All language subtitles for قسمت3

Hi everyone, it's Jerry. I'm on lead
chess right now and I just got paired up

15 -2 game.

So let's see how this plays out.

Try knight f3 to start.

C4, d4, I guess we'll go with c4.

Retain some flexibility with that d
-pawn.

Change up the opening, committing that d
-pawn.

So c -pawn first. Let's go with knight
c3.

On d5, I'll take, and then after knight
takes, I'll play e4. Not going for that,

though.

Okay.

Let's see.

d4 or e4.

e4 will prevent the d4, d5 advance.

Let's do that.

Or maybe not.

Let's see.

What other options might I have? I could
go with g3.

g3, g3, d4, e4 are my candidate moves
here.

I'm just a little bit concerned if I
play e4, this moves c5.

I could still get in d4.

We'll enter a maroxy bind.

That's fine.

It might transition into a Sicilian here
depending on black's next move. Okay,

no.

So their c -pawn will not be able to
exchange itself off from my d -pawn so

easily.

I have a group of three pawns now in the
center.

And probably just b5 to e2.

Let's see.

Any other good options? I don't want to
obstruct my queen's view of d4.

This is something that's surely going to
be struck at. Either c5, e5, knight c6,

maybe.

So I'm pretty sure, in other words, I
know where my light square bishop

So let's get him there.

Bishop to e2. This is also useful
depending on what black does here, of

This e5, d5 reply.

If I move my knight out of the way,
it'll stop a knight pivot.

Sometimes I'll want to go there to then
jump into f4.

But okay, we have knight c6.

Hmm.

Okay, my first thought is to just give
him a quick kick here with d5.

Is there anything wrong with that?

Let's give him a kick.

Is he going to go to e5?

I think I've had players do this against
me before.

Playing to this square.

I mean, they're doubled pawns.

I don't know how big of an issue it is.

But I like that my bishop is able to see
these squares after I do capture.

So they are going in that direction. My
first thought is just to take it.

Makes their bishop on g7. Not the
greatest piece in the world.

Yeah,

probably just take... I'm inviting this
pawn a little bit more forward, but it

is a doubled pawn now.

And in what direction is this game going
to go?

That's the question I have.

I should probably castle bishop to e3.

Can I do without castling? No.

Let's do that first. Remain a little bit
more flexible with my bishop.

Maybe he'll go to g5. I guess these are
the two candidate moves.

I don't think I'll invest any time with
fianchettoing.

Okay. Well, that was a move that was
played really quick.

And I have the option now to...

take and damage their queenside.

And also I could now look forward to an
ending.

And in an ending, I think I'll be the
better side here, because

I don't really see how this bishop will
be getting involved

anytime soon, so... I'm pretty much
going

to... take here. I'm just double
-checking stuff.

I don't want to allow it to be closed
either, like this knight reposition.

could be a fine home for the knight.

I think I should look to open it up and
in some sense play against

their poorly placed minor piece on g7.

After takes, recapture. I don't know if
I'll take their queen because I am

helping out their rook, but I think I
could say for certain I want to take

this.

I'd certainly welcome queen takes queen
by them.

So now the decision to take their queen
or not.

If I play bishop to e3, where

is their queen really even going to go?

I would have this knight jumping into
these squares. Now that these pawns are

split, they're isolated, so the squares
in front of them are

probably good homes for pieces.

Knight might want to arrive on c5.

This is a kingside -specific bishop,
dark square bishop, so he won't be

to watch over these queenside dark
squares so easily.

After queen takes queen, rook takes
queen, then bishop to e3.

We're heading towards queenside
-specific play.

I'm not sure what else to consider here.
Queen a4, pressure on c6, and then I

could be gaining a tempo with rook to
d1.

Hmm.

I feel like I should be starting with
bishop to e3.

One thing I want to make sure of is that
this knight does not get to d4 anytime

soon. It'll take forever.

It's knight two squares away diagonally.
It takes him a while to get there.

What other candidate moves do I have?
Bishop to e3, queen takes queen, and

bishop to e3.

I think I kind of like...

Just getting the queens out first.

Yeah, let's... Maybe not.

Yeah, let's go for it.

I couldn't resist.

Couldn't resist.

Alright, so, on bishop e3, knight here,
I could reply bishop here.

Or maybe even take.

And then, you know, this is my bad
bishop after all, so... Let's start with

this. This is also useful in putting
pressure here, so this might... Having

pressure on a7 may translate into me
obtaining control over this only open

because it's placing a restriction on
the rook.

Any pressure against my b -pawn, I'll
play b3.

And there isn't this idea of breaking
down...

in A2, B3, C4 structure, because this is
a nice pivot for my knight on A4.

So, let's see what black comes up with.

They're kind of hard -pressed to find a
good square for their light square

bishop.

You know, if you go here, I'm not sure
what you're doing exactly. This isn't an

inconvenience to put pressure on my C4
pawn.

They might try to activate their bishop
here, but again, the big question here,

in my eyes at least, is what exactly is
this bishop going to do?

So they're looking for a knight
reposition.

And as mentioned, I may be able to now
obtain control over this d -file. This

seems correct.

And I want to go with this rook. I don't
know if it makes so big a deal, but...

I want to have a fast track over here
with my king.

And I'm able to now win a pawn, am I
not?

Hmm.

So, let's see here. I take their rook,
they take back.

I take on a7, they enter on d2.

Is that really so much a problem?

I mean, I'll have to defend for just a
moment.

You know, rook to b1, or here, but I
think I'd play rook to b1.

And then on my next move I could come
back here, but maybe they caused me a

little bit of a problem with that.

Because of a move like bishop to 8 -6,
I'm not so sure I want to allow that

activity.

What would they do if I don't allow them
to have full control over the d -file?

You know, suppose I play king f1, king
e1, and then threaten to take here.

First of all, where is this knight
going?

He goes here, I play b3.

There might be then the follow -up of
this advance, but I don't know if that

really scares me so much.

My instinct tells me to just improve my
king position a little bit more.

Knight here to here is also an idea.

Hmm.

Maybe I should improve my piece. Maybe I
should be a bit more direct.

Although no. Knight to a4, knight d6,
and these two pawns are hit.

Okay, so not so fast.

Let's improve my king position.

King f1.

King f1, king e1, then they'll have to
do something for sure about their a

-pawn.

On knight d6, I'll play b3.

Knight d6, b3. And on f5, I'll play f3.

It may happen that there's an exchange
here, but if their f -pawn is exchanged

for my e -pawn, that'll result in them
having a double -isolated pawn.

And in a position where it's just the
bishops,

That's going to be not so good. Well,
really, no matter how you slice it,

two double -isolated pawns are a glaring
weakness.

So let me consider yet again capturing
on d8 and then a7.

Should I do that? I mean, I will have a
passed a pawn.

I'm sure the computer would be all over
that.

I'm not going to do it, though.

Okay, now they have to certainly tend to
this threat of exchanging rooks and

then capturing on a7.

And when they move their pawn to a5, I
can think about the b6 square.

Not only c5 anymore, but also b6.

Maybe even bishop b6 in some cases, but
I'll probably need to play b3 first.

Also, if their a -pawn moves, I think
I'll first play f3, just to reinforce

pawn, and that way my knight could move
without fear of knight d6 hitting both

of these.

And it's difficult. I mean, I'm not
quite sure what the bishop is doing on

know it wants to come out in this
direction, but...

So many things need to happen.

Like this bishop has to move, for
starters.

And then the pawn.

Okay, so they're giving up control of
the d -file.

I can't enter on it, but the rook is
restricted.

This a -pawn has to move before the rook
could move.

Well, I mean the rook could play here.

But on any rook move to the B file, I'm
playing B3.

Rook B8.

Rook B8, B3.

Okay, they're striking in the center.

Let's reinforce that point.

Oh, the knight might also come to F6. I
didn't consider that, but it shouldn't

be a big deal. Okay, they're closing the
position up. Hmm.

I don't think that that's a good option,
but... Alright, let's...

Stay here. I don't want to go to this
square.

I'll leave that option open for my
knight. So I don't have any concern

this.

And now, in order for this bishop to
become activated, it's clear that this

needs to move.

And it's very difficult because if he
goes here and then pushes, then it's the

light square bishop who becomes bad.

Hmm.

I didn't mention this much. I've been
talking about pivoting on this square

the knight, but maybe this move is an
idea as well.

This isn't a threat.

Let's improve my knight position.

I think he's going to be a great bother
on the c5 square, hitting the light

square bishop.

Yeah, knight c5.

And on bishop to c8, I could play rook
here.

Could be quite annoying.

Probably just protect to pick up the
pace just a little bit here.

Five minutes and change.

Okay.

Hmm.

Okay.

Interesting.

Knight c5, bishop back. How do I make
more progress?

Knight c5, bishop back, knight d3,
bishop g7, and then knight here.

Let's try that.

Let's try to induce some weaknesses. If
I'm able to force my opponent's bishop

to retreat like this, I move forward, I
force my opponent backward, I've likely

obtained something.

Something small, but...

You know, I move forward, I'm forcing
them backward, they're not going

backwards.

So they're giving me the bishop here.

Knight takes, king takes, c5.

Then I can think about giving this
check. This must be correct. I'm going

take that guy.

Is there anything better? I'm going to
go for that.

And then follow up with c5. I need to
activate my bishop.

Bishop c4.

So close to mate.

There's that move.

But a knight here I could even think
about taking.

I do have a majority.

First time referencing this, but this is
a healthy 3 versus 2 majority on the

queen side, whereas they have an
unhealthy king side majority. So I

probably insert this check first,
inconvenience their king, and now

taking the knight.

Taking the knight and then playing rook
here.

Or not taking the knight at all.

A little bit concerned about opposite
colored bishops. a4, knight here.

Let's see.

Hmm.

Rook d7.

Can I work around that knight?

Yeah, I mean, it certainly has my
attention here, this idea of giving some

material back.

a4, knight d4 takes, rook takes, and
then here.

Hmm.

I really don't want to give up my light
square bishop so easily.

What other moves would I have? Here, run
into a fork.

Rook d7, knight d4.

Hmm.

I'll take him.

Let's activate this rook.

And look to improve my king position.

This rook is still tied down. I could
also consider this.

You know, put pressure on this pawn.

King here, I just come over, and he
can't improve further.

Okay.

Still remains to be seen what is up with
that bishop. How is he getting

activated? Let's play to a spot where I
keep pressure on my opponent's pawns.

Maybe I'll improve like this.

I don't want to allow rook d8 with
check.

I don't know how big a deal that would
be, but at least for the moment, hmm,

maybe I should even do this move first.

Stop g4.

Yeah, let me do that.

Difficult for them to improve.

It's a useful move.

I could also look at this position from
the standpoint I have the better bishop.

He has pawns fixed on dark squares, so I
could maybe play a position where I'm

more focused on that.

You know, if the rooks are off and I
somehow lose this pawn, it's probably a

pretty easy position to hold for a draw.

despite being down a pawn, again, if I
was to lose my c -pawn.

It's very tough now. In order to
activate the bishop, the king has to

He has to move away, I should say, from
the action, which is the queen side of

the board.

So, as an improvement, if black is doing
nothing...

Playing king e2, king d3, they might
insert a check king here, and they have

be mindful of rook to b6 with check
picking up the a -pawn if the rook

this open file.

So let's see what black comes up with.
They're now investing some time here.

They're in a tough spot.

I don't know if I do well to open up
another file here. I don't know what

exactly I accomplish by doing that.

Although maybe I grant my king access to
c4 by pulling the a4 move. That might

be an idea.

And maybe I should not do this king e2
move. Maybe it's okay to cross on the d

-file first, and then get to the c3
square as soon as possible,

and then do this move a4.

Let's see.

I could push.

But maybe I'll push only after this pawn
has moved.

Hmm.

King e2 or king d2 is my... These are my
candidate moves.

I'm going to go here. I want to be just
a hair closer towards the queen side.

King c3 incoming, a4.

I think I want to do this first of these
two moves, just to get out of checking

distance.

They might try to pile up on my c -pawn,
but I'll be there to play this move.

Okay.

And their king is now completely cut
off.

Maybe a4 is the move right now.

No. I want to have this move available.

Let's do this.

Activate my king. I might run all the
way up here.

King b4 maybe.

King b4 instead of b4.

Interesting moment.

King b4.

But I am in a pin.

Don't really like that.

Let's go b4.

Rook to b6.

This would be super passive if they do
this to defend laterally.

Their king is cut off.

Under two minutes.

Okay, that's very passive.

If I play rook here, how are they
untangling?

Let's do that first.

Just to stop here, they might have
wanted to try that to undermine.

this structure.

So maybe king b3 and a4 is the idea.

Yeah, let's do this.

They might try to hunt down my bishop,
like 1, 2, 3. My bishop is kind of, no,

not really. I mean, he could camp out
here. Might not be a bad square either.

Come to think of it.

Putting pressure on e5.

If they do this, I'll take once, but not
twice, because

king here, and I'm helping them activate
their king.

So they're in a tough spot. I should
follow through, and let's do this.

Pressure on that b -pawn.

Improve my king position now.

Their king is still cut off.

The rook is restricted, and I'm looking
to move forward yet again.

With the b5, king takes and then push.

I'm playing with all my pieces in that
resulting position.

King, rook, bishop, and pawn.

Their king is cut off, and the rook is
passive along with their bishop.

So let's see what they come up with
here. This is one of those positions

you try as white to keep it as clean as
possible.

The rook, if he moves, if he tries to
get activated, I could take here.

If I put here, bishop takes pawn.

It's not working because of pawn takes
rook.

Bishop takes rook, bishop takes bishop,
or even pawn push.

I think I just get on with pushing. I
don't think I'm missing anything. I

think I can make a... I have to do this
to make progress.

And I'm at a minute.

So I'm just going to push away here. I
might be close to sacrificing here.

Let's continue pushing.

On a rook check on b8, I can block.

And I could also welcome a bishop
exchange, and if this position is

of, if it's just king and pawn ending,
this is winning.

Again, due to these doubled pawns here,
the double e pawns.

So let's see what black comes up with.

The big plan here is to push and then
king here, so let's just block.

I don't want to allow that rook any
activity.

And I'll be pushing next king here, so
this is actually pretty much seeing the

end to this one.

Their king isn't playing.

c7, king c6, and then rook to b8.

Let's do that first.

Bishop here, king here.

And I'm king there.

I could play bishop here.

I don't want to allow their king to get
here, though.

You know, they're not going anywhere
from that position, though.

I could improve a little bit more.

Let's see. Okay, that's what they're
trying here. So king c6 for starters.

a king c6 here.

Hmm.

Their king can't move, their bishop
can't move.

Their rook is the only one that could
move.

I think you do this.

Yeah. Less than 20.

So now, they're going to run out of
moves.

I think.

I could do this. Maybe a rook back and
then king here and rook here stuff.

That might be an idea.

Yeah. If I get my... Okay, and I should
probably just... Let's take first.

Take again.

The passed pawn, less than 10.

Rook to g8.

Rook to g8, I play here.

Okay, I think I got it now. Because
they're forced to make a move. If they

their bishop, I'm going here.

As soon as there's not two pieces
hitting c7, I could play rook here.

On rook here, what would I do? Maybe
just push my pawn.

Keep these guys sitting right where
they're at.

My opponent's in a bind here. They've
been in a bind for a little bit.

So... On Ra8, I just push.

And on that move, I have this.

I'm pushing through here.

Now they're going for that, but he is
protected.

It's my bishop.

So they might play it out just a little
bit more here.

Let's just approach over here.

Take here,

here, and then just take here and then
push

next.

That's with check.

Capri move, and they'll probably resign
here with the increment or not.

Might just play it out to mate here.

So we'll see what the computer has to
say afterwards here.

Just escorting this pawn, avoiding any
stalemates.

No stalemates.

And let's see.

The queen.

Let's see if we could do this.

Get the king and queen working, playing
this without the bishop.

Just picturing it as if it's the king
and queen alone. Okay, they resigned. So

let's see.

Let's just dive right in here, going to
the analysis board.

Getting a computer analysis. This
shouldn't take too long.

And I think...

That early middle game decision to play
into e5 and allow knight takes knight

and playing with those double d pawns,
probably not a good idea.

I think I've seen, I mean I've seen
that, I've played against that in blitz,

I've had opponents on the black side
play that in blitz,

but never really in a standard game. I
think I've even seen...

On that D5 push, the knight return.

And then look to pivot, you know, on the
D7 square.

So let's see.

Computer's still thinking a little bit
here.

But yeah, that's where I think there's
going to be something evaluation -wise.

see a shift there.

So this is just a quick scan.

I don't know if we could, let's see,
knight e5.

Yeah, well, first off, I mean knight c6.

Bishop e2, knight c6 is really the main
problem because of d5.

So something's given up there, and it
was a slow, you know, it just got worse.

But let's see what some of the
suggestions are by the computer here.

On the right -hand side, just kind of...

Well, it really doesn't even go into,
you know, some other suggestion besides

knight to c6 here, but, you know, there
is this main move of

e5, and then on d5, we go in

this direction where black will be
playing on the king side, and I'm going

the queen side.

But they didn't strike first in the
center, and that turned out to be a big

problem.

Takes... I mean, where are there some
other... where is there maybe another

improvement? This is having it as a .7,
.8 advantage, so...

Approaching... You know, it's just,
again,

a difficult road ahead. I mean, I'm not
sure what other options there are. I'm

just holding this E4 point.

If they're ever taking, these are
then... I mean...

It remains. They remain doubled. They're
either going to be doubled as a group

or double isolated. So this is just even
worse, given exchanging.

I mentioned it earlier. If they're
exchanging their F pawn for my E pawn,

double isolated pawns, that can't be
good.

So what else?

It's really difficult to suggest
something, to be perfectly honest here.

Hmm. I mean, it's just a growing
advantage from this point. Knight c5,

It's not pointing out some other
suggestion here. I thought bishop back.

And I was planning knight d3.

Then they have to tend to this pawn.

Bishop here.

I'm not sure. Oh, I think I said I was
going to consider this move.

Bishop here is ruled out because of c5
and bishop here.

Well, now I can think about entering
with c5 and then rook here with tempo.

So this would be very difficult to
defend if black did go in this direction

this knee -jerk reaction type move, you
know, here boxing the knight out from

these advancing squares, very common.

But knight here and...

into this square, gaining a tempo here,
and then hitting this pawn. It's very,

very difficult to defend.

The bishop's only one that could do it,
and the as -mentioned c5,

c5 with then a rook invasion, that's too
much, and you've got the bishop coming

here with a check. It's just crumbling.

So maybe relatively best is what they
did in the game here, giving

up the bishop, improving their king
position, but they were just sectioned

The king, it was either one or the other
pieces. I was mentioning it earlier

about, I think, right around here. Right
around when they played bishop

f8, I said, well, how are they getting
their bishop on this, you know, playing

on this diagonal?

They'd have to move their bishop.
They're hard -pressed to find a good

other than e6 for their bishop.

And, you know, after they did this move,
you know, if we have this sort of

thing, and then playing up here to the
bishop, that's bad. It's like one piece

will always remain bad for black in this
position.

One of the two bishops, as it turned out
in the game, the king ended up being

cut off, so the king was never really a
great contributor to the black position,

and one of their bishops was always bad.

The dark square bishop, he never really
got activated.

Just giving that check first,
inconveniencing the king, and this

enter now, just for that one moment.
Notice if I didn't do that first, right?

If I just take right away, takes, I
don't have d7, so inconvenience first,

then move forward with taking, activate
the rook, keep him activated, and just

improving first.

One other detail, I don't know how...

Big a deal it is, but if I was to play,
let's say, king d2 instead of h3,

this could be... My h -pawn is maybe

a little bit more vulnerable to, I don't
know, like a quick rook down here and

then capture.

If I have this pawn up here, if there's
ever this exchange and another exchange

here, the resulting base point, f3, is
an easier point for me to defend than

a pawn all the way over here on h2,
which I don't know how great, you know,

it really is likely to be an issue, but
that's, you know, that's just

like the quick thought that I had. You
know, if you are going to get this break

in, there won't be an h -pawn. I won't
have an h -pawn on the board that you

could even think about attacking.

and I'll have an f -pawn, which is a
little bit easier for me to defend with

king.

Ideally, you want your king in the
center, so if he could also be in the

and conveniently defend f3, should there
be pressure on f3 one day, I'm better

off in that case. So h3 first, that's
why I don't think I was able to really

voice that during the game, but that's
what was going through my mind.

So, yeah, and there's really very little
suggestion here. I mean, this is

already a winning position because you
could go by sectioning

it off, the king side and the queen
side. The queen side, I'm playing with

extra pawn, a healthy majority versus an
unhealthy majority on the king side.

And you could also do a piece -by -piece
comparison, rook versus rook, king

versus king, bishop versus bishop.

You know, they're better.

So I think, again, it's coming all the
way back to that,

you know, I'm sure there's, of course,
more resistance that could have been put

up.

But that decision to play knight to c6
and play a position where you have the

double d pawns, I've seen that played,
but then the follow -up of a quick

at the d5 pawn.

So let me just point out one additional
thing here. I've seen that move before.

Don't know that it can be recommended,
but knight to c6, takes, takes.

I've seen this as a follow -up.

What did I do next? I castled. So after
a castle, instead of c5, yeah, instead

of c5, the move e6.

And at least you're exchanging one of
the doubled pawns off for this one here.

White will still be standing better due
to the space advantage.

Just having an easier time, a bit more
free pieces.

Again, it's still a big question here.
With this pawn now fixed on the e5

square, what exactly is he doing?

Even in situations like this, should
this pawn come up, I just leave it

and continue with developing. I take
like this, and now I have

a place for my rook.

But anyhow,

interesting middle game, interesting

early night C6 move again, I don't know.
Really

can't play that.

But anyhow, feel free to leave any
comments in the comment section below to

video. As usual, I hope you got
something out of it, and I'll catch you

next one. That's all for now. Take care.
Bye.