All language subtitles for Power.to.Change.2016.GERMAN.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-VXT2_English

I was dreaming of a machine

that would drive over a field,
cut the straw

and then produce pellets.

And at some point I had the idea of building
my own, mobile pelleting system.

And that's when the story started.

My idea is to produce pellets out of
renewable resources and waste materials,

and to generate energy from them.

These waste materials, for example straw pellets,

can provide power and heating,
and thus replace coal, oil and gas.

In order to develop such a machine,
you need money, and a lot of it.

And I thought maybe Mr. Roughani could get involved.

That we should invest now to preserve
our resources over the long term,

in order to even attain some kind of sustainability.

Our world is being shaken by the struggle
for an energy transition, for peace, for justice.

It is a fight for the preservation of creation.

It has affected us all for many years now -
whether young or poor, safe at home

or fleeing for dear life.

But wealth is distributed extremely unequally.

A billion people are starving every day,

we'll soon have flows of refugees
that we can't even imagine right now,

we need to be taking that into account too.

The struggle for energy transition means calling
into question the most basic values of our age.

Whoever wants to win it
will have to be involved in it every day.

And that renewable energy also generates
revenue and financial profits.

But I can't imagine that
such small-scale solutions -

a few windmills here, a few solar panels there -

will meet the real energy needs
of an industrial nation like Germany.

I just can't imagine that.

A lot of people share your concern.
But we have to change something here.

I maintain, as do many other people,

that we'll be using 100%
renewable energy by the year 2030...

I don't know. What will we do
when the sun isn't shining?

Just send the factory workers home?

The things that are happening right now,
all the problems we have, everything,

be it the floods we're having now, the famines,
the melting of the glaciers,

everything we experience every day when
something in our environment is destroyed,

we can't just not care about that.

I was 24 years old,

and I was attending a seminar by Dr Kleinwächter.

And right at the end, the professor said:

"When you go home now, please think about this:

what will you say to your grandchildren -
at some point?

Why did you burn up the environment?

Why did you allow all this to happen?

And I thought about it, and I thought
I won't say that to my grandchildren.

POWER TO CHANGE - THE ENERGY REBELLION

A film by Carl-A. Fechner

Having a nice house some day.
Having a nice car, a nice life.

Travelling and consuming as much as possible.

I think that's what people get an education for,
what they study and work for.

And so, the faith in renewable energy -

I really believed in it as a young graduate.

But the way society was developing seemed so
hesitant that at some point I lost my faith in it.

That's why I'll admit I'm also sceptical
about projects like Edy Kraus' pelleting system.

I'm an entrepreneur who has founded
a technology company, and also runs it.

Our group of companies offers development services
and measuring technology for the car industry.

For us, it's very important
to identify new trends early on.

That's why I've met up with an expert
in change management in Berlin.

...could be opportunities for your company.

Sounds great.
But isn't it more of a PR stunt

than a real principle driving your company?
At the end of the day,

as a listed company,
you have to provide quarterly reports

and not CO2 reductions -
the latter won't drive up your share price.

Why shouldn't our solutions also help our clients

to be both more efficient and more ecological?
- Yes.

We're experiencing conflicts for limited resources.
Every one of us is worried, hears the news.

The only thing many people haven't understood yet is
that ultimately the root cause of all these problems

is the increasing need for energy and the competition
for these limited, usually still fossil, resources.

Well, if we don't react now, it'll simply be too late.

And I'd love it if someone like you
applied their creativity to supporting us.

Kiev, Ukraine

I've taken an interest in issues
of war and peace my whole life.

It's probably because I was born in Iran.

And now the war in Ukraine,
I'm very preoccupied with that.

This country spends 12 billion dollars
a year on gas imports.

And at the same time there's a war going on in Ukraine,

Russia has occupied Crimea and is also involved
in the war in Eastern Ukraine.

I also couldn't get my conversation with Prof. Uhl,
the SAP Change Manager, out of my head.

I was travelling to Ukraine on business,

and met up with two environmental activists,
Anja and Roman,

to find out what Ukranians themselves actually think

about the issue of energy and dependence on Russia.

Wars are caused by numerous factors.

But the struggle for resources is one
of the most decisive causes of war.

The coal and nuclear industries were always

a source of funding for totalitarian regimes.

Energy dependence leads to political impotence.

If we stopped buying natural gas from Russia, say,
major firms like BASF would immediately go bankrupt.

Chemical company BASF is investing 2 billion euros

into projects with Russian energy company Gazprom,

and is thus expanding gas exploitation in Siberia.

Who is supporting business with fossil fuels?

“The energy transition is the most unsound governmental project
of the past few decades.” Michael Naumann, Former Secretary of State

“The big energy companies' profits have
massively collapsed due to the energy transition.”

I work with data records about
people and companies,

with statistics on macroeconomic relations.

