Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
-: Alright, great.
Now that we know what the P-value is and how to use it,
we will get back to hypothesis testing.
We saw only one of two possible cases. Remember?
We haven't covered the more commonly observed case
when the population variance is unknown.
Alright. Imagine you are the marketing analyst of a company
and that you've been asked to estimate
if the email open rate of one of the firm's competitors
is above your company's.
Your company has an open rate of 40%.
An email open rate is a measure
of how many people on the email list actually open
the emails they have received.
At first, you struggle to figure out
how to get such specific information
about a competitor company,
but then you see that an employee of that competitor company
posted a selfie on Facebook saying "LOL.
The email management software we are using drives me nuts."
In the background, you can see her screen
and it shows clearly the summaries
of the last 10 email campaigns that were sent
and their corresponding open rates. Bingo!
With your statistical skills, that's all you need.
A little help from Facebook.
Let's state the hypotheses.
Null hypothesis mean open rate is lower or equal to 40%.
Alternative hypothesis mean open rate is higher than 40%.
Note that in hypothesis testing,
we are aiming to reject the null hypothesis.
When we wanna test if the open rate is higher than 40%,
the null hypothesis actually states the opposite statement.
Also, pay attention that this time,
we are dealing with a one-sided test.
Alright. Your boss told you
that 0.05 is an adequate significance level for this test,
so that's what you'll use.
Here's the data set.
You calculate the sample mean and get 37.7%.
The sample standard deviation is 13.74%,
thus the standard error is 4.34%.
You assume that the population of open rates of sent emails
is normally distributed.
Like confidence intervals with variance unknown
in a small sample,
the correct statistic to use is the t-statistic.
Remember, you do not know the variance
and the sample is not big enough.
This means that the variable follows
the student's T distribution
and you must employ the t-statistic.
Let's calculate it then.
We calculate the T score the same way as the Z score.
The T score is equal to the sample mean,
minus the hypothesized mean value,
divided by the standard error.
The result that we get is -0.53.
-: As we said earlier,
it is easier to work with positive numbers.
So, we should compare the absolute value of -0.53
with the appropriate T with N minus one degrees of freedom
at 0.05 one-sided significance.
We quickly navigate through the table
and get 1.83 at the 5% significance critical value.
Okay, 0.53 is lower than 1.83.
Remember the Decision rule?
If the absolute value of the T score
is lower than the statistic from the table,
we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we must accept it.
What you do next is you go and tell your boss
that at this level of significance, statistically,
we cannot say that the email open rate of our competitors
is higher than 40%.
Okay. What about the second measurement we saw?
What was that?
Ah, yes.
The P-value.
The P-value of this statistic is 0.304.
As the P-value is greater than the significance level
of 0.05, we come to the same conclusion.
We cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Let's do a quick check.
If the significance level was 0.01,
the P-value would still be higher
and we wouldn't reject the null hypothesis.
This is an important observation
that we haven't noted before.
If we cannot reject a test at 0.05 significance,
we could not reject it at smaller levels either.
Alright. That's all for now.
Make sure you learn the material by doing the exercises
after this lesson.
Thanks for watching.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.