All language subtitles for Shots- Eugenics To Pandemics_CLIP_2

The San Francisco Chronicle said that
lifting the ban renewed the allowance to

help increase the deadlines of any
pathogen that could potentially cause a

pandemic.

The Nobel Prize -winning French
scientist Luc Montagnier analyzed COVID

told CNews that it was man -made, coming
out of a laboratory, not the bat market

in Wuhan.

Et nous revenons avec l 'actualité du
Covid -19 et nous sommes avec le

professeur Luc Montagnier. Bonjour.

Bonjour. Et merci d 'être avec nous.

Faut -il le rappeler, vous êtes prix
Nobel de médecine et c 'est vous qui

l 'origine de la découverte du VIH.

Et vous êtes arrivé à certaines
conclusions.

Alors, nous sommes arrivés à la
conclusion qu 'effectivement, il y avait

manipulation au sujet de ce virus.

C 'est -à -dire ?

Well, only a part, I'm not saying the
total, but there is a model which is

obviously the classic virus, and there
it was a model mainly coming from the

bat, but in this model we have added

sequences above, especially of the VIH,
the virus of AIDS.

But when you say, we added, who added?

I don't know.

But it's not natural, is that what you
mean?

No, it's not natural. It was a work of
professionals, a work of molecular

biologists.

It's a very meticulous work.

After China's first reported case of
this novel coronavirus, or COVID -19, in

December of 2019 in Wuhan, as of October
4, 2020, they reportedly only having 4

,739 deaths from COVID -19, while the U
.S. reported 209

,382 deaths.

And the U .K., with a population 20
times smaller than China, saw 10 times

many deaths.

Though, as previously noted, the death
numbers do need to be questioned.

Nonetheless, CDC data showed Americans
of color dying at much higher rates of

COVID -19 than white Americans.

For example, this Brookings Institution
article shows CDC stats that report how

middle -aged, black, and Latino death
rates are at least six times higher than

for whites in the first four months of
the COVID -19 outbreak in the U .S.

One reason might be genetics.

A Northwestern University study showed a
strong correlation between vitamin D

deficiency and COVID.

WebMD tells of how dark skin in
northern, lower sunlight areas can be a

cause of vitamin D deficiency due to the
fact that the pigment melanin reduces

the skin's ability to make vitamin D in
response to sunlight exposure.

Did the racist, genocidal oligarchs have
dumb luck with this virus hitting

Americans of color the hardest?

Is the Pope Muslim?

The Project for a New American Century,
PNAC, was a who's who of former top

neoconservative leaders, including
Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Vice

Dick Cheney, Vice President Dan Quayle,
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,

and Secretary of Education Bill Bennett.

In September of 2000, the PNAC came out
with a report titled Rebuilding

America's Defenses, Strategy, Forces,
and Resources for a New Century.

In that 90 -page report, they stated
that advanced forms of biological

that can target specific genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the

realm of terror to a politically useful
tool.

While top news reports stated puzzled
scientists seek reasons behind Africa's

low fatality rates from the pandemic,
getting lots of vitamin D from the sun

likely helped.

The same would apply for India.

By 2010, the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, BMGF, bought out India's

advisory group on immunization.

The Gates -influenced advisory group
massively increased India's polio

protocols with terrible results.

As seen in this CDC table, the new
protocols mandated up to 50 doses of

vaccines through overlapping
immunization programs to children before

five. Indian doctors blame the Gates
campaign for a devastating non -polio

flaccid paralysis epidemic that
paralyzed over 490 ,000 children beyond

rates between 2000 and 2017.

This peer -reviewed journal hyperlinked
in that article also makes clear that

finding.

India's government decided to snap ties
with the BMGF in 2017.

and the non -polio acute flaccid
paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2019, ABC News reported that oral
vaccines for polio were causing more

cases than the original wild virus.

Canada's top newspaper published
questions about the history of the Gates

-funded World Health Organization
director with the world's longest name.

For example, Tedros Ghebreyesus, The
first non -medical doctor WHO director

former Ethiopian health minister
wouldn't acknowledge cholera outbreaks.

He also reportedly had formed a close
relationship with the Bill and Melinda

Gates Foundation over the past 10 years.

In 2020, during Ghebreyesus' tenure, the
Madagascar president would say that the

WHO offered me $20 million to put a
little toxic in my COVID -19 remedy.

And finally, For the pesky Africans and
Indians who refused vaccines, who had

found COVID -19 remedies, and who were
more likely to have healthier vitamin D

levels, Gates and his fellow oligarchs
had an answer.

Their answer even made Forbes facetious
in its headline.

Block the sun.

What could go wrong?

No, it's not an Onion parody article.

While Wuhan, China first reported a
cluster of pneumonia cases on December

2019, the Gates Foundation, the World
Economic Forum, and the Johns Hopkins

School of Public Health Center for
Health Security predicted a more

pandemic scenario in October of 2019
than the Rockefellers had in 2010.

They called their predictive pandemic
gathering Event 201.

They must have borrowed the
Rockefeller's crystal ball.

They filmed themselves in a simulation
of this pandemic event, with mock

newscasts included.

Infected people got a respiratory
illness with symptoms ranging from mild

-like signs to severe pneumonia.

The sickest required intensive care.
Many died.

Experts agree unless it is quickly
controlled, it could lead to a severe

pandemic, an outbreak that circles the
globe and affects people everywhere.

The Event 201 organizers also convened
the various people they considered the

most important to handle the situation
in a pandemic emergency board.

Of course, they had to include a non
-medical professional from the Bill and

Melinda Gates Foundation.

Here he is talking a second time about
the need to take handling of the

out of government hands and putting it
in the hands of private companies so

could get much wealthier from it.

I think it's going to take specificity
and it's going to take knowledge that

only the private sector has.

Everything worked as planned for the
private sector billionaire oligarchs.

Nearly 100 ,000 small businesses closed
down for good.

with over 20 million Americans losing
their jobs as unemployment was literally

off the charts and worldwide starvation
spiked from 135 million to 270

million. Yet billionaires made off like
the bandits they are, increasing their

wealth by $931 billion during the 2020
COVID pandemic.

Of the thousand -some billionaires
purported, philanthropist Bill Gates

made it to the top eight of increased
wealth.