And then I give people advice

about how to improve economic policy.

People who are driven by environmental concerns
and just want to push the energy transition,

may not be convinced that
economic efficiency is important.

So they set up this regime of subsidies and said:

we'll guarantee a feed-in tariff
for 20 years, a fixed price

for every kilowatt-hour of electricity you produce.

It was just launched,
without regard for the economic costs.

Thanks to the feed-in tariff,?

almost a third of the electricity produced in Germany

comes from renewable sources.

And yet the Bundestag has decided to abolish it.

I'm a scientist. I'm neutral.

When I saw that a project

that was being pushed in the right direction
by politicians is now being halted,

I really felt a duty to say:

no, I want to inform people about what is going on.

If you look at what Germany actually paid...

Without an energy transition, it'll cost us.

Without an energy transition, we'll be paying
more and more for oil and gas.

Every year, the German economy

spends around 100 billion euros on fossil fuels.

The development of renewable energies alone has
already generated savings of around 12 billion euros,

which is a figure that unfortunately
we never hear in the media.

The fight for electricity is a battlefield.
There are the lobbyists of the past,

who want to impede the energy transition,
who simply make their money burning fossil fuels.

And now renewable energies have come along.

They're getting cheaper and increase
the pressure to compete, for certain companies.

Those companies don't want to lose their market power.

Lobbyists try to discredit the energy transition.

They spread myths that it's
too expensive, too inefficient, impractical...

These claims aim to hinder the energy transition.

So they can continue to make money
using the conventional business model.

Electricity just makes up
a third of our entire energy supply.

But what we're currently not considering enough,

is energy in buildings,

and the transport sector. We also need
a sustainable mobility. That's all connected.

Electric lorries...

An experimental carrier that
has a range of about 50 km.

A gross vehicle weight of 40 tonnes,
so probably a payload of around 30.

It looks really futuristic.
One-man cabin...

This is really impressive.

Because for short journeys, the electrification
of goods transports really can improve our cities.

I'm studying urban planning
at Dortmund Technical University.

I also write a blog called 'future mobility',

and advise municipalities

Truck Electrification
and companies on transport issues,

Truck Electrification
and on future developments.

I've been doing it for over 4 years already,

and I think I've found the right niche.

Blog "future mobility"

How can we organise all this transport
all over the world

in a better, more environmentally-friendly,
more sustainable way?

Ships are the backbone of global goods transport.

You could introduce Skysails.

This company is trying
to use wind power, kites,

the sailing technology.

We could try to power ships entirely without fossil fuels.

I'm imagining a completely new generation of ships.

A mix of kite-pulling systems and fuel cells.

This would already be a huge gain.

The international shipping industry emits

more carbon dioxide than all of Germany.

90% of all transport worldwide
is powered by fossil fuels.

Concerning electromobility,
actually nuclear energy or coal power

also contribute to electricity production.

So electromobility only makes sense once
we are getting all of our energy from renewables.

There'll be no transport transition
without an energy transition, and vice versa.

A cargo bike is like a low-tech...

We're in the Institute for
Transportation Design in Braunschweig.

People from different disciplines
work together here:

Designers, design theoreticians, social scientists,

futurologists, economists,
transport scientists and engineers.

They aim to create a sustainable
mobility design.

Sustainable mobility means
moving away from private ownership.

Younger target groups are actually
driving a sharing economy.

They're sharing mobility products,
and everyday products.

There'll probably be less products,
because they are used by

a community, a neighbourhood etc.

The average power drill is used for about
19 minutes in its whole life.

Completely inefficient.

Cars are immobile for 23 hours a day.

No company would buy a machine which
doesn't produce anything for 23 hours a day.

It makes more sense to share these cars,

instead of everyone owning one and maybe
even using it as a status symbol.

Defining who you are through
1.5 tonnes of sheet metal

is a bit crazy anyway.

We probably can't completely forego cars,
but we will use them very efficiently.

We need vision, and it would be stupid
to think that we can let everything go on the way it is.

It took a while,

but I ended up finding an investor.

So we were able to build the first pelleting system,

and I then sold it to Franz Josef Tradt.

It's broken down again!

It's just not performing as it should.

I want to be pelleting,
and not constantly trying to fix the thing.

This is impossible!

The machine was tested. The manufacturer said
it can produce a tonne on average.

But if I can see now, after just 5 months:
the figures that were provided are wrong.

Perfectly normal, dry wheat straw
that has been stocked indoors,

runs through at around 600 kilos max.

Has nobody ever checked the figures?
There's a meter on it!

The specifications were provided by the manufacturer.
It's all data that we of course relied on.

I have to rely on the technology,
on the manufacturer.

That's the most important for me.
Having the correct data.

Well, at any rate we have a bloody problem now.

