Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:06,089
hey there everybody
2
00:00:03,810 --> 00:00:09,240
this is Cameron with the C butters
3
00:00:06,089 --> 00:00:11,700
Channel and I get have been getting this
4
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:15,360
question a lot what should I buy the i5
5
00:00:11,700 --> 00:00:17,310
version or the i7 version so this is my
6
00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:20,670
attempt to answer this question and in
7
00:00:17,310 --> 00:00:22,980
case you were wondering I am using the
8
00:00:20,670 --> 00:00:25,619
surface pro 7 currently to record this
9
00:00:22,980 --> 00:00:27,420
using the new studio microphones just as
10
00:00:25,619 --> 00:00:30,480
a test of how well these studio
11
00:00:27,420 --> 00:00:31,529
microphones work but let's go ahead and
12
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:34,469
get into it
13
00:00:31,529 --> 00:00:38,340
should you get the i5 version of the
14
00:00:34,469 --> 00:00:41,850
surface pro 7 or the i7 first let's take
15
00:00:38,340 --> 00:00:44,219
a look at the differences so on the i5
16
00:00:41,850 --> 00:00:47,129
version you're looking at a max boost
17
00:00:44,219 --> 00:00:51,030
rate on the processor of 3.7 gigahertz
18
00:00:47,129 --> 00:00:57,030
and that comes with a 6 megabyte l3
19
00:00:51,030 --> 00:01:00,180
cache a 1.05 GPU max 48 execution units
20
00:00:57,030 --> 00:01:02,430
on the GPU and the i5 is fanless and
21
00:01:00,180 --> 00:01:04,530
that does play a factor into your
22
00:01:02,430 --> 00:01:07,530
decision here which we'll get to in a
23
00:01:04,530 --> 00:01:11,850
little bit the i7 has a 3.9 gigahertz
24
00:01:07,530 --> 00:01:16,009
CPU max 8 megabyte l3 cache 1.1
25
00:01:11,850 --> 00:01:18,479
gigahertz CPU or GPU max and 64
26
00:01:16,009 --> 00:01:21,659
execution units and it does have an
27
00:01:18,479 --> 00:01:25,320
internal fan so those are the only
28
00:01:21,659 --> 00:01:28,110
differences between the CPUs let's go
29
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:31,110
ahead and look at the price points so
30
00:01:28,110 --> 00:01:35,250
your decision on buying an i5 versus an
31
00:01:31,110 --> 00:01:36,960
i7 is really going to come down to your
32
00:01:35,250 --> 00:01:38,850
storage requirements because that's the
33
00:01:36,960 --> 00:01:43,710
first thing going to start with to start
34
00:01:38,850 --> 00:01:47,040
if you need 16 gigabytes of RAM you're
35
00:01:43,710 --> 00:01:50,759
already going to be at $13.99 or if you
36
00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:53,790
need 256 gigabytes of storage you are
37
00:01:50,759 --> 00:01:59,520
going to be at 1199 the i7 versions
38
00:01:53,790 --> 00:02:01,140
start at $14.99 over here so let's look
39
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,850
at the performance for starting on the
40
00:02:01,140 --> 00:02:08,099
performance steep the price point
41
00:02:02,850 --> 00:02:11,250
difference between stepping up from an
42
00:02:08,099 --> 00:02:13,740
i5 to an i7 well if you're someone who
43
00:02:11,250 --> 00:02:17,610
only needs 8 gigabytes of RAM
44
00:02:13,740 --> 00:02:19,640
and 128 gigabytes of disk space is you
45
00:02:17,610 --> 00:02:22,950
know slower disk space because it has
46
00:02:19,640 --> 00:02:25,650
less the less storage that SSD has the
47
00:02:22,950 --> 00:02:29,040
slower it goes in general that's a
48
00:02:25,650 --> 00:02:32,670
generalization but generally true so
49
00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:35,250
you're asking for $600 more if you're
50
00:02:32,670 --> 00:02:38,810
someone who's okay with 8 gigs and 128
51
00:02:35,250 --> 00:02:43,080
so making that jump over to an i7 is a
52
00:02:38,810 --> 00:02:45,690
66% increase in price it's a $600 more
53
00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:46,980
so that's that's kind of steep you know
54
00:02:45,690 --> 00:02:50,820
especially for your just if you're just
55
00:02:46,980 --> 00:02:54,200
looking to try to get into a pro 7 now
56
00:02:50,820 --> 00:02:59,400
if you say 128 is way too small into 256
57
00:02:54,200 --> 00:03:02,010
you're paying $300 more to step up to
58
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:04,050
that I seven which is a 25% increase in
59
00:03:02,010 --> 00:03:06,600
