Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
All right,
everyone rocking and rolling. Everyone
excited? Um hopefully you're as excited
as I am uh to get to get going. Um I
want to warn you first first and
foremost up front. Um today will be
conceptually significantly denser um
than the last time you saw me talk. Uh,
and so I just want to kind of have you
mentally prepared for that.
Additionally, I would consider having
something up from a note-taking
perspective. You guys all have access to
the recordings here um, when we're done
today, but uh, we have a lot to go over
and I'm going to try and pack it in as a
short period of time as possible. And so
with each of the concepts that I'm going
to outline around scaling, I'm going to
try and provide as many examples as I
can so that it can hopefully be relevant
to you. And so that's kind of the
general gist. And so we'll have kind of
four portions of today. The first is
kind of setting the frame for how to
think through the rest of the day. Uh
the second is going to be walking
through basically the constraint
framework that I have never shared yet.
Um and part of that was in developing
this workshop. I had to think through
how do I actually approach a lot of
different businesses to deconstrain
them. And it turned out it was a very
very large decision tree. But I was able
to break it into um chunks that are
really manageable. Uh and so that'll be
kind of the second portion. The third
portion will be taking those constraints
and then applying them in a supply
constraint dynamic. So some of you guys
are demand constraint, some of you guys
are supply constrained, meaning demand
constraint means you don't you know
you've got capacity but you need you
need more customers. Supply constraint
is you wish you could take on more
customers but you can't because you've
got other issues. And so we'll talk
about that as kind of the third portion.
Um, the fourth portion is going to be
all around the implementation with the
AI and the tools. And so I'll give you a
handful of what I would consider like
pre-anned
stacks of playbooks and solutions that I
see as very typical combinations of
things that have to happen in specific
types of businesses. Um, and then after
that, we're just going to do some live
ones uh to just walk through the exact
same framework over and over and over
again so I can give you ideally as many
examples as I can. Uh, so you can be
like, that's what I need to do. This is
the order I'm going to do in and I'm
good to go. Rock and roll. And yes, that
is the Iron Man cave in the background.
All right, so uh let's rock. Also, um
I'm going to be using these a lot more
today. And so this will be a little bit
more of a hybrid because I think that'll
be engaging. So I'll kind of alternate
between the slides and the whiteboards
back and forth. Um and I think hopefully
it should be awesome. And if it isn't,
then you can tell me it's awesome. So I
feel you know good on the inside. All
right. So without further ado uh the
scaling implementation workshop
constraints leverage and playbooks. All
right. And so if I think about what
we're trying to accomplish if I see
learning as a change of behavior then
there's really three core behavior
changes that we're we're looking to do
today. So number one is uh change your
behavior in one way which is maximizing
leverage. Uh that's number one. So, if I
can just get everyone here to allocate
your attention to the things that
maximize leverage, you will get the
highest return possible. Number two is I
want to increase your odds of success of
utilizing leverage by selecting the
correct playbook and executing what's
inside. And then goal number three is to
increase your conviction around your
selection and then use the AI tools uh
by showing proof uh and use of outcomes.
me actually demonstrating in front of
you so you can feel really confident
that this isn't some complex thing that
you can actually just use this stuff.
All right, so that's that's it. Like if
we accomplish this, I'm stoked. Okay, so
part one is around constraints,
leverage, and compounding. And I see
these as the core elements of business,
right? Every business has a constraint.
Uh we need to deconstrain it. In order
to deconstrain it more effectively, we
use leverage. If we do that uh
successfully from a model perspective,
we achieve compounding. If we do those
three things, we have a business that
will continue to grow. All right? And
so, um, obviously some of you guys have
consumed most of my stuff, but I almost
always start with this because I like to
set the precedent that
it's very easy to get entertained by
business content, right? And the
difference between people who are
entertained by business content and
people who do business is that they
actually change your behavior. And so,
if after this you go back to the same
conditions of wherever you're at and you
don't change your behavior, you learned
nothing. this was functionally just
entertainment for you, which is fine if
that's what you're, you know, that's
what you signed up for. But, um, I think
there are more effective ways, you know,
to be entertained. Um, and so that being
said, same conditions, new behavior, you
turn off the computer, you look back,
you're at home, you're at your
workplace, whatever. If nothing changes,
you learned nothing. So, I would
encourage you to be very clear about the
actions you plan to take after this uh,
and even during today. All right. So my
classic example of this is phone rings
and you do you pick up and you say XYZ.
If I say hey here's a script and then
the phone rings and then you say XYZ
again it means you learned nothing. If
you now say the script then you learned
something and specifically the script
itself right and so that is a behavior
change. So if we're talking about the
skills of business right skills are
actually a chain of adaptive behaviors.
And so that is one behavior that I just
mentioned. But if you chain multiple
behaviors together, then you get a
skill. All right? And so skills are
chunked. And so this is why I think it's
so difficult for sometimes for people to
grasp uh or why they they can't get
their employees to do something is
because they talk in terms that are too
chunked up. And I think the reason that
the content that I've had has done, I
would say, disproportionately well um
has been because I try to put a lot of
effort into chunking and breaking down
concepts. And so here's a couple
examples. So if someone's good at
basketball, it's like no one can
actually be good at basketball. What it
is is they're good at a series of
chunked up skills. So like underneath of
basketball, you've got dribbling,
shooting, and passing. And each of in
within those, you've got free throws,
you've got uh you know, three-pointers,
you've got jump shots, you got bank
shots, you've got hooks, you got all
these different types of things. And so
you have to keep breaking these down
until you finally get to the most
rudimentary level. But business works
the same way, right? So it's like this
guy's good at business. Every I think
all of us want to be good at quote
business. But if I were to direct
someone, hey, learn business, it's like
what does that mean? Right? And so
within business, you've got marketing,
you got sales, you got product, you got
hiring, etc. And so what we what we seek
to do is create the meta skills that
then generalize across functions. All
right? So like reading, writing, and
speaking then allow you to learn stuff
which allow you to figure stuff out,
right? And in a sports context, hand eye
coordination allows you to be pretty
good at most sports which then
generalize into basketball. And so what
makes one person more successful than
another given the same same directives?
And this my whole goal here is to
maximize likelihood of your success
here. If you have the same directives
and one person wins and one person
doesn't, it's because they typically
have other skills that were not taught
by whatever the implementation was. And
so this is fundamentally why results
vary. All right? And so success, so if
you want to write something down,
success stops where you don't know how
to do something. That is where it stops.
Right? All right. So, if you imagine
you've got, you know, you on one side
and where you want to be on the other
side, you've got these kind of logs that
you have to jump from from thing to
thing to thing to get across. But if you
finally get to a spot where there's no
log, which is functionally like you
don't know what to do there, then you
fall or you just stop and say, I don't
want to die, right? And so, um, the goal
is to basically try and fill up as many
of those holes as humanly possible. And
so,
it's foundational. I like to state this
obvious point because many of you also
are in the space where you have to
educate your customers. you have to
educate an audience whether it's you
know in your marketing you have to
educate uh your employees so we we are
all fundamentally educators in some some
degree to or another right and so it's
like why do two people come in and some
people succeed and some people don't and
so like in the example I'm using here
because we only have a limited amount of
time in general with any individual
audience etc right and so if some people
get results and some people see no
results
then the issue is that there is going to
be a gap in their knowledge base, right?
And so if we wanted to get 100% and I
mean truly 100% of people results, which
is possible, I I fundamentally believe
that's possible. The thing is is it
worth it? Because if I were to try if I
were to try to approximate that, I would
need to re-educate everyone from K to
12, right, from kindergarten all the way
to 12th grade, get everyone the
foundations first of like here's how you
read, here's how you do math, here's how
you speak, here's how you think, here's
how you make make decisions, right? And
so
almost none of us can say that it is
worth it for us to do that for like
let's say an employee who comes in. You
expect they know how to turn on a
computer. You expect they know how to
use an iPhone. You expect that they know
how to use the internet. Expect how to
send an email. And so at some level we
have to cut off and say these are the
requisites in order to be an employee.
These are the requisites in order to be
a customer. Right? And so um I use this
as an extreme example here but if you
can't read it doesn't matter how good my
books are. Right? If you can't stay
focused, it doesn't matter what the
tactics are because you're not going to
stick with it long enough, which is a
whole other basket of skills. If no one
likes you, it's going to be very
difficult for you to attract key talent.
And so, the reality is that results vary
based on your background, education,
experience, and application. And this is
not an FTC compliance thing. This is me
just like being like upfront about why
results vary between people. And I think
it's worth understanding this because
the thing is is that this allows you to
take ownership. I'm very proud of the
fact that I've been pretty much every
single thing I've ever bought's biggest
success story. And the reality is that
it's not because and like this is
hopefully not in a self agrandizing way,
but if they work with 20 people and I
have the best results, then it means
that I have other skills that the other
19 people didn't have. And as a result,
those additional skills
disproportionately contributed to the
outcome. That's the difference.
And so if we think about learning as a
bridge, every step is needed, right?
Like you can't skip a step to get
across. Like you have to have every
single foundational piece and so the
more general skills you have the more
gaps you can fill when someone provides
incomplete information which is the vast
all of us provide incomplete information
right otherwise we literally have to
start at zero and start at goooo gaga
and then go all the way to coding AI
right it's just we don't have the time
to do it so if you're going to do any
kind of implementation I like to
approach it from the perspective of what
skills do I lack or what things do I
need to fill in the gaps for in order to
be successful and the moment where I get
stuck is oh there's something I don't
know how to do and therefore my ability
to figure it out becomes very important
and so your results will be proportional
to your existing domain skill period and
so that makes the ability to figure out
one of the most important skills to have
it's a meta skill right and so um what's
interesting about this is that if you
say hey um hey Alex can you build a
business I could say okay that's a very
general uh request right but then I just
have a big background of other skills, a
big bucket of skills behind me. Now, to
the same degree, if you go to Michael
Jordan and say, "Hey, just win." He
could, right? But you tell that to a
5-year-old and you're like, "Just win."
And they're like, "But how do I tie my
shoes?" Right? It's like we have to
start where the person's at. And again,
I put this as a preframe for today just
to set the context. And so, as an aside,
um, a really good framework. So, this is
a first of of a few frameworks that I'll
share with you just kind of ad hoc as we
go through this, but let's say that
you're looking at, uh, you know, two
potential people. Uh, you've got, you
know, hire one
and you've got hire two.
And this is super important for many of
you who have employees, uh, or would
like to have employees at some point in
the future. So let's say this person is
uh I just this is the classic attitude
attitude. There we go. Uh aptitude uh
dynamic. I'm sure you guys have probably
heard the statement um hire for attitude
and then train aptitude something to
that degree, right? And then this one
let's just say this guy has great
attitude and doesn't have the best
skills and this guy has uh you know
doesn't have the best attitude but has
the skills. Okay. So if you're looking
at this, which would you hire? Now
depending on the uh the answer, the
actual answer here is that it depends on
the nature of the role. But the the the
single golden truth is that you hire
for the smallest skill deficiency.
And so what that means is
if I have hire one and hire two, right?
If I have something that the aptitude
that I'm trying to teach takes,
you know, a day, I'm for sure going to
hire for attitude. Because for me to
teach someone to like be kind, be
respectful, smile, be nice, all that
kind of stuff, which are all chunked up
terms that have many, many skills
underneath of them, then for sure I'm
gonna say, well, I could teach this in a
day. This would take me years. So I I
don't want to do that. So, I'm going to
hire for the small skilled efficiency.
Now, let's flip it over. If I'm trying
to hire the foremost AI researcher,
and I'm saying, okay, well, this guy's,
you know, a bit weird, you know, I mean,
keeps to himself, bit in the closet.
That sounds a bit weird. Not like that.
Calm down. Okay. You know, we've got
this attitude uh bit of an attitude
issue, but man, the guy really knows.
Well, if I had another guy who's there
who's like, well, he doesn't really know
the AI that well, um, but he's a really
great guy, who do you hire? Well, it
depends on the role. And specifically
with this one, it would cost me way more
time to to teach somebody who's a nice
person who who works hard how to do AI
research versus trying to get this guy
who really knows AI how to just smile
every once in a while and not call
everyone a dick or an idiot, right? And
so this is fundamentally how I like to
approach hiring when I'm thinking about
specific roles. If you deal with what I
would consider to be lowkilled roles,
then it's absolutely true that attitude
over aptitude for sure because there's
so many more skills here, right? The
more high-skilled, the more high
aptitude you require for a role, then
the more uh the more that will matter
more than trying to and the thing is is
you'll start to learn how to train
attitude, right? because you'll see
attitude as just a bucket of behaviors
of like, okay, what are the things that
increase the likelihood that people
don't complain about you? What are the
things that increase the likelihood that
people like you? Okay, well, it turns
out there's only like, you know, six or
seven things that you have to do on a
consistent basis within a work setting
to decrease the likelihood people
complain about you, right? So, let's
just learn how to train those
consistently. And then all of a sudden,
we open up our aperture, the amount of
people that we can take in um who are
really good but aren't that really good
with people. All right. Now, the reason
I see this is important is that
for many of you, believe it or not, one
of the big issues you have is that you
sell to everybody. Meaning, you allow
anyone to walk in the door and then
you're surprised by the fact that your
results vary so widely. And sometimes
you're like, oh, you know, some people
are amazing and I've got all these other
people just they don't do anything. It's
like, yeah, it's because you let
toddlers in and you try to teach them to
code. Of course not. Right? Which is why
there are standards, which is why having
requisites becomes incredibly important.
There's a reason that Spanish one is
required to do Spanish 2. And so for
many of you, one of the big things you
can probably write down today is like
what are what if I if I had to pick what
requirements would must exist for my
customers to maximize the likelihood
that they would they would win, right?
We can probably tell or you probably
already know if you looked at your whole
customer base like on the phone call or
on the on the sales consultation or
whatever way you sell, right? You
probably know some specific way that
you're like, "Oh, this guy's going to
crush it." Well, then if you know the
difference between somebody's going to
crush it and one that you're like, well,
you probably shouldn't let the in. And
then you should say, okay, well, if
everybody crushed it, how much more
could I charge? Probably orders of
magnitude more. And then maybe that's
the right avatar and we have to get
narrower with who we select for, which
means we've increased our standards.
This is a huge issue with service
businesses, which based on the surveys
that I saw from you guys, it's like 75%
of you, which is why I bring this up.
Okay. Um,
and so yeah, and so if we look at these
two uh these two images I have here,
like the big jack guy and the and the
wobbly knees person, if we have to get
them across this bridge, right, of all
these different logs, which of them are
we going to have higher confidence is
going to get across? Well, obviously
the, you know, the gymnastic dude,
right? But the thing is is that our
bridge is our product, is our customer
experience. And so if two people can
come in and we get to be the gatekeeper
of who we choose to let in, then we're
the ones who are at fault when someone
doesn't succeed to a large degree. But
it doesn't mean, oh, I now have to
educate everyone through K2 because that
might not be worth it. You're just
saying, no, you have to graduate high
school in order to do this thing, right?
You have to be able to make you have to
be making $10,000 a month in your
e-commerce store, whatever. Right?
There's a couple things that must happen
in order if you get the outcome.
That's why prerequisites matter. And so
fundamentally, this is why I define
terms so many times throughout
presentations. And it's because I
understand that some percentage of
people might not understand this term.
And as a result, that's where they stop.
Right? Success stops the moment you
don't know how to do something. And so
if I am describing something, I try to
describe it in multiple ways so that we
can keep the the mental conversation
going so I can pull as many people along
as possible. And I and I translate this
for you so they understand why I do what
I do. So that hopefully whatever modum
of success I've had, I can hopefully
transfer over. All right? And I actually
I believe that there's an ethical
responsibility to set prerequisites to
the highest degree possible. Um
especially in services uh more than
anything else. self-s serve is a little
bit different but services especially um
I think we have an ethical
responsibility not to just say hey I can
sell these people but more so who should
I be selling to all right now
that we got that out of the way uh your
first behavior change
my goal is for you to focus on your
highest return activity which we refer
to as the constraint the constraint of
the business so this is uh this is a
drawing I have of before and after so if
you've got a four-lane highway and then
you've got a one lane That's where the
money is at and you're only going to
flow at a one money pace. Right now, if
we're if you're work if you're looking
at this left to right, so start at the
bottom left, that one at the halfway
point there, you've got potential, which
means many times we work to add
potential to the system. If you go from
four lanes to five lanes there, did you
do nothing? No, you didn't increase
throughput, meaning you're not going to
get more dollars out the other side. But
you did do something. you added
potential, meaning once the constraint
is resolved, you'll be able to grow that
much more that much faster. But until
the constraint is resolved, you will
stay the same. And so where we allocate
effort is where we're going to get the
highest return. And so my first and most
important behavior change today is to
get you to focus on the constraint and
stop doing whatever it is that you're
doing that's not growing the business.
And one of the key points around this is
that there's only one constraint.
There's only one. There's one today and
there's going to be one in six months
and there's gonna be one in two years.
There's always only one. That's how
constraints work. You can always keep
tracing it back until there's one point
of focus. And this is the thing that I
think most people fail to do. And I
think the reason is because it takes
multiple orders of thinking. What
happens after that? What happens after
that? What's stopping us from this? And
we're going to do a ton of examples
today, but I just I want to set this as
the frame of this is what this is the
highest leverage thing. This is the most
important thing is that if you don't
know what the one thing you should be
working on is, it's your fault. That is
the job of the entrepreneur. We're chief
allocators of resources.
And so businesses grow until they're
constrained and then they stop. That's
it. And I kind of see them that way.
It's like you will just continue to grow
until you hit a constraint and then you
stop there and you stay there and you
will stay there for months, weeks,
years, decades until you figure out the
constraint. All right? And so the thing
that's stopping the growth is the
constraint. Now, one of the famous
probably heard this, which is a chain is
only as strong as its weakest link. And
so in a lot of ways, we've got kind of
like our goals on one side and us on the
other and we're pulling. We can only
pull a goal that's as as heavy as our
chain can hold, right? And so if you
have, let's say, a weak link and you
keep adding, you know, either adding
links or strengthening the other links
in the chain, it just changes nothing.
And this is why if you've been stuck for
a while, you're not growing as fast as
you want, this may be the issue. Or my
argument is it is the issue.
So I'll give you a different example. So
I obviously come from the fitness world.
If you deadlift, which is just you just
pick up a bar off the ground, right? So,
if you pick a bar off the ground and
let's say that your grip, right, can
hold 500 lb, but your back can take 700
lb. Okay, great. If I get my back from a
700 lb back to an 800lb deadlift back,
I'm still only pulling 500 lb, right?
And so, we have to keep working on the
grip. And until we work on the grip,
nothing's going to change about our
deadlift.
And so working on the non-week link is a
waste for immediate growth. Again, we
have potential but not throughput
which I just gave. Okay.
Now that is fundamentally the constraint
we seek to work on the constraint. So
how does leverage play a role in this?
So leverage is the difference between
what you put in and what you get out.
Right? And ideally we want high leverage
so we get more for what we put in. Now,
within the context of speed, because I
don't know about you guys, but maybe uh
you'd want to grow faster. I don't know
about you, I like to grow faster, right?
And so, if we want more output per unit
of time, then it means we're exercising
or using more leverage.
And so, there are only two types of core
leverage. So, I've shifted my my
thinking process around this um and I
think that it will it will help, which
is there's really only two and then
there's outputs of those things that can
get reput. All right.
So leverage itself exists on a
continuum. It's not is there leverage or
is there not leverage, but how much
leverage is there? There's always a
certain amount of leverage. It could be
low leverage, it could be middle
leverage, it could be high leverage,
right? So it's not whether there's
leverage, but how much leverage is
there? And so the two are technology and
skills. These are the two types of
leverage that get you more for what you
put in. And so at the most basic level,
if I wanted to dig a hole, I could use
my hands, right? Zero zero technology. I
could use a shovel, which you know,
ancient humans figured that one out. And
so they got way more efficient using a
shovel than using their hands. And then
I could eventually, you know, more
modern human, I could use a bulldozer,
right? All of these are different
technologies, different levels of
technology, different levels of leverage
that we get to increase our output. A
different example, right? I could use
pen and paper if I wanted to write
stuff. I could use software to write it
faster. And I could probably use AI to
do it even faster, right? Different
types of leverage all through
technology.
Now on the other side we've got skills.
What what we learn to do rather than
tools we use. So on the skills continuum
I'll just give a basic one for a service
business. If you've got a hundred leads
and two sales people in one script you
might have a 5x difference between the
two sales people based on what based on
skill. Same leads same script two
people. One has five times the
throughput. So they get more for what
they put in skills
right? And to use a media example, if I
give two creators and I say, "Hey, go
make me one short reel." I might have
one guy who has literally a 100x the
difference, high leverage on that skill.
And so these are how you can know uh
these are the two forms of leverage. And
this is like I like to I always like to
chunk things all the way up to say like
how do how can I validate that this
hypothesis is true. If you look at
economics at the broadest level, what
increases GDP per capita right within an
economy? That's how we can measure
output of a whole country. What are the
two biggest variables that increase
output output for a country? Technology
and education, skills and tools.
Okay. Now, when we use skills and tools,
we then create other outputs. Money
being one of them and being maybe the
reason that some of you guys want to
want to do it, right? Uh other people's
skills and time. Okay. If we have that
money, we can get other people to do
stuff. If we have other skills, even
without money, you can get other people
to do stuff, right? You start to develop
a brand or reputation that comes as a
result of using tools and skills
repeatedly. You get distribution. For
example, 5,000 different stores carrier
stuff because you use skills and tech in
order to get them and build that
distribution. But that becomes leverage
for later. And then one of the more I
would say tactical ones that that that
we'll probably hit on a little bit
harder today later is something I'll
call single input multiple outputs. So
this is one of my personal favorite ways
of kind of creating leverage in in a
business which is how can I double dip,
how can I triple dip, how can I
quintuple dip, right? And so an example
of this is that we started running uh
workshops for our advisory practice.
Well the workshops is like a a quad dip
for us. It's like we get deal flow. So,
we get businesses that come in, we get
cash flow, they're profitable, we get
media because we capture a whole bunch
of, you know, clips and all that stuff
that further pushes through the
flywheel. And then we also have all the
data that we trained our AI on, which
some of you guys have already tried.
Pretty sweet, right? But we were only
able to do that because that thing like
imagine if I had to do one specific
thing to collect media, another thing to
collect data, another thing to create
cash flow, another thing to create deal
flow. I would have way less leverage.
And so, always thinking like what's the
sawdust? What other outputs can we can
we extract from the ex existing behavior
set or activity typically benefits big
time. All right. And so once we have all
these new leveraged outputs, we put them
back in and try to attack the constraint
again. And so if our first level of
attacking the constraint is we have
skills and tools, great. Then we get
money, other people's skills and time,
brand distribution, uh, and then
basically how can we slice it, slice and
dice it multiple times. We take this
again and then reattack the constraint
with even more leverage.
And so fundamentally the constraint is
the priority. Like right now our whole
job is chief allocator of resources.
That's what we are as the entrepreneur.
And so priority unfortunately like in
the modern era became a a term that
people use and have priorities plural
right but if you look at the Latin it
comes from I think a priority which
means first. All right. Or before which
means you do this first. means when you
wake up in the morning, this is what you
attack because everything that's not
this is not growing the business.
And so, and this is a this is a harder
pill to swallow, but if you have more
than one, you are the problem. And so,
it's like, how can we expect our teams
to prioritize their time when you
haven't prioritized theirs,
right? Like, we're the ones who are
responsible for this. And so if like you
can't decide what your priority is, like
it's your fault.
And so this is why we are the chief
allocator of resources. We are the chief
prioritization officer. And so I I bring
this up because there's a lot of people
who, you know, say they throw this word
strategy around and I think strategy has
become this big amorphous thing. But
strategy is just allocating limited
resources. All of us have limited
resources, time, money, etc., right?
Against unlimited potential uses. And so
the simple way of saying this is it's
prioritizing. That's what strategy is.
It's all it is. It's just prioritizing.
What are we going to what are we going
to attack with the limited stuff we've
got? We got a million things we could
do. What's the one we are going to do,
right? And so the best strategy is that
you use the limited resources you have
to get the greatest increase in
throughput. That is the best strategy
objectively. The question is you won't
be able to know which one it is until
after, right? That's the tough part. But
objectively that is the best strategy.
the thing that gets you the most bang
for your buck. A good strategy would be
that you re you allocate the resources
to get an improvement. Great. We grew.
Did we grow as much as you know God
telling us what to do? Probably not. But
did we grow more than we were before?
Yeah, we allocated resources. Well, good
strategy. What's a poor strategy? And
there's two levels of poor strategy. It
go it goes there's two on the negative
side, too. All right. So if you allocate
resources to no improvement,
for example, if you are stagnating right
now, then it means you're actually
wasting resources. It means you're using
the stuff you got and you're not seeing
any increase. So you have one level of
waste. The resources you have are
getting wasted.
Then there's two levels of w I'll give
you an example here. So um buddy of mine
uh owns a big business and he was really
confident that his marketing was like
not good. uh and he had a CMO in there
or whatever and he said, "Hey man, I
don't think these ads are good. I don't
think they're working." And they were
like, "No, like we're really confident
that this stuff's like making a huge
impact." And so it took them six months
and he finally was like, "Just cut the
damn ads." So they cut the ads and sales
remained the same. So they were
basically burning $2 million a month in
this specific campaign that did
literally nothing. And so it was $12
million that got flushed down the
toilet. Now, it didn't hurt the
business, but I mean, they wasted
resources, which then kind of leads to
the next one, which is you can also
double waste, which is like you could
spend $2 million a month on stuff that
not only doesn't make the business
better, but actively makes it worse. So,
not only do you waste the resources, you
actually decrease throughput.
And I bring these up because I like to I
just want to be real. Like if if the
businesses are growing as fast as you
want, you might have a strategy issue,
meaning you're not allocating resources
to the greatest potential improvement.
If you're stagnating right now, it means
that there's somewhere else you should
be allocating your resources to get a
better return.
All right, I'll tell I'll give you a fun
example of a double way so it's not so
you don't feel like uh I'm I'm beating
on you. So, my gym got to full capacity
um you know, different different times
in my career, but when I just had one
gym, um everyone was loving it. I had
these two kind of parallel sessions that
worked and like my gym was packed. And
so, I couldn't fit any more people in my
gym and but I wasn't making as much
money as I wanted. And so, what I did
was I attacked the incorrect constraint.
So, what I did is I took this really
working product that everyone loved,
which is these 45minute sessions. I had
these strength sessions and I had these
cardio sessions. And so I had them
running in parallel and because I
couldn't fit as many people in, I
decided to one combine them and then two
make them 30 minute sessions. By doing
that I increased my capacity but no one
liked the product and I ended up having
this massive spike in churn. Whereas the
intelligent thing would have been oh
everyone loves it. You're at full
capacity raise your prices and then I
would have been able to have an amazing
product and had more profit. It would
have been such a simpler solution than
trying to reorganize my whole thing. But
I was young and I didn't know any
better. And so I I used all these
resources to remarket it, tell you know,
communicate it, retrain my staff on this
new way of doing things. And not only
did I waste all that effort, I also hurt
my business. Bad strategy.
I also, just so it's like I've done this
more than once. Um, in gym launch, one
of the biggest mistakes I made, I made a
couple big ones, but this is one of the
biggest ones. Um I was it was the first
and last time that I look in
competitors, but there was somebody else
in the marketplace that um basically
advert you know they they took a bunch
of my my top you know customers and they
tried to partner with them to basically
just make a Mickey Mouse copycat version
of my stuff. And so I then got really
and they were like we're going to give
you know one-on-one help and I didn't do
one-on-one um at the time. And so they
they make this offer that was less than
mine and had one-on-one support. And so
I go through this whole rigomeroll and
then I do this launch to my existing
customer base and I say, "Hey, here's
this amazing thing. We're just going to
charge all of you less money by 25%. And
give you more and you don't have to do
anything." And I want to tell you a
couple really interesting things that
happened from that. Number one, many
people complained. So think about how
crazy this is. I lowered the price and
added services and people complained
because they're like, I've been paying
this whole time and you didn't give me
this
like and it was a great lesson for me to
tell you that people just hate change no
matter what it is. So, thing one, the
second thing um that happened is that
when you cut 25% of topline and add
costs, guess what that does to your
profit? It kills your profit. And so I
lost about $5 million a year in profit
from that one move, which we never
recovered. And considering we sold the
business, I guess 24-ish months later,
it probably cost me realistically $40 to
$50 million. Like a real true like not
like oh hypothetical like I I did sell
the company and it was based on profit
and I probably lost another four 40 to
50. That's not an extrapolation of of
the the multiple, but I'm just saying
round numbers. So, when I say this, I'm
not trying to be heavy-handed because I
want you to feel bad. I'm saying because
I've done this and made horrible
mistakes before and ideally would like
you to avoid them. So, as we as we we
kind of wrap or get close to wrapping
this particular part one for framing
today, um, one of the things that I
think is really important is to
understand the paradox of solutions,
meaning that there are multiple paths
that can lead you up the mountain. So,
let me explain what I mean.
