All language subtitles for Sauerbruch Hutton Architekten 2013 Harun Farocki SUB English

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French Download
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:48,000 Centre for Virtual Reality Laval, France. Competition. 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:51,615 Who is the contractor? 00:00:51,700 --> 00:00:55,816 The contractor is made up of the university 00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:58,000 and private companies in France. 00:03:35,151 --> 00:03:36,500 A green field. 00:04:35,050 --> 00:04:38,000 It can be up to 15 metres tall, we could build higher... 00:04:38,100 --> 00:04:41,200 but we have to consider the concept and what we can do. 00:04:41,500 --> 00:04:46,050 They want everything tied together: more like a shopping mall. 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,000 So we could build a tall Totem Pole, signaling "hello, here we are!". 00:05:59,920 --> 00:06:03,800 University Building, Potsdam Construction phase 00:07:06,280 --> 00:07:08,940 It's organic but it's not light-resistant. 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:16,615 That would be nice if it fades, hmm? 00:07:16,700 --> 00:07:19,500 That would help things enormously, but then... 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,600 These are the ones I picked. 00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,800 I picked it not based on the numbers but on the rendering. 00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:43,509 There are two possibilities: 00:07:43,599 --> 00:07:46,600 Standard colours, or we choose any colour we want. 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:48,800 That means what... 00:07:49,300 --> 00:07:52,600 This is the same roof like the EFM, identical. 00:07:54,350 --> 00:07:56,550 This could be pure aluminium. 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:17,000 We'll use the same textile floor covering as usual... 00:09:36,650 --> 00:09:38,700 Back to the question... 00:09:39,650 --> 00:09:42,500 Should we have the windows in two colours or not? 00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:23,300 I think that's number 500. No it's 8000. 00:14:38,500 --> 00:14:42,250 Folding and Stacked Chairs Venice-Mestre, Italy. Development phase. 00:15:07,300 --> 00:15:10,300 This one here has more options than the others. 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:15,100 You could put a brace on the back, so it's free when it folds. 00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:17,400 Show me again. 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:21,900 Here at this point with the strut you could mount a brace. 00:15:23,300 --> 00:15:25,700 Or put the brace across the supports. 00:15:26,100 --> 00:15:28,600 Exactly. You could put a brace here... 00:15:29,500 --> 00:15:32,300 A brace on the back and also in front. 00:15:35,100 --> 00:15:36,599 The same one in steel. 00:15:36,700 --> 00:15:38,200 The same one... 00:15:38,500 --> 00:15:40,250 It's a bit different... 00:15:40,850 --> 00:15:43,250 The proportions here are odd. 00:15:45,500 --> 00:15:48,600 Since this one is the widest, 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:51,350 the proportions seem a bit... 00:15:51,900 --> 00:15:53,099 ...strange, no? 00:15:53,200 --> 00:15:57,315 Both seem a bit stiff, perhaps since they 00:15:57,400 --> 00:15:59,715 are designed with such straight lines. 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:02,715 That's only if you really want to design 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:06,000 the seat to flip up towards the back. 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,665 Or you could flip it from the front. 00:16:09,750 --> 00:16:14,350 It folds up from the front, but then you need a bridge support. 00:16:14,700 --> 00:16:16,815 I can't demonstrate it well with this one. 00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:19,400 Let me remove the seat. 00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:23,800 It's built a bit different. 00:16:29,500 --> 00:16:31,800 That's rather clever actually. 00:16:32,500 --> 00:16:35,415 You don't have to use all these annoying parts. 00:16:35,500 --> 00:16:37,415 You don't need them. 00:16:37,500 --> 00:16:42,600 It's more effective, you just have a few elements. 