All language subtitles for CyberSleuths.The.Idaho.Murders.S01E02.720p.WEBRip.x264-GalaxyTV

* *

- Good afternoon,
I'm Colonel Robert Evanchick,

Commissioner of
the Pennsylvania State Police.

While I monitored
the investigation

into the horrific murders

of the University of Idaho
students,

I did not imagine
the investigation

would lead to the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.

In the early-morning hours
of Friday, December 30th,

warrants were executed
at the location.

Mr. Kohberger was
then turned over

to the Monroe County Prison,

where he has remained
in their custody since.

- The families of the victims
might have found a little bit

of comfort in knowing the
person who had allegedly come

for their children at night
was apprehended in the dark,

when he was most vulnerable.

- The tactical team
burst in to arrest

the Idaho murder suspect.

He was in pajamas
and latex gloves,

stuffing trash
into Ziploc bags.

- They went in there
like a SWAT team,

kicking open the door.

They had a helicopter
above the home.

- They watched his ass
like a fucking hawk.

And then they went in
for the big kill, bitch.

- How they got
Bryan Kohberger,

I am still wondering.

- It almost seems
like he did this

as some sort of experiment.

- I don't think
he was by himself.

I have heard this a lot.

- You don't listen to
the mainstream media.

And you got to be careful
who your sources are.

You want to know the truth,

you got to go find it
yourself.

- There's more coming.
So stay tuned.

* *

- After 19,000 tips
in a quadruple-murder case

that drew
nationwide attention...

- Last night, detectives
arrested 28-year-old

Bryan Christopher Kohberger.

- The 28-year-old is
a PhD criminology student

at Washington State
University,

just a 10-minute drive
to the Idaho campus.

- There he is, right
there in custody.

- It's been several hours.

This is fresh and
new information.

And it's shocking.

The reason why
it's so shocking, guys,

is because he had a background
in criminology.

He studied the mind
of criminals.

Just think about
that for a second.

- He's a PhD student studying
criminology,

studying
how to get away with murder.

- The alleged killer is
also a true-crime obsessive.

I mean, you have to
be in order to devote

your life to studying
criminology, right?

It just blew people's minds,
you know?

* *

- Hey, guys, Bullhorn Betty
here in Moscow, Idaho.

This is what we've all
been here waiting for.

This is--we wanted
to know who.

Who did such a horrific
crime like this?

And then come to find out,
it's this criminology guy.

He seems so smart.

- The fact that
they tracked him

down in Pennsylvania,
that means that someone

was on top of their job.

- Thank you for coming today.

Last night, in conjunction

with the Pennsylvania
State Police,

Federal Bureau
of Investigation,

detectives arrested 28-year-old
Bryan Christopher Kohberger

in Albrightsville,
Pennsylvania.

I recognize the frustration

with the lack of information
that's been released.

However, providing any details
in this criminal investigation

might have tainted the
upcoming criminal prosecution

or alerted the suspect
of our progress.

However, I do want to thank our
media partners for the help.

You kept this in the news.

You helped us with tips.
You kept things going.

And we truly appreciate that.

And you are the product
of those 19,000 tips

that we received, which
is an impressive number.

I would like to invite
Bill Thompson up at this time.

- Good afternoon, folks.
My name's Bill Thompson.

I'm the Latah County
Prosecutor.

This is not the end
of this investigation.

You all now know the name of
the person who's been charged

with these offenses.

Please get that
information out there.

Please ask the public,

anyone who knows about this
individual

to come forward to help
the investigators

understand what
happened and why.

- You guys can see how the
public has already played

such a huge role in the tips.

You can see that
that has clearly been

working to their advantage.

So please continue to
keep this in the spotlight.

Continue to talk about this.

- Police have to walk
a fine line

between providing information

that is valid, that can help
the public know where

to look so that
they can contribute

and tainting their
investigation.

* *

- We are in front of
Bryan Kohberger's home.

As you see behind me,
all the yellow tape--

the crime scene tape
that was here yesterday

has been removed.

We're following this case.

We're going to be out here
hitting the pavement.

And we're gonna be
finding out as much as we can

about Bryan Kohberger.

- Authorities
have not disclosed a motive

or if he had a connection
to the students.

But we are learning more

about just who
Bryan Kohberger is.

- This case, people
want to know more

because of this mysteriousness
of, why did he do this?

Were they targeted, and,
like, why were they targeted?

And all these things.

So people want to know as
much information as possible.

And I provide this to them.

And TikTok is so different
than other platforms

because you get it
all in 30 seconds.

We're living
in a generation now where

we have short attention spans.

To watch something
on the news,

you might have to sit
through five minutes.

TikTok, it's like, boom,

in 30 seconds, I just
told you everything.

Bryan Kohberger was
studying for his PhD

in criminal justice at
Washington State University.

Before coming to Wazzu, he was
taught by a famous professor

named Dr. Katherine Ramsland

at DeSales University
of Pennsylvania.

She is the author
that published

"How to Catch a Killer"
and "The Mind of a Murderer."

And I remember a few hours
after he was arrested,

on Reddit, the survey
that he had created.

- In a post that was
removed on Reddit,

Bryan Kohberger
sought participation

in a research project...

- That seeks to
understand how emotions

and psychological traits
influence decision making

when committing a crime.

And this was back in April
that he made this public post.

- He really wanted to
know how people felt

when they were committing
a crime.

And it just didn't
feel scientific.

It felt personal.

It felt like he
was trying to live

vicariously through these
other people's stories.

- How relevant or
irrelevant that is

is still a big question.

You cannot suddenly
think that somebody

is a suspect because
they're fascinated by crime,

because that would mean

that every single web sleuth
out there,

every person consuming
true crime,

every student of criminology,
every attorney,

every journalist,
every investigator

has the potential
of being a criminal.

- The following
is an interview

with someone who used to be
friends with Bryan Kohberger.

They went to high school
together.

- He liked to,
like, analyze why

people have certain emotions.

He didn't always understand

why people would react
to things

the way that they do, almost
like he didn't understand

human emotion properly.

I know for a time he struggled
with something

that he called
visual migraines.

* *

- So everyone's favorite creep

had an old
social-media account

talking about his visual snow

and how he has no empathy
and losing his mind.

- In his digital footprints,
they said,

even though these
were written years ago,

not being able to feel
emotions

and observing his own life
as if it were a video game.

He said, "Whatever
I want with little remorse."

- It was such a strange detail.

And if it's true,
it really gives...

unique insight
into how his mind works.

- They apparently found
this guy across the country,

across the literal country
in Pennsylvania.

How the fuck did he get all
the way across the country?

- The public defender
representing Kohberger

in the extradition says about
a month after the murders,

his client went on
a road trip home

to Pennsylvania
with his father

that was planned at
the beginning of the semester.

They were in a white
Hyundai Elantra.

It's the same make and model
of the vehicle spotted

near the scene of the murders.

- "'Idaho murder
suspect pulled over

'twice on cross-country
race home

with dad,' lawyer claims."

I believe once for speeding

and once for following
too closely

to a car in front of them.

- Hello.
- How you doing?

- How y'all doing today?

- Do you think it was
a coinkydink that they

were stopped twice
in Indiana?

- Oh, okay.

- At that point, I believe
Bryan Kohberger thought,

whoa, I am being looked at.

There's no way in the world

this was just some
sort of fortuitous,

you know, pulling me over.

- I 100% agree with you.

I think he looks like he has
been caught in this photo.

This is just my opinion.

But I think it looks like he
is about to crap his pants.

- They said he was
following too close.

Now, that's usually something
that's very nebulous

that can be used
for an officer to say,

this is why we're pulling
you over.

They were able to get
close and identify them.

And they gave their story.

And they let them move on.

- There's this
thing called NCIC.

It connects all
the police departments--

a computer system, and you can
put a warrant in there.

And every police
department knows

the person is wanted, okay?

So I assume they did not have
a warrant for his arrest yet.

Maybe they were
waiting for something,

like the DNA to come back.

And when the DNA came back,

that's when they hit
the house.

- Fox News is reporting that
an FBI surveillance team

were tracking Kohberger
on his cross-country road trip

from Washington State
to Pennsylvania.

And they asked the Indiana
police to pull him over.

And the reasoning
was because they were

seeking images of his hands.

* *

When you zoom in,
this is what you get.

You can see what
appears to be maybe some cuts

around his knuckle
and then on his wrist.

I turned the brightness all
the way down on this photo,

and you can see
it a lot better.

- When I first saw the film, it
looked like there was a cut--

a very significant
cut on his hand.

And so I kept looking at,
where was that first scene,

that first footage?

And I tell you what, there is
no footage without that cut.

None.

* *

- This is State of Idaho
versus Bryan C. Kohberger.

Mr. Kohberger is
present in court.

He's in custody.

He's appearing with his
attorney, Ms. Taylor.

- Let's talk about a lady
by the name of Anne Taylor.

* *

- The whole Internet is saying
that the prosecutor is not

nearly as qualified
as Anne Taylor.

- Anne Taylor used to
work for his office.

You didn't know that, did you?

Because nobody
vetted Anne Taylor.

Anne Taylor used to work

for the Latah County
Prosecutor's Office years ago.

She's a smart
lawyer, great person.

I have no problems with her.

Wouldn't you
want the best lawyer

if you were sitting in jail?

Even though it's a public
defender, she's a good lawyer.

She'll do a good job.

- So, with that,
then, Mr. Kohberger,

you will be remanded
in custody and remain

in custody on the "no bail,"
pending further proceedings

in this matter.

- Oh, my God.
So think about this.

Anne Taylor is
going to know all

of the tricks on how
the prosecutor

already lawyers, right?

So she might be
the only one that

could get Bryan Kohberger off.

If there is anybody that can
do it, it'll be Anne Taylor.

- A judge in Moscow, Idaho,

has just dealt a huge, huge
blow to the general public.

- The judge who will be
hearing this case in Idaho

has placed a gag order on any
person involved with the case.

- So what's that mean?

You need to shut
the up.

- Basically, it's
ordering investigators,

law enforcement personnel,
attorneys and agents

are prohibited from making
extrajudicial statements,

written or oral,
concerning the case.

They are not allowed
to talk to reporters.

* *

- The gag order
is so frustrating.

- It sucks.
I hate gag orders.

- And it's actually crazy,

because you never
see a gag order.

When do we hear about that?

- And the judge did say,
don't call it a gag order.

- It's not called that.

- That's offensive.

- So I will appreciate
not using that term.

* *

- That's cool.
Call it whatever you want.

But it hurts everyone.

- I don't know, you guys.

This is getting weirder
and weirder by the minute.

- I thought the gag order
was appropriate.

Keeping the case on a gag order
prevents the suspect

from getting an unfair trial.

* *

- I can't find any
case in this modern era

where a defendant got off

because the Internet or media
has been talking about a case.

I think if you're gonna
be open and transparent

and ask the public for help...

- Help us.
- Help.

- Help us solve this case.

- We should have the
right to know everything

going through the process.

So it's almost like, this
is your reward for helping.

You get nothing.

- I think transparency,
access to information,

access to the evidence, people
being able to see and hear

what is being said
helps justice.

The fact that people in social
media are gonna speculate,

they're gonna speculate more
in the absence of facts.

* *

- Y'all, Bryan goes to court.
The judge issues a gag order.

And they release the PCA,
all in the same goddamn day.

- Breaking news--

the affidavit was just
released to the public.

It's basically going to
summarize why they believe

that he is
the suspect responsible

and how it links him to this.

Now, these details
are very disturbing,

and they're surfacing quickly.

- The probable-cause affidavit

was like none
that I've ever written

and none that I've ever read.

It was so long.

- There's a lot.

- It was so detailed.

- People want answers.
People want details.

- We'll give you an
inside look into why

Kohberger is being
charged on four counts

of first-degree murder.

For them to come out,
make an arrest,

and show that that is what
he's being charged of,

they have to have some
pretty good, solid evidence.

- The good guys
catch the bad guy,

they're guilty and
in jail, right?

They committed the crime,
because the cops caught 'em.

We make mistakes.

So do doctors, so...

- I really do feel there's
something much bigger

going on here.

I feel like a lot
is being covered up.

- We are going
to literally dig

through this entire affidavit.

- The affidavit
talked about 12 times

that his phone had pinged
near the general location

of 1122 King Road.

- So let's talk
about cell phones.

- So, in the affidavit, they
talk about the phone data--

phone calls, text messages,

and real-time location

of a cell phone
within a few meters.

That is a very small area.

- The night of the murders,
there was a period of time

where he had turned
the cell phone off

'cause it stopped responding
to the towers.

But when it was on,

it was basically catching him
leaving from Pullman heading

towards Moscow,
then again leaving Moscow

heading back towards Pullman
once everything was done.

- That's how close
he was to a bitch.

How does this happen?

- Washington State University
cameras catch that car

leaving campus at 2:44 a.m.

His cell phone pings also
show him leaving his house.

He turns his phone off.

- They start to discuss
sightings of a white sedan.

They label it as "suspect
vehicle number one."

I want to note that it is seen
without a front license plate

at 3:26 and 3:28 a.m.
on Styner Ave, okay?

So they're implying they saw
the same vehicle on King Road

at 3:29 a.m.

Here's my problem.

How do you go from Styner Ave
to King Road in one minute?

My point is,
I think we're dealing

with two different
white sedans here.

- They can't both
be Bryan Kohberger.

- But then why would the cops
put that in the affidavit

like that to create
this weird narrative

that nobody can grasp

because it makes
no fucking sense?

- So on November 13th,
in the middle of the night,

they see video
footage of Hyundai Elantra

pinging around
the King Road residence.

- A white Elantra with
no front license plate

is seen driving by the
neighbor's Ring Cam

three times, fourth
time at 4:04 a.m.

- They claim suspect
vehicle number one

is seen on King Road
at 3:29 a.m.

It makes three passes past
the King Road residence.

And then it is seen
exiting the area.

They claim that that
same vehicle enters

King Road again at 4:04 a.m.

And then it's seen going
back down Queen towards King,

doing a three-point turn
again, trying to park.

They don't really know.

And the last time this
vehicle is spotted

is seen speeding
away at 4:20 a.m.

Whew!

- Now, at 4:48 a.m., the phone
returns to the network.

The phone continues to
move south of Moscow

down in kind of a U-shape form
back to Pullman, Washington.

- They then use cameras

to basically track the car
all the way back to Pullman.

- The affidavit says that
suspect vehicle number one

went straight up
this road and got

caught on every single
camera on the way back.

- 5:30 a.m., the
phone is utilizing

cell towers for Pullman,

consistent
with where he lives.

Now, what's troubling is that
he didn't stay in Pullman.

- Bryan's cell phone was
tracked back to the house

after the murders.

Between 9:12 and 9:21 a.m.,

the phone was near
the house again.

And this was on November 13th.

- Oh, my God.

After reading the affidavit
a million fucking times,

I think I know why Bryan went

back to the house
at 9:00-something

the next morning.

He had to have realized,

where the fuck is the holster

that I was holding
my weapon in?

The knife sheath.

* *

- Bryan Kohberger, he
thought he could get away

with the perfect crime.

But it turns out
he left a part

of the murder weapon behind.

The officer that wrote
the affidavit said...

- The athleticism that it took

to hold these victims down

and stab them mercilessly,

I think the sheath dislodged

without him even being
aware of it.

Remember, the adrenaline,
the hyperfocus

that he would have had,

even I'll call
it tunnel vision.

I think it was only when
he got into his vehicle

that he realized,

oh, my gosh,
where is that sheath?

- Supposedly, it's a Kabar.
That's what the affidavit said.

- He got it on Amazon.

But what I thought was really
interesting is, you know,

here, basically, I just
have the sheath itself.

And it says, "Kabar" and
"United States Marine Corps."

I mean, the truth is
it is a huge knife.

- To draw a knife,
especially a Kabar knife,

out of this sheath--
it fits in there tight.

This isn't loosey-goosey.

And if you snap it, it
takes a lot of force

to unsnap that
and draw that out.

And that's why I believe we
have the friction...

pull off the skin cells

from his fingers...

and not only skin cells but
also the oils and other parts,

and lodge onto that snap.

- Agents in Pennsylvania

do a trash pull
at the parents' house.

Trash is abandoned property.
You don't need a warrant.

They get a DNA sample
from the dad.

They get a sample that's this
much of a match to the DNA

that was found on the sheath.

- So guilty!

He left the sheath of
the knife on the bed.

And the DNA from
the sheath matched

garbage outside of his house.

Oh, my God!

- The discovery of
that knife sheath

is the only reason, really,

that Bryan Kohberger

sits right now accused.

- CBS News legal analyst,
Rikki Klieman,

says, if that link
is proved in court...

- The knife sheath
places him physically

in the house
at some point in time

but not necessarily
on the night of the killings.

- First responders
on the scene said

it was the most gruesome scene
they have ever witnessed.

It was very messy.

Even blood was dripping down
the outside of the house.

So there must have been
DNA everywhere, right?

But in two bedrooms
full of carnage,

they only found one piece of
touch DNA on a movable object.

Nothing on the bodies.

- Why isn't there a ton more?

And a lot of people will say,
well, there is probably more.

We just don't have it.

I highly doubt it.

And that's all I'll say.
I just--I highly doubt it.

But the touch DNA...

That's even gonna be really
hard to hold up in court.

It just is.

- People talk about touch DNA
as if it's not DNA.

It's ridiculous.

* *

- Please leave
your message for--

Hey, Rory. It's Olivia.

Give me a call back
when you can.

Just wanted to see if
you were still in town.

Rory is a YouTuber.

He hasn't been around for
very long--about two months.

- And welcome to the
brand-new true-crime channel

called Thou Shalt Not Kill.

I am your host and
creator of the channel.

My name is Rory.
So this channel will...

- I'm just kind of curious
to see, what does he know?

I think my worry is
that Bryan might walk.

That's my biggest
fear, you know?

- Guess what.

There's a very good
chance he's gonna walk,

'cause they don't have
anything

other than this, you know,
touch DNA

that's on a button
snap on a knife sheath

that, in my opinion, I think
he didn't even own

because he's a vegan

and he wouldn't own something
like that,

I don't understand
what else they have.

This is just my opinion.

- You know, we're talking
about the Internet.

And we're talking about
all the sleuths out there.

And everybody's got an opinion.

And everybody's building
their own cases.

When the case is solved,
someone's gonna say,

I was right, and, I was right,
and, you were wrong.

The police work
is a profession.

We spend a lot of time,
a lot of training.

All these people think
they can do our job.

- Hey, guys.

Bullhorn Betty here.

So this sheath, right?

