Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Now much is being said about the fact that the armed forces of Ukraine gain superiority
from the right bank over the left bank of the Kherson region, on the implementation
of fire pressure.
This is indeed true and it is very important, in the process of forming conditions for the
depletion of the enemy.
But much more interesting are the other distances.
In fact, much more interesting is not the possibility of Ukrainian trunk artillery to
exert pressure on the line from Skadovsk and rocket artillery to the northern locations
of the Crimea.
Whatโs interesting is 10 to 20 kilometers inland on the left bank.
The fact is that the armed forces of Ukraine have superiority in range and accuracy of
artillery, although still inferior in fire potential, but still the suppression of enemy
positions is from 10 to 20 km deep with minimal risks for Ukrainian artillery.
By risks I mean counter-battery combat of the enemy, which Russian troops can carry
out from the left bank with risk to their positions, but not the other way around.
And this is very important in the issue of effective impact on the left-bank location.
Interestingly, similarly, Ukrainian forces can control airspace within the same 10 to
20 km inside occupied territory, as well as with minimal risks for air defence assets.
That is, the optimal deepening of the front on a particular area of combat in the near
future may well be these 10-20 km.
And it is obvious that their retention for the Russian troops is suicide.
In fact, these 10-20 km is a kind of buffer operating zone, where the presence of the
enemy is uncomfortable for him, but the Ukrainian forces can conduct all sorts of existential
and metaphysical experiments.
The important thing is that exactly such a deepening is at least a breakthrough of the
defense line, but most likely there will be a collapse of the enemy's defense as a whole
in the area.
That is, the advance with artillery and air defense cover could be more than the depth
I have voiced.
And, most importantly - when retreating, the enemy itself complicates the situation, expanding
the possibilities of both fire pressure and expansion of the operational zone for the
AFU, but it has no other choice.
Suicidal stalemate.
About her I have already spoken about before the release of Kherson, it is repeated in
this area.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.