in price which is a little bit more
60
00:03:04,050 --> 00:03:10,950
palatable but if you're someone who
61
00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:15,870
wants 16 gigabytes of RAM you're only
62
00:03:10,950 --> 00:03:18,690
looking at $100 to step up to the i7 so
63
00:03:15,870 --> 00:03:22,440
that's kind of our that represents a 7%
64
00:03:18,690 --> 00:03:25,830
increase in price and let's go ahead and
65
00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:28,560
look at what does the i7 versus the I
66
00:03:25,830 --> 00:03:30,180
thought actually get you in terms of
67
00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:34,590
performance and does that performance
68
00:03:30,180 --> 00:03:37,980
warrant $600 more $300 more or $100 more
69
00:03:34,590 --> 00:03:42,810
so let's scoot over to the performance
70
00:03:37,980 --> 00:03:44,760
Delta so if you watch my channel you
71
00:03:42,810 --> 00:03:46,080
know I'm the guy who like points a fan
72
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:48,060
at the back of the surface to get
73
00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:51,000
maximum performance I have not done that
74
00:03:48,060 --> 00:03:52,620
in my benchmark testing for these
75
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:55,460
numbers I want to have real accurate
76
00:03:52,620 --> 00:03:57,810
figures for you guys so you can have it
77
00:03:55,460 --> 00:03:59,700
so you know that the numbers I'm giving
78
00:03:57,810 --> 00:04:03,120
you here or what you can expect to get
79
00:03:59,700 --> 00:04:07,680
without doing anything weird or crazy on
80
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:11,460
your device so that said I only have the
81
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:14,010
i7 in my possession so my i-5 figures
82
00:04:11,460 --> 00:04:17,070
are from the windows central review of
83
00:04:14,010 --> 00:04:19,500
the surface pro 7i 5 I'm relying on
84
00:04:17,070 --> 00:04:23,630
their benchmarking prowess where these
85
00:04:19,500 --> 00:04:27,120
numbers are ones that I did myself so
86
00:04:23,630 --> 00:04:32,210
let's go ahead and take a look
87
00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:35,370
geek bench 5 single 1191 versus 1273
88
00:04:32,210 --> 00:04:38,490
deep bench 5 multi 4 4 or 4/1
89
00:04:35,370 --> 00:04:40,380
anyways I'll cut to the chase I'll go
90
00:04:38,490 --> 00:04:42,360
ahead and load up that that slide so
91
00:04:40,380 --> 00:04:45,930
geek bench 5 you've got a 7 percent
92
00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:49,229
improvement and in the multi core test a
93
00:04:45,930 --> 00:04:52,199
9.2 percent improvement and a geek bench
94
00:04:49,229 --> 00:04:55,290
4 you've got a 7.5 percent improvement
95
00:04:52,199 --> 00:04:58,380
in the multi you got eleven point three
96
00:04:55,290 --> 00:05:00,450
percent proven PC mark 10 you pick up a
97
00:04:58,380 --> 00:05:03,620
15% improvement but that's because PC
98
00:05:00,450 --> 00:05:07,740
mark 10 does use some GPU accelerated
99
00:05:03,620 --> 00:05:11,430
tests but it's mostly it's mostly CPU
100
00:05:07,740 --> 00:05:15,380
and so I've separated these are the CPU
101
00:05:11,430 --> 00:05:20,610
benchmarks and these are the GPU
102
00:05:15,380 --> 00:05:22,380
benchmarks so let's look over at the GPU
103
00:05:20,610 --> 00:05:25,919
benchmarks where we see a pretty big
104
00:05:22,380 --> 00:05:31,350
difference so if you look at the geek
105
00:05:25,919 --> 00:05:38,850
bench 5 compute I 5 gets 7600 13 or the
106
00:05:31,350 --> 00:05:45,180
i7 it kind of creams it so it it has a
107
00:05:38,850 --> 00:05:50,490
37% improvement and 3dmark times pi has
108
00:05:45,180 --> 00:05:54,300
an improvement of 85% and you may be
109
00:05:50,490 --> 00:05:56,669
wondering okay well these these graphics
110
00:05:54,300 --> 00:06:00,000
are basically the same just one has 64
111
00:05:56,669 --> 00:06:04,200
execution units and the other one has 48
112
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:06,200
so if you have 64 divided by 48 you
113
00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:09,510
should only have a 33 percent
114
00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:12,000
improvement maximum and both of these
115
00:06:09,510 --> 00:06:14,880