I've agreed to client orders for 1,200 tonnes now,

and now I'm going to have to tell
my clients I can't fulfil them.

You need to think twice about
who you're working with.

I know it's a good concept.
I've spent enough time looking into it.

It has to go on, it has to!

It's over... I can't ride a dead horse.

At some point I thought: well,
that was a dream, and now it's over.

But it wouldn't let go of me.

I knew, this guy is fighting for his own survival,

and so am I, because I've
invested just as much into it.

So we were both in the same boat,

but you might say that I was the culprit
and he was the victim.

And that was very, very difficult.

There's one thing that matters to me:
if I give my word, then I stick to it.

Anyone who knows me knows that.

My greatest personal goal is

for us to achieve a 100% changeover
to renewable energy as fast as possible.

As head of a local
energy supplier,

I gain a lot of knowledge.
You quickly get to a point

like on a boat, you sail fast
in one direction since you notice

no, that direction is wrong.

The Wind's blowing here,
so that's where to sail.

However, there's a lot of work ahead.

But we need to deal with it.
Together with the community, that's important.

A crucial factor in making the change
are local energy suppliers.

Many are already doing their bit:

over 200 municipalities in Germany are already
self-sufficient in terms of energy.

Bordesholm is on the way.

In 1991, we were one of the
first local energy suppliers to

take over its electrical grid
here in Schleswig-Holstein.

And we really had to fight for it.

We faced excessive prices, massive attacks.

So it's... We really lived through a lot of things.

We give grants if a private household installs
a solar panel on their roof, or a windmill,

or buys an electric car, of 2000 euros for example.

100 euro grants for e-bikes, energy-saving
washing machines, dryers...

We've been providing such support
since we took over the grid.

It would be good now
if we could find a place for a gas tank.

So we could add a third
combined heat and power plant here...

In future, we want to switch over to energy
production facilities here in town

and become self-sufficient

with batteries and biogas digesters
and a smart grid,

to become as independent as possible.

The huge advantage of having
your own grid is

that value creation stays in the region,
contracts are awarded in the region.

Newly-installed LEDs save 220,000 kilowatt-hours
of electricity a year here.

We're now able to invest in a modern
broadband fibre optic network.

On this basis, we'll set up an
intelligent energy network, a smart grid.

That would have been impossible
without our own grids.

Looks good... with Internet,
telephone and television.

There the fibre optics
so in future, we can have

an intelligent management
for every household...

Of course, it's always the best,
if you save energy.

That's how you save the most resources.

I was long-term unemployed,
and now I work as an energy saving helper.

My work is pretty much no-risk.

I know that I'll always find some area
where I can save energy.

I never get bad reviews.

50 colleagues are working
in Berlin alone on energy-saving checks.

I think that we are already
making a big difference.

It's happening all across Germany,
and if it was worldwide,

then we would make a huge difference.

- How many people live here?
- Two.

Let's find some devices
and reduce your electricity consumption.

This fridge is here because

it's simply too big
for the size of the household.

We're pretty pragmatic about it.

How can we reduce
the storage volume?

Thank you.

Just cooling air is the most
expensive thing you can do.

If you have empty compartments,
simply fill them with newspaper.

You have a flow rate of around 12 “Hes.

You can buy a flow limiter in any DIY shop.

They cost around 2 euros
and have a huge effect.

And if I add all of that up,

you could be saving around 400 euros,
that's around 35 euros a month.

Energy-saving lamps, LED lamps...

And I'm sure that if we wanted to,

we could achieve self-sufficiency

through sun, wind and water in the future.

If brilliant minds and people who have a lot of money
were to invest a load of money into this,

then it would be possible for us to have
an absolutely great environment.

The "great minds", for example
banks and insurance companies,

however mainly invested in fossil fuels.

To the tune of over 1000 billion dollars a year.

But a countermovement is appearing: Divestment.

- Mr. Roughani.
- Good morning.

Krohn, Alexander. Welcome to Heidelberg.

I continued to think about my encounter with
the environmental activists from Ukraine.

Germany is also dependent on oil and gas imports.

I had the idea of investing in
energy-efficient construction.

I'll show you. By the way,
we're already in Bahnstadt here.

In Heidelberg, energy-saving flats
are being built for 12,000 people -

which is also creating 7,000 jobs in the district.

We're building passive houses, over a large area.

This area used to be a goods depot.

Here used to be rail tracks everywhere.

In passive houses, we only need 15 kilowatt-hours
per square metre and year of heat energy.

Compared to legal standards
for new builds, we're 70, 80% under.

Bahnstadt will thus be the biggest
zero emission district in Europe.

If you invest in an efficient house,
that's a long-lasting investment.

We hope this will inspire other municipalities:

an energy transition is possible.

An energy transition also means a heating transition.
And that begins at home.

In Germany, over half of the energy consumed
is used to produce heating.

