All language subtitles for New Uncovered Document Proves Moon Landing Fraud

greetings friends and countrymen welcome

to conspiracy corner news episode 21

this is bart sibrel conspiracy corner

news briefly highlights the week's most

significant and underreported news

events throughout the world focusing on

special preparation for the difficult

times ahead for all mankind to help

support the dozens of hours of research

required each week to produce conspiracy

corner would you please be so kind as to

consider making a regular PayPal

donation of just five dollars each month

I know last time I said one dollar

but PayPal took 1/3 of it so it's about

as much as a nice cup of coffee

so what about five it's my favorite

currency in any way Lincoln's a good

president allegedly because the whole

conspiracy behind that one but we'll

skip that simply click on bart sibrel

here below the video which takes you to

my youtube homepage

well looks like gonna have to widen the

screen here click on the donate button

then click on this thing that says make

this reoccurring monthly type in $5 and

then you go down and log in with your

PayPal account or pay with a debit or

credit card if you prefer this way

conspiracy core news is completely user

supported and this is done so in the

most painless and simple way possible

your thoughtfulness is most appreciated

for example on this particular week's

article which I write for the sooth

Journal I spent 14 hours writing the

article exhausting non-stop and to

prepare the video portion of it and the

slides and everything like that take

several more hours it's about two days

out of a five day work week volunteering

so if you think it's worth five bucks a

month which is what is that about a

dollar 25 an episode it would be greatly

appreciated that helps me take off from

other tasks to this effort here has a

volunteer so let's get on with what

we're

talk about today this is an Apollo

update most of you know me or came to

know me because of the Apollo moon

conspiracy which is not a theory it's a

fact if you've seen the movie and the

footage uncovered and if we get into the

details today of newly discovered

evidence I was well known for producing

the film a funny thing happened on the

way to the moon as well as astronauts

gone wild with the infamous punch I

received from Buzz Aldrin what I want to

talk about I'm kind of lead up to it is

this newly discovered document from 1958

that basically scientifically states

from a high-ranking NASA scientist that

there's a particular circumstance that

basically shows that the moon missions

could not have happened did not happen

in 1969 through 72 and still cannot

happen today but here are the points I

wanted to make Charles Lindbergh flew

across the Atlantic in 1927 and aircraft

was pretty new back then another

interesting point here is season but

Mason we could go into that couldn't we

32nd degree look at that and here's the

newspaper if you're into the Masons and

all the loominatee stuff they're always

into the number 33 look at this he

traveled from New York to Paris

and thirty three and a half hours he was

the first person to fly solo not across

the Atlantic but specifically from New

York to Paris as part of a contest and

that's how he became famous now if you

add 60 years to 1927 you come up with

1987

and you can guess during that 60 years

there has been a lot of technological

progress for example when he first flew

across the Atlantic though he had a

single wing aircraft this this is kind

of the the most advanced aircraft at the

time of 1927 a lot of them used biplanes

because the engines were fairly slow and

they needed the extra lift and then

within sixty years we have in fact

they're only 50 years but 60 years later

we had the 747s I don't know if you've

ever been in one I have it's just

humongous it's like three or four

two-story houses and the volume

contained therein getting off of the

ground I have a brother-in-law who works

for Boeing designing landing gear for

the 747 or at least they used to and he

says he can't even understand how the

thing gets off the ground

in fact interesting sidenote about

Apollo the Apollo missions which were

the most complicated flight in the

entire history of aviation were also the

only first tried aerodynamic craft and

the entire history aviation that worked

on the very first occasion so not only

is it the most complicated mission ever

attempted the lunar module had never

been flown and it worked completely

perfectly that has never happened before

and the entire history of aviation from

you know the first Wright brothers

flight they took them several attempts

to get off the ground until today in

fact the 747 took nearly two years

longer to develop with 10 years more

advanced technology than the Apollo

rocket which took about eight years to

develop the 1960s this took another two

years to develop with mostly 70s

technology and when they rolled it out

it could not lift off the ground they

believe went through a hundred and sixty

