Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
welcome back to the Dr Taylor Marshall podcast and
today I'm sharing my it's going to be interesting
interview with Archbishop Carlo Maria vigano he is the most controversial
Bishop uh alive today he has declared that Pope Francis is an anti-pe even a
counter Pope he has exposed numerous scandals Vatican bank scandals he was at
the epicenter of the controversy and the expose of mccarrick and the accusation
of him molesting boys and other scandals and I finally get an interview with
Archbishop Viano I've been asking this for years and it's finally here and I
think it's appropriate especially since he's been declared
excommunicated by Cardinal Fernandez and I'm going to ask
him directly about that he's going to give his answer and the topics today are
questions that I wanted to hear from Archbishop vegano directly I've think
I've read almost everything that Archbishop vegano has
written since the summer of Shame and these are topics
such as do you believe the Third Secret of Fatima revealed
in 2000 are real we talk about set of eonism we talk about
sedi privation ISM we talk about the fraternity of St
Peter Institute of Christ the King CI Pas I 10th all kinds
of things and unfortunately Archbishop Carl muray vegan know will not be on screen
with me live um there's a couple reasons for this uh first he cites his thick
Italian accent he has uh great English I've spoken to him
on the phone before um but he was concerned about that and
then also just the grave nature of the topics that we're
discussing I mean we're talking about Fatima we're talking
about heaven and hell we're talking about excommunication um
we're talking about anti-popes and Archbishop vegano wanted
to take time careful time to reflect and then write
these down in a in a mature Review of the 14 questions
and responsible way so what you're seeing is his um his careful analysis of
these questions I'm going to share with you off the bat the
questions uh ahead of time and U I'm going to give you a
little bit of biography on the background of vegano not everyone knows the
whole background and the biography of vegano and then we'll jump right into
it so here are the questions that I gave Archbishop vegano
and he responded to first of all do you believe that the 2000 year of 2000
published Third Secret of Fatima was the real one or is it
fake is it a fraud two I asked him about Vatican bank scandals
one of which he is exposed and ask him do you think the
Vatican Bank should be abolished third in my book infiltration
I documented Archbishop vgo's investigative work as
the Secretary General at the governor of the Vatican
City from 2009 to 2011 under Pope benedi 16th and I asked vegan what else did you
find during that investigation and for the sake of history
for the sake of clarity what exactly happened and this
will be as far as I know the first time he's ever documented
it with exact details dates names Cardinals Etc it's
quite fascinating four cardinal Fernandez stated that you received Archbishop
vegano a latte sentenia excommunication for the crime of sism and I asked
Archbishop vegano does this canonical penalty apply you why or why not five I
ask him who are the most dangerous men currently right now in the Vatican
six uh I ask him some pastoral questions I say what should lay Catholics do if
the traditional at Mass were to be banned one day seven what are your
excellency's thoughts on the fraternity of St Peter
Institute of Christ the King and the Society of St Pas the
10th a what would you say to Layman Layman who do not have access to the traditional
Latin Mass what should they do nine I asked Archbishop vegano what
was Cardinal mccarrick's role in the China Vatican deal
that Cardinal Zen has objected to um so often over the last
few years 10 I ask Archbishop vegano as him
being former Nuno to the United States of America what is his opinion on the
status of the health of the United States Bishops number 11 this is a really
interesting one as you know some people believe that Pope b v 16th never truly
resigned because he resigned the ministerium of the
papacy but not the munist not the office so I ask
Archbishop vno what he thinks of this argument that Ben the 16th did not
resign based on the munis ministerium distinction and I think
you'll be quite surprised to hear what Archbishop vegano
says about that 12 I asked Archbishop vegano what should a future Pope
do should he declare Pope Francis AKA bolio as an anti-pe should he invalidate
or nfy Vatican 2 What should happen in his opinion
13 Pope St Leo II declared his predecessor Pope anius anathema that is
a cursed cut off and I ask Archbishop vegano will this
happen again and in particular will it happen again for Pope
Francis in his opinion and then 14 and lastly this is a really interesting
question and I was really happy to see that he answered it I stated if Pope
Francis if bergolo is an anti-pot wouldn't his
Cardinals like Cardinal Fernandez wouldn't
his Cardinals be anti- Cardinals and therefore
invalid and and if they're invalid Cardinals how would there be a conclave
to elect another valid Pope you see the problem here and to solve this problem I
asked Archbishop vgo if he has read Gerard delorier Kasa chakum thesis the
kasakam thesis is a um Scholastic treatment by a Dominican Theologian who
since passed away um and I ask Archbishop vegano does
he agree with this thesis regarding a material papacy
argument where a pope who was not validly Pope could still make valid
Cardinals so those are the questions and Archbishop vegano does uh
a great job interesting job whether you agree with him or
not he clearly took time to carefully think through these
and pen out um some interesting responses that I think
that you're going to enjoy and maybe learn something or
maybe disagree with them even more U before we pray
and get into the questions I just want to give a
background on Archbishop vegano so he was ordained well
he was born in 1941 he was ordained in 1968 under the old
ordinal and as a priest he served on diplomatic missions
before being consecrated Bishop under John Paul II in
1992 he served in the governor of Vatican City state from 2009 to 2011 and
he'll share uh quite a bit of his experience during during
that time and then he was appointed Secretary General
uh when he was Secretary General of the Vatican Governor um he was appointed by
Pope Ben the 16th to reform the finances and he found deficits he found some
scandals he found the Surplus and he notified directly uh Pope Benedict and
this led well this sort of Spilled Out into the public as
what's known as the V links the Vatican leaks and he'll talk
about that as well you'll remember the butler um who
was uh sneaking out documents releasing to the public
publishing them and there's a huge Scandal under Pope Ben the 16th
Archbishop vegano will definitely provide some clarity on what exactly was
happening during that time he then was sort of ejected out
of the Vatican and he served as the apostolic Nuno or the
Ambassador from the Vatican to the United States from 2011 to
2016 and he became most famous
in 2018 when he published the 11 page
epistle which accused Pope Francis and numerous other Cardinals and Bishops for
covering up and concealing the sexual misconduct
of cardinal Theodore mccarrick who was the Cardinal
Archbishop of Washington D.C and in this letter it was very scandalous Archbishop
vegano revealed that Pope Bennett the 16th had
placed restrictions on Cardinal mccarrick and
that Pope Francis had either released them or refused to enforce them and
because of this at that time in 2018 AR Archbishop
vegano called for the resignation publicly called for the
resignation of Pope Francis which was quite a big deal hasn't happened in
quite some time in the Catholic church and he has
continued to publish letters and messages until finally in
year 2024 on the 5th of July 2024 the decter
for the doctrine of the faith under Cardinal Fernandez
announced that Archbishop vegano had been found guilty
of sism and had therefore incurred excommunication latte
senten this means that Archbishop vegano retains his title as Archbishop but
according to canon law and according to the interpretation
of Fernandez not the interpretation of vgo as you will see um
he is not permitted to celebrate mass or sacraments and Archbishop vegano as you
see maintains his innocence and states that he
is not in fact excommunicated for two reasons as
he'll explain in this interview so that's the background
on Archbishop vegano and um there's a couple things
I'll say before we pray and that is first of all I want to clear up a rumor
it's been going down for a couple years and that
is that I Taylor Marshall Am The Ghost Writer
or collaborator with Archbishop vegano 100% not the case I've never written one
sentence or even one word for Archbishop vegano I've never worked for him um and
that's that so that's a rumor that should probably die
I've never met him in person but I have spoken to him on
the phone and in correspondence and then
secondly whether or not you agree with Archbishop vegan I
think you can realize that we're in a crisis right now we're
in a time where there's confusion where there is a collapse in faith in Europe
and we're beginning to see it in the United States of
America and in the Western Hemisphere and people are
looking for answers and part of Archbishop vgo's assessment is that
the Deep church and the Deep state that is infiltrating forces both in the
political realm and in the realm of the Catholic Church are working
together that there's a symbiotic relationship between the parasites in
the UN the EU the United States um
Eastern Europe China and that it's sort of hand and glove working inside the
Catholic church and that this this Nexus this connection has
to do very much with Pope Francis AKA Jorge bolio the S gal
Mafia the lavender Mafia uh the homosexual Lobby in
the church Freemasonry Etc and you'll see that come
out in this interview so when we begin with the prayer we'll begin with
the Our father and then we'll jump into the Our Father prayer in Latin
questions amen
[Music]
amen I know many amen well the first
question of Archbishop vegano is that I asked him was do you think that the
third version I'm sorry the the version of the Third Secret of FAA published in the
year 2000 is the real one or is it fake and I'll share on the
screen the text here we
go Archbishop vegano responds and he says the text of the
third part of The Secret of Fatima was delivered by Sister
Lucia to the bishop of Lea in 1944 it refers to the vision that the three
Shepherd children had in 1917 in which the Virgin Mary expressly stated was to
be revealed in 1960 it was delivered to the holy office in 1957 during the reign
of Pope p i 1. Is the 2000 published third secret of Fatima is the real one?