This heating is still not produced from solar energy.
90% of it comes from nuclear energy, coal, oil and gas.

Solar heat installations warm up water
for heating and showering much more efficiently.

They use the sun directly,
like here in Berlin-Reinickendorf.

This is part of a general concept that starts
with energy consumption.

Housing associations modernise
their housing stock's energy systems.

I do energy saving checks

meaning I help the people I visit to reduce
their electricity and energy consumption.

But they all say that something
has to come from the outside.

We're renovating here, in the Märkisches Viertel.

We have 14,000 flats here and we're completely
modernising them from an energy perspective.

So we're insulating the facade here,
changing the windows,

insulating the roof, and the cellar ceilings.

And this will ultimately make it
the biggest low-energy estate in Germany.

- Enjoy your meal.
- Thank you.

And what do the tenants get out
of this modernisation?

Sorry.

They use much less energy.
They have modern bathrooms.

And they can decide
how much heating they need or not.

The tenants thus make energy savings of 50%.

Thanks to the modernisation, their overall rent
remains at roughly the same level for years.

Meanwhile, where do the tenants go?
Do they just stay in their flats and put up with it?

Even with such extensive works,
the tenants stay at home.

But we're usually out after 3 weeks.

So ultimately we created a forward-looking district

that will retain its value in the near and distant future.

It's a big investment, after all.
And the reviews show that it's worth it,

in terms both of economics and sustainability.

I saw, in the Märkisches Viertel,
energetic modernisation, huge roof areas...

I live out in Hellersdorf. Out on the estate.
We also have flat roofs.

Last summer my husband and I came home:
what are those huge black sheets?

They'd set up a solar panel system on our roof.
All over the whole district.

And so now I get my own solar energy
from my own roof, so to say.

So when I make my morning espresso,
it's coming from my own roof.

I'm proud that I can be a part of it,
without having to build a house.

Just as a tenant in East Berlin.

I didn't have to do a single thing.

In Germany alone, there is a roof area of 1,100 square km
that could be used to produce electricity.

Producing electricity and heating.
This makes you independent from energy imports.

From Russia, for example.

Shortly after our first meeting,
I travelled to Ukraine once more.

Anja had invited me to find out more
about this energy dictatorship.

We drove eastwards.

I grew up in Iran
in very sheltered circumstances.

But we did experience the Iran-Iraq war.

That killed around a million people.

The war lasted over nine years.
And I spent seven of those in Iran.

Those are things that you'll always remember,

and I don't think you every forget them.

Your ID, passports!

The home was bombed in June 2014.

I've been working here for 40 years. 40 years.

Our children's home was beautiful,
so cosy, so homely.

I thought I'd be hit by the strike.

They're in Kramatorsk in another children's home.

It's so cold here!

How can you ignore that
children and women live here?

It makes no sense.

They should stop, for the children's sake.

There are children dying on both sides.

I personally was confronted with the war
in school every day.

We were systematically prepared for the eventuality
that we would have to go to the front.

But then my parents made the decision

to send me abroad to my older brother,

who'd already lived in
a children's home in Germany.

I couldn't speak a word of German or go
to a telephone box.

It's like the end, as if nothing will go on
in your life after this.

My brother hadn't told anybody
that I was coming.

But of course they took good care of me

and gave us a room together.

Then my life in Germany started.
With two small suitcases,

100 deutschmark, in Berlin,
in the summer of 87.

I just took everything that
happened to me in my stride.

When I found out that he had
been at a children's home too,

I liked to caress him.

I'm touched by such children.

In 2015, over a million people fled to Europe

just like Amir did all those years ago.

At the moment, I believe Ukraine is at a crossroads.

Do they choose the Russian way,

and end up keeping their
dependence on Russia.

Or do they go the way of the West
and create a new dependence.

There are already contracts with Shell,

with ExxonMobil and with Chevron,

about the extraction of shale gas.

And if the Americans and the Europeans themselves
extract shale gas here

and feed it into the pipeline,

then Russia will be out of this business.

And strangely it's exactly where these exploration
sites are that the war is taking place.

Solar rays simply come down onto the Earth's surface,

and I don't need to go to war
to gain access to this resource.

And they're everywhere,
just like the wind.

We need to keep weapons
away from these areas.

And to use the money differently,
to promote economic development.

Ukraine is not alone in having
these fossil fuel subsidies.

Global subsidies for renewable energies
come to 120 billion US dollars,

those for fossil fuels come to
5300 bill/on US dollars per year.

Governments spend more on environmentally
damaging fuels than they do on health care.

For decades we have had wars in the regions
that produce crude oil.

The Islamic State has seized several oil fields

and is using the income to recruit
mercenaries, weapons and much more.

Our consumption of oil, which we use
in our cars and our heating systems,

is financing the very terrorism that threatens us.
This has to stop.

