All language subtitles for The.Investigation.S01E05.Et.helt.menneske.1080p.WEB-DL.H.264.R_track5_[eng]

No injuries to the skull?

And we don't have the arms.

That's just absurd.

Why the hell did he say
she hit her head if it's not true?

He must've been convinced
we'd never find her body.

And when he hears we're raising the sub
he makes up a story -

- about why we'll find
traces of blood in it.

The problem as I see it is
that this doesn't change a thing.

We still don't have
any compelling evidence.

But there were no skull injuries,
so his story is verifiably untrue.

Yes.
It is.

But only until he comes up
with another story.

And that is his prerogative.

First, he put her ashore.
Then he buried her at sea in one piece -

- after she hit her head.

Now she didn't hit her head
and wasn't buried in one piece.

He keeps changing his story.

It's the rules.

An accused is entitled to change
his story again and again.

The question is:
Can we rule out an accident?

Can we rule out suicide?

And can we even prove homicide?

What happened? What's the cause
of death? What's the motive?

- We don't know.
- Exactly. We don't know.

And the burden of proof is on us.

The wind is at 9 meters per second.
A northbound, 1.5 knot current.

The water is 7 degrees,
and that gives us good visibility.

I need at least two men per jackstay
and please stay close to each other.

It's cold
and we're all getting tired -

- so look out for each other.

Questions?

LUST, JEALOUSY, REVENGE, PROFIT,
EXTREMISM, EXPULSION, POWER

So back to the beginning.
What do we know?

We know she died in a homicide
or an accident.

What about suicide?
Is that out of the question?

It's like solving a puzzle
with half the pieces.

Okay. So let's look
at the half we do have.

We have torso, legs and head
with no injuries.

We have pieces of the pipes
used to weigh her down.

They match those found in the accused's
workshop, in other words premeditation.

We have panties, pantyhose,
a knife and some clothing.

We have books indicating the accused
was fascinated by criminals and crimes -

- and statements describing him
as sexually deviant.

We know that he invited three or four
other women to go sailing -

- and that they all declined.

We know that the journalist by chance
called him for an interview -

- sailed out with him and vanished.

But what does all that prove?

That he killed her, dismembered her
and tossed her in the sea.

No. It shows she was cut up and tossed
in the sea, but not that she was killed.

We found the head.
There were no injuries on it.

And his story constantly changes.
Isn't that enough pieces?

No. Not necessarily.

Right.

Musa and I have a meeting with
the IT investigators tomorrow.

They're working on his private computer
and may find something.

Does he know we found the legs and head?

Yes.

- And he didn't change his story again?
- No.

- Has anyone in his circle come forward?
- No.

Some of them must know something.

Jens here.

Let's call a press conference.

I want to share
our latest finds with the public.

Will you take care of it?

Great. Thanks.

If we tell the media
there are no injuries to the skull -

- and that he lied about that, too,
maybe his friends will talk to us.

And maybe he has something new
to add.

Good morning.

We're here to update you on what
the press is calling the Submarine Case.

Yesterday, with the help of divers from
The Royal Navy Clearance Unit -

- we performed a number of dives.

And during the morning hours
we retrieved a bag -

- containing Kim Wall's clothes.

A sweater, a skirt, shoes and socks.

In the bag there were also a knife
and weights to weigh down the bag.

Around noon we found a leg.

Then another leg.
And shortly after a head.

And it has been determined
that the skull has no fractures -

- and that there are no signs
of blunt force to the skull.

Cecilie's phone,
Anders speaking.

Hi, Anders, this is Jens,
Cecilie's dad.

Hi. Cecilie can't come to the phone
right now.

I see. I've tried to call her
many times.

I see. I didn't know that.

Will you tell her to call me?

Sure. I sure will. Bye.

We're putting pressure on him
to give us an explanation -

- that will hopefully be closer
to the truth.

And to get those around him
who still believe in him to talk to us.

