All language subtitles for Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference

Welcome everyone to the second.

Stop the shot.

Get the rest of the story.

Press conference and Citizen's Report

from Truth for Health Foundation

and our medical and scientific advisors.

And just to remind you, Truth

for Health
Foundation is a five or 23 public charity.

We serve the public interest.

We are volunteer physicians and scientist

who are donating our time and effort
and expertize

to help alert
the public to medical information

that you need to make informed decisions
and to inform you of risk.

As we learn about them,
that may affect your decision

making with regard
to the experimental COVID shots.

Today, our entire press conference

is focused on threats to pregnancy,

male fertility and female fertility,

and the way in which damage to the ovaries

and testes has been known

for at least nine years
and not disclosed to the public.

We have

experts who will present
the medical research

information from peer reviewed studies
that have been published

but have not been disclosed to the public.

And we will be looking at the damage
to the reproductive hormones

produced by the testes in men
and the ovaries in women.

Now, speaking as a physician

who has been practicing
preventive and climactic medicine

for nearly 35 years,

climate medicine is

an international field of focus
that integrates

the effects of our reproductive hormones
on all of our organ systems

in our body, including the brain

And this, while it's not an established,

separate specialty in the United States,

it's work that's been done overseas
for 50 years or more.

And I've been part
of the international meetings for at least

the last 25 years.

So the goal is to look at the way

in which reproductive hormones,

testosterone in men, estradiol,

testosterone, DHEA, progesterone in women

affect many functions
in our body beyond fertility.

The concern about the experimental KOVIC
charts

has been about impact on fertility
And we will address that.

But I'm also speaking to you
as a physician

who is looking at the broader effect
on your overall health beyond the effect

on whether or not
you will be able to have a child.

And that is an enormous picture

and one that is staggering in its impact

for our future health.

Male hormones affect everything

from brain function, cognitive function,

ability to concentrate and focus,
fine motor coordination,

as well as muscle mass, bone

mass strength, immune system,

the health of the heart
and cardiovascular system,

low testosterone in men is associated
with the risk of

diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome,

and later even dementia.

So I think it's important
that we pay attention to just exactly

what kind of impact
these experimental COVID shots may have.

And also look at the role
in which the reproductive hormones

from the ovary affect women's health
in many ways.

I wrote a book some years ago
called It's My Ovaries, Stupid.

And in that whole book, I focused

on the way that ovarian hormones
have many effects

on a woman's body
and quality of life and health risk

way beyond fertility.

So I'm very concerned about what
we're seeing.

It's one of the reasons
that I was particularly worried

about the new data that we have

prepared to disclose to you today.

And it's also why
I think it's critically important

to focus for reproductive age
men and women

to focus on early treatment

as our safest course of action

to reduce the risk of illness,
hospitalization and death with COVID.

All of the frontline doctors, myself
included,

that have been treating COVID patients
since the beginning of 20, 20

in February and March, using a combination
of early treatment approaches

that included anti-viral medicine
several of them

anti inflammatory medications,
including corticosteroids.

Blood clotting, prevention.

Nutraceuticals, vitamin
D, vitamin C, zinc and ANICETO system,

as well as being outside,
getting exercise, eating healthy

and all of the things that we know
will help improve our immune function.

Early treatment is inexpensive.

It's using FDA approved medicines
we've use widely for other conditions

for decades.

They have an incredible safety record

and they're widely available.

They don't they don't even cost very much.

So we want you to know
there's hope and help for COVID

that is way beyond
just focused on experimental vaccine

with risk that you haven't been informed
fully to know what they even are.

And that's why our campaign
is focused on helping you understand

the risk that we do know and helping
you look at other options.

I'd like to show you a graphic,

and this was published in 2018,

and it is

a publication

from a group of Chinese researchers

published in the International Journal

of Nanoparticle Medicine

or International Journal Nanomedicine.

And I think it's critically important
to look at the title of the article,

Potential Adverse Effects of Nanoparticles
on the Reproductive System.

You will hear more from the other experts
in our program today

about exactly what we know

about the concentration
of the nano particles

with these experimental COVID shots
in the ovaries and testes.

But it is noteworthy

that this publication from Chinese
researchers was published

in the International Journal in 2018.

And their graphic
shows multiple causes of injury

to the testes in men
and the ovaries in women

including damage
to hormone production for men and women.

This article
will be posted on our website.

It's widely available
And we would like for you

to have access to this information.

And we also I am going to show you

the actual paper itself.

As you can see, the title of the article

is what I read to you a moment ago.

And it is the Journal of Nanomedicine.

2018.

And in the highlighted section,
they are talking clearly about the damage

to components of male testes
and the female ovary.

And they also say

nanoparticle tech nology

can disrupt
the levels of secreted hormones

causing changes in sexual behavior.

So it's not just sexual behavior.

As I just informed you.

It's the health and optimal function
of every organ in our body.

As I said, we will make this available
to you on our website.

So with that introduction,

I'd like to continue our press conference
for the public and any press who will.

Print the truth.

About the threats
to pregnancy and fertility

with the experimental COVID shots
Thank you for participating today.

Our first speaker today is Dr.

Michael Eden.

Dr. Eden is an independent research

scientist, professional

research scientist,
over his entire career.

He is currently chief scientific

advisor for Truth for Health Foundation.

He is a former vice

president and chief scientist
for respiratory,

pharmacology and toxicology for Pfizer.

A pharmaceutical company.

He is the only former
pharmaceutical company executive

speaking out about the potential risks

of the experimental COVID

Rnade genetic vaccines.

Dr. Baden also has been a consultant

to over 30 biotech companies

and is the successful CEO

of his own biotech company,
putting together a team,

building a program and a

a new pharmaceutical agent,

and subsequently sold that

to a major pharmaceutical company.

In fact,
one of the largest in the world, Novartis.

So clearly, he is a successful scientist

who understands how to review the data

and look for safety signals,
look for risk,

and has been involved in drug discovery
for basically his entire career.

And I'd

like to start off the press conference
with Dr.

Jaden's presentation.

And I would like to introduce
to the public

a statement that likely very few in
America have heard.

And this is the opening paragraph

from a petition that Dr.

Frieden and Dr.

Vogt, ARG in Germany, presented
to the European Medicines Agency.

December 1st.

2020 as a warning

of potential risk.

And this is a quote

The M RNA vaccines are intended

to induce an immune response
to this spike.

