Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:01,168 --> 00:00:02,500
Roger, copy mission
2
00:00:02,569 --> 00:00:05,937
We live in an age
of astonishing advances
3
00:00:06,006 --> 00:00:09,135
Descending at about 75 meters
per second
4
00:00:09,209 --> 00:00:13,271
Engineers can land
a car-size rover on Mars
5
00:00:13,347 --> 00:00:14,371
Touchdown confirmed
6
00:00:16,817 --> 00:00:21,755
Physicists probe the essence
of all matter,
7
00:00:21,822 --> 00:00:26,692
while we communicate wirelessly
on a vast worldwide network
8
00:00:28,562 --> 00:00:31,031
But underlying
all of these modern wonders
9
00:00:31,098 --> 00:00:35,832
is something deep
and mysteriously powerful
10
00:00:35,903 --> 00:00:38,566
It's been called
the language of the universe,
11
00:00:38,639 --> 00:00:42,508
and perhaps it's civilization's
greatest achievement
12
00:00:42,576 --> 00:00:44,169
Its name?
13
00:00:44,244 --> 00:00:46,440
Mathematics
14
00:00:46,513 --> 00:00:48,846
But where does math come from?
15
00:00:48,916 --> 00:00:52,318
And why in science
does it work so well?
16
00:00:52,386 --> 00:00:54,252
Albert Einstein wondered,
17
00:00:54,321 --> 00:00:57,018
"How is it possible
that mathematics
18
00:00:57,090 --> 00:01:01,755
does so well in explaining
the universe as we see it?"
19
00:01:01,828 --> 00:01:05,959
Is mathematics even human?
20
00:01:06,033 --> 00:01:09,003
There doesn't really
seem to be an upper limit
21
00:01:09,069 --> 00:01:11,561
to the numerical abilities
of animals
22
00:01:11,638 --> 00:01:15,405
And is it the key to the cosmos?
23
00:01:15,475 --> 00:01:17,034
Our physical world
24
00:01:17,110 --> 00:01:19,375
doesn't just have
some mathematical properties,
25
00:01:19,446 --> 00:01:21,381
but it has only
mathematical properties
26
00:01:21,448 --> 00:01:25,943
"The Great Math Mystery,"
next on NOVA!
27
00:02:27,881 --> 00:02:30,373
Human beings have always
looked at nature
28
00:02:30,450 --> 00:02:32,885
and searched for patterns
29
00:02:32,953 --> 00:02:36,151
Eons ago, we gazed at the stars
30
00:02:36,223 --> 00:02:40,160
and discovered patterns
we call constellations,
31
00:02:40,227 --> 00:02:44,323
even coming to believe
they might control our destiny
32
00:02:44,398 --> 00:02:50,338
We've watched the days
turn to night and back to day,
33
00:02:50,404 --> 00:02:53,704
and seasons as they come and go,
34
00:02:53,774 --> 00:02:57,836
and called that pattern "time"
35
00:02:57,911 --> 00:03:03,111
We see symmetrical patterns
in the human body
36
00:03:03,183 --> 00:03:06,585
and the tiger's stripes
37
00:03:06,653 --> 00:03:09,589
and build those patterns
into what we create,
38
00:03:09,656 --> 00:03:13,718
from art to our cities
39
00:03:18,565 --> 00:03:20,625
But what do patterns tell us?
40
00:03:20,701 --> 00:03:25,139
Why should the spiral shape
of the nautilus shell
41
00:03:25,205 --> 00:03:29,404
be so similar
to the spiral of a galaxy?
42
00:03:29,476 --> 00:03:34,141
Or the spiral found in
a sliced open head of cabbage?
43
00:03:34,214 --> 00:03:37,412
When scientists
seek to understand
44
00:03:37,484 --> 00:03:39,077
the patterns of our world,
45
00:03:39,152 --> 00:03:44,181
they often turn
to a powerful tool: mathematics
46
00:03:44,257 --> 00:03:46,988
They quantify their observations
47
00:03:47,060 --> 00:03:50,827
and use mathematical techniques
to examine them,
48
00:03:50,897 --> 00:03:53,492
hoping to discover
the underlying causes
49
00:03:53,567 --> 00:03:57,436
of nature's rhythms
and regularities
50
00:03:57,504 --> 00:04:00,133
And it's worked,
revealing the secrets
51
00:04:00,207 --> 00:04:02,802
behind the elliptical orbits
of the planets
52
00:04:02,876 --> 00:04:08,838
to the electromagnetic waves
that connect our cell phones
53
00:04:08,915 --> 00:04:10,907
Mathematics has even
guided the way,
54
00:04:10,984 --> 00:04:12,350
leading us right down
55
00:04:12,419 --> 00:04:14,945
to the sub-atomic
building blocks of matter
56
00:04:18,024 --> 00:04:22,928
Which raises the question:
why does it work at all?
57
00:04:22,996 --> 00:04:27,559
Is there an inherent
mathematical nature to reality?
58
00:04:27,634 --> 00:04:30,934
Or is mathematics
all in our heads?
59
00:04:36,243 --> 00:04:39,407
Mario Livio is an astrophysicist
60
00:04:39,479 --> 00:04:41,209
who wrestles
with these questions
61
00:04:41,281 --> 00:04:45,878
He's fascinated by the deep
and often mysterious connection
62
00:04:45,952 --> 00:04:48,251
between mathematics
and the world
63
00:04:48,321 --> 00:04:52,383
If you look at nature,
there are numbers all around us
64
00:04:52,459 --> 00:04:54,928
You know,
look at flowers, for example
65
00:04:54,995 --> 00:04:56,520
So there are many flowers
66
00:04:56,596 --> 00:04:59,122
that have three petals
like this, or five like this
67
00:04:59,199 --> 00:05:03,637
Some of them may have 34 or 55
68
00:05:03,703 --> 00:05:05,365
These numbers occur very often
69
00:05:05,438 --> 00:05:09,239
These may sound like
random numbers,
70
00:05:09,309 --> 00:05:13,713
but they're all part of what is
known as the Fibonacci sequence,
71
00:05:13,780 --> 00:05:17,740
a series of numbers developed
by a 13th century mathematician
72
00:05:21,388 --> 00:05:24,153
You start with the numbers
one and one,
73
00:05:24,224 --> 00:05:25,715
and from that point on,
74
00:05:25,792 --> 00:05:27,988
you keep adding up
the last two numbers
75
00:05:28,061 --> 00:05:30,895
So one plus one is two,
76
00:05:30,964 --> 00:05:34,093
now one plus two is three,
77
00:05:34,167 --> 00:05:37,569
two plus three is five,
78
00:05:37,637 --> 00:05:42,575
three plus five is eight,
and you keep going like this
79
00:05:42,642 --> 00:05:45,077
Today, hundreds of years later,
80
00:05:45,145 --> 00:05:47,910
this seemingly arbitrary
progression of numbers
81
00:05:47,981 --> 00:05:50,678
fascinates many,
who see in it clues
82
00:05:50,750 --> 00:05:54,949
to everything from human beauty
to the stock market
83
00:05:55,021 --> 00:05:57,650
While most of those claims
remain unproven,
84
00:05:57,724 --> 00:06:01,786
it is curious how evolution
seems to favor these numbers
85
00:06:01,862 --> 00:06:03,990
And as it turns out,
86
00:06:04,064 --> 00:06:07,432
this sequence appears
quite frequently in nature
87
00:06:07,500 --> 00:06:10,766
Fibonacci numbers show up
in petal counts,
88
00:06:10,837 --> 00:06:15,673
especially of daisies,
but that's just a start
89
00:06:15,742 --> 00:06:17,720
Statistically,
the Fibonacci numbers
90
00:06:17,744 --> 00:06:21,613
do appear a lot in botany
91
00:06:21,681 --> 00:06:24,981
For instance, if you look
at the bottom of a pine cone,
92
00:06:25,051 --> 00:06:29,045
you will see often spirals
in their scales
93
00:06:29,122 --> 00:06:31,614
You end up
counting those spirals,
94
00:06:31,691 --> 00:06:34,820
you'll usually find
a Fibonacci number,
95
00:06:34,895 --> 00:06:36,761
and then you will count
the spirals
96
00:06:36,830 --> 00:06:38,696
going in the other direction
97
00:06:38,765 --> 00:06:42,202
and you will find
an adjacent Fibonacci number
98
00:06:42,269 --> 00:06:47,298
The same is true of the seeds
on a sunflower head...
99
00:06:47,374 --> 00:06:49,934
Two sets of spirals
100
00:06:50,010 --> 00:06:53,071
And if you count the spirals
in each direction,
101
00:06:53,146 --> 00:06:56,844
both are Fibonacci numbers
102
00:06:56,917 --> 00:06:59,318
While there are some theories
103
00:06:59,386 --> 00:07:01,946
explaining
the Fibonacci-botany connection,
104
00:07:02,022 --> 00:07:06,517
it still raises
some intriguing questions
105
00:07:06,593 --> 00:07:08,186
So do plants know math?
106
00:07:08,261 --> 00:07:12,198
The short answer to that is "No"
107
00:07:12,265 --> 00:07:14,632
They don't need to know math
108
00:07:14,701 --> 00:07:19,799
In a very simple, geometric way,
they set up a little machine
109
00:07:19,873 --> 00:07:24,402
that creates the Fibonacci
sequence in many cases
110
00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:29,381
The mysterious connections
111
00:07:29,449 --> 00:07:33,477
between the physical world
and mathematics run deep
112
00:07:33,553 --> 00:07:36,022
We all know the number pi
from geometry...
113
00:07:36,089 --> 00:07:38,649
The ratio between
the circumference of a circle
114
00:07:38,725 --> 00:07:42,253
and its diameter...