figures are beating that 33% so what's
116
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:19,050
going on here well we talked about the
117
00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:20,520
i-5 not having a fan a built-in fan not
118
00:06:19,050 --> 00:06:24,440
some weird fan that I put on the back
119
00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:30,810
another it's passive I 5 is passive
120
00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:35,250
where the i7 has active cooling I'm
121
00:06:30,810 --> 00:06:37,890
really enjoying my surface pen so my
122
00:06:35,250 --> 00:06:39,900
theory is that's where this is that's
123
00:06:37,890 --> 00:06:44,250
why we're seeing this performance 2
124
00:06:39,900 --> 00:06:47,790
because the i7 in our testing we've seen
125
00:06:44,250 --> 00:06:50,460
it kind of hangs out anywhere from 15 to
126
00:06:47,790 --> 00:06:54,120
25 Watts
127
00:06:50,460 --> 00:06:59,820
depending on how fresh it is my guess is
128
00:06:54,120 --> 00:07:02,220
the i-5 is set to 10 to 15 watts because
129
00:06:59,820 --> 00:07:05,250
I'm probably closer to 10 watts and
130
00:07:02,220 --> 00:07:08,070
that's because it doesn't have a fan you
131
00:07:05,250 --> 00:07:12,420
know it's passively cooled so Microsoft
132
00:07:08,070 --> 00:07:15,180
is gonna lock that down so because it's
133
00:07:12,420 --> 00:07:20,310
being throttled the i7 comes out ahead
134
00:07:15,180 --> 00:07:23,610
in these GPU benchmarks so if we look at
135
00:07:20,310 --> 00:07:25,740
the sum of all these parts we see that
136
00:07:23,610 --> 00:07:29,310
the average CPU advantage moving to an
137
00:07:25,740 --> 00:07:31,680
i7 versalife I've met you roughly a 10%
138
00:07:29,310 --> 00:07:39,350
performance increase for CPU related
139
00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:43,910
functions and the GPU advantage is a 61%
140
00:07:39,350 --> 00:07:48,270
advantage so that's actually really huge
141
00:07:43,910 --> 00:07:51,960
I've in my performance testing of the i7
142
00:07:48,270 --> 00:07:55,320
it's it is a beast with the surface pro
143
00:07:51,960 --> 00:07:57,990
7 those 64 execution units combined with
144
00:07:55,320 --> 00:08:01,200
a really good cooling solution really
145
00:07:57,990 --> 00:08:06,000
give it an edge and sustained workloads
146
00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:10,020
so so we now know that we have kind of a
147
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:12,930
61% advantage in GPU capability and a
148
00:08:10,020 --> 00:08:16,950
10% advantage in CPU capability so let's
149
00:08:12,930 --> 00:08:21,570
go back and look at our our price points
150
00:08:16,950 --> 00:08:23,100
here so if you are just this guy if
151
00:08:21,570 --> 00:08:24,780
you're looking at you know what I don't
152
00:08:23,100 --> 00:08:28,290
have a lot of money I just want to get
153
00:08:24,780 --> 00:08:31,800
into a surface pro 7 I would recommend
154
00:08:28,290 --> 00:08:34,910
the pro 7 over the pro 6 even in the i5
155
00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:37,680
version because it's got USB see it has
156
00:08:34,910 --> 00:08:39,930
Intel Wi-Fi it's just better all-around
157
00:08:37,680 --> 00:08:46,280
the intervals are completely redesigned
158
00:08:39,930 --> 00:08:48,840
the i-5 in the pro 7 is actually
159
00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:51,960
outperforming in general the surface pro
160
00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:53,600
6 I 7 version so the i-5 pro 7 is better
161
00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:56,390
than the pro 6
162
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:59,990
sorry am I saying that right the i5 pro
163
00:08:56,390 --> 00:09:02,060
7 is better than the i7 pro 6 that's
164
00:08:59,990 --> 00:09:04,700
that's kind of hard to say so if you're
165
00:09:02,060 --> 00:09:07,030
this guy that $600 is is a hard pill to
166
00:09:04,700 --> 00:09:11,600
swallow but if you are a person who
167
00:09:07,030 --> 00:09:14,810
wants to use the GPU that still could be
168
00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:18,650
viable you're you're gonna pay 66% more
169
00:09:14,810 --> 00:09:20,690
to get over here on the i7 but if you
170
00:09:18,650 --> 00:09:24,080
value GPU if you're gonna be using for
