Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:12,266 --> 00:00:13,766
the great movie director
2
00:00:13,766 --> 00:00:15,866
one of the most awarded of all time
3
00:00:15,866 --> 00:00:16,699
if not the most
4
00:00:16,700 --> 00:00:20,433
William Wyler had a simple formula
5
00:00:20,533 --> 00:00:26,066
he thought 90% of directing films was script
6
00:00:26,733 --> 00:00:27,966
and casting
7
00:00:28,300 --> 00:00:29,266
and then he said
8
00:00:29,266 --> 00:00:31,733
the other 10% was knowing how to get out of the way
9
00:00:31,733 --> 00:00:34,066
when you've done the first two things correctly
10
00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:37,966
um there there's a lot to be said for that
11
00:00:37,966 --> 00:00:41,199
casting is vitally important
12
00:00:41,466 --> 00:00:45,066
uh and and it's a process not to be trifled with
13
00:00:45,066 --> 00:00:46,699
to be taken very seriously
14
00:00:46,700 --> 00:00:50,533
a director can guide a performance in some instances
15
00:00:50,533 --> 00:00:51,999
maybe if you're working with a child
16
00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:53,800
or a very specific actor
17
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:57,066
with a set of tremendous strengths
18
00:00:57,066 --> 00:00:58,099
but you know
19
00:00:58,100 --> 00:00:59,400
another set of weaknesses
20
00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:02,500
it might be possible to really mold a performance
21
00:01:02,900 --> 00:01:08,700
but it's rare when that succeeds you you
22
00:01:09,566 --> 00:01:10,933
the director really
23
00:01:10,933 --> 00:01:14,299
really needs the actors to be strong
24
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:16,200
and especially in film
25
00:01:16,333 --> 00:01:21,099
there has to be some kind of connection between the
26
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:22,400
the the you know
27
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,900
the actor the performer and that character that
28
00:01:24,900 --> 00:01:27,166
that you can just readily accept
29
00:01:27,166 --> 00:01:27,966
now there's some great
30
00:01:27,966 --> 00:01:30,999
great character people who can surprise you
31
00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:31,333
and they can
32
00:01:31,333 --> 00:01:33,333
they can create that connection
33
00:01:33,333 --> 00:01:35,566
in ways that you never would have expected
34
00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:37,900
but that connection is still there
35
00:01:38,266 --> 00:01:38,999
Meryl Streep
36
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:41,466
you know leaps to mind um
37
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:42,600
Dustin Hoffman
38
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:43,666
some amazing
39
00:01:43,733 --> 00:01:45,299
uh characterizations
40
00:01:45,300 --> 00:01:45,733
and you know
41
00:01:45,733 --> 00:01:48,366
they don't seem very much like Dustin Hoffman at all
42
00:01:48,366 --> 00:01:49,599
and yet you know
43
00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:51,100
uh believe me
44
00:01:51,100 --> 00:01:54,500
Tom Hanks is nothing like Forrest Gump uh
45
00:01:54,666 --> 00:01:56,766
but but there's um
46
00:01:57,100 --> 00:01:58,666
there's an innate connection there
47
00:01:58,666 --> 00:01:59,299
that I think of
48
00:01:59,300 --> 00:02:02,133
a director sat and talk to any of those actors
49
00:02:02,133 --> 00:02:03,533
before they were gonna tackle a role
50
00:02:03,533 --> 00:02:05,266
where they were gonna transform themselves
51
00:02:05,266 --> 00:02:07,599
they were they were still building on something
52
00:02:07,766 --> 00:02:10,499
that they understood and
53
00:02:10,500 --> 00:02:12,366
and felt um
54
00:02:12,733 --> 00:02:13,899
so you know you
55
00:02:13,900 --> 00:02:14,366
you have to be
56
00:02:14,366 --> 00:02:16,499
very meticulous about the casting process
57
00:02:22,700 --> 00:02:26,400
all of directing boils down to taste
58
00:02:26,733 --> 00:02:30,233
you were talking a lot about techniques and
59
00:02:30,566 --> 00:02:32,666
options and possibilities
60
00:02:32,666 --> 00:02:33,733
and at the end of the day
61
00:02:33,733 --> 00:02:35,899
it always comes back to that
62
00:02:35,900 --> 00:02:37,900
that sense of what's good
63
