Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:48,000
Centre for Virtual Reality
Laval, France. Competition.
00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:51,615
Who is the contractor?
00:00:51,700 --> 00:00:55,816
The contractor is made
up of the university
00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:58,000
and private companies in France.
00:03:35,151 --> 00:03:36,500
A green field.
00:04:35,050 --> 00:04:38,000
It can be up to 15 metres tall,
we could build higher...
00:04:38,100 --> 00:04:41,200
but we have to consider
the concept and what we can do.
00:04:41,500 --> 00:04:46,050
They want everything tied together:
more like a shopping mall.
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,000
So we could build a tall Totem Pole,
signaling "hello, here we are!".
00:05:59,920 --> 00:06:03,800
University Building, Potsdam
Construction phase
00:07:06,280 --> 00:07:08,940
It's organic but it's
not light-resistant.
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:16,615
That would be nice if it fades, hmm?
00:07:16,700 --> 00:07:19,500
That would help things
enormously, but then...
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,600
These are the ones I picked.
00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,800
I picked it not based on the
numbers but on the rendering.
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:43,509
There are two possibilities:
00:07:43,599 --> 00:07:46,600
Standard colours, or we
choose any colour we want.
00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:48,800
That means what...
00:07:49,300 --> 00:07:52,600
This is the same roof
like the EFM, identical.
00:07:54,350 --> 00:07:56,550
This could be pure aluminium.
00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:17,000
We'll use the same textile
floor covering as usual...
00:09:36,650 --> 00:09:38,700
Back to the question...
00:09:39,650 --> 00:09:42,500
Should we have the windows
in two colours or not?
00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:23,300
I think that's number 500.
No it's 8000.
00:14:38,500 --> 00:14:42,250
Folding and Stacked Chairs
Venice-Mestre, Italy. Development phase.
00:15:07,300 --> 00:15:10,300
This one here has more
options than the others.
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:15,100
You could put a brace on the back,
so it's free when it folds.
00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:17,400
Show me again.
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:21,900
Here at this point with the
strut you could mount a brace.
00:15:23,300 --> 00:15:25,700
Or put the brace
across the supports.
00:15:26,100 --> 00:15:28,600
Exactly. You could
put a brace here...
00:15:29,500 --> 00:15:32,300
A brace on the back
and also in front.
00:15:35,100 --> 00:15:36,599
The same one in steel.
00:15:36,700 --> 00:15:38,200
The same one...
00:15:38,500 --> 00:15:40,250
It's a bit different...
00:15:40,850 --> 00:15:43,250
The proportions here are odd.
00:15:45,500 --> 00:15:48,600
Since this one is the widest,
00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:51,350
the proportions seem a bit...
00:15:51,900 --> 00:15:53,099
...strange, no?
00:15:53,200 --> 00:15:57,315
Both seem a bit stiff,
perhaps since they
00:15:57,400 --> 00:15:59,715
are designed with
such straight lines.
00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:02,715
That's only if you really want to design
00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:06,000
the seat to flip up
towards the back.
00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,665
Or you could flip
it from the front.
00:16:09,750 --> 00:16:14,350
It folds up from the front, but
then you need a bridge support.
00:16:14,700 --> 00:16:16,815
I can't demonstrate it
well with this one.
00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:19,400
Let me remove the seat.
00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:23,800
It's built a bit different.
00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:31,800
That's rather clever actually.
00:16:32,500 --> 00:16:35,415
You don't have to use all
these annoying parts.
00:16:35,500 --> 00:16:37,415
You don't need them.
00:16:37,500 --> 00:16:42,600
It's more effective, you
just have a few elements.
00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,900
Six struts the same
length, and this support.
00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,815
It's still not quite as
simple as it could be.
00:16:53,900 --> 00:16:57,115
It would be nicer if it
was just 3 supports which
00:16:57,200 --> 00:17:00,600
are cleverly connected
to make this shape.
00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:04,000
For now it's a shame...
00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:08,600
... it seems a bit
slapped together.
00:17:09,650 --> 00:17:12,115
This is really brilliant here.
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:18,400
That the seat itself keeps
this from moving apart.
00:17:20,300 --> 00:17:23,915
Otherwise you would have
to add a stopper here.
00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:25,700
To keep it from collapsing.
00:17:27,300 --> 00:17:29,700
Can you give me the seat again?
00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:36,800
It's mounted on top.
00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:43,700
So here's where it would snap in.
00:17:45,350 --> 00:17:47,000
How do we release it?
