Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Hello friends, how are you?
How is December?
I hope things go as best as possible.
It seems that, well, it seems that the
virus is beginning to be controlled a little,
that is, it seems that the light at
the end of the tunnel begins to be
seen a little.
Some of my workshops, such as that of
Colombia and that of London, are already beginning
to take shape, specifically that of Colombia has
dates already and that of London, well, soon
we will start to decide, with which we
will cut wood and see if things start
to work.
Well, as we told you in the previous
chapter, we already introduced you that today, in
this video, we were going to talk a
little about flashes, specifically about a session that
we had, it was a post-wedding session
and although not the whole session we worked
with flashes, it is true that we forced
ourselves to shoot a little with them, well,
to tell you a little bit about how
we work with flashes.
The truth is that, all this time, since
we created the Patreon channel, never, well, very
few times, punctually, I had talked a little
about how we work with flashes, that is,
for several reasons, mainly because, at the moment
we are now, we do not usually work
so much with flashes, I mean, from a
given moment, from the fact that we are
working on the speeches or the dinner or
the dance, obviously we are going to use
flashes and we are going to use it
almost always off camera, except that on occasional
occasions they are local or they are wedding
venues in which the ceiling is very, very
low and as it is obvious, it can
bounce off very easily, but in this video
we have not thought about it to tell
you how we work the flash when we
are partying, but how we work the flashes
in a creative way, for example, as we
did in the session that we are going
to tell you about, to work with hard
lights or with ambient light and how we
try to compensate or how we work with
a hand flash, for example, as this one,
as is the case.
Of course, I was telling you that at
the moment we are now, we do not
usually work with flashes for many reasons, well,
for many, I don't know, but for a
few reasons, mainly because throughout my career there
came a time when I started working with
flash and I did not take the flash
off the camera or off the camera, almost
never, and from the preparatory years I already
took photos with flash, reflections, stories, crazy things,
until later, especially at the time of portraits
or at the time of the posts, of
course, at the time I decided, I don't
know if it is not the correct word
to evolve, but I think it is the
correct word to take one more step and
say, well, I am going to investigate, I
am going to experiment in working with couples
with other types of lights, of course, you
already know that I am from Spain, you
already know that in Spain in the wedding
season we are talking about that we have
a sun that is scary, with which I
decided to investigate what would happen if I
worked without flashes, working with hard lights, with
shadows, with silhouettes, with flashes you can obviously
get the same thing, but I started to
be a little tired but I wanted, as
I said, to investigate on the other hand
and also what allowed me not to work
with flashes was that I did not need
someone with a tripod or someone with a
foot or someone who supported me with light,
I mean, I was already a little tired
that always when we did portraits someone had
to come with me who would hold the
flash for me, that is, in this way,
when working without flashes, as I could work
with the couple in an individual way, that
was one of the main reasons, another reason
not so important is that I started to
fit in as a flasher photographer, I was
known as well as many others and I
think that those who labeled us with the
name of a flasher I think they were
not wrong and the story that happened in
a similar way is that I remember how
several colleagues comparing it when they told me
I love your black and white at the
time that many photographers who told me I
love your black and white I started not
to edit photos in black and white because
I did not want it to fit me
in a term, not like with the flashes,
that is, at the moment that it fitted
me as a flasher and such and at
the moment that in all the workshops I
was only asked to work with flash then
I decided it is the moment it is
the moment to get out of all this
and it is the moment to take one
more step forward, but of course we have
to be consistent, this device gives us 40
% more creativity, of course, if today in
2020 I have barely used flash, it is
not because I do not know how to
use it, it is because I have decided
as a photographer, as an artist, to take
one more step or investigate in other points
of photography, but do not forget that this
little thing gives us 40% more creativity
and simply saying that it is not that
I work with natural light seems to me
very respectable, but gentlemen, handling this or knowing
how to handle it is perfect because it
will help us get out of a creative
blockade of a moment that we have a
day with many clouds, a day with fogs,
a day ...
I mean, it has huge resources that obviously
you have to know how to handle them
to, as I tell you, at a given
moment, go ahead with this.
Before I start talking, you see that I
have three flashes here, okay?
They are with the three flashes that more
or less we have worked on in the
last two years, right?
Of course, this is a Yongnuo, okay?
This is the Nikon, the latest model, the
SB5000, this is the Yongnuo 564, okay?
And this is the Profoto that we use
now, well, it is what we use both
in the last weddings and in the last
session in which we are going to analyze.
Of course, the reason why I use this
one, because sometimes we place flashes in super
crazy places, when we photograph a party in
this case, and this is worth 70 euros,
if it breaks, well, nothing happens.
