All language subtitles for [English (auto-generated)] Sherman Firefly vs Tiger_ The Only British Gun German Crews Feared [DownSub.com]

February 1943,

Tunisia. Columns of Tiger tanks push

forward with the swagger of armor crews

who believe themselves invulnerable.

Their frontal armor, roughly 100 mm

thick, has shrugged off almost

everything the British and Commonwealth

forces can bring to bear. The common

anti-tank measures, two-p pounder guns,

six pounders, and even the American

supplied 75 mm weapons find their

effects blunted or negligible at combat

ranges. German tank crews operate with a

degree of confidence bred by experience.

They can engage and survive where

earlier Allied armor would have been at

a clear disadvantage.

Then comes the grinding fight around

Hunts Gap. Over a few savage days,

Tigers are halted and neutralized by a

combination of mines, concentrated

artillery fire, and close accurate

anti-tank work. Some machines are left

burning and abandoned. Others are

wrecked at ranges where pre-existing

Allied guns should have been

ineffective. The scale of the losses led

regimental histories later to nickname

the area the Tiger Graveyard. And in the

midst of that maelstrom, British crews

bring out a weapon that looks almost

absurdly overbuilt. A gun with a barrel

so long it seems to belong to a railway

gun mounted for a time on carriages

barely conceived to handle its forces.

That weapon is the Ordinance QF17

pounder, and the armor equation in

Europe will never be the same.

What makes the 17 pounders tail

remarkable is not only its battlefield

record, but also its lead time. Design

work and planning for an exceptionally

powerful anti-tank gun began in London

meetings in late 1940, more than 2 years

before the Tiger tank would appear in

theater. While German engineers were

still developing the blueprints for

heavy tanks, British ordinance men were

sketching a gun intended expressly to

defeat the next wave of thick-skinned

armor. That was not luck. It was

strategic anticipation.

The basic problem was stark and obvious.

Enemy tanks were getting ever heavier

protection. The two-pounder used in

France in 1940 could defeat light armor

at moderate ranges. The six-pounder

under development promised better

performance, but intelligence and

battlefield reports indicated that

adversary designers were moving toward

frontal protection in the order of 100

mm or more. The British needed a step

change in anti-tank lethality.

On 15 May 1941, the ordinance committee

formally set out a specification for a

gun capable of penetrating in the order

of 120 to 150 mm of armor at a range of

730 m. That specification called for a

roughly 3-in caliber weapon firing a

heavy 17lb projectile at velocities far

in excess of contemporary anti-tank

guns. A further administrative decision

to produce a single gun design suitable

for both towed anti-tank mountings and

tank mounting would later prove crucial

because it permitted the same weapon to

be adapted quickly into armored

vehicles. Engineers at the Royal

Ordinance Factories in Woolwitch set to

work on the problem. To launch a 17pound

shot fast enough to meet the penetration

targets required a very long barrel and

a breach designed to survive enormous

pressures. The prototype barrel ended up

something like 55 calibers long, over 4

m in length, and the muzzle velocity

target was in the region of 900 m/s.

For clarity, that velocity is roughly

2.7 times the speed of sound, not

literally three times, but it is an

immense figure compared with earlier

anti-tank systems. The recoil forces,

the chamber pressures, the metallurgy,

and the machining tolerances demanded of

the weapon were substantial challenges.

Trials of early prototypes in 1942

produced results that validated the

concept. Muzzle velocities approaching

the required number were achieved and

penetration tables showed the DUN would

render existing enemy armor designs

vulnerable at realistic engagement

ranges. Official acceptance followed on

1st May 1942. The gun was approved for

service as the 17 pounder. But a new

problem emerged almost immediately. The

carriage. Designing and building a

heavy, rugged, split trail carriage

capable of surviving the recoil of such

a gun in quantity was not trivial.

Production of the proper carriages

lagged and by the autumn of 1942,

British intelligence reported the

appearance of German heavy tanks,

Tigers, in North Africa. The need for a

powerful anti-tank weapon at the front

was urgent. Waiting months for perfect

carriages was not an option. The British

improvisatively met the crisis. Under

the code name pheasant, engineers

adapted the 17pounder barrel to the

carriages of the ubiquitous 25p pounder

field gun. The marriage was uneasy. The

25pounder carriage was not designed to

cope with the 17 pounders brutal recoil

and muzzle blast, but it worked well

enough for wartime needs. The first

batch of roughly 100 such hybrid guns

was hurriedly dispatched to North Africa

even before the intended mountings were

ready. The gamble paid off at Menanine

on 6th March 1943 when Raml la la la la

la la la la la la la la la la la la la

la la la la la la la la la la la la la

la la la la la la la la la launched an

offensive prepared British anti-tank

positions including the hastily adapted

17 pounders stopped the attack. Captured

Tigers taken back to British ranges

confirmed the expectation. The 17p

pounder could defeat Tiger frontal armor

from ranges where previous Allied

weapons could not. Later, when properly

made split trail carriages arrived in

time for Sicily and beyond, the

temporary pheasant mounts were phased

out, but their early presence had

already altered the calculus.

Technically, the 17 pounder is a

formidable piece. It fired a roughly 7.7

kg projectile from a barrel roughly 4.2

2 m long, generating muzzle velocities

in the region of 900 m/s with standard

armor-piercing capped ballistic capped

APCBC ammunition. Those rounds could at

500 m penetrate roughly 163 mm of rolled

homogeneous steel, numbers that put the

Tiger 100 mm and Panther turret about

110 mm within comfortable killing

ranges. That in itself was

revolutionary. A towed or turreted gun

that could credibly and consistently

defeat the heaviest German armor at

combat distances. Even more

transformative was the development of

new ammunition types, particularly

armor-piercing discarding Sabo, APDS.

British researchers at the armament's

research department refined the concept

into a form that dramatically increased

penetration performance. APDS used a

dense small diameter core, typically

tungsten carbide, encased in a

lightweight Sabo, which fell away after

the projectile exited the barrel. The

reduced mass and highly concentrated

density permitted vastly higher muzzle

velocities. APDS rounds for the 17

pounder reached approximately 1,200 m/s.

Their theoretical and firing table

performance was extraordinary.

penetration figures in the mid 200 mm

range at 500 meters in controlled

conditions. APDS was not however a

panacea. The new rounds had accuracy and

dispersion problems in early iterations.

Sabo separation and wake effect produced

greater shot dispersion than

conventional rounds which reduced first

hit probability at long ranges. Tungsten

was also in short supply. So APDS was

issued sparingly. For that reason, most

crews relied on APCBC as the mainstay

round, keeping APDS for decisive

engagements. When the 17 pounder was put

into armored platforms, the tactical

effects multiplied. The most famous

application is the Sherman Firefly. An

initial attempt to create a dedicated

tank, the A30 Challenger, to carry the

17 pounder proved flawed. The turret was

tall, the chassis thinly armored, and

mechanical reliability poor. Instead,

Vicar's engineers devised a way to fit

the 17p pounder into the standard

Sherman turret. That required creative

engineering, shortening the recoil

mechanism, reorienting the brereech,

relocating the radio and crew spaces,

and accepting reduced ammunition stowage

and cramped working conditions for the

gun crew. The result, though

discomforting for crews, gave Allied

armored units a Sherman variant capable

of knocking tigers and panthers at

ranges where the enemy could not reply

effectively. By D-Day, some hundreds of

Fireflies were available, and they were

typically issued at a ratio of roughly

one per four Shermans in a troop. Their

long barrels and distinctive silhouettes

made them priority targets. German crews

learned to identify and eliminate them

first. Allied tankers learned counter

measures, visual deception, counter

shading, and even mounting dummy barrel

sections to disguise the Firefly as an

ordinary Sherman. Despite that, the

Fireflyy's record is full of dramatic

moments. A handful of documented actions

illustrate the gun's impact. On 9 June

1944 near Nor on Besson, a Firefly crew

engaged elements of the 12th SS Panza

Division. Reports credit a single gun

with knocking out five Panthers in short

order, a sequence that materially

disrupted the German assault. At long,

another Firefly knocked out five enemy

tanks by careful shot selection and

repositioning. The tactical dictim

quickly became shoot and move. Fire the

one or two rounds you need, then

relocate before enemy gunners could

accurately return fire on the unique

silhouette. One of the most famous

single vehicle exploits attributed to a

firefly occurred on 8th August 1944 near

St. Anand Cremanil. Trooper Joe Eekans

firing from a Firefly of the

Northamptonshire Yomenry is credited

with destroying multiple Tigers in quick

succession. One of the Tigers knocked

out in that fight has sometimes been

linked to Michael Vitman, the Panzer

Ace. While wartime claims and exact

vehicle identities have been the subject

of dispute, the broader point stands.

The 17 pounder equipped on mobile

platforms could and did produce decisive

outcomes against heavy tanks that had

previously dominated the battlefield.

Beyond the Firefly, the 17 pounder was

mounted in several other forms. The

Archer put the gun on the Valentine

chassis, mounted backwards so the

vehicle could fire from hull down

positions and withdraw without

traversing. About 655 archers were

produced and many armored crews

preferred them for certain tactical

roles. The American M10 tank destroyer

was similarly upged in British service

to create the Achilles variant. Roughly,

1100 conversions provided an effective

and more mobile 17pounder option. In

towed and self-propelled roles, the

weapon's flexibility proved important.

Comparisons with contemporary guns

illuminate the 17 pounders superiority

against the American 76mm gun fitted to

some Sherman variants. The 17 pounder

offered materially better penetration at

1,000 yard on the order of 118 mm versus

roughly 89 mm for the US weapon

according to period tables. Against the

German 88mm KWK36

of the Tiger, a gun feared for its range

and lethality, the 17 pounders AP rounds

put it on broadly comparable footing.

The British charted penetration figures

that were equal to or greater than the

88 in many ranges and scenarios. Soviet

testers also viewed the British gun

favorably. Evaluations at Guruchovich

found the 17 pounders performance

comparable to Soviet 100 millimeter

anti-tank artillery. APDS did complicate

crew gunnery. Early Sabbat rounds

suffered dispersion and muzzle brake

problems. The small aperture in the

brake could fail to promote clean

Sabbath separation, inducing yaw and

accuracy loss. Field workshops sometimes

reworked muzzle brakes to improve

performance, but APDS accuracy remained

a challenge. Nevertheless, when it

worked, an APDS round could defeat armor

that otherwise seemed invulnerable.

Production and service numbers underline

the scale of the Enterprise. By wars

end, some 15,000 17p pounder guns of

various marks had been manufactured. And

by May 1945, more than 4,000 vehicles of

different types bore the weapon in one

form or another. The towed gun required

a crew of five to six, and in competent

hands could deliver a high rate of aimed

fire. Its post-war life extended into

the British Army of the Rine and into

other nations arsenals. The design

influence persisted. Perhaps the most

enduring legacy of the 17 pounder was

doctrinal and developmental. The lessons

learned about high velocity, small

caliber, but dense projectiles fed the

evolution of post-war tank gun design.

The subsequent British and NATO path to

the L7 family of 105 mm rifled guns,

which became a global standard, traces a

conceptual line back to the high

velocity thinking embodied by the 17

pounder. Centurion tank development,

which produced one of the era's finest

main battle tanks, drew upon the

performance benchmarks and design

priorities that wartime experience with

the 17 pounder established. So returned

to Tunisia in the desert, those Tiger

crews had caused to feel confident.

Nothing then available could reliably

stop them at range. But British

engineers, planners, and ordinance

designers had been working a solution

years earlier. The result was

deliberately and unapologetically

oversized. A gun focused on physics

rather than elegance, pushing muzzle

velocities into regimes many had thought

impractical.

British improvisation, mounting the gun

on unsuitable carriages until production

caught up, was bold and risky, but it

bridged the gap between concept and

battlefield availability. When the 17

pounder arrived in numbers, it changed

the dynamics of armored combat. Mounted

on towed carriages on converted American

and British chassis, its rounds shredded

the myth of invulnerable German heavy

tanks. The hunter became the hunted.

Tigers and panthers, once shapers of the

battlefield, found themselves vulnerable

to an Allied anti-tank system that

combined engineering foresight with

expedient adaptation.

The production figures and vehicle

counts tell the final part of the tale.

Thousands of towed guns, over 2,000

fireflies, hundreds of archers and

Achilles conversions, and widespread

deployment across Italy, Northwest

Europe, and beyond. Training, logistics,

and tactical integration turned what had

been a laboratory solution into

something that crews could use under

fire. The 17-p pounder did not

single-handedly win the war, but it

removed the qualitative advantage heavy

German tanks had enjoyed and restored

balance to armored engagements. In

short, German designers produced a

feared heavy tank. British engineers

produced the gun that could kill it.

That technological and logistical answer

to the armor threat, born in foresight,

hardened by improvisation, and proven by

combat, stands as one of the key

engineering reversals of the Second

World Four.