12th John the 23rd read it in 1959 and decided not to make it
public Paul v 6 did the same in 1967 John Paul II read it in 1978 or perhaps
in 1981 in 2000 on the occasion of the Jubilee He ordered its
publication leaving people to believe that it was the
complete text saying that the vision of the stricken Pope
referred to him and more precisely the attack he suffered on
St Peter Square in May 13th 1981 this is the assassination
attempt against John Paul II the suspicion that the text of the
secret has been manipulated is more than well-founded Archbishop Veno goes on to
say beyond the anomalies and Technical inconsistencies such
as the format of the paper support used by Sister Lucia
it seems clear to me that the revealed content was censored
so as not to confirm that it was that what was there
for all to see the demolition of the Catholic Church
from within and the apostasy of the faith through a bad
Council and a bad Mass the decision not to jeopardize the
Revolutionary outcome of Vatican 2 LED ronali John 23d to decide not to reveal
the Third Secret Montini Paul the 6 acted in the same way also because the
revolution of the council had in the meantime extended
to lurgical reform that is the novas sordo on the other
hand it is not surprising that a hierarchy that adulterates
the sacred scripture and the magisterium can also
go so far as to censor the words of the most holy virgin
in the context of apparitions recognized by the church end
quote so Archbishop vegano is saying in his opinion most
definitely the Third Secret of Fatima is manipulated or is
false and he says if these hierarchs clergy Bishops Cardinals even
popes would adulterate scripture and magisterium they
would adulterate the words of the Virgin and Archbishop
vegano shares that he believes that the true message of
the Third Secret of Fatima was that there would be an
apostasy due to a bad Council and to a bad
Mass all right we're going to look now at the second question and it
regards the Vatican bank and I ask him should the Vatican
Bank be abolished 2. Should the Vatican Bank be abolished?
Archbishop vegano responds The Institute of
works of religion the i i is the abbreviation for
the title in both Latin and Italian it's the official name
of the Vatican bank it's not called the Vatican bank it's
called the I or The Institute of works of religion is a bank says vegano and it is
normal that an institution such as the Catholic church
in the Vatican City state are equipped with one its
management is entrusted to two lay people the president
and a general director while a commission of cardinals
is responsible for supervising its activities since
since it is not administered by the government of
Vatican City in my function of General Secretary I never had any institutional
role in the operation of the bank it is up to those who administer the I I.E the
commission of Cardinals and ultimately the Secretariat of State on behalf of
the Holy Father to dictate the rules that guarantee its
correct management and the transparency of its operations
and also to prevent speculation and elicit activities now that leads us to
this very important next question it's the third question
and this is where I ask Archbishop vegano to detail exact
exactly what was going on in the governor of the Vatican City with the
Vatican bank and here he gives dates names and I think for the sake of 3. In
my book Infiltration, I document your investigative work as secretary-general
of the Governorate of Vatican City State from 2009 to 2011 under Pope Benedict
XVI. What else did you find? For the sake of history, what exactly happened?
History this portion of the interview is very important I think this will go down
in the history books there is a lot of detail here it is
very long but I think it's worth our study and worth our
analysis so again I ask him in my book infiltration I
document your investigative work as Secret AR general
of the governor of Vatican City state from July 2009 to September 2011 under
Pope Bennett the 16th what else did you find for the sake
of History can you tell us exactly what happened and here
is Arch Bishop vegano answer before being appointed
to the governor at I've been appointed by John
Paul II as the Delegate for the pontifical representations
in the first section of the Secretariat of the state
my immediate Superior were the substitute and the
Secretary of State who are the only ones with direct access
to the Holy Father listen to the details here folks my task was to prepare all
the dossier relating to the hiring and promotion of the
staff of the Roman curia and the apostolic notit and also
to manage highly confidential dossier concerning members of the Roman decast
and the College of cardinals all right so vegano is managing highly
confidential dossier on members of the dicasteries and
the College of cardinals my investigative activity says
Archbishop vegano preparing the dossier and formulating
an assessment on the persons and the suggestion of the
decisions to be taken ended with the delivery of
the dossier to the substitute it was then up to the
substitute and the Secretary of State first sadono and then Bron these are
cardinals to present my dossier to the Pope or not deciding based on their own
total discretion whether to advance someone or shove them for example in
addition to the well-known case of mccarrick what did
my superiors do when I gathered very serious information
about Cardinal Maraga why was he elevated to the
rank of cardinal instead of being punished in
accordance with the crimes he committed so we see here
there's sort of a circuit breaker between Archbishop vgo
and the pope and it has to go through the secretary of state so Archbishop
vegano could assemble these dossier in this case against Cardinal Mara Diaga
and present them to the pope but if the Secretary of State
or the substitute got involved they could be sheld and they
could never get all the way to the top does
that make sense Archbishop vegano goes on to
explain some of these problems in the Vatican flow he says Cardinal Bron who
kept Pope Benedict under under control obtained his permission
to remove me from my position because as I said in my
June 2024 statement jacus I was obstructing his action and his
appointments he had me sent to the governor as general
secretary but since it was a demino that is a demotion
compared to the previous role Bron promised me at the end of Lolo's term
who was now close to retirement I would be appointed president
of the governor a Cardinal's position on the very first
day of beginning my role at the governor at 16th of July 2009 I realized the
total irregularity and Corruption of the administration I immediately discovered
the existence of a finance and management commission an illegal entity
that was not foreseen by the statutes of the governor
composed of a group of eminent Italian Bankers who were in
charge of the financial management of the Vatican
City State this commission presented a merely
con presented as merely a consultative body in reality
had decision-making functions and speculated for their own
profit on Vatican Investments placed in investment funds including black
rock it seems that black rock has their finger in every Pi including this Pi
according to Archbishop vegano so continuing along he
says including Black Rock with which they had signed
management contracts whose costs were higher than the interest paid to the
Vatican Governor vegano says I therefore immediately set to work and within a few
months the deficit of over $10 million that existed in the 2009 fiscal year
changed to a surplus of $44 million putting an end to the illicit Affairs of
both preets and lay people people this recovery
operation should obviously have entailed the removal of
the protagonists of such malfant starting with Cardinal president loolo
and the administrative director of the Vatican Museums monor Paulo
nicolini loolo who reeks of Freemasonry is roped together with
Cardinal silvestrini who is in turn a creature
of the Secretary of State austino ceroli
the man of ostop atic a key figure of the pontificate of John Paul II here we
see Archbishop vegano connecting the Italian Bankers with Freemasonry if
you've done any research or any reading on the history of the Mafia the mob in
Italy and the role of banking in the connection with Italian Freemasonry it's
thick it's thick some of that is covered in my book infiltration
if you want to read that you can get it at a Catholic
bookstore Amazon I'll send you a sign copy if you go to patreon.com drtaylor
Marshall silvast strini head of the second section of
relations with the States was a prominent member of the s g
Mafia again if you want to know what the s g Mafia is
reading my book infiltration I give you the names I give
you the dates he was a member of the S Gan Mafia and head of the Villa Nazareth
University College a sort of ecclesiastical version
of the young global leaders for tomor Pam of
Davos here you see deep Church deep State working
together former Italian Prime Minister jepi Conte a dark figure who condemned
Italians to house arrest during the pandemic farce emerg
from this breeding ground at the crossroads between deep
church and deep State mon Senor pilot nicolini belongs to the so-called
lavender Mafia the Vatican homosexual Lobby as administrative director of the
Vatican Museums and cultural heritage of the
Govern Governor he found himself managing the
main source of revenue for the Vatican City State among
nicolini's main misdeeds that I immediately had to deal
with there was a contract he prepared with the approval of cardinal Lolo and
my predecessor monino ronato Bardo for the restoration of bernini's colonade
and the two Fountains of St Peters for the value
of 15 million EOS the governor was not actually
