Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
So, people talk when writing fiction
about character and they talk about
dialogue. I talk about them as if
they're two different things. And they
are two different things, but they're
two different things that actually
amount to the same thing. And they're
like the the two legs that a character
needs in order to walk. So, in the next
class, we're going to talk about
character and dialogue and what they are
and how incredibly tightly interwoven
they can be.
When I started out,
the most
terrifying thing for me was the idea of
character creation
and who were characters. I didn't really
get characters. I didn't understand
what characters were. And it took a
while for me to learn really how to
write good characters. Characters who
were three-dimensional. Characters who
felt real. characters who felt real to
me.
A lot of the key to it, people say,
"Well, do you do you do those sort of
books and things before you start? Do
you list off lots of things about your
characters?" And and I say, "No."
Mostly what I do is try and figure out
what they sound like,
how they talk.
Sometimes what they look like, but
mostly how they talk. Because
dialogue is character.
The way that somebody talks, what they
say, how they say it
is character. And dialogue
has to show character.
It also has to show plot.
And maybe it can be funny along the way.
And good dialogue is doing all three of
those things at the same time. It's
making you smile or making you see
things you've never seen before. It's
moving the story along.
And more than anything, it's telling you
things about the people who are saying
it and who they're saying it to.
And so for me, the key to writing good
dialogue,
which was the key to character, were the
years that I spent as a journalist doing
interviews.
Um, I would meet somebody that I wanted
to talk to, writers, creators.
Um, I'd have my little tape recorder. I
would talk to them for two or three
hours. I would transcribe the tape and
then having transcribed the tape,
which would give me 10,000 words of
transcription,
my task would be to turn that into a 2
to 3,000word interview.
So, I learned a lot at that point about
economy. How do you make somebody sound
like themselves
without ever necessarily using the exact
words that they used? Because now you're
compressing
and people don't talk like themselves.
People don't use semicolons. People
don't speak grammatically. People
instead they they they start sentences.
They leave words dangling. A few seconds
ago I said people and then I hesitated
and then I changed course because that's
how people talk and you can't do that.
Well, you can't do exactly that
in writing. But you can figure out where
the rhythms are. You can figure out how
to make somebody sound like the person
who was talking to you. And you learn
compression. You learn more than
anything else economy.
And it was that economy
um that actually I think looking back on
it that was the most useful thing for
going out there and writing fiction
because I learned how to compress and
I'd learned how to show character, show
who somebody was by what they said.
The process of writing good dialogue
is a listening process.
Um, it's the process of you write the
line before
and then you listen and find out what
comes back at you. What does the person
say?
Sometimes for me, I need to know what a
person that I'm writing about looks
like. When I was writing Sandman, I
decided that um the title character, the
Sandman, who's also known as Dream,
would be part of a family called the
Endless.
And very rapidly
I figured out for myself who the first
six of the Endless were. And then there
was a young one and I knew there were
seven of them. And I wasn't quite sure
about that one.
And then I thought, delirium.
Delirium seems right.
And I saw a photograph
of a girl
at a nightclub wearing ripped fishnets
sort of all over herself and just
looking very very sweet but kind of out
of it. I thought, okay, her that kind of
look. There's something very fragile
there and very young.
And um that was where I began.
But I thought that when she came on,
in contrast
to the slightly out of it look, she was
going to be angry, she was going to be
in control, she was going to be um there
was going to be rage and and I tried
writing that and it felt wrong and I
wrote about a page of this dialogue and
it felt forced. it didn't really feel
like the character I had in mind. So I
thought, okay, let's listen to that
character. Let's see what we get.
And I thought, actually, let's go for
something much more
gentle and beused and speaking in
sentences in the same way that a small
child
can speak in sentences.
um that is slightly off from whatever
you're expecting.
And suddenly the character came to life
and she would say the strangest things
and it was like finding that part of
your mind that is
gloriously perfectly unhinged.
And every now and again she would just
say things like um you know, have you
ever spent days and days making up
flavors of ice cream that nobody's ever
eaten? Chicken and telephone ice cream.
And green mouse ice cream. I didn't like
that either. And you're going, "Oh, I
didn't even know that could come out of
my head." But once you have a character
who can say that kind of thing, then you
also have a character who is allowed to
say incredibly wise things as well. And
so I could sneak
huge and important things
into Delirium's mouth and know that they
could be taken hugely seriously
along with just the the weird lovely odd
funny little comments she'd make. You
know,
somebody talks about losing time and she
says, "I lost some time once. It's
always in the last place you look for
it." So you have to train yourself as a
writer to listen.
Characters if you are writing them
become part of you and become separate
from you at the same time.
You have to know your characters well
enough to know would they do this?
