All language subtitles for Nova S42E07 The Great Math Mystery.DVDRip.en.PBS

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American) Download
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:01,168 --> 00:00:02,500 Roger, copy mission 2 00:00:02,569 --> 00:00:05,937 We live in an age of astonishing advances 3 00:00:06,006 --> 00:00:09,135 Descending at about 75 meters per second 4 00:00:09,209 --> 00:00:13,271 Engineers can land a car-size rover on Mars 5 00:00:13,347 --> 00:00:14,371 Touchdown confirmed 6 00:00:16,817 --> 00:00:21,755 Physicists probe the essence of all matter, 7 00:00:21,822 --> 00:00:26,692 while we communicate wirelessly on a vast worldwide network 8 00:00:28,562 --> 00:00:31,031 But underlying all of these modern wonders 9 00:00:31,098 --> 00:00:35,832 is something deep and mysteriously powerful 10 00:00:35,903 --> 00:00:38,566 It's been called the language of the universe, 11 00:00:38,639 --> 00:00:42,508 and perhaps it's civilization's greatest achievement 12 00:00:42,576 --> 00:00:44,169 Its name? 13 00:00:44,244 --> 00:00:46,440 Mathematics 14 00:00:46,513 --> 00:00:48,846 But where does math come from? 15 00:00:48,916 --> 00:00:52,318 And why in science does it work so well? 16 00:00:52,386 --> 00:00:54,252 Albert Einstein wondered, 17 00:00:54,321 --> 00:00:57,018 "How is it possible that mathematics 18 00:00:57,090 --> 00:01:01,755 does so well in explaining the universe as we see it?" 19 00:01:01,828 --> 00:01:05,959 Is mathematics even human? 20 00:01:06,033 --> 00:01:09,003 There doesn't really seem to be an upper limit 21 00:01:09,069 --> 00:01:11,561 to the numerical abilities of animals 22 00:01:11,638 --> 00:01:15,405 And is it the key to the cosmos? 23 00:01:15,475 --> 00:01:17,034 Our physical world 24 00:01:17,110 --> 00:01:19,375 doesn't just have some mathematical properties, 25 00:01:19,446 --> 00:01:21,381 but it has only mathematical properties 26 00:01:21,448 --> 00:01:25,943 "The Great Math Mystery," next on NOVA! 27 00:02:27,881 --> 00:02:30,373 Human beings have always looked at nature 28 00:02:30,450 --> 00:02:32,885 and searched for patterns 29 00:02:32,953 --> 00:02:36,151 Eons ago, we gazed at the stars 30 00:02:36,223 --> 00:02:40,160 and discovered patterns we call constellations, 31 00:02:40,227 --> 00:02:44,323 even coming to believe they might control our destiny 32 00:02:44,398 --> 00:02:50,338 We've watched the days turn to night and back to day, 33 00:02:50,404 --> 00:02:53,704 and seasons as they come and go, 34 00:02:53,774 --> 00:02:57,836 and called that pattern "time" 35 00:02:57,911 --> 00:03:03,111 We see symmetrical patterns in the human body 36 00:03:03,183 --> 00:03:06,585 and the tiger's stripes 37 00:03:06,653 --> 00:03:09,589 and build those patterns into what we create, 38 00:03:09,656 --> 00:03:13,718 from art to our cities 39 00:03:18,565 --> 00:03:20,625 But what do patterns tell us? 40 00:03:20,701 --> 00:03:25,139 Why should the spiral shape of the nautilus shell 41 00:03:25,205 --> 00:03:29,404 be so similar to the spiral of a galaxy? 42 00:03:29,476 --> 00:03:34,141 Or the spiral found in a sliced open head of cabbage? 43 00:03:34,214 --> 00:03:37,412 When scientists seek to understand 44 00:03:37,484 --> 00:03:39,077 the patterns of our world, 45 00:03:39,152 --> 00:03:44,181 they often turn to a powerful tool: mathematics 46 00:03:44,257 --> 00:03:46,988 They quantify their observations 47 00:03:47,060 --> 00:03:50,827 and use mathematical techniques to examine them, 48 00:03:50,897 --> 00:03:53,492 hoping to discover the underlying causes 49 00:03:53,567 --> 00:03:57,436 of nature's rhythms and regularities 50 00:03:57,504 --> 00:04:00,133 And it's worked, revealing the secrets 51 00:04:00,207 --> 00:04:02,802 behind the elliptical orbits of the planets 52 00:04:02,876 --> 00:04:08,838 to the electromagnetic waves that connect our cell phones 53 00:04:08,915 --> 00:04:10,907 Mathematics has even guided the way, 54 00:04:10,984 --> 00:04:12,350 leading us right down 55 00:04:12,419 --> 00:04:14,945 to the sub-atomic building blocks of matter 56 00:04:18,024 --> 00:04:22,928 Which raises the question: why does it work at all? 57 00:04:22,996 --> 00:04:27,559 Is there an inherent mathematical nature to reality? 58 00:04:27,634 --> 00:04:30,934 Or is mathematics all in our heads? 59 00:04:36,243 --> 00:04:39,407 Mario Livio is an astrophysicist 60 00:04:39,479 --> 00:04:41,209 who wrestles with these questions 61 00:04:41,281 --> 00:04:45,878 He's fascinated by the deep and often mysterious connection 62 00:04:45,952 --> 00:04:48,251 between mathematics and the world 63 00:04:48,321 --> 00:04:52,383 If you look at nature, there are numbers all around us 64 00:04:52,459 --> 00:04:54,928 You know, look at flowers, for example 65 00:04:54,995 --> 00:04:56,520 So there are many flowers 66 00:04:56,596 --> 00:04:59,122 that have three petals like this, or five like this 67 00:04:59,199 --> 00:05:03,637 Some of them may have 34 or 55 68 00:05:03,703 --> 00:05:05,365 These numbers occur very often 69 00:05:05,438 --> 00:05:09,239 These may sound like random numbers, 70 00:05:09,309 --> 00:05:13,713 but they're all part of what is known as the Fibonacci sequence, 71 00:05:13,780 --> 00:05:17,740 a series of numbers developed by a 13th century mathematician 72 00:05:21,388 --> 00:05:24,153 You start with the numbers one and one, 73 00:05:24,224 --> 00:05:25,715 and from that point on, 74 00:05:25,792 --> 00:05:27,988 you keep adding up the last two numbers 75 00:05:28,061 --> 00:05:30,895 So one plus one is two, 76 00:05:30,964 --> 00:05:34,093 now one plus two is three, 77 00:05:34,167 --> 00:05:37,569 two plus three is five, 78 00:05:37,637 --> 00:05:42,575 three plus five is eight, and you keep going like this 79 00:05:42,642 --> 00:05:45,077 Today, hundreds of years later, 80 00:05:45,145 --> 00:05:47,910 this seemingly arbitrary progression of numbers 81 00:05:47,981 --> 00:05:50,678 fascinates many, who see in it clues 82 00:05:50,750 --> 00:05:54,949 to everything from human beauty to the stock market 83 00:05:55,021 --> 00:05:57,650 While most of those claims remain unproven, 84 00:05:57,724 --> 00:06:01,786 it is curious how evolution seems to favor these numbers 85 00:06:01,862 --> 00:06:03,990 And as it turns out, 86 00:06:04,064 --> 00:06:07,432 this sequence appears quite frequently in nature 87 00:06:07,500 --> 00:06:10,766 Fibonacci numbers show up in petal counts, 88 00:06:10,837 --> 00:06:15,673 especially of daisies, but that's just a start 89 00:06:15,742 --> 00:06:17,720 Statistically, the Fibonacci numbers 90 00:06:17,744 --> 00:06:21,613 do appear a lot in botany 91 00:06:21,681 --> 00:06:24,981 For instance, if you look at the bottom of a pine cone, 92 00:06:25,051 --> 00:06:29,045 you will see often spirals in their scales 93 00:06:29,122 --> 00:06:31,614 You end up counting those spirals, 94 00:06:31,691 --> 00:06:34,820 you'll usually find a Fibonacci number, 95 00:06:34,895 --> 00:06:36,761 and then you will count the spirals 96 00:06:36,830 --> 00:06:38,696 going in the other direction 97 00:06:38,765 --> 00:06:42,202 and you will find an adjacent Fibonacci number 98 00:06:42,269 --> 00:06:47,298 The same is true of the seeds on a sunflower head... 99 00:06:47,374 --> 00:06:49,934 Two sets of spirals 100 00:06:50,010 --> 00:06:53,071 And if you count the spirals in each direction, 101 00:06:53,146 --> 00:06:56,844 both are Fibonacci numbers 102 00:06:56,917 --> 00:06:59,318 While there are some theories 103 00:06:59,386 --> 00:07:01,946 explaining the Fibonacci-botany connection, 104 00:07:02,022 --> 00:07:06,517 it still raises some intriguing questions 105 00:07:06,593 --> 00:07:08,186 So do plants know math? 106 00:07:08,261 --> 00:07:12,198 The short answer to that is "No" 107 00:07:12,265 --> 00:07:14,632 They don't need to know math 108 00:07:14,701 --> 00:07:19,799 In a very simple, geometric way, they set up a little machine 109 00:07:19,873 --> 00:07:24,402 that creates the Fibonacci sequence in many cases 110 00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:29,381 The mysterious connections 111 00:07:29,449 --> 00:07:33,477 between the physical world and mathematics run deep 112 00:07:33,553 --> 00:07:36,022 We all know the number pi from geometry... 