In Europe now, renewable energies
can only continue to grow

if we stop using the old sources of energy.

But there are major economic interests behind these.

So they're fighting to maintain their business

with coal, oil, natural gas, and also nuclear power.

And they do so using their huge media power.

In 2013, there were posters all over Germany:

"Help, the energy transition is growing unaffordable!"

Mrs. Ternus, who is actually behind all this?

This was an action carried out by the INSM -
Initiative for a New Social Market Economy.

It's funded by the Federation of German Industries
and the Metal Industry and commercial enterprises.

What does this mean in practice?

The Initiative for a New Social Market Economy
influences opinion even at the school level,

by developing and producing work sheets
for teachers on specific political issues.

They work with a number of experts,

who if you look closer come out of institutes
that are financed by the industry itself,

such as for example the EWI Institute,
which is partly financed by E.on and RWE.

People think they're listening to
a wide range of different voices.

But it actually turns out to have a very clear bias.

Government - Expert Advisory Board for econmics
energy suppliers E.on and RWE - econmics institutes RWI and EWI

And if you endlessly repeat them,
pure speculations

or even lies can come to sound like truths.

Oi! and gas companies in the US spend around
400,000 dollars a day on lobbying.

Purely to put a stop to the energy revolution.

Do you have an example of actual lies?

The statement made during the debate
on the Renewable Energy Law:

"Subsidies will lead to a huge rise in electricity tariffs."

That's simply not true.

The real reason is a new calculation method
and the exceptions made for industry.

Industry saves five billion euros a year

because it pays a reduced EEG contribution.

Mrs. Ternus, 5 billion euros -
who is compensating for that?

Well, the consumer.

Thank you for talking to us,
what fascinating insights.

Over 2,000 companies benefit from the EEG exceptions.

Thanks to this discount, the Triment aluminium factories,
for example, pay 240 billion euros a year less for electricity.

We have to pay money for coal,
for the nuclear "bad bank",

and in the most important, forward-looking sector,
the energy transition, we just let it happen.

Over the past year, 40,000 employees
in the solar industry lost their jobs.

The coal industry still has around 50,000 employees.

But nothing is said about the solar industry.

And that has a lot to do with
the influence of the lobbies.

The world is topsy-turvy.

The traditional energy industry
is currently under enormous pressure.

This has a lot to do
with changes in recent years,

a lot to do with the energy transition
that was launched a few years ago.

And all these traditional companies
have to seriously rethink their business model.

And people in companies who have been taken by
surprise shouldn't be judged too severely for it.

With just one nuclear power plant,
big conventional operators make

between 300 and 450
million euros a year.

But nuclear power is by far the most expensive form
of energy for the next thousand generations.

What about the nuclear waste?
It'll radiate for thousands of years.

Is some future generation just meant to deal with that?
It's crazy, what we're doing here!

It has been being dismantled
for the past 15 years.

Can we use abandoned nuclear
power stations as energy stores?

Here are the facts:

22 nuclear power stations will be
dismantled over coming years in Germany.

They'll be leaving behind 100,000 tonnes of
radiation-contaminated steel and concrete.

That has to be put into a nuclear waste
repository somewhere. No one knows where.

The legacy of a generation of greed.

But that leaves 11 million tonnes of
uncontaminated concrete. And that we can use.

We want to build a storage system
for renewable energy

on sites where nuclear power
stations are being dismantled.

The more solar and wind power stations
are connected to the network,

the more storage we need.

To fully reap the benefits of renewable energy,

we need storage for times at which
this energy can't be produced:

during the night for solar,
or when the windmills can't turn.

What's great is how simple it is.
Keep it short and simple.

You dig a hole. Fill it with water.

And you let a heavy cylinder made out of
old concrete from the nuclear power station

move up and down in this hole.

When it sinks down,
it pushes the water below it

and this water drives a turbine
that generates electricity.

And in order to push the cylinder
upwards, you have a pump

which pumps water under the piston
and slowly lifts it up.

And then it's kept there
until you need the energy again.

We can build storage for up to 1,600 MW like this,
more than any nuclear power station can provide.

This is just great, because we need
storage capacity to be able

to change over from conventional energy
as fast as possible, push its use down to zero,

and change over to renewable energy as far
as possible. Or actually, to 100% renewables.

Then comes the question: what about when the wind is
down? What happens to heating and electricity then?

It's simple: it's only then
that we'll switch on the biogas plants.

They'll then produce the heating and electricity we
need and can thus provide the necessary adjustment.

But we also need more storage.

So for example it's possible to create
a gas that is similar to natural gas

using excess wind energy,
it's technically possible.

And this storage technology
has huge advantages,

because it also connects the transport sector
to wind and solar power production.

Here in Werlte, we've built the biggest
power to gas plant in the world.

