Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Music]
it's an iconic work it's an image which
everyone knows
[Music]
it's one of the most well-known images
in our history second only to the mona
lisa
over a century has passed since edvard
monk painted the screen
whether you're holding it in your hands
or you're looking at it on the wall of a
museum it will tell you straight away
it's a masterpiece
but who was this troubled artist and how
did this image come to represent a
lifetime's work it was a fantastically
important picture to monk the kind of
central figure in his painting at that
time
it's something that has crossed
continence cultures everyone knows it
so why in recent years has it become
such an object of desire for enthusiasts
and thieves alike
[Music]
for as long as i can remember i have
suffered from a deep feeling of anxiety
which i have tried to express in my art
edvard monk was a troubled soul
as can clearly be seen in his paintings
he lived for many years in poverty and
his unusual and often frightening style
took a long time to be fully embraced by
the artistic community
we now know edward monk as
the creator of some of the most say a
resting haunting
expressionistic images of the 20th
century
probably the only well-known norwegian
artist of the late 19th and 20th century
he was an emotional artist and he worked
when the inspiration came enormously
influential on
german expressionism
today this scream is the most famous
painting but
for him
in his time when he produced it it was
just one painting he didn't thought okay
now i'm painting my most important work
[Music]
monk created his most iconic work the
scream early in his career
little did he know that it would come to
define his legacy and that it would be
the target of so very many thieves and
just how hard it would be to recover
edvard monk was born on the 12th of
december 1863 in the small village of
ardelsbrook his family moved to oslo
then known as christiania when he was
only two
monk had been born into a norwegian art
scene that had blossomed in recent
decades especially with the paintings of
norway's landscape by the celebrated
johann christian dahl
just like monk dahl had come from a very
modest norwegian background
however monk's chances of following in
dahl's footsteps and traveling the world
seemed very slim from the outset
i think his childhood was horrible his
mom died when he was four of tb so
presumably had spent the first four
years of his life listening to her cough
which got to be nice
edward did have a difficult childhood
there were a number of family tragedies
and two deaths there were quite a lot of
diseases in the family
caused by the climate by the bad house
his father brought the children up on a
mixture of hellfire damnation and edgar
allan poe so
i think that explains a lot about
monk's later life
[Music]
although he displayed early talent monk
would only find his artistic calling in
his late teenage years
his most influential teacher was
christian cook
one of the
great realistic and social critic
artists in norway
monk really got his radical breakthrough
in the middle of the 1880s with the
painting that thick child how he painted
this was totally uncommon he was like
scrapping the color with knives and
there are really a lot of layers in this
uh painting it really divided the public
opinion
there is
undoubtedly an edge of darkness from his
work from the very beginning it's there
all along he was someone who was living
on the borderlines of sanity and
insanity
[Music]
many of monk's paintings from this era
in his career are missing
it's possible that they may have been
confiscated by his overtly pious father
who was covering his son's expenses yet
disapproved of his new direction
but edvard had a chance to break out on
his own
mooc was actually born into a family
where they had
several quite well-known artists one of
them was an artist called fritz taulom
and he
had close links to paris was quite well
known in paris and he sponsored
monk to go for the first time
and he went
into the studio of leon bonnell who was
pretty traditional painter and they
quite quickly came to blows i think he
immediately knew that he found it
stifling he found it dull
leonbona's style of painting may not
have been to mug's taste but he did
appreciate his tours of the parisian
galleries
paris was right in the middle of the
bell epoch and the work of many of the
greatest artists of the era was on show
one of them already toulouse-lautrec had
also been a student of leon bonner
edvard monk was stunned by what he saw
paris of course wasn't this time the
mecca the magnet for all artists they
had to go there they had to see what is
happening here he made two big trips to
paris the first time he came back having
seen impressionism he'd seen monet and
manet
but it's really the second trip when he
finds gauguin van gogh pre-expressionist
if you
like following the death of van gogh in
1890 there was the big retrospective in
1891 which undoubtedly he related to is
an artist who is
projecting emotion through colour
through lying through expression in art
paris at the time was sort of a
marketplace of various
uh painterly styles after impressionism
and i think
although he experiments with a lot of
things from paris and is indeed keen to
show his knowledge of impressionist
painting for instance we don't see him
really catching on to one
truly parisian way of of painting mung
always wanted to be a kind of parisian
artist because this was a center but he
got a lot of friends and supporters in
berlin and in other german cities like
hamburg lubeck grayson and so on so he
was more or less
20 years in germany
monk would have his greatest
breakthrough in berlin
he tried to model his works on what he'd
seen in paris trying out the
impressionist style the realist style
even painting in the puente list style
of george serra
but berlin was where he found his true
voice
painting picture by picture
i followed the impressions my eye took