00:17:47,700 --> 00:17:48,965
Like this, right?
00:17:49,050 --> 00:17:51,120
It's stuck somewhere...
00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:55,900
You've got to take it off,
I'll break something.
00:17:56,700 --> 00:17:59,700
That's the way to release it, right?
- Yes, probably.
00:18:02,500 --> 00:18:06,900
But I had a different candidate
recently, it worked quite well.
00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:21,300
I'm not sure if it
helps any, but...
00:18:22,050 --> 00:18:26,750
One reason it seems so stiff
is the straight back support.
00:18:27,800 --> 00:18:32,000
Theoretically you could
bend it a bit, right?
00:18:33,750 --> 00:18:37,950
You keep the functionality, and
it's easy to produce using wood.
00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,300
It's something to try for sure.
00:18:45,300 --> 00:18:48,665
But now we're still dealing with
the three straight supports.
00:18:48,750 --> 00:18:51,450
Yes, it has got something,
I like the idea.
00:18:52,150 --> 00:18:54,600
But it just seems a bit stiff.
00:18:55,550 --> 00:18:56,915
Yes, I think so too.
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:00,000
We now have to build one
that you can sit on.
00:19:01,050 --> 00:19:04,650
It looks like it's uncomfortable,
but maybe that's deceptive.
00:19:05,550 --> 00:19:09,200
University Building, Potsdam.
Construction phase.
00:19:28,300 --> 00:19:32,215
Can we have the two panels
next to each other please?
00:19:32,300 --> 00:19:35,115
They're on the table,
they're the same ones.
00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:37,465
So you can see them
in a smaller size.
00:19:37,550 --> 00:19:40,200
Yes, I'd like to see
them hung together.
00:19:40,600 --> 00:19:44,400
Since we have this bend
where they meet each other.
00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:46,250
Those two, right.
00:19:46,400 --> 00:19:48,815
Those two are clearly
darker than the others.
00:19:48,900 --> 00:19:50,700
That's true.
00:19:51,450 --> 00:19:53,600
Here's the other one too...
00:19:54,700 --> 00:19:56,715
No, please don't put
them down flat...
00:19:56,800 --> 00:19:59,400
then the light reflects differently.
00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:05,715
This is how the bend looks.
00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:07,915
We'll bend in the
right direction.
00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:09,900
No. We'll bend like this.
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,415
The building is a bit
like a "folding screen"...
00:20:13,500 --> 00:20:15,215
...these repeated angled walls.
00:20:15,300 --> 00:20:18,415
Move into the sun or shadow,
otherwise it's difficult to judge.
00:20:18,500 --> 00:20:20,415
This is full sun.
00:20:20,500 --> 00:20:22,615
Now let's all move
into the shade.
00:20:22,700 --> 00:20:24,300
Let's turn.
00:20:36,300 --> 00:20:39,365
You could do that if
you had a building,
00:20:39,450 --> 00:20:41,715
which we obviously do not have.
00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:46,615
If it were a geometric
building with a clear form...
00:20:46,700 --> 00:20:50,665
in its 3-D spatial sense,
which was subtle...
00:20:50,750 --> 00:20:53,615
and integrated itself
into the environment.
00:20:53,700 --> 00:20:55,550
I simply believe...
00:20:57,000 --> 00:20:59,850
this expression through
the form suffices...
00:21:02,300 --> 00:21:07,400
It doesn't need an additional
expression through colour.
00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:13,515
The building does have
a very unique form.
00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:16,200
It presents itself
with this form.
00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:23,100
So the question is whether this form
has to be amplified by this colour.
00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:03,400
Tina, can you come over here?
00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:11,400
Take this, and press it tightly here.
00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:13,000
Here?
- Yes
00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:36,000
Centre for Virtual Reality
Laval, France. Competition.
00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:52,000
University Building, Potsdam.
Construction phase.
00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:20,015
The right one? The other
was also very bright.
00:29:20,100 --> 00:29:24,715
We feel that the panel that
Mr. Bartenschlag put on the right...
00:29:24,800 --> 00:29:28,500
would fit better on
the north façade.
00:29:29,500 --> 00:29:33,715
The brighter or stronger
colour would be better...
00:29:33,800 --> 00:29:36,815
on the west side where
the sunlight shines.
00:29:36,900 --> 00:29:39,500
So it would shine even more.
00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:44,615
We understood that,
but we agreed last time...
00:29:44,700 --> 00:29:48,900
that we didn't want yellow
or yellow-green tones.
