All language subtitles for AMD B650 Roundup_ 35 Motherboards Tested, Complete Buying Guide-en

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:06,200 foreign 1 00:00:02,470 --> 00:00:09,660 [Music] 2 00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:11,940 boxed today is the day the day when I 3 00:00:09,660 --> 00:00:15,540 can finally give you my results of all 4 00:00:11,940 --> 00:00:17,100 my AMD b650 motherboard testing and boy 5 00:00:15,540 --> 00:00:20,119 oh boy was this one a massive 6 00:00:17,100 --> 00:00:22,500 undertaking in total I have tested 35 7 00:00:20,119 --> 00:00:24,119 motherboards in what has been months and 8 00:00:22,500 --> 00:00:26,279 months of work 9 00:00:24,119 --> 00:00:27,300 but it's finally all done and before we 10 00:00:26,279 --> 00:00:29,039 get into it 11 00:00:27,300 --> 00:00:31,199 today's sponsor spot is brought to you 12 00:00:29,039 --> 00:00:33,960 by thermal Grizzly and their new 12th 13 00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:35,700 gen CPU contact frame by De Bauer it's 14 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:39,000 well known that the integrated loading 15 00:00:35,700 --> 00:00:41,700 mechanism or ilm of the LJ 1700 sockets 16 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:43,559 Ben's 12th gen CPUs leading to an uneven 17 00:00:41,700 --> 00:00:45,719 contact surface that reduces cooling 18 00:00:43,559 --> 00:00:48,180 performance solving this issue the 19 00:00:45,719 --> 00:00:50,160 contact frame replaces the ilm allowing 20 00:00:48,180 --> 00:00:52,559 for a much more even contact with the 21 00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:54,239 cpu's IHS and the base of your cooler 22 00:00:52,559 --> 00:00:56,219 which in turn reduces operating 23 00:00:54,239 --> 00:00:58,140 temperatures installations quick and 24 00:00:56,219 --> 00:00:59,760 easy and thanks to the use of anodized 25 00:00:58,140 --> 00:01:01,920 aluminum the contact frame is 26 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:03,660 non-conductive and then for those of you 27 00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:05,640 who wish to further maximize contact 28 00:01:03,660 --> 00:01:07,140 thermal Grizzly now offers an optional 29 00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:08,700 lapping tool so for more information 30 00:01:07,140 --> 00:01:09,840 please check the link in the video 31 00:01:08,700 --> 00:01:12,960 description 32 00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:14,880 okay so since there are 35 boards in 33 00:01:12,960 --> 00:01:16,799 total I'm not going to show you every 34 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:19,260 single board individually as I normally 35 00:01:16,799 --> 00:01:21,600 would at least not in as much detail as 36 00:01:19,260 --> 00:01:23,340 that alone would take about an hour so 37 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:25,200 instead we'll briefly do a specs 38 00:01:23,340 --> 00:01:26,939 comparison we'll talk about some of the 39 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:29,580 standard options and then we'll dive 40 00:01:26,939 --> 00:01:31,320 into the varum thermal results and I'll 41 00:01:29,580 --> 00:01:33,000 go through the boards in order of price 42 00:01:31,320 --> 00:01:35,159 starting with the cheapest and then 43 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,840 working our way up I also did a lot of 44 00:01:35,159 --> 00:01:39,000 benchmarking for this video stuff like 45 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:40,920 boot times performance all that kind of 46 00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,479 stuff but I've decided not to include 47 00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:44,939 those results because some of them are 48 00:01:42,479 --> 00:01:47,640 now outdated with the new wave of BIOS 49 00:01:44,939 --> 00:01:50,460 updates and honestly I just didn't have 50 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:53,100 it in me to go back and retest most of 51 00:01:50,460 --> 00:01:55,860 the boards almost all 35 of them but the 52 00:01:53,100 --> 00:01:58,320 vrm thermal data is still accurate with 53 00:01:55,860 --> 00:02:00,479 the latest biases so I'm happy to show 54 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:02,579 that data not keen on showing what's 55 00:02:00,479 --> 00:02:04,259 possibly outdated data and this 56 00:02:02,579 --> 00:02:06,240 content's really been delayed long 57 00:02:04,259 --> 00:02:07,740 enough so yeah as I said don't really 58 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:09,360 have it in myself to go back and test 59 00:02:07,740 --> 00:02:11,459 all of the boards again for stuff like 60 00:02:09,360 --> 00:02:13,200 boot time which may or may not be 61 00:02:11,459 --> 00:02:15,060 relevant to you so we're just going to 62 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:17,160 stick with the vrm thermal data the 63 00:02:15,060 --> 00:02:19,379 specs comparisons and then the boards 64 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:20,760 that I recommend you purchase but if 65 00:02:19,379 --> 00:02:22,440 you're wondering why there isn't more 66 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:24,540 Benchmark data like what I've included 67 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:25,980 in a few of the previous videos that's 68 00:02:24,540 --> 00:02:27,720 the reason 69 00:02:25,980 --> 00:02:29,700 also on that note some of the more 70 00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:31,800 affordable models here from each brand 71 00:02:29,700 --> 00:02:33,120 have already been covered in a dedicated 72 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:35,400 video which featured a lot more 73 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:38,520 benchmarking so given all of that I'll 74 00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:41,000 briefly touch on those boards and the 75 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:43,680 most affordable of which is the gigabyte 76 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:46,920 b650mk and although this board only 77 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,959 costs 120 U.S it's not a particularly 78 00:02:46,920 --> 00:02:50,700 great board in my opinion as it uses 79 00:02:48,959 --> 00:02:53,280 discrete mosfets rather than power 80 00:02:50,700 --> 00:02:55,379 stages and as a result The vrm Thermals 81 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:58,500 