All language subtitles for Ancient Aliens S03E16 Aliens And The Creation Of Man

Highly advanced humans

living thousands of years ago...

unidentified DNA in
the human genome...

and ancient chronicles

describing heavenly
interventions on Earth.

Did humans really
evolve from apes?

Or is our intelligence the result
of an otherworldly design?

What are humans made of?

Why do we evolve the way
we do, grow the way we do,

think the way we do?

There's no
explanation for human beings.

They shouldn't be
here on this planet.

Science
and the world of history,

even in archeology, is still
scrambling around for answers.

We should
finally come to grips with the

idea that extraterrestrials had

something to do
with our development.

Millions of people
around the world believe we have

been visited in the past by
extraterrestrial beings.

What if it were true?

Did ancient aliens really
help to shape our history?

And if so, might evidence of
alien contact help to unlock the

mystery behind
the creation of man?

sync and corrections by Bellows
www.addic7ed.com

South Africa

25 miles northwest of Johannesburg
lie the Malapa Caves.

Here, in August of 2008,
paleoanthropologist Lee Berger

and his nine-year-old son
Mathew discover several

fossilized skeletal remains
of two-million-year-old early

humans, including a female adult
and male child, perhaps a

mother and son.

The size and shape of the bones
indicate that the individuals

walked upright and
had modern hands.

Over the past several decades,
scientists have unearthed the

remains of nearly two dozen
different types of early human

ancestors, all known as hominids.

We have an
extremely good fossil record

of ancient hominids.

and I think the picture
emerging from it is

pretty clear that in earlier days,
before Homo Sapiens came along

there were typically
many different kinds

our minds around this
now because of course

there is just one kind
of human on earth today

and there are 7 billion of it

but at one time within the last
few hundred thousand years,

you could find two or even
three species of hominids

living the same area
at the same time.

Most mainstream
scholars tell us hominids

evolved from an ape ancestor
nearly six million years ago

through what is referred
to as natural selection.

This theory of evolution was
first popularized by English

anthropologist Charles Darwin in

his 1859 book
On the Origin of Species.

Darwin's mechanism
of evolution was natural selection.

That is to say a long-term
process whereby

better-adapted individuals
reproduce more successfully.

Darwin's theory of evolution

by natural selection explained
that organism with certain traits

such as mutation

turned out to be
actually beneficial

turned out to be of advantage in
the struggle for reproduction

So mutation allow
organism to survive and

to pass on to the next
generation this mutation.

Darwin speculated that over
time, hominids walking

on two feet used their
hands to make tools.

This, in turn,
made them smarter.

Then, approximately 200,000 years
ago, hominids evolved into

Homo sapiens...
or modern man.

But many scholars dispute
Darwin's findings.

We don't see
dolphins building cars,

We don't see elephants
building houses.

That might sound trite, but it's
a fact that these animals just

simply haven't progressed and
advanced in the way we have.

And the big question is,
why is that?

Why should that happen?

Why should we be so unique?

Tool use doesn't
really come into play for

several million years after the
first earliest humans began to

walk upright.

And then brain size
doesn't really begin to

expand and really mushroom in
size until the last several

hundred thousand years.

So, actually six million years
of human evolution, there are

millions of years separating
each of those major features:

upright posture, tool
use, brain expansion.

So Darwin was wrong because he
couldn't possibly have known the

chronology in his day.

In 1967, British
zoologist Desmond Morris argued

against Darwin's theories
on evolution in his book

The Naked Ape.

In it, Morris wrote that there
was no reason why man stood

alone from other species
in terms of his nudity.

Well, of course,
as Homo sapiens we still

continue to have a coating of
hair, but that hair is very

much reduced over most of our
bodies, and that reduction

probably goes back way
beyond Homo sapiens in time.

It probably goes back to the
time when the very first early

bipedal hominids came out of
the forests in Africa into the

savannahs where they had more

sun and more thermal
radiation to cope with.

In places like Europe,
Northern Europe, why we

lost body hair is the
chicken and egg question.

Did we lose our body hair
because we began to wear

clothing to keep us warm or was
there some other factor at work

that caused us to
lose our body hair?

Perhaps women didn't find body
hair on men attractive, and so

it was lost because they didn't
choose those men as mates.

There's no way to ever
answer that question.

If we were to subscribe

100% to the idea of the
survival of the fittest

isn't it illogical to think
that all of a sudden

we're completely naked and
we're losing all of our fur?

I mean, that makes absolutely
no sense because right after we

shed our fur, we had to
wear furs to keep warm.

Had we not worn any furs, we
would have frozen to death,

we would have died.

So the whole idea that we shed
all of our hair in order to

survive because we were stronger,
logically makes no sense.

But if Darwin's
theory of natural selection

cannot account for the
appearance of intelligent

hairless Homo sapiens,
what can?

Might the transition of hominids
to modern human beings have been

the result of an otherworldly
design, as ancient astronaut

theorists believe?

Alfred Russel Wallace, a
colleague of Darwin, called it

the intelligence evolution.

Darwin believed
that the human brain had

been driven into existence by
natural selection, but Wallace

couldn't quite see how
this could be so.

What Wallace perceived was that
the way that humans think,

their intellectual faculties are
qualitatively different from

anything that had preceded them,
and he couldn't quite see how

this enormous gap could be
bridged by natural selection.

So he invoked another
explanation for the evolution,

the arrival of modern human
cognitive abilities.

His choice was a
spiritual explanation.

Alfred believed there was an unseen

creative spirit that was
behind all life on our planet.

And he believed that
this unseen creative spirit

had interceded three
times in this planet.

First was to create life
from inorganic matter.

And then the second time was

when animals achieved
some kind of consciousness.

And the third time was when
humans suddenly were able to

have the mental abilities
that we have today.

But he felt that it wasn't just

random selection like
Charles Darwin thought.

He believed that all of these
changes had a creative

intelligence behind it.

The view that I have
is that because the rest of

nature hasn't changed that much,
that arguably, we shouldn't.

So that suggests to me we're
seeing something potentially

that has gone against nature, and
if it's gone against nature,

maybe that means because somebody
has been manipulating nature.

There's no explanation
for human beings.

They shouldn't be
here on this planet.

If we were evolved and changed
by an extraterrestrial source

from our early primate ancestors

That's the only way, really,
you could've come

from the human species.

Unless you, of course,
put god into the equation.

Then, who knows who
the gods may have been.

Charles Darwin may be
crawling over in his grave right now

but it's very possible
that mankind came about

because of extraterrestrial
intervention.

Did the evolution
of modern humans

really received a jump start
by extraterrestrial beings,

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe

and if so, might there
be tangible evidence.

Some scientists believe
proof can be found,

inside the human brain.

Chicago, Illinois.

December 2004.

Researchers at the Howard
Hughes Medical lnstitute of the

University of Chicago publish
the results of a study that

claims the sophistication of the
human brain was the result of a

so-called special event.

They said mankind's intelligence
was not only the result of

evolution, and that around
50,000 years ago, the genes of

ancient humans went through an
intense amount of change in a

relatively short amount of time--

what some refer to as the
big bang of the brain.

No one really knows
how human beings developed so fast

in such a short period of time

They don't believe it
was done naturally.

It's very clear the fully
modern intellectual function

is a very recent acquisition
in our lineage.

It's not an improvement
of what was there before

it's a new kind of manipulation
of information and the mind.

There is no
other animal creature on the planet

that has such a comparative
point and that is why they call it

the big brain event.

People talk
about the missing link.

Where is between the link
between going from apes

monkeys, gorillas, ectetera,

to being out to develop atomic
weaponry and fly in space.

When we're looking
at the origins of man,

we've realised that 50,000 years
ago, we really went where

no creature has even gone before.

We have become human.

But what was the spark
that spored human intelligence

Was it a genetic mutation
brought about

by the natural selection
process of evolution

as many mainstream
scientists contend

or could've it been a
genetic modification

produced by
extraterrestrial beings

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?

There's also the idea
that there was a gene or genes

that popped up some
time in our ancestors

randomly, that might
have given the ability

to symbolically represent
objects in our environment

or the abstract, those are
things that for instance

chimpanzees have a great
deal of trouble with

even with the talk language

Homo Sapiens emerging from Africa
started to behave symbolically

They started to manipulate
information in their mind

in a way their predecessors
had never done before

They disassembled the world
around them into a vocabulary

of discrete symbols
and recombined them

so they could imagine
new kinds of worlds

Long long time ago,

extraterrestrials arrived
on this planet.

They realised that the
planet was full of life

and one of them was the
most advanced form

was one of our ancestors.