two engines just to get the thing off

the ground

now by this time millions of aircraft

had been built and flown before and yet

it still took them 162 attempts to get

the thing to work so how is it that a

decade earlier than this you know going

you know to another planet basically

worked on the first occasion we can talk

about that now

basically what I want to point out is if

I said to you that in 1927

you know Lindbergh flew across the

Atlantic and 60 years later in 1987 no

one had repeated his accomplishment and

60 years six decades more of

technological advancement would that be

logical of course not because we went

from the biplanes to the 747s now this

is the same thing that Uncle Sam wants

you to believe in regard to the moon

missions they want you to believe and

it's just as absurd as what I just said

it's as absurd as saying Lindbergh flew

across the Atlantic in 1927 and 60 years

later no one is able to repeat the event

with all the advancements in sciences

and technology the federal government

would have us believe that they went to

the moon on the very first attempt with

1960s technology and the earliest anyone

is slated to quote return to the moon is

six decades later if it doesn't make

sense with Lindbergh it doesn't make

sense going to the moon we know that

technology does not go backwards in fact

every year things are produced

exponentially faster and more

efficiently and cheaper than the year

before so just as absurd it is to say

that you know 60 years later no one had

yet flown across the Atlantic obviously

they're going way past that to say that

60 years later no one on earth including

the nation that claimed to have done it

first

can repeat the event is is pretty

strange now here in the 21st century

me NASA has and the military and some

private space contractors have had at

least a dozen catastrophic failures in

the last 16 years simply trying to put a

payload into Earth orbit the moon is one

thousand times farther than the general

Earth orbit that most people do which is

about 250 miles now if you had a globe

generally one of those one-foot Globes

you can hey will will look at this NASA

here as the globe it would be basically

equivalent to a half an inch above the

globe that is as high as the space

shuttle flies simply 1/2 an inch above

the globe in fact you can see a picture

here that you know the land is pretty

visible and quite detailed underneath it

because it's only 250 miles up now you

can just pick any destination you know

from you that's 250 miles away which is

about 350 kilometers and realize that

that's as far as the you know the most

advanced manned spacecraft can do today

and yet they claimed to have gone a

thousand times farther with 1960s

technology one thing that's kind of

interesting that someone pointed out to

me the lunar module that allegedly left

man for the lunar surface and

synchronized with the command module

orbiting the moon at 4,000 miles per

hour if they were off in trajectory or

timing by like one tenth of one second

they would have missed each other wasted

fuel and everyone would have died and a

Walmart watched that you can buy for ten

dollars has more computing power than

the entire Apollo program did all the

spacecraft in the command center so to

say that they were able to pull this off

you know coming up on fifty years ago

and cannot repeat it it you know

according to them for another ten years

with 1960s technology but it cannot be

done today that's really you know one of

the things to consider

here's one of the reports about the the

NASA's failures it's talking about how

NASA themselves who you know went to the

moon in the 60s somehow still can't put

things into Earth orbit without them

blowing up now most people are not aware

you know they they don't really think

about outer space or the details about

cosmic radiation or things like that

but the earth is surrounded by a

radiation field now the radiation field

is caused because the Earth's core is

iron which creates a magnetic field the

magnetic field traps solar and galactic

radiation around it and it has been

there since the creation of the earth

however long you believe that to be so

as you can see it's these very thick

layers of radiation that surround the

earth now one thing to point out I'm

going to try to find this fill here is

that every manned mission in the entire

history of light from the United States

China the Soviet Union they all have

been right about here at about 200 to

250 miles below the beginning of the

radiation and it starts at about a

thousand miles up and it extends now

they believe about thirty thousand miles

thick the only time humans are said to

have gone through this brick wall of

radiation is to the moon they have to go

through it to reach the moon and that's

what these new papers that are uncovered

from 1958 real reveal now they're the

Van Allen belts were discovered by a

gentleman by the name of Van Alen let me

find his picture here he's so humbled to

name the radiation belts after himself