113 00:07:36,089 --> 00:07:38,649 The ratio between the circumference of a circle 114 00:07:38,725 --> 00:07:42,253 and its diameter... And that its decimal digits 115 00:07:42,329 --> 00:07:45,766 go on forever without a repeating pattern 116 00:07:45,832 --> 00:07:47,698 As of 2013, 117 00:07:47,767 --> 00:07:52,000 it had been calculated out to 12 1 trillion digits 118 00:07:52,072 --> 00:07:56,271 But somehow, pi is a whole lot more 119 00:07:56,343 --> 00:07:59,313 Pi appears in a whole host of other phenomena 120 00:07:59,379 --> 00:08:01,405 which have, at least on the face of it, 121 00:08:01,481 --> 00:08:03,507 nothing to do with circles or anything 122 00:08:03,583 --> 00:08:08,021 In particular, it appears in probability theory quite a bit 123 00:08:08,088 --> 00:08:09,420 Suppose I take this needle 124 00:08:09,489 --> 00:08:12,084 So the length of the needle 125 00:08:12,158 --> 00:08:14,889 is equal to the distance between two lines 126 00:08:14,961 --> 00:08:16,759 on this piece of paper 127 00:08:16,830 --> 00:08:19,732 And suppose I drop this needle now on the paper 128 00:08:19,799 --> 00:08:24,066 Sometimes when you drop the needle, it will cut a line, 129 00:08:24,137 --> 00:08:26,766 and sometimes it drops between the lines 130 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,469 It turns out the probability 131 00:08:29,542 --> 00:08:32,410 that the needle lands so it cuts a line 132 00:08:32,479 --> 00:08:36,211 is exactly two over pi, or about 133 00:08:38,118 --> 00:08:41,054 64% 134 00:08:41,121 --> 00:08:44,853 Now, what that means is that, in principle, 135 00:08:44,924 --> 00:08:47,257 I could drop this needle millions of times 136 00:08:47,327 --> 00:08:50,195 I could count the times when it crosses a line 137 00:08:50,263 --> 00:08:52,755 and when it doesn't cross a line, 138 00:08:52,832 --> 00:08:54,824 and I could actually even calculate pi 139 00:08:54,901 --> 00:08:57,598 even though there are no circles here, 140 00:08:57,670 --> 00:09:00,333 no diameters of a circle, nothing like that 141 00:09:00,407 --> 00:09:01,932 It's really amazing 142 00:09:06,846 --> 00:09:09,714 Since pi relates a round object, a circle, 143 00:09:09,783 --> 00:09:12,981 with a straight one, its diameter, 144 00:09:13,053 --> 00:09:17,013 it can show up in the strangest of places 145 00:09:17,090 --> 00:09:20,492 Some see it in the meandering path of rivers 146 00:09:20,560 --> 00:09:22,028 A river's actual length 147 00:09:22,095 --> 00:09:25,259 as it winds its way from its source to its mouth 148 00:09:25,331 --> 00:09:31,737 compared to the direct distance on average seems to be about pi 149 00:09:31,805 --> 00:09:34,331 Models for just about anything involving waves 150 00:09:34,407 --> 00:09:40,745 will have pi in them, like those for light and sound 151 00:09:40,814 --> 00:09:44,512 Pi tells us which colors should appear in a rainbow, 152 00:09:44,584 --> 00:09:48,351 and how middle C should sound on a piano 153 00:09:48,421 --> 00:09:50,890 Pi shows up in apples, 154 00:09:50,957 --> 00:09:54,257 in the way cells grow into spherical shapes, 155 00:09:54,327 --> 00:09:59,288 or in the brightness of a supernova 156 00:09:59,365 --> 00:10:01,664 One writer has suggested 157 00:10:01,734 --> 00:10:05,637 it's like seeing pi on a series of mountain peaks, 158 00:10:05,705 --> 00:10:08,732 poking out of a fog-shrouded valley 159 00:10:08,808 --> 00:10:10,902 We know there's a way they're all connected, 160 00:10:10,977 --> 00:10:15,278 but it's not always obvious how 161 00:10:18,084 --> 00:10:20,519 Pi is but one example 162 00:10:20,587 --> 00:10:23,557 of a vast interconnected web of mathematics 163 00:10:23,623 --> 00:10:25,524 that seems to reveal 164 00:10:25,592 --> 00:10:28,994 an often hidden and deep order to our world 165 00:10:32,532 --> 00:10:37,596 Physicist Max Tegmark from MIT thinks he knows why 166 00:10:37,670 --> 00:10:41,198 He sees similarities between our world 167 00:10:41,274 --> 00:10:43,675 and that of a computer game 168 00:10:47,614 --> 00:10:51,073 If I were a character in a computer game 169 00:10:51,151 --> 00:10:53,882 that were so advanced that I were actually conscious 170 00:10:53,953 --> 00:10:56,354 and I started exploring my video game world, 171 00:10:56,422 --> 00:10:58,721 it would actually feel to me like it was made 172 00:10:58,791 --> 00:11:02,125 of real solid objects made of physical stuff 173 00:11:02,195 --> 00:11:05,393 ♪♪ 174 00:11:10,103 --> 00:11:13,870 Yet, if I started studying, as the curious physicist that I am, 175 00:11:13,940 --> 00:11:15,272 the properties of this stuff, 176 00:11:15,341 --> 00:11:18,368 the equations by which things move 177 00:11:18,444 --> 00:11:22,040 and the equations that give stuff its properties, 178 00:11:22,115 --> 00:11:23,879 I would discover eventually 179 00:11:23,950 --> 00:11:26,476 that all these properties were mathematical: 180 00:11:26,553 --> 00:11:28,385 the mathematical properties 181 00:11:28,454 --> 00:11:31,288 that the programmer had actually put into the software 182 00:11:31,357 --> 00:11:34,054 that describes everything 183 00:11:34,127 --> 00:11:36,596 The laws of physics in a game... 184 00:11:36,663 --> 00:11:39,758 Like how an object floats, bounces, or crashes... 185 00:11:39,832 --> 00:11:44,668 Are only mathematical rules created by a programmer 186 00:11:44,737 --> 00:11:48,139 Ultimately, the entire "universe" of a computer game 187 00:11:48,208 --> 00:11:52,407 is just numbers and equations 188 00:11:52,478 --> 00:11:54,456 That's exactly what I perceive in this reality, too, 189 00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:55,743 as a physicist, 190 00:11:55,815 --> 00:11:58,341 that the closer I look at things that seem non-mathematical, 191 00:11:58,418 --> 00:12:00,410 like my arm here and my hand, 192 00:12:00,486 --> 00:12:02,921 the more mathematical it turns out to be 193 00:12:02,989 --> 00:12:05,288 Could it be that our world also then 194 00:12:05,358 --> 00:12:10,558 is really just as mathematical as the computer game reality? 195 00:12:10,630 --> 00:12:15,625 To Max, the software world of a game isn't that different 196 00:12:15,702 --> 00:12:18,297 from the physical world we live in 197 00:12:18,371 --> 00:12:22,741 He thinks that mathematics works so well to describe reality 198 00:12:22,809 --> 00:12:27,008 because ultimately, mathematics is all that it is 199 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:30,517 There's nothing else 200 00:12:30,583 --> 00:12:32,518 Many of my physics colleagues 201 00:12:32,585 --> 00:12:36,249 will say that mathematics describes our physical reality 202 00:12:36,322 --> 00:12:38,689 at least in some approximate sense 203 00:12:38,758 --> 00:12:44,527 I go further and argue that it actually is our physical reality 204 00:12:44,597 --> 00:12:47,396 because I'm arguing that our physical world 205 00:12:47,467 --> 00:12:50,130 doesn't just have some mathematical properties, 206 00:12:50,203 --> 00:12:52,069 but it has only mathematical properties 207 00:12:55,174 --> 00:12:58,667 Our physical reality is a bit like a digital photograph, 208 00:12:58,745 --> 00:13:00,179 according to Max 209 00:13:02,215 --> 00:13:05,014 The photo looks like the pond, 210 00:13:05,084 --> 00:13:08,885 but as we move in closer and closer, 211 00:13:08,955 --> 00:13:12,448 we can see it is really a field of pixels, 212 00:13:12,525 --> 00:13:15,393 each represented by three numbers 213 00:13:15,461 --> 00:13:20,331 that specify the amount of red, green and blue 214 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:25,566 While the universe is vast in its size and complexity, 215 00:13:25,638 --> 00:13:29,166 requiring an unbelievably large collection of numbers 216 00:13:29,242 --> 00:13:31,177 to describe it, 217 00:13:31,244 --> 00:13:34,043 Max sees its underlying mathematical structure 218 00:13:34,113 --> 00:13:36,446 as surprisingly simple 219 00:13:36,516 --> 00:13:39,486 It's just 32 numbers... 220 00:13:39,552 --> 00:13:43,250 Constants, like the masses of elementary particles... 