I found this article

called SWAT Teams and Copycat

Cover-Ups by Ed Hooper.

Hooper had been featured in this documentary

called The Origin of AIDS.

Just like the wet market theory for COVID,

scientists blamed HIV on Africans

eating monkeys.

This was called the Bushmeat Theory.

But if you watch Hooper in this

documentary, he has a completely

different theory about the origin.

AIDS came about

as an act of man,

not as an act of God.

None of this surprises me

at all, man.

The more you dig, the more you find out,

the less faith you have.

In the late 50s,

scientists were in the Congo testing

polio vaccines on Africans.

You know, polio was a

horrible, debilitating disease.

The scientists that were

doing these polio vaccine trials

believed, probably

in their heart of hearts, that they were

doing this for humanity.

And sometimes when you have that belief,

you can cut corners.

You can always think you're doing

good, but that don't mean you are.

A scientist named Hilary Kaprowski

cultured the polio vaccine

in the kidney cells of

chimpanzees. Something like HIV

may have existed in primates for millions

of years, but it had never had a huge

outbreak in humans. During the

research, other primate viruses had already

contaminated the vaccines.

Despite these risks between 1957

and 59, scientists test

this oral vaccine on indigenous Africans

without informed consent.

It's just devilish.

For two years, these scientists administer

millions of doses in Kinshasa,

and by the end of the study in 1959,

in the same city, is the

first major outbreak of HIV.

It's evil.

Federal health officials say as many as one

million Americans may have been infected with

the AIDS virus. A mystery disease

known as the gay plague.

Even without any connections to

the polio vaccine and the origin of AIDS,

people were enraged at Reagan and

Fauci for how they were handling the pandemic.

Activists like Michael

Petrellas even stormed the NIH.

Anthony Fauci, I piss on you.

I promise you we'll give you the data.

We do think there is still a conspiracy.

You are a politician.

Fauci was hated by almost all people suffering with

HIV. He was arrogant and condescending.

I think that you may be naive

in understanding how you can get

things done in Washington.

Fauci was already under fire for failed treatments

like AZT.

Abandoned cancer chemotherapy treatments that were taken

off the shelf. Then in the late 90s,

this story comes out in Rolling Stone about the

oral polio vaccine and connections to

the origin of the pandemic.

Why and how? There were several mysteries

that Fauci was already

on the rocks with the black community.

To tell us what to do, how to treat

our bodies, and how to live a more

around this time he was working on an AIDS

vaccine. And a story about a vaccine tested

on black people accidentally causing a

pandemic that was ravaging the black community

was not good PR for him

or for science. Over the next

couple years, a series of papers come out debunking

the polio theory. Fauci

promotes some of that work saying that the

theory was dead. The crazy

coincidence is some of those papers were

written by Bob Gary,

Andrew Rambo,

and Eddie Holmes.

The same guys given

a big ask right before the pandemic

broke out.

Anyone seeing a pattern here?

It's all the same

people.

And they apparently have written the same

type of papers for the last 20 years.

Totally consistent.

After all, viruses only come from nature.

The story Fauci loves to tell.

I don't recall. I might have.

And I feel like I still don't even know the whole

story. What other shit are these people covering

up? I promise you we'll give you the

data. Makes sense why they needed to get an

honest guy like Redfield out of the room.

This doesn't seem like the place for honesty.

I think that you may be naive

in understanding how you can get things

done in Washington.

And when it came to getting things done in Washington,

Tony Fauci was masterful.

He always knew

how to get his way, and he always knew how

to cover his tracks. So after

decades of being called in front of Congress,

there was no big surprises.

The accusation being circulated

that I tried to cover up

the possibility that the virus

originated from a lab.

In fact, the truth

is exactly the opposite.

Was CDC Director Redfield on that call?

Some tough questions.

Redfield's lying to the committee when he sat right where you sat?

Really? Really? Wow.

There were some fireworks.

Some unhinged emotions.

Dr. Fauci, did you ever treat a patient

for COVID during the pandemic?

You can take care of many of them.

Some very powerful moments.

Why would I be criticized

by a bureaucrat who's never treated

a patient for COVID? You can read all

the things you want, but you're not there. You're not seeing patients.

You're not watching people die, intubating patients

right there.

My mom was a healthcare worker during the pandemic.