And that its decimal digits
115
00:07:42,329 --> 00:07:45,766
go on forever
without a repeating pattern
116
00:07:45,832 --> 00:07:47,698
As of 2013,
117
00:07:47,767 --> 00:07:52,000
it had been calculated out
to 12 1 trillion digits
118
00:07:52,072 --> 00:07:56,271
But somehow,
pi is a whole lot more
119
00:07:56,343 --> 00:07:59,313
Pi appears in a whole host
of other phenomena
120
00:07:59,379 --> 00:08:01,405
which have,
at least on the face of it,
121
00:08:01,481 --> 00:08:03,507
nothing to do
with circles or anything
122
00:08:03,583 --> 00:08:08,021
In particular, it appears in
probability theory quite a bit
123
00:08:08,088 --> 00:08:09,420
Suppose I take this needle
124
00:08:09,489 --> 00:08:12,084
So the length of the needle
125
00:08:12,158 --> 00:08:14,889
is equal to the distance
between two lines
126
00:08:14,961 --> 00:08:16,759
on this piece of paper
127
00:08:16,830 --> 00:08:19,732
And suppose I drop this needle
now on the paper
128
00:08:19,799 --> 00:08:24,066
Sometimes when you drop
the needle, it will cut a line,
129
00:08:24,137 --> 00:08:26,766
and sometimes it drops
between the lines
130
00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,469
It turns out the probability
131
00:08:29,542 --> 00:08:32,410
that the needle lands
so it cuts a line
132
00:08:32,479 --> 00:08:36,211
is exactly two over pi, or about
133
00:08:38,118 --> 00:08:41,054
64%
134
00:08:41,121 --> 00:08:44,853
Now, what that means is that,
in principle,
135
00:08:44,924 --> 00:08:47,257
I could drop this needle
millions of times
136
00:08:47,327 --> 00:08:50,195
I could count the times
when it crosses a line
137
00:08:50,263 --> 00:08:52,755
and when it doesn't
cross a line,
138
00:08:52,832 --> 00:08:54,824
and I could actually
even calculate pi
139
00:08:54,901 --> 00:08:57,598
even though
there are no circles here,
140
00:08:57,670 --> 00:09:00,333
no diameters of a circle,
nothing like that
141
00:09:00,407 --> 00:09:01,932
It's really amazing
142
00:09:06,846 --> 00:09:09,714
Since pi relates a round object,
a circle,
143
00:09:09,783 --> 00:09:12,981
with a straight one,
its diameter,
144
00:09:13,053 --> 00:09:17,013
it can show up
in the strangest of places
145
00:09:17,090 --> 00:09:20,492
Some see it in the meandering
path of rivers
146
00:09:20,560 --> 00:09:22,028
A river's actual length
147
00:09:22,095 --> 00:09:25,259
as it winds its way
from its source to its mouth
148
00:09:25,331 --> 00:09:31,737
compared to the direct distance
on average seems to be about pi
149
00:09:31,805 --> 00:09:34,331
Models for just about anything
involving waves
150
00:09:34,407 --> 00:09:40,745
will have pi in them,
like those for light and sound
151
00:09:40,814 --> 00:09:44,512
Pi tells us which colors
should appear in a rainbow,
152
00:09:44,584 --> 00:09:48,351
and how middle C should sound
on a piano
153
00:09:48,421 --> 00:09:50,890
Pi shows up in apples,
154
00:09:50,957 --> 00:09:54,257
in the way cells grow
into spherical shapes,
155
00:09:54,327 --> 00:09:59,288
or in the brightness
of a supernova
156
00:09:59,365 --> 00:10:01,664
One writer has suggested
157
00:10:01,734 --> 00:10:05,637
it's like seeing pi
on a series of mountain peaks,
158
00:10:05,705 --> 00:10:08,732
poking out
of a fog-shrouded valley
159
00:10:08,808 --> 00:10:10,902
We know there's a way
they're all connected,
160
00:10:10,977 --> 00:10:15,278
but it's not always obvious how
161
00:10:18,084 --> 00:10:20,519
Pi is but one example
162
00:10:20,587 --> 00:10:23,557
of a vast interconnected web
of mathematics
163
00:10:23,623 --> 00:10:25,524
that seems to reveal
164
00:10:25,592 --> 00:10:28,994
an often hidden and deep order
to our world
165
00:10:32,532 --> 00:10:37,596
Physicist Max Tegmark from MIT
thinks he knows why
166
00:10:37,670 --> 00:10:41,198
He sees similarities
between our world
167
00:10:41,274 --> 00:10:43,675
and that of a computer game
168
00:10:47,614 --> 00:10:51,073
If I were a character
in a computer game
169
00:10:51,151 --> 00:10:53,882
that were so advanced
that I were actually conscious
170
00:10:53,953 --> 00:10:56,354
and I started exploring
my video game world,
171
00:10:56,422 --> 00:10:58,721
it would actually feel to me
like it was made
172
00:10:58,791 --> 00:11:02,125
of real solid objects
made of physical stuff
173
00:11:02,195 --> 00:11:05,393
♪♪
174
00:11:10,103 --> 00:11:13,870
Yet, if I started studying, as
the curious physicist that I am,
175
00:11:13,940 --> 00:11:15,272
the properties of this stuff,
176
00:11:15,341 --> 00:11:18,368
the equations
by which things move
177
00:11:18,444 --> 00:11:22,040
and the equations that
give stuff its properties,
178
00:11:22,115 --> 00:11:23,879
I would discover eventually
179
00:11:23,950 --> 00:11:26,476
that all these properties
were mathematical:
180
00:11:26,553 --> 00:11:28,385
the mathematical properties
181
00:11:28,454 --> 00:11:31,288
that the programmer had
actually put into the software
182
00:11:31,357 --> 00:11:34,054
that describes everything
183
00:11:34,127 --> 00:11:36,596
The laws of physics in a game...
184
00:11:36,663 --> 00:11:39,758
Like how an object floats,
bounces, or crashes...
185
00:11:39,832 --> 00:11:44,668
Are only mathematical rules
created by a programmer
186
00:11:44,737 --> 00:11:48,139
Ultimately, the entire
"universe" of a computer game
187
00:11:48,208 --> 00:11:52,407
is just numbers and equations
188
00:11:52,478 --> 00:11:54,456
That's exactly what I perceive
in this reality, too,
189
00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:55,743
as a physicist,
190
00:11:55,815 --> 00:11:58,341
that the closer I look at things
that seem non-mathematical,
191
00:11:58,418 --> 00:12:00,410
like my arm here and my hand,
192
00:12:00,486 --> 00:12:02,921
the more mathematical
it turns out to be
193
00:12:02,989 --> 00:12:05,288
Could it be that our world
also then
194
00:12:05,358 --> 00:12:10,558
is really just as mathematical
as the computer game reality?
195
00:12:10,630 --> 00:12:15,625
To Max, the software world
of a game isn't that different
196
00:12:15,702 --> 00:12:18,297
from the physical world
we live in
197
00:12:18,371 --> 00:12:22,741
He thinks that mathematics works
so well to describe reality
198
00:12:22,809 --> 00:12:27,008
because ultimately,
mathematics is all that it is
199
00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:30,517
There's nothing else
200
00:12:30,583 --> 00:12:32,518
Many of my physics colleagues
201
00:12:32,585 --> 00:12:36,249
will say that mathematics
describes our physical reality
202
00:12:36,322 --> 00:12:38,689
at least in some
approximate sense
203
00:12:38,758 --> 00:12:44,527
I go further and argue that it
actually is our physical reality
204
00:12:44,597 --> 00:12:47,396
because I'm arguing that
our physical world
205
00:12:47,467 --> 00:12:50,130
doesn't just have some
mathematical properties,
206
00:12:50,203 --> 00:12:52,069
but it has only
mathematical properties
207
00:12:55,174 --> 00:12:58,667
Our physical reality is a bit
like a digital photograph,
208
00:12:58,745 --> 00:13:00,179
according to Max
209
00:13:02,215 --> 00:13:05,014
The photo looks like the pond,
210
00:13:05,084 --> 00:13:08,885
but as we move in
closer and closer,
211
00:13:08,955 --> 00:13:12,448
we can see it is really
a field of pixels,
212
00:13:12,525 --> 00:13:15,393
each represented
by three numbers
213
00:13:15,461 --> 00:13:20,331
that specify the amount of red,
green and blue
214
00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:25,566
While the universe is vast
in its size and complexity,
215
00:13:25,638 --> 00:13:29,166
requiring an unbelievably large
collection of numbers
216
00:13:29,242 --> 00:13:31,177
to describe it,
217
00:13:31,244 --> 00:13:34,043
Max sees its underlying
mathematical structure
218
00:13:34,113 --> 00:13:36,446
as surprisingly simple
219
00:13:36,516 --> 00:13:39,486
It's just 32 numbers...
220
00:13:39,552 --> 00:13:43,250
Constants, like the masses
of elementary particles...
