All language subtitles for 00002x

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional) Download
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:01,839 hi this is justin kelly of sonic scoop 2 00:00:01,839 --> 00:00:03,120 thanks for joining me for this week's 3 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:05,120 episode of the sonic scoop podcast 4 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:06,240 and today we're gonna be answering 5 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:08,639 another audience question this one that 6 00:00:08,639 --> 00:00:08,960 came 7 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:11,120 in with the very provocative title does 8 00:00:11,120 --> 00:00:12,320 my song even 9 00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:14,400 need to be mastered and this was with a 10 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:16,080 capital need i'm not putting it in there 11 00:00:16,080 --> 00:00:18,560 this was from a viewer reader listener 12 00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:19,119 named 13 00:00:19,119 --> 00:00:21,039 nick and it's a great question 14 00:00:21,039 --> 00:00:22,720 interesting one and i think there's a 15 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:24,560 lot of insights we can glean from it so 16 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:26,240 let's just jump right into the question 17 00:00:26,240 --> 00:00:28,640 nick writes hey justin i'm a big fan of 18 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:30,240 the sonic scoop podcast and i've been 19 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,320 listening for about a year now 20 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:34,160 all of your information is fantastic and 21 00:00:34,160 --> 00:00:36,239 made me a better mixing engineer 22 00:00:36,239 --> 00:00:37,920 that is awesome that is exactly what i 23 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:39,600 want to hear i come 24 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:41,360 with a question that you probably get a 25 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:43,040 lot i do get something like this with 26 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:44,160 some frequency 27 00:00:44,160 --> 00:00:46,239 he says i just produced a song and mixed 28 00:00:46,239 --> 00:00:47,520 it fairly well 29 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:49,840 and afterwards i ran it through some 30 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:51,360 mastering websites 31 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,399 lander soundcloud when i heard the 32 00:00:54,399 --> 00:00:55,600 master preview 33 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:58,640 it sounded almost exactly the same 34 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:01,440 when the levels were matched perfectly 35 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:03,680 do i even need to master the song if it 36 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:04,239 makes 37 00:01:04,239 --> 00:01:07,280 almost no difference here's a wav file 38 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:09,040 of the song so you can check it out also 39 00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:10,320 if you have any constructive criticism 40 00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:11,040 about the song 41 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:12,479 please don't hesitate to give me the 42 00:01:12,479 --> 00:01:14,799 most brutal and honest feedback 43 00:01:14,799 --> 00:01:17,040 thanks all right nick it's not my style 44 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:18,799 to be brutal but i'll give you i think 45 00:01:18,799 --> 00:01:19,200 what 46 00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:20,240 you need to hear and what's going to be 47 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:22,479 beneficial to you i usually don't have 48 00:01:22,479 --> 00:01:24,320 time to listen to every song that comes 49 00:01:24,320 --> 00:01:25,119 in 50 00:01:25,119 --> 00:01:26,640 unless i'm doing a coaching call or i'm 51 00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:28,799 doing a mastering session for somebody 52 00:01:28,799 --> 00:01:29,360 but 53 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:31,040 with all the compliments that nick 54 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:32,720 loaded this with and with the 55 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:34,880 the great title subject line he put in 56 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:36,720 uh i did end up listening to it 57 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:40,560 and let me give you my ideas on this 58 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:43,520 first of all lander soundcloud these 59 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:45,360 automatic mastering services 60 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:48,000 are they any good are they worth it is 61 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:49,600 his experience a common one where it 62 00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:51,200 sounds almost exactly the same after 63 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:52,000 mastering 64 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,000 would mastering with a real person 65 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:55,520 change that at all 66 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:58,159 is it going to be markedly better in any 67 00:01:58,159 --> 00:01:58,960 way 68 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:01,119 like what's the difference and are there 69 00:02:01,119 --> 00:02:02,960 some songs in some context that maybe 70 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:03,280 just 71 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,079 don't need mastering as a great set of 72 00:02:06,079 --> 00:02:07,600 questions so we're going to go into all 73 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:08,000 that 74 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,160 and a lot more in mere moments here 75 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:12,000 before i do the briefest 76 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:13,599 of shout outs to the sponsors on this 77 00:02:13,599 --> 00:02:15,360 podcast this week who do we have 78 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:16,160 sponsoring 79 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,720 we have got fabfilter sponsoring this 80 00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:20,239 month they just came out with their 81 00:02:20,239 --> 00:02:21,920 newest version of their timeless delay 82 00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:23,760 timeless three i recently did 83 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:26,000 a whole mastering session