Original subtitles

We live in a strange time.

Extraordinary events keep happening that undermine the stability of our world.

Suicide bombs, waves of refugees, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, even Brexit.

Yet those in control seem unable to deal with them.

No one has any vision of a different or a better kind of future.

This film will tell the story of how we got. to this strange place.

It is about how over the past 40 years politicians, financiers and

utopians rather than face up to the real complexities of the world retreated.

Instead they constructed a simpler version of the world in order to hang on

power.

And as this fake world grew all of us went along with it.

because the simplicity was reassuring.

Even those who thought they were attacking the system, the radicals, the

artists, the musicians and our whole counterculture, actually became part of

trickery, because they too had retreated into the make -believe world, which

is why their opposition has no effect and nothing ever changes.

But this retreat into a dream world allowed dark and destructive forces to

fester and grow outside.

Forces that are now returning to pierce the fragile surface of our carefully

constructed fake world.

The story begins in two cities at the same moment in 1975.

One is New York.

The other is Damascus.

It was a moment when two ideas about how it might be possible to run the world

without politics first took hold.

New York City was on the verge of collapse.

For 30 years, the politicians who ran the city had borrowed more and more

from the banks to pay for its growing services and welfare.

But in the early 70s, the middle classes fled from the city, and the taxes they

paid disappeared with them.

So the banks lent the city even more.

But then they began to get worried about the size of the growing debt.

and whether the city would ever be able to pay it back.

And then, one day in 1975, the bank just stopped.

The city held its regular meeting to issue bonds in return for the loans,

overseen by the city's financial controller.

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.

Today the city of New York is offering for competitive bidding sale 260 million

tax anticipation notes, of which 100 million will mature on June 3rd, 1975.

The banks were supposed to turn up at 11am, but it soon became clear that none

of them were going to appear.

The meeting was rescheduled for 2pm, and the banks promised they would turn up.

The announcement on behalf of the Comptroller is that the offer, which we

expected to receive and announce at 2 o 'clock this afternoon, is now expected

at 4 o 'clock.

Does this mean that so far nobody wants those bonds? We will be making a further

announcement at 4 o 'clock and anything further that I could say now I think

would not advance the interest of the sale which is now in progress. Does this

mean that you have not been able to sell them so far today?

We will have a further announcement at 4 o 'clock.

What happened that day in New York marked a radical shift in power.

Banks insisted that in order to protect their loans, they should be allowed to

take control of the city.

The city appealed to the president, but he refused to help.

So a new committee was set up to manage the city's finances.

Out of nine members, eight of them were bankers.

It was the start of an extraordinary experiment, where the financial

institutions...

took power away from the politicians and started to run society themselves.

The city had no other option.

The bankers enforced what was called austerity on the city, insisting that

thousands of teachers, policemen and firemen were sacked.

This was a new kind of politics.

The old politicians believed that crises were solved through negotiations and

deals.

The bankers had a completely different view.

They were just the representatives of something that couldn't be negotiated

with. The logic of the market.

To them, there was no alternative to this system.

It should run society.

Just by shifting paper around, these slobs can make 60, 65 million dollars in

single transaction.

That would take care of all of the layoffs in the city.

So it's reckless, it's cruel, and it's a disgrace.

There'd be a fair number of bankers, of course, who'd say, well, it's the unions

who have been too greedy.

Now, what would your reaction be to that? I guess they're right in a way. If

can make $60 million on a single transaction and a worker makes $8 ,000,

a year, I suppose they're correct, and as they go back to their little estates

in Greenwich, Connecticut, I want to wish them well, the slobs.

But the extraordinary thing was, no -one opposed the bankers.

The radicals and the left -wingers, who ten years before...

had dreamt of changing America through revolution, did nothing.

They had retreated and were living in the abandoned buildings in Manhattan.

The thinger Patti Smith later described the mood of disillusion.

that had come over them.

I could not identify with the political movements any longer, she said.

All the manic activity in the streets.

In trying to join them, I felt overwhelmed by yet another form of

What she was describing was the rise of a new powerful individualism.

that could not fit with the idea of collective political action.

Instead, Hattie Smith and many others became a new kind of individual radical

who watched the decaying city with a cool detachment.

They didn't try and change it.

They just experienced it.

Look at that. Isn't that cool?

I love that. We're like kids right all over the world.

That to me is neater than any art sometimes.

Jose and Maria forever.

Oh, there's a lot of things like when you buy big movie houses, maybe we'll

one, but they have little movie screens where you can see clips of like Z or

something like that. People watch it over and over. I've seen people, I've

checked them out all day.

I've gone back and forth and they're still there watching the credits of a

because they don't have enough dough, but it's some entertainment, you know.

Instead, radicals across America turned to art

and music as a means of expressing their criticism of society.

They believed that instead of trying to change the world outside, the new

radicalism should try and change what was inside people's heads.

And the way to do this was through self -expression, not collective action.

V.

W.

X.

Y.

Z.

But some of the left saw that something else was really going on.

that by detaching themselves and retreating into an ironic coolness, a

generation were beginning to lose touch with the reality of power.

One of them wrote

at that time, it was the mood of the era, and the revolution was

deferred indefinitely.

And while we were dozing, the money crept in.

What's your date of birth, Larry?

But one of the people who did understand how to use this new power was Donald

Trump.

Trump realised that there was now no future in building housing for ordinary

people because all the government grants had gone.

But he saw that there were other ways to get vast amounts of money out of the

state.

Trump started to buy up derelict buildings in New York.

And he announced that he was going to transform them into luxury hotels and

apartments.

But in return, he negotiated the biggest tax break in New York's history, worth

$160 million.

The city had to agree because they were desperate.

And the banks...

seeing a new opportunity, also started to lend him money.

And Donald Trump began to transform New York into a city for the rich, while he

paid practically nothing.

At the very same time, in 1975, there was a confrontation between two powerful

men in Damascus, the capital of Syria.

One was Henry Kissinger, the US Secretary of State.

The other was the President of Syria, Hafez al -Assad.

The battle between the two men was going to have profound consequences for the

world.

And like in New York, It was going to be a struggle between the old idea of

using politics to change the world and a new idea that you could run the world

as a stable system.

President Assad dominated Syria.

The country was full of giant images and statues that glorified him.

He was brutal and ruthless.

Killing or imprisoning anyone he suspected of being a threat.

But Ahad believed that the violence was for a purpose.

He wanted to find a way of uniting the Arab countries and using that power

to stand up to the world.

Kissinger was also tough and ruthless.

He had started in the 1950s as an expert in the theory of nuclear strategy, what

was called the delicate balance of terror.

It was the system that ran the Cold War.

Both sides believed that if they attacked, the other side would

launch their missiles and everyone would be annihilated.

Kissinger had been one of the models for the character of Dr Strangelove.

in Stanley Kubrick's films.

Mr. President, I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human

specimens.

It would be quite easy.

At the bottom of some of our deeper minds, sir.

Henry was not a warm, friendly, modest, jovial sort of person.

He was thought of as one of the more...

anxious, temperamental, self -conscious, ambitious,

inconsiderate people at Harvard.

Kissinger saw himself as a hard realist.

He had no time for the emotional turmoil of political ideologies.

He believed that history had always really been a struggle for power between

groups and nations.

But what Kissinger took from the Cold War was a way of seeing the world as an

interconnected system.

And his aim was to keep that system in balance and prevent it from falling into

chaos.

I believe that with all the dislocations we now experience, there

also exists an extraordinary opportunity to form for the first time in history.

a truly global society carried by the principle of interdependence.

And if we act wisely and with vision, I think we can look back to all this

turmoil as the birth pangs of a more creative and better

system. If we miss the opportunity, I think there's going to be chaos.

The flight has been delayed, we understand now.

The passenger will be arriving here about...

an hour and a half from now.

So we'll just have the press informed and then we'll stay in contact with you.

And it was this idea that Kissinger set out to impose on the chaotic politics of

the Middle East.

But to manage it, he knew that he was going to have to deal with President

of Syria.

President Assad was convinced that there would only ever be a real and lasting

peace between the Arabs and Israel if the Palestinian refugees were allowed to

return to their homeland.

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were living in exile in Syria, as well

in the Lebanon and Jordan.

Have you found that the Palestinians here want to integrate with the Syrians

all? Oh, no. No, never.

They don't want not here or neither in Lebanon or in Jordan, never.

No, because they want to stay as a whole, as Palestinians.

They call themselves those who go back. Al -A 'idun, they say in Arabic.

Assad also believed that such a peace would strengthen the Arab world.

But Kissinger thought that strengthening the Arabs would destabilise his balance

of power.

So he set out to do the very opposite, to fracture the power of the Arab

countries by dividing them and breaking their alliances so they would keep each

other in check.

Kissinger now played a double game, or as he termed it, constructive ambiguity.

In a series of meetings, he persuaded Egypt to sign a separate agreement with

Israel.

But at the same time, he led Assad to believe that he was working for a wider

peace agreement, one that would include the Palestinians.

In reality, the Palestinians were ignored.

They were irrelevant to the structural balance of the global system.

The hallmark of Kissinger's thinking about international politics is its

structural design.

Everything is always connected in his mind to everything else.

But his first thoughts are on that level, on the structural global balance

power level.

And as he addresses questions of human dignity, human survival, human freedom,

I think they tend to come into his mind as an adjunct.

of the play of nations at the power game.

When Assad found out the truth, it was too late.

In a series of confrontations with Kissinger in Damascus, Assad raged about

treachery.

He told Kissinger that what he had done would release demons hidden under the

surface of the Arab world.

Kissinger described their meetings.

Assad's controlled fury, he wrote, was all the more impressive for its eerily

cold, seemingly unemotional demeanour.

Assad now retreated.

He started to build a giant palace that loomed over Damascus.

And his belief that it would be possible to transform the Arab world began to

fade.

A British journalist who knew Assad wrote,

Assad's optimism has gone.

A trust in the future has gone.

What has emerged instead is a brutal, vengeful Assad, who believes in nothing

except revenge.

The original dream of the Soviet Union had been to create a glorious new world.

A world where not only the society, but the people themselves would be

transformed.

They would become new and better kinds of human beings.

But by the 1980s, it was clear that the dream had failed.

The Soviet Union became instead a society where no one believed in

had any vision of the future.

If you had a wish, what would it be now?

What? If you had a wish, what would it be now?

What? A wish.

A dream.

A dream?

Yes.

Well, how can I tell you?

I don't know what else to tell you. A dream.

Before, I didn't wish, I didn't guess, I didn't see anything anyway.

I dreamed and guessed, but now it's the other way around.

And now I don't believe, and I will never think or dream.

Do you believe?

To whom?

What? To whom do you believe?

I don't know.

To God?

I don't believe in anyone, I don't believe in anything.

Not even in you.

You have such a strange hairstyle.

Where did you get it?

They cut it beautifully.

I met the Moscow punks, and they cut it.

And what kind of punks are these?

Well, these are people who love freedom. They brought you there.

And you're not free, are you?

I'm free.

Well, I think something happened to you. Yes, I don't know.

I don't know.

No, but then they'll tell you.

I don't know if it's going to be difficult, but I'll try my best.

Those who ran the Soviet Union had believed that they could plan and manage

new kind of socialist society.

But they had discovered that it was impossible to control and predict

everything, and the plan had run out of control.

But rather than reveal this, the technocrats began to pretend that

was still going according to plan.

And what emerged instead was a fake version of the society.

The Soviet Union became a society where everyone knew that what their leaders

said was not real, because they could see with their own eyes that the economy

was falling apart.

But everybody had to play along and pretend that it was real.

Because no one could imagine any alternative.

One Soviet writer called it hyper -normalization.

You were so much a part of the system that it was impossible to see beyond it.

The fakeness was hyper -normal.

In this stagnant world, two brothers called Arkady and Boris Strugatsky

the inspiration of a growing new dissident movement.

They weren't politicians.

They were science fiction writers.

And in their stories, they expressed the strange mood that was rising up as the

Soviet empire collapsed.

Their most famous book was called Roadside Picnic.

It is set in a world that seems like the present.

except there is a zone that has been created by an alien force.

People known as stalkers go into the zone.

They find that nothing is what it seems, that reality changes minute by minute.

Shadows go the wrong way.

There are hidden forces that twist your body and change the way you think and

feel.

The picture the Strugatzis gave was of a world where nothing was fixed.

where reality, both what you saw and what you believed, had become shifting

unstable.

And in 1979, the film director, Andrei Tarkovsky, made a film that was based on

Roadside Picnic.

He called it Stalker.

What happened?

Why did you stop me?

I didn't stop you. Who?

You?

Ronald Reagan, you solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of

President of the United States. That I will faithfully execute the office of

President of the United States.

The new President of America had a new vision of the world.

It wasn't the harsh realism of Henry Kissinger any longer. It was different.

It was a simple moral crusade where America had a special destiny to fight

and to make the world a better place.

The places and the periods in which man has known freedom are few and far

between, just scattered moments on the span of time.

And most of those moments have been ours. The American people have a genius

great and unselfish deeds.

Into the hands of America, God has placed the destiny of an afflicted

God bless America.

But this crusade was going to lead Reagan to come face to face with Henry

Kissinger's legacy.

And above all, the vengeful fury of President Assad of Syria.

Israel was now determined to finally destroy the power of the Palestinians.

And in 1982, they sent a massive army to encircle the Palestinian camps in the

Lebanon.

Do you know how strong the Israelis are? Do you know how many tanks

they have outside Beirut? Do you know how strong they are?

They are not

ready

to surrender.

As long as the people raise their heads and the people are with us, no one can

beat us.

Quick, quick.

Two months later, thousands of Palestinian refugees were

massacred in the camps.

It horrified the world.

But what was even more shocking... was that Israel had allowed it to happen.

Its troops had stood by and watched as a Christian Lebanese faction murdered the

Palestinians.

This was the first of the massacres we discovered yesterday. Now, 24 hours

later, the stench here is appalling.

But the effects on the Israelis of what their Christian allies did here and in

dozens of other places around this camp are going to be immense.

There's always been a risk of such massacres if Christian militiamen were

allowed to come into Palestinian camps, and the Israelis seem to have done

nothing to prevent them coming into this one.

In the face of the horror and the growing chaos, President Reagan was

act.

He announced that American Marines would come to Beirut to lead a peacekeeping

force.

Reagan insisted that the troops were neutral, but President Assad was

that there was another reality.

He saw the truth as part of the growing conspiracy between America and Israel to

divide the Middle East into factions and destroy the power of the Arabs.

Assad decided to get the Americans out of the Middle East.

And to do this, he made an alliance with the new revolutionary force of

Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran.

And what Khomeini could bring to Assad was an extraordinary new weapon that he

had just created.

It was called the Poor Man Atomic Bomb.

Ayatollah

Khomeini

had come to power two years before as the leader of the Iranian revolution.

But his hold on power was precarious.

and Khomeini had developed a new idea of how to fight his enemies and defend the

revolution.

Khomeini told his followers that they could destroy themselves in order to

the revolution, providing that in the process they killed as many enemies

them as possible.

This was completely new, because the Koran specifically prohibited suicide.

In the past, you became a martyr on the battlefield.

because God chose the time and place of your death.

But Khomeini changed this.

He did it by going back to one of the central rituals of Shia Islam.

Every year, Shiites march in a procession, mourning the sacrifice of

founder, Hussein.

As they do, they whip themselves, symbolically re -enacting Hussein's

Khomeini said that the ultimate act of penitence was not just to whip yourself,

but to kill yourself, providing it was for the greater good of the revolution.

In the name of God, the compassionate, the merciful, good afternoon.

An Iraqi Soviet -made MiG -23 was shot down by the Air Force jet fighters of

Islamic Republic over the northwestern Iranian border region of Marivan at 10

.08 hours local time Saturday, said the Joint Staff Command's communique

numbered 1710.

Khomeini had mobilized this force when the country was attacked by Iraq.

Iran faced almost certain defeat because Iraq had far superior weapons, many of

them supplied by America.

So the revolutionaries took tens of thousands of young boys out of schools,

them on buses and sent them to the front line.

Their job was to walk through the enemy's minefields, deliberately blowing

themselves up in order to open gaps that would allow the Iranian army to pass

through unharmed.

It was organised suicide on a vast scale.

This human sacrifice was commemorated in giant cemeteries across the country.

Fountains flowing with blood -red water glorified this new kind of martyrdom.

And it was this new idea of an unstoppable human weapon that President

took from Khomeini and brought to the West for the first time.

But as it travelled, it would mutate into something even more deadly.

Instead of just killing yourself, you would take explosives with you into the

heart of the enemy and then blow yourself up, taking dozens or even

along with you.

It would become known as suicide bombing.

In October 1983, two suicide bombers drove trucks into the U .S. Marine

in Beirut.

It was seeing something move that took me out of my trance.

And then I recognized, oh yeah, Marines were in that building.

A lot of Marines were in that building.

And that's when I ran down.

And it was a black marine.

He looked white. The dust had just covered him.

The massive explosions killed 241 Americans.

The bombers were members of a new militant group that no one had heard of.

They called themselves Hezbollah, and although many of them were Iranian, they

were very much under the control of Syria and the Syrian intelligence

President Assad was using them as his proxies to attack America.

Whoever carried out yesterday's bombings, Shia Muslim fanatics, devotees

Ayatollah Khomeini, or whatever, it is Syria who profits politically.

The most significant fact is that the dissidents live and work with Syrian

protection.

So it is to Syria, rather than to the dissident group's guiding light,

Khamenei of Iran, that we must look for an explanation of the group's

activities.

Destabilization is Syria's Middle Eastern way of reminding the world that

must not be left out of plans for the future of the area.

There are no words that can express Our sorrow and grief over the

loss of those splendid young men and the injury to so many others.

These deeds make so evident the bestial nature of those who would assume

power if they could have their way and drive us out of that area.

But despite his words, within four months, President Reagan withdrew all

American troops from the Lebanon.

The Secretary of State, George Shultz, explained.

We became paralysed by the complexity that we faced, he said.

So the Americans turned and left.

For President Assad, it was an extraordinary achievement.

He was the only Arab leader to have defeated the Americans and forced them

leave the Middle East.

He had done it by using the new force of suicide bombing.

a force that once unleashed was going to spread with unstoppable power.

But at this point, both Assad and the Iranians thought that they could control

it.

And what gave it this extraordinary power was that it held out the dream of

transcending the corruptions of the world and entering a new and better

One should defend the realm of Islam and Muslims against heretics and invaders.

And to fulfill this duty, one should even sacrifice one's life.

We believe that martyrs can overlook our deeds from the other world.

It means that after death, the martyr lives and can still witness this world.

By the middle of the 1980s, the banks were rising up and becoming ever more

powerful in America.

What had started ten years before in New York, the idea that the financial

system could run society, was spreading.

But unlike older systems of power, it was mostly invisible.

A writer called William Gibson tried to dramatise what was happening in a

powerful, imaginative way in a series of novels.

Gibson had noticed how the banks and the new corporations were beginning to link

themselves together through computer systems.

What they were creating was a series of giant networks of information that were

invisible to ordinary people and to politicians.

But those networks gave the corporations extraordinary new powers of control.

Gibson gave this new world a name.

He called it cyberspace.

And his novels described a future that was dangerous and frightening.

Hackers could literally enter into cyberspace.

And as they did, they travelled through systems that were so powerful that they

could reach out and crush intruders by destroying their minds.

In cyberspace, there were no laws and no politicians to protect you.

This raw, brutal, corporate power.

But then a strange thing happened.

A new group of visionaries in America took Gibson's idea of a hidden, secret

world and transformed it into something completely different.

They turned it. into a dream of a new utopia.

They were the technological utopians who were rising up on the west coast of

America.

They turned Gibson's idea on its head.

Instead of cyberspace being a frightening place dominated by powerful

corporations, they reinvented it as the very opposite, a new, safe world.

where radical dreams could come true.

Ten years before, faced by the complexity of real politics, the

given up on the idea of changing the world.

But now the computer utopians saw in cyberspace an alternative reality,

a place they could retreat to, away from the harsh right -wing politics that now

dominated Reagan's America.

The roots of this vision lay back in the counterculture of the 1960s, and above

all, with LSD.

We've got some more acid over here if you want to go ahead and drop it. Many

those who had taken LSD in the 60s were convinced that it was more than just

another drug, that it opened human perception.

and allowed people to see new realities that were normally hidden from them.

See, the ones that have white in them are really great.

It freed them from the narrow, limited

view of the world that was imposed on them by politicians and those in power.

In the United States, in the next 5, 10, 15 years, you're going to see more and

more people taking LSD.

and making it a part of their lives, so there will be an LSD country within 15

years. An LSD society, there'll be less interest in, obviously, warfare, in

power politics. You know, politics today is a disease, that's a real addiction.

Politics, politics, politics, politics.

Don't politic, don't vote. These are old men's games, impotent and senile old

men that want to put you onto their old chess games of war and power.

Twenty years later, the new networks of machines seemed to offer a way to

construct a real alternate reality, not just one that was chemically induced,

but a space that actually existed in a parallel dimension to the real world.

And like with acid, cyberspace could be a place where you would be liberated

from the old corrupt hierarchies of politics and power and explore new ways

being.

One of the leading exponents of this idea was called John Perry Barlow.

In the 60s, he had written songs for the Grateful Dead and been part of the acid

counterculture.

Now he organised what he called cyberthons to try and bring the

movement together.

Well, you know, the cyberthon as it was originally conceived was supposed to be

the 90s equivalent of the acid test.

and we had thought to involve some of the same personnel.

You and I and Timmy should sit down and talk.

Okay, that's good.

And it immediately acquired a financial quality or commercial quality that was

initially a little unsettling to an old hippie like me, but as soon as I saw it

actually working, then I thought, ah, well, if you're going to have an acid

for the 90s, money better be involved.

Instead of having a glass barrier,

that separates you, your mind, from the mind of the computer. The computer pulls

us inside and creates a world for us.

Incorporates everything that could be incorporated. It incorporates experience

itself.

Barlow then wrote a manifesto that he called A Declaration of Independence of

Cyberspace.

It was addressed to all politicians, telling them to keep out of this new

It was going to be incredibly influential, because what Barlow did was

powerful picture of the Internet, not as a network controlled by giant

corporations, but instead as a kind of magical free place, an alternative to

old systems of power.

It was a vision that would come to dominate the Internet over the next 20

Governments of the industrial world, cyberspace does not lie within your

borders. We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her

beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence

or conformity. I declare the global social space we are building to be

naturally independent.

of the tyrannies you seek to impose on us.

We will create a civilization of the mind in cyberspace.

May it be more humane and fair than the world your government has made before.

None.

This is a plea to a new order.

This code means freedom.

But two young hackers in New York thought that Barlow was describing a

world, that his vision bore no relationship at all to what was really

online.

They were cult figures on the early online scene, and their fans followed

recorded them.

They called themselves Fibre Optic and Acid Freak, and they spent their time

exploring and breaking into giant computer networks.

that they knew were the hard realities of modern digital power.

My specific instance, I was charged with conspiracy to commit a

few dozen overt acts, they called them, among a number of things having to do

with computer trespass and, I guess, computer eavesdropping, interception,

unauthorized access to federal interest computers, which is pretty vague.

law, communications network computers, and so on. In a notorious public debate

online, the two hackers attacked Barlow.

What infuriated them most was Barlow's insistence that there was no hierarchy

controlling powers in the new cyber world.

The hackers set out to demonstrate that he was wrong.

Acid Freak hacked into the computers of a giant corporation called TRW.

TRW had originally built the systems that ran the Cold War for the US

They had helped create the delicate balance of terror.

Now TRW had adapted their computers to run a new system, that of credit and

debt.

Their computers gathered up the credit data of millions of Americans and were

being used by the banks to decide individuals' credit ratings.

The hackers... broke into the TRW network, stole Barlow's credit history,

published it online.

The hackers were demonstrating the growing power of finance, how the

that ran the new systems of credit knew more and more about you, and

increasingly used that information to control your destiny.

And the system that was allowing this to happen were the new giant networks of

information connected through computer servers.

The hackers were questioning whether Barlow's utopian rhetoric about

might really be a convenient camouflage, hiding the emergence of a new and

growing power that was way beyond politics.

But cyberspace was not the only imaginary story being created.

Faced with the humiliating defeat in the Lebanon, President Reagan's government

was desperate to shore up the vision of a moral world where a good America

struggled against evil.

And to do this, they were going to create a simple villain, an imaginary

one that would free them from the paralyzing complexity of real Middle

politics.

And the perfect candidate was waiting in the wings.

Colonel Gaddafi, the ruler of Libya.

The Americans were going to ruthlessly use Colonel Gaddafi to create a fake

terrorist mastermind.

And Gaddafi was going to happily play along because it would turn him into a

famous global figure.

Colonel Gaddafi had taken power in a coup in the 1970s, but from the very

he was convinced that he was more than just the leader of one country.

He believed that he was an international revolutionary whose destiny was to

challenge the power of the West.

Gentlemen, the Queen.

When he was a young officer, Gaddafi had been sent to England for training.

And he had detested the patronising racism that he said he had found at the

heart of British society.

Yes, I attended a course.

I had been in England since 1936, from April to

August. You had the best months.

I was in...

Baconsfield, a village called Baconsfield, in an army school.

In fact, we were ill -treated in that place from some

British officers.

I think those officers were Jews,

maybe. Ill -treated in what sort of way?

They ill -treat us every time.

By being rude or by being bullying or... In their own

behavior towards us, they ill -treat us.

They hate us anyhow because of colonization. It is the result of

colonialism.

Once in power, Gaddafi had developed his own revolutionary theory, which he

called the Third Universal Theory.

It was an alternative, he said, to communism and capitalism.

He published it in a green book, but practically no one read it.

He had sent money and weapons to the IRA in Ireland to help them overthrow the

British ruling class.

But all the other Arab leaders rejected him and his ideas.

They thought that he was mad.

And by the mid -1980s, Gaddafi was an isolated figure, with no friends and no

global influence.

Then suddenly that changed.

In December 1985, terrorists attacked Rome and Vienna airports simultaneously,

killing 19 people, including five Americans.

There was growing pressure on President Reagan to retaliate.

It's time to rename your State Department the Capitulation Department.

Get off of your stick, Mr. President.

The American people are sick and tired of being kicked around.

You talk tough.

Let's say you use some of these billions and billions and billions of dollars

worth of weapons that you've asked us to approve.

Your words are cheap talk.

President Reagan immediately announced that Colonel Gaddafi was definitely

behind the attacks.

These murderers could not carry out their crimes without the sanctuary and

support provided by regimes such as Colonel Gaddafi's in Libya.

The Rome and Vienna murders are only the latest in a series of brutal terrorist

acts committed with Gaddafi's backing.

But the European security services, who investigated the attacks, were convinced

that Libya was not involved at all, that the mastermind behind the attacks was

in fact Syria.

that the terrorists had been directed by the Syrian intelligence agencies.

But the Americans say that the attack at Rome airport was organized by Gaddafi,

not by Damascus. No. What do you say? We don't have any evidence.

You have no evidence? Supporting such affirmation.

The only evidence we have shows...

Do you say that it was Libya and the president said the evidence of Libya's

culpability was irrefutable?

Yeah. But the Italian authorities to whom I've spoken say emphatically on the

record that their investigations have shown that it was entirely masterminded

Syria.

I don't agree with that at all.

Well, they've interrogated the surviving terrorists.

I must just say I don't agree with that.

But you've no evidence that Libya was in on the planning either. Our evidence on

Libya is circumstantial but very strong.

But why did the president then say it's irrefutable if you call it

circumstantial? Well, people can be convicted and sentenced in our courts on

circumstantial evidence.

But what made it even more confusing was that although there seemed to be no

evidence that Gaddafi had been behind the attacks, he made no attempt to deny

the allegations.

Instead, he went the other way.

and turned the crisis into a global drama.

It is not a time of saying it is a time of war, a time of confrontation.

Threatening suicide attacks against America.

This hostile position cannot be explained in racist and crusade terms.

Suicidal attacks will have to be an answer to a military attack, but Libya

not.

Gaddafi now started to play a role that was going to become very familiar.

He grabbed the publicity that had been given to him by the Americans and used

dramatically.

He promoted himself as an international revolutionary who would help to liberate

oppressed peoples around the world, even the blacks in America.

Gaddafi arranged for a live satellite link to a mass meeting of the Nation of

Islam in Chicago.

Brothers and sisters, it is with great honour and privilege that I present to

you the leader of the al -Fatah revolution from Libya, our brother

-Gaddafi.

Gaddafi told them that Libya was now their ally in their struggle against

America. To express my full support.

and support of my country to your struggle for freedom, for emancipation.

Gaddafi promised that he would supply weapons to create a black army in

of 400 ,000 men.

If white America refuses to accept blacks as US citizens, he told them, it

therefore be destroyed.

Gaddafi also invited a group of German rocket scientists to come to Libya to

build him a rocket.

He insisted it had no military purpose.

Libya was now going to explore outer space.

It has nothing to do with any military things.

But no -one believed him.

Journalists warned that Gaddafi was really preparing to attack Europe,

dramatising the new danger.

That is something like this, which goes that way to put something into space.

But the same device tilted, say, to an angle of 45 degrees could, of course,

become something very different, a missile possibly carrying a warhead.

That would put Libya within range of an enormous area.

A chilling proposition with its range of 2 ,000 kilometres.

The Americans and Gaddafi now became locked together in a cycle of mutual

reinforcement.

In the process, a powerful new image was created that was going to capture the

imagination of the West.

Gaddafi became a global supervillain at the head of what was called a rogue

state.

A madman who threatened the stability of the world.

And Gaddafi was loving every minute of it.

Don't you think in the past his decisions sometimes have been taken too

Maybe, maybe. On world affairs?

Maybe.

I think sometimes that is what has made people in the world nervous of you,

perhaps.

Then there was another terrorist attack, at a discotheque in West Berlin.

A bomb killed an American soldier and injured hundreds.

The Americans released what they said were intercepts by the National Security

Agency that proved that Colonel Gaddafi was behind the bombing, and a dossier

that they said proved that he was also the mastermind behind a whole range of

other attacks.

President Reagan ordered the Pentagon to prepare to bomb Libya.

But again, there were doubts, this time within the American government itself.

There were concerns that analysts were being pressured to make a case that

didn't really exist.

And to do it, they were taking Gaddafi's rhetoric about himself as a global

revolution and his manic ravings and then representing them as fact.

And in the process, together, the Americans and Gaddafi were constructing

fictional world.

The analyst was certainly, I'm convinced, pressured

into developing a prima facie case against the Libyan government. From

the somewhat incoherent ravings of a maniac, both...

Interceptions of a clandestine nature, interceptions of an open radio

broadcast or whatever, as well as other sources, quotations of his, that one can

assemble a neatly put together package demonstrating that the man had violent

interests against the United States and its European allies.

The European intelligence agency told the Americans that they were wrong.

that it was Syria that was behind the bombing, not Libya.

But the Americans had decided to attack Libya because they couldn't face the

dangerous consequences of attacking Syria.

Instead, they went for Gaddafi, a man without friends or allies.

Libya had... There were less downside consequences, if you will. There's less

Arab support.

for Gaddafi. We figured there would be less Soviet support for Gaddafi.

There's no question but what Libya was more vulnerable than Syria and Iran.

And that is certainly an element of court.

In April 1986, the Americans attacked Libya.

Their targets included Colonel Gaddafi's own house.

Immediately after the attack, Gaddafi appeared in the ruins to describe what

happened. The family were asleep and my wife was, that day, tied down to the bed

because she had a slip disc.

I tried to rescue the children and the house started to collapse, as you can

see, and the books started to burn.

They concentrated on the children's room so that they would kill all the

children.

Our small adopted daughter was killed.

And two of our children were injured.

But yet again, Gaddafi might have been lying.

Ever since then, there have been rumours that his adopted daughter actually

survived.

But many other children were killed in the raid because the American bombing

so inaccurate.

Gaddafi realised that the attention of the whole world was now focused on him.

And he grabbed the moment to promote his own revolutionary theory, the third

way. as a global alternative to democracy.

I feel that I am really responsible for conveying the Third World Theory and the

Green Book to the rising generation, to the young American and British people,

so that we can rescue America and Britain.

and these generations of young people from this theory which, this electoral

party theory, which enabled an empathy like Reagan to rule the mighty power on

earth and use it to destroy other people's homes and enable the harlot

Thatcher to rule a great nation like Britain.

What the heck is that?

Oh my God. Look at that.

Holy crap.

It's just moving really slowly.

Wow.

What is it doing?

Dude, what is happening?

What is going on?

Oh, my God! Oh, my God, guys!

Guys, is that a... What the hell?

Wait, can you get a good video? What the hell?

In the 1980s, more and more people in the United States reported seeing

unexplained objects and lights in the sky.

At the same time, investigators who believed in UFOs revealed that they had

discovered top -secret government documents that stated that alien craft

visited Earth.

The documents had been hidden for 20 years and they seemed to prove that

had been a giant cover -up.

But actually, the reality was even stranger.

The American government might have been making it all up.

that they had created a fake conspiracy to deliberately mislead the population.

The lights that people imagined were UFOs may in reality have been new high

-technology weapons that the US government were testing.

The government had developed the weapons because they, in turn, imagined that

the Soviet Union was far stronger than it was.

and still wanted to conquer the world.

The government wanted to keep the weapon secret, but they couldn't always hide

their appearance in the skies.

So it is alleged that they chose a number of people to use to spread the

that these were really alien visitations.

One of those chosen was called Paul Benavides, who lived outside a giant

in New Mexico and had noticed strange things going on.

Years later, I sat down with Paul at dinner and told Paul exactly

that everything we did was a sanctioned counterintelligence operation to

convince him that what he was seeing was UFOs and that what we didn't want him

to know was that he tapped into something on the base, and we didn't

ever disclose that.

We kind of planted the seed in Paul that what he was seeing and what he was

hearing and what he was collecting was, in fact, Probably, maybe UFOs.

Benovitz and others chosen by the agency were, it is alleged, given a series of

forged documents.

Many of them were top -secret memos by the military describing sightings of

unidentified aerial vehicles.

The documents spread like wildfire, and they formed the basis for the wave of

belief in UFOs that would spread through America in the 1990s.

What the fuck is that?

That's crazy,

bro.

Is that a space?

And it also fueled the wider growing belief that governments lied to you,

conspiracies were real.

What the Reagan administration were doing, both with Colonel Gaddafi and

the UFOs, was a blurring of fact and fiction.

But it was part of an even broader programme.

The President's advisers had given it a name.

They called it Perception Management, and it became a central part of the

American government during the 1980s.

The aim was to tell dramatic stories that grabbed the public imagination.

Not just about the Middle East, but about Central America and the Soviet

And it didn't matter if the stories were true or not, providing they distracted

people, and you the politician, from having to deal with the intractable

complexities of the real world.

Reality became less and less of an important factor in American politics.

It wasn't what was real that was driving anything or the facts driving anything.

It was how you could turn those facts or twist the facts or even make up the

facts to make your opponent look bad.

So perception management became a device and the facts could be twisted.

Anything could be anything.

It becomes how can you manipulate the American people.

And in the process reality becomes what?

Reality becomes simply something to play with to achieve that end.

Reality is not important in this context.

Reality is simply something that you handle.

But something was about to happen that would demonstrate dramatically just how

far the American government had detached from reality.

The Soviet empire was about to implode.

A new one.

None of the politicians, or the journalists, or the think tank experts,

economists, or the academics saw it coming.

Thank you.

The collapse of the Soviet Union also had a powerful effect on the West.

For many, it symbolised the final failure of the dream that politics could

used to build a new kind of world.

What was going to emerge instead was a new system that had nothing to do with

politics.

A system whose aim was not to try and change things, but rather to manage a

-political world.

One of the first people to describe this dramatic change was a left -wing German

political thinker called Ulrich Beck.

Beck said that any politician who believed that they could take control of

society and drive it forward to build a better future was now seen as dangerous.

In the past, politicians might have been able to do this, but now they were

faced with what he called a runaway world.

where things were so complex and interconnected, and modern technologies

potentially dangerous, that it was impossible to predict the outcomes of

anything you did.

The catalogue of environmental disasters proved this.

Politicians would have to give up any idea of trying to change the world.

Instead, their new aim would be to try and predict the dangers in the future,

and then find ways to avoid those risks.

Although Beck came from the political left, the world he saw coming was deeply

conservative.

The picture he gave was of a political class reduced to trying to steer society

into a dark and frightening future, constantly peering forward and trying to

the risks coming towards them.

Their only aim?

To avoid those risks and keep society stable.

It only lasted for a few seconds, so you're basically shocked you really

know what was going on at the time. Where were you in the building and where

the explosion?

Oh, my God!

But a system that could anticipate the future and keep society stable was

already being built, pieced together from all kinds of different and

surprising sources, all of them outside politics.

One part of it was taking shape in a tiny town in the far northwest of the

United States called East Wenatchee.

It was a giant computer whose job was to make the future predictable.

The man building it was a banker called Larry Fink.

Back in 1986, Mr Fink's career had collapsed.

He lost $100 million in a deal and had been sacked.

He became determined it wouldn't happen again.

Fink started a company called BlackRock and builds a computer he called Aladdin.

It is housed in a series of large sheds in the apple orchards outside Wenatchee.

Fink's aim was to use the computer to predict with certainty what the risk of

any deal or investment was going to be.

The computer constantly monitors the world, and it takes things that it sees

happening and then compares them to events in the past.

It can do this because it has in its memory a vast history of the past 50

not just financial, but all kinds of events.

Out of the millions and millions of correlations, the computer then spots

possible disasters, possible dangers lying in the future, and moves the

investments to avoid any radical change and keep the system stable.

Today I'm going to deliver 1 .8 million reports.

Execute 25 ,000 trades.

And avert 3 ,000 disasters.

I'm going to monitor interest rates in Europe. Silver prices in Asia. Droughts

in the Midwest.

I'm going to witness 4 billion shares change hands on the New York Stock

Exchange. And record the effects on 14 trillion in assets across 20 ,000

portfolios. I am Aladdin.

I am Aladdin. And today, I'll find the numbers behind the numbers.

I will see the trends the models don't. The connections. The risks.

I am Aladdin.

I am Aladdin, and I will get the data right.

I am 25 million lines of code. Written by hundreds of people.

Across two decades.

I'm smarter than any algorithm.

More powerful than any processor.

Because I am Aladdin.

Because I am Aladdin.

I am Aladdin.

I am Aladdin.

Aladdin has proved to be incredibly successful.

The assets it guides and controls.

now amount to $15 trillion, which is 7 % of the world's total wealth.

But Wenatchee was also a dramatic example of another kind of craving for

stability and reassurance.

More of its citizens took Prozac than practically any other town in America.

When a person's central nervous system is changed...

By an SSRI, with that medicine, they will view things differently, and they

be strangers.

They look at things differently.

I have a chemical up here that changes me. I think differently. For me, it was

like walking around like this for my whole life, and really not knowing that

was nearsighted. I mean, really.

I mean, no one had ever offered me glasses.

And then all of a sudden, here comes somebody that says, okay, now try these

Try this Prozac on. And I tried it on, and for the first time in my life, I

went, whoa.

Is this the way reality really is?

Your perception can be changed. And it's frightening and it's scary to people.

It speaks of science fiction almost.

Well, the medicine just kind of lets you listen to what needs to go on. And then

your doctor, you know, every time you come back, he says, you're looking so

better. And then he just, like Jim, every time I come in, he goes.

You are so beautiful, you know.

And he isn't even sucking up. I mean, he's being nice, you know. You're

beautiful. You're nice. You're friendly. You've got so much going for you. And I

think, yeah, I do.

Yeah. So I go out and I tell my friends, oh, I feel so much better about myself.

You know, mom goes out, oh, I feel so much better about myself.

So your friends start saying, you know, I've seen such improvement.

I've seen such improvement.

And everybody improves all the way around.

They see improvement. You know, it's like everybody's kind of.

brainwashing each other into being happy.

But there was a more effective way of reassuring people that was being

that did not involve medication.

It too came from computer systems, but this time artificial intelligence.

But the way to do it had been discovered by accident.

Back in the 1960s, there had been optimistic dreams that it would be

develop computers that could think like human beings.

Scientists then spent years trying to programme the rules that governed human

thought.

But they never worked.

One computer scientist at MIT became so disillusioned that he decided to build a

computer programme that would parody these hopeless attempts.

He was called Joseph Weizenbaum, and he built what he claimed was a computer

psychotherapist.

Just like a therapist, people could come and talk to the machine by typing in

their problems.

Weizenbaum called the programme Eliva.

He modelled it on a real psychotherapist called Carl Rogers.

who was famous for simply repeating back to the patient what they had just said.

And that is what Eliza did.

The patient sat in front of the screen and typed in what they were feeling.

And the programme repeated it back to them, often in the form of a question.

Men are all alike.

In what way?

They're always bugging us about something or other. Can you think of a

example?

Well, my boyfriend made me come here.

Your boyfriend made you come here?

He says I'm depressed much of the time.

I'm sorry to hear that you're depressed.

It's true.

I am unhappy.

Do you think coming here will help you not to be unhappy?

Well, I need some help. That much seems certain.

One of the first people to use Eliza was Weisenbaum's secretary.

And her reaction was something that he had not predicted at all.

Then I asked her to my office and sat her down at the keyboard and she began

type. And of course I looked over her shoulder to make sure that everything

operating properly.

After two or three interchanges with the machine, she turned to me and she said,

Would you mind leaving the room, please?

And yet she knew, as Weissenbaum did, that Eliza didn't understand a single

that was being typed into it.

You're not my father in some way.

You don't argue with me.

Why do you think I don't argue with you?

You're afraid of me.

Does it please you to think I'm afraid of you?

Weissenbaum was astonished.

He discovered that everyone who tried Eliza became engrossed.

They would sit for hours telling the machine about their inner feelings and

incredibly intimate details of their lives.

They also liked it because it was free of any kind of patronising elitism.

One person said, After all, the computer doesn't burn out, look down on you,

or try to have sex with you.

What Eliza showed was that in an age of individualism, what made people feel

secure was having themselves reflected back to them.

just like in a mirror.

Artificial intelligence changed direction and started to create new

did just that, but on a giant scale.

They were called intelligent agents.

They worked by monitoring individuals.

gathering vast amounts of data about their past behaviour, and then looked

patterns and correlations from which they could predict what they would want

the future.

It was a system that ordered the world in a way that was centred around you.

And in an age of anxious individualism, frightened of the future, that was

reassuring, just like Eliza.

A safe bubble that protected you.

from the complexities of the world outside.

But the applications of this new direction proved fruitful and

If you liked that, you'll love this.

What was rising up in different ways was a new system that promised to keep the

world stable.

Its tentacles reached into every area of our lives.

Finance promised that it could control the unpredictability of the free market,

while individuals were more and more monitored to stabilise their physical

mental states.

And increasingly, the intelligent agents online predicted what people would want

in the future and how they would behave.

But the biggest change was to politics.

In a world where the overriding aim was now stability, politics became just part

of a wider system of managing the world.

The old idea of democratic politics, that it gave a voice to the weak against

the powerful, was eroded.

And a resentment began to quietly grow out on the edges of society.

But the new system did have a dangerous flaw.

Because in the real world, not everything can be predicted by reading

the past.

And someone who was about to discover that, to his own cost, was Donald Trump.

One day, a man called Jeff Markham received a phone call.

It was from Donald Trump.

and Trump was desperate for help.

Markham was a strange, mysterious figure.

He had been a nuclear scientist in the 1950s and studied the effect of

from nuclear weapons on the human body.

Then Markham had gone to Las Vegas and become obsessed by gambling.

He had a photographic memory and he used it to instantly process the data of the

games as they were played.

From that, he could predict the outcome.

And he always won.

The Las Vegas gangsters were fascinated by him.

They called him the automat.

Donald Trump was one of the heroes of the age.

But in reality, much of his success was a facade.

The banks that had lent Trump millions had discovered that he could no longer

pay the interest on the loans.

Trump's empire was facing bankruptcy.

His wife, Ivana, hated him because he was having an affair with Miss Hawaiian

Tropic, 1985.

And then, a famous Japanese gambler called Akio Kashiwagi came to one of

casinos and started to win millions of dollars in an extraordinary run of luck.

Trump, who was desperate for money...

as day after day he watched millions being siphoned out of his casino.

So he turned for help to Jess Markham.

Markham came to Trump's casino in Atlantic City.

He analysed all the data about the way that Kashiwagi had been playing.

He then told Trump to suggest a particular high -stakes game that he

Japanese gambler could not resist.

His model, Markham said, predicted that Kashiwagi had to lose.

And after five agonising days, he did.

Kashiwagi lost $10 million and he gave up.

Donald Trump was elated.

He thought he'd got his money back.

Before Kashiwagi could pay his debt, he was hacked to death in his kitchen by

Yakuza gangsters.

And Donald Trump didn't get his money.

Trump's business went bankrupt, and he was forced to sell most of his buildings

to the banks.

And he married Miss Hawaiian Tropic.

In the future, he would sell his name to other people to put on their buildings.

And he himself... would become a celebrity tycoon.

President Assad didn't want stability.

He wanted revenge.

In December 1988, a bomb exploded on a Pan Am plane over Lockerbie in Scotland.

Almost immediately, investigators and journalists pointed the finger at Syria.

The bombing had been done, they said, in revenge for the Americans shooting down

of an Iranian airliner in the Gulf a few months before.

And for 18 months, everyone agreed that this was the truth.

But then a strange thing happened.

The security agencies said that they had been wrong.

It hadn't been Syria at all.

It was Libya who had been behind the Lockerbie bombing.

But many journalists and politicians did not believe it.

They were convinced that the switch had happened for the most cynical of

reasons.

That America and Britain desperately needed Assad as an ally in the coming

War against Saddam Hussein.

So once again...

They blamed Colonel Gaddafi as the terrorist mastermind.

Syria, of course, was unfortunately accused of many terrorist outrage and of

harbouring terrorist groups.

It appears that we have now restored relations with them, as have the

They are now our friends, although we get no real assurances on the past

whatsoever. It strikes me as very strange indeed that many of the things

thought were previously the responsibility of Syria have now

the responsibility of Libya.

But Assad was not really in control, because he had released forces that no

would be able to control.

The force that ten years before he had brought from Iran to attack the West,

human bomb, is now about to jump, like a virus, from Shia to Sunni Islam.

In December 1992, the militant group Hamas... kidnapped an Israeli border

and stabbed him to death.

The Israeli response was overwhelming.

They arrested 415 members of Hamas, put them on buses and took them to the top

of a bleak mountain in southern Lebanon.

They left them there.

and refused to allow any humanitarian aid through.

But the Israelis had dumped the Hamas militants in an area controlled by

Hezbollah.

They spent six months there, and during that time they learnt from Hezbollah how

powerful suicide bombing could be.

Hezbollah told them how they had used it to force the Israelis out of Beirut and

back to the border.

The first sign that the idea had spread to Hamas was when a group of the

deportees marched in protest towards the Israeli border, dressed as martyrs, as

the Israelis shelled them.

But it soon became more than just theatre.

Hamas began a wave of suicide attacks in Israel.

Just before nine, at the height of Tel Aviv's rush hour, the bomb ripped apart

commuter bus.

An amateur cameraman recorded the scene in the moments afterward as a dazed

woman was helped out of the smouldering wreckage.

I didn't want to believe that under my house there is a bomb.

And when I realised it's a bomb, I started to cry because it was

the first time I saw it in Tel Aviv.

Hamas sent the bombers into the heart of Israeli cities to blow themselves up.

and kill as many around them as possible.

In doing this, Hamas were going much further than Hezbollah ever had.

They were targeting civilians, something Hezbollah had never done.

The tactic shocked the Sunni world.

This was something completely alien to its history.

Not only did the Koran forbid suicide, but Sunni Islam did not have any rituals

of self -sacrifice, unlike the Shias.

The most senior religious leader in Saudi Arabia insisted it was wrong.

But a mainstream theologian from Egypt, called Sheikh Karadawi, seized the

moment.

He issued a fatwa that justified the attacks.

And, he added, it was also justified to kill civilians.

Because in Israel, everyone, including women, serve as a reserve.

So really, they are all part of the enemy army.

It's not suicide.

It is martyrdom in the name of God.

Islamic theologians and jurisprudence have debated this issue.

Israeli women are not like women in our society because Israeli women are

militarized.

Secondly, I consider this type of martyrdom operation as indication of

of Allah Almighty.

Allah is just.

Through His infinite wisdom, He has given the weak, what the strong do not

possess, and that is the ability to turn their bodies into bombs like the

Palestinians do.

Hamas kept sending the bombs into Israel, sometimes day after day.

The horror overwhelmed Israeli society, and it completely destroyed the ability

of politics to solve the Palestinian crisis.

Instead, in the Israeli election of 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu took power.

He turned against the peace process, which was exactly what Hamas wanted.

And from then on, the two sides became locked together in ever more horrific

cycles of vows.

The human boss had destroyed the very thing that President Assad had first

wanted, the real political solution to the Palestinian question.

It was just after one o 'clock and the market was full of shoppers.

Streams of ambulances came to carry away the dead and the injured.

It was a place of appalling suffering.

But even with the first grief came the immediate political impact on the peace

process. It's impossible.

This moment, it will be the end, must be the end of this bloody peace process.

And in America, all optimistic visions of the future had also disappeared.

Instead, everyone in society, not just the politicians, but the scientists, the

journalists and all kinds of experts, had begun to focus on the dangers that

might be hidden in the future.

This, in turn, created a pessimistic mood that then began to spread out from

rational technocratic world and infect the whole of the culture.

and everyone became possessed by dark foreboding, imagining the very worst

might happen.

Dream,

baby, dream.

Dream, baby, dream.

Dream, baby, dream.

is oh

Oh, you never dream.

You never dream. You never dream. You never,

you never, you never, you never, you never dream.

Why you keep that.

I got to keep that.

The attacks in September 2001 were suicide bombs, but now on a huge scale.

They demonstrated the terrifying power of this new force to penetrate all the

fences.

They had come to kill thousands of Americans on their own soul.

Twenty years before, President Reagan had been confronted by the first suicide

bombers.

They had been unleashed by President Assad of Syria to force America out of

Middle East.

But rather than confront the complexity of Syria and Israel and the Palestinian

problem, America had retreated and left Syria and suicide bombing to

fester and mutate.

They had gone instead for Colonel Gaddafi.

and turned him into an evil global terrorist.

But in the process, this changed the way people saw and understood terrorism.

Instead of a violence born out of political struggles for power, it became

replaced by a much simpler image of an evil tyrant at the head of a rogue

who became more like an arch -criminal who wanted to terrorise the world.

All the politics and power dropped away.

The problem was just them and their evil personalities.

And after 9 -11, this led to a new and equally simple idea.

That if only you could remove these tyrannical figures, then the grateful

of their country would transform naturally into a democracy.

Because they would be free of the evil.

We owe it to the future of civilization not to allow the world's

worst leaders to develop and deploy and therefore blackmail free -loving

countries with the world's worst weapons.

We know they've already got chemical and biological weapons there. We know that

they're certainly doing their best to acquire nuclear weapons technology. If

allow them to do that... and do nothing about it, then I think later generations

will consider us deeply irresponsible.

Both Tony Blair and George Bush became possessed by the idea of ridding the

world of Saddam Hussein.

So possessed that they believed any story that proved his evil intentions.

And the line between reality and fiction became ever more blurred.

In September 2002, the head of MI6 rushed to Downing Street.

to tell Blair excitedly that they had finally found the source that confirmed

everything.

The source, he said, had direct access to Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons

programme, which was making vast quantities of VX and sarin nerve agents.

The nerve agents were being loaded into linked hollow glass spheres.

But then someone in MI6 noticed that the detail the source was describing was

identical to scenes in the 1996 movie The Rock, starring Sean Connery and

Nicolas Cage.

A really elegant string of pearls configuration.

Unfortunately, incredibly unstable.

And what exactly does this stuff do?

It's what the rocket renders an aerosol and can take out the entire city of

people.

How? The cholinesterase inhibitor.

It stops the brain from sending nerve messages down the spinal cord. A later

report into the Iraq war pointed out glass containers were not typically used

chemical munitions.

Seizes your nervous system. Do not move that!

And the informant had obviously seen a popular movie known as The Rock that had

inaccurately depicted nerve agents being carried in glass beads or spheres. Your

skin melts off.

My God.

That there is a threat from Saddam Hussein.

and the weapons of mass destruction that he has acquired, is not in doubt at

all.

Hafez al -Assad had died in 2000.

His son Bashar became the new president of Syria.

But he couldn't escape the inexorable logic of what his father had started.

Twenty years before, his father had sent Shiite suicide bombers to attack the

Americans in Lebanon.

Now, as America and Britain invaded Iraq, Bashar decided that he would copy

father.

But what he was about to let loose would tear the Arab world apart, and then

come back to try to destroy him.

Bashar Assad was never supposed to have been present.

It was always going to have been his elder brother, Basil.

But then Basil had died in a car crash.

So now, Bashar took over the giant palace that his father had built above

Damascus.

Up to this point, Bashar had not been interested in politics.

He was fascinated by computers.

He founded the Syrian Computer Society and brought the Internet to the country.

His favourite band was the Electric Light Orchestra.

But now he was president.

And he set out to attack America.

Bashar Assad was convinced that the invasion of Iraq was just the first step

a plot by the Western powers to take over the whole of the Middle East.

He knew that the invasion had outraged many of the radical Islamists in Syria,

and what they most wanted to do was to go to Iraq and kill Americans.

So Bashar instructed the Syrian intelligence services to help them do

Syrian agents... set up a pipeline that began to feed thousands of militants

across the border and into the heart of the insurgency.

And it grew.

Within a year, almost all the foreign fighters from across the world were

through Syria.

And they brought the suicide bombing with them.

The Americans estimated that 90 % of the suicide bombers in Iraq were foreign

fighters.

But it began to run out of control.

Most of the jihadists had joined the group al -Qaeda in Iraq, that then

to killing Shiites in an attempt to create a civil war.

And the force that had originally been invented by the Shiites, suicide

now returned and started to kill them.

Then this.

A moment of silence before people realised what was happening.

A few seconds ago we just had repeated explosions in the street below me.

People are now fleeing in terror from the central square around the mosque.

This is what everybody feared. We just heard another explosion in the distance.

That somebody would try to target this religious festival to try to bring about

a sectarian conflict in Iraq.

There was panic, a terrified stampede.

But some of these people were running into the next bomb.

We counted at least six separate explosions.

Tony Blair and George Bush were faced by disaster.

Iraq was imploding, while at home they were being accused of lying to their own

people to justify the invasion.

What they desperately needed was something that would show that the

having a good effect in the Arab world.

So they made an extraordinary decision.

They turned for help to the man who they had always insisted... was one of the

world's most dangerous tyrants, Colonel Gaddafi.

And instead, they set out to make him their new best friend.

It was going to be the highest achievement of perception management.

A man who had been created by the West as a fake global supervillain was now

going to be turned into a fake hero of democracy.

And everyone, Not just politicians would become involved.

Public relations, academics, television presenters, spies and even musicians

were all going to help reinvent Colonel Gaddafi.

It would show just how many people in the Western establishment had by now

become the engineers of this fake world.

Ever since he had been accused of the Lockerbie bombing, Colonel Gaddafi had

been a complete outcast.

The West had imposed sanctions on Libya, and the economy was falling apart.

But then suddenly, Tony Blair broke live into the BBC evening news.

The Prime Minister, Tony Blair, is about to make a statement the BBC understands

from Downing Street. It's of international significance.

He'll be making his statement at any moment now. We can see pictures of him

Durham, Durham City. Here he is. Colonel Gaddafi has confirmed that Libya has in

the past sought to develop weapons of mass destruction capabilities.

Libya has now declared its intention to dismantle its weapons of mass

destruction completely.

This decision by Colonel Gaddafi.

It's an historic one and a courageous one, and I applaud it. Today in Tripoli,

the leader of Libya, Colonel Muammar al -Qadhafi,

publicly confirmed his commitment to disclose and dismantle

all weapons of mass destruction programs in his country.

Colonel Gaddafi now became, for Western politicians, a heroic figure.

His decision to give up his weapons of mass destruction

seemed to prove that the invasion of Iraq could transform the Middle East.

And Tony Blair travelled to meet Gaddafi in his desert tent, to welcome him

back into what one journalist called the community of civilised nations.

But as in the past, Nothing was what it deemed with Colonel Gaddafi.

In reality, Gaddafi did not really have the terrifying weapons of mass

destruction that he was promising to destroy.

His nuclear program had stuttered to a halt long ago, and never produced

anything dangerous.

He had managed to buy some equipment on the black market, but his technicians

had been unable to assemble it.

His biological weapons were non -existent.

All he had was some old mustard gas in leaking barrels.

But now, he had to pretend to have a terrifying arsenal of weapons.

And the West had to pretend that they had avoided another global threat.

And then the made -up stories became even more complicated.

As part of the deal, the West said that if Gaddafi admitted that Libya had done

the Lockheed bombing, then they would lift the sanctions.

But many of those who had investigated Lockerbie were still convinced that

hadn't done it, that really it had been Syria.

But Colonel Gaddafi confessed.

His son Saif was interviewed about this confession.

He said that his father was simply pretending that he had been behind the

Lockerbie bombing to get the sanctions lifted, that new lies were being built

top of old lies, to construct a completely make -believe world.

You have to accept, or you had to accept at that time, a responsibility because

you have to accept responsibilities, you have to pay compensation in order to

get rid of the sanction.

It means we did that not because we are convinced that we did it, but because to

find an exit out of this nightmare.

So what you're saying is that you accept responsibility, but you're not

admitting that you did it? Yes.

And this is all a sham, you're saying, just to get sanctions over with so that

you can start normal diplomatic relations with the West.

Okay. What's wrong with that?

It's a very cynical way to behave as a country, isn't it?

Many people would say.

First of all,

I mean, the Americans in the British, they told us to write that letter.

They told us to pay compensation.

And then they opened their embassies and they restored the relation and they

came to us.

It was their game, not our game.

Public

relations

companies then came to Libya to do what they called... reframing the narrative.

One firm was paid $3 million to turn Gaddafi into what they described as a

modern world thinker.

They did this by bringing other famous world thinkers and TV

presenters out to Libya to meet the colonel and discuss his theories.

Hello and welcome to Libya.

In the global age, a conversation with Muammar Gaddafi. But

first, let's get the story so far of Libya.

One world thinker was called Lord Anthony Giddens.

Coincidentally, he had a theory which he called the third way, which had

inspired Tony Blair.

Colonel Gaddafi's own theory was called the third universal theory.

Lord Giddens later wrote about his talks with the Libyan leader.

Colonel Gaddafi likes my term, the third way, because his own political

philosophy is a version of this idea.

He makes many intelligent and perceptive points.

I leave enlivened and encouraged.

After 40 years, the leader of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi. And then Colonel

achieved his lifelong dream.

He was invited to address the United Nations.

He spent almost two hours explaining his third universal theory and also

demanded an investigation into the shootings of President Kennedy and

Luther King.

When he was in New York, Gaddafi was offered a tent, just like the one he had

home, in the gardens of a grand mansion.

The man who made the offer was Donald Trump.

We're not done with everybody.

Excuse me. I rented him a piece of land. He paid me more for one night than the

land was worth for the whole year or for two years.

And then I didn't let him use the land. That's what we should be doing.

I don't want to use the word screw, but I screwed him. That's what we should be

doing.

People in Britain and America now began to turn away from politics.

The effect of the Iraq war had been very powerful.

Not only did millions of people feel that they had been lied to over the

of mass destruction, but there was a deeper feeling that whatever they did or

said had no effect, that despite the mass protests and the fears and the

warnings, the war had happened anyway.

Liberals? Radicals and a whole new generation of young people retreated.

They turned instead to another world that was free of this hypocrisy and the

corruption of politics.

They went into cyberspace.

our cyber space had become even more sophisticated and responsive to human

interaction.

The online world was full of algorithms that could analyse and predict human

behaviour.

The man behind much of this was a scientist called Judea Pearl.

He was the godfather of modern artificial intelligence.

Pearl's breakthrough had been to use what were called Bayesian belief

They were systems that could predict behaviour.

even when the information was incomplete.

But to make the system work, Pearl and others had imported a model of human

beings drawn from economics.

They created what were called rational agents, software that mimicked human

beings, but in a very simplified form.

The model assumed that the agent would always act rationally in order to get

what it wanted, nothing more.

One of the early utopians of cyberspace, Jaron Lanier, warned of the

implications of this.

The agent's model of what you are interested in will always be a cartoon

And in return, you will see a cartoon version of the world through the agent's

eyes.

And, he added, it will never be clear who they are working for.

You.

Or someone else?

New technology began to allow people to upload millions of images and videos

into cyberspace.

And the web, which up to that point had seemed like an abstract other world,

began to look and feel like the real world.

From videos of animals, personal moments of experience, extraordinary events, to

horrific terror videos, more and more is uploaded.

And in a strange, sad twist,

The first terrorist beheading video that was posted online was that of Judea

Pearl's own son, Daniel Pearl.

He was a journalist for the Wall Street Journal and had been kidnapped by

radical Islamists in Pakistan.

They recorded what they said was his confession and then his killing.

My name is Daniel Pearl.

I'm a Jewish -American.

I come from a...

This was a new world that the old systems of power

found it very difficult to deal with.

In the wake of the 9 -11 attacks, the security agencies secretly collected

from millions of people online.

One programme was called Optic Nerve.

It took stills from the webcam conversations of millions of people

world, trying to spot terrorists planning another attack.

The programme did not discover a single terrorist, but it did discover something

else.

A top -secret assessment said...

Unfortunately, there are issues with undesirable images within the data.

It would appear that a surprising number of people are using webcam

conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person.

Also, the fact that the software allows more than one person to view a webcam

stream means that it appears to be being used to broadcast pornography.

But increasingly, people were using the internet in other ways to present

themselves as they wanted to be seen.

I guess a video blog is about me.

I don't really want to tell you where I live because you could, like, stalk me.

The web drew people in because it was mesmerising.

It was somewhere that you could explore and get lost in in any way you wanted.

But behind the screen... Like in a two -way mirror, the simplified agents were

watching and predicting and guiding your hand on the mouse.

Stop. I nearly threw my phone away. Stop.

Stop. Pose. Pose. Snap a selfie.

There you go.

My name is Sweetie.

The man asked me to take off my clothes.

They undress.

They play with themselves.

But what they don't know, I'm not real.

I'm a computer model made piece by piece to track down these men who

do this.

As the intelligence systems online gathered ever more data, new forms of

guidance began to emerge.

Social media created filters, complex algorithms that looked at what

liked and then fed more of the same back to them.

In the process, individuals began to move, without noticing, into bubbles

isolated them from enormous amounts of other information.

They only heard and saw what they liked.

And the news feeds increasingly excluded anything that might challenge people's

pre -existing beliefs.

Thank you.

The version of cyberspace that was rising up seemed to be very much like

Gibson's original vision.

That behind the superficial freedoms of the web were a few giant corporations

with opaque systems that controlled what people saw and shaped what they

thought.

And what was even more mysterious was how they made their decisions about what

you should like and what should be hidden from you.

But then, the other utopian vision of cyberspace re -emerged.

After the financial crash of 2008, the politicians saved the banks.

But they did practically nothing about the massive corruption that was revealed

in its wake.

And the reason they gave was that it might destabilise the system.

Public anger burst out. The Occupy movement took over Wall Street and then

Senate in Washington.

The issue is that certain individuals that are very wealthy have pretty much

corrupted our political system.

And this is, like, the heart of it. I mean, this is a Senate building. These

people have been cut off, and they've basically corrupted our democracy, and

it's literally killing people.

I'm an Iraqi war vet. I went to Iraq in 2009.

I see what happens firsthand when we let corruption rule our government and our

democracy, and we're coming here today basically just a way of the rareness.

What drove the Occupy movement was the original dream of the Internet that

people like John Perry Barlow had outlined in the early 1990s.

In his declaration of the independence of cyberspace, Marlow had described a

world, free of politics and the old hierarchies of power.

A space where people connected together as equals in a network and built a new

society without leaders.

Now, the Occupy movement set out to build that kind of society in the real

world.

The camps were to be the models.

All the meetings used the idea of the human microphone.

People throughout the crowd repeated a speaker's words so everyone could hear

them. We are now going to vote on whether to stay here for the next two

hours or leave now.

But if someone wanted to challenge the speaker, the human amplifiers also had

repeat their words.

so their voice had equal power.

What's he said?

What's he said?

What's that?

What's that?

The proposal... Each person was an autonomous individual who expressed what

believed. But together, they became components in a network that organised

itself through the feedback of information around the system.

You could organise people without the exercise of power.

Then, almost immediately, the Arab Spring began.

The first revolution started in Tunisia, but it quickly spread to Egypt.

On January 25th, 2011, thousands of Egyptians came out in groups across

and then started moving towards Tahrir Square.

It seemed like a spontaneous uprising, but the internet had played a key role

organising the groups.

One of the main activists was an Egyptian computer engineer called Wahil

He worked with Google in Egypt, but he had also set up the Facebook site that

played the key role in organising the first protest.

As hundreds of thousands took over Tahrir Square, Ghanim gave an interview

Egyptian TV.

They used to call us, in the days of Khaled Saeed's protests, the first time

went out, the low rate on Facebook, the one that makes a lot of noise. Don't you

believe that these guys came down with tens of thousands on the 25th?

So please, guys, there are no heroes.

The heroes are the people on the street. The heroes are everyone among us. There

is no one, there is no one today, the one who rides the horse is the one who

hits the fence and moves people. Yes, someone is laughing at you and telling

this.

But Ghanim was also overwhelmed by the power this new technology had, that a

computer engineer with a keyboard could call out thousands of people, some of

whom then died in the midst of the protest.

Many liberals in the West saw this as proof of the revolutionary power of the

Internet.

Again, it seemed to be able to organize a revolution.

without leaders.

A revolution powerful enough to topple a brutal dictator who had been backed by

America and the West for 30 years.

But the internet radicals were not the only ones who saw their dreams being

fulfilled in the Arab Spring.

Many of the political leaders of the West also enthusiastically supported the

revolutions.

because it seemed to fit with their simple idea of regime change.

It might have failed in Iraq, but now the people everywhere were rising up to

rid themselves of the evil tyrants, and democracy would flourish.

So when an uprising began in Libya, Britain, France and America supported

And suddenly, Colonel Gaddafi stopped being a hero of the West.

All the politicians and the public relations people and the academics who

all promoted him as a global thinker suddenly disappeared.

And Gaddafi became yet again an evil dictator who had to be overthrown.

His son Saeed said, The way these people are dethoning me and my father is

disgusting.

Just a few months ago, we were being treated as honoured friends.

Now that rebels are threatening our country, these cowards are turning on

Colonel Gaddafi retreated to the ruins of the house that the Americans had

bombed 30 years before.

and addressed the world.

Those who love Muammar Gaddafi, Muammar Gaddafi is the glory.

If I had a position, if I were a president, I would have resigned.

I would have thrown my resignation in your face. But I have no position,

no post.

I have nowhere to resign from. I have my gun. I have my rifle to fight for

Libya.

Withdraw your children from the street.

Take your children back.

They are dragging your children, they're making your children drunk, and they're

sending them to hell.

Your children will die.

What for?

In November 2011, a large convoy was spotted driving at high speed away from

Colonel Gaddafi's hometown of Thirt.

An American drone, controlled from a shed outside Las Vegas, was sent to

it.

The operator fired a missile at the lead car of the

convoy.

Gaddafi then fled, looking for shelter from the oncoming rebel forces.

He hid under the road in a drainage pipe.

But instead of becoming a democracy, Libya began to descend into chaos.

And the other revolutions were also failing.

The Occupy camps had become trapped in endless meetings.

And it became clear that there was a terrible confusion at the heart of the

movement. The radicals had believed that if they could create a new way of

organising people, then a new society would emerge.

But what they did not have was a picture of what that society would be like, a

vision of the future.

The truth was that their revolution was not about an idea.

It was about how you manage things.

And those who had started the revolution in Egypt came face to face with the

same terrible fact.

Social media had helped to bring people together in Tahrir Square.

But once there, the internet gave no clue as to what kind of new society they

could create in Egypt.

The movement stalled.

And a group that did have a powerful idea, the Muslim Brotherhood, rushed in

fill the vacuum.

The Brotherhood took power in an election, and one of them, Mohamed

became president.

The Liberals and the left were shocked, and bit by bit they turned back to the

military, protesting, asking them to fave the revolution from being captured

Idlimith.

In the spring of 2013, the military took action.

They arrested the president and killed hundreds of his supporters who

And an extraordinary spectacle unfolded in Tahrir Square.

Thousands of the liberal activists who had begun the revolution two years

before, summoned by social media, now welcomed the military back by waving

laser pens at the helicopters flying overhead.

The crowd had been summoned there once again by Facebook.

After the failure of the revolutions, it was not just the radicals. No one in

the West had any idea of how to change the world.

At home, the politicians had given so much of their power away to finance and

the ever -growing managerial bureaucracies that they, in effect, had

managers themselves.

While abroad, all their adventures had failed.

and their simplistic vision of the world had been exposed as dangerous and

destructive.

But in Russia, there was a group of men who had seen how this very lack of

belief in politics and dark uncertainty about the future could work to their

advantage.

What they had done was turn politics into a strange theatre, where nobody

what was true or what was fake any longer.

They were called political technologists and they were the key figures behind

President Putin.

They had kept him in power, unchallenged, for 15 years.

Some of them had been dissidents back in the 1970s and had been powerfully

influenced by the science fiction writings of the Strugatsky brothers.

20 years later, when Russia fell apart after the end of communism, they rose up

and took control of the media.

and they used it to manipulate the electrode on a vast scale.

For them, reality was just something that could be manipulated and shaped

anything you wanted it to be.

But then a technologist emerged who went much further, and his ideas would

become central to Putin's grip on power.

He was called Vladislav Surkov.

Surkov came originally from the theatre world, and those who have studied his

career say that what he did was take avant -garde ideas from the theatre and

bring them into the heart of politics.

Surkov's aim was not just to manipulate people, but to go deeper.

and play with and undermine their very perception of the world, so they are

never sure what is really happening.

Surkov turned Russian politics into a bewildering, constantly changing piece

theatre.

He used Kremlin money to sponsor all kinds of groups, from mass anti -fascist

youth organisations to the very opposite, neo -Nazi skinheads.

and liberal human rights groups, who then attacked the government.

Surkov even backed whole political parties that were opposed to President

But the key thing was that Surkov then let it be known that this was what he

doing, which meant that no one was sure what was real or what was fake in modern

Russia.

As one journalist put it, it's a strategy of power.

that keeps any opposition constantly confused.

A ceaseless shape -shifting that is unstoppable because it is indefinable.

Meanwhile, real power was elsewhere, hidden away behind the stage, exercised

without anyone seeing it.

And then the same thing seemed to start happening.

in the West.

By now, it was becoming ever more clear that the system had deep flaws.

Every month, there were new revelations of most of the bank's involvement in

global corruption, of massive tax avoidance by all the major corporations,

the secret surveillance of everyone's emails by the National Security Agency.

Yet no one was prosecuted, except for a few people at the lowest levels.

And behind it all, the massive inequality kept on growing.

Yet the structure of power remained the same.

Nothing ever changed.

Because nothing could be allowed to destabilize the system.

But then, the shape -shifting began.

Thank you very much. So nice.

So amazing.

So amazing.

What? That's OK. I love you more, OK?

The campaign that Donald Trump ran was unlike anything before in politics.

Nothing was fixed.

What he said, who he attacked and how he attacked them was constantly changing

and shifting.

Trump attacked his Republican rivals as being all part of a broken and corrupt

system. A politics where everyone could be bought.

using words that could have come from the Occupy movement.

You've also donated to several Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton

Nancy Pelosi.

You explained away those donations saying you did that to get business

favors. And you said recently, quote, when you give, they do whatever the hell

you want them to do. You better believe it. So what specifically did they do?

If I ask them, if I need them, you know, most of the people on this stage I've

given to, just so you understand, a lot of money. I will tell you that our

system is broken.

I give to many people before this, before two months ago, I was a

give to everybody when they call. I give. And you know what? When I need

something from them two years later, three years later, I call them. They are

there for me. So that's a broken system.

But at the same time.

Trump used the language of the extreme racist right in America, connecting the

people's darkest fears, pushing them and bringing those fears out into the open.

Many of the facts that Trump asserted were also completely untrue.

But Trump didn't care.

He and his audience knew that much of what he said bore little relationship to

reality.

This meant that Trump defeated journalists, because the journalists'

belief was that their job was to expose lies and assert the truth.

With Trump, this became irrelevant.

Not surprisingly, Vladimir Putin admired this.

But it's not our job to determine his dignity, it's the job of the voters of

United States. But he is an absolute leader, we see today, in the

race. He says that he wants to move to a different level of relations, a more

dense, deeper level of relations with Russia. But can we not

welcome this? Of course, we welcome it. As for the internal political things...

The Liberals were outraged by Trump, but they expressed their anger in

cyberspace, so it had no effect, because the algorithms made sure that they only

spoke to people who already agreed with them.

Instead, ironically, their waves of angry messages and tweets benefited the

large corporations who ran the social media platforms.

One online analyst put it simply, angry people click more.

It meant that the radical fury that came like waves across the Internet no

longer had the power to change the world.

Instead, it was becoming a fuel.

that was feeding the new systems of power and making them ever more

But none of the liberals could possibly imagine that Donald Trump could ever win

the nomination.

It was just a giant pantomime.

And then, of course, there's Donald Trump.

Donald Trump has been saying that he will run for president as a Republican,

which is surprising, since I just assumed he was running as a joke.

Donald Trump often appears on Fox, which is ironic because a fox often appears

on Donald Trump's head.

Donald Trump owns the Miss USA pageant, which is great for

Republicans because it will streamline their search for a vice president.

Donald Trump said recently he has a great relationship with the blacks,

unless the blacks are a family of white people, I bet he's mistaken.

But underneath the liberal disdain, both Donald Trump in America and Vladislav

Surkov in Russia had realized the same thing.

that the version of reality that politics presented was no longer

that the stories politicians told their people about the world had stopped

making sense.

And in the face of that, you could play with reality, constantly shifting and

changing, and in the process, further undermine and weaken the old forms of

power.

And there was another force that was about to dramatically reveal just how

politics had become in the West.

Syria.

So the attack happened here at a central police station in Damascus. Police say

the bomber came up the stairs.

Police then opened fire and then police say he detonated the explosives.

And the damage is here to see. Behind me, the pockmarked walls where the ball

bearings hit.

Blood splattered on the walls.

And the force of the blast caused walls to collapse and everything

It's topsy -turvy, everything destroyed.

By now, Syria was being torn apart by a horrific civil war.

What had started as part of the Arab Spring had turned into a vicious battle

the death between Bashar Assad and his opponents.

And at the heart of the conflict was the force that his father had first brought

to the West, suicide bombing.

Back in the 1980s, Bashar Assad's father had seen suicide bombing as a weapon he

could use to force the Americans out of the Middle East.

But over the next 30 years, it had shifted and mutated into something that

now ended up doing the very opposite, tearing the Arab world apart.

Hafez al -Assad's dream of a powerful and united Arab world was now destroyed.

In Iraq, extremist Sunni groups had used suicide bombing as a way to start a

sectarian war.

And now, groups like ISIS brought the same techniques into Syria to attack not

just Assad's son, but his fellow Shias.

And like his father, Bashar Assad retaliated with a vengeful fury, and the

country fell apart.

My fellow Americans, tonight I want to talk to you about Syria, why it matters,

and where we go from here.

Faced by the war, Western politicians were bewildered.

They insisted that Bashar Assad was evil.

But then it turned out that his enemies were more evil and more horrific than

him. The question before the House today is how we keep the British people safe

from the threat posed by ISIL.

This is not about whether we want to fight terrorism, it's about how best we

that.

So Britain, America and France decided to bomb the terrorist threat.

The effect of that was to help keep Assad in power.

Then it became more confusing.

Suddenly, the Russians intervened.

President Putin sent hundreds of planes and combat troops to support Assad.

But no -one knew what their underlying aim was.

They seemed to be using a strategy that Vladislav Surkov had developed in the

Ukraine.

He called it non -linear warfare.

It was a new kind of war, where you never know what the enemy are really up

The underlying aim, Surkov said... was not to win the war, but to use the

conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception in order to

manage and control.

In March

2016, the Russians

suddenly announced with a great fanfare that they were leaving Syria.

And a concert was held in the ruins of Palmyra.

to celebrate the withdrawal.

But in reality, the Russians never left.

But they are still there, and still no -one knows what they really want.

And

within

Syria, there was a new Islamist ideologist who was determined to exploit

growing uncertainties in Europe and America.

He was called Abu Musab al -Suri, the Syrian.

Al -Suri had originally worked with

Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan, but he had turned against him.

Al -Suri gave lectures that had a powerful effect on the Islamist

He argued that bin Laden had been wrong to attack the West head -on because it

created a massive military response that had almost destroyed Islamism.

Instead, al -Suri said, independent groups or individuals should stage

small -scale attacks on civilians in Europe and America.

The aim was to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt and undermine the already

failing authority of Western politicians.

The effect of the attacks shocked Europe and America and gave powerful force to

the new politics of uncertainty and anxiety.

I'm sure that you with me share the absolute horror and total

revulsion at what happened in Paris last Friday.

And I'm afraid there is, and we have to be honest and frank about this.

and talk about these things without being fearful, there is a problem with

of the Muslim community in this country.

There is a problem, and we have to be honest about it. Our politicians, I'm

afraid, haven't had the guts.

This could be the great Trojan horse of all time.

Because you look at the migration, study it, look at it.

Now they'll start infiltrating with women and children.

Both the Brexit campaign in Britain and Donald Trump in America did exactly what

al -Suri had predicted.

They used the fear to dramatize a world where everything, even going to a

restaurant, had become a risky event.

And what had been seen as doomed campaigns on the fringes of society that

never win became frighteningly real.

I am genuinely freaked out right now about this whole Brexit thing.

Because we'd all been told that it wasn't going to happen. Like it was

away. It was going away from Brexiting and on to the staying.

And because I had this like bedrock belief. I have friends who like live and

work in London. They said, oh, don't worry. We're very sensible people.

This isn't going to happen. It's a lot of talk, but we don't do that sort of

stuff here.

They were wrong.

And that really kind of crushes my view.

of what can happen that is bad that we don't think is going to happen.

It's just not supposed to happen.

a fascist group in Europe again.

And I genuinely never thought it would be my country.

I thought it would be America.

I thought America was the people who were so built to hate.

I'm so disappointed.

I'm so hurt.

You must think my bed's above dark.

The way you come and go.

I see you with the lights on.

Two nights in a row.

To pack your...

Don't help me set the table, cause now

there's one left place.

I won't blame Mama Silver for a man

who won't say grace.

Who not?

Thank you.