Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Wow...
There's so many things in the sky right now.
Let's face it.
We live in a time when fear and distrust
are at an all-time high.
There are so many government conspiracies,
it can be hard to tell what's real and what's not.
The drones off of New Jersey.
Are they Chinese?
Are they Russian?
Weather control.
The death of Jeffrey Epstein.
The list just goes on and on,
and nobody knows how to make sense out of what's real...
and what's fake.
My name is Andrew Bustamante,
and I am a former covert CIA intelligence officer,
and I'm here to help you separate
fact from fiction.
Since leaving CIA,
I've made it my mission to shed light
on the lies, cover-ups, conspiracies,
and tactics used to conceal them.
Now I'm going to pressure-test the most sensational,
ripped-from-the-headlines conspiracy theories out there,
and track down key experts,
eyewitnesses, and whistleblowers.
I'll analyze never-before-seen footage,
conduct eye-opening experiments.
These right here.
See the drone right there overhead, you see it?
And demonstrations.
Sleeping all the way down deeper and deeper.
It's just so fast. It's just incredible.
Nobody thinks of hypnotism as a weapon.
My mission is simple...
Is there a tunnel that connects us to Cheyenne Mountain?
...to find the truth.
Epstein was reported to have actually hung himself
from this side of the bed,
which is right here.
And arm you with the tools you need
to determine for yourself what is real
and what are you being manipulated to believe is real.
What in the world is going on
in the skies over New Jersey?
New Jersey's own Bruce Springsteen
once described North Jersey's sky with the line,
"The sun's just a red ball
rising over them refinery towers,"
but now we need to add had a few drones.
In November 2024,
the folks of New Jersey started to look up
in the sky and see this.
What is that?
For nearly a month, mysterious crafts were spotted
night after night.
They're just pacing back and forth,
going very slow.
We've been looking for the past hour.
We've seen about 40 or 50 of these drones.
In fact, there's one over my shoulder right there.
With distinct running lights,
these craft were too small
to be fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters.
Whatever that is, is massive.
But they were also too large
to be standard commercial drones.
There are SUV-sized drones flying over my home,
and the government has no idea what they are,
so I'm going to make a cocktail.
Some were reported to be flying in formation.
They're all going the same direction.
Others were seen hovering in place for hours.
Oh, my goodness.
And with residents on edge,
they were getting little in terms of answers.
They have a responsibility,
the FBI and the FAA,
to brief the public more thoroughly.
And in that government silence,
conspiracy theories started to explode
all over the Internet and in mainstream media.
Really want to know what's going on in New Jersey?
Radioactive material in New Jersey has gone missing.
Iran launched a mothership probably about a month ago
that contains these drones.
The third option is-- it's non-human.
I mean, you said it yourself.
The New Jersey drones quickly went from mystery to meme.
How are you, or should I say, what are you?
OK, no, we're not gonna do that.
See, I know what I am,
and I don't have to explain myself to anyone.
But serious questions still persist.
Why hasn't the government provided a complete explanation,
even a full year later?
On this episode, I'm going to apply my CIA background...
Becca, you got him?
Let's get creative here.
...to conduct the most comprehensive investigation
of the New Jersey drone mystery ever done.
This is taking what we do to a whole new level.
Ho, ho, ho, ho.
With key interviews.
Maybe there's a unit that's testing something out
that not everybody's aware of.
And real-world demonstrations.
Kivo 1 taking off.
So that we can separate fact from fiction
and understand what was really happening
in the skies over New Jersey in the fall of 2024.
Drones used to be toys.
Holiday gifts we used to film cool aerial shots of our homes
or our kids' soccer games.
Then they got useful.
They deliver packages.
They search for missing people.
They entertain us with light shows.
Convenient, harmless,
until they weren't.
We all watched as small, cheap drones became
terrifying weapons of war in places like Ukraine.
So when unexplained drones
began to pop up on the Eastern Seaboard,
people were concerned.
To dig deep into the mystery of the New Jersey drones,
I am headed to where it all started.
Northern New Jersey,
just across the Hudson River from Manhattan.
Here in Bergen County,
one of the witnesses who recorded
the most footage of these drones in the sky is a woman
named Lisa Puluse.
