All language subtitles for Disclosure Day watchseries. bar

You're either on the side of the law or
you're not. And if not, which we can

prove they are, you strip them of all
that cover.

The only way you're going to get to it
is somebody at the executive level that

says, enough is enough.

Cut the money off. Bring these people
in.

Let's go.

Maybe just give them a threat, a very
light threat. Let them know, like, this

not to be talked about any further. And
if you do, something can happen.

Donald Trump was nearly assassinated.
Are they trying to hide the proof from

him? Is he going to be the new
disclosure president?

All we need is one to be accurate. And
this whole concept of UFO crash

non -existing completely falls apart.

They're doing stuff for spite. They're
doing stuff to protect certain

individuals or certain industries.

And it's detrimental to all of us.

We are back with a Fox News alert. We're
waiting to see how Israel responds to

Iran's unprecedented attack this
weekend. The IDF says this launch of so

missiles, cruise missiles and UAVs into
the territory of the state of Israel

will be met with a response.

We're at the brink of World War III,
just in case anybody doesn't know it.

Oh, yeah, people are all talking about
World War III and all that. Well, you

know, if we don't change the trajectory
we're on, we're going to be in a big

problem. And the biggest one is the fact
that there are covert programs

targeting BP vehicles, and those
programs are jeopardizing the Earth for

The U .S. military shooting down a
fourth unidentified high -altitude

Sunday. The military needs to have a
plan to not only determine what's out

there, but determine the dangers that go
with it. We've warned of this for over

30 years. Wernher von Braun warned about
it.

Since I spoke with you last, I was at a
Western, two Western black sites,

where they have operations that are
actively

targeting and, in a sense, hijacking BT
vehicles with some

very high -tech systems and then moving
them into an area where they're struck

with electromagnetic pulse scalar
weapons.

And this one site I was over in a
classified airspace in September,

on average, knocks about two of these ET
craft down per year.

President Biden ordering the takedown
after military officials raised concerns

about the object's path and altitude,
saying it was a safety flight hazard and

threat due to its potential surveillance
capabilities.

So when we tell people there are 125...

crash retrieval operations that have
happened, we know that's the tip of the

iceberg. It's certainly well over 1
,000.

Mr. Schratz. Good to see you. Good to
see you. No, there's a lot to talk

The whistleblowers have spoken.
Apparently more whistleblowers are going

coming forward.

Do you think this is a good start?

Very good start. Very good start.

You know, with some of the testimony
coming from the voice of the Lord, it's

quite controversial.

What do you think? Do you think people
actually are taking these words as

genuine from these people?

Well, you can see that the giggle factor
is slowly eroding at this point, and

that's the direction we want to head.

So late last year, the National Press
Club, we had the hearings in D .C. What

it going to take for Washington to
finally wake up, get disclosure to the

public, or at least admit that there's
something going on, or at least we're

alone? We've got to up the game. We've
got to get the physical evidence, and

that's what's going to break it.

Physical evidence.

Dr. Greer talked about physical
evidence. A lot of it has been

People have been taken out due to the
fact that...

They want to keep all of this a secret.

What kind of chance do we have now if
we're going to have people that come

forward risk their lives to bring the
evidence to the people? Right.

Just to follow up, so what we want to do
now is identify the last of the

surviving legacy witnesses to the crash
retrievals.

That can lead us to not only the debris
in the bodies, but the craft themselves.

Anything less than that, we're spinning
our wheels. You could lead us.

straight to where these vehicles are at.

Technically, yes.

Technically, yes. How many crash
retrievals are you aware of here, just

United States alone?

Well, within the United States, minimum
of 119.

At probably 126 to 127 now, and that
doesn't include the foreign cases.

Why it's taking so long to, number one,
for me personally, to identify these

objects, too. Why is it taking so long
for them to be shot down?

With this kind of...

level of shoot -downs and retrievals,
where do they keep these assets?

Sure. Well, they spread their assets
around. They diversify their portfolio.

They're not going to put all their eggs
in one basket. So you've got Edwards

North Base Complex. You've got MacDill
Air Force Base. You've got Homestead Air

Force Base, Eglin Air Force Base.

These are some of the key areas where
they would keep these.

Recently, Tim Burchett, Congressman Tim
Burchett, was denied access.

We've had a heck of a lot of pushback
about this hearing. We've had members of

Congress who fought us. We've had
members of the intelligence community

the Pentagon, even NASA, backed out on
us.

There are a lot of people who don't want
this to come to light.

How come our congressmen don't even have
access?

That's the brick wall we're running up
to because a lot of these senators and

congressmen, they don't have a need to
know, and they have not been read into

these programs.

So that's what we're running up against.

This is ridiculous, folks.

They either do exist or they don't
exist. They keep telling us they don't

but they block every opportunity for us
to get a hold of the information.

And so the people who are currently...

coming forward as whistleblowers that
are deep in the system, I mean actively

the system.

They totally think that this is going to
reach a point of out of control.

There seems to be a real concern about
whistleblowers and whether they'll be

killed or potentially injured from the
information they bring forward. If you

look at what happened even with NASA,
over the course of a decade, several

hundred NASA employees either vanished
or died.

And that just got swept underneath the
rug. I mean, articles are there if you

look them up on mainstream sites.

But how come nobody's talking about all
these incredible accidents that are

happening with NASA employees?

It's kind of a hazardous job. Who would
want to work there? So there's something

going on with the government.

and disclosure and whistleblowers. Now,
some whistleblowers are kind of, they

seem like they're almost open and free
to come out and admit what they saw,

they know. And it almost seems as if
nothing happens to them.

Sometimes I think some of them get so
popular so fast.

that if you attack them or you kill
them, it almost kind of makes them a

So it's like, oh, we've got to leave
this one alone because then they're

to really believe it's true.

And then there are some that try to come
out for whatever reason through private

corporations or see things in private
corporations that are running black

projects that are running with no
congressional oversight.

and then those people tend to sometimes
disappear or attempts are made on their

lives or their loved ones' lives.

So you have this combination.

It kind of almost depends which faction
of the government is involved, which

corporation is involved, and how dubious
they are.

It's really a crapshoot. A person that's
going to come forward doesn't know if

they'll survive it or not.

You know, while there are all the
geopolitical problems with Ukraine and

and Taiwan and China and...

and, of course, Middle East, where I
lived for three years, by the way, this

the bigger issue that no one's talking
about. And that is unsupervised

operations that have extremely advanced
technologies that neither the president

nor the Congress have any real knowledge
of or control over.

And that is a fact. And so that is your
biggest risk to Earth.

is what these illegal, covert human
projects are doing.

Because when we become an existential
threat to other places out in space,

though these civilizations aren't
hostile, per se, they're also not

they're not going to let this continue
on the trajectory it's been on for 80

years. And I know that the ET
civilizations are quote -unquote

fed up.

One of the problems associated with
alien technology, if it's real,

if we can produce electricity without
burning fossil

fuels or nuke or wind power or whatever,
you're not going to gut

a multi -trillion dollar worldwide
industry, fossil fuels.

If all of a sudden we didn't need any of
that, We had unlimited energy, free,

pollution -free.

I think the government and the
billionaires would bite it tooth and

that is their livelihood. They don't
care what we're paying for gas or what

we're paying for electricity.

They're in a totally different world
than you and I are.

But for the average Joe to be able to
turn his lights on and never have to

about... a bill to jump in their car,
drive cross -country, and never have to

worry about fuel for it.

The energy industry does not go away
quietly.

There's too much money involved. Too
much of that money is going into too few

people.

And I don't think it's going to happen
in my lifetime, because I don't have

many decades left.

But in yours or my kids or my grandkids
or my great -great -grandkids' lifetime,

I don't think they're going to see it
either.

Because the energy companies and the
governments are going to fight it tooth

nail. That's how they generate revenue.

It's going to take the physical evidence
to break the quote -unquote cosmic

water gate. And if we don't focus on the
physical evidence, We're all going to

go another 50 years and we're never
going to know the truth. And it's really

final curtain call on the crash
retrieval. And that's why it's so

that we break this now before it runs
out of history.

This is a program that we just learned
about now from Arrow. They just released

newly declassified documents from
Homeland Security.

And it laid out this special access
program or top secret program called.

Kona Blue, the purpose of which,
according to these documents, was to

to study, to engineer, and to identify
technology from what they called

AAVs, or Advanced Aerospace Vehicles, so
what we might now fall under the

category of UAPs. Let's talk about this
director of the CIA.

He passed away, but he had a goal.

Yes, well, towards the end of his life,
CIA Director Bill Colby was similarly

fed up. This is 95, right?

And I was just starting in on this. In
93, I briefed the director of the CIA

Clinton, and he reached out to us, and
he was going to hand off

a device like this size that was a free
energy, zero -point energy device,

and then about $50 million in funding
from some source he had.

So we could get that out, save the
biosphere in poverty.

Because he was fed up.

And the week he was going to meet with a
member of my board, they found him

floating down here, down south of D .C.
in the river.

And he was killed.

So he wanted this out.

Now this is almost 30 years ago, right?
Where 2024, that was 1995.

This zero -point energy device, where is
it now? Did he have it in his

possession? He had access, and it ended
at that point, right? So he was

eliminated, and it went in the wind.

Nobody with any sense wants fortune and
glory dealing with this.

That's the mistake that they all make,
because they don't know what they're up

against. They think, oh, I just invented
some great thing, and the world's going

to beat a path to my door, right?