221
00:13:43,323 --> 00:13:47,351
Along with a handful
of mathematical equations,
222
00:13:47,427 --> 00:13:50,693
the fundamental laws of physics
223
00:13:50,763 --> 00:13:53,733
And it all fits on a wall,
224
00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:57,703
though there are still
some questions
225
00:13:57,770 --> 00:13:59,602
But even though we don't know
226
00:13:59,672 --> 00:14:01,470
what exactly
is going to go here,
227
00:14:01,541 --> 00:14:04,670
I am really confident that
what will go here
228
00:14:04,744 --> 00:14:06,872
will be mathematical equations
229
00:14:06,946 --> 00:14:10,041
That everything
is ultimately mathematical
230
00:14:10,116 --> 00:14:14,110
Max Tegmark's Matrix-like view
231
00:14:14,187 --> 00:14:17,385
that mathematics
doesn't just describe reality
232
00:14:17,457 --> 00:14:21,417
but is its essence
may sound radical,
233
00:14:21,494 --> 00:14:24,054
but it has deep roots in history
234
00:14:26,132 --> 00:14:28,431
going back to ancient Greece,
235
00:14:28,501 --> 00:14:32,563
to the time of the philosopher
and mystic Pythagoras
236
00:14:32,638 --> 00:14:36,336
Stories say
he explored the affinity
237
00:14:36,409 --> 00:14:39,072
between mathematics and music,
238
00:14:39,145 --> 00:14:42,604
a relationship that resonates
to this day
239
00:14:42,682 --> 00:14:45,083
in the work
of Esperanza Spalding,
240
00:14:45,151 --> 00:14:48,553
an acclaimed jazz musician
who's studied music theory
241
00:14:48,621 --> 00:14:52,490
and sees its parallel
in mathematics
242
00:14:54,761 --> 00:14:57,162
I love the experience of math
243
00:14:57,230 --> 00:14:58,960
The part that I enjoy about math
244
00:14:59,031 --> 00:15:01,660
I get to experience
through music, too
245
00:15:03,536 --> 00:15:04,469
At the beginning,
246
00:15:04,537 --> 00:15:06,165
you're studying
all the little equations,
247
00:15:06,239 --> 00:15:09,107
but you get to have this
very visceral relationship
248
00:15:09,175 --> 00:15:11,337
with the product
of those equations,
249
00:15:11,411 --> 00:15:13,288
which is sound and music
and harmony and dissonance
250
00:15:13,312 --> 00:15:14,871
and all that good stuff
251
00:15:14,947 --> 00:15:17,075
So I'm much better at music
than at math,
252
00:15:17,150 --> 00:15:19,142
but I love math with a passion
253
00:15:19,218 --> 00:15:20,447
They're both just as much work
254
00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:22,682
They're both, you have to study
your off
255
00:15:25,158 --> 00:15:26,558
Your head off,
study your head off
256
00:15:29,462 --> 00:15:31,761
The Ancient Greeks
found three relationships
257
00:15:31,831 --> 00:15:34,494
between notes
especially pleasing
258
00:15:34,567 --> 00:15:40,666
Now we call them an octave,
a fifth, and a fourth
259
00:15:40,740 --> 00:15:42,709
An octave is easy to remember
260
00:15:42,775 --> 00:15:44,953
because it's the first two notes
of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow"
261
00:15:44,977 --> 00:15:46,536
♪ La, la ♪
262
00:15:46,612 --> 00:15:48,274
That's an octave... "somewhere"
263
00:15:52,051 --> 00:15:53,849
A fifth sounds like this:
264
00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:55,513
♪ La, la ♪
265
00:15:55,588 --> 00:15:58,581
Or the first two notes of
"Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star"
266
00:16:00,626 --> 00:16:02,891
And a fourth sounds like:
267
00:16:02,962 --> 00:16:05,557
♪ La, la ♪
268
00:16:06,833 --> 00:16:08,444
You can think of it
as the first two notes
269
00:16:08,468 --> 00:16:09,731
of "Here Comes the Bride"
270
00:16:13,406 --> 00:16:16,308
In the sixth century BCE,
271
00:16:16,375 --> 00:16:18,695
the Greek philosopher Pythagoras
is said to have discovered
272
00:16:18,744 --> 00:16:21,680
that those beautiful
musical relationships
273
00:16:21,747 --> 00:16:25,047
were also beautiful
mathematical relationships
274
00:16:25,117 --> 00:16:29,578
by measuring the lengths
of the vibrating strings
275
00:16:29,655 --> 00:16:33,820
In an octave, the string lengths
create a ratio of two to one
276
00:16:36,562 --> 00:16:39,726
In a fifth,
the ratio is three to two
277
00:16:41,634 --> 00:16:44,934
And in a fourth,
it is four to three
278
00:16:48,274 --> 00:16:50,641
Seeing a common pattern
throughout sound,
279
00:16:50,710 --> 00:16:53,145
that could be
a big eye opener of saying,
280
00:16:53,212 --> 00:16:55,340
"Well, if this exists in sound,
281
00:16:55,414 --> 00:16:59,249
"and if it's true universally
through all sounds,
282
00:16:59,318 --> 00:17:03,085
"this ratio could exist
universally everywhere, right?
283
00:17:03,155 --> 00:17:04,555
And doesn't it?"
284
00:17:07,293 --> 00:17:10,593
Pythagoreans worshipped the idea
of numbers
285
00:17:10,663 --> 00:17:14,430
The fact that simple ratios
produced harmonious sounds
286
00:17:14,500 --> 00:17:18,437
was proof of a hidden order
in the natural world
287
00:17:18,504 --> 00:17:20,666
And that order
was made of numbers,
288
00:17:20,740 --> 00:17:24,177
a profound insight that
mathematicians and scientists
289
00:17:24,243 --> 00:17:28,704
continue to explore to this day
290
00:17:30,883 --> 00:17:34,149
In fact, there are plenty
of other physical phenomena
291
00:17:34,220 --> 00:17:38,658
that follow simple ratios,
from the two-to-one ratio
292
00:17:38,724 --> 00:17:42,491
of hydrogen atoms
to oxygen atoms in water
293
00:17:42,562 --> 00:17:45,361
to the number of times the Moon
orbits the Earth
294
00:17:45,431 --> 00:17:49,266
compared to its own rotation:
one to one
295
00:17:49,335 --> 00:17:53,170
Or that Mercury rotates
exactly three times
296
00:17:53,239 --> 00:17:58,041
when it orbits the Sun twice,
a three-to-two ratio
297
00:18:00,746 --> 00:18:04,205
In Ancient Greece,
Pythagoras and his followers
298
00:18:04,283 --> 00:18:08,846
had a profound effect on another
Greek philosopher, Plato,
299
00:18:08,921 --> 00:18:11,823
whose ideas also resonate
to this day,
300
00:18:11,891 --> 00:18:14,326
especially among mathematicians
301
00:18:14,393 --> 00:18:17,693
Plato believed that geometry
and mathematics
302
00:18:17,763 --> 00:18:22,201
exist in their own ideal world
303
00:18:22,268 --> 00:18:24,635
So when we draw a circle
on a piece of paper,
304
00:18:24,704 --> 00:18:26,400
this is not the real circle
305
00:18:26,472 --> 00:18:28,532
The real circle
is in that world,
306
00:18:28,608 --> 00:18:30,873
and this is just
an approximation
307
00:18:30,943 --> 00:18:32,206
of that real circle,
308
00:18:32,278 --> 00:18:34,474
and the same
with all other shapes
309
00:18:34,547 --> 00:18:37,483
And Plato liked very much
these five solids,
310
00:18:37,550 --> 00:18:40,076
the platonic solids
we call them today,
311
00:18:40,152 --> 00:18:44,089
and he assigned each one of them
to one of the elements
312
00:18:44,156 --> 00:18:46,148
that formed the world
as he saw it
313
00:18:46,225 --> 00:18:51,220
The stable cube was earth
314
00:18:51,297 --> 00:18:56,531
The tetrahedron with its pointy
corners was fire
315
00:18:56,602 --> 00:19:02,473
The mobile-looking octahedron
Plato thought of as air
316
00:19:02,541 --> 00:19:08,742
And the 20-sided icosahedron
was water
317
00:19:08,814 --> 00:19:11,079
And finally the dodecahedron,
318
00:19:11,150 --> 00:19:13,642
this was the thing that
signified the cosmos as a whole
319
00:19:18,591 --> 00:19:20,856
So Plato's mathematical forms
320
00:19:20,926 --> 00:19:23,794
were the ideal version
of the world around us,
321
00:19:23,863 --> 00:19:27,231
and they existed
in their own realm
322
00:19:27,299 --> 00:19:29,234
And however bizarre
that may sound,
323
00:19:29,301 --> 00:19:32,430
that mathematics exists
in its own world,
324
00:19:32,505 --> 00:19:37,000
shaping the world we see,
it's an idea that to this day
325
00:19:37,076 --> 00:19:40,843
many mathematicians
and scientists can relate to...
326
00:19:40,913 --> 00:19:42,939
The sense they have
when they're doing math
327
00:19:43,015 --> 00:19:45,280
that they're just
uncovering something
328
00:19:45,351 --> 00:19:47,377
that's already out there
329
00:19:47,453 --> 00:19:49,718
I feel quite strongly
that mathematics is discovered
330
00:19:49,789 --> 00:19:51,280
in my work as a mathematician
331
00:19:51,357 --> 00:19:53,519
It always feels to me
there is a thing out there
332
00:19:53,592 --> 00:19:55,561
and I'm kind of trying
to find it
333
00:19:55,628 --> 00:19:56,994
and understand it and touch it
334
00:19:59,598 --> 00:20:01,798
As someone who actually
has had the pleasure
335
00:20:01,867 --> 00:20:03,460
of making new mathematics,
336
00:20:03,536 --> 00:20:06,404
it feels like there's something
there before you get to it
337
00:20:06,472 --> 00:20:07,997
If I have to choose,
338
00:20:08,074 --> 00:20:10,202
I think it's more discovered
than invented
339
00:20:10,276 --> 00:20:11,904
because I think
there's a reality
340
00:20:11,977 --> 00:20:14,276
to what we study in mathematics
341
00:20:14,346 --> 00:20:16,281
When we do good mathematics,
342
00:20:16,348 --> 00:20:19,580
we're discovering something
about the way our minds work
343
00:20:19,652 --> 00:20:21,553
in interaction with the world
344
00:20:21,620 --> 00:20:23,486
Well, I know that
because that's what I do
345
00:20:23,556 --> 00:20:25,821
I come to my office, I sit down
in front of my whiteboard
346
00:20:25,891 --> 00:20:29,692
and I try and understand
that thing that's out there
347
00:20:29,762 --> 00:20:31,993
And every now and then,
I'm discovering a new bit of it
348
00:20:32,064 --> 00:20:34,192
That's exactly
what it feels like
349
00:20:34,266 --> 00:20:36,735
To many mathematicians,
350
00:20:36,802 --> 00:20:41,240
it feels like math is discovered
rather than invented
351
00:20:41,307 --> 00:20:43,742
But is that just a feeling?