Let's count the drones.
Right there, one, two,
three, four,
five, six, seven...
One of them literally went right over my house
where you could just reach out and touch it.
This one's right above us.
I didn't believe that it could be something
that was gonna harm us,
but you would hear other people talk.
Then you're like, well, maybe-- what if?
What if?
So you're making up your own stories,
and so is everybody else.
When I look at a map of northern New Jersey,
the first thing I notice is that Lisa and her neighbors
live only about five miles outside of Picatinny Arsenal.
This is not a typical military base.
It's the US Army's main laboratory
for testing explosives, weapons,
and advanced hardware, like robots and drones.
Could there be a connection between the base
and the sightings in Lisa's town?
I'm heading over to meet with the mayor of Mine Hill
to find out.
A lot of people up in that area
started seeing them up and over
around Picatinny.
There were airspace violations.
They then put restrictions in
and some of the drones still violated that.
The one thing that got me one night,
I got a call from a resident,
"Hey, mayor, the drones are over the elementary school
and heading toward town hall."
The mayor even grabbed his phone and shot
his own video of the fleet of drones
that had residents on edge.
They were in formation,
they were kind of working together-- a team.
People started seeing them as weapons and asking questions.
I am literally freaking out right now.
Myself and a whole group of people
were trying to get real answers.
Whoever's doing this is tiptoeing
right through the federal and state laws.
Are these things up there to harm us?
Are they Chinese? Are they Russian?
But the feds wouldn't respond. The FAA wouldn't respond.
The military wouldn't respond.
And when you leave people hanging like that,
they're going to fill in the blanks.
It was November 25th when the FAA closed the airspace
above Picatinny Arsenal and then extended
that restricted zone over a golf club
owned by then President-Elect Donald Trump.
They didn't provide a reason why,
but you don't restrict airspace without a reason.
The New York Post has been on this story from day one,
so I reached out to one of the first journalists
to report on the sightings
to find out if they believe there could be any connection
between the drones and the military base.
What was it like in the middle of it all on the ground
like you were? - It was total pandemonium.
No one really knew exactly what the hell was going on.
There was several agencies that all said,
"Everything is fine, don't worry about it,
no problems."
It was like the vibes of the mayor from "Jaws,"
where he tells you everything at the beach is fine,
there's no sharks, just so that everybody
can continue swimming in peace, right?
It was incredibly frustrating.
The number-one question is, "Why didn't Picatinny Arsenal
shoot down the drones that were in their airspace
operating illegally?"
It seems to me that it wasn't exactly just commercial drones
and miss-sightings that was going on in New Jersey in 2024.
There was something else going on.
If the government
wasn't shooting down the aircraft
that were violating the restricted zone,
you have to wonder,
did the government already know what was going on?
We have footage of a formation flight that's traveling
from one side of Picatinny Arsenal
to the other side of Picatinny Arsenal.
With so many sightings, in such a small area,
it actually elevated to the level
where the President himself
had to make comments.
Is there a chance that this could be related
to some kind of secret US government operation at Picatinny?
It's an intriguing lead,
but we're getting ahead of ourselves.
Before we jump to the conclusion
that these drones were part of some kind of conspiracy
or cover up,
I want to start with what my training taught me.
At CIA, we're taught to follow very strict rules of analysis,
something called Razors.
And the first Razor that we learn
is something called Occam's Razor,
which states that the simplest explanation
is oftentimes the correct explanation.
So the question is, "Was there something strange happening
"in the skies over New Jersey,
or were those lights nothing out of the ordinary?"
To answer that question, I've arranged a meeting
with a pilot from Skydio, a company whose drones are used
by police departments and first responders
all over the country.
- Hello. - Hey, Andy, how's it going?
Ken Van Hese is a former Navy SEAL
who flew drones on classified missions
all over the world.
If anyone can help me try and understand what was going on
over in New Jersey, he can.
I want to start by showing you a video that I received
from a woman named Lisa.
Lisa lives on a hill above Picatinny Arsenal.
Let's count how many drones--
we got, one, two...
three, four...
There's a lot more than I thought it was going to be.
...six... there's seven...
And as she's counting these,
you can see that she's moving her camera in one direction
- Yeah. - Which suggests that all
the drones are going in a predominant direction.
Would it be possible for us
to recreate what we just saw in this video?
We can take a try and see if we can do it.
- Let's do it. - Awesome.
Matt and I will be
the multi-drone remote flight deck operator.
Wes, you'll be covering down on thermal.
- Let's do it. - All right.
- All right. - Kivo 1 taking off.
Some witnesses said the crafts they saw
were much larger than these.
But what I wanted to recreate wasn't the size,
it was the visual effect.
When multiple drones move together at night,
it can trigger something called perception bias,
where a few small lights in the sky
suddenly look much bigger
and much more ominous than they really are.
I never think of flying a drone from a laptop.
I always think of it from a control.
- The future is here. - Holy smokes.
So now what we're gonna take them is right across
the horizon and see if we can recreate what she saw.
OK.
All right, three, two, one, go.
Look at that.
That is exactly what she sent us in the video.
Two, three, four.
She watched and counted them in the sky.
You can count them right now yourself as they move
across the horizon from one point to another
in one predominant direction.
So then, Ken, what's your theory about what was happening
in the skies over New Jersey?
And do you think any of it could have been Skydio technology?
I think it could have been Skydio.
We do have law enforcement customers
in the New Jersey area,
so I think they could have been flying a drone
as first-responder, uh, missions.
I don't think the average American recognizes
that police forces fly drones at all.
They don't. I think that's good for cops.
I think when people see drones in the sky,
it keeps the person honest.
The tech is here, and it's not going anywhere.
A police drone theory might not be too far-fetched.
The Jersey sightings coincided
with one of the most shocking events of 2024--
when UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was gunned down
in cold blood on the streets of New York.
CEO Brian Thompson was killed Wednesday morning.
This was a premeditated,
preplanned, brazen, targeted attack.
And a massive hunt for Luigi Mangione was underway.
After a frantic, three-day manhunt,
tonight the NYPD now believes the suspect who gunned down
UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson
has escaped New York City.
Coming up-- could it be that simple?
Could the Jersey drone mystery be explained by an increase
in police drones patrolling our skies
that most people are just not aware of?
2
Two weeks after the initial drone sightings,
on December 4th, 2024, everyone's attention shifted.
Federal authorities widened the urgent manhunt for a killer.
The NYPD deploying drones.
Drones played a critical role
in the manhunt for Luigi Mangione,
the suspect of the killing
of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Law enforcement drones ran grid searches over Central Park.
They helped locate early physical evidence,
and then they fanned out across the tri-state area
as he fled.
But here's the thing,
that manhunt happened more than two weeks
after the initial sighting, so that explanation falls apart.
Nevertheless, drone pilot Ken Van Hese
told me he believes the answer is police
and first-responder drone activity
the public is just noticing for the first time.
Ken's theory sparks my curiosity.
So I decided to have a little fun.
I want to see firsthand
what a drone tracking someone looks like
with a test of how my CIA evasion and escape techniques
stack up against the latest police drone technology.
So I asked Ken to set up a manhunt
with the local police department,
the target-- me.
We're going to see how long we can track and follow you.
My job is just to evade for as long as possible
and try to escape detection. - Exactly.
I had no idea that over 1,400 police departments
fly drones every day for all sorts of missions.
Check, maybe, Colorado and Nevada.
I'm going to start using my peripheral vision to try
to identify anything in the sky that's looking for me.
This is nerve-wracking as hell.
In my seven years at CIA,
I spent much of it operating overseas undercover.
I got used to people trying to follow me.
Learning how to shake surveillance
is basic tradecraft, but losing a drone
in the in the sky, that's a different game.
There's a very real instinct to run when you know somebody
is on your tail.
But a professional has to fight that instinct.
OK...
I saw the drone in the sky. All right,
let's get creative here.
I have a real chance of blending in with a crowd.
So all of these folks are hanging out.
Can I walk in here with you guys?
Alright.
Well, it's not easy to get accomplices
for this kind of stuff.
But that's not the only trick up my sleeve.
I need a place where the drone can't see me
and what I'm doing.
I'm actually going to go into an underground bar.
It's open.
We are now underground.
Um, it's a very strange question.