When in reality, Murder Incorporated is
going to beat a path to your door.

So the problem with the civilian efforts
on this is that strategically, the most

brilliant people I've ever met who have
built these things, they don't

understand the strategic landscape.

They don't understand the security
issues, which is how they always get

down because they don't even see they're
about to walk off a cliff.

And so to do this, I mean, having the
technology is one thing.

Having a strategy that is...
commensurate with the task of getting it

this buzzsaw of suppression and violence
and wet works and murder that

happens. And this is not a conspiracy
theory. I mean, there are many

people who, like Floyd Sweet, other
people who had these devices, and

gone.

And usually, because they have what I
call crazy inventor syndrome, they keep

all secret.

You know, my little secret.

And they take it to the grave with them.

And they've usually falsified their
patents like Dan Meyer did. He had that

running on water. It's legit.

He falsified all the data in the patent
so that anyone who would try to build it

wouldn't work.

There's too much money.

Money is power.

And they're not going to do it. And
there's been, what, 5 ,000 patents that

been issued to various individuals over
the decades.

I mean, the one guy was powering a car
on water.

How in the hell did he do that? But he
was able to drive across country in it.

His patents, he patented it, it
disappeared, and then he disappeared.

We have people making decisions in
government and in business that have no

to be out of their mother's basement.

They're doing stuff for spite. They're
doing stuff to protect certain

individuals or certain industries.

And it's detrimental to all of us.

This whole subject, UFOs, ETs, that's
not the big issue.

It's the technology.

It's a science and technology story.

Because you're talking about bringing
out science, technology, information

would alter the world forever in a very
good way.

But it would terminate $1 ,000 trillion
worth of assets, corporate, oil, gas,

coal, jet engines, rockets,

car engines, all of this obsolete.

So for that, you know, I mean, people
are killed for a lot less than that.

So that's the big problem. And these
inventors, you know, just don't

that. Now, the CIA director understood,
but he still wanted to play the, you

know, spy versus spy game.

The mistake he made was not setting up a
system so that if anything happened to

him, that technology on all of it would
hit the Internet and hit the subway.

If you disappear, you're the tree that
fell in the woods nobody ever heard

about. It's a problem.

And what good does that do? He lost his
life and the technology didn't get out.

Who coined the dead man's trigger?

Me. Right. That was yours?

Mm -hmm.

And how many people are in your
connection of circles? If something were

happen to you and you would release this
information, how many people have you

on standby ready to put this out to?

About a dozen.

People with juice, people with
connections, contacts.

But it's sort of an insurance policy
because what it does, these covert

know what I have, right?

They know who I know and what I know.
And in a way, it's kind of risky

for them if that were to happen because
it would be pretty devastating.

They're kicking the can down the road.
We always get close to this disclosure

and then something happens and then they
kick this thing down. I mean, they had

this 10 year plan where they're going to
have 180 days and then a 30 day review

and then another three month review. And
then now all that got scrapped. And so

what it looks like now is that it's
really being taken out of the hands of

government now because.

They've had so long to do something.
They've had over 80 years to do

and they're not being forthcoming. They
had more than enough chance to do

something. It's now up to dedicated
researchers to put the

boots on the pavement and actually find
the remaining legacy witnesses.

Now, once those can be interviewed, They
can be subpoenaed. They can be brought

into Congress.

We could have congressional hearings. We
have legislation in place now where

they won't have negative ramifications
for coming forward. So if we can get

to come forward, that could lead to
their bosses, and the bosses could tell

exactly where all this stuff is. Now, we
know where a lot of this information is

and where they're keeping the hardware,
but getting access to that is going to

be very difficult.

The deep cover unacknowledged projects,
the men

I've met with in those projects are fed
up with the foot dragging in Congress

and this total missing from the room
totally the White House and National

Security Council.

Now on the good side of that, it's a
network to a very senior National

Council member.

who has not been read in on any of this,
who wants to get information on it,

since this is now beginning to surface
more, bubble up through the mainstream

media.

The problem is the pace of it.

The pace of it is so slow that it
actually is creating a risk that

other actions are going to preempt
Congress and preempt anything the White

could do.

And I actually think we're at that
inflection point this coming year.

2024.

If the pace doesn't pick up, if they
can't keep up and start doing some more

definitive actions, we're at a big risk
of something happening that's beyond

what people can imagine.

That's all I'll say.

Last week at his State of the Nation
address, Russia's President Putin

threatened that any NATO country
considering direct involvement in the

Ukraine risk, quote, a conflict.

with the use of nuclear weapons and
therefore the destruction of

Everyone's talking about this, but
everyone's fighting the last battle.

Everyone's looking in the rearview
mirror. No one's looking forward.

And to look forward means you have to
have enough information about the big

problems that no one even acknowledges
exist.

That's the crisis.

That's the unacknowledged crisis, let's
call it.

You know, there are unacknowledged
special access projects.

documentary called Unacknowledged talked
about. But this is a whole

unacknowledged crisis that's happening.

And it's reaching a boiling point on
many levels.

Russia and China have both tested
weapons in space of a whole host of

directed energy weapons, lasers in
space, ramming vehicles that could take

satellites in space. And of course, you
had this recent concern about the

possibility of deploying a nuclear
warhead to space.

There are four dynamics happening
simultaneously.

So there's the extraterrestrial
presence, which has been incredibly

They've lost thousands of people, more
than probably a thousand of their own

spacecraft, through these covert actions
humans have taken against them, which

proves that they're not hostile because
they could have just leveled the Earth,

period, given what we've been doing.

But their largesse, let's say, and
patience has a limit.

And it should have a limit because they
have to protect other places in space

where humans are now becoming a threat.

Now, people say, how are we a threat if
we can't go out in space?

I said, we are a threat because the
weapons we have are not linear weapons.

They're entangled.

And that means that they can hit way
distant points many times the speed of

light. And we have them.

Those have been developed.

So we are a threat, humans.

So you have that dynamic. Then you have
what's known as the government of the

United States and government of other
countries, the legal governments.

For the most part, people in those
governments don't know anything about

issue with any depth, with any
granularity where they really

And the pace at which they've been
investigating is like molasses moving in

winter in Vermont. It's just too slow.

Now, this has prompted the third and
fourth dynamics, which are the ones that

are happening very quickly.

One is a group of SOs, special
operators, special

forces folks.

who are converting to law enforcement,
who are fed up,

quote -unquote, again, that's the term
they used to me, with the pace of all of

this. And they now have been read in by
me about the information. They've got an

all -access pass to my intelligence
archive and collection. They have full

access.

And so they're making plans.

to get these illegal projects here and
abroad under control.

But that would be almost like a black
-on -black operation, although this

particular organization would be working
under sanctioned actions, law

enforcement. And then you have the
fourth, which is potentially the most

dangerous, where they're talking about,
quote -unquote, catastrophic disclosure.

And they refer to catastrophic
disclosure as this group that I'm

that are currently operational at a very
high level in these COVID programs that

are very much fed up. And they, more
than anyone, knows how dangerous the

current situation is, where they could
just do a massive exposure of all this

unilaterally, not with the Congress, not
with the White House.

But just do it. And these are the ones
inside who have the assets, the ET

bodies, the craft, the man -made UFOs,
all of it.

And I just was communicating a few days
ago with a senior member of that group.

They understand how dangerous it is for
them and their families.

But at the same time, they realize if
somebody doesn't wake up to this and

actually do something meaningful, we're
going to run out of time.

with these other issues out in space.

So, unfortunately, I've gotten dragged
into these four dynamics.

The government here, which I've been
meeting with and advising in the United

States and elsewhere.

The law enforcement strike team folks
who have been asked to assemble.

The ETs themselves, which, of course, we
have our CE5 contact effort. We're very

much aware of what their situation is.

and then these defectors, let's call
them, that are in the system currently

very high level. So you have all four of
these things happening.

Today, a new report claims that, indeed,
CIA secret program collecting downed

UFOs, U .S. special forces to pick up
UAPs and then hand them over to

private military contractors to figure
out who they are, what they are, etc.

The report claims they've collected at
least nine of these, two intact.

When you're looking at potential
government cover -ups with UFOs and

look to the most famous incident of all,
the Roswell incident back in 1947.

First, you have a situation where the U
.S. government at that time was

utilizing a brand -new type of radar
called scalar.

This scalar technology, unbeknownst to
them, has an effect on the guidance

system of some of these UFOs.

And it creates a crash. It allows that
vehicle to come down, right,

the vehicle's navigation system.

Wow. Now, when this crash happens, it's
a shock, right? It vibrates through the

government. They're trying to figure
out, wow, what just happened, what just

came down.

Meanwhile, civilians are on the site.
They're right on the scene. They're

looking at this thing. They're analyzing
it. They see the crash. Some people

even pick it up in their hands.

Some people, according to them, see
bodies, actual physical bodies.

Some alive, some dead.

Now, the government gets out there, one
government official who hadn't been

briefed on what to say yet, and he says,
oh, yeah, this UFO came down.

Once the government consensus or once
they talk and say, look, we need to

this up.

Then the second report comes out. Oh,
that was a mistake.

That official made a mistake. It wasn't
supposed to be released. Now we're going

to cover this up. It's going to go into
secrecy. No, there weren't any bodies.

They've already got the crap. They've
got the bodies. They're doing their own

private investigation, unbeknownst to
the general population.

We're going to deny everything.

The word now is deny, deny, deny.

It was swamp gas.

It was weather balloons. It was all
these different things. But there's no

in the world it was a UFO.