352
00:20:43,809 --> 00:20:45,835
Could it be that mathematics
353
00:20:45,911 --> 00:20:49,905
is purely a product
of the human brain?
354
00:20:49,982 --> 00:20:54,443
Meet Shyam, a bonafide math whiz
355
00:20:54,520 --> 00:20:56,113
800 on the SAT Math
356
00:20:56,188 --> 00:20:57,520
That's pretty good
357
00:20:57,590 --> 00:20:58,967
And you took it
when you were how old?
358
00:20:58,991 --> 00:20:59,788
Eleven
359
00:20:59,859 --> 00:21:00,792
Eleven
360
00:21:00,860 --> 00:21:02,920
Wow, that's, like,
a perfect score
361
00:21:02,995 --> 00:21:05,362
Where does Shyam's math genius
come from?
362
00:21:05,431 --> 00:21:10,699
It turns out we can pinpoint it,
and it's all in his head
363
00:21:10,770 --> 00:21:16,368
Using fMRI, scientists
can scan Shyam's brain
364
00:21:16,442 --> 00:21:18,877
as he answers math questions
365
00:21:18,944 --> 00:21:21,641
to see which parts of the brain
receive more blood,
366
00:21:21,714 --> 00:21:25,708
a sign they are hard at work
367
00:21:25,785 --> 00:21:27,095
All right, Shyam,
we'll start about now
368
00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:28,052
Okay, buddy?
369
00:21:28,120 --> 00:21:29,120
Okay
370
00:21:30,823 --> 00:21:33,190
In images of Shyam's brain,
371
00:21:33,259 --> 00:21:37,959
the parietal lobes glow
an especially bright crimson
372
00:21:38,030 --> 00:21:40,522
He is relying on parietal areas
373
00:21:40,599 --> 00:21:43,569
to determine these
mathematical relationships
374
00:21:43,636 --> 00:21:46,572
That's characteristic of lots
of math-gifted types
375
00:21:46,639 --> 00:21:49,905
In tests similar to Shyam's,
376
00:21:49,975 --> 00:21:52,410
kids who exhibit
high math performance
377
00:21:52,478 --> 00:21:55,471
have five to six times
more neuron activation
378
00:21:55,548 --> 00:21:58,245
than average kids
in these brain regions
379
00:21:58,317 --> 00:22:02,379
But is that the result of
teaching and intense practice?
380
00:22:02,454 --> 00:22:07,586
Or are the foundations of math
built into our brains?
381
00:22:12,631 --> 00:22:14,998
Scientists are looking
for the answer here,
382
00:22:15,067 --> 00:22:18,834
at the Duke University
Lemur Center,
383
00:22:18,904 --> 00:22:20,463
a 70-acre sanctuary
in North Carolina,
384
00:22:20,539 --> 00:22:24,340
the largest one for rare and
endangered lemurs in the world
385
00:22:27,246 --> 00:22:30,648
Like all primates,
lemurs are related to humans
386
00:22:30,716 --> 00:22:33,276
through a common ancestor
387
00:22:33,352 --> 00:22:36,322
that lived as many as
65 million years ago
388
00:22:36,388 --> 00:22:38,687
Scientists believe lemurs
389
00:22:38,757 --> 00:22:42,489
share many characteristics
with those earliest primates,
390
00:22:42,561 --> 00:22:46,089
making them a window,
though a blurry one,
391
00:22:46,165 --> 00:22:49,602
into our ancient past
392
00:22:49,668 --> 00:22:51,796
Got a choice here, Teres
393
00:22:51,871 --> 00:22:53,271
Come on up
394
00:22:53,339 --> 00:22:54,967
Duke Professor Liz Brannon
395
00:22:55,040 --> 00:22:58,135
investigates how well lemurs,
like Teres here,
396
00:22:58,210 --> 00:23:00,475
can compare quantities
397
00:23:00,546 --> 00:23:03,675
Many different animals
choose larger food quantities
398
00:23:03,749 --> 00:23:06,446
So what is Teres doing?
399
00:23:06,518 --> 00:23:08,783
What are all of these
different animals doing
400
00:23:08,854 --> 00:23:11,414
when they compare
two quantities?
401
00:23:11,490 --> 00:23:13,925
Well, clearly he's not using
verbal labels,
402
00:23:13,993 --> 00:23:16,155
he's not using symbols
403
00:23:16,228 --> 00:23:19,357
We need to figure out whether
they can really use number,
404
00:23:19,431 --> 00:23:21,730
pure number, as a cue
405
00:23:23,903 --> 00:23:27,772
To test how well Teres
can distinguish quantities,
406
00:23:27,840 --> 00:23:31,174
he's been taught
a touch-screen computer game
407
00:23:31,243 --> 00:23:34,407
The red square starts a round
408
00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:37,348
If he touches it,
two squares appear
409
00:23:37,416 --> 00:23:40,580
containing different numbers
of objects
410
00:23:40,653 --> 00:23:41,712
He's been trained
411
00:23:41,787 --> 00:23:44,689
that if he chooses the box
with the fewest number
412
00:23:46,258 --> 00:23:49,660
he'll get a reward,
a sugar pellet
413
00:23:49,728 --> 00:23:51,196
A wrong answer?
414
00:23:55,768 --> 00:23:57,361
We have to do a lot to ensure
415
00:23:57,436 --> 00:24:00,304
that they're really attending to
number and not something else
416
00:24:00,372 --> 00:24:04,104
To make sure the test animal
is reacting
417
00:24:04,176 --> 00:24:07,146
to the number of objects
and not some other cue,
418
00:24:07,212 --> 00:24:12,776
Liz varies the objects' size,
color, and shape
419
00:24:12,851 --> 00:24:15,685
She has conducted
thousands of trials
420
00:24:15,754 --> 00:24:18,690
and shown that lemurs
and rhesus monkeys
421
00:24:18,757 --> 00:24:22,159
can learn to pick
the right answer
422
00:24:22,227 --> 00:24:24,389
Teres obviously
doesn't have language
423
00:24:24,463 --> 00:24:26,364
and he doesn't have
any symbols for number
424
00:24:26,432 --> 00:24:29,300
So is he counting, is he doing
what a human child does
425
00:24:29,368 --> 00:24:32,429
when they recite the numbers
one, two, three?
426
00:24:32,504 --> 00:24:33,904
No
427
00:24:33,973 --> 00:24:37,375
And yet, what he seems
to be attending to
428
00:24:37,443 --> 00:24:42,438
is the very abstract essence
of what a number is
429
00:24:42,514 --> 00:24:46,315
Lemurs and rhesus monkeys
aren't alone
430
00:24:46,385 --> 00:24:48,047
in having this primitive
number sense
431
00:24:48,120 --> 00:24:51,955
Rats, pigeons, fish, raccoons,
432
00:24:52,024 --> 00:24:55,426
insects, horses, and elephants
433
00:24:55,494 --> 00:24:58,589
all show sensitivity to quantity
434
00:24:58,664 --> 00:25:01,634
And so do human infants
435
00:25:03,836 --> 00:25:06,203
At her lab on the Duke campus,
436
00:25:06,271 --> 00:25:09,901
Liz has tested babies
that were only six months old
437
00:25:09,975 --> 00:25:12,604
They'll look longer at a screen
438
00:25:12,678 --> 00:25:15,546
with a changing number
of objects,
439
00:25:15,614 --> 00:25:17,606
as long as the change
is obvious enough
440
00:25:17,683 --> 00:25:20,152
to capture their attention
441
00:25:20,219 --> 00:25:24,816
Liz has also tested
college students,
442
00:25:24,890 --> 00:25:26,791
asking them not to count,
443
00:25:26,859 --> 00:25:29,328
but to respond
as quickly as they could
444
00:25:29,395 --> 00:25:32,388
to a touch-screen test
comparing quantities
445
00:25:32,464 --> 00:25:34,057
The results?
446
00:25:34,133 --> 00:25:38,764
About the same as lemurs
and rhesus monkeys
447
00:25:38,837 --> 00:25:40,567
In fact, there are humans
448
00:25:40,639 --> 00:25:42,938
who aren't as good
as our monkeys,
449
00:25:43,008 --> 00:25:44,943
and others that are far better,
450
00:25:45,010 --> 00:25:46,988
so there's a lot of variability
in human performance,
451
00:25:47,012 --> 00:25:50,039
but in general, it looks
very similar to a monkey
452
00:25:52,217 --> 00:25:55,415
Substitute in the three,
you raise that to the four
453
00:25:55,487 --> 00:25:57,888
Even without any
mathematical education,
454
00:25:57,956 --> 00:26:00,983
even without learning
any number words or symbols,
455
00:26:01,060 --> 00:26:03,586
we would still have,
all of us as humans,
456
00:26:03,662 --> 00:26:05,460
a primitive number sense
457
00:26:05,531 --> 00:26:09,400
That fundamental ability
to perceive number
458
00:26:09,468 --> 00:26:12,267
seems to be a very important
foundation,
459
00:26:12,337 --> 00:26:14,272
and without it,
it's very questionable
460
00:26:14,339 --> 00:26:18,037
as to whether we could ever
appreciate symbolic mathematics
461
00:26:18,110 --> 00:26:20,170
The building blocks
of mathematics
462
00:26:20,245 --> 00:26:23,181
may be preprogrammed
into our brains,
463
00:26:23,248 --> 00:26:26,446
part of the basic toolkit
for survival,
464
00:26:26,518 --> 00:26:30,546
like our ability to recognize
patterns and shapes
465
00:26:30,622 --> 00:26:33,023
or our sense of time
466
00:26:33,092 --> 00:26:35,357
From that point of view,
on this foundation,
467
00:26:35,427 --> 00:26:37,794
we've erected one
of the greatest inventions
468
00:26:37,863 --> 00:26:41,561
of human culture:
469
00:26:41,633 --> 00:26:44,535
mathematics
470
00:26:44,603 --> 00:26:46,936
But the mystery remains
471
00:26:47,005 --> 00:26:53,002
If it is "all in our heads,"
why has math been so effective?
