All language subtitles for Electric.Light.Orchestra.In.Performance.2005.1080p.WEBRip.x264.AAC-[YTS.GG - YTS.BZ]ENG

[waves crashing]

Downloaded from
YTS.BZ

Official YIFY movies site:
YTS.BZ

["10538 Overture" playing]

Whether people were ready
for the ELO, I'm not too sure.

I think they were lucky in terms

of they came out at roughly the
same time as Genesis, Yes, ELP,

the whole prog rock
movement had started.

♪ Did you see him run? ♪

♪ Did you see him crawl? ♪

ELO were experimental.

They went to do strings,
arrangements, interesting lyrics.

It was a quite a big undertaking
to create this large band

and they pulled it off.

They loaded in such an
incredible amount of orchestration

but the fact is it worked,
it was symphonic pop.

It was a different sound.

It was completely
something no one expected.

They mixed Beatles
harmonies with heavy rock

and orchestral sounds.

Beatles, lots of strings
and very catchy tunes.

They carried it off purely
because they had a flamboyance

which carried past the oddness.

ELO,
the Electric Light Orchestra,

really sprang out
of the late '60s.

I suppose they were in a
way inspired by The Beatles,

because The Beatles
showed the way with

songwriting and arranging,
album production,

set amazingly high standards.

And on the way,
inspired younger musicians

to try something
in the same field.

Using strings,
I think, was a crucial thing.

And that left its mark on a
young band called The Move.

♪ I don't know what to say, ♪

♪ She was running away ♪

But now I'm
standing on the corner,

♪ lost in the
things that I said ♪

♪ What am I supposed to do now? ♪

♪ Goodbye Blackberry Way ♪

The Move were a Birmingham,
who in the pop rock circles,

for want of a better description,
in the late 60s

had made a modest amount of impact,

thanks mainly to the fact

that they had an incredibly
talented songwriter in Roy Wood,

who was also
something of an eccentric.

By the time we got
towards the end of the 60s,

Roy Wood and the drummer Bev Be van
were the only members of The Move

who remained from the
original five-piece,

which had Carl Wayne singing,
Ace Kefford playing the bass

and Trevor Burton
playing the guitar.

Now, The Move had
established themselves

with a string of very
good hit singles,

but Roy Wood, on the
one hand, was being told

to keep The Move going
because obviously

that was the goose that
laid the golden singles.

But he wanted to do something else.

He wanted to branch
out a little bit.

And I remember as a teenager,
I always found that confusing,

reading the press, Roy
Wood's got a new band

and it's called Electric
Light Orchestra.

And then you sit
watching Top of the Pops

and he's still
performing Move songs.

What's going on here?

♪ Goodbye Blackberry Way ♪

♪ Sure to want me
back another day ♪

They reached the
point where The Move

suddenly seemed a bit out of date

and they outlive their
image, certainly.

And they wanted to move on,
literally, and do something

that was more artistically credible.

The Move brand ceased to be important
by the beginning of the 70s.

So what happened was the formation
of the Electric Light Orchestra

out of the move, comprising
Bev Be van on drums

and Roy Wood and Jeff Lynne,

who recently joined the
last version of The Move.

So you had these three guys
who've been writing great songs,

great material for The Move.

And in fact, there was a
little bit of a predecessor

to the ELO when Tony Visconti,

who produced David Bowie later on,

he actually played the cello as well
and he would do string arrangements

for The Move, which I
think gave Roy Wood ideas

of what he could carry on with.

♪ Tied to the bed ♪
♪ She's waiting to be fed ♪

♪ No pay 'til Saturday ♪

♪ Can't see an ounce
of reason in her head ♪

♪ Don't laugh and turn away ♪

♪ Wild wild wild tiger woman ♪

♪ You move me very fast ♪
♪ But can you last another day ♪

♪ Get out of the way ♪
♪ Wild wild tiger woman ♪

♪ You're gonna break
your little fall ♪

♪ They call her the
wild tiger woman ♪

I think the track Wild
Tiger Woman by The Move,

one of the ingredients that
has been carried over to ELO

it's quite interesting,
for a band of that era

to use this chord, which
is a diminished chord.

So they're playing a sort
of blues type of sequence.

[guitar playing]

Which is basically E to B
to A, and then suddenly,

which is very much Roy Wood,
he puts this E diminished.

[guitar playing]

If you transfer that to strings...

[guitar playing]

You can hear ELO in there.

[guitar playing, humming tune]

So there's the first thing
that's been taken by Roy

from The Move and put into ELO.

What he wanted to do was
follow the same route

that the Beatles had followed
with I Am The Walrus.

To have strings
involved in pop music,

to create something a bit different,

not just overdubbed
at the end of a song

or put on by a producer who
thought he was Phil Spector.

What they wanted, what he
wanted was something that really

could get the best of rock, the
best of pop, the best of Classical,

mix it in together
and come up with maybe

something that would
be as big in the 70s

as pop has been in the 60s.

Wasn't original, necessarily.

What was innovative was the fact

that this was to be the first time
someone had tried it on block,

rather than doing it
on occasional songs.