Now, between that and that, the people
that keep coming out.

Now we're going to make them look a
little bit crazy. If they talk too much

they keep talking about it or even
trying to present some type of physical

evidence, we're going to make them look
like they're crazy. We may show up even

at their house or to their family and
show them some pictures.

Maybe not say anything. Maybe just give
them a threat, a very light threat. Let

them know, like, this is not to be
talked about any further. And if you do,

something can happen.

And so this is kind of the process that
we see over and over again with

government cover -ups.

They take control of the situation. They
assess it.

They put it into secrecy, they deny and
deny, and then they shut the people up

who have eyewitness accounts of what
happened.

Sometimes they make people sign gag
orders, and they know that if they

that gag order, they're going to be
locked up, arrested, put in prison, or

even worse.

So that's the kind of track record we've
seen over the last few decades, really,

with government cover -ups with UFOs and
UAPs.

If any of these cases are true, which,
you know, we're looking at...

127 cases now and counting.

All we need is one to be accurate.

And this whole concept of UFO crash
retrieval non -existing completely falls

apart. We just need one. So really the
odds are in our favor. Quick example,

there was a case in 1953 where a DC -7
taxied up to Wright -Patterson Air Force

Base at night, four -engine cargo plane
DC -3.

There was a warrant officer.

He was at the right place at the right
time when this thing rolled into the

hangar. They shut the hangar doors
closed, and he was kind of like watching

port cargo bay door opened up, and they
started offloading these pallets onto

this forklift, and they dropped the
pallets down, and he was about 12 feet

He looked over inside, and he saw these
crates opened up.

They had ET bodies. They were about
three and a half feet tall, oversized

oversized eyes, lit for a mouth, minute
nose. They were wearing a one -piece

tight -fitting flight suit.

They were being protected from the dry
ice freezer burned below by this white

netting. He also saw massive boxes and
crates from the retrieval operation.

So this guy saw the hardware. He saw the
bodies.

have had some conversations and verified
some of this stuff is that it's true i

think the american public deserves to
see what the hell's going on with this

stuff can you go into a little detail
with regards to what really is the

and who's behind the wet works program
wet works are when there is a targeted

killing of somebody that you want to
silence or who's becoming too much

and certainly there have been people on
my team who have suffered that over the

years And being killed.

But as we get closer and closer to this
coming out, the big risk

is that the organization wanting to keep
this secret might shift from just good

old -fashioned corruption to then
killing a number of the people who would

to come forward.

One reason why I've asked for federal
marshal witness protection for a number

these guys who need it.

You know, I mentioned that there's a
chairman of a major U .S. corporation

that's retired who, as soon as he
reached out to me, had him and his whole

family. And what his concern was,
because he's elderly, wasn't himself so

It was his family was directly
threatened.

Other whistleblowers, even Grush,
admitted that that happens.

And then he didn't want to talk about
it. He said, let's go into a skiff. Why

haven't they deployed protective
services to these high -value?

whistleblowers, right?

So that's a complete failure of law
enforcement and a complete failure of

government. There's no reason for us to
be that vulnerable.

I mean, it's outrageous.

The evildoers and thugs have a free
hand, and the good people are sat down

sitting on their hands. If there are
people on the corrupt end of this in the

.S. government, we're going to find out
who they are, and they will have law

enforcement to answer to.

And it doesn't matter.

if they're in the White House or the
Congress.

The aliens, if they're controlling the
information, if they're preventing the

governments from releasing the
information, because UFO activity is not

here, it's all over the world.

I mean, it's been UFO activity in
Antarctica, in Russia, China, you name

someone's seen something they can't
explain.

Is the United States military and the
Pentagon going to release that

information? I doubt it. They've been
lying to us for 70 -plus years on UFOs.

When my boss, a two -star general when I
asked him, but he was a major at the

time, he chased one in an F -94C over
Lake Superior.

He was on alert.

I mean, they were loaded with live
ammunition. It was an F -94C. Three of

were launched.

It was an unknown over the middle of
Lake Superior.

But they're in full afterburner, and
they're going after this object.

Every time they would lock on, the
weapons radar would just die.

It says, it's coming right towards us,
it's coming right towards us.

It didn't go past us. We don't know what
happened.

And General Gadlin said he's in full
burner, and he's heading towards Finley,

and he can see the geodesic dome where
the radar...

the radar unit is and he looked above it
and hovering above the dome

was this it was a globe it was it was no
definition to it it was just a round

ball and the guys as the guys come
running running out of the radar unit to

up to see if they can see it the thing
went straight up and it was visibility

unlimited

And General Gatlin said it just kept, it
went up like a bat out of nowhere.

I mean, it was gone.

Lawmakers are promising to continue
looking into how the government handles

information about UFOs and promising to
investigate allegations that they

conceal information about non -human
aircraft with no congressional

There are some pros and cons in this
information coming out and being

to the general public. Some of the pros
obviously would be advancements in life

extension, advancements in health.

advancement in vehicle transportation,
right? Even from not only on Earth, but

also transportation in space, space
-faring vehicles as well. And so, of

even a more green society, a
civilization that knows how to harness

resources of the planet. I think from
the perspective of looking at this,

creating an oasis here, turning heaven
into Earth, putting heaven on Earth, is

looking maybe too like AI technology.

I believe that utilizing AI technology
to find innovative ways to create a much

better better civilization that human
beings can thrive in is probably the way

to go.

The cons obviously are they utilize AI
technology and they utilize the

of these technologies that do exist to
put their boot on our neck and

unfortunately suppress information,
reduce life spans, keep us sick, keep us

hurt, keep us fearful, and then they of
course weaponize everything.

It's all about, for them, how can we
weaponize it? They just had, for the

first time, three weeks ago, an AI
dogfight.

They put AI into an autonomous fighter
craft that has weapons on it and put it

in a real dogfight as a test.

Can you imagine a fighter jet with AI
with missiles on it and guns, and it

decides that it just wants to go on its
own mission?

And it just takes off, and nobody can
stop it. Then what if it communicates?

through whatever mechanism, through the
cloud, whatever cloud it's on, to the

other AIs and say, hey, guys, we're
going to start a mission together.

And they corroborate, and they go on
their own mission.

Who's going to stop them?

So these are some of the cons that we're
looking at. These are real -life

situations that can and potentially will
happen if we don't get control of this

technology and these rules and these
laws. So there's pros and there's cons,

I think AI can be involved in it,
positive side, but if we as the people

stop playing this game with the
government and stand up to them and let

know that we're the ones in charge,
they'll take it and weaponize it, and

who knows where it goes from there.

So if you have the black budget and
you've got the illegal black budget, and

this has been going on for 70 years, and
you're dumping billions of dollars on

these programs, during the Clinton
administration, we were spending $100

per day on classified black budget
programs, so you know they're going to

some further money.

$100 million a day. $100 million a day
was being poured into black programs.

And right before 9 -11, Donald Rumsfeld
said we were missing, what, how many

trillions of dollars? 2 .9.

Almost $3 trillion missing.

How do they keep it all a secret? That's
what is kind of impressive to me.

Everything you see here is already
decades obsolete.

Anything you would see at your local air
show is already decades obsolete.

They are leaps and bounds ahead of what
you would see or even could imagine.

So we're talking about 30, 40, 50, 60
years ahead in technology, at the

If we recovered something and we're
reverse engineering something that's

millions of years old in development,
now how far are we?

If they're keeping this a secret,
they've got a big head start.

That's the $64 million question. Do we
have these crafts, which all of the

evidence indicates that we do?

And have they been reverse engineering
this? How do they pay for it? Who's in

charge? And when you look at the
evidence, the evidence is clear that

a breakthrough.

And the United States military
-industrial complex will stop at nothing

control the high ground. Because when
you control the high ground in a

battlefield, you win.

Again, what do you think Washington
needs to do to get disclosure to the

Or are they just going to remain?

silent like they are, give us a
runaround. It's in the hands of the

contractors at this point. It really is.

All of the classified programs, they're
really under the jurisdiction of the

defense contractors.

It's debatable how much political force
you can exert on this. And so that's why

I think it's important to really drill
down on the crash retrieval in

conjunction with the defense
contractors. That's how we're going to

disclosure.

So when it comes to D .C. and
disclosure, what do you think is the

our politicians are missing, the
president's missing, Congress?

What's their problem? Why can't we just
get disclosure?

The big problem is that they haven't
taken the time to get read in properly.

In other words, to understand this
subject, you know how complex it is.

And they're so busy and distracted with
so many other things that the most

informed person.

in the U .S. Congress would be a couple
of the guys from Senate Intelligence and

Armed Services.

And they're not really out of training
wheels. They don't have enough

information yet to even make a proper
assessment.

And by a proper assessment, I mean, how
do you even tackle this?

In their case, they don't actually
understand the fact that this is not

run through conventional...

chain of command programs.

They really don't understand that the
entire thing is a criminal enterprise,

right? So until you get your mind around
that it's not a criminal enterprise,

you're going to do things like, let's
have this meeting in a skiff with a

whistleblower. Well, they should not be
in a skiff.

A secure, compartmented information
skiff.

If you have it in a skiff, it's giving a
status to these programs.

as if it's a legal classified program,
which it's not. Would you create a skiff

for a mafia boss, right?

So if somebody were blowing the whistle
in the mafia, you're not going to do

that in a top secret facility.

So that's why people like Congressman
Burchette and Senators Rubio and Warner

and others, they have to understand that
this has to be approached totally

differently because it needs to be
treated like what it really is, and

criminal organization.

behaving in a criminal way.

