All language subtitles for Citizenfour.2014.720p.WEB-DL.AAC2.0.H.264-NOGRP

"Laura,

at this stage, I can offer nothing more than my word.

I'm a senior government employee in the intelligence community

I hope you understand that contacting you is extremely high risk

and you are willing to agree to the following precautions

before I share more.

This will not be a waste of your time.

The following sounds complex,

but should only take minutes to complete for someone technical.

I would like to confirm out of email
that the keys we exchanged were not intercepted

and replaced by your surveillants.

Please confirm that no one
has ever had a copy of your private key

and that it uses a strong passphrase.

Assume your adversary is capable
of one trillion guesses per second.

If the device you store the private key
and enter your passphrase on

has been hacked,

it is trivial to decrypt our communications.

Understand that the above steps
are not bullet proof,

and are intended only to give us breathing room.

In the end if you publish the source material,

I will likely be immediately implicated.

This must not deter you from releasing
the information I will provide.

Thank you, and be careful.

Citizen Four"

Radio: ... surveillance means that there are facts

under the law to apply to

if we should take away the surveillance

there are no facts the government could manufacture

- Oh, that's right
and it's all about creating an independent record

- To me this goes to the question

of independently verifying

what the government is doing.

That's why I keep going
back to that question.

- So, that was David Suruda.
After CBS News traffic and weather...

Hey, can you hear me?

I am here David, how are you?

Well, I would just point...

start by pointing to (what) Barack Obama
himself said about those questions

when he was running for
the office that he now occupies.

On December 2007 he said
"The president does not have

the power under the Constitution to
unilaterally authorize a military attack

in a situation that does not involve stopping
an actual or imminent threat to the nation".

So by Obama's own words, the president doesn't
have the power that he is now exercising

under the Constitution.

And as far of why it matters,
in... on August 1st 2007

when he laid out his reasons
why he was running for office

and why he thought it was so important
to change the way we were doing things

he said

"No more ignoring the law
when it's inconvenient,

that is not who we are.

We will again set an example for the world
that the law is not subject

to the whims of stubborn rulers."

- So to allow presidents to simply
start wars on their own without any...

For now, know that every border you cross, every purchase you make,

every call you dial, every cell phone tower you pass,

friend you keep, article you write,

site you visit, subject line you type,

and packet you route,

is in the hands of a system
whose reach is unlimited

but whose safeguards are not.

Your victimisation by the NSA system means
that you are well aware

of the threat
that unrestricted secret police pose

for democracies.

This is a story few, but you, can tell.

Thank you for inviting me here,

to give me the opportunity to express my story.

But let me give you some of my background.

I spent about 4 years in the military and then I went to NSA directly, so...

so I ended up with about 37 years of service combined.

Most of it was a lot of fun!
I tell you, it was really a lot of fun,

breaking these puzzles.

You know, solving problems
and things like that.

So, and that's really what I did.

Fundamentally started working with data,
looking at data and datasystems

and how you do that.

I was developing this concept of analysis
where you could lay it out in such a way

that it could be coded and executed electronically.
Meaning you could automate analysis.

And it has to do with metadata
and using metadata relationships.

So that was the whole,
that was my whole theme there at NSA

that was eventually what I ended up to,
I was the only one there doing that, by the way.

So any rate, you know, 9/11 happened.

And it must have been right after.

A few days, no more than a week after 9/11

that they decided to begin actively spying on everyone in this country.

And they wanted that back part of our program to run all the spying.

So that's that's exactly what they did.

And then they started taking the telecom data,

and expanded after that.

So, I mean, the one I knew was AT&T,

and that one provided
320 million records every day.

That program was reauthorized every 45 days by the,

what I call the "Yes Committee"

which way Hayden, and Tenet, and the DOJ,

that program was called STELLARWIND.

So first I went to the
House Intelligence Committee,

and the staff member I personally knew there

and she then went to the Chairman
of that Committee, Nancy Pelosi,

who was the Minority Rep.

They were all briefed in to
the program at the time, by the way,

and all the other programs that were going on,

including all those CIA programs.

I wasn't alone in this,
there were four others out of NSA,

we were all trying to work interally
in the government over these years

trying to get them to come around,
to being constitutionally acceptable,

and take it in to the courts
and have the courts' oversight of it too.

So we na�vely kept thinking
that that could, that could happen,

and it never did.

But any rate after that
and all the stuff we were doing

they decided to raid us
to keep us quiet,

threaten us, you know.

So we were raided simultaneously,
four of us.

In my case they came in
with guns drawn,

I don't know why they did that,
but they did. So....

"Laura,

I will answer what I remember

of your questions as best I can.

Forgive the lack of structure, I am not a writer,

and I have to draft this in a great hurry.

What you know as STELLARWIND has grown,

SSO,

the expanded Special Source Operations that took over STELLARWIND's share

of the pie

has spread all over the world

to practically include

comprehensive coverage of the United States.

Disturbingly, the amount of US communication

ingested by NSA is still increasing.

Publicly,

we complain that things are going dark,

but in fact our accesses are improving.

The truth is that the NSA has never

in its history

collected more than it does now.

I know the location of most
domestic interception points,

and that the largest
telecommunication companies in the US

are betraying the trust of their customers,

which I can prove.

We are building the greatest weapon
for oppression in the history of Man.

Yet its directors
exempt themselves from accountability.

NSA director Keith Alexander
lied to Congress,

which I can prove.

Billions of US communications
are being intercepted.

In gathering evidence of wrongdoing

I focused on the wronging
of the American people,

but believe me when I say that
the surveillance we live under

is the highest privilege
compared to how we treat

the rest of the world,

this I can also prove.

On cyberoperations
the government's public position

is that we still lack a policy framework.

This too is a lie.

There is a detailed policy framework,

a kind of martial law for Cyber Operations

created by the White House.

It's called "Presidential Policy Directive 20"

and was finalized at the end of last year.

This I can also prove.

I appreciate your concern for my safety,

but I already know how this will end for me,

and I accept the risk.

If I have luck, and you are careful,

you will have everything you need.

I ask only that you ensure

this information makes it home
to the American public.

Does the NSA routinely intercept
American citizen's emails?

No.

Does the NSA intercept Americans'
cell phone conversations.

No.

Google searches?

No.

Text messages?

No.

Amazon.com orders?

Nope

Bank records?

No.

What judicial consent is required for NSA

to intercept communications

and information
involving American citizens?

Within the United States
that would be the FBI lead.

If it was a foreign actor in the United states

the FBI would still have the lead
and could work that with NSA

or other intelligence
agencies as authorized.

But to conduct that kind

of collection within the United states

it would have to go through a court order.

And the court would have to authorize it.

We are not authorized to do it,

nor do we do it.

All rise.

The United States Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit is now in session.

Please be seated.

Good morning and welcome
to the Ninth Circuit.

The first case for argument is
Jewell vs. National Security Agency.

You may proceed.

May it please the Court,
Kevin Bankston for Carolyn Jewell

and her fellow plaintiff appellants
in Jewell vs. NSA.

- Your Honors,

plaintiffs have specifically
alleged that their own communications

and communications records have been
acquired by the government.

But the District Court found that
we failed to allege facts

that differentiated the injury
of our plaintiffs sufferred

from the injury suffered
by every other AT&T user

whose communications and records
have been acquired by the government.

Basically concluding that so long as
every one is being surveilled,

no one has standing to sue.

However to deny standing to persons
who are injured simply because

many others are also injured
would mean that the most injurious

and widespread government actions
could be questioned by nobody.