included among the parties to the said contract which had instead been
stipulated in a Swiss bank between the company responsible
for raising funds to finance The Works through an advertising
display on the colonade of St Peter square and the company
in charge of the restoration work chosen by nicolini
without any tender monsor nicolini was owed a significant monthly fee paid to
him directly by The Firm that raised the funds
through advertising The Firm this firm retained
for itself some millions of Euros already collected which
should have been paid to the company that was carrying
out the Restorations according to the progress
of the work to the point of causing its
Interruption I was therefore forced to intervene to have
the contract dissolved and demand that the sums collected be
immediately paid to the governor and thus provide the
remuneration of The Works carried out it was then that I was
kicked out of the governor and Cardinal aelo
once again found himself in a position to act
undisturbed so here's just one example of some graft some Kickbacks
some manipulation of contracts and the flow of money for the restoration of
what was it burn uh bernini's colonade yeah in the two
fountains if you ever been to St peters's uh the Vatican
in Rome there's those two fountains out in the Piaza I I
assume that's what he's talking about there so this is
just an example here of of one case that's worth $15
million with corruption and Archbishop vegano comes on
the scene he blows the listle and he's out he's kicked
out Archbishop vegano gives us another case he says
another case of mismanagement was the assignment of the
contract for setting up sales points at the Vatican musician uh museums sorry
the Vatican Museums to the Opera laborator laborator fiorentini which
represented a turnover of millions of Euros in which allowed
nicolini to gain an enormous personal economic Advantage
under the table vegano says my removal from
the governor occurred after defamatory press
campaign organized by monor nicolini and the young powerful Marco Simeon a
well-known homosexual Freemason former Secretary of the minister for urban
cultural heritage and Secretary of the president of medob banka an intimate
friend of the Secretary of State Bretton and his Protegé to whom he he later owed
his promotion to the Italian State television
ra AI where he was in charge of relations
with the Vatican my work was nullified said vegano in called the team of
collaborator collaborators I had set up confirming in
their places all the corruption protagonists I had reported
monsenor nicolini was promoted to head of the pontifical Villas in Castle gondo
where he would manage an enormous property much larger
than the Vatican City State he obtained from bolio the
immediate expulsion with brutal and vict vindictive methods of Eugenio hosler a
man of integrity and my close collaborator son of of
the major of the Swiss guard who saw his reputation his
personal career his good name and indeed his very existence
destroyed recently monsenor nicolini was appointed by bolio
as director of the lato SE higher education center which
deals with green projects in accordance with
the dictat of the world economic Forum of
Davos the latest of them advertised a few weeks ago consisted of Agro voltaic
plant of an agro voltaic plant in the extr territorial
Vatican property of Santa Maria de Galeria the project had
already been proposed by Cardinal lello under
Bennett the 16th and I was one who prevented its
realization so here you kind of see you know
it's not just the banks and it's not just the
flow of money it's also these projects that are associated with according to
vegano papal documents right so they need this done
it's been blocked before and to sort of pave the way for these green projects
there is the lato C and so he takes nicolini who's
this corrupt guy according to vegano and bolio appoints
him the director of this lato SE Center and then they begin their project so
again it's sort of this hand and glove deep
State deep Church according to Archbishop vegano
following these media attacks Pope Ben the 16th set up a
commission of inquiry made up of three Cardinals harons Burke
and Lolo despite the latter being directly implicated and I think just as an aside
here this shows uh just Pope Benedict being
naive and I think you know in retrospect we see that Bretton managed to persuade heran
to dissolve the commission which he then replaced with a
disciplinary Commission of the governor which despite being
under the control of bton himself decided to dismiss
nicolini and adopted sanctioning me measures against the
management of the pontifical Villas the measures adopted by this disciplinary
commission were however nullified by Bron and leelo so again someone gets in
trouble someone above covers for them and clears
for them while Pope Benedict had twice EXP
expressed to me his desire to appoint me as president
of the prefecture of economic Affairs of the Holy sea in
place of cardinal vasio de Pei a position he told me in
which I could best serve the holy sea Berton obtained
my being sent to Washington DC away from the Roman Kira and those I had Disturbed
in my fight against corruption so here is where
the story of Archbishop vegano becomes even more
interesting he's uncovered these scandal in the Vatican they need to get them out
Bretton wants them out so they give him it's not really a
promotion but they say okay you're going to be the ambassador
to the United States of America Apostolic nuo that way
you're out of all of these economic details we can kind of Run free do what
we want to do do side deals do Kickbacks and we're going to send you over to DC
and you won't be with us anymore and of course Archbishop vegano is now going to
expose the greatest controversy in American Catholic history and that is
the sexual perversion and molestation of the leading Cardinal in America the
Cardinal of Washington DC mccarrick but in the meantime there was
the controversy of the butler the Pope's Butler who was leaking correspondence
to the Press let's take a look at that Archbishop
vegano he says the butler Paulo gabrieli
and I've done podcasts on this you can go back uh on the
Dr T Mar podcast and and watch whole podcast me documenting
exactly what happened here he says he's an honest
and naive but well-intentioned man on his own
initiative handed over to the press my letters vegano letters
addressed to Pope Benedict and Tony in which I denounced
the vast corruption in the governor with this gesture gabrial hoped
to be able to help Benedict by bringing to light the network of complicity in
the Vatican the role of excessive power of Bertoni and
leolo and the machinations against the Pope the role
of monor gvin was also decisive he competed with Bron for
control over Benedict in the in the government of the Church
in 2012 after Pope Benedict's Butler leaking documents
the leak of these documents vtil links one the pope established a new
Commission of cardinals composed of heran Tom Co and de
Georgie despite the fact that I was at the center of those events this new body
tried to ignore me for at least two months and it was
only following my explicit telephone request to Cardinal
heran while I was in Washington that I was listening to
said I could give my testimony your eminence don't you think
I also have something to say in this matter the
Cardinal's upset response was if you really want
to my written memorandum says vegano in addition to the report of the
interrogation was inserted in the famous white box that the ameritus delivered to
bolio in April 2013 when he went to visit him
in Cal gondo instructing his success Professor
bolio Francis to intervene and remedy the rampant corruption in the Vatican
and here is the picture of the white box documented
all right this contains the infamous "white box"
important documents and it contains veganos memorandum right
there gets interesting because
here is where vegano meets with
bolio on the 23rd of June 2013 so bolio
is in the Vatican right he's been elected he's
Pope Francis vegano meets with him he says on
the 23rd June 2013 when I met bolio after he asked me about mccarrick and
the Jesuits in the United States in order to
feel out my position he asked me to give him the
dossier that I had given to the three Cardinals appointed by Benedict to
investigate I did so immediately and he told me I have a small safe in my
bedroom now I'll take it over there which he did and read it this
evening vegano goes on to explain it is obvious that bolia
was only interested in knowing who the corrupt people were
in order to be able to use control and blackmail
them nicolini was among his proteges a man
who as we have seen he not only kept in his place but
promoted to higher positions eliminating anyone who would
oppose him starting with Eugenio hosler I've often wondered vegano says
what happened to that white box and why the two cardinals still
alive heran and deori continue to remain silent in the face of the coverup of
what emerged from their investigation so vegano
says there is a coverup there is a scandal it
is written down it is in that white box and why is it that the two
cardinals who help prepare it have remain quiet for all
these years well now we know why if you come out and are
critical of the Vatican or a critical of Francis you get the bishop Strickland
treatment you're removed from your sea or in the case of vegano they issue and
say youve received a latte sentenia excommunication
bye-bye so that reveals sort of how the sausage is made in the Vatican and now I
ask Archbishop vegano directly about his excommunication and
whether he considers 4. Cardinal Fernandez stated you received
a latae sententiae excommunication for the crime of schism.