221 00:13:43,323 --> 00:13:47,351 Along with a handful of mathematical equations, 222 00:13:47,427 --> 00:13:50,693 the fundamental laws of physics 223 00:13:50,763 --> 00:13:53,733 And it all fits on a wall, 224 00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:57,703 though there are still some questions 225 00:13:57,770 --> 00:13:59,602 But even though we don't know 226 00:13:59,672 --> 00:14:01,470 what exactly is going to go here, 227 00:14:01,541 --> 00:14:04,670 I am really confident that what will go here 228 00:14:04,744 --> 00:14:06,872 will be mathematical equations 229 00:14:06,946 --> 00:14:10,041 That everything is ultimately mathematical 230 00:14:10,116 --> 00:14:14,110 Max Tegmark's Matrix-like view 231 00:14:14,187 --> 00:14:17,385 that mathematics doesn't just describe reality 232 00:14:17,457 --> 00:14:21,417 but is its essence may sound radical, 233 00:14:21,494 --> 00:14:24,054 but it has deep roots in history 234 00:14:26,132 --> 00:14:28,431 going back to ancient Greece, 235 00:14:28,501 --> 00:14:32,563 to the time of the philosopher and mystic Pythagoras 236 00:14:32,638 --> 00:14:36,336 Stories say he explored the affinity 237 00:14:36,409 --> 00:14:39,072 between mathematics and music, 238 00:14:39,145 --> 00:14:42,604 a relationship that resonates to this day 239 00:14:42,682 --> 00:14:45,083 in the work of Esperanza Spalding, 240 00:14:45,151 --> 00:14:48,553 an acclaimed jazz musician who's studied music theory 241 00:14:48,621 --> 00:14:52,490 and sees its parallel in mathematics 242 00:14:54,761 --> 00:14:57,162 I love the experience of math 243 00:14:57,230 --> 00:14:58,960 The part that I enjoy about math 244 00:14:59,031 --> 00:15:01,660 I get to experience through music, too 245 00:15:03,536 --> 00:15:04,469 At the beginning, 246 00:15:04,537 --> 00:15:06,165 you're studying all the little equations, 247 00:15:06,239 --> 00:15:09,107 but you get to have this very visceral relationship 248 00:15:09,175 --> 00:15:11,337 with the product of those equations, 249 00:15:11,411 --> 00:15:13,288 which is sound and music and harmony and dissonance 250 00:15:13,312 --> 00:15:14,871 and all that good stuff 251 00:15:14,947 --> 00:15:17,075 So I'm much better at music than at math, 252 00:15:17,150 --> 00:15:19,142 but I love math with a passion 253 00:15:19,218 --> 00:15:20,447 They're both just as much work 254 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:22,682 They're both, you have to study your off 255 00:15:25,158 --> 00:15:26,558 Your head off, study your head off 256 00:15:29,462 --> 00:15:31,761 The Ancient Greeks found three relationships 257 00:15:31,831 --> 00:15:34,494 between notes especially pleasing 258 00:15:34,567 --> 00:15:40,666 Now we call them an octave, a fifth, and a fourth 259 00:15:40,740 --> 00:15:42,709 An octave is easy to remember 260 00:15:42,775 --> 00:15:44,953 because it's the first two notes of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" 261 00:15:44,977 --> 00:15:46,536 ♪ La, la ♪ 262 00:15:46,612 --> 00:15:48,274 That's an octave... "somewhere" 263 00:15:52,051 --> 00:15:53,849 A fifth sounds like this: 264 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:55,513 ♪ La, la ♪ 265 00:15:55,588 --> 00:15:58,581 Or the first two notes of "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star" 266 00:16:00,626 --> 00:16:02,891 And a fourth sounds like: 267 00:16:02,962 --> 00:16:05,557 ♪ La, la ♪ 268 00:16:06,833 --> 00:16:08,444 You can think of it as the first two notes 269 00:16:08,468 --> 00:16:09,731 of "Here Comes the Bride" 270 00:16:13,406 --> 00:16:16,308 In the sixth century BCE, 271 00:16:16,375 --> 00:16:18,695 the Greek philosopher Pythagoras is said to have discovered 272 00:16:18,744 --> 00:16:21,680 that those beautiful musical relationships 273 00:16:21,747 --> 00:16:25,047 were also beautiful mathematical relationships 274 00:16:25,117 --> 00:16:29,578 by measuring the lengths of the vibrating strings 275 00:16:29,655 --> 00:16:33,820 In an octave, the string lengths create a ratio of two to one 276 00:16:36,562 --> 00:16:39,726 In a fifth, the ratio is three to two 277 00:16:41,634 --> 00:16:44,934 And in a fourth, it is four to three 278 00:16:48,274 --> 00:16:50,641 Seeing a common pattern throughout sound, 279 00:16:50,710 --> 00:16:53,145 that could be a big eye opener of saying, 280 00:16:53,212 --> 00:16:55,340 "Well, if this exists in sound, 281 00:16:55,414 --> 00:16:59,249 "and if it's true universally through all sounds, 282 00:16:59,318 --> 00:17:03,085 "this ratio could exist universally everywhere, right? 283 00:17:03,155 --> 00:17:04,555 And doesn't it?" 284 00:17:07,293 --> 00:17:10,593 Pythagoreans worshipped the idea of numbers 285 00:17:10,663 --> 00:17:14,430 The fact that simple ratios produced harmonious sounds 286 00:17:14,500 --> 00:17:18,437 was proof of a hidden order in the natural world 287 00:17:18,504 --> 00:17:20,666 And that order was made of numbers, 288 00:17:20,740 --> 00:17:24,177 a profound insight that mathematicians and scientists 289 00:17:24,243 --> 00:17:28,704 continue to explore to this day 290 00:17:30,883 --> 00:17:34,149 In fact, there are plenty of other physical phenomena 291 00:17:34,220 --> 00:17:38,658 that follow simple ratios, from the two-to-one ratio 292 00:17:38,724 --> 00:17:42,491 of hydrogen atoms to oxygen atoms in water 293 00:17:42,562 --> 00:17:45,361 to the number of times the Moon orbits the Earth 294 00:17:45,431 --> 00:17:49,266 compared to its own rotation: one to one 295 00:17:49,335 --> 00:17:53,170 Or that Mercury rotates exactly three times 296 00:17:53,239 --> 00:17:58,041 when it orbits the Sun twice, a three-to-two ratio 297 00:18:00,746 --> 00:18:04,205 In Ancient Greece, Pythagoras and his followers 298 00:18:04,283 --> 00:18:08,846 had a profound effect on another Greek philosopher, Plato, 299 00:18:08,921 --> 00:18:11,823 whose ideas also resonate to this day, 300 00:18:11,891 --> 00:18:14,326 especially among mathematicians 301 00:18:14,393 --> 00:18:17,693 Plato believed that geometry and mathematics 302 00:18:17,763 --> 00:18:22,201 exist in their own ideal world 303 00:18:22,268 --> 00:18:24,635 So when we draw a circle on a piece of paper, 304 00:18:24,704 --> 00:18:26,400 this is not the real circle 305 00:18:26,472 --> 00:18:28,532 The real circle is in that world, 306 00:18:28,608 --> 00:18:30,873 and this is just an approximation 307 00:18:30,943 --> 00:18:32,206 of that real circle, 308 00:18:32,278 --> 00:18:34,474 and the same with all other shapes 309 00:18:34,547 --> 00:18:37,483 And Plato liked very much these five solids, 310 00:18:37,550 --> 00:18:40,076 the platonic solids we call them today, 311 00:18:40,152 --> 00:18:44,089 and he assigned each one of them to one of the elements 312 00:18:44,156 --> 00:18:46,148 that formed the world as he saw it 313 00:18:46,225 --> 00:18:51,220 The stable cube was earth 314 00:18:51,297 --> 00:18:56,531 The tetrahedron with its pointy corners was fire 315 00:18:56,602 --> 00:19:02,473 The mobile-looking octahedron Plato thought of as air 316 00:19:02,541 --> 00:19:08,742 And the 20-sided icosahedron was water 317 00:19:08,814 --> 00:19:11,079 And finally the dodecahedron, 318 00:19:11,150 --> 00:19:13,642 this was the thing that signified the cosmos as a whole 319 00:19:18,591 --> 00:19:20,856 So Plato's mathematical forms 320 00:19:20,926 --> 00:19:23,794 were the ideal version of the world around us, 321 00:19:23,863 --> 00:19:27,231 and they existed in their own realm 322 00:19:27,299 --> 00:19:29,234 And however bizarre that may sound, 323 00:19:29,301 --> 00:19:32,430 that mathematics exists in its own world, 324 00:19:32,505 --> 00:19:37,000 shaping the world we see, it's an idea that to this day 325 00:19:37,076 --> 00:19:40,843 many mathematicians and scientists can relate to... 326 00:19:40,913 --> 00:19:42,939 The sense they have when they're doing math 327 00:19:43,015 --> 00:19:45,280 that they're just uncovering something 328 00:19:45,351 --> 00:19:47,377 that's already out there 329 00:19:47,453 --> 00:19:49,718 I feel quite strongly that mathematics is discovered 330 00:19:49,789 --> 00:19:51,280 in my work as a mathematician 331 00:19:51,357 --> 00:19:53,519 It always feels to me there is a thing out there 332 00:19:53,592 --> 00:19:55,561 and I'm kind of trying to find it 333 00:19:55,628 --> 00:19:56,994 and understand it and touch it 334 00:19:59,598 --> 00:20:01,798 As someone who actually has had the pleasure 335 00:20:01,867 --> 00:20:03,460 of making new mathematics, 336 00:20:03,536 --> 00:20:06,404 it feels like there's something there before you get to it 337 00:20:06,472 --> 00:20:07,997 If I have to choose, 338 00:20:08,074 --> 00:20:10,202 I think it's more discovered than invented 339 00:20:10,276 --> 00:20:11,904 because I think there's a reality 340 00:20:11,977 --> 00:20:14,276 to what we study in mathematics 341 00:20:14,346 --> 00:20:16,281 When we do good mathematics, 342 00:20:16,348 --> 00:20:19,580 we're discovering something about the way our minds work 343 00:20:19,652 --> 00:20:21,553 in interaction with the world 344 00:20:21,620 --> 00:20:23,486 Well, I know that because that's what I do 345 00:20:23,556 --> 00:20:25,821 I come to my office, I sit down in front of my whiteboard 346 00:20:25,891 --> 00:20:29,692 and I try and understand that thing that's out there 347 00:20:29,762 --> 00:20:31,993 And every now and then, I'm discovering a new bit of it 348 00:20:32,064 --> 00:20:34,192 That's exactly what it feels like 349 00:20:34,266 --> 00:20:36,735 To many mathematicians, 350 00:20:36,802 --> 00:20:41,240 it feels like math is discovered rather than invented 351 00:20:41,307 --> 00:20:43,742 But is that just a feeling? 