- Do they have anything concrete
that in fact a specific communication

of your client was intercepted?

- We have evidence that all
the communications passing

between AT&T's network and other networks
in their Northern California facility

have been intercepted,
so that would necessarily include

the Internet communications of
our Northern California plaintiffs.

- Okay, thank you.

- Thank you, your honor

- May it please the Court,

I'm Thomas Byron from
the Department of Justice

here on behalf of
the Government defendants.

We think this litigation
need not be resolved in Federal Court.

In light of the oversight
of the political branches

both Legislative and Executive,

which provides a better opportunity
for oversight and resolution

of the concerns raised
concerning nationwide policies

of alleged surveillance
in these complaints.

- Even if it's revealed
that one or more of the plaintiffs

had email or telephone conversations
intercepted that had nothing to do

with the national security?

- Your honor, I don't know
that anyone necessarily

would have standing to raise
the particular claims that issue

in these 2 cases.

We think instead that the kinds of claims
that issue here against these defendants

are those that are
better suited to resolution

before the representative branches
of our government...

- What role... would the Judiciary have
if your.. approach is adopted...

- Judge Peterson, I think the...

- I mean, we just get out of the way, is that it?

- Well, Judge Peterson, what I think
is that there is a narrow category,

subset of cases in which
it may be appropriate

to step aside
for that narrow category of cases.

- But mmm... the Judiciary plays a role...

- To be sure, Judge Peterson....

- ...in our system.

- Yes Your Honor and we don't mean to diminish that.

- You're asking us to abdicate that role

- No, Your Honor,

but it is a question of this court's discretion
whether to reach that issue.

We do think that there is simply
no way for the litigation to proceed

without risk of divulging
those very questions of privileged information

that would cause,
as Director of National Intelligence

has explained,

exceptionally great damage to
National Security's disclose.

Thanks for having me.

Hum, if anybody has any questions,
like I said just..

Basically just raise your hand
and I'll try to call on you

as soon as I possibly can.

So, who here actually feels like
they are under surveillance,

pretty regularly?

Everyone inside of Occupy.

How many people here have been arrested

and at their Court date had
their phone taken into the back room?

How many people here
had their retina scanned?

Wow.

So you guys are actually, in a sense,
the canaries in the coal mine,

right,

because the incentives
are all lined up against you.

Anybody see how the subway link
your metro card to your debit card,

right? And, like, auto refill.

This is a concept which is key
to everything we'll talk about today.

And it's called linkability.

Take one piece of data
and link it to another piece of data.

So for example,

if you have your metro card
and you have your debit card,

you have those things
and you can draw a line between them right?

So that's, like, not a scary thing.

Except your bank card is tied
to everything else that you do during the day.

So now they know where you're going,
when you make purchases.

So when they decide to target you,
they can actually recreate your exact steps.

With a metro card and with a credit card alone.

Like literally where you go and what you buy

and potentially by linking that data with other people

on similar travel plans,

they can figure out who you
talk to and who you met with.

When you then take cellphone data,
which logs your location

and you link up purchasing data,
metro card data and your debit card.

You start to get what you could call metadata,

an aggregate over a person's life.

And metadata, an aggregate, is content.

It tells a story about you,

which is made up of facts,
but is not necessarily true.

So for example, just because
you were on the corner,

and all these data points point to it,
it doesn't mean you committed the crime.

So it's important to note

that if someone has a perception
of you having done a thing,

it will now follow you
for the rest of your life.

So just keep in mind that
what happens to you guys for example

with fingerprints, and retinal scans, and photographs.

That is what is going to happen
to people in the future

when they resist policy changes
and when they try to protest

in a totally constitutionally protected way.

This is for you, Director Clapper, again on the surveillance front.

And I hope we can do this in just a yes or no answer,

because I know Senator Feinstein wants to move on.

- So, does the NSA collect any type of data at all,

on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans ?

- No sir.

- It does not?

- Not wittingly.

There are cases where they could inadvertently,

perhaps, collect, but not wittingly.

Email from April 2013

The encrypted archive

should be available to you within seven days.

The key will follow when everything else is done.

The material provided,

and investigative effort required
will be too much for any one person.

I recommend at a very minimum
you involve Glen Greenwald.

I believe you know him.

The plaintext of the payload

will include my true name details
for the record.

Though it will be your decision

as to whether or how
to declare my involvement.

My personal desire is that you
paint the target directly on my back.

No one, not even my most trusted confidant,
is aware of my intentions

and it would not be fair for them
to fall under suspicion for my actions.

You may be the only one
who can prevent that,

and that is by immediately
nailing me to the cross

rather than trying
to protect me as a source.

On timing, regarding
meeting up in Hong Kong,

the first rendezvous attempt
will be at 10 A.M. local time

on Monday.

We will meet in the hallway outside of the restaurant

in the Mira Hotel.

I will be working on a Rubik's cube

so that you can identify me.

Approach me and ask if I know the hours of the restaurant.

I'll respond by stating that I'm not sure

and suggest you try the lounge instead.

I'll offer to show you where it is, and at that point we're good.

You simply need to follow naturally.

As far as positioning I mean

if you want us to sit in any particular way or whatever.

You know, I'm gonna go there just like we get better light.

There is, you know, so many different

enormous stories

just that are kind of standalone stories

that, even like you know certain things on my individual document

that can just be their own story

and I just want to start turning those stories out.

I basically woke up this morning and I already started writing stories

hum so I'm hoping to, you know,

start publishing within like a day or two days.

- OK

it's as long as you're good with that

- Yeah

and so as far as I...

the stuff we have to talk about,

I mean I'm kind of like

dichotomizing it between,

you know, stuff that I'd like
to talk you about,

in terms of like the documents
and the content.

Laura has a bunch of questions
about that as well.

So while we're working through
the documents getting your take-on,

a lot of the stuff that, you know,

help me understand it better,
but then also the sort of You story, right...

like the who you are?

- Yeah

what you've done, why you've
done what you've done

- Yeah

and I'd love to do that first

- OK

in part because, you are
the only one who can do that

- Yeah

so I'd like to just get it done
so let it's done,

and also because, you know,
it might be that you wanna do that early

- Yeah

because, it might be necessary,
we might choose to have that done early.

What are you... tell me your thoughts,
just where you are with that?

- So primary one on that,
I think I've expressed it

a couple times online,

is I feel the modern media
has a big focus on personalities.

- Totally

- And I'm a little concerned (that)
the more we focus on that

the more they're going
to use that as a distraction.

I don't necessarily want that to happen,
which is why I've consistently said, you know,

I'm not the story here,
hum haha, nervous uh?

- No it's a very very cheap pen, I just, the slider is broke,
go ahead.

- Hum, but hum, yeah, anything I can do
to help you guys get this out,

I will do,

I don't have any experience
with media, with how this works

so I'm kind of learning as I go.

Right, so, I just want to get a sense of
why did you decide to do what you've done.

So for me it all comes down to
State Power against the people's ability

to meaningfully oppose that power.

And I'm sitting there everyday,

getting payed to design methods
to amplify that State Power.

And I'm realizing that if, you know,
the policy switches,

that there are the only things that restrains
these states, were changed,

there, you couldn't meaningfully
oppose these.

I mean, you have to be the most
incredibly sophisticated ta* col* actor in existence.

I'm not sure there's anybody,
no matter how gifted you are,

who could oppose all of the
offices and all the bright people

even all the mediocre people out there
with all of their tools and all of their capabilities.