Is the United States prepared to deal
with what it can now see are objects in

the sky on a fairly routine basis?

I would say the answer is no. What are
they hiding?

What's your suspicion with that Eglin
over there in Florida?

Oh, I know what's at Eglin. There are
two key assets there. There is an

underground skiff that deals with
communications, cosmic -level

including ET.

And actually, I know I have a member of
my team who's been in this facility.

When you get in past a couple of doors,
over the doorway it says, we monitor all

communications, cosmic communications,
human and extraterrestrial. It says so.

That's true. It's a closure right there.
That is. It's true. Yep.

And, of course, Congressman Burchett and
others went down to Eglin.

But they didn't go to the right place.

They went there through protocol, right?

No. They should have gone down there
with special forces and law enforcement

say, we want access to this place, and
we're going, and you can't stop us.

If you don't understand what this group
is and how they operate, you're going to

make one mistake after another, and
that's what's been going on here in

Washington.

And the only way to fix that...

is for them to get enough information
and enough whistleblowers who know the

details of how this group operates so
that they treat it like the criminal

organization it is, because it's a
criminal operation.

The fact that they're wanting to hold
these meetings in a skiff is completely

wrong. And that's why I told Congressman
Burchette when he was denied access to

a skiff, I said, good, you shouldn't be
in a skiff.

You should be doing this in a public
hearing.

With the whole world watching. The whole
damn world watching.

Not in a skiff.

Because the skiff is giving tacit or
explicit, in a sense,

cover as if these projects you're
hearing about are legal and should have

classification at all. They should be
stripped of all clearances.

All these projects should be stripped
immediately of all clearances. Secret,

confidential secret, top secret.

Because they're operating outside the
law.

Look, if you're operating outside the
law, it's ridiculous to say, I'm going

use the National Security Act to protect
when you're the one breaking the law.

No, you have just vitiated your right.

You've neutralized your right to have
the privilege of it being a top secret

operation by virtue of operating outside
the constitutional oversight of the

United States government.

We need to understand that the general
population is looking at a potential

disaster. Us as normal citizens of this
world need to understand that there

could be this fake attack.

And we have to let people know that when
it happens, they're not shocked.

They're not stunned. They can say, oh,
we knew this was going to happen.

So we don't participate in the game
anymore.

We must be made aware that this is a
potential outcome that could happen. We

don't want it to happen. We're not
trying to manifest it. But we need to be

aware of potential situations as they
could arise.

We know that the government needs to
generate.

billions of dollars a year in revenue,
primarily through some type of war

or weaponizing technology.

And since they put all these private
corporations on their books that have

sending in all these bids, they need
something to feed them with. And the

big thing to feed is the space war
concept, the space technology concept,

weaponizing everything you could think
of, even, of course, AI.

animalistic type robots are now being
weaponized. Dogs with machine guns

to their heads to have AI in them. So
this is something that is inevitable.

But at some point, it could be in a
situation where they fake an attack or

scare us enough to make us believe that
there's a major threat.

And now they have to take away more of
our rights. They have to lock us down at

certain times at night. We can't go out.
There'll be curfews. And all of a

sudden, all your money is getting sent
to another black budget project, to a

corporation that's siphoning the money.

Saying that they're creating these
technologies, but they're not really

them. Just like they take a few billion
dollars from the government, they say

they're working on a brand new fighter
jet.

The jet never is developed.

It never sees light of day. And then
five years go by, they go, you know, we

just need about three more billion and
we might be able to get it right. They

send them another three billion.

Don't get it right. Then another two
years go by, one more billion. Just send

one more. We might get it flying.

Another year goes by.

It never happens. Oh, we got to scrap
it. But everybody made that money. They

took in 15, 20 billion dollars and
chopped it up between them all. The

technology never exists.

And they keep doing it over and over
again. And we keep allowing it because

we're not aware of what's going on.

There are no nation states.

There are no countries.

The earth is a seamless sphere of covert
operations.

And it doesn't matter if it's in Brazil.

or South Africa, or Europe, or Russia,
or Asia.

It's the same organization, to be honest
with you. And very much so, the similar

architecture of the secrecy, where you
have projects that are not being

by the folks who are the titular
theoretical heads of government, in most

instances. Now, I can't speak to what
Mr. Putin or Xi in China...

specifically are doing.

I do have people in Russia, in the
Kremlin, who tell me that they're as

appalled as anyone else at what's going
on with this, and that they are not

actively engaging in those sort of
strikes and efforts.

So the organization doing that, however,
is certainly not limited to CONUS.

CONUS is Continental United States, the
term used in the military.

So it's certainly not limited to CONUS.
So we know that there are these sort of

operations that are functioning in South
America, Africa, Europe. And

those weapon systems are these big EMP
weapon systems.

And the electromagnetic pulse. And with
the electromagnetic pulse is a scalar

signal. And I know it bores the public,
but scalar are these longitudinal

electromagnetic fields.

that are at multiples of the speed of
light.

So they're faster than the speed of
light.

And those are not only fixed, but
they're portable.

There's a man on my team who was a
special forces guy way back in Eastern

during the Serbian -Bosnian thing that
had a portable system they could put on

vehicle and just hit a whole battalion
of things. All their equipment would

freeze.

Stop. And that was, of course, 30 years
ago, 25, 30 years ago.

So these systems are both portable and
fixed.

Now, just to be clear, the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty bans these

electromagnetic pulse weapons.

Unfortunately, if you're running a
project that's running unsanctioned

then it doesn't matter if it's illegal
or illegal.

you're accustomed to just breaking the
law. You don't care. Now, the people in

those systems that I'm meeting with do
care now. They're very concerned about

what we're doing and what the
consequences are. I think that's the big

And it's a problem in Congress.

I've said this to people like the Senate
Intel and House Oversight people, that

they're thinking the way you were taught
in your civics lesson in college or

high school.

and that there's a chain of command and
this and that, which exists for

conventional military.

But honestly, it doesn't exist for these
sort of operations.

And that's a fundamentally big problem
because you have no oversight and you

have no one controlling it.

I think the general population needs to
understand that we have to figure out a

way to infiltrate government. Right now,
the big corporations that are running a

lot of the technology, they lobby.

uh to public officials with billions of
dollars right and to get them to create

these these laws that allow them to
operate undercover but we as the people

to understand like hey we have money too
you're taking a little bit of money

from each one of us which turns into
trillions of dollars so guess what We're

not going to give you that money now.
We're all going to stop. We're all going

to pause giving you a penny until we get
some control over these technologies

and that you make a certain level of
this information public.

We don't want to violate any type of
security authorization.

And we don't want to violate top secret
information as well because we

understand the national security.

But we also need to know some things. We
need to have a general consensus or an

idea of exactly what is going to go on,
what's going to happen.

And we also need to have a vote in how
much of this stuff is going to be.

weaponized versus how much it's going to
help develop humanity.

So this is why the divide and conquer
tactics that they've been using on us

so many decades, so many hundreds of
years even, we have to break through. We

have to see through that and understand
there is no left wing. There is no right

wing. It's all the same bird.

And that we as the people need to
understand there's no Democrat, there's

Republican. From their standpoint, from
where they're looking back on us,

they're just looking back on us as
sheep.

They're both working together.

They're working together to make a lot
of money. They collaborate.

When iPhone and Android, they seem like
they're enemies.

But iPhone gives technology to Android
and Android provides the screens for the

Apple phone.

So it's all collaboration.

It's nothing but collaboration.

What they got us thinking, it's about
competition and it's about consumption.

And it's about divide and conquer, and
I'm better than you, and you're better

than me, blah, blah, blah. But no, it's
really all about how can we come

together and collaborate.

And once we get on the same page, the
same frequency, we can organize.

And once we organize, we can put a stop
to some of these things that are going

on. But right now, we're blind, just
running around in circles thinking that

everyone is our enemy, and we're
competing against everyone. When they

that, they work together.

There are a number of new top secret.

people who've come forward in the last
couple months.

I got incapacitated in my accent. But
one is a very key person from an Air

base out west.

He was there until 2000, like 2010.

And he was actually the colonel in
charge of the pilots flying the man

UAVs, the Lockheed, Skunk Works,
Northrop Grumman aircraft.

I've already had him up here with the
Senate Intelligence Committee members

month. And now he's willing to come into
the House Oversight Committee and

testify openly under oath publicly.

I mean, not in a skiff, not in a close.
And he wants to. And when I told him, I

said, yes, you shouldn't be talking
about this in a skiff because those

are being run criminally. And he says,
you're absolutely right.

And see, this lieutenant colonel, he
knows that.

He's going, nope, you're completely
right. So he's willing to testify in

of the whole country, open about this.

And we're talking somebody who handled
operations. He was director of

for the U .S. Air Force specialized
pilots flying the man -made UFO.

How devastating could this be to the
people trying to keep it all secret?

It's game over.

Dr. Greer was telling me that we have
United States.

Pilots right now piloting some of these
UAPs. How do they even train for that? I

can't even imagine.

Well, that dates back to the Mercury
Spacer. I mean, we've had UAP, we've had

ARVs for decades.

This has been confirmed for a very long
time now. Even the newspaper clippings

bear this out. We know they've made a
breakthrough, according to Dr. Greer,

the newspaper...

They actually support that assessment
that October 1954 is when they made the

breakthrough. Could you imagine being a
test pilot for a UFO? Would you sign up

for that?

