All language subtitles for Behind the Smoke Curtain Barbara Honeggervia The 9 11 Pentagon Attack

We're fortunate to have with us one of
the most important voices of the growing

worldwide effort to learn the truth
about the events of 9 -11.

Among her other contributions, Barbara
Honiger is the visionary artist behind

both the Boston Tea Party for 9 -11
Truth and the third beam, which

symbolized Building 7, that she
organized in New York City on the ninth

anniversary of 9 -11.

And that has become the icon for
architects and engineers for 9 -11

well as the 9 -11 Truth movement
worldwide.

Barbara is also a national
whistleblower. She served as White House

analyst and special assistant for
domestic policy in the Reagan -Bush

administration, where she was the first
to resign as a matter of conscience.

She then wrote her groundbreaking book,
October Surprise, revealing the Iran

part of the Iran -Contra scandal.

Her book led to a full -scale subpoena
-powered investigation as well as a

story in Newsweek magazine.

Barbara then worked from 2000 to 2011 as
senior military affairs journalist at

the Naval Postgraduate School.

the premier science, technology, and
national affairs graduate research

university of the Department of Defense.

In this position, she had access to the
highest level civilian and military

officials of the Bush -Cheney
administration, helping her to get the

of the 9 -11 Pentagon attack.

She published her findings in the
Pentagon attack papers, which was

in Jim Maher's best -selling book on 9
-11 called The Terror Conspiracy.

Professor David Ray Griffin has said of
her findings that they would change the

discussion of what happened on 9 -11.

Ms. Honaker has also done pioneering
investigative work on the war games

exercises taking place on 9 -11, as well
as the anthrax attacks.

She's one of the founding members of
Patriots Question 9 -11 and a charter

member of Political Leaders for 9 -11
Truth.

Currently, she's completing a book on
the Pentagon attack.

Please welcome Barbara Hunniger.

Thank you so much for coming out.

It's a really great turnout. I'm
pleased.

It's wonderful to be in Seattle. I've
never been in Seattle before. I actually

saw Mount Rainier with hardly a cloud on
it yesterday.

And I was told that I would never be
able to see Mount Rainier without a

so I considered that a good sign for
tonight.

The title of my talk is Behind the Smoke
Curtain, which I believe will also be

the title of my book, which I hope will
be out this coming March, in a couple of

months. And I'm going to self -publish
it, and it will be available on Amazon

.com. The alternative title for my talk
is, Or Everything You Think You

Probably Know About the Pentagon Attack
is Wrong.

And that would be even for people who
have been members of the 9 -11 Truth

Movement for quite a while. I would be
interested to know...

Show of hands if you're not too shy.

How many people have already
investigated 9 -11 or consider

-11 truth people?

Oh, about a third of the audience.
That's wonderful.

So what that means is two -thirds of the
audience is here to be informed, and

that's also wonderful. I congratulate
you.

The reason I have this slide up.

It's because for those of you who are
members of the 9 -11 Truth Movement and

already believe you know about the
Pentagon attack, I wanted to put these

two slides up so that you understand
that even though what you're about to

is not what you think happened at the
Pentagon, this presentation, the

information in it, has already been seen
and reviewed by the world leaders of

the 9 -11 Truth Movement who have these
rather phenomenal feedback.

about this presentation.

So the bottom line is it's safe to open
your mind about what you're about to

hear.

And here's some more amazing work, truly
historic.

So, what happened at the Pentagon and
didn't and why it matters so terribly

for our future.

One year before 9 -11, on September
11th, the year 2000,

The neocon organization that called
themselves Project for a New American

Century, or you may have heard the
acronym PNAC or PNAC, actually called

in one of their publications for a new
Pearl Harbor.

This famous quote is from the Project
for a New American Century manifesto

page 51.

Quote, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change,

is likely to be a long one.

absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event like a new Pearl Harbor,

unquote. As the Project for a New
American Century manifesto was being

published, this offer was made to
producer Aaron Russo a full year before

9 -11.

In September of 2000, Nicholas
Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family

the Twin Towers, told Russo, Quote,
there's going to be an event, and out of

that event we're going to invade
Afghanistan.

So we can run pipelines through the
Caspian Sea, so we can go into Iraq, so

can take the oil, so we can establish
bases in the Middle East to make the

Middle East part of the New World Order.

And then he says, in my relationships
with some of these people, the

Rockefellers, the Council on Foreign
Relations, et cetera, in my

with some of these people, I can tell
you that is as evil as it gets.

That's Aaron Rousseau.

If he joined them, Russo was told, he
would, quote, be spared the police state

measures, the domestic surveillance
state measures, that would be imposed on

rest of the American public. That means
you, after, quote, the event, unquote,

happened. This is a year before 9 -11.

And you can see this statement by Aaron
Russo on a video on the

net.

The Project for New American Century
neocons prepared the ground for 9 -11 so

would be seen as a surprise attack,
which it wasn't, and for the chorus of

Harbor, Pearl Harbor, New Pearl Harbor
on September 11th.

In the months leading up to the 9 -11
attack, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld

out literally hundreds, if not
thousands, of copies of Neocon Roberta

Wohlstetter's 1962 book on Pearl Harbor,
a book which pushed the

false surprise attack and intelligence
failures official line of the original

Pearl Harbor attack.

She was the wife of Neocon godfather,
who was Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolf

of its personal mentor.

Richard Pearl's father -in -law, and
Zionist passionate war hawk Albert

Wohlstetter.

The movie Pearl Harbor hit theaters in
late May of 2001 using real Navy

ships that were arranged with the Navy
by the Navy's man in Hollywood who was

deck to assure so -called historical
accuracy and pyrotechnic special

an attack on an iconic national military
facility, however, could give them

their new Pearl Harbor. Just think about
it.

Even though on 9 -11 the World Trade
Center attacks were more spectacular,

sure, and they were the first attacks,
the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2,

they would have been likely seen, in my
opinion, as just a very much

bigger World Trade Center 93.

or a much bigger Oklahoma City.

But both of those attacks had already
been handled by the civilian courts.

And these people did not want the 9 -11
attack to be viewed as a bigger Oklahoma

City or a bigger World Trade Center 93.

They wanted them to be viewed as a new
Pearl Harbor, which required an attack

something like the iconic military
facility at Pearl Harbor. And that

military facility was the Pentagon.

Only the Pentagon attack made 9 -11 into
the new Pearl Harbor

that the authors of the PNAC manifesto
wanted and needed to roll out their

global domination agenda.

They needed it to claim justification
for endless preemptive wars, which we

still in, over 11 years later, for their
global domination agenda.

and most people don't know, .3, for the
creation shortly after 9 -11 of the

first U .S. mainland combatant command.

It's called NORTHCOM.

And what that means is, if you recall,
that the Bush -Cheney administration

much wanted and said that the entire
world, meaning including the mainland

United States, your homeland, was now
part of the global battlefield.

And in order to make it literally a
battlefield, they had to, for the first

time, create a combatant command over
mainland United States called NORTHCOM.

It also enabled the New Pearl Harbor
attack on the Pentagon, in addition, of

course, to the other attacks of 9 -11,
but it was the key one is what I'm

arguing, enabled the Bush -Cheney
administration to bypass.

On 9 -11 and before 9 -11, there was
joint authority.

Over NORAD's response, over the jets
that were so late in responding

to all of the attacks on 9 -11, took an
hour and 15 minutes, which was absurd.

On and before 9 -11, the decisions as to
NORAD responses were actually the joint

authority of the U .S. President and the
Canadian Prime Minister.

So once NORTHCOM was created, they
separated out the decision -making, the

unilateral decision -making authority of
the U .S. president over those kinds of

responses.

Also, of course, the 9 -11, and in
particular, the Pentagon made it into

Pearl Harbor, justified, they claimed,
their domestic surveillance state that

are still within.

And they enabled Bush Jr., President
Bush Jr., George W. Bush, to continually

evoke Article 2 of the Constitution, his
so -called commander -in -chief powers,

which he did and members of his
administration did over and over

justify violation of our Bill of Rights,
of U .S. federal law, of international

law, and even Nuremberg Principles. Bush
even said that it was the Pentagon

attack that made it war in his mind. And
a new Pearl Harbor.

In his memoir, which has been published,
his book, and in his speeches after his

memoir was published, he said that it
was after the World Trade Center 1 hit,

thought it was due to it just being a
terrible pilot, that it was an accident.

He said in print that when he was told
of the second hit, presumably we are

when Andrew Card whispered in his ear,
America is under attack, even then he

didn't think we were at war, not per se.

He said in his memoirs and his speeches
after his memoirs were published that it

was with the Pentagon attack that he
knew we were at war.

And you had to be able to sell to the
American public in the world that we

at war in order to justify all these
horrendous actions in the name of the 9

line.

Bush wrote in his diary on September
11th, quote, the Pearl Harbor of the

century took place today.

Because the Pentagon attack had,
therefore, to succeed, to affect us

war, to affect the new Pearl Harbor, and
to get their global domination agenda

and surveillance state, they couldn't
rely upon mere hijackers, no matter who

they were, even if there were any. They
had to control the operation.

And in order to control it, they had to
execute it, and only...

pre -placed explosives, both at the
World Trade Center, as David Ray Griffin

Richard Gage and Niels Heret and
Professor Stephen Jones and many others

proven is the real story at the World
Trade Center, both World Trade Center's

Towers 1 and 2, with planes, plane
approaches and impacts as the mere cover

cause, so that it was apparent that the
buildings would, it would be apparent

that the buildings came down.

to the uninitiated because of the planes
that impacts and the fires, the same as

you will see from this presentation is
true at the Pentagon, that the real

at the Pentagon is pre -placed inside
the building explosives with a plain

approach and destruction as the cover
cause.

To get their new Pearl Harbor, the
Project for New American Century neocon

signatories, In order to be certain that
they had it, they had to steal the 2000

election. And they did that in Florida
where Bush's brother was governor, Jeb

Bush. A project for New American Century
signatory.

Bush v. Gore was argued by none other
than Ted Olson, whose wife Barbara's, we

now know, non -existent alleged cell
phone calls from the alleged Pentagon

Flight 77 were the source, the most
important source for the claim that the

alleged Pentagon plane hijacker story,
that there were hijackers on that plane.

And without that story, there is zero
evidence that Flight 77 even returned

east. even if it was Flight 77, as
you'll see, that left Dulles Airport to

with. And the entire official story of
the Pentagon attack falls apart.

And in case you question that the cell
phone calls of Barbara Olson from Flight

77 have been deemed nonexistent, that is
now the official position of the FBI in

the Massawi trial of the Pentagon and of
American Airlines.

It's per David Ray Griffin.

Bush planned on being a, quote, war
president, unquote, before he even ran

the office of president. He said so.

With Bush's election, the Project for
New American Century signatories then

became the U .S. government. You will
see that in the next slide, which I will

not be able to read because it goes on
and on in fine print forever, of all the

PNAC signatories and participants.

There were two levels, signatories and
participants.

who actually became the United States
government.

Once in power, however, only the
Pentagon attack guaranteed Bush and the

for a New American Century signatory and
participants, Bush becoming a war

president, and they're getting their new
Pearl Harbor to roll out their global

domination and domestic surveillance
state agenda.

Now, these are just, if you could read
this, and this will be in my book, all

this. But following the theft of the
2000 election, and by the way, Bush v.

was decided by the Supreme Court
completely unconstitutionally, because

Constitution makes explicitly clear that
in the case of a contested presidential

election, that the House of
Representatives makes the decision, not

Court.

So following this after the 2000
election, the Project for New American

Manifesto signatories and participants
literally became the U .S. government

uniquely with the motive, means,
opportunity, and access to affect their

Pearl Harbor in the attacks of 9 -11.
And what you could barely see here are

name after name after name of the
individuals who were PNAC manifesto

signatories and participants.

and they're absolutely top positions in
the federal government once the election

was stolen.

Only the Pentagon attack enabled We Are
at War, which you notice this is from

immediately after 9 -11.

This is the National Security Agency NSA
General Zahner, who was head

of their Signals Intelligence
Directorate.

They apparently expected something to
happen because they whipped out this we

are at war immediately after the
attacks.

Zahner was in charge of the NSA unit
that surveilled calls to and from, and I

put al -Qaeda in quotes, al -Qaeda's
global communications center in Yemen

minimum of a year and a half before 9
-11.

They knew exactly what was coming down.

The new Pearl Harbor and war memes were
pushed by the mainstream media as the

attacks were literally in progress,
before either of the towers fell in New

and they were smoking.

This is just one example, but there are
dozens.

As the attacks were unfolding, the BBC
in London began playing clips from Pearl

Harbor. Tom Brokaw of NBC Today Show, as
the attacks were unfolding in New York,

said, there's been a declaration of war
by terrorists.

This is the most serious attack on the U
.S. since Pearl Harbor.

Time magazine, in its special September
2001 9 -11 issue, said, quote, what's

needed in response to 9 -11 is a
unified, unifying Pearl Harbor sort of

purple American fury, a ruthless
indignation that doesn't leak away in

week or two, unquote.

Pearl Harbor was mentioned, mentioned,
war was mentioned, mentioned by the

mainstream media.

9 -11 was clearly designed using the
original Pearl Harbor attacks as its

template.

So what did the new Pearl Harbor insider
script require the appearance of in the

actual execution of the attacks of 9
-11?

They had to appear to be surprise
attacks.

They had to appear to be kamikaze pilot
attacks.

With planes this time used as weapons on
buildings instead of ships.

Both the original Pearl Harbor and 9 -11
attacks were in the morning.

There needed to be a critical mass of
innocent deaths.

The next slide after this one is truly
chilling.

Condoleezza Rice, the National Security
Advisor, and Bush both said immediately

after the attacks, they just couldn't
imagine planes having ever been used as

weapons in a kamikaze -like attack.

Well, she isn't a historian.

And a kamikaze attack triggered U .S.
participation in World War II.

It is, I simply can't imagine, that
Condoleezza Rice couldn't imagine.

And Condoleezza Rice and Philip Zelikow,
who became the executive director of

the 9 -1 -1 Commission cover -up
inquiry, and I put inquiry in quotes,

members of Bush Sr.'s A -team when he
was president.

They had co -published a book.

They served on, as I mentioned, Bush
Senior's National Security Council

together, and Zelikow became her top
aide plenipotentiary at the State

Department when she moved to the State
Department.

And Zelikow, not surprisingly, in his
own bio, states that he is an expert on

creating public myths, you can read that
as lies, and maintaining public

presumptions about those lies, and
called that cover -ups.

He, Zelikow...

was effectively the sole author of the 9
-11 Commission report.

He wrote its detailed outline before
this so -called investigation even

and Zelikow authored the Bush Doctrine
for Unilateral Preemptive War under

Condoleezza Rice at the State
Department.

I also interviewed Richard Clark, who
was the so -called counterterrorism czar

in the Bush Jr.

Cheney White House. I interviewed him
when I was at the Naval Postgraduate

School, and he told me in an article
that was actually, I published it on a

website online, that, quote, the White
House approved all major exercise

scenarios in advance.

Now, the White House can only mean the
National Security Council.

and or Vice President Cheney. And the
National Security Council was headed by

Condoleezza Rice, and the
counterterrorism czar was Mr.

Clark himself.

So what does that mean?

I was the original researcher who
uncovered the reality of and the

the modus operandi for the planning,
execution, and cover -up of the real

perpetrator attack of 9 -11, that at the
center of that were...

military exercises that were taking
place on the morning of 9 -11 itself

were on hijack scenarios.

So what we're saying here is that
Richard Clark himself, the White House

counterterrorism czar before and on 9
-11, told me personally, and I have

published it on a DOD website, that he
and Condoleezza Rice knew of and pre

-approved the hijack scenario exercises
taking place before and on.

9 -11.

To succeed the real inside job 9 -11
PSYOP required a critical mass of

deaths. Believe it or not, after the
World Trade Center attack in 1993 that

killed, I believe, five people and
injured about a thousand, federal agents

heard to say by reporter Stephen Emerson
that, quote, there had not been enough

deaths this time.

After the 1993 World Trade Center
attacks also, most people don't know

the World Trade Center towers' roof
doors were locked, ordered locked, by

official New York City policy, so that
on 9 -11 it happened, because of that,

that the innocent victims above the
impact zones were trapped, terrorized,

killed.

They had no way to escape except to
jump.

And even the New York Times published
that I believe 105 victims had gotten

right up to the door, where in 1993 they
did, they were able to go onto the

roof, but they were blocked.