And as I saw the promise
of the Obama administration

be betrayed and walk away from it.
In fact, actually advance

the things that had been promised
to be sort of curtailed and rained in

and dialed back.

It actually gets worse,
particularly drone strikes.

Which I also learned in NSA,

we could watch drone videos
from our desktops,

as I saw that, that really hardened me to action.

- In real time?

- In real time, yeah,

it'll stream a lower quality
of the video to your desktop,

typically you'd be watching surveillance drones
as opposed to actually letting you know,

murder drones really going out there
and bomb somebody.

But you'll have a drone
that's just following somebody's house

for hours and hours.

And you won't know who it is because, you know,

you don't have the context for that
but it's just a page

where it's lists
and lists of drone feeds

and all these different countries
with all these different code names

and you can just click
on which one you want to see.

- Right, so if your self interest
is to live in a world in which

there's maximum privacy,

doing something that could
put you into prison,

in which your privacy is completely destroyed
is sort of the antithesis of that,

how did you reach the point where
that was a worthwhile calculation for you?

- I remember what the Internet was like
before it was being watched.

And there has never been anything
in the history of man like it.

I mean you could have children
from one part of the world

having an equal discussion,

where you know they were sort of granted

the same respect
for their ideas and conversation,

with experts in the field
from another part of the world

on any topic, anywhere,
anytime, all the time.

And it was free and unrestrained.

And we've seen the chilling of that,
the cooling of that and the changing

of that model towards something
which people self police their own views.

And they literally make
their own jokes on ending up on the list

if they donate to a political cause
or if they say something in a discussion.

And it has become an expectation that we're being watched.

Many people I've talked to have mentioned
that they're careful about what they type

into search engines.

Because they know that it's being recorded.

And that limits the boundaries
of their intellectual exploration.

And I'm more willing to risk

imprisonment

or any other negative outcome personally

than I am willing to risk

the curtailment of my intellectual freedom

and that of those around me,

whom I care for equally as I do for myself.

And again that's not to say that I'm self sacrificing

because it gives me, I feel good,

in my human experience

to know that I can contribute to the good of others.

- Could you elaborate on that?

- So, I don't know how much the programs
and the actual technical capacities

everybody's talked to you about
but there is an infrastructure in place

in the United States
and world wide that NSA has built

in cooperation with
other governments as well,

that intercepts

basically every

digital communication,

every radio communication,

every analog communication

that it has sensors in place to detect.

And with these capabilities,

basically the vast majority

of human

and computer to computer communications,

device-based communication,

which that sort of then forms
the relationships between humans,

are automatically ingested
without targeting.

And that allows individuals
to retroactively

search your communications
based on self certifications.

So for example, if I wanted
to see the content

of your email or,

you know, your wife's phone calls

or anything like that.

All I have to do is use
what's called a selector.

Any kind of thing

in the communication's chain

that might uniquely or almost uniquely

identify you as an individual.

And I'm talking about
things like email addresses,

IP addresses, phone numbers,

credit cards,

even passwords

that are unique to you,
that aren't used by anyone else.

I can input those into the system

and it will not only go
back through the database

and go
"have I seen this anywhere in the past?",

it will basically put an
additional level of scrutiny on it

moving into the future that says

"if this is detected now
or at anytime in the future,

I want this to go to me immediately"
and alert me in real time

that you're communicating
with someone,

things like that.

- So I don't know who you are
or anything about you.

- Ok. I work for Booz Allen Hamilton,
defense contractor.

I am sort of on loan to NSA,
I don't talk to Booz Allen boss,

I don't get tasking from Booz Allen,
it's all from NSA.

- So, I don't know your name.

- Oh, sorry, my name is Edward Snowden,

I go by Ed.

Edward Joseph Snowden is the full name.

(spelling) S. N. O. W. D. E. N..

- And where are you from ?

- I'm originally...
I was born in North Carolina,

small town, Elizabeth City.

There is a Coast Guard station there,

I'm from a military family.

But I spent most of my time
growing up around Fort Meade in Maryland.

- And your family,
what's the consequences for them?

- This is actually
what has made this hardest.

My family doesn't know
what's happening, they're unaware.

I don't think I'll be able
to keep the family ties

that I've had for all my life

because of the risk of
associating them with this.

And I'll leave what to publish
and what not to publish to you guys,

I trust you'll be responsible on this.
But basically, the closer I stay to my family,

the more likely they are
to be leaned on.

- So you don't want me to report this?

- We dont have ... I mean,
we definitely want to do

whatever we can not to
include them or bring them into the mix

- Oh I'm sorry that's fine, I won't...

- I'm sorry I'm going to interrupt you.

Can we just stop for a second,
do the document and then go back to that?

- What do I need? Do I need
an email address that we're using or...

- Well you can send... Once you've encrypted it,
you can send it from whatever you think is appropriate.

The main thing is
you've got to encapsulate all of this

in a way that it can't be
decrypted and read

once it's in transit across the
network or on either of the end points.

- Ok I mean just so you know
these documents are basically all going

to be uploaded within like 48 hours.

- This is simply..

You want to get in the process
of doing this for everything because

it seems hard but it's not hard,
this is super easy.

- Ok so just walk me through it.

- Ok. Show me the actual folder structure
where these files are first.

- How many documents
did you say there were?

- Seven

- Ok well, while you're working...

- Ok go ahead

- How many documents are we talking about?

Because in The Guardian,

that Wikileaks, technical people

set up a system

so that they were available
for anybody to see

and I just wonder if it's
possible to do the same thing.

- That would be the ideal end game.

But because some of these documents
are legitimately classified

in ways that could cause harm
to people and methods.

I'm comfortable in my
technical ability to protect them.

I mean you could literally
shoot me or torture me

and I could not disclose
the password, if I wanted to.

I have the sophistication to do that.

There are some journalists
that I think could do that,

but there are a number
of them that couldn't.

But the question becomes,

can an organization

actually control that information

in that manner

without risking basically
an uncontrolled disclosure?

But I do agree with that, honestly

I don't want to be
the person making the decisions

on what should be public
and what shouldn't.

Which is why rather than
publishing these on my own,

or putting them out openly,
I'm running them through journalists.

So that my bias, and my things,

because clearly
I have some strongly held views,

are removed from that equation

and the public interest is being
represented in the most responsible manner.

- Yeah.

- Actually given your sort of...
Geographic familiarity

with the U.K and whatnot.

I'd like to point out that
GCHQ has probably the most invasive...

- I know
- network intercept program anywhere in the world.

It's called TEMPORA,
(spelling) T. E. M. P. O. R. A.

and it's the world's first "full take",
they call it, and that means

content in addition to metadata

on everything.

- So this is what I'd like to do
just in term of scheduling

if it's good with everybody else.
Are you feeling you're done?

- Yeah yeah I'm done.

- So, I'm anxious to go back,

get those articles done

and then there is a
bunch of documents

that aren't about those first two or three stories
that I'd like to spend time with you...

- Sure yeah

- ...kinda going over.

- I'm not going anywhere.

- You're available?
You want to check your book first?

- Let me check my schedule.

- Is that good for you Laura?
You want to...

- It's great.
- OK

- Hello

- Yes

- My meal was great thank you very much

- No I still have some left and I think
I'm gonna be eating it later

so you can just leave me alone for now.

- Ok great thank you so much, have a good one bye.

Let's fix that real quick.

So another fun thing I was telling
Laura about this:

all these new VOIP phones

they have little computers in them

and you can hot mike these
over the network,

all the time even when
the receiver's down so...

as long as it's plugged in

it can be listening on.

And I haven't even considered
that earlier. But yeah...