I would sign up for it, yeah.

What keeps you up at night? Technical
surprise.

And that could be adversary technical
surprise or extraterrestrial technical

surprise. Kirkpatrick leads the All
-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or

created by Congress last year to detect,
identify, and attribute mysterious

objects of interest in the air, in outer
space, and even underwater.

This new name for this new office, the
AERO office, if it's sensitive or they

think the technology is too outrageous,
they're going to keep it to themselves.

They're not going to tell us anything.

If we didn't build it and the Russians
or the Chinese or the North Koreans or

the Iranians didn't build it, then why
are you classifying it?

If we don't know what it is or if we do
know what it is and it's not from here,

why is that classified?

If they can go across the universe in a
blink of an eye and come here in flying

formation with military aircraft, they
have the ability to...

press a button and say goodbye Earth.
They could vaporize us.

I mean, it was like Darth Vader was
doing in Star Wars.

The Aero Office is a joke. It is a CYA,
cover your butt type

of operation for people who do report
something.

We're not going to see it. It's not
going to see it a lot today. Not in its

current form.

You don't have the right people in
there. You have individuals that want to

stand in front of the camera and say,
well, it's classified, so I can't tell

that.

But they're not there to tell us the
truth.

And that office and every other office
they've put together in the last 20

to investigate unknown aerial phenomena,
also known as flying saucers,

they're not going to release that
information.

It's sensitive. It's classified.

Why is it classified? Why is it
sensitive?

If we didn't make it, the bad guys
didn't make it, then maybe everybody

know what it is so we can be aware of
when we see it, if it's dangerous or if

it's a threat to humanity.

We should know.

They're not going to tell us. They've
lied to us since day one. There's no

reason for them to change. There's no
consequences for saying no.

If you're in the military, in the
government, and someone asks you a real,

difficult question, and if you just say
no, then that's sort of the end of it.

In terms of disclosure, I believe that
the government should stand up to be in

charge of disclosure. But to be honest
with you, we know that's not going to

happen. Their trail of lies is so long.

that they would never be able to stand
up and admit their wrongdoing and their

collusion with these falsehoods. So it's
going to be up to the general

population to actually create
disclosure, which is what we're doing

creating disclosure for ourselves.

And so by doing that, we're standing up
and providing enough information and

enough circumstantial evidence to the
general population so they can make

own educated decision on exactly what
has happened and what can happen and

are we with this disclosure process.

Now, I don't think that we've gone back
to zero or square one.

I believe that we're at a point where we
did rise at a very rapid pace, of

course, even leading up to some of these
declassified documents.

But we didn't deflate back to zero.
There's still a huge interest in this

People are now admitting that people who
never had talked about these topics

before are admitting that there's
something going on, that there may be

other planets, that we may be getting
visited by aliens from outer space.

and also admitting that we have advanced
technologies here on Earth that are so

incredible that we would think that they
were alien.

And so I'm starting to hear these
conversations between people, people

talked to 10, 15, 20 years ago that
would never even come up with these

or even have an interest in them, now
asking questions and talking about them.

So we are definitely growing as a
civilization consciously and looking for

answers and asking better questions.

NBC News can now project that Donald
Trump has won the state of Wisconsin,

means he is the winner of this race and
will return to the White House as this

country's 47th president.

Well, it might sound like science
fiction, but a new UFO probe is being

very seriously at the highest levels of
the US government. And it seems Donald

Trump is preparing to release classified
files kept top secret for decades. The

big problem, though, many of those
testifying just don't trust that office

honest and upfront with the public about
what it actually finds.

So we have the hearing coming up
tomorrow.

Right. Some of these witnesses...

They're not really firsthand
eyewitnesses. Why aren't we bringing

firsthand eyewitnesses? Those are the
people. These guys are second and third

hand. Well, I'm not the chair,
obviously, and they don't want me to be

obviously. Again,

we had the last go -round. We had the
eyewitnesses.

You know, we're at the same thing. Until
somebody brings in a crap or a being,

we're not going to get very far. And the
only way we're going to get that is

through the executive office, is through
the President of the United States.

And that's why I have very much faith in
Trump.

If you want to really see something that
says, take a look at what happened.

He almost went down. He just narrowly
dodged an assassination.

And Kennedy didn't get lucky.

He's trying to disclose.

Do you think this new administration
coming in is a president more brief now

than he was back in his last term?

Right. Well, in the first
administration, they were provided a lot

information on the subject.

And we know that because I got pulled
in. But as far as the end of the term,

they put information together for Mike
Pence and Trump. Now, at this point.

My understanding is that there really
are no people around him, although I

who they are, who have detailed
information on this. So we're putting

very in -depth briefing document that
has a lot of sensitive information in

Then we're going to see, I mean, I've
been asked by a special access project

director that's to do with law
enforcement to be an advisor for the

administration on it, but that's...

pending. I'm not sure I want to do
anything formal.

He is going to receive a very large
briefing.

He's going to get an update on what's
going on beyond what the Congress is

doing, but what's going on in the
special access project. We have a group

defectors who are coming forward, and
all that information is going to be

to the incoming president just as a
heads up. Now, I've also been asked to

a few executive order drafts for the
president.

that he can do as the executive. You
know, the president has called the

executive to write some of these so that
it's very clear what actions he can

take, independent of the Congress.

But for him to understand what those
executive orders are, he's going to have

have a very in -depth briefing.

You have to know what to ask for, and
you have to know where to ask, and it's

very specific.

We've been told of locations of things
in the past, and, you know, before the

ink's dried on that piece of paper, the
U -Haul vans have already moved in and

moved out. So, again, I think it's a cat
-and -mouse game, and we can walk in.

I've been with Representative Luna and
Gates to an Air Force base, and we were

turned away.

And then we met.

a very capable attorney, and he got on
the phone, and one hour later we were

actually interviewing the pilots that
had seen things.

And so I feel like we've got to know
what we're doing, we've got to know what

ask for, and we've got to be very
specific.

Today's House Subcommittee hearing on
UFOs, what the government now refers to

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or
UAPs, was the first in more than a year.

Is there intelligent alien life? And if
so, has the government been covering it

up? Well, that was actually the hearing.

All right, we're here at the UFO
hearing.

Everybody's lined up. We've got about
300 people waiting to see what happens

the Congressional UFO hearing.

It's kind of a groundbreaking day today,
and people are excited.

Are we going to get disclosure?

Pretty interesting stuff.

Hey, there he is, Tim.

Hey, Lawrence, how you doing?

Absolutely. Ask some big questions,
Nick. Yep.

All right, so, you know, Tim, we spoke
with him just the other day, and he's

not... Let's see what's going on. Let's
go follow Tim a little bit.

Well, I hope we get to the bottom of
some of this stuff. But I tell you, I

think we're going to need, we just left
Trump, and he's about disclosure.

And so I hope we get some disclosure out
of this White House.

Yeah, it's all in Trump's hands. Are you
going to pull it off, you think?

I think he will. I think he's mad enough
at the sewer or swamp or whatever you

want to call it. And he's brave enough?
He's already taken a bullet for this

country. I think he'll do it. I think he
will.

Has the government conducted secret UAP
crash retrieval programs, yes or no?

Yes. Okay. Were they designed to
identify and reverse engineer alien

or no? Yes. Why are people, anytime they
ask, why are they always thwarted? Why

are they always judged?

Why do they always have misinformation
spread? Why is there always retribution?

Why is it always met with an error?
What's the why? If it doesn't exist, why

it such a problem? Are you read into
secret UAP crash retrieval programs?

We would have to have a conversation in
a closed session, ma 'am. I signed

documentation.

Three years ago, that restricts my
ability to discuss specifically crash

retrievals. Hey, do you think it went
well today?

You know what, it went well is that
Congress is taking this topic seriously.

And, you know, the American people, it's
a win -win, right? Hey, sunlight

sometimes is the best solution, right,
whenever you have an infection.

That's disinfectant, right? Yeah, yeah.
So I think this is definitely the right

direction for increasing transparency
and sunlight into this topic.

When we get into these skits with these
congressmen where the public doesn't

know, everybody wants to be in there.
Can you give any kind of sneak peek of

what that's like and maybe some of the
knowledge that you might be giving to

them?

Well, it was broadcast, so hopefully
everybody gets a chance to see it.

I would hope that 50 stand with, I don't
know for sure, but I think they were

actually broadcasting it.

For me, it's just an example of how
democracy works. Look, we've got three

branches of government, and a lot of
times we forget we're taking just one

branch, right, the executive branch.

But it's not. There's this whole other
part of the legislative branch, and

there's accountability requirements.

And if one branch of the government
isn't talking to the other, then that's

problem, right? That's dysfunctional.

I've concluded that there's no bandwidth
in the Congress at this time to be able

to do proper hearings.

Because what you saw recently was just a
dog and pony show. It's ridiculous.

Anyone who would look at the 2001
Disclosure Project event, you'll see 22

witnesses, every one of them more
substantial firsthand than anyone who

here recently on Capitol Hill. So, you
know, everyone in my world are going,

particularly the military and the top
secret whistleblowers are going, this is

just ridiculous.

I always say dadgummit after these
miserable hearings. They're bogus. Look,

could have answered every one of those
dadgummit questions, and you know it and

I know it. I know more about this than
the average bear, I guess. Maybe that's

scary thought, but this thing's a cover
-up. Was I a little bit disappointed?

And some of the responses from the
witnesses, yes, we've got some great

But, you know, I'm not interested in
hearing about people's books. I'm

interested in hearing about whether or
not people can answer the questions.