00:29:49,500 --> 00:29:54,200
Instead we prefer colours that
integrate with the property.
00:29:54,800 --> 00:29:58,755
So actually we requested colour
tones like that door over there...
00:29:58,840 --> 00:30:01,715
...or something like over
there at the library.
00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:05,415
So we could play within that
spectrum we agreed upon.
00:30:05,500 --> 00:30:07,500
That we could proceed...
00:30:08,400 --> 00:30:10,695
The colours aren't as
intense as last time.
00:30:10,780 --> 00:30:14,860
But you still propose yellow or green
tones that aren't on the property.
00:30:17,100 --> 00:30:18,600
That's how I see it too.
00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:21,115
The one on the left
is incredibly bright.
00:30:21,200 --> 00:30:23,575
Imagine this long
façade in this yellow...
00:30:23,660 --> 00:30:28,740
and the other in a different yellow shade,
and you walk directly towards it... no.
00:30:30,900 --> 00:30:33,895
I can understand that you
have a different opinion.
00:30:33,980 --> 00:30:36,915
But in the end, we are the
contractors, right. -Exactly.
00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:39,215
We have to live with
the building later.
00:30:39,300 --> 00:30:40,460
That's right.
00:30:46,540 --> 00:30:48,800
That's not what was
planned, but alright.
00:30:49,050 --> 00:30:52,000
What do you think of the
big one on the left?
00:30:52,100 --> 00:30:52,960
Nope.
00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:56,050
Just look how intensely
that stands out.
00:30:57,940 --> 00:30:59,940
It's like an "optical colour mix".
00:31:25,600 --> 00:31:27,015
The one on the right...
00:31:27,100 --> 00:31:28,655
The right one isn't bad.
00:31:28,740 --> 00:31:30,975
Maybe it has to be a bit darker.
00:31:31,060 --> 00:31:34,700
The left one could
be toned down more.
00:31:35,050 --> 00:31:36,375
A bit less pigment.
00:31:36,460 --> 00:31:38,495
The darker one on the right, yes.
00:31:38,580 --> 00:31:40,700
This colour, but a bit darker.
00:31:41,540 --> 00:31:45,055
You are welcome to rework the
concept, but I'd like to see...
00:31:45,140 --> 00:31:49,700
a variation based on the colours
present on the property.
00:31:50,100 --> 00:31:53,900
The concept is intended
to be a "reaction".
00:31:54,500 --> 00:31:56,460
A reaction to the surroundings.
00:31:56,600 --> 00:31:59,915
You don't have to precisely
replicate the colours
00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:02,815
already here, like
that apricot building.
00:32:02,900 --> 00:32:04,935
I really think the colours fit.
00:32:05,020 --> 00:32:07,335
This yellow toned courtyard fits...
00:32:07,420 --> 00:32:11,335
in an environment
with blue colours.
00:32:11,420 --> 00:32:14,060
I'd still like to see
another variation.
00:32:14,640 --> 00:32:17,495
To see the relationships
here at the site.
00:32:17,580 --> 00:32:18,850
Yes. We'll do it.
00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:34,100
Apartment and Commercial Buildings
Strasbourg, France. Competition.
00:32:44,100 --> 00:32:45,850
Hi Stephanie, it's Matthias.
00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:48,820
Do you have a minute?
00:32:52,900 --> 00:32:58,620
We want to discuss the ceramic
façade in Strasbourg.
00:33:01,500 --> 00:33:04,060
We're upstairs with the project.
00:33:08,850 --> 00:33:12,620
When Stephanie gets here we should
concentrate on the façade.
00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:17,135
Are you familiar
with this, Stephanie?
00:33:17,220 --> 00:33:19,260
You know the façade plans?
00:33:19,400 --> 00:33:20,580
No.
00:33:22,700 --> 00:33:25,900
In Straßburg, this
"STO"façade, you know it.
00:33:26,700 --> 00:33:28,775
You can see it clearly here.
00:33:28,860 --> 00:33:31,735
A perforated façade which
opens up toward the bottom.
00:33:31,820 --> 00:33:35,820
There are large openings at the base,
which get smaller towards the top.
00:33:39,220 --> 00:33:42,515
They have pockmarks or
whatever you call them.
00:33:42,600 --> 00:33:49,335
Something like relief
panels which protrude.
00:33:49,420 --> 00:33:51,780
They should all be
made from ceramic.
00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:56,780
But they are rather expensive,
280 per square metre.
00:33:57,860 --> 00:33:59,015
280?