using a high-end processor they're not 82 00:02:55,379 --> 00:03:02,519 great it also only has two pcie slots 83 00:02:58,500 --> 00:03:05,819 and no PCI 5.0 support not even for the 84 00:03:02,519 --> 00:03:08,819 primary m.2 it's also very light on USB 85 00:03:05,819 --> 00:03:11,099 ports so despite the low price tag this 86 00:03:08,819 --> 00:03:16,260 is a board I'd avoid and instead set 87 00:03:11,099 --> 00:03:19,019 your sights on the ASRock b650m hdv m.2 88 00:03:16,260 --> 00:03:20,760 the ASRock board costs just five dollars 89 00:03:19,019 --> 00:03:22,980 more right now but it packs a 90 00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:25,379 significantly better vrm using eight 50 91 00:03:22,980 --> 00:03:28,620 amp power stages for the vcore along 92 00:03:25,379 --> 00:03:32,400 with 3p PCI expansion slots and a pcie 93 00:03:28,620 --> 00:03:35,220 5.0 m.2 you also get three more USB 94 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:37,440 ports it does only have a dual dim 95 00:03:35,220 --> 00:03:39,900 configuration so just two memory slots 96 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:41,819 but for most of you I think that's going 97 00:03:39,900 --> 00:03:44,819 to be fine as you'll likely purchase 32 98 00:03:41,819 --> 00:03:46,980 gigabytes of ddr5 memory now and that 99 00:03:44,819 --> 00:03:49,680 really should be ample for quite a few 100 00:03:46,980 --> 00:03:53,580 years to come when it comes to gaming 101 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:55,319 there's also the gigabyte b650m ds3h and 102 00:03:53,580 --> 00:03:58,260 that's a board that should be on your 103 00:03:55,319 --> 00:04:00,360 radar it does have a solid vrm and 104 00:03:58,260 --> 00:04:04,319 decent expansion options though it does 105 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:06,599 lack pcie 5.0 support but at 150 it's 106 00:04:04,319 --> 00:04:09,180 well stocked and does include four dim 107 00:04:06,599 --> 00:04:12,140 slots for memory expansion 108 00:04:09,180 --> 00:04:14,939 moving on we find the MSI Pro 109 00:04:12,140 --> 00:04:17,160 b650m-a Wi-Fi and this is the most 110 00:04:14,939 --> 00:04:20,340 affordable b650 motherboard to include 111 00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:23,160 Wi-Fi support along with 11 USB 3.2 112 00:04:20,340 --> 00:04:25,080 ports you also get three pcie slots and 113 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:28,800 two m.2 slots though none of them are 114 00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:31,740 PCA 5.0 compatible the 855 amp power 115 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:34,080 stage v-core vrm does work well so at 116 00:04:31,740 --> 00:04:36,660 160 dollars US this is a pretty solid 117 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:39,860 option then we have the Asus Prime 118 00:04:36,660 --> 00:04:44,940 series which includes the prime 119 00:04:39,860 --> 00:04:49,919 b650m-a Wi-Fi Prime b650 Dash plus and 120 00:04:44,940 --> 00:04:53,040 prime b650m a Wi-Fi 2. all of which I am 121 00:04:49,919 --> 00:04:57,419 sad to say suck and should be avoided 122 00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:59,820 like the ultra cheap gigabyte b650mk the 123 00:04:57,419 --> 00:05:02,759 Asus Prime boards all use discrete 124 00:04:59,820 --> 00:05:05,900 mosfets which result in poor vrm 125 00:05:02,759 --> 00:05:08,639 thermals the b650 dash plus and 126 00:05:05,900 --> 00:05:11,780 b650m-a Wi-Fi both run at over 100 127 00:05:08,639 --> 00:05:14,460 degrees and our testing while the 128 00:05:11,780 --> 00:05:18,240 b650m-a Wi-Fi it's a bit less garbage 129 00:05:14,460 --> 00:05:20,460 but at 190 dollars it is a week offering 130 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:24,180 a much better option at this price point 131 00:05:20,460 --> 00:05:27,419 is either the ASRock b650 PG lightning 132 00:05:24,180 --> 00:05:30,600 or the PG Riptide Wi-Fi both of which 133 00:05:27,419 --> 00:05:32,940 cost 190 dollars the lightning is an ATX 134 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:36,120 board and it packs 14 60 amp power 135 00:05:32,940 --> 00:05:40,500 stages for the v-core vrm four pcie 136 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:44,220 expansion slots a PCI 5.0 m.2 and an 137 00:05:40,500 --> 00:05:46,500 additional two pcie 4.0 m.2s there's 138 00:05:44,220 --> 00:05:50,460 also a boatload of USBS on offer here 139 00:05:46,500 --> 00:05:53,699 with support for up to 11 USB 3.2 ports 140 00:05:50,460 --> 00:05:55,740 and eight USB 2.0 ports 141 00:05:53,699 --> 00:05:58,560 the riptide on the other hand it is a 142 00:05:55,740 --> 00:06:01,080 Micro ATX board it uses a dozen 50 amp 143 00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:03,300 power stages of the vcore vrm and it 144 00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:05,280 still manages to squeeze in four pcie 145 00:06:03,300 --> 00:06:06,780 slots though unless you have a single 146 00:06:05,280 --> 00:06:08,759 slot graphics card you're not going to 147 00:06:06,780 --> 00:06:11,400 be able to use all of them there's also 148 00:06:08,759 --> 00:06:15,240 just two m.2 slots but the primary slot 149 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:19,139 is pcie 5.0 compatible you also get nine 150 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:21,360 USB 3.2 ports and eight USB 2.0 ports 151 00:06:19,139 --> 00:06:23,819 along with two and a half gigabit Lan 152 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:26,580 and Wi-Fi 6E though I should note that 153 00:06:23,819 --> 00:06:30,900 all of the boards every single one of 154 00:06:26,580 --> 00:06:32,699 the b650 b650e boards does include 2.5 155 00:06:30,900 --> 00:06:35,100 gigabit lens so that's a standard 156 00:06:32,699 --> 00:06:36,600 feature across all of the boards now 157 00:06:35,100 --> 00:06:40,080 another viable option at this price 158 00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:43,199 point is the gigabyte b650m aurus Elite 159 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:45,900 ax which includes a dozen 60 amp power 160 00:06:43,199 --> 00:06:48,960 stages for the v-core vrm though just 161 00:06:45,900 --> 00:06:52,319 two PCI expansion slots it does include 162 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:56,880 a PCI 5.0 enabled m.2 along with an 163 00:06:52,319 --> 00:07:01,800 additional PCA 4.0 m.2 11 USB 3.2 ports 164 00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:04,259 eight USB 2.0 ports and then