Proteins of SARS-CoV-2.

But these spike proteins

which are transcribed for replication

within cellular ribosomes, also contain

a homologous or similar

form of sensation. One

this sensation, one natural

protein is created from human endogenous

retrovirus and is responsible

for the placental development
in mammals and humans.

This protein is

required for a successful pregnancy,

but after COVID19 vaccination,

an individual's immune cells

will be trained to attack sensation

one leading to potential miscarriages,

birth defects and infertility.

And in bold, these two courageous

doctors

stated the study designs do not test

for mutations or reproductive defects.

Yet the science of the René vaccine

shows potential to cause long term

autoimmune destruction
of the female reproductive system.

End quote.

Ladies and gentlemen,

I want you to listen
seriously to the warnings that Dr.

Frieden is bringing to us today.

Truth for Health
Foundation is the People's Foundation.

We are funded solely by the people.

We had no allegiance to any pharmaceutical
company or any major health system

We are chartered as a public charity
to serve the public good.

The scientists and doctors

working with Truth for our Health
Foundation are all volunteers.

No one is being paid with public funds

to bring this information to you.

Everyone is a volunteer

We are

doing it out of concern for the public
good, and many of our scientists

and advisors and physicians are doing
so at personal risk

for their lives, their livelihoods
and their licenses.

So I ask you, when you are deciding
whom to trust,

do you trust the volunteers
who are standing up in courage?

Speaking for the public
as the people's voice

Or do you trust those who are paid
millions of dollars to present a narrative

that doesn't even make common sense

With that, I'd like to introduce you.

It's my honor to introduce you to Dr.

Michael Yeung, and I am honored to have
his dedication and courage

as part of our team of scientific
advisors. Dr.

Udin, thank you for being with us today,
and I'd like to

ring you on and talk about

your data

and some of the new findings
that you just recently discovered

that shows how long this information
has been known and covered.

So thank you very much, Dr.

Lee, and thank you, everybody,
for paying attention.

I think Dr.

Lee is, I think, successfully established.

I'm a I'm a serious scientist,
but I'm otherwise just an ordinary person.

And the reason I'm. Here.

Is because you're not being told
the truth.

You're not being told the truth
right from the beginning.

So in thinking about this,
I tried to imagine

and I was speaking to my own
young adult daughters

for whom I'd be very concerned
if they got these vaccines.

So I would say, before I go any further,
I don't normally say this.

I'm pro innovative new medicines.

I've spent my whole life doing that
in the pharmaceutical industry.

So it's quite painful
for me to say this, but

do not accept COVID19 vaccines.

They're not safe enough.

They don't work well enough.

And there are alternative, very good
alternative treatments.

I'm just going to mention one reference
so you can check this out.

McCulloch et al.

American Journal of Medicine, 21,

Volume one, three, four pages 16 to 22.

That will support what I just told you,
that there are perfectly good treatments.

They're not safe enough.
They don't work well.

And there are plenty of alternatives.

When I started down this road
and I wrote that petition with Dr.

Rodrigue last year,
I was within weeks smeared

by, of all people,
the UK's national broadcaster, the BBC,

I'm just relating this just to help
you understand what has what has happened.

So the BBC chose to use one of their

perhaps more prominent journalists, TV

journalists, a woman called Emma Barnett,
a very well-respected journalist.

She often did
the politics show in the evening.

She did a one hour Woman's Hour podcasts

with a person from the Royal College
of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

She would think there's a couple
of trustworthy people to give you

good information They proceeded
to spend the first quarter of the

of the recording lying about me.

They didn't provide any reason
why what I said in that position

the doctor laid out might be incorrect.

They just literally attacked
me as an anti-vaccine.

They didn't address the substance at all.

I'm going to come back to to to that
because that's a serious mistake

because unfortunately
it turns out we were right.

But that's just to tell you

what the Saudis have done to anybody
who wants to speak out.

I contacted them
and told them they were lying

and that they had better withdraw it.

And without any further comments,
they just deleted the segment

that referred to me.

Now, just to let you know
their obligations

under the journalist code everywhere
to provide a right of reply.

This is a national broadcaster.

It's not a mistake
that they didn't contact me.

It was a policy decision

and it was so that they could smear me
and get away with it anyway.

That's just the background.

All I've ever tried to do is give you
straightforward scientific information.

No other motive has ever been advance.

I don't make any money.

I've lost lots of money,

all of my freedoms, pretty much
trying to do this, all of my reputation,

which doesn't matter at all because
something much more serious is going on.

But so no one has successfully
no one has proposed a motive.

Makes any sense.

And so when you read ridiculous stories
about me, I want you to think,

does that actually make sense
given this guy's history?

I could have just enjoyed
a quiet retirement and instead notes

saying we're being lied to.

I just got increasingly involved.

And I find myself
now telling you about serious risks

to reproductive reproductive health.

And I think

there are serious risks
from these vaccines

that could prevent you getting pregnant
and even if you got pregnant,

could prevent you
successfully carrying a baby to term.

I'm not saying it'll happen to everyone
who's vaccinated.

I am saying the evidence is really strong.

This is a stupid and reckless thing
for government to be doing.

And you should you should reject it.

I don't understand
why they're looking at it.

I'm now going to tell you,

I want to give you public information
so you can go and check it yourself.

Not much of it, but it's pretty bad.

Firstly, we never, ever give experimental

medical treatments to pregnant women.

And we don't do that because six years
ago, thalidomide took everybody a lesson

didn't know that thalidomide
caused birth defects

because the regulatory evaluation
was simply not mature enough.

And now we know harms can happen.

And so we've spent the last six years
being really careful in advising women not

to take

medicines that we don't understand
during pregnancy.

So how is it we've ended up
with a government telling you

it's quite safe
to take these gene based vaccines?

They've not been around long enough for it
possibly to have been the case

for them to evaluate them
and they've not even bothered.

So one is not been long enough to
they haven't done any studies at all.

So when you're told they're safe,
you must know they don't know that.

And I'm telling you they don't know that
and it's worse than that.

They're lying to you

to encourage you to take something
you don't even need to take.

And I'm now going to tell you two
or three bits of information that shows

there is a risk.

So first, Doctor
Lee mentioned the petition

we wrote to the European Medicines
Agency last year,

and we highlighted a number
of a number of risks. One,

the general concern

that these were new
and so we wouldn't know what would happen.

Something like 12,000 people
have been reported to have died shortly

after vaccination in the USA
from mainly blood clots and bleeding.

We did warn about that.

We mentioned the potential
for acute allergic reactions

because there's a certain kind of lipid
in some of the formulations.

Five thousands of those serious
allergic responses

that occurred So that's two out of two.

Three.

We worried that there might be a potential

for what's called
an antibody dependent enhancement.

And there's unfortunately
some breakthrough cases now

in Scotland and in Israel
that looks like people

who've been vaccinated
might actually be sometimes at worse risk.

That's three out of three, right?

We were serious scientists.

We didn't knock about
we were writing because we were worried.

Fourth one, potential impacts
on pregnancy, infertility.

So who are you going to believe

You know, governments, they've been wrong
on the last three and they've smeared us.

Maybe, maybe we're right.

So everyone on that list
looks like it's coming true.

So the two bits of

information that I pointed out last time

that what's called the lipid nano
particle LNP's

that surround the Pfizer
and Moderna vaccines

unfortunately accumulate
in the ovaries of rats.

How do we know that

an intrepid person
managed under the Freedom of Information

Act to extract a report that had been done
for Pfizer and submitted to the Japanese

regulator, and it's out on the way
that you can go and find it.

And in it it shows very clearly
that the lipid nanoparticles

accumulate
these two fold over the background

compared with other tissues
and also spleen.

But it's definitely in the ovaries.

That's not good, is it?

It really isn't good.

No one has evaluated
what the consequences of that are.

General rule of thumb in toxicology.

If you haven't got any data
to supersede the data of concern,

that's what you have to assume
is going on in humans.

But it's worse than that.
Since I last spoke to you,

by the

way, that that report I mentioned,
you'll be able to find it

on our on our website,
by the way, that reports that.

But unfortunately,
I've got another reference for you

Chatelet and colleagues
journal of controlled release 2012

volume 160 pages 15 to 112 nine years ago.

That paper has got
some unbelievable statements in it

and I think the title of the paper
is something like

homing of lipid nano carriers to ovaries

and unrealized human toxicity risk
that's the name of the paper.

And then when you read the paper
it actually says we are concerned that,

you know, accumulation
of these formulations in ovaries

represents could represent
an unrealized human safety risk.

And that means they've known
for nine years and I've checked this

with colleagues who work in the specialty
area of formulation and they say, yes,

well, now it's a problem
with these certain lipid nano carriers.

We have that concentrated here.

So that means Pfizer and Montana
and the regulators

presumably knew that nine years ago,
and then they chose them in 20, 20.

Didn't tell you about it.
That's what they're doing.

They're concentrating in the ovaries
in several strains of mice and rats.

They tried.

So yes, they both,
you know, there's been species tested.

So if someone's likely to persuade
someone wants to persuade me

that they're not concentrating
in human ovaries,

they're going to have to provide me
with some data until that I'm telling you

that is probably what is happening
to every person receiving those

vaccines and it's not good

so I would say the
companies are deliberately chosen a method

formulation that results in concentration
of those products in your ovaries.

They don't need to be there
to make you immune.

And if they produce spiked proteins,
which we think they will,

I think that's best would be neutral
and is likely to have serious harms

on the ability
to release eggs to be fertilized.

But it's worse than that.

That's that's the one of the hits
that the vaccines concentrate

in ovarian tissue and I think could stop
you getting pregnant.

But the other one we mentioned
the mentioned this in the summary,

the spike protein, the sticking out
bit on the vaccine on the virus.

That's the bit that these gene
based vaccines have your body manufacture

when you inject it,
it seems a bit of a Star Trek idea, but

it turns out the spike protein is somewhat
similar to some human proteins.

It's not very similar.

It's similar enough, though, to make me

I've talked biology
training as well as pharmacology.

And I looked at it and I thought,
OK, the three dimensional structure,

how similar they are
and if they're similar enough,

if you make an immune response
spike protein, there is a chance

that immune response
will also result in attack,

basically auto immune attack percent.

So that so that's what we put.

And recently, about two months ago,
a pre-print paper.

So it's not yet through peer
review with is a creeping paper.

You can find and we'll put it
on our website where they studied

the raising of antibodies

against spike in 15
women who were vaccinated

and they also studied whether they had
antibodies to this this placental protein

and you know they did within four days
all of them had generated

about a three times background
amount of antibodies against vaccines.

So within one to four days a profound

two and a half
to three fold increase in this binding

and then they lied about it
this paper they actually lie about it.

It's a short paper. It actually says

no antibodies were

raised again since it's in one, despite
a vigorous response, despite protein.

If you look at the figure
at the end of that paper, it's obvious

to a non-scientist and again,
it's in the little report on our website.

Go ahead. That it yourself.

There's a three fold increase in anti

antibody binding to you
to this protein of your percent.

So within four days,
but they've lied about it in the paper.

So if you just read the summary,
you'll think they've done

the work, it's all fine
and you can forget about it.

Luckily, I never accept abstracts.

I always read papers.

So it's very clear that people vaccinated
with this particular product.

It was the Pfizer. Well,

generate antibodies
to their own potential protein.

The only plausible way in
which that's occurred

is because their bodies
are making spike protein.

And if that's true, of course, reasonable,
I think there's a class risk.

All the vaccines currently generate
spike protein or parts of it in your body.

So you will be making antibodies to that.

And in some people that we're making
antibodies against Epicenter.

So there's absolutely no doubt in my
mind that we've ended up with

a situation where they're generating
antibodies against sort of presenter.

Just actually noticed in the discussion
of this, these people having lied

about it, then reveal
that they have no idea what they're doing.

It says there's no data

on clinically significant thresholds
of anti sensitive one antibodies.

In other words,
they can't tell you what amount is OK.

They don't know.

I don't either.

But what I'm not lying about is that
there is a strong anti placental signal

after vaccination so you've got vaccines
concentrating in the ovaries.

They knew that would happen
is the paper at least nine years ago

that said that would definitely happen
and it does and they generate

and you generate some antibody
against your own percentile

that's two hits, ovaries, placenta

and they're lying about it.

They're smearing honest scientists
like me that gain

absolutely nothing
for telling you this information.

So I would say to you,
do not take these back.

Do not take these vaccines

as a severe risk to your ability
to conceive and carry a baby to term.

And on worse, these are deliberate acts,
which I believe whoever is doing

it is lying about it to hide it.

And they're smearing people
who are trying to warn you.