Does the canonical penalty apply to you? Why or why not?
himself to be excommunicated why or why not Archbishop yo explains he says on
June 11th 2024 so this year I was informed by a simple email without ever
receiving any official notification of a canonical trial against me I was told
that if I wish to oppose the accusations made against me I need to appear in Rome
Just nine days later on June 20th or else to submit my written defense by
June 28th the vigil of the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul I do not believe
that such a short time to prepare one's defense it is given even if you just get
a parking ticket the charges brought against me are completely
inconsistent I'm accused of sism for having questioned
the legitimacy of bolio and for having rejected Vatican 2
but the law recognizes the non-applicability of the will or
intention to commit sism in the case in which the accused person is persuaded
that the one who sits on the throne of Peter is not the Pope and where the
groundlessness of his suspicions is demonstrated is willing to submit to his
authority so I'm going to pause here there's a lot there
what Archbishop vegano is saying here is according to
the law according his to his read on it if
someone is persuaded that the one who sits on the throne of Peter is not the Pope
and there are grounds for that it's not
groundless and he if convinced otherwise would submit to his
authority then the penalty does not apply he goes on to say I consider Jorge
Maria bolo an anti-pe or better said a counter Pope a usurper an emissary of
the anti-catholic lobby that has infiltrated the church for decades the
evidence that he is completely alien to the papacy his multiple heresies and the
coherence of his subversive acts of government and scare quotes
magisterium are very serious elements that cannot be hastily dismissed and of
course if you watch this podcast uh We've covered
many of those things the patcham mama and some of the
statements many of the statements and actions vegano says regardless of the
method and Merit of the extrajudicial canonical case the vacancy of the
apostolic Sea and the usurpation of the Throne of Peter by a false Pope render
all the acts of the Roman decastes completely void of validity and efficacy
so even the excommunication against me is null here Archbishop vegano is listed
the two reasons why he believes he's not excommunicated first off canon law would
release him from that penalty based on the condition I
read from him above secondly he just says Francis isn't the
pope so any extrajudicial canonical
case um is no one void end the
story he then says we are faced with a canonical Short
Circuit the one who holds the Supreme Earthly Authority in the church at the
moment in which he is denounced for heresy responds by accusing of sism the
one who denounces him and excommunicates him this instrumental use of Justice
typical of dictatorships says vegano contradicts the men's or the mind of the
legislator and rightly falls under what is foreseen by the bull of Paul I
four it is the very adhesion to heresy that expels the heretic from the church
and renders his authority illegitimate invalid
and no here he is referring to the bull of
Pope Paul IV and it states that any 5. Who are the
three most dangerous men in the Vatican right now?
cleric who is a heretic cannot assume Church office can't become a bishop
can't become an Archbishop can't become a cardinal and even
says cannot become a pope that the adhesion to heresy makes
it impossible for a man to be appointed to a church office and Archbishop vegano is
citing this here from Pope Paul IV and saying vegano I'm sorry bolio is a
heretic and therefore it is impossible for him
to assume the papacy so that's the question on
excommunication the next question number five who are
the most dangerous men in the Vatican right now Archbishop vegano says after bolio
the most dangerous are cardinal Fernandez hich Ro
penup and you'll remember that Cardinal Fernandez here he is Cardinal Fernandez
he is the one who uh wrote the book heal me yeah Heal Me with Your Mouth the art
of kissing where he talks about um kissing a witch he has another book that
also has some erotic material he is the prefect he is the head of the decast for
the doctrine of faith and he is the one who
Penn the excommunication uh or the notification
of excommunication to Archbishop vigano and we've covered him quite a bit here
on the Dr Taylor Marshall podcast I'm not a huge fan I think I think it's safe
to say I'm not a huge fan of cardinal Fernandez and I think he's a Jesuit and
I think his appointment by bolio reveals some major problems in the mind
and in the Theology of bolio I mean why would you
appoint this man who's writing this kind of
trash to be in charge of all the Dogma all the doctrines and all the morality
in the Catholic church it's comical so vegano lists Fernandez of
course and let me get it back on here holic Ro Roos is now in charge of
liturgy and sacraments he's the prefect pipara these men together with the
Secretary of State Cardinal perin are all accomplices in the disastrous
management of the Vatican in the entire church says vegano I recall in passing
that perin was a member of the network of the second section
of the Secretariat of State at that time headed by the
Freemason silvestrini a leading member of the S gallan Mafia to whom he owes
his rise the sixth question this is the Pastoral
question what should L Catholics do if the traditional Latin mass is banned by
the Vatican this is something that a lot of lay Catholics are concerned about not
without reason um what happened in 1970 what happened in 1976 what happened in
1988 and then France is overturning uh sumor and pontificum by
Pope Ben the 16th so that diois and Latin masses had a strangle hold around
them people are wondering where is this going where does it stop so what do we
do if that is to happen and here's what Archbishop vgo has to say the trentine
mass is a Priceless treasure for the holy church it has been canonized by its
Century old use in which we see the voice of sacred tradition expressed in
the hierarchy abusing its power against the purpose that the Lord is giving it
prevents oh sorry if the hierarchy yeah if the hierarchy
abusing its power against the purpose that the Lord has
given it prevents the celebration of the ancient Mass it commits an abuse and
this prohibition is null priests and Bishop should show more
courage continuing to celebrate the ancient right and
refusing to celebrate the Novis Ordo what's he talking about
here so the traditional Latin mats which came to its final formation or its
canonization uh under Pope St Pas I in his decree quo
prum after the Council of Trent so it's called often the trentine mass was in
effect until 1969 when the New Order of the mass in Latin novas Ordo Mis was
promulgated and went into effect in 1970 there was a big controversy many
priests refused to celebrate the new liturgy and only wanted
to celebrate the mass as they had received it from the
day of their ordination and here Archbishop vegano is asking
Bishops and Priests to be courageous and to not only celebrate the
traditional Latin Mass but to refuse to celebrate the nov
Ordo he goes on to say they would probably face sanctions
from the Vatican but they ought to ask themselves what
sanctions will await them when they have to answer before
the Lord's Tribunal for not having fulfilled their Duty
preferring servile obedience to the powerful rather than obedience
to God 6. What should lay Catholics do if the TLM is banned one day?