352 00:20:43,809 --> 00:20:45,835 Could it be that mathematics 353 00:20:45,911 --> 00:20:49,905 is purely a product of the human brain? 354 00:20:49,982 --> 00:20:54,443 Meet Shyam, a bonafide math whiz 355 00:20:54,520 --> 00:20:56,113 800 on the SAT Math 356 00:20:56,188 --> 00:20:57,520 That's pretty good 357 00:20:57,590 --> 00:20:58,967 And you took it when you were how old? 358 00:20:58,991 --> 00:20:59,788 Eleven 359 00:20:59,859 --> 00:21:00,792 Eleven 360 00:21:00,860 --> 00:21:02,920 Wow, that's, like, a perfect score 361 00:21:02,995 --> 00:21:05,362 Where does Shyam's math genius come from? 362 00:21:05,431 --> 00:21:10,699 It turns out we can pinpoint it, and it's all in his head 363 00:21:10,770 --> 00:21:16,368 Using fMRI, scientists can scan Shyam's brain 364 00:21:16,442 --> 00:21:18,877 as he answers math questions 365 00:21:18,944 --> 00:21:21,641 to see which parts of the brain receive more blood, 366 00:21:21,714 --> 00:21:25,708 a sign they are hard at work 367 00:21:25,785 --> 00:21:27,095 All right, Shyam, we'll start about now 368 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:28,052 Okay, buddy? 369 00:21:28,120 --> 00:21:29,120 Okay 370 00:21:30,823 --> 00:21:33,190 In images of Shyam's brain, 371 00:21:33,259 --> 00:21:37,959 the parietal lobes glow an especially bright crimson 372 00:21:38,030 --> 00:21:40,522 He is relying on parietal areas 373 00:21:40,599 --> 00:21:43,569 to determine these mathematical relationships 374 00:21:43,636 --> 00:21:46,572 That's characteristic of lots of math-gifted types 375 00:21:46,639 --> 00:21:49,905 In tests similar to Shyam's, 376 00:21:49,975 --> 00:21:52,410 kids who exhibit high math performance 377 00:21:52,478 --> 00:21:55,471 have five to six times more neuron activation 378 00:21:55,548 --> 00:21:58,245 than average kids in these brain regions 379 00:21:58,317 --> 00:22:02,379 But is that the result of teaching and intense practice? 380 00:22:02,454 --> 00:22:07,586 Or are the foundations of math built into our brains? 381 00:22:12,631 --> 00:22:14,998 Scientists are looking for the answer here, 382 00:22:15,067 --> 00:22:18,834 at the Duke University Lemur Center, 383 00:22:18,904 --> 00:22:20,463 a 70-acre sanctuary in North Carolina, 384 00:22:20,539 --> 00:22:24,340 the largest one for rare and endangered lemurs in the world 385 00:22:27,246 --> 00:22:30,648 Like all primates, lemurs are related to humans 386 00:22:30,716 --> 00:22:33,276 through a common ancestor 387 00:22:33,352 --> 00:22:36,322 that lived as many as 65 million years ago 388 00:22:36,388 --> 00:22:38,687 Scientists believe lemurs 389 00:22:38,757 --> 00:22:42,489 share many characteristics with those earliest primates, 390 00:22:42,561 --> 00:22:46,089 making them a window, though a blurry one, 391 00:22:46,165 --> 00:22:49,602 into our ancient past 392 00:22:49,668 --> 00:22:51,796 Got a choice here, Teres 393 00:22:51,871 --> 00:22:53,271 Come on up 394 00:22:53,339 --> 00:22:54,967 Duke Professor Liz Brannon 395 00:22:55,040 --> 00:22:58,135 investigates how well lemurs, like Teres here, 396 00:22:58,210 --> 00:23:00,475 can compare quantities 397 00:23:00,546 --> 00:23:03,675 Many different animals choose larger food quantities 398 00:23:03,749 --> 00:23:06,446 So what is Teres doing? 399 00:23:06,518 --> 00:23:08,783 What are all of these different animals doing 400 00:23:08,854 --> 00:23:11,414 when they compare two quantities? 401 00:23:11,490 --> 00:23:13,925 Well, clearly he's not using verbal labels, 402 00:23:13,993 --> 00:23:16,155 he's not using symbols 403 00:23:16,228 --> 00:23:19,357 We need to figure out whether they can really use number, 404 00:23:19,431 --> 00:23:21,730 pure number, as a cue 405 00:23:23,903 --> 00:23:27,772 To test how well Teres can distinguish quantities, 406 00:23:27,840 --> 00:23:31,174 he's been taught a touch-screen computer game 407 00:23:31,243 --> 00:23:34,407 The red square starts a round 408 00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:37,348 If he touches it, two squares appear 409 00:23:37,416 --> 00:23:40,580 containing different numbers of objects 410 00:23:40,653 --> 00:23:41,712 He's been trained 411 00:23:41,787 --> 00:23:44,689 that if he chooses the box with the fewest number 412 00:23:46,258 --> 00:23:49,660 he'll get a reward, a sugar pellet 413 00:23:49,728 --> 00:23:51,196 A wrong answer? 414 00:23:55,768 --> 00:23:57,361 We have to do a lot to ensure 415 00:23:57,436 --> 00:24:00,304 that they're really attending to number and not something else 416 00:24:00,372 --> 00:24:04,104 To make sure the test animal is reacting 417 00:24:04,176 --> 00:24:07,146 to the number of objects and not some other cue, 418 00:24:07,212 --> 00:24:12,776 Liz varies the objects' size, color, and shape 419 00:24:12,851 --> 00:24:15,685 She has conducted thousands of trials 420 00:24:15,754 --> 00:24:18,690 and shown that lemurs and rhesus monkeys 421 00:24:18,757 --> 00:24:22,159 can learn to pick the right answer 422 00:24:22,227 --> 00:24:24,389 Teres obviously doesn't have language 423 00:24:24,463 --> 00:24:26,364 and he doesn't have any symbols for number 424 00:24:26,432 --> 00:24:29,300 So is he counting, is he doing what a human child does 425 00:24:29,368 --> 00:24:32,429 when they recite the numbers one, two, three? 426 00:24:32,504 --> 00:24:33,904 No 427 00:24:33,973 --> 00:24:37,375 And yet, what he seems to be attending to 428 00:24:37,443 --> 00:24:42,438 is the very abstract essence of what a number is 429 00:24:42,514 --> 00:24:46,315 Lemurs and rhesus monkeys aren't alone 430 00:24:46,385 --> 00:24:48,047 in having this primitive number sense 431 00:24:48,120 --> 00:24:51,955 Rats, pigeons, fish, raccoons, 432 00:24:52,024 --> 00:24:55,426 insects, horses, and elephants 433 00:24:55,494 --> 00:24:58,589 all show sensitivity to quantity 434 00:24:58,664 --> 00:25:01,634 And so do human infants 435 00:25:03,836 --> 00:25:06,203 At her lab on the Duke campus, 436 00:25:06,271 --> 00:25:09,901 Liz has tested babies that were only six months old 437 00:25:09,975 --> 00:25:12,604 They'll look longer at a screen 438 00:25:12,678 --> 00:25:15,546 with a changing number of objects, 439 00:25:15,614 --> 00:25:17,606 as long as the change is obvious enough 440 00:25:17,683 --> 00:25:20,152 to capture their attention 441 00:25:20,219 --> 00:25:24,816 Liz has also tested college students, 442 00:25:24,890 --> 00:25:26,791 asking them not to count, 443 00:25:26,859 --> 00:25:29,328 but to respond as quickly as they could 444 00:25:29,395 --> 00:25:32,388 to a touch-screen test comparing quantities 445 00:25:32,464 --> 00:25:34,057 The results? 