Wi-Fi 6E 165 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:08,160 then also found at the 190 us price 166 00:07:04,259 --> 00:07:11,819 point is the MSI Pro b650 Dash p Wi-Fi 167 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:13,860 with a dozen 75 amp power stages and 168 00:07:11,819 --> 00:07:16,620 this is another great option that said 169 00:07:13,860 --> 00:07:19,199 it does lack pcie 5.0 support but you 170 00:07:16,620 --> 00:07:22,560 are getting four PCI 4.0 expansion slots 171 00:07:19,199 --> 00:07:25,080 and a pair of m.2s it's also the most 172 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:26,759 affordable b650 motherboard to offer six 173 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:29,759 SATA ports 174 00:07:26,759 --> 00:07:34,099 then price between 200 and 210 dollars 175 00:07:29,759 --> 00:07:38,819 we have the gigabyte b650m gaming X ax 176 00:07:34,099 --> 00:07:41,220 b650m auris Pro ax and MSI mag b650m 177 00:07:38,819 --> 00:07:44,759 model Wi-Fi all of which are pretty 178 00:07:41,220 --> 00:07:46,680 solid options the gigabyte b650m auris 179 00:07:44,759 --> 00:07:49,680 Pro ax would be my pick of this Bunch 180 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:51,900 it's 12 70 amp power stages and more 181 00:07:49,680 --> 00:07:55,259 than sufficient and it's the only one of 182 00:07:51,900 --> 00:07:58,800 the three to offer pcie 5.0 m.2 support 183 00:07:55,259 --> 00:08:02,099 and you also get 11 USB 3.2 ports and 8 184 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:05,520 USB 2.0 ports and for ten dollars less 185 00:08:02,099 --> 00:08:08,340 the b650m gaming X ax it just isn't 186 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:11,400 worth it as it lacks pcie 5.0 support 187 00:08:08,340 --> 00:08:15,120 and it packs a significantly weaker vrm 188 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:18,599 meanwhile the MSI mag b650m water Wi-Fi 189 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:21,780 it's decent but again it lacks pcie 5.0 190 00:08:18,599 --> 00:08:22,800 m.2 support and there's less USB ports 191 00:08:21,780 --> 00:08:26,460 overall 192 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:29,520 then we have the ASRock b650 Pro RS at 193 00:08:26,460 --> 00:08:32,399 215 which finds itself in a competitive 194 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:35,039 pricing bracket it's an ATX board but 195 00:08:32,399 --> 00:08:39,180 for just five dollars more the gigabyte 196 00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:42,659 b650 Aura sleet ax b650 gaming X ax and 197 00:08:39,180 --> 00:08:46,920 MSI mag b650 tomark Wi-Fi all become 198 00:08:42,659 --> 00:08:49,200 available that said the b650 gaming X ax 199 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:51,240 doesn't really make sense because for 200 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:54,180 the same price the aorus elite ax it's 201 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:57,480 just a much better product packing 14 70 202 00:08:54,180 --> 00:09:03,240 amp power stages for the v-core vrm pcie 203 00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:06,180 5.0 m.2 support and 11 USB 3.2 ports 204 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:09,300 so in my opinion the MSI mag b650 205 00:09:06,180 --> 00:09:12,360 Tomahawk Wi-Fi and gigabyte b650rs Elite 206 00:09:09,300 --> 00:09:16,500 ax are both better than the ASRock b650 207 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:19,260 Pro RS with many more USB 3.2 ports and 208 00:09:16,500 --> 00:09:20,940 Wi-Fi 6E support and personally I'm 209 00:09:19,260 --> 00:09:24,540 again leaning more towards the gigabyte 210 00:09:20,940 --> 00:09:26,279 board for its pcie 5.0 m.2 support but 211 00:09:24,540 --> 00:09:28,860 really I'd be happy with either option 212 00:09:26,279 --> 00:09:31,740 here as they are both very good 213 00:09:28,860 --> 00:09:35,820 there's also the Asus tough gaming b650m 214 00:09:31,740 --> 00:09:38,100 plus Wi-Fi it's a Micro ATX board with a 215 00:09:35,820 --> 00:09:40,800 dozen 60 amp power stages for the vcore 216 00:09:38,100 --> 00:09:42,600 vrm it's a decent board on paper but 217 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:46,380 doesn't really offer anything over the 218 00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:49,500 b650m RS Pro ax and there are a lot less 219 00:09:46,380 --> 00:09:53,040 USB 3.2 ports on offer here 220 00:09:49,500 --> 00:09:57,300 moving on to the 230 us price bracket we 221 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:59,459 find the ASRock b650 live mixer which is 222 00:09:57,300 --> 00:10:01,620 a bit of an oddity to say the least but 223 00:09:59,459 --> 00:10:03,899 it is a very unique board and therefore 224 00:10:01,620 --> 00:10:05,580 I suppose it's kind of cool basically 225 00:10:03,899 --> 00:10:07,440 you'd buy this board over anything else 226 00:10:05,580 --> 00:10:09,360 here simply because you like the look of 227 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:11,580 it in terms of features it's nothing 228 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:13,019 special it's price point and there are 229 00:10:11,580 --> 00:10:15,660 certainly better options in my opinion 230 00:10:13,019 --> 00:10:18,120 but they're not significantly better and 231 00:10:15,660 --> 00:10:21,779 while the live mixer does lack Wi-Fi 6 232 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:24,240 support you do get an insane 21 USB 233 00:10:21,779 --> 00:10:26,880 ports or at least support for up to 21 234 00:10:24,240 --> 00:10:29,220 ports though just nine of them are of 235 00:10:26,880 --> 00:10:31,320 the 3.2 standard 236 00:10:29,220 --> 00:10:33,860 but if the in-your-face design of the 237 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:37,200 live mixer just isn't for you the ASRock 238 00:10:33,860 --> 00:10:39,060 b650e PG Riptide Wi-Fi for just ten 239 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:42,180 dollars more is a better option anyway 240 00:10:39,060 --> 00:10:44,640 you get the same 14 60 amp power stages 241 00:10:42,180 --> 00:10:47,519 for your vehicle vrm but the riptide 242 00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:50,820 also includes pcie 5.0 support for the 243 00:10:47,519 --> 00:10:53,940 primary pcie slot as well as the primary 244 00:10:50,820 --> 00:10:56,160 m.2 and it's the most affordable b650 245 00:10:53,940 --> 00:10:58,560 board to offer this configuration you 246 00:10:56,160 --> 