00:02:37,900 --> 00:02:38,800
what's right
64
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:40,766
and you have to keep trusting that feeling
65
00:02:40,766 --> 00:02:42,499
these things are not academic
66
00:02:42,766 --> 00:02:44,866
uh you know uh issues
67
00:02:45,266 --> 00:02:45,866
they're they're
68
00:02:45,866 --> 00:02:46,533
they're creative
69
00:02:46,533 --> 00:02:47,366
they're aesthetic
70
00:02:47,366 --> 00:02:50,199
when you're looking at an actor's work
71
00:02:50,500 --> 00:02:52,666
whether you're watching other movies
72
00:02:52,666 --> 00:02:55,266
or television shows or plays that they're
73
00:02:55,266 --> 00:02:56,433
that they're in
74
00:02:56,600 --> 00:02:59,500
uh and and you're trying to make the decision about
75
00:02:59,566 --> 00:03:00,699
about the casting
76
00:03:00,700 --> 00:03:01,466
you do have to
77
00:03:01,466 --> 00:03:02,799
you have to follow your
78
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:07,100
your gut conversations with them will matter a lot
79
00:03:07,100 --> 00:03:11,100
sometimes other factors will come into play that
80
00:03:11,100 --> 00:03:13,433
by the way that actor has very little control of
81
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:14,566
for example
82
00:03:14,566 --> 00:03:15,766
if you're building a
83
00:03:15,966 --> 00:03:17,466
you're casting a family
84
00:03:17,700 --> 00:03:21,600
well if you put everybody's picture up on a wall
85
00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:23,366
do you feel like they're cohesive unit
86
00:03:23,366 --> 00:03:24,966
can they look like a family
87
00:03:25,133 --> 00:03:26,366
and the answer
88
00:03:26,366 --> 00:03:28,466
maybe uh no
89
00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:29,466
with you know
90
00:03:29,466 --> 00:03:31,199
with an actor or an actress that you're
91
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:32,600
that you're really considering
92
00:03:33,566 --> 00:03:34,666
as an actor
93
00:03:34,666 --> 00:03:38,799
myself often disappointed by going in
94
00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:41,166
auditioning and not getting a role
95
00:03:41,866 --> 00:03:44,833
I was shocked when I began casting
96
00:03:45,500 --> 00:03:50,100
because I realized that as a director
97
00:03:51,900 --> 00:03:53,033
most of the
98
00:03:53,166 --> 00:03:54,966
most of the people that you're looking at
99
00:03:54,966 --> 00:03:57,466
in a casting session can do the role
100
00:03:57,466 --> 00:03:57,899
in other words
101
00:03:57,900 --> 00:03:58,900
they're talented enough
102
00:03:58,900 --> 00:04:00,333
they're experienced enough
103
00:04:00,333 --> 00:04:01,766
they're intelligent enough
104
00:04:01,900 --> 00:04:03,566
of course they can play the role
105
00:04:04,366 --> 00:04:06,199
but of course
106
00:04:06,266 --> 00:04:07,533
most of them don't get the role
107
00:04:07,533 --> 00:04:10,566
you have to select the one and and
108
00:04:10,566 --> 00:04:13,466
there are so many intangibles that come into play there
109
00:04:13,466 --> 00:04:17,633
and again those boil down to taste
110
00:04:23,666 --> 00:04:27,166
now I would suggest a few other things to look for
111
00:04:28,300 --> 00:04:33,566
I believe that compatibility is important
112
00:04:33,566 --> 00:04:35,999
and I don't just mean congeniality
113
00:04:36,166 --> 00:04:37,066
cause you know
114
00:04:37,066 --> 00:04:39,066
it doesn't matter if a person is uh
115
00:04:39,266 --> 00:04:42,333
pleasant or sullen or funny and kind
116
00:04:42,333 --> 00:04:44,266
and none of those things matter again
117
00:04:44,266 --> 00:04:46,699
what matters is what you get inside those frame lines
118
00:04:46,700 --> 00:04:48,900
and what that actor can do with those
119
00:04:48,900 --> 00:04:50,000
with those scenes
120
00:04:50,066 --> 00:04:53,299
but you need a kind of creative compatibility
121
00:04:53,333 --> 00:04:55,666
you need to believe that
122
00:04:56,866 --> 00:05:01,066
that that actor um
123
00:05:01,066 --> 00:05:02,399
and that character
124
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:04,633
and your sensibility
125
00:05:04,966 --> 00:05:08,266
is gonna create a strong foundation
126
00:05:08,566 --> 00:05:11,666
um and if in conversation
127
00:05:11,766 --> 00:05:16,199
you believe that the actor disagrees with your approach
128