446 00:25:34,133 --> 00:25:38,764 About the same as lemurs and rhesus monkeys 447 00:25:38,837 --> 00:25:40,567 In fact, there are humans 448 00:25:40,639 --> 00:25:42,938 who aren't as good as our monkeys, 449 00:25:43,008 --> 00:25:44,943 and others that are far better, 450 00:25:45,010 --> 00:25:46,988 so there's a lot of variability in human performance, 451 00:25:47,012 --> 00:25:50,039 but in general, it looks very similar to a monkey 452 00:25:52,217 --> 00:25:55,415 Substitute in the three, you raise that to the four 453 00:25:55,487 --> 00:25:57,888 Even without any mathematical education, 454 00:25:57,956 --> 00:26:00,983 even without learning any number words or symbols, 455 00:26:01,060 --> 00:26:03,586 we would still have, all of us as humans, 456 00:26:03,662 --> 00:26:05,460 a primitive number sense 457 00:26:05,531 --> 00:26:09,400 That fundamental ability to perceive number 458 00:26:09,468 --> 00:26:12,267 seems to be a very important foundation, 459 00:26:12,337 --> 00:26:14,272 and without it, it's very questionable 460 00:26:14,339 --> 00:26:18,037 as to whether we could ever appreciate symbolic mathematics 461 00:26:18,110 --> 00:26:20,170 The building blocks of mathematics 462 00:26:20,245 --> 00:26:23,181 may be preprogrammed into our brains, 463 00:26:23,248 --> 00:26:26,446 part of the basic toolkit for survival, 464 00:26:26,518 --> 00:26:30,546 like our ability to recognize patterns and shapes 465 00:26:30,622 --> 00:26:33,023 or our sense of time 466 00:26:33,092 --> 00:26:35,357 From that point of view, on this foundation, 467 00:26:35,427 --> 00:26:37,794 we've erected one of the greatest inventions 468 00:26:37,863 --> 00:26:41,561 of human culture: 469 00:26:41,633 --> 00:26:44,535 mathematics 470 00:26:44,603 --> 00:26:46,936 But the mystery remains 471 00:26:47,005 --> 00:26:53,002 If it is "all in our heads," why has math been so effective? 472 00:26:53,078 --> 00:26:56,571 Through science, technology, and engineering, 473 00:26:56,648 --> 00:26:59,117 it's transformed the planet, 474 00:26:59,184 --> 00:27:03,815 even allowing us to go into the beyond 475 00:27:06,091 --> 00:27:09,084 As in the work here, at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory 476 00:27:09,161 --> 00:27:10,754 in Pasadena, California 477 00:27:10,829 --> 00:27:13,298 Roger, copy mission 478 00:27:13,365 --> 00:27:14,663 Coming up on entry 479 00:27:14,733 --> 00:27:19,865 In 2012, they landed a car-size rover 480 00:27:19,938 --> 00:27:22,840 Descending at about 75 meters per second as expected 481 00:27:22,908 --> 00:27:24,900 on Mars 482 00:27:24,977 --> 00:27:27,412 Touchdown confirmed, we're safe on Mars 483 00:27:32,417 --> 00:27:35,444 Adam Steltzner was the lead engineer 484 00:27:35,521 --> 00:27:37,513 on the team that designed the landing system 485 00:27:37,589 --> 00:27:41,890 Their work depended on a groundbreaking discovery 486 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:44,452 from the Renaissance 487 00:27:44,530 --> 00:27:48,661 that turned mathematics into the language of science: 488 00:27:48,734 --> 00:27:52,034 the law of falling bodies 489 00:27:54,673 --> 00:27:57,734 The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle 490 00:27:57,809 --> 00:28:02,042 taught that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones... 491 00:28:02,114 --> 00:28:07,178 An idea that, on the surface, makes sense 492 00:28:07,252 --> 00:28:11,087 Even this surface: the Mars yard, 493 00:28:11,156 --> 00:28:13,853 where they test the rovers at JPL 494 00:28:13,926 --> 00:28:15,417 So Aristotle reasoned 495 00:28:15,494 --> 00:28:19,488 that the rate at which things would fall 496 00:28:19,565 --> 00:28:21,090 was proportional to their weight 497 00:28:25,204 --> 00:28:26,433 Which seems reasonable 498 00:28:26,505 --> 00:28:28,667 In fact, so reasonable, 499 00:28:28,740 --> 00:28:32,700 the view held for nearly 2,000 years, 500 00:28:32,778 --> 00:28:35,338 until challenged in the late 1500s 501 00:28:35,414 --> 00:28:40,717 by Italian mathematician Galileo Galilei 502 00:28:40,786 --> 00:28:42,482 Legend has it that Galileo 503 00:28:42,554 --> 00:28:45,217 dropped two different weight cannonballs 504 00:28:45,290 --> 00:28:47,816 from the Leaning Tower of Pisa 505 00:28:47,893 --> 00:28:49,919 Well, we're not in Pisa, we don't have cannonballs, 506 00:28:49,995 --> 00:28:53,090 but we do have a bowling ball and a bouncy ball 507 00:28:53,165 --> 00:28:55,134 Let's weigh them 508 00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:59,194 First, we weigh the bowling ball 509 00:28:59,271 --> 00:29:01,297 It weighs 15 pounds 510 00:29:01,373 --> 00:29:02,602 And the bouncy ball? 511 00:29:02,674 --> 00:29:05,576 It weighs hardly anything 512 00:29:05,644 --> 00:29:06,703 Let's drop them 513 00:29:06,778 --> 00:29:09,577 According to Aristotle, 514 00:29:09,648 --> 00:29:12,880 the bowling ball should fall over 15 times faster 515 00:29:12,951 --> 00:29:14,749 than the bouncy ball 516 00:29:17,789 --> 00:29:19,749 Well, they seem to fall at the same rate 517 00:29:21,827 --> 00:29:23,352 This isn't that high, though 518 00:29:23,428 --> 00:29:26,262 Maybe we should drop them from higher 519 00:29:33,705 --> 00:29:36,732 So Ed is 20 feet in the air up there 520 00:29:36,808 --> 00:29:39,937 Let's see if the balls fall at the same rate 521 00:29:40,012 --> 00:29:41,378 Ready? 522 00:29:41,446 --> 00:29:45,008 Three, two, one, drop! 523 00:29:52,190 --> 00:29:53,658 Galileo was right 524 00:29:53,725 --> 00:29:55,819 Aristotle, you lose 525 00:29:55,894 --> 00:29:59,456 Dropping feathers and hammers is misleading, 526 00:29:59,531 --> 00:30:03,366 thanks to air resistance 527 00:30:03,435 --> 00:30:05,927 Well, in my left hand, I have a feather 528 00:30:06,004 --> 00:30:08,530 In my right hand, a hammer 529 00:30:08,607 --> 00:30:12,476 A fact demonstrated on the Moon, where there is no air, 530 00:30:12,544 --> 00:30:16,174 in 1971 during the Apollo 15 mission 531 00:30:16,248 --> 00:30:18,274 And I'll drop the two of them here 532 00:30:20,252 --> 00:30:21,276 How about that? 533 00:30:21,353 --> 00:30:22,821 Mr. Galileo was correct 534 00:30:22,888 --> 00:30:26,222 Little balls, soccer balls 535 00:30:26,291 --> 00:30:27,759 So while counterintuitive 536 00:30:27,826 --> 00:30:29,692 Vegetables! 537 00:30:29,761 --> 00:30:31,787 If you take the air out of the equation, 538 00:30:31,863 --> 00:30:35,959 everything falls at the same rate, 539 00:30:36,034 --> 00:30:37,832 even Aristotle 540 00:30:41,673 --> 00:30:43,608 But what really interested Galileo 541 00:30:43,675 --> 00:30:45,974 was that an object dropped at one height 542 00:30:46,044 --> 00:30:51,642 didn't take twice as long to drop from twice as high; 543 00:30:51,717 --> 00:30:54,243 it accelerated 544 00:30:54,319 --> 00:30:57,016 But how do you measure that? 545 00:30:57,089 --> 00:31:00,924 Everything is happening so fast 546 00:31:00,992 --> 00:31:02,858 Oh, yes! 547 00:31:05,697 --> 00:31:08,599 Galileo came up with an ingenious solution 548 00:31:12,204 --> 00:31:18,440 He built a ramp, an inclined plane, 549 00:31:18,510 --> 00:31:24,074 to slow the falling motion down so he could measure it 550 00:31:24,149 --> 00:31:26,618 So we're going to use this ramp 551 00:31:26,685 --> 00:31:31,589 to find the relationship between distance and time 552 00:31:31,656 --> 00:31:35,752 For time, I'll use an arbitrary unit: a Galileo 553 00:31:35,827 --> 00:31:37,261 One Galileo 554 00:31:38,864 --> 00:31:41,732 The length of the ramp that the ball rolls 555 00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:46,795 during one Galileo becomes one unit of distance 556 00:31:46,872 --> 00:31:49,068 So we've gone one unit of distance 557 00:31:49,141 --> 00:31:51,110 in one unit of time 558 00:31:51,176 --> 00:31:53,611 Now let's try it for a two-count 559 00:31:53,678 --> 00:31:55,977 One Galileo, two Galileo 560 00:31:56,047 --> 00:31:57,811 In two units of time, 561 00:31:57,883 --> 00:32:01,911 the ball has rolled four units of distance 562 00:32:01,987 --> 00:32:07,324 Now let's see how far it goes in three Galileos 563 00:32:07,392 --> 00:32:11,124 One Galileo, two Galileo, three Galileo 564 00:32:11,196 --> 00:32:13,324 In three units of time, 565 00:32:13,398 --> 00:32:17,768 the ball has gone nine units of distance 566 00:32:17,836 --> 00:32:19,429 So there it is 567 00:32:19,504 --> 00:32:21,473 There's a mathematical relationship here 568 00:32:21,540 --> 00:32:24,066 between time and distance 569 00:32:24,142 --> 00:32:26,976 Galileo's inspired use of a ramp 570 00:32:27,045 --> 00:32:31,107 had shown falling objects follow mathematical laws 571 00:32:33,251 --> 00:32:35,311 The distance the ball traveled 572 00:32:35,387 --> 00:32:40,223 is directly proportional to the square of the time 573 00:32:40,292 --> 00:32:45,196 That mathematical relationship that Galileo observed 574 00:32:45,263 --> 00:32:48,961 is a mathematical expression of the physics of our universe 575 00:32:49,034 --> 00:32:51,162 Galileo's centuries-old 576 00:32:51,236 --> 00:32:54,536 mathematical observation about falling