All language subtitles for An.Ordinary.Case.2024.2160p.4K.WEB.x265.10bit.AAC5.1-[YTS.BZ]

www.titlovi.com

January, 2020
Day one of the Milik process

Ladies, gentlemen, the court.

The lawsuit is open.
You sit down.

The blue thread

Based on a true story

February, 2017
Mas-Thilbert

No, Ryan.

That's my hug.
-On table.

At the table.

Hello, is your father at home?
-Yes.

Nicolas Milik?
-Yes?

We arrest you because
of murder of your wife.

Murder?
-Follow us.

What did I do?

I can't leave my children alone.

Dad ...

A child died last week
because of drugs.

I'm afraid of my son.

He plays his life
with such friends.

Talk to him.
I only have him.

He listens to you.
-I are going to do my best.

And my VAT problem?
-I is on top.

Here.
-No, I send an invoice.

Good, goodbye.
-Thank you.

Not to believe that you
still have that painting.

It was a gift.
-I know, I gave it to you.

For our first wedding year.

You bought it from your
friends with that gallery.

No, I bought it at ...

Aix.

You bought it here.
-No.

Yes.

Is that yours?
-No, yours.

Yes?

Can't that wait until tomorrow?

I'll call you back in five minutes.

The police for a picket arrangement.

So I am the only one
who records this hour.

Are you going there?
-I don't really have a choice.

I finally sit this evening.

Do you not want to do this for me?

Only this evening.

You do the provisional detention.
I'll take over the case tomorrow.

Come on, Jean.

Because it is you.

Thank you.

Don't go home.
Keep sleeping here.

I'd rather sleep in my own bed.

National police

Thank you.

Master.
-Good evening.

It is 00.30.
You have 30 minutes.

Can you release sir?
-Naturally.

I am Master Monier,
your assigned lawyer.

I don't know why you are here.
-Do you not know why you are here?

I would have killed my wife.

Nobody accuses you, you are in pre
-trial detention. There is a suspicion.

The police need
more for an arrest.

Why don't they let me go?
-The facts are serious.

They can hold you for 48 hours.
Enough now.

Tell me in detail what
happened last night.

I've already told it.
-You have to do that to me now.

I have nothing to look for here.
I have to go to my children.

Mr. Milik, to help you,
you have to tell something.

My wife and I had a fight last night.
-Why?

She had drunk too much again.

I just said I was worried
about her. Nothing more.

She went through the ribbon
and said: I do what I want.

And after that?

Then she shouted that I
had to leave the house.

I said it was my house too.

She wanted to hit me.

I avoided her, but ...

She scratched me a lot.

Was she violent against you?
-No.

Only if she had drunk too much.

When I start talking about the
alcohol, she becomes furious.

She has a hard head.

Were you violent against her?

I never beaten her. She
is my children's mother.

We don't have the same build.

What did you do afterwards?

I said I wouldn't leave.

And that ...

I said things that ...

You know how things are going in a fight.

What exactly did you say?

Keep your head. The children
were not allowed to wake up.

She left despite my
plea. That didn't work out.

I don't want her to sleep
on her intoput on her bench.

Which bench?

When she is drunk, she goes to the bench
on the village square, near our house.

Did she go there?

Yes, I think so.

It hurts me to see like this.

I no longer recognize her.

It's not good for children.

Since she drinks, she no
longer takes care of them.

There is no talk to her.
-I understand that.

What did you do
after her departure?

Looked at whether the children were still
sleeping. That was so and I went to Roger.

To Roger?

My friend's bar.

Five minutes walk.

What time was it?

Around 11 p.m.

Did you drink there?
-A glass of milk.

No alcohol?
-I don't drink, I don't like it.

Were there other people?

Roger, his wife,
But he went to bed.

Roland, Rachid and
Karim. We don't talk much.

What time were you home again?

Around 00.30 am.

About.

I talked to Roger and went home.

Your wife was not there
yet. Were you not worried?

She falls asleep on the bench.

Outside,
On a bench in the winter?

That happens.

When the police arrived,
She was still not back.

Were you not worried then?

Her sister Audrey often comes to get her.

Usually she returns
home the evening after.

Does her sister live far away?

In Pontet, at Avignon.

Does your wife have
problems with the locals?

Someone with whom she had a fight?

Not that I know.

If you have nothing to do with
it, Someone must have a reason.

Think carefully.
Help me, please.

I swear I don't know ...

I want my children
and wife back.

I'm going crazy here.

Gentlemen.
-Good day.

Hello, Jean.
-M .. Salah?

That's me.

Pardon ...

Did you not sleep?
-No.

Have you read the article?

Don't you want to sleep?
-No.

Have you read the article?

Yes, yes.

It's terrible.

What did you think of that man?

No criminal record or history.
Not likely, guilty,

Neither clearly innocent.

In what condition was he?

Nervous, confused.

Deliverer for his
children than for him.

He doesn't get it, is in the denial.
Talk about his wife in the present.

I'm curious about ...

The file.

Do you want to defend him?

Yes.

You have not argued since the Portal case.
That is 15 years ago.

RESEARCH
The registry

How can I defend you if
you don't tell everything?

What are you talking about?
-I have seen the file.

What Roger said on
the evening of crime.

You should have said that first.

I am not allowed to see the judge
there five minutes before I see the judge.

Roger, what are you doing here?

I didn't say anything.

M. Milik, the evening for the facts

you went to the caf�
of M. Roger Marton.

How did he react when you arrived?

He saw that I didn't feel good.
-please speak in the microphone.

He saw that I didn't feel good.

He understood that it was
because of C�cile. We had a fight.

Tell us the events afterwards.

I sat down at the bar.

I told about the fight.

Last round, we will close.
Well, thanks.

She is sick.

Go to child protection
if she doesn't stop.

You will do that well.
-I can't do that.

Too good, too stupid.

She rolls over you.
-No.

She has character.

Don't interfere with it.
-We talk.

Keep out.

I'm going to bed.

See you.

I would go crazy
without the children.

Doesn't that say enough?

Ah, I knew.

A bit quiet.

We usually hear you alone.
-This is my cafe.

C�cile is not easy.
You earn better.

Comfortable?
-A load.
She drinks.

It is not her fault.
-O No? Whose wrong then?

Not even if she removes
the children tomorrow?

How do you protect them
against her without you?

No idea.
-You said it. You go crazy.

You let yourself be
destroyed walk over you.

You are just like a child, you
look up at her. You are not a man.

Do you want a photo?

I tell you, if I was you
Would come a moment that ...

What?
-You understand me.

We are going to close.

M. Milik, During your three years in custody, you

have referred to M. Roger
Marton as your friend.

Can you say you admire him?

He is my only friend.

Mr.
Milik?

Yes, yes, sorry.

Do not blame me.

If he is your only friend
Counts his opinion, right?

You don't want to disappoint him.

I don't want to disappoint him.

Didn't Roger go too far when
he suggested to kill your wife?

I didn't take it seriously.

If he is drunk,
he wants to kill everyone.

He barks, but doesn't bite.

Did not get upset and did not
want to prove the opposite ...

When he said you were not a man?

My client is not a child.

He would not kill his
wife to prove himself.

Master, your speaking
time is coming. Continue.

Pardon ...

Did you consult a divorce
lawyer six months earlier?

To orientate me.
-Mag I ask you why?

C�cile drank a lot.

It became dangerous for Emma
and Ma�l. They were still small.

So you considered
discharging your wife?

Legal, I mean.
-I didn't do it.

I didn't want to keep my
children away from her.

You have seen the lawyer twice.

You can love someone and still divorce.
-or kill.

That was all, thank you.

Master, the defense.

Mr. Milik, when you were informed
about a divorce, what has ...

My colleague said about
custody about your children?

That I would probably get
custody through the courts.

Because of her alcoholism, I assume.

You don't drink.

And yet, if you were divorced and

had custody, would
your wife have

kept the house
in which you live?

The house is from C�cile,
inherited from her father.

She got the usufruct. The house is also owned by

your sister -in -law, Audrey G�rard, who now lives there.

In other words, even if you were not charged

with this murder, your
sister -in -law would ...

The house inherited and should
have moved you and the children.

Isn't it right?
-yes, that's how it is.

So you knew that you
would not inherit the house ...

If you kill your wife.

Now let's go back to
the conversation with ...

My colleague about
the divorce procedure.

What would the financial
consequences be?

With regard to the child benefit
you get to raise your children.

I would get that then.

If I have custody.

Are these amounts
sufficient to find a house ...

And to educate your children well?

Can we say that a divorce was
easy and to your advantage?

By the way, your wife had ...

A life insurance policy?

Did she have savings?

She had nothing, Only
her part of the house.

The part that is to her
sister and your children ...

Upon the death of
your sister -in -law.

Summary ...

Brings your wife's
death only sadness.

Thank you, M. Milik.

Thank you, Master.

... for her children, for �lodie,

for Jade, for Ryan, for Ma�l and

Emma who need this
power and comfort.

Holy Mary, is priced, The Lord

is with you, blessed are you ...

Above all women and blessed
is the fruit of your body, Jesus.

Saint Mary, Mother of
God, Pray for us sinners ...

Stop, let go.
Please don't touch them.

Who do you think you are?

We go, children.

Yes?
-For the lawyer's room.

If you don't help with the
reconstruction, that works against you.

Why don't you want that?

What does it matter?

Think of your children.

I can't see them.

There is an application. I
was with child protection.

Do you have children?

Yes.

I have questions for
clarification. Like the mud ...

On your shoes and your pants.

The expertise has also found it on Roger
and C�cile's clothing. What about that?

No idea.

I am not going to the reconstruction
because I have not done anything.

What day is it?

It's Saturday.

In good weather I went
with Ryan to Lake Aulnes.

I borrowed Roger's things.

I am going to buy his first
rod with a beautiful mill for him.

Within two years.
He's a little young.

If you help me within
two years, Are you free.

What is it for?

I am Master Monier, your
brother -in -law's lawyer.

I come and get things from him.

He has nothing.

Mme G�rard, if you have
something to say, I like to listen.

He doesn't necessarily tell me everything.

Malo, out. Come on, get away.

Get away.

Do you know how beautiful she was?

She has not always been such a wreck.

She was elegant when
she worked at the town hall.

She enjoyed
laughing and dancing.

Before she met that creep.

Because...

You defend him,
But he is a creep.

He made her happy
for a while, but the

children have
sucked life out of her.

The death of our father was a shock.

As if she had no one
anymore to protect her.

Gradually she started drinking more.

I was ashamed ...

And it was painful to pick her
up in that state of that bench.

She didn't tell me
anything about her life.

I said to her:
Come live with me.

She loved her
children, But it was bad.

Give him the photos of his
family. Then we both suffer.

And now, get out.

You hate what I represent.
-Nou and?

When he is released, My
sister will keep you out of sleep.

The victim is on February 20, 2017 ...

died around 2 a.m.
Marge of thirty minutes.

These photos were taken
seven hours after the crime.

Were there traces of alcohol in the blood?

In accordance with
investigation and dating was ...

The alcohol content
in her blood 4.

1 Promille.

There is one wound in the neck.

The cut is caused by a sharp,
serrated object, type of survival knife.

Dissection pointed
to a cut caral artery.

The knife pierced the
neck on the right, at A.

Then to the left and cut the carotid artery at B. According
to the wound research, the only and deadly stitch ..

.

brought with strength from behind.

Mme the chairman,
A question, please.

Go ahead.

You said the cut runs from right to left and has been inflicted from
behind. Can you physically imitate the movements of the murderer?

The expert refrains from
this. He is not a mime player.

If you allow it, I will do it. I
am a fan of Mime Marceau.

Go ahead.
-Thank you.

M. Expert, do you want to describe
the movements I have to perform?

Just.
-Good...

The murderer held her
from behind with one hand.

With one hand.
Like this?
-Yes.

He planted the knife in her
throat with the other hand.

Like this?

Thank you.

When the cut runs from right to
left, Then it was a left -handed, right?

That is plausible.

Thank you.
-Thanks, master, for your performance.

You can start a new career.

M. Expert, continue.

The horizontal shape
of the cut and blood ...

On her knees indicate
that she was standing.

Is there other injury?
-no other injury.

Neither resistance.

Mme the chairman, I have a question.
-Gaat uw gang.

In the absence of such traces, the victim
may have been dropped on the spot ...

By a well -known one?

That is a possibility.

That was all, thank you.

Mme. Marton, did you hear the night before

the facts that the accused
wanted to kill his wife?

Not that I know. Last
round, we will close.

And your husband?
-He is sick.

Go to child protection if she
doesn't stop. You will do that well.

I can't.

He gave advice to Nicolas.

Nothing alarming.
-Ewad over you.

She has character.
-Roger, don't interfere with it.

We are talking.
-Leave him.

I went to bed.

But you didn't go to sleep right away.

I removed my makeup.

Then I started reading in bed.

I heard the metal
roller shutter at 1 am.

Paracetamol is in the bathroom.

What do you say?

What did he answer?

He said:

I did it, crazy ...

Silence, please.

Silence, thank you.

Ms.
Marton, explained your husband ...

What he had done?
-He did not say.

He was drunk.

He immediately fell asleep.
-The next day not?

He stayed in bed all morning.

He said he couldn't open
Because he was sick.

I said: good.

What do you think he did between
1.00 am, when Milik left the cafe ...

And 3.15 am when he
came to your room with you?

No idea.

I never knew that.

Less than 24 hours after the facts,
the police arrested your husband.

Can you tell what they
have discovered with you?

A gun that doesn't work.

And also ...

A war knife.

What does it look like?

There are holes on the
handle to put your fingers in.

Like a boxing bracket?
-yes, that's it.

It is quite large.

I have it. It was in
the bar, under the sink.

I ask you again: what did your husband
say to the police at his first hearing?

That he had done nothing special.
-Not?

I will remind you of it.

He said he was between the departure
of Milik and arrival in your room ...

had cleaned the cafe.

Two hours?

Maybe we watched some TV.

You didn't drive?

I was drunk.

If I had taken my car
I was getting dazed.

Do you have a survival knife?

Beats.

Do you know where it is?

In the garage.
With my army souvenirs.

Then why did we find it
under the sink in the bar?

I once caught it.

Aha?
-Just ask my wife.

When I'm drunk, I go to the
garage and put on my uniform.

Sometimes I put on my
beret The customers like that.

Well, you took your knife out of
the garage and went to the bar.

If you have found it in the bar, yes.
-Do you clean it?

We found it wet with
traces of washing -up liquid.

I washed it.
What else should I say?

You understand that I have my doubts ...

About your husband's statement.

Mme the chairman, can I ask
you to break stamp number seven?

M. L'Huisensier?

Do you recognize this knife, Mme Marton?

It's my husband.

It has the same
characteristics as that of crime.

A serrated knife,
Similar length.

Moreover, according to the analysis
report DNA van Roger Marton found ...

On the handle and a piece of human
flesh between the handle and the knife.

Unfortunately, too small to

determine the date and origin.

I have one last question
Mme Marton.

With which hand does your husband write?

Left.
-I end by saying ...

That my customer is the right.

Thank you.
-Pardon, master.

Your insinuation is pure interpretation.

I see this as proof against the suspect.

Mr. Milik could
have killed his wife ...

By controlling her
with his right arm ...

And to stick with his left hand.

He could not have inflicted such
a deep wound with his weak arm.

Master,
This is not pressing a game arm.

What do you draw, Emma?
-Papa's prison.

With us before,
If we can see him.

Yes, that's nice.

Jade, have you not signed anything for dad?

Come children, it's a break.

No, stay here.

Sit down.

Jade is not doing better, isn't it?
-She still doesn't speak.

But she did play again.

What is the decision about the bail?

The request has been rejected again.

But from your father I had to
say that he loves you very much ...

You think you are very brave
and you are very missing.

Do you think we can see him?

Visiting him is difficult.

Have you thought about what
I asked? To come witnesses?

No, I don't want that.

Why not?
It would help your father.

I'm ashamed.

The mud has the same
composition as that in your street.

Not of the mud at the Van
Gogh bridge, Like the first study.

This is completely free on this point.

Thank you, master.

I have to examine the nature of the
relationship between your wife and Roger.

Roger again?

If I cannot prove
that he knew C�cile,

they will use it against
you as an argument.

That says nothing. She had
drunk. She had gone with everyone.

Yes, but we have
no other suspect.

It's not against him,
But for you.

Has your wife visited Roger's caf�?

That happened, yes.

How was he with her?

Good, correct.

Did she know he was your best friend?

Nice like that.
This is progress.

Wow.
Here, from �lodie.

It was a beautiful wedding.

C�cile's father was still alive.

He liked me.

He had argued with Audrey
who didn't want to come.

Did she not want to come?
-she thought it was too fast.

Are you married quickly?
-Two months after our meeting.

How did you meet?
-On a July 14 party.

She had such a sweet look. I
couldn't keep my eyes away from her.

When she saw that she
asked what my problem was.

I said: nothing.

And that I liked her.

Then I asked her to dance.

Did she say "yes"?

I couldn't believe it.

We went out to dinner.
We talked a lot.

That did me good.

As a child, she
also lost her mother.

I brought her home.

When leaving the car ...

I tried to kiss her.

While she let it happen,

I told myself that I would
never be alone again.

Did Master Monier explain it?
-Jean has told everything.

They beat him up. He wants
nothing more to do with their trade.

I'm afraid of my son. He
is a talented bullfighter ...

And will ruin his life.

We have to talk to him, He
wants to withdraw his complaint.

What is?

Nothing.

I was warm.
It's going to be.

Is it going again?
-Yja, nothing wrong.

Shall I call the doctor?
-No, it's nothing.

I was shocked.

You saw corpse.

Why do you smile?
-To "corpse". My mother said that too.

I'm not your mother. But I do say that
you have to take good care of yourself.

You work too much.
You get exhausted.

For the first time since Portal.
-That is separate from it.

There is no evidence,
The file is weak.

So for you is he innocent?
-That's not the point.

I'm talking about my defense. I
want to believe in my arguments.

But can you admit
that you are wrong?

I can admit that
I am wrong, yes.

January 2020
Day two of the Milik process

I have excellent news.

Mme Diallo from child
protection called me.

�lodie wants witnesses
if her father agrees.

Great.
-Meester Monier?

I have heard nice things about
you. Portal, do you say what?

Madam, please ...

The great lawyer who
received the elderly killer Portal.

Madam, stop.

And what did Portal do
immediately afterwards?

He went on with murders.

Enough so.

Come on, bastard. Are
you going to do dirty work.

Your daughter �lodie
must come witnesses.

Witnesses for what?

That she needs you.

And is responsible for
her brothers and sisters.

I don't want it.

You don't understand. The court
cannot refuse such a request.

She should not see this.

She is a big girl.
-I don't want her to see me here.

After three years,
I don't want it.

I don't want it.

You confirm: there are no DNA traces, Van

Milik nor Van C�cile, found in M. Marton's car?

Exact.
-And on the body?

The autopsy could only
DNNA from Nicolas Milik.

That makes sense
as a man of the victim.

You are right, but one
detail makes it less normal.

What did the autopsy report
about the nails of the victim said?

Under the nails of the right
medium and ring finger ...

The autopsy doctor found a
small blood residue from M. Milik.

As recorded when my client
interrogates, they had a fight

shortly before this drama and
Mme Milik wanted to hit my client.

She scratched him in the neck.
-Do you no longer want to interrupt the OVJ?

Let her hair finish.
-Thanks, MME the chairman.

This is not the point.

Please continue, agent.

We found under the nail
of her right index finger ...

A tiny piece of blue thread.

You definitely mean
the bright blue suit ...

That according to witnesses M.
Milik wore on the evening of the facts.

And that we found during the
house search at the foot of the bed.

This question is for the suspect.

M. Milik, you wore no jacket
during the fight with your wife.

How is that blue
thread under her nail?

Don't know.

If you didn't wear a jacket,
As you reported during the

interrogation, how can this blue thread end
up under the nail, just like your blood?

Your wife could not pull
a thread out of your pants.

She could not turn
around to get into the face.

I don't know that anymore.
Maybe I was wearing my jacket.

Agent, you can repeat the exact
words during his interrogation ...

About his clothes during
the fight with his wife?

He said he wore a white shirt
and the blue pants from his suit.

Not the jacket.
-That is it more likely ...

That she resisted the Van Gogh bridge
when she understood your intention.

She tackled you, that explains the

presence of the blue
thread and your blood.

No, I may have been mistaken
about my clothes at my interrogation.

Even if you were wearing the jacket,

you said the fight
was around 10 p.m.

Is it possible that a thread will
stay under a nail for so long?

If the victim was
killed around 2 a.

m., it is four hours.

Master, the defense.

I will first respond to
the public prosecutor.

My client has absolutely no reason
to remember what he did that evening.

The next day he still knew.

Today, three years later, It was
an evening like everyone else.

He has no reason to
remember what he did then.

As if I ask him what he was wearing
on December 22, 2016, for example.

I remember that.

It was Christmas at school.

I was wearing my gray
stripe costume. My favorite.

Master, it would be more
advisable to turn to the agent.

Did you argue today?

Yes, and I lost.

Your bull fighter has received
three years for drug trafficking.

Nicolas' daughter must testify.

Have you heard what I said?

Yes, the bullfighter. I'm
going to talk to his father.

That is probably not his priority.

Time for a cup of coffee?

I do, but not you.

Hello, sir.
Place the dough.

I report the death of Mr.
Marton.

We found him dead in his
cell. My condolences, sir.

He spit blood all night.
Nobody came to help him.

They let him die like a dog.

Nicolas, it's painful for you,
but...

It helps us.

No, master,
You don't mean that.

Do I have to make a list for
which he has all been charged?

What is?
-He was my friend.

Last month he said in
court that he was not you ...

had seen leave.

That witnesses your car at the ...

Had seen Van Gogh bridge.
-He protected itself.

Don't be that
loyal to this dick.

Let me defend you.

But Laure ...
-But why, Laure?

It is shame for her
or life in the cell.

Good, master, go for it.

I understand that your
client died. My condolences.

You must condemn his widow.

You are not here to
express compassion.

That's right, dear colleague.

Let us save our polite features.

Well, I sincerely think
my client is innocent.

What do you mean?

Apart from that is the
death of M. Marton.

I thought he feared him
protected him.

But even after his death
he stays loyal to him.

According to him, he is innocent.

Do you insinuates that my client is guilty?

That's why I'm here.

It is delicate, but did he make a
confession in your secret conversations?

If so, we can ask if ...

Professional secrecy
can be lifted so that you ...

You can act as a witness.
-Ga from my office.

Get out or let you put it out.

Get away.
Out.

Out.

Why did you want to get
information from Montel loose?

Roger Marton died yesterday.
-I know that.

He told me everything and
said he would sue you ...

If he and I didn't argue together.

It was risky,
But I had to try it.

I hadn't hesitated in his place.
-Are you crazy or something?

Don't say that never
anyone else tried this.

Others don't care. You
were almost suspended.

I want to prevent
a judicial error.

An innocent can get lifelong.
-You take it way too personally.

He did not change his version for
three years. No confession, nothing.

What do you think?

Just like you. But I
would keep my head cool.

I do not shut off the world
when I fight against injustice.

Who is speaking now?
My partner or my wife?

Your friend, Jean.

I know you areolates
if you are vulnerable.

Don't put me on my
number. It's annoying.

I have to argue in less than
two months. I can't use this.

I was with my grandmother
when I saw the call to testify.

I remember that
evening At the bridge.

What exactly did you see?

It was 2.00 a.m. I went
home My parents' house.

I saw a big car at
the Van Gogh bridge.

With its lights on.

Where exactly?
-On the other side, along the canal.

I went to Arles.

M. the clerk ...

Was it one of these vehicles?

I don't dare say that. I saw
nothing with the lights on.

What did you see then?

Two silhouettes behind the car.

For the open trunk.

You can describe their physique.

It's just an impression, but ...

I think the person who searched
the trunk was the largest.

You couldn't see the other.
-Mag I ...

State that Roger Marton is ten
centimeters larger than the victim.

My client is only four
centimeters larger than his wife.

Do you have any questions?
-No.

I was there around 2 a.m., yes.

What have you seen?
-A large, dark car.

At the old bridge,
With the headlights on.

Normally there is no car there.

I thought about bad
luck. I delayed to look.

Nobody was behind the wheel.
The trunk was open. There were ...

Two people behind the car.

Have you stopped?
-Yes.

They were thirty
meters away from me.

I saw movements.

There were two people. And...

A third person on the ground,

for them, with the arms in the air.

Silence, please.

What did you do then?

I left.

I thought of drunk young people and
that the one on the ground stoodled.

But eight days later
you called the police.

I saw the call in the newspaper
that I read every morning.

Sir, did the arms in the air of the
third person seem no sign of need?

It looked like a drunkard that
surrendered and asked for help.

No weird sounds?
Shouting for example?

I listened to the radio.

The windows were closed, so ...

No.

Can you describe the standing people?

Not really, no.
-And the person on the ground?

Not either.

Thank you, that was all.

Master, the defense.

Yes, thank you.

Are you a ragman?
-Anty.

Yes, antiquarian. The night you drove over the Van Gogh bridge, you

stated that you came from the flea
market in Nimes, where you had a stall.

You had to be in Nimes early.

To set up at 7 a.m.

And you left at 2 a.m.

I closed at 8 p.m. We
went to eat with friends.

Did you drink something then?

Almost nothing.

Two, three glasses.

I think I know what you
mean. I know what I have seen.

What you saw, blinded by the headlights,
intoxicated, after a

working day of 18 hours, without hearing anything,
That

silhouette in need on the ground
could have been a stump or bushes.

And the arms in the air, branches.

I can distinguish a
bush from a person.

He says he saw him.
Isn't that enough?

What else do you want?
-please sit, please.

He killed my sister.

Murderer ...

Gentlemen,
Do you want to delete Mme G�rard?

The session has been lifted and
will resume tomorrow morning.

Everthing okay?

I have to ask you that.

Today is the big day.

Has he given the green
light for his daughter?

He doesn't understand that it has to be done.

Are you going to pass him?

He can't judge it.

And so?

The judge has not acquitted
anyone for two years.

What choice do I have?

Your plea?

That's not enough.
I have to use everything.

Do you hear what you say?

Are you the Almighty?

You only have to defend him.

January, 2020
Day three of the Milik process

Ladies, gentlemen, the court.

Sir, you responded to
the call from the police ...

In Provence eight days after the facts?

You said you read that
newspaper every morning.

For 40 years.

The newspaper is called Provencal.

Then you probably read
the first article about the

case when the victim was found.

Certainly, yes.

In that first article, Published 48 hours after the facts, the

crime scene and the time were
mentioned. Black and white.

Why did you not have
to call the police then?

That is, 48 ??hours after you have
seen what you say you have seen.

No idea, me ...

There was no call to testify.

Did you not make the connection
between these two things,

The person you saw on the ground
and the victim in the same place?

That is to say ...

I have no answer to that.

Than the second article,
Eight days ...

After the facts,
With the call for witnesses.

Again the crime scene was mentioned,
As well as the two suspects ...

Three people in provisional
detention, together with the victim.

My question is as follows:
Is there no projection?

If you read in the newspaper: three people,
Then you also say three people.

My memory and vision is fine.
Get the Kolere.

Calm, sir.
-I do not repeat myself.

Respect for the lawyer.
This is the court.

Don't blame me.

Thank you, that was all.

Sir, the court thanks you.

Do you have questions for the suspect?
Okay ...

Then we continue with
the plea of ??the civil party,

The requirement of the public
prosecutor and the plea of ??the defense.

If you have to pee, then now.

I represent the
five children of Milik,

And am the civil party on behalf of
the administrator of child protection.

First of all, I have to say that the elders,
�lodie, 13 and Ryan, 12 years old,

are well informed and
aware of the situation.

I would like today ...

want to convey their deep conviction.

Neither nor Ryan believe that
their father may have done it.

In his own words ...

They miss their father enormously.

This father who raised them alone,

with love,

has ensured that
they have a decent life,

Despite his indifferent woman,
Alcoholic and absent for her children.

I am not here to be
attributed or accuse,

But to represent these five
children who lost their mother ...

And whose interest it is to
know the truth of this drama.

The truth.

Finally, as far as I'm concerned, I want to say ...

That I seriously doubt
the fault of M. Milik.

Of course I accept the
decision of the court and the jury.

Thank you.

I would like to express my respect for
what the children of M. Milik go through.

But nor the court and the
jury members are his children.

We must accept that they
naturally choose their father.

We can't make this choice,
Because Nicolas Milik is guilty.

There is no motive, you will say. Is
there a motive with a crime passionate?

A concrete motive?

His is despair.

That evening,

after another fight,

the suspect will cry out
with his friend Marton.

Is he already planning to
kill his wife? Probably not.

Marton has not
yet convinced him.

The witnesses know
nothing about the crime ...

which takes place three hours
later, With a cartel knife as he owns.

The witnesses leave, the two remain

alone left alone and
the suspect is convinced.

Otherwise he would not be a man.

And that is where the premeditation starts.

The two men, just like everyone
else, know where Mme C�cile Milik is.

They leave the bar and
go their future victim.

They take Marton's blue 4x4.

To the Dorpsplein.

The suspect appears
at his wife's bench.

She is drunk and does not
understand what there is.

But she recognizes her husband.

So let them take herself through him.

That is why we find
no traces of violence ...

Or resist with the unfortunate.

They go to the Van
Gogh bridge, It's quiet.

It is abandoned at night.
An ideal place.

The horrible follows,
Nobody sees her.

The material evidence tells.

The victim is lifted.

She knows they want to
hurt her. So she resists.

There she pulls a thread
out of her husband's coat.

She also scratches him in his neck.

But it's too late.
Marton is behind her.

He holds her with his right arm,
So that Milik can walk around her.

From behind he puts
the knife in her throat ...

And cut from right to left ...

With a serrated knife
with boxing bracket handle.

The suspect drags the body from
his dead woman to the deserted house.

A place where it
is not easy to find.

Then Roger Marton
brings the accused.

He goes home quickly.

At home he cleans ...

The murder weapon with soap.

Just as a murderer wants
to erase all traces of his act.

But not good enough.

Because a small piece of
meat, Stuck to the victim, stays.

He puts the weapon in
a bag and goes to sleep.

Commissioned.

With the courage of a drunk.

Before he falls into the arms of

Morpheus, He trusts his wife: I did it ...

Say, M. Milik,
What did he do?

Tidy?

Watched television?

Just like me, you know that he
has murdered with you and for you.

Because you both
killed Mme Milik.

That you didn't drink Does
not help your business.

You have consciously
accepted your friend's proposal.

That evening ...

Is the claimed love
for wife and children ...

ceased to exist.

M. Nicolas Milik is just
like M. Roger Marton ...

guilty of the murder
of Mme C�cile Milik.

His act was premeditated.

I demanded a 30 -year
-old in prison for the accused.

Thank you.

Prove it.

Prove your story,
Public prosecutor.

Don't say that the evidence is present.

Be consistent, Say that it
is convincingly proven ...

Or stop this story
to keep it true.

Because there is no conclusive
evidence against my client.

Just like there is no motive.

Nothing. Absolutely
nothing indicates that Milik ...

Calm, considered sober, had a

reason to commit
that act that evening.

To get lifelong?

You know that a divorce would
have been favorable for him.

Did you really divorce, M. Milik?

Of course not.
I believe Him ...

When he talks about his love
for the mother of his five children.

Now the material things that
the OVJ wants to let for proof.

She first rejected my
client's testimony ...

Because it was not logical and reasonable.

We are either the worst enemy of
the history of the facts of that evening.

The logic on which
the accusation is based,

Is really just a possibility.

I think of the blue thread ...

Under the nail of C�cile Milik that ...

Logically, it was more
likely to get out of his jacket.

Out of his pants is less logical,
Given what happened.

And so what?

Are we going to condemn a man for that?
Because it's more likely?

Do we know for sure this thread comes
from the jacket on the evening of crime?

Do we know how long such
a thread stays under a nail?

Anyone here knows
for sure that C�cile Milik

did not move the jacket an
hour before their fight and ...

the only proof taken,
That may show that ...

Perhaps it appears that Milik was at the
Van Gogh bridge that evening at 2 a.m.

Take a good look at your nails.

Isn't there a little dirty?
Three times nothing.

Ask yourself now when
that ended up on your finger.

This morning?
This evening?
Yesterday?

I repeat:
Logic is the enemy of this room.

That opposes care, that
contains the word "proof".

Now the witness, sir ...

Fouque, antiquarian, Very sure of themselves,

who has seen three people, But in what condition?

His testimony is very brittle.

I would even say: he defies all logic.

How can the three
people he describes ...

Didn't hear the
engine of his car?

And haven't seen him
in this deserted place?

In his testimony he says the
two people behind the car ...

did not try to hide. 30
meters away from him.

Foreign.

However, a logical explanation is
that these two people were drunk.

So much so that they no longer
pay attention to their environment.

However, Nicolas

Milik does not drink.

And he wasn't there.

It was Roger, because he
has his throat with his knife ...

The poor C�cile cut
and fled in its 4x4.

But I can't prove that either.

It is consistent with what we
know and I challenge everyone ...

To prove that things
went differently.

Because there is actually no evidence.

Finally, ladies and gentlemen of the jury,
I want to recite a nice text,

That I hope will lead
you as it leads me.

"The law does not ask judges about
how they have convinced themselves.

She prescribes that she
interrogates in silence and reflection ...

And in the sincerity
of their conscience ...

What impression the evidence and means
that were accused against the accused ...

have made his
defense on their mind.

The law asks them only one question:

Are you fully convinced of it? "

It is not even because of reasonable
doubt that I ask you to discharge M. Milik,

But because I'm sure of his innocence
Because the file does not show anything else,

because he has always denied
During his three years of custody,

Because nothing is
inexplicable if he is innocent.

He is also harmless for another reason.

According to everyone, he is a good father.
He is kind to his children.

If there is one reason why he could never
kill their mother, it is because he ...

never wants to hurt them.

Give this father back to his
children, Because that is justice.

Thank you.

Mr. Milik, according to the
law you have the last word.

Do you want to add
something to your defense?

Yes.

I really miss my wife,

she doesn't come back.

But my children are still there.

They are all I still have.

Thank you.

Thank you, M. Milik.

The interrogations are over.

The court withdraws
to deliberate.

How long will it take?

It can take quite a long time.

I want to thank you, master.

Yesterday I felt bad.
You gave me a little hope.

Hopefully the jury
members are in line with you.

This is the first time that
we see each other outside.

It is the clerk.

It is our turn.

Ladies, gentlemen, the court.

The process is resumed,
Please sit down.

Mr.
Milik, you stand.

The court had to
answer two questions.

Is Nicolas Milik guilty of
murder of his wife, C�cile Milik,

within the meaning of Article
221-1 of the Criminal Code?

If so, was this

murder premeditated?

On the first question,
with a majority

of six votes, the answer is: yes.

To the second question, with a

majority of six votes, the answer is: yes.

Nicolas Milik is therefore
found guilty of these charges.

The court condemns
him to 20 years in prison.

M. Milik, you have
ten days to appeal.

The seat has been lifted.

Gentlemen, gentlemen, wait.

I would like to
speak to my client.

Thank you.

We are not going to stop, we'll continue.
-No, it's okay. We stop.

We appeal.

I'm tired, I'm tired of it. I
want to serve my sentence.

You fought hard.
20 years is not that bad.

Let me defend you on appeal.

You must forgive me, master.

I lied to you.

I did it.

I killed her.
I killed my wife.

Roger did nothing. Only his
knife borrowed and went along.

But why?

I didn't dare to tell you. I
didn't want to disappoint you.

But why did you do it?

Nobody has respected me as you.

Not even Roger.

And never like that.

I earn this punishment.
It was terrible.

Why would you kill her?
-M�, we have to go.

Master?

Pardon ...

Can I talk to you?
-Naturally.

I did everything to
get him acquitted.

You can't say that.

I know, but it is
important that you know.

You had convinced all jury members.

Everyone had agreed to
say that M. Milik was innocent.

The chairman came to
us and everything changed.

Everyone was impressed by her.

When we heard her,
Everyone started to doubt.

I am the only one that
has not changed my mind.

I wanted to tell you that I am sorry.

That was it.
-Thank you.

Three years have passed.

My life has resumed its course.

I kept defending people
More or less successful.

I never forgot that night.

But I finally processed it.

It set aside and found a
way to maintain the illusion.

Then I received a phone
call from the Arles police.

He said the Nicolas Milik case,
who are still imprisoned in Tarascon ...

for the murder of his
wife, Was reconsidered.

And that he wanted to see me.

Thank you for coming, master.

I am happy to see you.

Given the past, I am not sure if I
can help you with this new process.

I mean, outside of this conversation.

I understand your restraint.

But I promise I
will tell the truth.

What do you want?

What is your story?

I was very lonely, master.

Before you met
For the death of my wife.

Very lonely.

She didn't do anything in the house.

She started drinking more and more.

She was fuggling all day.
So one evening,

I don't know how it
happened anymore

I started to cuddle Elodie.

She is my daughter.

She said nothing.
So I did it again.

And I went on.

I knew it was wrong.

I was ashamed.
But I felt so lonely that ...

It went on and on ...

Until she said she didn't want to.

That I had to stop.
It was a shock, it grabbed me.

I said sorry.
She is my daughter, I love her.

I said sorry and it
was an accident.

She promised she wouldn't say anything.

And then I did it again with Jade.

Only we were surprised by C�cile.

She had seen everything.

She threatened to tell everyone everything.
Certainly because she knew I wanted to divorce.

That's why I couldn't divorce.

She said she wouldn't say anything.

If I left her alone and
let her drink, and she

could do what she
wanted with our money.

She took almost everything.

I did the household, Cooked
and took care of children.

Only...

She started making allusions.

At school, against the neighbors.

"You know, Nicolas loves
his children very much.

I'm jealous. "

I couldn't stand it anymore.

That's why it happened.

I couldn't help but kill her.

I looked at him.

He had withheld everything for
everyone, In the first place for me.

For the witnesses who had
portrayed him as an exemplary father.

For the child protection
that the family followed.

For the member of the civil party ...

He argued that the children
loved their father so much.

How much they missed him.

The eternal, monstrous
loyalty conflict ...

From incest victims.

A life full of lies and deception
and nobody had noticed anything.

Preuzeto sa www.titlovi.com