00:33:59,100 --> 00:34:03,415
Yes, but only for the material,
without windows, etc.
00:34:03,500 --> 00:34:04,695
With mounting?
00:34:04,780 --> 00:34:08,020
Mounted, yes. But that's
only part of the process.
00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:10,975
You have to figure in
the concrete façade.
00:34:11,060 --> 00:34:15,175
The main part of the
surface is concrete,
00:34:15,260 --> 00:34:18,140
and that is part of the
cost of the façade.
00:34:34,220 --> 00:34:37,300
If we had a partial model,
that would be super.
00:34:37,980 --> 00:34:39,615
If we ourselves are convinced.
00:34:39,700 --> 00:34:43,180
We have to see it first, we
aren't 100% certain, right?
00:34:48,680 --> 00:34:54,780
It looks good in the pictures, but
it isn't worked out in 3-D yet.
00:34:57,550 --> 00:34:59,260
Click "View", there.
00:35:24,620 --> 00:35:27,220
But I don't see the
green ones, oh here.
00:35:56,400 --> 00:35:58,020
These are all blue.
00:36:54,900 --> 00:36:59,220
Folding and Stacked Chairs
Venice-Mestre, Italy. Development phase.
00:37:14,950 --> 00:37:16,150
See you later.
00:37:25,000 --> 00:37:30,580
The more this moves forwards,
the more space you have here.
00:37:31,140 --> 00:37:34,500
Maybe we could do it
differently, maybe...
00:37:36,550 --> 00:37:38,660
Maybe make it from...
00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:40,660
...from steel?
00:37:41,300 --> 00:37:43,015
No, that would be a shame.
00:37:43,100 --> 00:37:46,700
I think it should all
be made of wood.
00:37:51,600 --> 00:37:54,500
I'm not so sure
about that idea...
00:37:55,000 --> 00:37:58,740
...everything from one board.
- So now you've added steel braces?
00:38:01,100 --> 00:38:04,415
Yes, I wanted to explain that.
00:38:04,500 --> 00:38:06,140
I just thought...
00:38:07,100 --> 00:38:08,615
We shouldn't be dogmatic.
00:38:08,700 --> 00:38:12,055
Why force this idea of a
design from one material?
00:38:12,140 --> 00:38:18,620
Since it would simplify
the production.
00:38:19,100 --> 00:38:20,980
Or something like this.
00:38:22,600 --> 00:38:24,500
This would really...
00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:27,255
No, that wouldn't be right.
00:38:27,340 --> 00:38:28,540
We can't do that.
00:38:28,650 --> 00:38:30,940
It would be a real shame.
00:38:33,140 --> 00:38:37,135
Since the basic idea was:
00:38:37,220 --> 00:38:42,300
it should be produced by a milling
process and all from one material.
00:38:42,600 --> 00:38:45,700
You think we should stick...
-These join supports aren't good.
00:38:46,740 --> 00:38:50,500
Otherwise why not just screw
the whole thing together.
00:38:50,600 --> 00:38:53,580
If you start adding
support pieces...
00:38:54,460 --> 00:38:56,660
Yes, I see, but...
00:38:57,140 --> 00:38:59,020
I'm not sure.
00:38:59,260 --> 00:39:03,220
This one would be completely glued.
00:39:06,200 --> 00:39:08,020
This one would also be...
00:39:08,400 --> 00:39:10,215
...well, I'm not sure.
00:39:10,300 --> 00:39:14,340
I'm no longer convinced of
this all-from-one-board idea.
00:39:15,600 --> 00:39:18,540
It seems like an
artificial rule.
00:39:18,700 --> 00:39:19,780
I'm not sure.
00:39:22,060 --> 00:39:28,000
Maybe we toss the concept, and design
these elements from a different material.
00:39:28,460 --> 00:39:30,975
These are really simple parts.
00:39:31,060 --> 00:39:33,015
They are really easy to mill.
00:39:33,100 --> 00:39:35,100
Here's another variation.
00:39:35,220 --> 00:39:38,415
You could design
something like this.
00:39:38,500 --> 00:39:40,615
This kind of construction.
00:39:40,700 --> 00:39:43,980
Consider this type of
bent support...
00:39:44,200 --> 00:39:46,540
From metal?
- Or leather covered, for inside.
00:39:47,060 --> 00:39:49,415
It's rather simple...
00:39:49,500 --> 00:39:52,100
It's clipped in.
With screws.
00:39:54,220 --> 00:39:56,975
What are your issues,
I didn't understand...
