All language subtitles for 29-07-2023dexttrqwe

Russian "Lancets" on the battlefield or about the
promised swarm of thousands of Russian drones ...

But first, I want to share some information that
I've gathered from Russian 'war correspondents.'

Here's what they write, and I've
compiled the main theses together:

"Today's total for the day, if you
filter out the lies of the military rats.

The enemy has taken Staromaiorske,
up to the line of pyramids reached.

I conclude that the front has collapsed,
but they are hiding it from us. Now it

makes sense why the Ukrainians are announcing the
introduction of their main forces into the battle.

Considering that they have already passed through
the grey zone, which consists of a minimum of 3

kilometers of minefields and trenches in depth, it
is indeed high time to bring up the main reserves

into these breaches. And again it became clear
why General Popov was removed from the 58th Army.

He tried to prevent this collapse and warn of the
disaster that is unfolding right before our eyes.

The Southern Military District website has removed
new regions and left only Crimea. Earlier there

was a map with Kherson and Zaporizhzhya
regions, but now it has been removed".

What conclusion can be drawn from
this ? Ukraine has become one step

closer to breaking through
the main line of defense.

And now back to the Lancets. The
day before yesterday I already

told you that Russia does not have the
technical and technological capability

to produce thousands of drones per month,
let alone tens and hundreds of thousands.

And one of the examples was the most
problematic for the Ukrainian side "Lancet".

As an example of the lack of production in
Russia for thousands of Lancets per month,

I cited the fact that every strike of
these barrage munitions is recorded

on video and then published in open
sources with pathos and general glee.

For Russian propaganda such video
publication is just a holiday.

At the same time, every month thousands of
videos of Lancet strikes are not published,

moreover, their number does not exceed a hundred!

But, it is one thing to talk abstractly,
and quite another to analyze by fact.

And with this one were analyzed several
dozens of Russian resources on the

publication of videos with "Lancets".
I confess, it does not bring pleasure.

After conducting an analysis and sorting unique,
non-repeating videos over a period of 3 months,

from May to July, the following figures
were obtained for "Lancet" strikes:

May - 47;
June - 34;

27 days of July - 55 strikes.

Thus it is confirmed that Russian propagandists
have less than 100 Lancet videos per month."

You are not going to argue and prove to me
that the Russians are hiding their victories ?

There are a few other
peculiarities in the analysis.

I recorded only the fact of using a barrage
munition, but not the fact of hitting results.

Meanwhile, a number of videos showed
several Lancets, especially the

Lancet-1 modification, hitting the same object.

It is noteworthy that there were videos of hitting

Ukrainian equipment that had already
been hit, but from different angles.

Especially often this duplication concerned
Infantry fighting vehicle M2 Bradley. It is

also interesting that all videos with "Lancets"
propagandists accompany the word "Destruction".

In other words, they initially dismiss
the possibility that the "Lancet" defeat

could be unsuccessful and even not
damage the equipment, for example,

like in one of the videos with the D-20 howitzer.

But the point is not about that; it's about
the fact that even considering the statistics

of downed "Lancets" and conditionally unpublished
videos, they don't reach thousands or hundreds.

This only proves how much fear
can magnify when fueled by lies.

Yes, the Lancet is a big problem in the war zone,

but it is not worth catalyzing the
apocalyptic nature of this problem

by playing along with Russian propaganda.
I hope I was able to make my point to you.