It's been two months now.

Naturally, we're relieved
that you have...

... that you have... found...

But I don't understand
why we don't know more.

Every time you find something -

- he changes his story.
And now it turns out he lied again.

And it doesn't seem to have
any consequences for him.

How will we ever know what happened?

I wish I knew.

- But you're still diving?
- Of course.

When the weather permits.

Are they looking for the phones?

Well... finding the phones
isn't our main priority.

And why not?

If you find the phones,
maybe we can find out what happened.

I understand.

The question is if it's even possible
to find those phones.

Or if they've disappeared
in the sand on the seabed.

I'm good to go, Jarl.

Yellow buoy up!

So?

I found something.

- So 200 meter?
- Yes, from the center line. 219.

I hear you found the saw?

What's wrong?

- Something's wrong with the track.
- What do you mean?

We found the saw down here.

But that can't be.

According to our radar tracks,
the sub never sailed down here.

- How far is it from the track?
- Over 200 meters.

How much does it weigh? Could it be
carried 200 meters by the current?

I asked that very same question.

We bought an identical saw,
sailed out and tossed it in the water.

- And?
- It went straight to the bottom.

If we're to find the arms,
we need details about the sub's route.

- We don't have any.
- Then we'll have to get it.

I told VTS in Malmoe
we'll be there tomorrow.

I have a friend up there.
We'll look at the radar images -

- second by second, minute by minute,
hour by hour, till we have the details.

- And how long will that take?
- I don't know.

I'm done with this.
We need to find it all.

We start out searching for buzzwords.

Such as killing, submarine, sex,
words like that.

We search his files
and browser history -

- and if there's a match
we'll see where that takes us.

That way we slowly but surely
dig deeper into the data.

You could help us by categorizing
the buzzwords by motive.

We're already doing that.
I'll send you the list when it's done.

You can add anything
we may have overlooked.

- What if he's erased files?
- There'll be traces of them.

How so?

Once something's been on a hard drive
it's practically impossible to erase.

So, what do you do
if you want to erase something?

- Use a bathtub or a hammer.
- When will you see a result?

With no matches it'll be quick,
but if we do find something -

- and we start digging,
it could take a while.

How long is a while?

Weeks.

Or months.

They're searching for words like
sex, submarine, killing.

- How far are they?
- Not very.

It's apparently harder than you think.

It looks like your plan worked.

I just talked to the defense attorney.

She says her client has decided to tell
the truth about what happened.

He wants to be interviewed tomorrow.

What did he say?

After careful consideration,
he has decided to tell the truth.

And he explained that she didn't die
from an iron hatch hitting her head.

And that he cut her up as she was
too heavy to carry up the sub's tower.

So he admits to dismembering her?

And the cause of death?

He says lack of oxygen, asphyxiation
or carbon monoxide poisoning.

Something about engine trouble
and faulty valves.

It was a long technical account -

- but the hatch slammed shut
when he was in the tower -

- and she was at the bottom of the sub.

A vacuum occurred preventing him
from opening the hatch -

- and when he finally managed it, he
crawled back down and found her dead.

- And then he dismembered her.
- Yes.

Or... no.

He tried to lift her, but with no luck.

Later in the evening he decided
to cut the body into smaller pieces.

Afterwards,
he decided to commit suicide -

- which he postponed... or regretted.

And the pantyhose and panties?

He believes that her clothes came off
when he struggled to get her up.

And he says he didn't notice.

Every time you find something,
he changes his story.

We need to find the arms.

Next he'll say she committed suicide
by slashing her wrists.

And that he swore
never to tell her parents.

We have to rule out
everything but homicide.

- Oh, still here?
- Yeah, I had nothing better to do.

I talked to the submarine expert,
Ditte Dyreborg.

I'm meeting with her
to go over his latest story.

Whether the hatch can get stuck,
or it's just another lie.