I would assume there would
have been more DNA on the item

than just one small
molecule of DNA

left on the button
of the sheath.

But my questions
always came down

to whether Bryan Kohberger
intentionally

left the sheath
at the residence

to taunt law enforcement.

- Everyone described Kohberger

as being really smart, as
being a brilliant student.

And everything about this
crime was just sloppy.

And this is what he studies.

And so it worries me that
maybe he really is smart

and this is all part
of the plan.

- Was it there because he
accidentally dropped it,

or did he
intentionally leave it?

- I've waited to speak on
this sheath of a knife

being left at the crime scene.

Now, the reason I held
off on talking about this

is because an
account commenting

during the investigation
mentioned the sheath first.

* *

- Pappa Rodgers posted
a lot of things.

- Most people thought
this Pappa Rodgers

was this pompous jerk...

- That had a lot
of inside intel.

- But the one that
stuck out to everybody

is he said it's a
fixed-blade knife.

And from that, Pappa Rodgers
posted that he thought

they had the knife sheath.

And that was before it became
public knowledge that they

have the knife sheath.

* *

- Bryan Kohberger's arrested
on December 30th.

And we never hear from
Pappa Rodgers again.

- His account went down
completely after the arrest.

Crickets.

- So if he was
under some alias--

And, oh, my God,
the profile picture...

looks exactly like Kohberger.

- With him in that hat and
that side of his face, that--

And he's had that
from the beginning.

- But why would he leave
a digital footprint

that blatant and obvious?

That's what I say, like, yeah,
it kind of looks like him.

Like, I see what you're
saying, but--

- Other criminals have done
this in the past,

where they use social media to
kind of throw off the people

looking into the case.

It does happen.

- Do you understand
the implication?

- He was watching
all of our stuff.

- We're down there
with boots on the ground.

He could have been
getting information from us

that helped him.

And that's not what
I'd like to do.

* *

* *

- Bryan Kohberger today
made his second appearance

in an Idaho courtroom.

- Are you waiving your right to
a speedy preliminary hearing?

- Yes.

- The preliminary hearing
is now set for June 26th

to give his defense team
more time to prepare.

- Berger Boy is waiving his
right to a speedy trial.

And he will not have
to be seen

for his preliminary hearing
until June.

June?

- A judge will decide
at the June hearing

if there is enough evidence
for the case to move forward.

In the meantime,
Kohberger remains

behind bars without bail.

- Now that they have
the evidence from his car

and his computer
and his apartment,

I'm pretty sure they have
an airtight case, allegedly.

Keep in mind that less
than 5% of criminal cases

actually go to trial.

Most people plead out.

However, this guy
is a narcissist

and a sadist, allegedly.

And he is enjoying
the spotlight right now.

So I think he could push it
to trial,

even though it's against his
best interests, allegedly,

because he wants to squeeze as
much pain out of the survivors

and the victims' family as
humanly possible,

allegedly.

* *

- Let's see.

* *

One of the roommates
said that at 4:00 a.m.,

she heard what sounded like
Kaylee playing with her dog.

And then she thought she
heard her say something

like, "There's someone here."

She did at that time
look out of her door.

But she didn't see anybody.

She then looked out
of her door again

when she heard what sounded
like a male voice saying,

"It's okay.
I'm going to help you."

- Now, at 4:17 a.m.,
a security camera

picked up distorted audio
of what sounded like voices

or a whimper followed
by a loud thud.

A dog can also be heard
barking on this footage.

And note that this
camera was less than 50 feet

from Xana's bedroom wall.

- Then the roommate opened
her door for a third time

after she heard crying.

And she saw a figure
clad in black clothing

with a mask covering
the person's mouth and nose

walking towards her.

- She froze in shock.

And this person
walked past her

and towards the sliding door.

* *

- People accepted that both
roommates had been asleep

at the time of the murders

and that they probably
had heard nothing

and that that was why.

And as soon as these
things became public,

people went after her hard.

- Everyone's got a lot of
questions about the roommates,

and rightfully so.

Even when we thought they were
living on the bottom floor,

the question was, why
were they not attacked?

- That's what bothered me,

because they were in the
home, left untouched.

You told us that they were
sleeping, to begin with,

on the first floor.

They came out and said that.

Why lie about that?

And then there was a lot that
I think is missing, right?

Which, in my opinion, the
rest of those eight hours.

- That gap in
between calling 911.

Locking herself in her room,
totally understandable.

But not calling 911 for hours?

- Maybe her phone
wasn't in her room.

Maybe the suspect
threatened her.

Maybe she fainted
and knocked herself out.

- For those of you guys who
are saying I'm victim blaming,

this, that, and the third,

look, I need you to use both
sides of your brains here.

Her story doesn't add up.

* *

- It has come out now that
these girls were texting

with each other during the
murders, which looks really,

really, really, really bad.

