Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,679
oh
1
00:00:01,199 --> 00:00:07,040
my goodness
2
00:00:03,679 --> 00:00:07,919
this is ridiculous
3
00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,160
wow
4
00:00:07,919 --> 00:00:12,080
welcome to tech notice if you see this
5
00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:14,040
over here is a test pen setup and inside
6
00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:16,800
there we have the i5
7
00:00:14,040 --> 00:00:20,560
12600k it's the lowest of the 12th gen
8
00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:22,960
processors how good is this 300 cpu in
9
00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:24,080
premiere pro video editing performance
10
00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:25,920
so we're going to be looking through
11
00:00:24,080 --> 00:00:27,920
lots of different codecs as well as
12
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:30,640
color grading and how does the hardware
13
00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:32,719
react to this so let's jump right in
14
00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:35,120
motion airy is a fantastic tool for
15
00:00:32,719 --> 00:00:38,160
creators to make better videos and
16
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:40,399
faster motion array has over 80 000
17
00:00:38,160 --> 00:00:42,480
premium quality templates presets
18
00:00:40,399 --> 00:00:45,520
plugins music and sound effects stock
19
00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:47,680
video and photos in a nutshell it is a
20
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:49,680
one-stop shop for all your video
21
00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:51,600
post-production needs configure the
22
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:53,840
membership to suit your needs pay
23
00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:57,120
annually monthly cancel any time you
24
00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:59,760
want and enjoy your unlimited downloads
25
00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:02,559
not sure about motion array go try out
26
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:04,479
the hundreds of free assets available on
27
00:01:02,559 --> 00:01:07,600
the website check out motion array in
28
00:01:04,479 --> 00:01:07,600
the video description below
29
00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:13,439
there is a lot of new things and it's
30
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,040
very important to mention all of these
31
00:01:13,439 --> 00:01:17,680
components because having a different
32
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:19,520
component may impact the performance so
33
00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:23,360
in the center of this we are running the
34
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:25,600
asus z690 creator wi-fi motherboard
35
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:27,600
absolutely bells and whistles everything
36
00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:30,400
is on that motherboard it's absolutely
37
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:34,479
fantastic then the cpu is the 12600k we
38
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:36,320
are running a 64 gigabytes of ddr5 5200
39
00:01:34,479 --> 00:01:38,640
megahertz ram from kingston and it's
40
00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:40,799
called kingston fury now the thing is
41
00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:43,119
because it's ddr5 and everything is so
42
00:01:40,799 --> 00:01:46,079
new basically the system is unstable at
43
00:01:43,119 --> 00:01:47,680
5200 megahertz when you have four sticks
44
00:01:46,079 --> 00:01:50,640
inside the system the system just
45
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:54,000
crashes random times and we have to run
46
00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:57,439
the xmp at 4 800 megahertz for the
47
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:59,520
cooler we're running the rog roojin 360
48
00:01:57,439 --> 00:02:01,200
millimeter aio this is the version one
49
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:04,320
not the second version of this talking
50
00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:06,719
about gpu we are using the rtx 1390
51
00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:09,280
which is asus toof with that out of the
52
00:02:06,719 --> 00:02:10,959
way let's start with this benchmark by
53
00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:13,760
the way it's very important to mention
54
00:02:10,959 --> 00:02:17,120
that i am running the latest windows 11
55
00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:19,920
update so this is the premiere pro 22.