in at heightened moments i painted only
memories adding nothing
no details that i did not see
hence the simplicity of the paintings
their emptiness
monk loved berlin i think he really
found his place there he found people
who were
willing to listen to him who saw him as
a proponent of new ideas
and in 1892 he had been asked to come
over with 35 works and do an exhibition
for the association of berlin artists
the berlin arts association at that time
was a very conservative circle of
artists
and i don't think anyone expected what
monk brought to the show
so within a week the show
was closed down he
thought he was an anarchist i think so
the ferrari themselves the the club just
thought he was nuts
um critics went wild and of course he
loved it he thought it was fantastic he
said i've never had so much fun or words
of that effect this made him a real hero
for the younger generation someone to
look up to and someone who was
breaking the norm and paving the way for
them immediately a lot of invitations
from other cities in germany for
exhibitions and monk hired an own room
only some months later in berlin to make
his private exhibition there so in 1893
the stream was exhibited the first time
in berlin
one evening i was walking along a path
the city was on one side and the fjord
below
i felt tired and ill
i stopped and looked over the fjord
the sun was setting and the clouds
turning blood red
i sensed a scream passing through nature
it seemed to me that i heard the scream
i painted this picture
painted the clouds as actual blood the
colour shrieked
this became the scream
we have these four versions two
paintings two pastels but they're also
wood cuts with also drawings so we have
a kind of family orbiting this theme i
think it's now generally
accepted that the pastel 1893 version
was the first and possibly a study for
the painting well the pastel that we
have here is executed in what appears to
be haste
with crayon onto ungrounded cardboard
this is a rather rough
expression
1895
he had a german collectors called otto
von farkid he did buy despair and tried
to buy the painted 1893 version
and it was a fantastically important
picture to monk you know he didn't want
to sell it and so he said to him i i'll
sell you the spirit and i'll make you a
new screen
this one stands out because of its frame
so it has a very special frame in which
he had inscribed almost a poem which
reflected his vision the 1910 version he
needed to replace the 1893 version
because it had gone and so he did
himself one in in tempura on card and
you know
this is a sign of how important it was
to him as a kind of central figure in in
his painting at that time they're all
sort of quite different in both
technique
uh and style and also to a certain
extent content the colouring is
different
in each of them some of them are more
highly colored the slight differences in
the compositions and interestingly if
you look at the eyes they're also
depicted slightly differently
i think in a certain point of his life
he saw that the scream is a very very
special very strong composition but when
he painted it it was just one part of
this
work in progress called freeze of life
there's of course this famous
poem-like text which is older than the
painting where he is writing about
walking with the two friends along the
sea and then suddenly
the sky is turning red and he's hearing
a big scream through nature i mean it
has been suggested his sister laura was
in a lunatic asylum at what has been
identified as that point of the fjord
and that he might have been walking to
see her and you know that
maybe didn't cheer him up while it is
personal and he states this
haunting moment in his life it's also
very
universal it's something that everyone
can relate to it's not him in the
picture it is
just a figure
[Music]
it may have just been a figure but it
became an icon
and it would catch the attention of
daring thieves masked gunmen and the
world's richest art collectors
edward monks the scream would not only
become the work he would be most known
for it would become an iconic piece of
art
unfortunately in 1994 it also became a
prime target for a gang of norwegian
thieves
it was the lily hammer olympics all eyes
on the country and at the same time as
the olympics there's also a kind of
cultural
olympics going on a focus on the
cultural world of norway and of course
the scream would sit at the centre of
that one of their most iconic images and
actually one of the most iconic images
in the world
i remember watching the evening news and
that sunday the first day of the winter
olympics
there was not so much news about the
olympics but the theft from the oslo
national gallery
literally ran in and within 20 seconds
had cut the painting taken it from the
wall snipped the wire and gone and they
left a note saying thank you for your
terrible security
charlie hill is an art detective who
just a year before the scream was stolen
had recovered another stolen masterpiece
in antwerp for mia's lady writing a
letter
an english criminal who had been
arrested in norway in a drugs matter
went into the norwegian embassy here in
london and said that he could get the
picture back for five million
because he knew the people who'd done it
so the norwegian chief of detectives
came across
and interviewed this guy
charlie hill would need a perfect cover
to pull off a sting to reclaim the
scream the thieves needed to believe
that he was willing to cough up some
serious dough to get the painting back
and the big spending getty museum were
happy to oblige
one of the detective sergeants flew to
california
and brought back
a massive
material to
identify me as a member of the getty
museum and then i used that
to persuade the criminals when i got to
oslo that i was a kosher getty museum
employee and it was part of the pretense
but it worked and it worked well because
the getty were happy with it
under a false name of chris roberts
charlie hill got in contact with the
suspects in oslo