00:05:16,200 --> 00:05:18,700
you either have to think it through and and
129
00:05:18,700 --> 00:05:20,000
and and ask yourself
130
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:21,200
is the actor right here
131
00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:22,133
and am I wrong
132
00:05:22,133 --> 00:05:23,266
which is possible
133
00:05:23,500 --> 00:05:24,666
actors are smart
134
00:05:24,666 --> 00:05:27,233
and they think about characters in a very particular
135
00:05:27,333 --> 00:05:28,199
very profound
136
00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:29,466
and deep way often
137
00:05:29,766 --> 00:05:31,566
but if there's a
138
00:05:31,566 --> 00:05:33,033
if there's a disconnect
139
00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:34,133
the chances are you're not
140
00:05:34,133 --> 00:05:37,433
you're not going to benefit your story
141
00:05:37,933 --> 00:05:40,599
by trying to talk them out of their ideas
142
00:05:41,466 --> 00:05:43,066
even if they're pleasant about it
143
00:05:43,066 --> 00:05:44,599
and they try their best
144
00:05:44,766 --> 00:05:46,899
they're they're not gonna own their ideas
145
00:05:47,300 --> 00:05:50,000
so it's very important that they be able to
146
00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:52,066
put their personal stamp on their ideas
147
00:05:52,066 --> 00:05:53,099
of course you're gonna
148
00:05:53,100 --> 00:05:54,800
you're gonna give directions and suggestions
149
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:56,166
and they're gonna have to do some things
150
00:05:56,166 --> 00:05:57,966
that might be outside their comfort zone
151
00:05:58,000 --> 00:05:59,266
that's you know
152
00:05:59,266 --> 00:06:00,466
those are the particulars
153
00:06:00,466 --> 00:06:01,999
those are the specifics
154
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:04,566
but looking holistically at
155
00:06:04,566 --> 00:06:06,433
should this person be
156
00:06:06,533 --> 00:06:08,666
you know in this film or this television show
157
00:06:08,666 --> 00:06:11,733
you you have to look at that creative compatibility
158
00:06:11,733 --> 00:06:13,433
and be honest with yourself about it
159
00:06:19,300 --> 00:06:21,066
when I'm auditioning an actor
160
00:06:21,066 --> 00:06:21,499
and by the way
161
00:06:21,500 --> 00:06:23,400
I don't always audition actors very
162
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,766
very often I just know I want somebody in a role and
163
00:06:26,766 --> 00:06:28,066
and there's also a kind of an
164
00:06:28,100 --> 00:06:29,400
you know an easy consensus
165
00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:30,466
you're talking to your friends
166
00:06:30,466 --> 00:06:31,733
you're talking to the people
167
00:06:31,733 --> 00:06:32,399
uh you know
168
00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:33,833
involved in the project
169
00:06:34,100 --> 00:06:35,200
you mention somebody's name
170
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:36,300
as it relates to a character
171
00:06:36,300 --> 00:06:37,666
and everybody goes oh my god
172
00:06:37,666 --> 00:06:38,833
that would be great
173
00:06:38,933 --> 00:06:39,699
and you know
174
00:06:39,700 --> 00:06:42,000
if you have a meeting or a phone call or conversation
175
00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:43,366
and you sort of see that there's good
176
00:06:43,366 --> 00:06:44,533
good chemistry
177
00:06:44,533 --> 00:06:45,599
you know you just
178
00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:46,933
you just want that person in the role
179
00:06:46,933 --> 00:06:48,566
and trust that I've never
180
00:06:48,566 --> 00:06:50,699
I've never gone wrong with that
181
00:06:50,700 --> 00:06:52,366
that kind of thinking
182
00:06:52,366 --> 00:06:55,566
but whenever I'm working with an actor
183
00:06:55,566 --> 00:06:56,566
and I think they're
184
00:06:57,100 --> 00:06:57,966
you know I have a question
185
00:06:57,966 --> 00:07:00,066
as to whether they're really right or not
186
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,133
um but there's something about them intrinsically
187
00:07:04,133 --> 00:07:04,999
that I think
188
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:06,433
you know could really work
189
00:07:06,700 --> 00:07:08,000