472
00:26:53,078 --> 00:26:56,571
Through science, technology,
and engineering,
473
00:26:56,648 --> 00:26:59,117
it's transformed the planet,
474
00:26:59,184 --> 00:27:03,815
even allowing us to go
into the beyond
475
00:27:06,091 --> 00:27:09,084
As in the work here, at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
476
00:27:09,161 --> 00:27:10,754
in Pasadena, California
477
00:27:10,829 --> 00:27:13,298
Roger, copy mission
478
00:27:13,365 --> 00:27:14,663
Coming up on entry
479
00:27:14,733 --> 00:27:19,865
In 2012, they landed
a car-size rover
480
00:27:19,938 --> 00:27:22,840
Descending at about 75 meters
per second as expected
481
00:27:22,908 --> 00:27:24,900
on Mars
482
00:27:24,977 --> 00:27:27,412
Touchdown confirmed,
we're safe on Mars
483
00:27:32,417 --> 00:27:35,444
Adam Steltzner
was the lead engineer
484
00:27:35,521 --> 00:27:37,513
on the team that designed
the landing system
485
00:27:37,589 --> 00:27:41,890
Their work depended
on a groundbreaking discovery
486
00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:44,452
from the Renaissance
487
00:27:44,530 --> 00:27:48,661
that turned mathematics
into the language of science:
488
00:27:48,734 --> 00:27:52,034
the law of falling bodies
489
00:27:54,673 --> 00:27:57,734
The ancient Greek philosopher
Aristotle
490
00:27:57,809 --> 00:28:02,042
taught that heavier objects
fall faster than lighter ones...
491
00:28:02,114 --> 00:28:07,178
An idea that, on the surface,
makes sense
492
00:28:07,252 --> 00:28:11,087
Even this surface:
the Mars yard,
493
00:28:11,156 --> 00:28:13,853
where they test the rovers
at JPL
494
00:28:13,926 --> 00:28:15,417
So Aristotle reasoned
495
00:28:15,494 --> 00:28:19,488
that the rate at which things
would fall
496
00:28:19,565 --> 00:28:21,090
was proportional to their weight
497
00:28:25,204 --> 00:28:26,433
Which seems reasonable
498
00:28:26,505 --> 00:28:28,667
In fact, so reasonable,
499
00:28:28,740 --> 00:28:32,700
the view held
for nearly 2,000 years,
500
00:28:32,778 --> 00:28:35,338
until challenged
in the late 1500s
501
00:28:35,414 --> 00:28:40,717
by Italian mathematician
Galileo Galilei
502
00:28:40,786 --> 00:28:42,482
Legend has it that Galileo
503
00:28:42,554 --> 00:28:45,217
dropped two different weight
cannonballs
504
00:28:45,290 --> 00:28:47,816
from the Leaning Tower of Pisa
505
00:28:47,893 --> 00:28:49,919
Well, we're not in Pisa,
we don't have cannonballs,
506
00:28:49,995 --> 00:28:53,090
but we do have a bowling ball
and a bouncy ball
507
00:28:53,165 --> 00:28:55,134
Let's weigh them
508
00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:59,194
First, we weigh the bowling ball
509
00:28:59,271 --> 00:29:01,297
It weighs 15 pounds
510
00:29:01,373 --> 00:29:02,602
And the bouncy ball?
511
00:29:02,674 --> 00:29:05,576
It weighs hardly anything
512
00:29:05,644 --> 00:29:06,703
Let's drop them
513
00:29:06,778 --> 00:29:09,577
According to Aristotle,
514
00:29:09,648 --> 00:29:12,880
the bowling ball should fall
over 15 times faster
515
00:29:12,951 --> 00:29:14,749
than the bouncy ball
516
00:29:17,789 --> 00:29:19,749
Well, they seem to fall
at the same rate
517
00:29:21,827 --> 00:29:23,352
This isn't that high, though
518
00:29:23,428 --> 00:29:26,262
Maybe we should drop them
from higher
519
00:29:33,705 --> 00:29:36,732
So Ed is 20 feet in the air
up there
520
00:29:36,808 --> 00:29:39,937
Let's see if the balls fall
at the same rate
521
00:29:40,012 --> 00:29:41,378
Ready?
522
00:29:41,446 --> 00:29:45,008
Three, two, one, drop!
523
00:29:52,190 --> 00:29:53,658
Galileo was right
524
00:29:53,725 --> 00:29:55,819
Aristotle, you lose
525
00:29:55,894 --> 00:29:59,456
Dropping feathers and hammers
is misleading,
526
00:29:59,531 --> 00:30:03,366
thanks to air resistance
527
00:30:03,435 --> 00:30:05,927
Well, in my left hand,
I have a feather
528
00:30:06,004 --> 00:30:08,530
In my right hand, a hammer
529
00:30:08,607 --> 00:30:12,476
A fact demonstrated on the Moon,
where there is no air,
530
00:30:12,544 --> 00:30:16,174
in 1971
during the Apollo 15 mission
531
00:30:16,248 --> 00:30:18,274
And I'll drop
the two of them here
532
00:30:20,252 --> 00:30:21,276
How about that?
533
00:30:21,353 --> 00:30:22,821
Mr. Galileo was correct
534
00:30:22,888 --> 00:30:26,222
Little balls, soccer balls
535
00:30:26,291 --> 00:30:27,759
So while counterintuitive
536
00:30:27,826 --> 00:30:29,692
Vegetables!
537
00:30:29,761 --> 00:30:31,787
If you take the air
out of the equation,
538
00:30:31,863 --> 00:30:35,959
everything falls
at the same rate,
539
00:30:36,034 --> 00:30:37,832
even Aristotle
540
00:30:41,673 --> 00:30:43,608
But what really
interested Galileo
541
00:30:43,675 --> 00:30:45,974
was that an object
dropped at one height
542
00:30:46,044 --> 00:30:51,642
didn't take twice as long
to drop from twice as high;
543
00:30:51,717 --> 00:30:54,243
it accelerated
544
00:30:54,319 --> 00:30:57,016
But how do you measure that?
545
00:30:57,089 --> 00:31:00,924
Everything is happening so fast
546
00:31:00,992 --> 00:31:02,858
Oh, yes!
