All language subtitles for Core i5-13400 vs. Ryzen 7 5700X, CPU & GPU Scaling Benchmark-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:05,960 foreign 1 00:00:02,570 --> 00:00:08,400 [Music] 2 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:10,200 books today we're continuing our CPU and 3 00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:12,179 GPU scaling Series this time with a 4 00:00:10,200 --> 00:00:16,340 comparison between Intel's new Core i5 5 00:00:12,179 --> 00:00:19,440 13400 And the tried and true AMD ryzen 7 6 00:00:16,340 --> 00:00:21,660 5700x now as it stands the ryzen 7 7 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:25,980 processor is actually a good bit cheaper 8 00:00:21,660 --> 00:00:29,279 at around 190 us whereas the 13400 is 9 00:00:25,980 --> 00:00:31,500 currently fetching 240 U.S which is the 10 00:00:29,279 --> 00:00:34,020 MSRP for this part as the most 11 00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:36,300 affordable 13th gen Core i5 part the 12 00:00:34,020 --> 00:00:38,460 13400 has quite a lot of you very 13 00:00:36,300 --> 00:00:40,739 excited and while it looks quite good on 14 00:00:38,460 --> 00:00:43,800 paper it might also look very familiar 15 00:00:40,739 --> 00:00:46,620 to some of you with 6p cores four equals 16 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:49,920 and a 20 megabyte L3 cache you might 17 00:00:46,620 --> 00:00:52,440 have mistaken as the core i5 12 600k 18 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:56,180 because well that's basically what it is 19 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:59,100 in fact when compared to the 12600k the 20 00:00:56,180 --> 00:01:01,500 13400p cores a clock just 300 megahertz 21 00:00:59,100 --> 00:01:03,899 lower at 4.6 gigahertz so a mere six 22 00:01:01,500 --> 00:01:06,060 percent reduction there while the e-cors 23 00:01:03,899 --> 00:01:08,580 have been closed Lockdown from 3.6 24 00:01:06,060 --> 00:01:10,380 gigahertz to 3.3 gigahertz and that's a 25 00:01:08,580 --> 00:01:12,600 slightly larger eight percent reduction 26 00:01:10,380 --> 00:01:14,640 other than that they are basically the 27 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:17,280 same CPU with the only other notable 28 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:21,780 change being to the integrated Graphics 29 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:25,740 the 12 600k use the UHD 770 while the 30 00:01:21,780 --> 00:01:29,280 13400 uses the UHD 730 sounds trivial 31 00:01:25,740 --> 00:01:31,200 but the 770 does pack 33 more execution 32 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:33,360 units so that it is quite a significant 33 00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:35,280 difference though at the end of the day 34 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:37,380 you won't be gaming with either one of 35 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:40,079 these Solutions so at least in that 36 00:01:37,380 --> 00:01:42,180 sense it is a trivial difference now 37 00:01:40,079 --> 00:01:45,240 when compared to the 12400 this newer 38 00:01:42,180 --> 00:01:47,579 13th gen version and I do say 13th gen 39 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:50,460 with air quotes it clocks five percent 40 00:01:47,579 --> 00:01:53,159 higher for the P cores while the 12 400 41 00:01:50,460 --> 00:01:56,159 didn't offer any e-cors at all the 12 42 00:01:53,159 --> 00:01:59,159 400 was also limited to an 18 megabyte 43 00:01:56,159 --> 00:02:01,380 L3 cache and used the UHD 730 integrated 44 00:01:59,159 --> 00:02:04,920 Graphics so that means when compared to 45 00:02:01,380 --> 00:02:06,180 the 12 400 the 13 400 it is a big Gap 46 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:08,280 grade for those of you looking at 47 00:02:06,180 --> 00:02:11,580 productivity performance but at today's 48 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:13,620 prices it does also cost 30 percent more 49 00:02:11,580 --> 00:02:15,540 but as usual for this content we will be 50 00:02:13,620 --> 00:02:16,860 focusing on gaming performance so I 51 00:02:15,540 --> 00:02:20,160 thought it would be interesting to not 52 00:02:16,860 --> 00:02:22,560 only compare the 13 400 with the 5700x 53 00:02:20,160 --> 00:02:25,560 but also the previous generation value 54 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:28,440 champ the core i5 12400 along with the 55 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:29,700 ryzen 5 5600 so we have four CPUs in 56 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:33,000 total all of which can still be 57 00:02:29,700 --> 00:02:34,260 purchased today for between 130 and 240 58 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,239 U.S 59 00:02:34,260 --> 00:02:37,980 now given this is a GPU scaling 60 00:02:36,239 --> 00:02:39,900 Benchmark we are obviously focusing on 61 00:02:37,980 --> 00:02:41,879 gaming performance and in total we have 62 00:02:39,900 --> 00:02:44,840 a dozen games all of which have been 63 00:02:41,879 --> 00:02:49,500 tested at 1080p using the Radeon RX 64 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:51,239 6650xt 6950 XT and RTX 4090 now the 65 00:02:49,500 --> 00:02:53,400 reason for testing at 1080p is quite 66 00:02:51,239 --> 00:02:55,260 simple we want to minimize the GPU 67 00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:57,180 bottleneck as we're looking at CPU 68 00:02:55,260 --> 00:02:59,580 performance but by including a number of 69 00:02:57,180 --> 00:03:01,800 different tier gpus we still get to view 70 00:02:59,580 --> 00:03:04,260 the effects of GPU bottlenecks on the 71 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:06,360 CPU as for the test system specs we're 72 00:03:04,260 --> 00:03:08,160 using ddr4 memory exclusive here as this 73 00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:10,860 older but much cheaper memory standard 74 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:13,080 makes sense when talking about sub 250 75 00:03:10,860 --> 00:03:14,940 us processors though there are certainly 76 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:17,519 scenarios where you would opt for ddr5 77 00:03:14,940 --> 00:03:19,140 but for simplicity's sake we've gone for 78 00:03:17,519 --> 00:03:20,459 an Apples to Apples comparison using 79 00:03:19,140 --> 00:03:22,560 ddr4 80 00:03:20,459 --> 00:03:25,860 I've also decided to use G skills rip 81 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:28,860 Jaws V series 32 gigabyte ddr4 3600cl 16 82 00:03:25,860 --> 00:03:30,659 memory because at 115 us it is a good 83 00:03:28,860 --> 00:03:33,000 quality kit that offers a nice balance 84 00:03:30,659 --> 00:03:34,739 of price to Performance the am4 85 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:37,700 processors are able to run this kit at 86 00:03:34,739 --> 00:03:41,040 the 3600 spec using the standard CL 16 87 00:03:37,700 --> 00:03:44,580 1936 timings the locked Intel processors 88 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:46,200 though can't run above 34.66 if you want 89 00:03:44,580 --> 00:03:48,180 to use the gear one mode and ideally you 90 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:50,940 do want to use the gear one mode as the 91 00:03:48,180 --> 00:03:53,340 memory has to run well above 4000 before 92 00:03:50,940 --> 00:03:55,200 Gear 2 can match the performance of gear 93 00:03:53,340 --> 00:03:57,060 one and the reason for this limitation 94 00:03:55,200 --> 00:04:00,299 is due to the fact that the system agent 95 00:03:57,060 --> 00:04:01,980 or sa voltage is locked on non-k sku 96 00:04:00,299 --> 00:04:03,959 processors and this limits the memory 97 00:04:01,980 --> 00:04:06,000 controller's ability to support high 98 00:04:03,959 --> 00:04:08,099 frequency memory using the gear one mode 99 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,200 and I should note that all overclocking 100 00:04:08,099 --> 00:04:12,180 is locked down on these 13th gen Parts 101 00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:14,459 there are no special motherboards that 102 00:04:12,180 --> 00:04:16,199 can alade overclock all of them are 103 00:04:14,459 --> 00:04:18,419 locked down there is no non-k 104 00:04:16,199 --> 00:04:20,220 overclocking for 13th gen parts 105 00:04:18,419 --> 00:04:22,979 so that being the case I've tested the 106 00:04:20,220 --> 00:04:26,040 12 400 and 13 400 using the rip Jaws 107 00:04:22,979 --> 00:04:27,780 memory adjusted to 3466 as this is the 108 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:29,940 most optimal configuration for these 109 00:04:27,780 --> 00:04:31,380 processors short of going and manually 110 00:04:29,940 --> 00:04:34,259 tuning the subtimes which we're not 111 00:04:31,380 --> 00:04:36,120 doing for this content so let's get into 112 00:04:34,259 --> 00:04:37,979 the benchmarks 113 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,780 starting with watchdog's Legion we find 114 00:04:37,979 --> 00:04:42,360 very competitive results across the 115 00:04:39,780 --> 00:04:44,100 board regardless of the GPU used it's 116 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:47,400 really crazy to see that we're actually 117 00:04:44,100 --> 00:04:50,520 not that GPU limited when using the 6650 118 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:52,919 XT sure the 13400 was 21 faster with the 119 00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:55,199 6950 XT but that's actually quite a 120 00:04:52,919 --> 00:04:57,419 small margin given the difference in GPU 121 00:04:55,199 --> 00:05:00,660 power there the GeForce driver I've had 122 00:04:57,419 --> 00:05:03,479 is also visible here with the RTX 4090 123 00:05:00,660 --> 00:05:05,940 coming in slightly slower than the 6950 124 00:05:03,479 --> 00:05:08,400 XT that means we saw the highest frame 125 00:05:05,940 --> 00:05:11,580 rates using the Radeon GPU but even so 126 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:14,100 the 13 400 and 5700x delivered basically 127 00:05:11,580 --> 00:05:16,440 identical performance the Intel CPU is 128 00:05:14,100 --> 00:05:18,419 just one and a half percent faster even 129 00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:21,720 when compared to the much cheaper ryzen 130 00:05:18,419 --> 00:05:24,060 5 5600 the 13400 doesn't look that 131 00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:26,039 impressive winning that matchup by a 132 00:05:24,060 --> 00:05:28,020 mere five percent margin 133 00:05:26,039 --> 00:05:30,780 moving on to Warhammer 3 we see when 134 00:05:28,020 --> 00:05:34,680 using the 6650 XT that all CPUs are 135 00:05:30,780 --> 00:05:37,680 limited by the GPU at exactly 81 FPS and 136 00:05:34,680 --> 00:05:39,660 even with the much faster 6950 XT we're 137 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:42,240 still quite heavily GPU limited this 138 00:05:39,660 --> 00:05:45,240 time to around 180 FPS in fact it's not 139 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:46,800 until we employ the RTX 1490 that we 140 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:50,460 find the performance limits of these 141 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:52,320 CPUs the ryzen 5 5600 and core i5 12400 142 00:05:50,460 --> 00:05:55,380 for example both capped out at around 143 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:58,979 200 FPS so very respectable performance 144 00:05:55,380 --> 00:06:02,759 there the 5700x was however 12 fast in 145 00:05:58,979 --> 00:06:06,060 the 5600 while the 13400 was 9 faster 146 00:06:02,759 --> 00:06:07,620 than the 5700x so ultimately Intel does 147 00:06:06,060 --> 00:06:09,900 win in this game though that doesn't 148 00:06:07,620 --> 00:06:11,880 mean the core i5 is necessarily the 149 00:06:09,900 --> 00:06:13,500 better value choice but of course we 150 00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:14,400 will look at that a bit later on in the 151 00:06:13,500 --> 00:06:18,240 video 152 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:20,580 next up we have Hitman 3 and no the 6950 153 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:22,800 XT and 40 90 results aren't mixed up 154 00:06:20,580 --> 00:06:24,720 here for whatever reason the 40 series 155 00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:26,280 currently suffers from really weak one 156 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:28,139 percent lows in this title and 157 00:06:26,280 --> 00:06:30,600 presumably this is some kind of driver 158 00:06:28,139 --> 00:06:33,539 related issue in any case the average 159 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:36,060 frame rate of the 6950x10 RTX 4090 are 160 00:06:33,539 --> 00:06:38,880 quite similar at 1080p due to the 161 00:06:36,060 --> 00:06:40,500 performance being CPU limited if we were 162 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:43,380 to increase the resolution therefore 163 00:06:40,500 --> 00:06:47,220 reduce the CPU limitation we would start 164 00:06:43,380 --> 00:06:48,780 to see the 6950 XT Trail the RTX 4090 by 165 00:06:47,220 --> 00:06:51,300 a larger margin of course if we were to 166 00:06:48,780 --> 00:06:53,819 use much faster CPUs then it wouldn't 167 00:06:51,300 --> 00:06:56,220 require a 4K resolution but just want to 168 00:06:53,819 --> 00:06:59,160 make it clear that the 6950 XT is in no 169 00:06:56,220 --> 00:07:01,259 way a competitor to the RTX 4090 we are 170 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:04,199 heavily limiting the RTX 4090 here at 171 00:07:01,259 --> 00:07:07,319 1080p with these lower end CPUs or at 172 00:07:04,199 --> 00:07:09,660 least lower end by today's standards now 173 00:07:07,319 --> 00:07:12,180 the more limited and heavily utilized 12 174 00:07:09,660 --> 00:07:15,300 400 and 5600 did perform quite a bit 175 00:07:12,180 --> 00:07:17,280 better with the Radeon GPU again due to 176 00:07:15,300 --> 00:07:19,620 nvidia's driver overhead which sends 177 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:21,840 performance backwards in high CPU 178 00:07:19,620 --> 00:07:23,340 utilization scenarios for the most part 179 00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:24,660 though there was little to no 180 00:07:23,340 --> 00:07:26,099 performance difference between these 181 00:07:24,660 --> 00:07:28,620 four CPUs 182 00:07:26,099 --> 00:07:30,720 the a plague tail Requiem results are 183 00:07:28,620 --> 00:07:34,680 heavily CPU limited when using the RTX 184 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:36,060 4090 and 6950 XT the 6650 XT on the 185 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:39,419 other hand heavily GPU limited 186 00:07:36,060 --> 00:07:40,919 performance to 68 FPS as all four CPUs 187 00:07:39,419 --> 00:07:44,099 could easily meet that performance 188 00:07:40,919 --> 00:07:47,280 Target now with the 6950 XT we see that 189 00:07:44,099 --> 00:07:50,160 the 5700x and 3400 delivered the same 190 00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:53,039 level of performance while the 5600 and 191 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:54,960 12 400 were also comparable however 192 00:07:53,039 --> 00:07:57,960 things look a bit different with the RTX 193 00:07:54,960 --> 00:08:00,000 4090 namely for the 5600 which appears 194 00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:02,819 overwhelmed by the additional overhead 195 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:07,080 dropping well below the 5700x with just 196 00:08:02,819 --> 00:08:08,520 87 FPS on average the 5700x and 13400 197 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:09,720 though did deliver comparable 198 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:11,580 performance 199 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:13,800 next up we have Call of Duty Modern 200 00:08:11,580 --> 00:08:15,419 Warfare 2 using the basic quality preset 201 00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:17,819 as this is a competitive multiplayer 202 00:08:15,419 --> 00:08:19,919 shooter so lower quality settings are 203 00:08:17,819 --> 00:08:21,720 typically used to not just boost frame 204 00:08:19,919 --> 00:08:24,840 rates but also make it easier to spot 205 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:26,940 enemy players with the 6650xt we see 206 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:28,440 that performance is largely GPU limited 207 00:08:26,940 --> 00:08:30,060 with just a seven percent performance 208 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:33,360 difference between the fastest and 209 00:08:30,060 --> 00:08:34,740 slowest CPUs tested the 5700x for 210 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,659 example was just three percent faster 211 00:08:34,740 --> 00:08:39,479 than 13 400 so in other words 212 00:08:36,659 --> 00:08:42,180 performance was basically identical 213 00:08:39,479 --> 00:08:44,880 moving to the 6950 XT largely removes 214 00:08:42,180 --> 00:08:49,200 the GPU bottleneck and now the 5700x is 215 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:51,180 a massive 37 faster than the 13400 which 216 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:53,580 is a surprisingly large margin very 217 00:08:51,180 --> 00:08:56,580 surprising in fact the 13 400 was just 218 00:08:53,580 --> 00:08:58,680 five percent fast and the 12 400 so a 219 00:08:56,580 --> 00:09:03,120 very Mild improvement there while the 220 00:08:58,680 --> 00:09:05,160 5700x was 20 faster than the 5600 we're 221 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:07,560 also seeing similar margins with the RTX 222 00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:09,720 4090 though due to the overhead here the 223 00:09:07,560 --> 00:09:12,540 CPU limited results are slightly slower 224 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:15,240 with the GeForce GPU 225 00:09:12,540 --> 00:09:17,399 Spider-Man remastered is a very CPU 226 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,040 limited game especially with Ray tracing 227 00:09:17,399 --> 00:09:22,500 enabled that said we do see some 228 00:09:20,040 --> 00:09:25,980 performance improvement from the 6650 XT 229 00:09:22,500 --> 00:09:28,980 to the 6950 XT particularly when looking 230 00:09:25,980 --> 00:09:30,660 at the core i5 processors interestingly 231 00:09:28,980 --> 00:09:32,220 the ryzen processors did see a 232 00:09:30,660 --> 00:09:36,240 performance uplift when moving from the 233 00:09:32,220 --> 00:09:38,640 6950 XT to the RTX 4090 around a 9 gain 234 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:39,839 while the 13400 saw a seven percent 235 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:42,120 Improvement 236 00:09:39,839 --> 00:09:43,980 I suspect memory performance is the key 237 00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:45,660 limiting factor for the ryzen processors 238 00:09:43,980 --> 00:09:47,519 and namely its dram latency which will 239 00:09:45,660 --> 00:09:49,500 be responsible for why the core i5 has 240 00:09:47,519 --> 00:09:53,580 performed so much better here using the 241 00:09:49,500 --> 00:09:55,620 RTX 490 the 13400 was 13 faster than the 242 00:09:53,580 --> 00:09:57,060 5700x 243 00:09:55,620 --> 00:09:59,519 the shadow of the Tomb Raider results 244 00:09:57,060 --> 00:10:01,620 are quite interesting using the 6650 XT 245 00:09:59,519 --> 00:10:03,839 the results are highly predictable here 246 00:10:01,620 --> 00:10:06,300 we're entirely GPU limited so all CPUs 247 00:10:03,839 --> 00:10:08,700 were capped at 110 FPS however this 248 00:10:06,300 --> 00:10:11,640 limit was removed with the 6950 XT and 249 00:10:08,700 --> 00:10:14,880 RTX 490 now the results are CPU limited 250 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:18,660 basically the 12 400 and 5600 were 251 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:20,760 evenly matched with the 13 400 and 5700x 252 00:10:18,660 --> 00:10:22,080 also evenly matched delivering around 253 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:23,820 eight percent more performance than 254 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:26,459 those cheaper models 255 00:10:23,820 --> 00:10:28,140 moving along we have Horizon zero Dawn 256 00:10:26,459 --> 00:10:30,120 and this total always seems to heavily 257 00:10:28,140 --> 00:10:32,760 favor AMD processors and we're certainly 258 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:35,880 seeing an example of that here the 5700x 259 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:39,000 was 17 faster than the 13400 when using 260 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:43,019 the RTX 4090 and 9 faster when using the 261 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:46,079 6950 XT interestingly the 5700x was 262 00:10:43,019 --> 00:10:47,880 slower using the 6950 XT while the 13400 263 00:10:46,079 --> 00:10:49,920 delivered its best results with the old 264 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:52,200 rdna2 flagship 265 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:54,839 moving on to the cyberpunk 2077 results 266 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:57,360 we find when a CPU limited the game 267 00:10:54,839 --> 00:10:59,760 plays best with the Radeon GPU evident 268 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:02,820 by the fact that the 6950xt was up to 12 269 00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:06,300 faster than the RTX 4090 seen when using 270 00:11:02,820 --> 00:11:08,760 the ryzen 5 5600 if we look at the 6950 271 00:11:06,300 --> 00:11:11,339 XT results we see the 13 400 is three 272 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:15,480 percent faster than the 12 400 while the 273 00:11:11,339 --> 00:11:16,920 5600 and 5700x both hit a wall at 154 274 00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:18,899 FPS 275 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:22,680 performance overall though was similar 276 00:11:18,899 --> 00:11:24,899 with the 13400 beating the 5700x by a 277 00:11:22,680 --> 00:11:27,060 six percent margin 278 00:11:24,899 --> 00:11:29,220 ACC has been tested using the medium 279 00:11:27,060 --> 00:11:31,380 quality preset and as a result the game 280 00:11:29,220 --> 00:11:34,320 is heavily CPU limited and we're seeing 281 00:11:31,380 --> 00:11:36,360 this even with the 6650 XT still the 282 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:38,640 5700x was around five to ten percent 283 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:39,959 fast in the 5600 which also made it 284 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:42,300 seven to ten percent faster than the 285 00:11:39,959 --> 00:11:43,920 Thirteen four hundred the extra cores 286 00:11:42,300 --> 00:11:46,440 and small frequency Advantage the ryzen 287 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:48,600 7 processor has over the 5600 is clearly 288 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:51,180 helping here while the small frequency 289 00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:54,120 bumped the 13400 enjoys over the 12 400 290 00:11:51,180 --> 00:11:56,160 is virtually worthless in this example 291 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:58,380 the rift breaker results are really 292 00:11:56,160 --> 00:12:00,480 interesting and perhaps in part explains 293 00:11:58,380 --> 00:12:02,700 why the AMD processors typically do 294 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:04,860 poorly in this title for our CPU testing 295 00:12:02,700 --> 00:12:08,100 which normally only features the RTX 296 00:12:04,860 --> 00:12:11,220 4090 we see when using the 6950 XT the 297 00:12:08,100 --> 00:12:13,860 5700x and 13400 both delivered basically 298 00:12:11,220 --> 00:12:16,320 identical performance at around 140 FPS 299 00:12:13,860 --> 00:12:18,839 on average however when switching to the 300 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:22,620 RTX 490 we see some interesting changes 301 00:12:18,839 --> 00:12:24,180 firstly the 5700x is slower dropping six 302 00:12:22,620 --> 00:12:27,180 percent of the performance seen with the 303 00:12:24,180 --> 00:12:28,740 Radeon GPU meanwhile the 3400 actually 304 00:12:27,180 --> 00:12:30,959 gains performance becoming eight percent 305 00:12:28,740 --> 00:12:33,720 faster and that means with the GeForce 306 00:12:30,959 --> 00:12:37,380 GPU the Intel processor is a massive 18 307 00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:41,640 faster so it's possible how do I use say 308 00:12:37,380 --> 00:12:44,279 the 7900 XTX that the 13400 and 5700x 309 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:46,980 would deliver comparable performance 310 00:12:44,279 --> 00:12:48,779 okay last up we have Counter-Strike 311 00:12:46,980 --> 00:12:51,720 Global Offensive and as you can probably 312 00:12:48,779 --> 00:12:53,519 tell this title is very much CPU limited 313 00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:55,440 and that's really the case regardless of 314 00:12:53,519 --> 00:12:58,860 the visual quality settings used here 315 00:12:55,440 --> 00:13:01,560 the 5700x is around 13 to 16 faster than 316 00:12:58,860 --> 00:13:03,480 the 13 400 and interestingly the core i5 317 00:13:01,560 --> 00:13:05,820 processor struggles the most with the 318 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:07,740 RTX 4090 same we're looking at the one 319 00:13:05,820 --> 00:13:09,480 percent lows still if you happen to be 320 00:13:07,740 --> 00:13:10,680 using a Radeon GPU it's going to be very 321 00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:12,600 difficult to tell the difference between 322 00:13:10,680 --> 00:13:14,399 these two CPUs 323 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:17,519 now here's a look at the 12-game average 324 00:13:14,399 --> 00:13:21,000 data and as you can see the 5700x and 325 00:13:17,519 --> 00:13:24,000 13400 are extremely evenly matched using 326 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:25,980 the RTX 490 the 5700x was a mere two 327 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:27,899 percent faster than three percent faster 328 00:13:25,980 --> 00:13:31,980 using the 6950 XT and then back to two 329 00:13:27,899 --> 00:13:33,180 percent faster with the 6650 XT so given 330 00:13:31,980 --> 00:13:34,560 those margins are well within five 331 00:13:33,180 --> 00:13:37,800 percent I think it's fair to say that 332 00:13:34,560 --> 00:13:39,600 overall the 5700x and 13400 delivered 333 00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:41,880 the exact same level of gaming 334 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:44,459 performance it's also well worth noting 335 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:46,260 that for gaming the 13400 was just four 336 00:13:44,459 --> 00:13:48,240 percent faster than the 12 400 which 337 00:13:46,260 --> 00:13:50,160 makes sense given it's only clocked five 338 00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:52,320 percent higher therefore when it comes 339 00:13:50,160 --> 00:13:55,019 to gaming the 13400 really isn't an 340 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:56,880 upgrade over the 12 400 that also means 341 00:13:55,019 --> 00:13:58,920 that for the most part it's not a great 342 00:13:56,880 --> 00:14:01,980 deal faster than the ryzen 5 5600 343 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:04,740 despite costing significantly more so 344 00:14:01,980 --> 00:14:07,680 from a value perspective the 13400 does 345 00:14:04,740 --> 00:14:09,779 appear very weak finally here's the cost 346 00:14:07,680 --> 00:14:11,700 per frame analysis and for this one I'm 347 00:14:09,779 --> 00:14:13,740 just going to compare the CPU cost given 348 00:14:11,700 --> 00:14:15,779 all CPUs use the same memory and 349 00:14:13,740 --> 00:14:18,839 motherboard prices are also very similar 350 00:14:15,779 --> 00:14:21,420 that being the case the ryzen 5 5600 is 351 00:14:18,839 --> 00:14:23,940 by far the best value part here offering 352 00:14:21,420 --> 00:14:26,760 a little over 20 more value than the 12 353 00:14:23,940 --> 00:14:30,300 400 and over 40 percent more than the 13 354 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:32,279 400. meanwhile the 5700x is better value 355 00:14:30,300 --> 00:14:35,040 than the 12 400 and significantly better 356 00:14:32,279 --> 00:14:38,399 value than the 13400 reducing the cost 357 00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:40,139 per frame by 27 of course these margins 358 00:14:38,399 --> 00:14:42,839 are reduced once you factor in the 359 00:14:40,139 --> 00:14:45,779 motherboard and memory but the point is 360 00:14:42,839 --> 00:14:49,019 the 5700x presents as a far better 361 00:14:45,779 --> 00:14:52,800 investment for gamers at 180 than the 362 00:14:49,019 --> 00:14:55,320 13400 does at 240 dollars 363 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:57,660 for productivity the 3400 will fare a 364 00:14:55,320 --> 00:15:00,300 lot better but even there we've seen in 365 00:14:57,660 --> 00:15:02,160 the past that the 5700x and 12 600k do 366 00:15:00,300 --> 00:15:04,680 trade blows depending on the workload 367 00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:06,480 and I'd say best case the 12 600k is 368 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:09,120 faster in an application like cinebench 369 00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:12,180 but again it costs 33 more so it's not 370 00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:15,360 exactly a clear win here either okay so 371 00:15:12,180 --> 00:15:17,040 like the core I3 13 100 the core i5 372 00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:20,220 13400 373 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:22,380 it's pretty much Dead on Arrival at 374 00:15:20,220 --> 00:15:23,820 least at the current asking price if 375 00:15:22,380 --> 00:15:25,740 you're watching this video well into the 376 00:15:23,820 --> 00:15:28,440 future and this CPU is now heavily 377 00:15:25,740 --> 00:15:30,120 discounted then possibly a good buy 378 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:32,399 that's something you'll have to evaluate 379 00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:35,699 but essentially for Intel to be 380 00:15:32,399 --> 00:15:38,820 competitive here today right now these 381 00:15:35,699 --> 00:15:40,920 new locked 13th gen Parts which I say 382 00:15:38,820 --> 00:15:43,380 new because they are essentially just 383 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:45,779 12th gen processors with a new name but 384 00:15:43,380 --> 00:15:48,240 whatever the case they need to launch at 385 00:15:45,779 --> 00:15:50,339 the same price as the 12th gen parts 386 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:51,420 that they are effectively replacing so 387 00:15:50,339 --> 00:15:54,480 in other words 388 00:15:51,420 --> 00:15:57,959 the 13400 should be coming in at the 389 00:15:54,480 --> 00:16:00,420 current asking price of the 12 400. so 390 00:15:57,959 --> 00:16:02,820 in the case of the 13 100 rather than 391 00:16:00,420 --> 00:16:06,060 being priced at 150 U.S it should have 392 00:16:02,820 --> 00:16:09,240 launched 130 us at the most and really 393 00:16:06,060 --> 00:16:12,600 today should be at most a 100 part like 394 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:15,300 the 12 100 F the 13 400 it just suffers 395 00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:17,880 the exact same issue 240 for this 396 00:16:15,300 --> 00:16:21,240 processor makes no sense at all how it 397 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:22,800 costs more than the ryzen 5 7 600 but 398 00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:25,980 worse than that is the fact that the 12 399 00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:28,320 400 can be had for 180 and while it 400 00:16:25,980 --> 00:16:30,240 doesn't have the 4E cores Gamers really 401 00:16:28,320 --> 00:16:32,339 aren't going to care about that also 402 00:16:30,240 --> 00:16:34,320 Heavens forbid a new generation of 403 00:16:32,339 --> 00:16:37,320 product actually offers something extra 404 00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:38,699 at the same price point sadly this no 405 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:40,920 longer seems to be a thing in the PC 406 00:16:38,699 --> 00:16:43,560 space or at the very least it's becoming 407 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:46,199 increasingly rare then of course there's 408 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:49,860 the ryzen 7 5700x which can be had for 409 00:16:46,199 --> 00:16:52,259 as little as 180 us and the am4 platform 410 00:16:49,860 --> 00:16:55,199 has almost endless affordable quality 411 00:16:52,259 --> 00:16:58,259 motherboard options as well as cheap CPU 412 00:16:55,199 --> 00:17:01,500 upgrades you'd really only buy the 3400 413 00:16:58,259 --> 00:17:02,820 over the 5700x or 12 400 because you 414 00:17:01,500 --> 00:17:04,980 were interested in productivity 415 00:17:02,820 --> 00:17:07,799 performance but in that situation the 416 00:17:04,980 --> 00:17:10,079 13500 makes significantly more sense as 417 00:17:07,799 --> 00:17:13,079 it costs just ten dollars more comes 418 00:17:10,079 --> 00:17:15,120 with twice as many equals 20 more L3 419 00:17:13,079 --> 00:17:18,299 cash and clocks four to six percent 420 00:17:15,120 --> 00:17:19,860 higher not only that but the 13 400 will 421 00:17:18,299 --> 00:17:22,799 be around five percent slower than the 422 00:17:19,860 --> 00:17:25,620 12 600k and with the 12 600k now 423 00:17:22,799 --> 00:17:27,900 available for 250 dollars what's exactly 424 00:17:25,620 --> 00:17:30,360 the point of a 3400 it's a locked part 425 00:17:27,900 --> 00:17:33,299 which costs basically the same amount as 426 00:17:30,360 --> 00:17:34,679 the unlocked version but then you can 427 00:17:33,299 --> 00:17:37,080 just spend ten dollars more and get the 428 00:17:34,679 --> 00:17:40,260 3500 which has twice as many equals and 429 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:42,480 more cash as I've said so yeah this one 430 00:17:40,260 --> 00:17:45,120 really is Dead on Arrival it's up 431 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:47,700 pointless rebranding that really just 432 00:17:45,120 --> 00:17:51,419 didn't need to happen so in my opinion 433 00:17:47,700 --> 00:17:53,940 for between 200 and 250 U.S your best 434 00:17:51,419 --> 00:18:00,240 CPU options right now include the ryzen 435 00:17:53,940 --> 00:18:01,980 5 7 600 ryzen 7 5700x or core i5 13500 I 436 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:03,720 can very easily make an argument for 437 00:18:01,980 --> 00:18:05,820 each of these options they're all valid 438 00:18:03,720 --> 00:18:09,000 depending on your preferences but in 439 00:18:05,820 --> 00:18:10,679 short the 5700x is the value King it can 440 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:13,620 take advantage of affordable b550 441 00:18:10,679 --> 00:18:16,140 motherboards and ddr4 memory meanwhile 442 00:18:13,620 --> 00:18:18,299 the 13500 it's a budget productivity 443 00:18:16,140 --> 00:18:21,660 King it can be paired with either ddr4 444 00:18:18,299 --> 00:18:23,820 or ddr5 memory and it's supported by a 445 00:18:21,660 --> 00:18:27,179 range of Intel 600 and 700 series 446 00:18:23,820 --> 00:18:29,580 motherboards then the ryzen 5 7600 it's 447 00:18:27,179 --> 00:18:31,620 the least affordable of the three but it 448 00:18:29,580 --> 00:18:33,480 offers by far the best gaming 449 00:18:31,620 --> 00:18:36,539 performance and is without question 450 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:39,900 backed by a superior platform that will 451 00:18:36,539 --> 00:18:42,419 support future CPU Generations the 13400 452 00:18:39,900 --> 00:18:45,660 though unless it drops to at least 180 453 00:18:42,419 --> 00:18:47,700 us you can just ignore it completely in 454 00:18:45,660 --> 00:18:49,860 favor of one of the three processes just 455 00:18:47,700 --> 00:18:52,140 mentioned and that is going to do it for 456 00:18:49,860 --> 00:18:54,660 this video If you enjoyed it do one of 457 00:18:52,140 --> 00:18:58,020 those subscribe there will be probably 458 00:18:54,660 --> 00:19:00,960 more GPU scaling benchmarks to come and 459 00:18:58,020 --> 00:19:03,120 well many more or GPU and CPU scaling 460 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:05,400 benchmarks I should say but there will 461 00:19:03,120 --> 00:19:06,840 be more GPU content and CPU content 462 00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:08,640 coming in the not too distant future 463 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,539 some exciting stuff coming up on the 464 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:11,700 channel 465 00:19:09,539 --> 00:19:13,679 so yeah just make sure you subscribe 466 00:19:11,700 --> 00:19:16,320 that's all I ask just just hit the 467 00:19:13,679 --> 00:19:18,299 Subscribe button and do that 468 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:19,559 I don't know also we do have float 469 00:19:18,299 --> 00:19:21,780 Planet patreon so you can do those 470 00:19:19,559 --> 00:19:23,160 things if you want to as well uh they do 471 00:19:21,780 --> 00:19:24,780 cost money they're not free like the 472 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:27,240 Subscribe but you get some pretty cool 473 00:19:24,780 --> 00:19:28,620 perks in return monthly live streams 474 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:31,200 with Tim myself we can ask questions 475 00:19:28,620 --> 00:19:33,179 live uh we do well we have a Discord 476 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:35,100 server for members only so that's a cool 477 00:19:33,179 --> 00:19:36,240 place to hang out talk Tech and all that 478 00:19:35,100 --> 00:19:38,520 sort of stuff 479 00:19:36,240 --> 00:19:40,020 behind the scenes content and Q a so 480 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:41,760 some cool stuff there if you're 481 00:19:40,020 --> 00:19:44,039 interested check that out if not 482 00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:46,080 perfectly fine and I would like to thank 483 00:19:44,039 --> 00:19:49,400 you for watching this video I'm yo Steve 484 00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:49,400 see you next time 485 00:19:50,400 --> 00:20:02,000 [Music] 486 00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:02,000 thank you 487 00:20:02,360 --> 00:20:05,410 [Music] 37004

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.