00:11:01,140 also get Wi-Fi 6E support though the 247 00:10:58,560 --> 00:11:02,940 number of USB 3.2 ports is reduced to 248 00:11:01,140 --> 00:11:07,260 just seven so I think it's fair to say 249 00:11:02,940 --> 00:11:09,420 at 240 asrock's b650e PG Riptide Wi-Fi 250 00:11:07,260 --> 00:11:14,160 makes life difficult for the Asus tough 251 00:11:09,420 --> 00:11:16,980 gaming b650-plus Wi-Fi and MSI PG b650 252 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:19,019 Edge Wi-Fi both of which cost 240 253 00:11:16,980 --> 00:11:21,300 dollars the tough gaming in particular 254 00:11:19,019 --> 00:11:23,220 just really struggles here the vrm has 255 00:11:21,300 --> 00:11:25,860 been downgraded with two fewer 60 amp 256 00:11:23,220 --> 00:11:28,560 power stages and there's no PCI 5.0 257 00:11:25,860 --> 00:11:30,480 support beyond the primary m.2 slot so 258 00:11:28,560 --> 00:11:34,079 there's really no advantage to buying 259 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:36,420 the Asus board the MSI PG b650 Edge 260 00:11:34,079 --> 00:11:38,820 Wi-Fi does receive an upgraded vrm with 261 00:11:36,420 --> 00:11:41,579 80 amp power stages and there are four 262 00:11:38,820 --> 00:11:43,920 more USB 3.2 ports but again you are 263 00:11:41,579 --> 00:11:46,620 giving up pcie 5.0 support for the 264 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:49,019 primary pcie slot The Edge Wi-Fi though 265 00:11:46,620 --> 00:11:51,779 does somewhat cancel out gigabytes b650 266 00:11:49,019 --> 00:11:54,420 auris Pro ax though for ten dollars more 267 00:11:51,779 --> 00:11:57,120 you do get a massively upgraded vehicle 268 00:11:54,420 --> 00:12:00,360 vram with 16 90 AMP power stages which 269 00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:02,640 frankly is overkill but also I guess why 270 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:05,220 not so you really could go with either 271 00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:07,980 of these boards but again neither really 272 00:12:05,220 --> 00:12:09,959 match the value of asrock's b650e PG 273 00:12:07,980 --> 00:12:13,260 Riptide Wi-Fi 274 00:12:09,959 --> 00:12:17,220 now currently priced at 255 dollars is 275 00:12:13,260 --> 00:12:19,260 the Asus Pro art b650 crater it's 276 00:12:17,220 --> 00:12:21,180 another odd entry that doesn't really 277 00:12:19,260 --> 00:12:23,399 compete that well on paper it's a cool 278 00:12:21,180 --> 00:12:25,500 looking motherboard very elegant I guess 279 00:12:23,399 --> 00:12:28,260 you could say at least compared to the 280 00:12:25,500 --> 00:12:30,240 norm but it's also very Normy when it 281 00:12:28,260 --> 00:12:32,459 comes to Features the vrm is more 282 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:34,620 typical of a 200 board with a dozen 60 283 00:12:32,459 --> 00:12:37,680 amp power stages so not amazing for core 284 00:12:34,620 --> 00:12:40,560 heavy work with say a 7950x though it'll 285 00:12:37,680 --> 00:12:42,540 certainly work there's no pcie 5.0 286 00:12:40,560 --> 00:12:44,579 support for the PCI expansion slots 287 00:12:42,540 --> 00:12:47,160 though you do get a single PCI 5.0 288 00:12:44,579 --> 00:12:51,000 enable m.2 with an additional two PCA 289 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:53,399 4.0 m.2s there's just eight USB 3.2 290 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:56,220 ports and really the only unique feature 291 00:12:53,399 --> 00:12:57,720 on offer here is a second wired ethernet 292 00:12:56,220 --> 00:12:59,940 connection but it's just a gigabit 293 00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:02,220 connection and they cost basically 294 00:12:59,940 --> 00:13:04,500 nothing to include via an add-on card so 295 00:13:02,220 --> 00:13:07,139 that's not exactly an exciting feature 296 00:13:04,500 --> 00:13:10,019 and the board misses out on Wi-Fi 6 297 00:13:07,139 --> 00:13:13,440 which I do find a bit odd you do get USB 298 00:13:10,019 --> 00:13:15,240 C DisplayPort so maybe that's useful not 299 00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:17,899 exactly sure on that one 300 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:20,339 I'd actually say that the gigabyte 301 00:13:17,899 --> 00:13:22,800 b650rog is a much better Creator type 302 00:13:20,339 --> 00:13:25,440 motherboard and the vrm here is 303 00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:28,019 massively upgraded with 1690 amp power 304 00:13:25,440 --> 00:13:31,620 stages for the vcore you also get Wi-Fi 305 00:13:28,019 --> 00:13:34,320 6E and more USB 3.2 ports so it just 306 00:13:31,620 --> 00:13:36,660 seems like a better board all round 307 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:39,360 that said at this price point I'd be 308 00:13:36,660 --> 00:13:42,000 eyeing off the ASRock b650e steel Legend 309 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:44,820 Wi-Fi you get the same vrm configuration 310 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:47,339 as the Aero G but the board offers pcie 311 00:13:44,820 --> 00:13:49,079 5.0 support for the primary pcie slot 312 00:13:47,339 --> 00:13:52,200 but beyond that the feature lists are 313 00:13:49,079 --> 00:13:53,820 very similar the only odd aspect I'd say 314 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:56,760 of the steel Legend is the fact that it 315 00:13:53,820 --> 00:13:59,760 supports just two SATA devices and has a 316 00:13:56,760 --> 00:14:03,980 grand total of just two pcie slots 317 00:13:59,760 --> 00:14:07,200 then at 280 we find the Asus Rog strix 318 00:14:03,980 --> 00:14:10,079 b650-a gaming Wi-Fi and this is another 319 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:11,940 Asus board that looks a bit lost at this 320 00:14:10,079 --> 00:14:13,980 price point it really does need to be 321 00:14:11,940 --> 00:14:16,139 priced below 260 dollars to make sense 322 00:14:13,980 --> 00:14:18,899 in my opinion again you're only getting 323 00:14:16,139 --> 00:14:20,760 a dozen 60 amp power stages so a v core 324 00:14:18,899 --> 00:14:24,180 VM configuration that competes better at 325 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:26,160 the 200 price point there's no pcie 5.0 326 00:14:24,180 --> 00:14:28,860 support for the primary pcie slot 327 00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:31,139 there's just seven USB 3.2 ports in 328 00:14:28,860 --> 00:14:32,579 total and everything else is pretty 329 00:14:31,139 --> 00:14:36,420 standard 330 00:14:32,579 --> 00:14:38,820 and making the Rog strix b650-a gaming 