Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[THEME MUSIC]
My name's Gregg Braden.
And I'd like to welcome you to this very special presentation
of "Missing Links: The Deep Truth of Our Origin, History,
Destiny, and Fate."
Now last episode, we discovered that the key
to the thinking that will guide us through our time of extremes
is found in the timeless wisdom that our ancestors asked
themselves in their time and that science is asking today.
The question is simply this who are we?
Well new discoveries are changing our answer.
And as they do, they're changing the way
we think of ourselves and the world.
Today, let's zero in on some of those discoveries
and what they mean in our lives.
When I was in school back in the 1960s and '70s,
I was taught that the fundamental essence of matter
looked like this.
It looks like an atom.
And the atom was a mechanical atom.
It was little things moving around the thing.
Electrons moving around the nucleus.
Well, today, the atom no longer looks
like little things moving around the thing, it looks like this.
There are fields within fields within field,
pulsing fields of energy.
This is one of the ways that our thinking
has changed very, very quickly.
We now know that everything is energy.
We now know that everything is connected.
We now know that when we look into the universe,
for example, that the stars that we're seeing that
appear to be separate from one another
aren't really separate at all.
In this image that you're seeing,
this is from the Hubble Space Telescope.
It is an optical telescope.
It looks at the universe much the way
you and I would look through our eyes.
And when it sees the stars and the galaxies,
it sees them as separate from one another optically.
Now I'm going to share with you another image
from another telescope.
The image that you're seeing right now
is from the Chandra Space Telescope.
It is not an optical telescope, it senses energy.
We're looking at the same place in space,
but look how different this looks.
All of a sudden, those stars and galaxies,
they're no longer separate from one another.
They're all connected.
And one of the things I find really fascinating
about this connection is that we have a sense that it's almost
like a net or a web.
Interestingly enough, our indigenous ancestors
have always told us that we live in the web of creation.
In the Hopi tradition, for example,
when Spider Grandmother first emerged into this world,
she wove the web of creation so that her children
could live their lives.
Or in the Hindu traditions, the great god Indra
wove the web of creation at the intersection.
At each place in the web, Indra put a glittering jewel of light
that became the planets and the stars
that we see in our night sky.
So these ways of thinking, they're not scientific.
But these are the ways that our ancestors
made sense of what they saw in their world.
And this is where much of what science is revealing today
parallels those traditions.
We definitely are seeing a web-like presence.
When we think about one another, we've
been taught that we're separate from one another,
that we're separate from the world around us.
And that what we do in our bodies,
in our thoughts, feelings, and emotions
has very little influence on anything
beyond our own physical body, if that.
But the new discoveries are telling us
that's not true at all.
The new discoveries are showing us
that we are deeply connected.
And in some ways, the connection arises from fields of energy
that we've only begun to understand
in the late part of the 20th and now the early 21st century.
The heart for example, we now know around every human heart
there is a field of energy.
Now this is a field that we can measure
with conventional equipment.
You can go to the hardware store and build your own detector
if you know what you're looking for.
So this energy, it's not the prana, it's not the aura,
it's not the chakra.
It may be related to the prana and the aura and the chakra,
but it is an electromagnetic field
of energy shaped like a donut.
It's called the tube torus.
And it extends between five and eight feet
from every human heart around us.
When I asked the researchers who were working
with these fields-- I know that these fields are very
powerful-- and I said, why would they only
extend to five to eight feet?
And the researchers said, Gregg, it's a good question.
They said the five to the eight feet,
that is the limitation of the equipment doing the measuring.
They said in all probability, the field
that extends around every human heart
is probably an infinite field on the quantum level.
An infinite field from our hearts extending into creation.
And that means that what we create in that heart field
is broadcast, and in some ways influences,
the world around us.
And that's the beauty of understanding
the science that parallels these ancient traditions.
We interact with one another everyday
through these heart fields.
And new discoveries are telling us this.
