All language subtitles for 15 video Discussion of Mungo Man dating [360p]

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French Download
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:01,500 --> 00:00:03,700 today I'm with Professor John Ollie 2 00:00:03,700 --> 00:00:07,566 um John is running the Optical Dating Laboratory 3 00:00:07,733 --> 00:00:09,266 at Griffith University 4 00:00:09,500 --> 00:00:11,766 and John and I have both worked on the dating 5 00:00:11,766 --> 00:00:14,766 of the famous Mongol fossil and um 6 00:00:14,766 --> 00:00:16,033 today we talk about 7 00:00:16,466 --> 00:00:18,999 what happens if the results don't agree 8 00:00:24,533 --> 00:00:25,166 thanks for honor 9 00:00:25,166 --> 00:00:26,533 it's really good to be here with you 10 00:00:26,533 --> 00:00:28,699 and discussing the Mongol uh 11 00:00:28,700 --> 00:00:30,300 dating burial 12 00:00:30,533 --> 00:00:31,599 so the Mongol site 13 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:32,300 as you're aware 14 00:00:32,300 --> 00:00:34,533 is the oldest ritual burial site 15 00:00:34,533 --> 00:00:36,233 as yet found on the planet 16 00:00:36,666 --> 00:00:38,399 uh the body was rubbed with open 17 00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:40,200 before being turned of its hands 18 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:42,166 placed across uh 19 00:00:42,166 --> 00:00:45,199 the the midsection of the body um 20 00:00:45,500 --> 00:00:46,733 clear clearly evidence 21 00:00:46,733 --> 00:00:50,433 that there was burial practices underway at that time 22 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:54,266 uh most Australians aren't aware of the importance 23 00:00:54,266 --> 00:00:55,133 globally of the 24 00:00:55,133 --> 00:00:56,566 of the Mungo site 25 00:00:59,766 --> 00:01:02,499 so we applied three different methods um 26 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:06,066 within the same university 27 00:01:06,066 --> 00:01:08,033 but with different abortions of course 28 00:01:08,166 --> 00:01:12,099 um so we did optical dating um we did um 29 00:01:12,133 --> 00:01:24,899 uranium serious dating in difference 30 00:01:37,166 --> 00:01:38,666 but if you look at um 31 00:01:38,666 --> 00:01:39,999 all the results that we have 32 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:41,566 every single one of them 33 00:01:41,566 --> 00:01:43,699 none of them is 40,000 um 34 00:01:43,700 --> 00:01:45,366 and it's quite 35 00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:49,600 difficult to push everything down to 40,000 it's it's 36 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:52,233 it's very difficult to explain 37 00:01:55,333 --> 00:01:57,266 we applied uh 38 00:01:57,266 --> 00:01:58,266 luminescence dating 39 00:01:58,266 --> 00:02:01,299 optically stimulated luminescence to the side 40 00:02:01,566 --> 00:02:05,799 we dated two long profiles through the side 41 00:02:05,933 --> 00:02:07,899 and we used three uh 42 00:02:07,900 --> 00:02:12,333 laboratories independently to actually date uh 43 00:02:12,333 --> 00:02:15,533 the settlement samples one UH1 uh 44 00:02:15,533 --> 00:02:18,466 laboratory dated one of the channels that was cut 45 00:02:18,766 --> 00:02:21,966 the other laboratory dated the other chapel was cut 46 00:02:22,100 --> 00:02:24,466 and I did cross date dating um 47 00:02:24,466 --> 00:02:27,199 of selected samples to uh 48 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,500 test the results from each other laboratory 49 00:02:36,533 --> 00:02:38,533 and when we put all those dates together 50 00:02:38,533 --> 00:02:40,399 they were incredibly consistent 51 00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:42,700 more consistent than you'll actually uh 52 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:45,800 expect and the dates agreed 53 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,366 so we ended up with the same ages of the profile 54 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:52,466 so I think we applied one technique 55 00:02:52,933 --> 00:02:55,366 but three laboratories applied that technique 56 00:02:55,366 --> 00:02:57,566 and we ended up with a very consistent result 57 00:02:57,566 --> 00:02:58,999 so from that 58 00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:01,166 I'm pretty confident that we did the best 59 00:03:01,166 --> 00:03:03,766 optically stimulated luminescence dating 60 00:03:03,766 --> 00:03:05,966 of the site that we could do 61 00:03:06,166 --> 00:03:07,233 in addition 62 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:09,966 uh I dated uh 63 00:03:09,966 --> 00:03:12,599 material that was collected from the grave infill by 64 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:16,133 