331 00:14:36,420 --> 00:14:40,980 Wi-Fi seem even more bizarre is the fact 332 00:14:38,820 --> 00:14:45,720 that for the same 280 dollars right now 333 00:14:40,980 --> 00:14:48,180 you can buy the Rog strix b650e F gaming 334 00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:50,699 Wi-Fi which switches to the more 335 00:14:48,180 --> 00:14:53,220 powerful 80 amp power stages it includes 336 00:14:50,699 --> 00:14:57,300 PCA 5.0 support for the primary pcie 337 00:14:53,220 --> 00:15:00,000 slot and it packs 10 USB 3.2 ports along 338 00:14:57,300 --> 00:15:01,500 with two more USB 2.0 ports when 339 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:03,839 compared to the steel Legend you also 340 00:15:01,500 --> 00:15:06,360 get twice as many pcie slots with the 341 00:15:03,839 --> 00:15:08,220 addition of two times one slots which 342 00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:10,500 can be useful for adding in more SATA 343 00:15:08,220 --> 00:15:12,360 ports for example via an add-in card it 344 00:15:10,500 --> 00:15:16,680 also competes well with msi's Flagship 345 00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:19,079 b650 board the mpg b650 carbon Wi-Fi 346 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:20,459 which currently costs 290 and I think 347 00:15:19,079 --> 00:15:23,459 it's a little bit underwhelming at that 348 00:15:20,459 --> 00:15:25,860 price point when compared to the b650-a 349 00:15:23,459 --> 00:15:28,440 gaming the carbon drops PCI 5.0 support 350 00:15:25,860 --> 00:15:31,920 for the primary pcie slot but you get an 351 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:34,079 additional PCA 4.0 m.2 and two more 80 352 00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:35,639 amp power state I just saw overall the 353 00:15:34,079 --> 00:15:38,279 boards are pretty similar but I like the 354 00:15:35,639 --> 00:15:39,420 Asus board for the superior pcie 5.0 355 00:15:38,279 --> 00:15:41,940 support 356 00:15:39,420 --> 00:15:45,480 but if you want to spend even more money 357 00:15:41,940 --> 00:15:50,220 on an Asus b650 motherboard then we have 358 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:52,860 the Rog strix b650e E gaming Wi-Fi 359 00:15:50,220 --> 00:15:55,380 pretty confusing names all of these ASU 360 00:15:52,860 --> 00:15:58,860 sports but whatever this one does cost 361 00:15:55,380 --> 00:16:01,079 an eye-watering 350 and the key 362 00:15:58,860 --> 00:16:04,019 Advantage it has over the F gaming is 363 00:16:01,079 --> 00:16:07,980 the inclusion of a second pcie 5.0 times 364 00:16:04,019 --> 00:16:11,100 16 slot and a fourth m.2 it's hard to 365 00:16:07,980 --> 00:16:12,779 say if that's worth the 70 premium I 366 00:16:11,100 --> 00:16:15,540 kind of think not but for those of you 367 00:16:12,779 --> 00:16:17,880 who wish to go all out it is a very nice 368 00:16:15,540 --> 00:16:19,860 motherboard alternatively for twenty 369 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:24,560 dollars more you could buy the ASRock 370 00:16:19,860 --> 00:16:28,560 b650e Tai Chi with its insane 24 371 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:30,600 105 amp power stage v-core vrm you could 372 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:32,579 say extreme Overkill I suppose there's 373 00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:35,459 no chance this board even needs vrm 374 00:16:32,579 --> 00:16:37,920 heatsinks but other than the insane vrm 375 00:16:35,459 --> 00:16:39,360 there's really nothing amazing here and 376 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:41,339 really for a hundred dollars less this 377 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:44,220 steel Legend is basically the same 378 00:16:41,339 --> 00:16:46,560 product then we have the gigabyte b650e 379 00:16:44,220 --> 00:16:48,120 aorus Master which I had to price check 380 00:16:46,560 --> 00:16:50,220 several times while I was making this 381 00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:53,040 content as I couldn't quite believe that 382 00:16:50,220 --> 00:16:54,779 it costs 430 us which it does cost at 383 00:16:53,040 --> 00:16:56,279 the time making this video I believe 384 00:16:54,779 --> 00:16:59,160 upon release this board was more like 385 00:16:56,279 --> 00:17:01,860 350 which seems like a lot more 386 00:16:59,160 --> 00:17:05,040 reasonable for what it is 430 dollars 387 00:17:01,860 --> 00:17:07,319 though not so much that said as I was 388 00:17:05,040 --> 00:17:09,780 about to dunk on the b650e aorus master 389 00:17:07,319 --> 00:17:12,059 and its high asking price I did start to 390 00:17:09,780 --> 00:17:15,240 compare it with other high-end x670e 391 00:17:12,059 --> 00:17:17,459 boards and it started to become a bit 392 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:19,799 more reasonable at least for those of 393 00:17:17,459 --> 00:17:21,299 you considering spending about 400 on an 394 00:17:19,799 --> 00:17:24,720 am5 motherboard 395 00:17:21,299 --> 00:17:27,120 firstly you do get a 16 105 amp power 396 00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:29,400 stage v-core vrm which again is Extreme 397 00:17:27,120 --> 00:17:31,320 Overkill but if for some reason you're 398 00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:33,299 into overclocking or whatever this could 399 00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:36,419 be a good board for you it does of 400 00:17:33,299 --> 00:17:38,100 course include a PCI 5.0 times 16 slot 401 00:17:36,419 --> 00:17:40,919 but rather than go for a second like 402 00:17:38,100 --> 00:17:43,679 Asus did with the e-gaming they've 403 00:17:40,919 --> 00:17:48,000 instead included not one but rather four 404 00:17:43,679 --> 00:17:49,380 pcie 5.0 enabled m.2 slots personally I 405 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:52,559 would have preferred to see a second 406 00:17:49,380 --> 00:17:54,780 pcie times 16 5.0 slot as that adds a 407 00:17:52,559 --> 00:17:58,020 lot more flexibility to the board but 408 00:17:54,780 --> 00:18:00,780 still four pcie 5.0 m.2 is kind of cool 409 00:17:58,020 --> 00:18:03,299 now if you wanted to get a similar vrm 410 00:18:00,780 --> 00:18:06,660 configuration from an x670e motherboard 411 00:18:03,299 --> 00:18:10,320 you'd have to pay 490 for the x670e 412 00:18:06,660 --> 00:18:13,620 aorus master though the MSR x670e carbon 413 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:17,280 Wi-Fi for 440 is also a great option so 414 00:18:13,620 --> 00:18:20,520 at 350 the b650e auris