So here Jeff Lynne
developed the idea

of the Electric Light Orchestra,

and they came up with that by using

as an experimental
guinea pig, if you want,

one of the songs that Jeff Lynne
had written for a Move B side.

Roy Wood bought a
cheap Chinese cello

and he decided that he'd have a
fiddle about with this in the studio.

So he played along
with the finished track

or the work in progress track.

And Jeffrey has said, "hey, that's a
good sound, why don't we try that?"

So 15 overdubs later,
they had 10538 Overture.

♪ Did you see that man running ♪
♪ through the streets today? ♪

It was the first of the
Electric Light Orchestra saga,

but the beginning of a completely
different way to make a rock record

a very commercial record, using
strings, but not using strings

as a mellow, smooth,
cheesy sort of way,

but using strings in a
rhythmic, pushy, rocky way

that actually were, in a way,
sort of quite guitar based.

10538 Overture as a first single,

starts with a complete lift
from the Beatles's Dear Prudence.

[guitar playing]

So that repeats, then it
goes to a G major chord.

In the next section,
which is very much like

ELO's own style of writing,

it goes to a C major
to a C suspended fourth,

to a G minor, then it modulates.

It goes up a tone to a D
major to a D suspended fourth

to an A minor, and then
jumps to an E flat quickly.

Back to the introduction again.

[guitar playing]

The strangest thing
about this track is that

it manages to marry
something that you recognize,

which is a Beatles riff,
onto their own ideas.

And of course, in a period in
1970 when anything went musically,

you could try and
join things together.

So it sort of worked quite
well in a sort of bizarre way

and nobody had really done
anything quite like that before,

so they were fresh.

♪ Did you see that man running ♪
♪ through the streets today? ♪

♪ Did you catch his ♪
♪ face, was it 10538? ♪

Roy Wood picked up the
cello as being the way

he wanted to drive ELO
almost from day one.

Why he chose it? Only he can say,
but it was a brilliant choice

because it had a real power to it.

It was a pop rock
instrument in many respects,

waiting to be discovered.

And Roy would suddenly
decide, what we're going to do

is make the cello the focus
of our string section.

We're not going to make it violin,

we're not going to
make it anything else.

It had a smoother,
soothing, softer sound.

We're going to go for aggression.

He brought a new meaning to
cello playing, that's for sure.

And I mean even, you know, you
see performance of them playing,

he's rocking out with that cello.

So again, you know, that's
something no one had seen before.

He thought, "Aye aye this is
Roy going mad, he's lost it."

And other people thought,
"Absolutely brilliant.

This is absolutely amazing."

I thought it was Roy being a genius.

♪ Did you hear the news ♪
♪ came across the air today? ♪

Guitar is a rhythm instrument,
bass can be a rhythm instrument.

Logically, the cello can be.

It can be plucked,
staccato, or it can be bold.

And yes, they've used it a lot and I
think it's a great effect, actually.

I don't think that using the
cello as a bass instrument

was actually that effective.

It created a sound, a tone,
colour, it created a sound.

But it wasn't something that
really pushed things along,

it was more of a decoration
to the sound as it was.

It's not like picking out a
kazoo or a banjo. [chuckles]

You have to treat the
instrument with respect.

And yet, in a way, I
suppose Roy was doing that

and he was introducing an
instrument that might have got

overlooked and forgotten,
certainly popularized again,

and made people look at
it in a different light.

So it's nice to see him
using an unusual instrument

in a kind of pop rock context.

The basic string section in
an orchestra is double basses,

cellos, violas, and violins.

And what they would
do was double track

those triple trackers to make them
sound like a huge string section.

That was essentially it.
Although, strangely enough,

on 10538 Overture, they
had a French horn as well.

I think the only time that
it was that predominant,

mostly with ELO, it
was a rhythm section

and lots of strings
and lots of vocals.

Roy's idea was to
actually use an orchestra,

but what he did do,
because he was a guitarist,

instead of actually
doing string parts,

because he played
everything himself.

He played cellos, violins,
and did everything himself,

because he did all that, he
actually played it like a guitarist.

If you listen to the ELO singles,

and if you listen to anything on
ELO, it's not actually an orchestra,

it's actually Roy playing
all this... [humming tune]

Pushing stuff and then
all the little solo bits.

It's all based around
rock and rhythm

and about around the guitar,
what a guitarist would play.

They didn't try and
bolt-on an orchestra.

They employed other
musicians, violinists, etc.

To be part of the whole package.

That's what makes it
completely different.

It's not like, let's
have a rock band

and put loads of strings around it,

like Deep Purple did
with an orchestra,

or The Moody Blues
did with an orchestra.

It's nothing like that at all, it's
a completely different attitude

and a completely different thing.

They did with the 10538 Overture,
exactly what Roy would envisioned.

They took what was a very basic,
simple, very catchy pop song

and just loaded it in with
strings, especially cellos,

and turned it into this
classical pop piece,

which was quite remarkable.

They then took it to then
The Move manager, Don Arden,

the legendary Don Arden, and
said, this is what we want to do.