Who do you trust.

Thank you,

Doctor
Yuan, for your courage in speaking out.

And I hope our listeners understand
the enormity of what Dr.

Hayden has just said.

For women,

a hit to the ovary

and damage to your ovarian follicles

and causing inflammation in the ovary.

Yeah.

Is damaging follicles.

And women are born with all the follicles
they will ever have.

You don't make new ones throughout life.

Men make new sperm every day.

Women do not make new follicles
that can become eggs for fertility,

but also for the follicles
that end up being our hormone

produced in factories for estrogen

or progesterone or testosterone or DHEA.

So it is a woman's risk

to be injecting anything into the body
that causes inflammation

and damage to the female ovary.

Thank you, Doctor, again
for bringing this to everyone's attention.

References will be on our website
and to clarify and amplify what Dr.

Newton is talking about,
we now have a reproductive immunologist

who will talk about the fact
that it's been not for decades

that immunologic reactions,
autoimmune reactions during pregnancy

that can interfere with the placenta
are a known cause of miscarriages.

And so this is yet another risk.

Thank you, Doctor Ian.

And now we will present our next speaker

our next expert is Dr Rafael Stricker.

He is a specialist in internal medicine

at and signed up
Columbia University in New York.

The Forbes Specialty
Training in Hematology.

Oncology.

Immunology, and immunotherapy

from California Pacific
Medical Center in San Francisco.

He is currently for medical director

of the Allen Beer Medical Center

for Reproductive Immunology
in Los Gatos, California.

He is also an advisor

or two for Health Foundation

as an expert in reproductive immunology,

which is this area of research interest.

He's also been studying

reproductive
immunology effects on miscarriages

as well as borne diseases

such as Lime and COVID19.

Welcome, Doctor Stricker.

Thank you for joining our press conference
today.

Like for you to address your concerns
about the risk

that you are seeing with the push
to vaccinate pregnant women.

And we've been talking
about the fact that both ACOG

and the CDC are pushing vaccination
of pregnant women

with experimental COVID shots when that is
something we've not done in the past.

And I also know that you have just

been involved in publishing a paper

on the safety and effectiveness

of prophylaxis against COVID.

And so I'd like for you to talk
with our audience today

about the hope and the help

that are

available other than experimental
vaccines.

Well, thank you, Dr. Lee.

I'm happy to be here.

I do want to talk about
these experimental vaccines

that are being endorsed for

pregnant women

without any real safety trials

to show that they are safe and effective.

And that is a huge problem.

These are experimental vaccines.

They do not have full FDA approval.

They've never been studied in pregnant
women.

There are no trials in pregnant women
to show that they're safe and effective.

We certainly don't have the typical kind
of safety data that we would expect

for a vaccine, which would be five year

safety information.

We don't have any of that.

And now we're starting to see evidence
of the damage that these vaccines can do

because of some of the
effects on the immune system.

My work focuses on immune

complications that lead to pregnancy loss
and pregnancy failure.

We've treated at the Colony Beer Center.

We've treated several
thousand women who had these problems,

and immune issues are very,
very big issues

for women who have recurrent pregnancy
loss and pregnancy failure.

And any treatment that will cause more
of these kinds of immune issues

is definitely bad for pregnancy
and so what we're seeing now

with this experimental
the experimental COVID vaccines

is that they have the potential
to cause these types of new problems

and that is really
it should be a huge concern for everybody.

It's certainly a huge concern
for pregnant women, and it should be

a huge concern for their doctors
who are advocating for these treatments

without any real evidence
that they are safe

and effective in pregnant women.

The other issue is that

while some people say, well, gee,
you know, I don't have any other choice,

I mean, all that I can do
is take this experimental vaccine.

That's the only way I can protect myself
during pregnancy.

And the answer to
that is it's really not true

because there are other treatments
that are protective for pregnant women.

And we just published an article

in the Journal of Infection
and Public Health

based on a study in health care

workers from India
who are at high risk of COVID

and showing that treatment of those health
care workers

with weekly hydroxy
chloroquine pre-exposure

protected them against COVID up
to 80%, a decrease in infection rate.

So that's a very significant effect
of hydroxychloroquine

in these high risk health care workers.

Now, hydroxychloroquine
has been around for 70 years.

It's used for malaria prophylaxis
in the jungles

of Central America and Southeast Asia.

It's been used extensively
in pregnant women.

It's safe in pregnancy.

We've known that for decades,
and this would be an alternative

to using experimental vaccines

to protect these women against COVID

so I think that we need to broaden
our view of how to protect pregnant women.

It's not

enough to say, OK, I'm
going to take an experimental vaccine

that may be dangerous for me
and maybe dangerous for my baby.

We don't know anything about that.

It's not enough to say
that's my only option.

I think we have to look at other options
and look at options that have been around

for decades and that have been used safely
and effectively in pregnant women.

You personally have

pregnant women
with hydroxychloroquine, correct?

I have.

We have a protocol at the center

for treating immune abnormalities.

It doesn't actually
include hydroxychloroquine

because we use other types
of immune therapy

that are probably more effective
for certain types of autoimmune diseases.

But certainly hydroxychloroquine
has been shown to be safe

and effective in pregnancy
and I have used it in pregnant women

without any problems at all.

Well, another

question that I think our listeners
would like to hear from you.

Dr. Frieden has just talked
about the recent study

showing rising antibodies

to a key placental protein in human women

and when this placental protein is

having an immune reaction by our own body,

what can you explain

for listeners
who are laypeople what that really means

in terms of the effects on a pregnancy?

If the body's immune system
is attacking a key

placental protein.

I think that's
a very significant observation

because in our practice,
we test for those types of antibodies

in women who have recurrent pregnancy loss
and pregnancy failure.

And most of those women
have those types of auto antibodies,

antibodies that are self reactive
that react with their own tissue,

and that is what interferes
with the pregnancy.

So finding an antibody like that, as Dr.

Eden has done, that reacts
with a placental protein,

is a very significant finding and really
is that it's a it's a danger signal.

I mean, it shows that there is a problem
with anything that promotes those types

of antibodies in terms of interfering
with normal pregnancy.

So I think it's
a very significant finding.

And that is certainly a safety signal

that the CDC and FDA should be paying

close attention to and are not.

And that has been a concern of truth

for Health Foundation
as the People's Foundation

and the People's Voice to bring

potential risk to the public

so that they can make a better decision
about their options.