00:39:57,060 --> 00:39:59,335
with the
all-from-one-material idea?
00:39:59,420 --> 00:40:01,740
What exactly are your...
00:40:03,100 --> 00:40:04,780
Your problems?
00:40:05,800 --> 00:40:08,780
It seems to me that
has been tried.
00:40:10,300 --> 00:40:14,460
That it was tried
quite often, and...
00:40:19,580 --> 00:40:23,620
It seems like the concept is...
- A gimmick?
00:40:24,180 --> 00:40:28,800
Yes, it's something a
student would like to try.
00:40:29,100 --> 00:40:30,695
This principle...
00:40:30,780 --> 00:40:32,540
But I'm not sure, maybe not.
00:40:35,500 --> 00:40:36,620
Maybe I'm wrong.
00:40:39,180 --> 00:40:43,660
It was the impression
I had when I started.
00:40:45,300 --> 00:40:46,935
That it was a dogmatic idea.
00:40:47,020 --> 00:40:50,900
Like adding a slot here
and a groove there.
00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:58,580
Let's try again before we
reject the idea entirely.
00:41:00,000 --> 00:41:06,915
Initially we wanted to develop
a constructive, interesting idea.
00:41:07,000 --> 00:41:10,455
An intelligent system,
which is clearly visible.
00:41:10,540 --> 00:41:14,615
Since that was the weak
point of the lounge chair.
00:41:14,700 --> 00:41:17,855
It has a nice form,
and it's comfortable.
00:41:17,940 --> 00:41:21,495
but you have no idea
how it was made.
00:41:21,580 --> 00:41:25,460
It's rather dubious
the way it's constructed...
00:41:26,540 --> 00:41:31,575
The form is made of foam,
but inside there's a steel frame.
00:41:31,660 --> 00:41:35,215
We should find a solution that
is simple in construction,
00:41:35,300 --> 00:41:40,455
plausible and transparent, but
still comfortable and practical.
00:41:40,540 --> 00:41:42,135
That's mandatory.
00:41:42,220 --> 00:41:46,695
I'd also say this looks
like a student's project.
00:41:46,780 --> 00:41:48,860
You would agree.
00:41:49,400 --> 00:41:51,620
But this is the first round...
- Yes.
00:41:52,660 --> 00:41:56,615
I think even the
comfort factor and
00:41:56,700 --> 00:42:00,500
appearance has
markedly improved.
00:42:01,500 --> 00:42:06,000
Good, let's sum it up,
that I'll do another variation.
00:42:06,500 --> 00:42:08,340
That's my suggestion, yes.
00:42:09,460 --> 00:42:12,135
Ok, I'll build it.
00:42:12,220 --> 00:42:16,700
I'll present it first
as a model, right?
00:43:28,420 --> 00:43:30,220
Hello.
- Good morning.
00:43:33,900 --> 00:43:36,740
Over here?
- I forgot the vase.
00:43:38,820 --> 00:43:40,140
No vase...
00:44:21,220 --> 00:44:24,420
Bye, have a nice week.
- You too.
00:44:41,500 --> 00:44:46,000
Apartment and Commercial Buildings
Strasbourg, France. Competition.
00:52:56,180 --> 00:53:00,000
Handles for windows and doors.
Development phase.
00:53:27,000 --> 00:53:31,495
Then I set this
protruding edge back,
00:53:31,580 --> 00:53:34,100
so that it doesn't
have a bulge here.
00:53:37,500 --> 00:53:40,060
And you made the
bottom straight?
00:53:44,700 --> 00:53:48,980
You can see the bulge at the
bottom is also gone.
00:55:55,620 --> 00:55:59,455
But I think you can
see it a bit better here
00:55:59,540 --> 00:56:01,220
Can I move it?
00:56:01,500 --> 00:56:02,940
I'll set it over...
00:56:04,800 --> 00:56:07,915
We have it at a
strange perspective.
00:56:08,000 --> 00:56:09,060
Yes, exactly.
00:56:43,850 --> 00:56:46,895
But all locks are made that way.
00:56:46,980 --> 00:56:49,655
When you pivot the window
it would be like that.
00:56:49,740 --> 00:56:51,575
No, you open the window like this.
00:56:51,660 --> 00:56:53,020
You pivot it like this.
00:57:55,750 --> 00:57:57,980
The other one is mounted there.
00:57:58,700 --> 00:58:01,860
Which one?
- The one at the back.