and they sent up probes in 1958 that had

Geiger counters on them Geiger counter

is a method of registering radioactive

particles and it actually has a I guess

you call it a sample of radiation

radioactive particle in there to use

it's kind of a guidepost generally these

little boxes contain uranium in them so

if you find one at a garage sale I

wouldn't take it home it might be ready

so in any case they put these geiger

counters on these probes and sent them

into the Van Allen radiation belt and

this was done in 1958 and the Geiger

counters I think on one probe broke

because they were fluctuating at such an

excessive amount beyond what they

anticipated and they sent up other

probes and they wrote down these

particular readings now this is

something I guess I'm kind of compelled

to go a little bit ahead out of sequence

here Van Allen basically said this I'm

going to read his quote from these

probes I'm going a little out of

sequence here but we find my paper work

here of course you can read the article

in the length of the description of this

YouTube video he said our measurements

show that the maximum radiation level is

between 10 and 100 renta gems per hour I

think that's another name for REM since

a human being exposed to 2 days only of

Tim Renta gems would only have a 50%

chance of survival the radiation belts

obviously present an obstacle to

spaceflight beyond Earth orbit rockets

will need to take off from the radiation

free zones at the north or south poles

in order to reach the moon and as if we

go back to this little picture here you

can see that the radiation belts are

kind of like a doughnut shape so if

there's an opening here without

radiation and there's an opening down

here if you were able to somehow launch

from the north pole or the South Pole

you could miss the radiation that's what

he's saying

you would have to do the Apollo

astronaut do that they launched from

Florida near the equator which helps

them put them in a better orbit

additionally you may remember I think it

was the Challenger I think that was the

first space shuttle that blew up on

launch it did so because it got down to

like 43 degrees the previous night so

you can imagine the impossibility of

putting sensitive

and equipment and all those gaskets and

things and trying to do that you know

and zero degrees or below zero from the

North and South Pole that's just you

know an infeasible concept to do now

when the Space Shuttle went to its

highest altitude ever this was in 1997

they went up to 380 miles their safety

equipment started having their alarms go

off because they were I think they were

working on retrieving the out-of-focus

lens of the Hubble Space Telescope which

is kind of interesting 20 years after

going a thousand times farther than the

Space Shuttle with 20 years older

technology they can't even put a

telescope into orbit that has a lens

that focuses loops the lens doesn't

focus so it kind of shows you not that

necessarily their inept but this stuff

is extremely difficult so if it's

difficult just to do things into Earth

orbit blowing up two space shuttles

blowing up a dozen things in the last 16

years putting up telescopes that can't

even focus it shows you the absurdity of

saying with 20 you know years older

technology than space show they went a

thousand times farther than the Space

Shuttle but when they went up to 380

miles they found that the radiation

level was dangerous and because of that

they never went to that altitude again

now at 380 miles that's 620 miles away

from just the beginning of the Van Allen

radiation belts you have to understand

there is this radiation that is so

severe that alarms start going off

telling you you're you're approaching

dangerous radiation from a distance of

620 miles away CNN caught the story and

they said this word for word the

radiation belts surrounding earth are

more dangerous than previously believed

now you have to understand what does

that mean more dangerous than previously

really previous believed

meaning the knowledge gathered by the

Apollo missions as they were the only

crews who have ever claimed to have gone

through the radiation belts so the

question is how can a space shuttle crew

620 miles away from the beginning of the

radiation belt know more about it than

the Apollo astronauts who were allegedly

in the middle of the belts 18 times to

the moon and back for a total of at

least 24 hours

see it's not possible you see it

contradicts itself again CNN reports

that the space shuttle crew said that

the radiation belts are more dangerous

than previously believed because when

they got to about a hundred and thirty

miles higher than the space station

which is about 380 miles they found it

still too dangerous of a height because

of the radiation they descended to her

lower altitude more dangerous than

previously believed and the most

knowledgeable people about the radiation

belts have to be the Apollo astronauts

who went through it you know nine times

orbiting the moon and nine tons back a