Is there an exit other than this from this building?
Alright.
We got our back exit out of the bar.
So now the question is
whether or not the drone's gonna find us.
OK, we are underneath a canopy.
I hear a drone passing overhead.
There it goes.
It's going towards the opposite direction.
So we're going to continue our walk.
Hopefully that means there's a battery problem.
We are literally feet away from a place
that might be my safe haven.
How you doing? How you doing?
Ah! Cheers!
I was able to beat the drone by exploiting a weakness.
Even these expensive police drones are small in scale
and have battery limits.
But many of the drones reported over New Jersey
were seen flying for hours.
Police drones may have been part of the puzzle,
but I'm not convinced that they're the sole explanation,
which leads me to a number
of other wild conspiracy theories
that exploded on social media.
One of the first conspiracy theories to go viral
came from reality TV star Bethenny Frankel.
There are many different theories.
One, that the government, our government,
is searching for something that has been lost.
There have been many nuclear Ws
that were lost during different wars.
Something could be disassembled and then reassembled here.
Soon, people across the tri-state area started
freaking out that the drones were part of a search
for some kind of loose nuke.
There were over 80 nuclear warheads
that were in Ukraine that came up missing.
It's out there.
Nobody knows where it's at now.
And then rumors, of course,
come out on the Internet
that there may be some dire situation.
They could very possibly be sniffing out
something very dangerous.
How crazy was Bethenny's post?
Maybe not so much.
Before my time at CIA,
I was a US Air Force nuclear missile officer.
So let's walk through what would happen if there was
a dirty bomb in New Jersey.
You'd start quietly.
Radiation detection teams, aircraft with sniffers.
These are systems that already exist.
The public would in fact see more aircraft in the skies.
Helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft,
even drones flying tight-grid search patterns.
What you wouldn't hear is, "Good morning, there may be
a missing nuclear device in your neighborhood."
So what people were seeing could fit this pattern.
And a loose nuke isn't science fiction.
In 1961, a US Air Force B-52 bomber
broke apart over North Carolina
and dropped two fully armed hydrogen bombs.
We call this a Broken Arrow.
One of them nearly went off.
The public didn't learn how close that was
until decades later.
But in this case, you're probably not surprised
to learn there was no missing radiological weapon.
Energy agencies knocking down an alarming theory
saying it's just not true.
Authorities even addressed the rumor in time.
That statement goes on to say that nuclear officials
are not currently conducting any aerial operations
in that region.
What went missing was a small amount
of radioactive material that was used for testing.
It had nothing to do with the drones,
but that didn't matter.
This is what happens when national security anxiety
collides with social media,
and fear is rewarded with clicks.
Speculation takes over, and facts are forgotten.
And within days,
the New Jersey drone mystery went from a dirty-bomb scare
to a full-on invasion.
Only this time, it wasn't a real housewife
raising the alarm. It was a police officer.
2 We don't have any video from her,
but this isn't a random person with a phone.
This is a 911 call from a trained officer.
This was Ocean County,
about 100 miles south of Mine Hill,
where civilian and eyewitness Lisa Puluse was
first recording drones above her home.
A 911 call that came from a state park police officer
who wasn't sure what she was seeing.
She described it as a giant swarm of drones
coming in from over the ocean.
This sighting was one of many that happened in the region,
and the sheriff down there started to raise the alarm.
We have flight radar mapping capabilities,
and we did not see anything indicating it was a plane.
Obviously, they want us to know they're there.
They put on their lights.
Uh, so, who it is, I wish I could tell you,
but, you know, obviously, there's a lot of tension
to this matter throughout.
What struck me when I heard this 911 call
was the sheer number of drones
and that they seemed to be coming from a ship offshore.
What did your office do?
We immediately contacted the Coast Guard.
We reported back around 11:30 that night that there was
11 or 13 of them following their Coast Guard cutter.
One drone that they documented,
it didn't give a heat signal
and it needed another type of fuel source.
Nobody saw them take off or land.
And that's interesting, 'cause at some point,
you would have to take off or land.
So for us, the indication would be that it's possibly coming
off the ocean and possibly a submarine.
What the sheriff went on to tell me
is really quite alarming.