Good. It would be nice
if we could disprove that.

- See you tomorrow.
- Yes.

Hi, this is Cecilie. I can't pick up,
but leave a message. Bye.

Hi, Cecilie. Dad here.

Please call me back.

Talk soon.

We sat all day with a sheet of
tracing paper on the radar screen.

Drawing dots every time the radar
registered anything.

From 19:30 when they sail out -

- until 10:22 when the sub sinks.

Minute by minute by minute by minute.

There are over 600 dots.

Has it changed the route?

Yes. In the southern part of the track
in particular. Look.

The huge turns here
we knew nothing about.

And it fits with the spot
where we found the saw.

- And you're considering going out here?
- Considering?

They're good to go.

I had an interesting conversation with
submarine expert Ditte Dyreborg.

What did she say?

That it was correct
that a vacuum would occur -

- that would prevent the hatch
from opening -

- but she didn't understand
how he managed to open it anyway.

In her opinion, that is impossible.

Okay. So if he's truthful about the
accident, the hatch couldn't be opened?

Yes.

It would take a long time to neutralize it
so the hatch could be opened.

How long?

- At least an hour.
- What was her analysis?

Well, we didn't have all the drawings -

- and the condition of the sub after
having sunk leaves pretty big gaps.

So her conclusion is?

That he is definitely lying his ass off.

The glitch he claims happened -

- would have caused strong heat,
which would have created the vacuum -

- but the dead body would also
be visibly impacted by the heat.

I've asked Technological Institute
to examine it and possibly confirm it -

- in their official report.

Does she agree with Lars Møller
that the sub was sunk on purpose?

- Yes, she had no doubt about that.
- Jakob will be pleased.

Jens here.

What?

Hi, Jakob. Jens here.

I'm calling to tell you that an hour ago
they found an arm.

No, just one of them.

Right...

We'll sure as hell
find the other one, too.

Marker buoy on the surface!

Diver on the surface!

Yes!
Yes!

Alright!

- Alright!
- Yes!

Good job!

Yes!

I just spoke to the parents.

They asked me to thank you and your men
for your efforts.

It means the world to them
to be able to bury their daughter.

Usually, after a day at sea...

... spirits are high and lively.

The men talk about
what they're gonna eat and drink...

... and who they'll be making out with.

But today,
after the adrenaline rush wore off...

... no one said a word.

They were quiet.

Good job.

Well, we did our best.

Here's hoping it's enough.

Klaus here.

Hi Klaus. It's Jens.

Hi Jens.

Talk to me.

The cause of death
is not to be found on the arms.

No signs of suicide,
no defensive wounds, nothing.

Okay.

Right... So the question is
what the hell happened.

Yes. That's what we need to find out.

So suicide is off the table.

Mmm.

So we're down to homicide, right?

Yes, maybe.

Maybe we have enough
to get him convicted for homicide.

He'll get off with 14 years in prison
and be out in eight or ten.

In order to obtain a life sentence
or psychiatric placement -

- we must have homicide
plus something else.

But I don't have to tell you that.

Rape?

Yes. That'll work.

But to convict him of rape
we need evidence.

And that it happened before she died...
or that it was planned.

If it happened spontaneously
after she died -

- it's only...

Indecent interference with a corpse
and necrophilia.

That won't cut it.

We have to ascertain
what happened that night, Jens.

And we will...

... by establishing motive.

SUICIDE

Cause of death was
not found on her arms -

- so we'll just have to wait for
Forensic team's final conclusions.

Do you have ten minutes?

Yes, of course.

Until now we've found seven texts
about impalement of women.

Impalement?
What do you mean?

That's a good question.
They're texts of a sexual nature.

Fantasies about impalement.

The penetration of flesh
with a sharp object.

Skewers, pencils, knives, awls, needles.
Have a look.

How many stab wounds were there?

Seventeen.

- Do you think there's more like this?
- I'm afraid so.