56
00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:22,000
we're starting with 8 bit 420 60 frames
57
00:02:19,920 --> 00:02:24,160
per second i'm going to press play and i
58
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:26,720
have a look at task manager and see how
59
00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:29,040
does this react as you can see our gpu
60
00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:32,800
is igpu actually is doing some of the
61
00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:35,280
video decoding our cpu is just sitting
62
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:37,680
there pretty much idle over there as you
63
00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:39,760
can see we have two video decoders
64
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:41,920
inside the igpu which is absolutely
65
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,080
fantastic and look it's playing 60
66
00:02:41,920 --> 00:02:45,840
frames per second max it's super super
67
00:02:44,080 --> 00:02:47,120
smooth this is with the color grade on
68
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:49,040
as well so
69
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:51,280
even if we do the timeline performance
70
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:53,120
here it's absolutely smooth as anything
71
00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:56,400
and you might be thinking no one will be
72
00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:57,920
like pairing this rtx 3090 with this cpu
73
00:02:56,400 --> 00:03:00,400
well the thing is the color grade is
74
00:02:57,920 --> 00:03:02,080
played back on the 1390 and it's very
75
00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:04,959
easy for it to do basically but i don't
76
00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:06,959
want to bottleneck the cpu in any way so
77
00:03:04,959 --> 00:03:08,400
that's why we're using 3090 so all the
78
00:03:06,959 --> 00:03:10,159
effects and some of the other gpu
79
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:12,480
accelerated things will go in there but
80
00:03:10,159 --> 00:03:14,640
in here this 60 frames per second four
81
00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:16,879
to zero was very easy for this system
82
00:03:14,640 --> 00:03:18,640
now we're moving to 10 bit four to zero
83
00:03:16,879 --> 00:03:21,360
here acer 264
84
00:03:18,640 --> 00:03:23,440
and as you can see our igpu is playing
85
00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:25,120
this back as well thanks to intel quick
86
00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:26,720
sync this is full resolution as well
87
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:29,599
we're dropping zero frames timeline
88
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:31,519
performance is extremely good it's
89
00:03:29,599 --> 00:03:35,280
buttery buttery smooth as we should say
90
00:03:31,519 --> 00:03:38,560
here in the uk moving on to 10 bit 422
91
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:41,040
now this is actually cpu based codec as
92
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:43,440
you can see our igp is doing nothing c
93
00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:46,000
gpu is only playing back the color grade
94
00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:49,599
but the whole video codec is played back
95
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:50,959
on the cpu and it's very very easy no
96
00:03:49,599 --> 00:03:52,400
problem playing it back we're dropping
97
00:03:50,959 --> 00:03:55,200
zero frames playing it back full
98
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:58,400
resolution now this is 25 frames per
99
00:03:55,200 --> 00:04:00,080
second 4k 42 to 10 bit but the reason
100
00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:02,159
i'm testing this is i've got two
101
00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:05,439
separate codecs for the 25 frames per
102
00:04:02,159 --> 00:04:09,519
second this is just normal 10 bit xavc
103
00:04:05,439 --> 00:04:12,400
hd 264 codec and but when we move to the
104
00:04:09,519 --> 00:04:14,159
si codec this is much easier to playback
105
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:17,040
this is all intra codec over here this
106
00:04:14,159 --> 00:04:18,720
is the only all inter codec from a7s 3
107
00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:20,639
that i have over here but as you can see
108
00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,320
the timeline performance is extremely
109
00:04:20,639 --> 00:04:24,880
smooth this is still played back on the
110
00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:27,680
cpu but it's super super smooth on the
111
00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:29,680
25 frames per second it's not as smooth
112
00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:31,759
because it's more compressed codec but
113
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:33,759
this si codec
114
00:04:31,759 --> 00:04:37,280
very very smooth no problem over there
115
00:04:33,759 --> 00:04:40,160
so this over here is a 10 bit 402 60
116
00:04:37,280 --> 00:04:42,000
frames per second h3264
117
00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:44,320
and as you can see this is played back
118
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:46,160
on the cpu as well you might be seeing
119
00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:48,240
this on the gpu but this is actually
120
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:50,800
just playing back the color grade and
121
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:52,720
not actually decoding and the footage as
122
00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:56,479
you can see the code is doing nothing
123
00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:58,000
scrubbing through is not as good as
124
00:04:56,479 --> 00:05:00,320
previously
125
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:02,960
but this is as good as it can get
126
00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:06,960
totally still editable and i wouldn't
127
00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:09,759
worry about this now this is h3265 10bit
128
00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:11,680
420 and as you can see the timeline
129
00:05:09,759 --> 00:05:13,520
performance is very very smooth over
130
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,680
here as well we've got a color grade on
131
00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:18,479
and everything it's it's absolutely
132
00:05:15,680 --> 00:05:20,320
insane full resolution at 50 frames per
133
00:05:18,479 --> 00:05:22,400
second by the way as well and it's
134
00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:25,600
playing it back zero frames dropped as
135
00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:27,440
you can see the igpu is decoding this
136
00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:30,080
which is fantastic makes the video
137
00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:32,320
editing absolutely super super smooth
138
00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:36,720
very happy with the timeline performance
139
00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:40,639
on h265 now this is hr265 as well but
140
00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:42,560
this is 10 bit 422 which usually isn't
141
00:05:40,639 --> 00:05:44,320
hardware accelerated but with the latest
142
00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:46,000
premiere pro it should be hardware
143
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:48,479
accelerated as well so let's put this
144
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:50,080
full resolution press play and see what
145
00:05:48,479 --> 00:05:52,880
happens
146
00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:55,280
zero frames dropped over here
147
00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:57,280
we are playing this back on the igbo as
148
00:05:55,280 --> 00:05:59,120
you can see it's on the video decoders
149
00:05:57,280 --> 00:06:01,280
are playing this back on the igpu we've
150
00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:03,440
got the color grade on as well but we're
151
00:06:01,280 --> 00:06:06,639
dropping zero frames
152
00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:11,520
by the way guys this is canon r5
153
00:06:06,639 --> 00:06:14,160
h265 60 frames per second 10 bit 422
154
00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:16,720
this is like a nutcracker for any system
155
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:19,199
okay it plays back zero frames dropped
156
00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:20,400
let's see the timeline scrubbing
157
00:06:19,199 --> 00:06:22,880
oh
158
00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:26,160
my goodness
159
00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:27,120
this is ridiculous
160
00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:29,520
wow
161
00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:31,919
now i'd like to see apple do that if
162
00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:34,160
this is possible
163
00:06:31,919 --> 00:06:37,840
because this is ridiculous do you know
164
00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:40,960
that ryzen 9 5950x with an rtx 3090 and
165
00:06:37,840 --> 00:06:43,919
64 gigabytes of ram was not able to do
166
00:06:40,960 --> 00:06:48,000
this but i am breezing through this like
167
00:06:43,919 --> 00:06:50,880
this is nothing i cannot believe this
168
00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:53,680
this is why this cpu is absolutely
169
00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:57,199
insane and i don't see why would anyone
170
00:06:53,680 --> 00:07:01,280
need anything further than just this i5
171
00:06:57,199 --> 00:07:02,400
12600k this is absolutely ridiculous
172
00:07:01,280 --> 00:07:03,440
full resolution
173
00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:06,479
as well
174
00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:08,720
i cannot believe this it's ridiculous so
175
00:07:06,479 --> 00:07:14,639
if you've got any mirrorless camera
176
00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:18,240
footage like h.265 h264 422 420
177
00:07:14,639 --> 00:07:21,039
this cpu it plays it back so so so well
178
00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:23,360
better than ryzen 5950x
179
00:07:21,039 --> 00:07:26,080
i cannot believe this it's absolutely
180
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:28,880
insane that's why these latest 12 chin
181
00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:32,080
cpus are so good because of those little
182
00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:35,520
igbo decoders inside now this is canon
183
00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:38,479
c200 raw let's see full resolution
184
00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:41,520
timeline performance pretty good
185
00:07:38,479 --> 00:07:44,240
um it's a little bit choppy ish
186
00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:46,240
but this is played back only on the cpu
187
00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:47,440
and this is 60 frames per second canon
188
00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:49,039
raw as well
189
00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:50,720
so
190
00:07:49,039 --> 00:07:53,039
are we playing this back flippy neck
191
00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:55,280
we're actually playing this back
192
00:07:53,039 --> 00:07:57,520
without any frames dropped i think
193
00:07:55,280 --> 00:08:00,879
okay we're dropping some frames
194
00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:03,599
what one frame dropped
195
00:08:00,879 --> 00:08:06,560
this is pretty insane
196
00:08:03,599 --> 00:08:07,759
this is absolutely ridiculous this is a
197
00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:11,039
budget
198
00:08:07,759 --> 00:08:12,879
cpu i know 300 isn't you know
199
00:08:11,039 --> 00:08:15,120
cheap but
200
00:08:12,879 --> 00:08:19,280
in terms of the other offerings on the
201
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:21,599
market ryzen 9s and i7s i have nines i
202
00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:23,599
don't see why you would need an i7 or i9
203
00:08:21,599 --> 00:08:24,879
it plays it back no problem
204
00:08:23,599 --> 00:08:27,759
okay two frames
205
00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:29,520
i can forgive that it's totally editable
206
00:08:27,759 --> 00:08:31,360
timeline performance clicking through
207
00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:34,159
very very instant
208
00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:36,800
i'm super happy red 4k with color grade
209
00:08:34,159 --> 00:08:39,919
