All language subtitles for The Raw Ones (1965)

This motion picture presents
educational, scientific, sociological,

and cultural ideas that demonstrate the
conviction that the human body is clean

and wholesome, and that increased public
understanding of this point of view will

contribute to the well-being and
advancement of all, whether they be

practicing nudists or not.

One of the strangest and most damaging
mistakes ever made by humanity

was the notion that there is something
inherently evil and obscene about the

human body.

This denial and rejection of the flesh
has been a dominant feature of Western

civilization for centuries.

But finally, in 1957, the United States
Supreme Court ruled that nudity

is not in and of itself obscene.

Concealing the body has never served to
correct faulty morals.

Groping in a fog of superstition, some
moral crusaders have not had the

understanding to give up this insidious
practice of concealment or recognize the

mental distortions that it causes.

It is a psychological fact that an
interest out of all proportion becomes

attached to any part of the body that is
perpetually concealed.

And we react to this with prurient
curiosity.

Concealing the body invariably
stimulates such curiosity and gives it

life.

Attitudes on unity in America range from
one extreme to the other.

And even within the same community,
conflicting standards exist.

Modesty is subject to widely different
interpretations.

For example, consider the reaction of a
lady surprised in her bath by a strange

man. In China, she hides her feet.

In Laos, she covers her breasts.

In Samoa, she conceals her navel.

In Sumatra, she shields her knees.

In Arabia, she turns her face away.

Modesty, then, is in the mind of the
individual.

or it is the part of the mores of a
society.

Nudists point out that there is nothing
immodest or indecent about the human

body. There are only people who think
immodest or indecent thoughts.

Dr. Albert Ellis, psychologist and
outstanding authority on sex and

marriage, comments, I have had close
contact with a good number of nudists.

I find that their motives for being
nudists are quite varied, but that

running consistently through these
motives is the theme that they stoutly

want to be socially unencumbered. They
want to think for themselves in a

generally repressive society.

and to protest actively against some of
our idiotic restrictions.

Social nudism is mainly an outlook on
life rather than an instinctive urge.

Nudists, on the whole, are distinctly
more ethical and social-minded than

members of the general populace, and
they should not be confused with

isolated and invariably severely
disturbed individuals who get into

trouble with the law for exhibitionistic
or voyeuristic acts.

What can be said for the peculiar people
of the present time who drive long

distances on weekends so that they can
enjoy sunshine, swimming, and exercise

together free from clothes?

First, they're different.

They're not afraid to look. They're not
shocked by what they see.

Also, they don't mind revealing their
own bodies.

It is done in a spirit of openness and
frankness.

instead of in the very different
atmosphere of a peep show or nightclub.

If they seem strange to their
contemporaries, they know themselves

well enough not to mind in the
slightest.

Their custom or way of life, as some
like to call it, has proved so

enjoyable, has increased their physical
and mental health so much that they are

convinced of its rightness and of its
ultimate acceptance by the general

public.

Donald Johnson, author of Nudism Primer,
says, nudists see themselves as normal

Americans who are perhaps a little
better citizens than most.

They are better schooled, earn more, and
enjoy considerably greater family

stability.

The great majority of nudists are
married and go to their favorite nudist

parks as a family unit.

Yet, in spite of our inconsistencies,
nudity in this country is on the upswing

so is our desire to come to terms with
our natural selves suppression merely

forces natural desire underground
expression helps them to assume their

natural place in life why do people
insist on wearing clothes in the first

place

Back in the 19th century, the French
philosopher Rousseau was called the

father of naturism. He believed that
children should be required to be nude.

He said, clothes only hinder children's
growth in size and strength and injure

their constitution.

Where children are swaddled in clothes,
the country swarms with the humpback,

the bow-legged, the rickety, and every
kind of deformity.

Their first feeling of wearing clothes
is one of pain and suffering.

They find every necessary movement
hampered, more miserable than the galley

slave. In vain they struggle. They
become angry. They cry.

Their voice alone is free.

Why should they not raise it in
complaint?

The American writer, Henry David
Thoreau, called clothes a counterfeit.

An excuse for dullness.

He likened clothes to gold.

It dazzles the eye. It hides the true
nature of the person.

He wrote, Every man is the builder of a
temple, called his body, to the god he

worships. We are all sculptors and
painters, and our material is our own

flesh and blood and bones.

Let our mind descend into our body and
redeem it, and treat ourselves with ever

-increasing respect.