My mom died of COVID.

My stepfather died of COVID.

I lost both of my parents.

But nothing really changed in this story.

My opinion is that you are

an American hero.

And what we have found is the following.

Dr. Fauci did not

fund research that caused

the COVID-19 pandemic.

Dr. Fauci did not lie

about gain and function research.

And Dr. Fauci did not orchestrate

a campaign to suppress the lab

leak theory. He did not lie to

Congress. Unsubstantiated.

Unsubstantiated.

This is crazy.

It's the most unfair thing I have seen.

No evidence.

No evidence. What?

The evidence to date points to COVID-19

having originated from an animal market

in China. What planet are these

people on?

I mean this whole thing is a joke.

He should be tried for

mass murder and he should be tried for

crime. Our system is like professional

wrestling. That's how

the American people feel. Dr. Fauci

has had an honorable

career. He and his colleagues

helped us save millions of lives.

Does there need to be accountability for Dr. Fauci?

This hearing demonstrated

that he's being held accountable but they

have no evidence he did anything wrong.

Congressman, I'm just concerned

that there is evidence and that it's

being overlooked. There's evidence

of research that has been happening for

almost 20 years that is very dangerous

to humanity. If we saved

two million people with a vaccine, but

we lost 20 million people,

this is a bad thing for humanity.

I'm very concerned.

Like Dr. Fauci said, he has an

open mind on it and I think we all should

have an open mind. You cited the CDC

director. The CDC director was locked

out of conversation starting on January

31st. We're losing the plot.

I think we're open to all the other things.

I hope you are. I hope you are.

It's

so disturbing.

It's really disturbing.

This whole process

has been demoralizing.

But right around the time of the hearing,

Adam and Jeske had gotten all this

new data about the royalties that

the NIH received from Big Pharma

during the pandemic.

Six hundred and ninety million dollars

worth of third party royalties.

Those are payments from pharmaceutical

companies back to Fauci's

institute. It calls into question

whether these decisions were made in the

special interest of Anthony Fauci

and his institute. It's an open

question. It's not answered yet, but

the truth will come out.

A few weeks after this interview,

before Adam even got a chance

to release that information,

Adam inexplicably

died in his sleep.

The cause of death is unknown.

Hope, you know, for his family's sake,

they get the answers.

Right. But

totally healthy man.

Marathon runner.

And he's reporting

on the royalty payments

from pharmaceutical companies

and died in his sleep.

We don't know how Adam died,

but we do know that these

pharmaceutical companies have made a

lot of money from this pandemic.

After Moderna had taken in close to

50 billion from the vaccines,

sales started flattening out.

One of your main revenue

drivers is no

longer there. You have to find new ways

of running the company.

By 2024, Stefan

Bunzel was doing a lot of press about

the future of Moderna.

But the piece I saw we should look at is

long COVID.

Long COVID is a very complicated

condition. It's quite serious.

It can

present itself in many different ways.

Rixi's had long COVID since

2020. I was really

sick when I got COVID. And ever since

then, I've been hit with neurological,

cardiological, and immune

dysregulation symptoms.

One of the patients I saw today,

when she came to see

me two and a half, three years ago,

she came on a stretcher.

She had so much autonomic

dysfunction from COVID, she

couldn't sit up. There's research

suggesting that the fur and cleavage site

may be toxic to liver and lung

cells. And if there are HIV

inserts in the virus, it would

explain autoimmune problems.

I also have a

number of patients that have

post-COVID symptoms from the mRNA

vaccine.

After I got the vaccine,

the symptoms have been exacerbated.

My physical health has

declined dramatically.

Do you have any concern about

the side effect profile?

He's talking about mRNA

side effects like myocarditis

and blood clots, and they aren't the only

side effects. A lot of

negative side effects. There's a lot of

chatter on the internet right now about these

turbo cancers. It's been dismissed

as anti-vax, but all these scientists

have been going through the genetic information,

and they found 19 characters.

When you reverse them, they are a

2016 patent from

Moderna

for MSH3,

apparently a key component

in fighting the mutations that

cause cancer.

And Bonzel certainly isn't talking about

that in his interviews.

A cancer mutating gene

patented by his company

that may have been found in the virus

in this potential

surge in turbo cancers

after the pandemic.