- OK.

- There are so many ways... This could be...

Everything that's in here
is pretty much gonna be

on the public record at some point.

We should operate on that.

- Yeah. Yeah, I think...
I think we are...

- So, do you have your
air gapped machine with you?

- I do, I do.

- Let me pop that out.

- Do you have an
understanding or commitment on

when you guys are gonna
to press for the first stories?

- It's very seven or eight
in the morning in London.

- Uh uh, OK.

Oh, let's see here.

Ok, hey look there's another one.

Pro tip, let's not leave the same SD cards
in our laptops forever in the future.

- Did you know this was still
kicking around in your laptop?

- Yeah, I mean that was the... mmh...

- OK, just to make it sure.

- OK, yeah. This is it?

- Yeah.

- OK.

- Right there.

- Thanks. You will have a new one
who will look exactly identical

but it's a different archive.
So you might want to take

Could you pass me my
magic mantle of power?

- Uh uh...

Is that about possibility of overhead?

- Visual. yes,
Visual collection.

I don't think at this point
there is anything in this regards

that would shock us.

We become pretty...
Ewen you once said before,

he's like, he's like:
I'm never leaving my room,

I'm never leaving anything
in my room again.

And the single machine...
I was like

you've been infected by the paranoia bug,
happens to all of us.

He was like...
I would never leave a single of these device,

and I would never leave my and again alone.

- My bag's getting heavier and heavier

- Exactly

Alright, I'm gonna need you to enter

your root password 'cause
I don't know what it is.

If you wanna use this
you're more than welcome, so uh ..

- OK, looks like your root
password's not 4 caracters long anyway.

- it's usually a lot longer
but that's just like a one time only thing, right?

- So, it is uh...

- It had been a lot longer but ever since
I knew is that it was a one time only session,

I've been making it shorter. Is that not good?

- It's actually not. I was expressing this
with Laura either.

The issue is because of the fact
it's got a hardware MAC address

and things like that,

and if people are able to identify
your machine and they're able to...

- This is the fact you're about
to break the most upsetting story?

- Yeah, that's true.

- So they might kinda prioritize

- It's ten letters I type very quickly.
Actually it's ten letters but...

- So ten letters would be good
if they had to bruteforce the entire key space.

That would still probably only take
a couple of days for NSA. Uh...

That's a fire alarm, OK...

- hopefully this just sounds like a 3 seconds test
or is this...

Do you wanna to call the desk and ask? It's fine.

- Yeah, I don't think it's an issue,
but it's interesting that I just.

- did that happen before?

- Maybe they got mad cause they couldn't listen
into us through the phone anymore.

- Has the fire alarm gone off before?

- No that's the first time that has happened.
Let me... so just in case they have like an alert

- We probably...

- We might have to evacuate.

- Should we ignore that, I don't know?

- It's not continuous.

- It's not continuous.
No, I'm just saying if it continues...

- And then we come and
meet the guys down in the lobby.

- Yeah, alright.

- Yeah.

- Yeah let's, let's leave for now
when we'll have finished this up.

Not that they're gonna answer 'cause
they probably have seven thousands calls.

- Yeah.

- Hi, we hear a loud buzzing on the tenth flour.

Can you tell us what that is?

Ah, OK.

OK, great.

Thank you, bye.

Fire alarm testing, maintenance.

- Yes. that's good,
that's what I wanted to hear.

- Nice of them to...
Nice of them to let us know

Uhm, I just wanna give you
kind of a quick tour, uh..

when Laura was looking at this
she was kind of salivating...

and couldn't stop like
actually reading these documents

- Right, right.
So we'll try and restrain ourselves

although I don't promise
that it will succeed.

- I just wanna kinda explain
a brief overview

of what these are
and how they're organized.

On the beginning of
document of interest,

the primary purposes of the second archive
is to bring the focus over to

SSO as opposed to PRISM.

This is in general.
SSO are the Special Source Operations.

This is the world wide
passive collection on networks

they're both domestic to the US
and international.

There's a lot of
different ways they do it

but, uh corporate partnerships
are one of the primary things,

they do domestically
they also do this for multinationals

that might be headquarted
in the US so they can kinda coerce

or just pay into giving them access.

And they also do bilaterally
with the assistance of certain governments.

And that's based on the premise that they go

"All right, we'll help you set the system up
if you give us all the data from it".

Hum, there's... there's a lot more here

than any one person
or probably one team could do.

- Right

Hum, XKEYSCORE Deep Dive.

XKEYSCORE in general, and there's
a huge folder of documentation

on XKEYSCORE and how it works,

is the front-end system
that analysts use

for querying that sort of ocean of raw singing
that I was telling you about.

All that stuff where you can sort of
do the retroactive searches,

live searches, get flagging, what not.

XKEYSCORE is the front-end for that.

I'm just gonna show you one slide here,
'cause Laura thought it was valuable

on this talk on kinda
how these capabilities ramp up

in sophistication over time.

This is kinda nice.

As of fiscal year 2011, they could monitor

1 billion telephones and internet sessions simultanously,

per one of these devices,

and they can collect at a rate of 125 Gigabytes a second,

which is a Terabit per second.

- That's for each one of these?

- That's for each one of these, yeah.

- How many TUMULT missions would that be then?

- Part of this, back then there were 20 sites,

there's ten at DOD installations.

But these are all outdated, we've expanded pretty rapidly.

But still 20 sites, that's at least 20 billion.

- This all need to get out.
You know what I mean, it's like...

Just in terms of understanding,
the capabilities, it's so opaque.

- It's not science fiction.
This stuff is happening right now.

- No, that's what I mean, it's like...
The magnitude of it,

and like this a pretty inaccessible
technical document.

But, even this it's really chilling,
you know what I mean?

Yeah, I mean, we should be having debates

about whether we want Government

I mean this is massive and extraordinary.
It's amazing...

Even though you know it...
Even though you know that...

to see it like the physical blueprints of it

and sort of the technical expressions of it,

brutally hits home like...
in a super visceral way that is so needed.

This is CNN Breaking news

An explosive new report is
re-igniting the concerns

that your privacy is being violated
to protect America's "security".

It reveals a court order giving
the National Security Agency

blanket access to millions of
Verizon customer's records

on a daily basis.

Earlier I had the chance to
conduct the first TV interview

with the reporter
who broke this story wide open,

Glenn Greenwald, of The Guardian.

Congratulations on the scoop!

Explain for our viewers
why this is important?

It's important because people have understood

that the law that this was done under,
which is the Patriot Act

enacted in the wake of 9/11.

Was a law that allowed the government
very broad powers to get records

about people with a lower level of suspicion
and probable cause to traditional standards.

So it has always been assumed
that under the Patriot Act,

if the government had even any suspicion
that you where involved

in a crime or terrorism,
they could get a lot of information about you.

What this court order does
that makes it so striking

is that it's not directed at any individuals
who they believe or have suspicion of

committing crime or a part of
a terrorist organization.

It's collecting the phone records of
every single customer of Verizon business

and finding out every single call
that they've made internationally and locally.

So it's indiscriminant and it's sweeping.
It's a Government program designed

to collect information about all Americans

not just people
where they believe there is reason to think

they've done anything wrong.

It's a tough situation

You know hearing that

the person that you love
that you've spent the decade with

may not be coming back.

- What did they ask her?

- Hum... When was the last time she saw me?

Where am I?

What am I doing?

Hum.. you know.

What does she know about my illness?

Things like that.

So yeah they're pretty solidly aware.

Cause she's...