total of 18 times in it for more than an

hour each way totaling at least 24 hours

so how can the shuttle crew be making

discoveries about the radiation belts

from 620 miles away that the Apollo

astronauts did not make when they are in

the middle of them that itself is you

know indirect a little bit evidence that

the Apollo astronauts did not go through

the belts otherwise you know this would

not be a new discovery to the space show

crew even when they're you know just

approaching the belts now in my film a

funny thing happened on the way to the

moon here's our little logo on the cover

I guess I should have pulled out a

picture of the DVD but this is on the

DVD cover the footage that I uncovered

and this is what really convinced me

that the moon landings were faked is

that I was kind of doing the film under

the theory that it might be true that

they did not go and staged it as kind of

a bluff in poker

three and a half years in the five-year

project the film cost a half a million

dollars largely because of research and

documentation that we bought from you

know people in the ex-military people

and widows of astronauts and things like

that some documents cost $10,000 each I

said well they probably went to the moon

I'm going to give him the benefit of the

doubt and then I found a label

mislabeled tape what was on the tape and

on the label were two different things

the late bill casing believes a source

at NASA gave that to me deliberately I'm

beginning to think that that was the

case and in that footage which has a

warning here you know I specifically

asked NASA for unedited footage and

every single thing I got was edited

except this and one of the real which I

have yet to show to anybody

oops maybe I shouldn't have said that oh

well and some of my retractors say our

detractors say that the scutage that i

uncovered is widely available and that's

just simply not the case because it says

so right here at the beginning of it

this is not for general public

distribution this is an unedited reel

now in the reel they only aired maybe 20

30 seconds of it and what the TV viewer

saw was what they had claimed was a

picture of the earth floating in space

from some great distance away in fact I

should have done one other shot here if

you can ignore this part here that there

was one shot that was kind of

proportioned to this to show that you

know there's some great distance away

from the earth now they were allegedly

zooming in the camera the lens on this

here but there were other shots if you

take out this you know outtake there it

looked about this you know size to kind

of show hey look here we are halfway to

the moon as they claimed they were at

the beginning of the footage and the way

they

Octus footage as explained to the

viewers is that Neil Armstrong said on

this unedited tape they only had one

window that faced the earth and it was

completely filled up with the TV camera

meaning the TV cameras back then are

kind of big its bulky in order to get

this shot or this proportion here of the

earth allegedly floating in space

although that's an outtake because that

shows you how they're faking it which

I'll get to in a minute that they would

have to put the lens to the windows

glass in order to shoot the earth far

away and Neil Armstrong says we're

calling in from one hundred thirty

thousand miles out in fact right before

he says he's calling him from one

hundred thirty thousand volts out he

asked NASA how far out do you have us

well he's got the most advanced computer

on the entire planet he knows exactly

how far he is away from Earth his

display says it so why did he ask NASA

to tell him how far out he is because

his display actually says about 250

miles he's in low Earth orbit they never

left Earth orbit because of the

radiation belts and NASA was running a

simulation program after which one of

the controllers said they could tell no

difference between an actual flight and

a simulation on the computers so just as

they had fake pictures of them on the

moon they had fake data after all you

know all it is is a computer screen with

numbers on it that if they say the

temperature of Saturn is you know 15

degrees then it must be 15 degrees

because there it says so on the computer

screen and so what they had was is these

programs that they rehearsed the moon

landings and it would tell them how far

the spacecraft is away they're

approaching the moon the altitude above

the moon and they're descending altitude

all of this was simply based on clock

time of a scenario and Neil Armstrong

did not want to contradict the NASA

program that's why he asked how far out

do you have us and he just parroted it

back to them now what this really is

is a circular window of the spacecraft

they have actually this is the real

location of the camera this is what the

lens zoomed out and this is a part they

didn't intend to show but if you can

imagine this person's arm is not in

front of the window so I don't have this

picture prepared but basically you'd

have a circle earth with a black all

around it but trying to convince you you

see they're halfway to the moon now

halfway to the moon would be completely

on the other side of the radiation belts

which NASA just admitted in 1997 that

the space shuttle crew 620 miles away

from it knows more about it than the

Apollo astronauts were allegedly went

through it the only way that's possible

as if they did not go through it the

camera is actually in the back of the

spacecraft and they've turned out all

the lights and blocked sunlight from

entering the windows to the foreground

that's pitch black with silver here's

the PALS of the inside of the spacecraft

in Earth orbit

this is either a section of the earth

outside of the window or colleague of

mine David Percy in England he believes

they used a transparency kind of like a

positive slide and stuck it over the

window and had it backlit by earth shine

I'm not sure which it is but I've never

seen cloud patterns go completely across

the earth and any satellite picture I've

ever seen so it looks like the

proportion is off here they had a little

Crescent piece of black material which

they inserted here and that made it look

like the Terminator line between night

and day

now here's an outtake when one of the

astronauts arms gets in front of the

window now again the camera is supposed

to be at the lens of the camera supposed

to be at the glass of the window so it's

physically impossible to get between the

lens in the window or between you know

the earth there's no way unless you're

outside the spacecraft without us you

know spacesuit on if you can tell this

is the guy's arm

here's his hair on his arm this was an

outtake which they never show but we got

the unedited tape from it and it shows

that they are you know faking taking the

shot additionally and I should have had

this cued up to

give me a moment maybe I'll find it is

that we here this clandestine third

party of audio on the tape as well I'll

pause it here and I'll cue it up for you

here's a clip from a funny thing

happened on the way to the moon and this

is the shot of the allegedly the earth

floating in space again this is really

the blackened walls of the spacecraft

and here's a circular window with either

the part of the earth outside of it or

transparency of the earth over it and

this little Crescent piece of cardboard

slid into may look like night and day

now as rudimentary as that may sound I'm

a professional filmmaker and it was the

you know inconsistencies of the lighting

that made me realize that the film was

shot in a TV studio rather than on the

surface of the Moon however this

particular shot the 30 seconds or so of

the good takes that they aired to the

public I thought looked extremely

convincing it would have fooled me

unless I had received the unedited

version of all the behind-the-scenes

outtakes they're also talking about how

they're faking the shot they're talking

about how it's going to be used for

playback later even though they claim

that the pictures were live now if

they're halfway to the moon there and

especially this old analog radio

equipment it's going to take about two

seconds for the radio signal to reach

them they reply in about two seconds to

go back so if nASA says hey the TV

picture looks great and Neil Armstrong

immediately says hey glad to hear that

there should be a four second delay so

if he responds too soon because he's

actually in Earth orbit only 250 miles

above the earth then that's going to

give away that fact so he had apparently

an earpiece in with a private channel of

audio from the CIA or whoever who

counted off on a stopwatch

you know NASA would ask him a question

for seconds would go by and at the

beginning of this tape they left that

third microphone on and you hear someone

say talk it's crystal clear from being

recorded wherever the tape is being

recorded somewhere at some secret base

on earth it's not a

radio EQ like NASA or like the

astronauts now according to NASA there's

only two people on this channel of audio

and that's obviously false another my

retractor says not only is the footage

widely available which is a lie because

we just showed you a warning at the

beginning of the real saying do not show

to the public this part that I'm about

to show you the audio of the CIA or

whoever they edited out I mean if you

get spacecraft's films version of you

know showing clips of this which they

had to show to say that it doesn't

really mean anything they edited out the

audio of the CIA which says talk now if

that word talked and it being prompt

after a four second delay to create the

effect that he's further away from the

earth and it really is and if they

deliberately and specifically deleted

the evidence of that that is even

greater proof that it proves that they

didn't go to the moon otherwise they

would have just left the NASA footage as

the original and we would have heard the

talk on their version of the film but

you can't hear it because they took it

out because they know it's incriminating