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,900 Six struts the same length, and this support. 00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,815 It's still not quite as simple as it could be. 00:16:53,900 --> 00:16:57,115 It would be nicer if it was just 3 supports which 00:16:57,200 --> 00:17:00,600 are cleverly connected to make this shape. 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:04,000 For now it's a shame... 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:08,600 ... it seems a bit slapped together. 00:17:09,650 --> 00:17:12,115 This is really brilliant here. 00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:18,400 That the seat itself keeps this from moving apart. 00:17:20,300 --> 00:17:23,915 Otherwise you would have to add a stopper here. 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:25,700 To keep it from collapsing. 00:17:27,300 --> 00:17:29,700 Can you give me the seat again? 00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:36,800 It's mounted on top. 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:43,700 So here's where it would snap in. 00:17:45,350 --> 00:17:47,000 How do we release it? 00:17:47,700 --> 00:17:48,965 Like this, right? 00:17:49,050 --> 00:17:51,120 It's stuck somewhere... 00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:55,900 You've got to take it off, I'll break something. 00:17:56,700 --> 00:17:59,700 That's the way to release it, right? - Yes, probably. 00:18:02,500 --> 00:18:06,900 But I had a different candidate recently, it worked quite well. 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:21,300 I'm not sure if it helps any, but... 00:18:22,050 --> 00:18:26,750 One reason it seems so stiff is the straight back support. 00:18:27,800 --> 00:18:32,000 Theoretically you could bend it a bit, right? 00:18:33,750 --> 00:18:37,950 You keep the functionality, and it's easy to produce using wood. 00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,300 It's something to try for sure. 00:18:45,300 --> 00:18:48,665 But now we're still dealing with the three straight supports. 00:18:48,750 --> 00:18:51,450 Yes, it has got something, I like the idea. 00:18:52,150 --> 00:18:54,600 But it just seems a bit stiff. 00:18:55,550 --> 00:18:56,915 Yes, I think so too. 00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:00,000 We now have to build one that you can sit on. 00:19:01,050 --> 00:19:04,650 It looks like it's uncomfortable, but maybe that's deceptive. 00:19:05,550 --> 00:19:09,200 University Building, Potsdam. Construction phase. 00:19:28,300 --> 00:19:32,215 Can we have the two panels next to each other please? 00:19:32,300 --> 00:19:35,115 They're on the table, they're the same ones. 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:37,465 So you can see them in a smaller size. 00:19:37,550 --> 00:19:40,200 Yes, I'd like to see them hung together. 00:19:40,600 --> 00:19:44,400 Since we have this bend where they meet each other. 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:46,250 Those two, right. 00:19:46,400 --> 00:19:48,815 Those two are clearly darker than the others. 00:19:48,900 --> 00:19:50,700 That's true. 00:19:51,450 --> 00:19:53,600 Here's the other one too... 00:19:54,700 --> 00:19:56,715 No, please don't put them down flat... 00:19:56,800 --> 00:19:59,400 then the light reflects differently. 00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:05,715 This is how the bend looks. 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:07,915 We'll bend in the right direction. 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:09,900 No. We'll bend like this. 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,415 The building is a bit like a "folding screen"... 00:20:13,500 --> 00:20:15,215 ...these repeated angled walls. 00:20:15,300 --> 00:20:18,415 Move into the sun or shadow, otherwise it's difficult to judge. 00:20:18,500 --> 00:20:20,415 This is full sun. 00:20:20,500 --> 00:20:22,615 Now let's all move into the shade. 00:20:22,700 --> 00:20:24,300 Let's turn. 00:20:36,300 --> 00:20:39,365 You could do that if you had a building, 00:20:39,450 --> 00:20:41,715 which we obviously do not have. 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:46,615 If it were a geometric building with a clear form... 00:20:46,700 --> 00:20:50,665 in its 3-D spatial sense, which was subtle... 