The quality of the light, you have to
recognize it, which is not very good, but
for party photos it is plenty, right?
And we talk about Nikon, obviously it is
much better than the Yongnuo, okay?
We are talking about a great flash that
has great power, but that the light is
sometimes too flashy.
And on the other hand, if we talk
about both, the Yongnuo and the Nikon, as
you well know, the moment you put a
little bit of cane, the moment you put
it at 1.1, a little slow, okay?
The moment you put it at 1.1,
as you start to give it a crack,
as you start to give it a cane,
or you demand a lot, the first shot
at 1.1 will keep it.
The second no longer arrives and the third
does not shoot.
Of course, at the moment we are talking
about this little thing, if you put it
at maximum power, that notice that here it
is no longer that you put it at
1.25 or 1.5, it is super
simple, right?
It's like for fools, sorry.
You put it at maximum power, the first
shot will go to maximum power, the second
to maximum power, the third to maximum power
and so on until you burst the flash.
In addition, at the moment I have realized
that you want to use it for creative
use, okay?
It seems silly, but that the head is
circular is wonderful, because we are talking about
the recreation of light, it will be much
more natural.
But hey, it's not a video, it's not
an episode here to tell you about the
goodness of this flash, which is better than
this one, and that this one is better
than the other, that it's not about this,
but it's about working and we're going to
get down to business, okay?
With what the photos were.
Remember that I had told you that we
had a post-wedding session a couple of
weekends ago and what I said, fuck, this
is a good opportunity to get in, both
to work with natural light and, as is
obvious, to work with artificial light, with flashes
and to combine both, right?
So, of the four best photos we took
with flash, I'm going to describe them to
you, we're going to analyze them and, above
all, in the comments, any questions you have,
ask me and I will answer you.
Especially for those of you who do not
use flash or have not dared to, have
doubts, just practice, practice, practice, practice, practice.
It is that, after all, as photography and
the biggest enemy of this little thing, we
are always ourselves, the photographers, okay?
So if it doesn't come out the first
time, second try, third, third, fourth, fifth ...
until in the end I assure you that
you will be the fucking masters of flash,
okay?
Well, let's start first with the photo, this
one, with the one you are seeing, okay?
As I was saying, we go deeper into
this first photo, in which you are seeing
what was done, that is, the couple was
inside a house and I was outside, that
is, between the couple and me there was
a window, a completely glass door, okay?
What I intended was to get the reflection
that I had from behind, that is, behind
me I had the whole park, that is,
I had a whole huge garden, in front
of me I had the couple and between
the couple and me I had a large
glass door.
Simply what I wanted to capture was, in
the same frame, in the same photo, what
I had behind and what I had in
front.
Of course, the couple, as they were inside
the courtyard or inside the hall, they were
completely dark.
For it to be seen, it had to
give it a touch of flash, do you
understand me?
That is, what I wanted, as I have
told you, to be seen in the same
frame or in the glass, sorry, to be
seen from behind, that is, the garden and
the couple.
Of course, what to do?
We have to compensate what we have inside
with what we have outside and the best
of all is to start checking or exposing,
knowing what light we have outside, okay?
In my case, what I always do is
expose to the outside or to the highest
point of light, in this case to the
sky, and if it gave me, for example,
a measurement of 80 of speed and an
8 of diaphragm, what I am going to
do is simply sub-expose several steps of
diaphragm, one step or several.
In this case, if the correct measurement is
8 of diaphragm and 80 of speed, I
am going to sub-expose.
Why?
Because I am going to try to make
an American night, that is, I am going
to darken the outside, you understand, to try
to compensate with the flash.
Something important, the power that I use of
the flash is going to be almost always
something like an 8, a 9, a 10,
for example, of power, okay?
If you use a flash like this, it
was the one I worked with in the
session, right?
With which, what I am going to do
is gain, overcome the external power that I
have outside with this, that is, I mean,
I have to equalize the power of the
inside with the power of the outside, and
as you already know, the greater the power
of the flash.
Once we have all that, what I am
going to ask Erika to do is to
place herself inside the room, inside the building,
okay?
And already ask her to raise the flash
with a kick, with a foot.
Why do I ask her to raise the
flash?
Why do I ask her to always be
in a position, for example, like this?
Because, how does natural light work?
From top to bottom, the sun is always
up, okay?
Do you understand me?
And something also very, very important, why did
I ask Erika to put this little thing?
Because what I wanted was to direct the
light, notice that it is similar to this,
what I wanted to direct the light in
a super, super central way, that is, that
only the couple was illuminated, to, in quotation
marks, simulate that the photo did not carry
flash, that it was part of what entered
through the glass or through the glass door.