Also, after the impacts and before the
towers fell, dozens of military and

civilian helicopters, self -dispatched,
wonderful people from the military,

started flying towards New York City.

intending to rescue survivors from the
towers to risk their lives and their

helicopters. They were ordered to go to
a nearby military base so that they

could not respond.

On 9 -11, two World Trade Center tower
attacks 15 minutes apart, of course,

ensured the maximum PSYOP, ensured this
maximum live audience for the second

World Trade Center hit and the towers
collapsed.

After the 9 -11 attacks, Paul Wolfowitz,
who was a top signatory and participant

in the Project for a New American
Century manifesto, published exactly a

before 9 -11, and was Deputy Secretary
of Defense on 9 -11, immediately under

Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, he
actually had this to say about the

mass of death in the 9 -11 attacks.

This is after 9 -11 now. He predicted
before the final numbers were in that

9 -11 attacks would soon be found to
have resulted in a, quote, greater

of American deaths than any single day
in U .S. history since the Civil War,

more than any single day in World War I
and World War II.

and that Americans would now be willing
to sacrifice their lives in great

numbers for the cause of defeating
terrorism, the so -called global war on

terrorism. And quoted Winston Churchill,
quote, America is like a great boiler.

Once it gets fired up, the energy it
generates is enormous.

This was then echoed by Newsweek
magazine immediately after, quote, more

were killed by the alleged suicide
hijackers last week.

then the number of American soldiers
killed in the entire American Revolution

at Antietam, the bloodiest one -day
battle of the Civil War, or at Pearl

or on D -Day.

And locking the roof doors ensured that.

Zbigniew Brzezinski stated the number
killed on 9 -11 for added effect.

Quote,

it, meaning 9 -11, is more murderous
even than Pearl Harbor.

and the psychological impact is the
same, unquote.

But none of any of this would have
succeeded without the Pentagon attack.

So, proving its official story a lie, as
Richard Gage and

David Ray Griffin and so many others
have proven for the World Trade Center

attacks, to prove that the Pentagon
attack official story is a lie is so

extremely important.

So what is the evidence that a 757,
which Flight 77, according to the

story, was, did not hit the Pentagon at
the alleged impact point, which was in

Wedge 1, and I will show you a diagram
of the Pentagon in a moment to show you

exactly what the official story claims.

and did not hit at what the official
story says was the alleged impact time

Flight 77, which according to the
official story was 937 and 46 seconds.

almost 938.

When we prove this, we prove that the
official Pentagon story is a lie.

First, so what didn't happen at the
Pentagon?

We're going to go over this very quickly
because the meat of my presentation is

what I've discovered did happen there.

So first, what didn't happen at the
Pentagon? Well, what didn't happen at

Pentagon is what the government says
happened, is what the 9 -11 Commission

report says happened, which Professor
Griffin has called a 571 -page lie,

it is.

And the official story at the Pentagon
says that Flight 77, a large 757

Airlines Boeing airliner, hit the
Pentagon at column 14, which

you see in this slide.

photo. And this is actually a photo that
was published on the Pentagon's own

website. You see their logo up at the
left. Immediately after 9 -11 at either

the first or the second press conference
held in the Pentagon itself right after

the attacks.

So the official story, which they were
able to spin out that quickly, is

graphically shown with the overlay of
this alleged plane here that impacted on

Wedge 1 in Wedge 1 on the west face or
west side of the Pentagon.

Now, this is a diagram of the Pentagon
that shows the rings and the wedges.

Now, at the bottom of the graphic, it's
a little bit cut off, but

there's a, looks like a fireball, a
little graphic of a fireball. That's the

alleged impact point.

And if you notice, it is to the right or
south of the midline.

The Wedge 1 that had been upgraded to
withstand a terrorist attack, to

either a truck bomb or a bomb at the
wall or a high -force lateral impact of

a plane, specifically upgraded to
withstand the kind of terrorist attack

the official story says happened at the
Pentagon on 9 -11.

It's only in wedge one. And wedge one,
most people think wedge one is the whole

west side. That is not correct.

Wedge one goes from that center line at
the bottom of the graphic around that

right -hand corner at the bottom and up
to the center line of the next side to

the right.

So from going back to the bottom of the
graphic, from the center line to the

left, it's wedge two.

So Wedge 2 was going to start the
upgrading process the day after 9 -11 or

most two days after 9 -11. In fact, the
day after 9 -11, the Pentagon had

preannounced that they were going to
declare that the upgrade to withstand a

terrorist attack, a plane impact, or a
bomb on the outside of Wedge 1, which

includes the official story alleged
impact point of Flight 77, was complete,

that they were then going to start
upgrading Wedge 2.

Most people don't know this, but the
Pentagon both had and has its own

And the reason is that the President and
the Secretary of Defense and VIPs like

to helicopter in and out of the
Pentagon.

They don't like to go into Reagan
Airport or one of the civilian airports

then drive to the Pentagon. They like to
go straight to the Pentagon. So the

Pentagon has its own heliport. And that
heliport on 9 -11, this is actually an

aerial photograph before 9 -11,

this square structure out on the lawn,
and that's the west face.

Now, if you notice, to the left, which
is to the north of the heliport,

There's that little structure with a
smaller structure on top of it, and

the Heliport firehouse with the Heliport
air traffic controller where he sat on

top of the roof in that smaller
structure on top of the roof of the

And that structure is going to become,
and the Heliport itself, is going to

become extremely important when we see
what did happen at the Pentagon versus

what the official story claims happened
at the Pentagon. The official story

actually states that a plane came in.

at an approximate 45 -degree angle, and
that its wing hit here, and that it went

in basically here into the building
versus, as you'll see, because from

to window, it's 10 feet, according to
the Pentagon Building Performance

So it's approximately, count the
windows, at least 100 feet between the

story says the plane allegedly impacted
and where, as we're going to see, there

actually was a plane that was destroyed
at the Pentagon.

which was considerably to the left or
the north of where the official story

claims it happened.

So this is a graphic of a Boeing 757
alleged impact per the official story.

And you can see how absurd it is. Wing
tip to wing tip, 124 feet.

And as I mentioned, the window center to
window center on the Pentagon is 10

feet. So it's easy to know the distance
when you look at these images by just

counting the number of windows and
multiplying by 10 feet.

This is a properly scaled and positioned
Boeing 757,

actually positioned in, of course, it's
an overlay, but it's positioned the

way the official story claims that
Flight 77 came in, which shows the

and total absurdity of it.

As you'll see, it would be impossible
for the official story to be true

the Pentagon Building Performance Report
states that 90 % to 95 % of the

internal damage, which was alleged by
the official story to be from the plane

somehow getting through the wall, and we
will address that in a moment. That

couldn't have happened either.

But if it got through the wall and it
went in and created what they called the

internal penetration path of damage,
that that damage was 90 % to 95 % on the

ground floor.

Well, the ground floor is 12 feet high.

And they said that 5 % to 10 % max was
on the second floor.

Well, it's impossible.

And this is why it's impossible.

First off, the 757's massive six -ton
steel and titanium alloy engines extend

nine feet beneath its wings.

It would have gouged the lawn if it came
in anything like at the height of the

official story.

And there it is again to show you these
huge engines way down beneath the bottom

of the plane.

So based on the interior damage, which
was 90 % to 95 % on the ground floor,

Pentagon's own building performance
report found that, quote, the top of the

fuselage, or body of the plane, was no
more than 20 feet above the ground. No

more. But a 757's body is almost 12 1⁄2
feet in diameter, leaving less than 8

feet between the bottom of the ground.

And yet the engines themselves extend 9
feet below. The official story is

physically impossible.

And, of course, it didn't happen. If the
official story were true, those huge

engines would have gouged the lawn like
this. And it's very important that the

official story claims that the plane
came in effectively level, not at an

which would have avoided this.

Instead, the lawn outside the official
story alleged impact point, and this is

very famous photograph that almost
everyone in the 9 -11 truth movement has

wrongly, used as evidence that no plane
was destroyed at the Pentagon.

This is outside the official story
alleged impact point to the right or

that midline of the West Wall.

And there is no gouge on the lawn, and
it's pristine, and there's no airplane

debris. And for this reason, many people
in the 9 -11 Truth Movement use this

photograph and others like it.

to allegedly prove that there was no
plane that was destroyed at the

but that's not correct.

However, as you'll now see, there is
wreckage and a huge amount of it just

further to the left or north at and
around the Heliport, which you've now

outside the wall's center point and to
the north or left of that outside of

Wedge 2, which wasn't yet upgraded.

So this is just to remind you again that
you're going to see the damage that I'm

about to show you the photographs of is
just to the right of that little

firehouse building with the Heliport Air
Traffic Control's

lookout above it. That's what you're
about to see.

That's just one example. The lawn off
Wedge 2 is anything but pristine.

The Pentagon firehouse in this
photograph, you can see the top of the

just beyond that fire engine, and that's
that firehouse that you saw in the

previous photograph.

Two Heliport firefighters who were on
duty in that little firehouse that

of 9 -11 because, most people don't know
this, President Bush, before the

attacks, was pre -scheduled to arrive by
helicopter at the Pentagon Heliport

around noon, between noon and 1230.

So they were getting ready for that, and
he had just before what I'm about to

show you happened, the firefighter, Alan
Wallace, had backed that fire truck out

of the firehouse and parked it with its
back to the wall, perpendicular to the

wall. All of this is to the left or the
north of the line

demarcating Wedge 1 to Wedge 2.

It was considerably north, between 120
and 150 feet north of where the official

story says Flight 77, as you will see,
didn't even come close to the building

for another 5 minutes and 16 seconds, as
we'll see.

And here we're getting into the proof of
the timing.

On the left in this photograph is the
clock from that Healyport firehouse.

It was stopped by some violent event at
9 .32 and 30 seconds.

And guess what? That clock has been
preserved, stopped, at that very time in

Smithsonian Institution's official 9 -11
exhibit, which you see here.

The clock is on the flat table. It's the
third object from the left, just to

the left of Ted Olson's phone, in which
he allegedly received calls from his

wife, Barbara, from the Pentagon plane,
which...

The Pentagon, the FBI, and American
Airlines all say that it's a lie that

phone was ever used to talk to his wife.

So the burning question before us, and
this was the question I asked myself

this past year, what violent event,
because it had to be a violent event of

kind, at or near the Heliport, where
Heliport's firefighter, Ellen Wallace,

just backed.

one of the Heliport fire trucks out in
preparation for President Bush's

arrival. What was it that stopped the
Heliport firehouse clock at 9 .32 and 30

seconds? Especially when the official
story claims that Flight 77 was miles

miles still outside of Washington, D
.C., and wouldn't even approach the

building for 5 minutes and 16 more
seconds at almost 9 .38, technically at

and 46 seconds. What stopped the
Heliport clock?

Multiple witnesses state that at 9 .32
and 30 seconds, now they don't give the

time. You infer that from the
combination of the converging evidence

witnesses' testimony that I'm giving you
now and the stop clock at the Heliport.

Multiple witnesses, including those two
firefighters from the Heliport firehouse

itself, state that a white, low -flying
plane.

And if it's a white plane, it cannot be
any American airline, civilian airliner,

which are polished aluminum, so they're
silvery. They're definitely not seen as

white. But all these witnesses were very
clear that it was a white, low -flying

plane approached the Pentagon on a south
path.

In other words, south of that center
line, to the right of that center line,

coming in at a diagonal, a south of Navy
Annex path.

And hit, dragged, or scraped, as you'll
see they use those different words, but

for the same event, hit, dragged,
scraped its left wing at or near the

just before bursting into an immense
fireball.

And as I mentioned, as American Airlines
bodies are polished silvery aluminum,

this plane simply could not have been
Flight 77, an American Airlines polished

aluminum body.

Witness Jim Sutherland saw a white twin
-engine plane with multicolored

horizontal stripes flying an estimated
50 feet, he believed, above I -395 in an

almost straight -line approach towards
the building on the south path.

Pentagon Heliport firefighters, as we've
already seen, their names are Alan

Wallace and Mark Skipper, are direct
witnesses to a white plane approaching

heliport and exploding into a massive
fireball.

near the firehouse, which would have
killed them had they not noticed it at

last second and literally run. One of
them, Alan Wallace, ran away.

As he saw it coming in, he saw it maybe
200 and 250 feet from him, which is

difficult to estimate because it was
coming right at him, to his left. As he

walked with his back out from behind by
that fire truck, he was very clear that

he looked to his left, which was to the
south.

And it was coming right at him at that
diagonal angle.

And it would have killed him had he not
immediately run out of the way to save

his life and rolled under a van.

You'll see that van in a moment. It was
parked outside the wall of the Heliport

Firehouse. And Mark Skipper, the other
firefighter, ran out onto the lawn to

north or to the left and literally leapt
away. And they did survive. They were

burned, but they survived.

I believe, though this is an inference,
he did state explicitly that he believed

Alan Wallace that the plane, which was
coming in at an angle so he saw the

side of the plane on his left, that
there was two stripes down the side. He

thought they were orange and blue, but
they were almost certainly orange, red,

or red and blue in order to simulate an
American Airlines airliner.

To avoid being hit by this white plane,
Heliport firefighter Alan Wallace ran

toward the outer wall of the Heliport
and leapt for cover under a van.

And this is his published testimony.

After coming out, immediately after, he
said, quote, everything is on fire. The

grass is on fire. The building is on
fire. The firehouse is on fire. There

fire everywhere.

Areas of the blacktop, meaning the
helipad, were on fire. There was debris

everywhere. The trees were on fire.

The back end of the fire truck that he
and Mark Skipper had just parked facing

away from the Pentagon wall was also in
flames.

Inside the firehouse, the ceiling had
crumbled, temporarily trapping the third

firefighter, Dennis Young, and was
filled also with debris.

The official Pentagon report called...

Pentagon 9 -11 actually states that the
fireball may have even gone into the

still -open firehouse door, out of which
Wallace had just backed out the

firetruck or moved the firetruck out.

Multiple witnesses saw the planes, this
white plane's left wing, hit, scrape, or

drag on the helipad just before it burst
into a fireball.

These are just some of the testimonies.
Quote, the left wing of the plane

touched the ground by the helicopter
pad.

The left wing dipped and scraped the
helicopter area. The left wing touched

helipad. These are all separate
witnesses.

The plane dragged its left wing along
the ground.

It looked like it hit the helicopter
pad, then skipped up. The plane caught

edge of its left wing on the ground.

There is a helicopter pad right in front
of the side of the Pentagon.

The left wing touched there.

After the fireball, there was...

suddenly what one witness called
literally millions of small pieces of

which I think that the evidence shows is
this wreckage of this plane, pieces at

and around the Pentagon heliport. Now,
this is anything but a pristine lawn.

This is also well to the north, between
120 and 150 feet north or to the left of

the alleged impact point of Flight 77,
further south.

The debris, according to witnesses, also
rained onto I -27, which is to the

right, perpendicular to the wall, out,
with some even, according to witnesses,

falling on the north side of the
Pentagon and on the Fort Myer walking

This is completely different from the
official account.

One of the witnesses, Penny Eggless,
claimed that she also saw a white, she

very certain, white, low -flying, south
-approaching plane, the above piece from

which she said actually fell through her
car's sunroof.

The inside surface of this piece of
evidence is dark red, which is nothing

all like the light green on the inner
surface of the body of civilian

like American Airlines 757s. It looks
like a kind of graphite material, which

may actually be similar or identical to
the material used to stealth military

planes.

Former NSA, National Security Agency,
and Military Electronics, expert Dennis

Cimino has told me that he believes this
piece is from the wing or stabilizer of

a fiberglass drone that was shaped and
painted to simulate an American

Airlines plane, and that the fiberglass
would shatter upon impact into these

many, many, many pieces that you
actually see.

Here's another photograph, firemen
walking off the edge of the helipad

the Pentagon Wall.

Some of the witnesses actually referred
to this debris wreckage as like

confetti. There were some large pieces,
however.

Workers walking over the wreckage
between the helipad and the Pentagon

closer you get to the wall, the more of
this wreckage debris there is.

This is a very important photograph.

It's looking south towards the earrings
collapse zone. So you can see where the

wall has collapsed over the alleged
impact point of Flight 77, much further

south.

And the Pentagon firehouse is then to
the left off the edge of the photo. So

you're looking at something in the
middle now between the firehouse on the

and the alleged impact point of Flight
77 on the right.

Not too difficult to see where the
pristine lawn begins.

So the pristine lawn you saw in that
earlier photograph that members of the 9

-11 Truth Movement have been for 10
years or more citing as proof that there

no plain destruction at the Pentagon is
way off to the south.

And all of this destruction that they
don't show you for whatever reason,

inadvertent or otherwise, is further
north.

And here's more confetti -like wreckage
in the distance beyond this large piece.

There are some large pieces, which
itself is right next to the helipad.

And this is incredible.

When I discovered this this past year,
it was quite a shock.

There was not just a white plank that
came in on a south pass, a diagonal

pass, at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

was destroyed there in some way without,
I believe, hitting the wall because

there is no evidence that it actually
hit the wall. It was somehow destroyed.

And we're about to see how I believe it
was destroyed without hitting the wall a

split second later.

There was not just a white plane there.

At the helipad, there was also a
helicopter, a military helicopter at the

helipad. It had arrived at the helipad
four minutes and 42 seconds just before

this white plane flew in and exploded in
a fireball.

And this is amazing.

Lifted off only three seconds before the
white plane exploded exactly there.

And how do we know that? We know that
from this record.

This is the record from the Reagan
National Airport for the MC, and that, I

believe, stands for a Marine Corps MC
helicopter at the Pentagon heliport,

showing its arrival, and because this
was by radar from Reagan Airport, the

arrival meant it had descended below the
radar floor, which was about 100 feet,

and that was at 927 in 51 seconds, and
it then returned above 100 feet to radar

visibility,

at 9 .32 and 33 seconds. And we saw that
the Pentagon clock, the Pentagon

heliport clock, firehouse clock, was
stopped only three seconds before that,

9 .32 and 30 seconds.

So I believe, although it is an
inference, that that helicopter somehow

destroyed that plane.

As we will see in more detail at the end
of this presentation, where we get into

the evidence for who... planned and
oversaw the real insider plot of 9 -11,

not believe it is a mere coincidence
that the defense contractor company of

Pentagon's own chief financial officer
on 9 -11, Dov Zakheim, was the

manufacturer of a special proprietary
system for remote -controlling drone

aircraft and for destroying drones that
were used in military exercises at the

terminal phase of those exercises.

The near simultaneity of the helicopter
liftoff, within seconds, literally, it

had to take a few seconds to get up so
that it would avoid being hit by the

plane itself, and then could have
destroyed the plane by a missile. Or by

onboard system like that designed by
Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakhin's

for destroying military exercise drones
in their terminal phase.

That is, in this case, just before the
drone at the Pentagon on 9 -11 would

otherwise hit the wall.

That's speculation, but the plane was
then destroyed.

But it is more than telling that System
Planning Corporation, or SPC, designs,

manufactures, and distributes highly
sophisticated technology that enables an

operator to fly by remote control as
many as eight different airborne

at the same time from one position
either on the ground or airborne.

System Planning Corporation markets the
technology to take over the controls of

an airborne vehicle already in flight.

For example, the flight termination
system technology could hijack hijackers

bring the plane down safely.

The flight termination system can be
used in conjunction with the CTS

that can control up to eight airborne
vehicles simultaneously.

The possibility of nefarious use of
these brilliant technologies...

developed and deployed by Systems
Planning Corporation, certainly deserves

careful consideration in any full and
impartial investigation of what actually

took place on 9 -11.

And the helicopter then did lift off. It
was not destroyed.

In fact, naval historian John Sherwood
told Pentagon eyewitness Jeffrey Mark

Parsons, an extremely important Pentagon
witness, that a helicopter had been

sent to the Pentagon, quote, by the
White House itself.

which would almost certainly, if true,
mean that it was sent by either Vice

President Cheney or the Secret Service.

Quote, this is still from the naval
historian John Sherwood, quote, to

the plane from going into the Pentagon.

Well, if he was referring to that white
plane that exploded into a fireball at 9

.32 and 30 seconds, stopping the
Pentagon heliport clock.

At 9 .32 and 30 seconds, then it
certainly was prevented from going into

Pentagon because there is no evidence
that it hit the wall just beyond the

heliport.

Witness Jeffrey Parsons himself.

From the 17th floor of his hotel, which
was across I -395, he saw a helicopter

flying erratically between his hotel and
the helipad, going back and forth like

a bumblebee.

And then it disappeared from his
perspective below the Pentagon roof.

where he says it would have landed at
the helipad. And then he said only a few

minutes later, he first left the window.

After he had left the window and seen
this erratic helicopter, he then heard a

massive explosion, went back to the
window, saw this big fireball, but he

actually see an impact, but he saw the
fireball and smoke afterwards.

He himself was a helicopter pilot with
the U .S. Border Patrol, so he knows.

What's unusual for a helicopter to be
doing? And he says that was extremely

unusual, and he didn't understand what
it was doing.

Air Force witness to CNN's Chris Plant.

Quote, I was told by one witness, Plant
said, this is on air, live that morning

from the Pentagon, an Air Force senior
enlisted man that he was outside the

Pentagon when it occurred.

He said that he saw a helicopter
circling the building, the Pentagon.

He said it appeared to be a U .S.
military.

I believe that is the MC or Marine Corps
helicopter that we saw the radar record

from. And that that helicopter
disappeared behind the building where

helicopter landing zone, meaning the
Heliport, is.

And then the witness saw a fireball go
into the sky, exactly like the Heliport

firefighters say.

This helicopter disappeared behind the
building, and then there was an

explosion.

The near simultaneity of the liftoff of
the helicopter and the explosion

explains why this witness and many
others, whose vantage points only

them to see the helicopter and not also
the plane come in, like the Heliport

firefighters, led to erroneous early
reports that the Pentagon had actually

attacked by a helicopter.

In fact, Vice President Cheney said that
himself to Reuters.

And all this happened at 9 .32 and 30
seconds.

which is more than five minutes, five
minutes and 16 seconds before the

story says Flight 77 was anywhere close
to Washington, D .C.

So for those of you who are 9 -11 truth
aficionados, I'm going to answer this

question I'm always asked. Well, what
about the Citizens Investigation Team or

SIT, Northside Witnesses? I honor those
witnesses.

I, however, do not believe that the
interpretation of what the witnesses

the citizens' investigation team is
correct. I think it is very incorrect.

Why?

As there is no evidence of any plane
destruction other than the white plane

exploded near the heliport at 9 .32 and
30 seconds, if the plane that a dozen or

so witnesses saw approach to the north
of the center line, to the north of the

Citgo gas station, which is on that
center line, and to the north of the

annex, which is on that center line, if
that plane flew over, which many 9 -11

researchers believe, falsely believe, it
cannot be the White Plane, which was

destroyed. It didn't fly over the
building. It was destroyed if it was the

Plane.

So it would have to have been either a
different second plane or...

The white plane could have come around
twice.

As these Northside witnesses, who were
interviewed by the citizens'

investigation team, however, themselves
did not believe that plane that they saw

flew over. They believed it did hit
because they heard this huge explosion

after seeing it. And given their
experiences,

The plane that they saw coming in on
what's called a north path either

approached, would have to have
approached near simultaneously with the

plane. Basically, two planes coming in
from different directions at the same

time, effectively.

And the plane that the SIT witnesses,
that SIT claims went through the

would have gone through the fireball of
the white plane being destroyed near the

heliport.

The plane that the Northside witnesses
saw could have been the official story

plane that the official story claims
came in at 9 .37 and 46 seconds.

In which case, though, if for the SID
interpretation to be true, there would

have to have been a second explosion,
which was in fact reported by many

witnesses at the Pentagon as it flew
through, however, a pre -existing smoke

cloud. We just heard another loud
explosion down at the Pentagon building

seconds ago.

That's our Audrey Barnes, who is
standing nearby the Pentagon, saying

a second explosion. Audrey, did you see
anything? Since these other attacks have

been aerial, did you see anything flying
overhead just before this explosion?

We can't see exactly where the source of
the explosion was, but you could hear

it very clearly with a loud boom.

Now that's just for 9 -11 aficionados.

Now back to what the official story says
happened but did not.

further south as we've seen, at least
120 to 150 feet further south along the

West Wall, more than five minutes after
all this had already happened.

This is again the official story lie
from the Pentagon's own press conference

right after the attacks.

Now this is further proof that the
official story simply cannot be true.

Immediately adjacent to the official
story, alleged impact point to the right

south of that midline, way south of the
heliport.

The official story says that Flight 77,
a large Boeing 757, hit at effectively

ground level, 90 to 95 percent of the
damage in the ground floor, which is

12 feet tall, to the ceiling.

at column 14.

So where you see the large circle of the
fuselage is centered on column 14. And

just to the right, you can see that the
columns numbered 15, 16, 17, 18, off to

the right or to the south.

Well, you will notice that where the
right engine, that smaller circle is,

is over what's left of an external
column that is bowed out, as are all of

They're not bowed in as they would be if
impacted from a massive object from the

outside, especially a six -ton titanium
and steel engine, which they didn't find

at the Pentagon, by the way, at all.

Some official spokesman actually claimed
it was vaporized, which is absurd.

So it's impossible.

These columns are bowed out to the right
of the alleged impact point of the

center line of the fuselage of the
alleged Flight 77 impact.

And then there were also these large
spools that were in front. And these

are six feet high, and they were not
bowed over right in front of where they

claim that the plane hit.

And then this is a photograph to the
left of the alleged impact point, which

at that red dot.

And it's a little bit more difficult to
see in this, but what's remaining of the

columns on the outer columns of the west
wedge are actually bowed out also to

the left of where the official story
says the center nose of the fuselage

Okay. And then also a ground effect.
This is all the evidence that the

story, in addition to what I've
uncovered is what actually did happen,

official story did not happen as the
government says it did. The ground

makes the 757 impact into the first
floor effectively level, the official

says. at speed aerodynamically
impossible.

It is physically impossible.

Under these conditions, the plane could
not get closer, according to pilots and

aerodynamic experts, to the ground any
closer than one wing length, or

approximately 56 feet, which would put
it between, about what you see here, the

fourth and fifth floors up.

And yet, the official Pentagon building
performance report said 90 to 95 percent

of the damage was in the ground floor,
which is only 12 feet to the ceiling.

And this is a graphic representation of
the ground effect because of these high

-pressure vortices that happen under the
wings as it approaches the ground at

high speed.

The official story trajectory at the
claimed speed is thus impossible.

Now, these are quotes from Air Force and
commercial airline pilot Russ

Wittenberg.

It is totally impossible, the official
story. A 757 could not possibly have

flown at those speeds without going into
a high -speed stall to begin with.

The airplane won't go that fast when you
start pulling those high -G maneuvers.

That plane would have fallen out of the
sky at what the official story claims.

And certified Navy top gun pilot Ralph
Kolstad, whom I have interviewed, with

over 26 ,000 flight hours, including 6
,000 in Boeing 757, like American

Airlines Flight 77 was, including the
physical plane that flew as Flight 77

allegedly that day.

He states, I could not have flown it the
way the official story flight path was

described. I was a Navy fighter pilot
and an air combat instructor and have

experience flying at low altitude, high
speed aircraft.

In other words, exactly what the
official story claims.

I could not have done what these alleged
beginner hijackers allegedly did.

Something about the official story
stinks to high heaven.

Now, the official story also claims that
Flight 77, a large Boeing 757, coming

in very low at approximately 540 to 560
miles per hour, hit five light

poles in a row, there they are, without
exploding.

But a 757 could not have hit one light
pole, according to an expert I'm about

quote for you, let alone five in a row,
and even made it to the wall without

exploding. Why?

Because the official story means that a
757, Flight 77 or otherwise, would have

to have had still 11 ,250 gallons of
flammable jet fuel in its wing tanks.

Most people don't know. I certainly
didn't until I did this research.

that the largest, or two of the large,
almost as large as the center fuselage

tank, this is a graphic from Boeing's
own website of its 757 -200 series,

is what Flight 77 was.

And this is flammable material, the jet
fuel that is located in the two wing

tanks, including tanks off to the way
tips.

And experts have told me, including
Ralph Kolstad, who flew this very plane,

he was very clear that the fuel in the
center or fuselage body tank is used up

first. And the official story says that
Flight 77 or A757 went out and turned

around and came back. And before it hit
the Pentagon, it was only out for an

hour and 17 minutes. And it would have
used the fuel from the center fuselage

tank. And the tanks in the wings would
have been flying fuel bombs.

And the official story says that the
leading edge of those two wings that are

filled still with fuel, according to the
official story, hit five 240 -pound

light poles like this in a row.

When the impact, I found this wonderful
image, of a single flying bird does this

to a wing.

And here's an example of what a single
flying goose does to the lightweight

carbon fiber nose of a plane.

And as I mentioned, I interviewed Ralph
Kolstad, the top gun Navy pilot who flew

the physical plane that was Flight 77 on
9 -11. He said, if a 757 hit a light

pole going at that high speed, it would
rip open the wing, rip open the fuel

tank in the wing. That wing would erupt
into flames.

The wings and probably the entire plane
with it would have been destroyed before

it could ever get to the building.

When a leading edge of a wing of this
jet

Hit just a single light pole. It sheared
the wing entirely off, spilled jet fuel

and wreckage over 100 feet, and crashed
the plane to the ground.

When the same thing happened to a large
airliner, Now, that plane was smaller

than a 757, but when the same kind of
thing happened to a large airliner like

Flight 77, which was in Detroit in 1987,
18 feet sheared off the left wing,

which is the one that hit the light
pole, when it hit two light poles, going

only 222 miles per hour, which was less
than half the reported 540 to 560

miles per hour that Flight 77 was
allegedly going when it allegedly hit

light poles in a row.

And no wings or large wing pieces like
this were found anywhere at or in the

Pentagon.

And even if Flight 77 or any large
airliner had gotten through the light

pole and tall six -foot -high spools
obstacle course, a plane couldn't have

penetrated, I do not believe.

The evidence shows the newly hardened
outer wall of the Pentagon.

Wedge One's outer wall, which you see a
graphic to the right from the Pentagon

building performance report, how the
wall had been hardened after the

City bombings.

The Pentagon decided that they wanted to
harden all of its outer walls to

prevent that kind of an attack on the
Pentagon.

And Wedge One's outer wall, which
includes where the official story says

77 allegedly hit, had just been newly
hardened to withstand terrorist attacks.

specifically the kind that the official
story says happened on 9 -11.

Now, this very much parallels, doesn't
it, the World Trade Centers, because we

know that the World Trade Center Towers
1 and 2 were specifically designed to

withstand the impact of a plane like the
official story says hit those buildings

on 9 -11. Same thing with the Pentagon
in just that wedge.

Interesting, isn't it?

Two feet thick after the upgrade, steel
and Kevlar mesh, so the entire wall was

like a huge bomb and plane -proof vest.

This is what happened to the nose of a
large airliner when it hit a non

-reinforced wall, unlike the hardened
wall of the Pentagon on 9 -11, far

than the Pentagon's wall, going at a
mere fraction of the speed, I believe it

was 88 miles per hour, claimed for
Flight 77.

To summarize, This part.

The official story at the Pentagon on 9
-11 claims that after striking five

light poles in a row, the leading edge
of the wings, and somehow making it

through the newly hardened wall that was
specifically reengineered to withstand

just such a terrorist attack, as at the
World Trade Center, without its sole

wing fuel tanks exploding, which Ralph
Cole said would have happened,

A 757, according to the official story,
then finally did explode, but only after

it was almost entirely inside the
building.

And, this is the official story now,
that once inside the building, after

progressively shredded and dispersed
over 285 feet, going in at a diagonal 45

degree angle, that it turned into a
quasi -liquid unexploded fuel and debris

slurry.

And that that slurry somehow magically
reconstituted itself after going around

all of these still standing columns into
a perfectly focused cone of energy,

which somehow magically cut this almost
perfectly round alleged exit hole in the

ceiling wall.

Despite there being, according to Dwayne
Dietz, Former NASA Director of Research

Engineering did an analysis of this
slide from the Pentagon Building

Report. He has shown that there isn't a
single path between the official story

alleged entrance point or impact point
of Flight 77 and the alleged exit hole

the C -ring that does not have multiple
still standing columns in the way that

would have dispersed this alleged quasi
-liquid slurry.

according to the official story, somehow
made it through the five standing light

poles without exploding the wing tanks,
somehow made it through this hardened

wall like a huge Kevlar vest, somehow
made it into the building

before some of the fuel exploding, and
then this magical flurry reconstituting

itself around all of these still
standing columns.

And then after all of that, the official
story actually alleges, and this is

from the Pentagon Building Performance
Report again, that, believe it or not,

Flight 77 passenger bodies and remains
were found beyond the C ring exit hole.

In the AE drive between the C and the B
ring, the B ring being further in

towards the center than even the C ring.

And by an amazing coincidence, this is a
side note, but I think an important

one, because it talks to the passengers.

By an amazing coincidence, in the
Pentagon rubble, the official story

that there just happened to have been
found five unidentified body remains

that the government presumes were the
hijackers.

But that happens to be the very same
number, five, that the government claims

were unidentifiable remains.

that it assumes are not the hijackers,
which just to be sure that no one could

ever be sure that they were one and the
same, they reincinerated and dumped into

a landfill.

According to the Pentagon's own
spokesman, there weren't any victims,

or any playing parts outside the Searing
exit hole at all.

Terry Mitchell of the Office of
Assistant Secretary of Defense for

Affairs Audiovisual Division, who was
given immediate access, he was an

to the AE Drive to take the Pentagon's
own official photos, answered media

questions about a photo of the C -ring
hole that he showed at the September

Pentagon's own press briefing, press
conference.

And he stated this for the official
record, quote, There is a hole, yes, he

asked about this.

alleged exit hole. He said, yes, there's
a hole in the searing.

They suspect, he doesn't say who they
are, they suspect that this was where

of the aircraft came through.

Although, personally, he was physically
there. He says, I didn't see any

evidence of an aircraft down there.

This pile outside the hole, he said, is
all Pentagon metal.

None of that is from aircraft
whatsoever.

This is Pentagon's own spokesman.

As you can see, he continues, they've
punched a hole in here. This was punched

out for the rescue workers to clean out
the debris.

And here you see the hole again, and
it's a little bit difficult to see, but

the left of that hole is an upside -down
A with a cross across it and the words

punch out. They were added after the
hole was made, by the way.

Well, guess what? The inverted A is the
International Personal Rescue System

symbol for dead victim removed.

This hole was made for the exit of
Pentagon personnel and the entry of

and cleanup teams, just as he said.

And it was made, according to shape
-charge explosive expert and mechanical

engineer, Ph .D. Michael Meyer, it was
made with shape -charge explosives, not

by a plane or any part of a plane or any
magical quasi -liquid slurry of a

plane.

According to shape charge expert Michael
Meyer, quote, this so -called exit hole

is the signature of a shape charge
explosive, not of a plane impact or any

of it. It is physically impossible, he
said, for the C -ring wall to have

in a neat, clean circle like that,
except by shape charge explosives.

And in addition, the alleged plane exit
hole, which is at the point of the

arrow,

So where the arrow begins in the upper
right, you can see that this aerial

photograph was taken after the collapse
over the alleged impact point, according

to the official story. It came in at
that diagonal, about a 45 -degree angle,

and according to the official story,
poked its nose or some part of the plane

out of that at the point of the arrow on
the inside of the C -ring.

That's the official story.

But guess what?

I found this graphic.

From the Washington Post immediately
after 9 -11, that hole, alleged exit

is actually shown in the Pentagon's own
data as one of three exit holes in this

legend. It's a little bit hard to see,
but it says exit holes, third up from

bottom of the legend, exit holes,
plural.

And then on the graphic itself, the
actual holes are labeled with little

dots, one, two, and three.

And those...

perfectly matched with these three exit
holes on the inside of the C -ring.

Now, evidently, my pointing this out,
which I've been doing for a number of

years now, worried some insiders because
an alleged 9 -11 truth researcher,

I won't say which one, has now on his
website put out this doctored diagram.

where he has changed the original
Washington Post graphic to say that

only a single plain exit hole.

So the elephant in the room, one of the
big elephants in the room, not the only

one, proving that the official story at
the Pentagon is false, again, is time.

Because we remember that the Pentagon
heliports...

Firehouse clock was stopped by the
violent event there at 9 .32 and 30

versus the official story alleged impact
time of Flight 77 of 5 minutes and 16

seconds later at almost 9 .38.

The official story is not only wrong, in
addition, about the time of the

Pentagon attack, which it claims was 9
.37 and 46 seconds, but is hiding the

real time of the attack for obvious
reasons.

Interestingly, after the attack, the
Army did not know the time. The Army

was trying to figure out when its
building was attacked, let alone how.

And so they asked seismologists to check
the five closest seismic readout

stations for any indication of the time
of impact, as had been done for the

World Trade Center towers, and
Pennsylvania for that matter.

And guess what?

They found no above -noise seismic
signal at all for the official Pentagon

alleged impact time. None. Zero. There
was no impact signal at the Flight 77

alleged impact time at all.

And yet, according to Dave Gap, who was
a top Air

Force pilot and crash investigator for
over 30 years, quote,

If a 757 had struck anywhere near ground
level at the Pentagon, there definitely

would have been a seismic signal.

Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dave Gap
retired, 30 -year veteran senior

crash investigator, and who was chief of
master air attack planning for both the

Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Now, this is one of the frames from the
famous five frames that were taken from

one of the two Pentagon,

security cameras outside the West Wall.

And if you'll note that on the bottom
left of this famous, one of the famous

five frames, is September 12th, not
September 11th.

And if you'll notice, the time is 537 p
.m.

All right?

Well, the Pentagon claims in its report
in Pentagon 9 -11, the Pentagon claims

that this is the date and time that
these frames were downloaded after the

attacks. That's how they explain that
it's September 12th.

If so, however, because all security
cameras have digital time records or

would be useless.

If so, the original date and time stamps
have been removed before they were made

public.

So the time of whatever caused the
fireball, this famous photograph that

leaked in the spring of 2002.

and was on the cover of every newspaper
in the world as alleged proof that a

plane hit the Pentagon, which it does
not, the time of whatever caused that

fireball is being actively hidden by the
Pentagon and the FBI.

It is obviously not at the official
story alleged time of 9 .37 and 46

Also, that one five frames video, there
were actually two,

But those two almost identical videos
from two cameras close to each other

outside the Pentagon West wall happens
to be, we now know, the

only one at the time of this report that
I'm about to read you, and now we know

since the Massawi trial in 2005, I
believe it was, is only one of two of

the 85 videos that the FBI has in its
possession.

That shows any evidence of an alleged
impact, which it does not.

Below is the key paragraph from the
sworn under penalty of perjury affidavit

report by FBI Special Agent McGuire in
response to an FOIA request to

investigate, to look at, and report back
about all 85 videos.

Quote, out of the remaining 13
videotapes, which did show the Pentagon

site even, 12, in other words, all but
one of those videotapes, showed the

Pentagon after the alleged impact.

And she says, under oath, FBI agent, I
determined that only a single videotape

showed the alleged impact of Flight 77
into the Pentagon on September 11th, and

that is that famous five frames that has
the wrong date and the wrong time, and

they are hiding.

the time of that fireball for obvious
reasons.

So why is the Pentagon hiding the attack
fireball time?

Because, of course, the first violent
event happened over five minutes before

the official story says Flight 77 was
anywhere close to that building.

And the real time exposes what really
happened.

In addition to the early white plane
approach and destruction at 9 .32 and 30

seconds, as we have already seen, This
should give you a hint.

The FBI's official 911 investigation
codename is PentBomb.

It's not PentPlane.

And this stands for, officially,
Pentagon Twin Towers Bombing.

The FBI actually lied outright to one of
the Jersey girls who had lost their

husbands in the World Trade Center
towers on 9 -11, telling them that,

all of its investigation abbreviations
end in bomb. This is a lie.

The anthrax investigation, for instance,
which is, of course, related to 9 -11,

does not. It is codenamed by the FBI
Amerithrax, not Ameribomb.

And as well, codenames for
investigations known to be about

bomb. For example, the Oklahoma City
bombing investigation is codenamed Oak

Bomb. So it should tell us something
that the FBI's codename for the entire 9

-11 investigation is Pent Bomb.

That, it was, the code name of the
entire 9 -11 investigation, was

by the FBI's own director, Robert
Mueller, in 2011.

The terrorist hunter, this is the cover
image on that issue, which was right

after the alleged killing of Osama bin
Laden.

FBI Director Mueller to Time Magazine,
May 10, 2011.

Quote, the FBI's Strategic Intelligence
Operations Center filled to capacity on

September 11th and remained that way
through PentBomb. The FBI's, this is

part of the director's quote, the FBI's
cryptonym for Pentagon Twin Towers and

bombing.

The official story states there were no
bombs at the Pentagon, that there were

no bombs at the World Trade Center, that
there were no pre -placed explosives,

nanothermite or otherwise, at the World
Trade Center or at the Pentagon. The FBI

knows otherwise.

The real story at the Pentagon, just as
at the World Trade Center, is pre

-placed explosives.

But before we get into this compelling
evidence for inside explosives, first I

want to go back to this very large
elephant in the room, the real attack

The first attack on the Pentagon, and
there was more than one, was not at

9 .38, or even the white plane explosion
time.

of 9 .32 and 30 seconds, but according
to inside witnesses, just after 9 .30.

Wedge 2, and remember Wedge 2 was from
the center line of the West Wall to the

left in the north, which was not yet
hardened.

Wedge 2 E -ring Army Specialist April
Gallup, a very famous Pentagon witness,

her wristwatch was stopped by a major
inside explosion.

She insists just after 9 .30.

Now, of course, Her watch may have been
slightly off, in which case her watch

could have been stopped by the same
violent event at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

However, I doubt it because the
explosions that she experienced went off

the building and did not go through the
wall.

And whatever happened to the white plane
also did not go through the wall. They

were separate events.

And she claims also that this major
inside explosion just after 9 .30

as she hit the on button on her
computer.

And she was also far from the Wedge 1
alleged impact point, much further to

left or the north in Wedge 2.

Also, when I looked at the early times
of reports from presumably Pentagon

sources themselves as to when the attack
on the Pentagon happened, they were

all... quote, about 9 .30 a .m., about 9
.30, USA Today, Reuters, New York

Times, Frederick Freelance Star, U .S.
News & World Report.

And as time went by and as the official
lie solidified, the times got later and

later and later until the Pentagon
finally settled and the 9 -11 commission

report, big lie, settled on almost 9
.38.

Official testimony and records of the
real...

Early time of the Pentagon attack.

White House counsel, later Attorney
General Alberto Gonzalez himself, stated

an official taped Navy lecture, and I
have the tape, quote, the Pentagon was

attacked at 9 .32.

The FAA official timeline says the
Pentagon was attacked at 9 .32.

Denmark's about -to -be foreign
minister, Per Stig Moller, says the

attacked between 9 .32 and 9 .34.

If the Pentagon was really attacked, not
at almost 938, but a little bit after

932, you would expect major official
reactions by the Bush -Cheney

administration to happen immediately
after the Pentagon attack.

And that is true.

There was an E -4B command and control
plane circling over Washington, D .C.

at 930.

And then the Pentagon explosion
happened.

And then a White House evacuation
happened while presumed Flight 77 was

miles and miles from Washington.

The Pentagon attack triggered the White
House and other federal building

evacuations, which happened just after 9
.32.

Quote, Newsweek, at about 9 .30 a .m.,
Secret Service men told staffers

that is evacuating the White House West
Wing, to run, not walk as far away as

possible. Washington Post online version
on the day of the attack, September

11th itself, the crash at the Pentagon
triggered immediate security steps in

Washington area, including evacuation of
the West Wing of the White House. It

was the Pentagon attack that caused all
of officialdom to finally act as if they

were really being attacked, not the
World Trade Center attacks.

It's amazing.

The approximately 932 Pentagon attack
also finally triggered the Secret

to remove Bush from the floor of the
classroom.

Remember, he just kept sitting there.

I was watching in a split screen with
Bush continuing to look at the kids

reading the book on a pet goat, while on
the other side, innocent Americans were

jumping to their desks from the Twin
Towers.

After inexplicably allowing President
Bush to sit for eight to nine minutes in

floor of the classroom,

after he had already been told,
according to him and Andrew Card, but we

take their words for it, don't we, that
the Second World Trade Center tower had

been hit and that, quote, America is
under attack, Card allegedly told him in

his ear, the Secret Service finally
acted as if the ongoing attacks were a

emergency, but only after the Pentagon
was attacked at the actual time of the

attack that I'm telling you about, 9 .32
and 30 seconds.

Only then did they whisk Bush out of the
Florida classroom, and at approximately

9 .32, taking him to his limousine,
which left at 9 .35.

In response to the actual approximate 9
.32 Pentagon attack, Andrews Air Force

Base went on alert, quote, between 9 .30
and 9 .35.

Official story says Flight 77 didn't
even hit the building until almost 9

The offer of interceptors to the Secret
Service by Major Daniel Kane of Andrews

Air Force Base came immediately after
World Trade Center 2 was hit, was

initially declined.

But the Secret Service suddenly changed
its mind right after the Pentagon at 9

.33.

Quite plain explodes there at 9 .30
seconds earlier.

At 9 .33, Langley Air Force Base
interceptor pilot Dean Eckman received a

-down order for any planes coming within
30 miles of Washington, right after the

explosion of a plane at the Pentagon.

And I believe that was also after inside
explosions that already happened near

April Gallup's desk at about 9 .30.

Even in New York City, where two attacks
on the World Trade Center towers had

already happened and not yet caused a
shutdown of the New York Stock Exchange.

The exchange was finally shut down,
according to the New York Times, at 9

which is the shorthand for right after 9
.32 and 30 seconds.

Firefighters were at the Pentagon
fighting fires before the official

almost 9 .38 alleged impact time of
Flight 77.

And those were, of course, the Pentagon
firefighters.

One of them leapt under the van, the
other one raced out on the lawn, and

was a third who survived the destruction
inside the Heliport firehouse, and they

immediately started fighting fires.

There wasn't any other plane approach or
impact at that building at any level

that could have impacted, like the White
Plain.

Additional evidence for inside the
building, primary explosions at the

similar to what you already know about
pre -placed inside explosives at World

Trade Centers 1, 2, and 7.

Evidence that the Wedge 1 collapse,
Wedge 1, again, the official story place

the alleged impact of Flight 77,
evidence of the Wedge 1 collapse over

alleged plane penetration damage path on
the inside of the building was, in

fact, due to explosives.

I'm about to give you that evidence,
including possibly thermite.

These are...

Images on the top of the Oklahoma City
Murrah Federal Building after it was

known to have been destroyed by inside
bombs as well as an outside truck bomb,

but we know that there were at least
four internal bombs in addition to the

cover story outside Ryder truck bomb.

And then at the bottom is the Pentagon
after collapse of the section of Wedge 1

over the alleged impact point of Flight
77, using Al -Qaeda hijackers as the

cover story.

Witnesses to the sounds of a series of
explosions also in the Pentagon use

almost identical language to World Trade
Center firefighters describing the

going off of pre -placed controlled
demolition explosives.

These are just some of these witnesses.

Lieutenant McCowan, first floor D -ring
in the Naval Command Center of the

Pentagon on 9 -11, quote, it sounded
like a series of explosions going off, a

series of bombs exploding, similar to
like firecrackers when you light them

you just get that series going off.

Again, identical language to the
description of firefighters from the Nod

Brothers video of the World Trade Center
saying they went off like firecrackers

coming down.

Lieutenant

Colonel

Thurman, second floor D ring of the
Pentagon on 9 -11.

To me, it didn't seem like a plane. To
me, it seemed like it was a bomb.

Being in the military, I've been around
grenade and artillery explosions. In

other words, he's been around bombs.

It was a two -part explosion to me. It
seemed like there was a percussion blast

that blew me kind of backwards in my
cubicle to the side, and then it seemed

if a massive explosion went off at the
same time.

This graphic, which is a little bit
difficult to see.

shows the explosion that McCowan and
Thurman experienced. This is from the

Pentagon Building Performance Report.

That's a vertical rectangle that is in
orange.

And the official Pentagon Building
Performance Report itself states that

damage on the...

First floor was probably due to an
independent, that is independent of any

impact, explosion, as fire would have at
most, the official story is fire, would

have at most collapsed the second floor
downward, not thrusted upward.

So what that rectangle is, is the area
where the ceiling of the first

floor and the floor of the second floor
was pushed upwards by a very major

force.

and it could not have been due to a
lateral plane impact, which probably

that this famous photograph at the
Pentagon Wall is of that explosion.

Why? If you notice that this fireball in
the center of the wall, which may or

may not be the same fireball seen in
that famous five frames, but this looks

like the white -yellow hot of a thermite
explosion to me.

Whether it is or not, it remains to be
seen. But if you notice, there are two

separate sources of smoke. To the right,
which is to the south, is

the major billowing black smoke cloud
that everybody knows about. But there's

second one to the left, which is at the
heliport, and they are separate.

And neither of those smoke clouds are
coming from that fiery point.

Now compare what you just saw at the
Pentagon to the explosion of

a plane hitting a cement wall.

It's nothing like it.

There's no pulverized cement debris.

Instead, as we are going to see, that
the Pentagon wall at that point turned

mush.

So I have to ask myself, was thermite
placed somewhere at or around the

of the so -called plane penetration path
on the inside of the Pentagon?

An autopsy of the concrete of the
destroyed and damaged support columns on

inside of the Pentagon in the alleged
internal penetration path of Flight 77

the E -ring.

showed the effect of intense
concentrated and prolonged heat that,

the experts who analyzed it, turned some
of the concrete literally to mush.

And that mush had a reddish and orange
tinge due, according to them, to their

report, to the presence of iron.

Now, we know from the analysis of Niels
Heret and Richard Gage and others at the

World Trade Center, both sudden intense
heat, like you saw in that fireball,

that white, yellow hot fireball at the
Pentagon Wall and the resultant molten

iron are signatures of the reaction of
thermite on steel.

This is a photograph from the Pentagon
Building Performance Report of what's

inside the columns of the west wedge.

These are reinforced steel supports.

In fact, a massive explosion happened at
just the time of the collapse of the

outer wall over the alleged plane impact
point, which is yet further evidence

that another internal explosion caused
that collapse.

This is a live video clip from the
Pentagon that morning.

Note the time on the clip of 10 .10 a
.m.

And once again, on the left -hand side
of your screen, you are looking at the

Tower 2, the first one. This is all New
York now.

Michael, Michael, if you can hear me, we
just heard another explosion down at

the Pentagon building. We just heard
another loud explosion down at the

building just seconds ago.

That's our Audrey Barnes, who is
standing nearby the Pentagon, saying

a second explosion. Audrey, did you see
anything? Because these other attacks

have been aerial. Did you see anything
flying overhead just before this

explosion? We can't see exactly where
the source of the explosion was, but you

could hear it very clearly with a
loud...

Boom. And I'm looking for another plume
of smoke. I don't see anything right

now. It might be still in that same
general area where the fire is burning

now. But you can clearly hear another
loud explosion.

This Pentagon performance report graphic
also falsely claims, if you notice

across the upper part, those little red
or orange dots, those are on the

columns, the outside columns.

Column 14, kind of in the middle, is
where the official story says Flight

nose hit, and then it went in at a
diagonal angle. And down in the lower

is the alleged C -ring exit hole.

The Pentagon Building Performance Report
falsely claims that eight, those are

those orange dots, that eight external
columns were destroyed.

However, that is not true.

And this is the proof of it.

I was very excited when I found this
extremely rare and extremely important

photograph. It's the only one I know of
that is very clear that was taken after

the initial fires were out at the
Pentagon Wall.

This is at the alleged official story
impact point, but before the collapse of

the wall over this very area.

And what you see is that almost all the
damage, in fact, And as the

Pentagon Building Performance Report
itself said, I would say at least 90 %

the damage, if not more, was on the
first floor, and only a very small

percentage where you see that kind of T
with the two windows on either side

where the glass is blown out on the
second floor.

But if you notice...

There are the columns, even though
they're bowed out, are still standing to

right under the T and over to the left.
And there are only four columns that are

missing, not eight, which is impossible
for the official story of a plane that

had a wingspan of 124 feet.

you're looking at only 50 feet of a non
-round impact hole. And many people in

the 9 -11 truth movement falsely have
claimed that, inadvertently or

that this T area with the windows blown
out on either side on the second floor

in the center of the photograph, that
that is the so -called entrance hole of

the plane. It is not. And what they do
is they show photographs that don't show

the bottom floor at all.

And then remember, of course, that the
columns were bowed out and not in, as

they would be from an external impact of
a very large, fast -flying object of

great force.

And at the Pentagon on the morning of 9
-11, you saw all of these fire trucks

putting out their mist and spray and
foam.

I believe the real purpose of that mist
and spray and foam, which really wasn't

putting out fires at that point, was to
prevent you from seeing that there was

not an alleged impact hole where the
official story claimed that it was.

So we have seen that the physical
evidence clearly supports primary inside

explosives. By primary inside
explosives, I mean that aren't the

impact of a plane or fires therefrom.

Yes, there were reports.

by eyewitnesses also, of explosions and
explosives throughout the chain of

command from the very highest levels of
the Pentagon on down.

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and his
three -star top military aide.

When Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld was
asked by Sam Donaldson what happened at

the Pentagon right after the attacks, he
said, a bomb?

Acting head of the National Military
Command Center, Captain Charles Leidig.

He, Captain Leidig, had no awareness of
Flight 77,

coming back to Washington, D .C. at all.

His first awareness was a call from
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's three

aide, that's an extremely high military
officer, who asked if he, meaning

Leidig, felt the explosion in the
building and asked Leidig to investigate

whether it might be a terrorist attack.

Witnesses to cordite and gunpowder,
which has an extremely distinct smell

jet fuel and kerosene, burning jet fuel
and kerosene. Chairman of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff himself, General
Shelton, upon arriving at the Pentagon

-11, has said in his memoirs, page 434,

called Without Hesitation, quote, the
smell of cordite or gunpowder was

overwhelming.

Don Perkle, another witness, people
shouted in the corridor outside my

that a bomb had gone off. Even before
stepping outside, I could smell the

cordite. Then I knew explosives had been
set off somewhere, and many other

witnesses as well.

So, according to the official story
then, the only primary damage at the

Pentagon was in the outer E, D, and C
rings in Wedge 1, due solely to the

and result in fires and damage from a
plane, 90 to 95 % on the ground floor, a

little bit on the second floor.

going only into the inside of the C
ring. However, that is not what

There is, in fact, major damage on 9 -11
in the innermost rings, the A and B

rings as well.

In an interview that I personally did at
the Naval Postgraduate School with the

Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Special Operations on 9 -11, former Top

Marais, Robert Andrews, he told me,
quote, as he drew a diagram of it, which

I've retained,

Quote, my aide and I had to walk over
dead bodies on the inside of the

A ring, unquote.

Also, the B ring, next in from the C
ring towards the center courtyard, the B

ring between the fourth and fifth
quarters was decimated.

Washington Post.

Pentagon rescue team to the Washington
Post. On 9 -11, it's online version.

that day of the attacks, quote, when we
got into the building, we started to

feel the heat right away, and as we
walked deeper down the hallways, deeper

means towards the center, not away from
it, it got hotter and hotter, not cooler

and cooler.

It was just fire everywhere, not so much
smoke, but just fire all around us. You

couldn't see the plane. You couldn't see
anything of a plane, just debris

everywhere you looked.

And again, deeper means deeper towards
the center of the building. And as we

have seen, there was a major internal
explosion at or just after 9 .30 near

April Gallup's desk.

According to her sworn videotaped
testimony, April Gallup experienced all

below at 9 .30, the time that a massive
inside the building explosion near her

desk stopped her wristwatch.

This was in the outer E -ring in Wedge
2.

which, remember, is at least 150 feet
north of where the official story claims

plane hit the wall almost eight minutes
later.

April Gallup said she, quote, thought I
had triggered it when I touched the on

button on my computer. I thought it was
a bomb, unquote.

Gallup saw no plane, no plane parts, no
seats, no passengers, no passenger body,

then no luggage inside the building.

And she said there was no smell of jet
fuel and no jet fuel fires that she saw.

In fact, the only fires April Gallup
said she saw were coming out of the

computers, which was also experienced by
other inside the building witnesses,

for example, by Tracy Webb in the E
-ring off of Corridor 4, which was in

alleged penetration path of the alleged
plane.

April Gallup said the floor was not hot
inside the building as she walked out

with just one shoe and one bare foot,
and yet the sole of her bare foot was

completely unburned, as we're about to
see in the photo in the next slide.

And in addition, some dozen other inside
the building witnesses in the area

where April Gallup worked.

She meets with them, and they confirm
her experience.

And here is a picture of April Gallup on
the lawn.

This is what happened inside the wedge
two to the north or the left of the

center line.

And notice that she is not burned, and
those are the bottom of her feet.

And she has testified under oath to me
in a two -hour under oath videotaped

interview and testimony that she lost
one of her shoes, and she walked over.

Whatever it was she walked over, that
was allegedly, according to the official

story, burning jet fuel, and she wasn't
burned, including on the bottom of her

bare foot.

On September 11, 2001, I had returned
back from maternity leave.

I had to get Elijah situated in daycare.

I walked into the building.

I had to clear Elijah to go to the area.

There were some things that they wanted
me to take care of prior to me taking

him to the daycare.

I sat down at the computer.

to actually turn the computer on. As
soon as I pressed the button, boom.

So at that particular time, based off
what happened, I thought I had triggered

bomb.

I was covered from my neck all the way
down to my back in debris.

My son was completely blown out of his
stroller, and some of the floors had

collapsed within, and people were
trapped in between the floors.

My son had stopped crying.

So I felt strength out of nowhere to
actually low crawl from out under the

debris to try to find my son.

While I was coming out of the Pentagon,
I didn't see any evidence of metal,

airplane seats, luggage, nothing that
would give me any

indication that it was a plane that had
hit the building.

I lost one shoe, so I was walking
through the area barefooted.

So I was particularly careful to try to
make sure I did not step on anything

sharp while I had my son on my shoulder.

I did not have jet fuel over my body. My
son didn't have jet fuel over his body.

The people that I helped didn't have jet
fuel on their body.

So again, there was nothing on the
inside that would give me any indication

there was a plane on that particular day
that hit the building.

Most of the people that were in the area
where I was located,

You know, maybe I was off of my
judgment, but in speaking with everyone,

conclusive that no one else in the area
where I was located had seen any parts

of planes or luggage or baggage or
anything of that nature.

Yes, I believe it's something part of
much more sinister, and that's why my

is to try to push for a federal grand
jury.

so that people can be brought forth for
perjury and obstruction of justice.

When you go out of your way to fabricate
an official story, when obviously the

evidence that appears, whether it's
footage or the work that many people

done, shows that the official story
couldn't possibly be true, then yes, you

should be brought to justice.

And when people can come together and
feel like they can utilize human beings

lambs to a slaughter, Yes, that's what's
unpatriotic. That's what's un

-American. We'll turn our own people and
sacrifice them for whatever their

motive may be, regardless that their
motive is of no significance, but the

that they would use innocent human
beings as lambs to slaughter, to

whatever it is their cause or motive is.

Yes, they should be brought to justice,
and it's obvious that the official story

is... It has been fabricated. And here
is an aerial photo showing a large E

-ring cavity inside the outer E -ring
wall of Wedge 2, not just Wedge 1, where

the official story says the plane
impacted and there was later a collapse.

April Gallup, also you should know for 9
-11 truth aficionados, did not walk out

of the alleged entrance hole. Of course,
there wasn't an entrance hole to begin

with to walk out of. But the first
official interview that she gave, which

to the Army historians, she stated that
she and her son exited through a window

behind the Fort Myer fire truck that you
have already seen, the back of which

was on fire after the white plane
exploded there at 9 .32 and 30 seconds

stopped. the Heliport clock at that
time.

And she was, the Army historians also
interviewed other people, the other

that helped her and her infant son out
of that blown -out window just behind

fire truck.

And here you see the fire truck, and you
can see the blown -out window behind

the back of the fire truck.

And then just as the outer columns, as
we've seen to the right and left of the

alleged impact point of Flight 77 and
Wedge 1, were about outwards, not

In other words, consistent with an
internal explosion.

Pressure wave coming out instead of an
external impact by a large, heavy, fast

-flying object.

Similarly, in Wedge 2, further north
where April Gallup worked, a massive

internal force thrust office debris
towards the outer windows. And you can

them. If this were a higher -resolution
photo, you could clearly see that this

office debris is just forced out through
the windows.

Windows also first bowed out and then
back in.

Witness Lieutenant...

Colonel Victor Correa, who worked in the
office of the Army Deputy Chief of

Staff for Personnel, in the direct path
of the alleged official story,

penetration of Flight 77, said, quote, I
noticed the windows going out and then

coming back in. We thought it was some
kind of an explosion, that somebody had

got in there and planted bombs because
of that.

Army Fort Monmouth TDY auditor Michael
Nielsen, whom I personally interviewed,

told me, quote, hundreds of people raced
down the halls past him at the south

side exit, shouting, it's a bomb, bombs,
it's a bomb, i .e. explosives.

And as a plane did not hit at the wedge
one impact point, this famous five

frames video, which we're showing again,
is therefore evidence of what? Only of

an explosion and or the white plane
destruction.

Not of an impact.

There were also multiple primary inside
explosions independent of any impact or

fires they're from. We've already seen
April Gallup says that her watch was

stopped by this massive explosion by her
desk in Wedge 2 at 9 .30, at 9 .31, and

40 seconds. Stopped Navy area clock,
which we saw very early with the

clock, and at precisely 9 .43.

According to the official story, sole
survivor of the Naval Command Center,

which was the second and third rings in
in the alleged penetration path of

Flight 77, stated at precisely 9 .43 was
the explosion in the Naval Command

Center. At 10 o 'clock, explosives went
off on columns in the alleged

penetration path.

And at 9 .48, there was another large
Pentagon explosion.

There were bombs going off inside the
buildings over quite a long period of

time. This slide shows the relative
times of the inside -the -building

explosions at the Pentagon on 9 -11
relative to the outside explosions at

Pentagon that morning.

At 9 -30, as we have seen in Wedge 2,
well to the north of where the official

story says Flight 77 allegedly impacted,
almost eight minutes later,

April Gallup's wristwatch was stopped by
a massive explosion inside the

building. At 9 .30.

At 9 .31 and 40 seconds, another inside
-the -building explosion stopped the

Navy area clock.

Now, this was also the likely time of
the D -ring explosion that thrust the

second -floor floor slab upwards.

And then there is an external explosion,
the one we know about at 9 .32 and 30

seconds, when the white plane was
destroyed near the Heliport, stopping

Heliport firehouse clock at that time.

But there was also another external
explosion, and that was at approximately

.34 and 10 seconds.

That was when the huge billowing black
smoke cloud started to billow upwards

from a diesel trailer fire outside the
Wedge 1 wall near the official story

alleged impact point. And we know that
time because it was caught on the

Doubletree Hotel security camera digital
clock.

The next inside the building explosion,
and this was at, quote, precisely 943.

According to Lieutenant Kevin Schaefer,
who according to the official story was

the only survivor of the Naval Command
Center that morning, he said that a

massive orange fireball explosion went
off in the Naval Command Center at

precisely 943.

And at 9 .48, according to the Secret
Service's log that morning, there was

another Pentagon explosion.

And the well -known explosion at the
Pentagon at approximately 10 a .m.,

explosives likely went off on inside
columns in the alleged penetration path

Flight 77, causing the Wedge 1 E -ring
collapse over the alleged impact point

about 10 o 'clock.

The Pentagon also was expecting
explosives.

According to AP report on 9 -11 itself,
the Pentagon attack came minutes after

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld predicted
there will be another event.

There were bomb -sniffing dog teams at
the Pentagon before the attack.

Inside explosives at the Pentagon, just
as at the World Trade Center, explain

why there was no advanced siren to alert
personnel of alleged approaching danger

to evacuate the building, as there was
no incoming at the time of the alleged

official story Pentagon attack.

The National Military Command Center
didn't learn of any alleged incoming

hijacked plane until 9 .31, after the
explosion.

There was no way for non -perpetrators
of the actual inside job to know the

explosives were about to go off in order
to trigger alarms and an evacuation.

And April Gallup and many others
testified there was no alert to trigger

leave the building to save their lives.

Even after Pentagon workers shouted a
bomb had gone off, still no alarm

according to Don Perkle.

The chief NBC Pentagon correspondent on
9 -11, Jim Mikloszewski, I believe,

stated, at 9 .45, still no sirens and no
official evacuation order.

Primary inside explosions at the
Pentagon are absolute proof of what? An

job. Outside terrorists, whether Al
-Qaeda or Santa Claus, could not have

it.

None insider terrorists would have
targeted the easy -to -hit roof or the

central courtyard or the offices of high
-ranking officials on the far side from

the official impact.

point where Secretary of Defense
Rumsfeld, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs

had their offices.

They would never have chosen the least
populated, newly hardened, only newly

hardened West Wedge, which was also the
hardest to hit due to many physical

obstacles in the path, a hill, an
antenna, light poles, a chain link

the six foot high schools.

Now you're going to see evidence that
some of these, at least some if not all,

of the inside explosives were targeted
to take out particular functions and

perhaps even individuals.

The Naval Command Center was targeted
not by a plane but by inside explosives.

This is a graphic from the Washington
Post immediately after the attacks. It

actually titled The Targeted Ones.

And it's a little bit difficult to see,
but where they show that the plane,

allege that the plane hit at the
official story point, Then there is that

of gray, darker gray area, and within
that is the Naval Command Center, which

blown up in the legend up at the top.

And in the right -hand corner is number
eight, which is the Naval Intelligence

Cell. That turns out to be very
important.

The Naval Command Center official story
is that only one person survived, the

Naval Command Center on 9 -11. That's
important because that part was...

between two and three rings in from the
official story alleged impact point of

the plane.

It says that only Kevin Schaefer was the
survivor at the Naval Command Center.

He became a top staffer, I think not
coincidentally, on the key 9 -11

subgroup that was allegedly
investigating the Pentagon attack and

non -response, which was the heart of
the 9 -11 PSYOP.

including three NORAD versions, at
least, as Professor Griffin has pointed

at least two of which must be false, if
not all three.

Just briefly, the Naval Command Center
cover -up is important because I

interviewed Rear Admiral Hathaway, who
was in charge of the Naval Command

on 9 -11, and he told me that the
official story is not true, that

Kevin Schaefer was not the only
survivor, that in that little intel

He stated that there in the intelligence
cell, which was a hardened room,

hardened against bombs itself on the
inside of the Pentagon, there were 18 to

intelligence officers, most of whom also
survived.

Why is that not part of the official
story?

Follow the money.

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and the
Pentagon's comptroller, Dov Zachheim,

publicly acknowledged the day before 9
-11 on September 10th.

that the Pentagon was missing and could
not account for $2 .3 trillion.

The adversary is closer to home.

It's the Pentagon bureaucracies.
According to some estimates, we cannot

.3 trillion.

Mr. Secretary, according to the
Comptroller General of the United

are serious financial management
problems at the Pentagon, to which Mr.

alluded.

Fiscal year 1999, $2 .3 trillion
missing.

Fiscal year 2000, $1 .1 trillion
missing.

And DOD is the number one reason why the
government can't balance its checkbook.

The Pentagon has claimed year after year
that the reason it can't account for

the money is because its computers don't
communicate with each other.

My second question, Mr. Secretary, is
who has the contract today to make those

systems communicate with each other? How
long have they had those contracts?

And how much have the taxpayers paid for
them?

Finally, Mr. Secretary, after the last
hearing, I thought that my office was

promised a written response to my
question regarding the four war games on

September 11th. I have not yet received
that response.

but would like for you to respond to the
questions that I've put to you today,

and then I do expect the written
response to my previous question,

the end of the week.

Thank you, Representative.

The second question,

I've forgotten what the second

question was.

Susan Lindauer has stated publicly at
the Vancouver hearings, which I was also

speaker and an expert witness, that the
CIA knew this was actually $5 trillion

at that time.

The Army financial audit area and the
records therein were destroyed in the

attack in the area close to April
Gallup's desk with those inside

that she insists went off right around 9
.30.

And she also, if you recall, claimed
that the only fires she saw on the

of the E -ring and Wedge 2 were coming
out of the Army Area computers.

Flight 77 not only did not hit the
Pentagon, it didn't get anywhere close,

it was never ID'd, ever, affirmatively
ID'd, as the eastward -flying plane that

approached the Pentagon at almost 9 .38.

With Barbara Olson's phone calls now
officially nonexistent per the FBI,

American Airlines, and the Pentagon,
there is, according to Professor David

Griffin, and I agree with him, zero,
that is no evidence that the outgoing

plane, whatever it was, even turned back
east.

And with its transponder off, Dulles Air
Traffic Control had only a blip, never

a positive ID, and did not have any
altitude or speed, which has been

in a videotaped interview by Secretary
of Transportation Norman Mineta, that

when he talked to the FAA, to Monty
Belger, that Belger said they did not

altitude or speed.

and there was a C -130 pilot that
allegedly saw the attack on the

is not true. He never ID'd the plane,
and he did not see the impact, which can

be proven from the now -released audio
tapes from the air traffic control tower

that the C -130 pilot was talking to and
from the radar record.

Regarding the plane that took off from
Dulles at 8 .20, the reason...

I said, quote, whatever it was, unquote,
is because the official Bureau of

Transportation or BTS online database
statistics for all live civilian flights

that flew on 9 -11 that morning does not
include Flight 77.

The FDR, the Flight Data Recorder Data
Fields, Also, this alleged flight data

recorder from Flight 77 that one group
of officials at the Pentagon said was

found just inside the entrance hole and
another group of Pentagon officials said

was found just inside the exit hole.

The flight data recorder data fields
that could have positively identified

FDR as coming from Flight 77 or even
from any American Airlines plane at all

been zeroed out.

And according to FDR expert Dennis
Cimino, had been intentionally removed.

This is further proof that the flight
data recorder data, importantly based

which the Pentagon has claimed that it
learned the time of the attack of almost

938 from the FDR.

Further proof it was doctored is that
the data from that FDR was downloaded

hours before the Pentagon reportedly
found it.

Why the 937 in 46 seconds so -called, I
call it the FDR or radar data plane,

cannot be Flight 77.

At 854 in 43 seconds, Indianapolis FAA
Air Traffic Control, which was tracking

what they believed was Flight 77, began
a descent before the official story says

it turned back east. And it had already
descended, according to the Christian

Science Monitor,

Some 6 ,000 feet by the time its
transponder was turned off. However,

to the official story to the Pentagon
itself, the flight data recorder plane,

alleged to be Flight 77, didn't begin
its descent until after the turn back

of whatever plane it was and didn't
begin its descent until 901.

And as the same physical plane cannot do
both, the official story

FDR plane cannot be Flight 77.

Thus, the flight data recorder allegedly
found in the Pentagon rubble, whether

it was found wherever it was found,
claimed to have been from this 938

also cannot have been from Flight 77.

So if the FDR plane that approached the
Pentagon at almost 938 wasn't Flight 77,

what was it?

Evidence it was a military plane.

All of the Dulles air traffic
controllers thought it was a military

Daniel O 'Brien, who was the Dulles air
traffic controller tracking that blip,

said the speed, the maneuverability, the
way he turned, and again, there was no

altitude and no speed information
attached to this. We all thought in the

room, they were then many people
standing around her back looking at the

we all thought in the radar room, all of
us experienced air traffic controllers,

that it was a military plane.

In the room, it was almost a sense of
relief.

This must be a fighter.

This must be one of our guys.

So what happened to Flight 77?

The bottom line is we don't know.

The government needs to tell us.

This is what we do know.

We know that at 9 .09 and 55 seconds,
FAA, Indianapolis Air Traffic Control,

reported that...

The flight that had left Dulles Airport
at 8 .20 in the morning reported it

missing and possibly crashed to the Air
Force search and rescue.

It is not a coincidence, in my opinion,
that it was at this exact second,

almost, that military air traffic
controllers first, in quotes, reported

up the never positively identified
eastward flying blip that they then

all... established protocol to assume
and claim was Flight 77, but it was not,

clearly intended, in my opinion, to stop
the Air Force from search and rescue.

The non -coincidence of this timing, I
believe, is strong evidence that the

military had been tracking the eastward
flying plane all along via military

transponder mode that only it and not
the FAA civilian air traffic controllers

could see.

And thus, for the military, there was no
so -called radar hole, making the plane

invisible for this part of its flight.

And also that the official story plane,
alleged to have been Flight 77, was a

military plane giving off a friendly,
identify friend or foe IFF transponder

signal, would explain why it did not
trigger any interceptor response and was

not shot down.

Therefore, in my opinion, I do not
believe that there was any stand -down

needed to explain what happened at the
Pentagon for two important reasons.

One, it wasn't a civilian airliner.
We've shown that by many means.

And it didn't get through the system,
the defense system, to hit the building

any case.

In summary.

Flight 77 was nowhere near the Pentagon
when inside explosives went off over

five minutes before it allegedly even
approached the building, was nowhere

the Pentagon when a white plane with two
stripes, red and blue or red, orange,

and blue, made to simulate an American
airline plane, exploded near or at the

heliport, stopping the heliport clock at
9 .32 and 30 seconds, over five minutes

before the official story said Flight 77
got anywhere near the Pentagon.

Also, there is zero evidence that
whatever plane left Dulles at 820 turned

east at all towards Washington, D .C.,
in any case.

And the westward flying blip was
reported possibly crashed by FAA to

Air Force search and rescue before it
even turned east.

And even if whatever plane was flying
east had hit the Pentagon, which it

didn't, we have proven, It couldn't have
penetrated to just the inside of the C

-ring, as claimed by the official story,
and have caused the massive destruction

found all the way into the innermost A
and B rings.

And finally, the FDR plane, alleged to
have been Flight 77, was almost

a military plane.

The real story at the Pentagon, I
believe I have proven to you.

is thus the same as the real story at
the World Trade Center on 9 -11. That

story is pre -placed inside the building
explosives with plane approaches and

impacts and or destructions of the plane
as the cover causes.

And inside explosives at both the World
Trade Center and the Pentagon can mean

only one thing. 9 -11 was literally an
inside job.

How do we identify the operational mass
murderers? We would need to know who

made and controlled the weaponized
military -grade nanothermite that has

found, some of it unreacted, in the
World Trade Center dust, number one.

And I believe we would need to know who
made and controlled the weaponized

nanospores in the anthrax letters, which
were dated September 11th, after all.

And who specializes in nanosol gel
processes, which use silicon and...

that were found both in the World Trade
Center dust and in the anthrax letter

spores.

And who would that be?

So who could have controlled weapons
-grade nanothermite of the signature in

World Trade Center dust?

Well, I found out. This is at least one
serious possibility.

It may not be the only one. But
remember, this is an inside job.

Quote from Army Major Doug Rocky.

retired director of the United States
Army's depleted uranium project, to both

myself and Professor Stephen Jones in
Irvine, California.

I was standing only approximately one
and a half feet from him when he said

this. The only guys I know who have this
stuff are the golden boys at the Army's

Redstone Arsenal.

So who controlled the super military
grade nano anthrax in the anthrax

According to the world's foremost
independent investigator of the anthrax

attacks, Barry Kissin, who is an
attorney in the Washington, D .C. area,

the answer is Battelle Memorial
Institute, which is a U .S. government

intelligence lab and the CIA and
possibly also the Defense Intelligence

the Army. There's the Army again, Dugway
Proving Ground.

And I learned.

from my research, that William Patrick,
who is now deceased, he was one of the U

.S. government's top bioweapons experts,
used to work at Fort Detrick also, that

William Patrick held the private trade
secret, one should ask why private, the

private trade secret to the process to
create the one trillion spores per gram

anthrax that was found in the letters.

Who could handle military -grade
explosives and anthrax?

that were found in the World Trade
Center dust and the anthrax letters.

Once they have been created, I would
think it would take a military special

operators, black ops, trained in super
weaponized nanoparticles to set nano

explosives and deliver nanobiological
weapons.

This would be a highly trained, highly
specialized black joint special

operations team, I would think, like in
particular the Joint Special Operations

Command, JSOC, and that works hand in
glove with the CIA Special Activities

Division,

We learn from New York Times articles,
operate above the law with exemption to

execute covert operations by the United
States on behalf of the president.

In that time, of course, the president
was George W. Bush.

But as we'll see, JSOC was actually
overseen by Vice President Cheney.

The Joint Forces Command also happens to
script, plan, and run the military's

exercises and war games.

And we have seen that on the morning of
9 -11, they were running NORAD Northeast

Sector, which was responsible for not
responding, that the NORAD Northeast

Sector was running a hijack scenario
exercise on the morning of 9 -11 itself.

And the FAA hijack coordinator on 9 -11,
who should have been at his desk, Army

Lieutenant General Michael Canavan,
guess what he'd done just before that?

headed JSOC.

When Canavan first took the job, only
about nine months before 9 -11, he began

running and participating in military
exercises that, according to FAA

Intelligence Division analyst John
Hawley, quote, pretty damn close to the

plot itself.

And on the morning of 9 -11, Canavan's
whereabouts were, quote, unknown, and

9 -11 Commission didn't consider it
important enough to ask where he was.

Under whose command is JSOC?

According to Cy Hurst, Vice President
Cheney oversaw the Joint Special

Operations Command before and on 9 -11.

And Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Special Operations and forming top Army

Green Beret, there's the Army again,
Robert Andrews, reportedly, according to

Alternative Press, headed Cheney's
blackest dark ops under JSOC.

Susan Lindauer has sworn under oath that
before 9 -11, her CIA handler ordered

her to threaten Iraq's U .N. ambassador
that if they didn't turn over

intelligence about imminent hijack plots
with airplanes, i .e. like the 9 -11

plot, that the U .S. would bomb their
country, and that this threat came from,

quote, higher than the CIA director and
the Secretary of State, which could only

mean the Secretary of Defense, Vice
President Cheney, or President Bush.

Stephen Piznick, former Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State to three U .S.

presidents, has stated publicly that he
is willing to name under oath to the

proper venue the military general who
was on Deputy Secretary of Defense's

Wolfowitz staff on 9 -11 who told him
that the 9 -11 attacks were a false flag

attack. Quote, they ran the attacks, the
general said, of Wolfowitz, Cheney,

Cheney's aide Hadley, Elliot Abrams,
Condoleezza Rice, among others.

How did they do it?

I believe the evidence shows that 9 -11
was a red, white, and blue smoke and

mirrors preemptive self -attack, planned
and executed under cover of hijacked

scenario exercises, onto which the
neocon high cabal, headed by Wolfowitz,

Cheney, and Rumsfeld, planned and
orchestrated the overlay of inside -the

-building explosives to ensure its
spectacular success, a la the Reichstag

while also taking out targeted offices
and functions, i .e. the Naval Command

Center and the Army auditors who were
trying to track the $2 .3 trillion that

Rumsfeld had acknowledged.

We cannot track $2 .3 trillion.

The day before 9 -11 was allegedly
missing.

NORAD's Northeast Sector Operational
Commander on 9 -11, Colonel Bob Marr,

happens to be an expert in red team
gaming verisimilitude.

Verisimilitude is a fancy word for
making an exercise or war game seem

There's no better way to make it seem
real than to make it real, is it? To go

live.

He was an expert in red team gaming
verisimilitude and has publicly

that his northeast NORAD sector was
conducting hijacked scenario emergency

response exercises on the morning of 9
-11 itself. It's in this book, Touching

History.

Richard Clark revealed to me in an
interview I did with him at the Naval

Postgraduate School as the senior
military affairs journalist there on

30th, 2010, and I published this on
DOD's website.

He said that the White House clears
every major exercise, as I mentioned

meaning Condoleezza Rice and probably
Cheney and Bush and certainly Cheney.

would have known about those hijacked
scenario exercises being run on the

morning of 9 -11, which were then used
as part of the pretext for why NORAD

didn't respond in time.

White House approval of hijacked
scenario exercises being run on 9 -11

would have to have been known about and
approved by at least Rice and Clark.

JSOC NORAD exercise scenario planners
and executors were the core, I believe,

the operational plot.

Why? NORAD, which is an Air Force
agency, lied at least twice and probably

times to Congress as well as the 9 -11
Commission, putting out three

contradictory timelines of its non
-responses of its fighter jets in time.

And the 9 -11 Commission seriously
considered referring NORAD DOD to the

Department of Justice for criminal
investigation for lying and obstruction

justice.

9 -11, in my very educated opinion, was
not just an evil inside plot. It was a

diabolical. Whose purpose was, in my
opinion, to terrorize the United States

into putting Israel's interests above
our own.

I call that treason.

To get the United States military into
the Middle East, as Nicholas Rockefeller

told Rousseau a year before 9 -11.

This was a longtime goal of the Project
for New American Century U .S. and

Israeli Zionists.

To affect Israel's goals using American
blood and treasure, which is still

happening.

CENTCOM, which stands for Central
Command, the Central Combatant Command

United States military of the Pentagon,
had already before 9 -11 been moved to

the Middle East.

You would think that CENTCOM would be
centered over the United States. Well,

of the reasons for that is, as you have
already learned, there was no combatant

command over the mainland United States
until immediately after 9 -11 when they

created NORTHCOM for that very purpose.

Reported dual Israeli U .S. citizen Paul
Wolfowitz was Deputy Secretary of

Defense, number two immediately under
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

Richard Perle, reported dual U .S.
Israeli citizen, proclaimed himself one

the top Project for a New American
Century manifesto signatories. He self

-proclaimed himself the Prince of
Darkness.

And he chaired Rumsfeld's Defense Policy
Board.

If Richard Perle is the Prince of
Darkness, Dov Zakheim is the king.

Dov Zakheim is a rabbi and reported dual
U .S.-Israeli citizen.

He wrote a paper advocating a stage
catastrophic event to force the United

States into war to reconfigure the
Middle East in Israel's interest and

presented it to the Project for New
American Century before they wrote the

Project for New American Century
manifesto.

Zachheim is credited with the actual New
Pearl Harbor quote in that manifesto.

Zachheim headed all of the Pentagon's
accounts as its DOD comptroller under

Rumsfeld, as the $2 .3 trillion was
announced being missing the day before 9

on September 10th.

CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer says it
was really $9 .1 trillion and that it

had gone for Israel.

Pentagon auditors tracking the missing
money, killed on 9 -11 by inside

explosives in the Pentagon, and the
records were destroyed.

Zachheim was the chief executive officer
of Systems Planning Corporation, a

defense contractor that specialized in
remote control of airplanes, especially

drone aircraft, used in U .S. military
exercises.

and a special system which destroyed
them in their terminal phases.

This is what the evidence shows actually
happened at the Pentagon on 9 -11.

Systems Planning Corporation had a
subsidiary that actually oversaw the

1993 World Trade Center One attack, so
-called investigation, and through that

investigation obtained the secret World
Trade Center blueprints.

which were needed to know where to plant
controlled demolition explosives

throughout the building.

Dov Zakheim arranged for the Pentagon to
receive leased converted Boeing

767 fuel tanker planes, which are
consistent with what eyewitnesses saw

of the plane that actually struck World
Trade Center 2 on 9 -11.

Reported dual Israeli U .S. citizen
Philip Zelikow headed the 9 -11

cover -up as its executive director.

Reported dual U .S. Israeli citizen
Michael Chertoff headed the Department

Justice alleged, quote, investigation,
which is a cover -up of 9 -11, and

the second new Department of Homeland
Security director.

So we must ask, whose homeland and whose
security?

The insider 9 -11 plot.

was the highest evil because it was
premeditated.

It was based on a Hitlerian scale big
lie.

We have seen that not just the whole
official story of 9 -11 is a lie, but

single individual part of it is a lie.

The 9 -11 plot was designed to kill
masses of our innocent fellow citizens.

It was designed to falsely blame and
demonize Muslims who could not have done

and did not do it.

It was created to justify the invasion
of their lands in the Middle East for

geopolitical power, oil, and Israel's
interests.

The aggressive 9 -11 wars that have
killed hundreds of thousands, displaced

millions, and cost our country
trillions.

are based entirely on lies and are the
highest crime under international law

the Nuremberg Principles, which we wrote
as the victors over the Nazis in World

War II.

So what is the source of this high evil?

Incredibly, it is the mentality of
Nazism.

So who and what are the neocons, really?

The 9 -1 -1 Pentagon neocons.

Wolfowitz, Prince of Darkness himself,
Richard Perle, Shalabi, Khalidzad,

were all students and are followers of
neocon chief philosopher

Leo Strauss. They all studied under
Professor Strauss at the University of

Chicago.

And Professor Strauss' ideology is even
more extremist than his personal mentor

and sponsor in Germany, Hitler's own
legal theorist, Karl Schmitt.

The Schmitt -Strauss doctrine is that
the state needs enemies and must create

them if necessary and must fabricate
lies for the many, for the people, while

its leaders, quote, embrace the
darkness, unquote.

We also have to work the sort of the
dark side, if you will. We've got to

time in the shadows.

Leo Strauss taught that, quote, those
who are fit to rule are those who

there is no morality and that there is
only one so -called natural right, the

right of the superior man to rule over
the inferior.

This is from Leo Strauss in The American
Right, a book published about Strauss's

so -called philosophy in 1997.

Leo Strauss' neocons literally
brainstormed the attacks of 9 -11

those attacks.

Attorney Stanley Hilton studied under
Leo Strauss with Paul Wolfowitz and

Richard Pearl at the University of
Chicago.

Hilton's senior thesis under Strauss
detailed a plan to establish a

dictatorship in the United States using
a fabricated Pearl Harbor -like incident

as its justification.

Stanley Hilton, Richard Pearl, Paul
Wolfowitz, Leo Strauss, and others

an array of different plots and
incidents like September 11th and flying

airplanes into buildings way back in the
1960s.

And note that the book that Donald
Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, passed

hundreds of copies of,

Shortly before the 9 -11 attacks was the
1962 book by top neocon Roberto

Wolfstetter.

The 9 -11 neocon's mentor's mentor,
therefore, was Hitler's own justifier of

evil, Nazi Karl Schmitt.

This is a quote from Professor Francis
Boyle, an internationally renowned

professor of international law at the
University of Illinois.

Quote, Schmitt was the most notorious
Nazi law professor of his day,

justifying every atrocity the Nazis
inflicted on everyone.

We're talking about the Holocaust.

We must understand that these so -called
neoconservatives are, in fact, neo

-Nazis. They espouse the Nazi doctrine
of Schmitt and Strauss and Machiavelli

and Nietzsche, the doctrine of the
Superman, unquote.

This is what internationally acclaimed
journalist Seymour Hersh had to say.

Quote, we, that is the United States,
has been taken over basically by a cult.

Eight or nine neoconservatives, we've
seen they're really neo -Nazis in their

mentality, have somehow grabbed the U
.S. government.

Just how and why they did it so
efficiently, we'll have to wait for much

historians and for better documentation
than we have now.

but they managed to overcome the federal
bureaucracy and the Congress and the

press with the greatest of ease.

This does say something about how
fragile our democracy is, unquote.

Lawrence Wilkerson, who was chief of
staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell

the Bush -Cheney administration, about
this same coup said, it's not a coup,

it's worse.

This is how retired four -star U .S.
Army General and top NATO commander,

Clark, put it in a 2003 public address
at the Commonwealth Club in San

Francisco.

What happened in 9 -11 is we didn't have
a strategy, we didn't have bipartisan

agreement, we didn't have American
understanding of it, and we had instead

policy coup in this country. A coup.

A policy coup.

Some hard -nosed people took over the
direction of American policy, and they

never bothered to inform the rest of us.

Then I came back to the Pentagon. About
six weeks later, I saw the same officer.

I said, why haven't we attacked Iraq?
Are we still going to attack Iraq? He

said, oh, sir, it's worse than that.

He said, he pulled up a piece of paper
off his desk. He said, I just got this

memo from the Secretary of Defense's
office that says we're going to attack.

and destroy the governments in seven
countries in five years.

We're going to start with Iraq, and then
we're going to move to Syria, Lebanon,

Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

I sat on this information for a long
time, for about six or eight months. I

so stunned by this, I couldn't begin to
talk about it.

And I couldn't believe it would really
be true, but that's actually what

happened.

These people took control of the policy
in the United States.

And I realized then it came back to me,
a 1991 meeting I had with Paul

Wolfowitz. You know, in 2001, he was
deputy secretary of defense, but in

he was the undersecretary of defense for
policy. It's the number three position

in the Pentagon.

It was a pretty stunning thing. You mean
the purpose of the military is to start

wars and change governments? It's not to
sort of deter conflict?

We're going to invade countries. And,
you know, my mind was spinning.

And I put that aside. It was like a
nugget that you hold on to.

This country was taken over by a group
of people with a policy coup.

Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and
you could

name a half dozen other collaborators
from the Project for a New American

Century. They wanted us.

to destabilize the Middle East, turn it
upside down, make it under our

control.

It went back to those comments in 1991.

Now, did anybody ever tell you that?

Was there a national dialogue on this?
Did senators and congressmen stand up

denounce this plan?

Was there a full -fledged American
debate on it? Absolutely not. And there

isn't. The truth is...

Our government was and still is
penetrated and controlled by a Zionist

fifth column that took over the White
House, the Congress, the military

-civilian superstructure, key military
officers and intelligence personnel, and

the mainstream media leading up to, on,
and after 9 -11.

The level and extent of this penetration
is unprecedented in the history of the

world and amounts to a literal invasion
by an un -American and hostile force.

The same year, 2003, that General Wesley
Clark gave that warning that the United

States government's civilian
superstructure of the military, key

officers and special operators and
intelligence personnel had been taken

an Israeli neocon fifth column coup,
Israel's own prime minister, Ariel

frustrated that his Middle East
destabilization and domination plan

as well and as quickly as planned,
declared that the United States had

compromised. Remember Bush's famous
false and absurd premature mission

accomplished speech from the deck of a
Navy ship that same year, 2003?

Ariel Sharon went on that it was time
that the U .S. marched against Libya,

Syria, and Iran.

Note that President Obama has made
Sharon's Libya demand already a reality.

that the U .S. is now destabilizing
Syria by supporting none other than al

-Qaeda -affiliated Syrian so -called
rebels, and that the war drums are

now for an attack on Iran.

I do not believe it is a coincidence
that the same lead actor who played in

movie Pearl Harbor, Ben Affleck, that
prepared the ground for the American

public to accept the, quote, new Pearl
Harbor, unquote, meme for the inside job

9 -11 attacks, just happens to be the
producer, director, and leading actor of

the new movie Argo, a transparent piece
of Hollywood CIA propaganda which is

intended to...

demonize Iran, and prepare the American
public to now accept a war against that

final nation in the neocons' quickly
falling row of Middle East dominoes.

Facts alone are not enough. Our 9 -11
truth movement, I believe, needs to

the heart and soul, maybe the main
impetus of a global truth force

Mahatma Gandhi actually initiated
precisely such a movement in India,

called Truth Force or Satyagraha, on,
coincidentally, September 11th.

And this was pointed out by one of the
speakers, I believe, from India.

at an extremely important event that
just happened this past November 19,

at which Richard Gage was the speaker,
Michael Chosodowski was the speaker,

Cynthia McKinney was the speaker, and
individuals from all around the world

speakers. It's on YouTube. It was a
conference that was called Revisiting 9

that was orchestrated and hosted by the
former prime minister of Malaysia.

And in the audience were, they said, 30
ambassadors from 30 different countries

around the world.

And at that, I believe it was the Indian
speaker who mentioned how important it

was that Gandhi's Satya Graha movement
started on September 11th and that we

need to turn the 9 -11 truth movement
into a worldwide truth movement to stop

these secrets that they only get by with
their evil because they have

unnecessary secrecy.

So how can our reality -based community,
as George Bush and Karl Rove called us,

as opposed to the lie -based community,
how can we prevail over the power and

the lie -based community?

We need to unite the facts with the
force, the satyagraha of the truth.

And we do that as individual citizens.

We have the power within ourselves to
officialize the truth every single day

because credibility is a zero -sum game.

We need to take the oath of telling the
truth into our own hands.

And you do that in a very simple way.
You can take sworn jurid affidavits.

You don't have to be a notary public to
do so, but I recommend that every single

one of us in the worldwide truth
movement become, for a few dollars and a

bit of training, to become notary
publics so that we can take sworn jurid

affidavits. And most people don't know
it, but in California, at least, where I

live,

A notary public, when a notary public
notarizes a document, it becomes an

official state of California document.

So because credibility is a zero -sum
game, if you have the lie, the people,

insiders who did the job and have
covered it up with the lie, they have a

and they have credibility.

But as we increase our credibility by
officializing the truth and getting

witness testimonies, as I did with April
Gallup, under oath,

And then doing the transcript and
getting a sworn jurid affidavit making

an official state document, those can be
used in court. And we need to do that

with every single one of the witnesses
that have already come forward. It's a

simple thing to do. When I did my book,
when I was researching my book, October

Surprise,

I was trying to, I, nothing had changed.

I had all the same evidence like I'm
showing you here, but I hadn't

it yet.

And nobody would, they would pay
attention. They would say, oh, that's

nice. Yes, I agree with you. And nothing
would happen in the real world. The

rubber wasn't meeting the road in terms
of politics or the law.

And one day I had the idea, well, what
the heck? You know, I have a friend

a notary public, Betty Phillips in
Pacific Grove, California. I'm going to

take my statement of what I experienced
in the Reagan campaign and about the

October surprise, the truth behind the
Iran side of Iran -Contra, I'm going to

take that in and I'm going to type it up
and I'm going to have her swear me up

and do a sworn jurid affidavit.

And when I did that, it was like
people's mental doors opened up.

The Democratic Party officialdom, it
went all the way to the top.

And pretty soon there was a full
subpoena power congressional

the House of Representatives.

We need to officialize the truth, and we
do that in a worldwide pro -truth

movement, and we need to do that under
the Aegis and umbrella of

Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha movement.

Where are we now?

I'm just going to very briefly review
the major 9 -11 truth events of the past

year and how we lay the evidential
groundwork to bring the real

justice.

Interestingly, even though the Pentagon
attack has been kind of the black sheep

of the 9 -11 truth movement, which, for
reasons that are pretty clear to me, at

the beginning of my talk I told you why
it's the most important part of the 9

-11 attacks.

and therefore the real perpetrators
would not want the 9 -11 Truths Movement

go there.

And many people in the 9 -11 Truths
Movement even said, well, we shouldn't

at the Pentagon attack. There's too much
controversy.

Some people say it was a North Pass,
South Pass, so we shouldn't go there.

Well, even despite this,

amazingly, because I focus on the
Pentagon attack and have for over 11

was the only invited expert witness to
testify at both the Toronto 9 -11

hearings and the Vancouver 9 -11
hearings, which is a small miracle,

force is with us.

It truly is.

And then, of course, I mentioned the
Malaysia conference.

By the way, the Toronto hearings, this
is very important.

This is the 911 Toronto report.

It just came out, I believe, last
November.

Every single American should own this
document.

This report is my paper on the Pentagon
attack. It's Chapter 13.

And there are chapters in here by all of
the expert witnesses at Toronto.

And this cover was intentionally
designed by James Gourley, who is the

the report and who sponsored the Toronto
hearings, which were on the 10th

anniversary in Toronto, Canada. He
intentionally designed the cover so that

distance it would look identical to the
9 -11 Commission report.

So if you just hold up the 9 -11
Commission report, the 571 -page lie,

hold up the truth by the 9 -11 Truth
Movement.

So please get this, read it. It is
incredibly revealing, and it shows the

of the evidence that we have already
produced, which was the whole point of

Malaysia conference that was sponsored
by the former prime minister of

held on the, I think, the day the 9 -11
Toronto report came out.

So also you should know that one of the
four judges, they were called the

panelists, like a panel of judges,

to whom we gave our testimony at Toronto
on the 10th anniversary of 9 -11.

One of the four judges, called
panelists, was the Chief Justice of the

Court of Italy, and he is to this day
the Honorary Chief Justice of the

Court of Italy and the President, as I
recall, and also a title of the Supreme

Court of Italy.

And so this is an extremely important
and serious time when we have reached,

9 -11 Truth Movement has reached a
critical mass of evidence, including

evidence now being taken under Jared
Affidavit's sworn testimony, which did

happen at Jim Fetzer's Vancouver
hearings. All of the testimony was taken

under oath.

At the Malaysia conference, and, oh, I
should mention,

former Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court of Italy, who is one of the

judges at the Toronto hearings. He has
the final chapter in this 911 Toronto

report, and he has gone public stating,
including here, that it is his intent to

take it to the chief prosecutor of the
International Criminal Court, and it

doesn't really matter.

that to this point the United States is
not a signatory to the jurisdiction of

the court because some 80 innocent
victims of some 80 countries, most of

are signatories of the International
Criminal Court and therefore have

jurisdiction, can bring this matter
before the International Criminal Court,

that includes Italy, his country. The
greatest accountability opportunity of

all, in my opinion, is the upcoming 9
-11 Guantanamo trial.

Believe it or not, as I was on the
airplane coming here, which was on

10th, so I was reading the New York
Times of January 10th about what

the day before, January 9th, a few days
ago, the chief prosecutor of the

Guantanamo Military Tribunal announced
Wednesday, January 9th, that he is

abandoning terrorism conspiracy charges
against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the

other 9 -11 -5.

Why is that important?

Why is that incredibly important?

Why does it matter so greatly for our
truth movement?

The 9 -11 truth movement, as I and
others have shown, has proven that

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9
-11 -5 may have conspired and plotted

something like the 9 -11 attacks, it is
physically impossible that they were the

actual perpetrators or executors of
those attacks.

And therefore,

The chief prosecutor of Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed and the 9 -11 Five has just

out the only charge that they could
possibly be found guilty of under the

leaving only what they could never be
found guilty of, which is the actual

This is extremely important, and the 9
-11 Truth Movement, I believe, needs to

get this report as well as sworn
affidavits as soon as possible to the

attorneys of the 9 -11 Five.

And in conclusion,

The 9 -11 truce movement, and we the
citizens, we the people, must never give

up. If we don't, because this is a zero
-sum game, we will eventually win, and

the real perpetrators will be brought to
justice.

Thank you.

We're now going to go to the Q &As, so
just please come to the mic and one of

the two and ask your question, and I'll
do my best to answer it. My name is Dick

McManus. I'm a retired
counterintelligence agent from the U .S.

really agree with everything you said.

I'd like to point out that the flash you
saw of one of your photographs It had

to be an explosive flash. It couldn't
have been a regular fire.

That's the first time I've ever seen
that photo.

He's talking about the still photo on
the side of the building that I thought

might be thermite. Yes, explosive. I
don't think it can be from an impact of

plane. Right. It's more like a flash
from an explosion versus a fire.

That was a really interesting thing. And
that's why I said at that point that I

believe.

I brought that slide out right after
showing you the graphic from the

building performance report showing that
there was this massive explosion inside

the first floor in the building that
forced the floor of the second floor up.

Yeah, that was a very lucky photograph
that I caught at that right time. I'd

just like to point out there were seven
fake terrorist alerts after 9 -11.

They were all kind of coincide to the
vote on the Patriot Act right after,

previously prior to the election, the
second election of Bush.

And also those anthrax letters went to
the two senators who were resisting the

Patriot Act.

I was interested to ask you, do you know
that

nanoaluminum is a controlled substance?

That makes up nanothermite? Yes. Have
you looked into, is there any records of

who had access to nanoaluminum, which is
a component, a necessary component in

order to make nanothermite? That's a
very good question. I haven't personally

because that's been a World Trade Center
question, but I know that Kevin Ryan

has addressed that issue in one of his
published articles. I would recommend

read. Do you know how much time it took?
Before the alleged FBI came and

confiscated the videotapes from the...
It was almost instant.

I mean, do you have a...

You know, like instant really gets you
suspicious. No, almost, almost.

What we do know, for instance, at the
Citgo gas station, and as I understand

this is interesting, the Citgo gas
station, I believe, was owned by

the time, by Hugo Chavez.

I find that interesting.

But in any case, according to the person
who managed or owned that station, I

don't know which, the FBI arrived.

almost immediately, I think he said five
minutes, something like that, at the

Sitco gas station, and didn't even take
the time to go up on a ladder or

something and take out the film. They
just ripped the whole camera off the

And they were doing that around the
area.

And you don't know how much time it took
them to get from their FBI office to

the... They were already on the scene.

But the excuse or pretext they give for
already being on the scene, including

there were Secret Service agents already
on the scene, is that before the

attacks they were expecting the
president to arrive between noon and

Very convenient.

They had to be passengers.

Barbara Olson was quite well known, and
her husband even more so probably.

And they had to be relatives and
friends.

of passengers.

So what happened to passengers, you
know, supposedly, I mean, there should

whole group of people that want to know
what happened to my, whoever was

supposedly on Flight 77.

Right. Well, we don't know, number one.

Number two, the Bureau of
Transportation... BTS database, which is

states that Flight 77 was not scheduled
to even take off on the morning of 9 -11

as a civilian airline flight.

So we have open questions as to what
happened to the passengers. It's an

extremely important question. I do not
know the answer to it.

There should be some kind of history of
people going to the airport.

There has to be a manifest somewhere.

Dozens of supposedly passengers. Yes. It
is interesting. It is very important, I

think, that the Pentagon's own official
autopsy report states that there

was no Arab DNA in any of the remains
from the Pentagon attack, either on the

alleged plane or inside the building.

Well, the official story says that Arab
hijackers were in the plane.

Let's put it this way. If the official
story is anywhere close to being true,

and I've already demonstrated that
whatever was destroyed at the Pentagon

the Heliport five minutes or more
before, the official story says Flight

even close to the building, there
apparently were not passengers in that

at all. I believe that...

If Flight 77 took off with Barbara Olson
and anyone else in it, any real

passengers, that it either crashed or
was landed shortly after it was seen by

Indianapolis Air Traffic Control to lose
approximately 6 ,000 feet before it

lost its transponder signal.

So it probably went down somewhere close
to the tri -border area of Ohio,

Kentucky, and West Virginia.

Okay. When did you first begin to
question the official story?

When I first started to question the
official story, well, that's an

question.

I want to preface that with a context,
and that is I started to question

the official story of the release of the
52 hostages in Iran

the moment that they were released as
Reagan took his oath of office.

And that resulted in my book, October
Surprise.

And I actually questioned 9 -11 as we
weren't being told the whole story

on the day of 9 -11 itself.

And the red flags went up when I saw on
my split screen, I don't remember which

mainstream television channel it was,
with Bush still sitting in the classroom

looking like a deer in the headlights as
the other split screens.

showed Americans jumping to their deaths
from the Twin Towers. There was

something terribly wrong with this split
picture.

And from that moment on, I dedicated
myself to finding out the truth and

bringing the real perpetrators to
justice.

My question has to do with...

The large -scale operation, this whole
thing must be, you know, in the pre

-planning, the wiring of the buildings,
you know, of the various part of this

whole operation that would involve
hundreds if not thousands of people, you

know. And I can understand, you know, in
a military mentality, the need to know

and the compartmentalized information is
really important. And I can see how

people can be.

Well, instructed to do certain things,
like, for example, the light poles being

down. Somebody had to put it there. You
know, it didn't happen by itself.

And also being that, and I can see how
this thing happened, and perhaps to a

of these people surprised that this had
happened after the fact.

My question to you is, you work with a
lot, I mean, you were a government

employee, and you work with a lot of
military people. Yes.

I have to believe that most of these
people are good people. They are.

Yeah. And my point is, like, well, where
are they now? And how do they sleep?

And how do they keep silent over this
whole thing? There's got to be thousands

of people out there who know almost as
much as you do.

Yes. Well, first off, you're talking
about what's called OPSEC, operational

security, in a highly compartmented
black operation.

And you don't get to be a black operator
at that level.

unless you follow orders, no matter
what. And you know that if you talk, you

dead, and maybe your family's dead, too.

And then, on the other hand, people say,
well, how could they keep it secret?

They kept the Manhattan Project secret,
with far more people than that, number

one. Number two, how could my government
do this? They did it at Pearl Harbor,

the original Pearl Harbor. That's why
they wanted a new Pearl Harbor, if you

really know the history of Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor, if you read the book by
Dennett.

Day of Deceit.

Be sure and get the most up -to -date
edition of Day of Deceit, and in

particular in the back, because as he
was about to publish Day of Deceit, the

first edition, the National Archives, he
had done an FOIA request to the

National Archives for proof that
Roosevelt and Churchill and the high

the Navy knew that the attack at Pearl
Harbor was coming. Now, in that case,

there was a real enemy.

But that attack was protected, and the
high -asset carriers were moved out of

Pearl Harbor.

The others were ordered to remain there
as sitting ducks, the Arizona and the

other ships.

And Admiral Kimmel, who was the chief
admiral at Pearl Harbor, was explicitly,

the orders were given not to tell him of
the intelligence that was already known

from breaking the Purple Code.

by the magic machines.

So we know that Pearl Harbor, like the
Raksag fire, if you will, was a

attack by an enemy that was desired to
happen for larger

geopolitical goals.

And so it's 9 -11.

Yeah, but I see that perhaps a
difference in Pearl Harbor is that, you

were... we were led to believe that we
have a common enemy being the Japanese

and the Nazi.

It was a true enemy. Yeah, it was a true
enemy. And whereas 9 -11, we really

want to create fear to make this
fictitious enemy so we can keep pouring

into this whole machine. Well, 9 -11,
after 9 -11, what we have done in the

of the 9 -11 lie has created a real
enemy.

It didn't exist before, I don't believe.

Yeah, and then, you know, I guess...

The point is the result is the American
people losing our civil liberties. Yes.

You know, we've created this Gestapo
-like organization.

Homeland Security Department. Yeah,
exactly.

So everybody is seeing the effect of
what happened. Correct.

You know, with 9 -11. So these guys,
these friends of yours, they must be

They're not my friends.

Well, I mean. Sorry.

Shouldn't that be obvious?

You've got to have friends in there who
are not, who are losing sleep over there

still. No, well, they're not my friends,
and I don't know anyone close. I've

never signed any classification
agreement ever. I would never do that. I

public journalist.

No, they're not my friends.

Well, there's got to be a lot of people
who have conscience that would be still

part of that. Well, there are people
with consciences who have spoken to me.

I've given you the quotes for many of
them at a very high level.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, for heaven's sakes, has gone

with information that proves the
official story is a lie.

Thank you. Go ahead.

The way the plane came in, besides how
far it got or close to the building, it

flew over a highway, a major highway.

Weren't there people who saw what kind
of plane it was who were traveling on

highway at that time?

And, of course, if the...

Your point of the explosions further in
the building or other kinds of

explosions to get the plane to line up
with where that would happen would take

very good pilot to do that.

And so the question I would have is, or
two, didn't people see this plane who

were driving on the highway look like?

And what's said about how a terrorist
pilot could line up and even fly into

Pentagon that way?

I've just shown you that a terrorist
pilot did not fly into the Pentagon,

one. Number two, the official story path
is not the way the plane came.

And it wasn't Flight 77 to begin with.
It was a white plane that was formed and

painted to simulate an American Airlines
plane.

And, yes, many witnesses did see it.

And after the official story was put
out, assumed that it was Flight 77.

Yes. You showed, during your
presentation, you showed a photograph of

explosion after the impact, and I just
wondered if you knew. A possible

thermite. It was an explosion. It's a
possible thermite. Okay. I wondered if

knew what the source was and whether or
not there's more CATV.

photographs of the actual incident
available.

Right. There are only two videotapes
that the government claims exist at all,

and that's under oath by the FBI analyst
who looked at all 85 that the FBI says

they have.

There are only two, and they were almost
identical videotapes from the two

outside cameras, from the security
cameras, and all they show is an

They do not show a plane.

That is the only video. The only
photograph of the explosion we have is

photograph that I showed you that
appears to be an explosion.

It may or may not be the same explosion.
It probably is, but we don't know for

sure.

You've shown who the people are that you
believe are actually pulling the

trigger on all of this. The question is,
who is behind...

these people and what's their ultimate
goal?

Does this work its way all the way into
a one -world government business and all

that? I think at the beginning I made
clear who I think is behind it. It is

signatories of the Project for a New
American Century, and in turn behind

are people like the Rockefellers, the
Council on Foreign Relations. The World

Trade Center towers were built and owned
by the Rockefellers, and I believe that

they were built to be brought down.

And Rockefeller, David Rockefeller
himself was asked, you can see it, I

that you can actually see it on a video,
but if not, certainly the quote, it's a

public quote.

He was asked, he said words to the
effect, you know, I've been accused of

wanting a one world government and being
willing to do anything to get it.

And then after some more verbiage, he
said, well, if that's what I'm accused

I'm proud to say that it's true.

Words to that effect.

This was necessary, I believe, in order
to justify after the fall of

the Soviet Union, after the fall of the
wall, and when they were allegedly a

unipolar power before the rise of China
and other...

as they call them, peer competitors or
potential adversaries in the military, I

believe that that was the time that the
people behind the Project for a New

American Century, and they even say so,
that they believe that they should

strike while the iron was hot, as it
were, and have some kind of a pretext, a

new Pearl Harbor, to justify an American
century. It was called Project for a

New American Century, to have a global
domination.

Yeah, I've thought ever since about a
week after 9 -11 happened that it was an

inside job, and I certainly agree with
you on that.

And I think it was done in order to get
us ready for protracted

war in the Middle East, which we've had
now. We've been in Afghanistan for 12

years now, and now they're thinking
about it, we will get out soon,

going to go back to sleep and say
everything was fine.

But the thing is, sometimes it is
necessary to go to war, and it's very

get the public of this country to do
that, which is why... That's why Pearl

Harbor was protected.

Why, you know, they let Pearl Harbor
happen so that we go to war. Facilitated

Pearl Harbor to happen.

And they can manufacture this Tonkin
Gulf incident to get us into Vietnam.

Yes. Now, after Vietnam, nobody wanted
to even hear about war anymore.

Right. But now after...

After 9 -11, people were hot. Let's go
get those bastards.

But that was the whole point. Okay, but
the thing is, okay, so why is all this

being done? And one thing that's not
mentioned very often is that there's one

little habit we have in this country
called driving around in cars, which is

using something like 30 % of the world's
oil production. We're only 4 % of the

world's population.

How do we get away with that?

terrorizing everybody else into letting
us have it.

That's what I think is going on. So I'd
like you to comment on that.

Well, Michael Rupert's book, Crossing
the Rubicon, would be what I would

recommend that you read on precisely
that. By the way, chapters 19 and 20 on

war games are based upon my work, for
which he credits me as coming up with a

holy grail of 9 -11 research, that the
realization that the war games and

emergency response exercises on 9 -11
were on hijack scenarios.

That's a very important book, but the
vast majority of the book, of course, is

his proposal that the powers that be in
the United States and NATO countries,

especially Britain, saw or believed that
peak oil was coming, and if it hadn't

already come. It's not clear that it has
come, but if they believed that it had

come, that they wanted to be in a
position with troops on the ground in

Middle East to control the movement of
fossil fuels.

These flights, I didn't believe until
last year that these flights were not

real. And I've become convinced in the
last year that these flights...

have been fake. Last year, there was
Professor Fetzer who came to town. And

was threatened when he was going to give
his presentation.

And they had to put it in a little
church in U District. Yes, I remember,

before the Vancouver hearing. For a
small thing.

And he has come up with this theory.

Because I was suspicious from the
beginning, because how did these planes,

you see it in the film, even on the
World Trade Center buildings, how did

planes cut through the World Trade
Center, which is concrete like butter?

Well, it didn't.

I want to go on record that I have a
completely different point of view than

Professor Fetzer on the World Trade
Center towers. There was at least a real

plane that impacted World Trade Center
2. I've interviewed witnesses who were

physically on the ground on the
sidewalk, saw it go over, hit, and

plane almost killed them.

So just because you have proof that some
of the videotapes of World Trade Center

impacts were faked, in whole or in part,
tells you nothing about what happened

there. Right.

It doesn't rule out a plane impact at
all. Okay, two more questions.

Okay, you had the point of following the
money, right, and that like $3 .5

trillion was missing?

2 .3. Okay, whatever.

A lot of money? Uh -huh. What happened
to that? Yeah, that's up. Okay, and I

that, you know, the people who were
auditing that were blown up, but he

the money was gone, right? What happened
about that? No, they said they couldn't

account for it. Well, okay, they
couldn't account for it, so that just

disappeared when they blew up the
accounting?

Okay, I address that very in great
detail in my forthcoming book, which

have the same title as this presentation
behind the smoke curtain.

I address it in detail, and it's a
complicated question.

But one of the things that I have
discovered is that that very office, the

Command Center, which was, I mean, one
of the witnesses there, an exact quote

was that this looked like a bombed -out
office.

And according to the official story,
sole survivor of the Naval Command

which is two and three rings in.

Kevin Schaefer, he stated that the
explosion went off there at precisely 9

According to the official Pentagon
building performance report, the alleged

Flight 77 hit at 9 .37 and 46 seconds,
almost 9 .38, and had gone

completely through the building through
the Naval Command Center in less than

one second. So by 9 .37 and 47 seconds.

So you've got many, many minutes before
Kevin Schaefer says a bomb.

He doesn't say bomb, but he says there
was an explosion there, and it was

described as a bombed -out office space.

So why is that important?

It's important because I've learned that
the Naval Command Center was not only

almost certainly part of Able Danger.

which was tracking the hijackers prior
to 9 -11, almost a year and a half,

including three of the four cells that
were allegedly involved.

They had records of that there. Those
records were destroyed of not only that,

but I learned that there was something
called the Black Eagle Fund that was

allegedly $240 billion that was
controlled by the Central Intelligence

Agency and almost certainly by George
Bush Sr. himself.

that had been used to sabotage the
Soviet Union secretly, economically

the Soviet Union, which was one of the
main reasons that it fell, and not

because of Osama bin Laden, who was our
own CIA asset in Afghanistan, and that

those records, records of that were
actually held in the Naval Command

also.

My question is, what is your opinion of
the National Defense Authorization Act,

and what is your prediction for the
civil liberties in the United States?

What is my opinion of the National
Defense Authorization Act? Well, I think

you're talking about the provision of
the national.

The provisions.

I think there are two of the National
Defense Authorization Act, NDAA, which

just been re -approved by Congress.

that effectively the president is
presuming to himself the authority

to kidnap, basically, an American
citizen anywhere in the world, including

the United States, hold them without
trial, without an attorney, indefinitely

torture them and even kill them.

All constitutionally. This is, of
course, absurd.

And it needs to go to the Supreme Court,
but only after the Supreme Court

hopefully has...

better mix of progressive versus
conservative justices.

Thank you.