Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,400
intel versus amd always a good
1
00:00:02,080 --> 00:00:09,200
comparison now this over here is the
2
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:11,679
ryzen 7 5700g so the latest apu from amd
3
00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,360
and it cost roughly around 350 pounds
4
00:00:11,679 --> 00:00:17,440
something like that or dollars this over
5
00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:21,039
here is the intel i9 11 900k
6
00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:23,199
and that costs around 550 or 600 pounds
7
00:00:21,039 --> 00:00:26,800
somewhere around there quite a bit more
8
00:00:23,199 --> 00:00:29,199
expensive but does that mean it's better
9
00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:31,279
when you don't have a dedicated graphics
10
00:00:29,199 --> 00:00:33,440
card well in this video we're gonna find
11
00:00:31,279 --> 00:00:35,840
out which is better in davinci resolve
12
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:39,280
when you're editing and maybe waiting
13
00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,280
for your future graphics card
14
00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:46,800
so you might be thinking that this is
15
00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:49,760
not a fair comparison because the intel
16
00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:52,079
cost so much more than the
17
00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:55,120
amd system if you look at it this way
18
00:00:52,079 --> 00:00:58,000
both of them have 8 cars and 16 threads
19
00:00:55,120 --> 00:01:00,960
both of them have the latest technology
20
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:03,840
what amd and intel offer amd has
21
00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:05,600
actually a better or more powerful gpu
22
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:08,640
inside if you do a geekbench test but
23
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:12,240
the intel has a bit more powerful cpu
24
00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:13,760
inside maybe 5 to 15 depending on a test
25
00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:15,439
much more powerful in multi-core
26
00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:17,680
performance single core performance is
27
00:01:15,439 --> 00:01:19,680
quite a bit better than on the amd so as
28
00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,840
you can see they both have weaknesses
29
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:24,479
and strengths so interesting is what is
30
00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:25,920
the actual performance on the live
31
00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:28,159
program so if you want to check out
32
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:30,159
these systems or these like test bench
33
00:01:28,159 --> 00:01:31,520
setups check them out in the description
34
00:01:30,159 --> 00:01:34,040
below i'm going to leave both of them
35
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:37,520
down there so we have davinci resolve
36
00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:40,560
17.3 open on both of these systems i'm
37
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:42,159
also using the full hd timeline at the
38
00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:44,799
moment over here because i think if
39
00:01:42,159 --> 00:01:47,360
you're moving to 4k you probably you can
40
00:01:44,799 --> 00:01:49,280
still export that or upscale it to 4k if
41
00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:51,840
you want to when you're exporting this
42
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:54,240
but i think like timeline come on let's
43
00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:58,479
let's work it like that so we know how
44
00:01:54,240 --> 00:02:01,119
good it is so this over here is a 4k 422
45
00:01:58,479 --> 00:02:04,159
10 bit which isn't actually hardware
46
00:02:01,119 --> 00:02:06,320
accelerated but the timeline performance
47
00:02:04,159 --> 00:02:08,000
is so smooth so i'm just going to press
48
00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:09,119
play and let's see what happens over
49
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,000
here as well
50
00:02:09,119 --> 00:02:13,280
so as you can see the gpu is quite a bit
51
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:16,959
utilized
52
00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:19,120
uh cpu is you know 20 it's all right but
53
00:02:16,959 --> 00:02:20,879
we placed back 24 frames per second as
54
00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:24,720
you can see over there no problem this
55
00:02:20,879 --> 00:02:27,040
is 4k 42 to 25 frames per second a
56
00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:29,200
little bit lower still 10 bit
57
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:32,160
and let's have a look at similar setup
58
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:33,440
over here let's move on to here this is
59
00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:36,000
s i
60
00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:39,519
so it's a bit less compressed codec from
61
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:41,599
sony a7s iii and honestly it's buttery
62
00:02:39,519 --> 00:02:43,120
buttery smooth so if you don't have a
63
00:02:41,599 --> 00:02:46,000
gpu
64
00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:48,160
look at this it's brilliant it's it's
65
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:52,160
absolutely fantastic
66
00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:52,160
super super smooth no problem here
67
00:02:52,239 --> 00:02:56,959
this little bit timeline performance is
68
00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:59,040
a little bit more odd but if you go to
69
00:02:56,959 --> 00:03:01,440
si again
70
00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:03,599
that's brilliant
71
00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:06,400
25 frames per second is somehow hard but
72
00:03:03,599 --> 00:03:08,720
it does an arcade job like this is this
73