- Why in the affidavit
did it say

that their texts
show what times

the murders started and ended?

What the fuck was
on their phones?

What were their text messages?

What the hell was
on their fucking phones?

- We're only here
for a noise complaint.

Come to the damn door.

Who lives here?

- Everyone wants to know

what were the roommates
texting about,

and why did they take so long
to call the cops?

Back in December, I spoke
with a mother named Kim,

who claimed that her daughter
and a group of students

were privy to the murders
before the police.

But no one really believes
her story because she

has remained anonymous.

I've been in touch with Kim.

And, luckily, I convinced her
to meet up with me in person

and answer some questions.

I'm going to Idaho to meet
this woman face-to-face.

* *

Maybe if other moms
had come forward

and said the same thing,

then people wouldn't think
she's lying.

But all we have is just Kim.

I feel like once I see her,

I will know
and have a better idea of,

okay, is she telling the truth
or not?

I'm pretty good at telling
people's, like, vibe

just from my gut instincts.

- Yeah, it's on autofocus,
but it's--

- Oh, what I do is,
I do, like--

So today I'm going
to be meeting with Kim.

And this is the first time that
she will be seen on camera.

- Where do you want me to sit?
- Right here.

- Okay.
- And I'm just going to...

You're brave for coming
forward, and no other--

- I don't think it's brave.
I think I'm just a mom.

And here's the other thing.
My kids are alive.

There's four children
who aren't.

- To recap,
your daughter claims

that in the hours before
the police were called,

she and a group
of other students

were in a Snapchat group
discussing the murders.

Do you remember details
that your daughter

told you about what was
in the Snapchat group?

- So the details were

there was multiple people
inside.

And the girls had
seen somebody outside.

And that is why they locked
themselves in the room.

And they were awake, aware.

And then they called friends

to come over.

- What's the reason
behind that--

those eight hours
of not calling the police?

- They're adults.
But they're also kids.

I don't know. They can be
a little feral at this age.

- But the Snapchat groups,
I feel like, could be

the one piece of, really,
evidence, 'cause people

want to see things on paper.
And--

- Sure. When you have Snapchats
out there

and text messages out there

that there wasn't
just one person there

and that kids were
on the scene--

in the crime scene,
in the house,

and how could you not call 911
when you heard...

those screams?

And you can't tell me
they didn't scream.

All I'm saying is that
it's a really small town.

This is a really bad crime.

I hope that the students

are as involved
as I believe that they are.

* *

- Okay, so Kim, WSU mom,
she claims that friends

were called to the house hours
before the police

got there, right?

Which is so suspish,
if you ask me.

What could the friends
be doing in that time?

Were you coming up
with a narrative?

Were you involved?

I'm sorry. That just raises so
many more questions

if there is some truth
to the story.

- So, after the Kim thing
came out and that stuff,

did you talk to Steve
about that?

Like, what did he think
about the morning thing?

Did he believe it?

- I think there is an element
of that morning

that he does find
a bit suspicious,

just like everyone else.

That's the biggest
question everyone has,

is, what took so long?

* *

Holy shit! We have
another bomb interview.

Basically, there's
this kid named Dave.

And he said there were
a bunch of Snapchat groups

that he knew about
that morning,

hours before
the first 911 call.

Dave is the first
person to come forward

that has a similar story

to what Kim's daughter
was saying.

And I really wanted to find
out more about what he knew

and see if I could read
any of those messages

from that morning.

Sometimes law
enforcement or FBI

can be intimidating
to certain people.

They're scared.

And they would rather open up
to someone like me,

who just looks
like the girl next door.

I can learn about information

that may never
have been uncovered,

all because
they had someone to talk to

and someone to open up to.

* *

- Are you nervous?
- A little bit.

Yeah.

The fact that he's
coming forward,

it takes a lot of courage.

And I don't want his life to
be affected in a negative way

because of Internet sleuths.

So we pitched down his voice,

and we didn't show
his face at all

because we want
to protect him.

- I was telling
you the other day,

it's like cracking
back into trauma,

you know, and just,
like, a bunch of stuff

that you just want to forget.

- So right now
we are looking up

messages that were
in the Snapchat group

that Dave was a part of.

- I'm pretty sure that's it.

* *

But that does not look like
three days' worth of Snapchats

that I would even send today.
- Yeah.

- Sent, saved, chat.

And these are your messages.
- Yeah.

- Yeah, yeah, that's you.

And it wouldn't even show
other people.

- This looks like everything

that I, like, can see
or can send.

* *

Wait, look at the dates.

The 12th.
- The 12th.

12th, 12th, so 13th.

- Look at the time stamp--

05:16 in the morning.

Look at the next time stamp--

17:35.

What?

Snapchat's basically saying

that I did not use Snapchat for
12, 13 hours all day Sunday.