It must be that incredible foresight.
Here is Gates at another TED Talk in

Today, the greatest risk of global
catastrophe doesn't look like this.

Instead, it looks like this.

If anything kills over 10 million
people, In the next few decades, it's

likely to be a highly infectious virus
rather than a war.

Golly jeez, why can't it be both, Bill?

Gates, the prophet, made some of the
biggest profit off his prediction,

increasing his wealth by $20 billion,
from $98 billion in March 2020 to

$118 billion in October of 2020.

As they say, Planning pays off. Or maybe
it was just good karma from all his

giving.

So how did they get away with highway
robbery, with little protest from the

masses? Well, that's why the organizers
of Event 201 included these Essential

Emergency Pandemic Board participants.

Here's NBCUniversal's Hasti Taghi with
her eyes wide shut, discussing messaging

during the pandemic.

And here's Matthew Harrington of the
Edelman Group.

It's obvious why the oligarchs pulled
this guy out of relative obscurity.

Harrington's corporate profile explains
that here.

Matthew is a specialist in corporate
positioning and reputation management.

You've got to keep a good reputation
when you're stealing so much from

of millions of Americans, along with
conning billions of people overseas.

So did officials handle the COVID -19
pandemic correctly after all this great

planning? A former New York Times
investigative reporter of 10 years, Alex

Berenson, left the newspaper to write
best -selling books.

Berenson then started publishing an
investigation of the pandemic in three

mini -books titled unreported truths
about COVID -19 and lockdowns. First,

Berenson reported on estimates and death
counts, noting the exaggeration of the

problem.

In a second investigation for his three
-part Unreported Truths series, Alex

Berenson focused on the 2020 lockdowns.
A 108 -page CDC report of 2007

created a five -category Pandemic
Severity Index where, based on the CDC's

scale, COVID -19 almost certainly should
be classified as a Category 2 epidemic.

For this and the more severe Category 3,
the CDC merely said governments should

consider school closures of less than
four weeks, along with moderate efforts

reduce contacts among adults, such as
encouraging telecommuting.

Berenson continued, the prospect of
closing all retail stores or offices is

even mentioned in the paper.

not even during a Category 5 epidemic.

Alex Berenson conducted a last
investigation around masks.

He quoted Dr. Jerome Adams, the Surgeon
General, who on February 29th tweeted a

warning that would become infamous.

Seriously, people, stop buying masks.

They are not effective in preventing
general public from catching hashtag

coronavirus.

On March 31st, CNN reported that WHO
stands by recommendation to not wear

if you're not sick or not caring for
someone who is sick. CNN also

this Georgetown University global health
expert who warned that day.

These are supposed to be single -use
masks, but some people might wear them

days, in which case you actually, you
might get...

Particle bacteria might grow inside the
mask.

You're not used to wearing it. You don't
know what to do. You might be touching

your face more often. All of those are
opportunities to actually get yourself

sick.

And finally, the prestigious New England
Journal of Medicine said on April 1st,

2020, we know that wearing a mask
outside health care facilities offers

if any, protection from infection.

Alex Berenson noted that within days of
the New England Journal's article,

Health experts reversed course and
insisted people must wear masks, whether

were feeling sick or well, whether they
were in hospitals or stores or even

outside. Harvard Med School's Mike
Klompas and his two colleagues who wrote

New England Journal article were forced
to backflip two months later. In a June

3rd letter to the journal, they wrote,
In truth, the intent of our article was

to push for more masking, not less.

in saying masks offer little, if any,
protection.

A tripped -up Surgeon General Adams, who
often appeared more general than

surgical, said, If the American people
will do the things that we know slow the

spread of this disease, including
wearing a face covering, critically

for people to know COVID stopped with
me.

We have the power to turn this thing
around.

Okay, let's start there then, because
you are wearing a mask. You are clearly

trying to make a point.

At the beginning of April is when the
administration started telling the

to wear masks.

But just the last time you were with us
here on Face the Nation, March 8th, you

said this.

Let's listen. Stay safe by washing your
hands, by covering your cough, by

staying home if you're sick.

Masks do not work for the general public
and preventing them from getting

coronavirus.

Alex Berenson cited several studies,
including a Danish study conducted in

November of 2020 with 5 ,000 members.

That study found that mask wearing did
not reduce, at conventional levels of

statistical significance, the incidence
of SARS -CoV -2 infection.

If nothing else, studies whose results
differ should be discussed and debated.

By February of 2021, not only was Fauci
emphasizing the importance of mask

wearing, but saying people should be
wearing it another two years.

As this video published in March of 2021
shows, he really meant this for the

rest of us, not for those working for
the oligarchs, such as him and the woman

behind him once the cameras were off.

Also note how government mask guidelines
have been particularly helpful For high

school athletes.

I felt like I just wasn't being able to
get a full breath. I just felt super

dizzy and then eventually passed out.

Dr. Meryl Nass was reported as having
been the first person in the world to

at an epidemic, study its
characteristics, and prove that it was

biological warfare and that it was not a
natural occurrence.

She published her findings in the early
1990s. After researching COVID -19, she

stated her agreement with HIV isolator
Luc Montagnier's conclusion that it was

man -made.

She then read what she found was a
problematic article stating that it was

naturally occurring virus.

I was particularly interested in a paper
that came out in Nature Medicine by

five scientists claiming it was
definitely a natural occurrence rather

lab construct.

But the arguments they used did not hold
water. They didn't really make a lot of

scientific sense. And yet all kinds of
very important people started parroting

what this is. As previously stated,
Anthony Fauci backed the risky

research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan
lab in 2019, just before COVID

-19 hit that location first.

This NPR article noted how this project
focused on bats and coronaviruses at

that Wuhan laboratory.

Evidence around America's project
Baseless to develop biological warfare

seem so baseless anymore.

Manufacturing a deadly coronavirus is a
first step, but distribution is just as

important, and the oligarchs had the
know -how.

A review of a New York Times timeline
shows that the first American death from

COVID -19 was thought to be on February
29, 2020.

The Washington Post detailed problems
with the Center for Disease Control CDC

first tests for COVID -19.

They said shortcomings with the tests
were first noticed in late January after

the CDC sent an initial batch to 26
public health labs across the country.

False positives were found at 24 of the
26 labs caused by contamination that

occurred at the CDC.