I'm clearly not at home ill.

- Hello, hello

- Hello, let me disconnect
from the Internet.

- So there is some news?

- Yes there was indeed some news.

- I have config today, I think,
maybe just a few hours ago.

- What kind of people does it...?

- An HR lady I'm assuming from NSA
as opposed to Booz Allen.

Because she has was accompanied by a police officer

which mean the NSA police
and they're planning to break into my house

which regular police don't do.

- Does she lives there?

- Yeah she lives there so I told her to cooperate fully

I can't find my phone just one second.

and don't worry about herself

You know what I gonna do,
I'll just take out the stuff I want to use.

- OK

- OK well look I mean this is not a surprise at all.

- Not yeah I know I planned for it but it's just you know
when it's impacting

and when they're talking to you
it's a little bit different.

- Absolutely

- But it's possible that they just noticed
that you're missing

I guess it's not really possible.

- It is but yeah they're I mean

Hum... let me just get rid of this.

So I obviously was focused on other things
than appearance this morning.

- How was she? How does she reacted?
Was she relatively calm about it?

- She's relatively calm.

- Does she know anything about what you're doing?

- She has, she has no idea

and that's I mean I feel badly about that

but that's the only way I could think of where

like she can't be in trouble.

- Did you just basically do a
"I have to go somewhere for reasons

that I can't tell you about" kind of thing?

- I just disappeared when she was on vacation

and I left a note saying

"Hey I'm gonna be away for a while for work"

which isn't unusual for me in my business

- Right

you know so

- OK so let me ask a couple things just quickly.

Are they gonna be able to go into your stuff
and figure out what you took?

- Hum in some kind of some sort of like
peripheral sense but not necessarily

- Yes because I cast such a wide net

I they do that the only thing they're gonna do
is they're gonna have a heart attack

because they're gonna go
"He had access to everything"

- Yeah

and they not gonna know what
specifically has been done.

I think they're gonna start to actually feel a little better

although they're not gonna be wild about this in any case.

When they see that the stories are kind of cleaving to a trend

you know it's not like

"Here is the list of everybody who works everywhere"

- Right

- I also think you know there're gonna be
paranoid in the extreme

and assuming all kind of
worst case scenarios

which is gonna you know I think

make them react in ways that probably aren't like
gonna be particularly

rational on their part

but at the same time there's...
I do think they're limited

for the moment.

- I agree and I mean,
I had kind of time to set a stage where

we all enjoy at least a minimum
level of protection you know

no matter who we are who's involved in this
you know you're either a journalist

- Right

or you're either out of jurisdiction

so we have some time to play this
before they can really get nasty.

I think it's over you know the weeks
when they have times to get lawyers,

really sort of go

"This is a special situation
how can we interpret this to our advantage?"

like we seen them do this all the time you know

whether it's drones or wiretapping
or whatever they'll go.

Well according to this law
from the 1840's you know

- Yeah yeah of course

we can apply x, y to the Authority.

But that takes time and that takes agreement.

Yeah and also you know I mean I think

the more public we are out there
to like as journalists

and the more protection
it's gonna give as well.

- Have you started to give thoughts
to when you're ready to come forward?

- I'm ready whenever huh honestly
I think there is sort of an agreement

that it's not going to bias
the reporting process.

That's my primary concern at this point.

I don't want to get myself into the issue
before it's gonna happen anyway

and where it takes away
for the stories that are getting out.

We're talking about tens of millions
of Americans

who weren't suspected of doing anything

who were surveilled in this way.

...thoughts for a moment, I want to
continue this conversation,

these are really important sensitive issues

and the public out there has the right
to know what's going on... Stand by...

This is CNN breaking news

Another explosive article has just appeared
this time in the Washington Post

it's breaking news and it reveals another
broad and secret US government surveillance program.

The Washington Post and The Guardian in London
reporting that the NSA and the FBI

are tapping directly into the
central servers of nine leading Internet companies

including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google,
Facebook, AOL, Skype, YouTube and Apple.

Reports says they're extracting audio,
video, photographs, e-mails, documents

and connection logs that enable analysts
to track a person's movements and context over time.

Let's discuss this latest revelation
that coming out fast,

Bill Binney, the formal official of the NSA

who quit back in 2001, you were angry about
what was going on

you've been known as
a whistleblower right now.

- Bill, what do you think about
this Washington Post story?

- Well, I assume it's just the continuation
of what they've been doing all along.

- So you're not surprised?

- No

- Do you have any idea who's leaking this information?

- I don't know who leaked this,

I have no doubt that the administration will
launch an investigation

not into who approved these programs
but into who leaked the information.

I'm not shocked they come to denying it, I don't assume that...

- Do you believe it?

- There're maybe some technical basis on which
they can say that we are not

actively collaborating or they don't have
what we consider in our definition

to be direct access to our servers
but what I do know is that I've talked to

more that one person

who has sat at a desk at a web portal
and typed out commands

and reached into those servers
from a distance.

So, whatever they want to call that,
that's what's happening.

Hold on, what are we calling the
single biggest infringement on American civil liberties

probably of all time, isn't it?

- ...we already have the New York Times now today
saying that the Administration has lost all credibility.

- The New York Times slammed
President Obama for this

and frankly I was used to that

the New York Times used to slam George Bush
for protecting the country for the steps he took.

I don't want us to drop our guard.

I don't want us to be struck again as we saw in Boston,

I understand,

people are willing to sacrifice their
civil liberties, people are sheltered inside which is enough...

- How can you believe in freedom, do you see?

I mean try and play the devil's advocate for me,
when you have secret courts,

secret operations like PRISM, secret investigations which go into

every spit and cough of every American's lives without any Member
of the American public

knowing about it. That's not freedom is it?

- In 2008, they eliminated the
warrant requirement for all conversations

except ones that takes place
by and among Americans

exclusively on America's soil.

So they don't need warrants now for people
who are foreigners

outside of the US but they also don't need
warrants for Americans

who are in the United States
communicating with people

reasonably believed to be
outside of the US.

So again, the fact that there are no checks,
no oversight about who's looking over the NSA's shoulder,

means that they can take whatever they want
and the fact that it's all behind a wall

of secrecy and they threaten people
who want to expose it

means that whatever they're doing
even violating the law

is something we're unlikely to know
until we start having real investigations

and real transparency into
what it is the government is doing.

Glenn Greenwald, congratulations again
on exposing what is a true scandal,

I appreciate you joining me.

Hey I just heard from Lindsay and huh...
she's still alive, which is good and free.

My rent checks apparently are no longer
getting through to my landlord

so they said if we don't pay them
in five days we will be evicted,

which is strange because I got a system
set up that automatically pays them.

So there is that apparently there is
construction trucks all over the street

of my house, so that's, I wonder
what they're looking for.

It is... It is an unusual feeling
that's kind of hard to...

hard to like, describe or convey in words
but not knowing what's gonna happen

in the next days, the next hour
or the next week

it's scary but at the same time
it's liberating, you know,

the planning comes a lot easier
because you don't have

that many variables to take into plate,
you can only act, and then act again.

Now all these phone calls
are being recorded digitally

not for content but
for origin and destination

now word the government is going right into
the servers of these large Internet companies.

- How does the government politically speaking
make the argument that this is essential

to National Security and not
a dramatic overreach

in terms of personal privacy?

- It's difficult Matt, because
as Peter was pointing out, overnight

we had an extraordinary late night
close to midnight announcement

and a declassification from the
Director of National Intelligence.

They are scrambling, the Administration is
already supported strongly by leaders

in both parties from the
Intelligence Committees.