A swarm of drones tracking a Coast Guard Cutter.
The strange thing being that they showed no heat signature,
which suggests that possibly they were trying to cloak.
I mean, this sounds more
like advanced military-grade technology.
And that's why when a congressman went on TV
and made the following announcement
it was a New Jersey resident's worst nightmare.
I'm going to tell you the real deal.
Um, Iran launched a mothership
probably about a month ago,
that contains these drones.
- That mothership is off-- - Really?
I'm going to tell you the deal.
It's off the east coast of the United States of America.
They've launched drones.
It's everything that we can see or hear,
and again, these are from high sources.
I don't say this lightly.
Was there an Iranian mothership
launching an aerial invasion near Atlantic City?
If anyone can help me separate the facts from the fear
on this, it's my friend, Trevor Fortner,
a former US Navy counterterrorism special operator.
- Thank you for coming, brother. - It's great to see you, Andy.
What can I do for you?
So, I've been chewing on this question
of the drone sightings that happened in New Jersey
about a year ago. - OK.
And there were all these rumors circulating
about whether or not there was an Iranian mothership
launching drones into the mainland.
How would the United States
react to a foreign naval threat like that?
I don't believe that we would have allowed them to actually
get that close to the country.
So even though it's international water,
it's not really free water for anyone to just sail in?
Not from our perspective, no. We have a nautical statute.
It's 15 nautical miles.
It becomes international territory.
After that, we're still monitoring that
and observing what's happening.
Had there been a foreign threat,
what's your confidence level the US military
would have neutralized the threat before it even got
close enough to pose direct harm?
- One hundred percent. - That's where I am too, man,
'cause they would have been sunk in the water.
I believe that 100%.
Also, what would be the intent of Iran to send a mothership
so close to our shore and launch drones into our airspace
that they know that we can absolutely detect?
There's easier ways, more efficient ways
to clandestinely sneak items into the country.
Trevor's right.
A ship-based attack isn't very likely.
Boats are slow and trackable.
The nightmare scenario
for every national security professional I know
is a drone attack launched from inside
our own borders
by a group of non-state actors or terrorists.
So if it wasn't a foreign enemy, we have to test
the domestic threat idea.
How fast could a drone swarm go airborne?
And how hard would it be to stop?
2 I'm in the middle of a suburban area.
I have a white picket fence right here.
I have a petroleum depot just over there in the distance.
I have multiple schools and churches
all within the area.
This is a fantastic place to demonstrate the power
of a drone swarm.
A location like this is what we call a soft target.
And that's what the sheriff in Ocean County, New Jersey,
was so worried about when an officer reported seeing
a swarm of 50 drones.
We tried to ascertain, "Is this a government agency?
Is this the CIA? Is this the federal government?"
Obviously, we're thinking national security.
I'm going to talk to the guys operating these drones
to understand if the threat of a drone swarm
could be the key to finally unraveling
the mystery of the New Jersey drones.
That is an incredible display.
Yeah, just a little 80-drone demo
we put together.
We spent a lot of time out here just testing out
different configurations and fleet sizes.
We're operating a giant fleet of drones.
These guys aren't military contractors.
They're a private drone entertainment company.
Everything they need to launch their coordinated drone shows
fits in the back of a truck.
And with a single laptop, one person can launch
and coordinate hundreds of drones.
It's interesting to me that you describe this as a "fleet,"
but when you have to sign up for a waiver with the FAA,
it's considered a "swarm."
Is there a difference in terminology?
We refer to it "a fleet" because we have telemetry data
and communications with everything individually.
So we can control everything.
"Swarm" is a little bit more terrifying because it just
kind of speaks to, like, controlled chaos.
You know, we're in a suburban area right now.
There are some very interesting soft targets.
If you look at this very same community
through the eyes of a threat,
how easy would it be for someone to take
a commercial drone and use it for something nefarious?
- Very easy-- very easy. - , yeah.
Yeah, very easy. Could probably do it in five minutes,
honestly, at least now.
- Scary. - That is scary.
And that is what we're seeing
play out all over the world right now.
Yeah, very prevalent in Ukraine, for sure.
Very, very prevalent.
Drones have transformed the battlefield,
no more so than in Ukraine...