And apparently Arden's
initial comment was,

"You've got to be
joking, you're mad.

This is never going to work."

As soon as he heard 10538 Overture,
he thought, "this can work."

It sounded like the Beatles,

so that's a pretty great
thing to start off with.

And what was remarkable
about the single was that

it entered the charts
at number nine,

just as The Move's California
Man was leaving the charts.

♪ Did you see him run? ♪
♪ Did you see him fall? ♪

Some critics were a little
bit sniffy about ELO,

they thought they were pretentious or
rising above the station [chuckles]

and people had a tendency
to be rather suspicious

of any group that used strings, it's
not always a popular thing to do

because you have this idea of,

Are they trying to be
classical musicians?

Are they trying to be moving
into this orchestral rock thing?

When ELO came out, it
was a little different

and a little innovative because
they were trying to be mainstream

without trying to be
artistic at the same time.

So I think they did
hit people a little bit

square on the jaw
with a sound that was,

what is this?
What are they trying to do?

This is pop, but not
as we know it, Jim.

However, people started to
realize that the underlying melody

was so strong, it carried
everything forward.

♪ Did you hear the news ♪
♪ came across the air today? ♪

♪ Someone has been found on ♪
♪ the rocks down in the bay. ♪

Their first single proved that
the public were ready to listen.

If you could get the combination
of a kind of a good striking theme

and a good pop tune

together with all this
experimental stuff, then it worked.

It was a bit raw, but you could
see what was going to come,

or you could look back and see

that that was the starting
point for a lot of the hits

that they had after that.

For a first single from ELO,

I think it was everything
that everybody was expecting.

The classical edge, it
was certainly different,

but I certainly wasn't expecting
it to sound as Beatle-y as it did.

John Lennon himself actually said
that if the Beetles had carried on

what they would have been
producing, had they stayed together,

was more or less what ELO produced.

So if it had the master's
seal of approval,

I think that turned a lot of
people on to listening to it.

The difficulty for some
people was that The Move had

got themselves an identity
and the ELO was...

Well, was that a new group?
Was it The Move in sheep's clothing?

Nobody was really quite sure
what to make of it at the time,

and I think having John Lennon
put his reputation behind it

actually did them a lot of good.

Just trying to match acoustic,
delicate, subtle instruments

like a violin or a cello,
with a raucous drum kit

and a powerful lead guitar,
it's very, very difficult.

So they set themselves high
standards and a big task.

It wasn't an easy ride for the
ELO, but they were convinced

that they had something
original and fresh to say.

[audience applauding, cheering]

Jeff Lynne says, "If you could
blow it, pluck it or bow it,

Roy would play it."

And if you look on
that first ELO album,

almost all the orchestral parts, I
think they had a French horn player

and they had a violinist.

And then you had Bev Be van on drums,

Jeff Lynne in vocals and guitar.

And then Roy would do
vocals and everything else.

His one thing is
overdub it to oblivion.

If you're doing something
once, you'll treble it.

If you're doing something
twice, you'll quadruple it.

So because he was on to 16 and 24
track when he made those records,

if you wanted to have four
pianos, he'd play one piano,

then play another piano on top of
it, another piano on top of it.

And that gives a
completely different sound

to when you have four pianists.

Tends to sound quite squashed
and quite thin and quite small.

But if you do it the right way,
and if you have the right songs,

and the right ambiance
and things around it,

it'll always sound very interesting.

They certainly has the ability
to come up with interesting,

almost cartoonish concepts
and translate them

into these sort of almost bad
taste kind of extravaganzas,

musical extravaganzas in
which you throw everything in.

Fire bells ringing,
violins, [chuckles]

explosions, the 1812
Overture, anything.

You just throw it in.

It's a bit like a sort of
manic Phil Spector in a way.

A Birmingham Phil Spector.

There wouldn't have been
an Electric Light Orchestra

if it wasn't for Roy Wood
and his ability with,

you know, a myriad of
classical instruments

that he brought into the
studio and there were times

when he had to learn to play new
instruments and odd little bits,

just to sort of complete the ideas
that they had in their heads.

If Roy Wood had been American,

we would be calling him
the second Brian Wilson.

He came up with great ideas.

He was the man, really,
who drove of the early ELO.

At the beginning, it was Roy Wood's
project, it was Roy Wood's idea

and Jeff was coming
along for the ride.

If you look at the
early writing credits,

it involved Jeff Lynne as
much as it did Roy Wood.

They were equal on the first album.

If anything, I think Jeff Lynne
might have more songwriting credits,

but the innovation that
was used in the first album

very much was driven
by Roy Wood's genius.

It was he who came up
with a lot of the ideas

and the heaviness of the album.

So Jeff Lynne's own ideas
and the way to present songs

perhaps were overshadowed
by Roy Wood's personality,

Roy Wood's vision and
Roy Wood's enthusiasm.

Who was going to get the limelight?
Was it going to be Roy Wood

who'd achieved so much with
the first version of The Move?

And Jeff Lynne, who
joined the band later?

He was clearly a great
talent and burgeoning writer,

somebody who wanted
to express himself.