GCHQ has an internal Wikipedia at the top secret
you know, super classified level

where anybody working intelligence
can work on anything they want.

That's what this is, I'm giving it to you,
you can make the decision on that what's appropriate what's not.

Hum it's gonna be documents of,
you know, different types,

pictures and Power Points and Word documents.
Stuff like that ...

- Sorry can I take that seat?

- Yeah

- Sorry, I'm sorry I've got used to repeat,
so in these documents, they will show...

- Yeah there will be
a couple more documents on that,

that's only one part though,
like it talks about Tempora

and a little more thing
that's the wiki article itself.

It was also talking about a self-developed tool
called UDAQ U.D.A.Q. it's their search tool

for all the stuff they collect
was what it looked like.

- Yeah

- Hum it's gonna be projects,
it's gonna be troubleshooting pages

for a particular tool.

- Thanks

- And, the next step,
when do you think you'll go public?

- Arh... I think it's pretty soon,
I mean, with the reaction, this escalated more quickly,

I think pretty much as soon as they
start trying to make this about me

which should be any day now.

- Yeah

- Hum I'll come out just to go hey,
you know, this is not a question of

somebody skulking around in the shadows.
These are public issues,

these are not my issues
you know these are everybody's issues,

I'm not afraid of you, you know,
you're not gonna bully me in the silence

like you've done to everybody else

and if no body else is gonna do it I will

and hopefully when I'm gone
whatever you do to me,

there will be somebody else
who will do the same thing.

It will be the sort of Internet principle
you know, of the Hydra:

you can stop one person
but there is gonna be seven more of us.

- Yeah

Are you getting more nervous?

- I mean... no. I think the way
I look at stress... particularly because

I sort of knew this was coming...
because I sort of volunteered to walk into it.

I'm already sort of familiar with the idea.

I'm not worried about it.

When somebody like
busts in the door suddenly

I'll get nervous and it'll affect me
but until they do, you know...

- Yeah, yeah.

But until they do umm... you know.

I'm eating a little less
that's the only difference I think.

- Let's talk about the issue with when we're gonna say
who you are.

- Yeah

- This is, you know, you have to talk me through this
because I have a big worry about this.

- OK tell me

- Which is that...
if we come out and

I know that you believe
that your detection is inevitable

and that it's inevitable imminently.

There is, you know, in the New York Times
today Charlie Savage the fascinating

Sherlock Holmes of political reporting deduced that

the fact that there has been these leaks in succession

probably means that there's some one person
that decided to leak...

- Somebody else quoted you saying
it was one of your readers

- Yeah

- And somebody else is putting on things

- Yeah so you know, I mean it's fine
I want people to, I wanted to be like

- Yeah

- You know like this is a person,
I want to start introducing the concept of

this is a person who has a particular set
of political objectives

about informing the world about
what's taking place.

Like you know,
I'm keeping it all anonymous totally

but I want to start introducing you
in that kind of incremental way.

But here's the thing.

What I'm concerned about it
that if come out and say

here's who this is, here's what he did
the whole thing

that we talked about.

Then we're gonna basically be doing
the government's work for them

and we're gonna basically be handing them
you know a confession

and helping them identify who find it.

I mean maybe you're right,
maybe they'll find out quickly

and maybe they'll know but is there
any possible idea that they won't?

Are we kind of giving them stuff
that we don't...? Or...

- It's possible that they already know
but they don't want to reveal

it because they don't know...

- Or that they don't know
and we're gonna be telling them like

is it a possibility that
they're gonna need like 2 3 months or uncertainty

and we're gonna be
solving their problem for them?

or let me just say the or part
maybe it doesn't matter to you,

maybe you want it, maybe, I mean,

you're not coming out because

you think inevitably
they're gonna catch you

and you want to do it first,

you're coming out because
you want to fucking come out and...

- Oh there is that,
I mean that's the thing,

I don't want to hide on this
and skulk around,

I don't think I should have to

obviously there is circumstances
that are saying that.

I think it is powerful
to come out and be like

look I'm not afraid and I don't think
other people should either,

you know, I was sitting
in the office right next to you last week,

we all have a stake in this,
this is our country

and the balance of power
between the citizenry and the government

is becoming that
of the ruling and the ruled

as opposed to actually, you know,
the elected and the electorate.

- OK so that's what I need to hear,
that this is not about...

- But I do want to say,
I don't think there is a case

that I'm not gonna be discovered,
in the fullness of time.

It's just a question of time for me.

You're right, it could take them
a long time, I don't think it will

but I didn't try to hide the footprint
because again I intended to come forward.

- OK I'm gonna post this morning
just a general defense of whistleblowers

and you in particular
without saying anything about you.

I'm gonna go post
that right when I get back

and I'm also doing like a big fuck you
to all the people who keep like talking

about investigations like that.
I want that to be like...

the fearlessness and the fuck you to like
the bullying tactics,

has go to be completely preventing
every thing we do.

- I think that's brilliant.
I mean your principles on this I love,

I can't support them enough because it is,
it's inverting the model

of the government has laid out
where people where trying to,

you know, say the truth, skulk around,
and then hide in the dark,

and then quote anonymously.
I say yes, fuck that, let's just...

- OK, so here is the plan then,
I mean, and this is a thing, it's like

once, I think we all just felt the fact
that this is the right way to do it.

You feel the power of your choice,
you know what I mean,

it's like I want that power
to be felt in the world.

- OK

- and it is the...
it's the ultimate standing up to them

right like I'm not gonna fucking hide
even for one second,

I'm gonna get right in your face,

you don't have to investigate,
there's nothing to investigate,

here I am!

You know, and I think that
is just incredibly powerful,

and then the question just becomes

how do we do this in the right,
you know the perfect way,

that's my burden and
that's what I'm gonna spend...

So today it's gonna be
this story in the morning,

assuming that
it doesn't change in The Guardian,

it's gonna be this story in the morning,

just to keep the mental going,
just to keep like the disclosures coming.

A big one at night, now it's becoming like

"OK, this is a major leak"

and after today when we post
the two stuff things that we're gonna post.

It's gonna be
"what the fuck is this leak and who did it?"

I guarantee you.

I just want to make sure,
move over slightly...

- Do you want me to move
a little move over...

- I just wanna move... all right

- OK

- We are ready

- So let's us begin with some basic

background information like

just state your name,

what position you held
in intelligence community

and how long you worked
within that community

- OK, uh... just some...
how are we going, like,

in depth or
are we going like in general,

like I'm currently
an infrastructure analyst, you know,

Booz Allen Hamilton,
not going through my whole back story

- Yes

- OK,

- Just like summary kind of

- OK

- My Name is Ed Snowden,
I'm 29 years old,

I work for Booz Allen Hamilton
as an infrastructure analyst

for NSA in Hawaii.

- And what are some of the positions
that you held previously

within the intelligence community?

- I've been a system engineer,
system administrator, uh...

senior advisor, uh...
for the, Central Intelligence Agency,

solutions consultant and a
telecommunications information

systems officer.

- And what kind of clearances have...
have you held,

what kinda classification?

- Uh... Top secret,

So, people in my levels of access
for systems administration

or as a infrastructure analyst
typically have higher accesses

than an NSA employee would normally have.

Normal NSA employees have a
combination of clearances called

TS SI TK and Gamma.

Uh, that's a Top Secret Signals
Intelligence Talent Keyhole

and Gamma.

And they all relate to certain things
that are sort of core to the NSA mission.

