All language subtitles for INTEL vs AMD - Who Makes the BEST APU for Video Editing in DaVinci Resolve_-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,400 intel versus amd always a good 1 00:00:02,080 --> 00:00:09,200 comparison now this over here is the 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:11,679 ryzen 7 5700g so the latest apu from amd 3 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,360 and it cost roughly around 350 pounds 4 00:00:11,679 --> 00:00:17,440 something like that or dollars this over 5 00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:21,039 here is the intel i9 11 900k 6 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:23,199 and that costs around 550 or 600 pounds 7 00:00:21,039 --> 00:00:26,800 somewhere around there quite a bit more 8 00:00:23,199 --> 00:00:29,199 expensive but does that mean it's better 9 00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:31,279 when you don't have a dedicated graphics 10 00:00:29,199 --> 00:00:33,440 card well in this video we're gonna find 11 00:00:31,279 --> 00:00:35,840 out which is better in davinci resolve 12 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:39,280 when you're editing and maybe waiting 13 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,280 for your future graphics card 14 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:46,800 so you might be thinking that this is 15 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:49,760 not a fair comparison because the intel 16 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:52,079 cost so much more than the 17 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:55,120 amd system if you look at it this way 18 00:00:52,079 --> 00:00:58,000 both of them have 8 cars and 16 threads 19 00:00:55,120 --> 00:01:00,960 both of them have the latest technology 20 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:03,840 what amd and intel offer amd has 21 00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:05,600 actually a better or more powerful gpu 22 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:08,640 inside if you do a geekbench test but 23 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:12,240 the intel has a bit more powerful cpu 24 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:13,760 inside maybe 5 to 15 depending on a test 25 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:15,439 much more powerful in multi-core 26 00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:17,680 performance single core performance is 27 00:01:15,439 --> 00:01:19,680 quite a bit better than on the amd so as 28 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,840 you can see they both have weaknesses 29 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:24,479 and strengths so interesting is what is 30 00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:25,920 the actual performance on the live 31 00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:28,159 program so if you want to check out 32 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:30,159 these systems or these like test bench 33 00:01:28,159 --> 00:01:31,520 setups check them out in the description 34 00:01:30,159 --> 00:01:34,040 below i'm going to leave both of them 35 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:37,520 down there so we have davinci resolve 36 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:40,560 17.3 open on both of these systems i'm 37 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:42,159 also using the full hd timeline at the 38 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:44,799 moment over here because i think if 39 00:01:42,159 --> 00:01:47,360 you're moving to 4k you probably you can 40 00:01:44,799 --> 00:01:49,280 still export that or upscale it to 4k if 41 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:51,840 you want to when you're exporting this 42 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:54,240 but i think like timeline come on let's 43 00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:58,479 let's work it like that so we know how 44 00:01:54,240 --> 00:02:01,119 good it is so this over here is a 4k 422 45 00:01:58,479 --> 00:02:04,159 10 bit which isn't actually hardware 46 00:02:01,119 --> 00:02:06,320 accelerated but the timeline performance 47 00:02:04,159 --> 00:02:08,000 is so smooth so i'm just going to press 48 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:09,119 play and let's see what happens over 49 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,000 here as well 50 00:02:09,119 --> 00:02:13,280 so as you can see the gpu is quite a bit 51 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:16,959 utilized 52 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:19,120 uh cpu is you know 20 it's all right but 53 00:02:16,959 --> 00:02:20,879 we placed back 24 frames per second as 54 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:24,720 you can see over there no problem this 55 00:02:20,879 --> 00:02:27,040 is 4k 42 to 25 frames per second a 56 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:29,200 little bit lower still 10 bit 57 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:32,160 and let's have a look at similar setup 58 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:33,440 over here let's move on to here this is 59 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:36,000 s i 60 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:39,519 so it's a bit less compressed codec from 61 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:41,599 sony a7s iii and honestly it's buttery 62 00:02:39,519 --> 00:02:43,120 buttery smooth so if you don't have a 63 00:02:41,599 --> 00:02:46,000 gpu 64 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:48,160 look at this it's brilliant it's it's 65 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:52,160 absolutely fantastic 66 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:52,160 super super smooth no problem here 67 00:02:52,239 --> 00:02:56,959 this little bit timeline performance is 68 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:59,040 a little bit more odd but if you go to 69 00:02:56,959 --> 00:03:01,440 si again 70 00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:03,599 that's brilliant 71 00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:06,400 25 frames per second is somehow hard but 72 00:03:03,599 --> 00:03:08,720 it does an arcade job like this is this 73 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,400 is brilliant like just look how smooth 74 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,360 this is press play 75 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:14,159 here 76 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:17,519 start playing it back no problem look 77 00:03:14,159 --> 00:03:19,280 like gpu is 11 utilized it's nothing 78 00:03:17,519 --> 00:03:21,680 let's move on to 60 frames per second 79 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:24,000 let's see if 4k 60 frames is something 80 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:26,319 that we can do on these systems so i 81 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:27,280 have two clips over here one of them is 82 00:03:26,319 --> 00:03:29,920 4k 83 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:31,519 4 to 0 8 bit so something that you would 84 00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:32,560 see like your from your mirrorless 85 00:03:31,519 --> 00:03:33,599 camera 86 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:37,599 it's not 87 00:03:33,599 --> 00:03:39,440 able to produce as many like frames as 88 00:03:37,599 --> 00:03:42,720 before because the 60 frames on the 89 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:45,599 timeline but let's press play see if 90 00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:47,440 yeah it's fine no problem 91 00:03:45,599 --> 00:03:49,440 looks like it's 92 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:52,640 no problem 93 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:56,720 look maximum we've used is 74 watts on 94 00:03:52,640 --> 00:04:00,480 the amd now this over here is 42 to 10 95 00:03:56,720 --> 00:04:02,480 bit this is h.264 as well 96 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:03,510 and looks like it's playing it back all 97 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:04,720 right 98 00:04:03,510 --> 00:04:07,439 [Music] 99 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:09,519 60 frames per second 402 that's very 100 00:04:07,439 --> 00:04:10,959 hard because this should go all on the 101 00:04:09,519 --> 00:04:13,200 cpu 102 00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:15,120 so if you press play here yeah see like 103 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:17,120 all the cpu this was a spike over there 104 00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:19,919 not so much on the gpu but cpu 105 00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:22,079 definitely was used a lot more 60 frames 106 00:04:19,919 --> 00:04:24,160 per second 107 00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:25,840 it's not doing that great of a job to be 108 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,479 honest 109 00:04:25,840 --> 00:04:31,440 i think amd was playing this back much 110 00:04:28,479 --> 00:04:33,520 much better even this 8-bit let's see 111 00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:36,639 the 4-2-bit 112 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:38,320 it's very laggy as well so let's see if 113 00:04:36,639 --> 00:04:40,400 it can actually play it back yeah plays 114 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:42,400 back 24 frames per second when you scrub 115 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:45,199 on the timeline it still takes a little 116 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,880 bit of time to think and then playback 117 00:04:45,199 --> 00:04:49,520 but it's able to do it 118 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:52,320 let's have a look at this 422 now 119 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,320 it plays back 120 00:04:52,639 --> 00:04:56,960 cpu is that much utilized let's see 121 00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:58,880 what's happening over here 122 00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:02,560 well okay we're using quite a lot more 123 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:04,720 energy than or electricity than the amd 124 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:07,919 system but it's still able to do it no 125 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,520 problem 4k redraw let's see what can it 126 00:05:07,919 --> 00:05:12,880 do over here 127 00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:15,759 let's have a look timeline performance 128 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:18,880 it's quite okay actually 129 00:05:15,759 --> 00:05:22,080 i mean to be honest it's very nice place 130 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,080 it back no problem 131 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,840 very good as well 132 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:30,160 like i've got nothing bad to say about 133 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:32,000 the scrubbing of the timeline let's 134 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,240 press play see what happens 135 00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:34,240 oh 136 00:05:35,759 --> 00:05:39,520 see 137 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:42,880 amd can't play it back 138 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:45,759 that is fascinating well eventually like 139 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,800 the uh amd system catches up as well so 140 00:05:45,759 --> 00:05:49,390 if i'm gonna 141 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:52,490 okay 142 00:05:49,390 --> 00:05:52,490 [Music] 143 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:57,600 so the first clip is something where it 144 00:05:54,960 --> 00:06:00,160 struggles the second clip is all right 145 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:01,600 interesting the dci 4k is a bit easier 146 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,840 for it to play back even though there's 147 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:06,479 more frames than 148 00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:08,800 the ultra hd first clip which actually 149 00:06:06,479 --> 00:06:10,000 has less frames per second as well so 150 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:11,360 that's interesting if you press play on 151 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,160 the second clip it plays back in 152 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:16,800 normally but that is a weird phenomenon 153 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:20,080 phenomenon phenomenon 154 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:22,880 phenomenon fin whatever the word is c200 155 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:25,199 rather than very very smooth playback 156 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:27,440 like okay the first bit here is a little 157 00:06:25,199 --> 00:06:30,080 bit choppy so let's press play see if we 158 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:32,400 can do that 159 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:34,720 i mean i'd say it's completely 160 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:35,520 editable 161 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:39,520 whoa 162 00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:39,520 this feels a little bit smoother 163 00:06:40,479 --> 00:06:43,520 and when pressing play it feels more 164 00:06:42,319 --> 00:06:46,319 responsive 165 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:51,280 i think i'm gonna give the edge to amd 166 00:06:46,319 --> 00:06:51,280 system over here 5k redraw okay 167 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:56,560 timeline performance so so let's press 168 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:59,919 play see what happens 169 00:06:56,560 --> 00:07:01,840 amd system is not playing this back 170 00:06:59,919 --> 00:07:04,160 like at all that's interesting i think 171 00:07:01,840 --> 00:07:06,479 it's literally just a driver 172 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:09,680 driver issue over here because 173 00:07:06,479 --> 00:07:12,160 if we look if we press play 174 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:15,120 nothing gets utilized actually in here 175 00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:17,680 hardly the gpu harder the cpu it just 176 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:19,360 stops like playing it back interesting 177 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:21,840 the timeline performance is worse than 178 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:23,919 until then amd amd was like 179 00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:25,599 a bit more responsive 180 00:07:23,919 --> 00:07:27,759 so let's press play see what happens 181 00:07:25,599 --> 00:07:27,759 here 182 00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:30,479 plays back 183 00:07:29,599 --> 00:07:32,720 okay 184 00:07:30,479 --> 00:07:36,400 eventually catches up and plays back 24 185 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:38,000 frames per second cpu is 100 utilized 186 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:40,800 here 187 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:42,800 we'll give the win on 5k to intel 188 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:46,080 moving on to 6k 189 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,080 the timeline is 190 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:52,240 not so responsive let's press play see 191 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:53,280 what happens 192 00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:56,240 okay 193 00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:56,240 can it catch up 194 00:07:57,199 --> 00:08:03,440 no not really this is can't do it redraw 195 00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:06,160 is a little bit hard for intel system 196 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:07,520 see amd actually produces more frames on 197 00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:09,599 the timeline 198 00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:12,000 which is interesting 199 00:08:09,599 --> 00:08:13,840 this timeline is much more responsive 200 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:17,280 than intel system 201 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:17,280 but when we press play 202 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:24,879 i think i'm going to give the edge here 203 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:28,879 to the amd but like what you could do is 204 00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:30,720 also like timeline half the resolution 205 00:08:28,879 --> 00:08:32,000 and then when it's half the resolution i 206 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:34,959 think it's gonna 207 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:37,919 play it back no it doesn't actually it's 208 00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:40,479 just the codec support on the gpu and on 209 00:08:37,919 --> 00:08:42,880 the cpu it just can't figure it out the 210 00:08:40,479 --> 00:08:46,080 red raw is hard for it to play back so 211 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:48,080 let's move on to the 6k b-roll which 212 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,680 should be like a native kodak black 213 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:54,399 magic codec whoa 214 00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:57,360 see something's going on over here 215 00:08:54,399 --> 00:09:00,560 what is going on this oh i think it's 216 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:03,680 literally that the amd 217 00:09:00,560 --> 00:09:06,080 amd gpu can't actually decode that 218 00:09:03,680 --> 00:09:08,080 footage or even the cpu it doesn't know 219 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:10,240 like what to do with the b-roll when it 220 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:14,000 stops 221 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,000 it's all right when we screw around 222 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:17,839 it makes random things if you press play 223 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:22,320 it plays it back but you've got some 224 00:09:17,839 --> 00:09:25,680 weird artifacts going on over here 225 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,680 timeline is 226 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:31,040 is okay but like playing back is a 227 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:33,360 little bit choppy to be honest like 228 00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:35,920 b-roll is very nice kodak to edit the 229 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:38,959 gpu is only utilized because it's 6k but 230 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:40,880 like the actual codec is quite all right 231 00:09:38,959 --> 00:09:43,519 but i think intel still has the edge 232 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:46,880 over here last thing i want to try is a 233 00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:48,560 canon r5 8k so we know that the red is 234 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:50,880 quite hard for this 235 00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:54,080 like both of the systems to playback but 236 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:56,080 let's have a look at like canon r5 8k 237 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:58,240 like this is amd system over here and 238 00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:00,320 scrubbing on the timeline it's a bit of 239 00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:02,240 a lag 240 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:04,959 and it 241 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:07,279 it can't quite do it press play see if 242 00:10:04,959 --> 00:10:08,399 it does anything 243 00:10:07,279 --> 00:10:11,519 so it 244 00:10:08,399 --> 00:10:13,360 nah it just can't quite play it back but 245 00:10:11,519 --> 00:10:15,360 this clip for example on amd system 246 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:17,839 plays back quite all right so let's move 247 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,760 on to the intel system let's see if 248 00:10:17,839 --> 00:10:22,320 that's any different scrubbing on the 249 00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:22,320 timeline 250 00:10:24,079 --> 00:10:29,200 i'd say the amd 251 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:29,200 was a bit better 252 00:10:29,519 --> 00:10:35,120 because this is completely like laggy 253 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:37,360 and let's have a look what's maxed out 254 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:39,760 i think it's the ram it can't just use 255 00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:41,200 that much ram but let's press play see 256 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:43,200 if that's any different that's 257 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:46,640 interesting that was quite laggy at 258 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:49,440 first but now plays back quite normally 259 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:51,440 let's see if you press play again 260 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:53,440 i think intel system has an edge over 261 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:56,320 here so in conclusion if you want to do 262 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:58,720 some video editing the intel 11900k is 263 00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:01,680 much better on davinci resolve than the 264 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:04,640 ryzen 7 5700 g 265 00:11:01,680 --> 00:11:06,560 just because just the hardware like how 266 00:11:04,640 --> 00:11:08,800 they talk together with the program the 267 00:11:06,560 --> 00:11:11,600 hardware and the program works so much 268 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:13,440 better the amd has the hardware there 269 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:15,279 but for some reason just can't utilize 270 00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:17,839 it the cpu is not utilized the gpu is 271 00:11:15,279 --> 00:11:20,560 not utilized so we have to wait for amd 272 00:11:17,839 --> 00:11:22,800 to talk with davinci resolve and about 273 00:11:20,560 --> 00:11:25,519 blackmagic and to like figure out how 274 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:27,360 they can utilize this so the intel has 275 00:11:25,519 --> 00:11:29,440 quite a bit of an edge so i wouldn't go 276 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:32,079 with amd if you want to do some editing 277 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:34,480 i think if it's lower like you know 4k 278 00:11:32,079 --> 00:11:35,760 or less editing you can do it on the amd 279 00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:38,160 as well because 280 00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:40,399 what amd offers you've got a massive 281 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:42,560 upgrade path where on the intel you know 282 00:11:40,399 --> 00:11:44,959 that's it in here you can put even 12 283 00:11:42,560 --> 00:11:47,519 core 16 core cpus where this 8 core is 284 00:11:44,959 --> 00:11:49,440 the maximum for this platform at the 285 00:11:47,519 --> 00:11:51,920 moment so hopefully this helps you to 286 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:53,680 decide which one do you want to go for 287 00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:56,160 maybe if you don't have a gpu you know 288 00:11:53,680 --> 00:11:58,160 like what the actual performance is when 289 00:11:56,160 --> 00:11:59,680 working with these cpus here which 290 00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:02,160 platform is better 291 00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:04,240 the amd or intel system hopefully this 292 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:06,240 helped you likes if you enjoyed it subs 293 00:12:04,240 --> 00:12:07,600 if you like to see more and my friends i 294 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,880 will see you in the next time if you 295 00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:10,160 want to check out these systems i'm 296 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:12,830 going to leave them below thanks guys 297 00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:15,899 for watching bye 298 00:12:12,830 --> 00:12:15,899 [Music] 21119

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.