547
00:31:05,697 --> 00:31:08,599
Galileo came up
with an ingenious solution
548
00:31:12,204 --> 00:31:18,440
He built a ramp,
an inclined plane,
549
00:31:18,510 --> 00:31:24,074
to slow the falling motion down
so he could measure it
550
00:31:24,149 --> 00:31:26,618
So we're going to use this ramp
551
00:31:26,685 --> 00:31:31,589
to find the relationship
between distance and time
552
00:31:31,656 --> 00:31:35,752
For time, I'll use
an arbitrary unit: a Galileo
553
00:31:35,827 --> 00:31:37,261
One Galileo
554
00:31:38,864 --> 00:31:41,732
The length of the ramp
that the ball rolls
555
00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:46,795
during one Galileo
becomes one unit of distance
556
00:31:46,872 --> 00:31:49,068
So we've gone
one unit of distance
557
00:31:49,141 --> 00:31:51,110
in one unit of time
558
00:31:51,176 --> 00:31:53,611
Now let's try it for a two-count
559
00:31:53,678 --> 00:31:55,977
One Galileo, two Galileo
560
00:31:56,047 --> 00:31:57,811
In two units of time,
561
00:31:57,883 --> 00:32:01,911
the ball has rolled
four units of distance
562
00:32:01,987 --> 00:32:07,324
Now let's see how far it goes
in three Galileos
563
00:32:07,392 --> 00:32:11,124
One Galileo, two Galileo,
three Galileo
564
00:32:11,196 --> 00:32:13,324
In three units of time,
565
00:32:13,398 --> 00:32:17,768
the ball has gone
nine units of distance
566
00:32:17,836 --> 00:32:19,429
So there it is
567
00:32:19,504 --> 00:32:21,473
There's a mathematical
relationship here
568
00:32:21,540 --> 00:32:24,066
between time and distance
569
00:32:24,142 --> 00:32:26,976
Galileo's inspired use of a ramp
570
00:32:27,045 --> 00:32:31,107
had shown falling objects
follow mathematical laws
571
00:32:33,251 --> 00:32:35,311
The distance the ball traveled
572
00:32:35,387 --> 00:32:40,223
is directly proportional
to the square of the time
573
00:32:40,292 --> 00:32:45,196
That mathematical relationship
that Galileo observed
574
00:32:45,263 --> 00:32:48,961
is a mathematical expression
of the physics of our universe
575
00:32:49,034 --> 00:32:51,162
Galileo's centuries-old
576
00:32:51,236 --> 00:32:54,536
mathematical observation
about falling objects
577
00:32:54,606 --> 00:32:57,838
remains just as valid today
578
00:32:57,909 --> 00:33:01,209
It's the same mathematical
expression that we can use
579
00:33:01,279 --> 00:33:04,716
to understand how objects
might fall here on Earth,
580
00:33:04,783 --> 00:33:06,945
roll down a ramp
581
00:33:07,018 --> 00:33:09,214
It's even a relationship
that we used
582
00:33:09,287 --> 00:33:12,689
to land the Curiosity rover
on the surface of Mars
583
00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:17,124
That's the power of mathematics
584
00:33:17,195 --> 00:33:21,792
Galileo's insight was profound
585
00:33:21,867 --> 00:33:24,860
Mathematics could be used
as a tool
586
00:33:24,936 --> 00:33:29,738
to uncover and discover
the hidden rules of our world
587
00:33:29,808 --> 00:33:31,743
He later wrote,
588
00:33:31,810 --> 00:33:36,111
"The universe is written
in the language of mathematics"
589
00:33:37,749 --> 00:33:40,344
Math is really the language
590
00:33:40,418 --> 00:33:42,478
in which we understand
the universe
591
00:33:42,554 --> 00:33:44,420
We don't know why it's the case
592
00:33:44,489 --> 00:33:47,982
that the laws of physics
and the universe
593
00:33:48,059 --> 00:33:51,086
follows mathematical models,
but it does seem to be the case
594
00:33:52,764 --> 00:33:54,892
While Galileo turned
mathematical equations
595
00:33:54,966 --> 00:33:57,231
into laws of science,
596
00:33:57,302 --> 00:34:01,535
it was another man,
born the same year Galileo died,
597
00:34:01,606 --> 00:34:05,566
who took that to new heights
that crossed the heavens
598
00:34:05,644 --> 00:34:09,775
His name was Isaac Newton
599
00:34:11,149 --> 00:34:15,553
He worked here at Trinity
College in Cambridge, England
600
00:34:15,620 --> 00:34:19,079
Newton cultivated the reputation
601
00:34:19,157 --> 00:34:21,023
of being a solitary genius,
602
00:34:21,092 --> 00:34:24,824
and here in the bowling green
of Trinity College,
603
00:34:24,896 --> 00:34:28,060
it was said that
he would walk meditatively
604
00:34:28,133 --> 00:34:31,831
up and down the paths,
absentmindedly drawing
605
00:34:31,903 --> 00:34:34,930
mathematical diagrams
in the gravel,
606
00:34:35,006 --> 00:34:38,943
and the fellows were instructed,
or so it was said,
607
00:34:39,010 --> 00:34:41,172
not to disturb him,
608
00:34:41,246 --> 00:34:44,410
not to clear up the gravel
after he'd passed,
609
00:34:44,482 --> 00:34:47,782
in case they inadvertently
wiped out
610
00:34:47,852 --> 00:34:51,619
some major scientific
or mathematical discovery
611
00:34:51,690 --> 00:34:56,788
In 1687, Newton published a book
612
00:34:56,861 --> 00:35:00,889
that would become a landmark
in the history of science
613
00:35:00,966 --> 00:35:04,027
Today, it is known simply
as the "Principia"
614
00:35:04,102 --> 00:35:05,536
In it, Newton
gathered observations
615
00:35:05,604 --> 00:35:06,697
from around the world
616
00:35:06,771 --> 00:35:11,266
and used mathematics
to explain them...
617
00:35:11,343 --> 00:35:15,405
For instance, that of a comet
seen widely in the fall of 1680
618
00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:17,676
He gathers data worldwide
619
00:35:17,749 --> 00:35:21,481
in order to construct
the comet's path
620
00:35:21,553 --> 00:35:27,823
So for November the 19th,
he begins with an observation
621
00:35:27,892 --> 00:35:31,556
made in Cambridge in England
at 4:30 a m
622
00:35:31,630 --> 00:35:33,496
by a certain young person,
623
00:35:33,565 --> 00:35:40,301
and then at 5:00 in the morning
at Boston in New England
624
00:35:40,372 --> 00:35:43,240
So what Newton does
is to accumulate numbers
625
00:35:43,308 --> 00:35:46,710
made by observers
spread right across the globe
626
00:35:46,778 --> 00:35:48,610
in order to construct
627
00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:51,582
an unprecedentedly
accurate calculation
628
00:35:51,650 --> 00:35:56,452
of how this great comet
moved through the sky
629
00:35:56,521 --> 00:36:00,049
Newton's groundbreaking insight
was that the force
630
00:36:00,125 --> 00:36:03,755
that sent the comet
hurtling around the Sun
631
00:36:05,030 --> 00:36:06,828
was the same force
632
00:36:06,898 --> 00:36:10,164
that brought cannonballs
back to Earth
633
00:36:10,235 --> 00:36:15,799
It was the force behind
Galileo's law of falling bodies,
634
00:36:15,874 --> 00:36:21,245
and it even held the planets
in their orbits
635
00:36:21,312 --> 00:36:26,580
He called the force gravity,
and described it precisely
636
00:36:26,651 --> 00:36:29,120
in a surprisingly
simple equation
637
00:36:29,187 --> 00:36:31,850
that explains how two masses
attract each other,
638
00:36:31,923 --> 00:36:37,760
whether here on Earth
or in the heavens above
639
00:36:37,829 --> 00:36:40,924
What's so impressive
and so dramatic
640
00:36:40,999 --> 00:36:44,128
is that a single
mathematical law
641
00:36:44,202 --> 00:36:47,570
would allow you to move
throughout the universe
642
00:36:50,542 --> 00:36:56,243
Today, we can even witness it
at work beyond the Milky Way
643
00:36:57,649 --> 00:37:00,585
This is a picture
of two galaxies
644
00:37:00,652 --> 00:37:03,144
that are actually being drawn
together in a merger
645
00:37:03,221 --> 00:37:05,087
This is how galaxies
build themselves
646
00:37:05,156 --> 00:37:06,556
Right
647
00:37:06,624 --> 00:37:08,115
Mario Livio is on the team
648
00:37:08,193 --> 00:37:10,924
working with the images
from the Hubble Space Telescope
649
00:37:10,995 --> 00:37:13,988
For decades,
scientists have used Hubble
650
00:37:14,065 --> 00:37:17,160
to gaze far beyond
our solar system,
651
00:37:17,235 --> 00:37:20,433
even beyond the stars
of our galaxy
652
00:37:20,505 --> 00:37:23,839
It's shown us the distant
gas clouds of nebulae
653
00:37:23,908 --> 00:37:28,004
and vast numbers of galaxies
wheeling in the heavens
654
00:37:28,079 --> 00:37:31,243
billions of light-years away
655
00:37:31,316 --> 00:37:33,376
And what those images show
656
00:37:33,451 --> 00:37:35,750
is that throughout
the visible universe,
657
00:37:35,820 --> 00:37:38,449
as far as the telescope can see,
658
00:37:38,523 --> 00:37:42,221
the law of gravity still applies
659
00:37:42,293 --> 00:37:44,353
You know, Newton wrote
these laws
660
00:37:44,429 --> 00:37:46,091
of gravity and of motion
661
00:37:46,164 --> 00:37:49,498
based on things
happening on Earth,
662
00:37:49,567 --> 00:37:51,695
and the planets in
the solar system and so on,
663
00:37:51,770 --> 00:37:55,104
but these same laws,
these very same laws
664
00:37:55,173 --> 00:37:57,870
apply to all these
distant galaxies
665
00:37:57,942 --> 00:37:59,740
and, you know, shape them,
666
00:37:59,811 --> 00:38:02,975
and everything about them...
How they form, how they move...
667
00:38:03,047 --> 00:38:07,485
Is controlled by those
same mathematical laws
668
00:38:07,552 --> 00:38:11,648
Some of the world's
greatest minds have been amazed
669
00:38:11,723 --> 00:38:15,819
by the way that math
permeates the universe
670
00:38:15,894 --> 00:38:17,726
Albert Einstein, he wondered,
671
00:38:17,796 --> 00:38:21,597
he said, "How is it possible
that mathematics,"
672
00:38:21,666 --> 00:38:25,159
which is, he thought,
a product of human thought,
673
00:38:25,236 --> 00:38:29,367
"Does so well in explaining
the universe as we see it?"