As a systems administrator
you get a special clearance

called PrivAcc
for Privileged Access,

which allows you to be exposed
to informations of any classification

regardless of what
your position actually needs.

Monday

June 10, 2013

Just before we go,
a remind of our top story,

and that's the full map,
CIA typically worked at Edward Snowden

says he's responsible for leaking information
that US authorities have been monitoring

phone and Internet data.

The US justice deparment confirmed
it is the first stages

of a criminal investigation.

- Leave it long or got it shorter,
what do you think?

As far as the video the people saw.
Am I less identifiable now?

- lose it?

- lose it? Cause I can't go
all the way down, it's still gonna be stubble.

I don't have the blade for closer.

- Will you be talking
to any other media about this story today?

- I am.

- Uh, will you be coming to our office

- ... about where is Snowden now, what his plans are?

- No, I won't talk about that,
so unless you have any other questions...

- OK

- What are you plans please?
Are you staying in Hong Kong

for a the time being?

- For a little while.

- And do you have any hopes
to write more about this story

or are you stopping
new writing about this story?

- No, I'm gonna continue
to write about it.

- Have you had any pressure
from the US Authorities

about continuing to report on this?

- No.

- And have you heard anything about
what could be...

asked you the Hong Kong Authorities
towards this case,

whether they contacted you or asked you
anything about the whereabouts of Snowden

and whether that's just another...

- I haven't heard about
the Authorities of any Government.

- And do, where do you think
this story is going then?

For you and of course for Snowden
and of course for the US media

and the US Administration in general?

- Uh, for me, I'm gonna continue to report.

Reporting on what the Government has been doing
and what I think people should know about.

As for him I don't think anyone knows

... people come after me or any of their third partners
you know they work closely with a number of other nations

or you know they could pay off the trial
you know any of their agents are assets ...

A criminal investigation the whistleblower...
monitoring phone calls and Internet data goes public...

Security forces in Afghanistan
say a number of...

Now it's time for our news paper review
and looking at what's making headlines

around the world.

Let's start with The Guardian our top story
which is revealing the identity of the former CIA employee.

The paper says he leaks information exposing the scale
of American's surveillance of the Internet.

Edward Snowden,
what a great story...

Well I think it's a fantastic story this could be
straight out from a John Le Carr� novel

I mean when you read what he did,
yes he got the material,

he then decided to go to a place he identified to be
very difficult for America to get at him

- God dammit

which is Hong Kong because of course technically inside China,
the one country two systems policy

there meaning he would get potentially some protection,

he thought, all very well planned,
could be just out of a spy novel.

But what about the details.

- That could make it worse.
But just the lower half of my face.

Snowden says he'd become increasingly
dismay by what he saw as the growing power

of the NSA.

And it's his decision to pass on
documents which is said to reveal

the organisation monitored
millions of phone calls

but that it had direct access
to some of the...

- How do you feel?

...Internet companies in the world.

- uuh what happens, happens.
We've uh we've talked about this

I knew what the risks and if I get arrested,
I get arrested,

we were able to get the information
that needed to get out, out.

And you and Glenn are able to keep reporting
regardless what happens to me.

Now 29 year old Edward Snowden says that US intelligence agencies
gathered millions of phone records

and monitored Internet data...

- Yes. I'm sorry who's asking?

- I'm afraid you have the wrong room thank you.
Wall Street Journal.

- Yes. I'm sorry say again?

Uh, no thank you. No calls.

I think they have the wrong number.

Yeah, no calls. Thank you.

Uh wait I'm sorry if it's two men from the front desk
they can call but no outside calls.

Wait actually just... let them through. Wait, wait m'am?

Fuck

- Yes. Wait is it a lawyer? Yeah, no no no I mean,

the people who are asking. Ask them if they are lawyers.

No tell her that she has the wrong number
and there is no Mr. Snowden here.

Would you mind to talk in speakerphone?

- Sorry

- Hi. I'm the client

- Pretty good. I'm doing well

- Ok

- Ok

- Ok, that's great. Is it OK if i bring equipment?
Because i'm just kind of going, so i can leave in any direction,

at any time, and not come back. If necessary.

- Ok, that sounds good.

- Thank you, thank you so much for helping us.

- Yeah... And so, is there a precedent for this
where Hong Kong would extradite someone

for political speech ?

"The President surely does not welcome
the way that this debate

has earned a greater attention
the last week,

the leaked classified information about
sensitive programs that are

important in our
fight against terrorists

who would do harm
to Americans is a problem,

but the debate itself is legitimate
and should be engaged.

- Right, so which one do we want here then.

This is operational stuff,
so we mustn't say any of this.

- So redact that.

- Go near the top

- What about the Alexander's quote,
is that something ...

- Yeah. That's in TARMAC.
"Why can't we collect all the signals all the times?

Sounds like a good
summer homework project for Menwith"

Keith Alexander the head of the NSA
on a visit to the UK. This one.

- Yeah.

- Yeah. It's a secret document
in that secret document.

We've got a stick here
that should just have three single slides on it.

If it's got more than three single slides,
we have to be extremely careful.

- Yeah?

- Yeah, that's it.

This is really dangerous stuff for us, Guardian

If we make mistakes, ...very angry.

We kept it all under lock and key
and no one knows. No, I'm not saying that.

- OK

- They will come in and snap the front door down
if we elaborate on that...

And he said...

The Prime Minister is extremely concerned about this.

And they kept saying, "this is from the very top."

As you can see on this map
the flight that probably has Snowden aboard,

has almost reached its destination here
in Moscow's scheduled plan,

in the Russian capital within minutes...

As you may have heard, there is a CIA agent
who has revealed a lot of information

and he is now trapped in the

airport in Moscow

We managed to get him out of Hong Kong,

but when he landed in the Moscow airport,

the American government had canceled his passport.

So formally he hasn't entered into Russian territory,

he is in the transit area of the airport

And one of our people is accompanying him

We are trying to arrange a private jet

to take him from Moscow

to Ecuador or perhaps maybe Venezuela

or maybe Iceland,

countries where he would be safe.

May I collect all the phones please?

I have everything in here

Put them in the refrigerator

- So, as you know, in June,

Snowden was in charge with 3

legal violations felonies

Principaly under a World War I era

criminal law called the Espionage Act

The Espionage Act is an extremely broad

criminal prohibition against

the sharing or dissemination

of what's called
"National Defense information"

it was only used to

prosecute people who had been accused of

acting with a foreign power,
spies not whistleblowers

and it's a very unusual legal
representation I think

not just for all of you,
but for me as well.

The Espionage Act has not
distinguished between

leaks to the press
and the public interest,

and selling secrets to foreign enemies

for personal profit.

So, under the Espionage Act

it's not a defense if the information that was disclosed

should not have been withheld
in the first place,

that it was improperly classified.

It's not a defense if the
dissemination was in the public interest

that it led to reforms.

Even if the court determines
that the programs that were revealed

were illegal or unconstitutional.

that's still not a defense under the Espionage Act,

the Government doesn't have
to defend the classification,

it doesn't have to demonstrate
harm from the release,

All this is irrelevant.

So when we say that
the trial wouldn't be fair,

we are not talking about
what human rights lawyers think

of this fair trial practices

We are saying the law, the statute itself,

eliminates any kind of defense

that Snowden might be able to make

and essentially will equate him with a spy.

And of course those three counts
could be increased to a hundreed or two hundreed

or three hundreed, they could charge him separately

for each document that has been
published by a journalist.

And I think that we all recognize,
even though we sit here as lawyers

in a lawyer's meeting

that it's propably
95% politics and 5% law.