We've gone over
the accused's browser history -

- such as websites he's visited,
words he's searched etc.

- May I?
- Of course.

Beheaded.

Agony.

Girl. Three words the accused used
on multiple searches.

The latest being 18 hours before
the sub sailed out.

- Don't you spell agony without the 'r'?
- The typo is the accused's.

In spite of it, the search turned up
quite interesting results -

- such as a so-called snuff video
of a woman being decapitated.

Is it real?

In our assessment it looks very real.

- Did he watch it?
- Yes.

As late as 18 hours before
sailing out with the victim.

We also found three animated movies
with the same content on his computer.

So, cartoons.

Decapitation and impalement
presented in a sexual context.

I'd like to see those films.

I strongly advise against it.

Could he have tried to copy
the video he'd seen?

Was it all planned?

Contrary to usual practice he brought
the saw onboard.

That contradicts his story about trying
to carry the body up the tower.

If he didn't have any use for the saw
why did he bring it?

It turned out that he tried to invite
three other women that same day -

- and that they all declined.

When they declined, he seemed to give up.
He doesn't text anyone else.

But then his phone rings.

It's the Swedish journalist who has
requested an interview in the past.

She'd like an interview.
And then his plan is back in motion.

Is it correct that nothing indicates
that they knew each other beforehand?

- Yes.
- So we agree on that.

Then we needn't pursue jealousy -

- revenge -

- and expulsion.

Does anything indicate
it was for profit?

No.

Does anything indicate
a religious or political motive?

A satanic sacrifice or
a political statement or terror?

No.

Lust. He had semen residue
in his underpants.

He's known in the Copenhagen sex clubs.
Leading up to the killing, he watches -

- a snuff video of
a woman being decapitated.

That all points to a sexual motive.

Power.

He may have wanted to manifest his power
because he felt impotent.

His projects were in trouble,
he canceled the trip -

- and his company
was about to go bankrupt.

Maybe that was his trigger point.
He lost that part of himself.

The power. The control.

The panties and the excerpt from the
Amager Man's book tell the same story.

He wanted to prove himself
by copying that video.

He wanted to prove
that he could get away with it.

It gave him a rush.

Power.

ACCIDENT - HOMICIDE
LUST - POWER

- Jens?
- May I come in?

What's going on?

Beheaded. Agony. Girl.

We have a motive.

We have a motive.

If Forensics find decapitation to be
the cause of death, we've got him.

And if they don't?

Then it'll be more of an uphill battle
to prove he tried to copy that video.

The worst part is how random it all was.

She tried to get an interview with him
earlier this year.

She didn't and forgot all about it.
Then she suddenly remembers -

- calls him and sets up an interview.

She knew nothing.

But he knew exactly
what he was doing.

He brought all the tools.
She didn't stand a chance.

She did nothing wrong.
She was just curious -

- trusting and happy and brave.

She was exactly
as we want our children to be.

- Hello?
- Hi, it's Dad. Can I talk to you?

- Hello?
- I'll come down.

- Hi, sweetie.
- Hi.

- I've been calling you.
- Yes, I know.

- You didn't call back.
- No, there's been a lot going on.

I'm sorry I couldn't make it last time.
I couldn't...

- It's fine.
- You know how it is.

Yes, I do.

Maybe that's why I didn't call you back.

What do you mean?

You would have apologized and told me
how important the case was -

- and I'd have said okay,
although I didn't mean it.

What do you want me to say?

I don't know what you should say.
You don't have to say anything, it's...

I'm about to have my first child,
and I'm really scared, and I...

I just can't handle
being let down again and again.

So tell me what you expect?

I'm your daughter.

I need love and attention
and the feeling that...

... the feeling that I'm important to you.

You are important to me.

Listen, a young woman was murdered.

She was tossed in the sea.
What the hell do you want me to do?

I don't know.

And as long as you don't know either,
please don't call me.