674
00:38:29,440 --> 00:38:32,968
And Nobel laureate in physics
Eugene Wigner
675
00:38:33,044 --> 00:38:34,569
coined this phrase:
676
00:38:34,646 --> 00:38:37,707
"The unreasonable effectiveness
of mathematics"
677
00:38:37,782 --> 00:38:40,183
He said the fact
that mathematics
678
00:38:40,251 --> 00:38:43,221
can really describe
the universe so well,
679
00:38:43,288 --> 00:38:45,382
in particular physical laws,
680
00:38:45,456 --> 00:38:50,360
is a gift that we neither
understand nor deserve
681
00:38:50,428 --> 00:38:52,988
In physics,
682
00:38:53,064 --> 00:38:57,297
examples of that "unreasonable
effectiveness" abound
683
00:38:59,237 --> 00:39:01,172
When nearly 200 years ago
684
00:39:01,239 --> 00:39:03,902
the planet Uranus
was seen to go off track,
685
00:39:03,975 --> 00:39:06,570
scientists trusted the math
686
00:39:06,644 --> 00:39:11,412
and calculated it was being
pulled by another unseen planet
687
00:39:14,319 --> 00:39:18,188
And so they discovered Neptune
688
00:39:18,256 --> 00:39:20,623
Mathematics
had accurately predicted
689
00:39:20,692 --> 00:39:23,856
a previously unknown planet
690
00:39:23,928 --> 00:39:28,696
If you formulate
a question properly,
691
00:39:28,766 --> 00:39:31,429
mathematics gives you the answer
692
00:39:31,502 --> 00:39:34,336
It's like having a servant
693
00:39:34,405 --> 00:39:37,671
that is far more capable
than you are
694
00:39:37,742 --> 00:39:39,677
So you tell it "Do this,"
695
00:39:39,744 --> 00:39:42,839
and if you say it nicely,
then it'll do it
696
00:39:42,914 --> 00:39:45,941
and it will carry you
all the way to the truth,
697
00:39:46,017 --> 00:39:48,486
to the final answer
698
00:39:48,553 --> 00:39:50,886
WGBH, 89 7
699
00:39:50,955 --> 00:39:54,756
Evidence of the amazing
predictive power of mathematics
700
00:39:54,826 --> 00:39:57,318
can be found all around us
701
00:39:57,395 --> 00:40:00,297
I heard it took five Elvises
to pull them apart
702
00:40:00,365 --> 00:40:06,464
Television, radio,
your cell phone, satellites,
703
00:40:06,537 --> 00:40:13,501
the baby monitor, Wi-Fi,
your garage door opener, GPS,
704
00:40:13,578 --> 00:40:16,309
and yes, even maybe
your TV's remote
705
00:40:16,381 --> 00:40:20,546
All of these use invisible waves
of energy to communicate,
706
00:40:20,618 --> 00:40:23,281
and no one even knew
they existed
707
00:40:23,354 --> 00:40:25,823
until the work of James Maxwell,
708
00:40:25,890 --> 00:40:29,520
a Scottish mathematical
physicist
709
00:40:29,594 --> 00:40:34,225
In the 1860s,
he published a set of equations
710
00:40:34,299 --> 00:40:38,236
that explained how electricity
and magnetism were related...
711
00:40:38,303 --> 00:40:43,264
How each could generate
the other
712
00:40:43,341 --> 00:40:46,903
The equations also made
a startling prediction
713
00:40:49,314 --> 00:40:51,613
Together, electricity
and magnetism
714
00:40:51,683 --> 00:40:53,845
could produce waves of energy
715
00:40:53,918 --> 00:40:58,253
that would travel through space
at the speed of light:
716
00:40:58,323 --> 00:41:01,691
electromagnetic waves
717
00:41:01,759 --> 00:41:03,421
Maxwell's theory gave us
718
00:41:03,494 --> 00:41:06,589
these radio waves, X-rays,
719
00:41:06,664 --> 00:41:09,498
these things which were simply
not known about at all
720
00:41:09,567 --> 00:41:12,901
So the theory had a scope,
which was extraordinary
721
00:41:15,974 --> 00:41:19,172
Almost immediately, people
set out to find the waves
722
00:41:19,243 --> 00:41:22,611
predicted by Maxwell's equations
723
00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:24,808
What must have seemed
the least promising attempt
724
00:41:24,882 --> 00:41:27,943
to harness them is made here,
in northern Italy,
725
00:41:28,019 --> 00:41:30,579
in the attic of a family home
726
00:41:30,655 --> 00:41:34,057
by 20-year-old Guglielmo Marconi
727
00:41:34,125 --> 00:41:38,221
His process starts
with a series of sparks
728
00:41:42,166 --> 00:41:46,262
The burst of electricity creates
a momentary magnetic field,
729
00:41:46,337 --> 00:41:50,172
which in turn generates
a momentary electric field,
730
00:41:50,241 --> 00:41:53,211
which creates
another magnetic field
731
00:41:53,277 --> 00:41:55,508
The energy cycles
between the two,
732
00:41:55,580 --> 00:41:58,573
propagating
an electromagnetic wave
733
00:42:01,853 --> 00:42:05,654
Marconi gets his system
to work inside,
734
00:42:05,723 --> 00:42:09,125
but then he scales up
735
00:42:12,497 --> 00:42:16,434
Over a few weeks, he builds
a big antenna beside the house
736
00:42:16,501 --> 00:42:20,233
to amplify the waves
coming from his spark generator
737
00:42:20,304 --> 00:42:24,799
Then he asks his brother
and an assistant
738
00:42:24,876 --> 00:42:27,812
to carry a receiver
across the estate
739
00:42:27,879 --> 00:42:29,939
to the far side of a nearby hill
740
00:42:30,014 --> 00:42:31,812
They also have a shotgun,
741
00:42:31,883 --> 00:42:35,081
which they will fire if they
manage to pick up the signal
742
00:42:52,403 --> 00:42:53,837
And it works
743
00:42:53,905 --> 00:42:55,635
The signal has been detected
744
00:42:55,706 --> 00:42:59,700
even though the receiver
is now hidden behind a hill
745
00:42:59,777 --> 00:43:01,507
At over a mile,
746
00:43:01,579 --> 00:43:04,572
it is the farthest
transmission to date
747
00:43:04,649 --> 00:43:07,414
In fewer than ten years,
748
00:43:07,485 --> 00:43:11,980
Marconi will be sending radio
signals across the Atlantic
749
00:43:12,056 --> 00:43:16,687
In fact, when the Titanic sinks
in 1912,
750
00:43:16,761 --> 00:43:20,994
he'll be personally credited
with saving many lives
751
00:43:21,065 --> 00:43:24,331
because his onboard equipment
allowed the distress signal
752
00:43:24,402 --> 00:43:28,032
to be transmitted
753
00:43:28,106 --> 00:43:32,134
Thanks to the predictions
of Maxwell's equations,
754
00:43:32,210 --> 00:43:36,045
Marconi could harness
a hidden part of our world,
755
00:43:36,114 --> 00:43:40,108
ushering in the era
of wireless communication
756
00:43:45,056 --> 00:43:48,720
Since Maxwell and Marconi,
757
00:43:48,793 --> 00:43:52,753
evidence of the predictive power
of mathematics has only grown,
758
00:43:52,830 --> 00:43:56,392
especially
in the world of physics
759
00:43:56,467 --> 00:44:01,235
100 years ago,
we barely knew atoms existed
760
00:44:01,305 --> 00:44:04,139
It took experiments
to reveal their components:
761
00:44:04,208 --> 00:44:07,906
the electron, the proton,
and the neutron
762
00:44:07,979 --> 00:44:10,380
But when physicists
wanted to go deeper,
763
00:44:10,448 --> 00:44:13,418
mathematics began
to lead the way,
764
00:44:13,484 --> 00:44:17,819
ultimately revealing a zoo
of elementary particles,
765
00:44:17,889 --> 00:44:23,089
discoveries that continue
to this day here at CERN,
766
00:44:23,161 --> 00:44:26,290
the European organization
for nuclear research
767
00:44:26,364 --> 00:44:28,196
in Geneva, Switzerland
768
00:44:28,266 --> 00:44:33,034
These days, they're most famous
for their Large Hadron Collider,
769
00:44:33,104 --> 00:44:37,838
a circular particle accelerator
about 17 miles around,
770
00:44:37,909 --> 00:44:41,277
built deep underground
771
00:44:43,581 --> 00:44:47,416
This $10 billion project,
decades in the making,
772
00:44:47,485 --> 00:44:51,047
had a well-publicized goal:
the search
773
00:44:51,122 --> 00:44:54,559
for one of the most fundamental
building blocks of the universe
774
00:44:57,428 --> 00:44:59,090
A subatomic particle
775
00:44:59,163 --> 00:45:03,863
mathematically predicted
to exist nearly 50 years earlier
776
00:45:03,935 --> 00:45:08,532
by Robert Brout and Francois
Englert working in Belgium
777
00:45:08,606 --> 00:45:11,337
and Peter Higgs in Scotland
778
00:45:11,409 --> 00:45:14,402
Peter Higgs sat down
779
00:45:14,478 --> 00:45:16,290
with the most advanced
physics equations we had
780
00:45:16,314 --> 00:45:17,577
and calculated and calculated
781
00:45:17,648 --> 00:45:19,708
and made this audacious
prediction:
782
00:45:19,784 --> 00:45:21,878
if we built the most
sophisticated machines
783
00:45:21,953 --> 00:45:23,216
humans have ever built
784
00:45:23,287 --> 00:45:25,085
and used it
to smash particles together
785
00:45:25,156 --> 00:45:26,920
near the speed of light
in a certain way
786
00:45:26,991 --> 00:45:28,823
that we would then discover
a new particle
787
00:45:28,893 --> 00:45:31,658
You know, if this math
was really accurate
788
00:45:31,729 --> 00:45:34,426
The discovery
of the Higgs particle
789
00:45:34,498 --> 00:45:37,161
would be proof
of the Higgs field,
790
00:45:37,235 --> 00:45:41,866
a cosmic molasses that gives
the stuff of our world mass...