00:20:50,750 --> 00:20:53,615 and integrated itself into the environment. 00:20:53,700 --> 00:20:55,550 I simply believe... 00:20:57,000 --> 00:20:59,850 this expression through the form suffices... 00:21:02,300 --> 00:21:07,400 It doesn't need an additional expression through colour. 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:13,515 The building does have a very unique form. 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:16,200 It presents itself with this form. 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:23,100 So the question is whether this form has to be amplified by this colour. 00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:03,400 Tina, can you come over here? 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:11,400 Take this, and press it tightly here. 00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:13,000 Here? - Yes 00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:36,000 Centre for Virtual Reality Laval, France. Competition. 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:52,000 University Building, Potsdam. Construction phase. 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:20,015 The right one? The other was also very bright. 00:29:20,100 --> 00:29:24,715 We feel that the panel that Mr. Bartenschlag put on the right... 00:29:24,800 --> 00:29:28,500 would fit better on the north façade. 00:29:29,500 --> 00:29:33,715 The brighter or stronger colour would be better... 00:29:33,800 --> 00:29:36,815 on the west side where the sunlight shines. 00:29:36,900 --> 00:29:39,500 So it would shine even more. 00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:44,615 We understood that, but we agreed last time... 00:29:44,700 --> 00:29:48,900 that we didn't want yellow or yellow-green tones. 00:29:49,500 --> 00:29:54,200 Instead we prefer colours that integrate with the property. 00:29:54,800 --> 00:29:58,755 So actually we requested colour tones like that door over there... 00:29:58,840 --> 00:30:01,715 ...or something like over there at the library. 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:05,415 So we could play within that spectrum we agreed upon. 00:30:05,500 --> 00:30:07,500 That we could proceed... 00:30:08,400 --> 00:30:10,695 The colours aren't as intense as last time. 00:30:10,780 --> 00:30:14,860 But you still propose yellow or green tones that aren't on the property. 00:30:17,100 --> 00:30:18,600 That's how I see it too. 00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:21,115 The one on the left is incredibly bright. 00:30:21,200 --> 00:30:23,575 Imagine this long façade in this yellow... 00:30:23,660 --> 00:30:28,740 and the other in a different yellow shade, and you walk directly towards it... no. 00:30:30,900 --> 00:30:33,895 I can understand that you have a different opinion. 00:30:33,980 --> 00:30:36,915 But in the end, we are the contractors, right. -Exactly. 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:39,215 We have to live with the building later. 00:30:39,300 --> 00:30:40,460 That's right. 00:30:46,540 --> 00:30:48,800 That's not what was planned, but alright. 00:30:49,050 --> 00:30:52,000 What do you think of the big one on the left? 00:30:52,100 --> 00:30:52,960 Nope. 00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:56,050 Just look how intensely that stands out. 00:30:57,940 --> 00:30:59,940 It's like an "optical colour mix". 00:31:25,600 --> 00:31:27,015 The one on the right... 00:31:27,100 --> 00:31:28,655 The right one isn't bad. 00:31:28,740 --> 00:31:30,975 Maybe it has to be a bit darker. 00:31:31,060 --> 00:31:34,700 The left one could be toned down more. 00:31:35,050 --> 00:31:36,375 A bit less pigment. 00:31:36,460 --> 00:31:38,495 The darker one on the right, yes. 00:31:38,580 --> 00:31:40,700 This colour, but a bit darker. 00:31:41,540 --> 00:31:45,055 You are welcome to rework the concept, but I'd like to see... 00:31:45,140 --> 00:31:49,700 a variation based on the colours present on the property. 00:31:50,100 --> 00:31:53,900 The concept is intended to be a "reaction". 00:31:54,500 --> 00:31:56,460 A reaction to the surroundings. 00:31:56,600 --> 00:31:59,915 You don't have to precisely replicate the colours 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:02,815 already here, like that apricot building. 