and having been an actor myself
190
00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,566
always trying to give an actor every opportunity to
191
00:07:10,566 --> 00:07:12,866
to impress and and
192
00:07:12,866 --> 00:07:13,599
and sort of
193
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:14,833
um you know
194
00:07:14,966 --> 00:07:17,899
give their best to the audition uh
195
00:07:18,366 --> 00:07:22,299
I'll often ask them to do it again
196
00:07:22,300 --> 00:07:23,300
and and and
197
00:07:23,300 --> 00:07:25,433
and think of a direction to give them
198
00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:28,000
it might not even be a direction I would really give
199
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:29,233
on a shooting day
200
00:07:29,266 --> 00:07:31,133
it might it might be that their
201
00:07:31,133 --> 00:07:33,066
their instincts are fundamentally correct
202
00:07:33,166 --> 00:07:34,366
but I usually
203
00:07:34,500 --> 00:07:37,800
uh test the waters of my
204
00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:39,400
making a suggestion
205
00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:40,500
offering an adjustment
206
00:07:40,500 --> 00:07:41,866
and seeing how they handle it
207
00:07:41,966 --> 00:07:44,299
because it's also useful to know
208
00:07:44,466 --> 00:07:48,366
is this somebody who has that kind of command of their
209
00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:49,400
of their talent
210
00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:50,366
of their instrument
211
00:07:50,366 --> 00:07:53,433
or do they get locked in on a particular
212
00:07:53,866 --> 00:07:55,299
you know sort of idea
213
00:07:55,400 --> 00:07:56,933
a way of presenting the scene
214
00:07:56,933 --> 00:07:59,799
a way of approaching a scene and the dialogue within it
215
00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:01,900
and if so you need to know that
216
00:08:01,900 --> 00:08:02,733
and then say
217
00:08:02,733 --> 00:08:03,066
all right well
218
00:08:03,066 --> 00:08:03,733
there come there
219
00:08:03,733 --> 00:08:04,766
this is there
220
00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:05,866
this is how they see it
221
00:08:05,866 --> 00:08:06,733
this is how they feel it
222
00:08:06,733 --> 00:08:07,966
they've obviously prepared it
223
00:08:07,966 --> 00:08:09,699
that way and this is what they do
224
00:08:10,333 --> 00:08:12,866
and when you push them outside of that
225
00:08:13,066 --> 00:08:15,066
prepared approach they're
226
00:08:15,066 --> 00:08:17,066
they're gonna be a little bit at sea and lost
227
00:08:17,066 --> 00:08:20,433
and you just wanna note that there are other people who
228
00:08:20,500 --> 00:08:22,700
you know are improvisational and inspired
229
00:08:22,700 --> 00:08:24,333
and they can begin to
230
00:08:24,333 --> 00:08:25,166
uh you know
231
00:08:25,166 --> 00:08:27,266
to work with the scene in some remarkable ways
232
00:08:27,266 --> 00:08:28,166
and then you begin to say
233
00:08:28,166 --> 00:08:29,533
there's another element here
234
00:08:29,533 --> 00:08:32,599
this person could actually improve the writing
235
00:08:32,700 --> 00:08:34,566
they they could refine the character
236
00:08:34,566 --> 00:08:35,766
they could think of
237
00:08:35,866 --> 00:08:37,966
of details that none of us have
238
00:08:37,966 --> 00:08:39,066
have considered
239
00:08:39,066 --> 00:08:40,133
um you know
240
00:08:40,133 --> 00:08:41,766
that's always an exciting prospect
241
00:08:41,766 --> 00:08:43,199
when you can find that person
242
00:08:49,166 --> 00:08:52,099
I have definitely made some mistakes and missteps
243
00:08:52,100 --> 00:08:55,066
in casting and um
244
00:08:55,166 --> 00:08:56,233
probably the
245
00:08:57,100 --> 00:08:59,100
the only painful moments
246
00:08:59,100 --> 00:09:01,900
of having to replace somebody on a
247
00:09:01,900 --> 00:09:04,166
on a production um
248
00:09:04,166 --> 00:09:06,899
have have really been the handful of times
249
00:09:06,900 --> 00:09:10,000
when I realized that I made a mistake in the casting
250
00:09:10,666 --> 00:09:12,033
and it's never
251
00:09:12,100 --> 00:09:14,100
never been the actors fault
252
00:09:14,266 --> 00:09:16,099
it's not that they're showing up late
253
00:09:16,133 --> 00:09:17,499
or unprofessional
254
00:09:17,500 --> 00:09:18,500
or any of those things
255
00:09:18,500 --> 00:09:20,166
that you can talk to a person about
256
00:09:20,166 --> 00:09:21,533
it's usually that
257
00:09:21,533 --> 00:09:23,066
on some fundamental level
258
00:09:24,100 --> 00:09:26,300
they're not clicking with the role and the character
259
00:09:26,300 --> 00:09:27,600
the way you thought they should
260
00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:29,433
and it's apparent to you
261
00:09:30,133 --> 00:09:34,299
and there have been other times when um
262
00:09:34,300 --> 00:09:35,566
especially with you know
263
00:09:35,566 --> 00:09:37,499
people playing smaller roles
264
00:09:37,500 --> 00:09:39,100
or just coming in for the day
265
00:09:39,133 --> 00:09:40,199
where you know
266
00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:41,366
you realize that
267
00:09:41,366 --> 00:09:42,799
um this that
268
00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:44,333
there's a um
269
00:09:44,333 --> 00:09:46,133
there there may have been someone else who could
270
00:09:46,133 --> 00:09:48,066
who could have brought more to this role
271
00:09:48,133 --> 00:09:49,133
and and yet
272
00:09:49,133 --> 00:09:50,666
for practical reasons
273
00:09:50,733 --> 00:09:51,599
you know you
274
00:09:51,700 --> 00:09:54,033
you uh you you make it work
275
00:09:54,066 --> 00:09:55,066
you know you
276
00:09:55,666 --> 00:09:57,966
you shoot more coverage on them
277
00:09:57,966 --> 00:09:59,666
so that you're gonna have more options
278
00:09:59,666 --> 00:10:01,499
to help build the performance
279
00:10:01,533 --> 00:10:06,699
um you may stage the scenes in ways so that they're not
280
00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:07,300
they're not
281
00:10:07,300 --> 00:10:10,166
they're not really featured all that much
282
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,200
if somebody is really struggling with their dialogue
283
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:15,933
or with a character grasping something you might
284
00:10:15,933 --> 00:10:19,933
might suggest to a director to stage the scene more
285
00:10:19,933 --> 00:10:21,499
kind of over their shoulder
286
00:10:21,500 --> 00:10:24,600
and so that when you come around and shoot them
287
00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:27,066
for their lines or their reactions
288
00:10:27,166 --> 00:10:28,199
you have a you know
289
00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:29,133
a lot more control
290
00:10:29,133 --> 00:10:30,433
it's always gonna be the
291
00:10:30,533 --> 00:10:34,499
the the specific shot for the specific moment
292
00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:35,933
and you know then you
293
00:10:35,933 --> 00:10:38,099
you do a number of takes and choose the ones that
294
00:10:38,100 --> 00:10:38,900
that work the best
295
00:10:38,900 --> 00:10:42,633
so in film you can do a lot of things
296
00:10:43,133 --> 00:10:43,866
to help make
297
00:10:43,866 --> 00:10:45,499
make a performance work better
298
00:10:46,066 --> 00:10:48,399
um but without meticulous
299
00:10:48,400 --> 00:10:50,866
thoroughcasting um
300
00:10:50,966 --> 00:10:51,766
in the beginning
301
00:10:51,766 --> 00:10:53,366
especially with lead roles
302
00:10:53,366 --> 00:10:55,166
you're um that that's
303
00:10:55,166 --> 00:10:56,399
that's gonna be um
304
00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:58,200
you know a huge um
305
00:10:58,200 --> 00:10:59,433
detrimental
306
00:10:59,733 --> 00:11:03,133
um sort of misdirection for the for the
307
00:11:03,133 --> 00:11:03,999
for the movie
308
00:11:09,766 --> 00:11:11,199
so there's there's talent
309
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:11,966
there's skill
310
00:11:11,966 --> 00:11:13,066
intelligence
311
00:11:13,333 --> 00:11:16,699
um those things are important there
312
00:11:16,700 --> 00:11:21,166
there's also this other intangible quality which is um
313
00:11:21,166 --> 00:11:22,766
let's just call it chemistry
314
00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:28,933
and if you feel like that actor can
315
00:11:28,933 --> 00:11:31,366
can embody the spirit of that character
316
00:11:31,566 --> 00:11:33,099
in some honest way
317
00:11:33,100 --> 00:11:36,100
and some way that either entertains you or moves you