In studies on CNBC

talking about how cancer is about

to make Moderna a lot of money.

And it's completely horrifying.

So I figured I'd write Fauci one last

email. I told him what I really care about

is all this dangerous research,

the stuff he said was a risk worth taking,

and this Pandora's box

that he's opened up, creating this

terrifying dystopian future.

So thank you, Dr.

Fauci, for that.

And I did

get a response, but not from him,

from his lawyer, who is

a heavyweight attorney who is represented

like three presidents,

who basically said that Tony

is just too busy with his book

and he's not going to be able to do the interview.

So that is that.

So now I'm just listening

to his epilogue while getting my

car washed.

And he seems pretty

aware of how he changed society.

He does seem pretty aware about

how he changed society,

but from the perspective of a man living

in an alternate universe,

where none of this was problematic

and nothing he did was bad.

And for some reason,

half of the mainstream media in the United

States still praises him, which makes

zero sense.

Have you thought about running for president?

No, no, no interest

whatsoever. And egomaniacs

like Anthony Fauci really excelled at

that. Fauci, it's an honor to have you here.

Thank you so much. Thank you for having me.

I mean, it's almost like he's delusional or

something.

I don't think he's been gifted

with looking in the mirror

and seeing what's actually there right now.

I think he's convinced himself

that he's kind of above it all.

Well, remember this day.

I rewatched Oppenheimer the other day

because he was struggling

with the reality of what he

created. A weapon

that could destroy the world.

With viruses,

it's like that on steroids.

This research may have killed

200 times as many people

as Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

There's a whole lot of nothing going on

in Washington, D.C., you know, and I don't think

that that's acceptable.

It's just a slap in the face

to everyone who lost a loved

one or lost a business

or lost a milestone in their life

to this pandemic.

People died in every country

of every age

and whether it was from the virus

or the ridiculously insane

responses to the virus,

most of it was wrong.

And that's what matters.

We know now that

governments lie.

And the reason

that they lie is because

they want to cover up

government screw-ups.

Just handed the Chinese this technology for

access to their laboratory, which is probably the greatest

failure in military history.

I think the only way forward

is a military tribunal

who hold the long

list of bad actors accountable.

Those individuals likely

caused a pandemic that

killed 20 million people

and cost 25

trillion dollars.

I think Anthony Fauci should go to jail,

honestly, but, you know, that

alone won't do anything if we continue

to allow this

kind of biodefense research.

We have a right to make mistakes,

but where I get upset is if we don't

acknowledge our mistakes so we don't make the same

mistake next time.

Fauci knew and lied repeatedly.

I gave it 110 percent

every day.

Fauci's legacy is bullshit.

Making pathogens

more deadly is an existential

threat to humanity,

and it should be stopped. That's not happening.

There have been

no new safety regulations

and no new laws implemented.

Nothing.

They're actually building up more labs now.

Dr.

Fauci claims that they're creating more dangerous

viruses in the lab to predict

a pandemic or to prevent one.

It's never happened. It's a fantasy.

Biodefense may be

the greatest euphemism ever

for biowarfare.

The truth needs to be told.

It's not just that COVID came from a lab

because we might not ever

definitively know that.

It's about what people don't want

you to find out along the way.

That we are often

pawns in a war that we

know nothing about.

There are research projects that could kill half

the planet if there was an accident.

One that only killed a tiny fraction

of the population, collapsed

global economies, destabilizing the population

to the brink of civil war,

shut down schools, lock down homes,

forced everyone onto new technologies

where their data is being monitored,

controlled the media, censored

scientists and doctors, mandated

gene-altering drugs into our bloodstream

despite the damage they could cause,

while trillions of dollars

moved from the poor to the rich

in the largest transfer of wealth in

modern history. And if that much power

and that much wealth and that much

social control can be generated

by one minor pandemic,

this is only the beginning.

The great pandemic has come.

It's going to be a bird flu pandemic.

New concerns this morning over bird flu

for bird flu in Michigan.

Bird flu, bird flu, bird flu,

virus, Jesus, spreads, spreads,

going to be a major pandemic.

That's coming.

I'm kind of freaked out about this, man.

Oh, the bird flu thing?

Take a deep breath. If it was from the lab,

you know, we'd already be dead by now.

www.caseway.ai is for people
who can’t afford a lawyer