They took the DNA out

and they changed the
basic information in the DNA.

This is what our genetics
are doing every day.

Now, the cell was changed,
the product you plant into womb

of a female of the same species

This female will give birth to a child
approximately after 9 months

but because of this artificial
mutation, and that is the difference,

because it was made artificially
by the extraterrestrials.

What if as part
of the genetics updates

human beings were getting
from extraterrestrials

one of those genetic updates
involved a software download

biological download
to differentiate

the different hemispheres
of the brain

to allow human society, tool
making, fire, social organization

to be creative, and from that,
that particular species

of hominid became the
human being we are today.

If alien species out there could

fly across, interstellar space

then in all probability they
would have similar DNA

in common and technology.

Of course it would depend on
their own genetic composition

being similar to ours

but if they understood
sufficient chemistry

and physical principles
from their own experience

of their physical world model

then in all probability, manipulating
our DNA would be simple.

But if alien beings created
humans by genetically

altering our primitive ancestors,

might various versions
of hominids have been

the result of experiments at
creating intelligent life on Earth,

as ancient astronaut
theorists contend?

This is one of the greatest
unanswered questions.

The ancient records do not say

that we are part of a
social experiment.

The ancient records say that we
were bestowed upon this gift.

The gods gave us
the gift of intellect.

And it is for us to use it.

So yes, we might actually be
part of an experiment, but it

might be an experiment
in intelligence.

It might actually be a game,

a kind of the greatest reality TV
show, whereby the entire human

species is watched by ancient
aliens who have been watching

the show for maybe 50,000 years.

FOXP2 is a gene that was
found in our nucleotides

and it is something that
sets us completely apart

from any other animal

And scientists have suggested
that that gene alone

is responsible for language

And there is absolutely
no evidence of origin

where as this thing
somehow mutated

from the animal kingdom
towards us.

So this gene exists out of
nowhere without any origin.

So my question is, is it
possible that this gene was

given to us, or grafted into us,

by extraterrestrials
in the remote past?

And the answer is yes.

Was it the same non
human ancient aliens

so many ancient settlements
on this planet

deciding that they
wanted humans to be able

to communicate at a more
sophisticated level

I think that's the fundamental
angst today among people trying

to understand who are we in
relationship to extraterrestrials

that may have been
manipulating DNA

on this planet for
thousands of years.

Might the evidence of
our alien origins really have

been passed down to us
implanted in our genetic code,

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?

Perhaps further evidence can be
found, not by scientists, but

by religious scholars, that claim
Adam and Eve really did exist.

The Hebrew Bible.

In it, the Book of Genesis
describes how God created the

first two humans, Adam and Eve,
in the Garden of Eden and told

them to "go forth and multiply."

For centuries, scientists and
theologians have debated whether

this story of the Creation of Man
was mere myth or historical fact.

The Torah
mentions that humanity is made

out of the dust of the Earth,
and that God breathed life into

this to make us animated.

Here is the breath of soul,
the breath of vitality,

the divine breath that
suggests that with the spark

the life force that makes
a human body tick

it's divine in its nature

In 1987,
scholars disagreements

over the origin of man intensified

with the discovery that the genetic
lineage of every living person

could be traced back to a single
woman who once lived in Africa.

It's pretty well established by now

particularly from the
molecular, the DNA record

that homo sapiens did
originate at one place in Africa

and after having become fully modern
in the sense of intellectually modern

spread out to occupy Europe,
to occupy Eastern Asia

and the old world in general.

It is sometimes
called the Eve model

not meaning that we all descended
from the same woman

but it does mean that
there was a woman

in that early population
migrating out of Africa

who was the only female,
who ultimately left her genes

in every modern person.

But is it possible that
mainstream science

and the book of Genesis are
both pointing to the same

moment in ancient time when modern
man first appeared on Earth.

The myth of Adam and
Eve, I think, it's not a myth

I think it's a true story

I think Adam and Eve
were on this planet

they were the first human
beings that we know of

and they helped populate this planet

What is the Garden of Eden?

I think it just happened
to be the area

that the genetically manipulated
human beings, Adam and Eve,

were placed.

That's where they lived that's
where they started to breathe

and that's where the population's
planet started to grow

If Adam and Eve
actually had existed

as described in the Hebrew Bible,

might this also mean
that a serpent really did

tempt them to eat from
the tree of knowledge

and if so, might this account
have been an effort to describe

the sudden awakening of
the modern human mind,

when man first became
an intelligent being.

In the Bible says that if
you eat from this tree

you will be like god.

Satan in a form of a snake
tempted Adam and Eve

and promises them
that they will be like god

The knowledge that
Adam and Eve acquire

as well as humanity in general

gives man the ability to eventually
carry out genetic manipulations

So what was
this tree of knowledge?

Is the tree of knowledge
in fact a helical DNA sequencing

in our own bodies that
was genetically engineered

by extraterrestrials
50,000 years ago?

So that we would have the
abilities that we have today?

In my mind, it's our DNA itself
that is the Tree of Knowledge.

But why was this
suddenly a bad thing?

It would seem that the aliens...
some of them wanted us to have

this knowledge, to be like the
gods, but others said no, no.

Man is not to have all
of this knowledge.

This is also the same story of
the Greek god Prometheus, who,

against the orders of the other
gods, comes down to Earth and

gives mankind the
knowledge of fire.

But because of this gift to
mankind, he himself, as a god,

is, like Satan, he's
banished from the Earth.

And why?

Because he helped mankind to
have greater knowledge.

The whole idea
or concept of Satan

is based on a misunderstood
visit by extraterrestrials

in the remote past.

According to the ancient
astronaut theory,

the reason why we have
the idea of a Satan today

is because there might have
been some type of a mutiny

between good and bad

extraterrestrial factions
in the remote past.

And so the mutineers were cast
out by the commander and they

became known as
the evil fallen angels,

which they never were.

If as astronaut
theorists believe,

extraterrestrials were
responsible for providing humans

with intelligence, might they

have also given man
the ability to speak?

Our voice box, our larynx
is so different than the apes

even the chimpanzee who's
our closest cousin

that we are able to produce
sounds and produce language.

To a scientist today, that's almost like
it was genetically designed

so that we can
say words and sing

There really isn't anything more
advanced than the human language

So many different cultures, dialects,
languages around the world

and the very fact we can communicate
on such a deep extensive level

that really sets us apart
from all other animals.

Who invented language?
Where did that come from?

Was it something instilled in us?

I think there is a mystery to it,
that to a large degree science

and the world of history,
even archeology are still

scrambling around for answers

Maybe we shouldn't be looking
down here for answers

maybe we should
be looking up there.

We are told in the bible

that we are made into the image
of God What does that mean?

Does it mean that we were made
physically in somebody's image?

And so as for the question namely

whether we are
descendants from apes

or some other creatures
on this planet

or whether we have
been truly engineered

can be answered by mythology.

Mythology is able to say that we
are not descending from the ape,

but that something happened
on this Earth and an alien

intervention came and we
were the end result of this.

In my opinion

the extraterrestrials,
by an artificial mutation

they created the
intelligence of human

Then the extraterrestrial disappeared.

And some of our ancestors had
again sex with their ancestors,

with ape-like beings.

And that was called into
mythology, "original sin."

Then they return again, the gods,
they realized what happened...

and they decided to destroy the
whole race by a great flood,

and to restart the experiment

again with what we call
in mythology, Noah.

That's all text.

That's the way it is.

It would appear that
extraterrestrials came

here, used great apes, other
early hominids, created what

would be Neanderthal man, or
Homo erectus, somebody similar

to us, and then refined that
hominid until they came up with

Homo sapiens...
and then the other early

hominids were destroyed.

Might the biblical account
of Adam and Eve and

Noah's Ark really be the retelling
of extraterrestrial events,

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?

Perhaps further evidence can
be found in the archeological

remnants and eyewitness

accounts from man's earliest
known civilization.

Northern Iraq

Along the east bank of the
Tigris River, opposite the city

of Mosul, lie the ruins of
the ancient city of Nineveh,

a place originally inhabited
by the Sumerians of Mesopotamia.

Here, in 1842, British archaeologist
Austen Henry Layard

unearthed the ruins of
the great library of

Assurbanipal, a royal archive
containing thousands of clay

tablets with cuneiform inscriptions.

Dating to 3000 BC, the messages
carved into stone are considered

to be the world's first
written accounts.

Sumerian tablets are
probably one of the oldest

form of written record that we have.

They've been translated and
tell exciting stories about how

Gods intervene with human beings

and actually had a hand in
the creation of human beings.

Whether or not it's just
mythology, or if it's fact

no one really knows.

According to interpretations
of the sumerian tablets,

the gods were called
the Annunaki.

What we are looking at here,

is a sumerian tablet that
actually shows the tree of life.

linked by divine beings, you can
see here the Annunaki on each side

We also see the winged disc, a
symbolic reference that the

Anunnaki had the power of flight.

They actually had necklaces
with astronomical references--

a moon, a star, various symbols,
which even could be symbolized

as a wristwatch-- technology
being used 6,000 years ago.

The written accounts etched into stone

suggest the Annunaki were
giant beings, standing eight

feet tall, who came to Earth
in search of gold for

their home planet.

When the Sumerian gods,
the Anunnaki, realized the

toll it was taking to mine the
gold themselves, they decided

to fashion a worker being, a
slave to mine the gold for them.

And they explain in the Sumerian
creation tales that this was an

arduous process.

So it's very possible that our
genetic evolution was a process

done by the Anunnaki to
create us in their image and

after their likeness.

They created man according
to the sumerian texts.

They created Adam and Eve.

How interesting that the
Bible will echo the story

but talked about it in terms of God.

So much like these highly
advanced creatures

we're acting as teachers.

And certainly sumerian culture
and mythology is full of stories of,

you know, we're saving visitation
from these mysterious higher entities

that you know bestowed wisdom
and fantastic ideas and concepts.

And, you know, you have to
wonder-- is this just down to

myth, or was somebody coming

down and really trying to give
us a push, if you like?

Ancient chronicles of sky
beings creating human

life are common in early cultures
found all over the world.

But while mainstream scholars
often dismiss this evidence,

might such tangible historical
accounts provide proof of alien

intervention in man's evolution,

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?

The Sumerians are
not the only culture

that talks about this.

Also in the Koran, it says that

language was given to us by
Allah, or God.

The Maya Popol Vuh says that

language was given
to us by the gods.

The ancient Egyptian texts are
saying the exact same thing.

It doesn't matter what ancient
culture we look at, they all say

the same, that language
was a gift from the gods.

We should finally come
to grips with the idea

that extraterrestrials had something
to do with our development.

Prior to the use of
early systems of writing,

ancient people carved symbolic
communication into stone.

Called petroglyphs, the oldest

date to about 10,000 to
12,000 years ago.

According to ancient astronaut
theorists, petroglyphs located

in the American Southwest link
the prehistoric ancestors of the

Zuni and Hopi tribes
with star beings.

The first graphic expressions
by humans were petroglyphs.

That means symbols or figures
scratched into stone.

The Hopi Indians, for example,
scratched petroglyphs into their

rock faces that show people with
radiating wreaths, gods that

descend from the sky.

The Hopi Indians say that
these beings are Kachinas--

beings from space who came to
Earth in aircraft, who were not

gods, but who brought them
knowledge from another planet.

We have the same phenomenon
in Europe, in Valcamonica.

We have it in Asia.

We have it in Brazil.

When we look at the
fact that all around the world

we hear similar legends of
people from the stars coming

down and having a profound
impact on the people of this

country or that particular
culture, all embroiled in

similar time frames, you
know, we're seeing a pattern

developing, and it's difficult to dismiss
that that pattern is suggestive.

In our ancient past, creatures
came down, interacted with us,

and maybe manipulated us to
become the people we are today.

Why are so many past
civilizations all saying similar things?

I think the simple answer is,
is that the same thing happened

and they know the story.

And the story is that
extraterrestrials came to this

planet, genetically made and
manipulated whatever creatures

were here at the time, and
helped jump-start society.

The bottom line is every
civilization talks about

the existence of man through the
eyes of a god, and if you think

of the eyes of the god as
ETs, it all makes sense.

Back then, this was the
way they communicated events

that were significant to them.

And so when we have this imagery
of the so-called star people on

petroglyphs and things like that,

they're clearly chronicling
something real,

to my mind at least, that
occurred in their history.

The big question is, what?

But while the evidence
of contact between

alien beings and early humans is
compelling, what if life did not

begin here on Earth, but
arrived from somewhere else?

Huntsville, Alabama.

NASA's Marshall
Space Flight Center.

Here, in March of 2011,
astrobiologist Richard Hoover

reports the extraordinary news
that he found micro fossil

organisms-- or ancient
bacteria-- inside rare

meteorites that are more than
four billion years old, dating

back to the birth
of our solar system.

Until recently, scientists did
not believe life could survive

the rigors of space travel.

But Hoover's finding suggests that
live bacteria made it to Earth

and may have even taken root here.

Microorganism trapped
inside the comets

can survive the travel
through interplanetary space

and interstellar space.

And the reason is that the

microorganism are trapped
in the rocky core.

Around, you have a thick
shield of icy material.

And on top, you have a
stratification of dust.

Dust is highly effective in

shielding the microorganism
from ultraviolet light.

So comet are an excellent
vehicle to transport

microorganism, single-cell life,

amino acid in the
vastness of space.

Instead of aliens
coming to the earth in UFOs

in classic Hollywood terms

a microbial phase of life comes
to the earth in a meteorite

survives entering
our atmosphere

crashes on the planet
and begins to thrive.

The theory that life on
Earth began with alien

organisms landing here from

other parts of the
universe is controversial.

Called panspermia, one of the
most vocal proponents of this

theory was Sir Francis Crick,
a British scientist who

co-discovered DNA in 1953.

Francis Crick co-discovered

of the double helix himself.

Said that all this
can't happen by chance

that it has to have
been engineered.

One of his arguments is that the
rotation of the DNA is in the

same direction
for all living things.

Had DNA developed on Earth, it
would probably have had a 50-50

distribution, and that's exactly
what we don't have.

One of the reasons why I think

the theory of panspermia
is so incredible

is that it tells you that there
is life throughout the universe.

If panspermia is correct, life
came here on comets or meteorites,

and we're being seeded,
not only on this planet,

but other planets as well.

And it could be part
of the great design.

It is the intentional
deliberate colonization

of other planets, other worlds
by an intelligent race of beings

using not flying saucers landing
in the desert somewhere

or in the middle of the sea

but the best way
to colonize a planet

you colonize it with your own DNA
and let the DNA sprout

into your own species

In terms of our science
and technology today,

we have the ability to extract
cells and DNA at a genetic level

and save them.

That's how we have so-called
test tube babies for couples

who can't have babies.

We preserve the materials
for when they need it.

And the day may well come when
we send into outer space the

equivalent of, like, Noah's Ark,
but instead of sending literal

animals, we send their essence--
their DNA, their genetic makeup.

I don't rule out the idea that
we could seed a whole new world.

Today, scientists know
that only about five

percent of the DNA contained in

our genes is used to
reproduce human beings.

The remainder is an
undecipherable code, once

referred to as junk DNA.

But is it really possible that so
much of our DNA is unnecessary?

Or might the majority of our DNA

be decoded sometime in the future?

And when it is, what might our

DNA reveal about the
origin of modern man?

Just because
we cannot decipher

95% of our genetic material
doesn't necessarily mean

that that 95% is
in fact useless.

Nature is extremely efficient.

DNA is the most powerful storage
device in the universe.

Not even with all the
supercomputers combined in the

world could we store as much

information as we
could store on DNA.

So I'm suggesting that
the ultimate proof of

extraterrestrial life will not
be found in a crashed spaceship

or in a text, but it will be
found within our own genes.

We have so much to
learn from studying our own DNA.

We are only just now beginning
to decode the human DNA sequence

And as we do that, what
we may discover is that

extraterrestrial DNA is built
into our own genetics.

Whatever is out there
created the universe, this

planet, and other planets and life.

And I strongly believe that this
tie-in with whether gods and ETs

were one of the same might
very well be the case.

It does not take away from the
fact that there's a god, that

there's a higher power, that
there's some creation out there

that made the ETs, but I think
that layer between God and man

is right in the middle, and
that's extraterrestrials

from other planets.

We have to learn that most
of our knowledge in religion

is wrong, except one thing
there is creation

there is what we call god
in all respect

And we have to learn by religion
we are very teeny, little beings

in this gigantic universe and

why God is absolutely
inexpressible.

It's so gigantic.

It's so wonderful.

So we would never lose God when

we continue to think
of extraterrestrials.

God becomes bigger.

Is it really possible
that humans evolved

from bacteria growing in some
sort of primordial ooze?

Or were we intelligently
designed by a higher power--

of extraterrestrial origin--

as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?

Perhaps the answer lies within

the very essence of what
makes us, human.

And with this knowledge, we may

yet discover our rightful
place in the universe.

sync and corrections by Bellows
www.addic7ed.com