For centuries, early authorities tried
to control by fear the extremely

unpredictable sexual impulses.

It may have been dimly imagined that if
people were frightened of sex, supposing

it was part of the devil's armament,
that there would be less free expression

of the sexual impulse.

The result would be a tendency toward a
stable family and essential for all

social groups.

What was overlooked was that anything
which is forbidden tends automatically

to become excessively fascinating.

The one room in the house which is kept
forever locked and which no one ever

discusses except in whispers is the one
place which everyone is most interested

in. To get into this room becomes the
major objective of everyone in the house

for the purpose of seeing at last what
it is that is the cause of so much

mystery and concealment.

This familiar negative attitude toward
everything sexual has produced a number

of marked problems for human beings who
have been indoctrinated with it.

Most important has been the alienation
of man from himself.

Profound inner confusion was inevitable
when each child, virtually without

exception, has been raised to feel and
believe as a matter of truth that the

related parts of his body, their
functions, and the associated wishes,

sensations, and ideas are evil or
obscene.

Control of behavior is a necessity in
any society for the preservation of a

stable family.

In our part of the world, control has
been based primarily upon fear, not upon

reason. In the attempt to control sexual
behavior, a pattern of inducing guilt

and fear not only about actions, but
about wishes, ideas, and feelings was

developed. This has been...

as Freud discovered in his pioneering
work, disastrous for a great majority of

human beings who suffer neurotic guilt
and anxiety as a result.

In view of the significant discoveries
about personality and mental ills which

have been made by Freud and others, why
don't we bring up children so that they

would, from the beginning, accept all of
themselves with serenity and with

esteem?

Some people may not realize that we are
in the midst of a vast moral revolution.

But anyone looking back even five years
cannot fail to come to realize this.

With greater knowledge, more education,
and better communication, the idea is

rapidly gaining ground that nudity is
not the unwholesome thing that it has

been thought to be in the past.

The suppression of nudity creates a
condition of special emphasis often with

disastrous results.

One has only to look at the perversions
rampant in our society to realize that

the unhealthy and life-denying attitudes
of our Puritan background have not done

humans justice.

The do-gooder, the prude, the bigot, and
the censor concern themselves with the

affairs of others.

A concentrated interest in the affairs
of others may produce some worthwhile

ends. but it can also be the basis for
the meddlesome disruptions of other

people's private lives.

The great majority will agree to this,
yet the almost subconscious guilty

feeling persists that there is something
evil in the flesh of man, a carryover

from Puritanism of our forefathers,
which we have rejected intellectually,

but which still motivates us on subtler
emotional levels.

In many ways, it appears that we are a
nation of hypocrites.

The activity that we pompously preach
about and protest against in public, we

enthusiastically practice in private.

We lie to one another about our bodies.

We lie to our children about their
bodies. And many of us undoubtedly lie

to ourselves about our own bodies.

But we cannot forever escape the reality
that a hypocritical society...

is an unhealthy society that produces
more than its share of perversion,

neurosis, unsuccessful marriage, and
suicide.

Lyle Stewart, publisher, writes, To some
people, the human body is obscene, not

with clothing on, but in its natural
state.

The fault isn't with the body.

Kissing is obscene in some countries of
the world.

and kissing scenes must be removed from
the movie films before they can be shown

in these countries.

The very definition of what is obscene
varies from place to place, from time to

time, and from person to person, which
is why all obscenity statutes, rulings,

and laws are a mockery and should be
stricken from the book.

All the logic of the Dirt Hunters falls
apart when you hold it up in the light

of a fresh, sunny day.

It's fascinating that restrictions are
almost always imposed on society by its

psychological eunuchs.

By their standards, life itself seems to
be obscene.

They make their own lives obscenities
and then are driven to turn their own

sickness into an epidemic.

The human body is not obscene, despite
what the wit doctors would have you

believe.

And nothing written or pictured about
the human body is obscene, except as we

elect to think it so.

The United States Supreme Court states
that the fundamental freedoms of speech

and press have contributed to the
development and well-being of our free

society and are indispensable to its
continued growth.

Publisher Hugh Hefner states,
religiously inspired Puritanism has been

allowed to subtly undermine certain of
our precious freedoms.

Nowhere is this more insidiously
dangerous

than in the continuing erosion of our
constitutionally guaranteed rights to

free speech and press.

For it is these freedoms that assure the
protection of all our other freedoms.