Notice that my mission was not that of
causing a bomb of light and that it
smelled artificial, but that it seemed that everything
was in a certain natural way.
That is why I asked Erika to simply
place this, she will place it at a
height, quite large, I suppose that one and
a half meters from the couple, almost two
meters, and that's it.
I used the 35mm, that's why I stick
so much to the glass, I try to
place myself in a position like this, so
that I am not seen, so that my
shadow is not seen, and I am clearly
concerned that the reflection of the glass, what
I am seeing right in front of me,
is all this that I have behind and
the couple that I see there.
Important, why did I ask the couple to
get on two chairs?
Super easy, because I wanted to find a
neutral background for the couple, or at least
a neutral background in their faces.
What is the neutral background?
The sky, okay?
That's why we do this, so that the
subject or the couple stands out even more
in this case.
Notice that I am never going to put
a couple with a background in which they
are branches, a forest, in a situation of
an urban landscape, I will never place it
in something that does not highlight the couple,
always at a point in which I know
that it will stand out, do you understand
me?
Since we were inside, since we were in
that same place, what I asked the couple
to do was to separate, so as not
to photograph them in the same position, because
one of the things or one of the
limitations for me that existed with the flash,
in addition to always going with an assistant,
was that the poses almost always had to
be the same, that is, couple face to
face, and that made me a little nervous,
and that was, as I was saying, one
of the reasons why I stopped using the
flash a little in a creative way for
portraits, okay?
Well, I roll up too much.
Once I had the couple inside, we are
going to do something different.
Instead of being face to face, I am
going to ask them to separate.
What we are going to do is place
the bride, for example, here, with the head
looking that way, and the groom a little
two meters away from her, separated, behind, okay?
And with the face looking that way, that
is, the bride there and the groom there.
And I'm just going to ask Erika to
place the flash here, okay?
With the same power, the same measurement.
We were working all the time at 10
of power or 9 of power, okay?
Ah, ah, ah, important!
Remember that this is going to take away
a step from the diaphragm of power, okay?
You have to know that, okay?
The same, that is, to place, as I
have told you, the bride here, the bride
a little further ahead, and simply Erika, the
same, with the flash above, use more or
less, as I have told you, the same
power, and bam!
And simply illuminate the groom's face, okay?
The mission was that, to separate first, simply
for the couple, frame it perfectly in what
was the frame of the same door, right?
Of the glass door, of that door that
I have, that both were perfectly fitted there,
so that the composition, as is obvious, would
work and, as I have already told you,
illuminate only the groom.
I would just like a little bit to
say, right?
In other words, that the initial measurement of
the photo was the same, diaphragm 8 and
a 125 AO, okay?
With which, that was the ideal measurement, 8
-125.
What did I do?
Sub-expose, as I have told you in
the previous photo, I simply put it at
250 speed, okay?
To sub-expose everything and so that there
was that contrast.
Of course, remember the background too, ah, important,
the background, I used a neutral background again.
What is the neutral background?
Correct, the sky, do you understand me?
The same, absolutely the same.
Ah, why did I use both in the
previous photo and in this photo a diaphragm
8, which is not what I usually use
always?
Because in the first photo, between what I
wanted to photograph, which was right behind me,
although the reflection was here, and the couple,
there would be like a couple of meters,
I wanted everything to be focused, that simple.
In the photo that I was explaining to
you now, in which, for example, the bride
is right in front and the groom behind,
they would be a couple of meters away,
I wanted everything to be focused, from the
bride to the groom, diaphragm 8, as simple
as that.
I didn't want to complicate my life at
all, not at 5, 6, not at 4,
not at all, okay?
Do you understand me?
Okay, well, we're going to change a little
bit of the third.
In the previous photos, what we had done
was simply play with the couple inside, okay?
Now we are going to go for another
way of, well, to use the flash, which
seems more interesting to me, okay?
I directly asked the couple to take us
for a walk through the gardens of the
wedding farm.
Now I wanted to find something to play
with, with something more of architecture, with something
more of lines, and if I could play
with lights and shadows, perfect, right?
I mean, I mean, I wanted to make
a mix between playing with photography, sorry, with
very hard light, very, very, very hard, and
also with lines.
And if I could play with some super
interesting composition, well, perfect.
So what I got, or where we went,
was towards this image, okay?
And I show you the end, well, the
final result, which was this, but as you
can see, that is, it is very simple.
What I wanted is to put the couple
in the shadow, simply.
You see that shadow that forms in the
shape of a triangle?
So, I wanted to put them there.
Of course, if I put them there, they
are completely in shadow, they no longer have
any interest.
Well, you wouldn't even see the couple.