This is where we use excess power
to produce the fuel of the future.

Whenever the windmills are turning and
no electricity consumers are available,

we switch on this plant.

Then, first, hydrogen is produced
using the excess electricity.

At the same time, biogas from the neighbouring
biogas plant is processed to produce raw biogas,

and the CO2 is extracted.

And the hydrogen and CO2 are then methanised,
meaning that a new fuel is produced.

It's very important to us
to develop fuels that bind CO2,

that use CO2 as a recycling material.

This offers us huge potential to connect heating,
mobility and the electricity sector.

We have over 6,000 biogas plants in Germany,
we have over 10,000 wastewater treatment plants.

If we use the CO2 from these plants, we could build
thousands of these power to gas plants.

It's important for car manufacturers
to think about the future too.

But we really need
people who have visions and dreams,

and we need people
with some power of persuasion.

Think outside the box,
think in a revolutionary way,

go beyond the usual limits,
but do what you think is right.

And suddenly a complete restructuring,
a very decentralised energy system may be possible.

And then it won't be the big firms ruling the game,
but rather many small ones helping out.

We simply have to say we want
to move away from conventional fuels,

not all of a sudden,
but by phasing them out gradually,

just like the plan for the nuclear phaseout, really.

And when renewable energy rises, regulating energy will
be provided by battery power plants like in Schwerin.

This is the power plant of the future: a battery
power plant. It's quiet. It's very compact.

And it can easily be integrated
into a residential area.

We can provide a much better service
than what coal and nuclear offer.

We're all used to having 220 volts
and 50 Hertz in our plugs.

In order to offer this, conventional power plants
compensate for frequency deviation.

This means they constantly have to regulate
for the frequency to remain stable.

With this battery, we're replacing the part of
the power plant that regulates this frequency,

so we can retire the coal-fired plant.

How many battery power plants would we need
in Germany to replace coal and nuclear power plants?

If we take into account what power plants do
to stabilise the frequency,

then we'd need to build 100 to 120
of these batteries in Germany

in order to be able to shut down around 6 power plants.

The investment in battery storage -
a one-off cost of one billion euros -

would furthermore be significantly cheaper
than operating the 6 coal-fired power plants:

1.4 billion euros per year.

Well, here in Bordesholm we'd be very
interested in setting up such a plant.

Maybe at some point we'll all have a small battery at
home that you can hook up to an intelligent network,

and this will be a service that will be
provided by every electricity consumer.

This is how we create big storage capacity:
through decentralised storage facilities.

The American entrepreneur Elon Musk
wants to produce millions of them at a low cost.

A visionary man and an energy rebel.

Entrepreneur Elon Musk on Battery Storage

Elon Musk is building the biggest battery factory in the world.
This could change the world's energy supply.

I think that if we want
a more positive take on the future,

we need many more creative people
to bring innovative ideas to the market,

to inspire us, to take people with them,
in order to achieve this kind of transformation.

It needs to not weigh much to be efficient,
and it must be safe.

Because this is a car for urban mobility...

charged with renewable energy
and can really change things...

Technology follows a social desire.
We start with new forms of technology,

but above all with new forms of social innovation:

sharing economy, car sharing, cycling,
flying less, consuming regional products.

There is one high-impact change
I can make, as a private individual:

it's air travel and eating meat.

We're projecting that the volume
of traffic will triple by 2050.

This is the biggest challenge.

The rising global population,
rising consumption, rising mobility.

The more products on the roads,
the more vehicles drive around,

the bigger the volume of steel
and concrete infrastructure.

25 billion tonnes of concrete are
processed across the world every year.

Between 2011 and 2013,
China used more concrete than the USA throughout the 20th century.

To make concrete, you need cement.
Cement production releases huge quantities of CO2.

Celitement is a cement substitute.

The production of Celitement releases
up to 50% less CO2.

But the construction industry
insists on using cement.

For the moment.

Other sectors are already
much more advanced.

We have completely transitioned to
100% electricity from renewable sources.

This applies worldwide,
to all our data processing centres and buildings.

On a global level, data processing centres
produce as much CO2

as air travel.

Google clocks up almost 4 billion searches a day.

And every one of them requires energy.

This data processing centre uses considerably
less energy than the global average.

Mainly thanks to its intelligent cooling system
and radically improved hardware.

By focussing on our emissions and on
the business operations connected to them,

be it our fleet of vehicles, our electricity
consumption in data processing centres,

heating in our buildings, or telepresence,

we've managed to avoid costs of around
260 million euros over the past 6 years.

And these solutions, which other companies
can also use through our software,

have an incredible multiplier effect.

When my son was born with a heart defect,

I also realised

that the time I spend with him is

more important than anything else. And...

And that fundamentally changed my
personal attitude to my work, to my performance,

to where I invest my time.

We can all change.
But we need to see the point of it.

