All language subtitles for MasterClass Danny Elfman Teaches Music For Film - 04.Storytelling Through Music

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French Download
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,430 [FOREBODING MUSIC] 2 00:00:26,580 --> 00:00:29,690 Filmmaking, as a collaborative art, how seriously 3 00:00:29,690 --> 00:00:30,830 should it be taken? 4 00:00:30,830 --> 00:00:34,760 Well, that question applies to every part of filmmaking. 5 00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:36,680 Should films be taken seriously? 6 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:39,020 Should any part of cinema be taken seriously? 7 00:00:39,020 --> 00:00:41,000 Is it all just light entertainment 8 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,200 that doesn't take itself seriously? 9 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:49,040 And since the 1900s began and films began, 10 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:51,920 that's a question that's been going on and on and on. 11 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,730 Film music is just as important-- no more, no 12 00:00:55,730 --> 00:00:57,500 less-- than filmmaking. 13 00:00:57,500 --> 00:00:59,090 So if you believe that filmmaking 14 00:00:59,090 --> 00:01:01,640 has value and filmmaking can be important, 15 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:04,460 then the music can and is as well. 16 00:01:04,459 --> 00:01:08,319 So your job as a composer is exactly that important. 17 00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:11,450 It's however important that you take the subject of cinema. 18 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:19,780 When I started watching the movies, 19 00:01:19,780 --> 00:01:21,700 I'm guessing I was around 5 or 6. 20 00:01:21,700 --> 00:01:24,820 Because I remember the first movie that scared the crap out 21 00:01:24,820 --> 00:01:28,570 of me and kind of started a bit of a lifelong obsession 22 00:01:28,570 --> 00:01:30,550 was a movie starring Peter Lorre called 23 00:01:30,550 --> 00:01:32,210 "The Beast with Five Fingers." 24 00:01:32,210 --> 00:01:34,580 Now "The Beast with Five Fingers" 25 00:01:34,580 --> 00:01:38,900 was a horror movie from actually the '40s or '50s. 26 00:01:38,900 --> 00:01:43,040 But this Peter Lorre character became a lifelong obsession 27 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:44,000 with me. 28 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:48,290 And oddly, the hand that was pursuing him-- because that's 29 00:01:48,290 --> 00:01:49,140 what it was about. 30 00:01:49,140 --> 00:01:51,380 It was the hand of a pianist that he 31 00:01:51,380 --> 00:01:53,870 was instrumental in killing, this pianist. 32 00:01:53,870 --> 00:01:56,480 Then he was haunted by the hand that continued to play 33 00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:59,300 the piano and-- whenever he was alone-- 34 00:01:59,300 --> 00:02:00,260 would come after him. 35 00:02:00,260 --> 00:02:02,700 And it would be climbing up his shirt. 36 00:02:02,697 --> 00:02:04,027 And he would be pulling it down. 37 00:02:04,030 --> 00:02:06,380 It was always going for his neck. 38 00:02:06,380 --> 00:02:09,980 And anybody who knows their classic films-- 39 00:02:09,979 --> 00:02:14,869 Peter Lorre, who I identified with greatly, 40 00:02:14,870 --> 00:02:17,540 was better than any actor has ever 41 00:02:17,540 --> 00:02:23,120 been in terms of showing angst and the pain of a situation 42 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:28,010 and the horror of a moment when the hand was going up. 43 00:02:28,010 --> 00:02:31,010 And I loved it. 44 00:02:31,010 --> 00:02:31,970 That had me. 45 00:02:31,968 --> 00:02:34,008 And I couldn't have been more than six years old. 46 00:02:34,010 --> 00:02:36,440 Because it started lifelong dreams 47 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,230 of being pursued by an amputated hand. 48 00:02:39,230 --> 00:02:40,910 And if you look around my studio, 49 00:02:40,910 --> 00:02:43,580 you'll see I'm obsessed with hands. 50 00:02:43,580 --> 00:02:46,370 I collect hands-- hands that are human, 51 00:02:46,370 --> 00:02:50,300 hands that are not human, anatomical hands, wax hands, 52 00:02:50,300 --> 00:02:52,710 real hands, mummy hands. 