the L should organize themselves into small communities
by purchasing the churches that are now up for sale or by
setting up home chapels and by seeking out priests willing
to celebrate the mass and sacraments for them according
to the apostolic right and by helping them
materially to carry out their Ministry end quote
we have seen in the United States also in Europe that something like
70% of Catholics those who identify as Catholics do not
believe in the real presence of Jesus they don't believe in
transubstantiation they don't believe in
Eucharistic sacrifice and part of this is because
there was a major shift in 1970 the architecture became
round instead of having Transcendence like you see in the
cathedrals that were made for the traditional at Mass the AL
is in the middle the priest faces the people lay people are
in the sanctuary it's much more about Community it's much
more about a meal it's much more about talking and dialoguing that's why the
priest is looking at people over the altar instead of looking at God over the
Altar and it's my belief you've heard me say this before
it's my belief that these changes such as communion on the
hand have slowly
over the decades eroded Catholic belief in the real presence of Jesus Christ his
true body and blood his soul and Divinity in the Eucharist you know the
Eucharist is not a symbol the Eucharist is Jesus Christ the Eucharist is the
second person of the Most Holy Trinity incarnate of the Immaculate Virgin Mary
so why is it that after 50 years 7 % no longer believe is it bad
sermons well there are bad sermons but the Liturgy
has created a ethos is created a culture in which going to mass is more about
getting together having a meal and what the mass actually is is the second
person of the Trinity incarnate the Virgin Mary offering
his body and blood on the cross as a propitiatory sacrifice
as the Lamb of God to God the father on behalf of mankind in and through the
holy ghost that is the mass that is the Eucharist and the traditional Latin Mass
expresses that and when you attend the traditional
Latin Mass you enter into that trinitarian
action God the son Jesus Christ offering his body and blood to God the father in
and through the Holy Spirit and then the priest is Sanctified
and ordained with holy hands and holy digits to lend his
voice in his hands in Persona Christi in the person of
Christ and we get to participate in that that's why the
church says You must attend Mass every Sunday and on
holy OB holy days of obligation but you only must receive
communion once a year the most important thing here is the Eucharistic sacrifice
not necessarily communion both are infinitely important
I'm just making the point here and because of that the new
liturgy has eroded faith in the real presence now the next question regards the
fraternity of St Peter The Institute of Christ
the King and the Society of St Pas I 10th and
Archbishop vgo's thoughts on those groups we are going to take a pause here
I'm going to break this into part one and part two because
as you can see we're only about halfway through here
and we're approaching an hour so we're going to say a
prayer here we're going to pause and then part two will be
available here on the Dr Taylor Marshall podcast on YouTube
Twitter Rumble Facebook and we'll resume the remaining
questions are what do you think about fssp
Institute of Christ the King sspx what would you say to laymen who
have no access to the Latin Mass what was mccarrick's
role in the China Vatican deal um as the former Nuno to
America what's your take on the status or the health of
the United States Bishops do you believe Ben the 16th
resigned because of munus ministerium what should the next Pope do
should he declare bolian anti-pop get rid of
Vatican 2 um will he been be declared anathema
and then how could Cardinals elect a new pope and do you agree with Gerard Del
laier and the Kasich chakum thesis that will all be in part two and we'll close
now with a prayer we'll pray a Hail Mary and this hellur
will be um for an end to Closing Prayer: Ave Maria
sism and an end to heresy in the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic
church amen amen
welcome back to our exclusive interview with his Excellency Archbishop Carlo
Maria vegano his uh interview after Cardinal Fernandez declared that he had
received a latte Centier excommunication and this is the continuation from the
first half in the first half we looked at six questions
that Archbishop vegano responded to um regarding the Third
Secret of Fatima the Vatican bank scandals uh whether or not he was actually
excommunicated and the penalty applies to him we talked
about the most dangerous men in the Vatican right now
and we also looked at what lay Catholics should do if the traditional Latin Mass
would be banned that's all in part one now we move to the
remaining eight questions and in this second half of the
interview Archbishop vegano will discuss
his thoughts on the fraternity of St Peter Institute
of Christ the King and the Society of St Pas the 10th
he will give advice as to what Layman should do if they
canot get to the traditional Latin Mass we'll also look
at mck ex-cardinal mccarrick's involvement in the China Vatican
deal and his assessment when he was Apostolic Nuno of the health of the
United States episcopate the Bishops of the United States of
America look at the question as to whether Pope Bennett the
16th validly resigned in 2013 and the
controversy of the munus ministerium distinction which
are Latin words we'll get into that a little bit um and
perhaps defect in the resignation document of Pope Benedict the 16th we'll
also look at what future Pope should do should they declare Francis an anti-pe
should they invalidate Vatican 2 and should a future Pope declare Francis
anathema as once did St Leo II on Pope enorus and then the final question is
about Cardinals and valid Cardinals and how there could be a future conclave
we'll talk about the Kasa chakum thesis of GAD delorier and the idea of a
material papacy versus a formal papacy uh quite interesting I'm really excited
about that last one to hear Archbishop vegan on that so
we'll begin we'll open up with a prayer again and then we'll
jump into to these question questions and answers by Archbishop Carlo Maria
Vio amen [Music] Our Father Prayer
[Music]
amen St Joseph pray for us St p i 10th pray for us St P the 5th pray for us St
Peter pray for us
amen all right just picking up picking up where we left
off in the first half of this interview we have question
number seven and in the seventh question I asked Archbishop vegano I asked him
what are your thoughts on the fraternity of St
Peter fssp The Institute of Christ the King 7.
What are your thoughts on FSSP, ICK, and SSPX?
Do you encourage people to attend their Masses?
Sovereign priest IP and the Society of St p i 10th sspx
do you encourage people to attend their masses and here is what Archbishop vgo
said quote the former Ecclesia day institutes were born from the vatican's
intention to weaken the Society of St Pas the 10th after the Episcopal
consecrations of 1988 which having given it self an Apostolic succession was able to
continue its apostolate even after the death of Archbishop Marcel
leev what's going on here well the Society of St P the
10th was founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel leev and in
1988 Archbishop leev moved forward and he consecrated four Bishops without
explicit permission from John Paul II and that led to the announcement of a
lat senten excommunication same kind of excommunication that vgo is under and at
that time there was established the Ecclesia day institutes
and these were groups who wished to not follow Marcel
fev in this act but wanted to somehow retain formal communion and formal
submission to the holy sea um and so the Ecclesia day institutes were created now
since then Pope Francis bolio depending your take on here with vegano has
abolished the Ecclesia day commission and these uh Priestly fraternities are
on their own so that's the context here and this is the
reference to 1988 that Archbishop vegano makes in this answer
he continues to say the authorization to celebrate the trentine Liturgy which up
which until then had been completely excluded
had and still has as its condition the
acceptance of the post-conciliar magisterium in the litness of the Novis
Ordo Mass this premise is completely unacceptable says vegano because it
reduces the celebration of the traditional Mass to a ceremonial
question while instead it is evident that the trentine
right summarizes in itself all the doctrine and spirituality
of the Catholic faith in antithesis to the protestan IED right of Paul I 6 that
ecumenically silences that Faith he goes on to say whoever
celebrates the mass of St Pius I cannot accept Vatican 2 says vegano in fact
from the beginning many priests who had left the Society of Archbishop leev and
had joined the Ecclesia day institutes continued to have strong
reservations and so to speak played on the equivocation of a tacit acceptance
of the Vatican itself did not ask to be made explicit so here he's saying that
even the Ecclesia day communities Priestly societies that
didn't go along with Archbishop Marcel they still kind
of kept an equivocation um a doubt concerns about
the second Vatican Council and the Nova order Archbishop vegano goes on to
explain what happened under Pope Benedict the 16th in 2007 says vegano
Benedict the 16th recognized the legitimacy of the
traditional liturgy declaring that the traditional Latin
Mass was the extraordinary form of the Roman right alongside the ordinary form
of the novas Ordo the mono proprio summorum pontificum reveals ratzinger's
hegelian approach which is the coexistence of two
forms of the same right sought to compose the synthesis
between the thesis of the traditional mass and the antithesis of the montanian
right what is vegano talking about here uh Hegel was a post-enlightenment
philosopher who saw the progress of human thought or human Enlightenment as
a synthesis so over time there's always a thesis and an
antithesis or an antithesis and these battle it out over
and over and finally in this kind of very German way of thinking they meld
and form into a synthesis for human philosophy human thought and Archbishop
vegano is here saying that Bennett the 16th ratzinger carries with him this post
Enlightenment Germanic approach this hegelian approach of
seeing the progress of history as a battle between two
that eventually emerges into a one it's not a Catholic
way thinking but that's what he means here by hegelian he says but even if that case
the ideological basis of the Moto proprio was in
fact was in fact moderated by practice and so the end
result of sumor pontificum was relatively positive
at least in the spread of the celebration of the
traditional Latin mass that today's younger Generations had never
experienced young priests and many of the faithful have
embraced the the apostolic right discovering its beauty
and intrinsic coherence with the Catholic faith in face of the success of
the mass of all time the modor proprio tradus custodis that's the Modo proprio
of Francis bolio drastically limited the liberalization of summorum pontificum
declaring that the right of every priest to celebrate the
traditional Mass had been abolished and reserving it only for
the former easia day institutes for example Le fraternity
of St Peter and Institute of Christ the King Sovereign
priest thus an Indian Reservation of more or less conservative clerics who
depend on bolia has been created who are required to profess the conciliar faith
through the con celebration of the new right at least once
a year he's talking here about the crism mass during Holy
Week something that practically all the priests of
these institutes are forced to do willingly or not
on the other hand it does not seem to me that the
Bishops and Cardinals who support them have expressed any