00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,400
is brilliant like just look how smooth
74
00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,360
this is press play
75
00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:14,159
here
76
00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:17,519
start playing it back no problem look
77
00:03:14,159 --> 00:03:19,280
like gpu is 11 utilized it's nothing
78
00:03:17,519 --> 00:03:21,680
let's move on to 60 frames per second
79
00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:24,000
let's see if 4k 60 frames is something
80
00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:26,319
that we can do on these systems so i
81
00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:27,280
have two clips over here one of them is
82
00:03:26,319 --> 00:03:29,920
4k
83
00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:31,519
4 to 0 8 bit so something that you would
84
00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:32,560
see like your from your mirrorless
85
00:03:31,519 --> 00:03:33,599
camera
86
00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:37,599
it's not
87
00:03:33,599 --> 00:03:39,440
able to produce as many like frames as
88
00:03:37,599 --> 00:03:42,720
before because the 60 frames on the
89
00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:45,599
timeline but let's press play see if
90
00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:47,440
yeah it's fine no problem
91
00:03:45,599 --> 00:03:49,440
looks like it's
92
00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:52,640
no problem
93
00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:56,720
look maximum we've used is 74 watts on
94
00:03:52,640 --> 00:04:00,480
the amd now this over here is 42 to 10
95
00:03:56,720 --> 00:04:02,480
bit this is h.264 as well
96
00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:03,510
and looks like it's playing it back all
97
00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:04,720
right
98
00:04:03,510 --> 00:04:07,439
[Music]
99
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:09,519
60 frames per second 402 that's very
100
00:04:07,439 --> 00:04:10,959
hard because this should go all on the
101
00:04:09,519 --> 00:04:13,200
cpu
102
00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:15,120
so if you press play here yeah see like
103
00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:17,120
all the cpu this was a spike over there
104
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:19,919
not so much on the gpu but cpu
105
00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:22,079
definitely was used a lot more 60 frames
106
00:04:19,919 --> 00:04:24,160
per second
107
00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:25,840
it's not doing that great of a job to be
108
00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,479
honest
109
00:04:25,840 --> 00:04:31,440
i think amd was playing this back much
110
00:04:28,479 --> 00:04:33,520
much better even this 8-bit let's see
111
00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:36,639
the 4-2-bit
112
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:38,320
it's very laggy as well so let's see if
113
00:04:36,639 --> 00:04:40,400
it can actually play it back yeah plays
114
00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:42,400
back 24 frames per second when you scrub
115
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:45,199
on the timeline it still takes a little
116
00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,880
bit of time to think and then playback
117
00:04:45,199 --> 00:04:49,520
but it's able to do it
118
00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:52,320
let's have a look at this 422 now
119
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,320
it plays back
120
00:04:52,639 --> 00:04:56,960
cpu is that much utilized let's see
121
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:58,880
what's happening over here
122
00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:02,560
well okay we're using quite a lot more
123
00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:04,720
energy than or electricity than the amd
124
00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:07,919
system but it's still able to do it no
125
00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,520
problem 4k redraw let's see what can it
126
00:05:07,919 --> 00:05:12,880
do over here
127
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:15,759
let's have a look timeline performance
128
00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:18,880
it's quite okay actually
129
00:05:15,759 --> 00:05:22,080
i mean to be honest it's very nice place
130
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,080
it back no problem
131
00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,840
very good as well
132
00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:30,160
like i've got nothing bad to say about
133
00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:32,000
the scrubbing of the timeline let's
134
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,240
press play see what happens
135
00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:34,240
oh
136
00:05:35,759 --> 00:05:39,520
see
137
00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:42,880
amd can't play it back
138
00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:45,759
that is fascinating well eventually like
139
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,800
the uh amd system catches up as well so
140
00:05:45,759 --> 00:05:49,390
if i'm gonna
141
00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:52,490
okay
142
00:05:49,390 --> 00:05:52,490
[Music]
143
00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:57,600
so the first clip is something where it
144
00:05:54,960 --> 00:06:00,160
struggles the second clip is all right
145
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:01,600
interesting the dci 4k is a bit easier
146
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,840
for it to play back even though there's
147
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:06,479
more frames than
148
00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:08,800
the ultra hd first clip which actually
149
00:06:06,479 --> 00:06:10,000
has less frames per second as well so
150
00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:11,360
that's interesting if you press play on