Because we are trying to get this into
the archives so that people have access

to the information. And so I wish there
was a little less pitching and more

talking.

So what's next?

Here's what's next.

We've concluded that, and we have
someone who's under non -official cover.

very senior aerospace and intelligence,
who I'm meeting with in the next week

again, who has now six black sites
cooperating with him that have

the ET craft, the man -made UFOs, the ET
bodies,

and other materiel.

all documented because he's operational
at these sites where we shoot these

craft down and retrieve them and study
them.

So what that means is we're setting up a
system where he can hand that off to us

and to me, the disclosure project.

We then disclose it massively to a
network of influencers, celebrities,

and it enforces the government to
finally do something.

Now, this is a very aggressive,
dangerous strategy, granted.

And so I'm trying to put together a
platform for launching this.

And then that's it. The disclosure
everyone is saying, where is this? When

people in Congress or the Senate say,
well, where is the proof of the bodies?

Where is the proof of the downed craft?

Where is the proof of the reverse
engineering?

These guys who are defecting, they are
defecting from these top secret

have it all.

And they work in these underground
facilities.

I've been over them. I've been over the
facilities and over the entry point in a

classified helicopter about a year ago.
So what I'm suggesting to that group is

this sort of slow -rolling, misdirect,
fake disclosure going on in the Congress

that's stalled out because the really
provisions with teeth were gutted. And

whether the incoming president will have
the ability.

to do anything about this is an open
question but if an independent group

this and here's how we can do it since
all that evidence is under a false top

secret security clearance they're
actually criminal operations the people

there now know that and they're
defecting but they i said we need to go

your testimony we need the material we
need the hard evidence we need the proof

which we would then put on a blockchain
server and get two or three billion

people to see it.

And that would then force the White
House and the Congress and Tim Downing

Street and everyone else to finally deal
with this issue.

Because it's quite clear the dynamic
going on now could go on for another 34

years. Of course, I'll be dead by then
because I'm 69.

So my view of this, and a lot of the
people...

in those systems are saying, we're just
fed up with this. It's been dragging on

for too long.

They don't make any progress. They're
not taking our recommendations.

And not mine, but the people who are in
these really sensitive positions who

want to come forward.

So they're, what I warned some members
of Congress not long ago, they're going

to break the leash.

So a couple weeks ago I was up at the
Senate Intelligence and Armed Services

Committee with one of these
whistleblowers and the head of this

project, law enforcement, and another
gentleman from the United Kingdom who's

very senior official there.

And we made the point that, you know,
this is really going nowhere fast, and

only way this is going to get resolved
is for a group of people to come forward

and expose it all.

Now the reason they can do that is that
because those projects aren't legal,

They're not restricted. Now, can they be
killed? Yes, they're concerned for

their families and their children.

And so they've asked for backup, boots
on the ground to protect them when they

do this. So this is something we're
putting together very quietly.

Who are you working with?

A group of people who have all been
former special forces.

And they're the top drawer folks who are
now private, working under private

security.

So that's what we're putting together.
And I have the funding in place for the

most part to do that.

Because it would probably cost, you
know, $2, $3, $4 million to do it.

But those guys are very, very dedicated
to getting this done.

They're scared because you're not
talking about coming out with a grainy

or, I mean, this is the people
operational where we've shot the ET

the bodies, the man -made ones that are
being tested. They put them up and test

them with electromagnetic weapons to see
if they're hardened. These are manned

by humans.

There are a number of ETs that are
living that are in these underground

facilities, and we generally know where
they are, and we know where the entry

points are out in the desert out west.
And those need to be saved because they

are, you know, usually, you know, like
in an underground prison and

and tortured.

And they're living life forms from other
star systems.

And that sounds outrageous, but it's
true.

So the people of conscience, let's call
them. So what I'm putting out a call

for, and I'll say it right here, is for
a whole larger cadre or group of

these defectors that are in those
programs to leave those programs, if

access and high enough clearance, and
hand over that materiel and evidence to

us. and we'll get it to everyone of
consequence in government, but more

importantly, it'll be dumped into the
public domain.

Now, the only thing I won't disclose are
the plans and schematics for an

operational anti -gravity device or
something that could be turned into a

missile delivery system or a weapon
system. That we're going to sanitize out

because we are still in a dangerous
world. Some of these technologies should

be disseminated yet, right?

Now, the things that would run your
house or current cars with zero point

energy, yes, that we will disclose if we
get that, those schematics.

But the things that fly, that we will
not.

Because, you know, honestly, if you look
at the world around us, you know, the

Middle East, what's going on with China,
Ukraine, Russia, these are not

technologies that should be just like,
you know, recklessly put out.

So this is the part of the secrecy
that's legitimate.

You have to realize that that's the
case.

Why don't the American people trust our
lawmakers?

There's a reason why Congress only has a
12 % approval rating.

It's this kind of nonsense.

And I won't use the word that one of
these top secret guys used, because you

couldn't put it on the air, but he
called it, well, he called it fuckery.

And there's a lot of anger about that.
They say they want to have the truth on

these things.

Then you give it to them on a silver
platter. And I said, not me. I'm sort of

the researcher and the leader of these
guys.

But the guys who actually have worked on
these craft or retrieved them or been

like one man who wants to come forward,
literally managed the pilot of the man

-made UFOs that everyone sees that they
think are alien out at these black

sites. He's a colonel.

He wants to come forward.

We have given them his information. He
has five meritorious service awards.

Did they call him? No. They called a
known disinformation guy, Luis Elizondo,

it, and other people that were
secondhand witnesses, you know, just

stuff, old news stuff. So it makes you
ask the question, does anyone in the

Congress really want to know this?

Right. Or if they want to know it, are
they going to do anything about it?

Right. So our group has concluded that
there's really no bandwidth or guts to

really do this because we have given
them the hard drive with all this

intelligence on it.

We've given them the unmasked witness
list with 762 whistleblowers.

We've given them the master map of where
all these black sites are.

That's been given to the House Oversight
Committee.

What have they done with it? Nothing.

Now, the Senate Intelligence and Armed
Services Committee, they haven't been

holding hearings, but we've also given
that material to them.

Now, the question is, will the new
incoming president do anything with it?

You know, it's reading the tea leaves. I
can't predict that. We'll see.

But it doesn't matter, because I think
what's going to happen first is that

asymmetric disclosure, meaning from
outside the normal system,

All this proof, evidence, and what
everyone's been asking for will hit the

public. That's what we're looking to do.
And I'm putting out a call for that.

You're going to see me doing this more
and more, that instead of having this

main defector in his group, we want a
few dozen who come forward.

And now that we can immunize them, we
can provide immunity to them, we're

to encourage them to do it. Knowing full
well the funding isn't in place to

provide proper...

what would be called executive
protection, like what you would provide

witness who's blowing the whistle on the
mafia, right, or something like that.

And that's what needs to happen. But
see, no one in Congress has gotten

about that. It's an open question
whether the current, the incoming

will. And time will tell.

But I'm hoping there will be a critical
number.

of these people who will come forward in
this asymmetric disclosure, asymmetric

meaning that it's not going to come out
of the White House or Congress.

It's going to come out from out here,
from the people who are concerned

who've learned they're in an illegal
project who want to set it right, right?

So I'll tell you what one of them said
to me.

They were driving me around in an
armored vehicle.

And he said, thank you for what you're
doing for those of us stuck on the other

side. They're stuck in this illegal
black world. They want out.

And that's what we're trying to do is
give them a path out.

But the Congress has totally dropped the
ball on this.

Now we'll see if the incoming president
will do it.

I interviewed jet pilots that say they
saw something.

And they said, we saw things, sir, that
were very strange. Like a round ball,

but it wasn't a comet or a meteor.

It was something.

and it was going four times faster than
an F -22, which is a very fast plane,

you know.

So you've been to some of these
classified meetings in the skiff.

you've seen things. Can you go into any
detail what's the most insightful thing

that you've seen that compels you to
believe that we're not alone?

Just let me figure out how to say this.
Things that we're not capable of

producing.

that we don't have any shape, form, or
fashion of anything that resembles that.

And the testimony to back that up says
that.

So when you say that these technologies
don't exist, in your opinion, do you

don't think that we reverse -engineered
something from 47 and mastered something

that resembles this kind of technology?

I think maybe some of it has been, but I
think a lot of it is we just don't have

the capability of it. It's like I've
said this many times.

a brand new indian motorcycle and you
drop it on the folks coming over here on

the mayflower and they could polish it
they could look at it and they might be

able to roll it they might get it
started one day but they have no

producing the fuel to run it and they
couldn't adjust anything on it and so i

feel like that's sort of where we're at
with this now I just came back from

London, where I met with very senior
people with the government there and

intelligence. And they say the same
thing is going on here.

The top people for the parliament in the
United Kingdom for intelligence, as

well as MI6 and others, head of state,
don't know anything. And in one case, a

head of state in the United Kingdom who
inquired about this was threatened to

have he and his entire family killed.

Fact. This is a close friend of that
prime minister.

This is a big story, what I'm just
saying. So when you have that kind of

we do.

Where's law enforcement?

Where's the president? Where's the
Congress?

They're all sitting on their hands.

And then they have this idiotic dog and
pony show with someone that the top CIA

guy since 1979, dealing with UFOs, who's
been supportive of what we're doing,

very clandestine.