reservations about the council or about the doctrinal moral and
lurgical deviations of the post-conciliar period Summorum Pontificum
and of bolio himself it is difficult to expect from subordinates a combativeness
that emminent prets have never demonstrated so here Archbishop
vegano expresses it as an IND Indian Reservation uh I've
often diagnosed the same problem I I call it the Corral theory that what the
modernists are trying to do is Corral traditional priest and traditional Ley
into a Corral like we have down in Texas where you put livestock
and once you can kind of her all the livestock into the
cral you can close the gate and you've got them all there you
can sort them out you can you know ear tag them brand them
castrate them whatever you need to do but they're
in the Corral and so I think Archbishop vegano is
expressing something similar here by using the term Indian
Reservation which in American history for all of those who
aren't Americans uh the American government would gather up Indian tribes
give them reservations and say this is your place stay here uh I think it's a a similar
analogy Archbishop vegano then goes on to explain what he sees as the problem
with this Arrangement he says these institutes are therefore under
blackmail if if if with sumor and pontificum it was
possible to think of an attempt at lurgical peace that would
lead conservatives free to choose the right they prefer
in a vision that was so to speak liberal with Trad trados
cotus the clergy who celebrate and the faithful who attend
the traditional Latin Mass are burdened by the Ecclesia
ecclesial stigma of backwardness of the rejection of Vatican 2 of preconc
silar rigidity which is the term Francis uses for
traditionalists in this case vegano says Cali and parasia yield to the
authoritarianism of bolio who however does speak an uncomfortable truth the
ancient right calls into question the ecclesiology and Theology of Vatican 2
and as such does not represent the conciliar church I'll pause here so what
Archbishop vegano has expressing here is if you analyze
the traditional Latin Mass the trentine right and how it
relates to the Council of Trent and the catechism in the
Council of Trent those things fit together and then he's saying
that the second Vatican Council and the novas Ordo those fit together and what
traditionalists have experienced and what modernists have conspir experienced
is that you can't merge those ratzinger wanted his hegelian thesis antithesis to
come together a hermeneutic of continuity a cross-pollination of the
true rights and maybe something would eventually be
settled in the future and what he's saying here is that
bolio has thrown a wrench in all of that and now you have basically choosing
sides and it's not just lurgical it's not just a
preference it's actually theological it's dogmatic it has
to do with morals it has to do with theology so now it's
almost like you're dealing with package deals and not a lurgical
preference all right let's go back [Music]
to here we go is that it there it is
the illusion of lurgical Peace has therefore been shattered miserably in
the face of evidence of the irreconcilability of two
rights that excommunicate each other just like two
churches the Catholic church and the senatal Church of which they are a cultic
expression so here you can see how vegano is pushing
the Liturgy the council and then the pontificate of bolio Francis onto one
side and that is a Catal Church they even say right and and one of the
problems is is you'll hear modernist theologians and
they'll and they'll say things like well before the
council we taught this after the council we taught that
they'll even slip and they'll say that sometimes my wife was
once at a noas Ordo and the priest was there
and he preached um before the council we taught
that everyone should become Catholic that was the teaching
of the church after the council we now know that all
religions are capable of saving people my wife gathered the children and took
them out right and in this sermon you
even this kind of liberal modernist priest is articulating what vegano is
saying but on the other side of the chasm so whether you agree here with vgo
on this case it is it is the rhetoric of the left and
it's becoming more the rhetoric of the right as well if
you want to use left right we should probably be using ICK
Orthodox traditional versus modernist all right continuing on now he
talks about the Institute of Christ the King in the case of the in Institute of
Christ the King Sovereign priest the ritual and ceremonial
question seems to Prevail over the doctrinal one and there
no coincidence that amidst the general dissolution that
exists the Cannons of I'm going to mispronounce this gri gigo
seem to be exempt from opposition and ostracism they do not represent a
problem because they do not question the new course in the
slightest and indeed have extent extensive citations of
conciliar documents in their constitutions the other
institutes are also surviving but it remains to be seen
how they intend to respond to the coming future
restrictions now he talks about the Society of St Pas I 10th the Society of
St Pi the 10th after 50 years of activity is showing
signs of tiredness and sometimes it seems that its Silence
about the horrors of Santa Marta I'll interject here Santa
Marta is the residence where Francis Prolo lives the SSPX
hores of Santa Marta is motivated by a tcid agreement
of non-belligerent perhaps in the hope of being able to
become the collector of conservativism and of part of Catholic traditionalism
once Prolo has eliminated the competition of the former Ecclesia day
institutes vegano continues my fear is that this hope will in the end lead to
ratifying the day facto sism that is already present in the church forcing
Catholics to leave the official church as if they and not the Roman
hierarchy were in a state of sism once the critical voices are eliminated bolio
would find himself with his own heretical church from which the priests
and faithful who do not accept the permanent revolution have been
banished now he turns his attention to the faithful
what do we do what lay people do vegano says As for the faithful I believe it is
necessary to understand the situation of great disorientation Anarchy that is
present in the church and I think we could all recognize that he goes on to
say many Catholics who have discovered the traditional Latin
Mass are no longer able to attend the monian right here he
refers to Montini AKA Paul v 6 AKA he's referring here to the novas Ordo and he
says it is understandable that they are content so to speak with the trentine
mass celebrated by the former eclesia day institutes without how however
accepting the compromises that are required of their priests but it is a situation that
sooner or later will have to be clarified especially
if the acceptance of conciliar and cotal errors becomes
comes the condito Caan that is the condition without
which of the enjoyment of the traditional Latin mass in that case the
faithful must act coherently and seek out priests who are not compromised with
the Catal church he says the horrors of this pontificate are in any case eroding
the consensus of the clergy with regard to brolio a traditional faction could
decide not to follow him on the failed path he has overtaken
sorry undertaken let me reread that since I messed up a word a traditional faction
could decide not to follow him 8. What would
you say to laymen without access to TLM?
on the failed path he has undertaken end quote Now we move on to question eight
and that is what do you say to lay people who do not have
access to the traditional Latin Mass Archbishop vegano
gives some pastoral advice he says I understand the torment that many feel at
not being able to attend the TR the trentine mass it is like being deprived
of the very presence of the Lord and of The Graces that
the holy sacrifice spreads on souls and on the church but
we must remember that throughout history many Catholics both
in distant lands not yet reached by missionaries and also in
times of persecution have found themselves unable to attend Mass except
on rare occasions a Catholic vegano says can survive without the mass but not
without the faith if faith is therefore indispensable for salvation is important
that every Catholic nourish his or her religious
education by taking up the trentine catechism again and
nourishing the intellect and the heart in such a way as to resist the contagion
of the novas Ordo and its degenerations we must pray that the Lord
sends workers for his Harvest and we must support the few priests who are
still faithful so those are hard words coming from Archbishop
vegano we now shift back to mccarrick and the scandal of mccarrick and his
original accusations against mcck which were not just about sexual
molestation 9. What was McCarrick's role in the China-Vatican deal
and misconduct but also about mccarrick's wheeling and dealing in the
2013 papal conclave in which he spoke to a distinguished Italian gentleman about
getting bolia elected but also mccarrick's role in
the China Vatican deal and I'll just interject here a
personal anecdote when I became Catholic in 2006 I was in Washington DC and I was
a cardinal mccarrick was giving a talk and I was there and during the Q&A the
role of the underground Catholic church and the Chinese
communistic so-called Church was brought up in a question and
in his answer this was back in the day I didn't know
mccarrick was a molester or bad guy I just knew he was the
Archbishop of DC he said something that even I as a new Catholic was shocked he
said that Rome should regularize the Communist
Chinese patriotic faction and I remember thinking
well the underground Catholics are the ones
holding the faith just like the recu English who were holding the faith under
Henry VII and and uh Elizabeth the so even back then in 2006 I was shocked by
how mccarrick was ready publicly to make a deal with the Chinese Communist
socalled church and then we learn from vegano that mccarrick was actually
working behind the scenes to accomplish this and assigned by Francis here's what
Archbishop Veno says on the matter despite the fact
that accusations against mccarrick's scandalous conduct
were already wellknown and that disciplinary measures
had been taken against him by Pope Benedict bolio
instructed the then Cardinal to main contact with the Beijing government also
because of his connection to the White House and with
the Democrat establishment that that had and still
has relations with the Chinese dictatorship he goes on to
say mccarrick's ability to monetize the church's collaboration
with certain members of the Chinese government led to
the signing of a secret agreement which According to some rumors rumors which I
am unable to verify brings Millions into the Vatican every year in exchange for
its Silence about the persecution of Catholics who
are faithful to the apostolic sea about human rights
violation and we do have to salute Cardinal Zen of of Hong Kong who has
diligently sought to defend the rights
the reputation of that underground church and the deal
that was struck by Francis is wicked it's evil it's
something that a lot of Americans don't spend time on they're
more focused on you know some of the states that seem to
conflict with Catholic Orthodoxy but telling the Communist
atheistic Chinese government that they can appoint Bishops in a Bas in
basically abandoning the underground Church in preference
for those who are politically and ideologically opposed to
Catholicism is a grave Scandal and Cardinal Zen has been militant and
dutiful in protesting that decision by bolio Francis question 10 moving along as
former Apostolic Nuno to the United States what
is your assessment of the status and health of the
United States 10. As former nuncio, what was the
status and health of the United States episcopate?