It is for this reason that we are
opposed to censorship in any form.

The U.S. Constitution and the Bill of
Rights assure these freedoms, and our

legislatures, courts, and officials
continue to pay lip service to their

protection. But exceptions are
continually being introduced.

Small cracks in the wall that protects
our democracy's ideals.

Cracks that will surely spread and thus
weaken and eventually destroy the wall.

The right of the individual to speak and
write what is on his mind, to express

himself freely and without fear of any
action against him by his government,

does not permit any acceptance.

It is time enough for the rightful
purposes of civil government, wrote

Thomas Jefferson, for its officers to
interfere when principles break out into

the overt acts against peace and good
order.

Our speech and our press cannot be
hat-free.

or they are not truly free at all.

There is, in fact, a serious school of
scientific opinion that believes that so

-called obscenity actually makes a
valuable contribution to the mental

health of a society, since it may act as
an outlet for repressed desires that

might otherwise take the form of overt
offenses and be emotionally unstable or

maladjusted.

A report by a committee of Brown
University psychologists concluded,

after reviewing all available research
on the subject, there is no reliable

evidence that reading or other fantasy
activities lead to antisocial behavior.

Dr. Benjamin Cartman, chief
psychotherapist at St. Elizabeth's

Hospital in Washington, D.C., stated in
a report before the American Medical

Association that...

Contrary to popular misconception,
people who read salacious literature are

less likely to become sexual offenders
than those who do not, for such reading

often neutralizes what aberrant sexual
interests they may have.

Efforts at sexual suppression stem
largely from fear.

It is the vice crusader's most often
repeated charge that so-called...

Erotic literature inspires and
encourages crime.

The vast majority of psychiatrists and
psychologists, men and women undoubtedly

best qualified to speak on this subject,
share the opinion of Dr. Robert Linder,

a distinguished psychoanalyst and
author, who has said, I am convinced of

the absurdity of the idea that any form
of reading matter, including the so

-called comic books, leads to criminal
behavior.

I don't understand.

Doctors Eberhard and Phyllis Kronhausen,
two leading pioneers in the study of

psychological effects of erotic
literature, point out that it may

actually be extremely dangerous to
deprive certain very disturbed persons

of this safety valve.

It is not erotica that drives these few
back to crimes of violence, but the

censors' efforts to block their only
outlet by suppressing their interests in

erotica.

George Bernard Shaw wrote, All
censorship exists to prevent anyone from

challenging current concepts and
existing institutions.

Consequently, the first condition of
progress is the removal of censorship.

Bertrand Russell has written, I think
there ought to be no rules whatever

prohibiting improper publications.

I think that partly because if there are
rules...

Stupid magistrates will condemn really
valuable work because it happens to

shock them.

Another reason is that I think
prohibitions immensely increase people's

interest in the subject as in anything
else.

Judge Thurman Arnold warned about the
danger of removing one source of

stimulation only to have it replaced by
another more objectionable one. He says

human beings can be trained like
Pavlov's dogs.

so that they are stimulated by sights
and sounds completely unrelated to the

things they desire.

A strict standard of obscenity
contributes to such unhealthy training.

Taking the pinup girls away from
American soldiers would not make their

minds more pure.

It would only mean that they would be
aroused by some less healthy or

attractive substitute.

At the turn of the century, The old
police gazette had a nationwide

pornographic appeal.

A dance called the can-can, in which the
chorus girls kicked up their legs

covered with black stockings, was wicked
and highly stimulating.

Today, a person with an appetite for
pornography would not pay ten cents to

see either the magazine or the dance.

This is how censorship makes material
stimulating, which would not be at all

if that censorship did not exist.

And that is why anything but the most
tolerant standards creates an unhealthy

psychology.

Dr. Albert Ellis comments, How can you
ban desire?

Some people go out on the street and
look at clotheslines with drawers

hanging on it and become aroused.

Should we therefore censor clotheslines?

There's something wrong with an adult
who is embarrassed by pictures of pretty

girls and who becomes extremely agitated
when the human body is treated with

anything but solemnity.

There are frequently people who have no
more than their share of morbid

curiosity.

about the reams of newsprint devoted in
the daily press to stories which there

is a close association between sex and
sin, vice, crime, violence, and the

expose.

History proves that obscenity laws have
a stifling, far-reaching effect upon all

books, including works which do not
appeal to morbid interests.

