Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Good shot... Meaningful.
What happened to this Russian howitzer D-20 that I showed in more detail in one of my
previous videos? Did the barrel rupture due to reaching the end of its lifespan 40 years ago?
Or did a non-functional projectile explode inside the barrel,
which Russia still supplies to the conflict zone despite the risks?
In fact, barrel bursts are now no less a cause of Russian artillery being taken out of action than
the AFU's anti-battery warfare. And all because of the wear and tear and unserviceability of the
ammunition. But the enemy can do nothing about it, because the production of shells is slow...
Production of new artillery is in complete stasis, especially when it comes to smelting barrels.
Withdrawal of D-20, D-30 artillery from storage
and other nomenclature started in Russia back in the spring of 2022.
In just the past month, the Armed Forces of Ukraine destroyed 290 pieces of Russian artillery
The military-industrial complex of the occupiers is not capable of producing
even 10% of this amount of destroyed artillery per month, but it can ensure the unstorage.
Starting from the spring of 2022, relatively usable howitzers and
self-propelled artillery were taken out of storage. And now,
more and more of those that are unsuitable for use are appearing on the battlefield.
The situation with ammunition is similar.
Those rounds, which were tried not to be removed from storage in the summer and
fall of 2022 because of their condition, are now the main replenishment of the units' ammunition.
Thus, the concentration of substandard artillery and ammunition with the enemy is only growing.
Yes, a howitzer, even with a spent barrel, can shoot, but it should be understood that
its gun becomes unpredictable. In addition, to put excessive loads on it is to increase the
percentage of unpredictability. About the shells it's a hell of a lottery.
That's the "Russian roulette" with two rounds in the drum.
Before I continue, I ask you to subscribe to my channel, it will help to promote it.
In March 2023, Russian troops suffered 221 tank losses, the November 2022 level.
On March 23, Dmitry Medvedev announced that Russia
planned to produce 1,500 tanks in 2023, or 125 tanks per month.
Two days later he had already announced that Russia would produce 1,600 new tanks,
but within 3 years, that is 44 tanks per month.
Until February 24, 2022, the Russian military-industrial complex transferred 160 to 300
not new, but upgraded old tanks per year to the Russian army. That is 13 to 25 per month. Again
- not new, but old, de-conservation or already in service, upgraded tanks. But that's not the point.
The point is that the AFU destroyed at
least 116 Russian tanks per month during the full-scale invasion.
In turn, taking into account the rate of destruction of tanks over the past 5 months,
the average monthly figure is 180 units.
Of course, with the intensification of hostilities, this figure will increase.
After all, the average loss of Russian tanks in a year of war is 280 tanks per month.
I mean, whatever claims they make,
they canโt solve the loss problem even at the level of fantasies.
Currently, the Russian military-industrial complex is not producing, but restoring those
tanks that can be restored with minimal time and cost to bring them to combat readiness.
And when they run out? Oh, well... Maybe then the famous T-14 "Armata" will finally come into play?
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.