And we will see this point
once we have understood

that it will be personally
beneficial to us, and also to society.

This means that we need to increase our awareness
of which values really matter in the world.

And often it's the case that we lack the belief
or the idea that a process of transformation

can lead to success, and so we avoid change.

We don't want to take any risks.

But in my life, changes have
always brought me further.

The big transformation
won't come from the top down,

won't be managed by somebody, but from

the bottom up, through numerous small changes.

My client, Mr. Tradt,
has found a new pelleting system

that should perform well at last.

So we've tried that out.

- Greetings.
- We can start pelleting now.

- Yes, we can.
- Good. That's a good thing.

Let's see the barn where the straw is stored.

Franz Josef. Let's get started.

OK, I'll let it run.

Now it's working.

Look at that.

Yes, wow.

Excellent quality now. Hardly any dust.

Great.

Look at this!

Crazy! Crazy, look at that.

It's running at almost 1.1 tonnes now
and it's only just got going.

Now we've done it,
you've really proved your stamina.

You've really kept going.
I have a huge amount of respect for you.

Give me five.

We ended up pelleting
1.2 and 1.3 tonnes in an hour here.

For the first time.

And we were all happy
that it worked like that.

We have endless amounts of
biomass at our disposal.

Straw alone comes to around
13 million tonnes a year that we can use.

And that's not the end of it.
For example, we're thinking about dead leaves.

All municipalities and towns
could collect their dead leaves

and then they could be pelleted
and immediately used to produce energy.

We're on the right path.
The change is happening.

But...

it's too slow. We don't have time.
We have to react quicker.

We can't build up any bureaucratic barricades.
We should be pulling them down instead!

Hermann Scheer, a brilliant man,
and Mr. Fell, they had a pivotal role.

They created the Renewable Energy Law,
which has set an example for the whole world.

And now that's being destroyed!
And now we're relying on coal.

Who can understand that?

Well of course, many things
play a role in negotiations

between people,
in particular of course in economic life,

and power is a part of that, so that's exactly
what the social market economy tries to prevent,

the power that can be abused to take people
on the other side of the market to the cleaners.

Politicians want to shape things. To do that they
need a majority. Therefore, they have to convince people.

They're watching it all go wrong.
And it will all go wrong.

That's the way it is! So I ask myself:
what's happened to intelligence?

The Earth's power supply could
be provided by a mix of wind power,

solar power,

biomass,

and other renewable energy sources.

Heating

could be produced mainly from geothermal energy,
solar energy and biomass.

We could reduce our energy consumption.

Current fluctuations could be counterbalanced
continuously through a combination of storage systems

and decentralised power plants.

How these dual function power plants
could be intelligently managed

is already the subject of research today

and this research shows that

this is what the future could look like.

25 of these wind power plants could even

supply the Emden VW factory with electricity.

That's the production of 225,000 cars a year.

Could...

because up until now VW has only purchased
four of these wind turbines for its factory.

In 2011 we had
the great opportunity of setting up

a larger wind park with up to
nine wind turbines on this field.

A real, genuine 100% citizens' wind park.

This would have made us far more than
100% self-sufficient on balance.

And we could have directly and immediately
supported kindergartens and schools etc.

Unfortunately the population rejected the plan and
in one village we missed the target by 7 votes.

That was a real shock.

Because I absolutely couldn't understand how people
could actually reject something as clean as wind power.

We had some very strong supporters.

But there's always the danger...
we've experienced this, a handful of people

who distributed flyers with the craziest claims.

They went as far as going to school,
intercepting the kids and telling them

to say goodbye to their parents if they voted
for wind power, as they'd get cancer.

What do people have in their heads?
Now they come and say, oh God,

let's say: moving shadows. Infrared.

Monster turbines. Ice debris.
Annoying flashes. Disco effect.

We just wanted to make money.

We shouldn't just think about which arguments
to discredit. We must be far more proactive.

We want to create a multifacetted
regional energy transition here.

And wind power is just one of our building blocks.

I think we have to take all positions seriously.

OK, we hear them sometimes, we see them too.

But it's worth it to us for the sake of our future.

I mean, we'll never be able to make
them invisible and perfectly silent.

You can't generate energy invisibly.

We need wind power. The more we wait to make the
energy transition, the more climate change will progress.

And then? Who'll shoulder the costs?
Younger generations.

This year, 25 million euros of purchasing power
went to external electricity purchases.

If we had a decentralised energy supply,

50% of tax revenue
would return to our regions.

Directly to our communities, to the companies that
work for the common good. And to our citizens.

As for the environmental consequences...

With brown coal, whole swathes of land vanish for ever.
With their cemeteries, their churches, everything.

This simply isn't necessary. It's also not modern.

It's completely archaic.

Because renewable energy is market-ready.
We don't need conventional energy anymore.