So between Roy and Jeff, there was
always going to be a bit of rivalry

and probably arguments
about the musical direction.

The next one is part of a
long line of Jeff's songs

that he can't think of titles for.

Is Jeff's Boogie 1 to 13.

And this is Jeff's Boogie No. 2.

It's very easy to see, you
can spot the Jeff Lynne song

and you can spot the Roy Wood song.

So they both obviously
had their own idea

for what the band
was going to be like.

And to a certain extent,

it was almost like never
the twain shall meet.

Jeff's Boogie No. 2, the title
doesn't really rank up there

with the 100 greatest
song titles of all time,

but Jeff Lynne was in the habit of
creating a lot of different songs,

riffs, pieces of music,

and obviously he didn't
bother to give them a title

until he knew that something
was going to happen to them.

Now, Jeff's Boogie No. 2 didn't
actually make it onto the first album.

It was a piece that
they played live.

So I think what we do
is look at it and say,

would it have deserved a
place on the first album?

And the answer, to be
honest, is probably no.

It's not got the finished quality
of a song that's been thought

through all the way through.

It's a little bit staccato, jumpy,

but then ELO songs,
perhaps were then.

[indistinct lyrics]

Hang on a second.
This is, you know...

It's got some good beats,
but it's going all over the place

as far as I was concerned.

Yeah, Boogie 2 it's a bit of a
strange, strange old brew, that one.

It's hard to understand because
Jeff Lynne is a fantastic songwriter

and Roy Wood is a
brilliant songwriter.

So why, they must have had loads and
loads of great songs flying around.

Why do they do things like that?

I mean, don't understand.

In fact that we've got that dub
on film is obviously a plus,

because it shows you the way
that Jeff's mind was working.

[indistinct lyrics]

Bev Be van is an incredibly
underrated performer.

He's the third arm, if
you will, the early ELO.

He was with The Move,
with Lynne, and with Wood

and when those two decided
to start this new experiment

they took Bev Be van with them,
and there's a reason for that,

because Bev Be van is
an excellent drummer.

He can be heavy, he
worked with Black Sabbath.

He can be subtle, he can be
light, he can be orchestral,

but he's never been given
the credit he deserves,

because he doesn't have a profile.

He's always, oh, that bloke
at the back just bashing away.

But he remains one of
the most crucial elements

of the whole Electric
Light Orchestra sound.

The one thing about a
drummer in a band that size

is you have to be a
very powerful drummer,

and Bev is, you also have
to be rather like a conductor.

In a band of that
size, especially live,

you are giving musical
cue points within a song.

Someone like Bev would give
a signal, okay, a little fill,

going into the chorus or whatever.

So he was like a conductor,
he was the engine room

of a band of that size.

And it's perfect,
really, for the band.

The greatest thing he does add is
that he doesn't get in the way.

He doesn't want to be a soloist,
he doesn't want to be a star.

He just wants to play the drums.

I don't think with the ELO he
was necessarily called upon

to pull out all the
stops on every song,

because clearly the
focus was elsewhere,

but the fact is, he came up in the
John Bonham school of drumming.

He's one of these drummies
who learns how to hit things

at an early age and he channeled
all that energy into drumming.

♪ You shake my nerves
and you rattle my brain ♪

♪ Too much love
drives a man insane ♪

♪ You broke my will,
oh what a thrill ♪

♪ Goodness gracious,
great balls of fire ♪

♪ You get me lonely and
you get all my money ♪

♪ You came alone and
your with me honey ♪

♪ I cannot lie you are so fine ♪

♪ Goodness gracious,
great balls of fire ♪

♪ Kiss me baby, ♪

♪ Whooo, feels good ♪

♪ Come on over baby, ♪

♪ Love me like a lover should ♪

♪ Your fine, so kind, ♪

♪ Told this world that ♪
♪ your mine, mine, mine ♪

ELO tackled lots of things
that people and critics

certainly were a bit bemused by.
I mean, for example,

doing a version of Jerry Lee
Lewis' classic rock and roll tune

Great Balls of Fire.

Is that a good idea to do in
the 70s? I'm not too sure,

because people had their firm
memories of the original.

♪ You get me lonely and
you get all my money ♪

♪ You came alone and
your with me honey ♪

♪ I cannot lie you are so fine ♪

♪ Goodness gracious,
great balls of fire ♪

This particular song is
a rock and Roll classic.

And they pretty much
just tip the hat to it.

So, yeah, I mean, they
did a good job, basically.

I think they loved the song

and I think that comes across
in their overall production.

Of course, they added,
you know, the bigger sound

with the strings and
all that sort of stuff.

But essentially, they're holding
true to Jerry Lee Lewis' song.

It's not a very easy song to do
because it's one of those covers

that is always overshadowed by the
original because the original is

based so much on Jerry Lee Lewis'
own personality and flamboyance.

So when ELO tried to do it,
they didn't do it justice

because they were
overshadowed by the original.

