All language subtitles for M.E.T.B.M.WEB-DL-E

Jamie Dimon:
Every day, you know,
you have nonstop Bitcoin.

Who cares about Bitcoin?

I could care less
what Bitcoin trades for,

how it trades, why it trades,
who trades it.

If you're stupid enough to buy,

you'll pay the price
for it one day.

YouTuber:
Bitcoin is a fucking scam.

Donald Trump
Bitcoin seems like a scam.

- Magical internet money.
- It has no intrinsic value.

Bitcoin is worthless.

- What makes it valuable?
- Totally BS.

Bitcoin is a dead end.

Brian Kelly:
Bitcoin's dead again!

It's a combination of a bubble,
a Ponzi scheme,

and an economic disaster.

Whatever it's doing,
it's not money.

Whatever Bitcoin is,
it is not money.

Bitcoin is simply gonna implode
before you know it.

Today, we're having
a funeral for Bitcoin.

Cullen Hoback: Despite all
the doomsday prophecies,

just 15 years after launch,
Bitcoin had become

the 10th most valuable asset
in the world,

outperforming Wall Street
by a massive margin.

One of the biggest
unanswered questions

surrounding Bitcoin
is who invented it.

Andy Court:
When you ask about the creator,

who created this,
we have no idea.

There's these things
called nerds.

And in 2008,

one of them made up Bitcoin
out of thin air,

using the fake name
Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Nakamoto.

- Satoshi--
- Nakamoto.

Which, I think,
are the Japanese words

for Monopoly money.

Satoshi Nakamoto,

the inventor of said
Monopoly money,

was now presumably one of
the richest people on Earth.

speaker:
We are all Satoshi!

This anonymous character had
developed quite a following.

And if all these pundits
kept being wrong,

and Bitcoin kept going up,

then Satoshi could be worth

more than
a trillion dollars.

With a "T."

And that's because
Satoshi controlled

a shit-ton of Bitcoin.

Enough to break the system.

But, many years ago,
Satoshi had disappeared

without spending any of it.

What would happen

if Satoshi just
reemerged one day

to cash in?

They'd be like
king of the world.

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

Who do you think
he really is?

Simply put, Satoshi's identity

has remained
the greatest mystery

of the Internet Age.

No one knows who they are,
even though a lot of people

have tried to figure this out.

YouTuber:
Tonight's plan?
To reveal the identity

of Satoshi Nakamoto,

creator of Bitcoin.

Is he no longer here?
Is he amongst us?

Well, someone probably knew.

Like maybe this guy...

It's too high risk
for Satoshi to come back.

...who you'll
get to know soon enough.

It's way too high risk.

What's risky about it?

Well, you get
implicated as Satoshi.

And then, every country
in the world

is gonna wanna go after you.

Or people are gonna go
after you to steal it.

But, why does,
like, a murderer

go back to
the scene of the crime?

Satoshi's doing nothing
to pick up his stash.

Yeah, just a million Bitcoin.

And that's why he went
to such great lengths

to conceal his identity.

He thought of everything.

Well, not everything.

- Cash.
- customer: That should be 1,000.

How often do you pay with it?

customer:
Such nice guns!

You probably use your card
for just about everything.

Denied, denied... approved.

But the cool thing about cash,

you hand over your money,

you get a thing,

and no bank, credit card
company, government agency,

data broker,
social media advertiser

gets to know
about your hobbies.

But, it seemed like
we were maybe on our way

to getting rid
of cash entirely.

As the world transitions
into a cashless society...

speaker:
"We've gone cashless."

No one wants to
carry around cash anymore.
That's already-- Cash is gone.

In fact, there are quite
a few things about the dollar

that were just outdated
because these dudes

didn't have iPhones.

But, if you were
to start from scratch,

how would you make cash
for the digital age?

It was 2017

when I really started
paying attention to Bitcoin.

And as a filmmaker

who was concerned
with online surveillance...

Everything moved
into ones and zeros,

and ones and zeros can be
tracked and traced.

...the idea that Bitcoin

was supposed to protect your
privacy was pretty appealing.

It was trying to be money
for the internet.

And it had a few features

that the current
financial system just didn't.

announcer: Fight!

No single person or group
controlled it,

it was basically impossible
to shut down,

it was scarce.

Anyone with an internet
connection could access it.

You are personally
responsible for it.

And it was super secure

unless you made a mistake.

And it was distributed
through something called

"Bitcoin mining,"

which I tried.

Even if you don't usually
pay attention to Bitcoin...

...you might have
still heard about it.

Miners using powerful computers

to guess a random
string of numbers

and win a Bitcoin reward.

It's how new Bitcoins
enter the system.

This fancy computing rig,

it's like a ticket
to the Bitcoin lottery.

You said 1,600 Watts?

It takes a lot of electricity.

And if your mining rig is
the first in the entire world

to find
the computational equivalent

of a golden ticket...

I got it, Mr. Salt!
Here it is!

...you win some
freshly minted Bitcoin.

That means that some people
are gonna lose a lot of money.

- Probably.
- Oh yeah.

And every 10 minutes,
you get another shot.

It was the modern gold rush

from the comfort
of your living room.

But, my miner wasn't so lucky.

So, instead of winning
a down payment for a house,

I just ended up with
a large electricity bill.

Eh, fuck.

And the occasional
power outage.

I don't think
this is gonna work.

Meaning I'd have to go
get my Bitcoin on an exchange,

kinda like
how you buy stocks.

And like stocks,

people kinda hope
that this digital asset

is gonna make them rich.

Which, let's be honest,
was the real draw.

It was fueled
by an online culture

that was invested
in seeing Bitcoin win.

You're supposed to buy the dip.
Buy Bitcoin.

Designed to pull people away
from a financial system

that seemed like it was stacked
against the average person.

If you win all three rats,

- and they come in one-two-three,
you win everything.
- Oh, my God.

Drew Carey:
But, you have to win some rats.

And Bitcoin provided
this glimmer of hope

that you might get
out of the rat race.

Look at them go! Oh, man,
you're gonna have a car.

Asking you to put
your faith in math

instead of the government.

- I don't know what I said, ah!
- We finally beat Medicare.

So, maybe that's why in 2021,

an entire country
adopted Bitcoin.

Because the current
financial system

was also stacked
against them.

This is El Salvador,
a Latin American nation

plagued with a history
of gang violence,

corruption, and civil war.

For more than 20 years,
they had resorted

to using the US dollar
as their official currency,

adding to why
the president's announcement

sent shock waves
around the world.

Nayib Bukele:
Where are the Bitcoiners?

He planned to tie the
country's future to Bitcoin.

For starters, they bought
a bunch of it using...

reporter:
105 million taxpayer dollars.

Then, the country began
accepting Bitcoin

as legal tender.

Suddenly, Bitcoin could be
used alongside the dollar

to pay for things
like breakfast, real estate,

or even taxes.

At least, that was the idea.

We announced that El Salvador
was making Bitcoin legal tender.

We had some protests,
did you see those?

They started with misinformation
to the people,

telling them Bitcoin was bad,

and, you know, you shouldn't
use that currency

because it's invisible.
You cannot see it!

Yeah, exactly.

They are all full of bullshit.

The president was betting

that other countries
would want in on the game,

would reject the hegemony
of the US dollar.

Who was behind this effort?

So, we talked with
my friend Samson. Where is he?

Samson?

So, this is going
to make El Salvador

the financial center
of the world.

This is the beginning of, uh,
nation-state Bitcoin FOMO.

Do you guys like that?

The guy on stage
with the president

clearly had something
to do with it.

So, I reached out.

- Hello, we're going
on a helicopter.
- speaker: That's right. Hello.

Samson worked for a company
that was trying to expand

Bitcoin's reach
around the globe.

He considered himself a kind of

diplomatic ambassador
for Bitcoin.

And the president
was treating him like one.

Samson was busy

trying to convince
Mexico's third richest man,

known as Uncle Richi,

to use his power plant
to mine Bitcoin.

Because, you know,

who wants to just
be third richest?

Like myself,
investors also had questions

when it came to Satoshi,
Bitcoin's anonymous creator.

It was the elephant in
the helicopter, so to speak.

- They're gone.
- They're gone.

Yep.

Just before
the launch of Bitcoin,

there was a digital currency
backed by actual gold,

which was reportedly
processing $2 billion

in transactions every year.

E-gold is a currency

that's currently
pretty popularized

with a lot of online users.

They promised that e-gold
would be here this year,

next year,
1,000 years from now.

But, it seems the US government

didn't give a shit
what their website said.

They arrested its creator
and shut it down.

The takeaway?

If you're going to create
a digital currency

that will compete
with the US dollar,

you might wanna be
really careful

about letting people
know who you are.

And because Satoshi disappeared
and never cashed out,

I figured maybe their identity
should stay a secret.

After all,

it's not like they had
some master plan for Bitcoin

to replace the US dollar
and render them

the richest person on Earth.
Right?

Satoshi understood
the game theory of it all.

If Bitcoin was successful,

they'd go after him.

I don't think he would've
created this gift for the world

just to keep it as
a threat over the future.

He was more thinking
for the good of humanity.

Money is very broken.

It's just a house of cards built
on top of more houses of cards

on more houses of cards.

It's all gonna
come crashing down.

And when it does, that's when
hyperbitcoinization kicks in.

Samson Mow:
Hyperbitcoinization is just,

you can earn Bitcoin,
spend Bitcoin,

save in Bitcoin,
and the dollar is irrelevant.

There are a handful
of countries

that had printed their way
into hyperinflation,

where money becomes worth less
than the paper it's printed on.

But, that could never happen
to the US dollar.

Could it?

reporter 1:
Lehman Brothers
is going bankrupt.

reporter 2:
Customers are freaked out,

waiting to see
how low the Dow will go.

Back in 2008,
the world came really close

to figuring out that
our entire economic system

was held together with
chewing gum and duct tape.

reporter:
The President's plan
would allow the Treasury

to buy up to $700 billion
worth of bad loans.

Trust in financial institutions
was hard to find.

I know Americans are concerned
about the adjustments.

The only business
that seemed to be booming

involved taking pictures
of depressed stockbrokers.

It was during this fiasco
that a mysterious programmer,

calling themselves
Satoshi Nakamoto,

conceived of Bitcoin,

an electronic cash system.

And it was all set in motion
on January 3, 2009...

when the first
Bitcoin block was born.

It's called the Genesis Block.

And a new block is formed
about every 10 minutes,

adding to the record of
all the Bitcoin transactions.

It's called a blockchain.

It's like an indestructible
mathematical safe,

one that keeps track
of who owns what.

And if you want to
unlock your Bitcoin,

it'll require
your secret key,

which is basically
just a fancy password.

Bitcoin now has hundreds
of thousands of blocks.

But, in the Genesis Block,
Satoshi hid a message.

"Chancellor on brink
of second bailout for banks."

Referencing a headline that had
appeared in the London "Times"

that same morning.

It was a subtle
declaration of war

against the world's
financial powers,

which had just printed
more than a trillion dollars

to satisfy the recklessness
of the big banks.

In apparent opposition,

Satoshi designed Bitcoin
with a limited supply.

No one could just
print more of it.

Only 21 million total
could ever be mined.

It was programmed so that
the miners would receive

less and less over time.

Until 2140,

when the digital mine
basically runs out,

with Satoshi writing,

"It's very attractive
to the libertarian viewpoint,

"if we can explain it properly.

I'm better with code
than with words though."

You know, for Bitcoiners
who actually might know

who Satoshi is, if they do,

do you think that
they would keep that secret?

Well, I would keep the secret.

Adam Back
would keep the secret.

Samson's boss
is a cryptographer

named Adam Back
which jumped out at me

because Adam Back

has a pretty important
connection to Satoshi.

He was believed to be
the first person

Satoshi ever reached out to.

People have pushed Adam
to release the Satoshi emails

that Satoshi sent to him.

But, Adam is
a very upstanding guy.

His line of thinking is that
is a private conversation.

So, he's never released
those emails.

I've seen them, and, you know,

they're real.

Adam's company is
called Blockstream.

They were largely behind
this effort in El Salvador.

And now, they were looking
to help

more countries adopt Bitcoin.

Which brings Bitcoin closer

to becoming
the new global standard.

Which, in turn,
could make Satoshi

the richest person on Earth.

It might make you wonder

if Satoshi had any
relationship to Blockstream,

assuming Satoshi
was still alive.

So, I asked Samson if he could
connect me with Adam Back.

- Adam, is your mic on?
Can you hear me?
- Just wait a minute...

Okay, should be good.

I had, you know,
a brief interaction,

email interaction,
with Satoshi in 2008.

And-And, like, what happened?
We don't know.

I mean, is he alive or not?
I don't know. Um...

Did he just choose
a different pseudonym?

Is he-- he still active?

We don't know that either,
I'd say.

Satoshi's wallet,
there's this huge sort of chest

that hasn't been tapped.

It seems almost like a,
you know, a Bible story,

where nobody really knows
quite what happened

because it was
so many years ago.

It's hard to be definitive,
I guess is my point.

Hoback
So, Adam, are you
planning any trips

to El Salvador anytime soon?

Adam Back:
I haven't really been
traveling that much lately.

Usually in Malta, actually.

We should start with just
an interview with you in Malta.

Um...

If that sounds...
if that sounds good to you.

Okay.

When Adam moved to Malta,

Bitcoin was just
getting started.

It had no value yet.

So, perhaps it's just
a coincidence

that Malta is considered
a tax haven.

So, how'd you end up in Malta?

Adam Back:
Um, so, in 2009,

I was working for a startup.

I was thinking
as a remote worker,

I would try
something adventurous,

find somewhere
interesting to live.

The cryptography behind Bitcoin

is what makes it secure.

It's the "crypto"
in cryptocurrency.

And cryptographers,
they're like the math wizards

who are skilled
at making digital locks.

And to create Bitcoin,

Satoshi referenced ideas
from a few of them.

In particular, something
that Adam Back had invented,

called Hashcash.

And he dreamed this up 12 years
before the creation of Bitcoin.

Were you the first person
that Satoshi reached out to?

I believe so, yeah.

He just sent an email, um,

saying that he's about
to publish, um, a paper...

What would become Satoshi's
famous white paper.

...and wants to know the
correct way to cite Hashcash.

Did you ever release the emails
that you had with Satoshi?

- No.
- Was that to protect privacy

'cause they were private emails
or what was the reason?

Yeah, kind of convention--

I mean, convention,
so-called "netiquette,"

which was a popular term
back then, was that

you would not post somebody's
emails without permission.

Like, nobody knows how to
reach this guy at this point,

so I can't ask, you know?

But, we can look into
the group of people

Satoshi relied on
for inspiration and support.

Namely, the cypherpunks.

Back in the day,
there was a lot of hope

that this thing called
the internet

was going to usher
in an era of newfound freedom.

BBC speaker:
Imagine a world
where every word ever written

could be viewed
instantly in your home

via an information superhighway.

But, only a few predicted

the surveillance hellscape
that lay ahead.

And they could be found on
the Cypherpunk Mailing List.

Every cryptographer
worth their salt was on it.

Cypherpunks are
cryptography activists

who believe in personal
privacy for everybody.

Which meant in a digital world,

you would need some way
to secure your communications.

In the physical world, you had
a good degree of privacy.

In the online realm,
in principle,

you should enjoy
the same rights.

I mean, why should you lose
your rights just because

you're using a different
communication mechanism?

But, the military,
and three-letter agencies,

viewed cryptography
as a tool of war.

And they didn't want
unbreakable security

in the hands of the masses.

The unrestrained
public discussion

of cryptographic research

threatened our
national security.

The cypherpunks waged

a massive battle
against the US government.

I was sitting around
at university and thinking,

man, this is,
this is so ridiculous.

So, Adam,
being part punk...

...created an easily wearable
bit of illicit code.

It was just a method
of encryption.

Wear the shirt
while crossing a border,

and it could be considered
weapons trafficking.

A few people
had tattoos with it on

to, like, you know,
to make the argument that,

"Well, can I,
can I leave the country now?

I've got this on my arm,"
kind of thing.

And if you've ever used
a secure messaging app,

well, you have Adam and his
cypherpunk buddies to thank

because they won.

Except one key thing
evaded them.

Permissionless electronic cash
for the internet.

Hey, this could actually
change the world for the better.

They understood
that in a future

where everything would be
tracked and traced,

you needed untraceable
digital cash.

The holy grail was to find
a solution to this problem.

And we're not talking about

a digital representation
of money

like when you use
a bank or credit card.

We're talking
entirely decentralized,

totally secure,
fully autonomous currencies

spread across the globe that no
one could control or shut down.

It all needed to work without
putting trust in a bank,

a government,
or some big corporation.

I want to tell you
how PayPal stole my money

and my girlfriend.

Over the years,
a few key cypherpunks

took stabs at trying
to make this work.

It was deemed impossible.

But then, somehow, Satoshi
showed up and figured it out.

You know, you talk to
a lot of technical people,

and they will say of Bitcoin,
"I could have done that."

I say it's actually much harder
than it looks.

I'm just trying to imagine,
like,

who would've been
working around the clock

to introduce something
like Bitcoin...?

So, it could be somebody that
was on the cypherpunks list

that nobody knew
the real name of.

Or it could be somebody younger.

Rachel-Rose O'Leary:
I think the question,

"Who was Satoshi?"
always kind of creeps in.

It's hard to avoid
that question.

But, I've been told
it was a secret

which was known,
but that was closely guarded.

That there were
people in Bitcoin

who knew who Satoshi is,

but that they
wouldn't reveal it.

Um, and that maybe Satoshi
was a group of people

that is, like, still active
in Bitcoin today.

Rachel-Rose was
a journalist for CoinDesk.

It's one of the most
popular media outlets

covering the whole
crypto space.

Since leaving CoinDesk,

she'd become
a crypto-anarchist,

which is about using
subversive technology...

...to dodge government control.

O'Leary: I was hoping
you might have the time

to interview Amir
while you're here.

He's, uh, one of
the first five developers

to talk with Satoshi.

-Where is he
in Switzerland?
- He's downstairs.

Oh, he's here?
Oh, he lives with you!

Who just happened
to be her boyfriend.

Good to meet you.

Amir Taaki is a British-Iranian
anarchist revolutionary

and one of
the earliest programmers

who worked on Bitcoin
after Satoshi handed it off.

In terms of the "Fuck the man,

burn down the system"
roots of Bitcoin,

this guy is about
as real as it gets.

Should I call it...

Drug Market Ultra

or Death Market Revive?

These days, the Bitcoiners,

they don't really talk
about me anymore.

I'm no longer "in"
with the Bitcoin crowd.

But, part of it is because,

uh, I went to fight in Syria.

And I was like-- I was out
of crypto for two years.

There's a few photos of him
with Kalashnikov,

and it's like, "Bitcoiner
Fights ISIS in Syria."

Amir Taaki:
It was more like three years,

because I was under house arrest
for one year as well.

Oh wow. For what?

Investigation of terrorism.

How did you get
involved with Bitcoin?

I remember when I first
got into Bitcoin in 2010.

I started to, like,
delve a bit deeper,

started to look at the code.

The code itself was very bad,

didn't seem like the guy
who had wrote it

was a professional developer.

But, it wasn't nothing either.

Conceptually, it was,
it was a leap.

It was interesting.

Was Satoshi
communicating with you

in the early days at all?

Just on the forums.

Satoshi created
the Bitcoin Talk forum,

where early enthusiasts
could interact with Satoshi

who wrote 575 total posts.

Their posts usually had
a kind of bland academic style.

Unless something
got under Satoshi's skin.

Which Amir succeeded at.

When I posted
about WikiLeaks...

WikiLeaks, an online collective

known for publishing
state secrets,

had become the target
of the state.

The US government pressured
Visa, MasterCard,

PayPal to block all donations

and freeze their funds.

So, Amir suggested they start
accepting donations in Bitcoin.

"PC World" picked up the story.

Satoshi was afraid this
rapid adoption by WikiLeaks

would attract
the wrong kind of attention

from three-letter agencies.

One of my favorite quotes,

"WikiLeaks has kicked
the hornet's nest,

and the swarm
is headed towards us."

That's one theory
for Satoshi's departure.

The very next day,

that's when Satoshi made
their last post on the forum.

But, Satoshi quietly
continued communication

with a select few people,

primarily with a guy
named Gavin Andresen,

who had been an early
contributor to Bitcoin.

I was kind of looking around

for an interesting
open source software project

to contribute to
and stumbled across Bitcoin,

and then got sucked in.

Satoshi, when he left,

he distributed control

amongst different people
in the community.

Now, Gavin represented

a very different type
of Bitcoiner than Amir.

He wanted to work
with the state, not against it.

He's a normie.
Like a boomer-normie.

But, normalizing Bitcoin
appeared to be Satoshi's goal.

And Gavin looked like he was
from an L.L.Bean catalog.