What we're doing right now, what policies encourage, is:

running a renewable energy system

in parallel with a conventional energy system
that must be maintained at all costs.

And we need to move away from that.

In autumn I paid a visit to my first
industrial client, Mr. Hans-Georg Hof.

He heats around 6,000 square metres of
production halls using straw pellets exclusively.

- You didn't use gas heating at all?
- No! We didn't use gas heating.

Our consumption last winter was around
60 tonnes of straw pellets.

And these 60 tonnes are replacing
27,000 litres of fuel oil.

This means that if, in terms of cost,
we estimate an average fuel oil price,

we're effectively saving 50%.

For me it was important, with the whole
basic idea of doing something like this,

it was very important that
you only exploit waste material,

which isn't taking away any
valuable surfaces from the food chain.

Even the ash can be used up again
as potash fertiliser on the fields.

And I find that very, very positive.

It works. The fuel technology works too.

And now we can start to say goodbye to gas and oil.

The extraction of fossil fuels is becoming
ever dirtier and more dangerous.

When natural gas is extracted by fracking,
methane is released.

Methane is at least 20 times more damaging
for the climate than CO2.

In Canada, tar sands are being exploited
across a surface as big as England.

Around 500 million litres of water a day
are poisoned in the process.

And that's the fire burning inside of me.

And I'm doing this within the framework of options
that I have. I have limited options.

But I'm doing this. And I've always done this.
For 40 years.

Turn it off, turn it off, turn it off.

For over 40 years, people all over the world
have been combating nuclear power.

On 11/03/2011, an accident destroyed a large part
of the nuclear power plant in Fukushima.

Countless millions of tonnes of waste and earth
have been contaminated by radiation.

They are being stored in plastic sacks.

Every day, 600,000 litres of water are contaminated.

They are being provisionally poured into tanks.

In England, there are plans to build
a new nuclear power plant, Hinkley Point C.

The state is acting as surety for the construction
to the tune of 22 billion euros.

Austria and the green energy providers
Greenpeace Energy and EWS Schönau

are suing against the public grants.

Over 180,000 citizens are filing complaints.

In October 2014, the subsidies
were approved by the EU.

It stinks to high heaven that this was approved,

and I don't understand why the new EU Commission
isn't keeping its distance.

The problem is rather that we're maybe
not bold enough in some areas,

meaning that the EU does in fact set itself targets -

where it wants environmental protection
and energy transition to be by 2030 -

but it daren't break down these targets bindingly
at the level of national member states,

saying OK, you have to do this by then,
or we'll be talking about sanctions.

I think we need both, a bold population
and a bold government.

I always get so angry when I read that...

The English have a total of nine nuclear power plants,
which are all around 30 years old.

And now they have the unique opportunity

to make a new investment into renewables, instead
of depending on nuclear power for 60 more years.

Tying themselves to nuclear again.

It's really terrible, what's happening in Fukushima now.

Radioactive water is still flowing into the ocean,
people there are overwhelmed by the situation,

no one knows how to isolate the reactor core.

There is no solution to what to do
with all the contaminated soil.

Over 120,000 people still haven't
been able to return to their homes.

And that shows the scale of this catastrophe.

And Japan has demonstrated,
just after the Fukushima meltdown,

how quickly you can reduce your
energy consumption from one day to the next.

In order to make the world more just,
in order to make the world more peaceful,

in order to combat hunger, in order to put an end
to all the social inequality,

we must do more. We're responsible for
what we do, but also for what we don't do.

The pioneers of the energy transition were viewed
by many as crackpots, as tinkerers.

And that's how I see Edy Kraus,
he believed in things

I couldn't imagine it would be possible to realise.

But in hindsight,
I must say he was miles ahead.

I think we need these
people to open up new paths,

and at the end of the day they are
the trailblazers of the energy transition.

The Tautenhain site is a special case for me personally.

Because I know that this site was used to store missiles

loaded with nuclear explosives.

I know that, from this site,

Russian missiles were sold to Iraq,

during the time of the Iran-Iraq War.

And 25 years later,

I'm standing here

and making the opening speech
for this park in the missile hall,

where these missiles used to be stored.

And much more than that:
my team and I have succeeded

in converting this site, which had ended up in ruins
and was an encumbrance for everyone around it,

into a solar power plant, introducing
some peace and quiet here.

And that's not all: we're producing
electricity for 10,000 people.

I often had people arguing against me, saying
that this solar project is just a drop in the ocean.

And that you could just give up on it
and still keep a clean conscience.

And I think that was the really important realisation:
no, we can't give up on one single project.

It's the sum of all projects that will make
the change, create the energy transition

or achieve the goal of 100% supply
from renewable energies.

And that's how I think we should view this process.
Every one of us

can make a small contribution that doesn't have
a huge effect if you look at it in isolation.