♪ Love me, baby ♪

♪ I wanna love you ♪
♪ like a lover should ♪

♪ Your fine, so kind, ♪

♪ Told this world that ♪
♪ your mine, mine, mine ♪

Obviously, when a band
starts its career

it may not have enough
music to play a whole set.

Great Balls Of Fire serves almost
as not only stuffing in the set,

but it also perhaps
gives the listener

an idea of what
ELO are trying to do.

Because, as you know,

you can separate the
song from the treatment.

This was very much a
prototype of the kind of arrangement

that Jeff Lynne would be doing on
Roll Over Beethoven a year hence.

I can understand
Roll Over Beethoven

because Beethoven,
string players, rock band.

Hm, get that.
I get that combination.

You've got string players,
you've got the word Beethoven,

you've got a rock band.

Oh, that's good.
Makes sense to me.

Great Balls Of Fire.
Why? It's a piano song.

It's a rock song.

What's got to do with strings?

It's either that or they just
didn't have enough material.

And that's weird,

because you're talking
about Roy Wood and Jeff Lynne,

two of the greatest
songwriters around.

I think it's probably best
left in its original format.

♪ Dawn is the death wish
night has passed away ♪

♪ It left the sacred flower ♪

♪ Opened up the
grave and bowed its life ♪

♪ Unto the queen of hours ♪

♪ Queen of the hours ♪

♪ Along, along,
along the path of time, of time ♪

♪ She is still,
the clock shall tell the tale ♪

♪ When all is well, is well ♪

Queen Of The Hours is one of those
songs that was a very good pop tune.

Typical of Jeff Lynne at the time,

he wrote a very
simple pop number,

it could have been the Beatles,
it could have been Stones,

but then what they did was

once they had the basic
stuff structured down,

they loaded it up with strings and
so forth, and it worked really well.

That seemed to be the way
they were operating at the time,

which is to get the song done,
get the basis done,

get the, if you want,
the rock instrumentation

or pop instrumentation in place

and then think, "Okay,
how can we overload this?"

And throw in all
manner of styles

and all manner of instrumentation
from the classical end.

Because of the period
that it was recorded in,

I think it had had
some unusual influences.

It had sort of Eastern
music influences,

Indian music influences in there.

If there was a track that perhaps
put the ELO in the Beatles flame,

that was it.

It really is I Am the Walrus
backwards in certain respects.

♪ Dawn is the death wish
night has passed away ♪

♪ It left the sacred flower ♪

♪ Opened up the
grave and bowed its life ♪

♪ Unto the queen of hours ♪

♪ Queen of the hours ♪

♪ Along, along,
along the path of time, of time ♪

♪ She is still,
the clock shall tell the tale ♪

♪ When all is well, is well ♪

I think it also had some influences
that were around at that point,

which were not musical,
were pharmaceutical, called LSD.

Because there's a rather
odd section in the middle.

But in those days anything
went and it worked for the time.

If it does sound as if it
owes a little bit to the Fab Four,

well, maybe that's not
a bad thing.

Like any band, when they form,
they have to find their feet.

And this was a track where
they were finding their feet.

And certain ingredients
from Queen Of The Hours

stayed with ELO
right through their career.

And other ingredients were like,

"Okay, not so good.
Let's remove that".

There are bands that take music
on the road before they record it.

And yes, that sometimes
does mean that you come up with

a far better finished product.

If you've been able to
see how it goes down

in front of a live audience,

you can refine it, you can work
out what works and what hasn't.

Certainly with ELO
it was the reverse formula,

because you had to
create really in the studio,

but then start worrying about how
you're going to reproduce it live,

which certainly if you
have to do it one way round,

that's probably
not the preferred way.

ELO live were a
strange concoction

because they looked odd.

Certainly in the early days,

Roy Wood looked
like a crazed eccentric.

He could have been the
professor from Back to the Future.

He looked so mad
and so wild-eyed.

And it was him who carried
the whole thing, to some extent,

visually, in those early days,

everybody else held back.

But of course,
the big hanging point was the fact

that you had this line-up
of cellists on stage.

What was going on?

This is Baroque,
this is chamber music,

this is orchestral,
but this is still pop music.

There's what,
nine, 10 people in the band?

It's something that people
hadn't really seen before on stage,

that's for sure.

Cellos, violins and a
rock band to go with it.

So in that respect,
it was innovative and original.

I saw them playing at a concert.

I think it was one of the early rock
festivals back in the midst of time.

ELO were battling the elements

and all the things that
go on at rock festivals,

like bad sound and wind blowing

and the music sheets
blowing away in the breeze

and sound mixers
pulling their hair out

trying to get it all together.

So it's very difficult to kind
of get that stuff across live.

Some of the headlines
that ELO got for

the chaotic
performances they put on,

one in Croydon in particular,
I think,

was more or less the
death knell of that group,

because the reviewer
couldn't hear what was going on,

because back in those days

contact microphones
pickups didn't really exist.

And the other problem they
had was that Roy Wood on record

was playing four or
five different things.

So, obviously, having him
belting around from cello to oboe

to whoever knows what else,

was a little bit of a
logistical nightmare.

So heaven helped the poor sound man
with all he had to deal with.