and now let's take a look and listen

yeah during another segment also

intended to air I think I think I have

it cued up slightly wrong although

that's a good part of him lying saying

he's 130,000 miles out this is the part

that has to talk in it immediately near

Armstrong speaks

the TV look great so you can tell

there's one party which is NASA there's

another party which is Neil Armstrong

and there's another party which is talk

and again they're counting off for

seconds on a stopwatch he hears them

privately in his earpiece and after he

is given the okay to reply to the answer

he then speaks because if we replied

immediately which he could have it would

give away the fact that he's you know

only a couple hundred miles away from

the earth instead of one hundred thirty

thousand miles as he just claimed let's

look and listen again I will be behind

the scenes trickery to respond moments

pass and the other side is picked up on

by the clandestine third party who could

be prompt some with talk immediately

Neil Armstrong speaks

now I had the narrator say at first I

thought that he wasn't paying attention

because there you know to NASA because

he's doing this fake shot here and they

were reminding him hey pay attention it

was after the film was produced that I

realized it was a deliberate pause in

order to create the effect of an

increased radio delay to make it appear

as though he were farther from the earth

and he really is even here you can sign

us see the extrusion of the window it's

kind of a thickness about I guess a

couple inches thick kind of like a

window in a ship you know they're

waterproof and that's kind of this type

of window there's there's a thickness to

it and you can actually see the light

bouncing off the earth in Earth orbit

showing the dimension of the window then

we go basically all the way through

seeing how we got the film cued up with

muscles show this last part again here's

the part where they claimed was halfway

to the moon and yet this new theory

claims distance what happened was

because I've been in the video business

a while they had a manual recorder

wherever this was being recorder manual

video tape recorder and you hit the stop

button it's one of those older buttons

you really had to push all the way down

so they pushed it you can see a spark in

the video where the electrical

connection tried to send the signal but

the manual part did not go through

meaning that this part that they thought

was not being recorded was in fact being

recorded they didn't want this setup

from the you know faked shot of the

earth floating in space to you know show

the real interior of the space crafting

the proximity of everything the scene so

here basically you know they thought

this was not being recorded again moment

ago they said this was the earth

floating in space right they said this

is the earth there's here's how here's

proof that we're far away from it now

again that's a circular window inside of

the spacecraft the cameras actually no

Tim feet or so back away which means

they lied why would they lie you know if

they really went to the moon and there's

Michael Collins I believe pull

in the screen and part of the Crescent

piece of material to make it look like

the Terminator line and there's a work

light you can see there's diffusion over

it to keep it kind of low so it does it

throw now they open the iris and you see

you know the real position of the camera

and the very bright and near earth out

the window so basically all this to tie

this in is Van Allen says in these new

documents this is the discovery right

here this is from the Scientific

American magazine March 1959 I guess I

told you wrong about the year and it's

basically you know tells you that quote

in fact we can reread that quote if you

like it says right here this is out of

that Alan's mouth remember Van Allen was

the gentleman who discovered the

radiation belts so he is the you know

absolute expert on it after he sent

probes and night t I think he sent him

up in 1958 in the report came out in

1959 he said this our measurements show

that the maximum radiate radiation level

is between 10 and 100 ram per hour since

a human being exposed for two days even

Tim REM would only have a 50% chance of

survival the radiation belts obviously

present an obstacle to spaceflight

beyond Earth orbit rockets will need to

take off from the radiation free zones

at the North and South Pole in order to

reach the moon now we know that that

obviously cannot be done here's the

effects of what you know radiation

poisoning looks like and of course none

of the astronauts ever died had any

burns had any sickness none of them even

died of cancer now what happened was is

that the White House which was turned

over from Johnson to Nixon during this

time they said well we have to you know

make it possible to go to the moon so

even though there's this you know hard

to find document which we you know

purchased at an auction and found let's

his name von braun von braun sorry i'm a