And certainly from my own work in helping

people be healthy for pregnancy,

I'm not a fertility specialist,
but in helping my patients

deal with issues
that could interfere with pregnancy.

It's a huge red flag
that there is a rising antibody

to a key protein to maintain the placenta.

And in my mind, as a practicing physician,

that would be a huge red flag
as a potential trigger of a miscarriage.

Absolutely.

It is. It is a tremendous red flag.

It's something that the the CDC
and the FDA

really have to pay attention
to with these experimental vaccines.

And just kind of shoving that under
the rug isn't helping anyone.

It's not going to help, you know,

pregnant women trying to decide what to do
in terms of the vaccine.

And it's not going to help

their physicians who think, oh, you know,
there's no problem with these vaccines.

Everyone says they're safe
because it really it really looks

like they're not safe.

And that is a huge red flag, as you say.

Doctor Stricker, would you comment on
whether there are any animal data

to suggest safety or risk

in pregnancy and fertility?

So there is data on the Moderna vaccines.

There was a white paper
that was put together

for the European Medicines Association

that looked

at all the data on the maternal vaccine.

And it's on a it's a 135 page report.

And on page 56 buried in this report,

there is information about rat studies
with the maternal vaccine.

And what they found
was that there was a 16% decrease

in fertility in rats
who received the vaccine.

Now that was not reported

and the reason
why is that the threshold for reporting

the fertility problems was a 25% decrease
and since it was only 16%

they didn't bother to report that decrease
in fertility.

And rats, as you know, are probably
the most fertile animals on the planet.

So to see a 60% decrease in fertility
with this vaccine

I think is a big red flag
and it hasn't been publicized.

So for a woman trying to decide

about whether or not
to get the experimental vaccine

the fact that there was a 60%

reduction in fertility in rats

is not important enough
to alert the public

because it didn't reach 25%.

But what about if you fall in the 16%

and obviously have an infertility risk
right.

Obviously that's a big problem
if you're the one who's infertile.

That's a huge problem for for those women.

Right.

And women deserve to have been warned

and to have the pharmaceutical company
fail to report

it is another egregious example of failure
to warn the public.

That's exactly right.

That is exactly the reason that all of us

at great risk personally
and professionally as volunteers

have come forward
to bring issues to the public

because our government agencies
have failed us and are not doing so

and we have a moral and ethical

and legal duty
to inform patients of the risks

before we recommend a particular treatment
or intervention.

And I am very concerned
that pregnant women

are being falsely reassured
about safety and effectiveness

on no data of safety

and rising

risk information
that we are seeing clinically

that is being suppressed.

So I thank you
for joining our press conference.

I thank you for your courage in

speaking out
and bringing these issues to the public.

Your new publication
on the use of hydroxychloroquine

for prophylaxis in the meta analysis
paper will be available

to the press and the public on our website
following the press conference.

Dr. Stricker, is there anything you
would like to say in closing

to the public who very much needs
and wants

truthful information about this.

Well,
I would like to thank you for doing this

and spearheading this movement
to get this information out to the public.

And I hope that people will listen.

Thank you for helping us

bring the truth to the public

as the voice of the voiceless.

Thank you.

And a welcome to our next speaker, Dr.

Richard Blumberg, maternal fetal medicine
specialist fellowship

trained at Duke University, where he did

research and establish about how lipids

can be used to help

different vectors cross the placenta.

He is chairman of Obstetrics

and gynecology at a large

community hospital
in a large southwestern city.

And he is maternal fetal medicine

specialist, seeing pregnant
women, high risk pregnant women,

and is also concerned about taking care
of the mother and the baby.

Both are his patients.

He is the maternal fetal medicine
specialist,

advisor for Truth for Health Foundation,
and we are honored to have him

give us his input on concerns
about the experimental COVID

shots being used in pregnant women

and what are some of the concerns
for the mother and the baby?

As the developing baby in the uterus

has some special
issues to be concerned about?

We are

also going to have a conversation with Dr.

Blumberg, as if he were explaining this

to a pregnant woman
and her husband in his office.

So we want it to be helpful for all of you
members of the public who are listening.

Thank you, Doctor Bomer.

Thanks for having me, Dr. Lee.

OK, so a big question is

does the vaccine cross the placenta
and would there be risk to the baby?

Now, in comparison, the virus, COVID
virus does not seem to cross the placenta.

So if one had a natural infection,
yeah, they could get sick.

Most people just have mild symptoms.

There are treatments
we can give pregnant women.

And the very treatments
that are now showing an 85% reduction

in hospitalization and ICU admissions
are all safe in pregnancy.

That would be ivermectin,
hydroxychloroquine,

zinc, vitamin D and first it's in

all of

those have been used for decades decades.

And we have a long history of the safety
in pregnancy

so babies in utero which if they are born
one may not know immediately

any ill effects of the treatment
but as they get to be 4050 years old

you could see there's increased
leukemia increase this or that we know

from those medicines
because they've been around for decades.

The vaccine
has just been around for a year.

So we have no data on long term effects

so we have to worry
can this potentially cross the placenta

and although the virus doesn't,
this vaccine is using

messenger RNA

surrounded in a sphere of lipid

where the lipids now
blend with cell membranes

to deposit that message or RNA into cells
so that you run off these spike proteins.

Problem is these lipid vectors
are likely to cross the placenta

because

lipids freely diffuse across the placenta.

And in addition, there are fatty acid
transport proteins in the placenta

that actively sequester and bring lipids
into the baby's compartment.

So for example, DHEA,
which is an omega three fatty acid

which we know affects
fetal cognitive function

and brain development, and we're putting
that in prenatal vitamins.

The concentration of DHEA is 13 times

greater in the baby's blood than it is
in the mom's blood. Why?

Because it's actively drawn
in to the baby.

So here you have these viral vectors
that are likely to cross the placenta.

And what we found is that in the second
half of pregnancy, lipids accumulate

specifically in the brain,
which is great for brain development.

But now that's the problem.

If you're giving these vectors
of the vaccine

to deposit
these messenger A's in brain tissue,

now a baby's

cell tissue, baby fetal tissue

is the most metabolically active
tissue there. It's

babies grow large rhythmically
from one cell to two to four to eight.

Patients come in.

We do an ultrasound.

They're amazed at how much the kids grown.

They come back in a month.

They can't believe,
holy cow, look at how big this kid is.

It's just ruined. Yeah.