The very vagueness of the law invites
suppression.

The Supreme Court has made it clear that
the Constitution does not permit the

quarantining of the general reading
public against books in order to shield

juvenile innocence.

The adult population may not be reduced
to reading only what is fit for

children.

If the function of democracy is to
produce wise answers and solutions, then

clearly it is important to permit the
unfettered interplay of ideas.

Morality is a field upon which there are
less final conclusions than in any

other.

In our free society, founded on
individual liberty, every adult citizen

must be allowed to decide for himself
what he will read and what movies he

will see.

As a nation, We have staked our all on
the power of reason and the ability of

our people to choose wisely between good
and evil.

If the adult citizen cannot be trusted
to choose the books he will read, how

can he be trusted to govern himself?

The fact is that true democracy works as
nobly and as well in the areas of

literature and art as it does in
politics.

Have a lot, Alice.

The noted psychologist believed that
books which go substantially beyond

customary limits of candor in their
representation and depiction of matters

pertaining to the body are a necessity
in modern society.

Before seriously advocating a
desexualized, sanitized, cellophane

-wrapped society for our youngsters, we
should listen to the opinions of child

psychologists and experts in juvenile
behavior.

They are unanimous in their belief that
an overly protected child will find it

more difficult adjusting to an adult
society after he has grown.

A youngster who is reared in an
environment sufficiently removed from

the real world may never fully mature
and become capable of accepting the

responsibilities of adult life.

Will, frankly, adult books, magazines,
television, and motion pictures tend to

lead a child into patterns of antisocial
and delinquent behavior?

There is no evidence to suggest that
this is so.

Doctors Sheldon and Eleanor Gluck,
leaders in the field of child behavior,

published the results of ten years'
research into the causes of juvenile

delinquency of a thousand boys in the
Boston area.

in what has been termed a classical
study.

The subjects of pornography or of the
reading or viewing of erotic material of

any kind are never once mentioned as
contributing factors in delinquency.

We are all familiar with the
self-inflicted censor with which

Hollywood suffered through most of the
30s and 40s when the motion picture

production code required all sexual
intemperance to end in disaster.

If the heroine allowed herself a night
of dalliance with the hero in the first

reel, the movie-going public knew that
not only would the next scene be a teary

-eyed discovery that she was pregnant,
but the rest of the picture would be one

long series of heartbreaks and suffering
in which the hero usually conveniently

became unavailable.

The heroine usually became destitute, an
alcoholic, drew herself under a train,

or died of pneumonia.

teachings have pitted man's body and
spirit against one another, whereas

common sense would suggest that God
intended the body, mind, and spirit of

man to be in harmony.

What strange sort of religion have we
evolved that places the godly part of a

man in opposition to the whole of his
physical being?

Those who fear and oppose the erotic in
our literature and art do so because of

personal repressions and feelings of
frustration.

inadequacy, or guilt.

Literature and art are a mirror in which
man sees his own reflection.

Only a man who carries the obscenity
within himself will see obscenity in a

book, a painting, or a photograph.

If you find the obscene in a work of art
or literature or in life itself, you

have no one to blame but yourself for
having made it obscene.

If it is true that beauty is in the eye
of the beholder, one must accept its

logical counterpart that ugliness is,
too.

Censors attempt to thwart our God-given
and constitutionally guaranteed rights

to freely use our own minds and bodies,
so long as we do not infringe the rights

of others.

The right to speak and write our own
ideas expressed by others equally free.

The right to worship our own God in our
own way. The right to associate with

whomever we choose, whenever we choose,
without fear or prejudice from others.

By limiting our speeches and press, by
disapproving certain words and ideas,

the censor, in fact, tries to practice
thought control.

By suppressing the speech and writing
that embarrasses and disturbs him, the

censor unwittingly eliminates an
emotional outlet that most authorities

agree is helpful for society.

The censor so little understands the
nature of the thing he is doing that he

usually attacks first.

the more positive aspect of our
literature and art.

The book, magazine, or movie that
equates sex with sin and suffering is

less apt to bring down his wrath than
one that makes sex seem pleasurable or

appealing, for the former can be said to
have a moral, that the seeming moral is

in reality an abnormal and quite
unhealthy association between sexual

activity and ugliness, grief, and guilt.

seems to matter not a bit to the censor.

He thus quite successfully projects his
own negative attitudes towards sex onto

the rest of us.