little

tired and sick today oops I'm doing it

all wrong here can you tell I haven't

slept there we go dr. James Van Allen so

he says the radiation belts are you know

anywhere from ten from from - I'm sorry

anywhere from two to ten times more than

a lethal dose and yet when Nixon says

you know we need you to change that

story a little bit he does

he completely recants on his findings

and they bury you know the the Geiger

counter readings unfortunately for him

Geiger counter readings you know do not

lie I asked Van Allen's successor how

does he know that the radiation belts

are safe or not and he says well proof

is that the Apollo astronauts went

through it well that's what's that call

circumventing logic there they after Van

Alen now that he's dead the leading

expert on the bound radiation belts who

is like four years old when they went to

the moon allegedly he says he knows for

a fact that the radiation belts are not

lethal because the Apollo astronauts

went through them to the moon aback and

did not suffer any ill effects now we

just have von Braun saying here that it

is absolutely lethal to astronauts it's

two to ten times more than a lethal dose

we have the fact that the Space Shuttle

when they got 620 miles away from the

beginning of the radiation belt were

warned to not get any closer to it and

to descend to a lower altitude and then

we have this other information here um

we've got where's this picture I've got

them earlier somewhere oh it's the

national science here it is National

Academy of Sciences they came out with a

Reuters article at night I'm sorry in

2008 that basically says in order to

quote return to the moon they need to

first learn how to protect astronauts

from lethal space radiation

that's pretty interesting because this

is exactly what this gentleman kelly

smith said in 2014 about six years later

there's a link to this video I could

have had it queued up but basically he

says and I'll quote him word-for-word he

says the Van Allen belts are dangerous

radiation and we must first learn how to

protect the astronauts from the

radiation before we can send people

through this region of space when I

called up NASA to ask mr. Smith about

his remarks as a journalist they would

not let him talk to any journalists

after he made this mission on YouTube as

one of their projects of the Orion

mission the rhein mission was unmanned

it went up to 3,600 miles and it did a

u-turn and came back that means the

intent of the mission was whatever was

at 3,600 miles which is well into the

Van Allen radiation belt

he says they must first learn to protect

astronauts from this deadly radiation or

he said dangerous radiation Van Allen

said it was deadly before they can send

astronauts through this region of space

now unless the Apollo astronauts had a

time machine and went further into the

future than we are today because they

said this technology to protect you from

the radiation is still yet to be

invented then here's proof right now

that the Apollo moon missions did not

happen NASA said so this new guy who was

born after Apollo he said on camera on

the record that the technology to

protect astronauts from the lethal

radiation of the radiation belts has yet

to be invented then we have James Van

Allen himself and these newly discovered

papers saying the doses are two to ten

times beyond that of a lethal dose we

have the fact that the space shuttle

when it went to its highest altitude

ever they could you know detect the

radiation as being severe from 620 miles

away from

much less in the middle of it and they

reported that the radiation belts were

more dangerous than previously believed

now if the Apollo astronauts were in the

middle of it 18 times they should be the

experts right not people 620 miles away

from it which is proof they never went

through it all this was going on during

the you know notorious Nixon

administration now Nixon was known he

had a track record of falsification in

fact there's an event called the Gulf of

Tonkin incident and later came out in

the I think it's the Senate Committee on

Foreign Relations that the CIA the NSA

and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara

completely staged an attack by North

Vietnamese on the United States in order

to get people mad at North Vietnam and

demand that we you know counter-attack

because you know of this offense in fact

here was a poster from that time it says

you know blast them back to the Stone

Age because they attacked us first the

fact is this gentleman as well as the

CIA director and the NSA director

admitted albeit several decades later

that the entire event which started the

Vietnam War and killed tens of thousands

of Americans and maybe a million

Vietnamese that that event which got the

public interested in the war was

completely contrived and so here we have

during that same moment in history

Tricky Dick Nixon and the people are

protesting against the war

you know they had signs like this my son

was killed in Vietnam for what and so