53 00:02:52,710 --> 00:02:54,950 And so the things that frighten me are now the things 54 00:02:54,950 --> 00:02:56,450 that I stayed obsessed with. 55 00:02:56,450 --> 00:02:59,900 But I also noticed there was a great piece of music in there. 56 00:02:59,900 --> 00:03:01,550 Now I learned later that this was 57 00:03:01,550 --> 00:03:03,510 Max Steiner doing the score. 58 00:03:03,510 --> 00:03:06,530 The Steiner score was magnificent. 59 00:03:06,530 --> 00:03:08,270 And I didn't know who this was. 60 00:03:08,270 --> 00:03:12,410 But I began noticing music but not really paying attention. 61 00:03:12,410 --> 00:03:14,870 I didn't know the name Max Steiner. 62 00:03:14,870 --> 00:03:19,280 When I was about 11, I saw "The Day the Earth Stood Still." 63 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:21,380 And "The Day the Earth Stood Still," of course, 64 00:03:21,380 --> 00:03:23,690 was scored by Bernard Herrmann. 65 00:03:23,690 --> 00:03:28,500 And this time, I noticed the music. 66 00:03:28,500 --> 00:03:30,800 The music-- something moved me. 67 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,600 It grabbed hold of me. 68 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:36,080 And I actually went and checked who wrote the music. 69 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,380 And I got to a point where, by the time I was an early teen, 70 00:03:39,380 --> 00:03:43,820 I'd go, oh, I'll bet that's Miklos Rozsa. 71 00:03:43,820 --> 00:03:44,960 I'll bet that's Korngold. 72 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,640 That's got to be Korngold. 73 00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:48,350 And I was getting proud of myself 74 00:03:48,350 --> 00:03:51,560 for being able to hear the styles of different composers. 75 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:53,990 And it all started with my infatuation with Herrmann. 76 00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:05,960 Now the irony of my infatuation with Bernard Herrmann 77 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:08,810 is many people will agree that his best work was 78 00:04:08,810 --> 00:04:10,280 done for Alfred Hitchcock. 79 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:13,610 But at this young age, I had not seen any of it 80 00:04:13,610 --> 00:04:14,450 and couldn't see it. 81 00:04:14,450 --> 00:04:18,230 Because the first movie that came along at the theater 82 00:04:18,230 --> 00:04:21,380 that Herrmann would have scored that Alfred Hitchcock directed 83 00:04:21,380 --> 00:04:22,850 was "Psycho." 84 00:04:22,850 --> 00:04:27,860 And for all my life, it's the first movie my mom said, 85 00:04:27,860 --> 00:04:30,050 no darling. 86 00:04:30,050 --> 00:04:32,450 I don't think that's a good idea. 87 00:04:32,450 --> 00:04:35,180 And my parents never had any idea what I was seeing. 88 00:04:35,180 --> 00:04:36,800 I mean, I was seeing-- 89 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:39,140 the week before-- "The Head That Wouldn't Die," 90 00:04:39,140 --> 00:04:42,470 where the scientist reaches into the mutant's room 91 00:04:42,470 --> 00:04:44,540 and gets his arm yanked off. 92 00:04:44,540 --> 00:04:48,410 And then you see the bloody trail of his stump 93 00:04:48,410 --> 00:04:50,510 go down the stairs before he dies. 94 00:04:50,510 --> 00:04:53,300 And then another creature reaches into his neck 95 00:04:53,300 --> 00:04:56,330 and pulls out some jiggly thing and throws it on the floor. 96 00:04:56,330 --> 00:04:57,450 And there's a close up. 97 00:04:57,450 --> 00:04:58,870 These are the movies I grew up on. 98 00:04:58,867 --> 00:05:01,757 So for my mom to suddenly be aware of what I was seeing 99 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:03,560 was like, what do you mean, Mom? 100 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:05,870 You never even ask me what I'm going to see. 101 00:05:05,870 --> 00:05:08,390 And I realized that there was a difference. 102 00:05:08,390 --> 00:05:10,630 Because there was a lot of press for "Psycho." 103 00:05:10,625 --> 00:05:13,335 And the press all said sexual. 104 00:05:13,330 --> 00:05:14,480 "Psycho" is sexual. 105 00:05:14,480 --> 00:05:17,210 And suddenly, a lot of us kids had 106 00:05:17,210 --> 00:05:20,100 the brakes put on for the first time in our lives. 