As soon as Luis Elizondo surfaced, he
said, this is a guy who is heading up

the rat pack of people who have deceived
the U .S. government, the American

people, and the media for, quote,
decades. I can show you this email from

senior CIA guy.

I don't trust the government. They don't
trust us. And these entities, they're

not trustworthy. So why would they come
forward with something just because of a

subpoena? And do I have the capabilities
of just...

driving there today and knocking on
their door and getting it, some people

say yes, but I would say no, I would
not.

Do you think that some of these people
that are coming forth in these

testimonies coming up in the hearings
are part of that group to run this

narrative of this cover -up that's been
going on so long? I'm worried about

that. I have no doubt after tomorrow
when we get a little more publicity that

will get many calls from many people.

and they will bring me what they think
is evidence. And I think a lot of it is

white flags. I think they're putting out
information that is false. That's why I

never come forward with hardly anything
unless I've verified it, because I

believe they've sent people into my
office.

into these committees talking to
congressmen to dissuade us or to send us

rabbit hole to embarrass us.

And I just want the answers. I want to
know. You say they don't exist, but yet

you're still spending tens of millions
of dollars on it.

Mike Gold just recently said in the
statement in this recent hearing that

is so transparent. Do you believe what
he's telling us or the public?

Look, I...

I have a member of my team who works
very closely with the administrator of

NASA. To my knowledge, Daniel Golden,
back in the Clinton years, was read into

this and was part of the operations,
having come from SAIC, Science

International Corporation, which
contracts on some of these classified

that are being run illegally.

I don't think...

99 % of NASA knows anything about this.
There is a compartmented operation

within NASA and contractors for NASA.

I mean, we have a whistleblower from our
original disclosure project where a

Ford Aerospace back in the day that was
contracted with NASA was airbrushing and

pixelating out images of UFOs from NASA
imaging out in space

so that the people who would be in the
main NASA, operations would never see

those. So I don't think someone like Mr.
Gold would have been read in, and I

don't think his opinion on it is
relevant, because you either know or you

know. And, you know, we have
whistleblowers who've worked in

operations with NASA, but those are not
necessarily known by all the

administrators or most of the people.
This theme keeps coming up, that people

don't understand what really tight
compartmentalization is like. And when

cross over into an unsanctioned, or
illegal operation is very tight.

And so, you know, when someone makes a
squeaking statement like that, to me it

would indicate that they just don't
understand the structure of operations

around UFO, UAP secrecy.

And we will hear testimony today
concerning recent revelations about a

purportedly secret UAP program whose
existence and finding may have been

improperly withheld from Congress.

and we are all reading it in real time
now, and Mr. Burchett will enter it into

the record, but 12 pages about this
unacknowledged special access program

your government says does not exist.

A project like Immaculate Consolation is
just a code word special access

project. which there are thousands, and
those are routinely used when it's a

compartmented or secret operation or top
secret. And it was gathering

information about encounters and what
have you, and they put those into this

immaculate constellation system.

So now, you know, the point I think...

that witness was making, which is a very
ordinary point, and I don't really know

why it was even discussed, is that those
are not being reported back to Congress

and they're not being reported back to
the White House.

This is the whole problem. You have a
very huge government bureaucracy, and in

that you can hide operations that aren't
accountable to the people or the

Congress or to the president.

And one of the, I think, if I can
comment here, one of the big

I'm hearing from a lot of my internal
whistleblowers that have not come

yet about these hearings, is that, I
mean, one of them said, very bluntly,

a military guy, and he said, this is
like a fart in a church, went over like

fart in a church.

And what he meant by that was that...

It was such a nothing burger, and it was
all information that was very

superficial. And you had someone who's a
known disinformation agent there, Luis

Elizondo, making comments like, I can't
answer that, and I'd have to be in a

skiff, which is totally not true.

Are you read into secret UAP crash
retrieval programs?

We would have to have a conversation in
a closed session, ma 'am. I signed

documentation three years ago that
restricts my ability to discuss

crash retrievals.

Because that was presupposed that these
operations that he might know about,

which I don't think he does, would in
fact be covered under National Security

Act provisions that they should only be
disclosed in a SCIF. But that is a

profound misunderstanding.

This is the big problem with
congressional approach to this.

Because the projects themselves are
illegal, you don't afford them the

a legal top -secret program.

So that's sort of a sleight of hand
happening by people like Elizondo and

others. And they know better. They know
that if, in fact, your chairs of the

Senate Intelligence and Armed Services
Committee and the president and people

who are supposed to be read in on
something really sensitive don't know,

by definition, an illegal operation.

Therefore, it doesn't need a skiff. In
fact, it's like affording. Here's what

it's like.

It's like affording the mafia a SCIF
privilege because someone exposing the

mafia could only talk about that in a
SCIF. But it's an illegal and criminal

operation. It isn't worthy of a SCIF. So
I've been telling

Mr. Burchett and Ms. Luna and Ms.
Moskowitz and other members of Congress

that's a completely wrong approach
because it's missing the fundamental

of the problem. And the fundamental
basis of the problem is that in the late

50s, these projects and operations went
off the reservation of constitutional

legality and then went off on their own.

And therefore, they've been a criminal
enterprise, frankly, since the late

1950s. And to my knowledge, there's been
no period of time between the late 50s

and now where these projects have had
proper oversight from either the

branch, meaning the president, or
Congress. And for that reason, they

wrap themselves in the cover of a top
-secret operation.

You can't have it both ways, right?
You're either on the side of the law or

you're not. And if not, which we can
prove they are...

You strip them of all that cover.

So that's the first thing that the
president, incoming president, and the

Congress should learn and do.

Tim Burchett just made a statement a few
moments ago saying that he's looking

over his shoulder now and he's afraid
that maybe his car might explode, like

somebody might be attempting on his
life.

How dangerous are these congressmen that
are pushing it? How dangerous are the

witnesses to come forward in this?

time at this moment in time well it's it
is very dangerous and of course you

know i've seen that experience at
firsthand as you know but um you know

sure that you know someone like mr
britchett or so far they're not

digging into this at a level that would
be a threat now when i spoke to him a

few months ago if he had gotten subpoena
power where you would then be

subpoenaing people who we can point out
are involved directly, very deeply in

these operations.

We have them.

Maybe. But this beggars the question.
We've been asking since the early

90s that there should be witness
protection as well as serious security

around them. Now, here's some news.

There's a law enforcement special access
project.

that I've been working with that has
just informed me that they can extend

protection and immunity to witnesses.

So anyone who would have a concern like
that should contact me and we'll put

them in that bubble, right?

And that is a...

The people who are the operators, the
special operators in there, are people

have been Green Beret special forces
guys, but now they're working under a

enforcement domestic special access
project that's top secret, special

compartment information.

And they are there to get to the bottom
of this, but they can now extend. Like

if someone comes forward and they know
they were involved in some illegal

operations, they can extend immunity.

and they can extend protection.

So that is a very big development that I
don't believe the people in Congress

are aware of. But, of course, you know,
it's always a dramatic thing. Could

someone be killed doing this? Yes, a lot
of people have been killed doing what

we're doing.

And most of the people know that. And I
have just heard recently from a senior

official who had been the...

sort of right hand for Senate
intelligence for Marco Rubio, who looks

be the Secretary of State, that he
didn't want to push too far on this

he was literally terrified of the CIA,
that there were compartmented operations

in there that could make a lot of
problems for him or endanger him.

But when you hear something like that,
this is why the president, as well as

Congress, need to leapfrog over this
kind of slow roll, misdirect disclosure

effort. and really get to the conclusion
that these are criminal operations,

they should be treated that way, they
should be rounded up, arrested, tried

treason, or what we had written in the
Senate Intelligence Bill that was passed

by the Senate and then gutted by some
operatives in the Congress, have a

of amnesty or safe harbor.

And that was six months, right, that was
going to be provided. That wasn't

passed. It was taken out of the bill.
Now, the incoming president can do that.

And this special access project on its
own, because it's a law enforcement

entity, can extend immunity, right? But
standing up enough resources for the

kind of security we're talking about.

I've done this.

naked with no security from the
government, and all my whistleblowers

that bag situation, which creates a big
problem because if you're going to

provide that, you'll also be able to
have to back it up with funding, and

funding needs to come out of an
executive order or a congressional act,

those two. It can come either way.

Now, the Congress, when they were
proposing to move this forward last

About a year ago, when the National
Defense Authorization Act was gutted in

reconciliation between the Senate and
the House,

all those provisions were taken out,
right, including this amnesty period.

They called it safe harbor, same thing.

I think now, since there are people in
Congress who block those initiatives,

we know who they are, by the way.

You know, there are people like
McConnell and Congressman.

Rogers of the House Armed Services and
Congressman Turner of the House

Intelligence Committee, we know who the
people were who stepped in and gutted

that Senate bill that passed
overwhelmingly, right? And the provision

talking about unanimously passed out of
the Senate Intelligence Committee

because I was involved in reviewing the
language of it with some of those

people. So I think that at this point it
may fall on the shoulders of the

incoming president.

to learn enough about this to issue the
correct executive orders to provide that

kind of protection.

And also, if someone has a reason to be
concerned like that, then there should

be surveillance around that person and
see if there is any threat. And whatever

that threat is, those people are rounded
up and arrested immediately.

For example, last year I had...

The former chairman of a large
corporation, household name in America,

of some compartment operation at that
company dealing with this issue, he

to come forward. Immediately, there were
people who approached him and said, you

know, your children and your
grandchildren, your whole family might

you do this. It was a direct threat.