151
00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,160
the second clip it plays back in
152
00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:16,800
normally but that is a weird phenomenon
153
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:20,080
phenomenon phenomenon
154
00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:22,880
phenomenon fin whatever the word is c200
155
00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:25,199
rather than very very smooth playback
156
00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:27,440
like okay the first bit here is a little
157
00:06:25,199 --> 00:06:30,080
bit choppy so let's press play see if we
158
00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:32,400
can do that
159
00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:34,720
i mean i'd say it's completely
160
00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:35,520
editable
161
00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:39,520
whoa
162
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:39,520
this feels a little bit smoother
163
00:06:40,479 --> 00:06:43,520
and when pressing play it feels more
164
00:06:42,319 --> 00:06:46,319
responsive
165
00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:51,280
i think i'm gonna give the edge to amd
166
00:06:46,319 --> 00:06:51,280
system over here 5k redraw okay
167
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:56,560
timeline performance so so let's press
168
00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:59,919
play see what happens
169
00:06:56,560 --> 00:07:01,840
amd system is not playing this back
170
00:06:59,919 --> 00:07:04,160
like at all that's interesting i think
171
00:07:01,840 --> 00:07:06,479
it's literally just a driver
172
00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:09,680
driver issue over here because
173
00:07:06,479 --> 00:07:12,160
if we look if we press play
174
00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:15,120
nothing gets utilized actually in here
175
00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:17,680
hardly the gpu harder the cpu it just
176
00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:19,360
stops like playing it back interesting
177
00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:21,840
the timeline performance is worse than
178
00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:23,919
until then amd amd was like
179
00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:25,599
a bit more responsive
180
00:07:23,919 --> 00:07:27,759
so let's press play see what happens
181
00:07:25,599 --> 00:07:27,759
here
182
00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:30,479
plays back
183
00:07:29,599 --> 00:07:32,720
okay
184
00:07:30,479 --> 00:07:36,400
eventually catches up and plays back 24
185
00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:38,000
frames per second cpu is 100 utilized
186
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:40,800
here
187
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:42,800
we'll give the win on 5k to intel
188
00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:46,080
moving on to 6k
189
00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,080
the timeline is
190
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:52,240
not so responsive let's press play see
191
00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:53,280
what happens
192
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:56,240
okay
193
00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:56,240
can it catch up
194
00:07:57,199 --> 00:08:03,440
no not really this is can't do it redraw
195
00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:06,160
is a little bit hard for intel system
196
00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:07,520
see amd actually produces more frames on
197
00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:09,599
the timeline
198
00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:12,000
which is interesting
199
00:08:09,599 --> 00:08:13,840
this timeline is much more responsive
200
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:17,280
than intel system
201
00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:17,280
but when we press play
202
00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:24,879
i think i'm going to give the edge here
203
00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:28,879
to the amd but like what you could do is
204
00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:30,720
also like timeline half the resolution
205
00:08:28,879 --> 00:08:32,000
and then when it's half the resolution i
206
00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:34,959
think it's gonna
207
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:37,919
play it back no it doesn't actually it's
208
00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:40,479
just the codec support on the gpu and on
209
00:08:37,919 --> 00:08:42,880
the cpu it just can't figure it out the
210
00:08:40,479 --> 00:08:46,080
red raw is hard for it to play back so
211
00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:48,080
let's move on to the 6k b-roll which
212
00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,680
should be like a native kodak black
213
00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:54,399
magic codec whoa
214
00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:57,360
see something's going on over here
215
00:08:54,399 --> 00:09:00,560
what is going on this oh i think it's
216
00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:03,680
literally that the amd
217
00:09:00,560 --> 00:09:06,080
amd gpu can't actually decode that
218
00:09:03,680 --> 00:09:08,080
footage or even the cpu it doesn't know
219
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:10,240
like what to do with the b-roll when it
220
00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:14,000
stops
221
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,000
it's all right when we screw around
222
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:17,839
it makes random things if you press play
223
00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:22,320
it plays it back but you've got some
224
00:09:17,839 --> 00:09:25,680
weird artifacts going on over here
225
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,680
timeline is
226
00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:31,040