master might make 415 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:23,160 sense but for 400 you are better served 416 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:24,419 by a simile priced x670e board in my 417 00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:26,640 opinion 418 00:18:24,419 --> 00:18:29,000 finally for those of you after an ITX 419 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:33,080 motherboard I have tested the MSI MPG 420 00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:37,500 b650i Edge Wi-Fi and Asus Rog strix 421 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:41,039 b650e I gaming Wi-Fi the MSI model costs 422 00:18:37,500 --> 00:18:43,740 270 and the Asus model 330 so both are 423 00:18:41,039 --> 00:18:46,559 quite pricey since acquiring all of my 424 00:18:43,740 --> 00:18:49,980 b650 motherboards or 35 of them the 425 00:18:46,559 --> 00:18:52,080 gigabyte b650i aorus Ultra for 206 426 00:18:49,980 --> 00:18:57,299 dollars that has become available and 427 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:58,200 the ASRock b650e pg-itx Wi-Fi for 290 428 00:18:57,299 --> 00:19:02,520 dollars 429 00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:05,039 now the MSI MPG b650i Edge Wi-Fi packs 8 430 00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:08,700 80 amp power stages for the vehicle vrm 431 00:19:05,039 --> 00:19:12,000 but no pcie 5.0 support there is a 432 00:19:08,700 --> 00:19:16,260 single PCI 4.0 times 16 slot and two PCI 433 00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:19,740 4.0 m.2 slots then you get 9 USB 3.2 434 00:19:16,260 --> 00:19:24,260 ports two USB 2.0 ports and four SATA 435 00:19:19,740 --> 00:19:27,960 ports for 60 us more the Asus Rog strix 436 00:19:24,260 --> 00:19:30,720 b650e I gaming Wi-Fi that does offer PCI 437 00:19:27,960 --> 00:19:35,400 5.0 support for the primary or the only 438 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:38,280 pcie times 16 slot as well as PCI 5.0 to 439 00:19:35,400 --> 00:19:42,419 the m.2 the primary m.2 that is along 440 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:45,840 with a secondary PCA 4.0 m.2 you also 441 00:19:42,419 --> 00:19:48,840 get eight USB 3.2 ports and four USB 2.0 442 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:50,340 ports along with two SATA connectors so 443 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:51,600 it's certainly a better equipped board 444 00:19:50,340 --> 00:19:53,400 but whether or not it's worth the 445 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:55,380 premium hard to say and of course that 446 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:57,539 will be up to you to decide 447 00:19:55,380 --> 00:19:59,220 okay so now that we've taken a look at 448 00:19:57,539 --> 00:20:01,740 each motherboard individually it's time 449 00:19:59,220 --> 00:20:03,419 to get testing and for testing all b650 450 00:20:01,740 --> 00:20:06,419 boards we're using the gigabyte auris 451 00:20:03,419 --> 00:20:09,780 c500 glass case with the aorus water 452 00:20:06,419 --> 00:20:11,280 force x 360 millimeter AIO now for 453 00:20:09,780 --> 00:20:12,660 recording temperatures I'm using a 454 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:14,760 digital thermometer with k-type 455 00:20:12,660 --> 00:20:17,640 thermocouples and I'll reporting the 456 00:20:14,760 --> 00:20:19,200 peak rear PCB temperature finally I'm 457 00:20:17,640 --> 00:20:20,880 not reporting delta T over ambient 458 00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:23,580 instead I maintain a room temperature of 459 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:25,620 21 degrees and to ensure a consistent 460 00:20:23,580 --> 00:20:28,200 ambient temperature a thermocouple is 461 00:20:25,620 --> 00:20:30,360 positioned next to the test system as 462 00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:34,020 for the stress test I'm using the ryzen 463 00:20:30,360 --> 00:20:35,880 9 7950x and for load cinebench R23 which 464 00:20:34,020 --> 00:20:37,559 was looped for an hour at which point 465 00:20:35,880 --> 00:20:40,260 I'm reporting the maximum PCB 466 00:20:37,559 --> 00:20:42,419 temperature again recorded using k-type 467 00:20:40,260 --> 00:20:43,740 thermocouples so let's go take a look at 468 00:20:42,419 --> 00:20:46,140 the results 469 00:20:43,740 --> 00:20:48,059 so here are the vrm temperature results 470 00:20:46,140 --> 00:20:49,679 and I don't think it'll surprise anyone 471 00:20:48,059 --> 00:20:51,360 to learn that the aorus master and 472 00:20:49,679 --> 00:20:53,640 taiichi are the two best performing 473 00:20:51,360 --> 00:20:56,520 boards though there are a number of 474 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:58,919 aorus pro and Elite models with similar 475 00:20:56,520 --> 00:21:00,780 temperatures in the low 50s now I should 476 00:20:58,919 --> 00:21:02,820 stress that one sparium temperatures dip 477 00:21:00,780 --> 00:21:05,280 below say 70 degrees it really doesn't 478 00:21:02,820 --> 00:21:07,200 matter which board runs cooler for core 479 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:09,360 heavy productivity workloads in a warm 480 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:12,600 environment all boards will perform very 481 00:21:09,360 --> 00:21:14,580 well even sub 80 degree vrm temperatures 482 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:16,440 are very acceptable and really it's only 483 00:21:14,580 --> 00:21:18,720 the boards running over 90 degrees that 484 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:21,000 I'd recommend you avoid especially if 485 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:22,559 you're in a warmer climate and this data 486 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,720 really just confirms that the vast 487 00:21:22,559 --> 00:21:26,760 majority of b650 boards run at 488 00:21:24,720 --> 00:21:28,080 acceptable temperatures with just three 489 00:21:26,760 --> 00:21:29,880 boards in particular that you should 490 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:33,720 avoid if you're going to be running a 491 00:21:29,880 --> 00:21:35,520 170 watt CPU like the 7950x even then 492 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,919 though regardless of the CPU plan on 493 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:40,020 using now those boards should be avoided 494 00:21:37,919 --> 00:21:41,940 as you can purchase similarly equipped 495 00:21:40,020 --> 00:21:44,640 boards for