791
00:45:41,939 --> 00:45:46,775
What we usually experience
as weight
792
00:45:46,844 --> 00:45:50,406
Without mass, everything would
travel at the speed of light
793
00:45:50,481 --> 00:45:53,747
and would never combine
to form atoms
794
00:45:53,818 --> 00:45:55,753
That makes the Higgs field
795
00:45:55,820 --> 00:45:58,415
such a fundamental part
of physics
796
00:45:58,489 --> 00:46:01,118
that the Higgs particle
gained the nickname
797
00:46:01,192 --> 00:46:03,627
"The God Particle"
798
00:46:07,198 --> 00:46:09,429
In 2012, experiments at CERN
799
00:46:09,500 --> 00:46:12,766
confirmed the existence
of the Higgs particle,
800
00:46:12,837 --> 00:46:15,033
making the work of Peter Higgs
801
00:46:15,106 --> 00:46:17,200
and his colleagues
decades earlier
802
00:46:17,275 --> 00:46:21,736
one of the greatest predictions
ever made
803
00:46:21,812 --> 00:46:24,008
And we built it and it worked,
804
00:46:24,081 --> 00:46:26,482
and he got a free trip
to Stockholm
805
00:46:37,628 --> 00:46:40,393
Here, you have
mathematical theories
806
00:46:40,464 --> 00:46:44,401
which make
very definitive predictions
807
00:46:44,468 --> 00:46:46,835
about the possible existence
808
00:46:46,904 --> 00:46:49,499
of some fundamental particles
of nature,
809
00:46:49,573 --> 00:46:53,510
and believe it or not,
they make these huge experiments
810
00:46:53,577 --> 00:46:57,105
and they actually discover
the particles
811
00:46:57,181 --> 00:46:58,843
that have been predicted
mathematically
812
00:46:58,916 --> 00:47:01,476
I mean,
this is just amazing to me
813
00:47:03,721 --> 00:47:05,917
Why does this work?
814
00:47:05,990 --> 00:47:09,154
How can mathematics
be so powerful?
815
00:47:09,226 --> 00:47:12,890
Is mathematics, you know,
a truth of nature,
816
00:47:12,963 --> 00:47:14,829
or does it have something to do
817
00:47:14,899 --> 00:47:17,869
with the way we as humans
perceive nature?
818
00:47:17,935 --> 00:47:20,962
To me, this is just
a fascinating puzzle
819
00:47:21,038 --> 00:47:22,700
I don't know the answer
820
00:47:25,209 --> 00:47:28,976
In physics, mathematics has had
a long string of successes
821
00:47:29,046 --> 00:47:33,040
But is it really
"unreasonably effective"?
822
00:47:33,117 --> 00:47:35,609
Not everyone thinks so
823
00:47:35,686 --> 00:47:37,177
I think it's an illusion,
824
00:47:37,254 --> 00:47:39,018
because I think what's happened
825
00:47:39,090 --> 00:47:42,959
is that people have chosen
to build physics, for example,
826
00:47:43,027 --> 00:47:45,553
using the mathematics
that has been practiced,
827
00:47:45,629 --> 00:47:47,029
has developed historically,
828
00:47:47,098 --> 00:47:49,829
and then they're looking
at everything,
829
00:47:49,900 --> 00:47:52,563
they're choosing to study things
which are amenable to study
830
00:47:52,636 --> 00:47:55,162
using the mathematics
that happens to have arisen
831
00:47:55,239 --> 00:47:58,573
But actually, there is a whole
vast ocean of other things
832
00:47:58,642 --> 00:48:01,840
that are really quite
inaccessible to those methods
833
00:48:01,912 --> 00:48:05,781
With the success of mathematical
models in physics,
834
00:48:05,850 --> 00:48:09,617
it's easy to overlook
where they don't work that well
835
00:48:09,687 --> 00:48:12,418
Like in weather forecasting
836
00:48:12,490 --> 00:48:14,925
There's a reason meteorologists
predict the weather
837
00:48:14,992 --> 00:48:16,756
for the coming week,
838
00:48:16,827 --> 00:48:19,126
but not much further out
than that
839
00:48:19,196 --> 00:48:24,328
In a longer forecast,
small errors grow into big ones
840
00:48:24,402 --> 00:48:28,032
Daily weather is just
too complex and chaotic
841
00:48:28,105 --> 00:48:30,574
for precise modeling
842
00:48:30,641 --> 00:48:32,007
And it's not alone
843
00:48:32,076 --> 00:48:36,776
So is the behavior of water
boiling on a stove,
844
00:48:36,847 --> 00:48:39,874
or the stock market,
845
00:48:39,950 --> 00:48:43,751
or the interaction of neurons
in the brain,
846
00:48:43,821 --> 00:48:45,915
much of human psychology,
847
00:48:45,990 --> 00:48:48,289
and parts of biology
848
00:48:48,359 --> 00:48:50,157
Biological systems,
849
00:48:50,227 --> 00:48:52,128
economic systems,
850
00:48:52,196 --> 00:48:55,098
it gets very difficult to model
those systems with math
851
00:48:55,166 --> 00:48:57,567
We have extreme difficulty
with that
852
00:48:57,635 --> 00:49:02,232
So I do not see math
as unreasonably effective
853
00:49:02,306 --> 00:49:05,674
I see it as reasonably
ineffective
854
00:49:08,846 --> 00:49:11,873
Perhaps no one
is as keenly aware
855
00:49:11,949 --> 00:49:14,418
of the power and limitations
of mathematics
856
00:49:14,485 --> 00:49:17,614
as those who use it
to design and make things:
857
00:49:17,688 --> 00:49:18,883
engineers
858
00:49:18,956 --> 00:49:20,652
Look at that wheel!
859
00:49:20,724 --> 00:49:24,161
In their work,
the elegance of math
860
00:49:24,228 --> 00:49:30,498
meets the messiness of reality,
and practicality rules the day
861
00:49:30,568 --> 00:49:33,060
Mathematics
and perhaps mathematicians
862
00:49:33,137 --> 00:49:35,470
deal in the domain
of the absolute,
863
00:49:35,539 --> 00:49:40,273
and engineers live in the domain
of the approximate
864
00:49:40,344 --> 00:49:45,248
We are fundamentally interested
in the practical
865
00:49:45,316 --> 00:49:48,411
And so frequently, we make
approximations, we cut corners
866
00:49:48,486 --> 00:49:49,954
We omit terms and equations
867
00:49:50,020 --> 00:49:53,184
to get things
that are simple enough
868
00:49:53,257 --> 00:49:55,817
to suit our purposes
and to meet our needs
869
00:49:59,530 --> 00:50:02,398
Many of our greatest
engineering achievements
870
00:50:02,466 --> 00:50:04,867
were built using
mathematical shortcuts:
871
00:50:04,935 --> 00:50:09,100
simplified equations
that approximate an answer,
872
00:50:09,173 --> 00:50:12,575
trading some precision
for practicality
873
00:50:12,643 --> 00:50:17,513
And for engineers,
"approximate" is close enough
874
00:50:17,581 --> 00:50:20,745
Close enough to take you to Mars
875
00:50:22,820 --> 00:50:24,288
For us engineers,
876
00:50:24,355 --> 00:50:25,948
we don't get paid
to do things right;
877
00:50:26,023 --> 00:50:29,926
we get paid to do things
just right enough
878
00:50:32,796 --> 00:50:35,698
Many physicists
see an uncanny accuracy
879
00:50:35,766 --> 00:50:37,359
in the way mathematics
can reveal
880
00:50:37,434 --> 00:50:39,767
the secrets of the universe,
881
00:50:39,837 --> 00:50:46,710
making it seem to be
an inherent part of nature
882
00:50:46,777 --> 00:50:51,374
Meanwhile, engineers in practice
have to sacrifice
883
00:50:51,448 --> 00:50:54,543
the precision of mathematics
to keep it useful,
884
00:50:54,618 --> 00:50:58,714
making it seem more like
an imperfect tool
885
00:50:58,789 --> 00:51:01,349
of our own invention
886
00:51:01,425 --> 00:51:04,361
So which is mathematics?
887
00:51:04,428 --> 00:51:07,956
A discovered part
of the universe?
888
00:51:08,032 --> 00:51:11,196
Or a very human invention?
889
00:51:11,268 --> 00:51:15,729
Maybe it's both
890
00:51:18,509 --> 00:51:20,910
What I think about mathematics
891
00:51:20,978 --> 00:51:23,880
is that it is an intricate
combination
892
00:51:23,948 --> 00:51:26,713
of inventions and discoveries
893
00:51:26,784 --> 00:51:29,253
So for example, take something
like natural numbers:
894
00:51:29,320 --> 00:51:32,188
one, two, three, four, five,
etcetera
895
00:51:32,256 --> 00:51:33,952
I think what happened
896
00:51:34,024 --> 00:51:36,102
was that people were looking
at many things, for example,
897
00:51:36,126 --> 00:51:39,096
and seeing that
there are two eyes, you know,
898
00:51:39,163 --> 00:51:41,894
two breasts, two hands,
you know, and so on
899
00:51:41,966 --> 00:51:44,026
And after some time,
900
00:51:44,101 --> 00:51:47,367
they abstracted from all of that
the number two
901
00:51:49,206 --> 00:51:52,904
According to Mario, "two"
became an invented concept,
902
00:51:52,977 --> 00:51:56,641
as did all the other
natural numbers
903
00:51:56,714 --> 00:51:59,149
But then people discovered
that these numbers
904
00:51:59,216 --> 00:52:02,118
have all kinds
of intricate relationships
905
00:52:02,186 --> 00:52:05,623
Those were discoveries
906
00:52:05,689 --> 00:52:09,387
We invented the concept,
but then discovered
907
00:52:09,460 --> 00:52:12,089
the relations
among the different concepts
908
00:52:12,162 --> 00:52:15,599
So is this the answer?
909
00:52:15,666 --> 00:52:19,603
That math is both invented
and discovered?
910
00:52:19,670 --> 00:52:21,470
This is one of those questions
where it's both
911
00:52:21,505 --> 00:52:24,236
Yes, it feels like
it's already there,
912
00:52:24,308 --> 00:52:26,539
but yes, it's something
that comes out of our deep,
913
00:52:26,610 --> 00:52:29,102
creative nature as human beings
914
00:52:29,179 --> 00:52:32,775
We may have some idea
to how all this works,
915
00:52:32,850 --> 00:52:35,684
but not the complete answer
916
00:52:35,753 --> 00:52:40,885
In the end, it remains
"The Great Math Mystery"
71694
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.