as well by the way pressing play no
210
00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:43,039
problem let's d to the scrubbing
211
00:08:39,919 --> 00:08:45,200
smoothest butter no problem at all
212
00:08:43,039 --> 00:08:50,080
if you're trying to do any of this video
213
00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:52,720
editing it's insane move on to 5k redraw
214
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:55,519
okay timeline performance isn't
215
00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:56,800
the best actually it's pretty good still
216
00:08:55,519 --> 00:08:59,839
let's press play
217
00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:02,959
let's see what happens yeah 5k redraw is
218
00:08:59,839 --> 00:09:05,120
where i think we've seen the the gap now
219
00:09:02,959 --> 00:09:06,800
we're dropping quite a lot of frames but
220
00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:09,519
anything 4k
221
00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,480
is absolutely fine 4k and below any
222
00:09:09,519 --> 00:09:13,200
codec
223
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:16,959
super easy to do for this cpu this is
224
00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:19,839
red 6k timeline performance is
225
00:09:16,959 --> 00:09:19,839
pretty okay
226
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,680
clicking through there's a little bit of
227
00:09:22,160 --> 00:09:25,680
a weight but
228
00:09:23,680 --> 00:09:27,839
still does a pretty good job let's press
229
00:09:25,680 --> 00:09:30,959
play let's see what happens
230
00:09:27,839 --> 00:09:33,839
100 utilized on the cpu because it is
231
00:09:30,959 --> 00:09:36,800
cpu only and it just can't play that
232
00:09:33,839 --> 00:09:38,560
back this is where the ryzen 9s
233
00:09:36,800 --> 00:09:41,120
are very good at playing this back super
234
00:09:38,560 --> 00:09:44,800
super smooth and intel just can't quite
235
00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:46,240
hack it because eight cars or six cars
236
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:48,320
performance cars
237
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:51,680
isn't quite enough to play this back now
238
00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:53,519
let's try b-raw because this is a codec
239
00:09:51,680 --> 00:09:54,480
that probably a lot of people play back
240
00:09:53,519 --> 00:09:56,640
as well
241
00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:58,640
this is what i'm using a lot as well so
242
00:09:56,640 --> 00:10:00,800
without color grade seems very very
243
00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:03,279
smooth but very smooth to playback let's
244
00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:06,160
put the color grade back on and press
245
00:10:03,279 --> 00:10:10,000
play this is two b-roll clips on top of
246
00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:11,920
each other playing this back cpu is 45
247
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:13,120
about 50 percent used
248
00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:14,800
and
249
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:17,279
we're dropping zero frames okay we
250
00:10:14,800 --> 00:10:19,120
dropped one frame few frames
251
00:10:17,279 --> 00:10:21,040
but i still think this is completely
252
00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:24,000
editable because the timeline
253
00:10:21,040 --> 00:10:26,000
performance is very very smooth even 3b
254
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:29,440
rolls on top of each other completely
255
00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:33,440
work so i think you can do 6kb raw
256
00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:35,519
editing now this is canon r5 8k footage
257
00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:37,760
okay this is canon raw
258
00:10:35,519 --> 00:10:39,360
as you can see over here and let's see
259
00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:43,200
the timeline performance at full
260
00:10:39,360 --> 00:10:45,680
resolution it's um
261
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:49,360
not so good
262
00:10:45,680 --> 00:10:51,839
it's all right like clicking through
263
00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:55,360
it's all right i don't think it's gonna
264
00:10:51,839 --> 00:10:55,360
play it back if you press play
265
00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:58,800
yeah
266
00:10:56,880 --> 00:11:00,399
so i wouldn't edit this at full
267
00:10:58,800 --> 00:11:02,880
resolution
268
00:11:00,399 --> 00:11:05,120
what i would do is put it at
269
00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:07,680
quarter of a resolution
270
00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:09,680
and then now the scrubbing is very very
271
00:11:07,680 --> 00:11:11,200
smooth and you can actually play this
272
00:11:09,680 --> 00:11:14,640
back as well
273
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:15,680
so if you want to edit even the 8k r5
274
00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:18,880
footage
275
00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:21,120
then no problem now let's try 8k redraw
276
00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:24,240
as well so timeline performance
277
00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:26,399
scrubbing is very very like laggy
278
00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:28,720
uh let's put this at like quarter of a
279
00:11:26,399 --> 00:11:30,640
resolution as well because
280
00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:32,000
you would probably edit this at quarter
281
00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,279
resolution
282
00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:35,440
and
283
00:11:33,279 --> 00:11:37,680
this is super super smooth now pressing
284
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:39,839
play you'd have no problem playing this
285
00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:42,320
back and last of all we're going to try
286
00:11:39,839 --> 00:11:43,839
12k b raw now we're not going to put
287
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:45,360
this at full resolution because that
288
00:11:43,839 --> 00:11:47,839
will be ridiculous at half the
289
00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:49,839
resolution the timeline playback is very
290
00:11:47,839 --> 00:11:52,079
very smooth bear in mind i do have color
291