the same price or even less 496 00:21:41,940 --> 00:21:46,380 in some instances that run at much lower 497 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:48,600 vrm temperatures 498 00:21:46,380 --> 00:21:50,100 so in a nutshell any of the boards shown 499 00:21:48,600 --> 00:21:52,320 here running at sub 80 degree 500 00:21:50,100 --> 00:21:55,200 temperatures should be purchased based 501 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:57,360 on the price and features not how cool 502 00:21:55,200 --> 00:21:59,520 they ultimately run and as an example 503 00:21:57,360 --> 00:22:01,980 you wouldn't buy the MSI Tomahawk over 504 00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:04,140 the ASRock PG lightning because it runs 505 00:22:01,980 --> 00:22:06,780 five degrees cooler in our testing in 506 00:22:04,140 --> 00:22:08,580 fact it might be wise to save 30 and get 507 00:22:06,780 --> 00:22:12,179 the ASRock board especially if you don't 508 00:22:08,580 --> 00:22:15,240 need Wi-Fi as the pcie 5.0 m.2 support 509 00:22:12,179 --> 00:22:17,039 could be more useful to you but if 510 00:22:15,240 --> 00:22:19,200 you're looking at two boards that occupy 511 00:22:17,039 --> 00:22:21,960 a similar price point and offer the same 512 00:22:19,200 --> 00:22:24,360 features but one run say 10 to 15 513 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:26,400 degrees cooler than the other then vrm 514 00:22:24,360 --> 00:22:28,620 thermals might see you favor the cooler 515 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:30,600 running board in that example it's just 516 00:22:28,620 --> 00:22:32,460 another piece of the puzzle and 517 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:34,860 depending on your needs well you'll have 518 00:22:32,460 --> 00:22:37,620 to piece it all together there's just so 519 00:22:34,860 --> 00:22:39,780 many b650 motherboards I tested 35 of 520 00:22:37,620 --> 00:22:41,580 them which I think is pretty insane it 521 00:22:39,780 --> 00:22:42,960 took a ridiculous amount of time and 522 00:22:41,580 --> 00:22:44,880 even then I haven't been able to look at 523 00:22:42,960 --> 00:22:46,380 all if there are a couple that either 524 00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:48,120 weren't released in time for this 525 00:22:46,380 --> 00:22:49,980 content or they were just unavailable 526 00:22:48,120 --> 00:22:51,419 when I was rounding up all of these 527 00:22:49,980 --> 00:22:54,000 boards which just getting my hands on 528 00:22:51,419 --> 00:22:57,000 this many boards was a huge undertaking 529 00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:59,340 in itself anyway we've now looked at 35 530 00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:01,559 of the boards and I think the good news 531 00:22:59,340 --> 00:23:04,020 is that most of the boards pretty much 532 00:23:01,559 --> 00:23:06,840 all of them really are a couple are very 533 00:23:04,020 --> 00:23:08,760 good and you can spend as little as 125 534 00:23:06,840 --> 00:23:10,620 dollars and still get a really good 535 00:23:08,760 --> 00:23:12,900 board that'll work under all conditions 536 00:23:10,620 --> 00:23:18,900 there are a few standout options though 537 00:23:12,900 --> 00:23:20,820 and the 125 ASRock b650m hdv m.2 is one 538 00:23:18,900 --> 00:23:23,159 of them if you are looking at jumping on 539 00:23:20,820 --> 00:23:25,380 the am5 platform but wish to spend as 540 00:23:23,159 --> 00:23:27,000 little as possible while still ensuring 541 00:23:25,380 --> 00:23:29,820 that you have a solid upgrade path in 542 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:33,240 the future then the hdv is the board for 543 00:23:29,820 --> 00:23:35,580 you the gigabyte b650m ds3h is also a 544 00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:38,400 very good board but the hdv is better in 545 00:23:35,580 --> 00:23:40,679 my opinion and a little bit cheaper the 546 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:43,020 only potential advantage of the ds3h is 547 00:23:40,679 --> 00:23:45,059 its extra dim slots for memory expansion 548 00:23:43,020 --> 00:23:47,880 but if you don't need that then the 549 00:23:45,059 --> 00:23:49,799 ASRock board is better in my opinion and 550 00:23:47,880 --> 00:23:51,919 if you were going to step up to the ds3h 551 00:23:49,799 --> 00:23:54,539 then the MSI Pro 552 00:23:51,919 --> 00:23:57,059 b650m-a Wi-Fi it's a better buyer right 553 00:23:54,539 --> 00:24:00,419 now for just 10 dollars more you get an 554 00:23:57,059 --> 00:24:03,900 extra PCI expansion slot more USB 3.2 555 00:24:00,419 --> 00:24:07,080 ports and Wi-Fi 6E as for the best Micro 556 00:24:03,900 --> 00:24:10,980 ATX b650 motherboard my pick here is the 557 00:24:07,080 --> 00:24:14,880 gigabyte b650m auris Pro ax you get pcie 558 00:24:10,980 --> 00:24:19,280 5.0 m.2 support an amazing vrm and 559 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:22,320 plenty of USB 3.2 ports all for 210 us 560 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:26,760 basically it outclasses the Asus tough 561 00:24:22,320 --> 00:24:30,240 gaming b650m plus Wi-Fi MSI mag b650m 562 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:34,980 water Wi-Fi and gigabytes own b650m 563 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:37,559 aurus Elite ax and b650m gaming X ax now 564 00:24:34,980 --> 00:24:40,200 if you're after a more affordable ATX 565 00:24:37,559 --> 00:24:44,039 b650 board there are a few options 566 00:24:40,200 --> 00:24:47,220 priced between 190 dollars and 220 U.S 567 00:24:44,039 --> 00:24:49,799 none of them though offer PCI 5.0 times 568 00:24:47,220 --> 00:24:53,039 16 support though some of them do offer 569 00:24:49,799 --> 00:24:56,880 PCI 5.0 m.2 support and those models 570 00:24:53,039 --> 00:25:01,260 include the ASRock b650 PG light ASRock 571 00:24:56,880 --> 00:25:04,080 b650 Pro RS and gigabyte b650 aorus 572 00:25:01,260 --> 00:25:06,240 Elite ax now of those boards the PG 573 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:09,720 lightning is the cheapest and yet it 574 00:25:06,240 --> 00:25:13,380 offers the most pcie slots three m.2s in 575 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:15,539 total and loads of USB ports really all 576 00:25:13,380 --> 00:25:18,000 lacks relative to the competition is 577 00:25:15,539 --> 00:25:20,580 Wi-Fi but if you don't care about Wi-Fi 578 00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:24,240 then it is my recommendation as the best 579 00:25:20,580 --> 00:25:26,400 value b650 ATX motherboard