That is not true.

That is not true.
- Missing time.

- That's just the group chat.

That's not even
my individual Snaps.

Where are all of my Snaps
that I sent to people

asking if they were okay?

This is two ways, right?

This is saying that I didn't
message anybody for 12 hours

and nobody messaged
me for 12 hours.

That's also considering all
of the other group chats

I was in, too.
- Mm-hmm.

- Radio silent for 12 hours?
No. Guaranteed, no.

* *

- So we downloaded
some Snapchat data.

Yeah. And?

- And there's a chunk of time

that is missing
from their data.

And we're wondering
if that was, you know...

* *

- It's somewhere.

That chunk that you're talking
about that's missing,

that's somewhere.

Somebody's got it...

if they were even involved,

one way or the other.

So...

- From what I know, it
literally looks like somebody

went in there
and cleaned it out.

I don't know.
It just doesn't make sense.

It just doesn't make sense.

- Yeah, it doesn't.

- I guess the question is,
can the FBI take that data?

Snapchat?
- Of course.

The FBI has the capability

of asking these providers

to not publish such information

and making
sort of disappear, yeah.

I think that that's very,
very plausible in this case.

And it would make
a lot of sense.

- Now, if Dave is
telling the truth

and if the FBI did take
that data as evidence,

that must mean that the data
is relevant to the case.

Maybe the FBI know the reason
why the roommates

didn't immediately call
the cops.

- You guys, it has
been two months,

and we have gotten no
information on the Idaho case.

I'm getting so tired of it.

I just need to know
a little bit more,

just a little bit more.

What are we supposed
to do in the meantime?

Learn a TikTok dance?

Because I sure
the hell am not.

- I understand
that they want to help

and they want to know.

But why?

It's mostly because they
just want to get money,

to get clicks, to get noticed.

- I just looked that
I'm about to hit 700K.

And I have every single
one of you guys to thank.

- The Internet has
opened up, like,

an entirely new industry

through which
people make income.

- There's different platforms
that allow monetization

from views and ads.

- If you get enough
people looking at you,

you can make money.

- TikTok has a few
different programs.

So they have
a TikTok Creator Fund.

- TikTok announced
the launch of a special fund

to reward creators
on the platform.

This initiative enables
creators to earn money

directly from TikTok based
on different criteria,

such as the topics
they talk about,

their reach, the demographics
of their followers,

average performance,
or even interaction.

- Hi, guys.
Welcome in.

- What is a live?

- A live is when, on your
YouTube or your TikTok,

viewers can see
you in real time.

Tons of people can join it.

Yeah, comment any information
you'd like me to find.

I'm more interested
in his behavior.

- There are plenty of
true-crime content creators

who subsist off of donations

that are made
during their live videos.

Commenters can
donate in the chat.

And that bumps their comment up
so that the YouTuber is

more likely to call them out
in the live video

and say their name.

- So, morning, BHB.
Catching up with everyone.

It's nice to see you.

It's much different
than mainstream media.

We would never survive
if our customers

weren't interactive with us.

BHB, check your...
Mod chat.

Thank you.
I'm checking. I'm checking.

They want to talk to you.

They want to know
that you hear them.

So they can send you money.
They can send you super chats.

Super sticker.

I have to go to the other side
and see that super sticker.

Thank you.
God bless you.

They can say how
awesome you are.

And they can send
you some leads.

Hey, guys.

So we are right now
in front of The Coug.

They will put a $9 and
say, hey, you know,

I need you to go check on this.

You might find some
information here.

We received a lead that
brought us here to The Coug.

- When you make
requests to people

and pay them money
to do things

based upon no knowledge
whatsoever,

it has nothing to do
with the case.

- I found the leaker.

- It reinforces
the importance

of an individual's desire to
brand themselves

as, you know,
an authentic web sleuth.

- Jonathan Lee Riches
Investigates.

Jonathan Lee Riches
Investigates.

Jonathan Lee Riches
Investigates.

- The idea that you are not
just entertaining people

or you're not just
solving a crime,

but you are building a brand.

- I have
a JLR merchandise site,

a lot of shirts
like you see here, mugs, hats.

Now, that makes decent--
you know, a signi--

you know, decent amount
of money.

Roman soups,
these 40-cent soups

that you can get
in the supermarket...

I am in a few ad partnerships
with different businesses.

- They ship you a product.

You promote it.
You get a percentage of it.

This is the
best perfume ever.

If you want to smell like
the most expensive,

hottest bitch in town--

And I got it on TikTok Shop

for so much cheaper
than what I usually pay.

I did a TikTok Shop deal
the other day for a wig.

They pay well.

- I think I'm gonna get one
of these delicious soups.

These are cheap, but they're
actually very good.

- They get paid for that?

Hmm.