The new discoveries are telling us
a lot about, not only our everyday lives, but our past.
We've been conditioned to believe, for example, that we
as humans are the product of an evolutionary process that
began long ago and has gone through many iterations leading
to where we find ourselves today.
That's what we've been taught.
We've been steeped in a story that tells us
that evolution is our story.
However, the new science, the best science
of the 21st century, is now telling us,
while evolution is a fact for some forms of life,
that the theory breaks down when it comes to humans.
Something else is happening.
So all of these discoveries that I
am sharing with you right now, they're
all examples of where new discoveries are
in fact changing the story of the way we answer the question,
who am I?
We know that we are connected and not separate.
We know that we are energetic beings
and that we influence the world around us through that energy.
So what I'd like to do right now is zero
in on one place in this conversation.
To zero in on one of these places
where we're taught to think about our past
in the way that no longer works and that
is with civilization itself.
And I was in school back in the '60s and '70s,
I think many of you when you were in school,
or if you have young people in school today,
we have been taught.
We've been steeped in the belief that civilization
began about 5,000, maybe 5,500 years ago with ancient Sumeria.
And from that point in time there
has been a linear progression to the point where we are today.
And we're taught that we are the most sophisticated civilization
that has ever graced the face of the earth.
The problem is the data doesn't support that story.
The data doesn't support the story.
So what you're seeing on this screen right now
is you're seeing an image of the line of history,
the timeline of history, that was being
used when I was in school.
And I asked my history professor,
I said what happened to the left of Sumeria?
What happened before that 5,500 years?
And I remember my professor said to me something very powerful.
It triggered something within me.
He said don't worry about anything to the left.
He said that's not important.
He said history began, civilization
began, 5,000 years ago.
And I said what?
I said you mean we don't know what happened before that?
I said that's the place for me.
That's where I want to be.
That's where I want to look.
And I have spent much of my adult life exploring
the new archaeological discoveries that are now
overturning these ideas of history and civilization
and where we began.
So if you will look to this chart, what you're seeing
is the timeline of what we have been
led to believe-- you see ancient Sumeria, ancient Egypt,
and everything, the Maya, the Inca, the Aztec, the Olmec,
the Toltec, everything is more recent than that.
Greece and Rome, as old as they feel to us,
they are all more recent.
I have personally had the opportunity now
to document some of the new discoveries that are telling us
that civilization is much, much older.
For example, what you're seeing right now,
this is an image of me in 2010 documenting
a new site in northern Peru.
And this site is rocking the world of history,
of archeology, because it is now documented
to be the single oldest technologically
advanced civilization in all of the Americas in all
the Americas.
It's older than the Inca, than the Aztec,
than the Olmec, and the Toltec.
It's older than anything in Mexico,
older than anything in North America.
It is called Caral.
Caral.
C-A-R-A-L. Caral, Peru.
And Caral is a mystery to us, because we've
been taught that civilization began 5,000 years ago.
Interestingly, that's when this one ended.
Caral collapsed 5,000 years ago.
And what the dating now is showing
us is that thrived for 2,000 years before that.
That's 7,000 years ago.
So if this were the only place where the data does not
fit the traditional story, maybe we could call it an anomaly.
But what's happening is there are
so many anomalies that scientists and historians have
set aside.
And they said, well, you know these archaeological
discoveries don't fit our story.
We'll come back and look at them later.
Now there are so many discoveries
to come back and look at that the discoveries are
telling a new story.
And that new story is what we're talking about right here.
Caral was a technologically advanced civilization.
It is about 150 acres.
So it's a large site.
Five pyramids, three circular plazas--
like the one you're seeing in the image right now--
and a tremendous amount of information in a nonwritten
form.
So they weren't using writing, but they
were using symbols and geometry to tell us that they understood
the cosmos.
And they understood their relationship to the cosmos.
The astronomical markers that remain in Caral
today are indicating relationships
that were not even known in the Western world
until the 20th century.
Yet this was 7,000 years ago.
