Original subtitles

Hello everyone and welcome to PMGT 823, Project Risk Management.

In this session, we are going to focus on one of the most practical and

-driven steps in risk management, that is planning risk responses.

This is Session 5, Part A, and it is all about exploring the strategies we use

to respond to risks effectively.

Let's dive in.

In this part of Module 5, we will focus on two important aspects of risk

response, selecting the right strategies and turning them into concrete action

plans. We will explore how to choose appropriate responses for different

of risks, and then how to ensure those responses are clearly defined, assigned,

and ready to implement.

Let's quickly review the seven main risk management processes.

In this session, we are focusing on step five, which is planning risk responses.

This step helps us choose the right strategies and actions to address

risks. It builds on the previous analysis and prepares the team for

action.

Once we have identified, analyzed, and prioritized the risk, the next step is

decide how we want to respond to them.

Planning risk responses means developing specific strategies and actions to deal

with both individual and overall project risks.

The goal is to reduce risk and also take advantage of opportunity and keep the

project moving forward even when things are uncertain.

A good response plan supports the project objectives, is agreed upon by

stakeholders, and has a clear owner responsible for carrying it out.

The purpose of planning a risk response is to be proactive.

We want to eliminate treats before they occur and make sure opportunities are

actually realized.

We also try to reduce the likelihood or impact of negative risks and increase

the chance of positive outcomes.

But not all risks can be fully avoided.

For those, we prepare a contingency plan if the risk happens and a fallback plan

in case the first risk plan does not work as expected.

A risk response strategy helps the team decide how to act after a risk has been

identified and analyzed.

As we mentioned earlier, these strategies can be applied to both

overall project risk.

They should be chosen based on how serious the risk is, whether the

practical, and whether the stakeholders agree.

And of course, every strategy should be realistic, cost -effective, and assigned

to someone who is accountable for making it happen.

Treats are uncertain events that can negatively impact project goals.

Choosing the right response strategy is key to minimizing their effect.

The choice depends on the severity of the treat, available resources, and how

much risk stakeholders are willing to tolerate.

Here are the main strategies for managing them.

Avoid means changing the project plan to eliminate the treat entirely.

Mitigate involves reducing the likelihood or impact of the risk.

Transfer shifts the risk to a third party, like an insurance company or even

outsourcing it.

Accept means acknowledging the risk without taking action unless it occurs,

often with a reserve in place.

An exploit is used when the risk falls outside of the project team's authority

and needs to be handled at a higher level.

So as you can see, each strategy involves a different level of effort,

and remaining risk.

Choosing widely helps you to stay on track despite...

having uncertainties in your project.

Let's walk through a real -life example.

Alex is managing the construction of a new education center.

When he noticed that traffic might delay material deliveries, he avoided the

risk by changing the delivery route.

Later, when heavy rain was expected, he took steps to reduce the impact.

He ordered materials ahead of time and made sure there was enough space to

them.

Related to expensive equipment, Alex transferred the risk by getting

and using subcontractor services.

He also accepted a small delay in paperwork and escalated a legal issue

outside of his authority.

By choosing the right strategy for each situation, Alex kept the project moving

forward and handled uncertainty with confidence.

Opportunities are uncertain events that could have a positive impact on the

project. Just like tweets, they need proactive planning, but the goal here is

increase benefits instead of avoiding harm.

The strategy you choose should reflect the value, urgency, and alignment with

the stakeholder and project goals.

Here, you can see some strategies for managing opportunities.

Exploit means taking direct steps to make sure the opportunity happens.

This could include allocating resources or adjusting the schedule to fully

capture the benefit.

Enhance involves increasing the likelihood or positive impact of the

opportunity. You may improve a process or add a feature that boosts its value.

Share is about partnering with a third party to jointly benefit from the

opportunity. For example, co -developing a product with a vendor or a

stakeholder.

Accept means recognizing the opportunity but not taking proactive steps. You

simply monitor the situation and take advantage of it if it naturally occurs.

And finally, escalate is used when the opportunity is outside of the project's

scope. You refer it to a higher -level program or portfolio manager to make the

most of it.

Choosing the right strategy helps turn potential advantages into real project

gains.

Here is an example that shows how opportunity strategies work in action.

Morgan is leading the development of a city government app.

When a tech startup offered to test their tool for free, she took advantage

the exposure and used an exploit strategy.

Later, she redesigned parts of the app to better support people with

disabilities, applying an enhanced strategy.

She also formed a partnership with a specialized AI company, which shows a

shared approach.

In some cases, like the uncertain chance to present at a global event, she

simply accepted the situation without taking extra action.

And when a big decision came up that was outside of the team's control, she

escalated it to the city officials.

Her choices helped keep the project moving in the right direction.

Once a risk -response strategy is chosen, it needs to be turned into clear

actionable steps.

These actions should be practical, measurable, and part of the overall

plan. A strong response explains what needs to be done, who will do it, when

will be happened, and how success will be tracked.

You should define the timeline and budget and consider backup actions if

Also, don't forget to look for new risks that might come from the response

itself.

If this process is vague or incomplete, it can cause delays, confusion, or even

inaction.

risk response needs a clear owner who is responsible for making sure it gets

done. These owners are often subject matter experts or trusted members of the

project team. When responsibility is clearly assigned, follow -through

much more likely.

Ownership should also be documented in the risk register so everyone knows who

is accountable.

This helps reduce confusion and ensures that actions are actually implemented.

and that brings us to the end of part a on planning risk responses if you have

any questions feel free to ask in part b we will continue with additional tools

and examples to support your planning process thank you very much again for

watching this video and i'll see you in the next part