...helping the smaller country bog down
their Russian invaders into a near stalemate.
And what terrifies my national security friends most...
is an attack like this.
Tonight, the Kremlin's seeing the biggest drone attack yet
inside Russia.
Back in 2025,
Ukrainian operators hid armed drones
inside specially camouflaged truck beds.
Then those trucks were driven
thousands of miles deep into Russian territory.
The operators remotely activated the drones,
and a coordinated swarm lifted off,
striking multiple Russian military airfields,
taking out scores of planes
before the Russians even understood what was happening.
The lesson wasn't the drones.
The lesson was the tactic--
an attack that launched from inside an enemy's homeland
that was nearly impossible to stop.
So this is our new warehouse.
We just outgrew our last one.
Ho, ho, ho, ho.
This is our new system, which is basically taking
what we do to a whole new level.
These drones will fly out of the box,
do their whole show, finish, and they'll land
exactly back inside of the spot that they took out of.
I'd say out of 2,000 drones, maybe one will miss their slot.
That's how accurate these drones are.
Now, when I was in the military
and when I served at CIA,
the drones that we were dealing with were gigantic.
They were the size of a Volkswagen Beetle.
And they would carry out
reconnaissance missions, surveillance missions.
They would drop missiles from high altitude.
So this is the whole motherboard.
This is what the brains are of one of these drones.
This is it. This is a drone.
They barely are heavy enough to have to be registered
with the FAA. That's how light they are.
When I see the drone light shows
coming in, especially from Asia.
I can't help but be intimidated by what could be done
with a military grade drone.
Is there a one-to-one correlation there?
A lot of the components are the same.
Those are the same drones that could be used
in a military application.
When you take all of this
and you apply it to New Jersey...
It's not so much that we saw
some amazing technological advancement
that we'd never seen before,
but I think it was more that it was happening in a space
and in a pattern that people had not seen before,
but I think there is a weak point
in our airspace, low altitude.
You know, we don't see a lot of things
operate in that airspace.
You know, zero to a thousand feet is,
maybe if you live near an airport or a helipad,
you see activity,
but otherwise you don't see anything.
Graham is right.
We've all seen the movies where drug runners skim the ocean
to avoid Coast Guard radar.
So when it comes to tiny five-pound drones
operating at treetop levels,
you can imagine how hard it would be
to track these.
But remember,
a lot of the sightings were craft
much larger than this.
What do you think was happening in New Jersey
as experts in drones?
I go back and forth on whether it was our own government,
you know, maybe a radar detection,
jamming technology,
or maybe it's even a social experiment.
Like, how are people going to react to weird stuff
they start seeing at low altitude?
I got one more thing I want to show you.
The guys had something up pretty crazy for you.
So why don't we step back outside again?
Absolutely.
- Alright, let's go. - Ready.
It's just incredible to think
that every one of those lights in the sky
is being controlled by one single operator,
somebody who's on our side.
But just imagine what would happen
if somebody with hostile intentions
took control of those drones.
What kind of damage could they inflict?
Russian drones were spotted within NATO airspace,
this time in Romania.
If the government was running exercises
to prepare for such an attack,
they'd keep it under wraps.
But before we jump to this conclusion,
I need to pressure-test a more otherworldly theory.
They're not just like regular drones.
They're UAPs.
That's the UFO.
At Malmstrom Air Force Base,
ten of our nuclear ICBMs were rendered inoperable.
At the same time, a glowing red orb
was observed overhead.
Coming up, UFOs, government preparedness tests,
or police drones?
We may finally get our answers to the mysterious drones
flying over New Jersey.
2 Driving home, I keep replaying it.
Takes a lot to scare me, but the New Jersey...
- The rumors... - Radioactive material in New Jersey
has gone missing. - ...the confusion.
Iran launched a mothership.
Weeks of theories about Iran,
missing weapons, manhunts that spread
across New Jersey from November into December 2024.
Right there. Oh, my goodness.
Like Lisa Puluse said at the beginning...
Nobody's giving us answers.
Your mind goes...
all over the place.
Residents across the state were spiraling.
Bro, this is crazy man.
It even got to the point
where they were wondering if it was human at all.
