Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,920
[MUSIC PLAYING]
2
00:00:12,650 --> 00:00:14,750
I love the detail.
3
00:00:14,750 --> 00:00:18,440
I loved listening to the
great scores that I grew up on
4
00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,030
and hearing the detail.
5
00:00:20,030 --> 00:00:23,750
And to me, the detail is
what brings it to life,
6
00:00:23,750 --> 00:00:25,410
makes it exciting.
7
00:00:25,410 --> 00:00:29,980
There's an quality of--
8
00:00:29,980 --> 00:00:33,310
the intricacy of the structure,
as you're building it,
9
00:00:33,310 --> 00:00:36,490
and the details
of that intricacy
10
00:00:36,490 --> 00:00:42,010
is what makes orchestral
music so beautiful to me.
11
00:00:42,010 --> 00:00:45,170
Unfortunately, in
the real world,
12
00:00:45,170 --> 00:00:49,900
those details are usually
steamrolled over in the dub,
13
00:00:49,900 --> 00:00:52,600
and one of the first
things I had to learn
14
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:56,230
was, often, when I'm doing
a certain level of detailing
15
00:00:56,230 --> 00:00:58,880
in a piece of music that
gets me very excited,
16
00:00:58,878 --> 00:01:00,668
I realize the audience
will never hear this
17
00:01:00,670 --> 00:01:02,500
in the film because
of the moment,
18
00:01:02,500 --> 00:01:04,840
because there's stuff
happening on the screen.
19
00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:07,270
And there's a propensity
most of the time,
20
00:01:07,270 --> 00:01:09,280
that if there's stuff
happening on the screen--
21
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:15,460
and I'm not talking about
Gatling guns and machine robots
22
00:01:15,460 --> 00:01:17,590
in an army coming towards you.
23
00:01:17,590 --> 00:01:19,840
I'm talking about
just stuff, which
24
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,540
shouldn't, on the
surface, conflict
25
00:01:22,540 --> 00:01:24,250
with hearing the detail.
26
00:01:24,250 --> 00:01:27,340
But most of the time, it
does because the people that
27
00:01:27,340 --> 00:01:30,370
are putting together
the sound for the film,
28
00:01:30,370 --> 00:01:33,580
they like their own details,
and their own details
29
00:01:33,580 --> 00:01:35,860
means all the
detail of the stuff
30
00:01:35,860 --> 00:01:38,920
that you see and might
hear in the background.
31
00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:42,700
And there's a
conceptual problem here
32
00:01:42,700 --> 00:01:47,300
because I still believe in
the purity of music and image,
33
00:01:47,300 --> 00:01:51,370
and there are moments where
the music can do something
34
00:01:51,370 --> 00:01:52,750
that sound effects can never do.
35
00:01:52,750 --> 00:01:55,210
And there's moments that the
sound effects can do something
36
00:01:55,208 --> 00:01:57,068
that the music can
never do, and they
37
00:01:57,070 --> 00:01:58,370
should both have their place.
38
00:01:58,370 --> 00:02:01,420
But in contemporary film
scoring and film dubbing,
39
00:02:01,420 --> 00:02:06,250
frequently, we're both asked
to do everything all the time.
40
00:02:06,250 --> 00:02:09,010
"Lawrence of Arabia"
has an incredible score
41
00:02:09,009 --> 00:02:10,299
by Maurice Jarre.
42
00:02:10,300 --> 00:02:13,750
One of the beautiful moments
that I noticed when I first
43
00:02:13,750 --> 00:02:18,400
saw it was that, we're getting
ready for a giant battle,
44
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:20,140
and in the preparation
for this battle,
45
00:02:20,140 --> 00:02:22,840
you hear nothing
but horse hooves,
46
00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:25,240
rattling metal sound effects.
47
00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:28,600
And you feel like you're in
the middle of this charge,
48
00:02:28,600 --> 00:02:30,110
and it's perfect.
49
00:02:30,110 --> 00:02:31,280
They're not using music.
50
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:34,020
[RUMBLING OF THE HORSES' HOOVES]
51
00:02:35,980 --> 00:02:38,440
They want you to
feel in the middle
52
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,440
of the chaos of this moment
that the sound effects are
53
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:42,850
doing perfectly.
54
00:02:42,850 --> 00:02:44,760
It doesn't need anything else.
55
00:02:44,762 --> 00:02:46,002
[MUSIC PLAYING]
56
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:48,940
Then the moment-- there it is.
57
00:02:48,940 --> 00:02:49,870
That's the city.
58
00:02:49,870 --> 00:02:50,950
We're going to take it.
59
00:02:50,950 --> 00:02:53,170
The score comes
in, and it's huge.
60
00:03:02,860 --> 00:03:07,030
And the director, David Lean,
let the score take over.
61
00:03:07,030 --> 00:03:09,250
Now, you don't notice,
when you're listening,
62
00:03:09,250 --> 00:03:11,500
that the sound effects
almost completely disappear
63
00:03:11,500 --> 00:03:14,050
and the score takes over
because it's seamless.
64
00:03:14,050 --> 00:03:16,810
And it feels perfect because
the score can deliver
65
00:03:16,810 --> 00:03:19,330
an emotional element
for what's happening
66
00:03:19,330 --> 00:03:24,940
right there, as the great
conflict is coming to fruition,
67
00:03:24,940 --> 00:03:27,820
that the sound effects
can't possibly do.
68
00:03:27,820 --> 00:03:30,460
And he gave both of
them their moment.
69
00:03:30,460 --> 00:03:33,160
Unfortunately, if
"Lawrence of Arabia"
70
00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:36,210
were redone and scored
today, rather than, I'm
71
00:03:36,210 --> 00:03:40,780
going to guess, a 50 minute
score, less than 60 minutes
72
00:03:40,780 --> 00:03:43,750
probably, would be a two
and a half hour score,
73
00:03:43,750 --> 00:03:44,410
or [INAUDIBLE].
74
00:03:44,412 --> 00:03:46,122
If the movie's two
and a half hours long,
75
00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,060
it would be a two
hour, 20 minute score.
76
00:03:49,060 --> 00:03:50,960
There'd be about 10
minutes with no music,
77
00:03:50,957 --> 00:03:53,037
and everything would be
fighting for every moment.
78
00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:55,450
And unfortunately,
you wouldn't come away
79
00:03:55,450 --> 00:03:58,870
with the sense of hurting--
hearing a great score having
80
00:03:58,870 --> 00:04:02,500
just played and the beauty
that comes from feeling that.
81
00:04:02,500 --> 00:04:07,060
So I love it when,
occasionally, today, a director
82
00:04:07,060 --> 00:04:10,120
allows both things to
happen, and the detailing
83
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:13,690
in that piece of music can
actually be felt and heard,
84
00:04:13,690 --> 00:04:15,880
and it's a wonderful experience.
85
00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:22,690
But this is just me talking
as a purist, as a film purist.
86
00:04:22,690 --> 00:04:26,980
I love the separation of
sound effects and music
87
00:04:26,980 --> 00:04:30,250
put to their best
ability, both together.
88
00:04:30,250 --> 00:04:32,680
There's very few scores I've
worked on that I probably
89
00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:36,850
wouldn't suggest that
they be 25% to 40% less
90
00:04:36,850 --> 00:04:39,700
music in the score
today, but it's simply
91
00:04:39,700 --> 00:04:42,190
not how it's done these days.
92
00:04:42,190 --> 00:04:44,590
It's like, give these
moments to the sound effects.
93
00:04:44,590 --> 00:04:47,950
Let them bring you
into their own detail
94
00:04:47,950 --> 00:04:50,770
of the incremental things that
are happening around them--
95
00:04:50,770 --> 00:04:53,230
the sound of crickets, the
sound of this, all the things
96
00:04:53,230 --> 00:04:54,880
that they could do.
97
00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:58,120
When the music starts,
let me do that, but let
98
00:04:58,120 --> 00:04:59,980
me do it in an
emotional way that'll
99
00:04:59,980 --> 00:05:01,690
bring us into that moment.
100
00:05:01,690 --> 00:05:06,080
And then the detail
does actually
101
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:07,760
happen in just the right way.
102
00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:14,660
But detailing is something that
I think of as wishful thinking,
103
00:05:14,660 --> 00:05:19,820
but that doesn't stop me from
wanting to do the job right,
104
00:05:19,820 --> 00:05:24,160
because I know it's
the right way to do it.
7976
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.