00:32:02,900 --> 00:32:04,935 I really think the colours fit. 00:32:05,020 --> 00:32:07,335 This yellow toned courtyard fits... 00:32:07,420 --> 00:32:11,335 in an environment with blue colours. 00:32:11,420 --> 00:32:14,060 I'd still like to see another variation. 00:32:14,640 --> 00:32:17,495 To see the relationships here at the site. 00:32:17,580 --> 00:32:18,850 Yes. We'll do it. 00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:34,100 Apartment and Commercial Buildings Strasbourg, France. Competition. 00:32:44,100 --> 00:32:45,850 Hi Stephanie, it's Matthias. 00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:48,820 Do you have a minute? 00:32:52,900 --> 00:32:58,620 We want to discuss the ceramic façade in Strasbourg. 00:33:01,500 --> 00:33:04,060 We're upstairs with the project. 00:33:08,850 --> 00:33:12,620 When Stephanie gets here we should concentrate on the façade. 00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:17,135 Are you familiar with this, Stephanie? 00:33:17,220 --> 00:33:19,260 You know the façade plans? 00:33:19,400 --> 00:33:20,580 No. 00:33:22,700 --> 00:33:25,900 In Straßburg, this "STO"façade, you know it. 00:33:26,700 --> 00:33:28,775 You can see it clearly here. 00:33:28,860 --> 00:33:31,735 A perforated façade which opens up toward the bottom. 00:33:31,820 --> 00:33:35,820 There are large openings at the base, which get smaller towards the top. 00:33:39,220 --> 00:33:42,515 They have pockmarks or whatever you call them. 00:33:42,600 --> 00:33:49,335 Something like relief panels which protrude. 00:33:49,420 --> 00:33:51,780 They should all be made from ceramic. 00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:56,780 But they are rather expensive, 280 per square metre. 00:33:57,860 --> 00:33:59,015 280? 00:33:59,100 --> 00:34:03,415 Yes, but only for the material, without windows, etc. 00:34:03,500 --> 00:34:04,695 With mounting? 00:34:04,780 --> 00:34:08,020 Mounted, yes. But that's only part of the process. 00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:10,975 You have to figure in the concrete façade. 00:34:11,060 --> 00:34:15,175 The main part of the surface is concrete, 00:34:15,260 --> 00:34:18,140 and that is part of the cost of the façade. 00:34:34,220 --> 00:34:37,300 If we had a partial model, that would be super. 00:34:37,980 --> 00:34:39,615 If we ourselves are convinced. 00:34:39,700 --> 00:34:43,180 We have to see it first, we aren't 100% certain, right? 00:34:48,680 --> 00:34:54,780 It looks good in the pictures, but it isn't worked out in 3-D yet. 00:34:57,550 --> 00:34:59,260 Click "View", there. 00:35:24,620 --> 00:35:27,220 But I don't see the green ones, oh here. 00:35:56,400 --> 00:35:58,020 These are all blue. 00:36:54,900 --> 00:36:59,220 Folding and Stacked Chairs Venice-Mestre, Italy. Development phase. 00:37:14,950 --> 00:37:16,150 See you later. 00:37:25,000 --> 00:37:30,580 The more this moves forwards, the more space you have here. 00:37:31,140 --> 00:37:34,500 Maybe we could do it differently, maybe... 00:37:36,550 --> 00:37:38,660 Maybe make it from... 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:40,660 ...from steel? 00:37:41,300 --> 00:37:43,015 No, that would be a shame. 00:37:43,100 --> 00:37:46,700 I think it should all be made of wood. 00:37:51,600 --> 00:37:54,500 I'm not so sure about that idea... 00:37:55,000 --> 00:37:58,740 ...everything from one board. - So now you've added steel braces? 00:38:01,100 --> 00:38:04,415 Yes, I wanted to explain that. 00:38:04,500 --> 00:38:06,140 I just thought... 00:38:07,100 --> 00:38:08,615 We shouldn't be dogmatic. 00:38:08,700 --> 00:38:12,055 Why force this idea of a design from one material? 00:38:12,140 --> 00:38:18,620 Since it would simplify the production. 00:38:19,100 --> 00:38:20,980 Or something like this. 00:38:22,600 --> 00:38:24,500 This would really... 00:38:25,000 --> 00:38:27,255 No, that wouldn't be right. 00:38:27,340 --> 00:38:28,540 We can't do that. 00:38:28,650 --> 00:38:30,940 It would be a real shame. 00:38:33,140 --> 00:38:37,135 Since the basic idea was: 00:38:37,220 --> 00:38:42,300 it should be produced by a milling process and all from one material. 00:38:42,600 --> 00:38:45,700 You think we should stick... -These join supports aren't good. 00:38:46,740 --> 00:38:50,500 Otherwise why not just screw the whole thing together. 00:38:50,600 --> 00:38:53,580 If you start adding support pieces... 