00:58:49,100 --> 00:58:51,540
Let's look at them
with the windows.
00:59:51,700 --> 00:59:55,580
University Building, Potsdam.
Construction phase.
01:01:48,600 --> 01:01:53,720
Centre for the Virtual Reality
Laval, France. Competition.
01:07:45,200 --> 01:07:49,760
Renovation of an Office Building
Munich, Construction phase.
01:08:07,320 --> 01:08:10,420
Should we look at the
window handles first?
01:08:11,300 --> 01:08:14,915
Here they open,
going this direction.
01:08:15,000 --> 01:08:18,540
I hope that it doesn't
fall off when it's open.
01:08:20,740 --> 01:08:25,220
Since it has this bulge here...
01:08:26,700 --> 01:08:32,855
just like the other one, it eliminates
the danger of gripping too close.
01:08:32,940 --> 01:08:35,300
Gripping too close to the edge.
01:08:35,820 --> 01:08:39,495
The hazardous part of
this window is still...
01:08:39,580 --> 01:08:44,340
that the point of rotation is
very close to the frame.
01:08:44,860 --> 01:08:49,255
This handle doesn't function
correctly in this direction.
01:08:49,340 --> 01:08:51,720
Especially when closing it.
01:08:53,700 --> 01:08:56,540
It actually does work
when closing the window.
01:08:56,900 --> 01:08:58,810
This one works even better.
01:08:59,080 --> 01:09:02,550
It prevents injury,
when I close it.
01:09:02,820 --> 01:09:03,940
Even like this.
01:09:04,520 --> 01:09:11,220
The shape alone prevents my hand
from coming too close to the frame.
01:09:11,610 --> 01:09:16,000
Which in my opinion
is really critical with this one.
01:09:16,250 --> 01:09:21,620
This one doesn't set the
safe position of the hand.
01:09:23,300 --> 01:09:31,420
If you get your hand caught
here, that's a serious injury.
01:09:32,100 --> 01:09:35,580
We have to minimize this danger,
even if I can't banish it entirely.
01:09:36,000 --> 01:09:40,435
Further development has to be based
on the technical requirements of FSB.
01:09:40,520 --> 01:09:45,935
I can't explain them all, but
there are certain steel parts...
01:09:46,020 --> 01:09:50,935
and various requirements
of the mold.
01:09:51,020 --> 01:09:55,460
But this handle comes closer to the
edge, you can see that clearly.
01:09:56,940 --> 01:10:00,020
We have to work on it,
nothing else will help.
01:10:01,050 --> 01:10:05,450
University Building, Potsdam.
Construction phase.
01:10:38,650 --> 01:10:41,000
We have to put two colours
next to each other.
01:10:41,200 --> 01:10:43,300
One is yellowish,
as you can see.
01:10:43,450 --> 01:10:47,380
Yellow and a bit of caramel, or
however you'd like to call it.
01:10:47,520 --> 01:10:48,900
They're one pair.
01:10:49,100 --> 01:10:53,660
The other pair was
chosen in relation to...
01:10:54,460 --> 01:10:58,900
the brownish-grey or yellowish-grey
on the northern side.
01:10:59,130 --> 01:11:04,700
The neutral grey brownish-yellow,
or sand colour if you like...
01:11:04,980 --> 01:11:07,460
this will come on the west side.
01:11:07,990 --> 01:11:12,750
I like this rather neutral,
modest colour here.
01:11:13,070 --> 01:11:16,860
It lets this object, the
"objet trouvé", stand out.
01:11:17,080 --> 01:11:21,020
That's why I would argue for the
first, more neutral pair.
01:11:24,100 --> 01:11:27,600
That is an interesting aspect,
with the neutral colours.
01:11:27,820 --> 01:11:32,350
They emphasize the perception of
the older building, I like that.
01:11:32,700 --> 01:11:37,400
I don't have any problem with that
choice; I think it's very good, yes.
01:11:38,850 --> 01:11:41,275
Can I make one
comment at this point:
01:11:41,360 --> 01:11:44,020
We found your criticism
very helpful.
01:11:45,340 --> 01:11:48,015
We then had to rethink and
rework the concept,
01:11:48,100 --> 01:11:51,815
and such projects are
always collaborations.
01:11:51,900 --> 01:11:54,400
The architects or
planners aren't alone,
01:11:54,750 --> 01:11:58,750
it's a conversation between users,
contractors and ourselves.
01:11:58,940 --> 01:12:01,600
A process of dialogue.
- Exactly.
24685
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.