Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
just recently announced its non-x CPUs
including the 7600 seventy seven hundred
and seventy nine hundred in this video
we're reviewing and benchmarking the
7600 non-x we have reviews of the 77 and
79 coming up next and for these what
we're looking at is how is the value
proposition versus the generally too
expensive x-class 7000 series CPUs that
was everyone's main problem with the
7000 series was compared to Intel the
value was getting a little rough for AMD
it was a different scenario than the
last couple of years so now amd's
dropping the prices but the non-x CPUs
although technically they run slower
they are fully unlocked so you can run
them with PBO or overclock them and get
most the way to an x-cpu that's one of
the things we're gonna be looking at
today in the review let's get started
before that this video is brought to you
by the height y60 the height y60 is one
of the most unique cases to launch
anytime recently coming in multiple
color options like this bright red and
it's also built for both water Cooling
and Air cooling the case pays extreme
attention to detail particularly with
cable management paths like you can see
with the quality rubber grommets that
are always passed through and with split
lower and upper chambers learn more at
the link in the description below quick
background to get everyone up to speed
so the 7600 is a 6 core 12 thread part
it's lower TDP at 65 Watts but TDP is
not equal to power we'll talk about that
more later the 7700 non-x is eight cores
12 threads and the 79 is 12 cores 24
threads now all of these are reduced TDP
they all launch tomorrow at the time
this video goes up so that'll be January
10 2023 and here's a quick table showing
the basic spec on paper these are
basically just power limited versions of
the existing 7000 series CPUs all three
are limited to 65 watt TDP and you can't
compare this number to previous
generations so keep that in mind they
changed some of the numbers around other
than that the maximum boost clocks are
100 to 200 megahertz lower than the
x-class CPUs and the base clocks are
considerably lower 900 megahertz lower
in the case of the 7600 versus the 7600x
that will come into play in the
benchmarks they also come with coolers
though the 7900 and 7700 get The Wraith
prism and the 7600 we're reviewing also
gets a wraith cooler but it's the
stealth the stealth is the smallest of
all of amd's stock coolers we're not
entirely sure what happened to the
middle and race Spire but it didn't make
an appearance here now the biggest thing
to keep in mind here is that Andy's
original list prices for the x-class
CPUs were far higher than they have been
recently at what we call the street
price or what it's actually available
for from retailers so originally this
price Gap would have been about 70 bucks
230 for the nonx 300 for the X pretty
big difference very easy to start making
a strong value comparison to the non-x
however at the time we're filming this
the and the prices have been climbing
again but the x is available for around
250 bucks it has gone up a little bit it
was 240 a couple weeks or a month ago
um so the prices are fluctuating and
we'll have to come to conclusions at the
end we'll give you a couple options
based on what we think the prices will
most likely level out at but they've
been cheaper lately which does make it a
little weird for AMD with the non-x CPUs
and we think based on what we've heard
from talking to people within the
industry that the non-x CPUs will likely
also drop depending on what Intel pushes
at the low end over the next couple
months so prices are going to move
around a lot which is great that means
there's good competition motherboard is
still far too expensive in general for
am5 but that's a different different
topic okay we're gonna get into the
gaming benchmarks first then we'll go
through Power efficiency power testing
we'll also be talking about production
capabilities and we'll come to a value
judgment at the end we'll start off our
gaming Suite of bench parks with Far Cry
6 at 1080p where we have good scaling
throughout the stack with the 3090 TI
and we have some 40 90 tests coming up
in the 7700 review as well if you want
to see those the ryzen 5 7600 placed at
155 FPS average on the chart only 3 FPS
average behind the original 7600x and
without meaningful change in the one
percent loads this means that the X and
non-x are functionally tied here and you
won't notice any difference in the
experience next we applied PBR Precision
boost overdrive and the results were
basically indistinguishable from stock
since the change versus the 7600x is so
small the non-x still has a healthy lead
over the previous generation 5600x that
said the 5800 x3d with its larger cache
is still firmly the leading AMD CPU for
Far Cry with 181 FPS average the 12600k
is tied exactly with the 7600 and can be
bought for about the same money for the
KF version one potential Advan advantage
to the 12 600k is a lower overall
platform cost when using ddr4 as we move
through the other charts we'll see if
the performance of these two parts
diverges up from that is the 13600k
which holds a comfortable 19 lead over
the 7600 But really is in the next price
class up at about 320 dollars next is CS
go at 1080p the 7600 Falls right in
behind the 7600x at 387 FPS average
firmly within variants of each other
there's no performance difference
between them along with the 7600 PBO
results as well that's two games so far
with the non-x holds up just like the X
and here's why that is so even though
the TDP is constrained in the non-x
parts in gaming it is extremely uncommon
for the CPU to pull all of the power
that it would in an all-core production
workload like say blender or compiling
code so when you're playing games the
load tends to bounce between the CPU and
the GPU and other component Islands in a
way where it's not typically going to
run up against TDP or the PPT limits
that are configured for the CPU and
that's why a 7600x with a more unlocked
configuration compared to a 7600 with a
locked config basically look the same
it's because they're not bouncing off of
the power limit anyway so back to the
Chart the 7600 outperforms the similarly
priced 12 600k by 27 percent and even
the more expensive 13 600k by six
percent Zen 4 is showing up strong for
CS go making the 7600 look like a good
choice at 230 dollars this game is also
an example of a situation where the
58x3d's cache doesn't provide much
benefit at least as compared to Far Cry
giving a lead of 13 to the 7600 if
you've been hanging on to an early rise
in CPU like a 2600 and aren't compelled
to do an in socket upgrade this might be
your moment the 7600 more than doubles
the average frame rate for that CPU and
a rains way better frame time
consistency along with it moving to
Final Fantasy 14 and the end Walker
Benchmark we see all the ryzen 7000 CPUs
are tightly packed relative to the 7600
Final Fantasy seems to utilize CPUs and
the zenfor architecture similarly with
Intel 13th gen CPUs performing higher
and older ryzen CPU is performing worse
as compared to the previous generations
the 5800x3d is functionally tied with
the 7600 as well the extra cash makes up
for the missing core performance we can
see the other side of that when looking
at the 5600x which is outperformed by
the 7600 by 19 as for Intel comparisons
the 12600k is also tied with the 7600
But the 13600k comes out ahead by 17
percent for 90 dollars more in Rainbow
Six Siege at 1080p the 7600 falls into a
range of very similarly performing CPUs
just over 600 FPS average we know it's
not purely a GPU limitation due to the
fact that the 13700k and 3900k are out
ahead so we can chalk this up to other
behaviors like game engine or driver
overhead so in light of that the 7600
performs identically to itself under PBO
the 7600x is the same 13600k is about
the same and more the 5600x is
predictably slower as is the 12 600k
which allows an 11 lead to the 7600.
there's not much else to say here so
we'll move on now this next one is a GPU
bound scenario so this is total war
Warhammer 3. it's at 1080P and
technically speaking it's useless as a
CPU review comparison but it's useful
for illustrating what happens when your
GPU bound which is a big surprise
they're all the same so the only reason
we include this chart is to help people
who are partic in particular who are new
to the space new to building PCS
understand that in CP reviews and GPU
reviews you intentionally construct a
scenario to show a difference with the
part you're reviewing but in reality
sometimes it's bound by something else
so anyway let's get to the chart art so
in total Warhammer 3 It suffers from
poor scaling due to being generally held
back by the graphics load and the memory
load it's a good demonstration for what
a limitation looks like but it's not
useful for a CPU review the only thing
you really see scaling from is something
like a 2600. our final game Benchmark is
shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p the
7600 ran at 253 FPS average and again
tied with the 7600x so for all our game
tests there's not really a reason to
spend more on the X versus the non-x the
7600 is also the better pick over the
12600k as it outperformed the last ni5
by 14 this is also one of the rarer
situations where the 13600k shows no
benefit over the 7600 and as always this
is why it's important to test different
apis different games because not always
the case that say Intel's direct
competitors better or amds is better
they'll trade depending on what the
scenario is now as stated we have some
40 90 tests as well but we're going to
debut those with the 7700 and 7900
because we've started to need the higher
end GPU capability so we'll be looking
at that soon so for TDP AMD tried to
make some kind of Claim about gaming at
ultra low power consumption and one of
its presentation slides for the 7600 it
compared to the 7600 at 65 watts versus
the 13600k at 125 watts and AMD claimed
the following quote the ryzen 5 7 600
runs at a low air cool friendly 65 watt
TDP while the core i5 13600k consumes a
much higher 125 watt TDP first of all
CPUs don't consume TDP
AMD they consume electricity power uh
this quote is phenomenally stupid in a
lot of ways AMD has been playing screwy
games with TDP for a very long time we
published a deep dive on it years ago
they haven't changed and these
formulation for TDP is such that you
cannot even compare the 5000 series to
the 7000 series so this is silly it's
not possible nor is it I mean it's it's
just strictly disingenuous to compare
CPU power consumption cross brand by
using TDP which for AMD is not derived
from power watts does not appear in the
TDP formula except at the end of it when
they just slap a w on to the number that
calculates out from TK's T ambient which
is temperature for both of those and for
the thermal resistance of the cooler
strapped to the CPU so AMD let's just
stop with the slimy bullsh Petty
marketing and use real numbers 88 Watts
for yours and then we'll show enthals in
our power testing those are the numbers
you can use
come on let's not do the Radeon group
thing and start playing thumb games when
you don't have to you can't see but you
can feel it to prove the point about
Watts not equal in Watts we'll start the
tests off with all core power
consumption this is measured at the 12
volt cables to isolate down to just the
cpu's power draw not the full system the
ryzen 5 7600 at stock pulled an average
of 88 Watts the particularly astute to
Manu May notice that 88 is higher than
65. AMD has another number called PPT or
package of power tracking this acts as a
limit for how much actual power in
actual watts the CPU consumes the pvt
for the 7600 is 88 Watts so the limit
works as intended here if we could just
get AMD marketing to report the PBT
instead of or alongside TDP that'd be
great but back to the Chart the 88 watt
number is less than the original 7600x
which measured at 116 Watts that's the
32 percent higher than the non-x new
part kind of impressive considering
they're basically the same part with
different Power limits even when we
applied PBO to the 7600 it still used
less power than the X and despite lower
non-x power draw the previous generation
5600x is lower still pulling only 67
Watts overall the 7600 is relatively
well behaved out of the box and won't
put a preachable strain on any halfway
decent vrm or cooler when compared to
Intel's 12th and 13th gen i5s the 12600k
uses 35 more power than the 7600 and the
13600k at 161 Watts uses nearly double
the power the 13600k is going to be
faster in basically any scenario but it
does so at the cost of power consumption
our next test measures CPU efficiency by
doing a simple calculation between the
energy consumed versus the amount of
work completed and time is a variable
here so we allow them to run until they
finish the workload and then we look at
how much power did it consume during
that work how long did it take to
complete the work what is the result in
efficiency in Watt hours so if you use
eco mode the efficiency has been there
but if you don't use eco mode with the
excuse It's very inefficient by
comparison these are basically eco mode
xq CPUs without the X so let's take a
look at the numbers the 7600 calculated
to 24.4 Watt hours making it 20 percent
more efficient than the original 7600x
and place it at just above the 5600x
this along with the 7950x's Eco Mode
results really shows how much being
efficient comes down to just the tuning
of the part losing efficiency could be
okay if you make up for it with raw
performance in this case that'd be the
time to complete the render so let's get
into that next our first production
Benchmark is blender where we measure
the completion time of a custom GM logo
render designed to provide good scaling
across various textures since we're
measuring time in this charge lower is
better the ryzen 5 7600 completed the
render in 16.7 minutes establishing
itself in the middle of our charge and
just ahead of the 5800x3d the extra cash
doesn't help here the 7600x is five
percent faster than the new 7600 non-x
showing the relatively minor uplifts
afforded by the extra power budget with
PBO applied to the 7600 the gap between
it and the 7600x Narrows to a
functionally meaningless level there's
still a technical advantage to the 7600x
but it's not enough for anyone to
actually notice the new 7600 is better
value than the original X whether or not
you apply PBO and looking generationally
the 7600 is at 26 faster than the 5600x
which launched at a price of three
hundred dollars motherboard costs remain
high but at least it's moving in the
right direction down for price that is
Intel's previous generation I5 12 600 K
finished the render 14 faster than the
7600 the 12600k is selling for about 250
right now making it a better deal for
this kind of workload the newer 13600k
which won our best overall CPU of 2022
tested at 36 percent faster than the
7600. it's a major uplift but the 90
difference between the 76 and the 136k
renders the comparison a little less
impactful if your budget is strict next
up is our code compile Benchmark where
we measure the time it takes to fully
compile chromium from a source lower is
again better overall the lineup is
mostly the same as in blender as it's
also a highly threaded task that said a
few Intel CPUs have traded places with
their nearest AMD neighbors the R5 7600
completed the task in 86.8 minutes tying
with the eight core 5800x six Zen four
cores can generally do the job of eight
Zen three cores in most but not all
situations and that remains true here
apply and PBO doesn't get as much out of
the 7600 as it did in blender it's
barely moving the needle the 7600x is
about five percent ahead of the non-x
here as well scaling versus the unlocked
i-5s is nearly identical the 12 600k
completed 14 faster than the 7600 and
the 136k was 37 faster you're making
Intel a better value at this price class
file compression is next we test using
7-Zip and the scores are in millions of
instructions per second or mips and the
higher is better the R5 7600 is
functionally tied with several other
CPUs including the 58x3d and the 12 6K
PBO doesn't change anything the 7600x
scrapes out a three percent lead over
the non-x for a tactical lead but not
one that matters the 12700 KF and the
7700x are faster but if you're stepping
up your budget into the low 300s you
might as well go for the 13600k as it
boasts a large 40 lead over the 7600.
decompression has better scaling between
CPUs and the stack the R5 7600 lands
predictably between in the 3700x and the
7600x on our chart and the 7600 holds a
16 lead over the 5600x showing decent
generational Improvement the non-x R5
also manages to beat the 12 600k for the
first time in our suite posting a six
percent advantage over the I5 due to
Zen's inherent gains in decompression
one interesting observation is that
compared to the compression test the
last gen 5800x with its eight cores
LeapFrogs the 7600 by 17 percent here
the 5800x can be had for around 240
bucks an hour and so on the less
expensive but dead on platform it's
worth considering still the 13600k as a
last Point runs 29 better than the 7600
But it's also a higher price tier our
last set of tests is in the Adobe suite
starting with Premiere the score is an
aggregate built from a standardized set
of filters transforms live playback and
scrubbing and more the 7600 lands near
the middle of our charge just be behind
the 5800x applying PBO gives it a tiny
bump but not one equal to a 7600x which
performed seven percent higher than the
non-x this gives the new R5 a better
value proposition bearing in mind the
pricing caveats mentioned earlier
despite the stronger overall value we
can't recommend the 7600 for Premiere as
a primary work function it's not as bad
as an entry point to am5 but you'd be
better served by Intel's I5 options the
12600k posts a 9 lead over the 7600 and
the 13600k is closer to a 20 lead as
Premier users ourselves we just think
it's worth going for the 136k instead
our final production test is Photoshop
which benefits from a mix of thread
count and single thread performance the
7600 performs respectively here beating
the 12 600k by seven percent the 7600x
shows a token two percent gain over the
7600 and PBO again it gets you barely
anything over stock you need to step up
to a 7700x or 13 about her k for
meaningfully better performance though
you'd have to spend well over 100 bucks
more to get either one we'd recommend
waiting to see our other ryzen 7000
non-x reviews first before making a
final decision and those will be up
within the next 12 to 24 hours or so the
R5 7600 is a meaningful entry point to
the am5 platform that doesn't give up a
whole lot versus the X alternative
except you do still have to put it into
an am5 motherboard which the prices on
those haven't really changed too much
they're supposed to come down and the
made a note of it in its CES keynote as
of right now when we're filming they're
not down maybe by the time the video
comes up they will be but the
motherboards need to move in price to
really make this valuable anyway the
retail price landscape is different from
what AMD is putting on paper and that's
where it gets a little different so we
prepared this chart to help illustrate
some of the differences if by the time
this review goes live the 7600x is back
to its original launch price of 300 that
makes the 7600 look really good you're
getting within about five percent of the
performance for seventy dollars less
it's even tighter in games however if
the 7600x is still available at around
240 bucks like it was for several weeks
at the end of 22 then it Paints the
non-x as hard to distinguish and lacking
purpose a 10 Gap isn't much to talk
about and we'd probably just pay that
for the marginal uplift out of the box
or even potentially better resale value
down the road that's something to
consider too if you tend to sell your
stuff when you're done with it having
the X at the end who knows obviously but
it might help a little bit with
negotiating for getting that extra 10
bucks back later when you go yeah but
it's the X version that's better and
then they go I don't know what any of
that means here's money gaming computer
man now in the next tier up once we
start considering Intel things get a
little more interesting for Andy so the
13600k maintains significant value at
this point it is more expensive but it's
better in several situations if you can
buy up and afford it keep in mind the
motherboards maybe you have some better
options there too to help level out the
price a little bit the 7700x on the AMD
side though is 350 to 400 we think it's
too expensive to be relevant in most
workloads uh it's probably the roughest
one that AMD has right now compared to
its own other parts and the Intel's
Parts but we'll talk about that more on
the 7700 review for a quick recap of
some of the numbers from earlier in the
video in blender we saw the 7600 was 26
faster than the 5600x the 7600 with PBO
was four percent faster on average than
the 7600 still in blender 7600x was five
percent faster 12 600k was 14 faster
which is still a good consideration and
the 136k was 36 percent faster big
difference in things like chromium code
compile we saw the 7600 was 25 faster
than the 56x and the rest of the results
were basically the same as in blender
with PBO we were down to only a two
percent Advantage though with the 7600
to the PBO version then in things like
Adobe Premiere we once again saw PBO
doing almost nothing and the 7600x was
seven percent better than the non-x as
for gaming the differences are even less
so here's a look at some of those charts
we saw earlier in general the 7600 it's
really similar to the 7600x there is not
much appreciable difference in most
instances PBO doesn't help as much as it
probably will on the 7900 we'll look at
that in the next couple reviews but
overall basically what it comes down to
is if there is a significant price cut
like more than twenty dollars the 7600
non-x starts to make a lot of sense if
it's like the same or 10 bucks maybe
just get the X and maybe it's slightly
better silicon quality if you're
interested in overclocking no guarantee
but any more than that it starts to make
sense just buy the non-x and then PBO or
overclock it if you really want the last
like percentage point or two so there
are some advantages in certain
situations to having a lower power CPU
out of the box most of them are its
lower power out of the box you plug it
in and you go and then if you're more
enthusiasting client you can tune it if
you want to you could also put the 7600x
into eco mode and basically got the same
power efficiency that you're seeing on
this CPU a lot of people like to say but
what about the cooler and the answer is
it's just not that good it's fine for 65
watt TDP 88 Watts actual out of the box
it'll work okay especially if your case
has actual airflow in it and it's got a
perforated front panel or better yet
holes in the top because it'll pull air
from the top if it's not exhaust then
the that cooler is fine but if you're
doing anything more with your system
like you're overclocking at PBO uh you
have more constrained case than a 20
cooler is a far better way to go but it
adds the cost of the product obviously
it's still cheaper than the xq because
you have to buy cooler for that one
anyway so that's it for this review this
is one of those where it's like uh yeah
it's it's better value we think and for
most enthusiasts we think you should
probably just save the money buy the
non-x if you really care then tune it
overclock it do PBO whatever and go for
those last few percentage points but at
least you save the money as long as
you're willing to put in maybe an hour
or so of tuning if you've done it before
probably a couple hours if you've never
done it before so that's it for this one
thanks for watching as always subscribe
for more go to
store.gamersaccess.net to grab one of
our limited disappointment build 2022
t-shirts it's got the list of the worst
products from the year on the back of
the shirt and the front has some
artifact and gpus we have them in cotton
and in Tri blend if you like a lighter
weight or sportier feel to your shirts
so that's it for this one thanks for
watching subscribe more we'll see you
all next time
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.