I don't think the results
live of the first ELO

were ever really much
to write home about.

How could they recreate
that sound on stage

without having all
the string instruments,

without having 25 string players?

Synthesizers were
beginning to be developed.

That was allowing
them to recreate,

to a certain extent,
extent the sound of strings.

But it wasn't very
early in their career.

So once it had a bit
of success in America,

that's when the live shows
really started kicking in for them.

They were able to use
two or three keyboard players

and some real
live string players

and they got away with it sounding
as close as damn it to the records.

But in the very early days
there wasn't a lot happening live.

This one's from the Electric
Light Orchestra album.

It's supposed to
be a hymn.

On the album,
we did it with a choir.

We couldn't afford it tonight.

So this one's called
Whisper In The Night.

Whisper In The Night is very
definitely a Roy Wood track.

You wouldn't mistake
it for anyone else.

And in many ways it
does hark back to The Move

in the kind of sound it has.

So I would say it's
an inventive track.

It was one that had elements
that you would recognize

if you're a Move fan,

but also it was
trying to move forward

in the way that ELO were doing.

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ Over silent evening air ♪

♪ Angel's gown shines white ♪

♪ All at once you're glad
she's there ♪

♪ Daughter of your dream ♪

♪ Shine a guiding
light for me ♪

♪ For I'll be here 'til light ♪

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ 'Til she has forgiven me ♪

Whisper In The Night that
was a bit a bit [indistinct] for me,

and therefore I didn't have
much time in my life for it,

so Whisper In The Night,

I'm sure it's a lovely
way to end an album,

but not my cup of tea.

It's sort of sad on the one hand

and Christmas-y on the other.

It's really quite unusual.

And I think it
sounds a bit like to me

that he had had
an idea for a song

and brought it to the table

and nobody else
maybe had a particular

piece of material at that time,

so they put it together
and saw what they got.

Not one of their better moments,
I would say.

♪ For I'll be here 'til light ♪

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ 'Til she has forgiven me ♪

♪ La-dah-dah, dah ♪

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ 'Til she has forgiven me ♪

It was a really good song.

And they put on a
very angelic choir,

a very heavenly choir,

and a beautifully arranged
string operation as well,

which made it into something
slightly different than the norm.

It took it away from the norm.

It's very close in many respects

to what The Beatles had done

about five years previously
on Sergeant Pepper.

And it wouldn't have been out
of place on Sergeant Pepper.

It's one of the best
songs on the first album.

It was a bit moody,

but not a sort of dark,
meaningful moody.

It was just insipid, I think
was the word I'm searching for.

Quite an odd song, actually.

If you heard it now,

you might not associate
it immediately with ELO.

You'd probably say,
"Who's that?"

Whereas lots of other ELO songs

you immediately know it's ELO

just by their overall sound.

It's very easy now to look
back at the lyrics and think,

"Was Roy Wood writing his
valedictory letter to the band?"

Because it's all about
saying goodbye to a loved one.

Maybe you can read
too much into it these days,

but given the fact he wasn't to be
around for very much longer in ELO,

you do start to think,

"Was he already
having second thoughts

about carrying
on with this band?"

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ Over silent evening air ♪

♪ Angel's gown shines white ♪

♪ All at once you're glad
she's there ♪

♪ Daughter of your dream ♪

♪ Shine a guiding
light for me ♪

♪ For I'll be here 'til light ♪

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ 'Til she has forgiven me ♪

♪ La-dah-dah, dah ♪

♪ Whisper in the night ♪

♪ 'Til she has forgiven me ♪

I still remember to this day

the first time hearing
the first ELO album.

Me and mates
were going like, "It's the Beatles.

It's the goddamn Beatles".

The Beatles influence, I think
really did come from Jeff Lynne.

History has shown that
the guy's a Beatles fan.

No need to apologize for that.

The Beatles were one of the
best bands that have ever existed.

But, I mean,
the fact that Lynne ended up

producing new Beatles
material on Anthology,

worked with George Harrison

on the last couple of
records that George ever made

was with George in
the Traveling Wilburys.

And the overt Beatles-ness
of the classic period of ELO,

the 70s period ELO.

You know, that's what Jeff
kind of brought in to the mix

where Roy might have bought
the more quirky classical ideas.

♪ And she'll be
someone else in a while ♪

♪ I see the flood
lights burning ♪

♪ I hear the band play on ♪

♪ Now Nellie takes her bow ♪

I know a lot of people accuse Jeff
Lynne of being like John Lennon,

but I don't think Jeff ever went
out to sound like John Lennon.

He comes from northern England,
so did John.

He's got the sound of his voice.

I don't think it's
ever on purpose.

I don't think that ELO were
overly influenced by The Beatles,

but they were heavily
influenced by The Beatles.

They took that as a starting point.

What Roy Wood did,

and let's give Roy Wood the credit

for being the main
visionary in the early days.

What he did on that first album

was to ensure they used
Sergeant Pepper as a starting point,

and then said,
"What would happen if?"

And then project it out from there.

So Sergeant Pepper
was a starting point

and a heavily
influential starting point,

but it wasn't the
be-all and end-all.