These drones are mysterious and they're UAPs.
They're not just, like, regular drones.
Are the drones being controlled
by an extraterrestrial intelligence?
The idea that the drones could have been UFOs
became one of the big memes.
That is a yes.
And once again, officials were not denying it,
even though the drones were using FAA running lights,
and showed no characteristics
of out-of-this-world technology.
All of this got me thinking about something at CIA
that we call "narrative control."
In the intelligence world, this means shaping how people
understand events.
Not deceiving people or hiding secrets per se,
but steering perception in the direction that you want.
There's no better example of this than an incident
that happened 50 years ago
when a UFO story was used to cover up a classified test.
In 1967, unidentified objects were reported
over nuclear missile control centers
at Malmstrom Air Force Base.
Around the same time,
multiple intercontinental nuclear missiles
suddenly went offline.
Missileers on duty would later go on to tell the story
of the day UFOs turned off our launch capability
to anyone who would listen.
And that lived on in UFO lore for decades.
At Malmstrom Air Force Base,
in which 10 of our nuclear ICBMs were rendered inoperable.
At the same time, a glowing red orb
was observed overhead.
But last year, declassified documents
told a very different story.
The missiles being disabled had nothing to do with aliens.
It was all the result of a top-secret US military test.
An electromagnetic pulse experiment
designed to see whether an EMP
could knock our own missiles offline.
It worked!
And because it worked so well, the Pentagon stayed silent
because it didn't want the Soviets
to know what had really happened.
And the government allowed the story about aliens
to go unchecked for more than half a century.
What is that?
The government did not create the Jersey UFO story,
but they did allow it to live.
The fact that the federal agencies responsible
for briefing the public have not come forward
in a clear way is unacceptable.
Why it is that they're not being forthcoming
with this information is confusing to me
and very frustrating.
It seemed like we may never get an actual answer
to this mystery.
But then I get a major scoop.
The New York Post reports that they may have the answer
to what was actually flying in the skies in 2024.
A private company with a government contract
was testing out their newest tech,
a car-sized aircraft.
Does that ring a bell?
And residents have compared some of them
to the size of a small car.
There are SUV-sized drones flying over my home,
so I'm going to make a cocktail.
The reporter who broke the story?
My man, Shane.
We got a tip from a source who was former military
that some people were taking credit for setting off
some of the scares over there in New Jersey,
and they were debuting this manned aerial craft
that was about the size of a car.
This is from a company called Pivotal,
and it's a BlackFly.
Now, on the record, they said that they had
nothing to do with it,
but they did not rule out the fact
that they could have sold to somebody
on the East Coast.
So, Shane, what's your net takeaway from all this?
I do think that I keep coming back to, um, Picatinny Arsenal.
It could be, like, a field experiment, essentially.
It doesn't solve the whole mystery,
but it at least plugs something in
so that we can figure it out.
Even if this eases fears that what people were seeing
wasn't an invasion,
but rather advanced car-sized aerial technology,
the question still remains, why?
What is the government not telling us?
But then I heard this
from the White House press secretary.
After research and study, the drones that were flying
over New Jersey in large numbers
were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research
and various other reasons.
"Research and various other reasons."
Words that explain everything, but say nothing.
Unless it wasn't just a test of the technology,
but a test of us.
What is that?
Specifically, how we, the public, would respond.
Of all the places to carry out a test like this,
of course you would pick a dense,
heavily populated, urban location like New Jersey
to test what would happen, how would people react,
how would the rumors spread, how would authorities respond?
How would elected officials speak out?
Dozens upon dozens, every single night,
and nobody's doing anything.
It's plausible this test
was as much from an offensive perspective
as defensive.
If you think about the future of conflict,
it's going to be about reaching people where they live,
where they feel safe.
And when you look at how the public reacted
to these strange lights in the sky,
their reaction went from curiosity
to terror in an instant.
Holy crap.
What is going on in New Jersey?
Look at that.
Modern wars aren't won by weapons alone.
They're won by shaping perception.
The anxiety that people are just feeling.
I don't know. I don't know what to think.
Because the side
that can take control of the narrative
doesn't have to win the fight
to win the war.
Cheers, everyone, and stay safe out there.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.