Nixon said the greatest threat to the

United States was actually civil unrest

about the unpopularity of the Civil War

so what better way to have a pep rally

than to have something positive to think

about now that's the unique thing about

the moon-landing conspiracy is that it's

the only conspiracy that I know of that

is positive I mean

whoever killed JFK he's still dead

whoever did 9/11 3000 people are still

dead but trying to tell somebody that

this glorified event that they you know

pinned their you know academic

credentials on or patriotism on that it

was completely falsified is like telling

them that their team that just won the

Superbowl did so by cheating they're

ready to punch you in the face which is

really interesting if you think about it

people have differences of opinions all

the time you know I like this team I

like that team I like this you know

political party I like this one but why

do I receive such hate mail violent

threats curse words continually for

making this movie simply because I have

a different opinion that the moon

landings were staged by the CIA the fact

that you get this foaming at the mouth

you know retaliation against simply a

point of view to me says something that

something doesn't smell right about the

event now here we are again 60 years

later they're saying they can return to

the moon in 2030 right and yet no one

has been able to you know go back with

60 years greater technology and yet they

did so so easily in the 1960s with that

antiquated equipment the way I look at

it is the South Pole is a good example

just like Lindbergh twenty seven to

eight e7 saying that no one was able to

repeat the event is absurd it's the same

with the moon landing saying they could

go to the moon in 1969 of the first

attempt but can't go there until 2029 60

years later it is absurd the South Pole

which this is a picture of has wind

speeds

I believe in excess of 100 miles per

hour and temperatures almost reaching

100 degrees below zero Fahrenheit and

yet as you can see there are bases there

why are there bases there even though

it's such a dangerous

we place because it's physically

possible to be there if it were so easy

to go to the moon and the 1960s there

would be bases there by now

the fact that there are not is proof

itself that it cannot yet be done now

here's something that a beloved

scientist said and a friend of a friend

told me that he actually marrying the

end of his life had doubts about the

authenticity of the moon landing simply

because they could not be repeated and

here's something that he had to say

potentially regarding this one of the

saddest lessons of history is this if

we've been bamboozled long enough that

means fooled or deceived we tend to

reject any evidence of the bamboozle

were no longer interested in finding out

the truth the bamboozle has captured us

it is simply too painful to acknowledge

even to ourselves that we have been

taken you see that that he says a sad

lesson of history is that if we've been

fooled long enough we're no longer

interested in finding out the truth the

lie is captured us because it's too

painful to acknowledge even to ourselves

that we have been taken right all this

is about pride you cannot learn anything

new if you're prideful pride is the

unwillingness to be wrong just as

humility is the willingness to be wrong

and pride blinds you that's why these

people who foam at the mouth and you

know criticism of death threats and

things like that a curse words are

blinded because there's our pride

forbids them from seeing the plain truth

that if the moon missions were so easily

done in the 60s they would be bases

there by now and it wouldn't take 60

more years for anyone on earth to repeat

the event no more than it would take 60

years after Lindbergh flew across the

Atlantic for someone to fly across the

Atlantic again by then we had so much

more advanced airplanes and we should

likewise have some

much more advanced you know rockets and

spacecraft if they went to the moon in

the 60s we should have been on Mars 30

years ago and then here's one last quote

from Mark Twain he said this he said it

is easier to fool people than to

convince them that they have been fooled

and that's pretty interesting isn't it

he said it is easier to fool people than

to convince them that they have been

fooled that's pretty fascinating isn't

it I understand that the fascination and

marvel was with spaceflight I used to be

fascinated by it by myself at the same

time as with anything overly adored the

objects of one's infatuation can take

advantage of this entranced state of

their admirer and feed them unwittingly

false flattery that is sincerely

mistaken as factual this has been

brother Bart conspiracy corner news

episode 21 are you prepared for eternity

please tell your friends share the link

give me a youtube thumbs up if you like

this video check out my new Facebook fan

page linked in the description of this

video like it if you like it and thank

you for your kind support