and if you 580 00:25:24,240 --> 00:25:30,419 are after Wi-Fi 6E support out of the 581 00:25:26,400 --> 00:25:33,179 box either the MSI Pro b650-p Wi-Fi or 582 00:25:30,419 --> 00:25:36,779 gigabyte b650 or sleet ax will work 583 00:25:33,179 --> 00:25:38,880 nicely now of the b650e boards the best 584 00:25:36,779 --> 00:25:42,960 value option here is also the cheapest 585 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:45,900 the ASRock b650e PG Riptide Wi-Fi though 586 00:25:42,960 --> 00:25:48,840 it is a little light on USB 3.2 ports 587 00:25:45,900 --> 00:25:51,480 with a possible seven so if you require 588 00:25:48,840 --> 00:25:53,820 more a 30 premium will be required to 589 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:56,220 acquire asrock's b650e steel Legend 590 00:25:53,820 --> 00:25:58,559 Wi-Fi though be aware this board only 591 00:25:56,220 --> 00:26:02,279 features two SATA ports and two pcie 592 00:25:58,559 --> 00:26:03,500 slots therefore I feel the Asus Rog 593 00:26:02,279 --> 00:26:06,539 strix 594 00:26:03,500 --> 00:26:11,039 b650e-f gaming Wi-Fi is the best 595 00:26:06,539 --> 00:26:13,679 all-rounder b650e motherboard at 280 you 596 00:26:11,039 --> 00:26:17,400 get four PCI expansion slots three m.2 597 00:26:13,679 --> 00:26:20,580 slots 10 USB 3.2 ports and a further 8 598 00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:22,799 USB 2.0 ports and there's also four SATA 599 00:26:20,580 --> 00:26:26,820 ports then beyond that it's really 600 00:26:22,799 --> 00:26:30,659 either the Asus Rog strix b650e e-gaming 601 00:26:26,820 --> 00:26:33,720 Wi-Fi ASRock b650e taiichi and of course 602 00:26:30,659 --> 00:26:35,520 the gigabyte b650e auris Master the 603 00:26:33,720 --> 00:26:37,620 auras Master just makes very little 604 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:39,720 sense right now at its current price the 605 00:26:37,620 --> 00:26:42,059 Tai Chi is a decent board but it's not 606 00:26:39,720 --> 00:26:44,340 amazing at anything really though it 607 00:26:42,059 --> 00:26:47,279 does offer USB 4 support out of the box 608 00:26:44,340 --> 00:26:49,919 so that might be useful to you anyway in 609 00:26:47,279 --> 00:26:52,380 my opinion I think the Asus e-gaming is 610 00:26:49,919 --> 00:26:54,960 the best high-end option here the fact 611 00:26:52,380 --> 00:26:57,779 that it offers two pcie 5.0 enabled 612 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:59,100 times 16 slots is very cool mind you I'm 613 00:26:57,779 --> 00:27:01,860 not saying that you particularly need 614 00:26:59,100 --> 00:27:04,080 that feature but if you want it this is 615 00:27:01,860 --> 00:27:05,820 the cheapest means of acquiring that 616 00:27:04,080 --> 00:27:08,779 particular configuration 617 00:27:05,820 --> 00:27:11,279 for example the MSI MPG 618 00:27:08,779 --> 00:27:14,220 x670e carbon Wi-Fi is the most 619 00:27:11,279 --> 00:27:17,820 affordable x670e motherboard to offer 620 00:27:14,220 --> 00:27:20,640 two pcie 5.0 enabled times 16 slots and 621 00:27:17,820 --> 00:27:23,220 it costs 440 us right now so you're 622 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:26,700 looking at an almost 100 discount with 623 00:27:23,220 --> 00:27:28,679 the Asus e-gaming the e-gaming is also 624 00:27:26,700 --> 00:27:31,080 the most affordable of the three boards 625 00:27:28,679 --> 00:27:33,179 and although it has the weakest vrm it 626 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:35,520 is still massively Overkill peaking it 627 00:27:33,179 --> 00:27:39,240 to 60 degrees with the 7950x in our 628 00:27:35,520 --> 00:27:41,940 testing so the Asus Rog strix b650e 629 00:27:39,240 --> 00:27:44,279 e-gaming Wi-Fi is the best high-end 630 00:27:41,940 --> 00:27:46,380 board and it's what I would get if I was 631 00:27:44,279 --> 00:27:49,980 looking at spending comfortably over 300 632 00:27:46,380 --> 00:27:52,320 U.S on a b650 motherboard and with that 633 00:27:49,980 --> 00:27:54,179 said let me know which of these b650 634 00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:56,940 boards you're planning on buying or 635 00:27:54,179 --> 00:27:57,960 which one maybe you've already bought so 636 00:27:56,940 --> 00:27:59,700 hopefully it was one of the good ones 637 00:27:57,960 --> 00:28:01,380 not one of the Asus Prime boards anyway 638 00:27:59,700 --> 00:28:04,559 let me know in the comment section below 639 00:28:01,380 --> 00:28:07,080 and hopefully this b650 buying guide was 640 00:28:04,559 --> 00:28:09,720 useful to you and if it was please do 641 00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:11,340 give it a like does help out a lot well 642 00:28:09,720 --> 00:28:14,039 I think it does I don't know maybe it 643 00:28:11,340 --> 00:28:16,260 does anyway help helps out my mental 644 00:28:14,039 --> 00:28:17,659 state and maybe it'll encourage me to do 645 00:28:16,260 --> 00:28:20,460 something like this again with future 646 00:28:17,659 --> 00:28:22,799 motherboard Generations 647 00:28:20,460 --> 00:28:24,539 not sure on that one I also have to try 648 00:28:22,799 --> 00:28:27,120 and convince balen to do a lot of b-roll 649 00:28:24,539 --> 00:28:28,740 and editing so it was a lot of work for 650 00:28:27,120 --> 00:28:31,200 both of us anyway 651 00:28:28,740 --> 00:28:33,240 enough waffling I think we're done with 652 00:28:31,200 --> 00:28:35,159 this one if you did enjoy it you know 653 00:28:33,240 --> 00:28:38,460 what to do subscribe for more content 654 00:28:35,159 --> 00:28:40,200 and we have float plane and patreon I 655 00:28:38,460 --> 00:28:41,700 honestly did a lot of this content for 656 00:28:40,200 --> 00:28:43,740 our float plate and Patra members who 657 00:28:41,700 --> 00:28:45,480 have been begging for it apologies for 658 00:28:43,740 --> 00:28:47,279 the delay but yeah it was a it was a 659 00:28:45,480 --> 00:28:49,679 bigger undertaking that 660 00:28:47,279 --> 00:28:51,120 even I could have imagined and we've 661 00:28:49,679 --> 00:28:54,539 done some big content here at Harbor 662 00:28:51,120 --> 00:28:56,100 unboxed so yep patreon flight plane you 663 00:28:54,539 --> 00:28:58,320 get access to our exclusive Discord 664 00:28:56,100 --> 00:29:01,380 server monthly live streams behind the 665 00:28:58,320 --> 00:29:03,779 scenes content and Q and A's I'm your 666 00:29:01,380 --> 00:29:06,380 host Steve thanks for watching I'll see 667 00:29:03,779 --> 00:29:06,380 you next time 668 00:29:07,310 --> 00:29:16,160 [Music] 669 00:29:19,270 --> 00:29:22,319 [Music] 51015

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.