Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
It seems that the tank issue in Russia is quite painful...
After all, not for nothing, first Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council
of Russia, praised the T-90, which is the worst upgrade of the T-72B,
and after Putin, said that Russia will produce 1600 tanks in 3 years...
Seriously?
In general, the word "produces", can be understood in different ways.
For example, production from scratch, that is to make a brand new tank - a new combat unit. And you
can mean pulling tanks out of mothballs, repairs, and perhaps even modernization. But this is not
the production of a new combat unit, but exactly what the Russian military-industrial complex is.
Today the Russian military-industrial complex is not manufacturing, but the restoration, repair,
and modernization of tanks. So the very notion of "producing" sounds manipulative.
But what else can we expect from them?
While the Russian mass media is telling consumers of information
fast food that the T-62 tank (not produced since 1975) is the best tank in the world,
and Russian television is trying to explain the removal from storage of the T-54 and T55
(adopted for service in 1946), Putin is talking about production of 1600 tanks!
Over the past years the Russian military industrial complex has reported deliveries
to the Russian Army of between 160 and 300 tanks per year. At the same time,
they were not new tanks, but modernized cars that were in service, or removed from conservation.
That is, the maximum potential of transfer of such equipment was 25 tanks per month.
As for the production, mass production of the T-72 and T-80 in Russia was stopped in 1998,
and the T-90 has not been put into series production since 2011.
The tank building industry in Russia was kept entirely on repair and modernization potential.
What conclusions can we draw from this?
The conclusion is simple - the Russian leadership is well aware of what is going
on with their tank production. And they are lying,
trying to appease the domestic consumer of information, while scaring NATO with their
"capabilities. But their capabilities are already well known, so this is just cheap clownery.
Especially for those who talk about how T-54 and 55 tanks are very useful and
will be used effectively as artillery, I just want to ask, what is the difference
between the functionality of use between s self-propelled howitzers and tanks?
What is the functional difference between a tank and artillery barrel?
The difference in load and pressure on the barrel at an increasing angle? Why a Soviet
tank barrel has a life of 300-600 rounds, and an artillery barrel has a life of 1000-1200?
Do you know how many shells for this type of tanks are in Russian warehouses and storage
centers for T-54/55 tanks? What are their current characteristics, after 50 years of storage?
Artillery that hits at a distance of up to 2,500
meters ? With triple the load on barrels that have exhausted their service life ?
What is the sense in such artillery,
if the Ukrainian side will not arrange meat waves, as the enemy did?
It SHOOTS! Yes, it shoots. An axe can also liquidate a machine gunner. But how many such
berserkers would die in the field before they could throw the first axe at a machine gunner?
Let's close the delusional conclusions and arguments
on a topic that does not require discussion.
Before I continue, I ask you to subscribe to my channel, it will help promote it.
Now let's go back a few months. In May 2022 the first trains and columns with T-62 tanks
appeared in the war zone in Ukraine. Then a number of experts began to sharply state that these tanks
would not be in the first line, but would serve as "artillery", being "buried" in the positions.
A buried tank is nonsense. But for some reason most are pulling this narrative already in 2023,
including in the comments under my videos !
If you don't believe in logic and rationalism, in assessing the functionality of T-62 or T-54/55
tanks, there is a wonderful resource Oryx, which gives factual information. Open their site and
just estimate how many buried T-62 destroyed, damaged and became a trophy there ? How many ?
You can see the answer on the screen, the same story will be with T-54/55.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.