episcopate the US Bishops vegano says the American episcopate is the fruit of
Decades of bad management by the Vatican corruption in
the presence of a very powerful homosexual Lobby formed largely by
mccarrick's proteges is totally favorable to the new bolian agenda in a
scandalous submission before the woke positions of
the radical left that is destroying the United States
now before I continue you have to realize Cardinal mccarrick in DC was the
shot collar he was the king maker you might even say the queen maker and he
was reporting to Rome to the congregation of Bishops
and getting his proteges his cronies placed into the
dases as ordinary Bishops and so over the over the years
even over the decades what you've seen is is the installment of Bishops who are
businessmen who are very much sympathetic or even promote the lavender
Mafia the Pink Mafia in the church and this is one reason why we see a lack of
faith why we see a lack of growth and it's also why we see sexually AB barent
clergy protected moved around we've seen so many hundreds hundreds of millions of
dollars in settlements because of abuse and U sexual degeneracy it's
really sad the damage that mcck has done is still
being felt today vono says among these corrupt men
can be counted Cardinal Spelman Bernardine deeran mccarrick and their
progyny as well of course as the Society of Jesus that's the Jesuits which played
a decisive role in the dissolution of Catholicism the quote healthy part of
Bishops which as Nuno I tried in every way to promote and defend is a minority
conservative but conciliar minded and you can think you know the
most outspoken in the last several years who actually after
the summer of Shame stood up before the USCCB United States
Conference of Bishops that was Bishop Strickland and he said
there's a priest who goes around undermining the church's
teaching on same-sex attraction and you Bishops are letting him into your dasis
and he was talking about James Mar and he he calls the Bishops on the
carpet and it's my belief that when Bishop Strickland did that they put a
Target on his back that was the beginning of the end for
Strickland which would of course confirm what vegano is saying here at least with
one example the 11th question I asked
Archbishop vegano was what do you think of the
munus vers ministerium argument that Ben the 16th did not truly resign so in 11.
What do you think of the munus -
ministerium argument that B16 didn’t resign?
2013 when Pope Benedict issued his declaro his intention to resign in that
document in the Latin he resigns from the ministerium the ministry of the
papacy however in canon law when you resign your position in the church you
resign a munus that's an office not just the ministry and so many have stated
clergy and lay people and Scholars have said you know Pope Benedict either
purposely or ignorant when he resigned the papacy he used the wrong language
according to canon law he said he resigned the ministerium
the ministry but he didn't resign the munas and
therefore perhap perhaps Benedict did not validly resign the papacy which
would mean that Benedict remained validly and technically technically the
pope until he died which of course would mean that the
conclave in 2013 that elected brolio would be known void so
that's the debate that's the topic right here and I wanted to get viano's take on
it vegano says the resignation of Bennett the 16th due to the procedural
defects in the iCal monstrum that It produced two apparent quote popes Pope
ameritus and regular Pope is certainly invalid as Professor
enrio Mario radel has excellently excellently
explained the invention of the papacy Emeritus further undermined the petrine
Primacy and open the way to that shared papacy in a surreal division of munas
and ministerium office and Ministry without any I without any
theological or canonical basis which is today evolving into an interpretation of
the role of the pontiff in an ecumenical key as we've seen the study document the
bishop of Rome that was recently published by the
decter for promoting Christian Unity so vgo is saying by
ratzinger wearing white wearing a ring calling himself his Holiness your
Holiness Pope ameritus that right there was downgrading papal Primacy because in
the eyes of people there was a there was in a sense two popes the acting Pope and
then the praying Pope the pope ameritus and he says this dovet Tales nicely into
the reinterpretation of what the Roman pontiff is the Pope in the document that
came out I think within the last few weeks the
bishop of Rome from the decter of Christian
Unity vegano says a Unity that is already a mark of the one true church of
Christ which is the Catholic church and which Vatican
2 significantly present as an objective to be achieved
by interpreting Dogma in a way that does not cause conflicts
with The Heirs of the non-catholic sect especially the
Eastern Orthodox and Protestants as well vegano says the fact that ratzinger may
have subjectively believed that he abdicated from
the papacy does not affect the nullity of the
renunciation despite the aura of Orthodoxy that surrounds
the pontificate of Bennett the 16th especially within
modern conservative circles his redefinition of the petrine institution
and his creation of the P papacy ameritus constitute the maximum
expression of the heretical instances present in
Rat sigaran Theology and as such must be the object
of a very precise condemnation together with the other heresies well highlighted
by the studies of the eminent Professor rale that the German Theologian never
disavowed so these are strong words not only
is vegano um casting the title of heretic
towards Francis bolio here he's also say saying that ratzinger's theology has
heretical instances present in it and there is evidence that long before
ratzinger became Pope Benedict that already there was a discussion
of bifurcating the papacy and understanding it in a more fluid way and
instead of a monarchical way as you see in Vatican 1 so here vegano is critical
of ratzinger of Benedict as we saw before when we
were talking about summorum pontificum in the the
piece 12. What should the next pope do? Should
he declare Bergoglio and antipope? Invalidate v2?
that was try that was established between the ordinary
form and the extraordinary form of the Latin mass as
a sort of hegelian thesis antithesis looking towards a synthesis question
12 that I asked Archbishop vegano what should the next Pope do
should he declare brolio an anti-pop should he invalidate Vatican 2 these are
Big questions right if if you follow vegano and his
conclusions these are the questions that have to be asked and
here's what vegano says when our Lord became incarnate 224 years ago there was
neither a king nor a priesthood in Israel if we are to if we are in fact
approaching the end times then I believe that the vacancy of the apostolic sea is
destined to last think about that for a moment if we are
in the end times vegano is saying maybe we are in
the end times maybe this is it when he returns vegano says to Earth
our Lord will again take up the temporal scepter and the spiritual Crown
reassuming in his own person the Royal and Priestly power that today are
illegitimate but if Providence were to Dain to to Grant the church a true Pope
he could be recognized by the condemnation and Declaration
of the nity of the council and the disasters It
produced a holy Pope would abolish the novas Ordo and restore the traditional
liturgy because he would have at heart first of all the glory of God the honor
of the church and the salvation of souls so vegano gives two potential
outcomes there one eschatological one uh hopeful for what he calls the holy
Pope question
13 Pope Leo II declared his predecessor Pope enorus
anathema will this happen again I ask Archbishop vegano says that would be the
least that should happen the Archbishop says the condemnation of error is
necessary in order to restore the violated order which is
founded in God that is on the Supreme truth Pope enorus
was excommunicated by Pope Leo II not because he was a heretic but because
profan iMac sub K
EST because he allowed profane predition on for the uh to be brought against the
immaculate faith and in other words anius didn't teach heresy or propagate
heresy but he allowed the immaculate Faith the stainless Faith to be
subverted by profanity that is the mon the monelite heresy we won't go in all
that you can check a history book or you can join new St
Thomas Institute and I'll teach you about that heresy n
sti.com with worldly deception he tried to
subvert the purity of the faith because he had not
clearly condemned the monelite heresy According to
which in 13. Pope Saint Leo II declared his predecessor
Pope Honorius anathema. Will this happen again?