objects 577 00:32:54,606 --> 00:32:57,838 remains just as valid today 578 00:32:57,909 --> 00:33:01,209 It's the same mathematical expression that we can use 579 00:33:01,279 --> 00:33:04,716 to understand how objects might fall here on Earth, 580 00:33:04,783 --> 00:33:06,945 roll down a ramp 581 00:33:07,018 --> 00:33:09,214 It's even a relationship that we used 582 00:33:09,287 --> 00:33:12,689 to land the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars 583 00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:17,124 That's the power of mathematics 584 00:33:17,195 --> 00:33:21,792 Galileo's insight was profound 585 00:33:21,867 --> 00:33:24,860 Mathematics could be used as a tool 586 00:33:24,936 --> 00:33:29,738 to uncover and discover the hidden rules of our world 587 00:33:29,808 --> 00:33:31,743 He later wrote, 588 00:33:31,810 --> 00:33:36,111 "The universe is written in the language of mathematics" 589 00:33:37,749 --> 00:33:40,344 Math is really the language 590 00:33:40,418 --> 00:33:42,478 in which we understand the universe 591 00:33:42,554 --> 00:33:44,420 We don't know why it's the case 592 00:33:44,489 --> 00:33:47,982 that the laws of physics and the universe 593 00:33:48,059 --> 00:33:51,086 follows mathematical models, but it does seem to be the case 594 00:33:52,764 --> 00:33:54,892 While Galileo turned mathematical equations 595 00:33:54,966 --> 00:33:57,231 into laws of science, 596 00:33:57,302 --> 00:34:01,535 it was another man, born the same year Galileo died, 597 00:34:01,606 --> 00:34:05,566 who took that to new heights that crossed the heavens 598 00:34:05,644 --> 00:34:09,775 His name was Isaac Newton 599 00:34:11,149 --> 00:34:15,553 He worked here at Trinity College in Cambridge, England 600 00:34:15,620 --> 00:34:19,079 Newton cultivated the reputation 601 00:34:19,157 --> 00:34:21,023 of being a solitary genius, 602 00:34:21,092 --> 00:34:24,824 and here in the bowling green of Trinity College, 603 00:34:24,896 --> 00:34:28,060 it was said that he would walk meditatively 604 00:34:28,133 --> 00:34:31,831 up and down the paths, absentmindedly drawing 605 00:34:31,903 --> 00:34:34,930 mathematical diagrams in the gravel, 606 00:34:35,006 --> 00:34:38,943 and the fellows were instructed, or so it was said, 607 00:34:39,010 --> 00:34:41,172 not to disturb him, 608 00:34:41,246 --> 00:34:44,410 not to clear up the gravel after he'd passed, 609 00:34:44,482 --> 00:34:47,782 in case they inadvertently wiped out 610 00:34:47,852 --> 00:34:51,619 some major scientific or mathematical discovery 611 00:34:51,690 --> 00:34:56,788 In 1687, Newton published a book 612 00:34:56,861 --> 00:35:00,889 that would become a landmark in the history of science 613 00:35:00,966 --> 00:35:04,027 Today, it is known simply as the "Principia" 614 00:35:04,102 --> 00:35:05,536 In it, Newton gathered observations 615 00:35:05,604 --> 00:35:06,697 from around the world 616 00:35:06,771 --> 00:35:11,266 and used mathematics to explain them... 617 00:35:11,343 --> 00:35:15,405 For instance, that of a comet seen widely in the fall of 1680 618 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:17,676 He gathers data worldwide 619 00:35:17,749 --> 00:35:21,481 in order to construct the comet's path 620 00:35:21,553 --> 00:35:27,823 So for November the 19th, he begins with an observation 621 00:35:27,892 --> 00:35:31,556 made in Cambridge in England at 4:30 a m 622 00:35:31,630 --> 00:35:33,496 by a certain young person, 623 00:35:33,565 --> 00:35:40,301 and then at 5:00 in the morning at Boston in New England 624 00:35:40,372 --> 00:35:43,240 So what Newton does is to accumulate numbers 625 00:35:43,308 --> 00:35:46,710 made by observers spread right across the globe 626 00:35:46,778 --> 00:35:48,610 in order to construct 627 00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:51,582 an unprecedentedly accurate calculation 628 00:35:51,650 --> 00:35:56,452 of how this great comet moved through the sky 629 00:35:56,521 --> 00:36:00,049 Newton's groundbreaking insight was that the force 630 00:36:00,125 --> 00:36:03,755 that sent the comet hurtling around the Sun 631 00:36:05,030 --> 00:36:06,828 was the same force 632 00:36:06,898 --> 00:36:10,164 that brought cannonballs back to Earth 633 00:36:10,235 --> 00:36:15,799 It was the force behind Galileo's law of falling bodies, 634 00:36:15,874 --> 00:36:21,245 and it even held the planets in their orbits 635 00:36:21,312 --> 00:36:26,580 He called the force gravity, and described it precisely 636 00:36:26,651 --> 00:36:29,120 in a surprisingly simple equation 637 00:36:29,187 --> 00:36:31,850 that explains how two masses attract each other, 638 00:36:31,923 --> 00:36:37,760 whether here on Earth or in the heavens above 639 00:36:37,829 --> 00:36:40,924 What's so impressive and so dramatic 640 00:36:40,999 --> 00:36:44,128 is that a single mathematical law 641 00:36:44,202 --> 00:36:47,570 would allow you to move throughout the universe 642 00:36:50,542 --> 00:36:56,243 Today, we can even witness it at work beyond the Milky Way 643 00:36:57,649 --> 00:37:00,585 This is a picture of two galaxies 644 00:37:00,652 --> 00:37:03,144 that are actually being drawn together in a merger 645 00:37:03,221 --> 00:37:05,087 This is how galaxies build themselves 646 00:37:05,156 --> 00:37:06,556 Right 647 00:37:06,624 --> 00:37:08,115 Mario Livio is on the team 648 00:37:08,193 --> 00:37:10,924 working with the images from the Hubble Space Telescope 649 00:37:10,995 --> 00:37:13,988 For decades, scientists have used Hubble 650 00:37:14,065 --> 00:37:17,160 to gaze far beyond our solar system, 651 00:37:17,235 --> 00:37:20,433 even beyond the stars of our galaxy 652 00:37:20,505 --> 00:37:23,839 It's shown us the distant gas clouds of nebulae 653 00:37:23,908 --> 00:37:28,004 and vast numbers of galaxies wheeling in the heavens 654 00:37:28,079 --> 00:37:31,243 billions of light-years away 655 00:37:31,316 --> 00:37:33,376 And what those images show 656 00:37:33,451 --> 00:37:35,750 is that throughout the visible universe, 657 00:37:35,820 --> 00:37:38,449 as far as the telescope can see, 658 00:37:38,523 --> 00:37:42,221 the law of gravity still applies 659 00:37:42,293 --> 00:37:44,353 You know, Newton wrote these laws 660 00:37:44,429 --> 00:37:46,091 of gravity and of motion 661 00:37:46,164 --> 00:37:49,498 based on things happening on Earth, 662 00:37:49,567 --> 00:37:51,695 and the planets in the solar system and so on, 663 00:37:51,770 --> 00:37:55,104 but these same laws, these very same laws 664 00:37:55,173 --> 00:37:57,870 apply to all these distant galaxies 665 00:37:57,942 --> 00:37:59,740 and, you know, shape them, 666 00:37:59,811 --> 00:38:02,975 and everything about them... How they form, how they move... 667 00:38:03,047 --> 00:38:07,485 Is controlled by those same mathematical laws 668 00:38:07,552 --> 00:38:11,648 Some of the world's greatest minds have been amazed 669 00:38:11,723 --> 00:38:15,819 by the way that math permeates the universe 670 00:38:15,894 --> 00:38:17,726 Albert Einstein, he wondered, 671 00:38:17,796 --> 00:38:21,597 he said, "How is it possible that mathematics," 672 00:38:21,666 --> 00:38:25,159 which is, he thought, a product of human thought, 673 00:38:25,236 --> 00:38:29,367 "Does so well in explaining the universe as we see it?" 674 00:38:29,440 --> 00:38:32,968 And Nobel laureate in physics Eugene Wigner 675 00:38:33,044 --> 00:38:34,569 coined this phrase: 676 00:38:34,646 --> 00:38:37,707 "The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" 677 00:38:37,782 --> 00:38:40,183 He said the fact that mathematics 678 00:38:40,251 --> 00:38:43,221 can really describe the universe so well, 679 00:38:43,288 --> 00:38:45,382 in particular physical laws, 680 00:38:45,456 --> 00:38:50,360 is a gift that we neither understand nor deserve 681 00:38:50,428 --> 00:38:52,988 In physics, 682 00:38:53,064 --> 00:38:57,297 examples of that "unreasonable effectiveness" abound 683 00:38:59,237 --> 00:39:01,172 When nearly 200 years ago 684 00:39:01,239 --> 00:39:03,902 the planet Uranus was seen to go off track, 685 00:39:03,975 --> 00:39:06,570 scientists trusted the math 686 00:39:06,644 --> 00:39:11,412 and calculated it was being pulled by another unseen planet 687 00:39:14,319 --> 00:39:18,188 And so they discovered Neptune 688 00:39:18,256 --> 00:39:20,623 Mathematics had