using nothing 84 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:27,360 but fab filter plugins 85 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:29,200 and stuff actually turned out pretty 86 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:30,400 awesome i'll link to that 87 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:33,200 here in the show notes also sound toys 88 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:34,400 sponsoring once again 89 00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:35,680 they make some of my favorite creative 90 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:37,040 mixing effects in the own universe we 91 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:38,080 got two of the best 92 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:39,680 plugin companies out there sponsoring 93 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:41,040 this week which is awesome try out 94 00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:42,080 anything they make for free at 95 00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:43,040 soundtoys.com 96 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:44,800 also try out the fab filter stuff for 97 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,200 free over at fabfilter.com 98 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:49,200 last but not least jay-z microphones i'm 99 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:50,959 talking into a wonderful 100 00:02:50,959 --> 00:02:53,040 jay-z vintage 67 right now i've been 101 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:55,120 using jay-z mics on the podcast in my 102 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:56,000 videos for 103 00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:57,599 over a year now and they're having a 104 00:02:57,599 --> 00:02:59,599 huge sale where you can get mics like 105 00:02:59,599 --> 00:03:01,120 this for up to 60 106 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:03,760 off plus free shipping if you use the 107 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:04,560 special code 108 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:06,080 sonic scoop but you gotta act now 109 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:07,519 because that summer sale is ending on 110 00:03:07,519 --> 00:03:08,720 june 29th 111 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,040 all right let's get into it nick does 112 00:03:11,040 --> 00:03:12,480 your song even need to get mastered you 113 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:13,599 put it through landry you put it through 114 00:03:13,599 --> 00:03:15,040 soundcloud it sounded practically the 115 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:15,440 same 116 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:18,800 afterwards what's the point and also 117 00:03:18,800 --> 00:03:20,640 give me feedback in my mix 118 00:03:20,640 --> 00:03:24,239 all right i have experienced similar 119 00:03:24,239 --> 00:03:24,799 things 120 00:03:24,799 --> 00:03:27,280 with lander and soundcloud where i've 121 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,440 heard other people's mixes run through 122 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:30,080 them 123 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:31,760 when i hear really good mixes run 124 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:33,280 through them they sound 125 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:35,040 in my experience pretty much like the 126 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:36,640 mix but slightly less good 127 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:38,080 and then you usually don't really have 128 00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:40,400 the option too much to actually 129 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,560 change it like which direction do we 130 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:43,920 want to go in 131 00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:45,760 which is a big thing and this is 132 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:47,440 something that not 133 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:49,760 many automatic mastering services have 134 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:51,280 which is the idea of 135 00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:54,159 context genre like what's the feel we're 136 00:03:54,159 --> 00:03:55,120 going for 137 00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:56,560 and one of the big things about 138 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:58,000 mastering that's super important to 139 00:03:58,000 --> 00:03:58,799 recognize 140 00:03:58,799 --> 00:04:01,840 is there's no one right way to master a 141 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:02,879 track 142 00:04:02,879 --> 00:04:06,640 you could master a track reasonably well 143 00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:08,959 in a variety of different ways and i've 144 00:04:08,959 --> 00:04:11,280 sometimes done this for clients 145 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:13,519 first time i'm working with a client and 146 00:04:13,519 --> 00:04:14,560 i'll get a feel for some of their 147 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:16,479 favorite records get in my ear listen to 148 00:04:16,479 --> 00:04:17,120 them 149 00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:20,160 listen to their track and be like well 150 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:21,919 we've never worked together before 151 00:04:21,919 --> 00:04:23,360 here's the direction i think it needs to 152 00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:25,360 go listening to your track and listening 153 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:25,759 to 154 00:04:25,759 --> 00:04:27,840 some of the tracks you love send it back 155 00:04:27,840 --> 00:04:29,280 to them and say 156 00:04:29,280 --> 00:04:30,479 here's a place where i think it sounds 157 00:04:30,479 --> 00:04:32,320 really good however 158 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:33,759 since you're not here in the studio with 159 00:04:33,759 --> 00:04:35,520 me listening to other options i'm going 160 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:36,560 to send you one 161 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:38,240 maybe in some cases two additional 162 00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,000 versions just in case here's what it 163 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:40,720 would sound like 164 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:43,759 if we mastered it darker but also went 165 00:04:43,759 --> 00:04:46,080 kind of just as well balanced but in a 166 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:46,880 darker direction 167 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:48,400 