In a recent interview, Supreme Court
Justice Hugo Black expressed his

personal views on our American ideal of
absolute freedoms of speech and press.

I am for the First Amendment from the
first word to the last.

I believe it means what it says, and it
says to me, Government shall keep its

hands off religion.

Government shall not attempt to control
the freedom of the press or speech.

It shall let anybody talk in this
country.

I have never been shaken in the faith
that the American people are the kind of

people and have the kind of loyalty to
their government that we need not fear

to talk of communists or of anybody
else. Let them talk.

In the American way, we will answer
them.

The Bill of Rights is intended to see
that a man cannot be jerked by the back

of the neck by any government official.

He cannot be picked up legally and
carried away because of his views.

Our system of justice is based on the
assumption that men can best work out

their own opinions.

Today, nudist magazines and movies are
displayed on newsstands and in theaters

in all our major cities.

A few years ago, however, Mutist films
could not be shown in New York theaters,

and magazines were forced to retouch or
cover pubic areas in photographs.

A court decision in 1957 changed all
that.

A decision that was not only to have a
liberalizing effect upon all major

communications media, but even more
important, reflects a shifting climate

toward greater freedom of expression and
sexual acceptance.

It seems a reasonable assumption that
the smut traffic will decrease and

eventually disappear with a more
accepting and open attitude toward the

human body in our society since
unwholesome feelings about our bodies

usually stem from repression.

As for nudity, yes, it's here to stay
and increase.

Now in the United States, there are over
one and one-half million nudists.

registered and unregistered.

In time to come, we will undoubtedly
accept nudity more casually, as the

Europeans do.

We will view sex with a greater sense of
proportion, not as something to be

hidden, nor as the sole reason for
existence, but as a necessary part of

life. And we will judge the nude by its
beauty and taste in execution.

Any subject in photography deserves that
much to be valued for what it is. And

any interpretation of that subject is in
the minds of the photographer and of the

beholder.

The American Sunbathing Association
states the principles of nudism.

We believe in the essential
wholesomeness of the human body and

regard it neither as an object of shame
nor a subject for degrading

exploitation.

We believe that sunlight and air are
vital to human life and well-being and

that exposure of the entire body to
these elements is desirable at such time

and such places as are fitting and
proper for the purpose.

We believe that we are entitled to enjoy
the benefits of such exposure without

interference as long as we do not cause
injury to our fellow citizens.

Nudism is potentially one of the steps
to greater human acceptance and,

therefore, human awareness and growth.

False modesty and artificial concepts of
morality deny to people the meeting of

each other without fear.

True modesty can be achieved only when
it is possible to totally accept oneself

and others with unrestricted openness
and honesty.

Some of us have finally emerged from the
fog that distorted our vision, and we

have decided to experiment a little with
human reactions to the disclosure of

truth and God's original plan of life.

The reward has been instantaneous and
electrifying.

Spiritual release.

Physical improvement, moral stamina,
social integrity, and human

consideration immediately become
dominant factors in this program of

life. It is so impressive that we look
back with wonder at the stupidity that

once victimized us and is still
victimizing others.

Deliverance from this bondage is
realized by simply believing in the

decency and dignity of the human body
that God designed.

and in being practical about it.

If we want to restore sanity to our
world, we must first save the young from

the lies and hypocrisy inherited from
generations of Puritan thinking.

Modern man must find his path in a world
which has become dangerous and dense.

We will only survive if we start
producing individuals endowed with full

freedom of judgment.

We need positive and personal thinking
to guide us in our perilous journey

ahead.

The mind of man sets him apart from the
lower animals.

Man should use his intellect to create
an ever more perfect, productive,

comfortable, fulfilling, happy, healthy,
and rational society.

Our American democracy is based not
simply on the will of the majority, but

on the protection of the will of the
minority.

And the smallest minority in society is
the individual.

Each person has a right to explore his
own individuality that sets him apart

from the rest of mankind, as fully as he
takes pride in the kinship that links

him to every other man on earth, past,
present, and future.

Our society exists not only for the
purpose of establishing common areas of

agreement among men, but also to aid
each of us to achieve our own individual

identity.

Society benefits as much from the
differences in man as from their

similarities. And we should create a
culture that not only accepts these

differences, but respects and actually
nurtures them.

We will be happier living in an America
in which all men are allowed to exercise

full freedom of speech, of press, of
religion, and of association.

It is the America our founding fathers
meant us to have.

We should have it now.