Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
This programme contains scenes which some viewers may find upsetting
Hello and welcome to Global Eye from the BBC World Service,
where we bring you some of the very best of our global investigative
journalism and reportage.
I'm Anna Foster from the Today programme
and this week we're in Iraq,
a country that I've reported from many times
over the last two decades.
In the last few years, Iraq has seen relative calm,
but it's endured terror, chaos and bloodshed
both before and after the invasion
by American and British troops in 2003.
A battle against the Islamic State terror group -
who took over a swathe of the country in 2014 -
only made things harder.
Iraqis have just been to the polls
in the first election since the political crisis in 2021.
Over the next half hour, I'll be looking at just how much
the ghosts of Iraq's violent past
still haunt its political presence.
We'll bring you an Eye Investigation that sheds light on one of
the darkest chapters of America's occupation of Iraq.
With eyewitness testimony and never-before-shown footage,
we reconstruct the anatomy of a war crime -
what really happened in Haditha on November the 19th, 2005.
And as Iraq continues to struggle with chronic power shortages
and soaring temperatures,
we'll meet people finding innovative ways to adapt,
transforming their lives
and providing security for their families.
Life here in Iraq today bears little resemblance to the country
that I first came to back in the late Noughties,
when I joined British forces to report on the troop surge by them
and the Americans to try to crack down on the country's
increasingly violent insurgency.
But now, here in Baghdad, the sound of gunfire
and roadside bombs has given way to the noise of construction.
There are skyscrapers and luxury apartments being built.
And look - the markets here are always busy.
The restaurants are packed with people who travel from miles around.
And although the city still isn't a completely safe place to be,
it has come a long way from the dark days of President Saddam Hussein
and the chaos that followed his downfall.
His dictatorship was defined by rigid control
and widespread repression,
and life here has changed significantly now,
but the path to this point has been fraught with turmoil and peril.
Over the years, Iraq has transitioned from a country
of sectarian violence and instability
into a fragile democracy,
with power shared uneasily across ethnic and sectarian groups.
It's something we see in various countries across the Middle East
and here, that delicate arrangement has brought some stability,
but it's also stifled growth and development,
and for many Iraqis, it's something that has held the country back.
I was most recently here in Baghdad in 2021,
covering the political crisis that was triggered
by the last set of elections.
The mood was volatile, voter turnout was low.
It was a real sign of the widespread public discontent over corruption
and the slow pace of reform.
And despite protesting for change, young people
in particular just didn't believe that it was about to happen.
Then hundreds of Iranian-backed militia members tried to storm
the heavily fortified Green Zone,
which holds the Iraqi parliament.
It all looked like any kind of progress would be hard to achieve,
but after lengthy talks,
the Shi'a politician Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani
emerged as the compromise candidate that every faction
could at least live with,
and another fragile political settlement was born.
Al-Sudani proved to be a relatively popular leader,
bringing stability to the country domestically
and successfully walking the tightrope of maintaining Iraq's
crucial relationships with the US and with Iran.
His political coalition won the most seats in last week's election
and he looks set to form the next government.
The incoming administration will have a full inbox -
reviving an economy that has started to falter
and dealing with rampant official corruption.
And it will have to handle America's continued military presence
in the country.
The last remaining US troops in Iraq were meant to be leaving this year,
but that timetable has now slipped,
leaving visible reminders of the war in a country
that is still scarred by its past.
America's presence here still casts a long shadow
and, more than 20 years after the invasion,
one incident in particular has left enduring questions
about the conduct of some American troops
and about their rules of engagement.
On the 19th of November, 2005,
US Marines killed 24 civilians in the Iraqi town of Haditha,
northwest of Baghdad.
Many of them were women and children.
The brutal events of that day led to the longest
and most expensive war crimes investigation
in US military history.
Six Marines were implicated in the killings.
One stood trial, but none served any time in prison.
Now, after a forensic investigation over three years,
BBC Eye can reveal never-before-seen evidence which implicates
two Marines who were never prosecuted for the deaths of the
innocent civilians in Haditha.
Here's their exclusive report.
Iraqis claim the Marines went on a rampage in the town of Haditha
after one of their own men was killed in a roadside bomb attack.
There had never been a case on this scale
that involved the death of 24 Iraqi civilians.
WAILING
I'm trying to remember...
..what happened.
Time, 12:24.
Photography starting on house four.
Checking for defects.
We're going to be here longer than we thought.
I ended up getting sent to Haditha to do a forensic analysis.
We ended up having four sites
where there were killings that were brought into question.
The Marine version of events is
there was an improvised explosive device that was triggered.
It took out the last vehicle in their convoy.
The very lead of the convoy was pulled up almost adjacent to
a vehicle that had several Iraqi males in it.
The Marines said there were some suspicious things about the vehicle.
They shot and killed the men from the car.
That became... Our first scene is roadside.
They also reported receiving gunfire.
There was a house in that direction.
As they moved through the house to secure it,
that resulted in the death of three adult males,
a mother, a child, and others.
They saw who they thought was the gunman leave through the back,
so they followed into house 2.
House 2 is where we end up with the father
being shot by the front door
and then the horrific scene in the back bedroom
where the mother and the children are shot on the bed.
So what we're looking at, at the end of the day, is
that there were 24 deaths at the hands of the Marines in Haditha.
Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich will face a military trial
for leading a Marine squad
that killed 24 Iraqi men, women and children.
Wuterich was one of eight Marines originally charged with murder.
Sometime early in 2006,
I got a phone call
from someone who was seeking an attorney
for Staff Sergeant Wuterich.
I had represented other soldiers and Marines accused of war crimes,
but once you see the photographs
and read the forensic analysis,
anyone who was presented with that information
could never believe that these casualties were unintended.
What happened in here that allowed
two women and five children
to be identified as a threat,
as a target, and to be...
.."mitigated" would be the polite word.
I'll use the word "executed".
It's absolutely certain -
he either heard and/or saw you shooting.
I do not, honest to God,
remember firing in house 1 or 2.
I know I threw a grenade into house 2. Mm-hm.
OK, so you don't remember shooting in the houses at all?
I don't.
We have statements from the Marines
and, in house 2, we have two different versions of events.
Mendoza gives a very elaborate statement of what happens.
They entered the house.
We have Mendoza saying he was going down the hall.
Mendoza clearly states
that the one that was still in the hall was Tatum,
so there's a lot of invocation to Tatum is the one doing the shooting.
In Tatum's statement,
he's following Wuterich into the house.
So, certainly with Tatum,
he places himself in the room,
firing across the head of the bed.
Then we have Wuterich,
and he never makes a statement to NCIS,
but he makes some early statements.
Very simple - "We were there, we cleared the house, we left."
Based on Tatum's statement,
we placed Wuterich in that room, doing that shooting.
Frank seemed to have the worst memory about the events in house 2.
While he remembered making entry to the house,
he couldn't tell us basically anything that happened after that.
So, in 2008, Frank went back to Haditha.
This seemed like perhaps the only way we could get Frank to remember.
When we're talking about a forensic reconstruction,
the Iraqi versions of events doesn't matter,
the Marines' version of events doesn't matter.
It's "what can we physically determine happened
"based upon the physical evidence?"
We have someone
firing from the hallway through the doorway of that room,
which kills the aunt, and she collapses there.
When we look at
Tatum and Mendoza's statement, the aunt is ignored.
She's not mentioned.
So, at that point, we know that
their statements have at least one portion
where they're changing what happened.
We have the shooter immediately moving past her body,
penetrating into the room, turning at the foot of the bed
and beginning to shoot their way across the bed.
At the same time,
we have someone coming in behind them...
..facing the bed from the side
and shooting across the head of the bed.
On one of the victims,
the last to be shot,
she actually appears to be simultaneously shot
by both shooters at the same time.
We knew that we were going to have
to deal with solid evidence
that there were two shooters in that room.
Our job, at that point, became...
..somehow proving
that one of those shooters was not Staff Sergeant Wuterich.
..so it'll be clear on the record when someone reads the transcript.
Any objection by counsel to that procedure? No, sir.
The client may continue. Yes, sir.
Mendoza places himself at that room,
and he places himself opening the door.
So, against his own self-interest,
he places himself as the primary player at that door.
OK. Waited for the doors to open.
This is the first time I've heard this.
Now, he's going eight feet into the room,
which is the shooter position.
And I've never heard this before today.
So, if you were to ask me, "Is this a confession of sorts?"
what I'd say is Mendoza confessed
to everything except for pulling the trigger.
OK.
We had always known that Lance Corporal Tatum,
he admitted in his statement
that he positively identified
a child before he shot that child.
They dismissed the charges.
They never had a trial.
And now suddenly they had
Lance Corporal Tatum on their team as well.
We want to present you some evidence,
most of which will be presented at the court martial.
This is kind of a trial run. You're a focus group.
We did a mock trial. We presented a case not like
we would in a courtroom, but as close as we possibly could.
And they...
..reacted very negatively.
Reduction of rank,
bad conduct discharge and eight years confinement.
With a dishonourable discharge in 15 years.
House 2 is morally corrupt,
and if I thought so,
death penalty.
We understood that our client was in jeopardy,
despite our best case.
Frank could be convicted of homicides.
More now on the conclusion to
the biggest and longest running criminal case against US troops...
Some time into the trial, the main prosecutor,
he just kind of pulled me aside and he said,
"Neal, would your guy be willing to take a plea deal?"
I was preparing to testify.
I stood up, adjusted my necktie and started down the hall,
and they said, "Stop.
"We don't need you."
And then they reached a plea agreement with Frank Wuterich.
If I had taken the stand and testified,
I would have said that the best
explanation was two shooters in that room,
Mendoza leading
and Tatum firing across the head of the bed.
What would it have done for the larger...
..concept of justice?
Nothing, because both Tatum and Mendoza had been given immunity.
So, you've spent a lot of time with Frank.
Do you genuinely believe
that he doesn't remember or he doesn't want to remember?
I don't know.
I don't know what I believe.
You can watch the full film on BBC Two at 11pm
on the 2nd of December and on BBC iPlayer.
There's also a podcast with much more about
the survivors and families in Iraq.
That's No Justice, Just Kills on BBC Sounds.
This week, the BBC World Service
is launching an exciting new commitment to dial up
women's storytelling across our global output.
BBC Global Women will share stories throughout
the year across BBC News
and the BBC World Service and on television,
radio, online and social media every day.
We as students are on the right side of the future.
I'm working as a content creator.
When we stand up for the truth, we protect each other.
And that's how real change begins.
Here in Iraq,
people are really feeling the impact of climate change.
Summer temperatures now reach 50 Celsius
far more regularly than they did just four decades ago.
And when the heat peaks, power cuts often follow,
sometimes lasting for days
and leaving communities struggling to cope.
But even amid these challenges,
people are finding innovative ways to adapt.
The Kulak Solar Village in the Kurdistan region is
the first of its kind in Iraq.
Powered 24 hours a day by electricity from solar panels,
the project has transformed daily life,
especially for local women, who are now able to earn a steady
income and provide greater security for their families.
We came to Kulak Village
because we want to promote sustainability.
We want to create communities where they thrive.
In this village,
we have secured solar panels for all of the houses,
the local mosque, the school.
And that has meant their lives are completely transformed.
Our long-term aim is to replicate this throughout
villages in Iraq and Kurdistan Region.
We want to make sure
that our countryside stays full of life.
We don't want people to leave because they don't have electricity.
Thanks for joining me here in Iraq
for this week's episode of Global Eye.
And we'd really like your feedback on the programme.
So do let us know what you think on social media.
You can use the hashtag...
We'll be back at the same time next week.
Goodbye.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.