How did they know?
Where did they get their information?
So when we think about Caral, that confirmed date
7,000 years, it's old.
But it's not the oldest.
Now I know there has been a lot of controversy
around the discoveries that have been
made in Egypt over the years.
And I've worked with some of the researchers who
have done beautiful work on pushing against the mainstream
history and the mainstream classrooms
and the mainstream textbooks that tell us about what really
happened in Egypt.
And specifically, one of the best preserved places in Egypt
is the Giza Plateau.
This is where we find the Great Pyramid as well as the Sphinx.
Well as a geologist-- I'm a degreed geologist--
and I've been fascinated by what has
happened with the Sphinx for this reason.
The traditional dating of the Sphinx has been about
4,400-4,500 years before present.
So we're told that that is when the great pharaohs built
this structure.
The problem has always been that the Sphinx is constructed
of material, of rock, that is in situ, in other words that
are not made of blocks that were brought in from another place,
it was carved out of the natural rock out of the Mother Earth.
And because of that, what we find on that rock,
we know happened in that place.
It didn't happen somewhere else.
Well here's where this gets really interesting.
The erosion that we see on the shoulders
and on the back of the Sphinx, we've
been told for years that it was from wind, high amounts of wind
over long periods of time, that's called Aeolian erosion.
Well when geologists from Boston University and specifically,
Robert Schoch, when he went in and began
examining these erosion marks, what he found,
as a geologist-- he's actually a stratigrapher
and a paleontologist, I believe are the two terms that he uses
to describe his expertise-- what he found is that the erosion is
actually not made from wind.
It's made from water.
It's not Aeolian.
It's called fluvial erosion made from tremendous amounts
of water moving quickly over long periods of time.
That's where the story of the Sphinx
gets really interesting because there has not
been vast amounts of water moving quickly
over long periods of time for a very, very long time.
But the scientists, Robert Schoch, and his team, this
was their conclusion.
They published this in peer reviewed geologic journals.
And the interesting thing was that geologists said, sure,
it's obvious.
We have no problem with this conclusion, the geologists.
The historians have a terrible problem with the conclusion,
because the conclusion says the last time that kind of water
was moving through Egypt where the Great Sphinx is
is between 8,000 and 12,000 years ago.
Now that messes up all the history books.
However, that is what the science is showing us.
8,000 to 12,000 years ago, the Sphinx
would have already had to been in place, which means maybe it
was built even before that, for the water to begin the erosion.
In his own words, I just want to share with you
the words of Robert Schoch.
He said, quote "I came to the conclusion
that the oldest portions of the Great Sphinx
must date back to an earlier period, at least 7,000 years
and maybe as early as 9,000 years ago,
to a time when the climate was very different
and included more rain."
So what we're talking about are anomalies
in the archaeological record as we
have been asked to embrace that record in the past.
We're looking at evidence of advanced technological
civilizations during a time, we were told,
only primitive mud huts in primitive societies
were existing.
Now there so many of these anomalies
that we can take the time to explore, right now,
but I'd like to cut to the chase.
I want to spend a little bit of time
on the oldest technologically advanced civilization
that science has now agreed is a technologically
advanced civilization.
And they've agreed upon the dates.
It's a very mysterious site.
It's located in southern Turkey near the Syrian border, which
makes it a very difficult place for archeologists
to get into right now because of the war that's happening there.
It is called Gobekli Tepe, Gobekli Tepe.
And it is a site that has been on the radar
of some archeologists for some time.
Now I'm mentioning this because in the last episode,
we talked about the false assumptions of science
with the inverted pyramid.
One of those false assumptions was the assumption
that civilization began 5,000 years ago.
This is important because when we ask ourselves
who am I as an individual, who are we collectively,
and we look at where we've come from,
we've been conditioned to think in that box
to go back only 5,000 years.
Well let me share with you what a profound and limiting effect
that can have on a scientist who adheres
to this kind of thinking.