The New York Times quoted the
Association of Public Health

Scott Becker, who said that public
health laboratories started receiving

test kits on February 7.

These were test kits that went to 100
state and local public health labs.

and they were contaminated with the
coronavirus.

This was reportedly due to two of the
three CDC laboratories in Atlanta that

created the coronavirus test kits
violated their own manufacturing

Nonetheless, the Center for Disease
Contamination would not be deterred.

the CDC contamination seeming so
extensive that the FDA's recommendation

stop making the test kits in -house, As
late as February 28th, CDC Immunization

Director Nancy Messonnier resumed
testing with existing CDC test kits.

That following week, the CDC reported
that 1 ,007 people had been tested

nationwide, and the first COVID -19
American death was announced on February

29th.

Another problem would come with the
general COVID -19 testing itself.

The FDA outlined two key tests for COVID
-19, the reverse transcription

polymerase chain reaction, RT -PCR test,
and the antigen test.

Problems have arisen when top journals
such as the British Medical Journal

that their SARS -CoV -2 antigen rapid
qualitative test was highly inaccurate,

58 % of positive test results were
false.

The RT -PCR test has continued to show
large percentages of problematic false

positives, too.

For example, the University of Cambridge
tested over 12 ,000 of their consenting

students weekly over their first
semester of fall 2020.

They found that 80 to 100 % of the PCR
positive tests were false positive.

For example, In the first week of
December, zero pools were true positive,

they did not detect any new cases of
asymptomatic COVID -19 amongst 9 ,376

students living in college
accommodations screened that week.

Despite this, medical critics such as
Joseph Mercola point out how most U .S.

laboratories have been guided by federal
authorities, the FDA, and the U .S.

Center for Disease Control and
Prevention, who recommended running PCR

a cycle threshold CT of 40, as seen in
this December of 2020 CDC document,

40 CTs.

Mercola said this would produce an
inordinate number of false positives,

labeling healthy people as COVID -19
cases.

Dr. Mercola further stated that,
medically speaking, a case refers to a

person. It never, ever referred to
someone who had no symptoms of illness

is being done by U .S. authorities and
most media today.

Here's even Tony Fauci confirming what
Mercola said about PCR tests at a cycle

threshold of above 35 not actually being
COVID -19 positive people, but dead

nucleotides in a healthy person as early
as July of 2020.

It's evolving into a bit of a standard
that if you get a cycle threshold

of 35 or more, that the chances of it
being replication competent are

So that if somebody, and you know, we
do, we have patients, and it's very

frustrating for the patients as well as
for the physicians. Somebody comes in

and they repeat their PCR and it's like
37 cycle threshold.

But you almost never can culture virus
from a 37 -threshold cycle.

So I think if somebody does come in with
37, 38, even 36, you've got to say, you

know, it's just dead nucleotides,
period.

Here's another researcher reviewing
various labs and the level of their PCR

tests at 35 cycles or above that.

Here are the first five manuals that I
found.

The Nomagen PCR test uses 39 cycles.

The GK test uses 40 cycles.

The InBios test uses 45 cycles, as does
the Luminex Ares test.

The Quest PCR test uses 50 cycles.

All these test protocols are literally
off the chart.

The PCR tests used all over the world
today are operating in the 0 % accuracy

range.

The Nobel Prize -winning inventor of the
PCR test, Dr. Cary Mullis, spoke about

this test being used for over
-interpretation here.

PCR is separate from that. It's just a
process that's used to make a whole lot

of something out of something.

That's what it is. It doesn't tell you
that you're sick, and it doesn't tell

that the thing you ended up with.

really was going to hurt you or anything
like that.

Dr. Mullis, who died in August of 2019,
about four months before the COVID -19

outbreak in Wuhan, gave this flattering
assessment of Tony Fauci and the other

top administrative scientists at the NIH
and CDC.

Guys like Fauci get up there and start
talking, you know, he doesn't know

anything really about anything, and I'd
say that to his face, nothing.

The man thinks you can take a blood
sample and stick it in an electron

microscope, and if it's got a virus in
there, you'll know it.

He doesn't understand electron
microscopy, and he doesn't understand

He should not be in a position like he's
in.

Most of those guys up there on the top
are just total administrative people,

they don't know anything about what's
going on at the bottom.

Others also question the validity of the
PCR tests.

For example, Tanzania's president sent
samples from a human a goat, and a

to be tested, and all came up positive
for COVID -19.

Granted, goats are often getting
arrested for not keeping their masks on,

the papaya definitely caused some head
scratching.

On July 21st of 2021, the CDC sent a
letter to the FDA saying that it would

withdraw the request to the U .S. Food
and Drug Administration for emergency

authorization of the CDC 2019 novel
coronavirus real -time RT -PCR

panel, the essay first introduced in
February 2020, for detection of SARS

-2 only.

During the early months of the
coronavirus disease 2019 COVID -19

clinical specimens were not readily
available to developers of IBDs to

SARS -CoV -2. Therefore, the FDA
authorized IBDs based on available data

contrived samples generated from a range
of SARS -CoV -2 material sources, for

example, gene -specific RNA, synthetic
RNA, or whole genome viral RNA, for

analytical and clinical performance
evaluation.

While validation using these contrived
specimens provided a measure of

confidence in test performance at the
beginning of the pandemic, it is not

feasible to precisely compare the
performance of various tests that use

contrived specimens because each test
validated performance using samples

derived from different gene -specific,
synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid

sources.

From February through the middle of May,
the FDA issued a total of 59 EUAs for

IBDs for the qualitative detection of
nucleic acid from SARS -CoV -2 based on

validation data using contrived
specimens derived from SARS -CoV -2

This PCR test sure sounds contrived.

The pharmaceutical companies eventually
said that there's nothing to fear

because the vaccines are here.

Just take a shot or two or three and
this vaccine may last years in stopping

from getting severely sick.

Though this AP article from February
3rd, 2021 said only that it may reduce

virus transmission.

Perhaps not coincidentally, the
Rockefellers had increased their

with at least two of these three
pharmaceutical companies in the previous

decade. Why the third dose?

Well, Tony Fauci said we have to beware
of COVID's new variants, at least one of

which appears to be more problematic.

But don't worry, the drug makers are
working on boosters.

Fauci's thick -as -thieves friend Robert
Gallo had falsely claimed in 1984 that

he was the first to isolate the AIDS
virus HIV.