00:38:54,460 --> 00:38:56,660 Yes, I see, but... 00:38:57,140 --> 00:38:59,020 I'm not sure. 00:38:59,260 --> 00:39:03,220 This one would be completely glued. 00:39:06,200 --> 00:39:08,020 This one would also be... 00:39:08,400 --> 00:39:10,215 ...well, I'm not sure. 00:39:10,300 --> 00:39:14,340 I'm no longer convinced of this all-from-one-board idea. 00:39:15,600 --> 00:39:18,540 It seems like an artificial rule. 00:39:18,700 --> 00:39:19,780 I'm not sure. 00:39:22,060 --> 00:39:28,000 Maybe we toss the concept, and design these elements from a different material. 00:39:28,460 --> 00:39:30,975 These are really simple parts. 00:39:31,060 --> 00:39:33,015 They are really easy to mill. 00:39:33,100 --> 00:39:35,100 Here's another variation. 00:39:35,220 --> 00:39:38,415 You could design something like this. 00:39:38,500 --> 00:39:40,615 This kind of construction. 00:39:40,700 --> 00:39:43,980 Consider this type of bent support... 00:39:44,200 --> 00:39:46,540 From metal? - Or leather covered, for inside. 00:39:47,060 --> 00:39:49,415 It's rather simple... 00:39:49,500 --> 00:39:52,100 It's clipped in. With screws. 00:39:54,220 --> 00:39:56,975 What are your issues, I didn't understand... 00:39:57,060 --> 00:39:59,335 with the all-from-one-material idea? 00:39:59,420 --> 00:40:01,740 What exactly are your... 00:40:03,100 --> 00:40:04,780 Your problems? 00:40:05,800 --> 00:40:08,780 It seems to me that has been tried. 00:40:10,300 --> 00:40:14,460 That it was tried quite often, and... 00:40:19,580 --> 00:40:23,620 It seems like the concept is... - A gimmick? 00:40:24,180 --> 00:40:28,800 Yes, it's something a student would like to try. 00:40:29,100 --> 00:40:30,695 This principle... 00:40:30,780 --> 00:40:32,540 But I'm not sure, maybe not. 00:40:35,500 --> 00:40:36,620 Maybe I'm wrong. 00:40:39,180 --> 00:40:43,660 It was the impression I had when I started. 00:40:45,300 --> 00:40:46,935 That it was a dogmatic idea. 00:40:47,020 --> 00:40:50,900 Like adding a slot here and a groove there. 00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:58,580 Let's try again before we reject the idea entirely. 00:41:00,000 --> 00:41:06,915 Initially we wanted to develop a constructive, interesting idea. 00:41:07,000 --> 00:41:10,455 An intelligent system, which is clearly visible. 00:41:10,540 --> 00:41:14,615 Since that was the weak point of the lounge chair. 00:41:14,700 --> 00:41:17,855 It has a nice form, and it's comfortable. 00:41:17,940 --> 00:41:21,495 but you have no idea how it was made. 00:41:21,580 --> 00:41:25,460 It's rather dubious the way it's constructed... 00:41:26,540 --> 00:41:31,575 The form is made of foam, but inside there's a steel frame. 00:41:31,660 --> 00:41:35,215 We should find a solution that is simple in construction, 00:41:35,300 --> 00:41:40,455 plausible and transparent, but still comfortable and practical. 00:41:40,540 --> 00:41:42,135 That's mandatory. 00:41:42,220 --> 00:41:46,695 I'd also say this looks like a student's project. 00:41:46,780 --> 00:41:48,860 You would agree. 00:41:49,400 --> 00:41:51,620 But this is the first round... - Yes. 00:41:52,660 --> 00:41:56,615 I think even the comfort factor and 00:41:56,700 --> 00:42:00,500 appearance has markedly improved. 00:42:01,500 --> 00:42:06,000 Good, let's sum it up, that I'll do another variation. 00:42:06,500 --> 00:42:08,340 That's my suggestion, yes. 00:42:09,460 --> 00:42:12,135 Ok, I'll build it. 00:42:12,220 --> 00:42:16,700 I'll present it first as a model, right? 00:43:28,420 --> 00:43:30,220 Hello. - Good morning. 00:43:33,900 --> 00:43:36,740 Over here? - I forgot the vase. 00:43:38,820 --> 00:43:40,140 No vase... 00:44:21,220 --> 00:44:24,420 Bye, have a nice week. - You too. 00:44:41,500 --> 00:44:46,000 Apartment and Commercial Buildings Strasbourg, France. Competition. 00:52:56,180 --> 00:53:00,000 Handles for windows and doors. Development phase. 00:53:27,000 --> 00:53:31,495 Then I set this protruding edge back, 00:53:31,580 --> 00:53:34,100 so that it doesn't have a bulge here. 00:53:37,500 --> 00:53:40,060 And you made the bottom straight? 00:53:44,700 --> 00:53:48,980 You can see the bulge at the bottom is also gone. 00:55:55,620 --> 00:55:59,455 But I think you can see it a bit better here 00:55:59,540 --> 00:56:01,220 Can I move it? 00:56:01,500 --> 00:56:02,940 I'll set it over... 00:56:04,800 --> 00:56:07,915 We have it at a strange perspective. 00:56:08,000 --> 00:56:09,060 Yes, exactly. 