and here's what we do if we backed off 168 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:49,840 on the processing a bit and went a lot 169 00:04:49,840 --> 00:04:51,759 flatter or the opposite here's we really 170 00:04:51,759 --> 00:04:53,120 pushed it you know balls of the walls 171 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:53,919 went really hot 172 00:04:53,919 --> 00:04:57,280 really hyped it up and i can get it to 173 00:04:57,280 --> 00:04:57,759 these 174 00:04:57,759 --> 00:05:00,000 two or three maybe different sounding 175 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:00,880 places 176 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:02,479 all of which will sound awesome in their 177 00:05:02,479 --> 00:05:04,160 own way but 178 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:06,720 it really comes down to the aesthetic 179 00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:08,800 universe that the artist wants the song 180 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:09,680 to sit in 181 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:11,360 and this is one of the problems with the 182 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:13,360 automatic mastering services that are 183 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:14,880 out there now i'm hopeful that in the 184 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:15,440 future 185 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:17,120 there will be automatic mastering 186 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:18,639 services that go beyond this and give 187 00:05:18,639 --> 00:05:19,039 you 188 00:05:19,039 --> 00:05:21,680 more options more flexibility but i've 189 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,520 actually heard some examples of this in 190 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:24,880 the past i'm going to link you to 191 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:27,280 right here a past contributor to sonic 192 00:05:27,280 --> 00:05:27,919 scoop 193 00:05:27,919 --> 00:05:29,840 jason moss who ran the website behind 194 00:05:29,840 --> 00:05:31,360 the speakers he's great mixing engineer 195 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:32,880 in his own right he's written a bunch of 196 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:35,199 articles for sonic scoop 197 00:05:35,199 --> 00:05:37,840 he did this thing on his own channel 198 00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:38,240 where 199 00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:40,960 he compared a track that he had mixed 200 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:41,680 going through 201 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:43,280 lander and going through a couple other 202 00:05:43,280 --> 00:05:45,039 automatic mastering services 203 00:05:45,039 --> 00:05:48,400 and then also going to a professional 204 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:49,840 mastering engineer 205 00:05:49,840 --> 00:05:52,560 and his mix was great to begin with it 206 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:54,479 was one of those mixes that sounded 207 00:05:54,479 --> 00:05:56,479 good right out of the gate and sounded 208 00:05:56,479 --> 00:05:57,520 close to 209 00:05:57,520 --> 00:05:59,919 finished or mastered like it didn't 210 00:05:59,919 --> 00:06:01,199 necessarily 211 00:06:01,199 --> 00:06:05,120 need mastering but when it came back 212 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:06,319 through lander and some of the other 213 00:06:06,319 --> 00:06:07,759 automatic mastering services it 214 00:06:07,759 --> 00:06:09,039 generally sounded 215 00:06:09,039 --> 00:06:11,680 pretty similar to his original mix but a 216 00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:12,720 little bit worse 217 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:15,120 but the human mastering engineer took it 218 00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:16,800 in a different direction 219 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,240 and went significantly brighter and 220 00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:22,560 wider with his mix in a way that was 221 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:24,080 awesome and i think 222 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:26,240 stood up a lot better to some of the 223 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:28,080 commercial releases in that style 224 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:29,520 and i'll link to that so you can hear 225 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:31,360 his track mastered in a few different 226 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:31,919 ways 227 00:06:31,919 --> 00:06:33,280 and the one that really stood apart was 228 00:06:33,280 --> 00:06:35,199 the human mastering engineer because he 229 00:06:35,199 --> 00:06:37,440 made a creative decision 230 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:39,840 which was i think the track needs to go 231 00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:41,039 in this direction it's not the only 232 00:06:41,039 --> 00:06:42,319 direction it could go but if it went in 233 00:06:42,319 --> 00:06:43,600 this direction i think would be super 234 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:45,600 cool and i think he was right 235 00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:47,360 he could have also been wrong but in 236 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:49,039 this case i think he's totally writing 237 00:06:49,039 --> 00:06:51,199 his master in my opinion level match 238 00:06:51,199 --> 00:06:52,639 wins because it was the most 239 00:06:52,639 --> 00:06:55,759 interesting so that i think is the 240 00:06:55,759 --> 00:06:57,199 primary benefit 241 00:06:57,199 --> 00:06:59,440 to getting your stuff mastered isn't 242 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:01,360 just like bringing up the level 243 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:03,360 and isn't just the qc like that's part 244 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:04,960 of it i think the biggest part 245 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:06,560 of the mastering engineer's job who's 246 00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:08,240 helping you is the independent third 247 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:10,080 party qc where we're double checking 248 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:11,120 things for like 249 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:13,440 what you might consider technical errors 250 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:14,160 like 251 00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:16,000 there's some over abundant frequency in 252 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:17,759 the low end or some over abundant 253 