So those cells are made to grow
and produce all these proteins.

If you put in a messenger
in a fetal tissue,

if an adult cell will turn out
a million spike proteins,

a fetal cell will turn out a zillion spike
proteins.

Now, what's unique about a baby

that's in the uterus before it's

born is that that baby is half dead.

Now, if I take dad's kidney out
and put it into mom,

her body would likely recognize

that foreign tissue, it's an invader
and would attack it and reject it.

But yet that baby is half dead.

So what's unique about pregnancy
is that compartment

needs to be hidden
from mom's immune system.

So the first part of pregnancy
is specific.

It's a first trimester.

Physiologically,
things happen uniquely there where the

the baby's placenta
is growing into the mom's uterus.

Invading into her blood vessels.

And yet the mom's immune system
has to allow

this invading tissue to come in, attack
its blood vessels and yet not attack it.

So a lot transpires to keep that tissue
hidden and tone down.

Mom's
natural immunity to a foreign invader

so one

question
is, if you have this spike protein

vaccine in mom's tissue
in the uterus at that interface,

that's likely to cause inflammation,
which we know the spike protein does.

And that can break down
that that interface that should be hidden

and now mom's rejecting the kid
and resulting in miscarriages.

And I

it seems that

that's increasing dramatically.

And from the data
that The New England Journal put out,

if you recalculate the true data,
the miscarriage rates about over 80%,

which is what I would expect
if you have inflammation in that area

now beyond the first trimester

things change a little bit.

The babies established

now these lipids are actively accumulating
in the baby's brain.

Now, the baby
does not have an active immune system

and it does not
because it can't reject mom either.

So it's hooked up to mom.

It can't reject mom.

Mom can't reject the baby.

So babies while in the uterus have
virtually no immune system whatsoever.

So if you're making a zillion spike
proteins on the cells of fetal tissue

with no no immune system to deal with it,
what's going to happen to that?

How are those proteins
going to be metabolized and broken down?

And a question is, is that we know
in adults

that there are

substances we call Lewy bodies, WUIS,

and they're basically protein
deposits in the brain,

which we think are proteins
that are misfolded

and not metabolized correctly,
and they're associated with dementia.

So now in a fetal tissue
do you want to make

a bunch of proteins
that may not be metabolized correctly?

There's no immune system to deal with it.

It's orange particle.

That's the big question.

We want to maximize our kids
cognitive function.

We want them to be smart

and healthy and have good interaction
and do math well and read well.

You don't want to have deposits of protein
in their brains.

And another question

I have is
when you have these spike proteins

that are now protruding
out of cell membranes and fetal tissue

fetal tissue is forming and developing.

So how does your brain tissue know
to go from your head

all the way down to your big toe well,
it does that by reading special proteins

that are expressed on on babies tissues

at certain periods for certain duration.

So that the cells know
by reading these proteins where to go

and how to migrate
to go in the right place.

So a concern for me
is that if you have zillions

of these viral spike
proteins on the surface of these cells,

while you need to have the cells
reading these proteins they could

there's a potentially could misread them
and not go to the right place.

And that could result in conditions
like autism, behavioral problems,

cognitive problems
that you wouldn't even see once a baby's

born autism, we typically don't diagnose
till they're four years old.

So this vaccine's only been out
less than a year.

So how could you possibly have any data

on the effect of these proteins,

which are from all
we know are likely to cross the placenta

and accumulate in fetal tissue
and express themselves dramatically?

So overall, with medicines in pregnancy,
and I deal with this

every day, patients that have epilepsy,
they have kidney failure,

they have heart disease.

If wanted Iran medicines,
they come to me with questions,

how safe is this medicine?
Should I continue it?

Should I stop it?

And we review what know the risks

and the benefits
of continuing or stopping.

So now here you have the vaccine, which
I just suggested, a lot of severe risks.

And what's the benefit?

Well, there's other treatments
that show 85% reduction,

and all of those are safe in pregnancy
for decades.

Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin,
zinc, vitamin C,

vitamin D, of course, it's
in all of those decades of safety

so why would one risk an
experimental genetic therapy?

Thank you, Dr.

Blumberg.

You know, I think that's such
a common sense question

for all of our audience
to think about mothers who wouldn't drink

a glass of wine
during pregnancy are jumping in

and being misled to take an experimental

gene therapy shot that we know nothing

about when there are treatments.

As you said, hydroxychloroquine
has been in use worldwide in pregnant

women and nursing mothers for 65 years
with an amazing safety record.

And I think you've brought

a really important perspective
to our entire press conference.

Thank you so much for joining us today.

Thank you for all the work
you're doing on the front lines.

Taking care of women and their babies.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

And now I'd like to introduce

sister and physician Dr.

Eddie Byrne,

who is a retired military surgeon

and currently a medical missionary
in Baltimore,

Maryland,
as a surgeon and family physician.

She is also a member of the Truth
four Health Foundation Advisory Council

and Catholics for Preservation of Life,

one of our public charity initiatives.

Welcome, Sister Deedee, and thank you
so much for sharing your perspective.

On this critical issue
of the experimental genetic shots

and their potential impact
on fertility and pregnancy.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you.

But I will
you've all heard already from really

the experts about what's been happening
with this vaccine at many levels.

And for specifically,
I've been recently being asked

to help young women

who have had who desire
not to take the vaccine.

And we've heard from the experts today

what the vaccine can do scientifically,
medically, to the ovaries, to the

to the sperm and to the neutral tissues.

And so I want to appeal to

to our Christian Catholic faithful
to all Americans, especially young women

who are in
and young men who desire to have children

and want to conceive
not having a child is a heartache.

We've heard about this
in the Old Testament with Sarah

aching to have a child and having to have
grandma take over for her.

And it's really something
that does not have to happen.

So I want to appeal to each one
of our young people remember, the science

shows that very few very healthy young

men and women will die of COVID.

And so we have an experience
experimental vaccine

that we have shown
and proven that can affect your and your

ovaries
and sperm and your endometrial tissue

that could risk miscarriages

and infertility.

Is it really worth
taking an experimental vaccine?

You don't have to take this vaccine.

You have the God given right to say no
to something that is just an experiment.

And for the common
good of your own family, it's OK

because you are going to be

one day,
God willing, a mother and a father

and you want to not make any
anything difficult for that.

And this vaccine has a

has a high risk for that.

