Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:25,600
how's it going guys so today I'm gonna talk about 10 things that I do on almost
2
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:29,600
all my renders to just give it a little bit more photorealism
3
00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:33,600
photorealism, like most 3d artists, is photorealism
4
00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:35,600
photorealism
5
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:37,600
photorealism
6
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:39,600
photorealism
7
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:41,600
photorealism
8
00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:43,600
photorealism
9
00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:53,600
the following video is for serious artists only
10
00:00:53,600 --> 00:01:05,600
exciting, mysterious, intense, provocative, raw, euphoric, technically and visually stunning
11
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:11,600
this is no ordinary render, this is the exotic, bizarre, and beautiful world of NPR
12
00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:16,600
and this is your invitation to enter with one-click stylize
13
00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:20,600
critics say OCS makes photorealism look stupid
14
00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:22,600
it's awe-inspiring
15
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:24,600
the future of rendering
16
00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:27,600
one-click stylize is yours for free when you finish this video
17
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:31,600
with this state-of-the-art pipeline you will enter a world beyond imagination
18
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:33,600
a future out of
19
00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,600
and an experience you will never forget
20
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:37,600
2
21
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:39,600
4
22
00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:47,600
alright I think that's enough melodrama for the day
23
00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:53,600
basically I got bored of photorealism and I decided to dip my toes into non-photorealistic rendering
24
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,600
which, oh boy, was a deep deep rabbit hole
25
00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:01,600
today I wanna show off this workflow around this hidden gem of a software I found called Photosketcher
26
00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:03,600
that I haven't heard many people talk about
27
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,600
despite it being really powerful and giving out such a painterly and artistic result
28
00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:10,600
with such minimal effort, mind you
29
00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:11,600
and it's free
30
00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:15,600
this workflow is so powerful that last year I entered a render challenge
31
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:19,600
and just based on the style of my render I ended up bagging 7th place
32
00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:21,600
and here's what the judges had to say about it
33
00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:24,600
so we're gonna move on to 7th place
34
00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:27,600
which I will show you from a person called Radium
35
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:31,600
and they named the image finalfinalfinal.png
36
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:32,600
thank you very much
37
00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:34,600
I really like this one
38
00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:36,600
I think this is probably one of my favorites
39
00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:41,600
and I don't know if it's just the style or the colors or this, what are they, painterly look?
40
00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,600
candidly, I didn't like it at all at first
41
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:47,600
but it's one of those that the more I look at it, the more I love it
42
00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:55,600
and the closer you look, the more you notice the painterly aspect, the rendering style on, you know, whether it's canvas or brush strokes
43
00:02:55,600 --> 00:03:00,600
it has, I would say that this one has more style to it than any of the other renders
44
00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:05,600
and there's just so many little things, like the art style really unified all of the different elements
45
00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:09,600
like that painterly tonal contrast, it just works so well with this art style
46
00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:15,600
I think it's great, I'm really interested in what your post-processing workflow actually is to get this kind of thing out
47
00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:19,600
there are parts where I'm like, is this paint effect post-processing?
48
00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:27,600
because the texture is larger, closer, but if you look at the back you don't see the texture
49
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:29,600
so is it like part of the shader?
50
00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:31,600
I think it's part of the texture
51
00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:36,600
and when you have Arundel guessing what your post-processing workflow is like, you know you're struck gold
52
00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:38,600
cool right? now let's learn to make this
53
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:42,600
step 1, this is probably going to be the hardest step out of all of them
54
00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:45,600
and that is making a scene in Blender, and then rendering it of course
55
00:03:45,600 --> 00:03:48,600
step 2, color grade your render
56
00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:55,600
this is an important step, from me experimenting with this pipeline, I've found that photosketcher tends to mess up the colors of your render
57
00:03:55,600 --> 00:04:00,600
changing the colors later on down the line becomes nearly impossible and gives a messy result
58
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:05,600
so you want to dial in the colors right now and set the vibe of the scene before putting it through photosketcher
59
00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:07,600
step 3, start up photosketcher
60
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:11,600
now I know the UI looks like it comes from the 60s, but bear with me here for a second
61
00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:13,600
load up your render with this blue icon
62
00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:20,600
you are presented with this dialog box, now it all comes down to selecting your style and shifting sliders around to get the look you want
63
00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:24,600
it's crazy how easy it is to get a good looking result with such minimal effort
64
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,600
step 4, advanced tips and tricks
65
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:31,600
while messing around with photosketcher you might come across this custom brushes option
66
00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:35,600
which certain painterly styles come with, not all of them have it but certain do
67
00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:39,600
with this option you can load up a brush alpha mask that can be used to process your image
68
00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:45,600
and this allows you to give your image a more unique style and push in that NPR look even further
69
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:49,600
I've included a link to a free brush back down below if you want to use it
70
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:54,600
another option you might come across while messing with photosketcher is the option for manual brushes
71
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:59,600
with this you can actually go in and paint parts of the image you want the effect to be applied to
72
00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:04,600
but I don't like using this method because this is kind of rudimentary and I prefer doing the same thing
73
00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:10,600
but bringing over the stylized image and the non-stylized images to Photoshop or any photo editing software of your choice
74
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:13,600
another tip I have is blending between various styles
75
00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:18,600
what I usually do is process the image into multiple styles and then go into Photoshop
76
00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,600
and then blend between them to really push that stylized NPR look
77
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:26,600
if you do end up making something with this method be sure to tag me on Instagram
78
00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:28,600
I would love to see what you guys come up with
79
00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:31,600
and yeah, that's the video, if you enjoyed it consider subscribing
80
00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:34,600
thanks for watching, check out my socials and check out my Patreon
81
00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,600
I have some cool stuff up there now and God bless, bye!
82
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:52,600
Thanks for watching!
8286
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.