In the 1960s, there was an American archaeologist.
He heard from villagers about this site, Gobekli Tepe
and they took him there.
And he found some pottery on a hill.
And he began dating this pottery.
And the dates for the pottery came back so old
that the scientist said they can't be right
because civilization is only 5,000 years old.
That is what we've all agreed upon.
So even though the pottery told him something older
was happening, he made a professional choice.
He walked away from this site because he said it cannot
possibly be as old as what the dates are now revealing.
Well it wasn't until the 1990s that German archaeologist
returned to this site.
He did the same dating.
The difference is he was not bound
by the rigidity of the scientific thinking.
He wasn't in that box.
And he believed the dates.
And he very famously said, publicly,
and he said to his crew, to his team,
he said if I don't walk away from this site right now,
he said I will spend the rest of my life excavating this site.
And that is precisely what he did until he passed
just a couple of years ago.
So what is Gobekli Tepe?
It's a mysterious site.
It is believed to be a series of circular temples
that are buried under the earth.
Apparently they were intentionally buried.
And I say it is believed, because they are still buried.
Scientists are using Earth imaging radar, earth
penetrating radar, to look into the earth
and see these temples.
Right now, there are, I believe, five to eight
that have been unexcavated.
They are circular temples of vertical columns.
Scientists don't know who put them there,
why they were there, why they were intentionally buried.
But the fact that they were has preserved
what has been found to such a degree
that the hieroglyphs look like they were made yesterday.
Some of the most magnificent images
of what these hieroglyphs are all about.
Some of the hieroglyphs are very mysterious
and are now being linked directly
to constellations and star systems that
were not even acknowledged until the 20th century.
So once again, we're saying how did they know?
How did these people know?
Well one of the things that I find really intriguing
about Gobekli Tepe is the remains, the artifacts,
that have been found there.
And there have been a series of images of humans
that are anatomically correct.
And everything is done really well with one exception.
None of them have a mouth.
The mouth on every one of these is nonexistent.
Scientists don't know what that means.
I don't know what that means.
We've never seen anything like that before.
And because it is so consistent throughout the Gobekli Tepe
site, we have to think that it has some meaning that actually
will benefit us in helping to understand the site itself.
So we're looking at a series of circular temples,
underground, buried intentionally.
This is where it gets even more interesting.
The burial of the sites happened about 8,000 years ago.
So remember we're taught that civilization's
only 5,000 years old.
This site was buried 8,000 years ago.
But the dating now is pushing its origin back far
beyond that.
The scientific dating for Gobekli Tepe as it stands right
now, is between 11,300-11,500 years before present.
It's over twice as old as what you and I were taught
when we were in school and what we're
teaching our young people in the classrooms
and from the textbooks today.
11,300-11,500.
Now if we begin plugging in some of these dates
from what are called the anomalous sites
on the traditional timeline-- I'm
going to do this on your screen so you can see it-- what
we see-- here is Caral in Peru.
There is Gobekli Tepe.
There is the Great Sphinx.
There are other sites-- Catalhoyuk, for example,
another site in Turkey.
Or the Gulf of Khambhat in India, a fascinating site
just off the shore the Indian continent
underneath 120 feet of water.
So scientists say either this site
was built under water intentionally-- which
isn't likely but you have to say that as a scientist--
or it once was above water and became submerged
when the sea levels rose.
Well that brings up a problem for history
because the sea levels rose at the end of the last Ice Age
when the ice melted and the water raised the sea levels.
That was 12,000 years ago.
So the Gulf of Khambhat, a very mysterious site, it is huge.
It is five miles long.
It's three miles wide.
And scientists now very, very interested in excavating this.
The problem is it's all under water
and it adds to the complexity.
So I'm just mentioning it so you can
see it's not just about Caral.
It's not just Gobekli Tepe, or the Sphinx,
but there are many sites now that
don't fit this historic model.
As a geologist, I'd like to see what's happening on the Earth
when the civilizations are happening in the way
that they are.
So what I'm doing is I'm drawing for you now,
on the chart, the blue shaded box.
That is the last Ice Age.
And it ended about 12,000 years ago.
Gobekli Tepe, being dated to 11,500 years,
that is the date that scientists have now.
However, they have yet to excavate
to the bottom of the site.
So they believe that when they get to the bottom of Gobekli
Tepe, we're going to be looking at around a 13,000
year old archaeological site.
That pushes it into the last Ice Age.
We are now talking about a technologically advanced
civilization dating back into the last Ice Age.
So what I'd like to call your attention to is
when you look at the chart, I'm drawing the red lines
that represent the 5,000 year cycles that we talked about
in an earlier episode.
These are 5,000 year cycles.
They were known by Mesoamerican traditions--
the Aztek, the Maya, the Inca.
These are the 5,000 year cycles that
were the focus of the 2012 phenomenon
in the Mayan calendar.
So on the chart, what you're seeing,
the red line to the right, that is the most recent 5,000 year
cycle completion.
That was 2012.
So as you go to the left, you see when it began.
And interestingly, when that cycle
began the space between the beginning
and the end of this 5,000 year cycle
encompasses everything that we have been taught
about the history of the world.
What we have been led to believe is
the history of the whole world forever
is actually only the history within the most recent 5,000
year cycle.
There was another one before that, another one before that,
another one before that.
And what scientists are also finding
is that it is that these 5,000 year cycles
when the climate changes.
And that climate change is very, very similar
to the climate change that we're seeing right now.
It may be the trigger for the beginning of some civilizations
and the end for others.
As the climate changes, the way our ancestors
grew their food changed.
And they had to find new ways to take care of themselves
and to feed the large populations
for some of these sites.
So now what we're looking at is we're
looking at civilization in 5,000 year cycles
rather than a linear event that happened once and evolved
into the sophisticated state that we see today.
We're looking at the beginning and the end and the beginning
and the end and the beginning and the end of technologically
advanced civilizations in the past.
This opens the door to a lot of possibilities.
One of the questions, for example,
when scientists look at some of the most magnificent temples
remaining on the earth today, Machu Picchu, for example,
or if they look at the Giza Plateau and the Great Pyramid
and the Great Sphinx, or they look at Gobekli Tepe or they
look at Caral, and they look at what these people knew,
the cosmological knowledge, the astronomical knowledge,
the ability to calculate cycles.
And they say, where did this knowledge come from?
The understanding of these cycles may be giving us a clue.
Because it's possible, it's possible now,
that our most technologically advanced civilizations
had a knowledge that was perpetuated
from one civilization.
And as it collapsed, remnants became the next civilization.
And it collapsed.
Remnants became the next civilization.
And in that way, we are looking at a timeline and a heritage
of knowledge of the cosmos and wisdom of us, who we are
and where we've come from.
Now I have to say something here.
When people look at this, the idea of cycles
and technologically advanced civilizations,
two questions inevitably emerge.
What about Lemuria?
What about Atlantis?
I'm sharing what I know to be true with you.
Through the language of peer reviewed science,
as we know it today.
Now my personal opinion, I believe
there were advanced civilizations
before that may have been called Lemuria and Atlantis.
And I think we're probably finding evidence of that.
However, it is not yet accepted by science.
It is not yet peer reviewed.
So I want to mention that.
And this is important because in our next episode,
we'll take the exploration of our past
back even further in time to a time
when modern science tells us that all that existed
were the microscopic precursors of ancient amoeba.
The question is how do we explain sophisticated artifacts
that we find linked to that very same point in time,
to that same time in history?
And the growing body of evidence that simply
does not fit the traditional story of our past.
We're going to thank you for joining me
for this program today.
And be sure to tune in for our next
all new episode of "Missing Links:
The Deep Truth of Our Origin, History, Destiny, and Fate."
[THEME MUSIC]
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.