00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:19,120 resonant frequency in the high end and 254 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:20,639 we're trying to smooth those things out 255 00:07:20,639 --> 00:07:22,880 but there's also that creative side of 256 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:24,560 it of taking the context of 257 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:26,160 the whole library of recorded music 258 00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:27,680 that's out there and figuring out 259 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:30,560 how your song is supposed to sit so when 260 00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:32,000 i wrote back to nick 261 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,319 i said to him hey man you know the track 262 00:07:34,319 --> 00:07:35,280 sounds pretty good 263 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,840 as is and i totally get that experience 264 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:38,880 of it coming back from one of these 265 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:39,919 services sounding 266 00:07:39,919 --> 00:07:41,440 basically the same but louder that's 267 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:42,639 kind of what they're supposed to do if 268 00:07:42,639 --> 00:07:44,000 your mix already sounds right like 269 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:45,280 they're not trying to ruin it they're 270 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:46,479 trying to get to the right level and if 271 00:07:46,479 --> 00:07:48,160 you have way too much bass or way too 272 00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:48,879 much trouble 273 00:07:48,879 --> 00:07:50,240 they're trying to reel that in a bit and 274 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:51,919 they do fine at that 275 00:07:51,919 --> 00:07:54,080 but listening to your track like if i 276 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:55,440 listen to other tracks in the style it's 277 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:57,039 kind of electronica style 278 00:07:57,039 --> 00:08:00,479 it's way darker than like all of the 279 00:08:00,479 --> 00:08:01,360 major hit 280 00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:04,560 kind of things in that style so 281 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:06,479 if that's the feel that you're going for 282 00:08:06,479 --> 00:08:08,000 and those are the records you want to be 283 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:09,039 heard next to 284 00:08:09,039 --> 00:08:11,199 neither his version nor the mastered 285 00:08:11,199 --> 00:08:13,280 version had that kind of excitement and 286 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:14,960 clarity and energy 287 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:17,199 that a lot of the top tracks in the 288 00:08:17,199 --> 00:08:18,800 style do 289 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:20,560 but on the other hand if that's not what 290 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,080 he was going for and he was going for a 291 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:23,280 slightly more 292 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:26,080 you know esoteric like alternative 293 00:08:26,080 --> 00:08:27,520 electronic feel like a little bit more 294 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:28,720 in the direction of a band called 295 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:30,000 caribous like one of my favorite 296 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:32,080 electronic artists and like 297 00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,399 if he was going for that feel then it is 298 00:08:34,399 --> 00:08:35,680 an appropriate level 299 00:08:35,680 --> 00:08:38,560 of darkness then like that kind of muted 300 00:08:38,560 --> 00:08:40,479 top end and the slightly more mid-rangey 301 00:08:40,479 --> 00:08:41,039 feel 302 00:08:41,039 --> 00:08:43,919 totally works if like that's the kind of 303 00:08:43,919 --> 00:08:45,920 world we're trying to fit in 304 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:48,000 so that's a question and that's a 305 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:49,360 question that i ask 306 00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:50,880 my clients and it's a question that you 307 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:52,399 know unfortunately lander and soundcloud 308 00:08:52,399 --> 00:08:54,240 mastering service isn't going to 309 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:56,959 to ask so that's a big thing to know but 310 00:08:56,959 --> 00:08:58,399 one of the other things that i noticed 311 00:08:58,399 --> 00:08:58,959 is that 312 00:08:58,959 --> 00:09:02,080 nick's mix totally competent 313 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:04,959 good good overall job a lot of nice 314 00:09:04,959 --> 00:09:05,920 balances 315 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:09,200 there was one problem in it for me where 316 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:10,160 the kick drum 317 00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:13,680 was overly dominant again compared to 318 00:09:13,680 --> 00:09:15,680 anything whether it's this more 319 00:09:15,680 --> 00:09:17,839 alternative esoteric electronic style or 320 00:09:17,839 --> 00:09:20,240 this amped up electronic style 321 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:22,240 the kick was just really dominant really 322 00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:23,680 bottom heavy really big 323 00:09:23,680 --> 00:09:26,240 and totally taking over and that's 324 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:27,839 something he probably couldn't hear 325 00:09:27,839 --> 00:09:30,640 properly in his own studio when he got 326 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:32,320 the kick to a place where it felt right 327 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:33,760 to him 328 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,399 it ends up in other environments feeling 329 00:09:36,399 --> 00:09:37,760 out of step with 330 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:39,279 major releases that he might love the 331 00:09:39,279 --> 00:09:41,360 sound of so that's the other thing that 332 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:43,120 a mastering engineer might look for 333 00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:44,959 in this case i'd be going and doing one 334 00:09:44,959 --> 00:09:46,640 of two things one trying to do 335 00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:47,600 processing 336 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:49,839 to control that kick a little bit more 337 00:09:49,839 --> 00:09:51,120 whether it's eq 338 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:54,080 