107 00:05:20,100 --> 00:05:23,510 And so it took a while for me to be able to get into. 108 00:05:23,510 --> 00:05:26,450 Finally, I guess when I was 16 or 17 109 00:05:26,450 --> 00:05:30,200 and started to look more back into film history-- 110 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:31,740 oh my god. 111 00:05:31,742 --> 00:05:33,202 It's like I already loved Herrmann. 112 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:36,350 But "Psycho"-- this is the best score 113 00:05:36,350 --> 00:05:37,880 I've ever heard in my life. 114 00:05:37,879 --> 00:05:41,229 [ROUSING MUSIC] 115 00:05:46,990 --> 00:05:49,790 And then "North by Northwest" and then "Vertigo"-- 116 00:05:49,790 --> 00:05:53,720 and it's like this is the most amazing use of music 117 00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:56,260 in a film I've ever seen in my life. 118 00:05:56,262 --> 00:05:58,222 And then, of course, going all the way back to, 119 00:05:58,220 --> 00:06:01,040 you know, his earliest work with "Citizen Kane." 120 00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:04,190 So the one that was already a demi-god for me 121 00:06:04,190 --> 00:06:06,500 became a god at that point. 122 00:06:12,220 --> 00:06:15,330 I grew up paying attention to the music of Korngold 123 00:06:15,330 --> 00:06:19,090 and a lot of the classic composers 124 00:06:19,090 --> 00:06:22,120 who were excellent narrative storytellers. 125 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:28,660 They came out of the late 19th, early 20th century tradition. 126 00:06:28,657 --> 00:06:30,117 And that's literally who they were. 127 00:06:30,115 --> 00:06:33,615 They were German composers that were 128 00:06:33,610 --> 00:06:37,420 drafted to try to figure out in 1930, what is a film score? 129 00:06:37,420 --> 00:06:39,110 And what can you do with it? 130 00:06:39,110 --> 00:06:40,720 And they were lucky enough to get guys 131 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,870 like Korngold and Franz Waxman and Steiner. 132 00:06:43,870 --> 00:06:46,300 They were all classical composers 133 00:06:46,300 --> 00:06:50,800 out of this era of very narrative storytelling music. 134 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:54,760 Because that was the music that was leading into that period-- 135 00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:58,480 the music of Tchaikovsky and so many other composers that 136 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:00,370 was the beginning of narrative. 137 00:07:00,370 --> 00:07:04,660 You listen to music, and you can hear stories. 138 00:07:04,660 --> 00:07:07,090 That was the tradition that they established. 139 00:07:07,090 --> 00:07:10,270 The first two scores, the big ones-- 140 00:07:10,270 --> 00:07:13,000 "King Kong," "Bride of Frankenstein." 141 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:17,050 It's amazing to go and watch and listen to those scores again. 142 00:07:17,050 --> 00:07:20,540 Max Steiner with "King Kong" not only figured out what to do. 143 00:07:20,535 --> 00:07:22,665 And you have to understand if you're watching this, 144 00:07:22,660 --> 00:07:24,400 nobody had done this before. 145 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,280 He was figuring it out in his head from scratch. 146 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:30,790 There was no tradition to follow to say, how do you 147 00:07:30,790 --> 00:07:33,010 synchronize music to film-- 148 00:07:33,010 --> 00:07:34,810 this relatively new medium-- 149 00:07:34,810 --> 00:07:36,790 and make it work for a narrative? 150 00:07:36,790 --> 00:07:39,580 And he was inventing on what he knew. 151 00:07:39,580 --> 00:07:41,710 And when "King Kong" starts moving 152 00:07:41,710 --> 00:07:45,430 and his music moves with King Kong, 153 00:07:45,430 --> 00:07:47,050 that seems like nothing now. 154 00:07:47,050 --> 00:07:47,760 Of course. 155 00:07:47,755 --> 00:07:48,885 You hear that all the time. 156 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,200 But back then, it was extraordinary. 157 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,230 It was establishing an idea which 158 00:07:57,230 --> 00:07:59,360 would last for the rest of the century 159 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:01,160 and is still around today. 160 00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,760 And what Franz Waxman did with the "Bride of Frankenstein" 161 00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:09,350 was to go this great, effusive, mysterious melody and score 162 00:08:09,350 --> 00:08:13,340 that built and built and did such a beautiful job 163 00:08:13,340 --> 00:08:19,730 of bringing in this tragic, dramatic, melodramatic-- sure, 164 00:08:19,730 --> 00:08:20,990 why not-- 165 00:08:20,990 --> 00:08:25,010 but mysterious element of bride of Frankenstein 166 00:08:25,010 --> 00:08:26,270 and what she was. 167 00:08:26,270 --> 00:08:29,080 And it's an incredible score. 168 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,030 The bride of Frankenstein! 169 00:08:32,034 --> 00:08:36,874 [SOARING ORCHESTRAL MUSIC] 170 00:08:43,179 --> 00:08:47,469 And thank god John Williams-- in the '70s, who was a student 171 00:08:47,470 --> 00:08:49,150 of this music-- 172 00:08:49,150 --> 00:08:52,540 brought to life again in the '70s into the '80s and helped 173 00:08:52,540 --> 00:08:56,950 bring back the whole idea of a big narrative orchestral score. 174 00:08:56,950 --> 00:08:59,680 Because that's really what he did with Star Wars, 175 00:08:59,680 --> 00:09:05,020 was to re-establish, as a genre, a big, orchestral, melodic 176 00:09:05,020 --> 00:09:05,770 sound. 177 00:09:05,770 --> 00:09:09,400 It dates right back to the original composers 178 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:11,200 in a beautiful but original way. 179 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:14,170 I'm not saying that he was copying them because he wasn't. 180 00:09:14,170 --> 00:09:15,100 He had his own style. 181 00:09:15,100 --> 00:09:19,390 But he was illustrating exactly how 182 00:09:19,390 --> 00:09:22,600 the masters would take a thematic narrative 183 00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:25,210 and weave it into a score. 184 00:09:25,210 --> 00:09:29,830 And on the other extreme, you have contemporary music, 185 00:09:29,830 --> 00:09:31,810 which can be extremely effective, where 186 00:09:31,810 --> 00:09:34,830 there's no melody at all, but there could be a motif. 187 00:09:34,830 --> 00:09:37,120 And the motif says a lot. 188 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,940 The most minimalist beautiful way 189 00:09:39,940 --> 00:09:43,180 in recent history I can think of would be Mica Levi in the film 190 00:09:43,180 --> 00:09:43,960 "Under the Skin." 191 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:45,360 I love that score. 192 00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:47,140 And I love her compositions. 193 00:09:47,140 --> 00:09:52,930 But so simple and so basic and so primitive and so effective. 194 00:09:52,930 --> 00:09:54,420 [FOOTSTEPS] 195 00:09:54,415 --> 00:09:57,885 [TENSE MUSIC] 196 00:10:02,830 --> 00:10:06,340 Sometimes, the whole point is to make a statement 197 00:10:06,340 --> 00:10:11,050 and not be obvious that we're saying this or this. 198 00:10:11,050 --> 00:10:13,000 We're saying, just giving you a feeling. 199 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:14,680 How does that make you feel? 200 00:10:14,678 --> 00:10:15,968 And that's what you want to do. 201 00:10:15,970 --> 00:10:18,850 You want to go, I'm not sure how I feel about this character. 202 00:10:18,850 --> 00:10:21,430 I'm not sure if this character is good or bad. 203 00:10:21,430 --> 00:10:23,040 Maybe they're both. 204 00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:24,570 And you can do that with the music 205 00:10:24,570 --> 00:10:26,780 purposely, this kind of ambiguity 206 00:10:26,780 --> 00:10:29,410 that maybe it's telling a story, maybe it's not. 207 00:10:29,410 --> 00:10:32,770 And again, I think that's one of the beautiful things 208 00:10:32,770 --> 00:10:37,060 about composition is that gray area when you're 209 00:10:37,060 --> 00:10:40,330 telling a story that really can be interpreted different ways 210 00:10:40,330 --> 00:10:41,950 and intentionally so. 211 00:10:41,950 --> 00:10:46,440 Because you don't want to give up your hand at that point. 15920

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.