So, let's say
I have a leads issue and we're going to
cover this really heavy back half of the
day. Let's say I've got a really heavy
leads problem, right? And we're going
from clouds all the way to dirt, but I
have to frame it this way so that I can
bring everyone else along. Okay, so I
need more leads.
I could
increase my ad spend, right? That could
be one thing that I do. I increase my ad
spend. I could just make more ads
overall, more creative or make better
creative. That would do it. I could also
do some conversion rate optimization uh
on my pages. I could also improve my
lead magnet. Right? All of these things
would be things that I could do. And
this is like there's a hundred things I
could do, but that's five or four,
right? And so consider each of these as
these paths
up the mountain, right?
All of these are different paths up the
mountain. And so what's important to
realize is that it the difficulty is
properly identifying the constraint.
Once you identify the constraint
properly, you absolutely should hit it
with an atomic bomb to make sure that
you abs you destroy it, right? And so if
that was my issue, I could just do this,
but maybe I'll do all four, right? And
so this is the strategic priority. This
is the constraint. And so I bring this
up because some of you guys are going to
be like, well, which should I do? I'm
like, do them all or do the one that you
think you're most likely to succeed with
first and then you can start working
your way down. And if it resolves the
constraint, awesome. Rock and roll.
And so solving constraints happens in
unlimited ways. There's many flavors of
business. multiple ways to solve a
constraint, but identifying the
constraint is key. Going up the mountain
uh is singular. So solving the
constraint, getting to this altitude is
a singular goal. The paths can be
varied.
And so, right, your C's too high. You
can change your offer ad sales motion.
You can fix the problem. All right. Then
you need the next one. Right? And I I'll
talk about this more later, but the way
that you're like, okay, well, if I'm
going to talk to you, Alex, you tend to
give a specific directive. not only say
okay this is the problem how are we
going to fix it so I operate from the
position of what are the resources that
you have available to you so what are
the skills what are the um what are the
what are the assets that you have
currently and then I'm going to look at
all the different potentialities and say
okay well this one this person has more
experience with and so I think this is
the highest likelihood path for them if
this guy knows how to climb and this guy
doesn't well I'm not gonna have the guy
who doesn't know how to climb go on a
path that has some jagged rocks that
he'll have to climb up right so the path
could get them there, but which one's
the highest likelihood bet? And so this
is how I think through it. And with the
more skills you have, the more all of
these paths will work. Because if you're
a master climber and a master hiker and
an endurance runner, then you're like,
I'm pretty much good on all these paths.
Great. Then it means you have more ways
to win.
And so I want to bring this up though
from a from a different perspective when
it comes to well, how big of a peak can
I get up to with my existing skill set?
And so
one of the number one things that comes
up when I have like chromosy hotline or
I meet people in person at the workshops
and whatnot is like I don't know if my
vehicle the business that I'm in is is
sufficient for the goal that I'm trying
to accomplish, right? And so let's say
that you're like I want to get to a
million dollars a year hypothetically.
There's basically unlimited paths to
getting to a million dollars a year. And
so I'll give you a an easy visual for
this. So,
[Applause]
if you want to get up a foothill, right,
there's literally unlimited ways that
you can get up a foothill. If you want
to get up a larger hill, there's going
to be depending on how jagged the, you
know, the hill is, right? There's going
to be fewer ways potentially. If you
want to get up to Mount Everest,
I don't know if I don't know if that's
what Everest looks like. I'm going to be
real. Um, but there's probably I don't
know about Everest, but I'm sure there's
probably one or two paths that actually
get you to the summit, right? And so if
you have a $1 million year goal, then
you can get there whatever way you want.
$10 million still pretty unlimited.
Almost every business can get to $10
million a year. $100 million.
If it's enterprise value, yes, slightly
less so, but still like there's usually
an adjacent version of your business.
I'll give you an example. So if you're
if you're a brickandmortar store, you're
like, I can't get to $100 million
business. It's like, yeah, with one
store, no, but with 20 it could, right?
And so that's the idea is like it's
probably just like a tiny permutation
from the existing business could get you
there.
If your goal is to uh is to get to a a
trillion dollar company, right? Well,
then you pretty much exclude if you want
to get to Everest, you pretty much would
have to just do a global technology
product. There's just like there's
really no other way. And so depending on
the size of your goal, uh the path can
vary, but most people's goals are not a
trillion dollars. Most people goals are
like, I would like to have enough to be
free, enough to have the time that I
want, etc. Right? And so, um, I bring
this up because you've got your hill,
you've got your mountain, and you've got
Mount Everest. And, uh, unless your goal
is the trillion, then almost all of
these things that I'm about to share
with you will work in your existing
vehicle. Because so many um business
owners have this idea that they're like
you waste years on the existing business
you're in because you just don't commit
to it. It's like you're kind of like
have it as a side chick, right? Where
you're like you're like kind of dating.
You're half in half out rather than just
going all in. And if you just went all
in, you'd get to where you want to go
way faster. But you spend years not
going all in. And if you just gone all
in from day one, you'd already be there.
So if the constraint is the first thing
that we're trying to to figure out,
right? Thing one. Thing two is we want
to apply leverage to the constraint. So
we want to get more for what we put in
so that we can move through it. We can
break through that constraint faster.
The third thing that we're looking to
accomplish is compounding. We want a
business that grows on its own by just
continuing to do the same level of
activity. So fundamentally that is what
compounding is. You have the same input
and then increasing outputs over time.
same input increasing outputs.
Leverage is one time you get more for
what you put in. Compounding itself is a
form of leverage, right? But also in
that if I do one push-up and then I get
two push-ups back and I do one push-up
and I get three push-ups back, I do one
push-up and I get six push-ups back.
That is the compounding happening,
right? And so almost all businesses
should take a compounding vehicle of
some kind. So think of these as
flywheels or virtuous cycles. So an
example for real world, your reputation
is a flywheel. The more you do, the
better you get. The better you get, the
more people talk, the more people talk,
the better you do, the better you get,
the more people do. And it goes around
and around and around. Structural
virality is an example of a compounding
vehicle. So school, the whole platform
is built on you start you start a
community, you invite 200 people. Of
those 200 people, they invite they, you
know, one or two or three of those
people is going to start their own
community and then they invite 200
people, right? And so it has a
compounding has a structural virality
built into it. So it compounds, right?
Long-term stick is a is is a compounding
vehicle. Meaning if I sell 100 customers
this year and I sell 100 customers next
year and I sell 100 customers the third
year, if I kept 100% of customers, my
business would be three times bigger
year three than it is today. And many of
you um operate from the position that in
order to grow, you have to grow sales.
And that is a way to grow. It is also
the hardest way to grow. It is
significantly more valuable to find a
product or service that people don't
cancel. And then you could literally
stay the same level of marketing and
sales and just keep getting bigger every
year by default.
Network effects like an actual network.
Like if you have 100 people and they're
all cool, if you add 101st person who's
also cool, the whole network gets
better. That is a true network effect.
Different than adding more people to a
services business. To be clear, a
service of business that adds more
people in general will dilute the
service quality in a network, it
enhances the value of the network.
Facebook has a network effect. The more
people go on Facebook, the more valuable
Facebook becomes, right? You can also
have this from an integrations
perspective. The more things you work
with, if you work with a lot of
different vendors and that becomes a
value ad to a customer base like Zapier
for example, it becomes a compounding
vehicle. Sales networks are also
compounding vehicles. So, real
brokerage, Chiron, um, who's our
president, he came because you can have
a product where people never stop buying
it, which is long-term stick. Or you can
have a product where, and, this is a lot
of you guys, by the way, um, where
people don't stick for a long term
because the nature of the product you
you sell. Like selling houses isn't like
a long term. Like maybe over many many
years you buy or sell houses the same
person multiple times, but from a
business perspective, the node of
production is the agent, not the
individual houses. And so then you
think, oh, okay, I just need to get
these nodes in and the stickiness occurs
with how well I'm able to attract and
recruit brokers or agents and then what
each of them is going to represent for
me. Mortgages work the same way.
And so I want to give you a quick
warning, which is the compounding
reality, which is that everything that I
just said is how you build a really big
business.
Everything I'm going to show you the
rest of the day is just going to help
you build whatever you have to be
bigger. So, you can become wealthy
without any of that. You're just not
going to become the best. And so, I
share that because I want to talk to
younger me in the audience or older me
in the audience, whatever. Um, because I
would want to know that stuff. I would
want to be like, how do I how do I how
do I win in my market? How do I win in
my category? Those things are how you
win in your category.
But if you just want to get rich, right?
If you just want to become wealthy or
independently wealthy, you don't have to
really be the best. You just have to
like make more than it cost you to make
it and do it for a long enough time,
right? And so there are two very basic
compounding wheels that every business
can build into it with basically no
extra thought. So the first, so there's
three, sorry. First is just reputation
and referrals. We talked about that
earlier. If you do a good job, if you do
that long enough, you'll just keep
making more. That's a great thing to
focus on. The second is just trying to
get people to keep buying. Like every
business can do this. And the third is
to get people to never stop selling for
you. These are the three most basic
compounding wheels that require no tech,
no fancy thinking, no fancy strategy.
Like anyone can do these three
and I think I covered this one already.
Okay, so here's the TLDDR uh what it
looks like when it's right. There's
three elements here. We've got
constraint, we apply leverage, and then
if we design our business properly, we
unlock compounding. That is what it
looks like when it's right.
That is what we're hoping to accomplish.
This is how you scale.
So
hopefully that sets a decent groundwork
for today. So that was a little bit
clouds. Now we're going to get really
tactical. Okay, you're like that's
awesome. Um but uh I have trouble
getting leads. So what do I do now? That
is what we're going to cover now. All
right. So our objective right now is to
find your specific solution path. And so
what I'm going to do is walk you through
the decision tree for your specific
problem. All right? And so we'll start
with the obvious, match the constraint
to the solution, and then we'll take the
highest likelihood path based on your
assets, skills, and resources. This
fundamentally is what you know separates
individual attention. So like when
people come out here, the main thing is
that we can really pick, okay, based on
everything we've seen in patterns across
your industry, this bet seems to work
the best for most people and given your
background, I'd tweak it like this.
That's the value. There might be six
paths up that mountain, but we think
this path is the highest likelihood for
you. Okay,
so um some of you guys saw this, you
know, 20 hours of me taking uh Hermosi
hotline calls, um which was actually a
ton of fun for me. Um and some of the
feedback that I got was like, "Dude, you
went from like commercial refrigerating
to insurance to a restaurant to a B2B
SAS platform." like and then still was
able to drill deep on that. And so I
want to share with you kind of the
framework for doing this because what I
was doing was just working through a
mental checklist that I've just
developed over the years having just
done this with a lot of businesses. And
so uh if you're going to write something
down, this would be this would be the
thing to write down. So this is a linear
approach to constraints. I will call
these the mosy six. Okay. So the first
question that you probably heard me ask
many times if you listen to that was why
can't we do more? Like what stops us
from just doing more? Because if we
think about what
what it takes
to make more money, this is going to be
some this is going to be some some high
flutin math right here. Okay.
Sell more,
worth more.
That's it. Sell more units,
make them worth more.
That's it. And so then we just start
with the question which is like why
can't we sell more? Now sometimes the
reason you can't sell more is because
they're not worth enough. And that's one
of the problems and we'll get to that.
But fundamentally starting with this as
the question
allows us to massively simplify our
scope in terms of what we're trying to
think about um to grow the business.
The next is the next five basically
answer the question why can't we do
more? Because if the answer the first
question is well we could then stop
there go do more right? But you've got
metrics, you've got market, you've got
model, you've got money, and you've got
manpower.
And those very conveniently were M's. I
was I was not actually really trying for
that. Um I had five of the six were M's
by by default and I switched data to
metrics and then they're all all M. So
little little cute ism for you. Um but
this is it. Like this is the decision
tree. I'm actually very proud of this
because this took like an enormous
amount of time to narrow down and do in
this sequence. So when I'm asking
questions, I'm actually trying to check
through this list as fast as I can so I
can drill down to what the constraint is
so we can grow the business or
debottleneck it. And so again, the goal
here is that you want to get off at the
first exit. The point isn't like I'm
going to go through all six of these.
No, the goal is if you can just do more
today, then just do more today. Get off.
Like there's nothing else you need,
right? And so I will say this in all
bold. If you can double your company
doing one thing, why do three?
And it usually is one thing. It's just
harder because you don't know how to do
it or it takes longer than you want. So
you distract yourself with things you do
know how to do that take less time. So
you don't grow.
That's real.
It's hard. You just don't know how.
Everything that you don't know how to do
is hard. So if you can just reframe hard
to I don't know how to do it yet. And
the good news is you've got a brain in
two hands. You can figure it out. All of
a sudden you can attack things. And so I
will reframe this key point which is
that you should seek hard. And you
should seek hard because the things that
are difficult are things that other
people also have to figure out. If you
have an opportunity that literally has
nothing hard about it and it's not hard
at all for you, then it's going to be
not hard at all for everyone else and
it's going to very quickly become
saturated and then eventually not be an
opportunity anymore. Now, you can take
the the position of like, I just jump
from thing to thing to thing, which many
people do, and they never really see
long-term success because they just jump
to the easiest path and they just
restart over and over again. They never
unlock compounding. And compounding is
where all the money is made.
So when you hit that wall where you're
like, I just don't know what to do, it
usually means there's a skill that I
need to learn. When you do that, then
you can unlock it. Okay, so let's start
with the Bosey 6, right? The six M's.
Why not more? Like why can't we do more?
And I asked this as the first question
because right now if if you're going
through this, if you can do more, you
should do more for the following
reasons.
more is the highest risk adjusted return
move. If something has already worked,
more of it has a very high likelihood of
working again, right? Like repeat
successful actions. If it worked, do it
again. And do it until it stops working.
But many so many times when I say, "Hey,
why can't we double our ad spend?" It's
like, "Well, I mean, we could." It's
like, "All right, get off the phone. Go
double your ad spend. Why can't we do
twice the reachout? I mean, I guess we
could go do that." It's like, "Well, I
was thinking about starting a a personal
podcast. Why just do more? Do that when
more stops working. More is by far the
easiest bet. And I have become this this
broken record on more because more takes
work. And I think that's why people
don't want to do it. More it just takes
a unbelievable amount of work. And so
the thing that people I think also miss
out on is this is that diminishing
returns are still returns. You're still
making progress. You're still getting
better. you not you might not be getting
better at the same rate. If your first,
you know, $100,000 of ad spend gets you
10x return and your next $100,000 of ad
spend gets you a 3x return, you still
get a return. It's still better than the
stock market, right? And so I think to
myself in those is like, do I have an
absolute return? And is there something
else that has an absolute return that's
higher? Then yeah, then maybe you would
allocate the resources there. But for
me, because of risk, I'll max out a path
before I'm ever going to consider doing
other stuff because I know this works.
Why would I take the shot? And if the
hard is, oh, I have to figure out how to
do more of this thing that I already
know works, then that's a a hard I'm
very confident, very happy to to attack.
And so, this is a really interesting uh
perspective that has only come this like
this took me so long to figure out. And
so for those of you who come to the uh
come in person you might have seen this
but for those of you who haven't then uh
then this will be new for you. All right
so if we imagine this line as the
revenue of the business let's just say
this is normal normal business activity.
What I've observed in my businesses is
that when I make a change I have about a
20% decrease in performance a decrement
in performance. So, whatever we were
doing, if I say we're going to implement
this new customer success process, this
new sales motion, this new pricing,
whatever it's going to be, right? I
typically expect, especially if there's
people involved, I'm going to have a 20%
decrease. Now, if I believe this to be
true, which I do in general, again, this
isn't, you know, rule of law. This is
just rule of thumb. If I have a 20%
decrease that's going to that I have a
fixed and absolute like I know it's
going to happen, right?
What kind of bets am I willing to take
if I know I'm going to guarantee to have
a 20% cost? Well, if I've got this idea
that I'm like, I think this could give
us a 5% lift. Am I willing to stomach a
20% cost for the chance at a 5% lift?
Guaranteed negative 20 possible plus
five. No, I'll just keep living my life.
And so what ends up happening is I have
kind of like a rule of 20% as a minimum,
which is that if I'm going to guarantee
20, I got to have at least a 20%
increase for whatever thing I'm going to
implement in a business for it to be
worth the risk, for it to be worth the
work. Now, some of you might be like,
well, hey, if I still did that 20%, you
know, if I get that 5% improvement, it
would take me four or five months, and
then I'll finally be at 5% above
baseline. But let's also look at how
this works in reality.
you're going to start seeing this
improvement, right, over time, but the
thing is is that you're going to get
this really great idea over here and
then you're be like, "Oh yeah, well,
let's change this other thing about the
business and then you're going to get
another 20% decrease." And so the
business is almost always operating
below
its hypothetical capacity because you're
constantly changing things. And so I
would say one of the biggest things
that's changed about me as an
entrepreneur as I've gotten, you know,
developed more is that I just change
fewer things. And if something's going
to change, it better be worth it because
we're going to disrupt a ton of
different process flows, a ton of
different teammates. And one of the
things that you will find in general,
and this is kind of a fun one that again
you can extrapolate out, if you change
nothing about a business, it'll usually
improve by like 3% a year. If you change
nothing, right? That's why GDP in
general just grows by that amount. And
it's not because of population growth,
right? And so when we see this, I'm
like, okay, well, there's some degree of
population growth. But the point is this
is that if you just leave people alone,
they tend to get better at their jobs.
They just tend to get more efficient.
They develop the skills. They do more
repetitions, they get good. And when
that happens, the business just
improves, which is pretty sweet. And so
I've seen some of the biggest gains in
businesses sometimes when I just like
make my change and I just leave it
alone. And that's why lay some be like
just go away, go find a project, go
write another book, right? Um and so I
bring this up because I think many of
you may be guilty of this like I was for
I mean I still this is like an
addiction. you have to like, you know, I
fight it every day, right? But me
understanding that there is a fixed cost
of change with a variable upside has
dramatically reduced the number of
things that I'm willing to take the bet
on.
So,
that's my 20% minimum gain rule. Now,
this should look familiar to some of you
guys. Are you guys digging this, by the
way? that would uh I need to I need the
the approval of others in order to fill
the hole in my soul. Uh
I'm kidding. Um so if we're still back
on uh why not more, right?
Why aren't we doing
spending more money on ads? Why aren't
we making more creative? Why aren't we
adding more platforms? Right? More is
going to immediately make us more of the
core four, right?
And hopefully this should be familiar
with you guys and appreciate I just I
have a five-second delay. So I'm like I
make a point and be like I thought this
was a good point and I'll see nothing in
the chat and then I I see it. So I
appreciate you guys. Okay. So if we're
saying why can't we do more? Why can't
we spend more money on ads? Why can't we
make more creative? Why can't we make
more uh post across Instagram and Tik
Tok, right? All this stuff. Content
same. Can we spend more make more
creative? Can we also add in tech? Can
we do we need to recruit more people on
our media team in order to produce more
content? Okay, then let's do that. If we
have outreach as our primary way of
getting customers or getting affiliates,
right? We can spend more money on it. We
can put more messages out there. We can
do outreach on more platforms. We can
add more technology and we can add more
people. All of those things are very low
riskadjusted moors. And right now, if
you have that opportunity, you should do
it.
More works for astonishingly longer than
you expect.
So, I'll give you a couple reframes on
this because I think this is so
powerful. And if if you just got this in
terms of like if if I just if I just got
this through to 20% of you, I would see
today as a massive win. But you guys
have probably heard the story of the
pottery class. Teacher has two classes,
tells class one, we're going to grade
you on the person who makes the best
pot. Class two, he says, "Hey, I'm gonna
grade you on the number of pots you
make." At the end of the semester,
what's interesting about this little
story is that the class that did the
most pots not only made more pots, but
also their pots were better than the
ones that obsessed on trying to make the
best pot. Because quantity begets
quality. Doing more of stuff makes you
better at doing the stuff, which is why
I try to count in hundreds, right?
Right. I'll see someone say like, you
know, I had a couple of the Hormosi
hotlines that you guys probably heard.
Hey, uh, you know, I' I I've got seven
customers. Okay, fine. Got seven
customers. And I'm like, okay, how'd you
get the customers? Well, you know, I got
three of them from cold outreach and I
got one from attending an event and I
got, you know, one from a referral,
whatever. And it's like, okay, so of
those, there's clear input outputs, you
can go to more events. There's clear
input outputs, you can do more outreach.
Why aren't you doing more?
Well, I didn't have the data. Metrics
number one, right? It's the next it's
the next M, right? But this is why we
count in hundreds. So like I don't even
I can't even accept that we've done a
sufficient amount of anything until
we've done it a 100 times. Like a
hundred becomes your measuring stick.
You want to make content, do a hundred.
You want to you want to you want to do
outreach 100 a day. Like it just it just
it takes so much more volume. Like
that's what I want to translate. And so
right now the symptom of this if you
know if you're suffering from
insufficient volume is because things
are volatile. Things are erratic. Some
months you have two sales, some months
you have four. What's going on? The the
problem is you're not doing enough. And
so if we think about the problem of the
business as insufficient advertising. We
have not advertised enough. Then two
sales let's say over a month means that
you do x amount of advertising to get
two sales. And so if we want to get to
two sales a day, we have to do 30 times
that level of advertising
per day
to get the goal. And that takes us from
two a month to two a day. That's it. And
you're like, there's no way I could do
that kind of volume. Of course, you can.
It just takes time. But at least if
you're attacking from that perspective,
you're far more likely to achieve it.
And so, um, some of you guys have heard
this one. I think it's I'm not sure. I
can't remember if this is the story I
use in the book. Um, but old mentor of
mine, I start my gym up. Uh, don't have
enough customers. He crushed it with
flyers. He said, "Hey, put a flyer out."
I say, "Okay." I put 300 flyers out on
cars. I wait for the the phone to ring.
Phone only rings one time. It's a guy
who tells me that I dinged his Mercedes.
I immediately hung up because I was
like, "I don't have the money to fix
this." And so, I call my my my mentor
back like a couple weeks later and I
say, "Hey, put the flyers out." And he's
like, "Oh, yeah. How'd those work?" and
he's like, you know, excited and upbeat
and I was like ready to give him like a
verbal lashing of like, I did it and
your idea didn't work, right? And he
said, uh, and so I was like, yeah, I I
put out the the flyers and I didn't get
anything back. And he said, well, what
was your test size? First question he
asked. And I was like, what do you mean?
He was like, what was your test size? I
was like, why I put 300 out? And I said
it so like I was like, I put 300 out.
What are you talking about? He's like,
oh, he's like, hard to know if anything
works at 300. He's like, "We test with
5,000." And he's like, "And then once it
works, we'll do 5,000 flyers a day."
Oh, got it. 150,000 flyers a month,
not 300 one time.
And so I say this because like you you
can't imagine that someone's doing three
times your volume or five times like
there's no way. It's like in that
instance he was doing 500 times my
volume like real or 5,000 whatever the
math is there a lot right people can do
that much more volume right like we make
I don't know what the number is shy's
behind the camera I'm guessing 500 450
pieces of content a week it's a lot it's
a lot for like my content why isn't my
content work it's like dude I literally
do 20 times more 50 times more but not
only do I do 50 times more I've done it
for five years, 50 times more.
And so that is it's almost like I made
these slides. So AC that's that's our
current volume, right? And so if you're
and this is a special call out, if
you're at less than a million dollars a
year, almost guaranteed you're just not
doing enough. Like nine times out of 10,
like I I could just hang up the phone.
This is what you're just not doing
enough. You're just not doing enough.
Not even close. Sometimes there's
strategy issues. We'll get to that in a
second. But like more times than not,
you just need to do more because you
don't even know if anything's working
because you're not doing enough.
And so one of the difficulties of this
is it's not only doing like the only way
to do a tremendous amount is to do it
for a long period of time, right?
Because like if I did 450 for one week,
it wouldn't do that much. It would do
more than doing nothing, right? But if I
want to do 35,000 pieces of content, the
likelihood I can do that in a week is
low. Like it's just a lot of work,
right? Which is like why time unlocks
increasing amounts of volume. And what's
difficult about consistency, it's very
hard to observe. Which is why like when
people come and start working at
acquisition.com, you can only observe
consistency by consistently observing,
right? Like if you want to see me show
up every day at 4:00 or 5, you know, in
the morning, you've got to be here at
4:00 or 5 in the morning every day to
see that. And if you do it for a week,
you still haven't observed the
consistency of a year of years of doing
something like that. And so I bring this
up because like consistency is the
secret and it's so hard to see and you
have to be consistent to observe it.
And so if we have uh a business, which
we all do, so great. Hold on. Let me
show you what this uh what this looks
like.
So, let's say we've got this black box.
Okay.
If you think about a business in in the
simplest sense possible, you've got
advertising which is the inputs. You've
got some money-making box and then money
comes out. You turn raw attention into
money. That's the that's the machine.
Okay.
So, it would follow that the first thing
to do to make more dollars come out of
this side is just jam more here.
And people just don't do that. They're
like, "No, I would rather mess with my
black box." It's like, dude, we could
just jam more in. Just jam. Like, why
not more? Tell me. Why not more? For the
love of Pete. More. Okay. Hopefully I
hopefully I ran that one in. Um, and
what's interesting about this too is
that some of you guys are like crushing
it and don't even know it. Like I I'll
have a call where someone say like,
"Hey, you know, I'm getting I'm getting
20 to1 on my advertising and I'm
spending $1,000 a month." I'm like,
"Dude, imagine if you spent, you know, a
hundred, right?" Um, because when it
gets easy is when you go hard. What's
interesting is that it's usually the
opposite for most people. When something
really starts working, they let off the
gas. They're like, "Well, it's working."
It's like, "Dude, like you don't know
how long it's going to work for, like
this is when you lean in. This is when
you go hard."
And so my reminder here is that if the
answer uh is nothing is stopping you
from doing more, then that's it. Go do
more of what works. The goal is to get
off at the first and earliest exit here.
All right.
So, that was the first M of the Mosy 6.
Now, let's cover the second.
Yeah, Jordan French, you're getting 7x
row ads, uh, but you're only spending
2,000 a month. Why not more?
So, here are some reasons. Uh, more
isn't the answer. So, the first most
common, like these are not necessarily
the most common, but I did these in
order of like how I think through it.
So, it might be like I don't know what
my ads I don't know what I'm spending
and I don't know what I'm making. It's
like we'll do we can't do anything. like
we can't do more because you don't know
if more is work if any is working right
so it's like let's get our numbers this
where the metrics comes in right uh and
so this is where data knowing becomes
the priorities that means you stop what
you're doing you maintain the you know
obviously keep making the sausage but
the rest of your resources go towards we
have to track we have to know how many
people are walking in the door we have
to know how many phone calls are coming
in we have to know how many people are
buying we have to start tracking the
basic metrics of the business
and I I say this so heavy-handedly right
but I also want to balance it with a
very important point which is that you
have to balance it with your gut meaning
you will never have complete data like
this is a like not never like you will
have okay you will never have complete
data on everything in your business but
you will have some data and so the game
of entrepreneurship is oftentimes making
decisions with incomplete data but at
least you can get directional well when
we spend more money on ads we make more
money every month and when we don't
spend money on ads we don't make. I
didn't track anything. I don't know what
the rorowaz is, right? Like the more
specific we can be, the more surgical we
can be in terms of juicing the hell out
of it. But the at the simplest level, if
we spend money on ads, then we make
more. Great. Let's try and do more of
that. It's a decent bet, right? And so
the next framework is, okay, I think if
this is directionally correct, is it
reversible or irreversible? Is me
spending money on ads going to be a
reversible decision? Yeah, I could just
stop spending money on ads. It's not a
big deal. Now if I spend my life savings
on it and I have no backup that would be
an irreversible decision, right? So this
is how we think through bets, right?
And so I think this is super important
because many many businesses are
actually not limited by anything but the
entrepreneurs's ability to decide
like really want you to take this in and
again this took me like not just like a
couple years but like probably over a
decade to figure out which is the speed
of my business is proportional to my
speed of my ability to make decisions.
And so fundamentally well then what is a
decision? Well, once we make a decision,
we begin to allocate a resource. And so
the speed of the business is based on
your speed of your ability to allocate
resources, which is going to reverse
back into your ability to decide, right?
And so that decision-m
your ability to be definitive, like you
should decide very quickly on things
that are reversible. It's not the end of
the world. And I think what happens,
especially as a business gets a little
bit bigger, you have more decision
makers, people start to treat all
decisions as though they are
irreversible because people hold other
people accountable for mistakes. And I
think this is what creates a culture of
fear. And so it's like you have I mean
there's a very long time that Facebook,
one of Facebook's core values was uh
move fast and break stuff. is that that
was a value of theirs. Like we have to
be willing to just ship it and see what
happens and if it if it breaks we can we
can roll it back. And
the speed of decisions and here's where
it gets here's where it gets nasty is
typically proportional to the quality
and quantity of data because when you
have very clear data speed of decision
goes up because the data is very clear.
It paints a clear picture. If you had
all the data you could make the decision
immediately with high confidence. And so
this is where data although it feels
like a very boring subject allows you to
move the business faster because it
allows you to decide faster which allows
you to allocate resources faster which
allows you to get returns faster. That's
the cycle.
And so if you can't do more because you
don't know your numbers then knowing
your numbers becomes priority number
one.
And so one of the things that I I like
to frame for like when the you know the
big baller business owners come out and
they spend $135,000 to to to to hang out
with me for a day. This is kind of
light. I do a lot of work but is that
it's like I provide decisions as a
service like what are the big juicy
decisions that we need to make and let's
make them so that you can feel confident
in allocating the resources and going.
So think about that like your job the
job to be done the job you're hired to
do as the entrepreneur is that you
provide decisions as a service to the
business. The higher up you go it's
almost entirely your job is just to make
good decisions.
So, at the at the most tactical level
here, make sure you have the basics
down. So, lead, scheduled, show, sales,
and then the math ones, like those are
all like if you don't know how to do
those, like those you can Google those.
They're not hard to figure out. And then
CAC, lifetime gross profit, revenue, uh,
profit, and then cash flow, right? These
are the things that you should know how
to do. Now if you should have the lost
chapters. Um
these are the back of nacket methods for
these are just leads is you just count
in your CRM right schedules you can
literally just count shows you can also
count and then just do a percentages you
know scheduled over leads gives you how
many people what your schedule rate is
your shows over scheduled gives you your
show rate your sales over your shows
gives you your close rate right um very
straightforward your cost to car
customer I have entire chapters on CAC
lifetime gross profit and payback period
inside of the lost chapter book. They're
also inside the money models course.
Okay, so uh which is if those of you who
are in the um in the school group, uh
it's there and you can also see it on my
site. Okay, so it's it's free. All
right, just it's in there. Okay, so we
want to do more and if we can do more,
we do more. If we can't do more, the
first reason that we might not do more
is because we just don't have the
metrics. If you don't have the metrics,
then go get the metrics. That's your
that's your exit exit ramp. Okay, the
next one is gonna be market. So, this
one's interesting.
So, we say, "Hey, I can't do more
because my market is too small." And
that may be true. It's probably not, but
it may be true. So, if you're a local
business, it's possible. Uh, I talked to
somebody on the Rosie hotline during the
live. I don't know if you guys remember
this, or some of you guys might have
been there. Um he had I think it was 140
people in his town and he had a local
business that was a lounge.
Yeah. Like you're not like you're not
going to scale that to a billion
dollars. Like there's just there's
literally no way. I mean literally the
aggregate economy of the local area is
140 people's salary times their salary
or like people times the salary. That's
it. That's if you that's if 100% of
people will give you 100% of their
money. That's it. There's no more. You
can't do anything else. Just like the
GDP of the world is limited by 8 point
whatever billion people that that exists
like you can't you can't sell more than
that that's it right um so uh also kind
of fun fact like you can you can fact
check because I heard somebody the other
day one of these tech founders who was
like you know uh attention on is
compounding at an exponential rate and I
thought about that and I was like that's
not true there's eight billion people
there's 24 hours that's it that's max
attention that's all there is like it
can't compound an exponential rate
there's eight billion of us there's
There's only so many eyeballs and
earballs. That's it. And so there are
there are real maximums. However,
they're typically so much higher than
you think they are. And so if you were
local, it's possible. If you're anything
else, if you sell nationally, you sell
internationally, you sell online, it's
super unlikely that you've saturated
your quote market.
And also to the same degree, if you are
in a local business, you could just go
to another market, which is fine. But if
you're like, I've maxed out. I I'm in,
you know, a town of 400 people in
Kentucky and I have I have a gym. Yeah.
Well, you know, you if you have all 400
people, like you you got it, you know,
like now we got to do another one,
right? And so I I would encourage you to
Google industry revenue because it's a
great way to humble yourself when you're
like, you know what, uh I think I've
got, you know, we're doing $2 million a
year and I think I've saturated the
niche of of uh chiropractor agencies,
right? It's like, no, you haven't. And
what's crazy about this is that this is
one of the most commonly stated reasons
that I get for why someone can't grow.
And it's also one of the least correct
and least commonly true, right? Like if
you're actually, you know what's funny
is that the business this happens so
frequently. It's kind of funny. The the
businesses that are at the like I have
140 people in my market, I they almost
never say that they're the ones that
have a market that's too small. It's the
people are like, I'm going after weight
loss and I'm making $5 million a year
and I think I've capped it. I'm like, I
don't know. It's a 70 billion dollar
industry like probably haven't right and
so I'll tell you a little story about I
had this belief broken for me too which
was um that's why it's so nefarious
because it's so easy it just like it
just protects your ego so well just
gives you this big warm hug and it's
like dude it's just the market's too
small you're already winner like you've
got it all man you've got it all like no
you can't make anymore because you just
outside circumstances it's not you right
so uh you know Jim Mo was capped at I
can't remember what it was but we were
at 30ish And um I had somebody reach out
who was a sales guy um and he was
telling me that he worked at a different
gym company that I'd never heard of
before. And I was like never even heard
of these guys. And so I said, "Well, you
know, how big's your, you know, outbound
team that you work on?" And I think he
said 40 or 50 guys, whatever it was, a
decent amount at the time. And I was
like, "Whoa, 40 or 50 guys doing
outbound?" I was like, "Well, what's
revenue for you guys?" And he said,
"About 10 million a month." And I was I
was like floored. Like I if I had
glasses, I would have taken the glasses
and thrown on, but I don't wear glasses.
But if I did, I would have thrown them
on the floor. And so the thing is is
that that that story though completely
shifted my perspective of how many more
gyms there were available out there that
I was just only reaching on one channel.
I maybe maybe I tapped a channel, maybe
probably not, but maybe one element of
one channel, but there's so many other
channels, right? And so if you've been
following my stuff for a while, you've
seen this before, but it's, you know,
sometimes we need to be reminded more
than we need to be taught. All right? Is
that like people think it's the thing on
the left, right? I'm the only one
marketing to, you know, vegan
powerlifters on on on on Facebook,
right? And then somebody else comes in
and says, I also help vegan
powerlifters. You're like, what the
hell? Now we're splitting this pie in
half. And then two other people come in
and you're like, oh, what the heck, man?
Now it's I've got a quarter of the
market. When the reality is that it
looks much more like the image on the
right, which is most people think uh,
you know, they've got their one method,
one platform, one medium, which is fine
when you're starting out, but you
haven't capped you haven't capped your
market. You might have kept one platform
maybe, probably not. Maybe, probably
not, right? But to the right, right, is
what it really is. Is that you've only
got one method of doing this, which is
you post content. You're only doing on
one platform, okay? And you've only got
one medium on that platform. So, you've
got this tiny itty bitty bitty slice of
of a tiny of even bigger pie of another
of a table full of pies, right? There's
so much traffic. And this is something
that took me a very because it's a
belief thing. It's a it's a declarative
view of the world. Like if you if you
limit your view of how much traffic you
think there is, there just isn't. Like
some of you guys saw a clip that I had
of me walking um on the strip and some
guys comes up and says, "Hey, you know,
I love your stuff, whatever." And I was
like, "Oh, thanks, man. Come to the book
launch." And he was like, "What's that?"
I was like, "The book launch, the book
that I'm holding, all these green guys
behind me holding all these these green
madness." He's like, "Oh, sorry. I'm not
going to be in town." I was like, "It's
virtual. Like, it's all good." And he's
like, "Okay, I'll check it out." Right?
And then he he walks off. And so it's
just this this this great reminder. And
while I was on the trip, I probably had
like five or six people who like had
seen my stuff while I was walking there.
I think one of them knew the book launch
was coming, maybe. And so again, it's
like no one knows you exist. No one. No
one knows you exist. There's so much
traffic. There's so many people. It's
hard to comprehend what 8 billion is.
It's a lot.
So,
here's some actions for smaller business
or local businesses because you're
probably the only ones that could
potentially be affected by this. One is
you can consider expanding your existing
location. Knock down a wall, see if you
can lease the place next door. You can
also make it more efficient. So, within
your four walls, increase the delivery
ratio. I'll talk more about that uh a
little later. Um, but you can increase
the ratio. If you had a restaurant, you
could tighten the tables up. You could
add more chairs. Like, you could
experiment with times. Like, these are
things that can increase how much
throughput you get. Um, you can expand
channels. So, the only exception that
I've made to my one platform, one avatar
um one offer uh rule is for local
businesses. It's the only exception that
I'll give. And the main reason there is
just because like if you are in a local
market and you are, you know, you've got
10,000 people, they're not all going to
be on Meta. They're not all going to be
on, you know, Google. So, you might have
to do some direct mail and some Google
ads and some radio ads and some, etc.,
etc. And so in a local market, it's one
of the only times I'm like, it's okay to
have more than one advertising method.
You could also just do the obvious,
which is like, you're right, that market
is too small, and so we need to save up
our shekels and open up another
location, which is fine, right? Now,
another way you can do it is you can
expand uh market segment. So, we were
only doing moms, but now we do moms and
dads. Okay? Again, these are for local
businesses. The last one I would say is
a uh I would hardcore reserve because
that's a significant change in strategy.
And if the business is working and this
is actually the true limiter, the true
constraint, then I'd rather just say,
"Cool, this thing's working. It's
profitable. Let's just repeat it."
So,
why can't we do more? If you can do
more, do it. If you can't do more
because you don't know your metrics,
then go get your metrics. If you have
your metrics and you're like, I just
think that based on these metrics, uh,
the market's the issue. uh super super
super super super super super super
super unlikely,
but if you're in a tiny tiny tiny local
market, possible.
So then we get to model. Okay, so I've
got all these things. So my market's not
too small. I do have my numbers and I
can't do more. Why not?
And this actually happens a fair amount,
which is uh someone says, "I'm just not
sure if it's worth it. I'm not sure if
this is going to help me hit my
overarching goals. Like I started this
business a few years ago and like you
know, it's just not what I thought it
was going to be.
I'm not in love with it anymore.
You know the words.
So, I'll tell you a couple stories here
to to reframe this. So, Kale, who's GM
of or CEO, excuse me, of Gym Launch, now
it's been four years since we sold. Um,
he was actually like the f one of the
first 10 people that actually got sold
as a client into into the business. And
I remember having this conversation with
him where I think at the time, I don't
remember. I think it was it was like
$10,000 or something to start. And he
said, "I would totally do this, but I
just paid $10,000 to this other guy to
help me start an online fitness
business." And his gym was doing $4,000
a month. They were losing money every
month. And he had a one-year-old and a
kid on the way or two-year-old and kid
on the way. Uh, and he's working a job 5
to nine, sorry, 9 to5 during the day and
then working at the gym 5 am to 9 and
then uh um 5:00 pm to 900 pm. So, he's
just literally working all hours. He's
awake. And so, I said, "Hey, man. Um,
if this thing that I'm going to show you
made you the amount of money that you
want, would you even do this fit online
fitness thing?" And he was like, "No, I
would quit it in a second." And so, the
thing is is like sometimes there's
nothing wrong with the model at all.
It's like you just need to like like
like sorry, when I say model, I mean
like, "Oh, I want to go from insurance
into into you know, wealth management. I
want to go from uh you know making
content to starting a social media
marketing agency. Changing the business
you're in is just a gigantic risk and
it's extremely likely that you'll just
plateau at the exact same spot you
currently are with your current skill
level. And so
if we could just get your current
business to make the amount of money you
want, would you would you like it more?
And a lot of times the answer to that
question is yes. And so let's solve
that. Right? And so, um, I gave the
example earlier about like $1 million,
$10 million, $100 million, like there
for sure will be limits to, uh, how big
one specific business. And I typically
use these local businesses as the
example because anything that's online
can pretty much just reach so much more.
There's more complexity. There's more
there's more skills that you have to
learn, but proportionally, you also just
you can just you have the whole
internet. You have the whole world,
right? Um, but if you build a
restaurant, you will not be able to make
as much money as if you have a global AI
company. you're just not, right? If
you're like, well, I want to be a
trillionaire, a restaurant's not going
to be the path. And so, in that
instance, you should probably, if you're
like, I will do like, if I don't do
this, I will be really sad and and die,
then might as well just not be really
sad and die and just be really happy and
then die. right now. Um, that being
said, there's a really good perspective
on this that I'd like to offer for some
of you guys,
which is that sometimes the reason the
business you have can't grow is because
you built it wrong. But there's nothing
inherently wrong with like the industry
that you're in, per se. And so,
we do this little exercise. Uh, it's
like this pasta exercise. Basically, you
build a building as fast as you can. I
think you got 10 minutes, whatever. And
so once you finish building the
building, everybody kind of teams up and
then they they have, you know, different
level things, right? Different level
pasta towers. And so once they build the
pasta towers, the next natural question
is, okay, if you'd had a full day, would
you build it differently? And the answer
is usually yes. If you had a full day,
do you think you could build a build a
bigger building? The answer is yes. Now
you have your 10 minute 10-minute tall
tower. If I need you to triple it, could
you? And the answer is usually no.
Because when you build things
fast in the beginning, it doesn't mean
you built them for scale. And so you
have to build things differently. You
have to just like if you want to have a
hundredstory building, you have to drill
down stories to build the foundation,
right? So like the deeper the foundation
is, the higher the the building can go.
But if you compared a a two-story house
to a 100 store building, you would get
two stories above the ground before they
even finish the foundation when they're
down five stories right in the big
building. But the thing is is that in
the beginning, this guy out the gate is
bragging to the guy who's down in the
pit going negative to try and build the
foundation for this business, saying
like look how much faster I grew. But
then this guy just blows past them. And
so it it doesn't take into account how
much time it takes to build something
big. Because the fastest way, and you'll
write this down, the fastest way to get
to $10 million a year is not the fastest
way to get to a hundred.
Like this is why like I kept I hit this
wall with gym launch at 30 to $40
million a year. Like I built I didn't
build it to get to 100. I just built it
to not be poor. Like that was you know
what I mean? Like that like it was just
like oh this worked for me, right? Um
but I wasn't like strategic about how I
was building it. And if I said oh I have
to build this thing into a $100 million
business, I would have built it
differently. But I didn't know that when
I started.
And so to take the the absolute extreme
example on this with the building
analogy, sorry, with the uh with the
restaurant analogy I had earlier,
restaurants versus AI. The man who owns
my building, Mr. Panda, as I refer to
him, he owns Panda Express. He owns all
2600 locations. He owns the real estate
in the dirt for many of them. And he's
been selling Kungpow chicken for 45
years.
Most people would look at that and said,
"Hey, I own a I own a Chinese, you know,
fast casual restaurant." Most people
would say, "I don't know if that's the
best opportunity vehicle." Well, if you
do anything long enough, you get pretty
good. And he's gotten pretty darn good.
One of the best in the world at Kungpow
and General S's chicken, right? Little
uh little What's the one? Steak and
broccoli, right? Um little spicy spicy
pineapple. Anyways, uh I think it's
called Sweet Fire. Anyway, they've got
some good stuff. But the point is this
is that most of the times you can reach
the goals you have if you just expand
the timeline. And people wildly
underestimate the value of consistently
making progress towards a goal by
building the correct foundation. That is
the point I'm trying to make is that
your business might not have anything
flawed except for your timelines and
your expectations.
Because most of us aren't trying to
build the next trillion dollar AI
company. Most of us would be okay with a
$10 million business or a $100 million
business. Most people. And if that is
you, then all the things that I'm going
to share would apply to you and work for
you. You just need to change the
expectations around it. You can have
arguably the the hardest business to
scale, a brick-and-mortar restaurant,
and still become a decad billionaire
like Mr. Panda.
It just took him 45 years.
And so, how do you do something like
this? Like, how do you actually take
that little restaurant and build it into
Mr. Panda? Right? So, this is an
exercise that I do uh with some of the
folks that that that have come out in
person, but I like I like envisioning it
like this. So, let's say you've got
company A and then you've got company B.
Okay? And let's say year one, company A
sells 100 customers. Okay? But then they
lose 100 customers.
Year two, they sell 200 customers and
then they lose 200 customers.
Okay,
this should say year one, but you get
the idea. Okay, then year three, we've
got 300 customers and then they lose 300
customers.
So, if we were to look at this company,
we' be like, "Oh man, they're, you know,
they tripled in that same period of
time. Not bad." Now, company B, let's
say they sell 100 customers year one,
but then they lose zero. And then year
two,
they sell a 100 again, but then they
lose zero. But they still have the other
hundred from year one. So add this
together, right? They lose zero. So now
they have 200 customers. And then year
three,
they sell 100 again.
We add these together, they lose zero
again, and now they have 300 customers.
So both of these businesses have 300
customers. sold in revenue that year.
But which business would you rather
have?
Obviously, this one, this lower one, the
one that doesn't lose customers and has
lower sales velocity, sold us third as
many customers as the other one did.
Many of you are trying to build your
business like this, which is if I just
learn how to market better, I'll make
more money. And the answer is what I
originally said. If you just learn how
to market and sell, you can for sure
make money. You can for sure feed
yourself. You can become independently
wealthy. You can. you're just not going
to build big stuff.
I'm just being real. This took me a long
time to learn as somebody who's pretty
good at marketing and sales. All right?
Instead, we have to ask the question,
how do we build something that
compounds? Right? And one of the key
ways of compounding is reputation and
not losing customers,
right? And so here we have our get 100,
lose none. Get a 100, lose none, now we
have 200. Get 100, lose none, now we
have 300. And this company, this 300,
both these make the same revenue. This
one, not only is it a better business to
own because if you didn't sell any
customers for the rest of your life,
you'd still make money. Great. But the
other portion of this is that this one's
significantly more profitable because I
can promise you to acquire the first 100
customers compared to acquiring 300
customers is going to cost less. But not
only that, this business needed to
acquire 600 customers over that same
three-year period. So they had to
acquire twice as many customers. And
that additional cost of customers is
just scooped out of the bottom line.
And these incremental 300 are just
dropping probably disproportionately to
the bottom line because the cost of
delivery on existing customers is almost
always significantly lower. And this one
because they probably do a good job
probably has a decent amount of these
hundred that are probably word of mouth
or free. And so maybe their cost to
acquire might be only 50 of these
hundred or 25 of these hundred. And so
now we're comparing 300 uh customers
that have to get paid to acquire versus
maybe 25
a tenth and all of that extra drops
straight to the bottom line. This is how
you can really build a compounding
vehicle. This is how when Mr. Panda gets
interviewed on the rarity videos he
does. He says your customers absolutely
love your product. And if they do then
they will come back and buy again.
So we covered more. We covered metrics.
We covered market. We covered model. All
right. Why can't we do more? because I
don't have the numbers, because my
market's too small, because I'm not sure
if it's worth it. Okay, now we get into
the tactical We can't market more
because we don't have the money, right?
We can't afford to. All right, fair
enough. So, let me actually write these.
Actually, I brought this over here so
that we could keep track of it. So,
we've got more,
we've got metrics,
Now, this one's got four kind of like
subportions here. So, I'm gonna I'm
gonna make this look hopefully it'll
make sense. Okay.
All right. Is it because leads cost too
much?
In which case, we need better
advertising. But how do you know it's
that leads cost too much or that you
don't make enough from them? We'll get
to that in a second. But when I'm asking
the questions of like trying to
deconstrain the business, I'm running
through this. I'm like, "Why can't you
do more? I don't have my metrics. Go do
that. Call me later." Okay. Uh, my
market is too small. Is it really too
small? Is it actually too small? Oh,
you're just need to reframe. Okay, cool.
Let's keep going. Great. Your model.
Well, have you expanded your time
horizon? Is there another version of the
business that looks like yours that is
20 times as big? Yes. Okay, then it's
your mindset. It's not the model. Great.
Okay, now we're into the money stuff.
So, is it because your leads cost too
much or you don't make enough from them?
If the leads cost too much, you need
better advertising, right? Or do you
close too few of them, which would mean
that you need better sales?
or do you not make enough per customer
which means you increase lifetime gross
profit
or you make enough but you make it too
slowly. That's a cash flow issue.
So you'll also notice hopefully that
these correspond to leads, the lead
systems, right? Maybe you guys can point
over here. Um ads, hooks, branding,
marketing machine. All of this is to
help with people who need better
advertising. You need cheaper leads. If
you're like, you know, it's a it's a
sales issue. It's like, okay, we need to
nurture better. We need to close better.
We need to add more proof into our
process. If it's delivery, then it's
like, okay, that means we have to
increase lifetime gross profit per
person, right? Which is why we have
these playbooks. If it's, oh, I need to
accelerate profit or cash flow in the
business, then we have uh the the profit
playbooks. Okay? So, the question now
comes down to, and to be fair for
everybody who's watching this, I bet you
80% of you are in this bucket, but I
have to still cover these. actually
probably 30% of you maybe 30 30ish% are
probably here probably got like 10 to
15ish here and then this is probably the
rest or many many of the rest of you
there's still one more after this but
I made all those numbers up but that's a
rough estimation okay
so the way to know is that you start
with CAC all right so CAC cost you a
customer is it around the industry
average and so I I'll give you an an
observation that I had from Allen uh
which is our software company um across
different agencies. And so two
interesting tidbits. One is that the
cost to acquire customers between
different agencies with different
methods honestly typically pretty
similar, right? I mean maybe within one
or two of each other, but like not a 10x
difference, right? Unless you have a
brand, but for anybody who just had like
didn't have a brand, it was just
generically acquire customers via
outreach or via, you know, paid ads or
something like that, like that like
their cost to acquire customer was not
that different. And it was cool for me
to see and I was like, "Wow, it was
actually a big relief breaker." So I'll
hopefully try and translate that to you.
So
how far off industry average are we?
Because the difference between the the
the the agencies that were doing, you
know, 20x another agency was typically
never their CAC. It was typically other
stuff. Meaning they kept their customers
longer. Their lifetime value stacked.
They had a better model so people didn't
churn out.
All right.
And so if CAC is industry average, so we
start there, start with CAC
and you can't afford leads. So if you're
average and you can't afford leads, you
have an LTV problem, right? So if it
cost you the same amount as everybody
else, but you can't afford to do it,
it's because they make more money than
you. So they can bid you out of the
marketplace. So if CAC average and
you're not making money, your LTV is too
low. Hopefully this answers the question
for some of you guys. That might be your
issue. I'm going to give you tacticals
on how to solve it in a second, but
that's how it works. Okay, so you don't
make enough on customers. We'll solve
this in a second, but I want you to at
least know which which constraint you're
dealing with. Now, if CAC is average and
profit is good, but you can't spend more
because of cash flow, meaning this is
super common in like home services where
it's like, oh, we get paid on net 90.
So, it's like our profit is good. It's
just that we have to wait for the the
cash to come in. So, we have we're cash
flow constrained even though we have
profit as a business. All right? We get
paid net 90 or we get, you know, $100 a
month for years, but it cost us $1,000
to get a customer. That's a cash flow
constraint. This is super common with
software companies, too, right? So, you
make a profit, but it's too slow. So,
the solutions are we need to accelerate
cash flow. And I'll show you how to do
that in a second. All right. I just want
to make sure that we're picking the
right problem.
So the next is CAC is too high.
So if CAC is too high, it's one of two
different problems because they're
multiplicative. All right? So it's
either your sales your leads cost too
much or your sales sucks or both. So if
CAC is too high, it cost you too much to
get customers. Either your advertising
blows or you suck at sales or both.
Okay?
So improvements to either of those
because they're multiplicative could
solve the problem. But we want to work
on the one with the weakest link, aka
the biggest bang for the buck. And so
let's say we're looking at this. Let's
say you're closing 25% of sales, you
know, 25% of conversations. You've got a
very low opt-in rate. Well, likely the
opt-in rate would be the constraint,
which would mean leads are costing too
much. So we can fix that one with better
advertising, conversion optimization,
etc.
Now, let's say that our sales you're
closing 5% of people get on the phone
with. Well, then you probably have a
sales issue, not necessarily a leads
issue.
And so, then you're closing too few. So,
you would be this one, number two. And
so, I I I walk through these so that you
can get is it a leads issue, is it a
sales issue, is it an LTV issue, or is
it a uh cash flow profit issue?
And so this is where pattern matching
transparently becomes valuable because
like this is the difference between me
like just saying this one to many to you
guys versus me being on the phone or you
know me talking to you in person or
answering the question you know in the
scale advisory group is that like that's
where pattern matching is important.
Like I could be like well I know
plumbing should never cost more than
this so you're missing all of it here
right like I can just tell that quickly.
Um but this at least should give you the
decision-making variables of how to
think through it. All right. Now, if
you're like, "Okay, Alex, well, I
understand where my specific constraint
is. Um, then we have these four
potentialities. Lead, sales, profit,
cash flow." Okay. And by profit, it's
LTV, but I named it profit for this
because you're not making enough per
customer. Um, let's actually solve them.
Okay? So, let's say that we we have CAC
is too high because our sales are fine,
but leads is the constraint, right? So,
you close sales, but you can't get
enough leads. So, how do we solve this?
So, you need better ads. And remember
the the multiple paths up the mountain.
This is an exact example of multiple
paths up the mountain. What I'm about to
go through. See if I can find my
multiple paths up the mountain. I think
this is it. Well, that was my Everest
one. There's still multiple paths
though.
Is this it? Yeah, here we go.
Okay, this is actually this exact
example, right? So leads is what we need
to solve. And so we can have better ads,
right? Which we would do with the go to
ads playbook. Or for those of you who
picked up the ads handbook, you can have
that too, right? Hooks would also
improve this as well. You can make
better content using hooks and branding.
You could do that too. That would
cheapen the amount of leads you get. If
if you're currently not making content,
you started making content, you'd get
cheaper leads, especially if you're
already running ads. Uh better
messaging. So this would be the
branding, like what is contained inside
of the advertising. What are the
associations and the pairings that you
want to make?
You could improve the offer, which is
the offer, the entire premise of the
offer's book, right? You could add in a
money model mechanism. You could take
your existing offer and then make it a
giveaway. You could make it a win your
money back. You could make it a decoy
offer. You could make it a pay less now
or pay more later offer, right? You
could make any of those with your
existing thing and you would get more
leads.
And this one's a bit of a strategy one
that's kind of between sales and LTV.
It's it's a little bit more strategic,
which is like maybe you have a you don't
have enough leads because you're going
after the wrong people. And if you were
clearer on the avatar that you're going
for, you would increase the quality of
your leads and then by extension, you
end up making more. So, let me tell you
guys a fun little fact. So, at this
launch that just happened, uh we had
different campaign objectives for ads.
So, it' be like this is a campaign
that's optimized for leads. This is a
campaign that's optimized for uh return
on ad spend, meaning it's going to
optimize for people who are going to
pre-order the book. Okay, really
interesting. So, our cost per lead on
our our rorowaz driven campaigns,
basically the ones that are optimizing
to get more book buyers,
the cost per lead was like two or three
times higher than the campaigns that
were optimized for leads. That sound
that kind of makes sense. Okay, well,
this is optimized to get the most leads.
This is optimized to get the most sales.
But when you get sales, you also get
leads. But the lead cost on those leads
was like three times higher. But here's
where it gets really interesting.
The actual return on our rorowaz driven
campaigns, even though they cost the
leads cost three times higher or more
for those campaigns, we still had four
times the return from that campaign
compared to the lead generating
campaign. And so the reason I bring this
up is because
sometimes you have this this option
where it's like, well, I've got my
existing customer base that, you know, I
I can get uh, you know, cost me $100 to
get a customer and I make uh, you know,
$500 from the customer. Or there's an
avatar that costs you $500 to get that
you make $10,000 from.
Five times more expensive, right? from
here to here, five times the price.
But
this is a 20x and this is a 5x. So you
have a 4x difference in relative return.
And so sometime the most valuable thing
you can do is just decide to not sell to
a specific customer base and then go up
market to better avatars. So, I have a
great chapter in um lost chapters, your
first avatar, which is really good. Um
that covers this and also the entire
lifetime value playbook.
So, those are the those are the ways up
the mountain. Now, if I'm talking to you
and you're like, well, which one should
I do? We do the one that we believe we
have the highest likelihood of
succeeding with given our existing
resources and skills. So, if we're
looking back at this list, if you're
somebody who's run ads before but never
made content, then I probably say like,
let's just stick with ads. If you're
really good at content, I wouldn't be
like, "Oh, let's necessarily do ads as
our first bet. Can we make more or
better content in order to do it?" Um,
you know, offers. Now, the existing
thing there, I'd be like, "Okay, well,
is there a way that we don't have to
change your services, but just recombine
it in a way that makes it more
appetizing?" That's where the money
models come in and the mechanisms that
just make whatever you're currently
doing just better or more sexy.
Okay.
So that's
that's if leads cost uh too much. We
solve that. Great. So now we have lead
flow coming in. And so you deal with the
issue of well, I've got all this junk,
right? I got all these leads coming in,
but we can't close them, right? And so
the ways that we think through solving
this is like number one, better
conversion optimization on the page. So
look at the page flows, look at the
headlines, look at the sub headlines,
the lead magnet itself. if you don't
have a lead magnet. Sometimes that like
I would say probably 10% of the time I I
I go do a page takedown or tear down and
I find out that their entire page says
request invoice or request a quote or
just like book a strategy call.
Typically not a very compelling thing,
right? It'll increase the lead quality,
but you're missing out on a lot of sales
by not making the thing beforehand
better, right? Like why do I have the
scaling road map? Because it's a much
broader lead magnet. People who are
interested in scaling their business are
probably going to get a scaling road
map. If you're interested in getting a
scaling road map, you're likely to want
to come to a scaling workshop, right?
And then we can also grade them based on
the level that they select for the
scaling road map. So it also qualifies
leads for me. Right? Now the next thing
we can do is we can improve the sales
process. So I uh so obviously we have
lead nurture here. We have proof which
you can uh basically embed throughout
the process and you can build a VSSL.
So, some of you are like, "What's a
VSSL?" So, VSSL is something that so
many of you probably need to install
inside of your businesses. If I have
time later today, maybe I'll go over it.
But
should I do it now?
[Music]
All right. I'm going to give you the
8020 of this. All right. So, before you
have a sales call, any call you have,
there should always be a video that
precedes it. If you have a two call
close, there'll be two videos. If you
have a three call closer, there' be
three videos. All right, this is what a
VSSL does. The function of a VSSL is to
take all of the stuff that your sales
team would repeat over and over again on
a call and then just preload that with
the customer so that when you talk to
the customer, they already have all the
information. And then what the
salesperson is doing is actually just
making sure that they can make the
decision. They're helping them
personalize it to get them to close. All
right, so let's do it over here. Let's
do it over here.
Okay.
Your wish is my command. All right. So,
so you go proof,
promise. This is not in order. Sorry.
Pain,
plan,
picture. Okay. So, we have our five Ps.
Now, you're like, that's really similar
to what a YouTube video is. Yep. That's
because that's what gets attention and
gets people to stay. So, hey, uh, you
know, I can help you get appointments
using LinkedIn. If you're tired of
having people who are lowquality and
having them not show up and having to
come up with new creative and be the
face of your brand, um, I can help you
out and here's proof of 10 other
companies that are just like yours that
I've helped do it. And so, this is the
one, two, three-step process I'm going
to walk you through in this video and I
give you a nice visual that tells you
where you're at. So, that's how I would
intro this thing, right? And so then for
each of these, we're basically just
going to have a a belief breaking
framework. So it's going to be like
their FAQ number one. So consider this
as like the the biggest objections,
right? You're going to have number one,
number two,
number three, whatever, number four. You
can even go up to number five, right?
Whatever. I don't I don't usually go
over five. Try to stick to, you know,
three to five in terms of my my things,
right? And so for each of these, we want
to say uh what they think,
why it's wrong,
what's right,
proof.
So, a lot of people don't want to travel
to Vegas, but actually traveling to
Vegas is an awesome thing because when
you get in the sky, you actually get
some perspective literally physically on
the business. And you need to have that
time and that separation in order to
understand like let the dust settle in
your mind and so you can get really
strategic about what you're going to
implement. So, that's me saying what's
wrong, what's right in one line. And
here's proof. Here's John, Mary, and
Jacob who all said that actually getting
space away from their business was good
because they got away from the chaos.
They literally got physical space. They
could take their notes. They come with
intention. they could leave with
intention and end up being one of the
most valuable things they did and they
loved the city. Great. And they got a
memory for it that if they had just
gotten the memory it would have been
worth it on its own. So we take
something that they thought was going to
be I don't want to travel and turn it
into a actually this is a really good
thing. And so we just go through each of
the things that we would have and then
those are going to be the things that
most people object to. Why don't why
don't I want to buy, right? And then
we're going to have our CTA that has
some sort of the offer installed. Now,
sometimes you can do you can embed the
offer into each of these pieces like
each component of the offer can overcome
one of the obstacles. That works too.
Um, but if you're CTA offer and say,
"Hey, go book a call, go take the next
action, whatever." Now, if you have like
an in-person meeting, if you're for the
those you're in person, which is like I
think like 30% of you guys, um you can
just send this before they actually meet
with the sales person in person and you
can tell inside of the video, give a
keyword that's like um say what color
shirt you want, say what size shirt you
want, say tell me the dynamics of your
deck, tell me how many years old the
business, your your house is, whatever,
right? And the reason you have them send
that back is that way you actually know
they watch the video. Right now, if
you're in that kind of lead nurture
setting, let me give you the scripting
for this. You would say something like,
uh, hey, we like to send this video so
that uh, it has all the graphs and the
charts and the stats. And honestly, it's
way better than us trying to just like
do it offhand. Um, would you rather
watch that with us or on your own? Now,
no one's like, I don't want to watch
this with you, right? They're like, I'll
watch it on my own. So, then they told
you they want to watch it on their own,
which is what you want them to do, too.
But now, that way you set the precedent
so that if they don't watch it, you be
like, "Oh, I didn't get your text. Um,
you want to go pop it up and I'll uh
I'll be right back and I'll grab a cup
of coffee, whatever, and then uh we can
rock and roll." That way you have full
context on this so that you have the
visuals and things like that that I
could probably not do with my hands,
right? Whatever. So, you have your CTA
and offer, and then we just do a proof
roll,
which is basically I just have proof
going for the rest of it of just people
or experiences who've gone through
whatever the thing is. This is your
quick and dirty VSSL.
Five to seven minutes. Just hit it. One,
two, three, four. Um, super super
simple. Okay, so this is a VSSL
framework. And the thing is is that you
want this to be between every
conversation. And if the sale is moving
along, then they might have different
objections at different stages in the
conversation. You make the VSSL to do
that. And if you're like, wait a second,
but that means that sometimes I might
have someone watch two VSSLs that are
just different but still sell the same
thing. Yes, totally fine. Selling
someone more does not decrease the
likelihood that they buy. Okay. So, that
was a little segue, a little side quest,
but hopefully you guys are good with it.
So, hope you guys are happy with that.
Uh, okay. So, this is because we're
we're trying to solve the uh I've got
leads, but we're not closing as many,
right? So, we do CRO and the page.
Great. We have better sales process.
Great. Now, we do better sales training.
So, it's like, can we train the guys or
the gals to say the words they need to
say in the right way? The HQ handbook,
the closer handbook for those you guys
picked it up, also great. obviously is
our training and our cadence and our
onboarding all that stuff inside of it.
Um, better reputation. So maybe people
aren't closing because they see online
that you got terrible reviews, right? So
this is where this is where some of the
stuff comes a little full circle where
you can do whatever you want from
marketing side branding, but you also
have the product, right? Like are we
retaining customers? Um, are we picking
the right customers, which is what I
started today with like if you're
getting people who can't speak English
and you're trying to teach them Spanish
and they can't speak English, probably
not going to be successful, right? and
maybe you have an amazing Spanish
program, but if they can't speak
English, you're selling the wrong people
and it is your fault because you're
you're taking the money. So, you want to
make sure that you actually install
prerequisites. Like, what is actually
required to be successful? And for
everyone here, strongly encourage you to
at least set some requisites. Like, if
you want to come to one of the workshops
here, you have to be making I think it's
$500,000 a year, right? Like that's the
bar, right? It's just because it's going
to be it's going to be more valuable.
It's better. Like the the leads sort
automatically. Like you can't even get
on the calendar otherwise, right? It's
just it's just because like if
somebody's at $100,000 a year, there's
nothing wrong with that. They just need
more tactics, right? And we obviously
have these tactics. Um but most people
are like at 500, they're like, "How do I
get to and that's the minimum, right?
The average I think is like between one
and four million depending on the
workshop." Um but anyways, just to give
you guys an idea. Okay, so uh the next
thing is better lead quality. So I just
touched on this, but you might have the
issue where you're like, "We have so
many leads with so much junk, right? So
we have to add friction to the process,
right? Also, the ads themselves, you
might be not calling out the right
people. Right? If I'm giving away, I'll
give you an extreme example. If I give
away a free vacation for my IT services,
that's probably not a good lead magnet.
That's probably not a good mechanism
because I'm going to get everybody who
wants to go on a free vacation, not
people want IT services. Now, if the big
giveaway that I'm giving is like IT
services that are fully managed for a
year, that's probably going to be a way
better clientele base than me trying to
get uh people who want a vacation. Now
I'm going to get way cheaper leads, but
I'm not going to make more. Right? And
so introducing friction in the funnel,
adding a VSSL, adding proof, making sure
the ads call out the correct avatar.
That's this higher quality avatar. And
then if you want, you can add in Bant.
And some of you guys don't know what
Bant is, so I'll tell you what that is
right now.
budget, authority, need, timing. Do you
got the money to spend, the ability to
say yes? Do you need the thing right
now? Or do you need the thing? Is now
the right time? And so when you ask like
these are the four things you need to
ask a prospect if you have any kind of
application process for whatever service
you sell. This is what you want to ask.
And this is me kind of like opening up
the kimono for you.
I have I have I have just been in charge
of creating sales processes for
everything from you know I just from so
many different things from teeth
whitening to to marketing agencies to
plumbing to whatever right
I I so rarely I c I can't actually
recall a time where I I made less money
by adding friction and what's
interesting about it is it's the thing
that people are afraid to do. People are
afraid to raise prices. People are
afraid to narrow their avatar. People
are afraid to add friction to a sales
process. But almost always when you do,
when you focus on quality because no one
else will do it, is where the alpha is.
It's where the arbitrage exists. And so
I would encourage you to like be bold
here and be willing to to do things that
other people don't do so you can get
things other people don't get. Like most
business owners are mediocre at best.
Well, most business owner are mediocre.
I also say that most business own are
average and average people don't venture
off. They don't take bets, right? And so
be willing to do the thing that's going
to increase your lead cost. Do the thing
that's going to that's going to give you
a $500 lead that's worth $10,000 rather
than
a uh $100 lead that's worth 500. Like
you will spend more and you could make
more as a result. And oftentimes for me,
I have found that to be true more times
than not by a lot. So these are the
things that we that these are the
playbooks that we use that we that we
implement to fix sales related issues
when you can't afford uh leads. Okay.
Additionally, you can do uh uh payment
options if you don't have that. So um uh
payment plan downells is is a great way
if you don't already have payment plans
installed. I would just install that
system straight up which is inside of
the money models book. Okay. So you're
closing too few of them. All right. So,
we've got enough leads and they're the
right price and we're closing enough of
them, but we can't do more because if we
do that, we're still not making enough
per customer. So, that's a backend
issue. So, you can increase the price or
implement a price raise. What's
difficult about me saying this to you is
that some of you require me to literally
say to you on the phone and walk through
this logic tree with you, but I can't
physically do that. And so, this is me
trying to say it. If you walk through
this logic tree and you're like, well,
this is where I'm at, then this is what
you need to do, right? Alternatively,
you could decrease your costs. How can
we spend less to deliver on customers?
And I'll get I'll get you a couple more
taxes on this in the in the latter half.
Okay. Can we increase frequency? Can we
get them to buy more often?
Can we get them to buy again at the most
basic level? Can we ascend like upsells
and crossells? So, I'll give you guys a
little tactic around this.
You guys want it tactical. So hopefully
I know the first part started with
clouds. Hopefully you guys are good with
the the dirt the dirt the tactics of
what makes this work. Okay. So if you're
let's say a customer relationship starts
here
and this is kind of like your duration.
You sell you know 12 a 12-week thing
whatever. Okay. So the first time like
there are different specific areas that
you can do ascensions where you sell
someone more stuff, right? Num one of
them is just immediately. The next one I
usually like is like 24 to 48 hours.
They kind of realize that they they now
need something immediately. I also have
milestone.
We have halfway
and then last chance.
Let me give you a very important note.
We've got four opportunities to upsell
in the first half here.
Four.
Four. Okay.
And then one at the end. And so right
now, if you're somebody who waits till
here, which many of you are, you're
usually losing out two to 3x on your
sales. So, if you're like industry
average on this is you'll get between 10
and 30% of what you could get if you
only upsell here.
Crazy. And so, if you're like, man, I'm
not getting people to get into my
continuity. I'm not getting people to
take my ascensions. It's because you're
doing it at the wrong time. You got to
offer it earlier.
Hopefully, that was cool for you guys.
Okay.
So, that's how we solve I've I've got
the leads. I'm making the sales, but I'm
not making enough money per customer.
Those are the solutions. So then
finally, you're like, "Okay, I've got
all that stuff. I'm making profit, but
I'm not making the profit fast enough."
This is cash flow problems. So these
this is all dirt. Super tactical. Number
one is you can push out vendor terms,
especially if you're a bigger business.
You can say, "Hey, uh the the the status
quo here is that we pay everything net
30, meaning you deliver services and
then we pay you at the end of the month.
That's how we do things, right?" Also
tends to work better once you've already
gotten relationships with with with
businesses. they're typically not
willing to lose you as a customer. But
when you do that to all vendors, you
literally accelerate your cash flow in
the entire business by 30 days. Number
one. Number two, uh payment terms. So
I'll give you three or four different
tactics here. So number one is that
instead of starting with like a
monthtomonth or some sort of uh for
those you have recurring stuff, um and
typically people who have cash flow
issues tend to be recurring or more
long-term in nature versus onetime
transactions. So this applies to you.
Um, instead of having month-to-month be
the the core offer, just shift it so
that the primary offer is quarterly and
annual gets a discount and
month-to-month is more expensive. That's
just that one shift can accelerate cash
because now you're getting paid three
months at a time instead of one month at
a time.
That's one. Another tactic is that you
can always present high to low. So I if
whenever I present stuff I prefer to say
like what the total price is with
interest with whatever and then say hey
want to save money. Yes. Save money by
prepaying more of it. So if I have like
a year of service I'm going to sell the
month-to-month price with installments
and interest as the price I want to
anchor there and then say hey want to
save some money cool prepay for less and
then we can start doing step downs.
And then third is layaway. So, I think
this is still one of my like one of
those wildly underrated methods. I don't
know why people don't do it. Like, I
still have no idea why people don't do
it, but layaway rocks. Layaway is you
can start paying now and when you're
finished paying or when you pay you pay
half of what you need to pay will start
working. That's it. It's so simple,
right? Like that's that's all it is. You
pay and then you get rather than getting
or giving and then getting paid. like
the where you get paid relative to how
you deliver service dictates the
leverage you have in the relationship.
So imagine where you go to a surgeon and
they go perform surgery on you and then
you're like, "Okay, I'll pay you after
the surgery." It doesn't work that way,
right? Now, it does work that way for
the insurance companies to pay the
doctors because they have leverage over
the doctors. But if you're paying a
doctor, you pay the doctor first because
they have leverage over you. It's like a
food chain. It's the money chain. All
right? Right? And so if you want to go
up the money chain, you got to act like
a up the money chain uh business, right?
Another one is prepay incentives. So I
think a lot of you guys are missing out
on this. Um how do you incentivize
people? Um one, give them more good
stuff, take away bad stuff. So sometimes
it's like we really need to accelerate
cash flow. And then I ask the next
question like, well, what's the prepaid
incentive? They're like, well, I don't
have one. It's like, well, duh. There's
no incentive to prepay. So why why would
we be surprised that they're not doing
it, right? So we have to incentivize the
prepaid if we want accelerate cash flow.
This is just a specific pull out uh
guarantee with prepaid. I think this is
in the money models feature downell
section. Um this is one of the first
like super super strong uh prepayment
that you could uh structure that you can
offer. So if you offer a guarantee, not
all of you do, but if you do offer a
guarantee, you can say I'll give you the
guarantee if you prepay. And if they
don't prepay, you remove the guarantee.
Very compelling. Super compelling. Um,
so I recommend like really really
strong. If you're like, "How do I
accelerate it?" Pop that in. Um, upfront
fees. Obviously, this is where setup,
onboarding, onetime fees, all that kind
of stuff. You can just load it up. And
if you're like, "Do I need a reason to
have a onetime fee?" You just need
permission. You have you have the
world's permission to do it. You like
it's your business. You can make up your
own rules. Um, also, if you can get, you
know, third party uh, buy now pay later,
BNPL's. So, I had a firm at our last at
our at our event. Um, and so like you
will get typically you'll get about a
35% increase. That's that's based on a
firm stats. That's not what we got
because we have a more affluent
customer. Um, but a typical business
will get like a 35% boost in sales from
uh implementing some sort of BNPL.
And then this is the last I kind of did
these in order of complexity. Um, AR
financing. So I think Trent who's in the
scale advisory we we were you I called
you on Herozi hotline and uh you're in a
business like if you're in a
construction business you're in a
business that's very well understood by
a bank like a normal business if you
will um where you have like clear you
know outflows and the reliability of
payment like the likelihood that someone
pays you is super high then there
there's a whole divisions of banks that
do AR financing which is accounts
receivable financing and so I'll tell
you a story about this so there's a
company that um that I was looking at
investing in that was stuck at like I
want to say like two or three million
bucks a year and they had a bunch of
debt and they were really struggling and
I reached back out to the founder like
18 months later so a few months a few
months ago and I said hey man how's
business and he u he was like dude we're
killing it we're doing 5 million a month
so mind you this is like 18 months goes
from like two or three million bucks a
year to five million a month crazy and I
was like well what was the unlock he's
like honestly we got one of our vendors
to give us net 90 terms that was it
which function works exactly the same as
AR financing just done from a vendor
rather than a bank. But both of those
are things that you can negotiate. And
so I just I want to show you the
different pieces on the board. If you're
like, man, I've got the I've you know,
we got leads, we got sales, we got
profit. We just need to pull the cash
flow forward. If we had the cash flow,
we could scale. It's like, well, here's
seven different ways you can do it or
nine instead of Yeah, the second point
had three points. So more. All right. So
finally, you got the cash flow. You make
enough, but you slowly. We solve that.
Okay, so if money was the issue, right,
why can't you do more? Uh, if you can do
it. Can't do more because you don't have
your numbers. Well, now go get your
numbers. If you got your numbers, then
it's like, okay, my market's too small.
No, it's not. Okay, it's my model's the
issue. It's not worth it. The timeline,
my expectations. No, it is. I just need
to be more patient. Okay, cool. Money.
It's like, okay, leads are too
expensive. Sales aren't happening
enough. I don't have profit. I'm not
making enough per customer or cash flow
is my problem. Okay,
just solved all those. And so then
finally that leaves us with manpower.
Okay.
So that was that cool for part two. I
knew that one was like a little heavier.
I just don't want people to think uh um
I want to make sure that you guys feel
like I'm I'm delivering on on the value
promised. Um I want you to be very clear
on on your constraints.
And yeah, shout out to to Meg. Yeah. For
crushing it.
little I think time for a fresh a fresh
nicotine. Feels like it's that time,
doesn't it? Feels like it's that time.
No, I appreciate you guys.
Good. Yeah, I know. I was uh I was
talking fast. Um but I want to just cram
a lot in. You know, got a lot to cover
and I want you guys to get what you
want. All right. So,
part three,
supply based constraints. So, everything
up to this point is like, how do we get
more leads in the door? How do we
Let me find my big big black box. BBB.
My BBB. There's my big BB. All right.
Here we go. So, everything up to this
point has been this. How do we jam more
in the front end? Now,
sometimes you got to work on this stuff,
which is what some of these these mama
jambas are. But some of the other parts
in that black box are going to be supply
based constraints. Okay? So,
just from observing a lot of different
businesses, where do supply constraints
hit the hardest? So, uh, high volume,
low-wage roles. So, think like staffing,
social workers, like I would say
therapists, but just like people who
talk to elderly, um, you know, care
providers, like that kind of stuff
happens a lot in healthcare. Um, that's
where, you know, supply based
constraints, talent based constraints,
people based constraints hit hard.
Another kind of category is trades. So,
HVAC, plumbers, electricians, you know,
specific types of, you know, niche uh,
you know, welders, whatever, like a lot
of trades have this issue. uh where they
have supply constraints. They got the
business, they just can't they can't
service it. Um I got a buddy of mine
who's in the machine business. He just
builds machines. Kind of cool. Um he
just takes roles at like factories and
manufacturing and he just automates the
whole thing with big machines, but
that's a super specialized skill set.
Like I had dinner with him the other day
and he's like, I I had to turn down $13
million in projects because I just don't
have the people. And I was like, I'm
sorry. Uh and then we talk through the
framework I'm about to show you. Um
another one is high-end services,
high-end white collar services. So, um I
mean I'm in a business that has this
like high-end consulting which is what
we do. Uh accounting, legal, investing,
like these are super super hard to find,
very skilled people, right? So, these
are industries. So, if this is you,
you'll probably be nodding your head up
and down. And if you're not, you will
come up against this constraint. This is
just more commonly in the industries
that have it. Okay. So, this leads us to
question 10. Now, some of you guys might
have noticed that the dots across the
top did not fill in. And that's just
because I forgot to and I just realized
that. But we're making progress. All
right? And so we answer the question,
why can't we do more? It's because you
can't handle the volume, which is most
of the time manpower, sometimes
structural, and I'll cover that right
now. So here's some of the flavors of
manpower constraints. It's really hard
to find talent. I don't know how to do
it. Uh talent wants more than I can
afford. Like they want more money. uh
you don't have the money or the time to
find the talent which is sometimes a
little bit different. Um talent doesn't
solve my problem which I'll explain that
one um actually first and then I'll do
the rest. Okay, so uh this is what this
looks like. These are like symptoms of
manpower or supply constraints. So
weight list for services, you know,
maybe you're working 70 plus hours a
week personally in the business um and
you can't get any relief. Uh you're
turning away qualified customers like
the machine shop I was just talking
about. Uh this one this one's super big.
Uh quality declining due to volume. So
this happens a ton in like marketing
agencies and stuff. It's like uh they'll
just like you know they'll get really
good at selling and then they just like
hire bodies on the back end and then all
of a sudden people turn out the back
because the quality suffers because they
don't have good enough people. Right? So
what what appears to be a oh we you know
we can't spend more to get customers
actually we're not making enough money
from customers which is actually a
manpower issue. Right? And so this is
why I'm saying like it's usually it's
not like the big obvious problems most
people identify. It's the second and
third and fourth order problems that
people kind of get lost in which is why
I'm trying to walk as many of these
examples out as we do this live. Okay.
Uh the last one is uh uh your your staff
is fully utilized but uh you still can't
keep up. All right. So let me explain
what that one is. And so this is like a
huge epiphany I had that I want to share
with you and I like I've never seen
anyone else talk about this so I feel
very confident saying like nothing I
don't know it doesn't matter what who
cares I'll die no one no one people like
he had slideshows anyways uh so so since
manpower means employees it just means a
different type of customer becomes the
target so if you are supply constrained
it means you're just demand constrained
for employees think about what that
shift means. You're either demand
constrained for customers or demand
constrained for employees.
And so every business is demand
constrained in one way or another. And
so getting you to see this is basically
the entire point of this section. But I
really want to drive this home. Okay? So
instead of LTV to CAC ratios, you need
to learn something that I call LTGP
to CAT ratios, which is lifetime gross
profit per employee to cost of acquiring
talent. So many guys know what your
rorowes is, your LTV to CAC ratio is,
which you should if you watch any of my
stuff for the love of God. Please know
what those numbers are. But a leveled up
version of this is what does it cost me
to get talent and what do I make on that
talent?
So let me tell you a little story. So um
mentor, old old guy had an insurance
company, sold it for a zillion dollars,
doesn't matter. And he told me that he'd
been stuck at like $10 million a year
for like many years. And he said, 'You
want to know what broke me out of it?
And I was like,"Well, yeah, obviously I
want to know." He said, "So what
happened was I used to have this,"
because he had this uh it was insurance.
So he has a a bunch of agents, right,
that work work selling insurance
products. And so he said, "So what I did
was uh we used to have this referral
bonus. So agents could get $500 if they
referred another agent. That makes
sense. That's cool. but it wasn't really
driving anything. And some of you guys
have the same thing. You probably give
some sort of, you know, bonus for, you
know, or hopefully you give some sort of
bonus if if someone in your team refers
you somebody else. By the way, so much
more valuable than getting a customer
referral.
So, he did the math and I think I showed
the next slide. Did I show the next?
Let's see here. Do I show it here? Yeah.
So he figured out that he said, "I make
250,000 a year in gross profit per uh
not technician but per per insurance
agent, right?" And so that was per
activated insurance agent. And so he was
like, I was trying to get people
incentivized to send me agents for 500
bucks. And so then he took his $500
commission and made it 25,000
and said, "If you bring me an agent,
I'll give you 25 grand." And guess what
happened? it worked and he sold his
company for hundreds of zillions of
dollars many years later because he was
able to compound his supply base. And so
taking that into account, I had a
conversation with my team and I was
like, "Hey man, we need more um we need
more media people, right?" And so the
the fastest and easiest thing I did was
I was like, "Well, how much do we make
on a media person?" Okay, well, am I
willing to pay a tenth of that in order
to to go get them? And it's like, well,
yeah. Well, if we think about it from
like a stock market perspective, like
would I be willing to get a 10x return
on money? Of course. Yeah, I'm in. So,
we just have to think about the talent
as a return that we're going to get on.
But the caveat is you just have to put
milestones. And so, I'd say it's not go
refer me a friend and I'll just give you
25 grand. It's I'll give you 25 grand at
month six once they're activated. And
what's cool about that is that at that
point, you actually get both people who
are invested in being successful. So now
you've got this person who's taking a
lot of interest, the person who referred
the referer rather than the referee,
right? The referer takes a lot of
interest in the referee getting
onboarded and they kind of provide that
additional training, additional context
and they increase the likelihood of
success. So not only do you get this
amazing return, you also get that person
integrated better. They get trained
better and so it's just a win overall.
And so this is a huge place of returns
that I think is wildly underlooked. Um,
and if you are a supply constraint
business, this is where your capital
should be going.
So, this is a this is a huge point that
again, I think it's like 75% of y'all
are service businesses to some degree.
Um, and that's normal because that's
just what what it is, at least in the US
economy. Um,
service businesses have have a they're
double-edged sword. So, they're really
easy to start, more difficult to scale,
and they require almost no capital to
start. And they tend to produce decent
amounts of cash flow. If you like our
decent business and the economics and
you follow the stuff that we talk about
like you should produce a lot of cash
flow in a service business. Now the
question is how do you reinvest in a
service business right like in a in an
e-commerce business physical product
business you have inventory really clear
right you have raw materials really
clear if you were in a technology
business it's like okay I'm going to go
we got to go reinvest by hiring more
developers etc right so what do you do
in a service business to reinvest
two things brand and talent
which means what are the associations
we're going to make today. How are we
going to pair our business with
aspirational outcomes that our avatar
finds meaningful brand and how are we
going to spend money on training our
existing talent and recruiting new
talent so we can get the highest returns
possible on our core asset? Because if
you're a service business, you
fundamentally sell people at a profit.
It's what it is, right? You sell labor
and you have a markup. That's service.
And so what we want to do is have more
of those nodes and we want those nodes
to be able to expand what you can charge
for them. And you can expand what you
can charge for them by having more
skilled talent. That's the idea. And the
biggest arbitrage comes from being able
to take lowkilled talent, train them
well, continue to pay them at old talent
numbers, and then because of the
training, capture the arbitrage in
value.
That is how you reinvest in a
service-based business. So, if you're
like, "What do I do with this extra
money at the end of the year?" Well, if
you don't want to pay taxes on some of
it, you can choose to reinvest in the
business by doing this.
And so, the moral of this is that maybe
you can't afford not to get better
talent for your business. And that's
what you need to focus on. That's your
demand constraint.
And so, this just took me a very long
time to piece together, which is that
manpower means every business is demand
constrained. All right. Now, let me just
show you how crazy this is and how deep
this goes. Okay,
so we have our external ways of
advertising, right? You got the core
four, you got lead getters on the left,
right? You got warm outreach, cold
outreach, post free content, run paid
ads, you got customer referrals,
affiliates, employees, agencies, all
that stuff. You guys should already know
that's inside the leads book. Then you
have your internal version of these,
which is you ask your network, you do
cold outreach, you post to your network,
you promote job postings, right? You get
employee referrals. You go to community
owners who have like HR professionals or
SDRs or sales professionals, right? You
have an in-house recruiter or you go to
out ofhouse head hunters and staffing
firms. It's the same concept, just
different names. All right? Because
you're either demand constrained for
customers or your demand constraint for
talent. And the good news is you solve
both with advertising.
And better yet, the processes are
literally parallel. All right, we're
talking dirt here. We're getting
tactical. All right. So, you should all
be familiar with this, which is a
marketing customer acquisition funnel.
You've got some sort of lead generation.
You got some sort of lead nurture. You
got some sort of sales. You got some
sort of onboarding. And you got some
sort of retention and ascension, right?
Try to get a keep them to buy again or
to buy more expensive stuff, right? All
this should should should make sense.
Next,
you have your application generation.
Think about the words change here. Lead
gen application generation.
You've got applicant nurture, so
different than lead nurture. You've got
interviews, not sales. You've got
onboarding, wait, that's the same word.
You've got retention and ascension.
Wait, those are the same words. It's the
same thing because you have people going
through the process on either side. This
took me a very long time to figure out.
And what's crazy is that if you can do
one of these well, you can do both of
them well. So if you have a way of
getting customers, you also already have
the skills to get the talent you need if
you are supply constrainted.
So like before we started with the Mosy
6, right? You got more. Why can't we do
more? And we got metrics, market, model,
money, and manpower. All we do is we
take manpower, put it at the front of
this thing, and we just run it through
again. Okay, so it's the exact same
path.
So
why can't we do more warm outreach,
which is how you currently were getting,
you know, people? Can we do more? Why
can't we do more cold outreach aka
recruiting? Why can't we do more posting
content? Can we post more on job
postings? Can we post more places or
spend more on it? Right? Which is then
promoting those job postings, right?
Which is the paid ads version for
recruiting. Can we get more employee
referrals? Can we get more affiliates
aka associations, guilds, list serves,
community owners, right? Can we get
agencies aka recruiters and staffing
firms? Can we get employees aka this
one's unchanged, right? Your your team
would do this for you, right? And so all
eight of these, can we do more of this
before we do anything else?
If so, let's do that.
If not, we go down the metrics again,
which is okay, we can't do more because
we don't know our numbers or people
aren't the limiting metrics. I'll give
you an example of of the second part.
So, uh, there was a restaurant that we
looked at that had two-hour wait times.
We did a cash cows episode with them.
Um, and so they literally had limited
their four walls. So, what do you do?
They're they're supply constrained.
Well, you can expand your seating. You
can optimize your operations turntables
faster. You can change your hours,
expand your hours, or you can do a
combination of that where you just raise
prices during peaks,
right? And so pricing is going to be a
big lever that you can pull if you're
supply constrained. If you have more
business you can handle, raise price.
Very simple. And I'll talk I'll talk
about kind of like solution stacks in a
second, but this is an example of either
uh you don't know your numbers or people
aren't the limiting metric. Then do
this, change the other variables, change
the walls.
The next one's market. Same as before,
right? Because there's not enough people
in Kentucky, you know, where I live that
are, you know, grade three welders. I
don't know. Is there a way that they can
do this job remotely? Uh, is it
impossible to get these people or is it
expensive or can we add an incentive
like a moving bonus? Right? So, we had a
a roofing company owner that was
talking. He was expanding new locations
and he couldn't get a manager for the
new location. And he was like, "Man, you
know, it's really hard to find people
out there. And I was like, "Well, do you
have like multiple managers in your
current staff?" He said, "Yeah, but you
know, they don't want to move." I was
like, "Will they move for 20 grand?"
He's like, "I never really thought of
that." And I was like, "Well, how much
you going to make on the location?" He
was like, "Well, we probably make 500
grand a year in profit." And I was like,
"So, do you think 20 grand's worth it?"
He's like, "Yeah, I guess so. Is it
impossible or is it expensive?" Right?
I'll give you a different one. So, this
was a cash episode. Not cash, excuse me,
a hero hotline I did. a month or two
ago. So, there's a martial arts guy
who's got three martial arts gyms and he
says, "Hey, it's really hard to find
salespeople with black belts."
And so, I was like, "Yeah, I I believe
you." And so, remember at the very
beginning I said, "You can you want to
hire for the lowest skill aptitude?" So
all we did was I said, 'Hey, why don't
you just find black belts and teach them
how to sell because it's going to take
way less time to teach them how to sell
who's got a black belt than teach
someone how to how to black belt who can
sell, right? And so that was the issue.
So we had to solve for the small skill
discrepancy and then all of a sudden it
was like boom, he opened up his uh his
whole funnel for doing this for his
business and expanding, right? So we
sometimes you're actually just looking
for the wrong avatar. It's really hard
to find sales people that you can then
teach the black belt thing or finding
sales people who are already black
belts. Might be hard to find both. We
have to then say, "Okay, let's get 80%
of the way there and then we can train
the other 20."
So, that's a market issue.
Now, if you're like, "Okay, I can't get
more talent in my business because um
the basically you probably wouldn't say
this, but basically you're not getting
responses, right? like uh the offer is
wrong. Even if I basically this is gets
a little bit more to model, which is why
it's model. Uh but I'll get an example
to drive this home. So I had a physical
therapy business who um who came in
really nice lady and uh they were fully
like all four walls are booked out, all
the beds are taken, but they weren't
making any money. But I was like, "Wait
a second. So you're like you're selling
fine, you know, you're the leads are
good, all all this stuff's good." I was
like, "But you're not making money and
you're fully staffed." She's like,
"Yeah." And I kept diving and diving. I
had to go through all of this stuff
until I finally got all the way into
manpower and it was oh yeah well we give
50% of revenue to our therapists. I was
like 50 dude like yeah of course you're
not making anything that makes I was
like are they like marketing for
themselves and and like you know paying
for their own you know products and
stuff. She was like no we do all that. I
was like well are they doing the sales?
She's like no no we do that. I was like
wait so you literally do everything and
then just give them half. She's like
yeah. I was like well yeah so you have a
structural issue right? like the model
will never work. The model is broken,
right? And so she would then have the
impossible choice. Either you could
raise your prices, which would have to
be an absurd amount if you always have
to give half away, or you lower wages,
or you change it to not being percentage
based, right? But the thing here is like
we had to change something structural
about the role so we could then recruit
more people in and actually make the
business profitable. So then finally, we
get to the money one of like, well, I
just simply can't afford to hire more
people, but I need to hire more people.
Okay, so these are the same four
concepts just applied to the supply
side. So we don't get enough
applications. That's a lead problem,
right? So again, it's we're going to run
through the same ones. You got to have
better ads, of course. Like you think
these ads don't matter, headlines, copy,
the whole thing. It matters, right?
Better content. If you have a brand,
more people are willing to work for you.
When they when they go check out your
content or your site, they're going to
be like, "Oh, like they make a decision
there." That increases your conversions.
Uh the brand itself, right? The offers,
quite literally, the offer that you have
for them will increase the likelihood
that they actually, you know, opt in to
become, you know, applicant. Um add a
money model mechanisms. You could do a
giveaway if you want. By the way, we did
uh for when we do our um when we when we
hire for media, we'll do contests. We'll
just do contests for for people who want
to cut videos for us and we'll get like
a thousand people who will apply and
then we just walk them through the
process. We get like 50 people who
actually like do all the work and then
from the 50 we pick five, right? So, you
absolutely can add a money model
mechanism depending on the role.
Obviously, you're not going to get a CEO
that way, but like front line, midline
for sure.
Um or better avatar, right? level up
your target or you can level down and
add training. I'll give you an example
of this in a second. Um so for us with
uh with Allen when we were looking for
true customer success, people could do
B2B higher ticket onboarding like
concierge if you will, we were
advertising at first for customer
support and we were getting tons of
low-level people that just were not
going to be good for like highlevel
business owners, right? These were
business owners that were paying a
$25,000 setup and white label fee. like
this is a different caliber just to just
to use the platform, different level and
so we had to have customer success. So
we had to change the title and all of a
sudden we got the right people, right?
So like this matters.
So you have to write it like it's ad
copy. So all the things that you do to
change the leads on your front end, you
do the same things. You still have to
look at it like a funnel. Like if you
don't know your conversion metrics for
your lead or application flow,
don't be surprised, right? Like that's
that's like of course you're not you
don't you don't you don't have metrics.
You don't even know why where your where
your stopping point is. And this is if
this is the constraint of the business.
Then what else are you doing that's not
this, right? That's more important. So
okay, we've got we've got we've got lead
flow, but we're getting a lot of junk,
right? Okay. So this is a this is
conversion rate thing. Same as before.
Page flow, headline, job description,
better application process. Do you think
you put proof in there? I love my job.
Yep. Do you think you put a VSSL in
there? Yep. Right? Do you think you work
the leads through lead nurture? Yep.
Well, if they need me to remind them,
no, it doesn't work that way. No one
cares. You're not the center of the
universe. You got to work it. I've got a
brand. We work our leads. Right.
Better interview training. Like if you
It's funny like if especially if you get
a bigger business, like if you listen to
somebody who's like in HR recruiting do
do some interviews, you're going to like
it's going to make your stomach turn.
The same way as if you've never listened
to your own sales guys do sales calls,
you're going to want to kill yourself.
If you've never done it before, I
promise you, you're gonna you're gonna
want to end your life early. So,
training is how you overcome that. Same
with better reputation. That's the
brand. Um, better lead quality. So, this
is where you can add more friction. If
you're getting too much junk, you've got
like, you know, uh, healthcare workers
or something like that or something.
You've got a lot of volume for it is low
skill labor, tons of applications, add
friction. Add VSLs. It's a sales
process.
Um, so I'll give you two examples of
this. So, I had a um a mental health
business. So they had a business would
basically like um did therapy. It was
covered by the government or some
government program. Anyways, so they
would get like 200 bucks or something
like that per session from the
government and they could pay like 25.
Uh so they had a good I mean the the
money made sense, right? The issue is
that they just couldn't find therapists
uh good therapists, excuse me. And so
the issue was they literally couldn't
interview enough, right? And they were
the thing is that they were doing
one-on- ones because that's how they
started. But all I did was say, "Hey,
this is the big crux point of your
business. Your first interview, we
should just have it be one to many. Have
it be 20 people at a time and just have
everyone do 60 seconds and then you can
just pick the winners and then you can
follow up with those people one-on-one."
And so all we did is we truncated the
process by two steps and then that
dramatically opened up the amount of
interviews and people they could
actually touch because he was like,
"Yeah, I'm getting a thousand interviews
and and we're basically getting one
person picked for every thousand." I was
like, there's no way on earth that out
of a thousand people, you can't find
more than one lowkilled label person who
just like basically not a lot of
aptitude, just needed attitude. I was
like
more than, you know, 0.1 out of a
hundred people is a decent person,
right? And so all we had to do was
change the process and boom,
debottleneck the business and the
thing's off, right? We had the same
issue at Gym Launch. And if you recruit
outbound, this may be like I' I've seen
it happen so many times specifically
with outbound because there's churn in
the position as well. If you do like
SDRs or BDRs, people who do outbound uh
emails or cold calls, anything like
that, uh DMs, if you're in that
position,
doing group interviews is almost what's
required in order to maintain the the
volume and scale of an enterprise that's
that size. When you have, you know,
three, four, five, you're not going to
notice it. When you have like 20 or 50,
you need that. You need to have have a a
more efficient way of acquiring talent.
And the same concept of like if I could
sell 50 customers at once, I would.
Well, then you do a webinar, right? You
do a webinar to a bunch of job
applications, then you push them
through. It's how it works. Um, we don't
make enough to pay what they want. So,
this is now we're getting into like they
are not worthy enough to us to pay the
market rate, right? Means that other
businesses are making more off them than
you are. So, this does backlatter into
having to improve the business. So you
raise prices to increase pay. So an
example of this would be like an HVAC.
So I had an HVAC company uh who came out
and technicians are in very low supply.
Very common for trades right now. And so
what we did was rather than say hey you
don't have the cash flow go blow your
profit. That wasn't the directive. This
is when I talk about like solution
stacks. So what we did is say hey
install the sales motion. So put proof
put a VSSL in. Put uh you know start
training on closing. Okay good. Do that
first. What that'll do when paired with
pricing, so we're going to have a better
sales process. We're going to raise the
price with our better sales process and
convert more customers. With both those
things going up, that'll then unlock
cash flow so that we can pay more people
or give big ass referral bonuses or go
to a head hunter. So now with that extra
cash flow, we can bring the extra
technicians in and outspend our
competition competing for the same class
of people. Make sense? So again,
sometimes they're multi-step solutions
in order to resolve the constraint, but
the thing that you have to focus on is
the one that's in front of you. So it's
like I'm I'm, you know, I can't even
take more jobs. Why would I resolve the
why would I try and fix my sales? I'm
just going to take on more deals. It's
like, no, but we got to do that with
pairing a raise in price so that we
unlock the cash flow so that it's like
so that so that so that we can then go
recruit the people we need to. Okay. Um,
another way of doing this is that you
can basically force your way to getting
more out of each person, which is, uh,
you can change your delivery ratio from,
let's say you've got five clients per
rep to 10 clients per rep. You can
switch from a, you know, done for you to
a done with you. Same same concept. Uh,
you can cap usage. You can say, hey, we
only work this many hours or only work
this much on accounts. That way, your
costs don't get um, blown out. Just a
different way of thinking about it. You
can also time block uh, when each of
your, you know, teammates is going to be
working on specific projects. sometimes
like it takes just direct management of
their time that like more times than not
you can double or triple the
effectiveness of a team by just simply
managing their time um or you can just
offshore or nearshore right you just go
from a different pool
and I mentioned this earlier with the
high the high-end service is like if you
if you really want to dominate one this
is a strategic bet but you say instead
of trying to find third-year legal
whatevers we're gonna take these guys
out of college but we're going to
develop an exceptional training process
us so that we can get them upskilled so
that they're just as good as the three
years, but we only have to pay them like
a one year and it only takes us six
months to get that arbitrage. It's a
strategic decision. Like if you look at
some of the biggest investment banks,
you look at some of the biggest
management consultants, they did the
same thing. Like you go to Mckenzie, you
go to Bin, you go to BCG, you go to
Goldman, you go to JP Morgan, they have
just they take people right out of
college, they pay them six figures,
right? And they do that because they
have exceptional training because it's
so hard to find the people above that.
And so um similar example lifetime gross
profit so high-end uh consultant book
solid for six months. All right. So I
think this was like a tax strategist I
think but it was like a it was half
accountant half consultant right? So
it's like you're book solid for six
months jack the prices change the
delivery ratio hire associates and then
backfill by by scaling the training and
your recruiting ability.
So why can't you know why don't we make
enough to pay what they want? Well, we
had to fix the leads. We had to fix
sales. We had to fix delivery. And so
why can't we do more to get the talent?
We go through more metrics, market model
money,
which resolve all of the original Mosy
6.
Huzzah.
So, I want to do a quick little
dangerous middle,
which is right now if your revenue feels
steady or you're working hard but you're
not growing,
uh, or you kind of need more leads but
you can't really handle that much more.
If you're nodding your head and being
like, "This sounds a lot like me right
now." Typically, this is just my
analysis of businesses that feel like
they're at capacity but they're still
like they're like kind of in that
balance. You're actually demand
constrained.
So you need to break the business with
demand and increase cash flow and then
stretch capacity. So if you're in
equilibrium, it's almost it's like I
can't guarantee anything of course, but
it's super likely that if you had to,
you could do 30% more. Like almost
always like people can gas it for 8
weeks, 12 weeks if they have to. And so
sometimes you have to break through
those those those periods of stagnation
so that you can generate the extra cash
flow you need to then bring more people
in, right? So you can expand your
capacity. So sometimes you have to
redline. And so if you're like I'm not
sure which one I am, you can pretty much
like I would recommend you start with
making more money and then dealing with
the supply constraint with the extra
resources because the alternative
you expand your supply, right? But then
what if you don't have the demand? Now
you're just you're really underwater,
right? And so I would rather generate
the cash if I need to extend terms than
bring in the supply.
So with that being said, we're on part
four. You guys digging this? Is this
fun? Is this exciting? Yay. Burping the
green egg. I don't know what that was.
Um where is the watermark behind every I
don't know. Anyways, so part four tools
and implementation. So this is the this
is the next little section. So some of
you guys might still be wondering what
if I don't know my constraint or I'm not
sure or I know my constraint and I'm
just not sure I can figure it out or I
know my constraint, I just want support
and the ability to ask questions for the
next six months uh to make sure it's
implemented correctly. Okay. And so it's
what I made the scale advisory for. And
so we had a lot of people ask for the
scale advisory after the deadline closed
on Monday night uh because they missed
it when they were checking out or they
didn't want, you know, they didn't watch
the video because I was live and they're
like, I didn't know which one to do or
they didn't understand that it was six
months of support, not just six
workshops, whatever. And so out of
integrity and legally, I can't make the
same offer again. But I actually asked
this morning um everybody who was in the
scale advisory what they thought. And
this is what they said. I said, "Hey,
um, this group kicks off September 1st,
which is when it does kick off. Uh, we
gave everybody who, you know, obviously
donated books during the book launch
extra, you know, a few extra weeks to
let the dust settle, but our official
six month begins September 1, uh,
through end of end of February." So,
that being said, we got a bunch of
messages from very solid businesses
saying that they missed it or didn't see
the video. And I'd like to open the door
for them for a short period, but I want
to ask them. So, I actually asked our uh
the group this morning and I said, "So,
should I mention the ability to get in
the group today and leave the option for
24 hours, give them until September 1st,
or just not let them in?" And so, you
can see the responses right there. And
so, 83% um last time I checked and
screenshotted it, uh said to uh open the
door for 24 hours for you guys. So, um
that's what I'm going to do really
quickly. And so VUX populate VUX day
which is the voice of the people is the
voice of God or the voice of people is
the divine. Um so if you missed it and
uh would like me to help you for the
next six months just to get some of the
stuff implemented so you can kick off
2026 to hopefully break records. This is
just a quick recap of the scale advisory
entails. So this will be very very fast.
So um it's inside is the school
community. It's a scale advisory. Um you
get access to me and the directors. So
this is all the people from my team um
that are involved. What's actually crazy
as a side note is that I thought so like
I had a lot of different guesses of what
was going to what was going to happen at
the launch. This one surprised me the
most because we offer zero access to me
or the team ever anywhere. So there's
nothing ongoing ever and it's just
because I don't like ongoing commitments
um because I take them really serious
and hopefully up to my commitment
seriously. Um, and so none of these
people have anyone who has access to
them except for people in the scale
advisory. And so, uh, normally one day
we charge for just one person on the
team is $35,000. You get access to all
of them. So, if you're like, man, I need
help on marketing, you can talk to Louis
or Preston. If you're like, man, I need
help with like my kind of model and my
strategy. You can talk to Ed. You can
talk to Ned. Actually, that's kind of
funny name wise. Um, if you're like, how
do I talk about um, you know,
recruiting? We got Frank. If you've
like, how do I do more fulfillment? You
got Lindsay. We got more strategy, you
got Neil. you got more sales, you got
hop uh Jacob, right? And so all these
people are who do this for us. And so
they do this at a very high level. Um
and so that's the first thing you get
inside. Um we're also going to do a
leads workshop. So if you enjoyed this
workshop, this is just going to be even
more dirt, even more tactics just on
solving leads. So if we went through
this whole thing and you were like,
"Okay, I think I have a leads issue,
like they're costing too much. Like I
just need to solve that." We have a
whole workshop on that. Um if you're
like, you know what, I have a sales
issue. Um, so we'll basically go super
deep on the dirt of like let's solve the
sales constraint for good. Uh, if you
have a delivery issue, an LTV workshop,
so it's like, okay, let's make sure that
we can solve like basically make them
worth more so that you can afford to out
compete your competition. Um, the profit
workshop. So that's going to be like how
do we change pricing, how do we
repackage things, how do we build
differently, how do we accelerate cash
flow, um, all the things that we know
that we've done in all the different
spaces that have just dramatically
driven up uh, profit in the businesses.
Um, on top of that, Leila is running a
people and AI workshop. So, if you are
supply constrained that we're just going
to be doing that on steroids, plus we're
gonna talk about how we're implementing
AI into our service-based business. Um,
and how you can too. Um, I think that
like right now it's the best time to be
an entrepreneur. Um, there's just a
gigantic amount of opportunity in the
next 36 months. Uh, and then Shiron, who
some of you guys don't know, um, Shiron
was a super early mentor of mine. Uh, he
exited Tely's first and they, uh, they
went from like 50 million in volume to
3.4 4 billion. Uh, and then he did
nothing for like six years. Then he
started Swillo Capital, sorry, Swill
Ventures, which was basically just his
family office where he was investing the
money. Um, did that and then I convinced
him to go back, get back in the game.
And so he uh went to real brokerage and
they took them from 200 million to 1.2
billion. Um, and then after doing that,
I was like, "Hey man, you want to come
hang with us?" And he said yes. So um,
Chiron's actually president of ACQ. Um,
and so he's going to share all the stuff
that we like a lot of stuff he taught me
on wealth, tax, finance, operations. So
like if you're anyone who makes any
decent amount of money in your business,
the amount of things that we especially
if you're in the US, um, the amount of
things that I've learned from a tax tax
perspective, it's an insane like I feel
very confident. Um, that's why I was so
I was so surprised with this one because
I was like we have never offered any
kind of access and this is le like this
is half of what people pay for one day
in six months. I was like like this was
the one that I was like blown away. I
was like, maybe people didn't hear it
that well. Um, and so on top of that,
you'll get the school group uh that
houses everybody else. And so this is
actually kind of cool. So inside of the
school group, so I just pulled up Las
Vegas this morning and took a
screenshot. There's 32 people just like
in the Vegas area. Um, and so I bring
that up because like I think
entrepreneurship's lonely and being able
to connect with other high level
business owners I think is the coolest
thing. So are all 32 people you're going
to get along with? No. But there's like
two probably. Uh, and so like I think
that like for me the things that have
paid the most life dividends have been
the people that have come into my life.
And so um I wanted to create an
opportunity uh for those of you who want
that. And so I that is in total like
$65,000 of true actual value like real
value and I can't even price what six
months is because we don't do access. Um
but if you're like I would really like
help over the next six months
implementing these things into the
business um and be able to like directly
reach out then that's what I did this
for. Okay. So, it's um it's $3,000 times
six. We're doing it for 24 hours. Um
thank all the people who are in the
group if those you are in there. Um you
can let them know if you think it's
good. Um but we kick everything off
September 1st, so you're not like
missing anything by by coming in today.
Um but you can go to scale.acq.com,
which is at the bottom there. And so
this is just uh it's just if you want to
keep the party going, you want to set
yourself up for Q1 next year. Um we've
dedicated tremendous resources to doing
this because I want to do this super
well and just have like a crazy amount
of growth stories that I can tell. Um
and so I'll just give you a couple
things that I just saw from inside just
from the last like four or five days.
It's like Lance, you know, from one out
of 400 to a 40% close rate. Uh Hamza, he
talked about how his show rates
improved. You'll probably also notice
that I don't talk about income claims.
That is not by that is not by mistake.
Like I don't have them. Um I just don't
make them because I don't think they set
proper expectations and also it's tends
to be frowned upon. Um Preston, you
know, Preston is brilliant. I know
you're very busy. Respect for your time.
I followed your advice and spent all
night creating your blackbook. Um just,
you know, awesome. And like Ed Turner,
that's incredible value. Crystal, like
wow, so much value. Um Kevin, thanks for
putting such an awesome group together.
your team is really solid from Adam
Jacobs. Already adding so much value.
Mike Robinson, I can't believe so much
value has been shared. Uh any of these
are incredible.
Uh like we can keep going. Let's see.
Paul said, uh some of these I wanted to
bring up because people are actually
just sharing their biggest tactics. One
of the things I asked everybody in the
scale advisory is like introduce
yourself and then share the most
valuable tactic that you have in your
business. Like what is one of the things
that made the biggest difference
tactically? And so it's like Paul is
like, "Hey, we basically had no Google
reviews and then got 650 with one script
and he shared the script and this is you
know Chris Williams um how ACQAI made me
again I don't want to put income there
uh in four hours and he just explained
how the whole play worked right and he
just documented it and then Anton was
like hey I generated 84 leads with money
models books by just giving them away."
Uh and so he got like 84 leads 12 sales
calls booked six of them were ideal
clients just by giving the books away.
Um I'm not saying it's going to happen
for you. That's not the point. Um, but
this is like I like this is the mo like
I actually think this is an absurd
offer. Um, and so I'll give you guys 15
minutes to enroll and take a break
because I need to drink some water. Um,
you know, bathroom break. If you want to
enroll, go there now. Uh, so
scale.acq.com. You can go grab it. And
then we're going to do uh case studies
in the AI implementation uh second half.
All right, rock and roll. Do that
15. Start the timer, somebody. Okay.
and
with the uh the offer today and that's
because I legally cannot make the same
offer and say something has gone away
forever. So, the offer does not come
with the the 800 bucks.
All
right, I uh stuffed my face as fast I
possibly could uh for lunch. For those
of you guys who um who join us for the
next six months, super pumped to to have
you. The community is awesome. Um and
yeah, we uh we just wanted to uh tell
those of you who like are like you know
what I would love to have deeper dive on
all this stuff wanted to help and I uh
am giving you access to my actual team
so that you can get questions answered
which it's the most viable thing I can
do. All right. Um,
can you pull up my presentation?
Also, to the obvious answer to everyone
who's s I'm seeing in the chat like
start a 200 book school community. Well,
that would kind of defy the purpose. And
also just very transparently like I
can't afford to pay the people that I
pay. Just like just being really like
straight up with you guys. um like and
we did it that way so that we could
incentivize people who wanted to donate
more. So I have to keep it that way. I'm
not going to have a a group for one and
then a group for another. It doesn't
make sense. Um hopefully that should be
obvious. Um otherwise I appreciate you
guys and it's just it's a it's a huge
amount of work. Um like I'll say it
differently. If I wanted to have
something where just like everyone just
goes in then like
there's like you could have a zillion
people you know somewhere. Um, we I you
saw the amount of staffing I put into
this was because like I want to deliver.
Um, and transparently I think for that
level of access I probably could charge
$100,000.
The only reason this is priced at
$18,000 and $3,000 down is because at
the launch I couldn't facilitate
uh phone like I couldn't facilitate that
many phone sales, right? I mean
obviously we had as many people as we
could but like we couldn't we couldn't
take the take the volume. And so I had
to have it be at a price point that
people could just immediately say yes if
you guys would have like some behind the
curtain. Um but this is like this is
something that I would normally like we
charge $35,000 for one day
and it's not because it's about one day.
It's about how much is solving your
constraint worth. So if you're at
$500,000 a year and you know you could
be at a million dollar a year and
solving the constraints the difference
then $35,000 is nothing. I'm not saying
that's going to happen for you. I'm just
saying like that's how we think about
it. And so the question is less like 18
35 65 100,000. It's just what is the
likelihood that this thing can help me
solve my constraint. And so this gives
the most in-depth version of that I
possibly can, which is there are six
levels of constraints here. We do deep
dives on all of them using the stuff
that we know. And then in between you
can have access to me and the directors
are actually doing this in real time. Um
and obviously if you like are making any
amount of money the wealth workshop like
what are we talking about? What are we
even talking about? And so um that's
what we have that way. Okay. So with
that being said, uh there's 24 hours or
now whatever 23 and a half hours. Um
special thanks to everybody who's in uh
the ACQ scale advisory. Uh they're the
only reason. So that that little slide
thing that I just did I did this morning
in like 30 minutes because I just asked
them and I honestly was like I don't
know because some people might be like I
don't want them in and I've been like
okay. So I just kind of listen to um to
them. The reason it's 24 hours is
because I had 24 hours in September 1st
and they all the most of them selected
24 hours and so that's why it is. All
right. All right, with that being said,
uh let's rock and roll. Cool. I also got
a text from Cameron saying that you
figured out your constraint. So, thank
you Cameron. Appreciate it. Little
little boost. Um but yeah, so what I
want to do for this part four is we're
going to talk about playbooks by
business type number one. And then we're
just going to do real just
deconstrainings. Okay.
So, I want to start by kind of like
highlighting this point which is that
the thing that you need to do is hard,
right? Because if it were easy, you
would have already done it. Like we're
only constrained by the things that we
do not already know how to do. And so it
should seem obvious that if you don't
know how to do it, then it will feel
hard. But like if you think about when
you played a video game way back in the
past, right? When you get to a new level
you've never beaten before, you die a
bunch of times. You die a bunch of
times, then you figure it out. Now the
next time after you figure it out, you
play it, you don't even think about it.
You just go in the door, make a left,
fire two times at the guy, and keep
going, right? And it's because you have
no decisions to make. You know how to
beat the boss of that level, right?
And so it's the choice between two
apparently hard decisions, which is why
I think so many people get stuck, right?
It's between hard now or hard now and
later, right? And so when I frame it
that way, it makes it easier for me to
do the hard now thing because the other
thing is also still hard now and also
hard later. And so these um this will
seem familiar to some of the people
who've come to the the workshops in
person, but I think it's worth I think
it's worth highlighting this point.
So,
some of you guys have may have seen this
and if you have then this will just be a
reminder. Um,
and so this is a moniker of like common
um common sticking points that people
get into these kind of rock and hard
place scenarios. And so there are seven
of them that I have consistently seen
across businesses. The and I use ad
focus as like my own moniker. But the
first is avatar. And this is super
common in like the 1 to3 million range.
Sometimes a little bit earlier,
sometimes later, but 1 to three million,
it's like ripe for that. So if that's
you, this is pay attention. Um, but an
avatar issue is you're unclear on who
you want to serve. You've got some
customers that are lower, some customers
that are higher. You usually like the
ones that are higher and don't like the
ones that are lower as much, but if you
stop selling the ones that are lower,
you won't be able to payroll. So you're
not sure what to do, right? But the
strategic decision is which of these
customers do I think I can provide the
most value to? and how should I price
exclusively for this new avatar? Because
what typically happens is you've got a
high avatar and you've got a low avatar
and then you end up pricing if this were
like a line here, you end up pricing
somewhere around here. And that's the
issue because if you only serve this
high avatar, you could be pricing here.
So even if you had this drop in volume,
you'd be able to make up for it in
pricing power and then as by by
extension be able to make up your
profit. And so this is just one of the
seven issues. So right now, if you're
somebody who's like, I'm not sure which
customer I should go after, you're going
to look at this and you're going to want
to look at this next piece, which is
your LTV to CAC.
So I look at LTV to CAC for the cheaper
customer, LTV to CAC for the higher
customer. If LTV to CAC for the higher
customer is better, I then ask the
question, how can I do more of this so
that I can make up for my loss in in
low, right? And by doing that, I can
then re uh recolor or reshift the
percentage of customers I have in the
base to be these high high caliber
people. So that's number one. The next
is data which we talked about earlier,
right? These are the metrics. If you
don't have the metrics in your business,
you're like, well, I can't afford to go,
you know, get the metrics or make this
decision, but I can't afford not to make
this decision. So one, you have to be
able to operate on incomplete data. Two,
you want to think about directional
rather than absolute. And then three, if
you have a way of getting the data, then
that becomes your priority. Maybe that
means that you don't grow for a quarter,
but you have the data so you can grow
for the next three.
The next is focus. Now, this one I have
not mentioned at all at this point, but
is one of the the biggest ones. All
right, which is it's super common when
you're an entrepreneur. In the
beginning, you quit your job, you quit
your whatever, and then you start
something on your own. You take that one
big jump, and it's so rewarding because
you're still here. You're still in the
game. And so, if you've made that jump,
then what happens? you get this really
good reinforcement loop on a bad
behavior, which is jumping ship and
starting something new. That's what it
reinforces. Which is why it's my belief
that so many entrepreneurs are so
addicted to starting new things. You've
probably seen
this outline of mine. Oops. One more.
Okay. So, you've probably seen this
outline of mine that looks like this.
So you've got your uninformed optimism
and then you've got your
informed pessimism.
You've got your valley of despair.
Then you've got informed
optimism.
And then you've got achievement.
All right. So these are kind of like the
five stages that that happen in
entrepreneurship. But the problem is so
many people just repeat one, you know,
one, two, three over and over and over
again. They get to the value to spare
and then they say, you know what,
there's this other thing that looks
interesting. Let me ride that ride
again. And so they keep going over and
over again. And so what happens is right
now, I remember I had a lady who came
who was uh who had a yoga studio and a
chocolate factory.
If you're on here, I love you. I I don't
I don't want to I don't want you to feel
bad. Um but like it was one of the most
hilarious like I'm building a platform.
It's like I love you and I believe you.
Um but the thing is this is that you
have some crazy reason why you think
that you should have two completely
different businesses.
You probably shouldn't because it's hard
enough to do one and try to make two win
is near impossible because you're
basically just taking all the
horsepower, all your mental brain power,
all your spare time, all your talent
between both companies and splitting it.
When what happens is if you concentrate
all of that attention, all of those
resources, all of that talent, all of
your money on one opportunity, like I
talked about earlier, 1 million, 10
million, 100 million, almost all
opportunities can get to 100 million.
And so if you're not there, it's not
moving fast enough, it's usually because
you have too much going on. You can't go
deep enough with anything. Right? If
you've ever done this, if you've ever
cut things out of your life and you're
like, "Wow, I feel so much better. Man,
I feel so much smarter. I feel like I
can solve these problems that were once
seemingly impossible. I can now solve
them really easily." It's because you
have bandwidth, right? You literally can
just think through the second and third
order consequences deeper on each
business. And so right now, one of the
big strategic issues that comes up is
that you simply have too many things
that you're pursuing.
So, what's the hard hard now versus hard
later? You're going to have to make the
hard call and pick the baby that you
want to keep. Little Sophie's choice. It
sucks. And I only say this to somebody
who has struggled with this one more
than any of the others of the seven. And
it's so painstakingly difficult. Um,
I'll tell you a little Well, we're all
here. We're all hanging out. Let's just
do it. So, I'll tell you how to get over
this because I think entrepreneurs more
than just about anyone are super add.
And so if you have this creative mojo,
you've got this juice that you want to
get out, there's a reason that I write
books, it's not the best use of my time,
but there is a reason I do it. And the
main reason is because it gets out this
energy that I would otherwise be using
to break my business. The business runs
exceptionally well when it has this much
of me. If I'm there all the time, I
break too much stuff. So, which is why
it works well for me to like work with
companies like once a year because like
it's like here's all the stuff that'll
give you 12 months of work, right? Um,
but what are the divisions? If we think
about the divisions of a business, what
divisions benefit from
somebody who has lots of innovation,
right? Like, let's think about it. Which
one benefits the most? I'll give you a
hint. It rhymes with marketing.
And so, if you're like, man, I have
trouble focusing. I like doing lots of
different things. Then what I would
encourage you to do, and this is what
took me way too long to figure out,
one front door that leads to money,
which is your business. But if you want
to have lead magnet number one, lead,
you know, lead magnet number two, lead
magnet number three, uh, you know,
media,
um, you know, uh, content,
ads,
scaling, roadmap. I don't know if you
guys paid attention during the uh during
the the the money models uh,
presentation. Uh I was like if you guys
have gotten value from my free podcast,
free course, free event, free keynotes,
um free scaling roadmap, free books,
free audio book, like I had all the all
the different things and I free
newsletter. I was like my god, I do so
much stuff. And so the thing is it's
like I have so much juice that if I
don't squeeze the hell out of it, but I
have to squeeze it in a way that doesn't
break the business. Imagine all of that
horsepower. And this is what the earlier
part of my career was like. I would
literally take all of this and I'd be
like, "All right, we got a new sales
script. All right, we got we're building
another landing page. Hey, we're also
going to, you know, change this about
our delivery. Hey, we're also going to
be, you know, changing this on on the
back end over here. Oh, by the way,
finance, if you can redo, you know, the
way that you're reporting this stuff,
that'll be awesome." And I would just go
around like a Tasmanian bed devil just
breaking things, right? And so, no one
ever could breathe because I had
everyone buried underwater because it
takes two seconds for me to make a
directive. it takes two weeks for them
to to actually deliver on it. And I
could make commands and make directives
fast than people could do them, right?
And so you have to you have to pull back
and realize and I had that cost of
change thing was that like you have to
realize that some things will stay
imperfect.
But striving to constantly change things
does not make them more perfect. It
actually makes them more imperfect. And
took me a very long time to realize
that. And then eventually as Leila and I
learned to work together better and
better, it's like I just kept naturally
gravitating more and more to the front
of the business because I didn't hurt
the business when I made 17, believe it
or not, one of my first uh lead magnets
for gym launch was 17 money models uh
for for making gyms wly profitable. And
so it's just like these are the models
that we use to build, you know,
profitable gyms. I had nine profitable
frameworks. I had all these different,
you know, frameworks that I would use to
build gyms. And I'd write these
basically just full books. I mean like
my my lead magnets were like 120 pages.
Like they were full books. Um and I
would do these and that's why like
people would come in after consuming and
be like my god this isn't because I
would just pour my heart into it because
I have an overactive mind probably like
you do. And so I this might be one of
the bigger like for the right person
maybe like 5% of you this might change
your life. Like just realizing that you
take all your ADD and don't apply it to
your business apply it to your
marketing. Okay.
Oh, I didn't finish this. See, there's
my there's my example of ad. Okay. So,
so you got to pick your avatar. You got
to pick you got to make sure you're
getting your data. You have to focus and
kill kill the babies that sounds
aggressive. Kill kill kill the the
businesses that you uh that that are not
the main thing. Um,
by the way, the new business, the second
one, the one you started afterwards,
always seems like it's the one that has
more opportunity in it. That's why you
decided to do it. But that's also
probably not true because um the people
who are in there also know that there's
crap in that business too. You just
haven't figured it out yet because
you're on my little optimism trail.
You're like up here. Okay, the next one
is over uh overexpansion
which really just means undertalented.
So this is the uh supply constraint.
So, if you have one location and you
opened a second location and you're
like, "Okay, but now my two locations,
like I had one location that was here, I
opened a second one, both went down."
Then you say, "Okay, well, I cut my
profit in half between two, but now
what's the best decision? I should open
a third location, right? And it goes to
crap. Now you have three times the
liability and even less profit. No
bueno." So, it's not to say that you
shouldn't open locations, you shouldn't
expand. Of course, you should expand.
That's the goal if you're doing a good
job, right? You should expand the
business. But if you expand too fast,
it's not that you expand too fast, it's
that you had too little talent to
support you. And that's the thing is
that with one business, one location,
one smaller thing, you have more
coverage. As soon as you expand beyond
your purview, if you don't have other
people have good decision-making power
and ability, competence,
things will start falling through the
cracks. And so it's a people issue. And
so overexpansion just means that you
don't have enough good people. Now, this
is can be tough though because you're
like, "Well, now that I'm I've got these
two locations, I can't afford to bring
anyone else in because the performance
has dropped." So, you basically have one
of two options. Option one is that you
essentially just kill yourself. That
sounded aggressive. I mean, like kill
yourself working-wise. Like, you just
bury yourself to try and like, you know,
breathe life into this thing again and
work overtime at both to get them above
so that you can get the cash flow or you
just realize that you made a boo boo and
you might have to give up your profit
for six months to get somebody else in
who can manage it and then hopefully
they turn it up. But like this is why
business owners are paid more. We take
on more risk. Like that's like that's
why we get that's why we get the
paycheck when it works out, right? We
take on more risk than other people
other people do. So overexpansion, you
solve that by cutting losses, by
overworking yourself or by bringing
someone in and underprofiting. Those are
your options.
But if you don't do anything, you will
just stay there and eventually just like
burn out because you will make no money
and then you'll work like you'll be
working all the hours of the day and
literally just not make anything. I only
know that because I've done it. The next
one is um compensation.
So this one sometimes happens. I would
say this is the rarest of the list, but
if you're in this category, this applies
to you. Um
this can be over or under compensation.
So the HVAC, you know, thing that I was
telling saying earlier, if it's like,
man, you know, we can't we can't find
good talent. It's like, have you
considered paying more? like some of the
best returns I gotten by far is taking
whatever the market rate is and then
always paying top 10 percentile, top
eight, 15th percentile of uh of of roles
that are key lever points within the
business. And so to this day, I still
think some of the best value arbitrage
that exists is on talent always. I mean,
think about the reason that Zuck would
pay a hundred million signing bonuses
for AI because he believes the return is
there, right? And obviously the return
is there and he's done this a lot of
times, right? Now, on the flip side, uh,
so that's when you're not paying people
enough. On the other hand, you can also
pay people too much. If you have a
frozen yogurt store, you're not going to
be able to do profit shares to the front
front desk people. It's not going to
work, right? Um, and so we want to make
sure if you're like, okay, but if I were
to change this rockin hardplay scenario
if I'm going to change this compensation
structure, then I'm going to lose I'm
going to lose people, right? I might I
might lose some talent. So, I'll tell
you how to do this. So, the price raise
letter,
this guy, you guys all have it. Um, by
the way, banger, so good. But you can
use that same concept and apply it to
compensation. And so the way you do that
is you say, "Hey Sarah, uh, I know that
you came in and I said I would give you
50% of revenue that you're that you were
generating. So I owe it to you one to
apologize and I want to tell you why."
So, I told you that I was going to have
this big vision for how you could grow
your career here, have more opportunity.
But based on the current compensation
structure, this business will never grow
because there's just not enough capital
in order to to expand. And so, I owe it
to you and I owe it to everybody else in
this business to give this business and
our customers a shot so we can help more
people. And so, this is what we have to
do. The decisions already been made. I
have to change compensation and it has
to be like this. That being said, that
wasn't our original agreement. And so I
want to give you um you know three
months to think about it. Um or you
could say I want to give you you know a
week to think about it. This is what the
compensation would be going forward. Um
but then what we do is we say hey your
your uh price your compensation is going
to change in 90 days. All right. That
way they have a three-month runway and
then you also if they tell you the next
morning or two days later that they
don't want to do it, you also have three
months to go back fill them with
somebody that's cheaper. And if you do
it earlier, you can obviously, you know,
excuse them earlier if you want, or they
might just say, "It's okay." And I'll
say this, of the times I've had to do
it, I really have not lost many people
because most people are like, "I get it.
I did think it was a little bit rich."
You know what I mean? And they they kind
of get it. They're like, "This is a
little above market." Like, I'm not
going to say anything because I'll take
the money, but like I don't know when
the when the music's going to end. So
the next one is underpriced. Okay.
So underpriced
is god it's so like if I'm looking I'm
looking I'm looking at you guys right
I want to say at least 40% of you are
underpriced
and so taking to the natural extreme so
think about what a service business does
when it's when it's super super old and
has done well you can you can pretty
much draw a straight line between the
price of services this is with humans
right price of services um and the
experience and skill of the service
provider. So if you want to demonstrate
that you have more skill, you can know
by how much you charge because taking
the other natural extreme, if you did
everything you do for a dollar, you
would have pro hopefully you would have
a lot of people who take you up on it,
right? And then as you slowly keep doing
that, you'd be supply constraint, supply
constraint, supply constraint,
eventually you'd reach some point where
you'd be right at the equilibrium.
That's not the most profitable point in
the business because ideally you keep
having more demand and you keep being
able to keep driving that price up. And
so that is where the brand loop of you
doing a good job, people telling people,
continues to spin. And so you want to be
always driving price up because it means
you're doing a good job. It's an
indicator that that quality has
sustained at each at each increment in
in value creation. And so most of you,
that's why pricing is such a big one.
I'll actually I'll read you what what
Cameron texted me. He's my friend from
from elementary school. And uh he we
called up on him on um uh during the
live. So he said uh this is such an
amazing workshop already helped me so
much in actually understanding my
constraints. I was sitting here thinking
I have a manpower constraint but really
my current biggest constraint is cash
flow. If I fix that then I'll have the
cash to better attract top talent.
Right? And that's the point is that like
it's sometimes it's several orders or
several steps they have to reverse
engineer to get to how you actually
solve the problem rather than what the
problem is. Right? And so the the profit
playbooks will help you with that. Um,
and that's why like it's there's three
playbooks just around pricing because
it's such a powerful lever. Um, and then
this one
is single product. So, this basically
just means that you have insufficient
LTV, but you're unwilling um to add an
additional upsell or additional thing.
So, it's like, hey, we're, you know,
we're selling customers um and but our
our margins continue to compress
compress compress compress compress
right now. And so it means that you have
to have an increase in LTV, right?
Because the cost of leads will always
only go one direction, which is up. So
think about this.
If you're making content, the first
people that ever join your world when
you're an early content creator are
going to be the people who are the most
interested in this stuff, right? Because
you aren't that good at making content
and it's super early in the algorithm
for their, you know, displaying your
stuff and they bought in, right? If
you're running ads, the first people
that a ad platform is going to show your
ads to are the most likely to convert
because that they can only do it at that
level of spend. And the higher up your
spend goes, the colder and colder the
audiences are, the lower and lower the
conversion is, right? Which is why you
can only achieve tremendous scale with
spend. when you have a tremendous money
model that can still monetize a much
broader and colder base or you have a
brand that just has a massive warm
audience you've already provided value
to, right? So, you either expand your
warm audience or you find a way to
monetize warm cold audience better. But
in either of those scenarios, typically
what happens is your margins continue to
impress and you keep trying to hope that
you could go back to your old customer
acquisition cost, but you can't because
cost of acquisition only goes up. it
literally only goes up. So the best
deals you're ever going to get on
getting customers, unless you know,
barring you have some major issues with
how you acquire customers, is going to
be now. So really think about that. And
so if you have a single product,
sometimes it's time to just create the
upsell. And when you're like, what is my
upsell going to be? I'll give you a rule
of thumb for my upsells, but typically
so this this launch was an exception to
that mostly because uh logistics of of
doing payment was difficult with the
volume. But typically I I go 5x
and the reason for that so the
appropriate price for like scale
advisory should be like if I were to
just do normal pricing should be between
30 and 36,000. That would be the correct
price for it. It's 18. the correct price
for it is because typically 20% of
customers
will take something that's five times as
expensive because customers tend to be
fractal 8020. And so if 20% of your
customers are willing and able to spend
five times more, then it means that with
each additional upsell or service that
you add to a continuum, then you double
revenue with each of them. All right, so
I'll do the math real quick. Is this
cool? I like this stuff I like geek out
on.
Okay.
So, let's say you sell um 100 people
at $100.
Cool. So, you've got $10,000.
Okay. Now, we have an upsell that 20%
take. So, we got 20 people and we're
doing five times the price. Remember
And here we could say, you know what, we
also have another thing that's
$2,500 that we expect 20%. So four
people are going to take that.
So we go from $10,000,
here's the cool part, to $30,000 in
revenue.
But this is the sexiest part of all.
This is for servicing a 100 customers.
This is for servicing
124 customers because all we do is we
add this 20 and this four. We triple the
business.
So that's how you solve one of these.
Okay. Is that cool? I think it's I think
this stuff's cool. like this stuff like
when I understood this part of like this
is how pricing to like this is how I do
pricing um is you reverse engineer to
the willingness to pay of the avatar you
have rather than trying to say well it
cost me this much like it's cost plus
pricing is not how you price things you
price things by willingness to pay.
Okay, so let's get really tactical.
Hopefully that was good. Um ad focus is
these are seven of the most common
things that people get stuck on. Um, if
any of those, I'm sure more than one of
you guys, you know, resonated with one
of those things. Make the hard call,
make the decision, debottleneck the
business. Okay. Now, I want to talk
about a couple of the more common kind
of playbooks. Okay. So, this is more
just like me observing a lot of
different businesses over the years. And
so, um, like people behave in patterns
and they typically come in with similar
skill sets and similar personalities. So
like there's people who are good at you
know like Instagram which typically have
a little bit of a different personality
than people who are like really good
YouTubers which are different than like
the big live streamers. Now of course
there's people who just like learn how
to do everything but people who are
attracted to one or the other tend to
have different kind of like psychoraphs
and as a result they approach problems
in similar ways which means they
typically have similar problems and are
constrained by the same things. And so I
want to give you a couple of examples
that I think represent kind of like with
broad brush strokes many of you. Um and
so let's talk about the influencer
playbook. So if you can can we do a
poll? Is that possible?
Can we do a poll?
If we can't do a poll, you can just say
it in the chat. Oh, do I need to talk a
little faster?
I can talk faster if you want me to talk
faster. Okay.
So, part of the reason, by the way, that
I um that I that I put words on the
slides for uh my presentations um as
much as I can is because it it slows
down my cadence. Um which is better, but
I'm flawed. Okay, so influencer
playbook. Um let's let's rock here. I
wanted So, I'll tell you what the poll
was going to be. The poll is just going
to be uh how how many of you guys use
organic as your method for getting
customers? So, how many of you guys I
know she's joking. How many of you guys
just just put a one in the chat. Um if
you
if you use organic as your primary means
of getting customers.
Yes. Okay.
Give me some ones. We got some ones.
Okay. Great. So if you're an influencer,
I think this is really important to
understand.
Okay? So pay attention. So right now,
let's say that you're doing $1 million
per year. It doesn't really matter. Just
like just say this is your current.
All right? You're currently doing a
million dollar a year. Now, I want you
to imagine you've got a hundred,000
followers
that are following you right now, and
that's what's generating
this million dollars a year. Now, when
you post,
you normally are getting, let's say,
like, you know, one to two% of your
traffic of that of that 100K is actually
seeing your posts. Right?
Now, when you make a call to action,
it's more like 0.1%. It's a little dot
inside of there.
The reason that there's typically a huge
amount that you can increase with a
business that has organic when they run
ads is that
if you think about it like this,
you're currently monetizing this 1 to
2%. Okay? When you run ads,
you basically reach down below there and
just monetize a larger slice because
you're able to reach a way broader
amount of the audience that you have
with your paid ads.
It's not necessarily expanding your
audience. It's simply t it's just
reaching a higher percentage of them on
a consistent basis. So, there's
something else that does this too, which
is a sales team.
Both of these things don't expand, not
really your capacity because most people
who are influencers who then start
running ads or do organic and then start
running ads. You're not running like
branding and value based ads. If you did
that, you could actually expand the pie.
But most people run kind of right hook
direct response ads, which is fine. And
use your your free content as your way
of kind of top of funnel of letting
people know you're they're aware of you
and providing value. And then you kind
of scoop back up with ads and sales
teams. Both these things kind of reach
further down. But the thing is is that
each of these levers you can only pull
once. So you'll get an instant 2x, 3x,
5x, which sometimes can be really
material. So I don't want to downplay
that. It can be really big for a
business. But once you do that, that
lever is pulled. There's nothing else
you can do. And so then you go back to
what's the constraint. And so in those
businesses, you want to make the I'm
going to go off the off the page here,
but you want to expand the pyramid so
that ideally this one to 2% or wherever
your ads drawn is that now that same
percentage captures even more. Okay. So
if you were an influence and you're
like, I want to grow my business. What
should I do? Well, there's a number of
things kind of like many many roads lead
to Rome or many many paths up the
mountain. You could just start running
paid ads. And if you did that, you would
probably make more. And by the way,
running paid ads so much easier than
making content if you just didn't know
that. You just like don't know how to
click the buttons. It takes like an
afternoon. Like it's really not hard to
learn. Making content that's good, much
harder. So, just take your best
performing content, slice a CTA at the
end, CTA being call to action of like uh
literally take your top 10 from the
year, highest performing pieces of
content that are not like meme stuff,
but stuff that's like specific to your
avatar, the stuff that you actually like
the type of people you actually want to
help, and then say, "Hey, by the way,
like um like let's say I had a, you
know, something about businesses and
making money, whatever." I would say,
"Hey, uh by the way, I have seven other
things that are just like that that I
want to give to you for free if you opt
in over here. Let me show you a visual
of it." Awesome. And if you're the right
type of person, I'd love to book a call
with you. Or if you have something
that's a straight checkout, it's like
and if you want, you get the whole
complete thing on the next page,
whatever. Right? And so the idea here is
that you can go ads as one way, one
lever you can pull. You can do sales
teams as another way because that's just
going to convert a higher percentage of
the audience. Um, this expanding the
triangle this way is going to be more
versus better content. So how when do
you decide to do more? When do you
decide to do better? I always do more
first and then typically after a certain
amount of more it accordians. So I'll
give you kind of like a a verbal
example. So if I go I make one YouTube
video a week at some point I say you
know what I'll bet you I could get to
like three three YouTube videos a week.
So then I expand my my three YouTube
videos a week and then all of a sudden I
look at you know I look at my last month
or two months and I'm like man you know
80% of my views came from three videos
that happened over the last you know 12
weeks. I'll bet you if I spent more time
on just making the videos better, I
would get even more out of it. So then
it cordians back down. And then I say
and then I learn all the things that
make something good. And then I say,
okay, can I do that repeatedly and do
more of them? And so it's very natural
to have this better versus more, better
versus more that happens with content.
So I don't think there's a right answer.
But typically, if you've been stuck for
a while, you're going to have to do one
or the other. And if I have to bias,
I'll typically do more first.
Now, for anyone who who tends to
monetize, I I'll give you a couple
couple platforms. So, if you monetize on
if you have a YouTube uh audience, if
you have an Instagram audience or even a
Tik Tok audience. So, something that we
have found that's worked exceptionally
well for a lot of companies is they
actually direct almost all of their
traffic towards Instagram. So even
though they have a YouTube, they could
have they could obviously go straight to
checkout or have a link there, which is
fine, but you can also have people just
like DM me on Instagram and Tik Tok.
Like Tik Tok's been notoriously
difficult to monetize for anything
expensive. So Tik Tok shop and low
ticket, you know, consumerbased products
tend to do really well with Tik Tok. But
anything that's in the thousands or B2B,
much harder time. The only people I've
seen succeed with that is that they say
their call to action on their Tik Tok is
DM me on Instagram and then they have a
DM funnel. So, what's a DM funnel? So,
if you guys saw um on the launch, we had
like book or comment book or DM book or
whatever as a call to action on some of
the posts, especially the green man
posts. And so, um if you look at like
the Guinness record uh video on my
Instagram, it should be in the first
like 12 or so, you'll see it has like
20,000 comments on it. And it's because
the CTA in there was like, "Hey, if you
want the free stuff uh from the launch,
comment, I think it was book." And so
they commented book and then because of
that there's many chat automation that
just fires and then sends them the thing
they say yes and then it sent them the
link. But by doing that you build a
whole another list and you'll be able to
actually turn views into leads and leads
into conversations because the
conversions will happen in the
conversations. So you're like okay that
would be like an influencer playbook if
we're like how do I grow the influencer
team provided sorry influencers revenue
provided they don't have a supply
constraint. So that's what I'm going to
go deep on these because I want to solve
as many of these problems for you guys
as you can. All right. So it would be
combination of ads versus sales teams.
Pick one. More content versus better
content. Pick one. And then I would add
in a CTA with many chat um as the
mechanism behind making that that work.
Doing that with an influencer business
can like immediately grow the company.
Okay. So,
so, so I was putting the, uh, putting
icons in and putting visuals in for this
presentation. Um, and I accidentally
said, uh, give me a icon for Homer
services instead of home services. And
so, and so gave me this, which I thought
was hilarious, and so I left it in. Um,
but if you're a home service business,
right, so you're brickandmortar, you've
got trucks, you've got routes, you've
got technicians, uh, you've got
tradesmen. um really common couple
things. So number one, if you're not
running any ads and it's all word of
mouth, if you run ads, it's like ads in
home services for whatever reason, it's
just like the competition is just not
that sophisticated. Like if you just run
like simple lead ads and call them, you
do exceptionally well. Um I've also
found that home services in general tend
to have really really terrible websites.
So, they'll have like a hidden button
that no one can ever find that says like
talk to a rep or it says, you know,
request a quote or request an invoice.
Horrendous, right? No one wants to opt
in for that and they still get traffic,
right? Because the whole industry is so
supply constrained. But if we fix that
by adding a sales motion, adding a
nurture rep, jacking up the prices so
that we actually meet like it's okay
that we sell fewer. That's fine. We
can't even handle the volume we have. we
might as well make more cash flow so
that we can hire more people, right? But
page optimization. So, this is this is
just having done so many home services
businesses, these are the common things
that you probably need to be looking at.
Um, and I think the reason home services
typically suck at sales is because they
don't have to be good and they can still
get business. They also typically suck
at marketing because they don't have to
be good and they can still get business,
which is why they tend to be price
constrained. Now, part of the reason
they have price constraints for those
who are in home services
um is because they believe that they
sell a commodity, which maybe you do,
but that's your choice. So, if you're in
home services, as a reminder again,
because there's common themes here,
you can win on speed,
you can win on risk,
you can win on ease.
These are your three vectors of value.
And so we have to think what are the big
fears of a customer. They think it's
going to be overbudget.
They think it's going to be
uh overbudget overtime
and headache,
right? And so we want to guarantee
around these things. And so I would say
pick one of these that you think you
absolutely can win on and then lean into
it. Speed is an excellent vector to beat
people on. And then the natural thing
that comes back is like, well, I've got
subcontractors. I've got these other
tradesmen that are subs underneath of me
that I can't control. You can if you
choose to pay them more to do things
faster. So all of these things is like,
is it impossible or just more expensive?
And if it's more expensive, can I price
that in? If I price that in, can I make
more than it is expensive on my price?
Probably. And especially when you're
somebody who's supply constrained, like
the first your first gut reaction to
like, I can't handle the amount of
demand that I have is raise your price.
But everyone's afraid of raising their
price because they're like, we closed
80% but we can't handle anymore. It's
like then close 40 and triple the price.
And you're like, there's no way we could
do that. It's like, well, you should get
that looks at, right? Of course you can
do that. Done it a zillion times. That's
why we wrote the whole price rates
letter. That's why we have the pricing
playbook. You can totally do it. Now,
I like to pair the solutions in the
following sequence.
So, this is how we do it. I go sales
motion. So, this is where we install the
VSSL that I referenced earlier. So, we
put a sales motion in place, right?
Which is going to be a VSSL. We're also
going to have lead nurture so that we
get to a higher percentage of our leads.
We then follow the closer
the closing book
which then gets us even more. So think
about all of this is squeezing even more
demand in and you're like I can't even
handle demand. So now we got to drop put
some put some brakes on it. So this is
why we jack the price
and then with this jacked price and this
way more demand we might be able to
double price and keep sales volume the
same. We might even double price and
sales volume goes up. Oh no. Right. But
then what happens is cash flow goes
through the roof. And so let me show you
how because this is super common yet
again for home services businesses.
And I'm covering these each of these is
like one out of five of you is each of
these big categories that I'm doing
right now. Um so most home services
businesses and I and I hear this a lot
and this I want to like erase this from
your mind. If you've ever like I get
this this this retort which is hey I you
know we run you know 15% margins but
that's that's industry average. That's
that's kind of what it is in our
industry. Why on earth would you compare
yourself to anybody else? They're all
broke. Don't look at what they do. They
have no idea what they're doing. I
promise you they have no idea what
they're doing. Zero. No idea.
So you have this quote industry average,
but like the American average is
overweight, divorced twice, like can't
hold down a job, can't focus, scrolling
TikTok eight hours a day. Why would we
compare ourselves to that average?
Completely irrelevant. Just do it down
to physics. If we have more demand than
we have supply, uh then we should raise
our prices. Now, back to this. So if you
have
a normal home services business, you
might be running 15% margins. Okay?
Well, if we let's say we incre let's
just let's go crazy. Let's go crazy. And
by crazy, I mean not crazy at all. And
let's just say we do a 50% price raise.
If we pair that with an improvement in
the sales motion out of VSSL, we
actually work our leads and we follow a
closing process and we got our price
raise. What did we do to our profit?
We 4x the profit of the business.
Dudes, we do this all the time, day in
and day out, every week to home service
businesses. There is so much opportunity
here if you just know where to look.
So, this is a stack of solutions and I'm
giving you guys more stacks of solutions
here um so that you can actually
implement these and and win because now
of course like let's play it out. You
increase the cash flow, what happens?
But I'm supply constrained. Great.
Pay more.
pay more referral bonuses,
more
recruiting and ads.
So, you have to follow it through the
natural sequence. And if you're like,
well, that's going to take me like the
thing is is like this, this, this, this,
this, all those lots of words, two
weeks, it doesn't take a ton of time to
do that. This one will take more time.
This is decisions onetime asset process
training process training process
training couple weeks price change
decision
cash flow output
okay
and I have that the last the last bullet
there because I think it's worth saying
I see a lot of home services businesses
do a do an absolutely atrocious job at
uh sales and specifically uh lead
nurture. um one of the highest
converting and there's been a bunch of
shorts about this but like there was a
guy who came in he was closing 55% of
his leads and he was able to close 55%
of his leads that he was only getting
two to three leads a day and I think he
was in I think it was in roofing um
because he hired his aunt to only have
one job which was that she called the
leads the moment they came in. That was
it. That was her only job. She she had
literally no other responsibilities. He
only got two to three leads a day. But
he knew that if he could call them
within 15 seconds, the likelihood that
he would close them doubles, triples,
quadruples, right? And so some of you
are like, "Man, I can't afford to hire a
lead ner." It's like, "Dude, you can't
afford not to." It's like you're
converting 5% of your leads. It's like
you convert 20% of your leads, you 4x
revenue. Could you with 4x revenue pay
for a new a lead nurture rep? Probably.
All right. So, that was home services.
You guys digging this? Okay.
So uh this is B2B services and SAS. So
this you know I I book both these
together despite the fact that um you
might be like how does a B2B service and
software as a service similar? Well they
actually say that they actually
fundamentally sell the same thing. They
deliver differently. So B2B service and
a B2B SAS is software as a service and
B2B service is just service as a
service. Right? So they're both SAS
service as a service software as a
service but they sell the same thing.
They just have a different delivery
mechanism. And the idea behind B2B SAS
is that it should be more consistent
because it's software. It's technology
that's doing it. And it should in theory
have higher gross margins. Doesn't
always, but it should in theory. So
you'll notice that the sales motions for
a B2B service and a B2B SAS are almost
identical. So the sales motion that we
had for Allen, for example, uh the
agency software was identical to Gym
Launch. Like literally just like line
for line was the exact same thing. Um,
and so the the the common issue with
these types of businesses, especially if
you are more ads driven on this. So I
I'll I'll give you two examples. Um, if
you are more ads driven, then you're
noticing that your cost to acquire
customers is continuing to get more and
more expensive. Uh, your margins are
compressing and compressing. Churn is
likely going up uh because your delivery
on the back end has continued to uh
dilute because you're not as good at
training and recruiting as you are at
marketing and sales. Um that's like
archetype one. Archetype two is the
entire uh B2B uh referral driven
business that has almost no marketing in
general. And so they have different kind
of playbook stacks uh to solve those.
All right. So let's say the ads driven
B2B.
So this may seem counterintuitive but
number one is going to be content. And I
know that sounds crazy because you're
like wait how's that going to fix? The
thing is is you have a brand issue. is
that no one trusts you and they're right
to not trust you because you're diluting
like your your reviews, your word of
mouth continue to trickle down to almost
nothing and so you have to reestablish
the brand and start providing more value
upfront. This will in the short term
increase your conversion percentage. In
the long term, it'll start actually
generating deals and lead flow for you.
So that's the first thing that you'll
have to do. The next thing is that again
most most businesses here could benefit
from multiple VSSLs.
So if you have two calls or three calls
then you should probably have two VSSLs
or three VSSLs not just one.
The next here and this is super common
again is going to be avatar is they are
unclear on the person that they provide
the absolute most value to. So you have
to get clear on which customer segment
you're deciding to to serve. And because
of that because you're doing too many
things to too many different types of
people you can't price appropriately.
Your CAC is too high. Your margins are
compressing. you dilute down your
ability to service those customers um
because
you have too many people you're serving
and so you have to do so much custom
stuff it's impossible to be good and so
you have to narrow it so that you can
templatize it and get consistent
outcomes. When you have a consistent
avatar, you have consistent messaging,
consistent outcomes, then the whole
thing becomes more productized and it
ultimately drives more value, right? And
you can also now price appropriately to
that significantly higher value avatar.
So, it's not uncommon to see doubles,
triples, quadruples in pricing when we
get really clear on this 20% slice or
30% slice of your existing customer
base. That is the ideal customer base
for you.
So, content sales motion, making sure
that we're picking the right avatar,
which then
goes into pricing.
So, I'm trying to do like kind of white
whitewashed uh consulting with like
whole like tranches of you at a time. Um
but this is this is like the stack of
what I would be going through. So the
content here is going to be um marketing
machine plus branding
plus hooks.
This is proof.
This is uh your first avatar in the lost
chapters book. And then this is the
pricing um pricing playbook which is
right there. You already know what it
is. And so that's like the stack of
playbooks to go through. Okay. Now, if
you're the other side, so you're you're
a legal a legal firm or you're an
accounting firm and uh you you've been
doing this for a while and you have
people who are coming in. Um typically,
more so than anything, you guys suck at
sales. So, it's going to be sales
motion.
You don't need to do content. You need
to do sales motion. Typically, uh
pricing change
is almost
certainly the two things that you'll end
up having to do and kind of like I said
earlier with
the multi-step VSSL with these types of
changes um we approach it with something
called a calculator close which is if
you're the type of business that can um
demonstrate a savings. So this is super
common in accounting, super common in
tax, um it can be for different types of
restoration work, um different type of
commercial services, uh different IT, uh
security, there's a bunch of different
ones where like you save businesses or
make them money or combination of those
things. And so what we want to do is we
have to create a sales motion that
anchors our pricing with a calculator
around the savings around the earnings
as long as we can demonstrate it and
prove it after the fact which if you're
in that type of business you can. You
want to get completely get rid of this
whole cost. Like everyone here who does
cost plus pricing and if you're like
what's cost plus? You look at how much
it cost you and then you add something
that is cost plus pricing. It is a
terrible way to price. It's the worst
way to price. Please stop doing that
now. All right. Value based pricing is
the only type of pricing that matters
which is what is someone willing to pay.
Now what it costs you to do and deliver
is entirely not their problem. It's just
about what they're willing to pay and
how many people are willing to pay it.
And then you just do your math, right?
These are not up for negotiation. Now
you might think this and say, "Well,
wait, that would mean that we'd have
different prices for everyone." That's
okay as long as you have a method behind
doing it and as long as the margin still
works out great for what you're doing,
which if you're pricing it the right
way, you should. As long as the delivery
is still more or less the same thing in
terms of um the doingness of each of
your teammates, totally fine. I'll give
you a totally different example. So, one
of the best ways to sell, it's a little
bit more advanced for like a weight loss
uh business like a gym. Like the easiest
way to sell is to sell a program six
weeks defined end like here's a
challenge or whatever detox
transformation. If you get a little bit
more advanced, then you want to sell to
goal. And that's exactly what this is.
is a calculator close is selling to
goal. It's a diagnostic sale. And so
what happens the person comes in and you
say, "Okay, you want to lose 50 pounds,
50 pounds. We find that it takes
reasonably we want to do 2 pounds a
week. It's going to take 25 weeks for us
to get there. Then we're going to have a
maintenance period of, you know, half
that time, which is going to be 12
weeks. So 37 in total. And then we're
going to do a recalibration phase after
that, which is another 12 weeks. All
right. So all in all, we're looking at
whatever that is, 49 weeks. Okay. Now,
we charge 200 bucks a week. How do you
want to pay? Right? And all of a sudden
that becomes a $9,800 sale. Right? Now,
somebody else comes in later and they
only need to lose 30 pounds. Then that
means that you can just decrease the
amount of time. That's fine because your
revenue per person per month is the
same. You just have different durations.
And the doingness of each of your team
is still going to be stop eating crap,
move more, jump to the gym. Right? You
get what I'm saying here? So like even
though the the price can accordion
um the revenue per customer is going to
be the same and then you just renew them
at different times. Okay, hopefully that
was um if you were in either of those
scenarios either the uh kind of referral
driven or ads driven you have some
playbooks that you can follow. Okay, so
quick reminder here um one constraint at
a time. So even though I do these stacks
here, every business has one constraint,
but we focus on solving that constraint
by reverse engineering it. So if the
issue with this business for example is
that we need to be able to price better,
right? Well, then we have to start here
and then move on as we move through it
so that we can price better.
the the Instagram the Instagram the
influencer business that I was
referencing earlier.
This business not wants to convert a
higher percentage of the audience. Let's
say that that was the constraint of the
business. They just need to sell more.
So, can we do more? Well, we could do
more content. That would work. We could
do more ads. That would work. We could
do more sales. That would work. All of
those things work. And so, that's why in
the beginning, there's multiple multiple
paths of the mountain, but they're still
solving the main issue, which is we need
to get more leads so we can get more
sales, right? it was a conversion issue.
We have the leads. We're not converting
as many of them as we need to. And so
each of these processes will drive that
conversion mechanism. And so you can hit
it with multiple angles. That's fine.
But the constraint remains the same.
And once you hit it from all three
angles, eventually you get to a point
where like, oh my god, we don't have
more leads. And then you say, great, we
need to make more better content. That
becomes the next constraint, right? It
always the constraint will move. If
you're doing a good job, your constraint
will move regularly. If you're doing a
bad job, you'll have the same constraint
for years.
So many ways to solve it but you want to
identify them correctly.
Okay. So final reminders uh your
constraint is your priority. It means it
comes before everything else. You want
to leverage all of your resources
against the constraint and you want to
build compounding vehicles for long-term
success. So
and then we're going to do AI stuff. All
right.
So we have all these different things.
We find our constraint.
We then want to apply leverage
to our constraint. See if we can hit it
from a bunch of different angles. And if
we succeed at this, we create a
compounding vehicle.
Because fundamentally you want to have a
way
where you put effort
plus money plus brand all of your
inputs, right? You want to put all the
stuff you've got into your machine
into your black box. And you want this
thing
to self-compound.
And so this is the flywheel. So if
you're a brick-and-mortar business, it's
like you eventually just want to get to
the point where once you fill up a store
or a shop, you don't need to spend money
on marketing again because that shop
stays at full capacity and then the only
lever you have there is pricing. You
just keep jacking price and you stay
there and then you open up another
location and you repeat it and you do it
again. Um, if you have a a brokerage or
something that's like sales driven, it's
like the whole point is you're going to
have to get into a business that you can
continue to recruit, onboard train,
recruit, onboard, train, and then
consistently activate new sales reps.
And then as long as those sales reps are
uh produce, you just keep stacking year
over year over year, right? Um, you need
to have some sort of compounding in the
business. Otherwise, you will run into
an issue where you're just kind of
flooding people in and they're just
falling out the back door. And then you
think the solution is I just need to
sell more people. But then your margins
are going to continue to compress. So
you want to learn enough marketing and
sales to get going and then you focus
all of your effort on making sure people
never leave and you have to stay there.
And sometimes it takes years to solve
that one problem. But once you solve
that problem, your business will grow by
default. And then you could keep the
same level of sales kind of like company
A and company B and you'd want to be
company B because that's the one that
just keeps growing no matter what
because even if you sell the same amount
or even if you don't sell, you still
make money. All right. So, with that
being said,
I'm going to call up a handful of the uh
the scale advisory folks who uh entered
their their data. Hopefully, you guys
can see my screen. If you guys haven't
done this already, like
do do it. If you haven't onboarded
yourself, uh we spent so much and we
still are spending a lot of time on
making this exceptional. Um, and so,
okay,
now your first time going through here,
you're going to have to take go through
the onboarding flow. All right. Now, the
onboarding flow, you're going to answer
these questions about your business. And
so, let's say
I'm actually going to call one up. So,
we're just going to do it right now. All
right. So, shoot, what was the code?
Okay, here we go.
Okay,
Kevin Gong, you're first up. Let's rock.
Let's put some speakers on this guy.
>> Yo, Kevin, what's up,
>> Alex? Oh my god. Hi.
>> What's up, man?
>> So, we're going to do this AI thing
together. All right.
>> Okay.
>> So, primary delivery type of your core
offer. Is it do it yourself, done with
you, or done for you? Where's your most
of your revenue coming from?
>> Um, most of it up until now has been
done with you. I just released a done
for you offer.
>> Let's just do done with you for now
then. Okay.
>> Okay.
>> Primary delivery mechanism for your core
offer is it software, information
services, or physical products?
>> It's a tech enabled service.
>> I'll say services. Okay. Um, primary
mode of advertising, warm outreach, cold
outreach, free content, or paid ads?
Currently, it's just organic. I had a
growth partner that I split up with two
months ago.
>> So, it's going to be free content. Okay.
Yes.
>> So, primary lead getter. Um, is it you
doing this stuff? Uh, yes. Okay.
>> Great. Uh, monetization mechanism. So,
for getting the majority of your
revenue, is it a continuity kind of
recurring payments, low ticket, high
volume, or high volume? It's it's
>> high ticket. High ticket recurring. It's
5K a year was my V1 offer.
>> Okay. I'll go high volume. Uh, sorry.
Low volume, high ticket. That's where
we're going to go. Okay.
>> Primary selling mechanism for your core
offer. Is it uh inerson salesperson,
online salesperson, online selfch
checkckout, or inerson selfch
checkckout?
>> Online salesperson. I'm the one taking
calls.
>> Online salesperson. Here we go.
>> How many employees do you have?
>> Just me.
>> All right. Easy. Uh, current tech
status.
>> Current tech status.
>> Yeah. So, do you run your business with
pen and paper? Do you have a mess of
spreadsheets? Do you use a CRM and maybe
a few tools? You have a full tech stack
or almost everything that can be
automated is automated.
>> Uh, Google Sheets Empire. I use GHL for
my CRM.
>> Um, yeah. So, I'll be either between
little or middle. I'll just keep it at
little. Okay. So, primary business
constraint
>> based on everything today. Yeah.
>> It's it's uh up between leads and cash
flow.
>> Okay. So, well, let's walk through this
together then. This will be fun. Okay,
before I finish this, let's let's just
let's walk through our our mossy six.
Okay, so it's gonna because the conrink
there can only be one. So,
>> why can't you get more lead? Like, why
can't you do more of what you're
currently doing?
>> Um, my lead flow was disrupted two
months ago when I split from my uh
growth partner who had 370K on IG. My
personal brand is very small. So about
1.5k followers on X and 7.4K on school,
but there's a very low engagement rate
in school. Okay.
>> But that's where most of my clients are
coming from right now is just from
upselling and ascending existing
clients.
>> Okay.
So you had a lead source that you lost.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. So you can't do more because you
don't have it anymore.
>> Correct.
>> Okay. Got it. So uh I don't think
metrics is an issue for you, right?
We're good there. We don't have to worry
about that. So, it's not metrics or I'll
just make that a checkbox. So, you've
got metrics and then market. I think
your market is plenty big enough. So, we
don't have a problem with that.
>> Yeah, it's a 60 trillion dollar tam.
>> Yeah, not worried about that. So, you
got metrics, we got market, then we got
model. I don't think there's any issues
with the model based on the goals that
you have. I mean, what are the goals you
have right now?
>> Um, I did 330 last 11 months. I want to
hit a million ARR.
>> Yeah, but this model can easily hit that
though, so I'm going to say yes.
>> Okay, great. So then we got money. So
we've got four options here within
money, which is we've got leads. You
can't afford them because you don't have
the leads aren't cheap enough. You've
got sales because you can't convert
them. We've got uh LTV and then we've
got cash flow. Okay. So uh I already
know that your issue is not going to be
cash flow because you sell a digital
thing and you get accelerated up front.
I'm guessing unless are you are they
getting charged up front or are they
charged over time?
Um I actually charge up front annual.
>> Yeah. Okay. So then cash flow is not
going to be the issue. All right. So
then
>> lumpy though it is lumpy.
>> That's because of uh insufficient
volume.
>> Uh not because it's inherently anything
wrong with the business. Okay. So you
just aren't selling enough of them.
That's why it's lumpy. Not because
there's anything like if you were
selling one a day it wouldn't be an
issue. So okay. So now we've got um do
you not have enough leads that are
coming in?
No, I basically have um not been doing
any lead generation the past two months
because I've been building out my done
for you offer with this higher uh LTGP.
>> Okay.
>> Well, okay. So, leads though. So, how
are you going to get leads right now?
>> Um right now it's just from ascending
existing customers and I raised my
prices by 4x recently. sale.
>> So, but you have a you have a leads list
that you're just going to hit
fundamentally and then after that you're
then you're I mean this is a one-time
shot. You're going to collect some cash,
but then after that you're going to be
at zero again.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> So, that's fine. Go do that. Extract
value. But then I think you're still
just going to have to do really more.
But it's just you haven't really you're
in a weird position where you like had
something and then now it's a zero,
which is not common, but that's fine.
So, either you're gonna have to run ads,
we're gonna have to make content,
or you're gonna have to do outreach. Um,
I'm gonna bet right now that you're
going to want to start being far more
aggressive on content as your primary
strategy.
>> I agree.
>> Okay. So, I would, if I'm you, I would
go hardcore marketing machine, branding,
and hooks as the three playbooks that
I'd be like pouring myself into. And
obviously you want to do VSSL with
proof, follow the closing and lead
nurture stuff. That's just because it's
going to that'll just like you'll just
juice more out of it. But the front of
the funnel is for sure the issue. And so
I'd be asking myself, how can I make
what? So you're on X and what?
Instagram.
>> Uh X is my biggest following with 1.5K
followers. I do have a 7.4K school
community, but engagement rate is only
5%.
>> Inside of your group?
>> Inside of my school group. That's cuz
you mined all of the people who were
good into your paid group.
>> Yeah, that the group was passed on to me
after
>> it's just you just inherited a dead
group. That's okay. Um anyways, so I'm
glad you have some people there. I would
just go outreach from that perspective
for for those people. That's like day
one is outreach. Mind the rest of you
can so you can stack some cash. Then I
would say concurrently I'm asking myself
how can I do but how can I make two
three pieces of content a day that I can
repurpose across IG Tik Tok X like we
want to get this whole machine going and
I would do probably the CTA the um the
CTA plus manyhat as the the play so that
you can direct everyone towards
Instagram run a DM funnel to a phone
sale with a VSSL and then sell them in
>> so pivot from X to IG, right? Because my
IG is very small audience.
>> If you want to go to X, that's fine. I
just think more people will be it's just
more common for people to have
Instagram.
>> Sure.
>> If you want, you can have a DMR on both.
Like it's not the end of the world. I
just prefer to have one front door. So,
that's more of an operational issue. If
you can manage it, there's definitely a
bunch of um combined inbox softwares
that exist that can just pull all your
uh inboxes into one place between
different platforms.
>> Okay. And what uh would you just focus
on making content on IG only if I were
to make that switch?
>> No, I would keep No, I would keep making
it on X. Like I want you to make as much
content as humanly possible because the
nature of the sale you have requires a
lot of trust,
>> right?
>> Anything investing related is going to
require a lot of trust. And so I would I
would be trying to put as much content
out as I possibly could.
>> Yeah. Because I know you said one
channel, one avatar, and so one million.
>> Yeah, I know. I just you want thing is
is that you have like the infrastructure
of a business that had a much bigger
audience that then just disappeared. And
so I want you to play catchup right now.
>> Okay. Got it. Got it. Got it. So just
make as much content as humanly
possible. Point it all at one front door
which is IG any chat integration. And
then would you how would you integrate
school into that? Because I
>> well your delivery is going to be on
school.
>> My deliveries on school. Got it. Okay.
>> Easy.
>> Done.
Love this for us.
All right. Well, leads was the
constraint of the business.
>> Yes. leads is the Yeah, leads is clearly
the constraint.
>> Okay. Well, appreciate you, Kevin. I'm
gonna call the the next one up. All
right.
>> Can I Can I just say one thing, Alex?
>> Only if it's really nice.
>> Before it's really nice. Before Money
Models launch, I the only thing I bought
from you was a 50 cent Kindle, which is
$100 million offer Kindle. And at this
money model launch, I I bought every
single upsell, spent like 24.5K.
uh got the act uh handbooks for closer
ad handbooks ACQAI the school community
and this is I will tell you um a weekend
this is the best money I've ever spent
in my life
>> the school group is incredible the the
network um the advice from not just ACQ
team obviously but like there's seven
and nine figure business owners in there
so just so much game being dropped daily
um so yeah worth investment for the
first six weeks and it it's for six
months so I'm just blown I'm blown way.
>> Thanks, man. I appreciate it.
>> All right. Thank you, Alex.
>> You bet, man. All right. See you.
>> Have a good one. Bye.
>> That wasn't planned. Um,
um, okay. Hold on. 100.
All right. Next up, hopefully this is
cool. Like actually seeing the models,
get a walkthrough in real time because I
want the the output I want from everyone
here is that you're very clear on what
your specific constraint was. So, we had
to figure out what his constraint was
and I didn't even get to to use the AI
because we just had to walk through it.
But, um, okay, let's go. Ivan Ivan
Bunan. Ivan Boon.
Pareto talent.
>> Ivan,
>> hello.
>> Talk to me. Pareto talent.
Hey, uh first of all, thank you so much
for having me and thank you so much for
creating such a great offer. It's
amazing to be a part of
>> I'm happy to help. So tell me about the
core offer. Is it uh done with you, do
it yourself, done for you? What which is
it?
>> So it's done for you. We are finding
training and managing executive
assistants from Latin for entrepreneurs
from the US. Got it. And have the full
package for them.
>> So your services, how do you get uh how
do you get customers?
Right now it's 100% referrals like we
have organic traffic. My partner Kasm
has yeah Facebook following of 20,000
and we also launch.
>> Okay. So content.
>> Yeah. Content. We'll put that out. Okay.
And then primary lead getter. Is it you
guys then?
>> Um once again
>> I'm going to say it's it's you and your
employees that are the ones getting
getting these leads after you make the
content. Correct.
>> Yes. Yes. Okay. So we don't we don't
have any agencies here. And then I'm
going to say you guys are high ticket
because it's a
>> Yeah. So we start at 2,000 a month.
>> Yep. That's high ticket. Okay. Uh
primary selling mechanism online call
plus salesperson.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Got that. Uh how many employees
you just have do you have?
>> Uh seven and two co-ounders.
>> Okay. I'm going to say a few here. There
we go. Um and then uh current tech
status. What's uh what's your tech stack
look like?
>> Um I think we're pretty robust.
>> Pretty robust. So, I'm going to say hi.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. And then what's the what's the
thing that's stopping you from growing
the business right now?
>> Uh, I think we hit the limit on our
referrals and scaling businesses in this
way. So, we're looking to open up for
lead generation.
>> All right. So, I'm going to say your
core offer is we recruit executive uh
assistants
offshore
or nearshore or whatever for CEOs. Is
that correct?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. So, we're saving these changes.
Fantastic. Um, I have a leads
constraint. I
am uh I have 20K followers.
We are getting referrals as our primary
way of getting customers.
How can I
where should I say this? Where
should
I focus to get more leads?
Okay. So, we're going to let the AI do
its do its thinking. Um, in the
meantime,
>> yeah,
>> right now you have your content from
your partner that's doing 20K, right?
>> Yep.
>> Okay. And you are getting some leads
from that.
>> Yeah. So, majority of the leads like we
are in a lot of different communities,
masterminds, entrepreneurs, and so on.
This is where a lot of our leads right
now.
>> Okay. So, you just join mastermind so
that they can go get leads. That's
funny. Um, don't be fishing in my pond,
man. Um,
>> I'm providing the most money I can I
think I generated like 50 apps last week
for all the
>> post. No, I appreciate it. So, by the
way, if everybody who's watching, one of
the like I said, one of the big things
that I try and do to like start any kind
of community is I I hate one of my big
one big pet peeves is when it just
becomes like this this stream of just
asks. And so, I try to flip that and say
like if everyone gives, then everyone
will end up getting all the questions
answered. about the whole community to
be awesome. Um, and maybe anybody who's
listening to this who's in there can can
vouch for that in terms of how the how
the community is structured. Um, but if
everyone gives their best thing to the
community, the community just like
really profits. And so I appreciate you
building 50 apps for all these people.
Um, that being said, we need you to get
uh more leads. So, and good. So, right
now the AI just said to fix leads fast,
I need to know where your constraint
really is. And believe where are the
20,000 followers? So, that's going to be
Facebook.
>> Facebook,
>> right?
Facebook average client value is what?
>> Um, so if you're looking into the LTV,
it's uh 21,000
>> 21K. So I'll go one, Facebook two. And
so everybody who's following along with
this, like anybody who's used the AI,
it's savage. I mean, like if you were to
ask me, I'm half talking to you, you
have talking to everybody else, just
FYI. Um, if if you were to ask me, "Hey,
Alex, what should I do to grow my
business?" My answer is not going to be
this is what you should do to grow your
business. I'm going to have like nine
other questions. So, we program the AI
to model the same question uh framework.
And you can probably look at this versus
like a GPT or something like that. This
isn't designed to be like a uh like a
wrapper. Um we built this tool and we're
continuing to reinvest in this tool
because we're using this internally. So,
this is our internal tool that you guys
got access to um so that we can
basically consult with businesses. And
so, it follows the same logic path,
logic tree to to determine basically the
the the best answer. All right. So, 21K
is the uh average client value. Um, and
what's your close rates right now?
>> Um, approximately 70%.
>> Oo, we have a we have we have some
pricing power there. Okay. Uh, weekly
capacity, how many new clients can you
onboard without breaking?
>> Um, 10.
>> 10. And what's your current flow?
>> Uh, right now we are pretty low about
six per month. So, it depends. Okay. So,
you have you have 5x the capacity right
now. Okay. Ideal buyer
>> um founders that make 20,000 per month
plus and want to save their time.
>> Okay. Founders over 20k per month. Got
it. And then do you have an uh a basic
referral program?
>> Yeah, we are paying out $1,000 for any
referrals that have been sent to us.
>> $1,000 referral program. Okay, great.
So, um, one time, boom.
So, we're, uh, we're we're letting the
letting the AI do its let let Alex AI or
ACQAI do its do its thing. Um, let's see
if we match. We probably will, but
there's also, as a reminder, everybody,
there's many ways up the mountain. So,
if I'm trying to grow the business, I'm
Why can't we just do a lot more of the
follower stuff and then on Facebook and
have
CTAs there like how why not do that what
stops us from doing that
>> so we are actively posting and actively
growing that but I started also my
LinkedIn and we started this YouTube
channel but we are just not getting the
all the result that we're looking for so
we started Facebook ads we started call
outreach as well
>> and looking to test different avenues
and to save time spending money
>> yeah I would rather you because the
thing is is when you when you try that
many it's hard to get good you what I
mean at any of them because all of them
work, right? Like you could do outbound,
it would work. You could do uh I think
that I think making LinkedIn content
like I think if you just stuck with
content since that is the primary way
that you've done it, I'm okay with you
making more uh types of content if
you've like maxed out Facebook as in
like you're posting three four times a
day or how many times a day you're f
posting on Facebook? Uh
>> so about that. So custom post about um I
would say four times a day.
So yeah.
>> Okay. So you're maxed out on Facebook,
right?
Like I would say pretty much and
Facebook algorithm is doing weird stuff
recently. We only showed it to like 5%
of your audience actually
>> heard. Okay, let's see what the AI says.
So uh the move 7-day capacity drop to
your room audience. So you don't have a
lead problem. You have an an action
problem with 70% close rate on 20,000
Facebook follows. You can uh fill your
calendar quickly. So uh capacity drop to
room audience will be rule of 100. Um
limited spots with a clear CTA. Book
calls now. So, basically, you would be
DMing, like if you wanted to rip, which
this totally would. Um, if you wanted to
rip through the 20k followers, one is
you can DM them. Um, and from a drop
perspective, it's like this is what you
could do this week, like 10 priority EA
assignments, um, first come, first
serve, like we already have these
killers comment EA. So, that's a mini
chat um, integration that you can do.
And then you can do a wait list once
you're sold out. After you do that, then
you can do a DM sprint. I would also
weigh in here and I'm just going to say,
"Hey, how would you structure a giveaway
for my audience with my offer?"
So, I would probably look at doing a
giveaway here and say like, "We just got
Bill Gates is not really, but like
whatever. We got we got an unbelievable
super high tier executive assistant.
We're going to do a giveaway where we're
going to um give this this human being
away. You're not in the human
trafficking business. Calm down."
um and uh to to one lucky, you know,
bootstrap founder. Um and so we're going
to cover her payroll for, you know, six
months or three months or whatever,
right? Um and I think that that would be
a pretty big W and then you'll get a ton
of people that will show interest in
that and then you can work that lead
list. Like if I had to go like fastest
money, um literally what it outlined is
probably a pretty good like place to
start, which is do a a banger offer, DM
everybody. You can also pair it with a
giveaway. Um, and I think that would be
quite sexy.
>> Yeah, that sounds amazing. Awesome. We
done something similar. So, we were
restructuring the pricing basically. So,
right now we are charging 2,000 per
month plus we also charge 3,000
placement fee and I was working with
your previous a bit more and it said
that this upfront placement fee might be
a problem. So, it recommended to move
forward to just increasing the price to
perhaps 3,500 a month and then removing
the placement fee. Yeah.
>> And the other that I recommend is to add
a two weeks trial like part time try the
CA before you actually test anything.
>> So I'm going to tweak it and the only
reason I'm going to tweak it is that you
have a 70% close rate which maybe it
didn't know the first time around. Um
but given the fact you have a 70% close
rate, you don't need to increase your
conversion rate
>> on the sale. So I'm super game for you
just charging $3,500 a month. What I
would do is I would rather take that
kind of trial concept and say I'm sure
you already do this, but just emphasize
it more that we'll replace we'll replace
the EA um as many times as needed uh
within the first 90 days.
>> We already do lifetime. So
>> you do lifetime. Jesus.
>> Yes.
>> Uh well then yeah, I mean like to me
then you don't need the trial like you
know what I mean? Like if we're
replacing them as many times as needed,
it's like we're going to keep doing this
job for you until it's done.
>> Yeah, definitely. Awesome. That makes
sense.
>> And I would just use this exact line
because I'll tell you how how to how how
I would close this. I would say after
you finish your like pitch or your spiel
or I would say, "And that means when you
pay this, you've solved your EA problem
for good.
>> So you never have to think about this
again because this is all we do
full-time. And if you ever have any
issues, we will replace them
>> and look at all these reviews to prove
that I know that I'm that I'm legit."
>> That's awesome. Amazing. Awesome. That's
yeah, we so once somebody gets an EA
from us, our average customer life is
like 220 days.
>> Okay.
>> You know, so they never leave. So that's
exactly what we're looking for for
someone to like step like get in a in a
door and actually try because I know
once they try.
>> And the tough part that you're going to
have is that once once someone develops
a really good rapport with an EA,
they'll just cut you out.
>> Um and so
>> we have by outfield, they can buy them
out.
>> Okay.
>> After 90 days,
>> it's just the enforcability um because
of international, you know what I mean?
Um, so are you US- based?
>> Uh, I'm based in Wisconsin, uh, but
moved from Ukraine a couple of years
ago. Okay.
>> Yeah. As unfortunate this is, as as as
you start scaling, you're going to have
to start enforcing that and making sure
that people don't screw you because EAS,
if you really nail it, they'll stay for
like 10, 20 years. So, it's a great, you
know, model for you. I would just make
sure because 220 days is like nine
months. And I would bet that there's
plenty of people who've done it, found
the right EA, and then just like go
around you and then just pay them.
Um, so far like we are we are at 56
customers until right now and so far
like I can see all that. But yeah, I
definitely agree because our scale to
scale it to to 300. Yeah. And then there
was no way for me to know all of that.
Yeah.
>> Well, rock and roll. Let's see what the
giveaway looked like. Let's see if it
matched mine. There we go. Look, it did.
The AI matched mine.
>> Thank you so much. I appreciate you a
lot.
>> You bet. The EA placement scholarship
giveaway. Grand prize. The thing you
sell. So, one full-time nearshore EA
placement package. You wave your
placement fee. Make the prize your core
offer. Assign the clear dollar value. So
it be like this is a $20,000 value or
whatever it is, right? Six months or
18,000. Um and then the promotional
offer is going to be a partial
scholarship which you can knock out $500
a month um or something like that, which
would be times six. So uh $3,000 as the
as the second place offer.
>> Got you. Yeah. Try this week.
>> All right. Rock and roll. Appreciate
you.
>> Awesome. Thank you so much.
>> All right. That's it. So hopefully you
guys as you're going through this like
we've trained this AI like I know I've
already seen a bunch um of you guys
saying this online and I the the scale
advisor group has a bunch of these like
the AI is really good. Um we have a so
what people don't know is like we have a
very large infrastructure for for
technology atacquisition.com because
it's very common for us to like look
into a business and we have to like do
things right and so we have a full tech
team um of developers and engineers who
work for us. So we do DevOps, which is
internal development that we do. So like
basically streamline our internal
operations, but we also have full like
like our head of engineer is ex head of
engineering from Upwork, you know what I
mean? Um like we have very good people.
Um
and so that's why this is a really legit
product. Um and so I wanted to make sure
that everyone absolutely loved it. Uh
and so that's why we did it. So let's do
another one. So I want hopefully is
hopefully is this is this cool for you
guys? I I want to show that this stuff
like walking through the constraints and
figuring out what the real constraint is
um follows a process um so that you can
do it for yourself. All right, we're
going to go. Joseph Pas um Alliance
Health Group phone number. Here we go.
>> Hello,
>> Joseph. What's up? You're you're going
to be uh I think you're going to be the
last one that I'm gonna I'm gonna do. Um
so give me your give me give me the
rundown for the business. All right. So
talk to me. Business is it B? Alliance
Health Group. Okay.
>> Yep. We just it's a health insurance
call center. So we sell health insurance
people who call in. Yeah.
>> Uh mostly from inbound calls generated
from we have vendors and we also do our
own uh PPC as well. Okay. So, you have
vendors. Would you say is paid ads you
say your biggest or which one do you say
is your biggest?
>> Uh, for the most part it's like split.
I'd say 50/50 between vendors and paid
ads.
>> That's fine. I'll just do affiliates and
paid ads. All right. And would you say
this is a uh high volume low ticket or
low ticket or high volume?
>> I'd say mid mid and mid. It's about 300
300 bucks per uh per policy and it's
about you can do like 10 15 deals a day.
Oh, to me that's high volume. That's
high volume high ticket for sure. Um,
yeah. Yeah. So, like for me like Yeah, I
hear what you're saying. If you thought
low ticket was like sub 999, I'm like
I'm in the middle. Okay. Primary selling
mechanism is online call plus
salesperson, I'm guessing.
>> Yep.
>> Okay. How many employees do you have uh
right now?
>> Three reps.
>> Oh, okay. Uh total
>> a total. Yeah.
>> Okay. So, a few. Um, and then text
stack.
>> Uh, text stack. Uh, no, pretty much
Google Sheets.
>> Okay, work.
>> We have, uh, we have some like call
routing software and stuff like that,
but pretty much Google Sheets.
>> Okay, that works. I'm going to say CRM
and a few tools. Um, okay. Business
constraint right now. Can you just like
if you just had more leads, could you
sell them? Is that the
>> Yeah, 100%. That's that's the biggest
main conraint. I can dive in a little
deeper if you want.
>> Yeah. Yeah, go for And so the core offer
is is uh is it health insurance?
>> Yeah. Yeah. People would just call in
normally. So let's say like online, you
would probably type in like health
insurance. One of our ads would come up
and they would request a quote. We'd
reach out to them or they would call
inbound from the website or the call
extension ad online.
>> Okay, got it. What's um Shoot, I didn't
even do this for the other guys. I
forgot. Uh what's revenue right now?
>> Uh 750.
>> Okay.
Uh profit
>> uh 150. All right.
And then new customers per month.
>> Uh per month it's about 24
per week.
>> 200. Okay.
>> Yeah.
>> And then current headcount you said was
three. Okay. Save some changes. Boom. By
the way, everybody, whenever you're
talking to the AI, every time you want
to ask a new thing, start a new chat.
So, just like for everyone. Okay. Um All
right. So, let's let's scale the
business. So, what stops you from
spending more PPC? So like if we're
walking through our logic tree, what
stops us from doing more?
>> So on well I'll start with vendors. On
vendors they just don't have any more
volume to give. So there's nothing more
to buy on there. And on PPC
uh we can up the budgets but uh when we
scale past a certain point and even as
of right now it's just not profitable.
>> Yeah. Heard. So um couple things. Are
you only licensed to sell one type of
insurance?
Uh yeah, just health insurance.
>> Okay. Are there other products that you
could sell that are insurance products
that could increase the average cart?
>> Uh yes, but they're already attached.
>> So,
stuff like that.
>> Okay.
>> Well, so I'm gonna I'm gonna go back to
the first thing you said, which is like
the vendors that you have don't have any
more lead volume. There's for sure other
vendors that have other leads. Sure.
Yeah.
>> Right. Well, I mean, I'm just like
thinking volume. It's like there are
other health insurance providers and
they also go to vendors who get them
leads. So, like I'm sure that exists.
Um, and so I would probably if I'm you,
um, you would have to have a conversion
issue. So, if we're like metrics I'm not
worried about, market I'm not worried
about, model I'm not worried about
because all that stuff is more or less
controlled. Insurance is a good is a
good vehicle. There's plenty of people
need health insurance and you have
metrics. Fine. All that stuff's there.
So I actually think that your issue is
going to be on sales and LTV. So
conversion and lifetime value. So I
would be focused on the conversion part
because if you have ads in PPC like
you're getting clicks but it's like can
we get cheaper clicks number one with
better headlines and can we get higher
conversions on our landing pages through
just conversion optimization. So, do you
have um anything like Hot Jar or Mouse
Flow or anything like that that's um
installed on the page so you can
actually watch people do it? Uh actually
use your page and you can see where
they're where they're falling off.
>> Yeah, I have a clarity.
>> Okay. So, how often are you running
conversion rate tests and what is the
actual opt-in offer?
>> Um I check clarity daily and I see where
they're clicking.
>> Yeah. But, you know, from our click to
call rate, so let's say it's about it's
it's 25%. So, from the people who see
our ad, um, it's about 25%.
>> Okay, that's pretty good. Um, so then my
So, what percentage of people are you
closing?
>> Uh, so of total calls, it's about we
have a 7% and then of qualified calls,
it's about 25%.
>> Okay. I mean, I'm not gonna beat you up
on that. You know, 25's okay. You know
what I mean? It's not like bad. It's not
good. It's just like fine. Um, the thing
is is like I feel like so again, if I'm
if I'm going back, I would do number
one, I'd be reaching out to way more
vendors, number one. But the big issue
that I see is the LTV problem.
>> So, it's like we have to sell more
products to make this thing more
profitable.
>> Okay. said differently, is there? Yeah.
Said differently, is there, if you look
at your customer base, there's obviously
some customers that are worth more than
others. Correct?
>> Yeah.
>> So, I would be thinking Yeah. I would be
thinking, is there a way that I can add
friction or tweak my targeting so that I
can better target the customers that
have the highest lifetime value? Because
basically, you have an issue of cact,
right? And I would bet also you have
some elements of cash flow because you
don't, you know, the premiums get paid
sometimes in a rears, whatever, right?
Um, what percentage are you getting paid
up front with these uh these deals from
your carrier?
>> Uh, well, they're actually they're
advanced. So upfront on a 320 that pays
out 819.
>> Okay.
>> And then on the back end, that's an
LTGP. Yeah. Uh, that 819. And then the
back end is also 975.
So you're making 1,700ish in total,
right?
>> Uh yeah, about
>> Okay. In gross profit
>> in gross profit off of
>> So fundamentally it's like we need
cheaper leads or we have to make more
from them. And if you have fixed costs
like basically you can't tweak the price
because that's what the carrier that's
the price, right?
>> Yes.
>> Um so it means that we have to sell more
expensive packages. thing A, option A,
option B is, which is paired with option
A is that you're doing that to a better
avatar. Um, or C, we just have to get
more cheap leads, which again, the
conversion rate stuff, I'm not like,
you're not bad there. Your sales r's
okay. The conversion rate from click to
phone call is pretty decent. So, like
I'm not as concerned there. So, I'm
thinking I'm going to go to more
vendors. That would be like objective
number one would be go to like 20 times
100 times the vendors you currently are
and see if you can get leads at the
price that you need them to be at.
That's like thing one. How are those
leads compared to the ones that you're
buying off PPC?
Uh, so there's one source out there who
has uh good leads and you know they make
you go to their carrier and have their
contracts and they're good ones but
everyone else besides that and I've
tried some I haven't tried all but I've
tried some of them they aren't uh nearly
as good and then just that and PPC is
what's really supplying the volume. So
what I would look at is how they're
qualifying their leads because obviously
they have good quality leads. And so I
would look at their actual click journey
and say, okay, what are the ads they're
running? What are the pages they're
doing? How are they nurturing the leads?
Like are they doing driving them to a
webinar and that's how they enrich the
leads and then they do a call to action
um to get people take the next step?
Like what's their process? And I would
look at mimicking that process for my
PBC because right now you're competing
against everybody else who's doing just
basic PPC campaigns. And so you're
priced at close to market rate because
the pricing is commoditized within
insurance. And so it's like you have to
find better raw material that's likely
like raw diamonds versus diamonds. So
it's like to do the raw diamonds, it's
like you might have to cast a broader
net to shittier leads and then enrich
them through a nurture or sales process.
>> That's like if I'm you, if we can't like
I I'm taking I put a big asterisk on
this. Like if we can't increase LTB,
which I still am like I don't have time
to go through it now. Um but like that
would be like thing one because if you
could just like spend more on PPC, then
I'd be like let's do that. That's for
sure the easiest path. And if we could
do that by increasing uh either the
person that we're selling to or the
average package, that makes the most
sense. The second most sense is okay,
can we juice our PBC in a different way
by wide like way more broadening uh the
market that we're going after? Um
and then having an enrichment process.
>> So would you recommend that second round
just to make everybody, you know, come
in and then we'll qualify you from
there?
>> I would because I mean again it's like
you're capped right now is what it
sounds like, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Right. Right? And so it's like we have
to do something and the worst case
scenario kind of like the reversible
decisions like you can always roll it
back,
>> right? You can always go back to what
you're doing. Worst case scenario.
>> Um but we have to break some stuff. You
know, we have to break some eggs. We
want to make an omelet. So um thing one
though is I'll bet you there are other
good vendors. That's like thing one.
Thing two is I really want to dive into
the LTV thing because that would be the
lowest risk we have to make. Thing three
is I want to reverse engineer the best
guys funnel.
Okay,
>> those would be those would be my angles
of attack.
>> Gotcha. And for LTVI, I don't want to
get too deep into it, but
>> like what are a couple things that
you've seen that you know other people
have done in this space?
>> It's really just comes down to going up
market for Avatar so that you can sell
more expensive health health insurance
products because like the you know the
thing with insurance is that the the
limit does not exist. You know what I
mean? like you can go
>> zillions of dollars. And so right now,
>> and this don't take this as a slight,
like you're kind of bottom feeding in
terms of the, you know, the the packages
that you're selling. You know, you're
selling $300 price points. Like it's
not, you know, the most qualified. I
mean, it's it's like people with pulse
is the is the qualification, right? So
for sure there's a much higher echelon
even general consumer that you'd be
looking at selling you know 2,000 5,000
you know dollar type deals which are for
like my life insurance mine's egregious
so I just leave it there.
>> Yeah.
>> Hate to cut you off there. I'm sorry I
didn't make that clear but it's 300 a
month.
>> Okay. 300 a month so a little better.
Yeah. Yeah.
>> Um
>> but it's still like
>> you know it's I'm shrugging. You know
what I mean? It's like I understand some
people buy like thousands and that or
millions.
>> What's the ultimate? Great.
>> Yeah. Right. Yeah. I I Yeah. I put it a
gazillion dollars a year into mine. Um
uh but okay. So those are the big three.
That's what I'd be focused on
>> in terms of points of constraint.
>> Vendors. Uh get the other guys PPC.
>> Yep. And then I would still just like
bang my head against the wall to try and
figure out reverse engineer of the
customers that I sell. Is there is there
a package that is bigger and more
expensive than the one that I currently
am that I can sell instead?
>> Well, okay. So, let's say like there was
a package there. There's let's say
there's a $1,000 a month package,
>> but we sell the 325 because that's what
people can afford.
>> Yeah.
>> And then when they can't afford the
thousand, we sell them a thousand.
>> Yes. So, the issue is that we just need
the messaging to match. So, kind of like
the example I gave earlier where it's
like maybe your lead cost doubles, but
your LTV 5xes.
>> Yeah.
>> And the thing is is usually that's where
everyone's afraid to go. And that's why
most people don't get there.
>> So, like the other other agents or
brokerages in the space are afraid to
spend that kind of money on a lead. But
if you just have the qualifications,
that's how you can skim off the top. And
the upside is usually significantly
larger than the incremental cost
increase. Like you'll still have an
increase in lead cost, don't get me
wrong, but it's just like I will spend
two times as much for the lead or three
times as much for the lead, but they
will be worth 10 times as much.
>> Yeah. So go after the the the bigger
>> Yeah.
>> the bigger price point market.
>> Yes.
>> Yes.
>> 100%. And when I was reading the book, I
read the the playbook earlier, I just
saw a price increase. I was like, this
is probably the best way to go.
>> Yeah. So, the lost chapters, uh, your
first avatar is what I use the process
in that chapter to reverse engineer
which customer segment is probably worth
the most to you. And then I would
reverse that into the messaging and the
headlines. Um, and maybe even a lead
magnet if I have to to get way cheaper
leads. Um, that would get that would
attract that level like executive health
insurance, right? Or professional
health, you know, I mean, I'd be looking
at those types of terms. Yeah.
>> Uh, to get higher higher quality leads.
Cool.
>> 100%. This is great. Yeah.
>> Okay. Appreciate you, man.
>> Awesome.
>> Talk to you. See you.
>> So, um, we were at we were at 2:30. I
know that, uh, I tried I I told my team,
they're like, "How long do you think you
go?" I was like, "I think it'll be four
hours." So, it's a little longer than
that. Um, but I, uh, I'll I'll wrap us
up. Hopefully, you guys enjoyed this um
this this workshop. The whole point here
was that I wanted to make sure that as
many of you got the answers that you
needed, you got to see the AI tool in
action. Um I strongly would encourage
you to use the tool. We we're continuing
to invest um time and effort into
continuing to improve it. U ours has an
entire context layer. So um if you are
going to ask questions because this was
one of the things that came up. If you
have questions about like multiple
businesses, make sure to change out that
little personalized tab because that's a
context layer that basically uh is a
filter through which all of the answers
are given through. Um, which is why I
like RAI the most because like I want to
I don't want to always keep having to
upload stuff um in order to get the
answers that I need. Um, but beyond
that, uh, I think I'll I'll I'll state
this, um, one more time
because we have whatever 20 21 hours or
20 hours left or something like that.
Um, but, uh, we're doing direct access
to me. Um,
plus the director team, which we've got
my head of sales, two heads of
marketing, um, two strategy, business
offer people, we have wealth, uh, we
have recruiting, uh, and then little old
me is there, um, as well to help answer
the questions that you guys have. Um,
and so you guys have six months of that
inside of a school group,
which if you're like, man, I really
would like more of this, um, then or I
have more questions or whatever, like go
there. Um, on top of that, we have the
six workshops that we're gonna do. So,
we've got the leads workshops where
we're going to dive into a lot more
detail tactically just because hopefully
like you guys are like talk slower. Like
I'm trying to talk as fast as I can as I
want to cover as much stuff as I
possibly can. Um, but this whole whole
workshop was designed to do one thing
which is did you get the constraint? Did
we use the most leverage by collecting
the correct playbook? And do you
understand how to use the tools like the
AI in order to personalize the
responses? And hopefully you feel like I
I delivered on that today. Obviously,
there's a ton more that's like cover
business in four hours, right? Um we've
got the sales workshop. We've got the uh
LTV workshop. We've got the uh we've got
the profit workshop.
We have uh people ops and AI. So, those
you have like recruiting issues,
management, leadership issues because
you're you're having difficulty scaling.
Um and then we have wealth uh with
Sherrod. And so, uh we'll show you all
the tax strategies that we're using um
that work within a service-based
business. uh if you have a you know
significant business you heard Kevin at
the beginning there's really awesome
businesses in there um there all we also
have a map so you can actually place
yourself on the map which I think is
really sweet and so uh you can get all
this stuff at scaleacq.com
um because otherwise uh this is our our
last live workshop um I appreciate you
guys you guys rock um I'm super grateful
um for you guys donating the books it
means the world to me um it really
because I hope hopefully believe that.
Um
I would say measure how much it means to
me by the work that I did to put this
together. It's probably the easiest way
that I can say it. Um we always really
want to overd deliver. We really want to
blow you guys away. It's hard to it's
hard to explain what like doing two
years of those types of consultations
that I just did over the phone over the
last like 30 or 40 minutes. Um, I did
that for the last two years to train
this one AI so I could help as many
businesses as possible um as an
incentive to get people to donate as
many books as I can uh as they could so
that like I really do mean what I say
what I really would like to get the
books in the hands of every entrepreneur
in America and it's just because like
books is what changed my life. Um I read
every book that I possibly could get my
hands on and like that's that's that's
what like that's what changed my life
and so I just want to say thank you to
you guys. Um, if you want to party with
us for six more months, um, let's see if
I have the thing up here. Maybe I'll go
back one. There you go. Um, it's not 15
minutes, but that's the that's the
stuff. Um, you guys can go there,
scale.acq.com. If not, totally cool.
Like, really, I really mean that.
Totally fine. Um, but if you're like, I
have questions that I really wish I
could work with them for a little
longer. Um, then that's what we made it
for. And so, I think it's it's 3,000
bucks today and then I think it's five
installments after that. sets 15,000
after that. Um, and uh, one of the
reasons I structured it that way also is
that like I don't like things to go on
forever. So, this isn't like a forever
membership. It's a six months set you up
for, you know, Q1 crush 2026. And the
idea is if we can install
because these parts, leads and sales are
additive. So, as long as you don't have
a supply constraint, if you just get
more leads, you make more. If you
convert more of those leads, you make
more. If you make more per customer, you
make more. If you improve your cash flow
position, you make more, right? All of
these things, like installing even
portions of each of these things into
the business can make a huge material
change. Um, and then if you have
questions along the way, that's why we
put the people who actually like
collaborated with me to put these
playbooks together uh in the group. And
so um you can go to scale.acq.com.
Appreciate you guys. It's been my
absolute honor um serving you. I think
we'll leave this up. I guess we don't
have to leave it up. I just You guys
know what the link is. You guys know
what the link is. Um, you guys are
amazing. Thank you again. And um, let me
leave I'll read my last slide.
See what my last slide is.
I already did the VSSL framework. Okay.
No, this was my last slide. Here we go.
Final reminders. So,
strategy is dictated by how you choose
to allocate resources. Your time, your
money, your effort are the raw resources
that you have. putting them towards
the thing that is going to get you the
highest return
[Applause]
[Applause]
and I shouldn't write so much. It's like
write write faster talk slower or
something like that. Um, and if you're
unsure of which
which constraint you have, just walk
through the same process of like, can I
do more? Do I have the data? Does the
market work?
Will this model get me to where I am?
If I can't afford it, is because my
leads are too expensive, which means I
need better marketing or more marketing.
Is it because we're not converting
enough people, which is going to be all
the sales system? is because we need to
increase LTV per customer because we
need to make them worth more or we need
to accelerate profit in the business
which is what the whole pricing
playbooks are for. Once you solve that
then you have the manpower issues and
you repeat this entire process from top
down
as it relates to manpower. And so
hopefully this framework um this has
served me really well. This is how we've
been able to debottle neck so many
businesses um and just get ruthless
about this. Now kind of like the
insurance one that I did at the end
there. Sometimes it just requires more
work, right? Like I would like if I were
doing a true consultation rather than
like a quick, you know, 10-minute phone
call, it'd be like, "All right, let's
look at all the other LTVs across all
the other health categories. Is there
another way that we could sell different
products to the exact customer base? Is
there a different customer base that we
can attract via messaging and lead
magnets?" because I don't think I'll bet
you dollars to donuts that there's a
lead magnet issue there where we could
attract a much higher status customer
who's able to pay significantly more um
to make a bigger arbitrage there. Um and
so this is what I think about um as I'm
trying to like dissect and and and
debottleneck businesses. Um and
ultimately we want to build something
that compounds, right? That's that's the
whole goal. So whether that compounds
via reputation, via customers that never
leave, via sales network that continues
to sell for you, they keep recruiting
and activating. Uh where they have some
sort of network effect overall that
every person who gets added to the
network increases the value of the
network. Um all of those are things that
compound with time. And we want to have
something like that because otherwise
your cost to our customers will only go
one way, which is up. And so you have to
have an equal and opposing force like
your reputation, like your brand that
can bring it down over time as you
expand to colder and colder markets that
warms it up for you. So um appreciate
you all and oh uh all of the uh six
workshops these guys
all of these uh the group is just for
owners but you can bring um plus ones to
those. So I think it's actually like
pretty sweet. Uh so if you have teams
that are going to be implementing stuff
for like leads or you've got like sales
managers are going to do the sales stuff
or somebody who's in the service side or
customer success who's going to do
delivery, you can bring plus ones to
those. I keep the group just for owners
because I think it's keeps it higher
level and it's just better overall. So,
um, yeah, you guys, you guys rock. So,
thank you all. Uh, I think you have 20
whatever 21 hours. scale.acq.com
and, um,
let's scale.
Appreciate you guys.
I needed like a really elegant sign off.
Um,
send nice DMs.
Uh, when you use the stuff, let me know.
It actually like really fills me up. Um,
it's what really encourages me like I
get a huge boost of energy from um, like
anybody who's been a developer that I
know who's a friend of mine has said
this is like every developer just wants
one thing which is that their technology
gets used. And I would say that I I fall
in the same category of like I write
these books, I make this content because
I I just want it to get used. Um, and it
makes it feel like all the pain and
suffering that it took me to figure it
out is just like a little bit more worth
it. Um, and so please let me know. It
means the it means the world to me. So
rock and roll. Scale your businesses.
Save the world.
I'll see
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.