He was forced to admit the truth in 1991
about France's Luc Montagnier actually

first isolating HIV, as this headline
states.

In 2021, Gallo told the Baltimore Sun,
we'll possibly be boosting again and

again, as frequently or more frequently
as we do for the flu.

Wahoo! That's a vaccine royalty booster
bonanza for Fauci and his colleagues.

Thankfully, there's a video interview of
the Nobel Prize -winning Luc

Montagnier, whose system isn't for
profit and was working outside the

2020. He confirmed that COVID -19 is
regularly mutating and getting weaker as

does, saying exactement or exactly to
this statement.

Of even more interest, the vaccine
company Moderna received nearly $1

of U .S. government funding in
developing the vaccine.

Now they will make $10 to $50 per dose.

Since the U .S. has secured 100 million
doses for Americans at $15 per dose,

they've already made $2 .5 billion off
of us taxpayers.

And this is just by the date of this
article, November 23, 2020.

The European Union was negotiating with
Moderna for a $25 per dose deal.

Aren't Americans lucky to spend a
billion dollars of research money to get

off the price?

This billion came despite that this
would be Moderna's first -ever FDA

authorization for a vaccine, if
successful.

Why would the government give a billion
dollars of our taxpayer money to a

company that has never had success in
having a vaccine approved before?

It couldn't possibly be because of what
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

states here that Tony Fauci and his
NIAID scientists have a partial

Moderna.

Here's Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

discussing the government and
pharmaceutical companies' impeccable

best -selling author Naomi Wolf, Ph .D.,
in the documentary film Truth.

aides own royalties to that. So people
in his agency

collect $150 ,000 a year in royalties on
that vaccine.

How is that legal?

You know what? Tony Fauci made that
legal. It was made legal in the Bayh

-Dole Act, which I think was 1982.

And the CDC owns 58 patents.

His agency owns over 1 ,000 patents, I
think close to 2 ,000, like 2 ,200

patents. He's the J. Edgar Hoover of
public health.

The FDA gave emergency use authorization
to a second COVID -19 vaccine that came

from Pfizer.

Pfizer, a name you can't trust, said the
U .S. Justice Department in 2009.

The federal government today announced
the largest medical fraud settlement in

US history. Pfizer will pay $2 .3
billion to settle charges of promoting

drugs for uses not approved by the Food
and Drug Administration.

Maybe FDA Director Peter Marks had
Pfizer and Moderna's track records in

when he hedged his bet by reminding
Americans in their official declaration

this emergency authorization was
actually not an FDA approval.

The FDA's marks may have also had in
mind the fact that Moderna and Pfizer,

which got America's first emergency use
COVID -19 vaccine authorizations in

December of 2020, used a never -approved
mRNA technology in their COVID -19

vaccines. This late November of 2020
article noted how researchers tried for

years to get the mRNA technology to
work.

But every time they injected an
experimental mRNA vaccine into an

triggered dangerous inflammation.

Moderna and Pfizer would later claim
that their vaccines only reduce the

severity of illness from the virus, not
the spread of the virus.

For the millions confused by mainstream
media's presentation of this issue,

here's Moderna's chief medical officer,
Tal Zaks, talking about it.

When we start the deployment of this
vaccine, we will not have sufficient

concrete data to prove that this vaccine
reduces transmission.

Two more interesting notes about Moderna
include the fact that sitting on the

board of directors with Tal Zaks is
Stephen Berenson, who this company

says spent his last 12 years at J .P.
Morgan as vice chairman of investment

banking. Furthermore, in 2013, DARPA,
the Defense Advanced Research Projects

Agency, awarded Moderna $25 million.

And here is Pfizer's former vice
president and chief of scientific

Michael Yeadon, stating only the most
vulnerable should be vaccinated, while

most people shouldn't. He further says
mandating or even coercing people is

illegal. It would be good, I think, to
have a vaccine to use for very

people. But, this is a really important
but, nobody else needs this thing.

Your body and my body, I'm not
vulnerable. I'm not going to be made

ill and die. It would be an astonishing
thing, one in a million.

You don't vaccinate a population because
one in a million people might have a

bad outcome.

For people to suggest that the only way
we all get our lives back is if we mass

vaccinate a population, something very
smelly is going on. But the main problem

I have with it, as you mentioned, is
this notion of being mandated or even

coerced. So you don't have to, but you
can't travel if you don't. That's the

sort of thing.

I want your viewers to know that that's
illegal and for international law.

A group of 12 prominent doctors and
scientists addressed an urgent open

to the European Medicines Agency
regarding COVID -19 vaccine safety

February 28th of 2021.

This website summarized their footnoted
letter here citing reports worldwide of

problems from the current COVID
vaccines.

They ended their letter with their
concern that an emergency authorization

these vaccines had been given, despite
that most countries were no longer under

imminent threat because the worst of the
pandemic had already abated.

Dr. Sukharit Bhakti, who spoke on behalf
of this group of 12 doctors, is one of

the most highly cited medical research
scientists in Germany.

Dr. Bhakti is a professor emeritus of
medical microbiology and infectious

diseases and was a chairman at the
Institute of Medical Microbiology and

Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University
of Mainz in Germany for 22 years.

It turns out that the European
Commission also owned a crystal ball in

outlined a roadmap for a vaccination
card slash passport for EU citizens.

20 months prior to the pandemic.

As

vaccines

had already started being given to
nurses, the elderly and others working

the sick or frail, concern came about an
ingredient in America's first mRNA

-based vaccine used by Pfizer and
Moderna.

As this article reports, Immunologists
believe a small number of people

previously exposed to polyethylene
glycol PEG, which coats the mRNA, have

been exposed to it and have antibodies
to it, putting them at risk of an

anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine.

A more important aspect of that science
article may have been its discussion

that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines
both contain mRNA wrapped in lipid

nanoparticles. The International Journal
of Nanomedicine states that

nanoparticles, NP, accumulate in
reproductive organs, damaging organs,

ovaries, and uterus, causing
reproductive organ dysfunction.

A study done by Hervé Seligman in
France, who works at the Emerging and

Infectious and Tropical Disease Research
Unit Facility of Medicine, Aix

-Marseille University, and engineer Haim
Yativ, who have children living in

Israel. revealed mainstream cover -up of
extensive fatalities.

They found that Pfizer's vaccine caused
mortality hundreds of times greater in

young people compared to mortality from
coronavirus without the vaccine.

Seligman is of Israeli Luxembourg
nationality and has over 100 scientific

publications.

Yativ and Seligman found that there is a
mismatch between the data published by

the authorities and the reality on the
ground.

mortality for the first five weeks of
2021 is 40 times higher than for other

years, and that for them, this is a new
holocaust in face of Israeli authority

pressure to vaccinate citizens.

As of April 29, 2021, Israel had the
highest percentage of its population

receiving COVID -19 vaccinations.

After vaccine -injured Israelis flooded
their offices, Israeli attorneys Ari

Sukhavolski, and Ruth Mockney
-Sukowalski petitioned the Supreme Court

and filed a complaint accepted by the
International Criminal Court at The

It included 26 pages detailing their
case of why Israeli mass vaccinations

under crimes against humanity and a
violation of the Nuremberg Code by Prime

Minister Netanyahu and Pfizer. The
complaint cited the FDA in the U .S. as

stating the vaccine -only emergency use
authorization.

which only may allow the use of
unapproved medical products in an

They said Israeli public health misled
the country by saying the vaccine was

approved by the FDA.

The complaint also cited continued
lockdowns and access to the airports and

flights, gyms and public events for
vaccinated as examples of coercion and

mandates overriding willingness and
informed consent for this experimental

medical intervention.

It showed the redacted or blacked -out
agreement between Netanyahu and Pfizer.

The complaint further said the mass
vaccination comes despite that according

CDC data, the coronavirus has a 99 .5 to
99 .997

percent survival rate in all age groups
up to 70 years of age.

Some doctors and researchers started
saying more about the ingredients of the

vaccines, citing sources and patents.

My name is Dr.

Christiane Northrup. I'm a board
-certified OB -GYN physician trained at

Dartmouth Medical School, Tufts New
England Medical Center. I'm a former

clinical professor of OB -GYN at the
University of Vermont College of

I'm the author of three New York Times
best -selling books, including Women's

Bodies, Women's Wisdom, The Wisdom of
Menopause, and Goddesses Never Age. I've

done eight highly successful public
television specials. I was on the Oprah

Winfrey Show.

10 different times, and all the numerous
TV shows like Dr. Oz and Rachel Ray and

NBC Nightly News and all of the rest of
it. There's never been a vaccine like

this. It's an RNA vaccine.

It is what's called a trans infection.

What is worse, though, is that there is
a patent and work that they've done at

MIT to make a dye.

And the patent of the dye is called
luciferase.

And under a light, you'd be able to see
who was vaccinated, who wasn't.

Look at that.

It's glowing.

And that's exactly where I got the shot.

But the worst part, look at the vein in
my hand.

It glows.

The deal is to store your biometric
information because this vaccine will

nanoparticles, nanocrystalline particles
that are actually little robots,

like little antennas. And they will have
the ability to take your biometric

data, not only your vaccine record, but
your breathing, your heart rate, your

activity, sexual activity.

these drugs that you're taking, where
you travel, all of that, and then take

that data and store it in the cloud.

What's even more concerning is that the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on

March 26, 2020, applied for a patent,
patent number 060606, to

take that biometric data, give you a
barcode, and connect each of us to

cryptocurrency so that we would
become...

literally slaves to the system. Like
everything, it would be the

end of privacy, the end of freedom,
because who gets the data? Who uses the

data? And what do they do with it? So
this patent to connect the vaccinated to

cryptocurrency, making all humans a
commodity, is extremely concerning.

In further support of Dr.

Northrup's video, it looks like IBM
didn't send 900 executives to turn

Rich Computer Nerd and Oblivion into the
world's top computer and vaccine guy

for no reason. In October of 2001,
Microsoft announced that they had formed

new corporation with IBM and Pfizer,
which they called... Amacor. They build

themselves as coming together merely to
provide office automation solutions for

physicians. Would Microsoft, IBM, and
Pfizer later work on a new high -tech

version of the old tattoo IBM perfected
during World War II?

In even more support of this idea,
Amacor named Jim Fitzsimmons as

CEO.

Microsoft News highlighted how
Fitzsimmons had previously been a

consultant with Booz Allen and Hamilton.

Booz Allen's innocuous sounding name and
logo makes it sound like a boring

computer firm.

Their major contracts with DARPA, the
Defense Advanced Research Projects

supports their nefarious, deadly
activities.

And finally, Our favorite Nazi
-supporting war machinery -making

General Electric, would never be kicked
out of that bed. As this Google search

shows, General Electric is right in bed
there with Booz Allen.

GE had also announced

in 2016 that Pfizer will use GE's mobile
biotech factory to make next

-generation drugs in China.

Don't worry, Moderna, you're not going
to be left out, because IBM is what the

millennials now call polyamorous.

They prefer an orgy of corrupt
bedfellows. In early March of 2021, two

great names that go great together came
together.

As this title says, Moderna and IBM plan
to collaborate on COVID -19 vaccine

supply chain and distribution data
sharing.

This would include IBM's digital health
pass that they want you to have in order

to travel.

The first name in wasteful multi
-billion dollar taxpayer vaccine

the first name in Holocaust tattoos came
together to celebrate their brave new

world. When the thoughts you think you
thought you didn't think.

Is there hope?

Of the many other inexpensive
supplements such as vitamin D previously

mentioned, some scientists worldwide
have found great results in treating

-19 using ivermectin, which has been on
the World Health Organization's list of

essential medicines for over 40 years.

For example, in February of 2021,
England's prestigious Lancet medical

published a Spanish study stating
ivermectin provided a marked reduction

-reported anosmia hyposmia, medical
jargon for the loss of a sense of smell,

a reduction in cough and tendency to
lower viral loads.

An Australian study from April of 2020
also found that ivermectin is an

inhibitor of the causative virus

These studies led the British Medical
Journal to write about Ivermectin's

emergency approval for treatment of
COVID -19 in South Africa.

They also noted Ivermectin's addition to
the treatment guidelines in Bolivia and

Guatemala. And finally, they discussed a
group called the Frontline COVID -19

Critical Care Alliance, which was a
group of experts that published a review

available studies.

That review reported ivermectin helping
improve patients' health at all phases

of COVID sickness in various regions of
the world.

The Frontline COVID -19 Critical Care
Alliance consists of an impressive array

of doctors from hospitals, universities,
and medical schools in Tennessee, New

Jersey, Houston, Ohio, Virginia, New
York, and even Norway and England.

Here's Pierre Corey speaking for that
group.

making a plea to the U .S. Senate and
the National Institute of Health,

outlining their and others' findings and
studies.

And all we have sought is to review the
world's literature on every facet of

this disease, trying to develop
effective protocols.

In the last nine months, in our review
of all of the literature as a group,

mountains of data have emerged from many
centers and countries around the world

showing the miraculous effectiveness of
ivermectin. It basically...

obliterates transmission of this virus.

If you take it, you will not get sick.

In early outpatient treatment, we have
three randomized controlled trials and

multiple observation as well as case
series showing that if you take

the need for hospitalization and death
will decrease.

The most profound evidence we have is in
the hospitalized patients. We have four

randomized controlled trials there,
multiple observation trials, all showing

same thing. You will not die, or you
will die at much, much, much lower

Statistically significant, large
magnitude results if you take

Dr. Corey went on to cite loads of
studies conducted worldwide supporting

ivermectin's effectiveness at combating
COVID -19.

Nonetheless... the British medical
journal writer appeared to hold his

aristocratic nose up at this group,
putting a sentence in their article

Doctors and patients share anecdotal
evidence through email and WhatsApp,

appeared to imply that's all this group
did.

The U .S. National Institute of Health
ruled there are insufficient data to

recommend either for or against the use
of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID

-19. The BMJ article at least stated
ivermectin has a long and safe history,

unlike mRNA vaccines, the original
testing of which showed a short,

history.

Many doctors, lawyers, and general
activists continue to stand up to what

continually appears at tyranny in the
guise of medical necessity.

For example, in Europe, Dolores Cahill,
Ph .D., is a professor of biomolecular

research at the University College
Dublin School of Medicine.

She's a member of the Irish Government
Advisory Science Council, as well as

science review boards in Germany,
England, and Sweden.

Professor Cahill, Dr. Heiko Schoening of
Germany, and Dr. Mohamed Adil are three

of a dozen organizers of a large group
of international doctors and scientists

applying critical analysis that
undermines many aspects of the

narrative around COVID -19.

Besides this group and the
aforementioned frontline COVID -19

alliance, Dr.

Simone Gold, who graduated from both law
school and medical school, founded

America's Frontline Doctors.

The group advocates for inexpensive
treatments for COVID, such as

and argues against vaccine passports and
vaccine mandates.

In the fall of 2020, three medical
professors came together to write the

Barrington Declaration, starting yet
another activist organization to counter

the current mainstream approach to the
COVID issue.

Their declaration stated that Current
lockdown policies are creating

effects on short -term and long -term
public health.

Professor Martin Kulldorff, Ph .D., and
epidemiologist at Harvard University,

Professor Sunetra Gupta, Ph .D., and
infectious disease epidemiologist at

University, and J.

Bhattaharaya, M .D., Ph .D., a professor
of medicine at Stanford University,

wrote this declaration in Great
Barrington, Massachusetts, in early

2020.

You cannot look only at one disease.

You have to look at public health very
broadly.

And the strategy we have used for COVID
-19 has not been good for COVID

-19, but it's also generated enormous
collateral damage on other public

The professors looked at public health
broadly, critiquing the COVID response

and pointing out that the lockdown
themselves killed a potential 100

people.

If this only gets people to sit up and
look around and say, oh, my God, 130

million people are going to starve to
death as a result of this.

Furthermore, COVID -19 is more than a
thousand fold higher in the old than the

young. Indeed, for children, COVID -19
is less dangerous than many other harms,

including influenza.

So while everybody can get the disease,
everybody can get infected.

The risk of mortality is very, very
different between the oldest and the

youngest, and it's more than a thousand
-fold difference in the risk. And that

is, in a sense, a weakness of the
pandemic.

And finally, they stated that as
immunity builds in the population, risk

infection to all, including the
vulnerable, falls.

So allow those at minimal risk of death
to live their lives normally.

to build immunity through natural
infection while protecting those who are

highest risk.

They also said it would be healthy for
everyone if the less vulnerable

a natural herd immunity.

And that strategy essentially consists
of shielding the vulnerable or investing

quite seriously in finding ways to
protect the vulnerable, those in care

obviously.

stopping infections in hospitals, but
also more generally in the community.

We think we can do that while allowing
those who are not vulnerable to this

disease to go out there and get infected
and build up what we call and will

continue to call herd immunity.

Herd immunity is a fact about most
infectious diseases, the course that

spread through the population.

We're saying, let's just do this for the
three months that it takes for the

pathogen to sweep through the
population, create a deferred immunity.

Those signing the Great Barrington
Declaration, over 40 ,000 medical

practitioners and about 14 ,000 medical
scientists, along with over 778 ,000

concerned citizens.

How did top health organizations respond
to the Great Barrington Declaration?

They just changed their definition of
herd immunity in November of 2020, a

after the declaration.

This local CBS News article fails to
mention the Barrington Declaration and

implies it's a coincidence that the WHO
changed its definition of herd immunity

a month later. The article did hyperlink
a screenshot of the WHO from June 9,

2020, stating, Herd immunity is the
indirect protection from an infectious

disease that happens when a population
is immune either through vaccination or

immunity developed through previous
infection.

It also hyperlinked the new definition
from November 13, 2020 that deleted the

possibility of natural infection and
herd immunity, stating herd immunity is

concept only used for vaccination, not
by exposing them to it.

as if the Barrington Declaration authors
are suggesting purposely giving young

people the virus.

The U .S. Senate asked Baylor
University's Vice Chief of Medicine

McCulloch, M .D., to speak on COVID -19
treatment in November of 2020.

McCulloch reported very successful
outpatient treatment protocols for COVID

that he helped publish.

And what doctors have done is they've
innovated and they've identified both in

the hospital and outside of the
hospital, aided by clinical trials and

observational studies, an approach that
involves combination antivirals followed

by corticosteroids and antithrombotic
agents. I summarized these and published

them in the American Journal of
Medicine, the synthesis of the

randomized trials and observational
studies.

And this algorithm has been updated
multiple times.

Dr. Peter McCulloch has held leadership
positions in universities nationwide,

while also winning awards from national
and international medical groups. In an

April of 2021 interview with The New
American, Dr.

Peter McCulloch had dire warnings about
the dangerous adverse effects of the

vaccine and the U .S. going against its
usual vaccine safety protocols.

Furthermore, Dr. McCullough compared U
.S. health agencies' reactions to the

swine flu vaccine death versus COVID
vaccine death today.

And so we do have some precedent for
vaccines. In the 1976 swine flu

we attempted to vaccinate 55 million
Americans in 1976.

There were 500 cases of Guillain -Barre
syndrome, which is an ascending

paralysis from the legs upwards, and 25
deaths. The program was killed.

At 25 deaths. In the United States
today, we have approximately 77 million

individuals fully vaccinated.

And we have 2602 deaths, 2 ,602 deaths.
So it's unprecedented

how many deaths have accrued.

He also told of the corruption of the
NIH, which collaborates with the CDC in

hundreds of work groups.

Keep in mind the National Institutes of
Health is a co -owner of the Moderna

patent. So they have a vested financial
interest in keeping these vaccines

going. So there's been tens of thousands
of hospitalizations all attributable to

the vaccine and going strong.

Here's a Yale epidemiologist discussing
doctors' reports to him about the

ineffectiveness of the COVID vaccines.

They've estimated that 60 % of the new
cases that they're treating, new COVID

cases, have been people who've been
vaccinated.

And here's Dr. Richard Fleming
discussing how COVID -19 is a man -made

bioweapon. And the vaccine that causes a
reproduction of the weaponized portion

of COVID -19 appears to be part of a
mass bioweapon experiment.

This virus is a man -made gain -of
-function virus paid for by U .S.

taxpayers' dollars, including monies
that came from the Department of

This is a bioweapon.

by every definition, and by every
definition, their having developed this

violation of the Biological Weapons
Convention Treaty.

Now, this vaccine rollout is the largest
research project conducted in the

history of mankind.

You are either part of the experimental
group or part of the control group. You

are injecting.

a bioweapon into the arms of our
children and the people we love.

And finally, here's Dr. Ben Edwards
speaking under oath to the Texas State

Senate about vaccination deaths,
Nuremberg violations, and studies

that these numbers are 1 % of the total
numbers.

To give some context, over the past 20
years, all vaccinations combined, there

were a reported 4 ,182 deaths.

over the past 20 years. In the past four
months, we're now sitting at 4 ,178

deaths associated with the COVID
vaccine.

We had a study commissioned by the
Department of Health and Human Services

2010, and Harvard carried out this
study.

And the conclusion was only about 1 % of
adverse reactions are ever reported to

VAERS. A similar study in 2015 by
Shimbukru et al.

came to a similar conclusion.

As of the start of August of 2021, the
European database reported over 20 ,000

COVID vaccine deaths and just under a
million seriously injured.

Here's an interview with Karen Kingston,
who worked as a consultant to Pfizer,

Johnson & Johnson and other
pharmaceutical companies for over 20

Kingston talks with interviewer Stu
Peters about the companies using

graphene oxide in the COVID vaccine
nanoparticle formulation.

and their violation of codes regarding
vaccines and initial new drug

applications. She also states her
emotional reaction to it all. So if you

look at the Moderna patent, it says
right there that this contains lipid

nanoparticle formulation.

It's poisonous to humans and well known
that it's poisonous to humans.

When I read this information, I didn't
know a woman could cry as hard as I

cried.

It should be noted that the Canadian
Broadcasting Company reported Health

Canada's announcement that the toxic
graphene oxide nanoparticles discussed

Karen Kingston have been found in four
packaged mask brands.

In relation to Dr.

Christiane Northrup's earlier warning
about nanocrystals in the COVID vaccines

possibly acting as little antennas, At
least two of many science articles on

graphene oxide may provide clues to
this.

In 2008, scientists had found tunable
electrical conductivity with graphene

oxide. This article went on to describe
how graphene oxide nanoparticles could

change scattered to bonding structures
and circuits in the body through heat

-stimulating connection from amorphous
to the two -dimensional nanocrystalline

graphene.

Another article in March of 2017 said
more definitively that graphene oxide

nanoparticles can be magnetic and self
-assemble in our bodies.

This might explain why so many people,
such as this woman, are finding

themselves magnetic after the
vaccination.

At least she doesn't have to worry about
pockets for her keys anymore.

Other activists working to stop this
seeming societal tyranny in the guise of

medical necessity includes German lawyer
Rainer Fulmik, who organized with the

German Investigative Committee to launch
legal action against those responsible

for the COVID -19 crisis.

Fulmik interviewed Holocaust survivor
Vera Sharov, the president of the

for Human Research Protection.

Sharov stated believing Western
governments are acting in parallel ways

Germany around COVID -19.

using medical mandates with a eugenics
goal of depopulation.

The stark lesson of the Holocaust is
that whenever doctors join forces with

government and deviate from their
personal, professional, clinical

do no harm to the individual, medicine
can then be perverted from a healing,

humanitarian profession to a murderous
apparatus.

Attorney Reiner Fulmik also organized an
international network of lawyers filing

separate lawsuits on behalf of their
citizens and sharing information.

This four -hour public Zoom conference
call, titled The International Legal

Offensive Part 1, included lawyers from
Italy, Great Britain, Canada, the U .S.,

Austria, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile.

In International Legal Offensive Part 2,
German attorney Rainer Fulmik and his

colleague Vivianne Fischer discussed
progress on legal work around citizens'

rights regarding COVID -related tyranny
with attorneys and organizers from

Greece, France, South Africa, Israel,
the U .S., and Namibia.

In July of 2021, the aforementioned top
microbiologist Dr. Sukharit Bhakti made

a pronouncement about new findings.

Dr. Bhakti is one of the most highly
cited medical research scientists in

Germany. He explained how three new
studies showed that people now have

fast immune system abilities to develop
antibodies to the COVID -19 virus,

including from the variants.

He also detailed how and why gene -based
vaccines have led to blood clots

worldwide. What one has to do is, one
has to inject this virus or the virus

into the body.

and see how long the immune system takes
to make the antibodies against this

gene. And this was done by three
independent American research groups in

last week and published.

And this applies to all the variants.

So forget it if someone tells you that
you are not immune against the variants.

Now what happens when the cells that
line the vessel walls begin to produce

these spikes?

The spikes will then be produced by the
cell and

protrude from the cell surface into the
bloodstream.

These lymphocytes are going to mount the
attack on your vessel walls.

This is the first way towards clot
formation.

that as we know is happening all over
the place, all over the world.

Backing up what Dr. Bhakti said
regarding our immune system, an August

review found 15 studies that indicate
natural immunity is more robust than the

COVID vaccines.

These include peer -reviewed articles
published in the prestigious journals

Nature and The Lancet.

Another August 2021 article in Science
magazine stated, having SARS -CoV -2

confers much greater immunity than a
vaccine.

It discussed a study with a database of
2 .5 million Israelis and found never

-infected people who were vaccinated
were 6 to 13 times more likely to get

infected than unvaccinated people who
were previously infected with the

coronavirus.

It also stated that the risk of
developing symptomatic COVID -19 was 27

higher among the vaccinated and the risk
of hospitalization was 8 times higher.

Regarding Dr. Bhakti's talk of blood
clots, a Canadian doctor stated that he

given 900 doses of the Moderna vaccine
to his patients and was surprised by

of their complaints of migraines and
other issues.

When conventional tests showed no large
clotting issues, He decided to give all

his patients D -dimer tests that showed
microclots in capillaries and that 62 %

of his patients injected with an mRNA
shot are positive for clotting.

In August of 2021, a freelance reporter,
Chris Waldberger, wrote an article with

the headline, Bombshell UK Data Destroys
Entire Premise for Vaccine Push.

He linked the report with the data based
on briefings from February 1, 2021, to

August 2, 2021.

Deaths added up to 402 for full
vaccinated Brits and 253 for

unvaccinated Brits. That means over two
-thirds of the deaths were vaccinated

Brits.

As of August 28, 2021, only 63 % of
Brits were fully vaccinated.

Writer Waldberger also pointed out that
this was 402 deaths out of 47 ,008

cases in vaccinated, 253 deaths out of
151 ,054 cases

in unvaccinated.

If you get COVID having been vaccinated,
according to this data, you are much

more likely to die than if you were not
vaccinated.

Scottish writer Rodney Atkinson
presented a compilation of reported

and death results of 2021 up to August
12, 2021.

Comparing the most vaccinated countries
to the least vaccinated countries,

results showed about four times the
amount of cases and deaths per million

the most vaccinated country.

The previously

discussed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

founded Children's Health Defense.

is a final advocacy group of doctors and
lawyers fighting for human rights amid

this COVID -19 tyrannical new normal.

Children's Health Defense has published
countless articles hyperlinked with

endless documentation from medical
journals to legal documents.

The Children's Health Defense team wrote
how those in positions of power have

long recognized that conditions of fear
and panic furnish exploitable

opportunities to restructure society.

COVID -19 is certainly a textbook
example of this, as one of the well

fear campaigns that can persuade many
people to abandon essential medical and

individual freedoms.

Leaders such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

gives us some.

For example, when Rutgers University
president announced that it would

all students to get the COVID vaccine,
RFK Jr.

wrote them a letter citing the federal
law requiring that the person to whom an

EUA, Emergency use authorization vaccine
is administered be advised of the

option to accept or refuse.

He explained that this stems from the
fact that EUA products are, by

experimental.

RFK Jr.

further wrote about the international
Nuremberg trial following World War II

to the Holocaust.

He said, under Nuremberg code, no one
may be coerced to participate in a

experiment.

Kennedy was joined in his advocacy for
Rutgers students by physician and

immunologist Dr. Humann Norkasham, who
explained in a letter how natural

immunity should first be assessed by
screening individuals for the presence

IgG antibodies against SARS -CoV -2, as
they are likely to be at an increased

risk of adverse events and immunological
harm from indiscriminate vaccination.

Nine days later, on April 7th of 2021,

USA Today published an article stating
that Rutgers and Cornell were mandating

the COVID -19 vaccine, along with four
other universities, asking, is this the

new norm for college?

The article did report that Rutgers and
other schools had built -in medical and

religious exemptions, suggesting at
least some bending to Kennedy and

Norcosham's advocacy.

Rutgers' chief operating officer, or
COO, which is a strange name for a

leader, did note three good reasons to
require student vaccinations.

For one, vaccine maker Pfizer had been
giving Rutgers a boatload of money for

fellowships, sponsoring all these people
here and more each year.

Secondly, Moderna has been giving
Rutgers a boatload of money to conduct

vaccine trial over the next 25 months,
starting in September of 2020.

All right, Rutgers COO Calcado did not
actually state these first two reasons

that USA Today article.

He may wear glasses, but he's not blind,
deaf, and dumb.

Calcado did state this third reason to
require student vaccinations. He said,

Safety precautions may not be students'
top concern.

Of course, college campuses are just one
of many battlefields in the U .S. and

worldwide. For example, Americans can
only travel with restrictions.

Hopefully, Americans and other citizens
of the world will struggle fiercely to

oppose this shredding of constitutional
rights under the guise of what the

oligarchs -backed politicians and
doctors call medical necessity.

You didn't think we can afford this
life, so I feel you on the other

side of this.

See what my heroes left to die gonna
pay. And they shipped us all, they're in

the process of shipping us all to the
digital heart. The shadow smile drains

through this train of death.

I hold a doctorate in biochemistry and
molecular

biology from the University of Texas and
have over 30 years of scientific

experience, primarily in toxicology and
mechanistic biology.

I strongly feel that all the gene
therapy vaccines must be halted

due to safety concerns on several
fronts. We have seen 100 pregnancy

reported in VAERS as of April 9th, as we
could potentially sterilize an entire

generation.

Secondly, all of the gene therapies are
causing coagulopathy. This is not

isolated to one manufacturer, and this
is not isolated to one age group, as we

are seeing coagulopathy deaths in
healthy young adults with no secondary

comorbidities.

We now know the spike protein is very
dangerous. Very dangerous. It is

biological. Sure, the FDA did not think
that the S1 subunit and the spike

protein was toxic. And so they knew, the
FDA knew about the biodistribution. And

one of the scary things is that the
biodistribution, like, peaks in your

ovaries. And so just to nail the point
home, they did know.

They did. I did send them the
manuscripts.