That's a job?
Okay.

- Money--it's not a bad thing.

They're spending
a lot of time doing it.

They should be reimbursed
and compensated.

But it's disheartening
oftentimes

the motives that exist
for a lot of these people,

because it really is
about money

and exposure and fame.

- Sure, it's nice.

Who doesn't like money, right?

- Some people
don't feel comfortable

that I'm monetizing
true crime.

But at the end of the day,

how would I be able to fly out
to places?

It's a job.

This is my job.

- There's all of these people
that are trying

to make dollar bills off
of the victims' stories.

I mean, I think there's, what,
three or four books on Amazon.

James Patterson is
trying to do a book.

I think Bloom is trying to
do a book--documentaries.

And we haven't even
gotten to trial.

- If someone wants
to watch your TikTok video

of what you think is important,
good for you.

And if you get cash for it,
that's even better for you.

But it has
nothing to do with the case.

- It took me about,
I want to say, 15 times...

reading the affidavit
until I finally started

to actually understand
parts of it.

Have you read it?

- I've read the affidavit
probably more times

than what
I would have liked to.

- Every time I reread it,
I see something kind of new.

- In most
probable-cause affidavits,

you don't need all that detail,

because you don't
want to give the public

all this information.

I would have put the sheath,
and I would have put the DNA.

But I wouldn't have put

all that other information
in there,

which now has caused sleuths
to put all this

"evidence" out there
to social media,

to millions and millions
of viewers

and just really caused
so much doubt.

- There was so much
speculation in this case,

because there wasn't a great
deal of DNA evidence,

given the nature
of the crime scene.

They really needed to present
a deeper, stronger case

with other kind of evidence
to justify that arrest.

- It was a lot of information
to release in the affidavit.

And it did lead to a lot of
harassment of the survivors.

But, I mean,

that's how the criminal justice
system works, right?

These are public
prosecutorial findings.

They had to release
this information

at some point in order
to justify the arrest.

- But, please, let me remind
you, this is not a "CSI" show.

This is not
a Netflix documentary.

This is real life.

In real life,
the professionals,

such as the FBI, which
are involved, by the way--

62 agents, to be exact,
they just beefed it up.

They're professionals.
There are processes.

- But...

on the other aspect,

you are gonna get mad
about social media

going into a frenzy,
but you're fueling it.

- All right, so Xana, she was
still on her phone on TikTok

at 4:12 a.m.

At 4:20 a.m., the fucking
car is seen speeding away.

- It was a three-story
freakin' house.

And he killed four people
in that short of time?

I'm sorry, I know people that
take shits longer than that.

That dude is a fucking
psycho, or he had help.

- Yeah, I definitely
think there's

at least two people involved.

- There's people in
my comments every day

saying there's no way he
could've done it alone.

So I'm gonna tell you why
I think he did it alone,

because there is
no evidence--

zero evidence

that anybody else
was there with him but him.

There's no other DNA.

There's no other
nothing, okay?

- People can do
some major damage

in a short amount of time.

It's not like--
that this happened

in the middle of the day,
you know,

while they're
walking to their car.

They were
in the most vulnerable place

and the most vulnerable
position

you could possibly imagine
when they were attacked.

That helped Bryan get this
done as quickly as he did,

because they were defenseless.

- Imagine him sneaking into
that house

in under nine minutes,

doing what he did
in the way that he did it

with the weapon that he used
in the manner that he did it,

which makes your head spin.

Oh, my God,
breaking news, y'all--

Kohberger's defense
just announced

that one of the roommates
has evidence

that could exonerate Bryan.

- Newly unveiled
court filings assert

that a surviving housemate
has exculpatory evidence.

She allegedly heard
or saw something

that could clear Kohberger.

- Bryan Kohberger's
attorneys argue

that the housemate's testimony
is key to the trial

and could clear
the murder charges

levied against
their client, Bryan.

What?

- The two surviving roommates,

they have
some explaining to do.

- She's a roommate.
She was there.

She was in the house
that night.

So of course she's
gonna be subpoenaed.

Of course
she's gonna have information

that very few people have.

- So rumor has it
Berger told his attorney

he knows who did this crime.

It was not him.
He's completely innocent.

And that he will help
identify that person.

A lot of people are
feeding into that,

because when he was first
arrested--apprehended

from the Pennsylvania
Police Department,

he said, "Was anybody
else arrested?"

Why is everybody

so hard-core
about sticking to,

it was one person
that did this,

there was nobody else involved,

he did it all alone?

Why? Why?

Like, how could you say
that it was just him?

You don't know.

- Two male DNAs
were found within the home.

And the other one
was found outside.

It says "on glove."

- Steve said that you had

some really interesting
information.

- This was supposed
to be a burglary.

- This individual gave the guy
from jail a backpack,

and he opened it.