Christ there are not two Wills but one Divine and one human according to his
two Natures but only one that's the heresy that there's
only one nature the Catholic faith and the councils teach
that Christ has two Wills the Divine will and the human
will proper to his human nature bolio's subversive action
is much more serious just as the heresies that Vatican 2 not only did not
fight but rather became a pastoral vehicle for in a colossal deception of
the ecclesial body are much more serious so he's saying yes Pope St Leo II said
anius was anathema not because he was a heretic but because
he allowed the immaculate Faith to be subverted he says
in the case of Francis bolio it's not just allowing
it but it's actually propagating it and then our last
question in the interview this is question 14
and this is on the topic of sedi sedi prism or the Kasich chakum thesis it is
a version of sedevacantism that holds that since 1958
those who have been elected to the papacy
John the 23rd perhaps up to Francis I don't I
don't quite know how 14. If Bergoglio were an antipope, wouldn’t his cardinals be anti
cardinals and invalid? How would a conclave occur? To solve this problem have your read
Guerard des Lauriers Cassiciacum Thesis. Do
you agree with his “material papacy” argument?
they slice that if they keep Benedict have been material popes in other words
they had the ability to name Cardinals and Cardinals
had the ability to elect popes but since the popes adhered to heresy they were
not able to receive the form of the papacy they were not
able to receive the Keys of the Kingdom so they were only
materially Pope not actually formally Pope this thesis the Kasich chakum
thesis was put forth by uh father Gad delorier and a Dominican and here's the
answer by Archbishop Beano the College of cardinals is
composed for the most part of widely compromised and
corrupt figures he's talking about currently in this year
moreover vegano says the illegitimacy of Prolo also for the violations of what is
prescribed in the apostolic Constitution University Domin greis which render the
election invalid nullifies all his acts of government there therefore also all
of his appointment to the sacred College as null so the position here vegano is
bolio Francis has not named any cardinals because he is not a
pope he goes on to say if the Cardinals appointed by his predecessor were to
recognize that bolio is not Pope and conv be a conclave then
they should also have the courage not only to deplore the
present effects but also their causes which all date back to the second
Vatican Council then he goes on to talk about the kasakam
thesis the so-called kasakam thesis takes its name from the town now called
casago branza In Lombardi where in the year of
Our Lord 387 St Augustine Cassiciacum Thesis
retreated to pray for his mother before
receiving baptism this thesis formulated in 19 78
by father Gerard delorier op Dominican identifies in the post-conciliar popes
from Montini to Prolo an external acceptance of the papacy tainted by an
internal obstacle the will to promote the new paradigms of
the second Vatican Council which contradict the perennial
magisterium of the church an obstacle that pre prevents the
communication by God of the Divine charism that that normally belongs to the Vicor of
Christ without this objective and habitual intention to procure and
realize the good and the purpose of the church the post-conciliar popes that
would be arguably John the 23rd but definitely Paul the 6 moving
forward without this objective habitual intention to procure
and realize the good and the purpose of the church the
postc conciliar popes would therefore be
popes only materially in that they were only
canonically elected and therefore not proper and therefore properly not popes
or to use the language of GAD delorier not formally popes not popes in
form the conciliar revolution of which borolo is the implacable executor has as
its aim the dissolution of Roman Catholicism into
a false religion without dogmas that is of masonic
inspiration a dissolution to be obtained through the parlamentti of the church on
the model of civil institutions this requires the downsizing of the papacy
and the extinction of apostolic succession together
with the radical upheaval of the ministerial priesthood
for this reason even if at the moment it is appropriate to suspend definitive
judgment on the popes of the council it is necessary
to put everything that they have prod produced in
parenthesis so to speak in particular the catechism that's the new catechism
of the 1990s and the doctrinal teaching the reform of the mass and of
the sacraments and among these the right of conferring holy orders so here
vegano states that we could suspend judgment and it's my position
that we should suspend judgment until we have Clarity and that because we suspend
judgment he says there should be a parentheses placed on everything and I
would have to ask him if if he were live with me now I would
ask him everything from 1958 or everything since 1965 when
the council ended and perhaps I can seek uh Archbishop
vegano and ask his Excellency to clarify if he has a date
in mind here but he definitely states there is a
parenthesis what I can say is that with respect to the thesis of sanism or SED
privation ISM and by the way the Kasich chakum thesis is sometimes called SED
privation ISM because the popes that are or the men who are elect Ed who are
materially Pope are they have a privation they are
deprived of the form of the papacy so although in a sense
they sit on the sea of Peter they are deprived of the charism the keys or the
formal office of Pope he says what I can say with respect
to the thesis of sanism or SED privation ISM which also have
elements that can be shared in theory it is not possible to
believe that the Lord allowed his church to to remain eclipsed and deprived of the
ordinary means of Grace the Vigano's
closing statement on the Mystery of Iniquity
sacraments for over 60 years with Bishops and priests not validly ordained
and therefore with valid masses and sacraments the mysterium iniquitatis the
mystery of iniquity cannot imply the failure of the assistance promised to
Christ promised by Christ to the church Eis [Music]
I will be with you even until the consummation of
the end of the age but on our part it is urgent to
restore the Integrity of the depositum fidi Lex credendi and its pray prayerful
expression Lex arandi the law of prayer so that the gates of hell do not Prevail
signed Carlo Maria vegano Arch Bishop so here's a careful distinction at the end
and I'm sure this would probably upset the majority of set
of contest any set of contest watching um he is saying that
the progress of apostolic succession the validity of the seven
sacraments uh cannot go away for 60 years it must it cannot the ordinary
means of Grace which are the sacramental gifts Christ gave to the church cannot
be eclipsed and deprived for 60 years
so it seems to me on this final point
that when it comes to Francis he would not see Francis as materially holding
the papacy according to the Kasa chakum thesis that might be
because of what he said earlier about Benedict not actually
resigning and therefore he would not even be materially
Pope uh I do have a question about that as well and kind of
the dating you know are we talking about 1958 or are we talking about
1965 for the parenthesis so there is the
interview and if the if you have clarifications if you
have questions you have comments leave a comment below I
will be engaging those and I will be reading those and uh
perhaps collecting some of those um just to ask Archbishop
vegano if he's willing you know to clarify or answer
some of those questions I myself found this interview
to be fascinating I've read it several times and um I'm very grateful that he
took the time to to write out um all these answers and
to consider them and Dr. Marshall's closing remarks
to think you know think them over and present them to
us uh whether you're a fan of Archbishop vegano or not I
imagine um that many Cardinals and Bishops and Priests
and maybe even Francis himself are going to watch this
video because um this is the most explicit statement
that Archbishop vegano has made since his he would call
alleged EXC community ation on these key topics ranging from the Third Secret of
Fatima to canon law to set of vonm to Vatican 2 to post being declared
anathema a lot of heavy topics if you enjoyed this video and you want to get
more more updates Please Subscribe please like the video and Archbishop
vegano has a website ex Serj doin and I imagine he'll post the uh written
version of this interview there I will also post the written
version if with his permission I'll make sure of this
interview at my website which is Taylor marshall.com Taylor marshall.com his
website is exj is it XJ Domin let me just confirm
that apologize I should have had that ready ahead yeah it's exer do.it
exer Domin and then the English version one
moment apologize I should have had this ready the English version is exer Domin
usa.org and I'll post that in the link below so you can uh go to the site and
and download the original so thanks for watching we will
uh pray a Hail Mary here you know we live in a difficult
time there's a lot of confusion I think people who even if
they disagree with Archbishop vegano I think he there is a
there is a sense of gratitude that he brought
so much Clarity all of us knew something
was rotten in the church particularly in America and in a way it's kind of like
when you've been sick for so long and the doctor tells you
you have cancer that's a horrible diagnosis but at least
you know what's going on and at least you know what are the
procedures and the care that you can move forward with and
I think vegano was was the one who told us about mcck and he told us about
things Shady things going on in the background with
Francis and in the Vatican and he has continued to show the
light on that and whether you agree with his conclusions
on some of the topics today or disagree I think we do owe a
tremendous debt of gratitude for his exposing the rod particularly in America
and I think in the Vatican and Rome and Europe people don't
quite understand the traditional catholic movement movement
in the United States and that's because they don't understand
how injured and hurt American Catholics are by the I
mean I've met people whose children have been abused
by the scandals by the closing of historic beautiful
parishes and heretical sermons and Eucharistic abuse and lurgical abuse and
it's just people feel beat up and I think one reason why Americans rally to
Archbishop vegano even if they don't totally agree with
him on some of these things is he was the apostolic Nuno to
America and he is a voice of clarity and they respect that in a way he has become
America's Archbishop so thank you Archbishop Carl Maria vegano for
entertaining this interview we uh do appreciate you and we'll pray
a hell Mar for Archbishop vgo now together oros Ave Maria Prayer
no amen
amen St Peter pray for us St Paul pray for us amen
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.