accurately predicted 689 00:39:20,692 --> 00:39:23,856 a previously unknown planet 690 00:39:23,928 --> 00:39:28,696 If you formulate a question properly, 691 00:39:28,766 --> 00:39:31,429 mathematics gives you the answer 692 00:39:31,502 --> 00:39:34,336 It's like having a servant 693 00:39:34,405 --> 00:39:37,671 that is far more capable than you are 694 00:39:37,742 --> 00:39:39,677 So you tell it "Do this," 695 00:39:39,744 --> 00:39:42,839 and if you say it nicely, then it'll do it 696 00:39:42,914 --> 00:39:45,941 and it will carry you all the way to the truth, 697 00:39:46,017 --> 00:39:48,486 to the final answer 698 00:39:48,553 --> 00:39:50,886 WGBH, 89 7 699 00:39:50,955 --> 00:39:54,756 Evidence of the amazing predictive power of mathematics 700 00:39:54,826 --> 00:39:57,318 can be found all around us 701 00:39:57,395 --> 00:40:00,297 I heard it took five Elvises to pull them apart 702 00:40:00,365 --> 00:40:06,464 Television, radio, your cell phone, satellites, 703 00:40:06,537 --> 00:40:13,501 the baby monitor, Wi-Fi, your garage door opener, GPS, 704 00:40:13,578 --> 00:40:16,309 and yes, even maybe your TV's remote 705 00:40:16,381 --> 00:40:20,546 All of these use invisible waves of energy to communicate, 706 00:40:20,618 --> 00:40:23,281 and no one even knew they existed 707 00:40:23,354 --> 00:40:25,823 until the work of James Maxwell, 708 00:40:25,890 --> 00:40:29,520 a Scottish mathematical physicist 709 00:40:29,594 --> 00:40:34,225 In the 1860s, he published a set of equations 710 00:40:34,299 --> 00:40:38,236 that explained how electricity and magnetism were related... 711 00:40:38,303 --> 00:40:43,264 How each could generate the other 712 00:40:43,341 --> 00:40:46,903 The equations also made a startling prediction 713 00:40:49,314 --> 00:40:51,613 Together, electricity and magnetism 714 00:40:51,683 --> 00:40:53,845 could produce waves of energy 715 00:40:53,918 --> 00:40:58,253 that would travel through space at the speed of light: 716 00:40:58,323 --> 00:41:01,691 electromagnetic waves 717 00:41:01,759 --> 00:41:03,421 Maxwell's theory gave us 718 00:41:03,494 --> 00:41:06,589 these radio waves, X-rays, 719 00:41:06,664 --> 00:41:09,498 these things which were simply not known about at all 720 00:41:09,567 --> 00:41:12,901 So the theory had a scope, which was extraordinary 721 00:41:15,974 --> 00:41:19,172 Almost immediately, people set out to find the waves 722 00:41:19,243 --> 00:41:22,611 predicted by Maxwell's equations 723 00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:24,808 What must have seemed the least promising attempt 724 00:41:24,882 --> 00:41:27,943 to harness them is made here, in northern Italy, 725 00:41:28,019 --> 00:41:30,579 in the attic of a family home 726 00:41:30,655 --> 00:41:34,057 by 20-year-old Guglielmo Marconi 727 00:41:34,125 --> 00:41:38,221 His process starts with a series of sparks 728 00:41:42,166 --> 00:41:46,262 The burst of electricity creates a momentary magnetic field, 729 00:41:46,337 --> 00:41:50,172 which in turn generates a momentary electric field, 730 00:41:50,241 --> 00:41:53,211 which creates another magnetic field 731 00:41:53,277 --> 00:41:55,508 The energy cycles between the two, 732 00:41:55,580 --> 00:41:58,573 propagating an electromagnetic wave 733 00:42:01,853 --> 00:42:05,654 Marconi gets his system to work inside, 734 00:42:05,723 --> 00:42:09,125 but then he scales up 735 00:42:12,497 --> 00:42:16,434 Over a few weeks, he builds a big antenna beside the house 736 00:42:16,501 --> 00:42:20,233 to amplify the waves coming from his spark generator 737 00:42:20,304 --> 00:42:24,799 Then he asks his brother and an assistant 738 00:42:24,876 --> 00:42:27,812 to carry a receiver across the estate 739 00:42:27,879 --> 00:42:29,939 to the far side of a nearby hill 740 00:42:30,014 --> 00:42:31,812 They also have a shotgun, 741 00:42:31,883 --> 00:42:35,081 which they will fire if they manage to pick up the signal 742 00:42:52,403 --> 00:42:53,837 And it works 743 00:42:53,905 --> 00:42:55,635 The signal has been detected 744 00:42:55,706 --> 00:42:59,700 even though the receiver is now hidden behind a hill 745 00:42:59,777 --> 00:43:01,507 At over a mile, 746 00:43:01,579 --> 00:43:04,572 it is the farthest transmission to date 747 00:43:04,649 --> 00:43:07,414 In fewer than ten years, 748 00:43:07,485 --> 00:43:11,980 Marconi will be sending radio signals across the Atlantic 749 00:43:12,056 --> 00:43:16,687 In fact, when the Titanic sinks in 1912, 750 00:43:16,761 --> 00:43:20,994 he'll be personally credited with saving many lives 751 00:43:21,065 --> 00:43:24,331 because his onboard equipment allowed the distress signal 752 00:43:24,402 --> 00:43:28,032 to be transmitted 753 00:43:28,106 --> 00:43:32,134 Thanks to the predictions of Maxwell's equations, 754 00:43:32,210 --> 00:43:36,045 Marconi could harness a hidden part of our world, 755 00:43:36,114 --> 00:43:40,108 ushering in the era of wireless communication 756 00:43:45,056 --> 00:43:48,720 Since Maxwell and Marconi, 757 00:43:48,793 --> 00:43:52,753 evidence of the predictive power of mathematics has only grown, 758 00:43:52,830 --> 00:43:56,392 especially in the world of physics 759 00:43:56,467 --> 00:44:01,235 100 years ago, we barely knew atoms existed 760 00:44:01,305 --> 00:44:04,139 It took experiments to reveal their components: 761 00:44:04,208 --> 00:44:07,906 the electron, the proton, and the neutron 762 00:44:07,979 --> 00:44:10,380 But when physicists wanted to go deeper, 763 00:44:10,448 --> 00:44:13,418 mathematics began to lead the way, 764 00:44:13,484 --> 00:44:17,819 ultimately revealing a zoo of elementary particles, 765 00:44:17,889 --> 00:44:23,089 discoveries that continue to this day here at CERN, 766 00:44:23,161 --> 00:44:26,290 the European organization for nuclear research 767 00:44:26,364 --> 00:44:28,196 in Geneva, Switzerland 768 00:44:28,266 --> 00:44:33,034 These days, they're most famous for their Large Hadron Collider, 769 00:44:33,104 --> 00:44:37,838 a circular particle accelerator about 17 miles around, 770 00:44:37,909 --> 00:44:41,277 built deep underground 771 00:44:43,581 --> 00:44:47,416 This $10 billion project, decades in the making, 772 00:44:47,485 --> 00:44:51,047 had a well-publicized goal: the search 773 00:44:51,122 --> 00:44:54,559 for one of the most fundamental building blocks of the universe 774 00:44:57,428 --> 00:44:59,090 A subatomic particle 775 00:44:59,163 --> 00:45:03,863 mathematically predicted to exist nearly 50 years earlier 776 00:45:03,935 --> 00:45:08,532 by Robert Brout and Francois Englert working in Belgium 777 00:45:08,606 --> 00:45:11,337 and Peter Higgs in Scotland 778 00:45:11,409 --> 00:45:14,402 Peter Higgs sat down 779 00:45:14,478 --> 00:45:16,290 with the most advanced physics equations we had 780 00:45:16,314 --> 00:45:17,577 and calculated and calculated 781 00:45:17,648 --> 00:45:19,708 and made this audacious prediction: 782 00:45:19,784 --> 00:45:21,878 if we built the most sophisticated machines 783 00:45:21,953 --> 00:45:23,216 humans have ever built 784 00:45:23,287 --> 00:45:25,085 and used it to smash particles together 785 00:45:25,156 --> 00:45:26,920 near the speed of light in a certain way 786 00:45:26,991 --> 00:45:28,823 that we would then discover a new particle 787 00:45:28,893 --> 00:45:31,658 You know, if this math was really accurate 788 00:45:31,729 --> 00:45:34,426 The discovery of the Higgs particle 789 00:45:34,498 --> 00:45:37,161 would be proof of the Higgs field, 790 00:45:37,235 --> 00:45:41,866 a cosmic molasses that gives the stuff of our world mass... 791 00:45:41,939 --> 00:45:46,775 What we usually experience as weight 792 00:45:46,844 --> 00:45:50,406 Without mass, everything would travel at the speed of light 793 00:45:50,481 --> 00:45:53,747 and would never combine to form atoms 794 00:45:53,818 --> 00:45:55,753 That makes the Higgs field 795 00:45:55,820 --> 00:45:58,415 such a fundamental part of physics 796 00:45:58,489 --> 00:46:01,118 that the Higgs particle gained the nickname 797 00:46:01,192 --> 00:46:03,627 "The God Particle" 798 00:46:07,198 --> 00:46:09,429 In 2012, experiments at CERN 799 00:46:09,500 --> 00:46:12,766 confirmed the existence of the Higgs particle, 800 00:46:12,837 --> 00:46:15,033 making the work of Peter Higgs 801 00:46:15,106 --> 00:46:17,200 and his colleagues decades earlier 802 00:46:17,275 --> 00:46:21,736 one of the greatest predictions ever made 803 00:46:21,812 --> 00:46:24,008 And we built it and it worked, 804 00:46:24,081 --> 00:46:26,482 and he got a free trip to Stockholm 805 00:46:37,628 --> 00:46:40,393 Here, you have mathematical theories 806 00:46:40,464 --> 00:46:44,401 which make very definitive predictions 807 00:46:44,468 --> 00:46:46,835 about the possible existence 808 00:46:46,904 --> 00:46:49,499 of some fundamental particles of nature, 809 00:46:49,573 --> 00:46:53,510 and believe it or not, they make these huge experiments 810 00:46:53,577 --> 00:46:57,105 and they actually discover the particles 811 00:46:57,181 --> 00:46:58,843 that have been predicted mathematically 812 00:46:58,916 --> 00:47:01,476 I mean, this is just amazing to me 813 00:47:03,721 --> 00:47:05,917 Why does this work? 814 00:47:05,990 --> 00:47:09,154 How can mathematics be so powerful? 