171
00:09:20,690 --> 00:09:28,370
gaming or sustained GPU workloads for
172
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:30,830
whatever reason it's you you're paying
173
00:09:28,370 --> 00:09:32,300
66% more but you're getting 61% more
174
00:09:30,830 --> 00:09:35,570
performance so that may or may not be
175
00:09:32,300 --> 00:09:41,720
worth it but if you're this guy who
176
00:09:35,570 --> 00:09:44,810
already needs the 256 and the 8 gig the
177
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:47,690
25% more that you're paying is well
178
00:09:44,810 --> 00:09:50,600
worth it if you are going to utilize
179
00:09:47,690 --> 00:09:53,600
that GPU if you are this guy right here
180
00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:55,700
you just need to not buy the i-5 and you
181
00:09:53,600 --> 00:10:00,290
need to go straight over the i7 the the
182
00:09:55,700 --> 00:10:02,870
7% extra in price is is well worth it to
183
00:10:00,290 --> 00:10:05,480
get the i7 version so really what it
184
00:10:02,870 --> 00:10:08,540
comes down to is are you a person who is
185
00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:13,550
gonna use the CPU or you person who's
186
00:10:08,540 --> 00:10:14,840
going to use the GPU heavily well I
187
00:10:13,550 --> 00:10:17,420
guess you're always going to be using
188
00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:20,330
the GPU but are you going to be using
189
00:10:17,420 --> 00:10:23,960
the GPU do you want to play games do you
190
00:10:20,330 --> 00:10:29,120
want to do compute workloads do you want
191
00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:32,960
to have an edge in certain applications
192
00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:34,450
that utilize GPU that's for you to
193
00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:40,570
decide
194
00:10:34,450 --> 00:10:45,950
but do know that if you want that GPU
195
00:10:40,570 --> 00:10:50,180
improvement the i7 is a much better bet
196
00:10:45,950 --> 00:10:52,730
for you so I'm not gonna say that you
197
00:10:50,180 --> 00:10:56,980
have to get the i7 but it it's
198
00:10:52,730 --> 00:10:59,600
definitely a very good value proposition
199
00:10:56,980 --> 00:11:02,240
for the extra performance that you're
200
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:06,350
getting and if you're already planning
201
00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:07,370
to get this range on the 256 16 gig you
202
00:11:06,350 --> 00:11:10,640
may as well step right over
203
00:11:07,370 --> 00:11:13,280
so that's as good as I can I can help
204
00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:15,500
you guys out it's always a personal
205
00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:18,020
decision you know some people are only
206
00:11:15,500 --> 00:11:21,440
gonna have this much to spend
207
00:11:18,020 --> 00:11:22,730
and that's still money well worth it
208
00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:26,360
we're obviously getting gouged
209
00:11:22,730 --> 00:11:28,790
especially in in these versions even i7
210
00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:31,580
we're getting gouged a little bit but
211
00:11:28,790 --> 00:11:34,370
what are you gonna do hopefully you
212
00:11:31,580 --> 00:11:37,670
should apply your 10% student discount
213
00:11:34,370 --> 00:11:42,440
if you can and that should help ease the
214
00:11:37,670 --> 00:11:47,600
burden of buying a new service pro 7
215
00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:51,850
device so anyways if this has been
216
00:11:47,600 --> 00:12:01,190
useful information to you be sure to
217
00:11:51,850 --> 00:12:03,250
thumbs up like and subscribe so thanks
218
00:12:01,190 --> 00:12:06,890
for watching my surface pro 7
219
00:12:03,250 --> 00:12:11,230
performance video on the i-5 versus the
220
00:12:06,890 --> 00:12:11,230
i7 we'll see you next time
16745
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.
Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Faroese
Finnish
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Maltese
Maori
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Swedish
Tajik
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkmen
Ukrainian
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof