Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
In this lesson we're going to look at technicalities versus emotional impact.
Now right off the bat, emotional impact; that is a piece that has a lot of emotion to it, has a mood, it
has a story, and it has feeling- a piece with these emotional elements will always win out over a piece
that is more technically correct, but lacking in these emotional elements. You know technicalities often
occur,
for example when someone critiques your work, or you've seen work being critiqued, where someone will
say "Hey, that arm is drawn incorrectly, or that head is on skew," or something like that.
However, if the piece has enough of an emotive element to it, enough feeling in it,
lot of the time this causes a blindness in the viewer so to speak, perhaps even a willing blindness,
that they're willing to disregard the technical incorrectness, just because of the joy that they're feeling, or
the emotive or the emotions that they're feeling from that particular piece.
Right.
The feelings that they're getting from the piece.
Now that's not to say that we should abandon all technical rules and things like, that but rather that
by understanding how weighty the emotive elements of a piece are, that we can use this knowledge to leverage
it in a very similar way to the way that poets leverage poetic license, right, where they're making up
words and things that don't exist.
The words are not technically correct, yet the poets use it in such a way that it really just adds to
the poem,
and you know we don't really look at people and go "Wow look at this fool making up these random words,
you know, this doesn't exist, is this guy educated?"
No we go, "Wow, that's a pretty cool made up word.
That's awesome."
So we kind of want to leverage the emotional impact of our pieces and of course definitely to instil
as much story, feeling, and emotion in our work as possible, therefore sort of freeing us in some respects
to not being so hard on ourselves about the technical aspects of a particular piece.
So, the last thing that I want to say as well is, that what you're going to find as we discuss this later
on that this relates a lot to believability and realism, and the difference between these two things,
and which one is more important in an artwork.
So let's go to the next lesson.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.