or dynamic eq are going to be the most 339 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:55,519 likely tools it could be multi-band 340 00:09:55,519 --> 00:09:56,240 compression 341 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:58,480 to help contain that kick a little bit 342 00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:00,160 more and bring some of those other 343 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:01,040 elements out 344 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:03,279 so we have this totally more rich kind 345 00:10:03,279 --> 00:10:04,640 of immersive 346 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:06,399 environment where it's not just like kik 347 00:10:06,399 --> 00:10:07,760 and a whole bunch of 348 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:10,720 other decently balanced stuff below it 349 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:12,560 being totally dominated 350 00:10:12,560 --> 00:10:14,640 and that's one of the changes i would 351 00:10:14,640 --> 00:10:15,680 try to make 352 00:10:15,680 --> 00:10:18,399 but even if i couldn't do the ideal job 353 00:10:18,399 --> 00:10:19,519 of getting there 354 00:10:19,519 --> 00:10:21,279 i could at least give nick the feedback 355 00:10:21,279 --> 00:10:23,680 of hey 356 00:10:23,680 --> 00:10:25,519 one thing you might want to look at is 357 00:10:25,519 --> 00:10:27,120 bringing that kick down 358 00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:29,680 maybe bringing it down by x number of db 359 00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:30,399 is 360 00:10:30,399 --> 00:10:32,240 i think would get you closer to the feel 361 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,160 of some of your favorite records 362 00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:35,839 maybe taking out a little bit of low end 363 00:10:35,839 --> 00:10:37,519 below this particular frequency would 364 00:10:37,519 --> 00:10:38,000 get you 365 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:39,839 a little closer to your favorite records 366 00:10:39,839 --> 00:10:41,519 here's what i could do 367 00:10:41,519 --> 00:10:43,920 without you doing that i think it sounds 368 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:45,680 pretty good here's as far as i could get 369 00:10:45,680 --> 00:10:46,079 it 370 00:10:46,079 --> 00:10:48,320 i think it's in a way better place and 371 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:50,079 stands up to your favorite records even 372 00:10:50,079 --> 00:10:50,560 better 373 00:10:50,560 --> 00:10:51,839 but if you want to take it even further 374 00:10:51,839 --> 00:10:53,360 here's a little bit of feedback i'd give 375 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:54,959 to you 376 00:10:54,959 --> 00:10:57,519 so those are the benefits of mastering 377 00:10:57,519 --> 00:10:58,160 does it 378 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:00,560 need mastering you don't need anything 379 00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:01,760 right 380 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:03,440 no track needs to be matched no track 381 00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:05,519 even needs to be mixed no track iv 382 00:11:05,519 --> 00:11:08,320 needs to be recorded it's like what's 383 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:09,040 optimal 384 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:12,000 what's going to satisfy you and for most 385 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:13,600 people most of the time 386 00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:15,680 i'm going to suggest that getting 387 00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:17,920 another human set of ears 388 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:20,880 on your record as the final qc who's 389 00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:21,279 like 390 00:11:21,279 --> 00:11:23,279 almost a little bit your mixing coach a 391 00:11:23,279 --> 00:11:24,640 little bit of 392 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,040 the final sweetener a little bit of the 393 00:11:27,040 --> 00:11:28,480 final quality control 394 00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:31,440 that's the purpose of mastering and what 395 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:32,320 things like 396 00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:34,720 landers sound clouds automatic mastering 397 00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:36,480 can do for you is just 398 00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:39,200 bring your level up to an appropriate 399 00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:40,000 loudness 400 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:42,640 level within reason and they don't 401 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:44,079 really give you that much flexibility 402 00:11:44,079 --> 00:11:45,440 they're like what's an appropriate 403 00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:46,320 loudness level 404 00:11:46,320 --> 00:11:48,000 well that depends i've got a whole video 405 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:49,519 on that i did one with fab filter 406 00:11:49,519 --> 00:11:51,200 recently where we looked at 407 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:52,720 like how loud should you actually shoot 408 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,200 for is it negative 14 lux like spotify 409 00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:56,079 recommends 410 00:11:56,079 --> 00:11:58,320 probably not depending on the genre it's 411 00:11:58,320 --> 00:11:59,360 probably louder 412 00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:01,120 how much louder could be anywhere from 413 00:12:01,120 --> 00:12:02,880 negative 13 to like negative six 414 00:12:02,880 --> 00:12:04,160 depending what genre 415 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:06,320 you're in could be common so like watch 416 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:07,760 the right loudness level 417 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:09,519 to sit next to your favorite tracks 418 00:12:09,519 --> 00:12:10,720 watch the right amount of brightness 419 00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:12,000 watch the right amount of low and watch 420 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:13,760 the right amount of width 421 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:15,279 and hopefully you have a really 422 00:12:15,279 --> 00:12:17,360 competent human being working with you 423 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:19,760 to decipher those things that said i'm 424 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:21,680 not against the idea of these automatic 425 00:12:21,680 --> 00:12:23,360 mastering services there are contexts in 426 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:24,639 