How this would be resolved.

"Mr. Snowden has been charged with very serious crimes

and he should be returned to the United States
where he would be granted full due process

and every right available to him
as a United States citizen.

Facing our justice system
under the Constitution."

No, I don't think Mr. Snowden was a Patriot.

I called for a federal review

of our surveillance operations

before Mr. Snowden made these leaks.

My preference,

and I think the American people's preference,

would have been for a lawful, orderly

examination of these laws.

A thoughtful, fact based debate,

that would then lead us to a better place.

- Oh my God. David. Hello my baby.

- I'm OK.

- You're OK?

- I just wanna go home.

- OK, OK OK. You just have to walk...

- How are you?

- Good, good. I'm totally fine, I didn't sleep at all, I couldn't sleep.

- I know.

"Brazil Demands Explanation from UK Government"

Recent reports have revealed that the NSA
have access to encryption keys

and they paid tech companies to introduce
backdoors in encryption protocols

So we are going to talk about ways in which
we can defend ourselves against

governments spying on us.

So Mr. Jacob Appelbaum, as an encryption and
security software developper,

and journalist.

Ladar Levison, the founder of the
encrypted email service

Lavabit

used by Edward Snowden.

You have the floor.

Thank you

Lavabit is an email service
that hopefully one day

will be able to stand on its own
without any references to Snowden.

My service was designed to remove me

from the possibility of being forced

to violate a person's privacy.

Quite simply

Lavabit was designed to remove the service provider

from the equation,

by not having logs on my server

and not having access to
a person's emails on disk,

I wasn't elimitating

the possibility of surveillance,

I was simply removing myself
from that equation.

And that surveillance
would have to be conducted

on the target

either the sender

or the receiver of the messages.

But I was approached
by the FBI quite recently,

and told

that because I couldn't
turn over the information

from that one particular user,

I would be forced to
give up those SSL keys

and let the FBI
collect every communication

on my network without
any kind of transparency.

And of course,

I wasn't comfortable with that,

to say the least!

More disturbing was the fact that
I couldn't even tell anybody that it was going on.

So I decided:

"If I didn't win the fight to unseal my case,

if I didn't win the battle

to be able to tell people
what was going on,

then my only ethical choice left
was to shutdown".

Think about that.

I believe in the rule of law,
I believe in the need to conduct investigations,

but those investigations
are supposed to be difficult for a reason.

It's supposed to be difficult
to invade somebody's privacy.

Because of how intrusive it is,

because of how disruptive it is.

If we can't, if we don't have
a right to privacy,

how do we have
a free and open discussion?

What good is the right
to free speech,

if it's not protected,

in a sense that you can't have
a private discussion

with somebody else
about something you disagree with.

Think about the chilling effect
that that has.

Think about the chilling effect
it does have

on countries that don't have
a right to privacy.

I've noticed a really interesting
discussion point

which is that what people used to call
liberty and freedom

we now call privacy.

And we say in the same breath

that privacy is dead.

This is something
that really concerns me

about my generation

especially when we talk about
how we're not surprised by anything.

I think that we should consider that

when we lose privacy we lose agency,

we lose liberty itself

because we no longer feel free
to express what we think.

There is this myth of
the passive surveillance machine

but actually what is surveillance
except control?

This notion that the NSA are passive

this is nonsense

what we see is that they actively attack

European citizens, American citizens and,

in fact, anyone that they can

if they perceive an advantage.

- OK. Right.

- I have to give that in testimony.

- What are you going to tell?

- Everything I can truthfully.

- What will you talk about?

- Uh, whatever the questions they ask me.

- Yeah I think it's over there.

- Ok, it's alright. Thank you.

- Hey, how are you?

- Good.

- How are you?

- Good to see you again.

- Nice to meet you again, yes.

- Yeah

- What do you think they're doing to reporters,
those of us that are working directly with...

Snowden documents?

How do you think they would approach
dealing with people like us?

- You're.. You're on a cast iron cover list.

Which means any electronic device you use

that they can attach to you
they all record and capture all that data.

- And what do they do with that data?
They're just trying to figure out what we're doing?

- Uh, well the primary...

That's part of it. But the other part, primarily part,

is for them. I think it's to find the
sources of information you're getting.

- So if I have a confidential source
who's giving me information as a whistleblower,

and he works within the US Government,
and he's concerned about

what he perceives as
violation of the Constitution,

uhm... and he gets in touch with me,
they...

- Yeah...

- Go ahead. Yeah.

- Yeah. From there on, they would nail him
and start watching everything he did.

and if you start passing data,
I'm sure they'd take him off the street.

I mean, the way you have to do it
is like Deep Throat did, right?

In the Nixon years,
meet in a basement of a parking garage...

physically.

Let's disassociate our metadata one last time.

So we don't have a clear record of your true name
in our final communication chain.

This is obviously not to say
you can't claim your involvement,

but as every trick in the book
is likely to be used and looking into this,

I believe it's better,
that that particular disclosure

come on your own terms.

Thank you again for all you've done.

So sorry again for the multiple delays.

But we've been entering a territory

with no model to benefit from.

If all ends well,

perhaps the demonstration that our mess has worked

would embolden more to come forward

Citizen.

- So the update that I want to give you is about the new,

uh.. the new source that, that we...

- OK.

- that... uh, this is what... this is the...

you know this is the person who is doing
the... the most of the...

- Right, right, right.

- ...the work on it, uh...
And now... and now,

what basically, what happens is...

- and...

- That's actually...
That's really dangerous...

uh, on the source's side.

Do they know how to
take care of themselves...

- Well he knows...

- ...or do you know anything about...

- ...he means it's, uh...

It's all being done..
through this...

- OK.

- and they're all talking this way...

- OK.

- and, uh...

- I was gonna say
one of the big questions there is:

can they handle it?
You know with...

- Yeah, they're very careful...

even they're through that.

- OK

- Yeah.

- And...

- That's what that is.

- Wow, that's really something.

- Oh, oh...

- Did you know that?

One key thing: ALL drone strikes are done through
Ramstein Air Base in Germany - German govt has always

- It's not the actual plan.

- Right, right right. You mean the control.

- It's the process, who's sending the...

- Yeah.

- There's a... There's a chart.
You know, it goes like a whole layout in it

for everyone and it's...

- Yeah. It's really bold, but it's really risky.

But you know that... that's the thing if...

- There's more...

- ... if they understand what they're doing.

- There's this chart, it goes like this...
It shows the decision making chart.

It's a chart... It's, it's... it's shaped like this.

- Hum hum...
- So up here it says "POTUS" (President of the Uniteed States)

- That's the decision making chart for each... one.

- And...

- And it's so political...

- This is... This part's amazing.

- That's...

- That's fucking ridiculous.

- This... This is... it's so shocking.

- (laugh) That's...

- No, I know...

- That's...

- ... I know...

There are 1.2 m people on various stages
of their watch list.

- ... the population of an entire country.

- I know.

- That's... what we're working on.

- That person is incredibly bold, but, uh...

- But also very well aware.

- Right. I... You know, I just hope. I mean...

- No, I mean...

the boldness of it is shocking,
but I mean it was obviously..

- But the other thing is just...

- ...motivated by what you did,
I mean, it...

- This is going to... This is going to...

That could raise a profile

of this whole political situation

with whistleblowing
to a whole new level, because...

- exactly...

- It's gonna...

- Yeah, I mean...

I actually think
that's a great thing.

And I think people
are gonna see what's being hidden...

again, again..
by a totally different part

POTUS