Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,210
A great way to establish visual hierarchy is using contrast.
2
00:00:04,210 --> 00:00:05,455
So you can see here,
3
00:00:05,455 --> 00:00:07,855
I use contrast to really make an obvious
4
00:00:07,855 --> 00:00:11,315
what it is that you should be focusing on on the slide.
5
00:00:11,315 --> 00:00:14,520
Fun with PowerPoint, funny guy,
6
00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:18,985
that's really a better version of this is that by using things like
7
00:00:18,985 --> 00:00:26,470
darker text and a bright yellow with black text on top of it,
8
00:00:26,470 --> 00:00:30,170
just by using those to enhance contrast,
9
00:00:30,170 --> 00:00:34,410
you're signaling to somebody what it is that they should focus on on the slide.
10
00:00:34,410 --> 00:00:40,120
You can also do reverse so you can have white text on a darker background,
11
00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:44,320
you can have bright red text as well.
12
00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,870
So red would be considered sort of more urgent
13
00:00:47,870 --> 00:00:51,680
or higher contrast is something that people are going to probably focus on first.
14
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:54,020
So all of these things are ways of using
15
00:00:54,020 --> 00:00:57,690
contrast to signal to somebody what it is that they should be looking at.
16
00:00:57,690 --> 00:01:02,150
If I asked you what would you look at first if I just showed this to you now,
17
00:01:02,150 --> 00:01:04,055
you probably would see this first
18
00:01:04,055 --> 00:01:07,880
and then well maybe this one because of the black and yellow and then this one third.
19
00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:13,940
Right? So you go left to right which probably is a good way of processing
20
00:01:13,940 --> 00:01:16,880
the visual information on the slide so that would be a useful way of
21
00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,750
organizing this information just by using something like contrast.
22
00:01:20,750 --> 00:01:25,560
If a little contrast is good then a lot of contrast must be better right?
23
00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:29,470
No not really I wouldn't say so.
24
00:01:29,470 --> 00:01:31,155
Okay. You get the idea.
25
00:01:31,155 --> 00:01:35,790
Again, this is just a little kind of I don't know visual humor if you want is that,
26
00:01:35,790 --> 00:01:39,640
this is kind of hard to look at just forcing you to look at
27
00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:43,180
this for a minute is probably not the most pleasant thing because again,
28
00:01:43,180 --> 00:01:48,060
you're overloading somebody's brain you're making them look at too many things at once.
29
00:01:48,060 --> 00:01:51,250
You trying to figure out what's the subject here and yes they're
30
00:01:51,250 --> 00:01:55,145
seeing this kind of text and shape like maybe that's the subject,
31
00:01:55,145 --> 00:01:57,630
but this bright yellow background makes somebody go, "Wow!
32
00:01:57,630 --> 00:01:58,955
This is super important.
33
00:01:58,955 --> 00:02:01,600
I should really be looking at this whole thing all at once."
34
00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:03,955
It's almost kind of tiring,
35
00:02:03,955 --> 00:02:06,840
because your brain keeps trying to figure out what am I looking at,
36
00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:08,175
what's going on here.
37
00:02:08,175 --> 00:02:10,260
So obviously you want to avoid that,
38
00:02:10,260 --> 00:02:12,300
you want to just use contrast,
39
00:02:12,300 --> 00:02:15,400
very strategically use it
40
00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:18,785
when it's important when you want to draw attention to something.
41
00:02:18,785 --> 00:02:21,830
So for example with this version here,
42
00:02:21,830 --> 00:02:26,500
it's really obvious if I just had something like this on the map or on my image,
43
00:02:26,500 --> 00:02:29,545
then the person knows that must be the most important thing
44
00:02:29,545 --> 00:02:33,560
without having to overload them with a lot of high contrast than the other parts.
45
00:02:33,560 --> 00:02:35,575
In terms of contrast on a map,
46
00:02:35,575 --> 00:02:39,460
I'm just going to show you some different examples here is that these are the outlines of
47
00:02:39,460 --> 00:02:44,665
census tracts in Toronto and this is obviously really low contrast version of the map.
48
00:02:44,665 --> 00:02:47,230
I'm hoping you can actually see that there's outline's there,
49
00:02:47,230 --> 00:02:52,700
but I made it kinda of a slightly dark beige outline on a later beige background
50
00:02:52,700 --> 00:02:58,475
so really not enough contrast this would be frustrating for somebody to look at.
51
00:02:58,475 --> 00:02:59,990
If I do this though,
52
00:02:59,990 --> 00:03:02,605
obviously I'm color-coding it with some kind of value.
53
00:03:02,605 --> 00:03:05,960
But the point is, is that now there are some kind of contrast going on we
54
00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:09,260
have contrast between the land and the water,
55
00:03:09,260 --> 00:03:13,190
so you can definitely see contrast between those two and then we have contrast
56
00:03:13,190 --> 00:03:17,335
between different census tracks within the land and so,
57
00:03:17,335 --> 00:03:21,180
it's easy for somebody to start to look at that and see similarities,
58
00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:23,750
differences and relationships in terms of trends
59
00:03:23,750 --> 00:03:27,380
or what's going on with this map and so by having that,
60
00:03:27,380 --> 00:03:30,020
I think it helps somebody just by using something like
61
00:03:30,020 --> 00:03:33,465
contrast to be able to interpret that visual hierarchy.
62
00:03:33,465 --> 00:03:38,050
This is using color with contrast I'm not saying this is a great map I
63
00:03:38,050 --> 00:03:42,750
wouldn't necessarily recommend this but you do have this idea of low,
64
00:03:42,750 --> 00:03:46,630
lighter areas versus darker areas in getting this kind of contrast thing
65
00:03:46,630 --> 00:03:51,010
happening not sure if this works too well when you're on a lake so,
66
00:03:51,010 --> 00:03:53,080
this kind of looks like a rectangular lake
67
00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:55,300
since it's almost the same color as Lake Ontario.
68
00:03:55,300 --> 00:03:59,335
But I'm just saying this was just meant to show you differences in contrast.
69
00:03:59,335 --> 00:04:02,700
Here we don't have a ton of contrast,
70
00:04:02,700 --> 00:04:04,875
this is an okay color scheme.
71
00:04:04,875 --> 00:04:07,870
I really wouldn't recommend it necessarily what I might do with
72
00:04:07,870 --> 00:04:11,455
a map like this is actually make the lake white
73
00:04:11,455 --> 00:04:15,610
if I had to or some really dramatic dark blue or there might be some other way of
74
00:04:15,610 --> 00:04:19,505
working with this and so we don't really have a lot of contrast on the land.
75
00:04:19,505 --> 00:04:22,680
So it's okay, but if it
76
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:26,240
was a base map or a background and I was gonna put something on top of that,
77
00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:29,600
this would be okay but on its own there's not really a lot of contrast here,
78
00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:32,740
not really enough to make it useful for us.
79
00:04:32,780 --> 00:04:35,115
This is too much contrast,
80
00:04:35,115 --> 00:04:38,035
this is you've got really dark colors,
81
00:04:38,035 --> 00:04:39,420
you used really bold colors,
82
00:04:39,420 --> 00:04:44,615
you got a light yellow and a dark blue and these greens.
83
00:04:44,615 --> 00:04:47,950
Again, I always think of it like well what's the subject here,
84
00:04:47,950 --> 00:04:49,120
what someone's supposed to look at,
85
00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,385
what are they supposed to see and it's really not clear.
86
00:04:51,385 --> 00:04:53,355
So this is a little too much contrast,
87
00:04:53,355 --> 00:04:57,575
it's really not going to be that useful or efficient for someone to see that hierarchy.
88
00:04:57,575 --> 00:05:00,020
Something as simple as changing the width of
89
00:05:00,020 --> 00:05:03,240
a line can help with visual hierarchy and visual contrast.
90
00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:05,650
Here we have a road network for part of Toronto,
91
00:05:05,650 --> 00:05:09,319
and by having them all the same color in the same line width,
92
00:05:09,319 --> 00:05:11,220
it's telling somebody that they're all the same.
93
00:05:11,220 --> 00:05:12,970
Remember we're looking for similarities,
94
00:05:12,970 --> 00:05:14,595
differences and relationships, right?
95
00:05:14,595 --> 00:05:17,335
So there's no contrast, in other words,
96
00:05:17,335 --> 00:05:19,460
on this and contrast isn't just about
97
00:05:19,460 --> 00:05:23,475
lighter or darker it can be the thickness of a line.
98
00:05:23,475 --> 00:05:28,955
All I had to do was change the thickness of the major arterial roads
99
00:05:28,955 --> 00:05:34,320
and now we have more visual contrasts we have more information to tell our reader.
100
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:35,760
If somebody's looking at this,
101
00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:37,370
more than likely they're going to key in on
102
00:05:37,370 --> 00:05:42,270
those thicker lines and why is that important?
103
00:05:42,270 --> 00:05:44,230
Because there's probably more people using those,
104
00:05:44,230 --> 00:05:45,390
there's higher traffic volume.
105
00:05:45,390 --> 00:05:47,149
If I'm trying to navigate the city,
106
00:05:47,149 --> 00:05:50,930
it might be easier for me to get around using those roads as opposed to
107
00:05:50,930 --> 00:05:53,570
the side roads and so just something as
108
00:05:53,570 --> 00:05:57,400
simple as this can increase contrast and make your map more efficient.9694
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.