So I just prayerfully

appeal to each one of our young people
to to pray and discern

and to really read the science
and do not be afraid to make.

That may be difficult,
but don't be afraid.

Thank you so much, Sister Didi.

And for all of the young people
listening to our press conference,

just know that early treatment for COVID,

the only young people
that are at risk of illness are those

who have other medical problems,
such as diabetes.

Or cystic fibrosis or asthma, or serious

medical problems, autoimmune disorders

and for the high risk young people,

our early treatment algorithms

that are outlined in our free patient
guide on our website

are working beautifully
to keep people out of the hospital

and keep people
from going into a more serious illness.

So the treatment has been available.

Many of us have been.

Sister Didi and I have been treating
people all last year

early and successfully.

So there is hope, there's help,

and you don't have to be manipulated
by fear.

To be pushed into an experiment

that threatens the body's ability
to make a placenta for a pregnancy,

that threatens your ovary dysfunction
and threatens testicles in men.

So thank you, Sister Didi, for being part
of our press conference today.

We are grateful
you are part of our advisory council

and working with us to bring medical
wisdom

and truth and stand on faith
in God's promises as well.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

Our next speaker is

leading Canadian pathologist

Dr Roger Hodgkinson,

who restrained Cambridge University
and is practiced

in the United States,
the United Kingdom and Canada.

He has been the chairman of Pathology

for a large community
laboratory in Canada.

He is currently the CEO of an American

biotech company focused on DNA sequencing

and is the medical pathology advisor

for Truth or Health Foundation.

Welcome to the press conference.

Doctor Hodkinson.

Thank you.

Doctor Blades.

I'd like to ask you if you could

please help our listeners understand

the implications

of the science that Doctor Yagan
and Doctor Stricker have presented

about the potential damage to the ovaries,

the testicles and the placenta.

And the uterine
lining with the experimental college shot.

It really is potentially quite serious

for future fertility
in ovarian and testicular function.

And I'd like you to comment on that as a
pathologist who understands tissue damage.

It's much worse than you described.

It's stark raving mad.

And I blisteringly annoyed

about the risks that we're subjecting
pregnant women to and younger women

who might wish to become pregnant
in the future and their husbands.

And I'll explain the scientific rationale
for that.

You have to ask yourself,
Doctor Blade, has the world's

gonna start raving mad

to subject these people
to an experimental agent,

a gene therapy
that's never been done before

with no testing whatsoever

for determining
if there's any experimental

if there's any evidence for these terrible
adverse effects that I'm going to list.

But let me start from the beginning.

When you're injected with this stuff,

it's intended to create spike protein
that your body

then reacts to with an immune reaction
to protect you.

Theoretically, we now know
that it's not very protective at all

from a COVID19 infection.

The problem is

that we're all different,
and some people produce an awful

lot more of this spike protein,
we believe, than others.

And those people get the those women

get the circulation swapped with trillions

of these spike protein particles.

As a result of the overproduction
that's occurred.

Those spike proteins

latch on to the receptor
for those proteins,

which is called the ace to receptor
two receptor

the H two receptors widely distributed
in the distributed in the body,

but it's particularly concentrated

in the worst places,

the inside of every blood vessel,

the ovaries and the testes

I think you can start to understand
the significance of this when I tell you

that when the spike protein attaches
to that ACE

two receptor in an unintended fashion,

it creates an

inflammatory process
that causes the blood to clot,

causes inflammation
to descend on that area

and and undergo cellular destruction

translation into pregnancy.

We have in the inside of the uterus

the most fragile, the most lush

tissue the body has in it.

I'm privileged as a pathologist.

I've opened up hundreds of uteruses

gynecologists don't do that.

I've seen how fragile that

lining of the uterus is,
and it's intended to be.

So as a very desirable destination
for a fertilized egg

coming down the fallopian tube.

But when that fertilized egg
gets down to the endometrium

with all its blood vessels,
it could find it's

a very inhospitable, dangerous place

because the blood vessels lining
the endometrium

are going to be attacked
after vaccination.

I shouldn't use that word
after the jab with an experimental vaccine

after the jab.

But the experimental gene product

thrombosis will occur.

Bleeding will occur on the
in the lining of the uterus,

which the ovum the fertilized egg hopes
is going to be very receptive to it.

Instead, the endometrium is destroyed.

It sheds the woman bleeds.

It may not be that obvious.

It may be a mild bleed,

mild menstrual blood loss

many, many women are not aware of
when they lose a baby

very early, very early on in pregnancy.

And we suspect that that will be occurring
now in women

who've received the jab

simply because those blood vessels
are incredibly fragile,

very susceptible
to any change in their environment.

The same thing happens in the placenta,

assuming the placenta actually
gets going on the inside of the uterus.

The placenta also had blood has blood
vessels.

The placenta can also be thrombosis

because of the attack of the blood
vessels in the placenta.

And that obviously could be ballgame
over for a developing embryo.

So that's

a consequence of early miscarriage, early

miscarriages, placental attack,

it doesn't end there
because the jab creates

antibodies intentionally.

Of course, that cross reacts.

Those antibodies to the spike
protein cross reacts

with certain critical proteins
in the placenta

protein course in setting.

And if you get an attack again,

since setting a normal protein
in the placenta

by the antibodies
directed against the spike protein,

I think you can see that
that pregnancy too is at risk

the big point is here, we just don't know

how to quantify that risk
because the studies have not been done.

The last time I checked, pregnancy
last nine months,

if you only do a trial
for four to six months

and you intentionally exclude
pregnant women, how in God's name

do you know what the effect is going
to be on the pregnancy and on the baby?

We'll come to the baby in a second.

It's the
most outrageous attack on humanity

to do that, knowing that there could be
these serious consequences

they're still doing it today
and it should stop immediately.

I'm viscerally outraged

at how this could be continuing
despite the scientific evidence of risk

for a vital function called fertility.

But it's still going on

let's not forget the baby in all of this.

Cast your mind back to it. Solidified.

Oh, that wasn't expected, was it? No.

Well, we don't know what
the effect on the baby is going to be.

Could could create melt.

Could the injection create malformations?

As a as a result of spike protein attack
on the lining of the uterus

and the in the end and the placenta
we just don't know.

Doesn't that terrify you
that we've reached this point in a

in a program at this
scale and we just don't know

that's called a criminal enterprise,

massive medical malpractise

on a scale that the world has never seen.

The baby is at risk here.

As well as the mother.