00:11:49,839 --> 00:11:53,760
grade applied as well so i'm just going
292
00:11:52,079 --> 00:11:56,320
to press play see if it can play that
293
00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:59,120
back half for the resolution
294
00:11:56,320 --> 00:12:00,639
the cpu is not 100 utilized but we
295
00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:02,800
actually were playing this back we
296
00:12:00,639 --> 00:12:05,040
dropped a little bit of frames when we
297
00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:07,680
uh like changed the clip but just look
298
00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:09,519
at that if i just press play over here
299
00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:10,720
it takes some time but it does play it
300
00:12:09,519 --> 00:12:12,240
back
301
00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:13,760
quite smoothish
302
00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:17,120
but hey
303
00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:20,160
it's half the resolution of 12k so a
304
00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:22,880
quarter of a resolution and
305
00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:25,200
it's super smooth pressing play
306
00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:27,279
we've got no problems over here
307
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:29,920
plays back zero frames dropped
308
00:12:27,279 --> 00:12:32,399
even when clips has been changed
309
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:33,600
look at that
310
00:12:32,399 --> 00:12:36,000
no problem
311
00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:38,399
so then what's the conclusion for this
312
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:41,200
i5 12600k
313
00:12:38,399 --> 00:12:44,320
i think it's absolutely insane for video
314
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:46,959
editing if you're not doing above 5k
315
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:49,519
above 4k actually video editing then
316
00:12:46,959 --> 00:12:52,000
this is all the cpu you're gonna need
317
00:12:49,519 --> 00:12:54,240
and buying anymore is just gonna improve
318
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:57,440
a little bit of your export times so
319
00:12:54,240 --> 00:13:00,000
what i'd do is get the i5 and just put
320
00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:02,480
the rest of your cpu budget to the gpu
321
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:04,959
and try to get a better gpu because i
322
00:13:02,480 --> 00:13:06,399
think 90 percent of people edit 4k
323
00:13:04,959 --> 00:13:08,959
footage from all these mirrorless
324
00:13:06,399 --> 00:13:11,920
cameras or even raw you see camera
325
00:13:08,959 --> 00:13:14,320
redraw 4k any 4k is just
326
00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:17,040
smooth as anything or as good as it can
327
00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:19,600
get on any um you know cpu even the
328
00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:23,279
ryzen 9 with 12 and 16 car performance
329
00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:26,639
cars weren't as good as this 12 600k
330
00:13:23,279 --> 00:13:28,320
because of the encoders inside the igpu
331
00:13:26,639 --> 00:13:30,160
so i am extremely impressed with the
332
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:32,240
video editing performance now i'm not
333
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:34,320
sure if i should do this with davinci
334
00:13:32,240 --> 00:13:36,720
resolve as well let me know if you want
335
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:38,560
to know or see that video with exactly
336
00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:40,720
the same codex i'm going to leave a
337
00:13:38,560 --> 00:13:42,720
comment down below so just reply to that
338
00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:45,279
comment or upload that if you want to
339
00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:47,120
see this on davinci resolve but i think
340
00:13:45,279 --> 00:13:48,480
most people are on premiere pro let me
341
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:50,079
know in the comment section below if i'm
342
00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:53,440
wrong anyway but i do want to mention
343
00:13:50,079 --> 00:13:56,160
another thing which is ddr5 versus ddr4
344
00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:58,560
now when i was benchmarking and this you
345
00:13:56,160 --> 00:14:00,639
know systems then actually there isn't
346
00:13:58,560 --> 00:14:03,519
that big of a difference between ddr4
347
00:14:00,639 --> 00:14:09,040
and ddr5 if you're using like something
348
00:14:03,519 --> 00:14:10,320
cl 16 3200 or 3600 ram ddr5 then most of
349
00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:11,839
the timeline performance you're not
350
00:14:10,320 --> 00:14:15,040
going to see a difference so even if you
351
00:14:11,839 --> 00:14:17,120
build the same system on a ddr4 platform
352
00:14:15,040 --> 00:14:19,760
on the 12th gen you know platform
353
00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,639
basically you know ddr4 12th gen then
354
00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:22,480
you're going to see a similar
355
00:14:20,639 --> 00:14:24,160
performance and it's going to be
356
00:14:22,480 --> 00:14:26,800
absolutely fantastic if you want to know
357
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:29,199
how the 12600k performs in other
358
00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:31,920
creative benchmarks then stay tuned for
359
00:14:29,199 --> 00:14:33,279
the full review of the 12600k
360
00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:34,880
likes if you enjoyed this video
361
00:14:33,279 --> 00:14:36,480
subscribe if you haven't already and
362
00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:39,959
i'll see you next time thanks guys for
363
00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:39,959
watching bye
364
00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:44,879
[Music]
26493
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.
Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Faroese
Finnish
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Maltese
Maori
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Swedish
Tajik
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkish
Turkmen
Ukrainian
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof