All language subtitles for The War on Children (2024) ENG

O beatiful, for spacious skies,

For amber waves of grain.

America, America,

God shed His grace on thee,

From sea to shining sea.

You'll hear some say ignorance is bliss.

If you prefer that ignorant bliss,
then now's the time to turn the TV off,

because you'll have
no excuse left by the

end of this to not
take your rightful place,

as a warrior protecting and
preparing the next generation.

We're the Starbucks.

We left the entertainment business because
we knew that a silent war was being fought

for the minds of America's children.

And we knew that nothing would matter
more than exposing it and stopping it.

That's why we're here now
to expose the war on children.

How long has this been going on?
How did it happen? Who's responsible?

How far down the rabbit
hole does this all go?

We know it's overwhelming,
so let's start here.

First, you need to
understand that one of the most

effective forms of
normalizing the woke agenda

is via something called
the mere exposure effect.

The mere exposure effect is a
psychological phenomenon by which people

tend to develop a
preference for things or people

that are more familiar
to them than others.

That means the more you
show someone something,

the more they start
to like it or prefer it.

This psychological mere exposure
effect is the reason society is now flooded

with imagery of what
would have been considered

fringe by most people
only ten years ago.

I was a director in Hollywood
for some of the biggest stars,

so I speak from experience when I
tell you that the mere exposure effect

is how the media creates
the reality we live in.

Simply exposing the public to fringe
concepts makes us normalize things

that have never been
considered normal before.

This social engineering is how you
make people see theories as facts,

facts as theories, opinions
as violence, silence as safety,

and men is fully able to become
women with the snap of their fingers.

With the power of the mere exposure effect,
you can make almost anyone believe anything

with enough pressure and exposure.

This makes it one of the most
dangerous weapons the kids face today.

For instance, you might
be wondering why some

politicians propose
seemingly ludicrous bills

like the one in Michigan
threatening people with

five years in prison for
misgendering someone.

It's not because they believe
they can get away with it now.

It's because they
understand the process of

normalizing prison over
pronoun violations today

so that it can become a reality in
the future for the next generation.

The mere exposure effect is why the concept
of putting a screen in front of your child

as a babysitter became normal.

You saw people do it on TV
when they were exhausted.

You saw it in commercials.

You saw it on social media,
and then finally, it was normal.

The mere exposure effect
is also why Hollywood

is flooding children's
shows with woke agendas

and sexual content, while most
parents aren't looking because

they have a trust bond with
the shows they watched as a kid.

I am Gonzarella, calling me a
she or a he doesn't feel right to me.

I'm sorry, I used the
wrong name and pronouns.

Hey, Blue.

The mere exposure
effect is why scholastic is

featuring books pushing
transgender ideology on kids.

It's why Bugs Bunny was
naked at a pride parade.

It's why kids are bombarded with

pharmaceutical ads on
nearly every TV station.

It's why the White House is flying a trans
flag at the center of their flag display

and it's why nearly every corporation
and sports team on the planet

feels the need to create a custom
pride logo that they use every June.

It's why the Washington
Post ran a piece

encouraging kids to
see kink at pride parades,

and the New York Times ran
a film review lamenting that the

new Little Mermaid didn't
have enough kink for their liking.

It's why Target is selling trans pride
toddler onesies and tuck-it swimsuits,

and it's why they did TV shows and magazine
covers to normalize sex changes for kids.

But never did a show recover
updating you that those kids no longer

identify as the sex they pretended
to be on the shows or covers.

So why would corporations
take part in this effort

to destroy the fabric
of reality as we know it?

To find out, we sat
down with Justin Danhoff.

He's a Wall Street expert who's made
it his mission to answer this question.

So how did Wokeness
take over corporate America?

It was a tripart takeover. It was bottom
up, it was top down, and it was outside in.

Top down, if you look at the
banking industry, if you look

at the past political affiliations
of the board members,

it's over 80% leaning to the
left as opposed to the right.

So there's no longer a balance at the
top. What do I mean when I say bottom up?

The same thing that's happening on
college campus, we're now seeing on

the corporate campuses, where
conservatives, they keep their mouth shut.

The Woken employees, they feel
very empowered because they now

know the C-suite and the board
agree with their Woken positions,

and then there's the outside
in. When you talk about

companies like BlackRock,
State Street, and Vanguard,

you know, they're probably
your largest shareholder,

and they're demanding
you take certain actions.

What is ESG and how is it
used to push Woken ideology?

It is social change by changing
business behavior, by changing culture.

So I, for example, went to the shareholder
meetings of Amazon, Facebook, and Google.

At all three of those meetings, they
announced that they were adopting

affirmative action policies for the board
in reaction to shareholder proposals.

Jesse Jackson was at two of
those three meetings applauding.

And Woken shareholder
proposals important, that's

one reason. But they also
moved the cultural needle.

Fast forward three years. That's
when Goldman Sachs announced

that they were no longer going
to finance any company's IPO,

unless they had at least two diverse board
seats in the terms of affirmative action.

That's when NASDAQ put
a rule in place where they

said they are going to
delist you from the exchange.

If you don't have two
diverse boards of spots, one

for a woman, one for an
underrepresented minority.

Why is it that our kids today
are faced with pride flags

everywhere they go, no
matter what it every company.

Now to keep your perfect score on
the corporate quality index, you have

to have three events each year that
promote the LGBTQ plus community.

So, you know, you've got your Super Bowl
ads that have gotten crazy. There's one.

You get your, you know,
flag up on all of your, you

know, social media and your
website during Pride Month.

You better find a third
really quick before the year

runs out or you're going
to lose your perfect score.

What happens if a company steps out of
line and they don't do those three things?

They are tired and feathered and shamed.

As a consumer, as a
mom, it feels like corporate

America has given us
all a giant middle finger.

Are they banking on us going
back to those same buying

behaviors after these Alenciaga
and Target boycotts are over?

Yeah, they frankly are.

Talking with Justin got us thinking,
how well do we know where our money

is going when we shop at Target or
get our insurance from State Farm?

We looked and found that Target has given
over 2 million to GLSEN, an organization

that promotes schools
secretly transitioning

children and
undermining parents.

While State Farm went the
extra mile after their donation to

GLSEN by partnering with an
organization called Gender Cool.

The program that they supported gave
LGBTQ plus books to kids as young as 5

years old to introduce concepts about
gender identity and transitioning to them.

These companies aren't alone though.

A quick look at GLSEN's website
displayed sponsorships from Hollister,

Disney, PetSmart, Gucci, YouTube,
New Balance, Hulu, Amazon, Calvets,

Amazon, Calvin Klein, Nickelodeon,
Walmart, and many more.

GLSEN also supports pornographic books and
schools and opposes the removal of them.

GLSEN is only one of the
nonprofits using funds donated by

corporate America to fundamentally
change the reality we live in.

These are other groups
that many corporations

are giving money to
without your knowledge.

Even Walmart has funded drag
shows and gender ideology for kids.

Every once in a while, powerful people
pull back the curtain to expose the plan.

This video is one of those times.

In Davos a couple years ago Vice President
Biden met privately with those of us

working behind the
scenes and he sat down

with us and looked us
in the eye and he said,

you companies can do what we
government cannot and will never do.

You have to change the world on this issue.

We are committed to change the world
for LGBTI inclusion around the world.

How many companies
have signed on to that now?

270, our goal is to get many, many
more and then to work around the world.

We are bigger than most a lot of
countries. So tremendous power.

After talking to Justin,
we still had questions.

So we sat down with a
former top executive, one

of the largest ad agencies
in the world, Deutsche.

So it's Chief Creative Officer
at Deutsche. I was there for

eight years and before that I
was 12 years at TVWA Shia Day,

which is the other probably
biggest agency in the West Coast.

What does diversity equity inclusion
look like at a major ad agency?

Diversity is conformity. Equity is
unfairness and inclusion means exclusion.

Every ad is about advancing
wokeness of some kind.

We used to sit around
and say, what is our

agency stand for? What
is this brand stand for?

We're not asking that
question anymore. We stand for

diversity equity and
inclusion, which is wokenism.

Just packaged up for corporations.

Are they intentionally sexualizing our
children and stealing their innocence?

I think they're trying
to introduce the radical

gender theory, radical
gender ideology to your child.

They're using commercials
and merchandise and what

they're selling to get
your kid to believe that.

That is how advertising
works. Over time it's

building equity, brand
equity in your mind.

Fortune 500 companies, Fortune 100
companies, have decided that they're

going to indoctrinate your children
with radical gender ideology.

And that's 100% what they're
going to do and they don't

even question it. And
you should just expect that.

It just seems like there's no
moral construct at all or end to this.

No boundaries to message
sexuality to kids to the gender ideology.

If we don't speak up,
it's over real fast from

here. I don't think it's
going to take long now.

So as long as they can protect their own
kids from this insanity, they're perfectly

okay with pushing
it on unsuspecting

children whose parents
maybe aren't present.

I think that's right. I
think they feel at this

point the incentives
are greater to do that.

What do you think people
parents out there should

do to prevent this
from hurting their kids?

Basically the thing I
would tell parents is

there's an all-out
assault for the four-year,

the brains of your
children and it's coming

through every form of
media you can imagine.

And if you don't know that, you're
naive and it's going to transform

your child's mind and it won't take
long unless you guard their mind.

So what can you take away
from this? Look at the example set

this year by conservative
boycotts of Bud Light and Target.

Those companies have lost over
40 billion since the start of those

boycotts. Use your money as a weapon
to fight back and the war on children.

Go the extra mile to buy
from companies or small

businesses who aren't
pushing woke agendas.

This is key to reclaiming
America and it's a far

smaller price to pay than
our ancestors had to pay.

Know what your kids are
doing online and protect

them from the harmful
content before they see it.

Talk to your kids about how
advertisers and major corporations are

using the mere exposure effect
to change their values and beliefs.

There's power in knowing
and often you'll see that they

resent being manipulated
like this by powerful entities.

Knowledge is power and
a generation that seeks

truth is a generation
that can save America.

Every parent needs to
realize that what you've seen so

far is only one part of the
mere exposure effect that's

been driving what can only
be described as a far left

cultural revolution that's
meant to destroy our country.

But that's only part of the
story. For the revolution

to be successful, kids
are the attack point.

If this is a war on children,
then what are the weapons being

used? One of the most
destructive weapons is social media.

It's a weapon that
communist dictators like

Mao or Fidel Castro
would have blushed over.

With it, these powerful
forces have the ability to

censor what they don't want
you to know and amplify what

they want you to believe
while normalizing the social

media alone will have the
power to transform a generation.

Have children died because of social media?

Absolutely.

Have they been trafficked
off of social media?

100%.

Have they been sexually
exploited off of social media?

On going. Yes.

How did social media
influence your transition?

Well, honestly, I
didn't even know that

transition from female
to male was an option

until I was on social media and began
being exposed to those type of communities.

It just really appealed to me as a
scared, traumatized, you know, girl

going through puberty, pre-cocious
puberty, and I just clung to that idea.

What platform was the
first platform you saw it on?

Instagram, but I think
a lot of content trickled

over from Tumblr and
it was reposted there.

Did the algorithm
eventually start feeding

you this stuff in your
four U-pages and things

like that where you would immediately see
it even if you didn't follow the accounts?

I do think the algorithm
was definitely geared toward

and would recommend more
accounts and stuff like that.

There were pushing
the idea of transitioning.

Right, look at a lot of LGBT
pages and stuff like that.

It's definitely a learning,
you know, the idea

of, you know, a super
accepting, loving community.

How accepting and loving have
they been since you detransitioned?

Honestly, if anything, I
feel like I've been hushed.

I've been told I'm going to hurt trans
people by speaking about my experience.

And that I'm taking their rights away.

So they want to erase you?
That's what would make them happy.

Essentially.

At what age did you get into porn?

So I got into porn at 18
years old and up until 23.

And how did you get into it?

I came from a family, an immigrant
family, that didn't have a lot of money.

I wanted to have, you
know, financial freedom.

So for me, it was very accessible.

This social media affected your life,
your peers, and your generation as a whole.

I'm scrolling on TikTok
and I see these crazy

people putting up
the most awful things.

And I imagine I see
little kids with TikTok.

What are they looking at?

I think that we have
teenagers that grow up in

society today and they
feel heavily influenced.

Now we're going to turn to
the new warning from the certain

general this morning about growing
concerned around social media

and its impact on teens
and why these cognitive

companies for rigorous
health and safety standards.

It really is influencing our generation in
more of a negative way than a positive way

because people feel like they have
to compete with these other people.

I don't think a 10 or 11 year
old should have social media.

A child is easily influenced.

Social media addiction is a
growing concern for many parents.

In fact, according to Pew Research, 97%
of US teenagers go online every single day.

Like I'm young and I scroll through TikTok.

And I see all of these people who have
jumped on the transgender bandwagon.

Our generation is seeking affirmation
constantly and that feels good.

And I think a lot of
people are aged don't

even care whether
that's a real person or not.

Do you feel like your
fed explicit content though

as a young person by the
social media companies?

Oh definitely.

100%.

I feel like it's making it allowing
it easier to get to pornography.

You see something you can't
always like unsee it and stuff.

To their finding
this identity in social

media, in pornography,
from the LGBTQ religion.

There's a higher percentage of women
that are addicted to pornography now.

I know for myself I've fallen
victim to this type of thing.

Sometimes I'll see like a drag
queen being so sexual and gross.

And I'm like, what if the little kids
who I babysit who I see on their iPads

are going through TikTok see that?

People will get bullied if
you don't have Instagram.

TikTok.

You don't have Snapchat,
Twitter, whatever it may be.

How is it affecting your friends?

Like what have you seen from them
in terms of even changing behavior?

I saw the kids who I grew up
with turn into these transgender's.

And I would have to call them
ZZem Zerr or I got in trouble.

I've seen a steady year by year change
in their patterns and their belief system.

A friend of mine clicked
on the site, kept looking

and ended up starting
addiction to pornography.

Kyrae Chuk, the founder of Lips of TikTok,
who for a very long time was anonymous.

Nobody knew who you were.

Let's talk about how you got here.

It started during COVID time.

There were all these TikTok
videos going very viral on Twitter.

And it was mainly just COVID themed.

I saw a whole other side
to TikTok that was went

beyond the vaccine songs
and the dancing nurses.

And that was the LGBTQ activism on there.

TikTok specifically
is designed to target

young, young people
that to their audience is.

When you got on TikTok, you downloaded it.

How quickly were you service those
videos on, you know, trans content?

Right away, almost immediately.

It's the first thing that pops up.

They feed you content
about pronouns and about

transgenderism and drag
shows and all that kind of stuff.

How do you see this when
you watch these videos?

Like what is it that we're doing?

Attention and mental illness.

And what is being done by our government?

I don't see anything being done.

Having young kids on social
media is really, really dangerous.

Does something need to be
done, whether it's finding a way

to segment and remove porn
so that kids aren't exposed to it?

Definitely. I think porn should
definitely be restricted to 18-pause.

I don't think it should
be able to access porn.

Do you think that it's irresponsible
or even unethical or wrong

that social media companies
invite children at age 12 and out to

come out of their platforms
knowing that there's pornography all

over the platform and even
predators that have access to kids?

Absolutely. I feel like it
is the responsibility of all

these social media platforms
to put an age limit again.

If it would be me, it
would be 18 years old.

After that, we were curious.

Would young people today
give social media to their kids?

So would you give your
children social media?

Absolutely not.

Not at all.

No.

Absolutely not.

Definitely not when they're younger.

I don't think under 18, I would not
give it to any child under the age of 16.

I would not allow my
children to have social media.

I would not let my kids
have social media as well.

I think that social media
is not good for kids.

You know, looking at this
whole landscape from social

media, the Chinese influence
when it comes to TikTok and AI.

Do you feel like this is a war on children?

I know it's a war on children.

And not just from a
malicious foreign adversary,

but from adults in
this country who are

visiting very corrupt values
on children, sexualizing

them, and doing so
in some ways for profit.

I think we can all see the
evidence of our eyes and our ears.

Especially on social media.

And maybe becoming a mom
awakened me to the stanger

and sort of the scales
fell from my own eyes.

But like they said, you know,
we're coming for your kids.

Yeah.

And they are.

And they have.

Yeah.

We're here.

We're coming for your kids.

Yeah.

What do you guys think is a
bigger addiction problem and

is hurting more people right
now within your age group?

Sigarettes are social media.

Social media.

Yeah.

Social media.

No, it's a big.

Social media.

I think that China is laughing at us.

I think that Russia is laughing at us.

And I think that you can't have a strong
country if you have confused citizens.

The honesty from these
young people hit us hard.

They seem to know that
their generation is addicted.

And that social media is hurting their
generation more than anything else.

Their instinct already
is to protect their young.

But what are they protecting them from?

Remember this.

No matter what the powerful
entities across the world try to tell you.

What the media industrial
complex tries to tell you.

You are your child's greatest teacher.

And they won't always like what you say.

But keeping them safe from
predators and exploitation is

more important than them
being upset for a little while.

We have to prioritize our job as
the greatest teachers and protectors.

Embrace the outdoors.

Embrace family time.

Embrace connection.

Emfaith.

Embrace wonder.

Embrace curiosity with you as their guide.

Reject the culture that
seeks to destroy traditionalism.

Reject isolation.

Reject synthetic experiences.

And choose real adventure.

This is a cultural
revolution that operates both

online and offline in the
open and in the shadows.

You are the warriors charged
with protecting kids from it.

If you still need convincing that this
is a modern cultural color revolution.

What's another sign
that we're living through?

The remaking of parenting and education.

But to understand where we're
going, you have to understand

where we are, where we
were, and where we're going.

Let's start with where we were.

Sexualization in school
used to be almost nonexistent.

Parents raised their kids
instead of relying on screens.

They took them
out shooting targets,

swimming, playing games,
and exploring nature.

Life was built around real experiences.

And at school, we didn't have
books with graphic illustrations

of different kinks we
could explore in the library.

States didn't sue school districts
and attempt to force them to hide the

gender identity or sexual orientation
of students from their parents.

We didn't have teachers forcing
us to watch videos where we were

exposed to pride videos featuring
adults and intimate embrace.

We weren't taught about blood
play or bondage during sex ed.

And we were taught to never
keep secrets from our parents

because predators could use that
secrecy to groom you into abuse.

Is it concerning that we're
normalizing keeping secrets

from parents or that you would
be asked to do something?

Does that make you feel that
you're putting your students at risk?

Absolutely.

I'm going to get emotional because
I've been in that position as a child.

Where really awful
things happen to me and

that individual wanted
me to keep it a secret.

I think, believe, you know,
from a young age, I've always

like stood firm and what's
good and right and true.

And I immediately, the second my mom picked
me up from school, told her what happened.

And she took it to the police.

It was so scary for me. I
was put in a police car and we

went to his house and I was so
scared he was going to see me.

But they let me know he
can't see you. We have

bright lights on him. We
just need you to tell us.

This was his. And I said yes. And it
turns out that he was abusing his kids.

And my mom and grandma told me that
I was the little girl's angel because that

abuse was finally taken out of her home
because I didn't keep a secret from my mom.

And if I had, we can
imagine how that would have

played out, that abuse
would have continued.

I try to look at everything
happens for a reason.

And we have the choice
to handle it in truth.

Comprehensive sexual
education or CSE is the name of the

sex ed most kids are getting
today in public schools.

But where does CSE originate?

A woman named Mary Calderon
who believed that children are born

sexual beings and that kids of
all ages needed to learn about sex.

Like CSE is this like very broad
umbrella kind of education in term to

what to to smuggle or sneak in all
of the priorities of progressiveism.

So you know, gender spectrums,
transgenderism, abortion.

So where does sex ed
come from? Where does

the kooky obsession
with pushing porn on kids?

We might go back to Alfre Kinsey
who in the late 1930s and early

1940s starts to parent this belief
about the sexuality of children.

But the first director of the World Health
Organization was named G. Brock Chisholm.

And in 1945 G. Brock Chisholm goes
to DC and gives three lectures on sex ed.

And he says, quote, we have to
eradicate the concept of right and wrong.

Well, one of the senior chief
administrators at the World

Health Organization at the
time was named Frank Calderon.

Was going around the country bringing
the Las Vegas burlesque and putting

on sexual titillating public
performances for people in the 1940s.

Frank Calderon was married to
Mary Calderon who left Planned

Parenthood as Planned
Parenthood's medical director in 1964.

To found the sexuality information
and education council of the United

States, Seacus, which today is the
major primary group at the helm of

creating, promulgating, and raising
up the next generation of teachers to

integrate comprehensive sexuality
education into Americans public schools.

Founding members of Seacus had
said that children were sexual from

birth and that we had to affirm
the strong sexuality of the newborn.

The seed money to found Seacus
came from Hugh Heffner and Penthouse.

The history behind this is far darker
than most Americans understand.

Mary's dead now, but her work
is very much alive in Seacus and

it's influencing sex education in
America more than anything else.

Seacus advocates now
for sex change surgeries.

Seacus also partnered
with a group called

B-Vive that sells
bondage accessories and

bondage teddy bears.
The kids might be drawn to.

What about the books in school? Readers are
leaders, right? If you've engaged in the

subject of books online and there's a good
chance you've seen comments like these.

People like you have
been bold enough to say this

doesn't belong in our
schools. This is not the case.

People like you have been bold
enough to say this doesn't belong in

our schools. This is what you
don't want kids to see. Is that correct?

Exactly. Why is that? Why do
you think this is inappropriate for

children? That is grooming,
but it's also a form of mental rape.

You don't think that this
is empowering or inclusive

in any way when they talk
about eating their own bodily

fluids from sexual
functions.That's not something that

you think is empowering
or inclusive for our children.

You know, I'm
filled with righteous

indignation. We have
people in this country.

They will go to any extent to push their
level of normalcy which is really abnormal.

It's abnormal to put that level of
content in front of a child. In the

name of making sure that a gay boy
or lesbian girl can feel good at school.

What educational benefit
will a child learn from even

thinking about the idea of
ingesting their own body fluids?

These are celebrated books
by the largest association for

librarians in America. So, parents
need to understand that. So, if

you've ever heard this idea
that there's just no pornographic

books in our schools. I think
we've proved that wrong today.

So, we're not into banning
text books. We want to ban filth.

I had a really hard experience
with these books that I was reading

from freshman year to sophomore
year and even in eighth grade.

There was books about masturbation
and books about rape. And I'm a teenage

girl and I'm reading this and it's
horrifying. It made me uncomfortable.

We want to ban pornography and we want
to expose children to wholesome literature.

We're each busting a load into
this bottle. If you don't come, you

have to drink it. Ha ha ha. Give
me that. I'll show you how to do it.

It comes with illustrations. This one is
called Flamer. Okay? Every one of these

books can be found that we're showing
today in a school library in America.

And again, this is
depicting children. This is

supposed to be kids.
People in the Democratic

Party who say there are
no pornographic books

in our schools. What
would you tell them?

I would say that they have
reprobate minds and that

their conscience has
been seared with a hot iron.

I think in many ways the adults
had to become desensitized

first to be willing to subject
children to this type of content.

What happened to society
where we've all been

groomed to now think
that there's some sort of

subjective interpretation
of a blowjob or anal

sex tutorial showing
that to minor children.

Oftentimes we hear about Mama
Bears speaking up at school boards and

addressing these issues. I'm trying
to call forth the Papa Bears men.

And so I'm reminding men in America to
stand up, square your shoulders, use the

authority that God gave you because men
are called to be providers and protectors.

Today our men in the culture,
our pastors in the culture are not

engaging the intruders. The enemy
has not crept around the back door.

We have brought in the
enemy through the front door

and we're giving him the
red carpet to push his agenda.

I don't know that there's
a more important call

than that right now.
You know that men need

to stand up because
we've been involved in

this fight and I've seen
so many moms stand up.

But dads seem to be
slinking in the background.

And I'm asking for men in the culture
to stand on their post and to address

these issues because we are
almost at the point of noting you return.

After investigating these books
we had to ask are teachers okay with

this? To find out we looked into
the views of the Teachers Unions.

The National Educators Association is the
largest teachers union in America and we

quickly found that this year they put
gender queer on their summer reading list.

And we found these recent panels at their
annual conference. They include panels on

critical race theory, so-called pedagogies
of change, modeling climate change action,

using education as a lever for environmental
justice, decolonizing, recruiting

allies, how to establish safe spaces, how
to counter the quote right wing echo chant.

Right wing echo chamber had to bring social
justice into curriculum, reparations,

gender theory, pronouns,
encouraging student

activism to achieve
equity and justice.

They also went on
to have panels on

transformative social
change and using social

emotional learning to bring about the
transformative change that they desire.

Social emotional learning programs
are in just about every school now.

And the warm fuzzy name makes a
lot of people feel good. But what is it?

Social emotional learning
is a mental health and

anti-bullying program that
was originally brought into

schools to teach kids how
to manage their emotions

and how to build healthy
relationship with others.

Unfortunately now that has been
completely changed. In 2020 the

Estelle standard bearer castle,
which is a collaborative for academic

social emotional learning, changed
the definition of Estelle and its

five core competencies to be a
thing called transformative Estelle,

which is a completely different
way of teaching SEL in that

it does it through a racial
and equity lens. What exactly

does that mean? Right, so
they think the original way that

social emotional learning
was taught was racist itself.

They said that it made children of
color had to conform to the norms and

standards of this white
supremacist culture.

And therefore it
needed a whole redo.

And what they're doing now is they're
taking subjects that are usually taught in

Estelle like empathy and perspective taking.
And they're saying that in order to be

empathetic, you have to understand that the
whole systems of America, all the institutions

have been set up to purposely oppress
people of color and other oppressed groups.

They're saying now that you have to
understand that in order to be empathetic, you

have to show compassion, you have to do
something. So that means you have to become

a social justice activist for these racial
and gender causes and then work to tear

down the systems of America to make them
more equitable for those oppressed groups.

Social emotional learning has been
the biggest weapon in this war on kids.

They spend millions pushing
SEL into schools, which is

supposed to in theory make
children more socially aware and

able to have more positive
interpersonal skill sets and

connections yet we're seeing a
lot more violence in classrooms.

Where's the disconnect there?
What's why is this happening?

Well, you said that there were supposed to
be more socially aware and more connected.

In that sense, this is
true. They're socially

aware of things like
microaggressions.

They're more socially
aware that people can have

infinite genders. They're
more socially aware. They are

more connected. They're
more connected to men going

to women's bathroom. They're
more connected to them.

We're seeing objective reality play out
where there is more violence and teachers

hands are behind their
back to stop it because

of these restorative
justice practices.

So when restorative justice came in, it
basically said, depending on your skin

color, you can't be
punished this way

because it would be
not cultural responsive.

So now the child gets picked
on to get bullied. They have to

sit with the other child and
understand why they acted out.

The danger to that is that once at least
public school you see it now in a lot of

cities like San Francisco where they don't
even arrest anyone for like chop lifting.

And we're seeing victims of horrific
sex crimes have to sit face to face across

from their abuser and negotiate
what that restoration process looks like.

All these virtues are being
taught through either the lens of

a critical race, serious or a
transgender court recruiter. And

then when they get older, they
don't follow laws because they've

been taught in schools that
what they do is not their fault.

And it's the same reason when a
child sees a man or a girl sees a man in

the bathroom locker room, they have
to go through that struggle session.

They have to get counseling
to understand better,

be more socially connected,
be more socially aware.

And so that's the
danger of social emotional

learning to understand
language contamination,

understand to ask the question through
whose lens is this being taught through.

And if I tell you something and I tell you
this is from a mass murderer, you're going

to take that advice very differently. And
if I told you always from a trusted mentor.

At this point, you might be thinking that
this sounds closer to communism than the

school you remember going to. And while not
all teachers are communists, consider this.

In Colorado, the teachers union
representing 40,000 teachers voted

this year to disavow capitalism
entirely in a statement that read...

They believe that
capitalism inherently exploits

children, public schools,
land, labor and resources.

Capitalism is an
opposition to fully addressing

systemic racism. The
school, the prison pipeline,

climate change, patriarchy,
gender and LGBTQ

disparities, education
inequality and income inequality.

In Oregon, a high school teacher
at Churchill High School recently

asked the students to write
stories about their sexual fantasies.

The California Teachers Association
conference had a presentation on

how to introduce unlimited genders
and transgendarism to toddlers.

While yet another English
teacher in Pennsylvania

showed his students penises
and videos of ejaculation.

And another had kids in
her class read a book we

discussed with John Amachewu
called This Book Is Gay.

Stories like these seem to happen
on such a regular basis, the shock

factor almost begins to fade
away. And all of this is happening

as Democrats in the Biden
administration create hundreds of

millions in funding for something
called, quote, community schools.

Those are schools that provide
health care in addition to the

regular curriculum. Like social
emotional learning, that might sound

nice at first glance. But it really
means that your child can receive

sexually oriented care or
counseling that you aren't told about.

And then we have teachers going
on national TV to say that parents

don't have rights once they
send their kids to public school.

But allowing movies such as
this assist teachers in opening a

door for conversations that
have no place in our classrooms.

That just shows me that she's ignorant and
has not come and volunteered at all because

are these conversations
these doors they're

open. These students
have one to one devices.

The amount of things that
they're able to pull up that we have

to shut down, these conversations
these doors that she's talking

about that's telling me I'm stripping
her rights as a parent. Those

rights are gone when your
child's in the public school system.

Activist teachers like this used to pretend
the CRT didn't exist in schools. But

now they're the first to tell you how
important DEI and CRT are in education.

This is why when we're talking about
let's say critical race theory and school

people go they're not teaching critical
race theory. It's actually much worse.

When a child walks into
a K-312 today, they're

not learning about
critical race theory. They're

learning how to behave,
can act and think and

make decisions like
a critical race theorist.

And that means that America
is oppressive, America is racist,

your skin color determines your
success and so on and so forth.

That's why we should call them state
schools. These are government run schools.

Yes, these are not public
schools. They're run by the

government who is ruled by
an authoritarian left wing party.

And so that's why when you walk into
a public school today, it's a discipleship.

It's not even an academic brainwashing,
it's an emotional brainwashing.

So it's truly a discipleship.
And that's why these kids they

behave like missionaries
because they're trained like one.

And that's so whatever they're
whatever their social contagion

they want the child to
regurgitate, that's their mission.

And so anything, whether
it be climate changeism,

whether it be gun
control, abortion, anything,

whether you have one
opinion on this or not,

they're teaching children
in schools only one way.

And that's how they're
that's that's that critical

consciousness that underpinds
a lot of the critical race theory.

And transgenderism is just
one of the ways. It's not a

separate thing. It's just one
branch. And it's an effective

branch because it
sexualizes kids and obviously it

destroys them and that creates
very useful angry soldiers.

So we wondered, do D.E.I or CRT make
John A. Monshuwu feel included as a black

man in America? What does it mean
to you as a black man as a black father?

Do you feel protected
or included by knowing

that there's a D.E.I
officer at every school?

No I don't. It doesn't benefit blacks
through D.E.I. In North Carolina, in

particular when you consider Wake County,
we've had a D.E.I. office since 2013.

And they have spent nearly
$8.7 million on that office.

And where are the measurable
outcomes? You can't find any.

But what about the good teachers?
There has to be some good teachers

left, right? Right. But to find
the schools and teachers who

aren't embracing this woke
revolution, you have to be involved

and not be afraid to ruffle a
few feathers by asking questions.

You're a teacher who
refused the transgender

ideology at your school
and in return you were

fired and the school
refused to accommodate your

religious beliefs. How
did that make you feel?

It felt surreal and it still does honestly.
You could have never told me that I would

spend seven years
going to college to become

a teacher, you know,
without my dream.

Impacting and influencing,
you know, the next

generation is only two,
six years into my career, be

let go of because according
to my school district

they could not accommodate
my religious beliefs.

That's where it gets really
interesting and because it started with,

as you mentioned, the transgender
policies that were placed on me.

These policies they presented
me really essentially are wrapped

around lying. So lying to students
first and foremost because they've

asked me to call children by
whatever they want to be called by,

whatever gender, pronoun it
is, I have to go along with that.

And so if you really think about
that, right, that is lying to a child

because they're confused. And as
adults we're supposed to step in and

guide them, you know, on the path
of success and prosperity and hope

and positivity and to go along with
the lies that they're experiencing.

That would not be in my eyes doing my job
and so it was so bizarre for the district

to say, no, no, you have to get it to keep
your job, you have to go along with it.

So to be very clear,
the policy was, if you

have a student and they
say that they go by ZZM

or clown, clown self,
which is a real pronoun

that some people use,
you had to call them that.

Correct. And it gets worse than
that too. When they presented that

policy to me that I had to, they
said refer and respect students,

gender preference or pronouns.
That was in writing. And they

then said vocally, you also
need to withhold that from parents.

And I looked the superintendent
assistant superintendent like dead in the

eye and I said, are you asking me
to lie to parents? And he said, yes.

The problem with cultural
revolutions is that they

build underground almost
invisibly for many years

until they happen seemingly
all at once and such

a dizzying pace that it
will make your head spin.

And while they're all different,
every destructive cultural

revolution has a few things
in common. One is separating

parents from their children.
This even happened to my

family in Cuba where they
survived a communist revolution.

Kids in state schools were
reported for reporting on their family

members, not dissimilar from how
somewhere asked to report on their

families during COVID if they
broke COVID guidelines. And if you

think you're automatically safe
in private schools, think again.

So if a parent says, I want to get
away from this craziness in the public

schools, they send their kid to private
school. Their kid is safe now, correct?

Unfortunately, no. I think
it used to be that simple,

but today unfortunately
is not. And so most private

schools are under the umbrella
of the NAS, which is sense

for the National Association
of Independent Schools.

Just because you send
a child to private school, it

doesn't mean that they're
automatically safe at all.

So there's really two reasons for
that. Number one, the NAS, they have

these decrees that they come down
and say, you have to follow these.

Because every private school follow it to
the T, no, but a lot of private schools do.

NAS is an organization thousands of
private schools in America associate with.

And it's at the forefront
of pushing this far

left ideology. They even
make recommendations

that they stop using
terms like boys and girls

in favor of gender
neutral terms like students.

And at their annual people of color
conference, they had panels called

white boys behaving badly. And
another panel called no more white tears.

It's suffice to say that if
your child is in a private

school, ask that school about
their association with NAS.

Besides the NAS, they're
still largely using the same

pool of teachers. So just
because the teacher goes

to a private school, they're
still being trained under

the same colleges that
indoctrinate the teachers.

Parents are trying to find
a path of these resistance.

What's the least I can do to
get my children to education?

The dis-movement of separating
children of Korean revolutionists

is everywhere. It's in
cereal boxes, it's on YouTube

shorts and YouTube kids and
Instagram stories and private

schools and public schools and in
bonds and ovals and everywhere.

And so you can't, as a parent,
ever say, my child is good because

you're always, you need to have
your hands in everything that they do.

The regime change in
revolutions is to separate

children from their
parents. Bad actors

are working to do this now through various
means. One of those is gender ideology.

Your daughter was secretly
transitioned at school.

My father passed away unexpectedly and then
I was diagnosed with breast cancer. So my

daughter was in fifth
grade at the time and was

distraught over some
of our family dynamics.

I reached out to a guidance counselor and
told her that she thought she was a boy.

That guidance counselor immediately walked
her after that meeting back to class.

And asked her if she wanted to be
called her boy name and boy pronouns

at school and went ahead with
that transition without me knowing.

I'm in a policy in place
right now that if your child

identifies as a transgender
and they just have to

say that they're not ready
to tell their family that

the school can transition
them without your knowledge.

This policy has to do
with children as young

as five all the way
through high school.

Of five year old can be
transitioned at school without

parents ever being notified
and stay to California.

All the child has to say is that
they aren't ready for their family

to know. And it's all in the name
of the child's right to privacy.

Well, if they're able to
consent to something as

serious as changing their
sex without their parents

knowing, wouldn't the
next natural step be people

saying, oh, they can consent
to sex with adults then.

To me, that sounds
crazy, but also what's going

on when it really happened.
I felt was crazy and

that's why I worked
my way up with a district

saying, how could you
allow this with my child?

When summer hit and she was removed
from that environment and she wasn't around

that counselor
and that school, she

immediately went back
to wanting to be a girl.

She came to me after a
couple of months and said,

mom, what happened to me
at school was just so wrong.

I just feel like it was
really fast and I really

didn't understand what
me and trans really meant.

This agenda has been
more successful than some

realize. The CDC's most
recent report on youth

found that a record 25%
of high school students

identify as something
other than street.

That's an over 600% increase from the
2.8% of baby boomers who identify as LGBTQ.

Pro mutilation activists have said this
is because of increased acceptance,

but we found that this is a number not
replicated anywhere else in the world.

Something else is happening and that's
something else is a social contagion.

A social contagion is the
spread of emotions or behaviors

from one individual to another,
sometimes without awareness.

Social contagion processes
become problematic when

they lead to spades of
self-injurious behaviors.

That sounds an awful lot like what's
happening when TikTok feeds you videos

about transgender ideology and
you start to question your own gender.

The attack on identity becomes even
clearer when you see a mom describe how

they knew their kid was trans based
on their green vegetable eating habits.

The pattern of everything
that he had experienced

as a child including eating
green vegetables because

that boosts testosterone
were just methods of

his body trying to become
who he was meant to be.

You see successful countries a lot like
successful people have a track record of

certain traits like strength, resilience,
outside the box thinking and confidence.

One key ingredient of confidence
is identity knowing who you are.

If you want to shake the
confidence of a person

or a country you must
create an identity crisis.

It might seem to many
like this ideology with

pronouns as crazy as clown
and clown self spring up

overnight but in reality
the groundwork was laid

many years before by John
Money and Alfred Kinsey.

Money tried his theories first on
twin boys who he experimented on.

One brother was mutilated and raised
as a girl but he never felt like one.

Despite pretending this was a success
both brothers ended up committing suicide.

At this point I doubt it will shock
you to find out that Hugh Hefner

and Playboy were key parts of
Kinsey's plan to sexualize our country.

If Kinsey is the bridge and his science
is the bridge to the law to change

the laws well then Hugh Hefner
was the bridge from Kinsey to culture.

Alfred Kinsey actually met
Hugh Hefner when he was

in college and Hugh Hefner
was a virgin at the time.

And he revolutionized this Hugh Hefner
into the Playboy that he would become.

Hugh Hefner would
say things like fornicate

early, fornicate often
and fornicate everywhere.

So what's the motto of Playboy? Money.

Yeah.

And what do bunnies do? They hump.

And what is Hugh Hefner's
bunny wearing? A bow tie.

Every photo of Alfred Kinsey he's
wearing a tweed suit and a bow tie.

And by the way Kinsey built his
public appearance with this lie that

he was a happily married man, a
heterosexual and faithful to his wife.

His biographer would later
admit that Kinsey was a

sadomasochist homosexual,
sexual deviant pedophile.

When we begin to understand the
history behind this agenda, which

wasn't just to disciple children
through the public school system,

it was to actually change laws all
around America that were passed with

the explicit intention of protecting
children, family and marriages.

The goal was to actually work
through the American Law Institute

and other revolutionary groups
to bring in this new social science.

How then are we going to get this
kind of curriculum into the schools?

Well, we have to pass
laws, but they had to

get this new social
science into curriculum.

But then we got to get,
we got to do the state

boards of education,
they accept it, right?

So you know what they did.

They start sending
sex experts to lobby and

argue before state boards
of education to accept

this new radical sex
ed as just the norm,

healthy public health
kind of curriculum we need.

Penthouse, footed the bill to send
the sex experts to lobby before state

boards of education to allow for
this kind of comprehensive sexuality.

Education, yes, penthouse
and playboy, of course.

Some of Seacus's early
pamphlets in 1964 and 1965

never used the term
person or child or human.

They always use the
term sexual being to refer

to human beings because
that's how they see us.

One of the early board members of
Seacus was named Wardel Pomoroi.

Wardel Pomoroi was a very close friend of
Kinsey, some people actually think a lover.

Guess who became the executive director
of the Kinsey Institute? Wardel Pomoroi.

In 1980, in an article called
Attacking the Last to Boo,

Wardel Pomoroi was described
as part of the pro-incess lobby.

And in this interview with Time Magazine,
he says, incest between children and

adults can sometimes be beneficial and
it need not be a sign of mental illness.

That was said by the
executive director of the

Kinsey Institute, one of
the first board members.

The primary problem with
Kinsey was that his entire

social science and science
on sex was based off of lies.

So his book, published in 1948, was
called Sexuality and the Human Mail.

Then in 1958, he published a
sexuality in the human female,

which is the same year the
playboy is launched by Hugh Hefter.

And he claims that most
American men, about 90%

of American men are
not faithful to their wives.

Most of them have homosexual
tendencies and engage in homosexual sex.

You read his numbers
and his predictions in his

books and you're like,
where does this come from?

Well, what he had done is he
had gone into the prisons and he

had interviewed rapists and
pedophiles serving life sentences.

And so he went into the prisons and
he actually interviewed pedophiles.

And so he asked
them about their sexual

experiences with children,
guys, is what he does.

And so table 34, this is
the kind of the infamous

table in his book Sexuality
and the Human Mail.

It documents the rape
of children as young as

about 18 months old and
as old as about 10 or 11.

With how many orgasms the children had over
a 24 hour period, time with a stopwatch.

And Kinsy believed that
even if these children were

wriling, writhing, screaming
and moaning in pain,

that that was just proof
that they were taking

pleasure from this sexual
act being done on them.

Is there an agenda to
normalize pedophilic behavior?

And so when you look at
Kinsy, when you look at his

obsession with incess and
with the sexuality of children,

it's hard to not believe
that the agenda was not to

normalize eventually any
form of sexual behavior.

Queer theory is also why
you might see activists using

terms woman with a Y or woman
with an X. Those aren't typos.

Those are to remove the
word men from women.

Another sliver of reality
they seek to destroy.

Coupled the vile beliefs of John Money,
Alfred Kinsy and Queer Theory with TikTok

and our social contagion of identity
confusion among youth is what you get.

In some pockets of the country,
this social contagion is even

clearer, like California's Davis
Joint Unified School District,

where students self-identify as
transgender 4.3 times the national average.

What do you guys say that
people who are identifying

as all these things are
being treated better?

Well, they're getting affirmed
by culture and culture is the big

elephant in the room because it's
like everything is affected by culture.

And so if culture affirms it, that
means you're universally accepted.

What happens is they come
from these environments

that they don't feel
value, they don't feel loved.

So what happens is they get this admiration
from people around them and these people

around them encourage
them to continue doing

what they do and
then they get too deep.

And they value the affection
and the attention that they get

because they so so wanted but
they have never gotten it before.

Absolutely, that's why
they gave Mr. Thomas

William Thomas the trophy
rather than Riley Gaines.

Yeah, that's like one of the
best examples he could use.

Exactly.

Well, at this private
school people, the teachers

would favor these kids
who were going through this.

And they would give them extra attention.

Them, like after time, after
class, more attention towards them.

They're just like worshiping
these kids and that makes them feel

good and that makes them want to
continue to do it and make it worse.

Put it out there more and
indoctrinate other people,

their friends, their
family into this ideology.

California's 2020 to 2021 main
report of the California Healthy

Kids Survey also found that
kids who identify as non-binary,

self-report, far more
mental illness than other kids

do, including chronic
depression and suicidal ideation.

If you think kids can't be
influenced by a litany of algorithms on

TikTok, then you're not familiar with
a famous psychological experiment,

conducted by a man named Robert Kweck.

He was a psychologist
at Dartmouth University.

In the experiment, they
put a fake scar on people's

faces who were going into
a room with other people.

But right before they went into
mingle with the crowd, the makeup artist

made what the subject thought was a
touch up to make the scar more visible.

But in reality, they removed it
before they entered the room.

At the end, they were asked if they
were discriminated against over their scar.

Nearly all of them reported that
they were discriminated against.

They were confident
that their scar was being

stared at or that people
made rude comments.

They felt that way after
only one impression seeing

the scar on their face
via a small pocket mirror.

Now imagine how sure a team feels
about their identity confusion if they're

fed a steady stream of videos on the
TikTok algorithm about transitioning.

At least the social contagions when
we were kids didn't hurt you long-term.

Maybe at a weird haircut, a pure singer,
a very unique style, but you outro it.

You can't outgrow a
double mastectomy though.

If you watch the news,
you've probably heard

politicians impundit
saying things like this.

My gender children are not having
surgeries. That's really important to say.

In his tweet, he talked about
stopping surgeries for people

under 18, which is not a thing.
That is not a thing that happens.

There is misinformation presented
that somehow that we're doing

surgery on minors or even
children. And that simply is not true.

So, Laila Jane, how old were you when
they gave you a double mastectomy?

It was a month after my 13th birthday.

And how long was the process before that
with the doctors to prepare you for this?

I initially started seeing doctors for
my gender dysphoria when I was 12.

So, it was within that
time frame within a year.

What age were you when they
put you on puberty blockers?

I was 12 years old.

12 years old, doctors gave
you a drug called Lupron.

The drug has been
used to chemically

castrate sex offenders,
pedophiles in prison.

But they prescribed it to you to
stop your hormones. Is that correct?

Correct.

A 12 years old.

Do you believe that you were given informed
consent about the risk of puberty blockers?

I don't think so. I think it
was spoken out very lightly.

I mean, they really did
say it. It's just a pause.

There were slight concerns
about my phone development.

But, you know, they just told
me it takes them vitamin D.

That's it. That's the only
thing they were concerned

about while giving you a
chemical castration drug

that they give to
pedophiles that isn't

actually designed or
made to stop your puberty.

It's not even approved for that.

They're just playing,
you know, doctor, they're

doing science
experiments on little kids.

You know, at that age, you were
still, we're still very much a kid.

Right?

Right. I mean, I was really naive. I
didn't have the understanding of the world.

I wasn't even high school yet.

It'll never leave my mind how Leila
looked when she walked in the room with us.

She was a damaged young girl.

Her anxiety was palpable.

Before she ever said a word, my heart sank,

because I wondered how a doctor could
ever operate on such a vulnerable child.

They took an oath to do no harm.

How? Then it hit me.

We have a daughter older than Leila
was when the doctors did this to her.

The other side says
to listen to trans people.

Well, Leila did identify as trans.

And when you were experiencing
the gender dysphoric feelings,

was there any inquiry as to
what that root cause might be?

Or was there just, you know, seemingly this
shift laser focus on the gender transition?

Definitely. There is definitely a shift.

And they really kind
of ignored my comorbid

mental health issues
like anxiety and whatnot.

I remember one of my
doctors said that if I transition,

my anxiety and my mental
health would get better.

Did the doctors warn
you at all about potential

side effects from a
double mastectomy?

Like seriously, warn
you about the long-term

consequences of a
dangerous surgery like that?

Really, the main thing was they told
me, and this is what the words they use,

they told me I wouldn't
be able to chest feed.

I might have some slight cosmetic.

They called it dog ears.

This is like the term. I think
it's like when the scars sag.

But that's really all they warned me about.

Like when I was in the healing
phase the first year or so,

the nerves kept reconnecting over my
scar tissue and it was just excruciating.

Any of those regressive gender
stereotypes used as a factor of,

oh, you might like
this color or this

clothing, so therefore
you should transition.

I was a bit tomboyish as a kid.
I used to love hot wheels and

I used to follow my dad around
the garage and stuff like that.

I wasn't big on dolls and I definitely
was like, you know what makes sense?

I kind of latched onto that
as more proof that I was trans.

Can you speak a little
bit to your experience

and how that pressure
affected your body image,

your self-perception and your idea
of what it means to be a woman?

Yeah, I mean around
the time I fell into all this,

like now it's like in to be
like curving and whatnot.

But back then it was the thigh
gap and I didn't have that build.

Yeah.

Were there some, you
know, body issues as far as

eating disorders or
anything that played a role

that maybe then turned into that
more gender dysphoric esyptomology?

Yeah, definitely.

I definitely had
some issues with my

relationship with food
and my body and whatnot.

That just went completely unresolved.

And they got really bad after I had
top surgery and I need something

else I guess for my brain to focus
all the negative energy on myself.

Is there a difference between
somebody who's anorexic

or bulimic going to a doctor
and requesting liposuction

and a child going to a
doctor and requesting

to have their healthy
body parts chopped off?

You know lately I'm having a harder
time seeing the difference especially.

If they would have gave me liposuction
I wouldn't, I would have done it.

That's very important
you said that admitting

that you would have
gotten liposuction.

If they would have allowed
it that tells us that you

couldn't have possibly
consented to anything else.

Do you feel like you had informed consent?

No, I mean even the way they
watered down their wording and

just called it top surgery
instead of a double mastectomy.

You know and there's
just a lot of information

that I didn't know about
like my own anatomy.

Because mind you I was
so young I hadn't taken

a sex ed class I hadn't
even seen like diagrams.

I think the biggest thing that
they left out that I still deal

with sometimes is the nerve
damage on my scars and my chest.

You know they told me I might lose
sensation but I was expecting numbness.

I wasn't expecting
like the electrifying jolt

and just itchy sensation
that I can't scratch.

What were some of the effects of
testosterone in your female body?

Increased permanent body hair.

My voice is deep and I don't
know if you could see it under

the lighting but I actually
have a slight Adam's apple.

Is your hope that those
things will go away?

I've just kind of accepted that some
of these things I have to live with.

You know this Adam's
apple is always going to

be here unless I get it
shaved down surgically.

You know I have
increased bodily hair and a

little bit of facial hair
that continues to grow.

I was in the impression
that would stop if

I stopped taking
testosterone and it didn't.

That's another thing they
didn't inform you about.

Correct.

Who paid for all these
medical interventions?

Was it insurance or their private groups?

It was covered by Kaiser.

Everything?

Yeah.

Now just Kaiser cover your
aftercare now that you've transitioned.

No, not really.

Laila's case is heartbreaking
not only because of what

she was put through but
because she's not an anomaly.

She's a drop of rain in
a storm that's coming.

A reddit group called D-Trans has
grown to nearly 50,000 members this year.

Some critics say I thought you
believed in parental rights but parental

rights don't allow you to abuse your
child by giving them a sex change.

Any more than it allows you to
legally turn them into a heroin addict.

In the US one study
found that 70% of

pediatric patients are
diagnosed with autism,

ADHD or some other
mental health problem prior

to being diagnosed
with gender dysphoria.

Kids are not the only people
being abused in this scheme.

Parents in the oath to do no
harm are being abused as well.

When I heard a pediatric doctor
from Stanford using the phrase,

daughter with a penis
during a TED Talk, I

knew we had entered
dangerous new territory.

Right when Avery was handed
to her mom, her mom sensed a

special bond, a mother's
intuition, that Avery was different.

And her parents, as soon as Avery
was a preschooler, used that as

a daughter with a penis, they
needed to advocate for her rights.

The trust bond where kids believe
doctors and do as they say is a

no-brainer when you consider the
milgram experiments from the 1960s.

In the 60s a social psychologist
named Stanley Milgram

conducted several studies at
Yale on obedience and authority.

Milgram wanted to know
why people do evil things.

In his book, Obedience to
Authority, Stanley used that most evil

acts are committed by normal
people who blindly obey authority.

Basically he believed that
most people would stray from

basic morality if someone
in authority told them to.

And he was right. In the
experiments Stanley had

an authority figure tell
unknowing participants

to deliver electric shocks
of increasing intensity

to what they believe
to be a real patient.

And deliver the shocks
all the way up to max

intensity even when
the fake patient begged

them to stop, asked for mercy and even when
they told them they had a heart condition.

So when a doctor tells a
confused child that they are

in fact born in the wrong
body by immediately affirming

gender dysphoria, they are
in effect the supervisor telling

the child to turn the electric
shocks all the way up.

What are some of the more
egregious programs that

our taxpayer dollars are
funding that harm children?

I think it's mainly through
the schools. My concern is

really about kids who aren't
ready to make this decision.

People say, oh you're a
libertarian, what are you

getting involved with this,
the bedroom and all that.

And I was like, I don't care
what adults do in the bedroom,

but I do care if they have
to tell my children about it.

Why they involve with this has to
be something they need to tell the

children in elementary school.
They've got to tell them at the library.

They've got to tell them
in all these public venues.

You know, ten years ago, do you
think anybody, I don't remember

any, conservators complaining
about a drag show for adults.

You know, there are adult places that
you can go around town, bars have ages.

We've always had sort
of this idea of adults can

make decisions and we
may not approve of other

people's decisions, but
for the most part we're

like, live and let live,
leave people alone.

But with kids there is
an obligation. I mean, for

example, if a child is
being abused at home, even

by the parents, physically
or otherwise, the state

has an obligation to go
in and rescue that child.

I think it's the same here, but it's the
opposite. The government's funding the

schools and then the schools are saying,
oh we're not going to tell the parents.

We're going to change
the kids clothes, call

them by another name,
encourage counselors.

I mean, ultimately
we're going to talk

about, are they going
to give the counselors

going to give them medication there at
school without their parents permission.

I mean, I think we're leading
towards an absurd and

horrific time and there
already are these cases.

You know, parents taking their kids
to California, you know, your 13 year

olds going to have irreversible
surgery and the father doesn't want it.

And they're calling the
father somehow a hater

and the father has no
rights over the child now.

I mean, this is leading
to a time in which there's

going to be war between
families, war in our culture.

You know, this is a bad
time and I never thought we'd

get there in our lifetime,
but this is where we come.

Can you tell us the answer
since Dr. Rachel Living, wouldn't

kind of child consent to
these transgender surgeries?

You know, it's a question
that's been going on

for a long time. What's
the age of adulthood?

When can children make
decisions about their medical

care? We always had it. It
was pretty much decided.

I mean, I've worked as an
emergency room doctor. If kids came in

with even with a small assurration,
we'd begin cleaning it up.

But we wouldn't sew it up even a small
ill-incision till the mom or dad got there.

In Oregon, your kid can transition
at 13, have parts of their body

removed, but can't get a tattoo
without their parents' permission.

It's kind of sort of
absurd. And it's sort of

the opposite of what
you hear from the media.

If in the media you hear all
these kids are being bullied,

they're going to commit suicide
because they're being bullied.

I think it's the opposite. I
think they're being encouraged.

They're being affirmed. Everybody's
saying we're so proud of you.

If you go or someone advises you go
to a gender dysphoria clinic, I guess they

don't even call it
dysphoria, a gender

affirming clinic, where
they want to call it.

When you get there, there's nobody
giving you the other side of the story.

You know, people who work in these
clinics or people who have either had the

surge of themselves or huge advocates
for this. It's a one-sided process.

What can you do? Speak
up. That's what every abuse

survivor we've talked
to has asked you to do.

Conversations are going to
be uncomfortable. You may lose

a friend or a client, but
speaking up is how this ends.

Some may even ask you,
why do you care? These

aren't your kids. Let
them do what they want.

But this line of thinking ignores the
reality that our kids are going to have

to grow up alongside these issues and
sometimes inside a locker room with them.

We were forced to swim against biological
male, Leotamas, who is far really

well-tomised, who swam three years on the
men's team at University of Pennsylvania,

forced them transitioning
to the women's category

his senior year to where
he dominated the women.

For the first time we
weren't for a war and

we would be sharing a
locker room. We had no

idea. We're in the
locker room I'm changing.

I had my back turned
silent. I turned around.

A 6'4", 22-year-old man disrobing fully
intact with an exposing male genitalia.

The only time we became
aware that this was the

arrangement was when we
had to see it with our own eyes.

So any man would have had
full access to that bathroom,

any coach, any parent,
any pervert who wanted to,

would have had full
reins to be in there and

bare minimum we weren't
even told about this.

So they most certainly
want to normalize this.

They want to take away
our rights to privacy.

Is it fair to refer to what
happened to you with Leotamas

exposing his penis to you and
other female swimmers mental rape?

No, it most certainly is fair to say that.

If a man would have
walked into a woman's

locker room, a DA is
walking in there arresting

this man and he is
getting charged with sexual

harassment, voyeurism
and decent exposure.

I'm sure the list can
go on of charges. But

now it really is
celebrated. It's encouraged.

That next day of competition
was the day that Thomas and I

raised and almost impossibly
enough, it resulted in a tie.

We get out, we go behind the
awards podium where the NCAA

official looks at both Thomas
and myself and says, great job.

But you guys tied and we only
have one trophy. We're going to

get Leo the trophy because
Leo has to have it for pictures.

That's when I was no
longer willing to why.

And that's when I
ultimately took this public

stance and acknowledging
how it's harmful

to women, not just
female athletes to women.

Leotamas was nominated for
Insta-Lay Woman of the Year. That's

how they honored Thomas for
taking away our rights to our privacy,

for taking away our scholarships,
our spots on that podium. Our dignity,

this award was devalued to me. It was
meaningless. I didn't want this award.

They're encouraging men
to go into women's locker

rooms and for others to
be complicit in the process.

Average people like us, we
look at what happened and we go,

Riley, Riley won. You know, no
normal person is going to Leo won.

I think what's really worse is the
situation happening in the locker room

because this is sexual assault and
instead of treating it like sexual assault,

we've got a group of people in
our country who are running a large

majority of our country, who
are actually more likely to charge

someone like you with a hate
crime for saying something about

it than they are to go after the
man who's exposing themselves.

When they can't win this argument or get
confronted with victims of their ideology,

they often turn to something Marxist
revolutionaries have always turned to.

Old-fashioned lying. That's why
they try to claim these surgeries don't

exist despite mountains of evidence
that they're happening at record rates.

And it's why you'll hear people
pretending that there's no competitive

advantage for men or boys
playing sports against actual women.

Women in some that are short?

That a biological
male has a physical

advantage in sports
over a biological female?

Not as a definitive statement.

How many female members
of the NBA do you see?

Well, I can say that, you know,
there's been this news article about

men that think that they could
beat Serena Williams in tennis, right?

That they think that they
could actually score a point on

her. And it's just not the
case. She is stronger than that.

What's your experience being male female?

Both Serena and Venus
lost to the 203rd ranked male

tennis player, which
they're phenoms for women.

My experience, my husband,
he's swam at University of Kentucky

as well in terms of accolades
and in terms of national ranking.

I was a much better swimmer than him.
He could kick my butt any day of the week.

Oh, that's it!

Oh, I like that!

How you feeling right now? I'm
feeling excellent. That was sweet, huh?

Did you like that?

Every woman in this tournament
better look out. I'm freaking coming.

So why are there no cases
of females like you deciding

that they're a man and coming
to compete against men?

My size. You know why?
Why isn't that happening?

This is only happening one way. Women
don't want to go into men's restrooms.

All of these stories, it's only
contributing to the erasure of women.

This is actually a point that I think is
so important. In regards to that InstaVla

Championship, we had another swimmer from
Yale, who was a female transitioning to.

The only male swimmer that Isaac
beat was a male swimmer with one arm.

And it's because Isaac would
have never and will never

be able to compete against
the men at that same level.

This is the fastest meet in
the world. And it goes back to

the question of why isn't this
happening the other way around.

It's because there's only
something to gain from men.

Being in women's
facilities, bathrooms, prisons,

sororities, locker
rooms, sports, Peyton

McNabb, the volleyball
player from North

Carolina who was spiked
in the face by a male.

Still to this day, she's partially
paralyzed on her right side.

She has vision impairment.
She can't play college sports now.

She has to have special
accommodations at school for testing

because she can't retain information
like she could before the hit.

So this is a legitimate concern.
So back to the message

that's being sent that I'm
constantly reminded of.

It's that we don't matter. It's
that our safety doesn't matter.

What matters to the InstaVla
to the people leading this

country, whether that's
the state level, the federal

level, all of these different
sport governing bodies,

what matters to them,
is the feelings of a male.

Not our feelings, not any of our
success or sacrifices as you mentioned,

that doesn't matter. And that's
the message that they're sending.

The mental rape of Riley Gaines
and other girls like her is only possible

because of silent accomplices who
refuse to speak up about these issues.

So today does a girl have a right
to a space where for her to undress

without men staring at her or without
her having to look at male genitalia.

If it's up to the Biden
administration, then

no. This means that
men could join sororities.

Men would have full access to bathrooms,
changing areas, locker rooms on campuses.

They could take academic and athletics
scholarships away from women. They

could be housed in dorm rooms with
women and you can do nothing about it.

Actually, if you were
to say something about

it, you're guilty of
sexual harassment.

They want to normalize this so bad and you
have to ask yourself the question of why.

Why do they want to normalize this? Men and
women's locker rooms, undressing next to

young girls? Yeah, we should have a right
to privacy, but we don't as women anymore.

You might even be tempted
to say, well that's one

example, but this isn't
happening outside of college.

But it is. Girls now must
worry at all ages about

a man exposing his penis
to them in a locker room,

raping them in a bathroom,
or they have to worry

about being beaten by a
man claiming to be a girl.

You might still be tempted to think
that you could hold strong and not

give in if your child was affected
by gender ideology or queer theory.

But in California, they passed a
law that would classify a parent not

affirming their child's self-professed
transgenderism as child abuse.

This law would also give custody
preference to parents who are affirming

the child this trans, while punishing
those who refuse to affirm it.

One man that would
affect his Harrison, a dad

whose son is called
non-binary by his mother.

My son actually knows he's a
boy. He'll tell you he's a boy if you

ask him. If you say anything to
the contrary, he'll actually get mad.

The media has reported that Sawyer's
mom has borderline personality disorder.

And there's also a major study that was
done that showed that 53% of moms who

have children that they are transitioning
have borderline personality disorder.

Does that seem like something that
should be setting off red flags to people?

That those types of
numbers are showing up when

it comes to mental illness
associated with this?

Absolutely. It's
horrifying, first of all, but

secondly, I mean to
see that staggering of a

number of 53%, and I
believe it's of moms that

have boys that are
transitioning specifically.

And to see that, it's pretty scary to
think that that could be happening

at such a big number, and I do
think it has a big relevance to it.

But his mother is able to take
him to these meetings or to

these appointments in furtherance
of having him be transgender.

Well, she takes him
to a doctor that's okay

with it. This doctor
actually testified in our

trial. They actually
court ordered after our

trial that he has to
continue to see that doctor.

And this judge was a member of
the LGBTQ community, is that correct?

That was part of her election process.
It was like that was her big thing.

Okay, so there's some bias there.
Did she come up with this on her own

as far as like I want to raise these
babies as sometimes they call it?

Or was this something that
she saw a stereotypical behavior

and decided to associate
that with a particular gender?

When he was really
young, she actually would

call him a boy on social
media and everything.

It wasn't until about when I started
getting custody of him that this happened.

I just started seeing things on social
media where she was calling him.

They and things like that. And
then I found pictures of him in dresses

and wearing makeup. And just
a lot of really scary stuff to see.

Did he ever talk with you about that
experience that, you know, was he,

was his idea? Did he ever want to
play dress up with you at your house?

Or was this something that happened
exclusively at the mom's house?

When he's with me, he fully
expresses, he loves being a

boy. He's like a picture perfect
little boy playing the mud.

He likes to fight and wrestle
and climb and play sports.

If he were to say, I want to
play with a doll or I like the

color purple or pink, you know,
how would you respond to that?

I would probably just give it no meaning.

In the Republican Party,
state legislatures seem to be

the primary group fighting
back against this ideology.

That's why we spoke to
Representative William

Lambroth and Tennessee,
a champion to bill that

banned sex changes
for kids and voted to ban

sexual adult performances
like drag shows for kids.

Just yesterday, the Tennessee
legislature faced a domestic terrorist

attack where somebody sent
a letter with white powder in it.

I don't think there's any
determination on what that was yet,

but this is clearly being done
to try to make you guys afraid.

When you see these
activists do this, and in

this case, we know
from reporting that this is

most likely a trans
activist, it was sent in the

name of somebody who
was trans and they died.

What do you think, are
they able to make you afraid?

Absolutely not. So
here's a thing. We're

going to fight for what's
right in Tennessee.

And these folks from
all over the country

that have obviously
never visited our state,

that have obviously never met at Tennessee,
and they don't really understand us, okay?

We stand up for what's
right. We stand up for what's

going to make Tennessee
better tomorrow than it is today.

We are the volunteer state. We
literally volunteer to go all over

the world to help out other people
to fight battles for other states.

That goes back to Davey
Crocket. Absolutely. There

be no Texas if there
were not for Tennesseans.

And so this is who we are.
Tennesseans have got an

awful lot of grit and mailing
some powder to an office

in a cowardly act to try
to intimidate somebody is

both not going to work
and it's also kind of stupid.

Okay, because think about
this. There's a staff member

in one of our members offices
who opened that envelope.

She sees white powder in a
threatening letter and yet it scared her.

She's a young lady who's
pregnant with their first child.

And all of a sudden she's got this white
powder in front of her. The only thing that

that person did was terrorize an innocent
state employee who's just doing her job.

It not even be a Republican. You know,
like that's the thing is when they send

these letters, you don't know if a
Democrat or a Republican's opening them.

Yep. To the people who
oppose these bills that would

protect children from
sterilization, chemical castration, or

even these sexually explicit
adult shows really understand

the nature of what these
procedures and experiences entail.

Well, unfortunately
some did and they're still in

favor of it, but many of
the folks that we talked

with when they were
really told like, look, this

is what this procedure
is. This is what it does.

This is what the negative effects
that are going to last a lifetime.

When they really heard from these
young people that were so brave

to come down here and just testify
as to some of their most intimate

and difficult decisions in their
life that could have been made.

When that happened,
when that was exposed, it

changed a lot of minds
and I hope it changes more.

What do you think it is that the left
is making this some sort of civil rights

issue as if it's akin to when Rosa Parks
sat down and refused to get up from a bus?

It mixes different issues
together and that's insulting to

those folks that fought and
bled and died in our country

for us to have civil liberties
so that nobody is judged

based on their ethnicity,
their religion, or their sex.

And that sex is something
you can't change. That's

built up in our civil rights
that protect men and

women and when you
start blending that it actually

erodes those civil liberties.
It doesn't protect them.

After a wave of Republican
led states passing laws to

prevent more innocent
people from being victimized,

many Democrat run states
have pounced back what one

expert described as
trans youth trafficking bills.

Late in 2022, California had a SB
107 and that was the first one. It's

essentially trafficking. Very briefly,
the bill basically says out of state

children can cross over to California
and they will not reunite them

with their parents if the parents do
not agree to transgender procedures.

That's the puberty
blockers, cross-ex-homone

surgeries. That was
the first one. And since

then there's been at
least five or six states

that have done
copycat bills to SB 107.

And so the transgender trafficking bill
is an extension to all the secrets that

are being kept in schools by school
counselors and social workers, teachers.

And so they've set the tone
that parents are unsafe and

abusive. Then they're expanding
on that foundation that these

transgender trafficking bills
like SB 107 in California like

HF 146 in Minnesota and
Washington State, there was a SB 5599.

And those are copycat bills that
does exactly that as separate of

children from the parents because
parents are deemed unsafe and abusive.

So why would a state try to
undermine the laws of another state,

especially when that law is built
to protect kids from sex change

surgeries? To find out, we
tried to interview a lawmaker from

Colorado, representative Brianna
Teton who identifies as transgender.

In fact, Brianna is only the
eighth trans state representative.

To tone got a trans
youth trafficking bill signed

into law that makes Colorado
a state where minors can go

for sex change surgeries,
hormones, and puberty blockers.

If they're home state, rightfully bans
those abusive medical experiments.

We were going to initially
reach out to the first

trans representative in
American history. But they were

unavailable seeing as how
they were recently arrested for

child pornography charges
in an absolutely horrific story.

But as the interview date grew
closer with Brianna, Brianna

canceled after researching me.
I decided I had to give him a call.

Hello.

Hey, is this Brianna?

Yes, who's this?

Hey, Brianna. This is Robbie Starbuck.
I want to see if you had a second to talk.

Oh, no, no, thanks. I'm not interested.

I guess I'm just confused because
your interviews you said that you want to

talk to people who disagree on this.
And you know, we want to just have a

respectful discussion with you to see if
I'm missing something I'm totally open

to, you know, you're kind of stuff that
you say on a daily basis all the time.

There's still, there's a
reaching you. There's the point.

And then in the call, they
say call and reply back.

Do you think that little
kids can consent to sex

changes? Well, that's it.
Brianna did not want to have a

discussion. And that
shouldn't be a surprise because

everyone on this pro child
mutilation advocacy side.

They avoid conversations at
all costs because they know that

they can't win the argument against
people who are empowered with

facts, statistics, and the
horror stories of what kids have

been through who've gotten
double mastectomies at ages like 13.

Okay. They don't want to speak to
people like that. They want to speak to the

people who are manipulatable. They
want to speak to the people who are weaker.

That's why they target
children. They want to

speak to people who
are not resolute in their

values because ultimately
they know that's the

only group that they
can get on their side.

That's why they run away from
these conversations. So it shouldn't

be a surprise to you that they're
not interested in conversation.

In fact, in the email
before this, they said

they didn't want to do
the interview anymore

because they don't want
to go into the lions den

and stick their head
in the mouth of the lion.

You know, it's kind of a
compliment because I do kind of

feel like that's what parents
need to be right now. Lions who

protect our pride, protect our
children. That's the pride there

should be on all our minds is
the one that we need to protect.

An ongoing theme we noticed
when we tried to learn more

about the opinions and
beliefs of people on the left who

adhere to this ideology, we
realized they don't want to talk.

They declined interview
after interview after interview.

We were left with no other
choice. We tried to call them.

Really sad that you feel that
way. We actually represent a lot of,

you know, detransitioners that also
have a voice and should be heard.

Do you not believe there's
anything such as detransitioners?

We heard of detransitioners
that have had their

genitals medilated and
are on hold like God.

Have had surgeries and double
mastectomies at 13 years old.

And out of your asking these questions,
is it perfectly why we're declining?

Why does society-

We want to know if
detransitioners can get help?

I hope you find exactly
what you're looking for.

Why does society ideology
not allow questions? Isn't that,

you know, a sign of grooming
when you can't ask a question?

I don't understand why you're
continuing to ask a question.

This war even reaches newborn babies now.

The Biden administration's CDC
recently issued a guidance for

men who identify as women
to, quote, chestfeet their babies.

This comes after recent
viral videos of men identifying

as women, forcing babies
to suck on their nipples.

Make no mistake, this is sexual abuse.

The CDC's guidance doesn't
warm once about the lack of nutrition,

the potential for harm through
ingestion of the drugs these men take,

or the reality that this
is a known sexual kink

of at least some men
who identify as women.

This war on kids is institutionalized
within our government.

The Assistant Secretary
of Health appointed by

Joe Biden is a confused
man named Rachel Levine.

He says that sex changes
for kids is healthcare that will

literally prevent suicides, but
I think Abigail might disagree.

He started at that school. She was
going through depression in middle school.

It was in eighth grade when I went
talk to the principal what happened.

I took her to the hospital
because on that day she

took some pills over
the, so it was allergy pills.

So that's how everything started.

When to the doctor, she was fine, but
they didn't release my daughter with me.

They called CPS.

Since that moment, I had CPS
at my house coming twice a week.

When her grades was
going down, that's when I went

to the high school, and
talked about her depression,

and I was hoping to get help to
give her more time for the test.

Instead of that, what they did
is send her to LGBTQ group.

I didn't know anything about it.

So my daughter started to change.

She looked pretty mad, upset, depressed.

One day she talked to her sister that
she thought that maybe she liked girls.

But later on she wants to change her name.

Her name is Yaeli. She
changed her name to Jay.

A couple months later she didn't like
it, so then she changed it to Andrew.

And then she started to talk about
she felt like she was in the wrong body.

I'm here, you see a girl, but inside
I'm a boy and I go like since when?

I didn't know that she was
going to these groups at school.

Nobody at the school told you.

No, they secretly sent her to these groups.

How is her mental health in the
limited visits you have with her?

She was not able to sleep.

After you know
going through all these

depression is worse
than what it was before.

Why? Because now they
are dealing with pain, with

medication, going back
and forward to the doctor.

Surgery is not just one.
They don't tell them that.

I thought she was going
to go into therapy first.

That they will explain the positive, the
negative and you know the side effect.

If you want to help my
daughter help her inside out.

What's in here? Why is this
depression after the testosterone shot?

She tried to suicide twice.

When CPS came to remove your
daughter, we walk us through that process.

They planned all this with the mother
and this other kid from the high school.

Oh my gosh, I was crying.

Then what should I do?

I need to do something.
My neighbor had cameras.

So they were able to see.

That car was there for five minutes
waiting for my daughter to get out.

That made me feel like my
daughter was in sure doing this plan.

All the time that they had my
daughter, they sent it to a group home.

I couldn't go to visit after
court. It was her new home now.

After we went to court,
we had a meeting there.

With LGBT CPS, the people who
worked there, the group home, trying to

convince me that what my daughter
needs is going to the transition.

And I have to respect her.

And you have to refer to that.

Not to my daughter,
you have to say, my son.

And I say, no, I can't do that.

Who's my son?

They say, well, if you
don't do that, you rather

have a dead daughter
and not a life as son.

And I said, none of that is going
to happen just because of a name.

Why did they do that to parents?

Because I've heard that from
every kid who has a de-transition.

They want to manipulate the
parents and see if they gave up.

And they are very cruel with parents.
They're not there to support the parents.

One of them came to my house and I
asked her to leave because she asked

me that why it was so difficult for
me to accept a boy instead of a girl.

And I said, I don't
think you have children.

But it's easy. Just plan a funeral
for your daughter in a adopt your son.

Oh, and the moment I
ask her to leave my house.

Don't you ever come
because you cannot tell me, I'm

going through this
depression trying to commit...

And you're telling me to prepare a funeral?

I'm cruel as that.

What they did, people should go to jail for
life for what they did to your daughter.

And then September 4.

She decided to melt in front of a drink.

They begged even
the funeral at the funeral

home that I wanted to
see her for the last time.

He said there's note that you can't.

And I said, well, just let
me see one of her hands.

When he asked me that, he went
backward. He had my daughter.

And he said, let me check.
Let me see what I can do.

He was an ex-marine.

And when he came inside,
he looked different to me.

And he said, can I have you got his seat?

He asked me, I'm going
to tell you I'm an ex-marine.

And I saw a lot of...

I'm going to therapy because of that.

But I never got to see something like that.

So I will encourage you
not to see her like that,

because if you're but if you
insist and I cry and I said,

can I see one of her
hands finger something?

And there's nothing
that you can really see.

Well, I think from heaven, you
can see how hard you fought for her.

And you told the truth always.

And I think that's a gift that a
lot of kids aren't getting right now.

They don't have parents that care enough
to tell the truth and to fight for them.

And you fought very hard for her.

You're a good mom.

Take a few of your hugs.

Thank you for being such a good mom.

I'm so sorry what did it to you guys.

Thank you.

It's my heart.

What would you say
to parents that don't

understand the very
serious result that can happen

by not taking action to
protect their children?

What I will say is not to
trust the school, the principal,

the school psychologist, because
now they are working on this agenda.

So I will ask the parents
to get involved in school.

Go inside and ask them
what are they reading.

Because now it's not math,
it's not science, it's not English.

It's going to this ideology.

This ideology is killing our kids.

Do you think more people need to speak
up to protect kids like your daughter?

Yes.

I do.

Because if they pretend
this is all normal or they're just

afraid of somebody being
upset at them or whatever it is,

whatever reason they're
using to be silent, isn't

it just helping evil
people do this to kids?

Yes.

The government's complicity
doesn't end there though.

Even the Pentagon is involved in this.

The Department of Defense admits
that their doctors are transitioning kids.

One of these DOD doctors
actually said that transitioning

kids can cause psychotic
illnesses to quote,

melt away.

The only issue is that
his own study using

DOD treatment records
told a different story.

Not only did his study
find no significant

psychological benefit to
transition drugs for kids,

but many kids' psychotropic drugs
increased after taking transition drugs.

The most pronounced
increases in psychotropic

medication were in
anti-psychotics and lithium.

So surely the government stopped
these experiments on children, right?

In fact, Klein and other DOD
doctors, Noel Larson and Natasha

Schveig, argued in the
American Journal of Public Health,

that kids must be affirmed
and immediately moved onto

puberty blockers or hormones
if they have dysphoria.

Dr. Klein even claimed
that kids as young as

seven can make this
decision on their own.

He called this a human right for the child.

This is who the military
has in charge of this issue.

Some major Pentagon doctors
recently came out and they said that they

believed that children had the
ability to decide which gender they are,

that they could change
back and forth and they

also were promoting
transitioning children.

We've also found that they
are in fact transitioning children.

How did this happen within
our own military that we've got

doctors who are transitioning the
children of our service members?

I think it's awful, it's reprehensible
and they should be fired for doing this.

I think it's a crime against
humanity to do this kind of stuff.

The thing about a child making
the consent is, how do you make the

consent to remove your sexual
organs if you have never used them?

I don't even know what
this is. A seven-year-old

barely knows the
difference between a boy.

They probably have a vague idea of
the difference between boys and girls.

But they really don't
have yet any kind of

comprehension of how boys
and girls interact sexually.

And it's like, oh,
you're just going to give

up on that. That's not
an informed consent.

The parents might be able
to make informed consent,

but I probably wouldn't let
the parents consent to that

for children because a child
has to make the consent to

have to be old enough to
know what they're giving up.

They also aren't informing
them basically of the

urinary child complications
that go on and on and on.

Joe Biden has recently
been saying our children

as in the US government
has a stake in each of our

children and that they're
not wholly ours as parents,

but that they belong
somehow to the government.

Is that a slip of the
tongue or do you think

that's intentional that
that's entered his message?

I think the language is
very purposeful and you

remember Hillary
Clinton that takes a village.

It isn't about the
parents. It isn't about the

individuals. It isn't about
a mother or a father.

You know, then there's a
birthing person and maybe

somebody else around
sometimes. I mean, it is really about

thinking that the traditional
family unit, the traditional

family values, the religion
makes no difference.

Mental health issues
should be no surprise

among the kids affected
by the social contagion.

Dr. Lisa Lippmann, a former professor
at Brown University School of Public

Health, did a study of 256 trans

identifying teens that
found 82% were girls.

62.5% had at least one other mental health
diagnosis before identifying as trans.

Nearly 40% had a friend group where
the majority identified as transgender.

Nearly 50% tried to isolate away from
their family. 25% stopped hanging out with

non-transgender friends. 86.7% showed an
increase in social media or internet use.

And to quote the study,
60% of the friend groups

were known to mock people
who were not transgender.

Despite the mental health
issues that exist prior to

identifying as transgender,
one of the top methods used

to induce guilt by trans
activists who support child

medilation is citing a study
from the Trevor Project.

That study says that giving kids
hormones for a sex change will reduce their

suicide risk. What they don't tell you is
that it wasn't a scientific study at all.

It was a quiz which found
youth through targeted ads

and offered them $50
prizes to respond. The results

also excluded data on
the self identified 36% of

responding youth who did
not want hormone therapy.

They also used this
desecration of science to say that

puberty blockers would lower
the suicide risk for kids too.

I think it's safe to say that
pharmaceutical company

AvB got their money's
worth when they donated 50

grand to the Trevor Project
since they make the drug

lupron that's given to
kids as a puberty blocker.

It's also given to pedophile
child rapists to chemically

castrate them, but I'm sure
they don't want to talk about that.

The FDA has never approved these
drugs to be used for transitioning.

Yet doctors still
prescribe it and other

so-called gender affirming
care drugs off label.

This is the very
definition of an experiment

and it's been done
on America's children.

The drug companies AvB and
Endo were asked by doctors

to seek FDA approval for
these drugs but both declined.

Many believe they want to
avoid safety studies. Why isn't the

media hounding these pharmaceutical
companies you might ask?

Well, in 2020 pharmaceutical
companies accounted

for about 75% of the
TV ads spend in America.

That's what. Many describe what the Trevor
Project is doing as convenience sampling.

Convenient sampling
involves using respondents

who are convenient
to the researcher.

What is the cost of
transitioning kids anyways?

A Swedish study concluded
that transgender people

have increased suicide
risk after transition.

The study says sex reassigned
trans persons of both genders had

approximately a three-time higher
risk of all cause mortality than controls.

Childhood transition can
also result in micro penis,

total sterilization, and the
inability to ever orgasm.

One well-known surgeon
who transitions young people

recently gave an interview
where he admitted to

needing the help of a
robot to castrate a child and

create a wound that they
call an artificial vagina.

I want you to listen and ask yourself
how is this different from any of the

most evil medical experiments performed
on children in the history of humanity?

That is very new
is genital surgery in

someone that is under
one puberty suppression.

You don't have enough tissue to line
the vaginal canal so you either have to

take a skin graft or take skin from
elsewhere or use an artificial product.

The way that we're dealing with
it is by using a robot and we're

basically performing intro
abdominal components of the surgery.

So we're using paratonam
which is the interlining

of the abdominal line
most of the vaginal canal.

In the process of making this documentary
we tried to reach out to the left.

We sat down with
Joellyn Vargas. She's a

tick-tock influencer
with over 30 million likes.

She practices something
called gender-creative parenting.

Something happened that I didn't expect.
She admitted something that stunned us.

It was a silent knowing
that what's going on online

with this transgender
social contagion is wrong.

Some very sick people are profiting often.

I think there is a big group of people out
there who push back against his parenting

staff who also push back against people
who are transitioning their children.

They'll say, you know, essentially that
the internet is creating social contagion.

That kids are on tick-tock and
they see a thousand videos of

kids who are saying that they're
non-binary or whatever it is.

And they're just following the trend.
And do you think there's any truth to that?

You guys' questions. I love them.

I will say another big reason why I
took my kids offline is because there

were a couple of accounts who did
center their accounts around their children

and their children's
transitions and things like that.

And I started to realize
that they were causing

somewhat of a discredit
to the community

because a lot of
people obviously would

assume they're only
doing this for the cloud.

These people have millions of followers.
Every video they post of their child and

it has anything to do
with their transition,

gets millions and
millions of views.

And they essentially
are getting paid and some

of these accounts are
doing ads with these kids.

Yeah, and so I didn't
want to add to that

discredit because I
feel like if I am sharing

my kids that side of
the political spectrum

does get to say you're
doing that for cloud.

And granted, there are
still some people who are

like you're doing that
for cloud because even

though you're not
sharing your kids, you're

still gaining cloud from
talking about your kids.

My son, we did a, we did
film with Disney before the

pandemic. While we were
filming, he had like so many rights.

So like we had to get a Cougan
account which meant the money

would go to him. Most of the
money would go to his account.

And that he had like a tutor on site, even
though he was only like four at the time.

And that tutor made
sure that he was hungry.

He ate. If he needed
a nap, he took a nap.

She was there to like be
there for him. And it made me

realize like there's
nothing like that for internet.

Like for social media parents, there's
no Cougan accounts. There's nobody

on set making sure that the children
are not working 10, 12 hours a day.

And then you see these
parents doing like ads and stuff

and you're just like that
child is making the money.

This movement isn't
hiding its aims. A drag

queen named Little Miss
Hot Mess made that clear.

And in academic paper, they
wrote explicitly recognizing

that pride and drag for kids
was meant to be political.

The sudden inclusion of kids
in pride and attending drag

shows has nothing to do
with tolerance or acceptance.

It's not only about
sexualizing them either.

It's about creating
lifelong left-wing voters.

Like other activists,
Little Hot Mess ghosted

us after scheduling
an interview with us.

This is awesome mom
for their kid house. We're a

family friendly drag show
ladies and gentlemen.

Drag queen story
time and drag shows for

kids are a political
operation at their core,

meant to divide society, sexualize kids
and destroy the innocence of children.

That much seemed clear to us,
but we wanted to make sure. So we

sat down with a Nashville drag
queen named Veronica Electronica.

Hello.

Hi.

Thank you for joining us.

Thanks for having me.

I have a question for
you guys. What do you

guys do when you're
not in front of the camera?

We're with our family.

What are your last names? Start up.

Starbuck.

Yeah.

I'm going to have to end the interview.

Why is that?

Because I feel very uncomfortable.

Can I ask the camera to get
turned off for just a second?

I want to have a real conversation. I
think that when you start equivocating

a live performance like drag that
is not an adult themed art form,

and it's not adult
content. It's not a 21

and a triple X content.
It's just, it's not.

I'm concerned about children's safety and
being exposed to sexually explicit adults

who want to take off their clothes
and grind and gyrate in front of children.

Could you at least announce that?

I'm there. I am unable to.

I wasn't going to do
this, and this isn't like,

I think this is the stuff
I have a problem with.

And you're probably not
okay with this. The kids right

there in the background,
that's not an enriched child.

They're not learning something from this.

But today, that really
isn't showing any part

of the body that would
be considered as illegal.

If I show you the full
video, you will see it.

But we have many, many, many
things that are happening in our state

and our country that are jeopardizing
the lots of children like guns.

You're deflecting the conversation,
though, and not answering the question.

I so, you cannot denounce behavior
that is sexually explicit around children.

I am not saying that. I'm saying
I am declining to comment.

And even for children?

Oh, it's for those kids. I get it.
We have laws protecting children.

Have you seen any
sexually explicit fractions

marketed as only
just for kids that you

would denounce or
think that are a problem

and that you want to
distance yourself from?

No.

You know this is wrong.

So, that photograph
could very easily have been

taken at the 50-yard
line of the Titans game.

I would have the same problem.

They don't wear G-strings.

But they do.

They wear G-strings and spread
their legs and children's faces.

Well, they may be not wear G-strings,
but I don't know if that's a G-string.

The sound by of that
photograph shows a glimpse

of a moment and
probably a moving picture.

I'm sure that that person wasn't
spread-eagle there for any...

Do you want me to put it up in time?

She denounced behavior
that was sexually explicit like

that of somebody spreading
their legs showing their

G-string to a child audience
in a show that was explicitly

marketed as all ages
family-friendly, just morally.

Then would you spread your
legs in front of a child like that?

No, not on purpose.

As a person of faith, I feel personally
attacked for the stances that you have and

what you and the views that you have
toward me, my co-workers and my community.

The amount of times I've
been told that I hate drag

queens and I want them
all to die is ridiculous.

I want nothing but good things for people.

I just don't want kids to be
exposed to sexually explicit stuff.

I think that your line of
questioning was very misleading.

The question we've asked
has been respectful, has

been about trying to
understand that respect it.

If these conversations are
shut down and we were not

going to get anywhere, this
interview was not about us.

But the interview is to
hear your perspective.

This is your opportunity to
tell people that you at least

announce this sexually explicit,
egregious behavior for children.

Do you still think regardless of the
laws, you don't have a problem with

that behavior in front of children
because it's protected by free speech?

You know this is right.

So, I feel why.

It's just a very simple question.

Well, I'm just an entertainer.

You're a professional drag queen.
That's why I wanted to hear from.

I am, but just because I'm a
professional drag queen doesn't

make me an expert in some
of the legal conversations.

We never asked you any legal questions.

No legal questions.

So, you cannot denounce behavior
that is sexually explicit around children.

I don't have to.

If you want, he can walk
you out to the best area.

The area, my life on the school's ground.

I do not have a mic on me.

What's your head?

I can see.

Have a wonderful afternoon.

It's still here.

Oh yeah, that one.

Oh, good.

Psychology today reports that 99% of
child sexual abuse involves grooming.

The methods to groom a
child include selecting a victim.

A pedophile named Jack
Reynolds gave what's now a famous

interview where he was asked
how he selected his victims.

How did you get them alone?

Grumming.

I would check out their family situation.

I would check out their clothing
to see how well they were.

When we were on the ball
parks or on Jim Ford, you

know, I would make sure
which ones I wanted to molest.

I would give them special attention.

Were there certain
characteristics that you

looked for in children
before molesting them?

In children, yes, but more I
also looked at their families.

If I thought the father was a threat,
I would not approach the child.

Predators admit that
they select the vulnerable.

Those with little supervision
online are prime targets.

That's one way predators
gain access to them.

Then those predators develop trust.

This can be done many
ways, but one is to give

rewards such as attention
or likes on social media.

Step 4 is to desensitize the child's
sexual content and physical contact.

Look no further again than the
social media algorithms to do that.

Step 5 is what's called
post-abuse maintenance behaviors.

Those can look like persuading a minor
that it's normal to be sexually exploited.

Social media does
this as well when a kid

sees that sexualized
girls get all the likes.

Social media isn't just
sexualizing our kids.

It's also a vector of attack
in the child trafficking trade.

To learn more about this,
we talked to someone who is

sold online over a thousand
times, beginning at age 14.

The big news outlet, the
Atlantic, ran a headline saying

child trafficking essentially
is a conspiracy theory.

Is that true?

No, that's not true.

I wish that was the case, to be honest.

I wish that was really
what was going on, but

in reality as I work with
hundreds of survivors,

not only in my state,
but all across the country.

No, it's happening.

When we look at our status as
the 80% of victims are US citizens.

I think sometimes
we get this idea that it

comes from third world
countries and it's not.

It's happening in our own backyard.

As I work in safe houses, as I run support
groups, the survivors are from here.

I've had two survivors in the last
five years that I've been working

with survivors that two of them
came from a different country.

Two.

All of the survivors I currently
work with are from the United States.

When I look at one
with the idea that it's only

happening somewhere else,
it's not happening in America.

In my story of exploitation, I
was sold in over 12 states total.

12 states.

But it wasn't just me.

There was a whole trafficking ring.

There were other
children, 12, 13, 14 year old.

And I think that in some
cases we begin to think

that some people
believe it's just prostitution.

Kids cannot consent to prostitution.

Our kids are being trafficked.

It's interesting because I think
that that same thought process is a

part of what allowed me to stay in
modern day slavery as long as I did.

Because people didn't
think it was happening.

So, Keelan, as a survivor of child
trafficking, tell us a little bit about

the process that yourself and many
other kids go through called grooming.

Yeah.

So the grooming process is very intricate
and something that can take either

a couple weeks to a couple of years
depending on the type of trafficking.

If we're looking at CSEC, which
is a commercial sexual exploitation

of children, it's going to be
a maybe a shorter process.

But if it's familial trafficking,
which is it's happening in the home,

it's happening by a guardian that
can take up to a couple of years.

So with my grooming process,
my trafficker took a couple of months

and I was actually boyfriended
into the life of exploitation.

And what grooming process
really looks like is the perpetrator

taking the time to fully understand
what are the vulnerabilities?

Where can I enter into your
life to then manipulate you

into the actions that the
perpetrators want you to do?

When kids are groomed
today, where is that happening?

I think that that's the scariest
part in the world that we live in.

When we look at the grooming
process, the easiest way that kids are

being groomed right now are on
social media and online platforms.

I think with COVID, it's kind of increased
the nature of kids sitting behind the

screen without parental
control and guidance,

which is a scary
place for kids to be.

If I told a parent, you know, would you
feel comfortable dropping off your kid?

At a park where you knew there were
three or four pedophiles hanging around

the park and just take the chance
that nothing's going to happen to them.

Every parent would say,
absolutely not, that's crazy.

But aren't we essentially doing the same
thing online? We're just dropping them

off with almost no supervision, all a bunch
of pedophiles hanging out around them?

Absolutely. I think it would be
crazy to think that they're not on there.

I think the hard part is as
parents is sometimes we kind of

run away from that idea because
it makes us uncomfortable.

When I think about my
exploitation and starting as being

trafficked when I was 14,
my buyers knew how old I was.

And they purposely purchased
me because I was under age.

As we listened to Keel and I was
struck by the fact that she was the

same age when she was first
sold that our oldest daughter is now.

Made my heart sink. Who
could do this to a child?

How could this have been
prevented? So I asked her.

I watched this video
where a pedophiles in jail

was asked, what did you
look for in your victims?

And what he responded with was
honest and kind of jarring. And he

said, I looked for the kids who
had weak fathers or no fathers at all.

Is that what you've seen is that the kids
who are most at risk are the ones with no

fathers around or fathers who are weak and
are not going to stand up for their show?

I think that is definitely
vulnerability. When we look at

single parent homes, I was
raised in the single parent home.

What did dads need to do to
step up to make sure that their kids

are not those kids who end up
vulnerable to online exploitation?

Yeah, they have to be
a great example of what

a real healthy father
relationship looks like.

I think a lot of times
in relationships we

always seek after what
we've seen in the home.

So if we're in homes that are
broken, we often find that in psychology

you continue that cycle and broken
relationships over and over again.

And so how do you show
up for your kids even if

you're not in the same
home with the other parent?

Sometimes that's just not
viable for everybody. Parents

go through divorces,
but it's still a father stop

to show up for their
child and be able to sit in

those very hard spaces but
have honest conversations.

So there's a lack of
understanding when it comes to the

kind of the structure that a
good father brings into that.

So when you don't have a
parent in the home, what we

find a lot of the times is
that children are missing it.

So if you're not getting
in the home, they're

going to seek that validation
and outside sources.

The harm for kids doesn't end
with the internet, big pharma,

wall street, academia, entertainment,
or even our own government.

The very food that they eat in tap
water they drink is cause for concern too.

Atrazine's a pesticide
that's in much of the tap

water kids drink today
and the food that they eat.

When Berkeley professor of integrative
biology Tyron B. Hayes investigated

Atrazine, he did an experiment on frogs
where he introduced Atrazine to the water.

The result was that
many of the male frogs

turned gay and made
it with other male frogs.

One intent actually began to produce eggs
and 75% of them were chemically castrated.

So what is Atrazine doing to
our children? No one seems

to want to invest in finding
out the answer to that.

One limited study on grown
men produced results showing

that many exposed to Atrazine
had very poor seam inequality.

While a rodent study
found that Atrazine could

pose a cancer risk,
and Atrazine isn't alone.

Similar studies have found other
toxins in non-organic foods in tap water.

After reviewing Tyron Hayes
Atrazine's study on frogs, it got us

thinking about how often people we
interviewed brought up masculinity.

I think there's an attack on masculinity.
I think that it's watering these men down.

Yeah, most people are
looking towards celebrities

and they're looking up to
people like Santa Smith.

That's not even a picture of masculinity.
It's just a very, very toxic culture.

It is extremely hard and challenging to
find. Like mine did, godly masculine men.

We just have a generation of weak men.
We need men to rise up and become men.

You mentioned boys being boys. That's how
a lot of people see boys looking at porn.

And this is sort of an
interesting weird thought

I had a long time ago
and it's that somehow

there was like a flip
in the matrix where we

switched up the way
we thought about this.

Because if you caught a
boy outside and he's staring

at a girl's window watching
her change, he's a creep.

What a weirdo. I'm calling the police.

If you see him peering in
on earth through his computer

screen and he's paying
two dollars on only fans,

suddenly it's just boys being
boys getting out some weird

urge. But the truth is, you
know, if you go back in time,

these were seen as the least
masculine qualities you could have.

You were so amazulated
that the only way for you

to ever see a woman
naked was to be voyeuristic.

It's now flipped to that being empowering
in some way. How did that happen?

Oh, that is a good question. That's
an interesting question. I don't know.

Neither do I. I don't
understand. I think it's

interesting because we
stopped requiring men to be men.

I think that's exactly where
it stems. We stopped raising

the bar for them to navigate
world in a different way.

And the same thing with women,
right? Like there was a standard. But

now we've lowered the standards
to it's okay to be super sexualized.

When back in the day, that was
not okay. Not just okay, but it's better.

It's better and it's
desirable. And they lie

and pretend that men
are going to want you then.

This will probably be a
controversial take, but it's

true. Most men, if they want
to get married to a woman,

they're not looking for
the person who's super

sexual. They might go
on their page or whatever.

But they're actually
putting them in a totally

different category. And
it's not wife category.

And if we're thinking about the
context, you know, yes, there's anomalies.

Some people don't want to get married.
Some people don't want to have kids.

They can do what they
want to do. The vast majority

of people want to get
married and have kids.

And in that context,
we're lying to kids.

These kids are crying
out to us, aren't they?

I mean, do you see that in the
trafficking survivors you work

with? Are they crying out to us
to do something and to act like

adults and for men to be men
and dads to step up and women to

be that nurturing and pathetic
voice that's finding out like,

what's going on in your
heart? Are you okay?

Oh, absolutely. I think that's the
one thing that's missing and that

creates the vulnerability and a lot
of survivors is they don't have that.

But I do think that it's the
men's stance that really will

create the difference in our
children being trafficked or not,

because they will stand in
the way of the vulnerability

that's happening if
they're being exposed to it.

We're at this point
where it seems like

nothing's real that
used to be real anymore.

And it almost feels like
the medical industry and our

schools are abusing kids.
Am I wrong to think that?

Oh, no, I think you're
completely right. It almost

feels like they're test
subjects. I think what's

happening is they are
doing tests and we're not

going to see the effects
until about 10 years later.

When we're sitting here and we're
like, we were completely wrong.

But at the expense of who?
Like at the expense of our children

and that's it. No child should
have to go through that.

When I think about me in high
school, like, I was a tomboy. There was

nothing in me playing sports and
watching video games and playing comics.

Like, there was nothing in that space
that was like, well, maybe you're a boy.

Right. Like, maybe you should
change your gender. Like, there

was nothing. I didn't have to
deal with that. But you're right.

Now we've gotten into
this narrative of like, well,

if you feel that way,
then you should change it.

Porn is another weapon
in this war on children.

Why is it important to
have sex at on PornHub?

Well, it's important to
have sex at everywhere.

Are you concerned that
having sex at on PornHub might

entice miners to come to the
site to have access to sex at?

Absolutely not. And
when it was created, it was

created. We never advertised
it outside of PornHub.

Was it ever promoted on social
media or anywhere else in the news?

And no, we don't really promote it.

PornHub's sex at is here.

Today we're going to
talk about healthy and

masturbation habits. The
proper way to use a condom.

Female and mad at me.

What is normal and what is
not for people with a penis?

What age should sex and start for kids?

I believe sex has to
start in inner guard,

in the sex education
because they work back.

Fortunately, a lot of
people think, oh my god,

they're going to teach my
children how to have sex.

Well, I think they think a sex.

Do you believe some of
these schools of thought

believe that children
are inherently sexual?

Is that something that
you believe starts at

a young age or at what
point do you feel like?

Of course. Of course. Have you never
seen a 18-month-old masturbating?

No, I have it.

But the hand on
their pants, a little boy,

they catch themselves
because it feels good.

Their penises get hard. All little boys
ask, hey, look, mommy, my penis is hard.

Like, blind my penis is hard.

Do you think pornography that
portrays child simulation, like with

women or men dressed as young
children or simulating child behaviors,

drive the pedophilic
behavior and tendencies?

No, I don't think so.

I think I have a big head of
a child who has a big head

of a child representative,
I think, in the, you know,

she has a big account influencer,
but also as a spokesperson at

Corn Hub that made a comment
about having sex with teenagers.

Did you even do that?

This 13-year-old, I think I'm...

He could have easily passed away.

Okay, if I were you...

He wasn't necessarily
like an old-looking 13.

You look at him and
he's definitely a child.

He's just like really, like,
he had the perfect 10...

He's doing adult-######r and...

That shouldn't be considered statutory
rape and like, it's consensual and...

No one would consider that
rape except maybe his mom.

And that's what we have shoes like to...

I think there's not one
person that would think that's

abuse and would just
think how lucky that kid is.

Pretty much.

I mean, and we're specifically talking
about Asa and this 13-year-old kid.

So, would you feel morally dirty
if I went to the other room and...

Yeah.

this kid, like, would
you look at me different?

Yeah.

Okay, not maybe would
you look at me different, but

like, would you think that
I'm doing something wrong?

I would be a bad for the kid.

I would be so proud of both of you guys.

Maybe a proud of me.

Because you go to prison and you really...

I'm trying to think about
the problem right now.

What are you a ####ing like?

Snitch?

Are you a snitch?

Oh yeah.

Would you snitch on us?

It sounds like you would.

Yeah.

Because you're so sure we'd go to jail.

No, we would never go to jail.

I would just hurt you guys.

What are you talking about?

What are you the protector
of 13-year-olds or something?

I think somebody has to...

Is that something that
you support or endorse?

It depends.

Again, the age of sexual
consent is 16 years old.

So, let's go with the law.

Is there...

There's no sufficient of
authority over that 16-year-old and

legally they can choose to
have sex with anybody they want.

Do you think it's problematic that
poor and hub doesn't require age?

I don't think so.

I'm not speaking for that.

I'm not the both story-own, you know,
your version, so I don't want to ask.

I don't want to...

Oh, I don't have a version.

It's just a fact.

Poor and hub doesn't verify age or consent.

Are you familiar with the work,
you know, Dr. Alfred Kinsey?

Of course.

Yes.

Do you, you know, find
his work to be instrumental

in shaping your views or
modern sexuality framework?

Well, I think that he did the biggest...

The one of the biggest large-scale studies.

So, I mean, obviously,
it opened the door to

looking at so many
different aspects of sexuality.

He was the first really to...

Especially to look at.

So, I've back then called
deviant sexuality or fetishes

or like people really were
able to talk about the huge...

The range of sexuality out there.

So, certainly, he opened that door.

Poor and companies
seem to have no interest in

protecting kids because
they know it means less traffic.

So, in Virginia where they've passed
a law to mandate age verification,

Poor and hub has chosen
instead to shut down in the state.

A gamble made in hopes that Virginia
politicians will give in and change course.

Parents could fight this by
rallying a wave of legislation

in other states requiring
age verification for porn

until it's impossible for
companies like Poor and

Hub to do business without
verifying age and consent.

Social media companies
should face similar restrictions to

ensure miners aren't exposed
to porn or exploited on their sites.

This is all in our control if the
adults in the room stop putting

their porn viewing habits in front
of child safety and do their job.

This generation also
reports the highest uses of

birth control and psychiatric
drugs we've ever seen.

A recent study showed use of birth control
was linked with higher rates of depression.

I saw a statistic the other
day that really bothered

me too, not just the failing
numbers and academics,

but the absolute crushing
levels of depression and despair.

This poll was on eighth
graders and twelfth graders.

And we have near 50% level
answering yes to questions like,

my life has no meaning.

I don't want to get up in the morning.

I don't think life is worth living.

This does not bode well
for our future in this country.

We're taking away all of the things that
throughout history have given life meaning.

Family, faith, a believe in personal
achievement, a belief that you could

do things and that you matter and
that faith matters and your family matters

and that your parents are
looking out for the best for you.

All of those messages are being
taken away and look at the levels of

depression and despair and just really
just sadness and loneliness in our kids.

We're looking at a generation that is
the most faithless we've had in America.

They report the highest levels of not
believing in God that we've ever seen.

Are you afraid that that
need to believe in something

is being replaced with
worshiping, wokeness?

Yes, absolutely.

Several other people have pointed
out especially during COVID when kids

are spending so much time online
and the messages that they're getting.

And a lot of times the
natural feelings that kids

have during puberty or
twin years where they're

uncomfortable in their
body or they're feeling

lonely or they feel
like nobody likes them.

They're finding this group online who are
telling them, well that's because you're

trans or you're this and your parents don't
understand you but will be your family now.

And it's disturbing that
there are many teachers and

counselors who are trying
to then affirm these confused

kids as opposed to years
ago you would find your group

in your neighborhood or in
your family or in your church.

Now they're being told
that the answer to these

feelings is to somehow be
medicalized for a lifetime.

These kids probably aren't
being told that once you go down

that path you're a medical
patient for an entire lifetime.

And they're a slave to Big Pharma.

Yeah, the alternative
is being a slave to

Big Pharma in a different
direction being put

on anti-depressants
at a super young age

instead of dealing with
whatever the problem is.

And maybe there's an argument
that some kids may need some sort of

pharmaceutical intervention in some
rare cases and stuff but I think most of

the problems people in my
generation, your generation dealt with, if

you were sad or something like
that, these were dealt with in real life.

You didn't pop a pill to fix it.

It was human interaction.
It was going outside.

It was changing your environment,
exercising, all types of different

things, try to deal with the
problem first before you jump to that.

And it seems like we're
putting kids on these

tracks that all end
with either Big Pharma

or some sort of woken-dever that's supposed
to push them in the direction of leftism.

If we look at cultural Marxism
or socialism throughout

history, it always ends
in authoritarianism.

It always ends, as
you know, from Cuba,

bloodshed, China, Matt
under Mao, Pol Pot, Russia.

Once you sort of break
down the family unit and

you break down the things
that make life meaningful

like traditions and like
values and faith that it

becomes very easy for
governments to take over.

They also report the highest
levels of depression, mental

health issues and lack of faith
in God that we've ever seen.

It's never been clear that this
generation desperately needs God,

something to believe in and
an aspirational goal for their life.

Some might bristle at calling
this a war on children, but

let's go through a checklist.
In wars there's propaganda.

And I don't think anybody can argue
that propaganda isn't being used.

There's weapons used to mutilate people.

Look no further than the
images of surgeries being

done on kids today to
confirm that that's happening.

Wars have soldiers willing to kidnap,
maim and destroy for their ideology.

And wars have victims.

We have to use our voices. Use
our levers of power. Take risks,

set boundaries. Be willing to
be unpopular or called a prude.

Embrace family and
traditionalism. Embrace the olds that

the modern redguard of
wokeness wants you to reject.

Embrace the outdoors and human
connection. Embrace monogamy and

marriage. Embrace being your
child's leader, not their best friend.

Your kids need you. And so do kids
who don't have anyone fighting for them

because there's one thing about this
war on children that we haven't discussed.

Wars have winners and losers. If
evil wins then all of our kids lose.

The question we face now is
whether good or evil will win this war.

Who wins is up to us?
It's up to everyone of you.

Will we make changes
to save our own children?

Will we wake up friends
and families do the same?

Will we return to a time
where adults did their

greatest duty of protecting
childhood innocence?

Will we begin to truly hold
predators accountable with long prison

sentences or the death penalty
instead of slaps on the wrist?

Will we rise to the occasion or be a
footnote in history where the winning

side of evil laughs about our naive
silence as they indoctrinated our kids?

The choice is ours. We
can choose to be warriors for

children or bury our heads
as the next generation

is influenced by people
who hate our values, hate

our faith and hate the
foundations of our country.

We choose to raise
warrior children and to be

warriors for our children.
What do you choose?

The enemy is closing in, it
seems there's no way we can win

A generation lost and drowning in our sin

We've built these gods of gold

Now the common for the young and old

To take our power and control

Turning us to stone

Silence led to apathy

Cowards living comfortably

Just thinking of ourselves

Just doing what was easy

We can't go back, we can't rewind

It's gone too far, they've crossed the line

These mountains are coming down

We're standing on crumbling ground

And we go down

And the land is flying

Until we have no more enemies to fight

Yeah we go down

And the land is flying