which they could totally 427 00:12:24,639 --> 00:12:27,279 be useful i could totally imagine if 428 00:12:27,279 --> 00:12:28,480 you're out there 429 00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:31,760 doing library music or you know 430 00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:33,519 like soundtrack music that's like 431 00:12:33,519 --> 00:12:35,360 royalty-free soundtrack music you put 432 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:37,200 out a lot of songs a lot of cues 433 00:12:37,200 --> 00:12:38,639 you can't afford to get every single one 434 00:12:38,639 --> 00:12:40,720 of them mastered then 435 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:43,760 doing most of this on your side might 436 00:12:43,760 --> 00:12:45,600 make a lot of sense 437 00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:47,200 but i've even worked with some clients 438 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:48,880 in that realm where it's like 439 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:50,720 yeah i get the economics of what you're 440 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:53,360 doing it makes sense not to have every 441 00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:53,760 cue 442 00:12:53,760 --> 00:12:56,720 you do get mastered by some human being 443 00:12:56,720 --> 00:12:57,920 who's going to charge you 444 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:01,600 you know 125 bucks 150 bucks or more 445 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:03,360 or less high level engineer who's going 446 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:05,200 to charge you 50 or 60 bucks 447 00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:07,600 that might not make sense for what 448 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:08,480 you're doing 449 00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:10,560 economically realistically doesn't make 450 00:13:10,560 --> 00:13:12,639 sense but what you could do 451 00:13:12,639 --> 00:13:14,880 is take a couple of tracks in a couple 452 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:16,320 different styles 453 00:13:16,320 --> 00:13:19,360 send those to a mastering engineer have 454 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:20,160 him or her 455 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:22,079 master those tracks and then tell you 456 00:13:22,079 --> 00:13:23,200 exactly what they did 457 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:24,639 and i've done this for clients before 458 00:13:24,639 --> 00:13:26,079 like hey yeah i know i'm only going to 459 00:13:26,079 --> 00:13:27,360 master a few tracks for you you can do 460 00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:28,320 the rest yourself 461 00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:29,600 but at least we can go through this 462 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:31,360 process where you can figure out 463 00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:32,959 what you're not hearing right in your 464 00:13:32,959 --> 00:13:35,200 environment exactly what kind of changes 465 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:36,800 i needed to make to exactly what 466 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:38,399 frequency is to get it 467 00:13:38,399 --> 00:13:40,000 sitting better next to the things that 468 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:41,920 you're going up against and competing 469 00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:42,639 with 470 00:13:42,639 --> 00:13:45,120 giving you those few little mix tips of 471 00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:46,160 the things that i'm hearing that are 472 00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:47,839 maybe slightly off compared to the 473 00:13:47,839 --> 00:13:49,120 records that you're really shooting to 474 00:13:49,120 --> 00:13:51,199 sound as good or better than 475 00:13:51,199 --> 00:13:53,440 and going through that process even once 476 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:55,440 with that mix coach last mastering 477 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:56,560 engineer 478 00:13:56,560 --> 00:13:58,639 huge benefit and then from there run 479 00:13:58,639 --> 00:14:01,279 with it i've even had one client ask me 480 00:14:01,279 --> 00:14:03,440 hey could you do everything in izotope's 481 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:05,199 ozone the entire master 482 00:14:05,199 --> 00:14:07,920 so that i can open it up in my version 483 00:14:07,920 --> 00:14:09,120 of izotope ozone 484 00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:11,199 see exactly what you did and use as like 485 00:14:11,199 --> 00:14:13,199 a preset starting point template 486 00:14:13,199 --> 00:14:15,120 for my other tracks so that i can master 487 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:16,399 them myself 488 00:14:16,399 --> 00:14:19,600 and i was like yeah totally why not i 489 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:20,240 could get 490 00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:22,160 why some mastering engineers wouldn't be 491 00:14:22,160 --> 00:14:23,519 comfortable doing that 492 00:14:23,519 --> 00:14:25,120 but i'm totally comfortable doing that 493 00:14:25,120 --> 00:14:26,560 because there's a lot of people out 494 00:14:26,560 --> 00:14:27,120 there 495 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:28,480 who need mastering and i don't think 496 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:30,160 we're going to run out of them any time 497 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:30,959 soon 498 00:14:30,959 --> 00:14:33,199 and i see it as being a cool service 499 00:14:33,199 --> 00:14:34,320 that i can offer people so that's 500 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:36,560 something that's happened a few times 501 00:14:36,560 --> 00:14:38,240 so i hope that's answered your question 502 00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:39,920 nick did you need to get your song 503 00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:40,720 mastered 504 00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:43,760 nothing needs to get mastered but 505 00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:45,199 nothing needs to get mixed either 506 00:14:45,199 --> 00:14:46,480 nothing needs to get written nothing 507 00:14:46,480 --> 00:14:48,160 needs to get recorded 508 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:51,040 would help you to get mastering in your 509 00:14:51,040 --> 00:14:52,560 case and in the case of 90 510 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:55,040 or more people i think yes in part 511 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:55,680 because of the 512 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:57,920 sweetening the additional human 513 00:14:57,920 --> 