following a long drawn-out period of
negotiations charlie hill ventured out
to a location 70 miles outside the city
to hopefully bring this complicated plan
of recovery to a brilliant conclusion
he said to me as we went in but it's
down there in the basement
and
they pulled the carpet back and there
was a trap door
the in the kitchen down
and i just flew at him and told him no
i'm not going down there to sit down
there until next christmas you're going
down there and it's there you bring it
back up
and he came up and there he had a
picture
in a blue sheet and he laid it down
and flipped it back and i'll be damned
as it turned out it was the back of the
picture but monk had started it already
and then i turned it over and i knew
straight away it was the right picture
because the thing about a masterpiece is
it will tell you it's a masterpiece
whether you're holding it in your hands
or you're looking at it
on the wall of a museum or wherever
you're behind glass and a big frame it
will tell you straight away it's a
masterpiece
the scream had been recovered but legal
complications meant that the
perpetrators of the theft were able to
walk free
then ten years after the first theft
another version of the scream was taken
this time in broad daylight
in 2004 the monk museum's version of the
scream was also stolen on this occasion
by armed
thieves who rushed in and forced their
way in and took the scream and another
important painting madonna well they
meant business they used guns um the
picture was missing for over two years
well it's interesting that two separate
versions of the scream were both stolen
in oslo i mean they're both such iconic
paintings and also extremely valuable
financially so they were attempting
targets for thieves the very thing that
makes it
so stealable of course stops anybody
being able to steal it which is its fame
i would think bravado and stupidity
would be two good reasons why he might
try to steal it
both this version of the scream and the
madonna painting were recovered in 2006
but we know far less about how this
police operation went down
the next time that the screen would make
international headlines was in 2012 when
the least scene of the versions of the
painting sold at auction for an
astonishing 120 million dollars
[Music]
this particular version had been in the
family of a norwegian businessman peter
wilson for many many years and his
family had been neighbours
of monk and turned out to be patrons
friends
so it's not one that had been seen it
had been hidden from view in the same
place which always makes value shoot up
it was the most expensive painting which
had ever been sold at that time but of
course you only need two people at
auction
who want a painting for it to push up
the value if you look at what's happened
to stock markets over the past 20 years
they've gone like that and if you look
at what's happened to the value of
gilt-edged you know blue chip a-list art
it's gone like that
just like with van gogh's sunflowers
monk's scream has come to symbolize the
artist
the two of them share many similarities
they both came to paris and were
inspired by the great artists of the
bell epoch especially paul gogan they
were both unstable characters who forged
their own artistic style but whereas
vincent van gogh died in 1890 munk lived
until old age
the first part of his life mung is
traveling all the time he's really
living from a suitcase a lot of
exhibitions a lot of parties a lot of
relations and so on
and then after his breakdown in 1908
he's coming back
to his home country he's buying a big
house a villa with a huge garden it's a
little bit above the town so he's
looking down on the city it's a very
remote place
my breakthrough came very late in life
only starting when i was 50 years old
but at that time i felt as though i had
the strength for new deeds and ideas
he became more and more isolated and
less involved with oslo society but most
importantly he continued to paint and he
did a magnificent series of
self-portraits he pinched himself again
and again and again and what he sees is
you know is disturbing and chilling i
think
monk may have wanted to live a reclusive
life but that became impossible with the
outbreak of world war ii
[Music]
in 1940 the germans invaded norway and
monk was very concerned that his work
would be confiscated by the nazis
because the germans had regarded his
paintings as degenerate all his works in
germany were confiscated from all the
museums they were sold in norway
or in switzerland
and moon didn't like it of course
82 pictures in german collections that
were all taken off walls
rather sweetly 71 of them are bought in
time by norwegian collectors and brought
back to norway which shows his status as
the living norwegian painter i think he
was very worried and he decided to give
his
leave his estate to the municipality of
oslo and that is the basis of the
collection in the monk museum where it's
just on view today
[Applause]
from my rotting body flowers shall grow
and i in them
and that is
eternity after monk's death the scream's
international reputation would grow and
grow
it is an extraordinary work of art it
represents
something in
western european and worldwide thought
at the turn of the 20th century there
was this terrific of apocalyptic fear
the
picture i think spoke very directly to
that fear
um it was a very new looking picture
it's crossed continents it's across
cultures
it's been on the simpsons to andy warhol
it's an image that we all know
covers of books and record sleeves and
we see all the accretions of its
fame i think what is really well known
is the
face
of the person in the middle this person
who's screaming has become a sort of a
symbol of angst or
psychological disturbance this work
really shows
the basic fear of the human being so
everyone every visitor in this museum
can put his own feelings in this
painting so it's timeless
[Music]
[Music]
you
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.