is okay but like playing back is a
227
00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:33,360
little bit choppy to be honest like
228
00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:35,920
b-roll is very nice kodak to edit the
229
00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:38,959
gpu is only utilized because it's 6k but
230
00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:40,880
like the actual codec is quite all right
231
00:09:38,959 --> 00:09:43,519
but i think intel still has the edge
232
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:46,880
over here last thing i want to try is a
233
00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:48,560
canon r5 8k so we know that the red is
234
00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:50,880
quite hard for this
235
00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:54,080
like both of the systems to playback but
236
00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:56,080
let's have a look at like canon r5 8k
237
00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:58,240
like this is amd system over here and
238
00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:00,320
scrubbing on the timeline it's a bit of
239
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:02,240
a lag
240
00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:04,959
and it
241
00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:07,279
it can't quite do it press play see if
242
00:10:04,959 --> 00:10:08,399
it does anything
243
00:10:07,279 --> 00:10:11,519
so it
244
00:10:08,399 --> 00:10:13,360
nah it just can't quite play it back but
245
00:10:11,519 --> 00:10:15,360
this clip for example on amd system
246
00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:17,839
plays back quite all right so let's move
247
00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,760
on to the intel system let's see if
248
00:10:17,839 --> 00:10:22,320
that's any different scrubbing on the
249
00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:22,320
timeline
250
00:10:24,079 --> 00:10:29,200
i'd say the amd
251
00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:29,200
was a bit better
252
00:10:29,519 --> 00:10:35,120
because this is completely like laggy
253
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:37,360
and let's have a look what's maxed out
254
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:39,760
i think it's the ram it can't just use
255
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:41,200
that much ram but let's press play see
256
00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:43,200
if that's any different that's
257
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:46,640
interesting that was quite laggy at
258
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:49,440
first but now plays back quite normally
259
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:51,440
let's see if you press play again
260
00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:53,440
i think intel system has an edge over
261
00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:56,320
here so in conclusion if you want to do
262
00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:58,720
some video editing the intel 11900k is
263
00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:01,680
much better on davinci resolve than the
264
00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:04,640
ryzen 7 5700 g
265
00:11:01,680 --> 00:11:06,560
just because just the hardware like how
266
00:11:04,640 --> 00:11:08,800
they talk together with the program the
267
00:11:06,560 --> 00:11:11,600
hardware and the program works so much
268
00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:13,440
better the amd has the hardware there
269
00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,279
but for some reason just can't utilize
270
00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:17,839
it the cpu is not utilized the gpu is
271
00:11:15,279 --> 00:11:20,560
not utilized so we have to wait for amd
272
00:11:17,839 --> 00:11:22,800
to talk with davinci resolve and about
273
00:11:20,560 --> 00:11:25,519
blackmagic and to like figure out how
274
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:27,360
they can utilize this so the intel has
275
00:11:25,519 --> 00:11:29,440
quite a bit of an edge so i wouldn't go
276
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:32,079
with amd if you want to do some editing
277
00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:34,480
i think if it's lower like you know 4k
278
00:11:32,079 --> 00:11:35,760
or less editing you can do it on the amd
279
00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:38,160
as well because
280
00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:40,399
what amd offers you've got a massive
281
00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:42,560
upgrade path where on the intel you know
282
00:11:40,399 --> 00:11:44,959
that's it in here you can put even 12
283
00:11:42,560 --> 00:11:47,519
core 16 core cpus where this 8 core is
284
00:11:44,959 --> 00:11:49,440
the maximum for this platform at the
285
00:11:47,519 --> 00:11:51,920
moment so hopefully this helps you to
286
00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:53,680
decide which one do you want to go for
287
00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:56,160
maybe if you don't have a gpu you know
288
00:11:53,680 --> 00:11:58,160
like what the actual performance is when
289
00:11:56,160 --> 00:11:59,680
working with these cpus here which
290
00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:02,160
platform is better
291
00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:04,240
the amd or intel system hopefully this
292
00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:06,240
helped you likes if you enjoyed it subs
293
00:12:04,240 --> 00:12:07,600
if you like to see more and my friends i
294
00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,880
will see you in the next time if you
295
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:10,160
want to check out these systems i'm
296
00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:12,830
going to leave them below thanks guys
297
00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:15,899
for watching bye
298
00:12:12,830 --> 00:12:15,899
[Music]
21119
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.