Every time I tried
to make a change to Bitcoin,

he tried to reject it.
I was like, dude, fuck off!

On the Bitcoin website,

Satoshi even replaced
their own email with Gavin's,

seemingly rendering him
the spokesperson.

So, I-I took over from
the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto.

But, Satoshi became annoyed
with Gavin's PR efforts

rather quickly, writing,

"I wish you wouldn't
keep talking about me

"as a mysterious
shadowy figure.

The press just turns that
into a pirate currency angle."

Then, Gavin did something that
mortified early Bitcoiners,

prompting Satoshi
to permanently cut ties.

My last email to him was
telling him that I had

agreed to go visit
the folks at the CIA.

Gavin Andresen announced

that he was visiting the CIA
to present Bitcoin.

Everybody was
absolutely shocked.

Like, dude,
what are you doing?

And after that,
Satoshi just disappeared.

Nobody heard from him again.

Which was good timing

because Bitcoin was about to
find its first real-use case:

buying drugs.

YouTuber:
Something special
came in the mail

just today from Silk Road.

reporter:
Imagine logging on to
an Amazon-like marketplace,

only instead of
household items and shoes,

you can buy heroin, meth,

and pretty much any other drug
you can think of.

"Many thanks and much love."

Yeah, I'm pretty sure
there are some, uh,

people interested in drugs,
let's say,

who ended up
being relatively wealthy.

While this sent
Bitcoin's value skyrocketing,

its reputation
was easy pickings.

It's untraceable,
and that makes me think

that the real purpose of
Bitcoin is to use it for drugs

or to buy weapons illegally.

Although anarchists like Amir
were loving it,

the emerging generation
of corporate Bitcoiners

wanted to improve its image,
give Bitcoin a friendlier face.

reporter:
Bitcoin Jesus himself
joins us on the phone.

- Roger, great to have you back.
- Roger Ver
Hello, everyone.

Thank you for having me again.

Roger Ver
put millions of dollars

into some of
the first Bitcoin startups,

eventually rendering him
a billionaire.

But, when Roger first heard
about Bitcoin,

he had what's best described

as a near-religious
experience.

Got so excited about Bitcoin
and didn't sleep for a week

and literally had to be
taken to the hospital,

and they gave me a sedative.

Anybody here
that's sick of the government

inflating the money supply

to pay to kill people
all around the world?

Stop using their money!

This was like a dream
come true for me.

The-The thing I've been waiting
almost my entire life

finally arrived,
and so, of course,

I was gonna be busy
promoting that.

Like a prophet,
Roger spread Bitcoin

to anyone he met,
earning him the title

of Bitcoin Jesus.

I think the world
would just plain work better

and be better for everybody
if there wasn't a ruling class

called the government. Uh...

But, I don't want chaos.
I want order

and things to work smoothly and
people to deal with each other

on a voluntary basis to make
the world a more orderly,

prosperous place for everybody.

Nouriel Roubini
is a famous economist,

best known for predicting
the 2008 financial collapse,

earning him the nickname
Dr. Doom.

I'm a pain for them

because I'm public enemy
number one of crypto.

YouTuber:
Nouriel Roubini.
He can either be

the world's biggest
crypto troll

or an idiot.

He's also known for throwing
wild hot tub parties,

where he looks to have
"10 girls to every one guy."

You know, I usually say
that I'm not, uh, "Dr. Doom,"

I'm Dr. Realist.

Honestly, I believe that
crypto, even blockchain,

is the biggest fad
in financial history.

In crypto, somebody steals
your private key,

your money is gone,
your wealth is gone forever,

for good. It disappears.

reporter:
This guy is out

of $225 million.

Seven and a half
thousand bitcoins

on a hard drive
that I'd thrown out.

If somebody steals
my credit card

or gets my bank deposit,

literally, I make a phone call,

and I'm made
100% whole on that.

We have reasons why

we can monitor
financial transactions.

Some government may abuse it,

but there is no civilized
country in the world,

or government,
is gonna allow crypto.

There will be a crackdown,

and it's all gonna disappear.

This is about
undermining the Federal Reserve.

This is about dis-intermediating
the nation-state.

Satoshi, whoever he or she was,

maybe was an idealist.

Maybe he really cared
about protecting people

from excessive abuse
of power and so on.

The ideological origins

of cryptocurrency, of Bitcoin,
of Satoshi himself,

unequivocally anti nation-state

and pro human freedom.

But, they had a problem.

While Satoshi understood
that Bitcoin

wasn't actually anonymous,
just about everyone else...

They didn't realize
it was traceable.

It wasn't until
there was analysis done,

cryptographers looking into it
started to see, actually,

there's links.

There's like a trail
on the blockchain

that we can actually map.

So, if someone who stole

a bunch of Bitcoin
tries to cash out,

you can see that
their Bitcoin wallet

contains the stolen funds.

Which is how people doing
illegal shit got caught.

Today, the FBI
successfully seized

criminal proceeds
from a Bitcoin wallet.

So, Amir gathered
some hackers together

in a sketchy squad

to try and solve
Bitcoin's privacy problem.

They hired a young kid
as their lead programmer.

His name was Peter Todd.

Peter Todd was living with us.

You know,
that's how I got to know him.

We put Peter Todd as the
chief scientist of our project

to put him in opposition
to Gavin Andresen.

You know, we're sitting in
a freezing cold room

because it's an abandoned
building with no heat.

And it's very unique.

But, equally though,

you get people who know
what they're talking about.

You need to give people space to
actually work on these issues.

Nine years later,

Peter was still trying
to solve these issues.

Peter Todd:
There's a lot of people who
would like to see cash go away

and like see your ability to
transact anonymously disappear.

I mean, this,
this is a very dangerous thing.

This needs to be treated
as a human rights issue.

How'd you get into caving?

There was something called
the Toronto Caving Group.

Didn't really pick the best
place to live for good caves.

Here, you can actually see, uh,

stalactites and stalagmites
sort of forming a column.

So, you know this thing hasn't
moved for probably 30, 40 years.

It's unlikely it'll collapse
on our heads,

but one day, it will.

Tell me about your endeavors

to try to make
a digital currency yourself.

Well, you know,

in, like, the mid-2000s,

I was off getting
a fine arts degree.

Started working halftime,
like, 2007, full-time in 2008,

and I finally kinda
finished it in sort of 2009,

and then went on
to start doing physics.

So, have people suspected you
of being Satoshi at any point?

Why do they, uh,
think you're behind it?

It was back in 2001,

when Peter Todd,
a self-taught coder,

first contacted Adam Back.

He was only 15 at the time,

and, like some sort of savant,

he already had a deep
understanding of digital cash.

You almost learned how to code
before you learned how to read.

Yep.

That's wild.

The logic of coding
seemed pretty obvious to me.

Were you just interested in
those issues in high school?

I happened to be
a young libertarian,

and it was pretty obvious
to me that

control of money
is a very big problem

for freedom of speech.

We should find a way to
have decentralized banking.

Over the years,
Peter became

an increasingly
controversial figure.

The war on cash is the thing
that has to be stopped.

And, frankly, everyone
in this audience,

if you don't use cash
to go pay regularly,

I don't, I don't respect you
as a Bitcoiner.

Like, that's just a fact.

If you're using credit
every single day, fuck you.

Let's just say his takes
weren't always appreciated.

One day,
Bitcoin will go to zero.

You know,
it will eventually fail,

like everything else.

Peter will always try
to disagree with you.

He's the contrarian
of contrarians.

You know,
the people who really know...

know how this stuff works,
I think realize

that anyone competent enough
to go do Bitcoin

probably would be competent
enough to not leave any traces.

I mean, Satoshi left
a lot of digital history.

Yeah, but digital history
doesn't mean much, you know?

Doesn't necessarily give you
any insight into who they were.

Remember, things that
look like mistakes

can be intentionally
misleading.

If I were Satoshi, I would have
destroyed my ability

to go prove I was Satoshi.

Because then,
you'd never be tempted.

But, uh,
you're-you're not Satoshi?

Oh, no, I am Satoshi.

I'm Satoshi Nakamoto.

-Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We're all Satoshi.
-Yep.

It's a monkey, I guess.

-Yep.
- Could be better.

How'd you guys meet?

Online first.

I got more actively interested
in Bitcoin in 2013.

Had the feeling that I don't
understand how this works.

There are people
developing it,

maybe I can find out
where they hang out.

So, still trying to understand
how Bitcoin works,

Adam heads over
to the forum

and, for the first time ever,
makes some posts.

A lot of posts.

Trying to prove his relevance

and his apparent ignorance.

I was a guy
who had a fine arts degree.

Yet, you know,
I still understood the system
better than he did.

So, to clear things up,
Adam started a thread,

"Who is this annoying
Adam Back guy?"

Of course, the Bitcoiners
knew who he was.

I knew who you were.
I knew you invented Hashcash.

And here you pop up,
and you were clueless.

And they just thought
he was, well, pretending.

Best evidence of
him being Satoshi.

-Of not being Satoshi.
-Being Satoshi.

- Uh--
- Only Satoshi would go
to such great lengths

to go and make sure no one
thought they were Satoshi.

By the way,
everyone's Satoshi.

Yeah, except for me.
I'm not Satoshi.

But the most suspicious thing

was the timing of
his appearance on the forums.

The same day Adam registered,

a researcher discovered
a bug in Bitcoin's code.

It enabled them to see
how much Satoshi had mined.

About a million Bitcoin.

Adam seemed concerned, writing,

"Perhaps we're forced
to protect him."

And he had a plan.

And I had a potential way
to improve Bitcoin's privacy...

He wanted to make
Bitcoin truly anonymous.

Which would also mean
Satoshi could spend their stash

without anyone knowing.

So, I talked to developers

about how do--
how do you achieve this.

And Adam's coming-out party
on the forums

positioned him
so that within a year,

he could start Blockstream.

Because Bitcoin's problems,

they just couldn't be solved
in a squad,

like what Peter and Amir
had attempted a year earlier.

It required serious funding.

It's a big undertaking.

So, it'd need a company,

it needs to employ
lots of people.

Blockstream could do what
Satoshi couldn't.

Raise money, build a huge team,

and solve Bitcoin's
technical problems.

You could say Blockstream is
a kind of corporate Satoshi?

- Mm-hmm.
- Like, how did he become
the head of the company

that became
the stewards of Bitcoin?

Uh, it's a good question.

He kind of, uh, shows up
and very quickly

becomes integrated
into the Bitcoin community.

Where he knew to pursue
the right kind of talent.

So, Adam,
when you started Blockstream,

did you try
to get Peter on board?

- Well, kinda intentionally not.
- Yeah.

We talked about saying it would
actually be much better

- if I didn't work
for Blockstream.
-Mm-hmm.

'Cause it's better
if Blockstream
doesn't have everyone.

While Peter Todd decided
not to work at Blockstream,

his friend Greg Maxwell did.

We're building infrastructure

that Bitcoin needs
going forward.

In fact, Greg founded
the company with Adam.

O'Leary:
People like Greg Maxwell,

they were considered
the, the thought leaders.

Greg doesn't do interviews
anymore, right?

Getting him to come
out of his, uh, home is, uh...

...seemingly off the table,
with Greg writing to me,

"I'm pretty exhausted
from years of harassment

"driven by conspiracy theories.

I feel like I've given enough."

So, do you think
they were working with Satoshi?

It was very mysterious.
Uh, th-there is the question

of whether Adam Back is Satoshi.

There's been a lot of debate

over which of these cypherpunks
is most likely to be Satoshi.

Hal Finney received
the first Bitcoin transaction,

but he died of Lou Gehrig's
disease in 2014.

Well, sort of.

His head is frozen.

So, if he's Satoshi,

you'd probably have
to solve cryonics

to get the key
that's stored in his head.

But, there were some problems
with this theory.

Satoshi's code bears zero
resemblance to Hal Finney's.

And Hal was photographed
in a 10-mile race,

while Satoshi was
actively emailing with someone.

In 2015, The New York Times
pointed to Nick Szabo,

a reclusive cypherpunk
who envisioned something

pretty similar to Bitcoin.

Would you ever be
open to, to doing,

like, an interview on camera
about all of that?

The key piece of evidence,

he changed the date
of a blog entry,

presumably so it would seem
like he came up

with this idea after Bitcoin.

Thing is, he'd actually
announced months earlier

that he'd be doing reruns
of his blog favorite entries,

making this piece of evidence
look a lot less suspicious.

There's Wei Dai,
who is a famous cryptographer.

He claims there are no real
photos of him on the internet.

But, he did speculate
that Satoshi

must have been someone
with energy and time

that isn't obligated to publish
papers under their real name.

There's Len Sassaman,
David Chaum, Dorian Nakamoto...

The list goes on and on.

I am Satoshi!

Okay!

The biggest critic of crypto
is Satoshi himself.

And while we could pick apart
each of these theories,

the evidence pointing
in Adam's direction

was a lot harder
to poke holes in.

So, we're gonna focus on that.

Though for a long time,
people hadn't really

considered him a suspect.
And that's because

he wasn't just cited
in the white paper.

He was the only person called
out by name in the body of it.

But, was Satoshi simply
hiding in plain sight?

I've never done it
before, so...

- Okay. It's 99%.
- It's just one--
Just this one hand, right?

You see, like Satoshi,

he writes in
a typically measured style

with similar spelling choices.

Now, Adam also claims that
he didn't really get involved

until four years
after the launch of Bitcoin.

In 2013, I felt like, you know,

the embarrassing late guy,

given that I should've known
better at the beginning, right?

And, uh...

Thing is,

back in 2011,

you can see he was
on a mailing list,

openly defending Bitcoin,

and sharing complex insights
into Bitcoin's expansion.

Weirder still, in 2012,

he began making revisions
to Bitcoin's Wikipedia page,

eventually restoring
the section about Satoshi...

Just, like, tried to right
a slight historical wrong there.

...even adding
possible suspects.

Just leaving out his own name.

How much is
Satoshi worth these days?

I don't know. Um, I mean,
even the number of coins

that he might have
is a bit speculative.

If they had a million coins,

whoever Satoshi is
would technically have

a huge amount of influence
if it becomes the,

- the new global currency, right?
-Right.

That would mean that
whoever Satoshi is

might be one of the most
powerful people in the world.

Even the slightest suggestion

that Satoshi had access
to their coins

had the power
to tumble markets.

Market fear has begun
to overtake rationality.

But selling
a million coins all at once?

If these coins were dumped...

That could kill Bitcoin.

And as the stakes grew,

it kinda mattered
if Satoshi still had access.

If you were Satoshi,
where would you store

your private key
to the, uh, trove?

I don't know. That's a lot
of bitcoins, isn't it?

What do you think Satoshi
might've done with that key?

I don't know. I mean,

some people speculate that
he might've deleted them.

But, of course, we don't know--
we wouldn't know, right?

But, we could've known.

You see, there's a way

to verifiably destroy
your bitcoins.

It's called burning the coins,

and it's done in a public way
for all to see...

...on the blockchain.

You could burn all the coins

because that would remove the
small uncertainty that exists.

But,
Satoshi didn't do this.

Meaning they very well
might still have access.

If they kept that stuff,
there'd be a lot of temptation

to spend some of it.

So, Satoshi had to weigh
the temptation

of becoming
the richest person on Earth

against the possibility

that it would
derail their invention.

Do you think it'll ever
be known who Satoshi is?

I don't think so, no.

I mean, just-just because
all of the people

that have been identified

have various reasons,
believable reasons,

why it's probably not them.

And you know
what the list is, right?

- It's been circulated
a million times.
- Right. Right.

Wei Dai is on the list.

Um, Nick Szabo is on the list.
Hal Finney.

You're on the list.
And then,

maybe mysterious...
mysterious other person.

- Right.
- Um...

Well, I thought
you might think I'm Satoshi,

and I don't want that
to be on the record, really.

- I mean, you're on
the list of suspects, right?
- Yeah, yeah,

but, uh, you know,

I was interested for you,
personally, to understand

that really-really,
I'm not, you know? Yeah.

It seemed to me that,
at a minimum,

Adam was more involved
than he was letting on.

Meanwhile, Blockstream's
Bitcoin ambassador

was trying to make Bitcoin
the new global standard.

This is a pivotal
time with Bitcoin,

and we have to push
the advantage we have now.

I have an in in Korea,
but if you wanna do Vietnam...

Michelle Phan:
Wow... Yeah!

- Fist bump... I'm down.
- Are you down? Okay!

Alright, I'm down, too.

Samson's young new ally
just happened to be

one of YouTube's
biggest beauty influencers.

Now, she was advising
on more than just makeup.

With Bitcoin,
you can buy it in smaller units.

There's 100 million satoshis
in one bitcoin.

Nothing ever infinitely goes up,

but Bitcoin will.

I feel like California
should become its own country

and adopt Bitcoin.
In my humble opinion.

It's like, what, the fourth
largest GDP right, in the world?

Yeah.

They were headed
to a political function

for Andrew Yang...

Andrew Yang:
I'm Andrew Yang,

and I'm running for president
as a Democrat in 2020.

...who kinda brought the idea
of universal basic income

into the mainstream.

- So, we gotta talk to Andrew
about UBI. Your UBI!
- Yeah.

Yes,
the universal Bitcoin income.

Not universal basic income.
We don't want basic shit.

- We want Bitcoin.
- Yeah, we're not basic.

Thank you. Okay, here we are.

So, these two,
they're what's known as

Bitcoin maximalists,
or Maxi for short.

I'm a proud
Bitcoin Maxi now.

I'm toxic as fuck.

Does their profile pic

have lasers
coming out of their eyes?

Usually means they're a Maxi.

It was a system
of monetary belief.

Welcome to the new religion.

Faith that Bitcoin could fix
all the problems in the world.

Bitcoin fixes everything!

And that the US dollar
was on its way out.

Okay, here's a $10 bill.

This is garbage.
This is garbage.

Which could be
pretty fucking annoying.

But, ultimately, their goal
was to orange pill the world.

We're gonna try
and orange pill him.

Oh my gosh! Hey, Michelle!

We have a real life
Asian-American supermodel
and activist.

Their tactics could
be pretty shameless.

- Andrew,
nice to meet you.
- Oh, nice to meet you, too.

This guy's changing the world.
I want you to meet him.

I think he's really important
for you to talk to.

Oh, no, I'm super pumped
about this. See this magic?

You see this magic in real time?
You wanna say a couple words?

Bitcoin is the most
important crypto out there.

Holy cow!

- Let's talk, uh, more deeply.
-Yeah!

What's your info? What's
the best way to be in touch?

Many of these utopian movements
start by a bunch of idealists.

But then, they're captured
by a bunch of greedy people,

they become a cult,

and the people and the system
becomes like a religion.

They become fanatic.

And then, all these utopias,
in due time,

they just disappear
in the dustbin of history.

And that's what's
gonna happen with crypto.

Samson thought he could use
his own right hand.

Someone with connections.

Enter the Prince of Serbia.

Prince Philip:
2020, that's when
it really clicked.

There are synergies
between Bitcoin and monarchies.

I'm a Maxi now.

That's my great-grandfather.

This is my great-
great-grandfather.

I see. When do you get
your painting in here?

Who knows?

He has the perfect skill set

to contact, uh,
diplomats, presidents.

There's a lot of
big family network

to-to-to work through.
That opens a lot of doors.

Not that long ago,

Montenegro and Serbia used
to be part of the same country.

And Prince Philip's family
still had a lot of influence.

Prince Philip:
Prime Minister Spaji.

In terms of where he's at
with Bitcoin,

could be the start of
a good relationship with him

to get things moving
in this country.

I'm a big fan of Bitcoin,
obviously,

and of the technology
that Bitcoin brought.

Politically,
it's, it's a difficult sell.

You have to think about
all kinds of risks.

I think the government
shouldn't invest in Bitcoin.

If you're risk-averse,
you think the government

should not hold it.
That's fine.

But, in the event
that fiat currencies collapse,

everyone will rush into Bitcoin.
So, what we're trying to do

is get parallel systems
in place.

Dollars, Bitcoin, pesos,
Bitcoin, yen, Bitcoin.

We don't have our own currency.

We're using euros without
being able to print euros.

And that's not fair.
You know, that's not cool.

Maybe something to consider

is adopting Bitcoin
as simply money.

You don't need to tax anybody.

- You can just mine Bitcoin...
- Prince Philip: Yes.

...and that will
fund everything.

The electricity
is relatively cheap.

It's usually
the smaller countries

that are more agile
and willing to embrace change

'cause they're looking
for some advantage.

I think it's a good idea.

You can really be a beacon
in Europe right now.

Concretely, how do we do this?

We had a really good talk
about Bitcoin adoption

and what they can do.
And they also, like Costa Rica,

have a lot of hydropower,

so we're making progress
everywhere.

How did something with such
anarchistic roots

end up being
mined by countries?

narrator 1:
It all started in 1849.

There was gold in California.

In the beginning,

if you wanted to do
Bitcoin mining,

your home computer
was good enough.

Which is how Satoshi racked up

what appears to be
over a million Bitcoin.

But, once Bitcoin had value...

narrator 1:
Within a short time,

all had caught the fever
that only gold would quench.

...people created
specialized mining rigs

to increase
their chances of winning.

narrator 1:
Which made the job move faster.

The more people who compete,
the harder it gets.

narrator 1:
As the gold became
more difficult to find...

Mining industrialized,
becoming an arms race.

narrator 2:
It was buckets,
after buckets, after buckets.

Looking for the cheapest
energy, the fastest miners,

in search of
the next golden ticket.

reporter:
Bitcoin mines generated
about $70,000 a day.

And if you can't keep up,
it stops being profitable.

narrator 1:
As the gold gave out,
people moved away.

Until most of the players
left in the game

are basically billionaires
who own their own power plants,

or countries
who own the power grid.

It's the grand unveiling.

I think there's
a couple hundred in here.

It's a 40-foot container.

Requiring about
0.5% of all the energy.

And it requires increasing
amounts of energy consumption

as more miners compete.

And while you might think
that's pretty terrible...

...compounding
a climate catastrophe,

if you've ever heard
of petrodollars,

that's because Nixon
ditched the gold standard

and intertwined the US dollar
with the oil trade.

The effect of this action,
in other words,

will be to stabilize
the dollar.

Which helped solidify
the dollar's status

as the global reserve currency,

but kinda kept us
dependent on oil.

So, maybe it's just
the nature of money

that it's based on things
that people value.

Which is to say, a currency
derived from electricity

might pose a real threat
to the dollar

if it gained in popularity.

Assuming it actually worked.

You see, Bitcoin's original
design had a fatal flaw.

reporter 1:
Well, computer giant Dell
announcing today

- it will accept Bitcoin.
- reporter 2: Sacramento Kings
to accept Bitcoin.

Overstock is now
accepting Bitcoin.

If too many people
started using Bitcoin,

it would stop working.

And that's because those blocks

that make up Bitcoin's
record keeping system,

they just can't hold
very much information.

They're small.
And you have to wait

10 minutes before
another block forms.

So, when Bitcoin got popular,

your transaction would be stuck

in line for hours,
sometimes days.

And since money needs
to work immediately,

this was a disaster.

Transaction times
are incredibly high.

There's a lot of people
questioning long-term
sustainability.

Stripe is getting out
of the Bitcoin business.

So Gavin, who was still kind of

steering the Bitcoin ship,
announced...

We'll definitely
need to increase

the maximum block size.

In other words,
make each block bigger.

More room for all
the transactions.

But, not everyone agreed.

This is obviously a bad idea.

Oh, this is all bullshit.

These guys are bringing
about the doom of Bitcoin.

A disagreement which resulted
in a massive nerd fight,

known as the Blocksize War.

So, why were they being
so apocalyptic

about just adding more space
to each Bitcoin block?

The nerds had
some good reasons.

For instance,
if you could change something

as fundamental
as the block size,

could you also change
the total supply

from 21 million to 100?

People might lose their faith
in what makes Bitcoin Bitcoin.

Although, to make
a change like this,

you have to get pretty much
everyone on board.

Otherwise,
the community will split.

So, instead of
changing Bitcoin,

the Small Blockers had
a complex technical solution,

but it would take years.
Meanwhile,

the Big Blockers wanted
Bitcoin to work now,

not in some theoretical future.

Governments move slowly.
We need to move quickly

and make this cash
for the entire world

before the politicians
even know what happened

and they have time to react
via bigger blocks.

The fight became vicious,
with each side

accusing the other of
trying to destroy Bitcoin.

I'm not exaggerating, this
is a life and death matter.

More babies are dying
in countries around the world

because they have
less economic freedom.

He's not Bitcoin Jesus.

He's Bitcoin Judas.

He's the one that's
trying to kill Bitcoin.

With Bitcoin
essentially divided

between the church
of small blocks

and the church
and big blocks,

you might be wondering

where did Satoshi
fall in all of this?

I think Satoshi
handed the keys off to Gavin

because he viewed Gavin
as a responsible steward

of the future
of the project.

But, that doesn't mean
you're the leader.

That just means you're the guy
who answers questions.

Well, it seemed Satoshi

was about to make
their views known.

After years of silence,

Satoshi sends an email out
to the mailing list

to share their concerns.

It's from the same address
Satoshi used back in 2008.

The one to distribute
the white paper.

His words were clear, harsh...

and firmly against
Roger, Gavin,

and the big corporations.

There's a debate
around whether or not

that was, like, legitimate.

But, whoever had access
to Satoshi's email

was somewhat aligned
with Blockstream,

with their angle
on the scaling debate.

While some question
the email's authenticity,

it placed Satoshi squarely
on Blockstream's side.

And then, as if sent
from digital heaven,

Satoshi appeared
in the flesh.

He was apparently
an Australian fellow...

named Craig Wright.

So, you're gonna show me
that Satoshi Nakamoto is you?

Yes.

I do think Craig is Satoshi.

I met with him in London.

Uh, he fits the kind of person

that I was interacting
with way back in 2010,

and he provided
some cryptographic proof.

Miraculously, this Satoshi

was on Gavin and Roger's side.

At first, it seemed
wonderful because, oh,

Satoshi's back,
and he's a Big Blocker.

Raise the block size.

Very quickly, people figured out

this is obviously bullshit.

It seems like
he'd fake the evidence

by backdating
his cryptographic proof.

Craig Wright is
incredibly convincing.

For me, he's proved it

beyond a reasonable doubt.

But, if you dig
deep enough, long enough,

the inconsistencies will emerge.

Yeah, I-I have to be careful
about talking about that topic

because he, uh, sued me
at some point.

-Who did?
- Craig.

- He sued--
-For what?

For libel.
He sued a lot of people.

Well, that's
something to look forward to.

To me, Craig Wright was
the death blow in the war.

"Death blow" is a strong word,
but something close to that.

Thanks, Craig.

We got lucky.

The Blocksize War
went the right way.

The Blocksize War was over,

and the Small Blockers had won.

The victor
writes history.
Yeah.

O'Leary:
They established themselves as

the ideological
authority on Bitcoin.

But, had Satoshi
simply regained control?

It took the Small Blockers
almost a decade

to make their plan work.

None of that Starbucks bullshit!

You could buy
coffee with Bitcoin,

which is why countries
were now able to adopt it.

But, it required the support
of companies like Blockstream.

Cheers. You're not
supposed to cheers coffee.

And these companies
would take a small cut

out of every transaction.
Meaning it ain't...

Permissionless electronic cash
for the internet.

Which fueled theories that
they had ulterior motives.

It's been delayed by
at least a decade, if not more,

because of this, uh, block size
limit that was imposed,

and probably covert government
agents helping it along.

-Yeah, so I guess
we'll just go--
- Peter Todd.

Sorry, what was that?

I said Peter Todd,
for one.

Wait. Roger thought Peter Todd
was working for the government?

What-What indication
did you have

that he was,

perhaps, collaborating
with the government?

The things he was advocating
that should happen with Bitcoin

were counterproductive
to Bitcoin being usable

as cash and usable as money.

Prior to 2013,

pretty much all of
Peter Todd's history

appears to be wiped
from the internet.

I finally found
his personal website.

2001...

Where, in high school,

when he was communicating
with the cypherpunks,

he joked that in the event

he becomes an evil dictator
who takes over the world,

he was screwed up
from childhood.

His father was an economist,

and his mother taught him
about encryption.

And while Peter Todd
might have worked for...

A company manufacturing
gyroscopes

for drones in the military.

...being in the CIA obviously
wasn't on his resume.

Or whatever the fuck Canada's
intelligence agency's called.

But, Roger brought up
something suspicious.

Later, somebody leaked
this email exchange from him,

and that guy openly claimed

that he was working
for the US government.

Anybody who looks on Google

and searches,
"Peter Todd leaked emails"
will see...

Back in 2013,
there was this email thread

that had been leaked
between Peter Todd

and a guy who called
himself John Dillon.

And in the emails,

Peter Todd was conspiring
with this other guy

who was affiliated
with state actors.

With John Dillon claiming,

"My day job
involves intelligence,

and I'm in a relatively
high position."

Maybe Amir just wasn't
aware of this at the time.

If it looks like something's
coming into existence

that could replace the US dollar
as the world's reserve currency,

the US government and
its three-letter agencies

absolutely, without any doubt,
will do whatever they can,

including secretly and covertly
disrupting projects

like Bitcoin.

If the government
wanted to undermine Bitcoin,

or try to get close to Satoshi,
how might they do it?

A guy that openly said
that he was working
for a three-letter agency

literally paid Peter Todd

to implement what's
called replace-by-fee.

John Dillon offered
a strangely small $500 reward

for anyone who could
design replace-by-fee.

It was essentially
a bidding service.

If you pay more, you can
send your Bitcoin faster.

Replace-by-fee was an attempt

to fix one of Bitcoin's
design problems.

Something that Satoshi
had speculated on

just before disappearing
from the forums.

And Satoshi knew it would be
a fair amount of work.

So, why would Peter Todd
do it for 500 bucks?

On the forums, John Dillon
publicly prodded Peter Todd to,

"Write some code for once."

And so, in 2013,

about three years after
Satoshi's disappearance,

Peter Todd solves
this design problem.

I played that little part,

creating this
replace-by-fee patch.

Which the Big Blockers
thought was a terrible idea

because it could result
in some really high fees

just to send some Bitcoin.

Peter Todd, whether
he's a government agent,

he's absolutely
a super smart guy.

He's gotta be
the smartest guy in the room.

He always wants
to make sure he can prove

that he's the smartest guy
in the room.

So, is anyone
in this audience

working for government
right now?

Because if you are,
I guess I'm one of the people

handling negotiation
with government.

Even the email exchange

made Peter Todd
look pretty damn smart.

But after the leak,

John Dillon
disappeared for good.

As far as I know, Peter Todd
never denied any of that.

I think that's pretty much
accepted as fact at this point.

I found myself wondering

if maybe he did work for
the government in some way.

So, how close were you with
Blockstream back in the day?

-Me?
-Yeah.

Uh, mostly,
I went to their office,

uh, drink all their Red Bull.

I'd go and
eat all their snacks.

Yeah, yeah. I mean,
they'd never pay me,

but I might as well get paid
in all other possible ways.

So, he was just
strategically close to Adam.

Well, Adam seems
to respect you a lot.

Meh, I mean I guess
I have reasonable ideas.

It's not that hard.
Adam respects plenty of people.

- I think he thinks of
you like a son.
- A son.

Yeah. I mean,
I first talked to him

when I was, like, a teenager.

It's probably part of it.

They've got a lot of
conspiracies about you.

Well, they should.

Don't you know I, like,
worked for the CIA, NSA,

and also KGB at the same time?

Well, they like to point at that
email dump that happened.

Oh, yeah, yeah,
the John Dillon bullshit.

-Did you release that?
- I have no idea
who that guy is.

-Really?
- I mean, you know, people go

and email you all the time,

like, telling you
all kinds of bullshit.

Looked like you were trying
to solve a lot of problems

- with him at the time, and, uh--
- No, I mean--

And there was, like, concerns

that, I guess that
John Dillon guy

was like under-- was like,
an agent or something and then--

The guy explicitly
claimed he was, uh,

you know, working for
the US government intelligence.

But, you know,
is that true or not?

Who the fuck knows? Like,

the problem with all this stuff

is people play all kinds
of crazy games.

Could be a 4chan troll.

Like, that's just
the reality of it.

You just don't know.

In that email chain,

there was one thing that
the John Dillon guy said,

where he was like,

"If the US government
wanted to fuck up Bitcoin,

- here's the strategy
that they might take."
-Well, yeah...

If you wanted
to go screw with Bitcoin,

one of the things you do is try
to convince the coding community

to go splinter up into, like,
five different efforts.

Which is what happened
after the Blocksize War.

Because if you couldn't
change Bitcoin,

why not just
make your own coin?

♪ Pump it up,
you've got to pump it up ♪

♪ Don't you know, pump it up ♪

♪ You've got to pump it up ♪

Soon, dozens, then hundreds,

then thousands of
alternate coins revved up,

each coin proclaiming to offer

something different
from Bitcoin.

You could even bank
while you wank.

newscaster:
It's unbelievable
how much this has taken off.

The crypto industry exploded.

Bitconne... ct!

Like the stock market,

you could bet
that these alt coins

would boom in value,
and many did,

with some coins 10-X-ing
or 100-X-ing in value.

Wall Street now
had competition.

You heard it here first!
Bitcoin is going to zero!

Virtually unregulated
competition.

Dogecoin to the moon!

Which couldn't last.

And now, the mark--
Oh! Ow! It went to zero!

By the end of the year,
the bubble burst louder

than the stock market
did in the early 2000s.

Bitcoin's value cut in half
from its all-time high,

with the crypto casino

just making the whole
industry seem stupid.

crypto investor:
It sucks. I mean, I've lost

over $100,000 right now.

Yo! The motherfucking coins
are dipping!

Why is the price falling so low?

I've never cried so much

in my grown-ass adult life.

It hurts. Um...

Yeah.

Nouriel Roubini:
These shitcoins,
they were outright scams

and frauds.
If there were real shitcoins,

you could use them as manure
to fertilize food.

I would rather buy shit,
literally shit,

that's worth something,
is a good fertilizer,

than buying shitcoins.

So, how could Bitcoin
separate itself from the pack?

choir:
♪ Hallelujah ♪

The answer was
Bitcoin maximalism.

Bitcoin is perfect.
It's perfect money.

singer:
♪ Hallelujah ♪

It was salvation
from the shitcoins.

A gift from on high.

Bitcoin is what they call
the Immaculate Conception.

The cure to all
the world's problems.

This idea that Bitcoin
was born perfect, you know?

It just, like, emerged
from the mind of Satoshi,

almost like a gift
that was received from God,

and just, like,
perfectly articulated
into the white paper,

and then into the code.

That's a complete myth.

So Bitcoin's greatest "virtue"

became that
it was already perfect,

reinforcing that it could
never fundamentally change.

Which created an opening
for its greatest competition.

Ethereum, a coin which was

Bitcoin's opposite
in almost every way,

including having
a very prominent founder.

- Why the hat?
- Oh, yeah...

For mosquitoes?

So, Bitcoin is a blockchain

that's designed
for one application.

The hat makes you
even more... conspicious.

Vitalik Buterin:
Ethereum basically
will let people do

whatever thing that they want
to do on top of it.

Like NFTs,

which are basically just...
whatever fucking shit

stored on a blockchain.

- We're part of the same
community. We're both apes.
- I know. Yes, love it.

Some people paid
ungodly amounts for these.

The Ethereum team even made
their announcements

through... rap.

♪ Yo, not just a pre-compiler
change of op-codes ♪

♪ We're here to sustain
the scale of our full nodes ♪

♪ Proof-of-stake is hard,
but what I do know ♪

♪ Is when we learn to shard
we'll change
the whole game though ♪

I mean, that was
super embarrassing, right?

Yeah.

Proof of cringe or something.

That was pretty bad.

Naturally, Bitcoin maximalists
hate Ethereum.

But then, what do you do
with Ethereum?
You make more shitcoins.

It went from
10,000 coins to 20,000 coins

in actually not that long
of a period of time.

The Scambrian explosion.

But, the so-called
Scambrian explosion

had a serious side effect.

China now had
the excuse it needed

to ban all crypto currencies,

so that they could
launch their own.

China's currency
is going digital,

known as e-Chinese yuan.

It was basically
a government-backed shitcoin.

Their digital currency
was inflationary,

their government had
total control of your wallet,

and it took Bitcoin's
privacy problems

and turned them into a feature.

speaker:
The People's Bank of China
is gonna be able

to peer inside of
every single transaction.

So, they're building
everything to be monitored.

So, there were protests
in Hong Kong.

And what people had to do

was buy their subway tickets
with cash.

- They couldn't use their card.
-Mm-hmm. Yeah.

Because then you can be traced

that you went to the protests.

So, it's a very dangerous thing.

It's what's known as a CBDC,

or central bank
digital currency.

With Bitcoin, it still takes
some digging

to figure out who owns what.

And if you're careful,
or you're Satoshi

and never spend your coins,
you can stay hidden.

But, with CBDCs, your identity
is known to the government

and your wallet controlled.

In other words,
Satoshi's invention

had given rise to the very
thing it aimed to prevent.

What would happen if other
countries followed suit?

But, the Maxis were convinced
that Bitcoin would win the day,

putting their faith on display

by pilgrimaging to a massive
yearly conference.

And it's ridiculous.

I'll die on this hill,
but they can't stop this idea.

That bright orange future
that is Bitcoin...

We are the vanguard
of a new monetary system.

Yo! Yo! Yo! Bitcoin!

I am more bullish
than ever on Bitcoin.

It's like you're in
some sort of cult.

You're gonna
make me look bad.

I have Senator Indira Kempis

to give an update on Mexico.

Indira Kempis:
67 million people
are not included

in our financial system.

As the president of Madeira,
I believe in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin, within Prospera,

operates as legal tender.

I'll make a small announcement.

I have a new Bitcoin
company called Jan3.

I decided to leave Blockstream

and focus more on
nation-state Bitcoin adoption.

So, were
they feeling the pressure?

I guess Bitcoin doesn't
adopt itself, right?

Well, I want it to go faster.

So, uh, your company name, 3Jan?

- Jan3.
- So, explain why 3Jan?

January 3, 2009.

That was the start
of Bitcoin, was it?

- Well, that's the
Genesis Block, right?
- Okay!

Every year, it's Jan 3
is the anniversary

- of the Genesis Block.
- Alright, yeah, you're good
on the anniversaries.

Samson was telling me there was
another anniversary recently

- that I did not know of.
- Yeah, uh, Adam's birthday
on April 5th.

- That's not my birthday.
- Inside joke.

- Is it? Very well.
- It's an inside joke.

April 5th

was Satoshi's
supposed birthday.

-She wants to take
a photo with her artwork.
-Okay.

- It has no sleeve, right?
- No.

- It's a cloak? Alright.
- It's a cloak.

You guys are having fun now.

So, he thinks that
you're Satoshi.

I hope he doesn't.

I tried to explain to him
specifically that I'm not.

I said that you can
make a case for Adam,

and you can make
a strong case,

but it doesn't mean
that I'm convinced.

No, Satoshi was a team.

Just kidding. Just kidding.

Even with the breakup,
I was a little surprised

he was trolling Adam this hard
about being Satoshi.

Yeah, yeah, as long as
the troll is on your side.

Oh, boy.

The US had more
or less fought wars

to maintain the status
of the dollar

as the global
reserve currency.

- Let's order a coffee.
- Okay.

How might they react

if more countries
adopted Bitcoin?

I'm not gonna lie.

You're probably gonna
get some heat

because the powers that be
don't want this to happen.

Prince Philip:
All currencies
will turn to one.

Bitcoin.

Things change very quickly.

Tucker, I just wanna say hi.
You're doing an excellent job.

That's my card.

I'm the crazy prince
that's talking about Bitcoin.

But, you know how it is.
They-- First, they laugh at you.

Stealth mode.

That's not stealth.
That's a Canada hoodie.

Jack Dorsey: What Bitcoin
does to societies,

what it does to people's
relationship with money,

to the state, to each other,
it literally changes everything.

But, what path would it take?

Today, Bitcoin takes
yet another turn lower.

This is a Bitcoin emergency.

Complete free fall.
Anything can happen.

There's a crisis. You've got
reporters calling you right now.

What are you telling them?

Well, I mean,
people look at the short term,

and the news cycle
is, like, day by day.

But, Bitcoin has been around
for, like, over a decade.

Yeah.

That's pretty cool.

Unfortunately for him,

amidst this crash,

Luna was a shitcoin
that really hit the fan.

- He had it.
- Yes.

Looking like a Ponzi scheme...

You're looking at
a similar scale

to the Madoff Ponzi.

...after million-dollar
Ponzi scheme...

Celsius is being
accused of functioning

like a Ponzi scheme.

...this was their founder.

Who would be crazy enough
to give their coins,

their crypto, to somebody
who's not a bank?

But the people who trusted
this guy with their crypto,

they lost billions.

This is bullshit!
I gave you my goddamn money!

I want it back!
What the fuck is going on?!

Jim Cramer:
Cryptocurrencies of all kinds

are still cascading
with no real bottom in sight.

Is lightning serious?

Uh, I guess we're-we're
getting the hell outta here.

But, this storm wasn't over.

FTX shocked investors

by declaring
bankruptcy this week.

It spent millions making sure
its name was seen and known.

Sam Bankman-Fried,
known as SBF,

was the young, disheveled CEO
of a massive US-based

crypto exchange called FTX.

FTX? It's a safe and easy way
to get into crypto.

Eh, I don't think so.

He defrauded customers
and stole billions.

reporter:
This is worse than Theranos.

This is worse than Madoff.

And although he donated to
a lot of politicians

and charities...

If I can do anything
to help other people,

help the world,
that's just as good.

...he didn't manage to bribe
his way out of being arrested.

The fraud they committed
was worse than the Enron mess,

according to the guy
who cleaned up the Enron mess.

They used QuickBooks.

Multi-billion-dollar company
using QuickBooks.

The regulators, when they
see something losing...

...$60 billion of retail money,

then, of course, they're gonna
have something to say.

Yeah, alright, let's get out.

The Secretary of the Treasury,
Janet Yellen,

began acting on
an executive order

that Biden had signed to
rein in the crypto industry.

There are risks to
financial stability,

and we need a framework.

But, what would this mean
for Bitcoin?

Just because you're paranoid
doesn't mean they're
not out to get you.

It's actually more realistic
than you think.

Hello, Melina.
Good to see you again.

Samson returned to El Salvador,

where the President
was facing increased

international pressure
for having adopted Bitcoin.

The attacks are increasing.

This rating agency
just downgraded

El Salvador's long-term debt.

They're trying to put
the pressure on.

But, President
doesn't give a fuck.

Shepard Smith:
The International Monetary Fund

has urged El Salvador
to reverse course on Bitcoin.

In response, Bukele tweeted,

"Okay, boomers.
You have zero jurisdiction.

We are not your colony, your
backyard, or your front yard."

William Soriano:
The IMF has some
political control

over the countries
they assist.

And that's where
Bitcoin comes in.

The first time I saw him,
he was saying,

"We're ready to die
on this hill. All of us!

We're ready to die
on this hill."

Hope they were ready
because the powers that be

had a plan of their own.

Okay, yeah,
this is the news. So...

uh, MasterCard, Wells Fargo,
Citigroup, and others launch

a 12-week experimental
digital dollar pilot

with the New York Fed.
Did you see that?

I didn't see that.
So what, it's a CBDC?

Oh, interesting.

- Your plot is coming true.
- Can I give you this?

Things are heating up.

Can I give you some fiat?

Under the cover
of the FTX scandal,

the United States announced

it would explore remaking
the US Dollar as a CBDC.

You know, that thing that was
condemned by Western media

and US politicians
over human rights issues.

The Chinese CBDC
is a surveillance tool.

But now, the West was
preparing to get on board.

The Fed even had
their own white paper.

Jerome Powell:
As our white paper
on this topic notes,

a US CBDC could also
potentially help maintain

the dollar's
international standing.

A digital dollar...

...that could replace
cash entirely.

And they weren't alone.

reporter:
60% of central banks
around the world

are currently experimenting
with CBDCs.

The CBDCs,
it's really or authoritarianism

from even Western governments.

On CBDCs, I have
pushed that project.

By 2030,

Britcoin,
a central bank digital currency,

will be up and running.

Why would a country
adopt Bitcoin

when a government could just

issue their own
digital currency

and have complete control?

Digital public money
could help drive out

bogus digital private money.

The technology
is tough to compete with,

so if you can't beat 'em,
you have to join 'em.

reporter:
It is potentially
the biggest change to money

since, I don't know,

currency consolidation
after the Civil War.

Once we have CBDCs,

they're gonna
essentially crowd out

any alternative
payment system.

So, the future
of payment transaction

is one bank,
run by the government

with some cooperation
of the private sector,

financial institutions.

So, banks might still manage
things like giving out loans.

But someday, our bank accounts

could be directly with the Fed?

They can surveil
all your transactions,

and they have
complete data monopoly.

Well, I think it's
a bit of a crossroads.

It could become
extremely dystopian.

There is a way
that you could do a CBDC

that is not... bad for people.

- But, the problem is
they don't want that.
- No, of course not.

They don't want the privacy.

Faster Bitcoin adoption means

the better off the world will be
when the shit hits the fan.

And the shit is hitting the fan.

Fallout continues
to grow from the collapse

of Silicon Valley Bank
and Signature Bank.

First Republic Bank,

second largest bank failure
in US history.

Following the pandemic,
the Fed printed a lot of money.

$13 trillion.
It triggered inflation

not seen in over 40 years.

Suddenly, banks had
risky balance sheets.

There were bank runs,

and four massive banks
were wiped out overnight.

Similar to what happened
in 2009,

the government stepped in
to prevent

a total financial meltdown.

I can reassure the members
of the committee

that our banking system
is sound.

Amid this crisis,

regulators seized
an opportunity.

Kathy Hochul:
New York State Department
of Financial Services

took possession of
a New York chartered bank,

known as Signature,
last night.

This was strange

because Signature Bank
wasn't actually insolvent.

Meanwhile, First Republic,
another bank that failed, was.

But instead of
shutting them down,

they got a full bail-out.

The difference, Signature was
the only major bank

servicing the crypto industry.

The regulators are sending a,
uh, a clear signal.

Stay, stay away from digital.

But, the next signal
would come in the form

of a familiar face.

So, Roger Ver, Bitcoin Jesus

was just arrested in Spain.

Roger had allegedly evaded

$48 million in Bitcoin taxes.

You can have your own
private bank account, right?

It's called a Bitcoin account,
and it's impossible

for the government
to seize your account.

But, it seems
they could extradite him,

even though he'd renounced
his US citizenship.

You know,
what you're really asking

is what's the endpoint
to the crackdowns.

This is an example
of regulators

who cannot actually do
what they want to do,

- which was just go ban Bitcoin.
-Right.

Instead, they apply pressure
in this sort of alternative way

to go do something they're
not really allowed to do.

They fired all
the missiles now, right?

They-They've sued
the biggest exchanges.

They've made
all the allegations.

But, the big banks and the
government weren't done yet.

Crypto, Bitcoin, etc.

If I was the government,
I'd close it down.

We've got a way to do this!

So, Senator Warren
introduced a bipartisan bill

that would essentially
make it illegal

to use Bitcoin
like digital cash.

Asked if they would
support this,

the banks seemed delighted.

- Let's go on down the line.
- Absolutely.

- banker 1: Absolutely.
- banker 2: Absolutely.

banker 3:
Absolutely.

- Absolutely, Senator.
- Okay, I like absolutely!

But Wall Street had a plan.

Let's get it inside
the regulated system

as much as, as we can.

Bitcoin would be traded
on the stock market,

but you wouldn't
actually own it.

The banks and hedge funds,
they would hold it for you.

This is the day
where it goes from malarkey

to actually
an investable asset.

Bitcoin would now be a part of
retirement funds and pensions.

Put Bitcoin in their 401(k)s.

Solidifying its role
as digital gold.

It seemed so long as Bitcoin

didn't compete
with the US dollar,

so long as governments could
monitor every transaction...

Let's do
a central bank digital currency.

Are you there?

Yes, I think it's time.

...so long as Bitcoin didn't
function like digital cash,

it would be allowed.

Because the Small Blocker solution

kind of required
government permission.

Those people who are like,
"We need Bitcoin

"to become, like,
well-established,

become accepted by the banks,"

they didn't realize that they
were, like, cutting this deal

which would compromise
some Bitcoin's values.

In fact,
Maxis seemed more concerned

with Bitcoin
hitting a million dollars

than being usable as cash.

To get to one million,
we should be going up,

on average, 10k a day.

And if Bitcoin hits
a million dollars,

then Satoshi becomes
a trillionaire.

O'Leary:
And there has been rumors

that maybe Satoshi
will weigh in.

With the stakes so high,

and with Bitcoin
being woven into

the fabric of
the financial system,

affecting everyone,

perhaps the question
of Satoshi's identity

was more pressing than ever.

Peter's never taken you
on one of his...

- caving adventures before, Adam?
- No.

Civilization's ruins, eh?

Yeah.
- End days.

When you look out on all this,
uh, abandoned shit,

what does it
make you think of?

Maybe, um,
a more decentralized future?

Geopolitically.

There's something to be said
for not breaking what--

There's something to be said
for exploring this great place.

-Okay.
-Without dying.

So, there's a lot of
things that point to you,

Adam, being Satoshi,

and I had been spending some
time trying to disprove that.

You know,
like the Wikipedia edits?

It was because I was like,
why are you deleting this?

Bitcoin is a big deal. It's like
a clever invention, right?

You added suspects for Satoshi.

- Really?
-Yeah.

Well, don't-don't just
agree with him. Ask for a proof.

That doesn't seem like something
very advisable to do.

There's, like,
old emails with you

commenting on Bitcoin
in pretty detailed terms.

- I mean--
-It doesn't mean
that you're Satoshi.

- It just means that you were...
- Yeah. Well, I think--

...you were engaged before you
say you were engaged.

Anyway, like, you're missing
the biggest piece of evidence

that he's Satoshi of all.

Which is that he gets
on the Bitcoin Talk

in, what, 2012 or so? 2013?

- '13. Mm.
- Yeah, '13.

And, like, he's clueless!

Doesn't know anything
about Bitcoin!

This wasn't the first time

Peter had pointed
to this evidence.

Best evidence of him
being Satoshi.

- Of not being Satoshi.
-Being Satoshi.

So, was his goal
to out Adam as Satoshi?

It's hard to know, right?
These agencies are sneaky.

Months earlier, I began
looking into Peter Todd,

trying to understand
his motives.

In particular, I'd focused
on the leaked email exchange

between Peter Todd
and John Dillon,

the supposed government agent
who had offered Peter

that ridiculous $500 reward
to create replace-by-fee.

John Dillon's email
had supposedly been hacked,

and their emails were leaked.

I wanna talk through the stuff

we were going over
the other night.

So, I called up an editor
on my team

to talk through
some of these clues.

This is
an encrypted email chain,

and this is all you do
with the hack

is release something that makes
Peter Todd look pretty good?

Uh, that, to me, that's part
of what started to really...

smell like maybe it was
the same person.

Going through the archives,

I discovered
I wasn't alone.

Gavin Andresen and some
of the folks at Blockstream,

they also suspected
they were the same person.

- I mean, why did you
create the John Dillon handle?
- I didn't.

Come on!

Nope. Not me.

He was playing bad cop.
You're playing good cop.

So, my theory about John Dillon

is that Peter just enjoys
perverse game theory.

I don't enjoy perverse
game theory that much.

Although it was
certainly interesting

to get contacted by the guy.

- Okay.
- I certainly enjoyed
it enough to respond to him.

Mm-hmm.

- Okay.
-The only person
who believes Peter is Peter.

Yeah,
that's how it should be.

If Peter Todd wasn't
communicating

with a government agent,
and he just made this shit up,

then why concoct
such an elaborate scheme?

So, I went through everything
I could find on Peter Todd,

going back to his
earliest messages

on the Bitcoin Talk forum.

Now, Peter likes to suggest

that he didn't really get
involved with Bitcoin until...

2014. That's when I sort of
"quit the day job," if you will.

But, he had registered
all the way back

in December of 2010.

The first thing he wrote

was just asking for
an invite to something.

But the next post,
a few days later,

was super technical.

And then, he doesn't
post again until 2012.

But, it's that
super technical post

that made me rethink
just about everything.

I was so taken aback,
I called my editor immediately.

Uh, so, I'm kind of embarrassed
I missed this.

So, his first post
is on December 7, 2010.

But then, three days later,
uh, he makes another post.

editor
"Of course, to be specific,

"the inputs and outputs
can't match exactly

if the second transaction
has a transaction fee."

Seems like
he's responding to something.

Yeah.

editor
Oh, responding to Satoshi?

He's replying to Satoshi, yeah.

Yeah, like
an hour and a half later.

But, read it closely.

Is he responding, David?

Or is he continuing a thought?

So, Satoshi is proposing this,
like, future scheme

that hasn't been invented yet.

And Peter Todd

just kinda continues
that thought

an hour and a half later.

Someone who had
just created this account,

and never posted
about Bitcoin before,

was finishing
Satoshi's sentences?

With a deep fucking
knowledge of how,

wait for it,
replace-by-fee works.

That thing that Peter Todd

would one day invent
a character for.

It gets weirder though, David.

So, you know,
we've thought that, like,

Satoshi dropped off
of the Bitcoin Talk forums

because of WikiLeaks, right?

But, when would Satoshi

drop off the
Bitcoin Talk forum?

editor David
Three days after Peter Todd

- replies or adds
on to this post.
-That's right.

You'll never see another post
from Satoshi ever again.

Three days after
joining the forum,

Peter Todd finishes
Satoshi's sentence,

and then disappears.

Alongside Satoshi.

Here's what I think
might have happened.

He created this new account.

Then, a couple days later,
you know,

writes the Satoshi post,
logs out...

logs back in,
but doesn't log back in

with the correct account.

And he posts as Peter Todd
instead of Satoshi.

And then, makes a couple
more posts as Satoshi

'cause he doesn't want it
to look like

it's directly related to this.

And Peter Todd just evaporates
for two fucking years.

editor David
That's, that's insane.

It's insane.

It was just so suspicious,

I wanted Peter to explain
how this was possible.

Satoshi's last post was, like,

one week after I signed up
for Bitcoin Talk.

But...

Right. And then,
you disappeared.

Yeah, then I disappeared.

And Satoshi disappeared
at the same time.

Yeah.

I really should've paid more
attention to Bitcoin early on,

but, you know,
I had other stuff to do.

Y-You corrected Satoshi,
but it kind of looks more like

you were continuing
a thought of Satoshi.

Well, Satoshi made
a little brain fart on, like,

how exactly transactions work,

and I corrected him
on that very boring thing.

Why didn't you delete
the 2010 post?

Why would I?

Well,

I mean, 'cause it,
it just makes you look like

you had these deep insights
into Bitcoin at the time and--

Well, yeah.
I'm Satoshi Nakamoto.

I mean,

it's sort of the last thing
you'd expect Satoshi to say.

Ah, but that's it.

That's like
the meta level, right?

Because I know you would
expect Satoshi Nakamoto

to delete the post.
You just said,

"Why didn't Satoshi Nakamoto
delete the post?"

- The post that was corrected?
- Yeah, yeah,
the correction post.

Right? But then,
I did the next level of meta

and then didn't delete the post
to go throw off people like you.

Peter sure remembered this post

he'd made 13 years ago
awfully well.

Yeah...

I don't know.
You're-You're feeding him, like,

- footage that's just gonna be--
- Yeah. Oh, it's gonna be great.

Peter Todd's strategy,

his game theory to
throw people off the trail...

Oh, no, I am Satoshi.
I'm Satoshi Nakamoto.

...was so effective,

I hadn't really
considered him a suspect.

In fact, just about
no one had considered him.

So, you don't think it's Peter?
You-- No way?

Peter's ruled out
way, way early on.

And even insinuating this

would get you laughed
off the forums.

Peter Todd was just
a little kid back then.

So, was it possible that

Peter Todd could be Satoshi?

When you start to, like,
run through all the,

all the scenarios,

it checks a lot of boxes.

Satoshi wrote messages

like they were
on an academic calendar,

with more time in the summer.

I was off getting
a fine arts degree.

Then, there was the British
or Canadian writing style.

There was something called
the Toronto Caving Group.

In 2001,
when the dude is 15 or 16,

he is literally already
trying to figure out

how to turn Hashcash
into a currency.

After all,
I did try to invent Bitcoin.

And I'm not bitter that
Satoshi got there first.

You know, when I first
saw the Bitcoin code,

I was like, this is not
a professional programmer.

Which Peter Todd wasn't.

Experienced C++ coders
basically confirmed

that it could've been
written by either of you.

- So, do you think
I can write in C++?
-Yeah. Yeah, definitely.

Mm. That doesn't sound
like you've done your research.

Yeah.

But, that old resume he tried
to scrub from the internet

showed that he'd coded
a system in C++ from scratch.

Why bother lying about this?

So, he's done a bit of,
bit of research. That's good.

And if you were like, 22
when you created Bitcoin,

imagine what it would do
to your psyche.

He's the contrarian
of contrarians.

I-I think people often,
often miss this nuance.

He always wants
to make sure he can prove

that he's the smartest guy
in the room.

Well, I think if it was a team,

it wouldn't have been
more than two people.

Didn't need even two people.
One could have written it.

But, who could Satoshi
trust with Bitcoin's future?

Adam Back
would keep the secret.

Maybe the first guy
that emailed back in 2008.

Or it could be
somebody younger.

The guy who, you know,

has sort of considered you
like a son.

Remind me again,
what's your source

for the "considered you
like a son" thing?

That was with you last time.

-What?
- No.

I think he thinks
of you like a son.

A son. Yeah.

No, sorry. No, no offense,

I'm much closer
to Greg Maxwell than you.

Much closer.

Greg Maxwell, who co-founds
Blockstream with Adam Back.

This loose coupling
isn't inherent.

You can sort of pick
your degree of looseness.

Keeping Peter at
arm's length...

We talked about saying it
would actually be much better

if I didn't work
for Blockstream.

...in order to solve
Bitcoin's technical problems,

which they couldn't
do anonymously.

You need to give people space to
actually work on these issues.

But, they would need cover...

O'Leary:
Whoever had access
to Satoshi's email

was somewhat aligned
with Blockstream.

...to push back against Gavin.

We'll definitely
need to increase

the maximum block size.

That doesn't mean
you're the leader.

That just means you're the guy
who answers questions.

And here's the big one.

What if the real reason
for using the name Satoshi,

for the anonymity,

was so that people
could take Bitcoin seriously?

So they could believe
that it must have been created

by one of these
famous cryptographers,

and not some kid
still in school?

- So, here's what
I think happened.
-Hm?

- Possibly. Okay?
-Possibly.

I think that John Dillon...

...was created
so that you would have an excuse

to make replace-by-fee.

A concept which you had
envisioned years earlier,

but you needed some kind
of cover in order to make.

And you also needed some cover
for that 2010 post.

2010 post? Please.

Yeah, because I was Satoshi?

I mean, yeah.

You know, you're very concerned
about all the privacy stuff.

So, you reach out
to your old buddy Adam Back.

You say, we need to do
something about this,

but we need to pay the devs.

But you can't join Blockstream

because it would look
too, uh, suspicious.

- So, you don't.
- I will admit,
you're pretty creative.

You come up with
some crazy theories.

It's ludicrous,

but it's the sort of theory
someone who spends their time

as a documentary journalist
would come up with.

So yeah, yeah. I'll say,
of course I'm Satoshi,

and I'm Craig Wright.

And yes,
I was definitely covering

that little bit about,
you know, fees

to go pretend to be Satoshi.

Or not Satoshi,
one or the other.

Well, why make up
the whole John Dillon thing?

- Well, like I said,
I'm not John Dillon.
-Okay.

Sorry. I'm not John Dillon.
I don't know who that is.

I'll warn you.
This is gonna be very funny

when you put this
into the documentary

and a bunch
of Bitcoiners watch it.

-I think--
-Well, I don't think
they would be very happy

with this conclusion because
you're pretty controversial

within the community
at this point.

No, I-I suspect a lot
of them will be very happy

if you go this route.

'Cause it's gonna be like
yet another example

of journalists
really missing the point,

in a way that's very funny.

What is the point?

The point is just to make
Bitcoin the global currency.

And people like you
being distracted by nonsense

can potentially
do good on that.

And it seemed this plan
was coming to life.

With Wall Street's involvement

bringing Bitcoin
to new heights...

El Salvador found
itself in the black.

Suddenly, presidents
were taking Samson's calls.

And Argentina's
newly elected president

shut down its central bank
and allowed people

to use Bitcoin
however they wanted.

Bitcoin was advancing
as a currency,

even if America throttled
its use as digital cash.

Maybe it wasn't the design that
made Bitcoin so unstoppable.

Maybe it was human nature.

Or just plain old greed.

Even Dr. Doom

launched his own
blockchain-based token.

Craig Wright was proven
to be a fraud in court,

but it required Adam
to finally release

his emails with Satoshi.

He had been telling the truth.

And as more of Satoshi's
conversations came to light,

so did the genius,

the struggles,
and the immaturity.

But, what about the stash?

Well, you know my--
I-I mean, I don't know for sure,

but, like, my suspicion is

Satoshi did, in fact, go destroy
all of Satoshi's ability

to prove who they were.

But, they hadn't
burned the coins.

Or in a way, had they?

A few months after
confronting Peter,

I came across
this old chat log,

that someone probably
shouldn't have recorded,

where Peter says,

"I'm probably
the world-leading expert

"on how to sacrifice
your Bitcoins.

"And I've done exactly
one such sacrifice,

and I did it by hand."

It was hard not to read
this as an admission.

Like Peter wanted
his inner circle

to trust that he had, in fact,
sacrificed the Bitcoins,

and destroyed all access.

But, this wasn't proof.

It's Bitcoin.
Don't trust, verify.

And sometimes,
you can't verify.

Mm-hmm.

And if Peter Todd
and his friends at Blockstream

were, in fact, behind Bitcoin,

would he remain an idealist?

Or was he still holding on

to the keys to
the world's fortune?

Just in case.