318
00:11:36,100 --> 00:11:39,266
or fascinates you um
319
00:11:39,333 --> 00:11:42,366
you should really respond to that and keep note of that
320
00:11:42,366 --> 00:11:43,766
and that should be a tiebreaker
321
00:11:43,766 --> 00:11:46,266
so you might have several people who can play the part
322
00:11:46,333 --> 00:11:47,699
one person might even be
323
00:11:47,900 --> 00:11:49,500
you know maybe a little more experienced
324
00:11:49,500 --> 00:11:51,000
a little a little more creative
325
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:52,200
a little more talented
326
00:11:52,200 --> 00:11:55,466
but I would give the nod to the person
327
00:11:55,466 --> 00:11:59,366
who seems to inhabit the character in a more natural
328
00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:01,466
spontaneous kind of way
329
00:12:01,466 --> 00:12:02,699
assuming that they
330
00:12:02,700 --> 00:12:04,600
they do have the talent and the skills
331
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:05,766
to be able to give you
332
00:12:05,766 --> 00:12:07,699
give you what you need as an actor
333
00:12:07,700 --> 00:12:08,600
that's that
334
00:12:08,666 --> 00:12:09,166
then they're
335
00:12:09,166 --> 00:12:11,699
they're bringing that X factor to a role and
336
00:12:11,700 --> 00:12:12,966
and cameras film
337
00:12:12,966 --> 00:12:15,366
it's more important in film than it is in the theater
338
00:12:15,366 --> 00:12:16,966
this this factor that I'm talking about
339
00:12:16,966 --> 00:12:18,366
because you know
340
00:12:18,866 --> 00:12:20,499
lenses do kind of see into
341
00:12:20,500 --> 00:12:21,166
through the eyes
342
00:12:21,166 --> 00:12:22,999
into the soul and um
343
00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,000
and it's you um
344
00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:27,400
so much more subtle process
345
00:12:27,466 --> 00:12:29,299
and the more connected
346
00:12:29,333 --> 00:12:32,333
that a film or television actor is to the character
347
00:12:32,333 --> 00:12:33,533
um the more we
348
00:12:33,533 --> 00:12:34,333
as audience members
349
00:12:34,333 --> 00:12:36,266
just believe it and lose ourselves in it
350
00:12:36,366 --> 00:12:38,499
whenever possible I
351
00:12:38,500 --> 00:12:40,466
I try to bring the actors together
352
00:12:40,533 --> 00:12:42,333
before the final casting is
353
00:12:42,333 --> 00:12:43,766
in pairs especially
354
00:12:43,766 --> 00:12:44,533
you know um
355
00:12:44,533 --> 00:12:46,799
if they're gonna be friends or
356
00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:49,033
or you know
357
00:12:49,966 --> 00:12:51,466
you know parent child
358
00:12:52,533 --> 00:12:53,866
loved ones you know
359
00:12:53,866 --> 00:12:56,133
I try to see them together
360
00:12:56,133 --> 00:12:56,766
and certainly the
361
00:12:56,766 --> 00:12:58,533
in the major roles
362
00:12:58,533 --> 00:13:01,566
very often I will bring uh
363
00:13:01,566 --> 00:13:04,233
the actors who have already been cast in
364
00:13:04,366 --> 00:13:07,099
to actually audition with finalists
365
00:13:07,100 --> 00:13:09,866
so that I can quickly see where there's a
366
00:13:09,866 --> 00:13:11,633
a natural rapport
367
00:13:11,700 --> 00:13:12,900
uh in a in a
368
00:13:12,900 --> 00:13:13,933
in a chemistry
369
00:13:13,933 --> 00:13:15,133
and just observe it
370
00:13:15,133 --> 00:13:15,866
and again it's a
371
00:13:15,866 --> 00:13:17,399
it's a very uh
372
00:13:17,466 --> 00:13:19,166
you know elusive
373
00:13:19,266 --> 00:13:21,299
um imperfect process
374
00:13:21,333 --> 00:13:26,099
and I often toss and turn during the casting process
375
00:13:26,133 --> 00:13:30,666
it is it's one of the only phases of making
376
00:13:32,066 --> 00:13:34,333
a movie or a television show that I find really
377
00:13:34,333 --> 00:13:35,599
really unsettling
378
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:37,566
because these
379
00:13:37,566 --> 00:13:40,699
these are the decisions that are gonna transcend
380
00:13:40,900 --> 00:13:44,266
the director's ability to solve a misstep
381
00:13:44,566 --> 00:13:45,666
um you know
382
00:13:45,666 --> 00:13:47,966
be other than some drastic measure
383
00:13:47,966 --> 00:13:50,566
like having to let somebody go and recast
26210
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.