This is not Ebola. It's not source.

It was unneeded.

It was untested.

It's experimental.

It's being injected into women
who are pregnant

as we speak with a baby in the swing.

This is one of the most disgusting

episodes in medical history.

I'm absolutely appalled by it.

The solution,

we we just got to stop this now.

We got to stop the shot now.

Right now.

Thank you.

Thank you, Dr.

Hodgkinson,
for a very powerful presentation

and now this is Dr.

Gilead again.

And I would like to just remind everyone
watching

of the Chinese researchers study from 2018

that shows the potential

adverse effects of nanoparticles

on the entire reproductive system

in men and women

the enormity of this damage

hits every aspect of male

testicular function
in male hormone production.

As I mentioned earlier in the program,

when men lose their testosterone

it not only affects fertility,

but it affects muscle strength,
stamina, bone mass.

It affects cognitive function,
concentration, memory,

alertness, ability
to perform at a high level

it also tends to

cause increase gain in body
weight around the middle of the body.

An increased risk of insulin resistance
prediabetes,

diabetes and heart disease.

This is a devastating impact

beyond infertility.

It is also

a devastating impact for women.

When you look at the damage
to the ovaries shown in this chart

that the Chinese researchers
clearly outlined,

with the nanoparticles

concentrating in the ovaries
and the testes,

you see that
all aspects of ovarian function

are affected, including the number

of mature oocytes, which are

the way

that a woman can produce
an egg to become pregnant.

And the cellular energy,
the mitochondrial function

is affected,
hormone production is affected.

And when women lose estrogen, it affects

brain function, bone health,

cardiovascular health, immune function

and all of the functions

that help give us quality of life.

So as we think about

all that our speakers have said

today, I wanted to leave you

with this graphic visual image again

of the severity

of the testicular
and ovarian damage from the nanoparticles

that are components
of all of the experimental COVID shots.

Another reason to stop the shot

and get the rest of the story

and look at safer options

such as all of the early treatment
approaches that work

so well to keep people out of the hospital

and reduce the risk of dying from COVID.

And now in closing our formal program
today,

I want you to hear again

from our chief medical advisor
for the foundation, Dr.

Peter, a local cardiologist,

epidemiologist
and internal medicine physician

who has treated
hundreds of COVID patients.

He is a pioneer in early
treatment of COVID in the home setting.

He and I have coauthored the new version

of the COVID Early Treatment Guide Options

to keep you out of the hospital
and save your life

available on Truth or Health
dot org website

under the TAB Treatment.

Doctor McCullough is also

Professor of Medicine at Texas
Christian University and University

of North Texas
Health Sciences System and Medical School

We are honored to have him
with the Foundation

in our Chief Medical Advisor role

to oversee the scientific credibility
and medical truthfulness

and balanced information
that you can be sure

that we are presenting to
you with our best interests

working hard

as volunteers to serve the public good.

And now I'd like for you to hear Dr.

McCullough in a passionate interview
on Daystar TV as he talks about

the dangers of these experimental shots
for pregnant women.

Dr. McCullough.

You know,

I have interviewed several doctors

who have seen women who were pregnant
who got the vaccine.

Even one doctor that was seven months
pregnant in her thirties

that she got one shot and that night

she miscarried a seven month

old baby in pregnancy.

I know of another nurse
that nursed her baby.

She was required to get the shot
and she nursed the baby

and the baby died from blood clots.

They did an autopsy.

So what about pregnant women?

What about women who are nursing?

Why is this so dangerous?

Is does this go back to the spike protein?

It does.

And I have to tell. You,
this. Is deeply. Disturbing.

Doctors in my.

Circles are wondering what has.

Come over the minds. Of.

Doctors and.

Hospitals and health care systems.

Pregnancy pregnancy.

We have classes of safety, of drugs
and pregnancy.

We would never use a brand new drug
in pregnancy, ever.

A pregnant woman won't even have a half
a glass of wine because.

She's worried about our baby.

Why would she take an injection
of brand new,

unproven genetic material in her body?

The FDA Pharma Journal

excluded pregnant women
and women of childbearing potential. Why?

Because they knew
what was dangerous in pregnancy.

We never inject pregnant pregnant women

with brand new,
potentially dangerous substances.

Now we know this because the body produces
the spike protein.

It ravages the blood
vessels, causes blood clotting.

The New England

Journal of Medicine published
a paper of women who took the vaccine,

and the paper was was, in a sense,
made a completely incorrect

conclusion
and said it was safe in pregnancy.

We said, wait a minute.

They didn't follow everybody
for nine months when we just look at

who got injected
where in the trimester of pregnancy

and this has now been letters have been
poured into an English journal medicine,

first trimester of pregnancy,
taking the vaccine.

83% fetal loss rate.

Oh, they're atrocious.

It's absolutely atrocious.

So there are stories all over of women
all taking the vaccine

and then losing the baby.

Why they would never

if it was a new seizure medicine
or any diabetes, we would never do this.

Of course, pregnant women
should never take the vaccine.

Doctors should never, ever recommend
the vaccine.

And I predict
doctors will do a walk of shame,

a walk of shame, of medical malfeasance
and medical malpractise

for recommending this.
They need to come out of their trance.

Thank you Dr.

McCullough,
and thank you to all of our speakers

and all of our listeners
for this important time today.

We hope that you will take these messages

and use them to make wise decisions
for your health

And now, as we close the press conference

today in our

message for the public,

we welcome you
to join our crusade of the voiceless.

We are silent no more.

And those of us with Truth for Health
Foundation are speaking out

to ensure that the public interest
is served with the most truthful,

accurate, balanced medical information
that we can bring to you

with the interest of helping

you make wise decisions.

I'd like to close our program in prayer.

Heavenly Father,

we weep
for all those who have been lost to COVID

and those

who have been injured
by these experimental COVID shots.

Those who have died.

Those who have suffered
devastating consequences.

And those who have suffered miscarriages
and death of a baby

because they weren't warned of the risk.

Lord, we ask that you will guide all of us

as we strive to serve your purpose

in protecting your precious gift of life
and liberty for all of us.

That we have the right
to make our medical decisions in free will

with full information,
and that we have the right

to seek options
that suit our needs without pressure

Lord, we thank you for those
who opened their hearts

and minds to listen to this message today.

And we ask that you multiply our efforts
to help save lives around the world.

Thank you

for your wisdom
and strength and guidance in Jesus name.

Amen.