There is a good example to explain how
we work, right?
How we put the flash.
Again, the idea was to put them inside,
expose them to the sky.
If the exposure, for example, is diaphragm 2
and it gave me, for example, a speed
of 2,500, I'm going to try to
do something similar to an American night, okay?
Similar, more or less.
I mean, I'm going to set the speed
to 5,000, okay?
If the original exposure, the supposedly correct one,
is 2,500, in this case 5,000,
I'm going to expose it to the maximum,
to create more drama.
And now, yes, I'm going to talk to
Erika, so that she gets close to me,
she gets close to the couple, raises her
vertigo, as always, more or less, about two
meters from the couple, again with this, okay?
And already 45 degrees, well, more or less
like that.
Power, in that case, I remember that we
used 10, that is, very simple, okay?
That is, maximum power.
The couple, again, very, very close together.
Look, I mean, I clearly noticed that in
the triangle this, that is, the triangle that
you see black, that neither on the left
nor on the right touched any body, neither
the couple's body, neither on one side nor
on the other.
In other words, the lines had to be
respected.
After all, it is the same formula as
when we are photographing without a flash, that
is, it is the same, but doing it,
in this case, correctly, right?
Once we had done that, simply, I mean,
I stuck to the maximum of the glass,
okay?
Camera stuck to the maximum, for what?
To have that double reflection, you understand me?
And simply, pam, pam, pam, and the photo,
you see it, right?
Very, very simple.
The ISO always at 100, okay?
Because I'm not going to, well, we're outside,
it's obvious, okay?
And it is that practically, the only thing
that I dedicated myself to, and the only
thing that I lost a lot of time
was in eliminating, with Photoshop, all those lines
that bothered me or that made the image
not have so much strength or so much
interest, right?
That is, as it was diluted, everything was
diluted quite a bit, right?
Okay?
And we are going to go to the
last image.
I wanted to pretend that I had not
used flash, right?
I wanted to deceive the viewer, in quotes,
that the profile that the couple has, that
profile came from the sun that they had
just against them.
Notice that my mission is, as always, right?
It is to go for a walk with
the couple and see a little bit, right?
See a little bit what are the points
of interest to photograph it.
Almost always, you already know that what I
like is to play with neutral backgrounds, and
since we were, for example, outside, what I
was looking for was a neutral background and
it occurred to me, I said, damn, the
light comes in from above, okay?
So what we are going to do is
simulate, right?
Pretend or deceive the viewer that that profiling
that I have explained to you is part
of the light, well, the natural light, right?
So I asked Erika to release the vertigo,
that it would be placed right behind, hidden
from the couple, okay?
And that she would already remove this, directly
this, why?
Because I was interested that the light would
open a little more.
If Erika was close to the couple, when
I say close, it is a palm, eh?
If she was close and if she kept
this, it would only light up a little,
right?
Like a part of the face.
I wanted this to open and I don't
know if you can see it, but the
good thing about this damn flash is that,
I mean, for the zoom, it is this.
Depending on how you turn it, that is,
it opens or closes, right?
I told her to open as much as
possible so that it had a little more
light and she simply placed a palm of
the couple, I told her to point directly
for this, that is, for the couple's face
and that's it.
And I put a couple of shots, pam,
pam, pam.
I tried at the same time that, that
is, the flash light was flowing through the
couple, I also tried that the flash light,
the natural light, sorry, would flow into my
lens, right?
That is, it would be placed.
Of course, here I also worked with a
35mm, of course I removed the sunshade so
that even more light would come in and
the result was this, right?
The power also, as I have told you,
was at the maximum, it may be at
10 of power or it may be between
8.5 and 9, right?
At the maximum almost all the time so
that the flash light would stand out, that
is, it would be above the natural light
or the external light.
You see that the operation of the flash
is very simple, you just have to get
used to it a little bit.
And the truth is that, from being almost
two years without using flash creatively in portraits,
when the time came, I felt like out
of the blue, right?
I mean, like I didn't know where to
go, but hey, it was five minutes and
already, bam, bam, and I already got down
to work.
So that's all, friends.
Surely you have heard my son Leo out
there, who is screaming out there.
And well, that was all about flashes, okay?
Well, not everything, but we are going to
try to introduce, in the future chapters, some
more chapters in which we can be seen
a little more working in portraits in a
more creative way, for example, with flashes, because
I know that many of you like all
this and here we are to work for
you, right?
So that's all, friends.
I hope you liked it, I hope you
had fun and, as I had told you,
if you have any questions, any questions about
this, simply in the comments, write, write and
we will be there to help you in
everything we can.
So nothing else, friends, be good and see
you soon.
Bye!
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.