It was a love of the music.

And it does sound great,
there's no doubt about it.

And it was wrapped
around their songs,

so it wasn't as if they
were just stealing the songs.

They weren't doing that.

But there's no doubt that ELO

would never have sounded
like ELO without The Beatles.

Early ELO just
reeked of The Beatles,

every song we could more
or less take apart and say,

"That's The Beatles".

Maybe apart from, what was it,
the Battle of Mars ton Moor.

That was it.

July 2, 1644.

Which was a [indistinct].

♪ My Lord King, ♪

♪ You stoop to betray
your own people, ♪

♪ And even in the eyes of God, ♪

♪ Do you not relent? ♪

♪ I am therefore bound
by no other course ♪

♪ I shall raise an army; ♪

♪ Together we will march
against you and your kind, ♪

♪ And every born man will
fight to regain his own freedom, ♪

♪ And cleanse his wretched soul. ♪

The Electric Light
Orchestra first album

certainly wasn't the
answer to everyone's prayers,

but it had enough
in it to suggest that

had they made a second
album with that same lineup,

what they'd have come
up with would have been

far nearer the finished article,

far nearer a real combination
of rock and the classics.

The first ELO album was
a very good debut album

for the one simple and
obvious fact it was different.

It was a completely
different thing.

It's an interesting album,

it's an enjoyable
album in places,

it's a fun album in places,

but it's not a great debut album.

The first album was
still trying to find their feet

and maybe pushing and pulling

between the different
dynamics that were in the band

as songwriters.

What's also funny is
that the ELO first album

was called No Answer In America.

And the reason for that
was because a secretary

at United Artists had been
asked to phone the UK office

to find out what the
album was going to be called.

And there was
nobody in the UK office,

so she just wrote on a
piece of paper "no answer,"

which some genius then saw later on.

And hence the album was
called No Answer in America.

For me,
the whole of the first album,

the material took second
place of the actual sound,

that they were more interested
in getting the sound together,

getting the orchestration thing
and the whole vibe of it together.

I can take that.
Except for the fact that

when you're a listener

and when you're listening
to an album you've bought,

the one thing that makes
you listen to it is the material.

And I think the greatest weakness
in that first album is the material.

I don't think it's great.

And there's stuff you
listen to and you just think,

"What on earth
were they doing here?"

And there's some stuff that just
sounds so baroque and bizarre

that you just wonder
how they thought

they were going
to get away with it.

But overall, it's the blueprint
for the fantastic rock band

that they were going to become.

Some of the most important
ingredients they had was

Jeff Lynne and Roy Wood's
vocals were good sounding,

they were good singers

and they were interested
in lots of harmonies

and so it was poppy,
but it was this big sound.

♪ Lifting her head,
her countenance redeemed ♪

♪ Re-acted the murder
by the silver stream ♪

♪ Ah look at me now
displaying emotion ♪

It was heavy,
it had a baroque style,

something slightly
surreal about it

and was more adventurous
than they ever were to be again.

And it was a great introduction.

It certainly took a
few people by surprise.

My dad was sat in the
corner reading his racing post

and his ears
pricked up and looked at me,

"What the hell is this
you're listening to?"

"Oh, it's ELO, dad".

And he didn't make one of
his disparaging comments.

[grunty voice] "I'm
verbally impaired by you".

So I took that as a thumbs up.

And I know that he
liked his orchestral pieces

and I think that's
probably an indication

that it did have
orchestral qualities

that even my old man
found quite appealing.

Apart from using
a brass section,

which they used in places,

you couldn't really cut the
glockenspiels

and triangles thrown in.

It was big, you know.

And logistically,
it was a big job to record it.

Recording sessions in those days

were a bit trial and
error sometimes.

And sometimes you kept a take
that maybe wasn't the most solid,

temper wise,

but was the best feel wise.

In a strange way,
despite the ambition and innovation

that Roy Wood was
trying to introduce,

they were the
anathema of prog rock,

because prog rock was very much
influenced by classical respect.

The prog rock musicians
were into writing huge pieces,

great swathes of music

which drew on pretentious
twaddle if you want,

or pretentious culture,
however you want to put it.

ELO were about pop.

They had pop hits,
but they weren't a pop band.

They have always
been a progressive rock band.

They might have
been more progressive

when they started,
like most prog bands are.

I think ELO thought in the true
meaning of the word progressive,

they thought that they
were being progressive

because they were
progressing from The Move

and taking the music to what they
thought was the natural progression.

But as for prog rock,

no, I don't think
they were prog rock.

It's more free form pop.

Progressive rock,
as far as I was concerned,

had closer links
with the jazz tradition,

which I don't think ELO did.

They were more obviously
pseudo-classical influences.

The use of Beethoven themes,
that sort of thing,

in a pop context, which is fun

and artistically
satisfying in its own way.

But I would never call
them a progressive rock band.

Early ELO is most definitely
the mixture of the two styles,

of Roy's style and Jeff's style,
working together.

But you can also hear
their styles separately.

In songs that were
written together,

Jeff's musical stamp is there.