815 00:47:09,226 --> 00:47:12,890 Is mathematics, you know, a truth of nature, 816 00:47:12,963 --> 00:47:14,829 or does it have something to do 817 00:47:14,899 --> 00:47:17,869 with the way we as humans perceive nature? 818 00:47:17,935 --> 00:47:20,962 To me, this is just a fascinating puzzle 819 00:47:21,038 --> 00:47:22,700 I don't know the answer 820 00:47:25,209 --> 00:47:28,976 In physics, mathematics has had a long string of successes 821 00:47:29,046 --> 00:47:33,040 But is it really "unreasonably effective"? 822 00:47:33,117 --> 00:47:35,609 Not everyone thinks so 823 00:47:35,686 --> 00:47:37,177 I think it's an illusion, 824 00:47:37,254 --> 00:47:39,018 because I think what's happened 825 00:47:39,090 --> 00:47:42,959 is that people have chosen to build physics, for example, 826 00:47:43,027 --> 00:47:45,553 using the mathematics that has been practiced, 827 00:47:45,629 --> 00:47:47,029 has developed historically, 828 00:47:47,098 --> 00:47:49,829 and then they're looking at everything, 829 00:47:49,900 --> 00:47:52,563 they're choosing to study things which are amenable to study 830 00:47:52,636 --> 00:47:55,162 using the mathematics that happens to have arisen 831 00:47:55,239 --> 00:47:58,573 But actually, there is a whole vast ocean of other things 832 00:47:58,642 --> 00:48:01,840 that are really quite inaccessible to those methods 833 00:48:01,912 --> 00:48:05,781 With the success of mathematical models in physics, 834 00:48:05,850 --> 00:48:09,617 it's easy to overlook where they don't work that well 835 00:48:09,687 --> 00:48:12,418 Like in weather forecasting 836 00:48:12,490 --> 00:48:14,925 There's a reason meteorologists predict the weather 837 00:48:14,992 --> 00:48:16,756 for the coming week, 838 00:48:16,827 --> 00:48:19,126 but not much further out than that 839 00:48:19,196 --> 00:48:24,328 In a longer forecast, small errors grow into big ones 840 00:48:24,402 --> 00:48:28,032 Daily weather is just too complex and chaotic 841 00:48:28,105 --> 00:48:30,574 for precise modeling 842 00:48:30,641 --> 00:48:32,007 And it's not alone 843 00:48:32,076 --> 00:48:36,776 So is the behavior of water boiling on a stove, 844 00:48:36,847 --> 00:48:39,874 or the stock market, 845 00:48:39,950 --> 00:48:43,751 or the interaction of neurons in the brain, 846 00:48:43,821 --> 00:48:45,915 much of human psychology, 847 00:48:45,990 --> 00:48:48,289 and parts of biology 848 00:48:48,359 --> 00:48:50,157 Biological systems, 849 00:48:50,227 --> 00:48:52,128 economic systems, 850 00:48:52,196 --> 00:48:55,098 it gets very difficult to model those systems with math 851 00:48:55,166 --> 00:48:57,567 We have extreme difficulty with that 852 00:48:57,635 --> 00:49:02,232 So I do not see math as unreasonably effective 853 00:49:02,306 --> 00:49:05,674 I see it as reasonably ineffective 854 00:49:08,846 --> 00:49:11,873 Perhaps no one is as keenly aware 855 00:49:11,949 --> 00:49:14,418 of the power and limitations of mathematics 856 00:49:14,485 --> 00:49:17,614 as those who use it to design and make things: 857 00:49:17,688 --> 00:49:18,883 engineers 858 00:49:18,956 --> 00:49:20,652 Look at that wheel! 859 00:49:20,724 --> 00:49:24,161 In their work, the elegance of math 860 00:49:24,228 --> 00:49:30,498 meets the messiness of reality, and practicality rules the day 861 00:49:30,568 --> 00:49:33,060 Mathematics and perhaps mathematicians 862 00:49:33,137 --> 00:49:35,470 deal in the domain of the absolute, 863 00:49:35,539 --> 00:49:40,273 and engineers live in the domain of the approximate 864 00:49:40,344 --> 00:49:45,248 We are fundamentally interested in the practical 865 00:49:45,316 --> 00:49:48,411 And so frequently, we make approximations, we cut corners 866 00:49:48,486 --> 00:49:49,954 We omit terms and equations 867 00:49:50,020 --> 00:49:53,184 to get things that are simple enough 868 00:49:53,257 --> 00:49:55,817 to suit our purposes and to meet our needs 869 00:49:59,530 --> 00:50:02,398 Many of our greatest engineering achievements 870 00:50:02,466 --> 00:50:04,867 were built using mathematical shortcuts: 871 00:50:04,935 --> 00:50:09,100 simplified equations that approximate an answer, 872 00:50:09,173 --> 00:50:12,575 trading some precision for practicality 873 00:50:12,643 --> 00:50:17,513 And for engineers, "approximate" is close enough 874 00:50:17,581 --> 00:50:20,745 Close enough to take you to Mars 875 00:50:22,820 --> 00:50:24,288 For us engineers, 876 00:50:24,355 --> 00:50:25,948 we don't get paid to do things right; 877 00:50:26,023 --> 00:50:29,926 we get paid to do things just right enough 878 00:50:32,796 --> 00:50:35,698 Many physicists see an uncanny accuracy 879 00:50:35,766 --> 00:50:37,359 in the way mathematics can reveal 880 00:50:37,434 --> 00:50:39,767 the secrets of the universe, 881 00:50:39,837 --> 00:50:46,710 making it seem to be an inherent part of nature 882 00:50:46,777 --> 00:50:51,374 Meanwhile, engineers in practice have to sacrifice 883 00:50:51,448 --> 00:50:54,543 the precision of mathematics to keep it useful, 884 00:50:54,618 --> 00:50:58,714 making it seem more like an imperfect tool 885 00:50:58,789 --> 00:51:01,349 of our own invention 886 00:51:01,425 --> 00:51:04,361 So which is mathematics? 887 00:51:04,428 --> 00:51:07,956 A discovered part of the universe? 888 00:51:08,032 --> 00:51:11,196 Or a very human invention? 889 00:51:11,268 --> 00:51:15,729 Maybe it's both 890 00:51:18,509 --> 00:51:20,910 What I think about mathematics 891 00:51:20,978 --> 00:51:23,880 is that it is an intricate combination 892 00:51:23,948 --> 00:51:26,713 of inventions and discoveries 893 00:51:26,784 --> 00:51:29,253 So for example, take something like natural numbers: 894 00:51:29,320 --> 00:51:32,188 one, two, three, four, five, etcetera 895 00:51:32,256 --> 00:51:33,952 I think what happened 896 00:51:34,024 --> 00:51:36,102 was that people were looking at many things, for example, 897 00:51:36,126 --> 00:51:39,096 and seeing that there are two eyes, you know, 898 00:51:39,163 --> 00:51:41,894 two breasts, two hands, you know, and so on 899 00:51:41,966 --> 00:51:44,026 And after some time, 900 00:51:44,101 --> 00:51:47,367 they abstracted from all of that the number two 901 00:51:49,206 --> 00:51:52,904 According to Mario, "two" became an invented concept, 902 00:51:52,977 --> 00:51:56,641 as did all the other natural numbers 903 00:51:56,714 --> 00:51:59,149 But then people discovered that these numbers 904 00:51:59,216 --> 00:52:02,118 have all kinds of intricate relationships 905 00:52:02,186 --> 00:52:05,623 Those were discoveries 906 00:52:05,689 --> 00:52:09,387 We invented the concept, but then discovered 907 00:52:09,460 --> 00:52:12,089 the relations among the different concepts 908 00:52:12,162 --> 00:52:15,599 So is this the answer? 909 00:52:15,666 --> 00:52:19,603 That math is both invented and discovered? 910 00:52:19,670 --> 00:52:21,470 This is one of those questions where it's both 911 00:52:21,505 --> 00:52:24,236 Yes, it feels like it's already there, 912 00:52:24,308 --> 00:52:26,539 but yes, it's something that comes out of our deep, 913 00:52:26,610 --> 00:52:29,102 creative nature as human beings 914 00:52:29,179 --> 00:52:32,775 We may have some idea to how all this works, 915 00:52:32,850 --> 00:52:35,684 but not the complete answer 916 00:52:35,753 --> 00:52:40,885 In the end, it remains "The Great Math Mystery" 71694

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.