And sometimes they won't
and at that point mostly I'll trust
them.
Um I have known writers who are like
well you know they have no choice. If I
have written my outline and I have the
character going from here to here and
they don't want to well they do. I tend
to listen to my characters.
It's like a kind of um
controlled insanity.
Because on the one hand, I am perfectly
aware that I'm creating the characters.
I made them up. They start with me.
Everything they say came out of my head.
And on the other hand, the moment that
they are alive, the moment that they are
doing things, the moment that they are
real, I am imbuing them with life. I'm
imbuing them with my belief. I care
about them. I'm interested in them. And
it's almost as if I'm watching them and
listening to them.
And the problem then comes when they
stop, when they don't say anything, when
they don't move. And instead of writing
down what they're doing, you have to
figure it out. You have to figure out
where you went wrong. you have to figure
out why the character isn't saying
anything.
And that
it's always a slightly strange process
because there is something genuinely mad
about it. Um if you are writing good
characters,
believable characters, glorious,
larger than life characters,
um
they do take on a a sort of a life.
You know, Terry Prattet and I used to
joke that we talk about, you know, going
to meet our maker
and if we killed characters in our
fiction, maybe one day there'd be a
knock at the door and we'd open the door
and there would be some of our
characters looking up at us sadly
saying, "Why did I have to suffer and
die?"
And you want to say, "Well, for the
entertainment and enlightenment of other
people." And they'd look up at us and
go, "Is that enough?" And you go, "It
has to be enough."
If I'm doing my job as a writer, if I'm
giving it everything I've got,
my characters are going to be
believable. because I believe in them
and I believe them. They are going to be
separate from me and they're going to be
part of me. And some of that is simply
having come up with a character, knowing
what kind of person that character is
going to be. At the point where you
start writing them,
you are going into yourself
and you have to not be afraid of
yourself. You have to be willing if
you're writing a murderer, if you're
writing a bad person to go and find that
part of you that is the bad person, that
is the murderer that would take pleasure
in this thing and go, okay, what would
you say? What would you do? Who are you?
By the same token, you go and find the
part of you that is female. You go and
find the part of you that is old. You go
and find that part.
Um, and then
you don't think of it as the part of you
that's female, the part of you that's
old, the part of you that's bad. You
think of it as that person.
And you trust them.
You listen to them.
While you're writing a character named
Caroline,
you are always, if you are me anyway,
asking yourself, well, what would I do?
What would I have done?
What would I have done if instead of
being me in my childhood,
I was 7, 8, maybe 9 years old and
this was happening to me now?
What would I do?
And that question,
finding that part of yourself that is an
eight or nine year old girl
and feels right
is is important. Um, it's vital.
On the one hand, if you are an adult
writer, you know a lot of people. You
have encountered a lot of people in your
lifetime. You encountered them at
school. You've encountered them at home.
You've encountered them in the streets.
You have met good people. You have met
bad people. You have met bullies. You
have met angels. You have met um complex
and interesting people. you can and
those people filtered down, flavored
differently, are going to start showing
up in your fiction. But you're also
going to need to write about people you
don't know. You're going to need to
write about people from cultures you
don't know. You're going to write about
people with professions you do not
understand. You may need uh to write
about types of people
who you do not know.
And for them, my advice to anybody
starting out is just go find them. Go
talk to them.
Talk to people. Um,
talk to people with different sexual
orientations to yours if you're going to
be writing them. Talk to people from
different cultures.
Go in, do your research,
do it with respect, know that there are
things to be known. So,
I think
if you are a starting out writer,
probably even if you're an experienced
writer, I have two pieces of advice for
you if you want to to channel a
character, a time period, anything.
One of which is and and they're kind of
opposite and contradictory and they're
both true.
One of which is trust yourself.
do it. You do it by doing it. Just do
it. And the other is do your research.
But I've known too many writers starting
out who would get trapped
in a vortex of research.
Um, and you can't. You have to do enough
research. It's it's like you're a a
smash and grab
robber. You are going to put that brick
through the window. then you're going to
reach in and grab everything that you
need and run away and use it because
honestly you don't want to spend uh 10
years researching
manners and mores in British public
schools of the 1870s
in order to get your story perfect.
There may be some stories that you have
spent your life unconsciously
researching. You know what a heartbreak
is. You know what it's like to work in a
bank. You know um what it's like to have
to walk a long way in the rain.
Whatever it is the thing that you're
writing is, you're going, "Okay, well, I
have that. I have that already. That's
there." Um
and if you don't know what it's like to
walk for 10 days in the rain, you might
know what it's like to walk for a few
hours in the rain. And you can
extrapolate and you go, "Okay, well,
it's going to be like that, only worse.