00:56:43,850 --> 00:56:46,895 But all locks are made that way. 00:56:46,980 --> 00:56:49,655 When you pivot the window it would be like that. 00:56:49,740 --> 00:56:51,575 No, you open the window like this. 00:56:51,660 --> 00:56:53,020 You pivot it like this. 00:57:55,750 --> 00:57:57,980 The other one is mounted there. 00:57:58,700 --> 00:58:01,860 Which one? - The one at the back. 00:58:49,100 --> 00:58:51,540 Let's look at them with the windows. 00:59:51,700 --> 00:59:55,580 University Building, Potsdam. Construction phase. 01:01:48,600 --> 01:01:53,720 Centre for the Virtual Reality Laval, France. Competition. 01:07:45,200 --> 01:07:49,760 Renovation of an Office Building Munich, Construction phase. 01:08:07,320 --> 01:08:10,420 Should we look at the window handles first? 01:08:11,300 --> 01:08:14,915 Here they open, going this direction. 01:08:15,000 --> 01:08:18,540 I hope that it doesn't fall off when it's open. 01:08:20,740 --> 01:08:25,220 Since it has this bulge here... 01:08:26,700 --> 01:08:32,855 just like the other one, it eliminates the danger of gripping too close. 01:08:32,940 --> 01:08:35,300 Gripping too close to the edge. 01:08:35,820 --> 01:08:39,495 The hazardous part of this window is still... 01:08:39,580 --> 01:08:44,340 that the point of rotation is very close to the frame. 01:08:44,860 --> 01:08:49,255 This handle doesn't function correctly in this direction. 01:08:49,340 --> 01:08:51,720 Especially when closing it. 01:08:53,700 --> 01:08:56,540 It actually does work when closing the window. 01:08:56,900 --> 01:08:58,810 This one works even better. 01:08:59,080 --> 01:09:02,550 It prevents injury, when I close it. 01:09:02,820 --> 01:09:03,940 Even like this. 01:09:04,520 --> 01:09:11,220 The shape alone prevents my hand from coming too close to the frame. 01:09:11,610 --> 01:09:16,000 Which in my opinion is really critical with this one. 01:09:16,250 --> 01:09:21,620 This one doesn't set the safe position of the hand. 01:09:23,300 --> 01:09:31,420 If you get your hand caught here, that's a serious injury. 01:09:32,100 --> 01:09:35,580 We have to minimize this danger, even if I can't banish it entirely. 01:09:36,000 --> 01:09:40,435 Further development has to be based on the technical requirements of FSB. 01:09:40,520 --> 01:09:45,935 I can't explain them all, but there are certain steel parts... 01:09:46,020 --> 01:09:50,935 and various requirements of the mold. 01:09:51,020 --> 01:09:55,460 But this handle comes closer to the edge, you can see that clearly. 01:09:56,940 --> 01:10:00,020 We have to work on it, nothing else will help. 01:10:01,050 --> 01:10:05,450 University Building, Potsdam. Construction phase. 01:10:38,650 --> 01:10:41,000 We have to put two colours next to each other. 01:10:41,200 --> 01:10:43,300 One is yellowish, as you can see. 01:10:43,450 --> 01:10:47,380 Yellow and a bit of caramel, or however you'd like to call it. 01:10:47,520 --> 01:10:48,900 They're one pair. 01:10:49,100 --> 01:10:53,660 The other pair was chosen in relation to... 01:10:54,460 --> 01:10:58,900 the brownish-grey or yellowish-grey on the northern side. 01:10:59,130 --> 01:11:04,700 The neutral grey brownish-yellow, or sand colour if you like... 01:11:04,980 --> 01:11:07,460 this will come on the west side. 01:11:07,990 --> 01:11:12,750 I like this rather neutral, modest colour here. 01:11:13,070 --> 01:11:16,860 It lets this object, the "objet trouvé", stand out. 01:11:17,080 --> 01:11:21,020 That's why I would argue for the first, more neutral pair. 01:11:24,100 --> 01:11:27,600 That is an interesting aspect, with the neutral colours. 01:11:27,820 --> 01:11:32,350 They emphasize the perception of the older building, I like that. 01:11:32,700 --> 01:11:37,400 I don't have any problem with that choice; I think it's very good, yes. 01:11:38,850 --> 01:11:41,275 Can I make one comment at this point: 01:11:41,360 --> 01:11:44,020 We found your criticism very helpful. 01:11:45,340 --> 01:11:48,015 We then had to rethink and rework the concept, 01:11:48,100 --> 01:11:51,815 and such projects are always collaborations. 01:11:51,900 --> 01:11:54,400 The architects or planners aren't alone, 01:11:54,750 --> 01:11:58,750 it's a conversation between users, contractors and ourselves. 01:11:58,940 --> 01:12:01,600 A process of dialogue. - Exactly. 24685

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.