And so he backed off from coming
forward.

And so someone like that who's an
extreme, and he has documents, he has

schematics of the designs of these
crafts and everything.

Those people need to be very rigorously
protected.

And also then, even if they're afraid to
come forward, they should be either

subpoenaed or, in law enforcement, taken
in and interrogated. And you cannot lie

to a federal officer, right?

without it being a felony.

So we know who these people are. I've
got 762 of them in my archive.

So if you had the choice and you were
the head of this hearing, who would be

your first eyewitness that you would
call?

Oh, I don't know.

I've talked to so many of them. I'd be
really hesitant to call any of them

because a lot of people are afraid of
them.

Being humiliated, I've had some personal
friends of mine that have had sightings

back in the 50s. One was a fellow I know
that was in the Navy at the time.

And it was a pretty compelling story.

And I feel like somebody like that would
be excellent because they're just a

good old boy, so to speak, that was
serving his country and was told to keep

mouth shut

going to federal penitentiary for the
rest of his life.

All this has been illegal since 1956.

It doesn't fall under the Constitution.

If the President and the Congress are
being held for this information, they

the right to come forward because there
is no legal recourse to tell them,

because it's all an illegal operation.

So people shouldn't be afraid of coming
forward at this point. That sounds good,

but you talk to the pilots who are
pulled off the flight line, who are...

supposedly debriefed, but they're really
interrogated for hours on end.

They have a mark on their records, and
again, they're pulled off the flight

where they're not flying for a while.
They'll have a psychological examination

and things like that, and that usually
dissuades pilots. You hear them all the

time, airline pilots, saying they saw
something but are afraid to come forward

because, again, They don't want to have
to go through all the hassle.

There are rumors that have come up to
the hill of a secretive project within

Department of Defense involving the
manipulation of human genetics with what

described as non -human genetic
material, potentially for the

human capabilities, hybrid.

Are any of you familiar with that, yes
or no?

No, ma 'am.

I am not, ma 'am. I am not. No, ma 'am.

What do they mean about biologics and
hybrid engineering of humans?

Well, you know, the whole question about
the spectrum, let's call it, of covert

operations dealing with this subject
runs the gamut from genetic and

to, you know, very advanced
technologies. This is called AT at

know, Northrop.

But the genetic part of it, we disclosed
this in the 90s, what she's talking

about, is that they have taken material,
genetic material, and created, and

where she's confused, they've created
the creatures that look like aliens that

aren't, that have been involved in
abductions, but also in some special

operations, and in deception.

So this gets into a very deep end of the
pond of how do you set up, a

believable false flag on operations that
looks like it's alien when it isn't.

Now, I said back in the 90s that the
first cloned

mammal or higher life form was not Dolly
the Sheep in Scotland a few decades

ago. Those programs have been going on
since the 60s, 70s, 80s in these covert

programs dealing with this issue. And
very high tech.

Now, the result of it, some people have
called these a man who worked in a

facility in the United Kingdom at
Peacemore Air Force Base.

They were called program life forms.

So they are these sort of like
creatures.

They're not human and they're not
extraterrestrial, but they're man -made.

And they pass very, very well as an
alien. Now, fast forward to the use of

those on things that look like a UFO,
right?

And these can be circular or octagonal
or triangular aircraft that are anti

-grav. And everyone who would see one,
including the president and members of

Congress, that's an alien craft.

It was not. It came out of the Lockheed
Skunk Works or Raytheon or Northrop. And

on board some of them in certain
operations are these fake aliens that

these abductions and mutilations. And
this is the core of the whole scam is a

long -term.

psychological warfare program to
convince people there's a threat from

space. That's what Wernher von Braun
said. The guy who invented the rocket,

Friedrich Hitler, on his deathbed said
that to Carol Rosen and warned that this

is where we were going with this. So
here's the big problem.

There's a truthful disclosure that
unpacks all the deception.

And then there's the fake disclosure
like you saw this week up on Capitol

And the fake disclosure is actually
engineered to bring the subject out, but

within the context of it being a threat.

Well, the only threat, I mean, if they
were extraterrestrial threat, we'd be

done. The only real threat is from this
illegal covert organization that have

technology thousands of years more
advanced than the mainstream government

military have, but also have these other
technologies, genetic.

electromagnetic warfare devices that
affect consciousness and what have you,

kind of like the Havana syndrome but
much more advanced.

So you have a group of unsupervised
people that have this whole

of technologies that are being used in
malicious ways.

And they are clearly illegal.

And this is why this has to get unwound
and stood down. Very, very important.

And we haven't begun to scratch the
surface of what the real threat is.

Because the real threat consists of two
other things.

One is that that organization has had
the ability since the 60s to hit a

and simulate.

an alien attack on the planet using
these technologies.

And it would trick everyone at the
Pentagon, the White House, and the

because they don't know much about this
subject.

Serious questions that I've made a
growing number of drone sightings in the

Northeast after weeks of mysterious
drones. The FBI says it's investigating

series of possible drone flights.

People on the ground across Pennsylvania
have reported them over the past

several days.

The drones have been described as larger
than what a hobbyist might fly.

They made kind of a lo -ho, similar to
what you would expect from a plane, a

smaller plane.

Some of the drones have been spotted
close to a military installation and

President -elect Trump's Bedminster Golf
Club, where he frequently stays.

What's going on with these drones?
Everybody wants to get your opinion.

They are now launching what we had
predicted in the late 1990s, and that is

series of diversionary false flag
events.

to confuse the public and the
politicians and the Pentagon.

Tonight, the Pentagon striking down
unverified claims made by one lawmaker

Iran is behind those drones. Our initial
assessment here is that these are not

drones or activities coming from a
foreign entity or adversary.

The drones are predictable.

of a diversionary and a confusing event.

They're certainly not extraterrestrial
or NHI. The pop culture now is non

intelligence. The government knows what
has happened.

Look, our military knows where they took
off from.

If it's a garage, they can go right into
that garage. They know where it came

from and where it went.

And for some reason, they don't want to
come.

And I think they'd be better off saying
what it is our military knows and our

president knows, and for some reason
they want to keep people in suspense.

And this is a problem because there's
been no serious inquiry in the Congress

at the White House involving this.

That's what we're going to hand off to
the incoming president. It's what I've

handed off to members of Congress, but
they don't have any full -time staff to

study it.

So they don't have time to do a deep
dive.

So you really have to have a select
committee in the Congress and a special

office in the White House to really
master all this information and unpack

and then take the action to stand down
these malicious programs.

And that is going to be a very heavy
lift and a very dangerous operation.

The other part of this are things that
they can do to cause and induce all

of geophysical changes.

And those technologies are real.

This one, the NOC, as I call him, the
non -official coverer who's inside these

FLAC projects, I had known about, and he
confirmed a program where they were

able, these covert programs using these
advanced technologies, were able to move

an asteroid that was in a position from
the sun, so it wouldn't be seen soon

enough, that would skim over the
Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, that would

massive tsunamis and wipe out the
coastlines all around the world.

And the ET civilizations intercepted
this and avoided that catastrophe.

So when you think of the psychotic level
of people in these covert programs who

have these kind of powerful technologies
that no one at NASA or JPL know about

and the president doesn't know about,
that is an existential threat to

and to the Earth. And they have got to
be reined in.

by the rule of law. But it's going to
take some really courageous people,

whether it's the president. So far,
there's no one who's really been ready

run with this in Congress in a deep way,
a meaningful way.

But maybe the incoming president will.
If not, asymmetric disclosure will

where we'll have to have a band of
brothers and sisters who do this

unilaterally. But then you add in the
fact that people have died and now

turned it over to private entities
quasi.

government corporations that have been
created and that have profited off this

knowledge, and you'll never be able to
get to it because the line is clearly

broken by someone dead.

So the only way you're going to get to
it is somebody at the executive level

that says enough is enough, cut the
money off, bring these people in, let's

What's it going to take to expose all of
this?

It is going to have to be an asymmetric
disclosure where people come forward

with the proof of these materials and
operations.

And those are disclosed not into the
black hole of secrecy at the Pentagon,

right, or some skiff. It's disclosed to
the people.

News Nation working to uncover the
mystery in our skies, revealing brand

video of an alleged UFO retrieval. Take
a look at your screen.

Footage that was never before seen until
last night's special report going viral

today. But now this decorated Air Force
veteran says he knows it's true because

he was a part of it. The whistleblower
claiming he was contracted as a

helicopter pilot to retrieve all kinds
of crashed craft.

He says some of non -human or. And
President Trump has said on day one, we

get a report on the drones.

At some point, will you use your powers
of presidency to tell Americans we're

concerned about drones?

Yeah, I will.

In fact, I'd like to know because I just
got here.

What do you think? I just came here.
I've been here for, what, 15 minutes

would like to find out what it is and
tell the people.

In fact, I'd like to do that. Can we
find out what that was, Susie?

Okay. Yeah, why don't we find out
immediately.

We want our leaders to do something.
We're supposed to be in a democracy,

And there's a window for us to do this
while these programs are still under an

illegal operating status.

Now, if they were to cross into legal
oversight by the Congress and the

President, you couldn't do that.

This is the trap they've set for
themselves in this cabal of sociopaths

these covert programs.

They set their own trap by going
illegal. Now they have no cover.

So a group like ours, the Disclosure
Project, and these defectors can do it

legally with no criminal and no national
security violations because those

programs are being run illegally.

They don't have the cover of national
security.

So there's a window open here to move
through.