Jim and I produced the same age for the grave infill 65 00:03:16,133 --> 00:03:18,466 as we got from the stratographic layer 66 00:03:18,866 --> 00:03:21,833 from the three laboratories previously 67 00:03:21,966 --> 00:03:24,766 and so all the obstacle uh 68 00:03:24,766 --> 00:03:28,066 ages were consistent and so you 69 00:03:28,066 --> 00:03:31,266 I can't see anything that we could have done more 70 00:03:31,266 --> 00:03:32,899 to improve what we did 71 00:03:33,866 --> 00:03:35,766 we can't both be right um 72 00:03:35,766 --> 00:03:36,666 because the 73 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:38,700 the discrepancy between the dates is 74 00:03:38,700 --> 00:03:40,466 is more than 2 3 75 00:03:40,466 --> 00:03:41,899 4 5 Sigma so the 76 00:03:41,900 --> 00:03:43,533 the error range does not 77 00:03:43,533 --> 00:03:44,999 does not allow on overlap 78 00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:47,900 I still I still lean towards the fact that you know 79 00:03:47,900 --> 00:03:51,100 because we dated the entire stratographic profile 80 00:03:51,533 --> 00:03:52,999 we did there was no I 81 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,133 I'm not aware of uh 82 00:03:55,133 --> 00:03:57,133 any errors in the approach that we took 83 00:03:57,133 --> 00:03:59,499 three laboratories to be always eldating 84 00:03:59,700 --> 00:04:01,066 the only weak weakness 85 00:04:01,066 --> 00:04:02,533 I can see in what we did 86 00:04:02,533 --> 00:04:06,599 is the fact that we used one dating technique um 87 00:04:07,066 --> 00:04:08,399 having said all that 88 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:09,300 I've looked very 89 00:04:09,300 --> 00:04:10,933 very closely at what you did 90 00:04:10,933 --> 00:04:13,099 and the uranium series dating 91 00:04:13,100 --> 00:04:15,866 and I can't see anything wrong with what you did either 92 00:04:15,866 --> 00:04:17,666 so the annoying thing for me 93 00:04:17,666 --> 00:04:18,766 and I'm sure for you 94 00:04:18,766 --> 00:04:20,966 is that it's nice in science 95 00:04:20,966 --> 00:04:24,266 if you understand the reasons why there's a difference 96 00:04:24,700 --> 00:04:26,166 and when you don't understand the reasons 97 00:04:26,166 --> 00:04:27,299 why there is a difference 98 00:04:27,300 --> 00:04:27,933 it leads you 99 00:04:27,933 --> 00:04:29,699 leads you worried that okay 100 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:31,366 well if I don't understand 101 00:04:31,366 --> 00:04:33,766 why that result is different to mine 102 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:35,066 have I made a mistake 103 00:04:35,066 --> 00:04:36,366 is there something in my 104 00:04:36,366 --> 00:04:38,266 the way the techniques that I've used 105 00:04:38,266 --> 00:04:39,399 that is actually flawed 106 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:41,100 but we don't know about it yet 107 00:04:41,100 --> 00:04:42,366 in this particular case 108 00:04:42,366 --> 00:04:44,166 whether we can resolve that 109 00:04:44,333 --> 00:04:46,099 this is more than questionable 110 00:04:46,100 --> 00:04:47,100 because the 111 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:47,900 as you know 112 00:04:47,900 --> 00:04:50,366 the Mongol remains have been repatriated 113 00:04:50,366 --> 00:04:52,499 and without further analysis to 114 00:04:52,500 --> 00:04:53,766 to cross checks 115 00:04:53,766 --> 00:04:55,599 perhaps we do cross sections 116 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:57,733 Lithuanian series dating across the bone and 117 00:04:57,733 --> 00:04:59,333 and these sort of things that we developed 118 00:04:59,333 --> 00:05:00,433 in the meantime 119 00:05:00,466 --> 00:05:03,799 uh perhaps we could get some insight on on that 120 00:05:03,900 --> 00:05:05,133 whether it would resolve it 121 00:05:05,133 --> 00:05:05,999 I don't know 122 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:08,600 but I would love to resolve the problems 123 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:10,766 but it would be associated with 124 00:05:11,300 --> 00:05:14,000 more analysis on this glitter material 125 00:05:14,333 --> 00:05:18,766 and I think that is not something um 126 00:05:18,766 --> 00:05:19,566 that we should do 127 00:05:19,566 --> 00:05:22,133 because Mongol has been repatriated and 128 00:05:22,133 --> 00:05:23,599 and I agree with the 129 00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:24,833 aboriginal Ada 130 00:05:25,333 --> 00:05:28,799 Mongol man has done its job for signs 131 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:32,233 it should have peace in the land where it came from 132 00:05:33,666 --> 00:05:34,599 I agree 9202

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.