00:14:59,519 perspective the additional 514 00:14:59,519 --> 00:15:02,639 final qc on it all that stuff 515 00:15:02,639 --> 00:15:06,079 i think is tremendously valuable 516 00:15:06,079 --> 00:15:07,839 and it depends again on the quality of 517 00:15:07,839 --> 00:15:09,600 the mix with some people who are mixing 518 00:15:09,600 --> 00:15:11,519 at a super high level i'll get mixes 519 00:15:11,519 --> 00:15:12,240 from people 520 00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:14,320 that sound awesome they sound pretty 521 00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:16,240 much like mastered or ready and loud 522 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:17,199 enough already 523 00:15:17,199 --> 00:15:19,120 from the moment they come in and i 524 00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:20,959 barely do anything to them 525 00:15:20,959 --> 00:15:24,079 and i'm just like ducking down 526 00:15:24,079 --> 00:15:26,880 below 100hz by half db or the opposite 527 00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:28,639 bringing it up by like a db 528 00:15:28,639 --> 00:15:30,880 and like that's it that's all that i've 529 00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:33,040 done and occasionally that'll happen 530 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:34,959 and occasionally some records it'll be 531 00:15:34,959 --> 00:15:36,399 much more radical where there's 532 00:15:36,399 --> 00:15:38,639 significant dips and cuts and additional 533 00:15:38,639 --> 00:15:40,160 dynamic processing and 534 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:41,600 sweetening and widening it really 535 00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:43,360 depends on what it needs 536 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:47,120 and some tracks need mastering less 537 00:15:47,120 --> 00:15:47,920 because they're mixed 538 00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:51,360 so incredibly well but even those people 539 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:52,079 at that 540 00:15:52,079 --> 00:15:55,759 level often find hey if i can work with 541 00:15:55,759 --> 00:15:56,560 someone who i 542 00:15:56,560 --> 00:15:58,240 trust who i know isn't going to overdo 543 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:00,000 it and try to change the thing that i've 544 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:00,959 done 545 00:16:00,959 --> 00:16:02,800 so well but it's just kind of going to 546 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:04,160 like have my back 547 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:06,480 and help me maybe sequence an entire 548 00:16:06,480 --> 00:16:07,519 album and make sure that 549 00:16:07,519 --> 00:16:10,240 each track that i you know kind of mix 550 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:11,279 to where it's almost mastered 551 00:16:11,279 --> 00:16:12,800 individually that they all fit well next 552 00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:13,519 to each other 553 00:16:13,519 --> 00:16:15,839 so that i don't have one that is like 554 00:16:15,839 --> 00:16:17,199 hotter in the low end compared to the 555 00:16:17,199 --> 00:16:19,199 next one or vice versa 556 00:16:19,199 --> 00:16:21,440 that's even helpful when people's mixes 557 00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:23,120 are tremendous and they already sound 558 00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:24,399 like commercial releases just like 559 00:16:24,399 --> 00:16:25,519 straight out of the daw 560 00:16:25,519 --> 00:16:28,560 which happens sometimes but a lot if not 561 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:29,839 most of those people 562 00:16:29,839 --> 00:16:32,720 often want mastering even if their mixes 563 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:34,160 are still a level above 564 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:35,279 you know the quality of the guy who 565 00:16:35,279 --> 00:16:37,199 wrote in again nick's mix 566 00:16:37,199 --> 00:16:38,880 totally competent totally excellent for 567 00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:40,880 where he is at in his journey 568 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:42,959 but there are people levels above that 569 00:16:42,959 --> 00:16:44,560 whose stuff sounds 570 00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:46,800 like super finished who still feel like 571 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:47,839 they benefit 572 00:16:47,839 --> 00:16:51,120 from that do you need it 573 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:52,639 you don't even need to be making music 574 00:16:52,639 --> 00:16:54,320 so the answer is there's so few things 575 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:55,600 in life you actually need what do you 576 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:57,519 need you need oxygen right 577 00:16:57,519 --> 00:16:59,759 you need food is it going to be useful 578 00:16:59,759 --> 00:17:01,040 and helpful for you 579 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:03,680 and worth it in many cases i think so 580 00:17:03,680 --> 00:17:04,799 then again 581 00:17:04,799 --> 00:17:07,760 you're listening to a podcast that's 582 00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:10,160 done by a mastering engineer 583 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,280 so take all this with the grades solved 584 00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:15,439 but again with that said i'm a mastering 585 00:17:15,439 --> 00:17:17,199 engineer who will do things like say 586 00:17:17,199 --> 00:17:18,880 there's some context word use lander 587 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:20,640 it's gonna be fine or i'll show you 588 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:22,000 exactly what i did and you master stuff 589 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:23,120 for yourself 590 00:17:23,120 --> 00:17:25,439 and go on and be merry so i'm not the 591 00:17:25,439 --> 00:17:26,959 guy who's trying to drum up 592 00:17:26,959 --> 00:17:29,120 endless amounts of work i already have 593 00:17:29,120 --> 00:17:30,640 as much work as i need 594 00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:32,799 i just think this stuff is true and 595 00:17:32,799 --> 00:17:34,559 useful to know 596 00:17:34,559 --> 00:17:37,280 i hope you believe that because i do and 597 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:37,760 uh 598 00:17:37,760 --> 00:17:39,520 thanks for staying tuned for this 599 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:41,200 episode of the socks group podcast 600 00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:42,320 hope you can relate to some of that 601 00:17:42,320 --> 00:17:44,000 stuff do you agree disagree let me know 602 00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:45,600 in the comments down below have you ever 603 00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:47,120 had something mastered 604 00:17:47,120 --> 00:17:49,120 and regretted it there have been cases 605 00:17:49,120 --> 00:17:50,559 where i have i'll link you to an episode 606 00:17:50,559 --> 00:17:51,039 about 607 00:17:51,039 --> 00:17:52,720 mastering sessions gone bad and how to 608 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:54,240 avoid them but have you ever 609 00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:56,640 not had something mastered and regretted 610 00:17:56,640 --> 00:17:58,320 it that's an interesting case to let us 611 00:17:58,320 --> 00:17:59,520 know about that in the comments down 612 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:00,080 below 613 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:02,160 as well big thanks again to our sponsors 614 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:03,200 this week we've got 615 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,080 fab filter making some excellent effects 616 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:08,320 creative mixing effects as well as 617 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:10,640 awesome utilities really great 618 00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:11,360 compressor 619 00:18:11,360 --> 00:18:14,400 saturators eqs uh tremendous stuff 620 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:16,320 check them out over at fabfilter.com you 621 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:17,919 can try out any of their stuff for free 622 00:18:17,919 --> 00:18:19,600 also sound toys making some of those 623 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:21,600 vibey interesting cool creative effects 624 00:18:21,600 --> 00:18:22,160 out there 625 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:24,640 check them out soundtoys.com both those 626 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:25,679 companies you can try on anything they 627 00:18:25,679 --> 00:18:26,720 make for free so go over to their 628 00:18:26,720 --> 00:18:28,320 websites and please do tell them we sent 629 00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:28,799 you 630 00:18:28,799 --> 00:18:30,960 also big shout out to jay-z microphones 631 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:33,520 i've been using one of their vintage 67 632 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:35,600 microphones on the podcast lately i've 633 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:37,600 done videos with their black hole their 634 00:18:37,600 --> 00:18:38,720 bb29 635 00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:40,320 their amethyst which i was using on the 636 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:42,160 podcast a while back really rich and 637 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:43,679 delicious sounding condenser 638 00:18:43,679 --> 00:18:46,799 so great stuff they even make my 639 00:18:46,799 --> 00:18:48,480 favorite pop filter which i don't use on 640 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:50,160 the podcast because i speak off access 641 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:51,520 in the podcast i don't even need a pop 642 00:18:51,520 --> 00:18:52,080 filter but 643 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:53,120 if you're looking for one that's my 644 00:18:53,120 --> 00:18:55,520 favorite one all right check them out 645 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:57,200 because you can get these mics for up to 646 00:18:57,200 --> 00:18:58,160 60 647 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:00,480 off right now up until june 29th and you 648 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:02,080 can get free shipping on top of that 649 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:03,200 with the discount code 650 00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:05,440 sonic scoop i've also got more free 651 00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:07,039 stuff for you if you want it i've got 652 00:19:07,039 --> 00:19:09,120 a intro to mastering workshop called 653 00:19:09,120 --> 00:19:10,080 mastering 101 654 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:12,320 that you can get over at sonicscoop.com 655 00:19:12,320 --> 00:19:13,280 mastering101 656 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:16,160 that's sonicgroup.commastering101 we go 657 00:19:16,160 --> 00:19:18,080 30 40 minutes deep into 658 00:19:18,080 --> 00:19:20,400 what is mastering how do we go about it 659 00:19:20,400 --> 00:19:21,919 what are the benefits what are the best 660 00:19:21,919 --> 00:19:23,440 practices if you want to get started 661 00:19:23,440 --> 00:19:25,440 doing it or just have some master tracks 662 00:19:25,440 --> 00:19:27,280 for you i think it's an invaluable free 663 00:19:27,280 --> 00:19:29,440 workshop check it out sonicscoop.com 664 00:19:29,440 --> 00:19:31,360 slash mastering 101. if you want 665 00:19:31,360 --> 00:19:32,480 something on mixing 666 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,120 check out the habits of every great 667 00:19:35,120 --> 00:19:36,960 mixer the five habits to be precise of 668 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:38,000 every great mixer over 669 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:40,270 at 670 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:41,679 sonicscoop.commixhabits.sonicscoop.com 671 00:19:41,679 --> 00:19:43,520 mixhabits and learn what the best mixers 672 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:44,720 on the planet are doing 673 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:47,120 that you might not be doing we've also 674 00:19:47,120 --> 00:19:48,240 got full length courses like 675 00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:50,960 mixing breakthroughs now in its 2.0 676 00:19:50,960 --> 00:19:52,640 iteration definitely a good one 677 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:54,799 as well as a mastering demystified where 678 00:19:54,799 --> 00:19:56,240 i tell you everything i know about 679 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:56,880 mastering 680 00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,360 they come with a money back guarantee i 681 00:19:59,360 --> 00:20:00,640 think you're going to love them 682 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,120 and you could also just tune into the 683 00:20:03,120 --> 00:20:04,720 sonic 2 podcast if you want more free 684 00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:05,280 stuff 685 00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:06,480 hope to see you around this has been 686 00:20:06,480 --> 00:20:08,480 justin coletti of sonic scoop thanks for 687 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:10,880 hanging out with me 688 00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:17,760 see you next time45251

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.