And what's it going to be like on day
three? And now you're having to sleep in
wet clothes." And okay, and everybody
and everything's going to hurt. And now
you're getting sore. And now you're
getting the athletes foot and the
trench. Oh, this is But imagination
plays a huge amount. Putting yourself in
the place of somebody. But then
there will be places and times where you
go
um
you go I don't know this and I need to
find out.
Go and learn because that's what will
make your fiction good.
Um and that's what will also make your
fiction feel honest
and true.
characters in a book.
There are lots of them. And one of the
things I learned, I think, I may have
learned it from Dickens
or I may have learned it from Jack
Kirby.
Um, but whoever I learned it from,
possibly even from a Milm. Um, when you
have a lot of characters wandering
around,
you need to help your reader.
You need to just give your reader a
hand. And one of the ways that I've
always like to do that is what I call
funny hats.
And by funny hats, I don't actually
literally mean you have a character wear
a funny hat. What I do mean is you give
your character something that makes that
character different from every other
character in the book.
And it's sort of it's something that
reading the work of young writers,
they tend to hesitate to do.
And um and the trouble with that is you
can read a short story, occasionally
even read a novel with a number of
people who are indistinguishable from
each other except for their names.
Which means you have to remember their
names. You have to remember who they
are. And when they show up, you have to
thumb back and go, "Okay, hang on. Is
this Simon
or is this Jack
or is and oh no hang on this is the
other this is the one the other one who
they met before this is Peter and
what's lovely is just and you do this as
an author out of kindness for your
reader is give them funny hats
give them that point you know Simon
wears the bright red bowler hat and
Peter wears the not packed. And
and of course, all of these hats are
metaphorical. You just make sure that
when somebody comes on, they don't look
like anyone else. They don't sound like
anybody else. You can do it in realistic
fiction. You can do it in children's
fiction. You can do it in You can do it
in fiction
aimed at the lowest common denominator.
You can do it a fiction that is elegant
and beautiful. But either way, you just
write characters who are different from
each other. They look different from
each other. They feel different from
each other. There is something about
them that means that the reader is being
you're holding the reader's hand a
little bit. And you're just making sure
that they're never confused.
So in a book like Neverware,
we begin
with Mr. Kroo and Mr. Vandermar.
Um,
and uh, you immediately realize how
different they are. Mr. Kroo had hired
Ross at the last floating market which
had been held in Westminster Abbey.
Think of him, he told Mr. Vandermar as a
canary
sings asked Mr. Vandermar. I doubt it. I
sincerely and utterly doubt it. Mr. Kroo
ran a hand through his lank orange hair.
No, my fine friend. I was thinking
metaphorically, more along the lines of
the birds. They take down minds. Mr.
Vandermar nodded, comprehension dawning
slowly. Yes, a canary. Mr. Ross had no
other resemblance to a canary.
There are four simple ways for the
observant to tell Mr. Kroo and Mr.
Vandermar apart. First, Mr. Vandermar is
two and a half heads taller than Mr.
Kroo. Second, Mr. Croo has eyes of a
faded China blue, while Mr. Vandermar's
eyes are brown. Third, while Mr.
Vandermar fashioned the rings he wears
on his right hand out of the skulls of
four ravens, Mr. Kroo has no obvious
jewelry. Fourth, Mr. Kroo likes words,
while Mr. Vanmar is always hungry. Also,
they look nothing at all alike.
And so we immediately have a couple of
killers.
Um they are very very dangerous and they
do not talk in any way alike. They do
not look alike. Um one of them is
monoselabic, the other is multi-elabic.
um enjoys words, is going to have um
a a relationship with things where the
only thing we ever see him eat is a
piece of very fine tang dynasty,
uh China, whereas Mr. Vandermar um is
always hungry as we have learned and
just eats things as he goes, frogs and
rats and bits of dead puppy and anything
that he happens to find along the way.
And they are the assassiniest assassins
I could come up with. Some of the other
characters
in
um Neverear also are funny hat
characters. The Marquita Carabus who who
deals in favors wears a huge and
glorious coat and is always wearing the
coat until he is murdered and the coat
gets stolen and things in the plot get
very difficult for him. Um, old Bailey
lives on the top of roofs and up on the
rooftops he's dressed and in in a cape
of feathers. He's described as looking
like what Robinson Crusoe in the popular
imagination would have looked like if he
were cast away on the rooftops of London
with nothing but birds to create his
world out of. Um,
so you take these characters and
securing the knowledge that none of them
could be confused for any of the others.
None of them talk the same. And when
they turn up,
um, they,
you know who they are. The reader does
not have to work at that
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.