Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[MUSIC PLAYING]
So the question that--
that people in books should be really nice people all the time
and that women in particular ought to be very well-behaved,
first of all it's not real life as we know.
first of all it's not real life as we know.
And second, women come in all shapes and sizes, ages
and stages, heights and colors in different parts
of the world.
And to expect or demand that they be angelic and perfect
is very Victorian.
There is limited space on a pedestal.
You don't get to move around a lot.
So my view is that women are people,
and that people are not perfect.
and that people are not perfect.
And that there are many, many different kinds of them.
And why should that not be reflected in fiction?
When you're writing, you're going to be looking at how
people in the world you're writing about,
if it's the present age or if it's the 50's--
those are two very different periods--
how they are performing gender--
which is always to a certain extent
a way of presenting yourself in society--
to other people.
to other people.
What am I conveying to other people about myself
by this performance of gender?
So gender is partly dependent on how it is performed
in a historical period.
So what does it mean, for instance, in the Tudor era
to be a male person?
What does it mean to be a female person?
What do those things mean when they're
at different social levels?
at different social levels?
Because that, too, varies from age to age.
Women actually lost a lot of rights in the 19th century
that they had had earlier.
And some of the things that they've
tried to regain in the 20th and 21st
were things they had had before the 19th.
One of the big offenders was Napoleon Bonaparte, by the way.
And let us mention that in the French Revolution,
they're very vague on the Declaration
of the Rights of Man.
of the Rights of Man.
But when a woman came along with the Declaration
of the Rights of Women, they denounced her as a traitor
and chopped off her head.
So what does gender mean has been going on
for a very long time.
And in our age, we no longer think
that there are only two packages, pink and blue.
And science has backed that up.
It's a bell curve, it's a continuum.
It's a bell curve, it's a continuum.
And your character can be situated anywhere
on that continuum.
"The Robber Bride," the name comes
from a gender switch on a Grimm's fairy tale
called "The Robber Bridegroom."
It's a female thief rather than a male thief,
and it's structured like the opera, "Tales of Hoffman."
and it's structured like the opera, "Tales of Hoffman."
That is, it has a prologue, then it has three stories embedded
within it, one for each of the three other characters.
And then it has an epilogue, just like "Tales of Hoffman,"
the opera.
So there is Zenia, who is the eminance grise
of the piece, who appears in all of the stories.
And then there are the three friends,
And then there are the three friends,
to whom these stories happen.
And each one of them involves Zenia stealing their man
but in very different ways.
And she is the kind of character who
can restructure her story and even her identity
to conform with what might appeal
to that particular woman.
How does she get in the door?
How does she gain their confidence and then betray it?
How does she gain their confidence and then betray it?
So it's that kind of character.
And I wrote it in part because somebody said to me,
there are no female con-men.
And I said, oh yes there are.
So Zenia became quite popular, oddly enough.
I was in England, and I was talking about her.
And I said, which of the characters
in "The Robber Bride" do you identify with the most?
And they said, Zenia.
And I said why do you do that?
And I said why do you do that?
She's not a very nice person.
They said, because women are tired
of being good all the time.
And it is indeed quite wearing to be expected
to be good all the time.
So I think in a way, she was an outlet.
You enjoy seeing how they manage to deceive people and get away
with what they get away with.
Not that you would do it yourself, of course not.
What makes a compelling villain?
Yes, who was it?
William Blake said, the devil has got all the good lines.
It depends on what kind of novel you're writing, again.
If you're writing Dr. Faustus, we
watch Mephistopheles in action.
So I think really it's a question of if you don't quite
know what a character is going to do next--
know what a character is going to do next--
think of some of the noteworthy villains.
Hannibal Lecter, you don't know what he's going to do next,
and that's what makes him interesting.
You have to engage with him.
You have to keep your eyes on him,
because you may change his line of defense.
He may change his tactic with without warning.
Unpredictability.
So surprise me.
And if you're surprising me, you're engaging me.
And if you're surprising me, you're engaging me.
If your surprise is convincing.
Likability is a factor when you're choosing a roommate.
But it's not necessarily a factor
when you're creating a living character.
You will find people saying the central character isn't
likeable.
And you'll find other people saying
that's not the only criterion.
So Captain Ahab is not in any way likable.
So Captain Ahab is not in any way likable.
But he is compelling.
Let's put it that way.
There's a book by John Gardner called "Grendel."
and it's from the point of view of the monster
Grendel in the Beowulf story.
It's absolutely riveting.
He's a completely unpleasant character.
So a character can be very vibrant and alive
although not likable.
although not likable.
So think of the people in your life.
Think of the people that you're interested in hearing about.
What have they done now?
What have they got up to now?
What sort of a mess are they in now?
On the other hand, there is Mabel,
who is always well-behaved.
Are you interested in hearing more about Mabel?
No, not particularly.
But if I tell you that Richard III has just
murdered all his relatives, you're
probably going to perk up.
And I think that comes from our deep evolutionary background.
When things are stable, we don't have to pay that much attention
to them.
It's when the wolf comes out of the woods
that we get very alert.
So dangerous and unstable characters--
characters we can't necessarily predict,
characters that we don't know whether they're telling us
characters that we don't know whether they're telling us
the truth or not--
they hold our attention in a way that Mabel doesn't.
I got Mabel out of "The Pirates of Penzance," yeah.
She's always very good.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.