And that's what took over
the band after Roy had left.

Logically, of course.

When the pair started
Electric Light Orchestra,

they were equal partners,
but it was an equal partnership

that never really sat
comfortably with either of them.

They both wanted to be number one.

And things apparently
reached such a bad state

that when ELO went
on tour and played in Italy,

there was an infamous gig

when it was announced
by the promoter

that ELO would not
be playing that night

and no reason was given.

The problem was, backstage,
Lynne and Wood had fallen out

as to who should actually be
the first to step foot on stage.

Both wanted to be
ahead of the other.

That was how crazy it had gotten.

On ELO's first album,

Jeff Lynne and Roy Wood
came up with all the songs,

rather like Lennon and McCartney,

and as with Lennon
and McCartney,

they couldn't necessarily
satisfy their own needs

within that format.

Because Roy always
wanted to control

the production and the
sound and the writing,

the rest of the band
found it very hard to deal with.

And I think anyone.

I think it's very
hard to work with Roy

because he wants to do everything.

He wants to write it all,
he wants to play it all,

he wants to sing it all,
only because he's very talented.

He does trust people and
he does appreciate people.

It's just his pure
enthusiasm for working

and for making a sound.

It had obviously fallen apart
in terms of the relationship.

Jeff Lynne was going to
leave or be booted out.

Roy Wood would
take complete control.

But such is the
character of Roy Wood.

He got bored with it all and said,
"No, I've got another idea.

Let Jeff Lynn have this.
This is old hat.

I'll move on and form Wizzard.

Once he'd done the
Electric Light Orchestra,

he'd done the album,
he was bored.

To him, it was over.
He'd done this.

That's why I always think

the first Electric
Light Orchestra album

is Roy Wood's solo
orchestrating album.

Because Roy Wood got bored

and Jeff Lynn
took up the bat on,

and he developed it.

♪ You made a fool of me ♪

♪ But them broken
dreams have got to end ♪

Jeff Lynne probably
found greater freedom

without the
competition from Roy.

So he would be able to
focus his energy and ideas.

ELO were led by Jeff Lynne.

Bev Be van was
his right hand man.

Richard Tandy I suppose,
was his left.

And then an array of
new musicians came into

that he felt could project the sound
that he thought ELO should have.

Jeff thought again,

"Okay,
how am I going to approach this?

Roy's gone need to have
some madman dashing around,

playing five
instruments in one song.

That simplified it a bit.
I do the guitar and the vocals.

I write the song,
and then we add in the other bits

as we go along,

rather than try and have
this forced clash, if you like,

of the pop and the classical,

which is what Roy
found so exciting.

It certainly did
become a different beast.

I mean, that was it.
It was Jeff Lynne's baby then.

And basically he took it in
the direction that he wanted to.

Many critics and
probably the fans

and probably the manager thought,

"Oh, my God, the band's doomed.
They're going to fail".

But they did a new album,
ELO II, after Roy went,

and then they had an
enormous success in America.

♪ Ha, ha, woman,
what you gonna do? ♪

♪ You destroyed all the
virtues that the Lord gave you ♪

♪ It's so good that
you're feelin' pain ♪

♪ But you better get your face on
board the very next train ♪

♪ Evil woman ♪

♪ Evil woman ♪

For the first time, Jeff Lynne
became the main songwriter

in a band of national
and international stature.

And he rose to it magnificently

because he was
a great songwriter.

Like Roy Wood,
he wrote wonderful pop songs.

The difference is,
Jeff Lynne locked everything down.

The experimentation,
the adventure,

the innovation that
Roy Wood had begun

with the first album
was suddenly sidelined.

Jeff Lynne decided, "What we're
going to do is make pop rock music

with soothing,
smooth use of orchestration".

His Electric Light Orchestra

is a continuation of Roy's idea

done much better.

More lush,
much more commercial,

much more slick,

much more obvious
sort of piece of sell able product.

Bev Be van was still drumming

and we still had Jeff Lynne singing,
writing, playing guitar.

But the band that ended
up was really a rock band

with the odd string
or two here and there.

One can never argue
what the ELO achieved.

However, they never fulfilled
the potential and ambition

that Roy Wood showed
in those early days.

And that's because Jeff Lynne,
I don't think totally believed in it.

He wanted to use classical
influences for pop reasons,

to get commercial hits,

and he wrote some of
the greatest songs of the 70s.

♪ Thought I saw love
smilin' in your eyes ♪

♪ Ha, ha, very nice to know ♪

♪ That you ain't got
no place left to go ♪

Very often when people
come up with an idea

and one person gets bored
and the other one doesn't,

there's a real bit of animosity.

But for some reason,
when Roy got bored with it

and decided not to carry on

and Jeff took it on,

they just shook hands
and went their own way.

It always seemed to be
a really pleasant divorce,

which is very unusual in rock.

I think the fact that Roy and
Jeff are still on speaking terms

and the fact
they're still mates,

I don't think we'll have them
together again in our lifetime.

But it would be nice to
think that they can look back

on the early work and say,

"Well, we did something
there that was worth doing".